1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:02,320 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, thanks for listening to Breaking Points with Crystal 2 00:00:02,320 --> 00:00:04,240 Speaker 1: and Sager. We're going to be totally upfront with you. 3 00:00:04,360 --> 00:00:07,200 Speaker 1: We took a big risk going independent to make this work. 4 00:00:07,320 --> 00:00:11,880 Speaker 1: We need your support to beat the corporate media CNN, Fox, MSNBC. 5 00:00:12,200 --> 00:00:15,760 Speaker 1: They are ripping this country apart. They are making millions 6 00:00:15,760 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 1: of dollars doing it. To help support our mission of 7 00:00:18,440 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 1: making all of us hate each other, less hate the 8 00:00:20,720 --> 00:00:24,000 Speaker 1: corrupt ruling class more support the show. Become a Breaking 9 00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:26,560 Speaker 1: Points Premium Member today, where you get to watch and 10 00:00:26,680 --> 00:00:29,640 Speaker 1: listen to the entire show ad free and uncut, an 11 00:00:29,640 --> 00:00:32,440 Speaker 1: hour early before everyone else. You get to hear our 12 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:35,360 Speaker 1: reactions to each other's monologues. You get to participate and 13 00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:37,960 Speaker 1: weekly ask me any things, and you don't need to 14 00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:41,040 Speaker 1: hear our annoying voices pitching you like I am right now? 15 00:00:41,120 --> 00:00:43,320 Speaker 1: So what are you waiting for? Go to Breakingpoints dot 16 00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:46,080 Speaker 1: com become a Premium member today, which is available in 17 00:00:46,120 --> 00:01:05,440 Speaker 1: the show notes. Enjoy the show, guys, Good morning, everybody, 18 00:01:05,480 --> 00:01:07,920 Speaker 1: Happy Thursday. We have an amazing show for everybody today. 19 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:09,720 Speaker 1: What do we have, Crystal? Indeed, we do a lot 20 00:01:09,760 --> 00:01:13,800 Speaker 1: of interesting stories this week, so a lot of movement 21 00:01:14,120 --> 00:01:16,560 Speaker 1: from both the right and the left on potentially banning 22 00:01:16,600 --> 00:01:18,800 Speaker 1: members of Congress from trading stocks. Of course, as long 23 00:01:18,840 --> 00:01:21,600 Speaker 1: as Nancy Pelosi and Chucks You were in charge, unlikely 24 00:01:21,640 --> 00:01:25,039 Speaker 1: to go that far, but still really interesting to track 25 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:27,080 Speaker 1: this progress. This all comes amid a new report from 26 00:01:27,120 --> 00:01:31,480 Speaker 1: Unusual Wales detailing exactly how many millions of dollars in 27 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:34,520 Speaker 1: stocks were traded by members of Congress when they invested 28 00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:35,840 Speaker 1: all of that. So we'll give you all of those 29 00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:41,280 Speaker 1: details extraordinarily important. Also some really pretty troubling numbers on inflation, 30 00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:44,839 Speaker 1: will tell you what price is spiked, where things are headed, 31 00:01:44,959 --> 00:01:49,640 Speaker 1: as well as show you some vintage Elizabeth Warren that's 32 00:01:49,760 --> 00:01:52,960 Speaker 1: from before she was you know, just cringe identity politics 33 00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:54,600 Speaker 1: all the time. This was the type of stuff that 34 00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:56,400 Speaker 1: you might have heard from her, so we'll bring you 35 00:01:56,400 --> 00:01:59,360 Speaker 1: that as well. President Trump making some new comments calling 36 00:01:59,360 --> 00:02:02,720 Speaker 1: out politics titians who are ashamed that they got the booster, 37 00:02:03,080 --> 00:02:05,800 Speaker 1: saying that they are effectively gutless coward. So we'll play 38 00:02:05,840 --> 00:02:09,320 Speaker 1: those remarks for you there. We also have Marian Williamson 39 00:02:09,400 --> 00:02:13,000 Speaker 1: on the show. She's been floated recently as a potential 40 00:02:13,240 --> 00:02:15,799 Speaker 1: Biden primary challenger. We'll talk to her about that. We'll 41 00:02:15,800 --> 00:02:18,480 Speaker 1: talk to her about her assessment of the Biden Party, 42 00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:22,680 Speaker 1: thus the Biden administration thus far. This also comes amid 43 00:02:22,840 --> 00:02:26,519 Speaker 1: some horrendous takes from the press about what they would 44 00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:30,760 Speaker 1: like to see in twenty twenty four spoiler alert, Hillary Clinton. 45 00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:35,640 Speaker 1: And you would think that you couldn't top that, but 46 00:02:35,760 --> 00:02:40,000 Speaker 1: this suggestion may actually top it. Biden Cheney as in 47 00:02:40,080 --> 00:02:43,480 Speaker 1: Liz Cheney twenty twenty four. That's what one prominent columnist 48 00:02:43,880 --> 00:02:46,320 Speaker 1: once But we wanted to start with a pretty stunning moment. 49 00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:49,840 Speaker 1: Of course, we've been tracking these questions around January sixth 50 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:52,320 Speaker 1: of We know the New York Times reported there was 51 00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:54,960 Speaker 1: at least one FED in formant in the capital on 52 00:02:55,120 --> 00:02:58,480 Speaker 1: that day. Not crazy to think that there were others involved, 53 00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:00,919 Speaker 1: And you don't have to go down a whole false 54 00:03:00,919 --> 00:03:04,200 Speaker 1: flag rabbit hole of conspiracy to want to know, Hey, 55 00:03:04,639 --> 00:03:07,680 Speaker 1: what insight did the FEDS have before January sixth, because 56 00:03:07,720 --> 00:03:11,440 Speaker 1: their response was total shit, and what active involvement in 57 00:03:11,480 --> 00:03:14,480 Speaker 1: addition to this one informant might they have had. Of course, 58 00:03:14,480 --> 00:03:16,720 Speaker 1: we know the way that the FBI has infiltrated some 59 00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:20,680 Speaker 1: of these groups. Proud Boys have some past affiliations with 60 00:03:20,720 --> 00:03:23,080 Speaker 1: the Feds. Let's just say, we know the way that 61 00:03:23,120 --> 00:03:26,000 Speaker 1: the FEDS infiltrated these individuals who were involved with the 62 00:03:26,040 --> 00:03:29,760 Speaker 1: Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping. So Senator Ted Cruz, who we trashed 63 00:03:29,760 --> 00:03:31,080 Speaker 1: on Monday, now we're going to give them a little 64 00:03:31,080 --> 00:03:34,760 Speaker 1: bit of props. He had the opportunity to question Jill Sandborn, 65 00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:39,119 Speaker 1: She's a top FBI official about hey many how many 66 00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:41,720 Speaker 1: FEDS were there? What was going on? Take a listen 67 00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:44,680 Speaker 1: to that exchange. I want to turn to the FBI. 68 00:03:46,320 --> 00:03:51,200 Speaker 1: How many FBI agents or confidential informants actively participated in 69 00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:57,160 Speaker 1: the events of January sixth? Sir? I'm sure you can 70 00:03:57,200 --> 00:04:00,480 Speaker 1: appreciate that. I can't go into the specifics of sources 71 00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:05,960 Speaker 1: and methods. Did any FBI agents or confidential informants actively 72 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:10,520 Speaker 1: participate in the events of January sixth? Yes, sir, I can't. 73 00:04:10,720 --> 00:04:14,160 Speaker 1: I can't answer that. Did any FBI agents or confidential 74 00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:19,400 Speaker 1: informants commit crimes of violence on January sixth six? I 75 00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:23,279 Speaker 1: can't answer that, sir. Did any FBI agents or FBI 76 00:04:23,480 --> 00:04:30,880 Speaker 1: informants actively encourage and insight crimes of violence on January sixth? Six? Sir? 77 00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:35,960 Speaker 1: I can't answer that, miss Saburn, Who is Ray Epps? Yes, 78 00:04:39,760 --> 00:04:42,680 Speaker 1: I'm aware of the individual, Sarah, I don't have the 79 00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:46,560 Speaker 1: specific background to him. Well, there are a lot of 80 00:04:46,560 --> 00:04:50,800 Speaker 1: people who are understandably very concerned about mister Epps. So 81 00:04:50,880 --> 00:04:55,520 Speaker 1: she's just totally unwilling to answer any of the questions 82 00:04:56,080 --> 00:05:00,320 Speaker 1: and answer that why exactly why not see the only here? 83 00:05:00,720 --> 00:05:02,400 Speaker 1: By the way, if there's nothing to see here, then 84 00:05:02,440 --> 00:05:04,960 Speaker 1: say no one was there, there was nothing to see here. 85 00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:10,200 Speaker 1: And so the fact that they're completely stonewalling here unwilling 86 00:05:10,240 --> 00:05:14,640 Speaker 1: to answer basic questions pretty telling. You guys, remember, just 87 00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:17,160 Speaker 1: as a refresher, who Rayeps is? We've played some of 88 00:05:17,160 --> 00:05:19,720 Speaker 1: the videos for you here. He seemed to be a 89 00:05:19,839 --> 00:05:23,840 Speaker 1: primary instigator of telling the night before saying we got 90 00:05:23,880 --> 00:05:27,360 Speaker 1: to go into the Capitol, being so aggressive that the 91 00:05:27,640 --> 00:05:29,440 Speaker 1: you know, Trump fans who were around him at the 92 00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:33,240 Speaker 1: time started chanting fed, fed, fed because what he was 93 00:05:33,279 --> 00:05:37,120 Speaker 1: suggesting seemed so at landish. Then on the day of, 94 00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:39,400 Speaker 1: he again seems like an instigator. He's sort of at 95 00:05:39,440 --> 00:05:43,080 Speaker 1: the front in terms of people going inside. He was 96 00:05:43,160 --> 00:05:47,240 Speaker 1: originally on the FBI's list of people of suspects people 97 00:05:47,279 --> 00:05:50,720 Speaker 1: they were looking for, and then has dropped off with 98 00:05:50,800 --> 00:05:56,799 Speaker 1: no explanation. January sixth. Committee has received enough pressure around 99 00:05:57,000 --> 00:05:59,479 Speaker 1: ray Epps that they felt the need to respond in 100 00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:02,680 Speaker 1: the series of tweets. Again, this is really woefully inadequate. 101 00:06:02,720 --> 00:06:05,719 Speaker 1: They say this s let Committee is aware of quote 102 00:06:05,800 --> 00:06:08,880 Speaker 1: unsupported claims that Rayeps was an FBI informant based on 103 00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:10,880 Speaker 1: the fact that he was on the FBI wanted list 104 00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:13,240 Speaker 1: and then was removed from that list without being charged. 105 00:06:14,080 --> 00:06:17,400 Speaker 1: They go on to say, the Committee has interviewed Apps 106 00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:19,800 Speaker 1: informed us that he was not employed by, working with, 107 00:06:19,960 --> 00:06:22,159 Speaker 1: or acting in the direction of any law enforcement agency 108 00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:24,000 Speaker 1: and jurnerally for their sixth or at any other time, 109 00:06:24,240 --> 00:06:25,880 Speaker 1: and that he has never been an informant for the 110 00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:30,880 Speaker 1: FBI or any other law enforcement agency. Okay, then why 111 00:06:30,920 --> 00:06:32,960 Speaker 1: is it being charged. Well, there's also a lot of questions. 