WEBVTT - Ep124 "Why don't we notice gaps in time?"

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Do we experience gaps in time? Is your consciousness like

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a flame that continually goes out and then gets reignited.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Why can you see someone else's eyes move but you

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>can never see your own eyes move in the mirror?

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>The answer is some freaky stuff that's going to shift

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>your view of reality. And what does any of this

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>have to do with deep sleep or anesthesia or comas

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>or amnesia, empires of soft bodied creatures that might have

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>come before us, and what you do or don't remember

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>about your life. Welcome to Inner Cosmos with me David Eagleman.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm a neuroscientist and author at Stanford and in these

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>episodes we sail deeply into our three pound universe to

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>understand why and how our lives look the way they do.

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is about gaps in time. It's about the

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>narrative that we have about what just happened in the world,

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>and what happens when chunks of time disappear. When do

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we notice, when do we care? And what does this

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>mean at a very deep level in terms of what

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>time is for us. I'm going to unpack this mystery

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>today by telling the story in six chapters. Gaps in

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Time on the scale of milliseconds, then hours, then weeks, years, millennia,

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and eons. And if this doesn't get you feeling messed

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>up about our view of reality, I don't know what. Well,

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with milliseconds. You are standing in your

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>kitchen and looking over at the salt shaker on the table,

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and you think, where's the pepper shaker? And you glance

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>over let's say twelve inches to the left of that,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's the pepper shaker. But something strange has just

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>happened and you didn't notice it. Your eyes didn't smoothly

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>move across the table. Instead between the salt and the pepper,

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>your eyes took a ballistic leap. Ballistic just means that

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the movement is launched and can't be changed along the way.

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's a sharp movement of your eyes. And these

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>jumps are called cecads, and you make three to four

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of these every second while you're looking around the world. Now,

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're around anyone else right now, take a careful

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>look at their eyes and you will see this. Their

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>eyes are jiggling around multiple times a second, fixating on

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>one spot, and then a few hundred milliseconds later, jumping

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>to the next spot and fixating there. But here's this

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 1>super weird part. Your experience from the inside behind your

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>eyes is totally unaware of these secads. You don't notice them.

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>You don't feel like the world is jumping around. But

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>why not? What does your visual system do while your

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>eyes are in motion between the fixations. Why doesn't your

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>brain say, oh my god, the world just screamed past.

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, there it goes again, and so on. Well

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to answer that, I'm going to give you something that

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you can try, and I really want you to do this.

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Take out your cell phone and hit the button to

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>record a video. Now, point your camera at something and

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>then jerk it over to a nearby position, then jerk

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it to a point at something else, then jerk it again,

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Now watch the video, and what you'll

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>see is that this video is totally nauseating. So here's

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the question. Why isn't it nauseating when your eyes are

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>doing exactly what you just did with your cell phone camera.

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>The answer is that your vision is not like a camera.

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>What you see is your internal model of the world

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>out there. Every time you move your eyes, you're just

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>gathering more data to add to your internal model of

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the world. So your eyes are jumping around the scene

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>like special ops on a secret mission, and they're adding

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>little bits of data to your model with each movement.

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And during the periods when your eyes are in motion,

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>your visual system essentially shuts down. It says, okay, eyes,

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I want you to take a jump to the next site,

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>and while you're in motion, I'm just going to shut

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>down information processing until you get there. And that's why

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't see the world screaming past. Okay. So that's

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>totally amazing, But that's just the beginning of the weirdness

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>for today, because the question I want to ask is this.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>It takes time for your eyes to move to make

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that jump. For a small secada, it takes about thirty milliseconds,

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.799
<v Speaker 1>and for large ones they can take over one hundred

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.919
<v Speaker 1>milliseconds a tenth of a second. And as I said,

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you're doing multiple of these jumps every second. So here's

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the mystery. What happens to the gaps in time while

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>your eyes are moving. Why don't you notice the small

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>absences of visual input? Okay, So the first thing you

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>might say is, well, I don't know how long thirty

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>milliseconds is maybe that's too short to notice, but it's not.