112 00:06:33,080 --> 00:06:35,960 Speaker 1: Was that interview under oath? Is the FBI the only 113 00:06:36,320 --> 00:06:39,520 Speaker 1: also law enforcement agency? Is a very specific term that 114 00:06:39,560 --> 00:06:43,000 Speaker 1: implies to the FBI or the Department of Homeland Security 115 00:06:43,400 --> 00:06:47,240 Speaker 1: Intelligence Agency. There are a lot of other intelligence agencies 116 00:06:47,520 --> 00:06:49,880 Speaker 1: all across the United States. I think the latest count 117 00:06:49,960 --> 00:06:52,800 Speaker 1: is like twenty two. Was he employed or an informant 118 00:06:52,839 --> 00:06:56,160 Speaker 1: or a contractor or affiliated or whatever in any of 119 00:06:56,200 --> 00:06:59,679 Speaker 1: those instances, no answer to any of that. Also, where's 120 00:06:59,680 --> 00:07:02,440 Speaker 1: the actual transcript of the interview? You're just describing the 121 00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:04,799 Speaker 1: it to you? Was it under oath? Like I said, 122 00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:08,120 Speaker 1: have it happened in open in an open jurisdiction in 123 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:10,680 Speaker 1: front of the camera for the Senate Judiciary. At least 124 00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:12,800 Speaker 1: put the transcript out with the transcript. At least the 125 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:17,320 Speaker 1: transcript really has I mean, that would at least, you know, 126 00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:20,760 Speaker 1: I'll give you some transparency, not that it would still 127 00:07:20,880 --> 00:07:24,480 Speaker 1: answer every question. Because again, if you really care about 128 00:07:24,520 --> 00:07:27,600 Speaker 1: January sixth accountability, and there are a lot of Democrats 129 00:07:27,640 --> 00:07:31,040 Speaker 1: who claim this is like their top priority, well you're 130 00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:33,800 Speaker 1: just gonna let one of the main instigators go free 131 00:07:33,880 --> 00:07:37,520 Speaker 1: and not charge him and not explain why he's not 132 00:07:37,680 --> 00:07:40,800 Speaker 1: ultimately being charged. So this is the part of this 133 00:07:40,840 --> 00:07:43,760 Speaker 1: conversation that really frustrates me is, of course it's gotten 134 00:07:43,760 --> 00:07:46,440 Speaker 1: subsumed into the culture word. Of course, Ted Cruz wants to, 135 00:07:46,480 --> 00:07:48,200 Speaker 1: you know, make political hay out of this and all 136 00:07:48,240 --> 00:07:51,440 Speaker 1: of this, and Taker Carlson puts on his documentary suggesting 137 00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:54,200 Speaker 1: it's all entirely a false flag. There's no evidence to 138 00:07:54,240 --> 00:07:58,640 Speaker 1: support that. However, it would be surprising frankly, just knowing 139 00:07:58,640 --> 00:08:01,880 Speaker 1: the history of the FBI, knowing their infiltration of some 140 00:08:01,920 --> 00:08:05,040 Speaker 1: of the groups that were present on that day, to 141 00:08:05,160 --> 00:08:08,760 Speaker 1: think that there weren't there wasn't forward visibility, They didn't 142 00:08:08,800 --> 00:08:11,400 Speaker 1: know what was coming. So then why was the response 143 00:08:11,440 --> 00:08:14,120 Speaker 1: so bad? That's one question, And then you know how 144 00:08:14,160 --> 00:08:16,840 Speaker 1: many people are actually I thought Cruz's question there about 145 00:08:17,160 --> 00:08:21,920 Speaker 1: did anyone affiliated with the FEDS commit violent crimes? That's 146 00:08:21,920 --> 00:08:24,120 Speaker 1: the most because that's the other thing is we know 147 00:08:24,880 --> 00:08:28,080 Speaker 1: that there are tens of thousands of crimes that are 148 00:08:28,200 --> 00:08:33,120 Speaker 1: routinely sort of accepted and sanctioned by the FEDS so 149 00:08:33,440 --> 00:08:35,720 Speaker 1: posedly in service of keeping us all safe. That's a 150 00:08:35,720 --> 00:08:39,120 Speaker 1: big question mark how effectively they're ultimately doing this. But 151 00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:41,200 Speaker 1: you know, if you really care about what happened on 152 00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:44,240 Speaker 1: this day, these are significant questions. I also think focusing 153 00:08:44,240 --> 00:08:46,439 Speaker 1: on Apps is a mistake. As we detailed in the 154 00:08:46,559 --> 00:08:50,120 Speaker 1: latest Revolver News report, He's not just the only one. 155 00:08:50,200 --> 00:08:52,920 Speaker 1: He just was so starkly caught on camera. There are 156 00:08:53,040 --> 00:08:56,120 Speaker 1: multiple other ringleaders and individuals who are not wanted have 157 00:08:56,200 --> 00:08:59,240 Speaker 1: not yet been charged, who are actually known and their 158 00:08:59,240 --> 00:09:02,840 Speaker 1: identities were because they were pulled over by police officers. 159 00:09:03,080 --> 00:09:05,760 Speaker 1: These are people who were up on scaffolding with the 160 00:09:05,760 --> 00:09:09,559 Speaker 1: bullhorn kind of directing the attack on the capitol, encouraging 161 00:09:09,640 --> 00:09:12,280 Speaker 1: that that person hasn't been charged. The people who help 162 00:09:12,360 --> 00:09:14,600 Speaker 1: breach the gates and who seem to have like a 163 00:09:14,640 --> 00:09:19,640 Speaker 1: fire retardant suit on at the time, very specific, you know, 164 00:09:19,720 --> 00:09:23,240 Speaker 1: type of uniform exactly that person has not been charged, 165 00:09:23,280 --> 00:09:25,719 Speaker 1: despite the fact that we know that that person had 166 00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:29,040 Speaker 1: contact with the police the day before on suspicion of 167 00:09:29,040 --> 00:09:30,800 Speaker 1: having a ton of weapons in his car. I mean, 168 00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:32,880 Speaker 1: these are also the pipe bomb. I mean, that's a 169 00:09:32,880 --> 00:09:36,360 Speaker 1: whole other one. Where where's the guy pipe bomb? Probably 170 00:09:36,400 --> 00:09:40,240 Speaker 1: the most egregious example. Also, why did Kamala Harris's security 171 00:09:40,240 --> 00:09:42,440 Speaker 1: detail clear her being able to go in the building 172 00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:45,120 Speaker 1: if there was a pipe bomb? Really interesting, right in 173 00:09:45,240 --> 00:09:48,360 Speaker 1: terms of the plant, when it exactly happened, the timeline, 174 00:09:48,440 --> 00:09:50,520 Speaker 1: it's been a year. We still don't have the answer 175 00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:53,280 Speaker 1: to all of these questions. And you know, the corporate 176 00:09:53,320 --> 00:09:57,040 Speaker 1: media is just picking up these statements by the January 177 00:09:57,040 --> 00:09:59,760 Speaker 1: sixth Committee as if it's gospel. They have no questions 178 00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:02,600 Speaker 1: around this. You know, It's like remember the way they 179 00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:05,240 Speaker 1: covered the Bengazi hearing rightfully being like, hey, this is 180 00:10:05,320 --> 00:10:08,240 Speaker 1: you know, doctor or not, this is selective testimony. All 181 00:10:08,280 --> 00:10:10,920 Speaker 1: of this skepticism. They have none of that. Here. Adam 182 00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:14,200 Speaker 1: Kissinger puts out a BS thread about, oh, this shows 183 00:10:14,200 --> 00:10:17,080 Speaker 1: this Ray Epps didn't actually commit any crimes. How do 184 00:10:17,160 --> 00:10:19,640 Speaker 1: you know? You don't know anything. I mean, he said 185 00:10:19,640 --> 00:10:22,040 Speaker 1: he never entered the capitol. Once again, why was he 186 00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:24,720 Speaker 1: on the FBI's most wanted list then, I mean, it's 187 00:10:24,760 --> 00:10:27,320 Speaker 1: not like you wouldn't be placed there without some pretty 188 00:10:27,360 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 1: explicit reasons. And he was even interviewed and talked to 189 00:10:30,520 --> 00:10:34,160 Speaker 1: in the days afterwards. This is all we now know. 190 00:10:34,400 --> 00:10:36,439 Speaker 1: The ultimate end, which is what we've been warning from 191 00:10:36,480 --> 00:10:38,800 Speaker 1: the very very beginning. Put this up there on the screen, 192 00:10:39,040 --> 00:10:42,200 Speaker 1: which is that it's not a coincidence that the Justice Department, 193 00:10:42,520 --> 00:10:45,800 Speaker 1: one year after January sixth, is now forming a new 194 00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:50,120 Speaker 1: domestic terror unit, and that new domestic terror unit is 195 00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:53,480 Speaker 1: going to be within the Department of Justice to go 196 00:10:53,600 --> 00:10:56,520 Speaker 1: after what they say is a threat that has doubled 197 00:10:56,600 --> 00:10:58,640 Speaker 1: in the past two years. I always love whenever they 198 00:10:58,679 --> 00:11:01,679 Speaker 1: say this. The National Secure Division of the d o 199 00:11:01,800 --> 00:11:04,920 Speaker 1: J says that you know, statistically the threat has doubled 200 00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:09,280 Speaker 1: based on what your BS statistics. Once again, this is 201 00:11:09,840 --> 00:11:13,800 Speaker 1: that you created. Yes, the number of plots whs FBI 202 00:11:13,880 --> 00:11:17,800 Speaker 1: agents have been creating has doubled. That's another way particular 203 00:11:17,920 --> 00:11:21,680 Speaker 1: realm especial resources from Rich Whitmer, from you know, framing 204 00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:26,080 Speaker 1: Muslim men, Yes, framing another group of people, and you know, okay, 205 00:11:26,160 --> 00:11:28,280 Speaker 1: okay with it, no matter who it is. What's especially 206 00:11:28,720 --> 00:11:32,240 Speaker 1: terrible is that within the announcement they actually specifically talk 207 00:11:32,320 --> 00:11:36,760 Speaker 1: about how they are redirectoring resources away from al Qaeda 208 00:11:36,800 --> 00:11:40,520 Speaker 1: and ISIS towards this new domestic terror group. Also, here's 209 00:11:40,559 --> 00:11:46,240 Speaker 1: how they describe it. Extremist, anti government and anti authority ideology. Guess, 210 00:11:47,960 --> 00:11:52,000 Speaker 1: very anti authority. Anybody who's that experienced with the COVID 211 00:11:52,040 --> 00:11:55,440 Speaker 1: regime of the last two years should probably be anti authority. 212 00:11:55,520 --> 00:11:57,480 Speaker 1: And this also, I mean that shows you it's it's 213 00:11:57,520 --> 00:12:01,959 Speaker 1: not exclusively for right wing right. You shouldn't feel comfortable 214 00:12:02,280 --> 00:12:04,760 Speaker 1: if you're you know, an anti capitalist, if you have 215 00:12:04,840 --> 00:12:07,640 Speaker 1: any sort of critique that's uncomfortable of government. No matter 216 00:12:07,679 --> 00:12:09,920 Speaker 1: where you fall in the political spectrum, you could be 217 00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:13,080 Speaker 1: targeted by this new unit. And this again is why 218 00:12:14,480 --> 00:12:17,040 Speaker 1: it's important to understand what happened on this day, because 219 00:12:17,040 --> 00:12:19,240 Speaker 1: they have used January six as a weapon to sort 220 00:12:19,240 --> 00:12:22,800 Speaker 1: of further their own powers. Well, if there's indications that 221 00:12:22,920 --> 00:12:25,959 Speaker 1: you had knowledge beforehand, that you had people there on 222 00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:29,600 Speaker 1: the ground at least who were informants, then that raises 223 00:12:29,640 --> 00:12:32,240 Speaker 1: a lot of questions about why we should be entrusting 224 00:12:32,280 --> 00:12:36,240 Speaker 1: you with more power when you so dramatically failed on 225 00:12:36,400 --> 00:12:39,760 Speaker 1: that particular day. And I will say, you know, some 226 00:12:39,800 --> 00:12:43,840 Speaker 1: of the sort of online liberal faithful who are deeply 227 00:12:43,880 --> 00:12:47,600 Speaker 1: invested in the January sixth committee and following every person 228 00:12:47,600 --> 00:12:50,559 Speaker 1: who's being subpoena and all of that stuff, are starting 229 00:12:50,600 --> 00:12:53,920 Speaker 1: to get a little agitated with Merrett Garland and others 230 00:12:54,000 --> 00:12:57,280 Speaker 1: about the fact that there haven't been high level arrests 231 00:12:57,280 --> 00:13:00,720 Speaker 1: of people who were ring laders and were instigation. And 232 00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:03,640 Speaker 1: you know what, they're not wrong to feel that way 233 00:13:03,679 --> 00:13:07,079 Speaker 1: when they've been led to believe that this was Pearl 234 00:13:07,160 --> 00:13:10,200 Speaker 1: Harbor and nine to eleven wrapped in one, that this 235 00:13:10,280 --> 00:13:12,320 Speaker 1: is I mean, this is Kamala Harrison's roric. I'm not 236 00:13:12,360 --> 00:13:15,200 Speaker 1: making this up. This is the worst thing that's ever 237 00:13:15,320 --> 00:13:19,280 Speaker 1: happened on American soil. And yet you know, the charges 238 00:13:19,320 --> 00:13:23,160 Speaker 1: you're getting are like the QAnon Shaman for interrupting a 239 00:13:23,200 --> 00:13:27,840 Speaker 1: government proceeding or for trespassing. Okay, if this is really sedition, 240 00:13:28,000 --> 00:13:30,720 Speaker 1: if this is really treason, like where are those high 241 00:13:30,840 --> 00:13:34,599 Speaker 1: level charges and why are you letting people like Reps 242 00:13:35,160 --> 00:13:38,760 Speaker 1: off the hook with no explanation? Who was clearly, you know, 243 00:13:38,960 --> 00:13:42,560 Speaker 1: invested in making this day as bad as possible. So 244 00:13:42,840 --> 00:13:45,480 Speaker 1: they're not wrong to feel like they've been really sold 245 00:13:45,520 --> 00:13:48,560 Speaker 1: a bill of goods here in terms of the sort 246 00:13:48,600 --> 00:13:52,040 Speaker 1: of prosecutorial stance. But this is the other part. As 247 00:13:52,200 --> 00:13:54,000 Speaker 1: you know, I made a point of saying this sort 248 00:13:54,040 --> 00:13:58,560 Speaker 1: of like online liberal faithful, because the broader Democratic base 249 00:13:59,200 --> 00:14:03,640 Speaker 1: is not super obsessed with one six whatsoever. In fact, 250 00:14:03,679 --> 00:14:05,480 Speaker 1: this is kind of funny, and put this tweet up 251 00:14:05,520 --> 00:14:09,280 Speaker 1: on the screen. This is a reporter says, you watched 252 00:14:09,280 --> 00:14:12,480 Speaker 1: two focus groups with moderate voters last night, but these 253 00:14:12,480 --> 00:14:14,480 Speaker 1: were all people who were sort of like lean Biden, 254 00:14:14,640 --> 00:14:16,480 Speaker 1: voted for Biden. They were kind of like towards the 255 00:14:16,480 --> 00:14:21,560 Speaker 1: Democratic camp or swingable towards the Democratic camp. Moderator asked 256 00:14:21,600 --> 00:14:25,760 Speaker 1: the first group, five women about January sixth. Long pause 257 00:14:25,880 --> 00:14:30,360 Speaker 1: followed before one of the women asked, what do you 258 00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:36,920 Speaker 1: mean invoking January sixth? Didn't immediately mean anything at all 259 00:14:37,000 --> 00:14:40,680 Speaker 1: to these folks even days after the anniversary, not because 260 00:14:40,720 --> 00:14:45,000 Speaker 1: they're bad people who don't care about maintaining democracy, but because, 261 00:14:45,040 --> 00:14:46,560 Speaker 1: guess what, they got a lot of stuff going on 262 00:14:46,560 --> 00:14:50,280 Speaker 1: their lives. And you know, as there's further tweets that follow, 263 00:14:50,320 --> 00:14:52,360 Speaker 1: that's basically like they all agreed this was a bad day. 264 00:14:52,400 --> 00:14:54,080 Speaker 1: They didn't like it. You know, there was a lot 265 00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:56,520 Speaker 1: of blame on Trump, etc. But there was also a 266 00:14:56,560 --> 00:15:00,440 Speaker 1: sense that, like, this is not the focus of mike concerns. 267 00:15:00,840 --> 00:15:02,360 Speaker 1: There are a lot of other things that are that 268 00:15:02,400 --> 00:15:04,680 Speaker 1: are going on that are more relevant, more pertinent to 269 00:15:04,720 --> 00:15:07,360 Speaker 1: me in my day to day life. And so you 270 00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:09,360 Speaker 1: can just think about the fact that this is what 271 00:15:09,440 --> 00:15:13,880 Speaker 1: Democrats have leaned into, especially over the past couple of months, 272 00:15:14,400 --> 00:15:17,760 Speaker 1: and even their own voters are like your off base, 273 00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:21,880 Speaker 1: in your exclusive focus on this, on your obsession over this, 274 00:15:21,880 --> 00:15:25,000 Speaker 1: this is not landing with us whatsoever. And that's why 275 00:15:25,240 --> 00:15:29,520 Speaker 1: in part I just saw this morning, Larry Sabadeau's Crystal Well, 276 00:15:29,600 --> 00:15:32,800 Speaker 1: Kyle konnig we have him on. Great analysts there say 277 00:15:32,840 --> 00:15:36,640 Speaker 1: that Republicans are poised to potentially win their largest majority 278 00:15:36,680 --> 00:15:41,160 Speaker 1: in a century in a century. That's how badly off 279 00:15:41,200 --> 00:15:43,080 Speaker 1: based Democrats have been with all this stuff. Look, so 280 00:15:43,120 --> 00:15:45,720 Speaker 1: you put it all together. This has been from the beginning. 281 00:15:45,920 --> 00:15:48,400 Speaker 1: Look nobody. Once again, I guess we always have to 282 00:15:48,400 --> 00:15:51,320 Speaker 1: cover our bases. It's not like Trump was not primarily 283 00:15:51,360 --> 00:15:54,600 Speaker 1: responsible for what happened on January sixth. Yes, that does 284 00:15:54,640 --> 00:15:57,640 Speaker 1: not mean that there were not agent provocateurs who are 285 00:15:57,640 --> 00:16:01,040 Speaker 1: within the audience or within the right, know, the rioters 286 00:16:01,320 --> 00:16:05,320 Speaker 1: that pushed things to a direction and infla flamed them 287 00:16:05,400 --> 00:16:08,840 Speaker 1: up such that the actual storming of the Capitol happened. 288 00:16:08,960 --> 00:16:12,080 Speaker 1: How many of those people were FBI informants, It's a 289 00:16:12,160 --> 00:16:15,160 Speaker 1: simple question, or not even FBI informance. How many of 290 00:16:15,160 --> 00:16:18,600 Speaker 1: them were affiliated with law enforcement intelligence, a higher US 291 00:16:18,680 --> 00:16:23,280 Speaker 1: government authority, such that it justified the largest domestic crackdown 292 00:16:23,440 --> 00:16:27,680 Speaker 1: in modern American history. You should not forget that we saw. 293 00:16:28,160 --> 00:16:31,960 Speaker 1: I mean remember here in Washington, d c our capital 294 00:16:32,200 --> 00:16:35,960 Speaker 1: was locked down for months and occupied by national troops 295 00:16:36,160 --> 00:16:39,040 Speaker 1: for months, not a word from a lot of people. 296 00:16:39,400 --> 00:16:42,440 Speaker 1: They were here for the Keanon rally, which nobody actually 297 00:16:42,520 --> 00:16:46,120 Speaker 1: ended up coming to. It cost almost a billion dollars 298 00:16:46,160 --> 00:16:49,240 Speaker 1: in that deployment. Now we have a new domestic terror law, 299 00:16:49,560 --> 00:16:54,000 Speaker 1: then we saw the systematic technology private deplatforming of a 300 00:16:54,120 --> 00:16:57,440 Speaker 1: lot of people who are in the quote unquote dissident 301 00:16:57,480 --> 00:17:01,360 Speaker 1: anti authority regime. Remember, this has been the greatest thing 302 00:17:01,360 --> 00:17:03,920 Speaker 1: that ever happened to the powers that be, and so 303 00:17:03,960 --> 00:17:05,920 Speaker 1: you should ask a lot of questions as to why 304 00:17:05,920 --> 00:17:08,320 Speaker 1: that is. The new domestic terror unit is a threat, 305 00:17:08,440 --> 00:17:10,600 Speaker 1: I think to everybody who has a dissonant belief, ye, 306 00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:14,440 Speaker 1: one hundred percent. Look, guys, this is like fundamental question. 307 00:17:14,600 --> 00:17:16,280 Speaker 1: Are we going to be a security state? Are we 308 00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:18,560 Speaker 1: going to be a democracy? Those are the choices. And 309 00:17:18,640 --> 00:17:22,480 Speaker 1: so if you really actually care about democracy, the way 310 00:17:22,520 --> 00:17:26,680 Speaker 1: this has been weaponized should be more troubling, way more troubling, 311 00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:29,800 Speaker 1: because these are powerful institutions versus most of the people 312 00:17:29,800 --> 00:17:33,320 Speaker 1: there who were totally powerless. You should be way more 313 00:17:33,320 --> 00:17:35,679 Speaker 1: troubled by the direction that they have taken this in, 314 00:17:35,760 --> 00:17:38,080 Speaker 1: by the way that they have weaponized it. Then, even 315 00:17:38,119 --> 00:17:40,720 Speaker 1: of the events of that day which listen. There are 316 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:42,359 Speaker 1: two things I want to respond to and that I 317 00:17:42,359 --> 00:17:45,080 Speaker 1: saw online sentiments that were expressed when I was tweeting 318 00:17:45,119 --> 00:17:48,440 Speaker 1: about this. One was why are you scapegoading the FBI 319 00:17:49,119 --> 00:17:51,359 Speaker 1: for the events that happened in the day, And I 320 00:17:51,400 --> 00:17:53,560 Speaker 1: just want to be clear, we're not letting anyone off 321 00:17:53,600 --> 00:17:57,199 Speaker 1: the hook for the personal act. They have agency, and 322 00:17:57,400 --> 00:17:59,240 Speaker 1: you know, if they did bad stuff that day, they 323 00:17:59,280 --> 00:18:01,320 Speaker 1: should be held accoun and they're responsible for that. And 324 00:18:01,359 --> 00:18:03,240 Speaker 1: we are certainly not letting Trump off the hook either, 325 00:18:03,280 --> 00:18:04,919 Speaker 1: and we say that every single time that we do 326 00:18:04,960 --> 00:18:07,360 Speaker 1: segments on this. The other one that I really liked 327 00:18:07,880 --> 00:18:11,320 Speaker 1: is people were like, this was Trump's do OJ, So 328 00:18:11,400 --> 00:18:14,159 Speaker 1: there's no way that they would have been like, you 329 00:18:14,240 --> 00:18:17,520 Speaker 1: totally don't understand the concept of the deep stick. That's 330 00:18:17,520 --> 00:18:22,920 Speaker 1: the whole idea is permanent bureaucracy, not loyal to any 331 00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:27,040 Speaker 1: particular president with their own agenda. And that's by the way. 332 00:18:27,080 --> 00:18:29,040 Speaker 1: I know the term has gained a lot of popularity 333 00:18:29,400 --> 00:18:31,119 Speaker 1: during the Trump years and started to be used by 334 00:18:31,119 --> 00:18:32,719 Speaker 1: the right during the Trump year, but this is a 335 00:18:33,080 --> 00:18:37,040 Speaker 1: long held concept that actually originates on the left of 336 00:18:37,080 --> 00:18:39,439 Speaker 1: the political spectrum. So just wanted to put those two 337 00:18:39,480 --> 00:18:43,840 Speaker 1: pieces out there. But again, bottom line is moving us 338 00:18:43,880 --> 00:18:48,080 Speaker 1: more towards a security state, demonizing and criminalizing, you know, 339 00:18:48,280 --> 00:18:51,719 Speaker 1: more of the country, surveilling, cooking up these plots, all 340 00:18:51,760 --> 00:18:55,080 Speaker 1: of these things are a way greater risk to our 341 00:18:55,320 --> 00:19:02,000 Speaker 1: democracy than the admittedly bad events of that. Yeah, let's 342 00:19:02,000 --> 00:19:04,880 Speaker 1: move on speaking of threats to our democracy, which is corruption. 