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>If I came into your room right now and flicked

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>the lights off and then back on, even for thirty milliseconds,

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you would detect that, and one hundred milliseconds would be

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>super obvious. So why don't you notice the little gaps

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>while your visual system is on holiday. Well, your brain

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is doing movie editing and it just gets rid of

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>those little gaps in time. Now, this might all sound

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a little unbelievable, so I want to give you a

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>very easy way to demonstrate this to yourself. First, stare

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>up close at your friend's face and ask kim or

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>her to look at your left eye, then your right eye,

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>then your left eye, then your right eye. And what

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you'll find is that it's very easy to see your

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>friend's eyes move. Their eyes make big jumps from one

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>position to the other, and you can watch that transition.

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>But now what I want you to do is get

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>up close to a mirror and stare at your own face. Now,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>look at your own left eye, then your right eye,

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>then your left eye, and what you'll see is bizarre.

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You can never see your own eyes move. Your experience

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is that you are fixated on your left eye, and

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>then you are suddenly fixated on your right eye, and

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>then you are suddenly fixated on your left eye again,

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>But you don't see any movement. And the deep, deep

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that I want to address today is that there's

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>no gap in time. It seems like you're on one

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>eye and then you're immediately on the other. You can't

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>see the gap in time at all. No, how could

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>this possibly be. It's for the same reason that you

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>don't see the world screen past you when you move

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>your eyes. All you see is your internal model. And

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>just like your internal model constructs space for you, it

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>constructs time for you also, and if it doesn't want

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to include something in there, like the gap in time,

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>then you simply don't experience it. Now, as our store

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>already proceeds today, we're going to get a deeper understanding

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of why this is. But for now, let me just

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>say that I've been publishing papers on time perception for

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>my whole career in journals like Science and Nature and

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>so on, because this is such a weird and under

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>explored field. The main thing I want to establish for

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>now is that our sense of time, how much time

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>passed and what happened when is constructed by our brain.

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not an accurate barometer of what's happening out there.

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And for today's episode, the issue we're zooming in on

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is what happens when time disappears. Okay, so during eye

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>movements we lose little gaps, and now we're ready to

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>move to the next chapter of this story of disappearing time.

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>If we can lose fractions of a second and never

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>know it, what happens when we lose hours. There are

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>many hours in your life when you are alive, but

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you have no sense of the passage of time. In total,

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>like thirty years worth of hours in a long life

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>are gone. And this is because of sleep. You spend

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a third of your life asleep. And what's fascinating for

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>today is not simply that you sleep. It's that you

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>don't notice time passing. While you do, you close your eyes,

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts begin to drift, and then what feels like

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>an instant later, your alarm is going off. Seven or

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>eight hours are gone. Where exactly did that time go? Well,

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>here's the trick. The passage of time from the brain's

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>point of view is stitched together from memory. If you

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>happen to have heard the very first episode of this

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast from some years ago. I explained how my students

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and I dropped volunteers from a one hundred and fifty

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>foot tall tower in free fall and measured their time

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>perception on the way down. And what we covered is

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that time doesn't actually move in slow motion when you're

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in a scary situation. Instead, it's that you lay down

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>more memory when you're scared, and so when your brain

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>says what just happened, what just happened, it has all

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:20.239
<v Speaker 1>this detailed footage to draw on, and so it assumes

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that more time has just passed. In other words, we

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>estimate duration retrospectively, and we do it by looking at

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>how much footage we can pull up. Now, what we're

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about here is the flip side. If there's no

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>footage at all, then your brain concludes that no time passed.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's what happens to you in sleep. So when

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you're awake, your brain uses all the data streaming in,

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like what happened and who said what and where you were.

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>All these things get used as time landmarks. They're mile

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>markers in the road of experience. But during sleep, especially

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>during slow wave sleep, there's almost no information coming in.

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:07.479
<v Speaker 1>The brain becomes decoupled from the external world. Now, interestingly,

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>during rem sleep, the brain reactivates in some ways that

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>look like waking life. There's intense cortical activity, there's vivid dreaming,

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and you often have the sense of a passage of

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>time in a dream, sometimes the sense that a long

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>time is passed. But in non rem sleep stages, which

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is the majority of the night, there's little dreaming. And

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in the deepest stages of sleep, your neural firing patterns

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>become highly synchronized. Neurons fire and rhythmic bursts followed by silence.

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>You're not experiencing anything and you're not encoding memories, so

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 1>the result is no memory, no narrative, and no timestamps.