343 00:19:05,000 --> 00:19:08,640 Speaker 1: Here in Washington. Has been some really interesting and good 344 00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:12,920 Speaker 1: moves around cracking down on members of Congress who are 345 00:19:12,960 --> 00:19:15,760 Speaker 1: trading stock. But I think a lot of the credit 346 00:19:15,920 --> 00:19:18,600 Speaker 1: has to go to Unusual Wales, who is an account 347 00:19:18,680 --> 00:19:20,840 Speaker 1: on Twitter put this up there on the screen, who 348 00:19:20,920 --> 00:19:23,480 Speaker 1: for the last couple of years really brought to the 349 00:19:23,480 --> 00:19:28,280 Speaker 1: public consciousness by compiling public of publicly available data, just 350 00:19:28,359 --> 00:19:31,159 Speaker 1: how much members of Congress are beating the S and 351 00:19:31,160 --> 00:19:34,920 Speaker 1: P five hundred in twenty twenty one. And just look 352 00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:38,399 Speaker 1: at that graphic here of all of these members of 353 00:19:38,440 --> 00:19:44,240 Speaker 1: Congress red and blue, Dan Frenshaw, Nancy Pelosi, Debbie Dingle, 354 00:19:44,560 --> 00:19:49,320 Speaker 1: and Don Bayer, Victorious Sparts, Alan Lowenthal. I mean, every 355 00:19:49,359 --> 00:19:51,840 Speaker 1: one of these people I named are members of both 356 00:19:51,880 --> 00:19:55,000 Speaker 1: parties who are beating the S and P five hundred. 357 00:19:55,160 --> 00:19:58,280 Speaker 1: And here's the best thing. Somebody in finance pointing this 358 00:19:58,320 --> 00:20:00,960 Speaker 1: out to me, they're only fifty three hedge funds who 359 00:20:00,960 --> 00:20:03,640 Speaker 1: beat the S and P five hundred in twenty twenty one. 360 00:20:04,000 --> 00:20:07,159 Speaker 1: So that means there are almost as many members of 361 00:20:07,240 --> 00:20:12,399 Speaker 1: Congress who are beating the billionaires on Wall Street in 362 00:20:12,520 --> 00:20:16,480 Speaker 1: terms of their private stock picks. Now, that's really really 363 00:20:16,480 --> 00:20:19,560 Speaker 1: interesting to me personally. I've got a lot of questions. 364 00:20:19,920 --> 00:20:23,480 Speaker 1: And the best thing about Unusual Wales report is by 365 00:20:23,600 --> 00:20:27,800 Speaker 1: going and looking at the specific timing of trades where 366 00:20:27,800 --> 00:20:32,320 Speaker 1: we have massive flurries of activities of stock sales right 367 00:20:32,359 --> 00:20:37,560 Speaker 1: before major legislative events. It's exactly what happened previously whenever 368 00:20:37,600 --> 00:20:40,440 Speaker 1: we would see members of Congress start to sell right 369 00:20:40,480 --> 00:20:42,800 Speaker 1: around the time they knew that coronavirus was coming, then 370 00:20:42,840 --> 00:20:46,520 Speaker 1: they ended up buying the dip. We saw huge options 371 00:20:46,600 --> 00:20:50,800 Speaker 1: trades being leveraged by Nancy Pelosi's husband based upon possibly 372 00:20:50,840 --> 00:20:54,080 Speaker 1: non public information and horror role as a speaker of 373 00:20:54,119 --> 00:20:57,199 Speaker 1: the House. We see members of committees who are trading 374 00:20:57,240 --> 00:21:01,240 Speaker 1: defense stocks, the Defense Committee's trading defense stocks, Tech committees 375 00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:04,719 Speaker 1: trading tech stocks. I mean, you almost can't get away 376 00:21:04,760 --> 00:21:06,800 Speaker 1: from all of it. And you just tend to see 377 00:21:06,800 --> 00:21:13,280 Speaker 1: here that massive amounts of capital are in the companies themselves, 378 00:21:13,640 --> 00:21:16,560 Speaker 1: of which Congress has the most direct impact on, the 379 00:21:16,680 --> 00:21:20,000 Speaker 1: major technology companies which have contracts with the Pentagon and 380 00:21:20,040 --> 00:21:23,040 Speaker 1: the defense contractors themselves. You cannot step away from it. 381 00:21:23,200 --> 00:21:26,399 Speaker 1: And when technology has become the most valuable sector of 382 00:21:26,440 --> 00:21:29,439 Speaker 1: our economy, and they are then charged with trying to 383 00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:33,600 Speaker 1: regulate technology. Is it such a coincidence that they perhaps 384 00:21:33,680 --> 00:21:37,080 Speaker 1: do nothing. And here's the question too, we will never 385 00:21:37,240 --> 00:21:39,440 Speaker 1: know the answer to how much of it is corruption 386 00:21:39,800 --> 00:21:43,760 Speaker 1: and not. I genuinely have no idea, So let's find out. 387 00:21:43,920 --> 00:21:47,160 Speaker 1: And that's the key from this publicly available data, which 388 00:21:47,280 --> 00:21:50,960 Speaker 1: just shows you that something's happening. They're not geniuses. I've 389 00:21:51,000 --> 00:21:53,160 Speaker 1: met some of the people on this list. A lot 390 00:21:53,160 --> 00:21:54,720 Speaker 1: of them are dumb. A lot of them are much 391 00:21:54,760 --> 00:21:58,359 Speaker 1: dumber than you. And the question is what access to 392 00:21:58,440 --> 00:22:01,760 Speaker 1: non public information or shady did they get access to 393 00:22:02,119 --> 00:22:06,360 Speaker 1: that allowed them to do better than the billionaires on walls. Yeah, 394 00:22:06,400 --> 00:22:09,520 Speaker 1: well ask yourself that question. That's what's so damning is 395 00:22:09,680 --> 00:22:11,640 Speaker 1: that when you look at the numbers overall, that they're 396 00:22:11,680 --> 00:22:13,920 Speaker 1: beating the market, and they're beating the people whose job 397 00:22:13,920 --> 00:22:16,639 Speaker 1: it is to be good at this, right, So that's 398 00:22:16,840 --> 00:22:21,240 Speaker 1: that's damning. The timing of the trades is extraordinarily damning. 399 00:22:21,359 --> 00:22:23,320 Speaker 1: This was actually kind of funny to me. There was 400 00:22:23,359 --> 00:22:27,800 Speaker 1: a flurry of trading activity among Senate Republicans when Joe 401 00:22:27,840 --> 00:22:30,560 Speaker 1: Biden was sworn in verb and they're like, oh, this 402 00:22:30,600 --> 00:22:32,280 Speaker 1: is going to be good for the stock market. So 403 00:22:32,359 --> 00:22:36,920 Speaker 1: that's kind of funny. But also flurry of trading activity Democrats, 404 00:22:36,960 --> 00:22:40,080 Speaker 1: there was a significant flurry around the infrastructure bill, So 405 00:22:40,320 --> 00:22:44,200 Speaker 1: when there were big things happening in Washington, especially things 406 00:22:44,240 --> 00:22:46,520 Speaker 1: that you know, they would have some insight into being 407 00:22:46,560 --> 00:22:48,840 Speaker 1: part of those negotiations, I mean part of you know, 408 00:22:48,880 --> 00:22:51,560 Speaker 1: the people were directly voting on it, that's when they 409 00:22:51,560 --> 00:22:54,680 Speaker 1: were making big moves. And so again, look, it's very 410 00:22:54,720 --> 00:22:58,919 Speaker 1: hard insider trading prosecutions, very difficult. Yeah, you have to 411 00:22:58,960 --> 00:23:02,320 Speaker 1: prove everything on both the transition. Yeah, very very hard 412 00:23:02,359 --> 00:23:05,840 Speaker 1: to know. Okay, this trade was corruption, this was just 413 00:23:06,000 --> 00:23:08,040 Speaker 1: you know, they bought it and they got luckier. They 414 00:23:08,080 --> 00:23:10,240 Speaker 1: sold it and they got lucky. But when you look 415 00:23:10,280 --> 00:23:13,439 Speaker 1: at the overall picture, there's no doubt that this is 416 00:23:13,600 --> 00:23:17,560 Speaker 1: just shady as well. And beyond that, what this does 417 00:23:17,560 --> 00:23:21,800 Speaker 1: to public trust in our government and our dually elected 418 00:23:21,840 --> 00:23:25,760 Speaker 1: government is devastating, and I should I also I want 419 00:23:25,760 --> 00:23:28,000 Speaker 1: to point out it's not every member of Congress that's 420 00:23:28,040 --> 00:23:30,960 Speaker 1: doing this. There are a lot of people who aren't 421 00:23:31,000 --> 00:23:33,439 Speaker 1: on this list who have decided that you know what, 422 00:23:33,520 --> 00:23:35,520 Speaker 1: while I'm a member of Congress. I am I'm not 423 00:23:35,560 --> 00:23:38,480 Speaker 1: going to involve myself in, you know, playing games on 424 00:23:38,520 --> 00:23:41,960 Speaker 1: the stock market. So let's just let's make that the standard. 425 00:23:42,240 --> 00:23:45,200 Speaker 1: And in fact, there are movements now on the right 426 00:23:45,240 --> 00:23:48,439 Speaker 1: and the left, I think you point out accurately thanks 427 00:23:48,480 --> 00:23:51,639 Speaker 1: to the pressure that has been put online, thanks in 428 00:23:51,720 --> 00:23:55,560 Speaker 1: part to the fact that Nancy Pelosi and her husband's trades, yeah, 429 00:23:55,600 --> 00:23:58,159 Speaker 1: have been so egregious, have been so egregious, but have 430 00:23:58,240 --> 00:24:01,879 Speaker 1: become such a flashpoint on the right. That's why you 431 00:24:02,000 --> 00:24:04,800 Speaker 1: end up with politicians who feel like it's in their 432 00:24:04,920 --> 00:24:08,199 Speaker 1: interest to make some hay over this and try to 433 00:24:08,240 --> 00:24:11,720 Speaker 1: push things forward. So that's where we are today, which 434 00:24:11,720 --> 00:24:16,159 Speaker 1: is pretty interesting. There's some new moves this morning, but 435 00:24:16,640 --> 00:24:20,000 Speaker 1: you know, so the backstory is Pelosi comes out and 436 00:24:20,040 --> 00:24:24,359 Speaker 1: makes our comments basically like scoffing at the idea that 437 00:24:24,400 --> 00:24:26,800 Speaker 1: we should have any checks on trading for members of 438 00:24:26,840 --> 00:24:30,639 Speaker 1: Congress and for their spouses and family members. John ass Off, 439 00:24:30,880 --> 00:24:34,480 Speaker 1: it leaks out, is actually preparing a bill that's effectively 440 00:24:34,480 --> 00:24:38,600 Speaker 1: a direct rebuke of Pelosi given those comments, And so 441 00:24:38,720 --> 00:24:41,760 Speaker 1: reporters run out and they start trying to press Democratic 442 00:24:41,800 --> 00:24:44,960 Speaker 1: politicians on where they stand on this, And a lot 443 00:24:45,000 --> 00:24:49,440 Speaker 1: of these folks were very cagey because now you're asking them, 444 00:24:49,680 --> 00:24:51,280 Speaker 1: all right, am I on the John osoff side or 445 00:24:51,280 --> 00:24:53,639 Speaker 1: a mind the Nancy Pelosi side. Let's go ahead and 446 00:24:53,640 --> 00:24:56,960 Speaker 1: throw our next element up on the screen there. So 447 00:24:57,160 --> 00:25:00,920 Speaker 1: Insider took it upon themselves to go talk to Kikeem 448 00:25:01,000 --> 00:25:05,040 Speaker 1: Jeffries and Chuck Schumer in particular. And this is funny. 449 00:25:05,480 --> 00:25:07,359 Speaker 1: The other piece of this is Kevin McCarthy came out 450 00:25:07,359 --> 00:25:09,479 Speaker 1: and said, oh, we may do something on this, you know, 451 00:25:10,040 --> 00:25:13,200 Speaker 1: if we take if when we take control of the house. 452 00:25:14,240 --> 00:25:17,200 Speaker 1: So Hakeem Jefferies is happy to go in on Kevin McCarthy. 453 00:25:17,200 --> 00:25:19,320 Speaker 1: He has no credibility. I'm certainly not going to listen 454 00:25:19,359 --> 00:25:23,120 Speaker 1: to ethics lectures on him. Fair enough. But then when 455 00:25:23,119 --> 00:25:26,760 Speaker 1: they ask Kakim Jeffries, who is seen as Nancy Pelosi's 456 00:25:26,800 --> 00:25:28,919 Speaker 1: most likely successor, all right, well what do you think 457 00:25:28,960 --> 00:25:33,760 Speaker 1: about this stuff? Nothing to say, he says, quote, I 458 00:25:33,800 --> 00:25:36,359 Speaker 1: support continuing to make sure that everyone complies with the 459 00:25:36,440 --> 00:25:41,000 Speaker 1: law as it is right now. I'm unfamiliar with the legislation. Bullshit. 460 00:25:41,320 --> 00:25:43,400 Speaker 1: It has not been presented to me. Nobody has talked 461 00:25:43,440 --> 00:25:45,480 Speaker 1: to me about it, and of course, I'm open to 462 00:25:45,560 --> 00:25:50,040 Speaker 1: having conversations with any members. Also, they ask Center Majority 463 00:25:50,119 --> 00:25:53,800 Speaker 1: Leader Chuck Schumer about a hypothetical stock trading band on Tuesday. 464 00:25:53,840 --> 00:25:56,880 Speaker 1: He dodged the question, saying, quote, I don't own any stocks, 465 00:25:57,280 --> 00:25:59,680 Speaker 1: so her flows encouraged. I mean, you know, yeah, It's 466 00:26:00,080 --> 00:26:02,840 Speaker 1: here's the thing, like you said, it is becoming bipartisan, 467 00:26:02,920 --> 00:26:04,920 Speaker 1: and that is the best news. So this morning, Broke 468 00:26:05,119 --> 00:26:07,800 Speaker 1: Senator Josh Holly has introduced his own bill which would 469 00:26:07,840 --> 00:26:11,159 Speaker 1: go ahead and ban trading. Some of the specifics aren't 470 00:26:11,320 --> 00:26:14,320 Speaker 1: entirely there. It's not the same as the John Osoft bill, 471 00:26:14,520 --> 00:26:17,760 Speaker 1: which also now has a co sponsor. The big difference 472 00:26:18,119 --> 00:26:21,120 Speaker 1: as far as we know, between the Ostoff and Holly bill, 473 00:26:21,160 --> 00:26:24,480 Speaker 1: and apparently they were in negotiations because Osoff originally wanted 474 00:26:24,480 --> 00:26:27,520 Speaker 1: a Republican co sponsor. Now instead he's got Mark Kelly's 475 00:26:27,520 --> 00:26:30,359 Speaker 1: Democrat from senator who's also you know, in a reddish 476 00:26:30,520 --> 00:26:35,520 Speaker 1: state of Arizona. The big difference between them is osof 477 00:26:35,640 --> 00:26:39,920 Speaker 1: supplies not only to spouses but also to family independent 478 00:26:40,200 --> 00:26:44,399 Speaker 1: family members, and Holly's is just spouses. There's also some 479 00:26:44,520 --> 00:26:48,760 Speaker 1: different enforcement mechanisms apparently, but those were sort of the 480 00:26:49,040 --> 00:26:51,360 Speaker 1: as far as Axios is reporting this morning, those were 481 00:26:51,359 --> 00:26:55,040 Speaker 1: the distinguishing factors. Look like I said, even a ten 482 00:26:55,160 --> 00:26:58,000 Speaker 1: percent increase and just making it so they can only 483 00:26:58,040 --> 00:27:02,800 Speaker 1: trade mutual funds would be a dreamtic increase in terms 484 00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:06,080 Speaker 1: of public transparency and public trust. I've seen the way 485 00:27:06,080 --> 00:27:09,520 Speaker 1: these things go through the mangle. It's very unlikely anything 486 00:27:09,560 --> 00:27:12,720 Speaker 1: becomes law, but it gives me some hope. Josh Holly, 487 00:27:12,960 --> 00:27:16,520 Speaker 1: John Ossoff, Mark Kelly, Representative Chip Roy, who are in 488 00:27:16,560 --> 00:27:19,040 Speaker 1: the House of Representatives, who is backing the House version 489 00:27:19,080 --> 00:27:21,399 Speaker 1: of this bill. There are people, and now you have 490 00:27:21,480 --> 00:27:24,680 Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy who wants to do it to own Nancy Pelosi. Fine, 491 00:27:24,760 --> 00:27:27,520 Speaker 1: I don't care, Yeah, take it. You know, this is 492 00:27:27,560 --> 00:27:30,680 Speaker 1: one of those institutional ways where the culture war actually 493 00:27:30,720 --> 00:27:32,760 Speaker 1: can work to all of our benefit. And I want 494 00:27:32,760 --> 00:27:34,680 Speaker 1: to say this to a lot of the younger people 495 00:27:34,680 --> 00:27:36,840 Speaker 1: in our audience. You guys are the reason that this 496 00:27:36,920 --> 00:27:41,480 Speaker 1: is happening. And the reason why is because increasing public disillusionment. 497 00:27:41,800 --> 00:27:45,640 Speaker 1: Posting about it on Twitter, on TikTok, on Instagram, our segments, 498 00:27:45,680 --> 00:27:48,800 Speaker 1: other people who talk about this unusual whales has brought 499 00:27:48,800 --> 00:27:51,919 Speaker 1: it to a level of public public consciousness where politicians 500 00:27:51,920 --> 00:27:54,840 Speaker 1: can look at that energy and outrage and say we 501 00:27:54,920 --> 00:27:57,359 Speaker 1: got to do something about this. It actually is a 502 00:27:57,440 --> 00:28:01,840 Speaker 1: rare instance of people on the Internet, using publicly available information, 503 00:28:02,280 --> 00:28:04,359 Speaker 1: being outraged about it talking about it. I mean, how 504 00:28:04,400 --> 00:28:05,760 Speaker 1: long have we been talking about this? Now for two 505 00:28:05,800 --> 00:28:08,080 Speaker 1: years almost? I mean it's years we've been talking and 506 00:28:08,119 --> 00:28:11,080 Speaker 1: we were very lonely in the wilderness whenever we've first started, 507 00:28:11,680 --> 00:28:14,919 Speaker 1: and is based once again upon unusual Wales. Information started 508 00:28:14,960 --> 00:28:18,159 Speaker 1: becoming a TikTok meme, started becoming something that teenagers and 509 00:28:18,200 --> 00:28:21,440 Speaker 1: others looked at, and now people in Congress are talking 510 00:28:21,440 --> 00:28:23,960 Speaker 1: about it. So look, that's how it starts. It's a 511 00:28:23,960 --> 00:28:27,960 Speaker 1: good example of how internet activism, outrage whatever it can 512 00:28:28,000 --> 00:28:30,800 Speaker 1: seem so fau and empty in ninety nine percent of cases, 513 00:28:30,920 --> 00:28:32,920 Speaker 1: but in the one percent, if it does work, it's 514 00:28:32,960 --> 00:28:34,720 Speaker 1: still a real victory. So I want you guys to 515 00:28:34,800 --> 00:28:37,600 Speaker 1: understand one hundred percent. And it's important to understand why 516 00:28:37,680 --> 00:28:40,840 Speaker 1: it worked, because you can never count on these people 517 00:28:40,880 --> 00:28:42,920 Speaker 1: to like do something because it's the right thing to 518 00:28:43,040 --> 00:28:49,520 Speaker 1: been do, right, but ass off Holly Kevin McCarthy. They 519 00:28:49,560 --> 00:28:52,200 Speaker 1: have perceived this to be in their political interest, yes, 520 00:28:52,200 --> 00:28:54,280 Speaker 1: and it is, and it is best thing, right, And 521 00:28:54,360 --> 00:28:56,400 Speaker 1: so the fact that you have people on both sides 522 00:28:56,400 --> 00:28:58,680 Speaker 1: of the aisle perceiving this in their political interest and 523 00:28:58,760 --> 00:29:02,080 Speaker 1: putting pressure on their owned leadership. That's the other thing 524 00:29:02,120 --> 00:29:05,600 Speaker 1: that's important to note is even Holly's bill goes further 525 00:29:05,760 --> 00:29:09,640 Speaker 1: than what McCarthy was floating, So he's also putting pressure 526 00:29:09,680 --> 00:29:13,280 Speaker 1: on Republican leadership to do something, to do something that 527 00:29:13,280 --> 00:29:16,000 Speaker 1: would actually be real here because frankly, what McCarthy floated 528 00:29:16,080 --> 00:29:19,280 Speaker 1: was kind of bullshit. But the fact that they perceive 529 00:29:19,320 --> 00:29:22,640 Speaker 1: it in their individual political interest thanks to the pressure 530 00:29:22,720 --> 00:29:26,080 Speaker 1: that you all put on them, that is a model 531 00:29:26,400 --> 00:29:29,120 Speaker 1: for success for the future and something to remember and 532 00:29:29,160 --> 00:29:31,600 Speaker 1: something to build on. So absolutely that is what is exciting. 533 00:29:34,760 --> 00:29:38,240 Speaker 1: All right, guys, So we got new inflation numbers yesterday, 534 00:29:38,240 --> 00:29:42,400 Speaker 1: but we also got a pretty interesting moment from Elizabeth Warren. 535 00:29:42,520 --> 00:29:45,960 Speaker 1: So this particular segment on inflation has both the good 536 00:29:46,080 --> 00:29:48,840 Speaker 1: and the bad here. Ultimately, let's start with Elizabeth Warren. So, 537 00:29:49,880 --> 00:29:52,760 Speaker 1: you guys know, Center Warren used to have really good 538 00:29:52,800 --> 00:29:56,840 Speaker 1: economic politics. We're talking like nine yeah, I mean, she 539 00:29:57,160 --> 00:30:03,080 Speaker 1: came to into public prominence trashing Hillary Clinton and the 540 00:30:03,120 --> 00:30:08,120 Speaker 1: bank's most important the banks, trashing Joe Biden for pretend 541 00:30:08,240 --> 00:30:12,160 Speaker 1: posing posturing as an ally of women with his you know, 542 00:30:12,200 --> 00:30:15,560 Speaker 1: bills against domestic violence, which are important, but meanwhile selling 543 00:30:15,560 --> 00:30:18,720 Speaker 1: them out financially. I mean, she went toe to toe 544 00:30:18,760 --> 00:30:20,920 Speaker 1: with him on this stuff, and then suddenly when she 545 00:30:21,000 --> 00:30:23,840 Speaker 1: runs for president she doesn't say a word about any 546 00:30:23,880 --> 00:30:29,520 Speaker 1: of That leans hard into the shallowest, most impotent form 547 00:30:30,000 --> 00:30:33,160 Speaker 1: of identity politics, things like I mean, throwing Bernie under 548 00:30:33,200 --> 00:30:36,240 Speaker 1: the bus pretending he's a sexist, promising to wear a 549 00:30:36,280 --> 00:30:39,440 Speaker 1: pink planned Parenthood scarf on inauguration Dan, and that was 550 00:30:39,480 --> 00:30:41,960 Speaker 1: my personal favorite. No, my personal favorite was promising an 551 00:30:41,960 --> 00:30:44,280 Speaker 1: eleven year old trans child that they get to pick 552 00:30:44,320 --> 00:30:47,400 Speaker 1: the Department of Education. I liked even more than that 553 00:30:47,480 --> 00:30:50,479 Speaker 1: at the DNC when she had the BLO in the 554 00:30:50,520 --> 00:30:54,240 Speaker 1: block blocks behind her. So this was so, this was 555 00:30:54,400 --> 00:30:56,720 Speaker 1: a major. I used to love Elizabeth Warren. I was 556 00:30:56,760 --> 00:30:59,160 Speaker 1: such an Elizabeth Warren stand and so to watch her 557 00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:03,480 Speaker 1: debaser self and just crumble into this totally like impotent 558 00:31:03,680 --> 00:31:08,440 Speaker 1: figure that you know, is not really offering anything challenging 559 00:31:08,480 --> 00:31:10,360 Speaker 1: the powerful anymore, was very sad for me to see. 560 00:31:10,560 --> 00:31:14,800 Speaker 1: So this week we had Jerome Palll's confirmation hearings to 561 00:31:15,160 --> 00:31:19,480 Speaker 1: be reconfirmed as a fedchair and Warren is not a 562 00:31:19,520 --> 00:31:22,840 Speaker 1: fan of Jerome Palell to start with, and I think 563 00:31:22,880 --> 00:31:24,600 Speaker 1: she's a no vote on that. But he's still going 564 00:31:24,680 --> 00:31:26,840 Speaker 1: to get confirmed ultimately because Republicans are going to vote 565 00:31:26,840 --> 00:31:31,080 Speaker 1: for him too. But she really pressed him on the reasons, 566 00:31:31,200 --> 00:31:33,240 Speaker 1: some of the reasons that we have such high inflation 567 00:31:33,400 --> 00:31:38,400 Speaker 1: right now and forced him to admit that corporations jacking 568 00:31:38,480 --> 00:31:42,160 Speaker 1: up their prices using inflation as an excuse to further 569 00:31:42,280 --> 00:31:44,680 Speaker 1: jack up their prices was a part of what's going on. 570 00:31:44,920 --> 00:31:47,000 Speaker 1: Let's take a listen to what she did here. Let 571 00:31:47,040 --> 00:31:48,760 Speaker 1: me ask it the other way then, because we're still 572 00:31:48,800 --> 00:31:50,640 Speaker 1: kind of doing econ one oh one here. If you're 573 00:31:50,640 --> 00:31:55,240 Speaker 1: a corporation that is eaten up most of the competition 574 00:31:55,600 --> 00:31:58,600 Speaker 1: and cornered the market, is it easier for you to 575 00:31:58,720 --> 00:32:02,360 Speaker 1: raise prices on your customers and maximize your profits because 576 00:32:02,360 --> 00:32:04,600 Speaker 1: you don't have to worry about losing your business? In 577 00:32:04,600 --> 00:32:07,960 Speaker 1: other words, that's you've lost the discipline that the market 578 00:32:08,000 --> 00:32:10,840 Speaker 1: imposes in principle, if you don't have competition in your 579 00:32:10,920 --> 00:32:13,600 Speaker 1: monopolist yes, you can raise your prices, okay, And over 580 00:32:13,640 --> 00:32:17,800 Speaker 1: the past here we know that prices have risen because 581 00:32:17,840 --> 00:32:22,200 Speaker 1: of supply chain problems, unexpected shifts in the demand for goods, 582 00:32:22,200 --> 00:32:26,320 Speaker 1: and even higher labor costs. But if corporations were simply 583 00:32:26,520 --> 00:32:31,760 Speaker 1: passing along these costs in highly competitive markets, would the 584 00:32:31,800 --> 00:32:36,440 Speaker 1: company's profit margins have changed much? You know, so many 585 00:32:36,520 --> 00:32:43,560 Speaker 1: things affect affect those that calculation, But in principle you 586 00:32:43,560 --> 00:32:47,440 Speaker 1: could be right. But well, it's very much not what 587 00:32:47,440 --> 00:32:50,920 Speaker 1: we're seeing right now. Today, Nearly two out of three 588 00:32:50,960 --> 00:32:55,560 Speaker 1: of the biggest publicly traded corporations in the country are 589 00:32:55,600 --> 00:33:01,080 Speaker 1: reporting fatter profit margins than they reported before for the pandemic, 590 00:33:01,600 --> 00:33:04,160 Speaker 1: which doesn't sound like they're just passing a long costs. 591 00:33:04,200 --> 00:33:08,640 Speaker 1: So let me ask you, does that increase in profit margins, 592 00:33:08,680 --> 00:33:14,480 Speaker 1: combined with greater market concentration in industry after industry, suggest 593 00:33:14,560 --> 00:33:18,600 Speaker 1: to you that some corporations may be passing along increased 594 00:33:18,760 --> 00:33:23,960 Speaker 1: costs and at the same time charging more on top 595 00:33:24,040 --> 00:33:28,320 Speaker 1: of that to fatten their profit margins. That could be right. 