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Nothing is written down in the internal log book. So

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>your subjective experience skips from point A falling asleep to

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>point B waking up, and you have no passage in between. Now,

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:12.719
<v Speaker 1>equally weird but chemically induced is anesthesia. You'll sometimes hear

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>people describe general anesthesia as a deep sleep, but that's

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit misleading because anesthesia doesn't quite simulate sleep. Instead,

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're under an anesthetic agent like propofol, or isofluorane,

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>or ketamine. Your brain is doing something different than just

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>moving into synchronized activity. Instead, it's more of a disconnection.

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>What brain imaging studies show is a breakdown of cortical connectivity,

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>especially between the thalamus and the cortex, and between key

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>regions that are needed for conscious awareness, like the posterior

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>singular cortex and the prefroneral cortex. So when you're anesthetized,

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no dream, no floating sensation, no tunnel of light,

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>there is nothing. When you wake up, you don't feel

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>like time has passed because you was there to witness

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it and write anything down. The brain can't register time

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the absence of self modeling processes, the default mode network,

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>which normally buzzes along constructing your sense of identity, that

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is offline. So when consciousness returns, you emerge from a

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 1>silent void because you have no memory, you have no

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of the passage of time. Now, one thing that's

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>always struck me is how untroubled we are by this.

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>You go under for surgery, you're counting backward from ten

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to nine eight, and then you're blinking awake in recovery

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>three hours of past, no questions asked. The continuity of

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>your self just hops the gap. Now that should feel bizarre,

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't, because, as I said, continuity isn't measured

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>by what happens. It's only measured by what gets remembered.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And you didn't miss anything that you can recall, so

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>no time think about how weird that is. Your life

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>can be paused without your awareness. You disappear and the

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>world keeps starting, and when you return you feel whole

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and intact, like you never left, but you did and

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>there was no you to notice. So if your conscious

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>self can go entirely offline for seven hours or for

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the length of a surgery and reappear without damage or

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>awareness of the missing time, that means we should really

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about this self not so much like a

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>continuous beam, but more like a flame that gets constantly reignited.

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>So what we've seen so far with psychotic eye movements

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and sleep and anesthesia is that the movie of your

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>life is full of jump cuts, but your brain, the

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>great editor, doesn't show you the gaps. It stitches for

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you a seamless illusion. You were here, now you're here,

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You've always been even when you weren't. Now, maybe right

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of my last sentence, the whole universe

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>froze for five hours. We were all completely frozen, no action,

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>no memories. And then just as suddenly as we froze,

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the universe started up again. As far as we are concerned,

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the sentence flowed smoothly. You got the meaning of it

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>as you continue to drive or walk or drink the coffee.

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And none of us were the wiser for the universe

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>coming to a sudden stop and then restarting. And now

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we're ready for chapter three. We've talked about millisecond gaps

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>due to eye movements and hours long gaps due to

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>sleep or anesthesia. Now let's stretch time even further to weeks.

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>What happens when there's no memory laid down for this

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of period of time. One scenario where this happens

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is when a person falls into a coma and they

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>wake up after a month of being in a coma,

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and it feels like no time has passed at all.

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>There are countless stories like this in any hospital war

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a man gets in a terrible motorcycle accident. He is

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>rushed to the ICU. He's intubated. He's stabilized, but he's

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in a coma. His brain activity is minimal. There's no communication,

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>no awareness. Weeks pass, and then one day, without warning,

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>his eyes open. He turns his head, He looks at

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>his mother and says, I'm hungry. To the people around him,

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a miracle. They've been counting the days. They've

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>been pacing the halls, they've been watching the clock. Time

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>has passed agonizingly for them, But for him, it's been nothing.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>He reports no dreams, no thoughts, no sense that time

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>even moves. One moment, he was riding his motorcycle. The

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>next he was in a hospital bed, maybe a little thinner,

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by unfamiliar machines and unfamiliar faces. It might have

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>been six minutes or six weeks. To him, it's the same.

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>So what's happening here? A lot of what we know

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 1>about coma comes from EEG readings and fMRI scans, which

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>show severely reduced metabolic activity, especially in the cortex, where

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>higher order processing lives. The reticular activating system in the

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.719
<v Speaker 1>brain stem, which keeps you aroused, that goes quiet the thalamus,

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of like a central switchboard. It fails

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to distribute the sensory information and the default mode network,

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>which is that ever chattering backdrop of identity and self

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>awareness that goes dark. So, in effect, the machinery of

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>consciousness powers down, like a city experiencing a blackout. Your

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>lights might flicker a little in one nayemborhood, but the

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>downtown grid where memory and narrative and time perception live,

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that downtown grid is silent. When someone wakes from a coma,

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>they have to figure out where they are and what

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the heck happened. But what's striking is how little distress

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>they show over the lost time itself. They may be confused,

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but they're not grieving the missing days. Why. It's because

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you can only feel the passage of time when you

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>have been there to experience it. Duration of time is

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>something that you build neurally, without sensory input, without new memories.

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>There's no architecture of time. The period where one is

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in a coma is not perceived as a gap. It's

0:18:44.119 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>just omitted. So what does this tell us? Consciousness is

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>an evolved interface that gives you the experience of being

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a unified self moving through time. The interface can crash,

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and when it does no internal witness remains to keep

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the clock running. So this phrases deep questions about selfhood.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean to be you? If you can

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>vanish for months and reappear unchanged. If months of your

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>life can go unregistered, not as memory and therefore not

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 1>as a duration, then was it part of your life

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>at all? Your life is only what you write down

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in your neural circuits. And when your consciousness vanishes, so

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>does the passage of time. So we just explored the

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:49.239
<v Speaker 1>gaps caused by unconsciousness, sleep and anesthesia and coma. But

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>now we reach something stranger. When you're fully awake, your

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>eyes are open, your senses are functioning, and time still vanishes.

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>This is in particular let's talk about what's called antaro

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>grade amnesia, which is the inability to make new memories

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>after you get some brain damage. So your short term

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>working memory can remain fine, so you can carry on

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a conversation, you can make a cup of coffee, but

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 1>you won't retain any of what just happened fifteen minutes later.

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>In other words, you've got short term memory, but you

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>are not converting it into long term memory. Experience evaporates

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>outside a fifteen minute window. The key player here is

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a region of the brain called the medial temporal lobe,

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and inside that the hippocampus and the surrounding cortex. These

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>regions act as a kind of staging ground where new

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>experiences are encoded and then gradually consolidated into long term

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>memory from interactions with the rest of the cortex. When

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the hippocampus is damaged, which can happen for a lot

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of reasons like stroke or trauma, or hypoxia or encephalitis.

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>When the hippocampus is damaged, the encoding of memories gets disrupted.

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You still got sensory input getting to the brain, Your

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>emotions are still functioning. You still have your motor skills

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 1>like walking and eating. But the narrative thread of life

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I was here and then I was there, that part

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is severed. So consider this case of Henry Meliason. It's

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretty well known case. He had epilepsy, and so

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the surgeons removed a lot of his medial temporal lobe,

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>including the hippocampus on both sides of his brain, and

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>when he woke up from the surgery, it was found

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that had indeed cured the epilepsy and everything seemed perfectly

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>fine until his clinical team realized that something wasn't quite right,

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>and it became clear that his short term memory was

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>fine and his long term memory was fine, but he

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>could no longer make the new long term memories. In

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>other words, he could carry on conversationations for ten minutes,

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but afterward it was as if nothing had ever occurred,

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>no learning, no narrative, no accumulation of time. His consciousness

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>would reset with each passing moment. So even though the

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 1>surgery took place in nineteen fifty three when he was

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven years old, he lived for fifty five more

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.239
<v Speaker 1>years after his surgery, and during that time he was

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>stuck in what one of his researchers, Suzanne Corkin, called

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a permanent present tense. For example, he could remember living

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>with his parents and playing with his cousin's neighbors. His

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>relationship with his mother remained a touchstone even after her death.

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>He thought she was still alive because his stable memories

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>were from when he lived at home with her in

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen forties nineteen fifties. Henry was a teenager during

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>World War Two, and he retained knowledge from that period

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to him even from the late nineteen forties felt just

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>as near to him in time as they did when

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>he first underwent the surgery. When asked about his employment,

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>he sometimes mentioned working at a typewriter factory in the

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forties, as though that were his current or most

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>recent job. His cultural knowledge was frozen in the early

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties, so people said that meeting him was like

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>speaking to someone displaced from the Eisenhower era, with none

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of the intervening decades having registered. So his body aged,

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>but his personal timeline didn't. Events didn't accumulate into a

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>personal timeline, so decades really did vanish for him. It

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>was as though those years had simply never been lived.