596 00:33:28,360 --> 00:33:30,800 Speaker 1: It could also just be though that demand is incredibly 597 00:33:30,840 --> 00:33:35,960 Speaker 1: strong and that you know, they're they're raising prices because 598 00:33:36,000 --> 00:33:40,640 Speaker 1: they can. Well that's the points They're raising prices because 599 00:33:40,680 --> 00:33:42,880 Speaker 1: they can. Yeah, I mean it's yeahs shown you is 600 00:33:42,920 --> 00:33:45,920 Speaker 1: absolutely the case. You know, we looked at that gap 601 00:33:46,000 --> 00:33:49,200 Speaker 1: in corporate profits which is up like by I think 602 00:33:49,200 --> 00:33:52,800 Speaker 1: at the high record number in twenty twenty one, which 603 00:33:52,960 --> 00:33:56,520 Speaker 1: again nobody's denying that there has not been a massive 604 00:33:56,520 --> 00:34:00,240 Speaker 1: demand shock. As the chairman indicates, that is absolute the 605 00:34:00,280 --> 00:34:04,440 Speaker 1: case due to both money savings, weird wonky stuff within 606 00:34:04,480 --> 00:34:08,840 Speaker 1: the economy, supplies chain issues and all of that. But also, 607 00:34:09,120 --> 00:34:13,359 Speaker 1: as we've seen, the corporations are bragging to their shareholders 608 00:34:13,520 --> 00:34:16,440 Speaker 1: that because people expected increase in price, they can increase 609 00:34:16,480 --> 00:34:19,200 Speaker 1: it even more so than they actually have to. And 610 00:34:19,480 --> 00:34:21,320 Speaker 1: this is the part two which also kind of drives 611 00:34:21,320 --> 00:34:26,319 Speaker 1: me nuts, where people deny the ability for local monopolies, 612 00:34:26,360 --> 00:34:30,320 Speaker 1: so not necessarily a monopoly nationwide, but in specific areas 613 00:34:30,600 --> 00:34:34,880 Speaker 1: obviously have massive ability in order to manipulate price, especially 614 00:34:34,880 --> 00:34:38,720 Speaker 1: when people don't have all that much competition. And look, 615 00:34:38,840 --> 00:34:42,520 Speaker 1: we got the final numbers on inflation. Let's look at 616 00:34:42,520 --> 00:34:47,279 Speaker 1: the key price hikes where everything is concentrated, specifically in 617 00:34:47,520 --> 00:34:50,520 Speaker 1: these areas which are most subject to the supply shock. 618 00:34:50,560 --> 00:34:53,520 Speaker 1: Put it up there on the screen. Gas is up 619 00:34:53,680 --> 00:34:59,560 Speaker 1: forty nine point six percent. Is a constitution inflation fuel 620 00:34:59,600 --> 00:35:02,920 Speaker 1: oil forty one percent. That's something that really relates to 621 00:35:02,920 --> 00:35:06,520 Speaker 1: people who heat their homes, especially in rural areas. Use cars. 622 00:35:06,960 --> 00:35:09,960 Speaker 1: This is an annual number, right, just so you know, 623 00:35:10,000 --> 00:35:12,160 Speaker 1: because it's a little bit confusing from the TWEE assess. 624 00:35:12,200 --> 00:35:14,760 Speaker 1: Inflation hit seven percent in December. That's an annualized number, 625 00:35:14,800 --> 00:35:16,560 Speaker 1: that's right. Yeah, So that's the annualized number. And this 626 00:35:16,600 --> 00:35:19,359 Speaker 1: is also the annualized increase year over year. Use cars 627 00:35:19,400 --> 00:35:22,479 Speaker 1: up thirty seven, rental cars up thirty six, hotels twenty seven, 628 00:35:22,560 --> 00:35:27,200 Speaker 1: utility gas twenty four, steak twenty one, beef eighteen point six, 629 00:35:27,480 --> 00:35:31,640 Speaker 1: bacon eighteen point six, furniture thirteen point eight, tires twelve 630 00:35:31,680 --> 00:35:35,799 Speaker 1: point four, new cars twelve. So guys, basically get it. 631 00:35:35,800 --> 00:35:39,160 Speaker 1: It's gas, and it's food and it's travel. Those are 632 00:35:39,200 --> 00:35:42,040 Speaker 1: the three things where you've seen a massive increase in 633 00:35:42,360 --> 00:35:45,560 Speaker 1: price of goods. All three are subject to massive supply 634 00:35:45,640 --> 00:35:49,359 Speaker 1: shock for various reasons. A lot of it, almost all 635 00:35:49,400 --> 00:35:52,160 Speaker 1: of it actually has to do with globalization. And I 636 00:35:52,239 --> 00:35:54,560 Speaker 1: wish that somebody would talk about that, I mean drives 637 00:35:54,600 --> 00:35:56,879 Speaker 1: me nuts. Yeah, that people look at this and you're like, yeah, 638 00:35:56,920 --> 00:35:59,640 Speaker 1: we have an international gas market, domestic supply here in 639 00:35:59,640 --> 00:36:03,200 Speaker 1: the United States is actually subject to international demand rather 640 00:36:03,239 --> 00:36:05,399 Speaker 1: than domestic demand. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense 641 00:36:05,440 --> 00:36:09,080 Speaker 1: to me. And yet we just allow Exxon and Chevron 642 00:36:09,120 --> 00:36:11,479 Speaker 1: and all these people to ship out half the gas 643 00:36:11,480 --> 00:36:13,920 Speaker 1: that we produce here naturally, even though we don't have 644 00:36:14,000 --> 00:36:16,319 Speaker 1: to same. Whenever it comes to food, I mean, you 645 00:36:16,360 --> 00:36:19,200 Speaker 1: have a huge increase in the price of fertilizer, droughts 646 00:36:19,239 --> 00:36:22,800 Speaker 1: in Brazil, droughts in Montana, you know, increase in demand 647 00:36:22,880 --> 00:36:25,919 Speaker 1: of people staying at home, plus the shipping crisis. Yeah, 648 00:36:25,960 --> 00:36:27,960 Speaker 1: you have an increase in food. And then I mean 649 00:36:28,160 --> 00:36:31,920 Speaker 1: the used car one we've talked about endlessly semiconductors. I 650 00:36:32,000 --> 00:36:35,920 Speaker 1: heard stories about Detroit. Who is Detroit is designing new 651 00:36:35,960 --> 00:36:40,040 Speaker 1: cars by promising buyers stuff that they'll slot in into 652 00:36:40,080 --> 00:36:42,600 Speaker 1: their car in the future. So they're basically like selling 653 00:36:42,600 --> 00:36:45,160 Speaker 1: them a three fourth finished car. This is all plans 654 00:36:45,200 --> 00:36:47,200 Speaker 1: in Detroit right now because they're freaking out. They they 655 00:36:47,239 --> 00:36:48,920 Speaker 1: don't have cars. I think it's have a friend who 656 00:36:49,000 --> 00:36:52,960 Speaker 1: works at the truck assembly plan in Louisville, and he 657 00:36:53,000 --> 00:36:55,799 Speaker 1: hasn't worked in like twenty days because they just you know, 658 00:36:55,840 --> 00:36:59,279 Speaker 1: it's one of the chips. It's they had the what 659 00:36:59,320 --> 00:37:01,439 Speaker 1: do they call him chat these the frame of the car. 660 00:37:01,760 --> 00:37:03,879 Speaker 1: It's shortage of those. It's just been like one thing 661 00:37:03,920 --> 00:37:08,399 Speaker 1: after another. And so yeah, it's it's bad when you 662 00:37:08,920 --> 00:37:11,840 Speaker 1: it turns out that it's good to make some things 663 00:37:11,880 --> 00:37:15,680 Speaker 1: here and not be totally dependent on you know, China 664 00:37:15,680 --> 00:37:19,320 Speaker 1: and the rest of the world for our basic goods 665 00:37:19,360 --> 00:37:23,160 Speaker 1: to continue to continue living life here. It hasn't worked 666 00:37:23,160 --> 00:37:25,680 Speaker 1: out that well. And then the other piece of this 667 00:37:25,880 --> 00:37:28,919 Speaker 1: that Elizabeth Warren very effectively, if I you know, gets 668 00:37:28,960 --> 00:37:31,320 Speaker 1: your own power to admit even though he really didn't 669 00:37:31,360 --> 00:37:33,480 Speaker 1: want to. I was surprised by that. I didn't really 670 00:37:33,600 --> 00:37:36,319 Speaker 1: understand why he was being so reluctant because these are 671 00:37:36,480 --> 00:37:38,759 Speaker 1: I mean, you know, we have this illusion of the 672 00:37:38,760 --> 00:37:41,760 Speaker 1: Fed being this like independent, these wise men and women 673 00:37:41,840 --> 00:37:44,239 Speaker 1: who are largely academics, but they're deeply tied in with 674 00:37:44,280 --> 00:37:47,200 Speaker 1: Wall Street. I mean, that's their milia. The Federal Reserve 675 00:37:47,440 --> 00:37:51,960 Speaker 1: is comprised of series of regional banks. The whole system 676 00:37:52,080 --> 00:37:55,759 Speaker 1: was created by bankers, effectively, So I think that's why 677 00:37:55,880 --> 00:37:58,120 Speaker 1: is they're just so tied in with Wall Street that 678 00:37:58,600 --> 00:38:02,359 Speaker 1: they don't want to admit. But what the corporations themselves 679 00:38:02,480 --> 00:38:07,520 Speaker 1: are acknowledging that they're doing. So she gets him to admit, yeah, 680 00:38:07,560 --> 00:38:10,800 Speaker 1: they're raising prices because they can. Well, that's exactly the 681 00:38:10,840 --> 00:38:13,480 Speaker 1: point here. They can. They have the excuse of inflation, 682 00:38:13,920 --> 00:38:17,600 Speaker 1: they have monopoly power, and so they're raking in record 683 00:38:17,640 --> 00:38:21,319 Speaker 1: profit margins because they're able to use the excuse of 684 00:38:21,320 --> 00:38:24,960 Speaker 1: inflation to lift prices way more than is actually justified. 685 00:38:25,280 --> 00:38:30,120 Speaker 1: And so the reason they don't want to acknowledge the 686 00:38:30,160 --> 00:38:34,399 Speaker 1: globalization issues, just in time issues and the corporate greed 687 00:38:34,440 --> 00:38:37,720 Speaker 1: issues is because that would require them changing business as usual. 688 00:38:37,880 --> 00:38:39,960 Speaker 1: That's true. The easiest thing in the world to do 689 00:38:40,320 --> 00:38:43,440 Speaker 1: is to say, you all got a little stimulus check 690 00:38:44,000 --> 00:38:46,280 Speaker 1: and now you're able to like buy a few things. 691 00:38:46,719 --> 00:38:49,160 Speaker 1: Let's make sure that you're more impoverished, so you can't 692 00:38:49,239 --> 00:38:51,560 Speaker 1: keep doing that. That's the easiest thing in the world 693 00:38:51,560 --> 00:38:53,680 Speaker 1: for them to do. Then that doesn't require them to 694 00:38:53,760 --> 00:38:58,200 Speaker 1: change businesses usual. So that is Look, that is part 695 00:38:58,200 --> 00:38:59,960 Speaker 1: of the story is that people were able to save 696 00:39:00,120 --> 00:39:02,120 Speaker 1: there was a demand shot coming out on the pandemic. 697 00:39:02,400 --> 00:39:05,680 Speaker 1: You know, people can't still can't go out and you know, 698 00:39:05,719 --> 00:39:08,000 Speaker 1: engage in services and those sorts of things, so they're 699 00:39:08,040 --> 00:39:11,040 Speaker 1: buying more goods that is part of the story. But 700 00:39:11,160 --> 00:39:14,400 Speaker 1: why would you want to respond to this multifaceted crisis 701 00:39:14,480 --> 00:39:18,600 Speaker 1: by making the American people poor, which is what the 702 00:39:19,000 --> 00:39:21,359 Speaker 1: you know, the sort of mainstream conventional wisdom, that's what 703 00:39:21,400 --> 00:39:23,719 Speaker 1: it would lead you ultimately to do. Yeah, sadly, that's 704 00:39:23,719 --> 00:39:25,600 Speaker 1: probably what's going to happen. I just wanted to warn 705 00:39:25,640 --> 00:39:28,920 Speaker 1: you all that's almost entirely the most likely thing that's 706 00:39:28,960 --> 00:39:32,040 Speaker 1: going to happen. Hundred percent were already had in that direction. Yeah, 707 00:39:32,040 --> 00:39:35,080 Speaker 1: that's right. Okay, let's move on to Donald Trump. This 708 00:39:35,160 --> 00:39:38,680 Speaker 1: has been very interesting to watch, so you might not 709 00:39:38,880 --> 00:39:42,840 Speaker 1: recall this, but Governor DeSantis was recently interviewed and asked 710 00:39:42,840 --> 00:39:45,319 Speaker 1: whether he got the booster shot, and he kind of 711 00:39:45,360 --> 00:39:49,000 Speaker 1: demurred and did not confirm whether the answer was yes 712 00:39:49,280 --> 00:39:53,359 Speaker 1: or no. Now, next, Donald Trump was then interviewed by 713 00:39:53,440 --> 00:39:56,480 Speaker 1: Oan and it's the same situation as during the Candice 714 00:39:56,520 --> 00:39:58,879 Speaker 1: Owens interview, where the interviewer clearly wants him to say, 715 00:39:58,920 --> 00:40:02,759 Speaker 1: like I regret the vaccine, like trast the vaccine, you know, 716 00:40:02,840 --> 00:40:05,520 Speaker 1: all of that, and Trump comes out forcefully, not only 717 00:40:05,560 --> 00:40:08,759 Speaker 1: in effect for the vaccine, but calls out DeSantis in 718 00:40:08,880 --> 00:40:12,080 Speaker 1: all but name. Let's take a listen, do you reconsider 719 00:40:12,160 --> 00:40:14,359 Speaker 1: your push for it or what's your view now on 720 00:40:14,400 --> 00:40:17,879 Speaker 1: the vaccine in job? Well, I've taken it. I've had 721 00:40:17,880 --> 00:40:21,680 Speaker 1: the booster many politicians. I watched a couple of politicians 722 00:40:21,719 --> 00:40:24,799 Speaker 1: being interviewed and one of the questions was did you 723 00:40:24,800 --> 00:40:28,040 Speaker 1: get the booster because they had the vaccine? And they, oh, 724 00:40:28,280 --> 00:40:30,600 Speaker 1: they're answering it like in other words, the answer is yes, 725 00:40:30,600 --> 00:40:33,400 Speaker 1: but they don't want to say it because they've goutless. 