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Neurosurgeons stopped doing those medial temporal lobe surgeries as soon

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>as they saw what had happened with Henry, But you

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>can still see this condition of antaro g amnesia all

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the time. For example, it happens in Corsicov's syndrome, which

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>is caused by chronic alcohol abuse leading to thiamine deficiency.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>The damage affects a circuit that's critical for laying down memories,

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and the result is patients who are alert and socially

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>interactive but just like Henry, they live in a kind

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of temporal groundhog day because they are not laying down

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>long term memory, and so when they say how much

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>time passed since I was last year, there's no memory

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>footage to draw on, and so the answer is no time. Now.

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Shift a bit to imagine not just losing the ability

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to build new memories, but also retrograde amnesia, losing memories

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that had already been encoded. And this can happen after,

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, a major brain injury. Here the damage tends

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to affect the areas where memory has previously laid down,

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>like the the temporal in the frontal lobes. Depending on

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the severity, you can wipe out months or years or

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>even decades. Now. One of the oldest rules in neurology

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>is called ribos law, and this is that older memories

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>are more stable than newer memories. I wrote about this

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>at length in my book Live Wire. But the bottom

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>line is that older memories get burned more into the

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>circuitry of the brain with time. So in these medical

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>cases of retrograde amnesia, a person wakes up after head

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>injury and they still know how to speak, how to walk,

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>how to solve a math problem, but they have no

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>memory of their spouse, their job, maybe their own name.

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Procedural memory, which is how to do things like ead

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>or walk or talk that remains. But autobiographical continuity, the

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>sense of being a single person through time that breaks

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>from the outside. Their life has gone on, but from

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the inside, their personal timeline has been redacted. The calendar

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>has skipped, and they have no internal record of the passage.

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So that brings us back to the central lesson that

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the experience of duration has everything to do with episodic memory.

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>We crank up a network called the default mode network.

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>This includes a number of regions, but the key is

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that this network is active during introspection and daydreaming and

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>imagining the future. It's how we mentally time travel, reliving

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the past, simulating possible futures, placing ourselves in a temporal context.

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>When episodic memory fails, when nothing gets written down, the

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>internal model of the passage of time collapses. There may

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 1>be sensory continuity, but there's no narrative continuity. Just like

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>coma patients, the people with amnesia often don't feel distress

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>about the missing time because they don't experience it. Is missing.

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>The brain doesn't alert you to what it failed to store.

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>If no memory was written, the time doesn't register as empty.

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It just is non existent. Again, this is just like

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>your deep sleep at night. You don't lay down memories

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and the time just poof disappears. In this sense, we're

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>all like Henry. Eight hours just passed, but we splice

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the film together, just like Henry between his twenty seventh

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>birthday and sixty seventh birthday. Okay, so we've talked about

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>missing milliseconds and hours and even years. But there's another

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of time distortion, one that doesn't happen in your

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>direct experience, but instead inside your imagination. And that happens

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>when we try to think about centuries or about millennia,

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>about things way older than our own lives or our parents'

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>lives or the oldest thing we've ever touched personally, were

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>really bad at long time. So ask a group of

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>sixth graders what happened one hundred years ago, and they'll

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 1>say the olden days or maybe before the Internet. But

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>one hundred years ago was nineteen twenty five, when the

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Model t Ford was rolling off assembly lines and the

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Great War was over, and quantum mechanics was controversial. Asked

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>them about five hundred years ago, and you might as

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>well be describing mythology. The timeline collapses into a soup

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of olden stuff, where Genghis Khan and Cleopatra and Abraham

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln all might live at the same time. Now, as

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you grow older, you get better at understanding time, in

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>part because you have more practice at it. You get

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to know what longer and longer periods feel like. In

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>other words, the ability to judge historical time requires a

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>cognitive map of scale, and that map has to be built.

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Children's brains are still developing ways of representing duration and

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sequence and castality over large time scales. What it has

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to do with is the gradual accumulation of memory across years.

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>In other words, you get better at representing long time

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>scals because you've lived more time. To a six year old,

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>one year is a sixth of their entire life, it's massive.

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>But to a sixty year old, one year is a blip.

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a small ripple in the pool of memory. So

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>our internal yardstick for time stretches. As we age, we

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>got a better sense of proportion. We begin to feel

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>what a century might mean not because we remember it directly,

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>but because we've had enough decades to simulate it with

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>some emotional weight. But go further back, like ten thousand

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>years or one hundred thousand, and your mental simulation is

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>not particularly good. You've got evolutionary time, in geological time,

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and cosmological time. These scales are too vast to inhabit intuitively.

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>You can say the invention of writing is six thousand

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>years old, but does that number feel real? Can you

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>feel the difference between six thousand and sixty thousand? For example,

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>there's an internet meme that asks did Cleopatra live closer

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in time to the building of the Great Pyramid at

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Giza or to the lunar landing. Now you'll remember that

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Cleopatra was the Greek queen of Egypt from fifty one

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to thirty BC. So what comes as a great surprise

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people was that she was actually

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>closer in time to the moon landing. Why because she

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>was born about two thousand, five hundred years after the

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Great Pyramid at Giza was built, and only about two

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand years before the first lunar landing, So she was

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>five hundred years closer to moon landings. And iPhones and

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT than to the Great Pyramid. It's surprising, right,

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And what it demonstrates is that none of us have

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly good intuitions about deep time. Now, if you are

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>an evolutionary biologist or a geologist or an astrophysicist, you

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>can learn how to do temporal sequencing, like that event

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>happened a billion years before that other event, But you

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>may as well be memorizing the order of exits on

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the highway in the sense that you're not feeling or

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>simulating a billion year. You're mostly just memorizing that road sign.

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>So what seems clear is that as soon as we

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>start talking really long timescales, our brains just weren't built

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>for that. Really, think about this, what's the longest period

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of time that you can realistically simulate emotionally? You can

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of feel what a day feels like, probably a week,

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a month, and you may even have enough experience in

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the world that you can really feel the weight of

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a year or maybe even a decade. But can you

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>really simulate what it would be like to spend a

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>century of time hanging out and doom scrolling and cooking

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>meals and taking your dog for a walk for a

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand years. Just try to imagine ten thousand years since

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the invention of agriculture. Try to feel ten thousand years.

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Your brain might conjure up some images like cave paintings

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and mammoths and spears, but can you actually understand the

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>sheer stretch of a time period like that. Presumably not,

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>We're just not wired for it. Our temporal reasoning evolved

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in the service of short term prediction, hunting and gathering,

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>planning social exchanges, maybe tracking seasons, but that's it. The

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>oldest parts of the brain work in rhythms of hours

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and days, or sometimes weeks. This is why we struggle

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to grasp timelines like civilizational collapse, or for younger people,

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>even something like retirement planning. Our cognitive system compresses distant

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>time the way it compresses vision, blurring the edges to

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>focus on what's close. Just like we have a phobia

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in the eye, a center of sharp focus, we have

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>what you can think of as a temporal phobia, which

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>sharpens the present and blurs the deep past and distant future.

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>The truth is it's sort of a biological miracle that

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we can contemplate large time scales at all. We can

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>look at a fossil and say this was alive three

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:09.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred million years ago, and feel even the faintest flicker

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of what that means. It's surprising that our brains can

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>even attempt to model epics that no organism ever lived

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to see. We've talked about missing time, milliseconds loss to

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>eye movements, hours lost to sleep, years vanished to amnesia,

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>centuries gone because we can't understand deep time. We've seen

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 1>how the brain edits the story and patches the gaps.

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 1>But what if entire chapters of Earth's history are missing,

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>not from your memory, but from the planet's memory. Here's

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. It seems clear enough that we humans

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>are the first intelligent civilization. We're the only creatures to

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 1>build cities, to form empires, to write literature about ourselves.

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But we've only been here for the last last blink

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of evolutionary time. We invented agriculture only ten thousand years ago,

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in something like a big urban center with laws and organization.

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It's all unbelievably new. But the Earth is four point

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>five billion years old, and complex life has been around

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for hundreds of millions of years. So here's a speculation

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that Some thinkers have chewed on what if we are

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>not the first? What if something like a civilization had arisen,

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>say six hundred million years ago, way before Homo sapiens,

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>like a full civilization with philosophies and literature and politics

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and music and wars, And maybe the civilization lasted for

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty million years, and we would have no idea it

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>had ever been here. Now, how could that possibly be?