726 00:40:33,480 --> 00:40:35,759 Speaker 1: You've got to say it, whether you had it or 727 00:40:35,800 --> 00:40:38,920 Speaker 1: not say it. But the fact is that I think 728 00:40:39,120 --> 00:40:42,720 Speaker 1: the vaccine has saved tens of millions of people throughout 729 00:40:42,760 --> 00:40:46,359 Speaker 1: the world. I have had absolutely no side effects. I've 730 00:40:46,400 --> 00:40:49,160 Speaker 1: had it like other people have had it. Nothing special. 731 00:40:49,680 --> 00:40:53,480 Speaker 1: I've had it. Wow, I mean interesting, Yeah, I just 732 00:40:53,640 --> 00:40:56,680 Speaker 1: I think it's once again an area where this is 733 00:40:56,840 --> 00:41:00,879 Speaker 1: I always try to ponder counterfactuals, which is that, yes, 734 00:41:01,440 --> 00:41:04,360 Speaker 1: you know, it may seem more calm with Trump off Twitter, 735 00:41:04,560 --> 00:41:06,840 Speaker 1: but what did we lose? And this is again shows 736 00:41:06,880 --> 00:41:10,080 Speaker 1: you the you know, many cascading and twentieth order effects 737 00:41:10,120 --> 00:41:12,800 Speaker 1: of censorship. Yeah, you lost, you know, he was banned 738 00:41:12,840 --> 00:41:15,919 Speaker 1: or whatever on January sixth. But there's a world, where 739 00:41:15,920 --> 00:41:19,399 Speaker 1: this entire right wing response looks completely different if Trump 740 00:41:19,520 --> 00:41:22,160 Speaker 1: was on Twitter. A huge amount of what we see 741 00:41:22,200 --> 00:41:25,239 Speaker 1: in terms of vaccine activity and more on the right 742 00:41:25,600 --> 00:41:28,360 Speaker 1: is in the absence of Trump as a singular figure, 743 00:41:28,680 --> 00:41:31,600 Speaker 1: and I see this very clearly. I also think now 744 00:41:31,680 --> 00:41:33,719 Speaker 1: that him getting booted off Twitter is probably the best 745 00:41:33,719 --> 00:41:36,680 Speaker 1: thing that ever happened for him. He receded from public memory. 746 00:41:36,920 --> 00:41:39,719 Speaker 1: Whenever he does pop up and enter the public consciousness, 747 00:41:39,960 --> 00:41:43,080 Speaker 1: it is in moments like this one. You know, in general, 748 00:41:43,400 --> 00:41:46,560 Speaker 1: people blame the country's problems on Joe Biden. Rightfully, they 749 00:41:46,600 --> 00:41:48,880 Speaker 1: don't even consider Trump, you know, they're like, it's kind 750 00:41:48,880 --> 00:41:52,920 Speaker 1: of like a yesteryear phenomena, and the intensity of the 751 00:41:52,960 --> 00:41:55,600 Speaker 1: way that you feel starts to fade. And I see 752 00:41:55,600 --> 00:41:58,680 Speaker 1: clips like that, and I just think about Trump, by 753 00:41:58,800 --> 00:42:01,600 Speaker 1: not being such a big forced in the vaccine discourse 754 00:42:01,640 --> 00:42:04,000 Speaker 1: on the right. And I'm talking over a year ago. Now, 755 00:42:04,320 --> 00:42:06,520 Speaker 1: there's very likely a way in which he negates and 756 00:42:06,640 --> 00:42:10,040 Speaker 1: nukes all of this and ridicules people on the right 757 00:42:10,200 --> 00:42:13,480 Speaker 1: for not doing so. Like this so very interesting in 758 00:42:13,560 --> 00:42:16,600 Speaker 1: order to see that. But honestly, at this point, I 759 00:42:16,600 --> 00:42:18,319 Speaker 1: think it might be too late. I mean, I think 760 00:42:18,360 --> 00:42:19,640 Speaker 1: so much of it has a life of its own. 761 00:42:20,360 --> 00:42:22,080 Speaker 1: You know. It really is like you look at canvas 762 00:42:22,080 --> 00:42:24,040 Speaker 1: saying she would rather die of COVID than take the 763 00:42:24,040 --> 00:42:27,160 Speaker 1: COVID vaccine, or you know, a lot of these other 764 00:42:27,840 --> 00:42:30,240 Speaker 1: a lot of these other people in the absence of Trump, 765 00:42:30,280 --> 00:42:32,600 Speaker 1: you know, kind of decided to go in this way. 766 00:42:32,680 --> 00:42:35,359 Speaker 1: And now Trump coming out and calling them out isn't 767 00:42:35,400 --> 00:42:38,279 Speaker 1: necessarily going to do anything. Yeah, And I was thinking 768 00:42:38,320 --> 00:42:41,440 Speaker 1: about this in terms of the sort of political calculus. 769 00:42:41,480 --> 00:42:43,880 Speaker 1: I mean, this is something we've talked about on this show. 770 00:42:44,000 --> 00:42:45,799 Speaker 1: Is that you've got like, what is it, eighty five 771 00:42:45,800 --> 00:42:49,319 Speaker 1: percent adult of the adult population that's had at least 772 00:42:49,400 --> 00:42:53,480 Speaker 1: one shot. That means even within the Republican Party, Trump's 773 00:42:53,480 --> 00:42:57,120 Speaker 1: position is the majority position, I know, especially ninety five 774 00:42:57,160 --> 00:43:01,920 Speaker 1: percent of boomers are vaccinated, ninety five percent of them. Yeah, yes, exactly, so, 775 00:43:01,920 --> 00:43:06,319 Speaker 1: so he actually is on firm political ground, not with 776 00:43:06,480 --> 00:43:09,400 Speaker 1: maybe the most ardent supporters, but with the majority of 777 00:43:09,400 --> 00:43:12,560 Speaker 1: the Republican base. He's on solid footing here, which is 778 00:43:12,600 --> 00:43:15,120 Speaker 1: also I mean, that's just interesting to note and very 779 00:43:15,160 --> 00:43:18,040 Speaker 1: different than the picture that I think is often painted 780 00:43:18,080 --> 00:43:22,000 Speaker 1: because you do have more vaccine hesitancy sort of ideological 781 00:43:22,120 --> 00:43:25,480 Speaker 1: vaccine hesitancy on that side of the aisle. I did 782 00:43:25,520 --> 00:43:28,480 Speaker 1: want to say the what Desantas said because I found 783 00:43:28,480 --> 00:43:31,920 Speaker 1: the quote when he was asked by Maria Bartiromo. This 784 00:43:32,040 --> 00:43:35,840 Speaker 1: was back in December. If she said you got to 785 00:43:35,880 --> 00:43:38,520 Speaker 1: say it, well that was that was a yeah, Trump 786 00:43:38,600 --> 00:43:40,560 Speaker 1: said you got to say it. What whether you had 787 00:43:40,600 --> 00:43:43,399 Speaker 1: it or not, barbaro. But back in December had asked 788 00:43:43,400 --> 00:43:47,200 Speaker 1: Asantis and he said, quote, I did done whatever I 789 00:43:47,320 --> 00:43:51,200 Speaker 1: did the normal shot. So he would not say and 790 00:43:51,840 --> 00:43:54,440 Speaker 1: right like that doesn't even yeah, it's not even like 791 00:43:54,480 --> 00:43:59,719 Speaker 1: really English. The other thing I wanted to note here 792 00:43:59,880 --> 00:44:03,439 Speaker 1: is that Governor Jim Justice of West Virginia, huh, has 793 00:44:03,480 --> 00:44:08,640 Speaker 1: COVID right now and is is vaxed, is boosted, and 794 00:44:08,719 --> 00:44:12,879 Speaker 1: is apparently very ill. He described he described himself as 795 00:44:13,080 --> 00:44:18,760 Speaker 1: extremely unwell, had to postpone his State of the State speech. 796 00:44:19,040 --> 00:44:21,160 Speaker 1: So just wanted to say, you know, we're thinking of 797 00:44:21,239 --> 00:44:23,440 Speaker 1: him and his family because he's he's an older guy. 798 00:44:23,480 --> 00:44:26,759 Speaker 1: He's a heavier guy, big duties, Like he's either six 799 00:44:26,760 --> 00:44:29,239 Speaker 1: foot seven or six foot eight, and I've met him 800 00:44:29,280 --> 00:44:31,399 Speaker 1: in person. He is a sort of larger than life 801 00:44:31,440 --> 00:44:33,560 Speaker 1: figure and he has you know, a number of comorbidities 802 00:44:33,600 --> 00:44:36,480 Speaker 1: that would put him at more risk with coronavirus. So 803 00:44:36,719 --> 00:44:38,440 Speaker 1: you can see there are still people who even when 804 00:44:38,440 --> 00:44:41,440 Speaker 1: they're vaxxed and boosted, continued to be at risk because 805 00:44:41,520 --> 00:44:43,480 Speaker 1: of their you know, sort of personal health death. I 806 00:44:43,480 --> 00:44:45,200 Speaker 1: heard all the time people who just got the booster 807 00:44:45,239 --> 00:44:47,600 Speaker 1: shot now they have COVID or whatever. I just you know, 808 00:44:47,640 --> 00:44:50,520 Speaker 1: it's another thing. Yes, it protects you from a hospitalization 809 00:44:50,600 --> 00:44:54,040 Speaker 1: and death. But look, be very, be very very you 810 00:44:54,080 --> 00:44:56,440 Speaker 1: know clear that taking care of yourself is one of 811 00:44:56,480 --> 00:44:59,359 Speaker 1: the best ways in order to avoid having a bad time, 812 00:44:59,400 --> 00:45:01,759 Speaker 1: not just what co but with all disease. Something I've 813 00:45:01,800 --> 00:45:04,480 Speaker 1: really learned from this I do want to highlight something 814 00:45:04,640 --> 00:45:07,920 Speaker 1: which has been fascinating to me is that Trump shot 815 00:45:08,000 --> 00:45:11,240 Speaker 1: at DeSantis spawned a lot of conversation on the online 816 00:45:11,360 --> 00:45:15,799 Speaker 1: right who were trashing Trump for going after DeSantis because yeah, 817 00:45:15,800 --> 00:45:19,520 Speaker 1: so and Coulter actually said this quote exclusive Trump is 818 00:45:19,560 --> 00:45:23,000 Speaker 1: demanding to know Ron DeSantis's booster status, and I can 819 00:45:23,000 --> 00:45:25,560 Speaker 1: now reveal it. He was a loyal booster when Trump 820 00:45:25,680 --> 00:45:28,320 Speaker 1: ran in twenty sixteen. Then he learned our president was 821 00:45:28,360 --> 00:45:30,840 Speaker 1: a liar and a con man whose grift was permanent. 822 00:45:30,920 --> 00:45:33,480 Speaker 1: I hope that clears things up. Of course, Culter has 823 00:45:33,520 --> 00:45:35,440 Speaker 1: hated Trump for a while. She has. But then I 824 00:45:35,480 --> 00:45:38,000 Speaker 1: also saw a guy, Matt Wallash, she works over at 825 00:45:38,000 --> 00:45:40,719 Speaker 1: the Daily Wire, kind of interesting, more libertarian figure, and 826 00:45:40,760 --> 00:45:42,440 Speaker 1: he again was doing the same thing. He's like, hey, 827 00:45:42,600 --> 00:45:46,240 Speaker 1: is a classic Trump trashing the one national figure who 828 00:45:46,280 --> 00:45:49,600 Speaker 1: actually would have a chance in his absence. So there 829 00:45:49,600 --> 00:45:52,400 Speaker 1: has now been you know, kind of an internacine war 830 00:45:52,560 --> 00:45:56,680 Speaker 1: online as to people turning against Trump for going after 831 00:45:56,719 --> 00:45:59,320 Speaker 1: DeSantis because they see DeSantis as a much more competent, 832 00:45:59,360 --> 00:46:02,360 Speaker 1: true figure, you know, on the national political stage. I 833 00:46:02,360 --> 00:46:05,000 Speaker 1: just thought it was a fascinating thing too. I think 834 00:46:05,080 --> 00:46:07,480 Speaker 1: in a way that this could also be driven by 835 00:46:07,480 --> 00:46:11,239 Speaker 1: Trump's insecurity as seeing DeSantis kind of rise up and 836 00:46:12,080 --> 00:46:14,480 Speaker 1: take a lot of national media attention. I mean, at 837 00:46:14,480 --> 00:46:17,759 Speaker 1: his core, that's all he cares about, his attention on him, 838 00:46:17,840 --> 00:46:21,480 Speaker 1: on himself, and you know, very very very jealously guards 839 00:46:21,760 --> 00:46:24,719 Speaker 1: his role as the number one person within the Republican 840 00:46:24,760 --> 00:46:26,959 Speaker 1: Party and his hold on the base. So there's another 841 00:46:27,080 --> 00:46:29,719 Speaker 1: element to it too. I'm just saying, yeah, I found 842 00:46:29,760 --> 00:46:32,120 Speaker 1: it all interesting. I mean, the Republican Party is very 843 00:46:32,200 --> 00:46:35,480 Speaker 1: much Trump's party if he runs he'll be the nominee, 844 00:46:36,280 --> 00:46:38,680 Speaker 1: but he is super petty, and so the fact that 845 