0:35:55.480 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't we find fossil evidence of them? Well, under certain circumstances,

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 1>we might, But let's say they were soft bodied organisms,

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we would almost certainly never know. Soft tissues decay quickly.

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Fossilization is very rare, and if things aren't buried in

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the right sediment, they can vanish without a trace. So

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:21.320
<v Speaker 1>our fossil record as it stands is a shattered mosaic.

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a few lucky remnants scattered across eons of erosion.

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So think about the Ediacaran period, about six hundred million

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago. That's before trilobytes, before shells, before vertebrates. We

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 1>have impressions in sandstone of strange, soft bodied life forms,

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>organisms with no clear ancestors or descendants. Their biology is strange,

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Their symmetry is unfamiliar. Could some of them have evolved intelligence?

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Could they have had cognition, maybe not quite like ours,

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 1>but in some way parallel. Could they have built societies

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and languages and structure that we can't even imagine. If

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they did, and if they were made of soft flesh,

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>glatinous matter, fragile compounds, and they built their civilizations with

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 1>adobe homes, the odds are that none of the appropriate

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>evidence would exist anymore for us to find. No bones,

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>no ruins, just a story that played out hundreds of

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>millions of years before us and was completely erased. So

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>we assume we're the first ones to tell a story.

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 1>But maybe we're just the ones holding the pen at

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the moment, totally unaware of how many other pens were

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>lifted and scratched across time and then lost. Here's the

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:47.959
<v Speaker 1>link to what I've been talking about. The Earth has

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 1>no central memory or backup drive. If there are no

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>records that survive, no fossils, no scars on the crust

0:37:57.000 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 1>that lasted this long, then that time is gone and

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:05.439
<v Speaker 1>it's therefore forgotten and unrecoverable. Just like you falling into

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a deep sleep or having amnesia. It's another gap in time.

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>We like to believe that history is cumulative, that it

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>adds up in layers like strata in a canyon wall.

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>But as we saw in the neuroscience of the first

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 1>four chapters of today's podcast, history can be fragile and erasable.

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Any story from milliseconds to eons can pass, and if

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no record, then there's no memory. What we've seen

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:40.800
<v Speaker 1>today is that time is a narrative medium, and narratives

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>can fail, They can go unrecorded, they can be lost.

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>We began with milliseconds lost to eye movements called secods,

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>where the brain quietly deletes motion, blur and pastes your

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:57.280
<v Speaker 1>world back together as if nothing ever vanished. We moved

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to hours lost to sleep, where consciousness dissolves and time

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>drops out unnoticed. We looked into anesthesia, where the self

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>disappears completely, no memory, no mind, no time, and then

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>returns like a light flicked back on. We stretched to

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks and months and years. Time scale is lost not

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>to unconsciousness, but to amnesia, where the person continues but

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the story does not, a life lived but not remembered

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 1>because the timeline never makes it to the page. Then

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:35.399
<v Speaker 1>we pushed it further to centuries and millennia, where even

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>our best efforts at understanding falter, where time becomes too

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>vast to meaningfully simulate it anymore. And finally, we looked

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 1>back into deep time, hundreds of millions of years, where

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>entire histories may have unfolded before us, only to be

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>erased by geology, by the quiet forgetting of a planet

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>with no memory. The wild part is that in all

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>these cases, we move forward, stitching together a story from fragments,

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 1>believing it to be complete. But it's important to remember

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that we are the inheritors of a story that is

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>largely erased, and if you ask me, it's a story

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that we do not fully understand, a story whose missing

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>pages occasionally outnumber the ones that we have. And yet

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we keep telling our stories because that's all we've got.

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So across all these scales milliseconds to eons, we see

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a common thread. If events are not remembered, they might

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>as well not have happened. Our sense of time is

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 1>simply what gets recorded by anything from neurons to fossils.

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>When the record fails, the time disappears. So we assemble

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>our narrative from scraps moments we notice, memories, we hold, traces,

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we dig from the earth, and what we call reality

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is just the part that we managed to write down.

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Go to eagleman dot com slash podcast more information and

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to find further reading. Join the weekly discussions on my substack,

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and check out and subscribe to Inner Cosmos on YouTube

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:20.439
<v Speaker 1>for videos of each episode and to leave comments until

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>next time. I'm David Eagleman, and this is Inner Cosmos.