00:46:38,719 --> 00:46:40,840 Speaker 1: Desantas even has a little bit of a toe hold 846 00:46:40,920 --> 00:46:43,920 Speaker 1: even though he's not a real threat to people like whatsoever. Yes, 847 00:46:44,400 --> 00:46:47,239 Speaker 1: I'm sure that that's definitely part of his calculus that here. 848 00:46:47,360 --> 00:46:50,120 Speaker 1: I do think your counterfactual is interesting to contemplate too, 849 00:46:50,560 --> 00:46:52,800 Speaker 1: the fact that we don't have Trump in our face 850 00:46:52,840 --> 00:46:56,040 Speaker 1: on Twitter every day reminding us how annoying and obnoxious 851 00:46:56,080 --> 00:46:59,600 Speaker 1: and awful he is routinely. That probably has helped him, 852 00:47:00,080 --> 00:47:03,319 Speaker 1: probably has put him in better position because memories have 853 00:47:03,400 --> 00:47:07,560 Speaker 1: faded and people have forgotten how like horrible and selfish 854 00:47:07,560 --> 00:47:10,319 Speaker 1: and narcissistic. Well, there's just none of the there's none 855 00:47:10,360 --> 00:47:13,480 Speaker 1: of the like Stormy Daniels as a horse face, you know, 856 00:47:13,560 --> 00:47:15,719 Speaker 1: there's none of like all that other stuff which was 857 00:47:15,800 --> 00:47:19,319 Speaker 1: intrinsic to Trump. Now whenever it, you know, whenever he 858 00:47:19,360 --> 00:47:21,880 Speaker 1: comes out, it's in a more filtered format. Most of 859 00:47:21,880 --> 00:47:25,200 Speaker 1: his statements don't get any play whatsoever. It's only in 860 00:47:25,320 --> 00:47:28,520 Speaker 1: these kind of breakout moments in which the media covers him. 861 00:47:28,800 --> 00:47:31,320 Speaker 1: And you know, with all the national tension on Biden, 862 00:47:31,560 --> 00:47:35,200 Speaker 1: then there's nothing to really compare it to so it's 863 00:47:35,239 --> 00:47:38,239 Speaker 1: it's a very fascinating thing to me that it could 864 00:47:38,280 --> 00:47:41,520 Speaker 1: be the best thing that ever happened to Trump politically, 865 00:47:42,239 --> 00:47:46,040 Speaker 1: allowing him to not remind people constantly of the most 866 00:47:46,080 --> 00:47:49,320 Speaker 1: odious and annoying parts of his personality and letting people 867 00:47:49,360 --> 00:47:52,960 Speaker 1: only remember the good times of twenty nineteen or whatever. 868 00:47:53,040 --> 00:47:56,960 Speaker 1: You know, People's consciousness and their memory changes very very quickly. 869 00:47:57,480 --> 00:48:00,200 Speaker 1: One year is an eternity in American politics. So you 870 00:48:00,200 --> 00:48:02,920 Speaker 1: put that all together and you see this. I see 871 00:48:03,200 --> 00:48:06,000 Speaker 1: a jockeying for being the top of the Republican party. 872 00:48:06,160 --> 00:48:10,040 Speaker 1: Look with a good message, undeniably of it, and just 873 00:48:10,080 --> 00:48:12,520 Speaker 1: to it makes me really think. I'm like, what would 874 00:48:12,520 --> 00:48:14,760 Speaker 1: the world look like with Donald Trump on Twitter today? 875 00:48:14,840 --> 00:48:16,439 Speaker 1: Maybe it would be a better one in some ways 876 00:48:16,440 --> 00:48:18,160 Speaker 1: and worse than others. I don't know. Yeah, we had 877 00:48:18,200 --> 00:48:21,360 Speaker 1: no idea. We'll never know. Okay, this is you found this. 878 00:48:21,719 --> 00:48:24,680 Speaker 1: I love this. Two of some of the greatest op 879 00:48:24,800 --> 00:48:28,200 Speaker 1: eds in history. We always save our we always save 880 00:48:28,440 --> 00:48:31,399 Speaker 1: the e block, the last block. Peak corporate media right here, 881 00:48:31,440 --> 00:48:35,240 Speaker 1: this is peak corporate brain media. Rot so many different 882 00:48:35,239 --> 00:48:37,799 Speaker 1: ways to describe it. Let's put these joint op eds 883 00:48:37,840 --> 00:48:40,319 Speaker 1: they dropped on the exact same day, which is kind 884 00:48:40,360 --> 00:48:43,560 Speaker 1: of amazing to me. Thomas Friedman, of the world is 885 00:48:43,600 --> 00:48:47,880 Speaker 1: flat fame, says Biden Cheney twenty twenty four, but even 886 00:48:48,000 --> 00:48:50,400 Speaker 1: worse over at the Wall Street Journal, I don't know 887 00:48:50,520 --> 00:48:56,920 Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton's twenty twenty four election comeback. Oh my god. 888 00:48:57,520 --> 00:49:00,400 Speaker 1: So let's start with this. By the way, that on 889 00:49:00,440 --> 00:49:03,480 Speaker 1: Instagram and I got a hilarious joke saying that Hillary 890 00:49:03,560 --> 00:49:05,600 Speaker 1: is on her fifth poor crux. That's for all my 891 00:49:05,640 --> 00:49:11,080 Speaker 1: Harry Potter fans out there. Look, let's go ahead and 892 00:49:11,160 --> 00:49:14,720 Speaker 1: actually consider this, right, What exactly is the Hillary argument 893 00:49:14,760 --> 00:49:17,319 Speaker 1: that they're saying here, So Doug Shown and Andrew Stein, 894 00:49:17,400 --> 00:49:20,160 Speaker 1: So they say, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have become unpopular. 895 00:49:20,440 --> 00:49:24,520 Speaker 1: It is time for a change candidate. Nothing says change 896 00:49:25,000 --> 00:49:28,920 Speaker 1: like Hillary Clinton four times a charm, folks. And the 897 00:49:29,000 --> 00:49:31,879 Speaker 1: amazing thing, though, is that the tortured logic of it 898 00:49:31,920 --> 00:49:37,120 Speaker 1: makes sense. Kamala is super unpopular. Joe Biden's poll Quinnipiac 899 00:49:37,160 --> 00:49:39,200 Speaker 1: poll just came out. He's a thirty two percent, one 900 00:49:39,200 --> 00:49:42,520 Speaker 1: of the lowest on record for a sitting American president 901 00:49:42,520 --> 00:49:45,800 Speaker 1: in his first year in office, nearing Trump territory without 902 00:49:45,840 --> 00:49:49,840 Speaker 1: any of the actual like the actual fervor of his 903 00:49:49,920 --> 00:49:52,919 Speaker 1: own base. And so they look at Kama being as 904 00:49:53,640 --> 00:49:57,640 Speaker 1: as if not more so, unpopular than Biden, and they go, Okay, well, 905 00:49:57,680 --> 00:50:01,279 Speaker 1: who's somebody who could do it? Hillary and those of 906 00:50:01,360 --> 00:50:05,040 Speaker 1: us are saying, yeah, but how much more marginally popular 907 00:50:05,680 --> 00:50:08,880 Speaker 1: is she? I mean, maybe a little bit more than Kamala, 908 00:50:09,200 --> 00:50:12,240 Speaker 1: But this is still somebody who is probably the most 909 00:50:12,239 --> 00:50:16,840 Speaker 1: odious and hated American figure in modern politics. And you 910 00:50:16,960 --> 00:50:20,680 Speaker 1: know she, yes, she literally lost. She has a routine 911 00:50:20,960 --> 00:50:26,680 Speaker 1: proof lost to the likely Republican candidate of twenty twenty four. 912 00:50:27,000 --> 00:50:29,040 Speaker 1: It says also a lot about the fact that how 913 00:50:29,040 --> 00:50:31,440 Speaker 1: do we keep putting up the same people over and 914 00:50:31,480 --> 00:50:34,160 Speaker 1: over and over? And that is a shot sign of 915 00:50:34,200 --> 00:50:38,360 Speaker 1: a stagnating republic. But the other one is also important 916 00:50:38,400 --> 00:50:42,280 Speaker 1: to understand from Thomas Friedman, because this is just pure 917 00:50:42,760 --> 00:50:47,000 Speaker 1: New York Times like neoliberal breed. Because what he's like, Well, 918 00:50:47,239 --> 00:50:51,360 Speaker 1: Liz Cheney stood up for democracy, and so Joe Biden 919 00:50:51,600 --> 00:50:54,600 Speaker 1: and Liz Cheney can team up in order to defend 920 00:50:54,840 --> 00:50:58,759 Speaker 1: democracy because this is the real right left. And you 921 00:50:58,800 --> 00:51:01,640 Speaker 1: know the point we try to make here right and 922 00:51:01,719 --> 00:51:03,759 Speaker 1: left in the way that you understood it in two 923 00:51:03,760 --> 00:51:06,760 Speaker 1: thousand and four. That does not make any goddamn sense 924 00:51:07,160 --> 00:51:10,440 Speaker 1: in the year twenty twenty two. Biden and Cheney have 925 00:51:10,560 --> 00:51:13,520 Speaker 1: a lot in common in terms of their political orientation, 926 00:51:13,840 --> 00:51:16,600 Speaker 1: in terms of their policy priorities, in terms of their 927 00:51:16,640 --> 00:51:19,319 Speaker 1: record on the war in Iraq. I mean, that's why 928 00:51:19,360 --> 00:51:22,600 Speaker 1: this block is called uniparty, because that's really what it is. 929 00:51:22,960 --> 00:51:25,600 Speaker 1: If you look at the institutional interests of Washington that 930 00:51:25,640 --> 00:51:28,360 Speaker 1: the two of them seem to represent, there is not 931 00:51:28,480 --> 00:51:31,960 Speaker 1: a lot of difference between the two and you look 932 00:51:32,000 --> 00:51:35,000 Speaker 1: at the brain of the pundits, and this is how 933 00:51:35,040 --> 00:51:41,400 Speaker 1: they grapple with the idea of Biden losing popularity amongst 934 00:51:41,400 --> 00:51:45,000 Speaker 1: the American people. They cannot tell you why Biden is unpopular, 935 00:51:45,280 --> 00:51:48,680 Speaker 1: and the story of why informs what you want to 936 00:51:48,719 --> 00:51:51,840 Speaker 1: do in order to correct it. The idea that a 937 00:51:52,120 --> 00:51:56,839 Speaker 1: Cheney would be the savior of democracy, that's also that 938 00:51:56,840 --> 00:52:00,680 Speaker 1: that's the real left right divide is also complete nonsense, 939 00:52:00,800 --> 00:52:04,840 Speaker 1: and that you know, it's actually useful op ed because 940 00:52:04,880 --> 00:52:08,240 Speaker 1: this is the ideology of liberal elites at this point. 941 00:52:08,280 --> 00:52:10,520 Speaker 1: That's how they're able to make common cause with someone 942 00:52:10,600 --> 00:52:14,240 Speaker 1: like Liz Chaney and put aside all of the totally abhorrent, 943 00:52:14,719 --> 00:52:19,640 Speaker 1: you know, militaristic tendencies of her and you know record 944 00:52:19,719 --> 00:52:21,560 Speaker 1: of her father and all of that, and say, oh, 945 00:52:21,640 --> 00:52:23,720 Speaker 1: this is a hero, This is someone we should embrace, 946 00:52:23,760 --> 00:52:25,719 Speaker 1: This is someone we should make common cause with. This 947 00:52:25,760 --> 00:52:27,760 Speaker 1: is how you end up with, you know, Nicole Wallace 948 00:52:28,120 --> 00:52:31,719 Speaker 1: as one of the top liberal stars on MSNBC. This 949 00:52:31,760 --> 00:52:33,560 Speaker 1: is how you end up with all of these like 950 00:52:33,760 --> 00:52:39,279 Speaker 1: FBI CIA types being given cushy contracts because what are 951 00:52:39,280 --> 00:52:42,000 Speaker 1: they gonna what are they going to stand for making 952 00:52:42,040 --> 00:52:45,600 Speaker 1: more speeches about January sixth. That's what you really think, 953 00:52:45,680 --> 00:52:48,560 Speaker 1: like the Democratic Party needs right now. They think is 954 00:52:48,840 --> 00:52:51,719 Speaker 1: to you know, to double down on January sixth and 955 00:52:52,440 --> 00:52:55,560 Speaker 1: voting rights, which is just like a debate about process. Effectively, 956 00:52:55,640 --> 00:52:57,840 Speaker 1: I support it, it's fine, but if you're just arguing 957 00:52:57,920 --> 00:53:00,560 Speaker 1: about like the mechanics of the process, you're not even 958 00:53:00,600 --> 00:53:06,320 Speaker 1: really playing the game. So it exposes the true way 959 00:53:06,400 --> 00:53:09,560 Speaker 1: that they think about the country and the type of divide, 960 00:53:10,160 --> 00:53:13,120 Speaker 1: the type of deviceive politics that they want, and it's 961 00:53:13,160 --> 00:53:16,200 Speaker 1: a type that maintains everything as bad as it is, 962 00:53:16,680 --> 00:53:22,760 Speaker 1: but offers more Lin Manuel Miranda show tunes, more Kneeling 963 00:53:22,760 --> 00:53:27,280 Speaker 1: and Ken take Cloth more one sixth denunciation, which ultimately 964 00:53:27,280 --> 00:53:30,879 Speaker 1: doesn't threaten, you know, threaten the livelihoods or the lifestyles 965 00:53:30,920 --> 00:53:34,439 Speaker 1: of the elite class and allows them to feel good 966 00:53:34,480 --> 00:53:37,120 Speaker 1: and virtuous about themselves, feel like they're doing the right 967 00:53:37,160 --> 00:53:38,960 Speaker 1: they feel like they're on the right side of history, 968 00:53:39,400 --> 00:53:44,759 Speaker 1: without actually being committed to effectuating a single change on 969 00:53:44,880 --> 00:53:47,719 Speaker 1: the Hillary thing. Yes, So I was actually debating with 970 00:53:47,800 --> 00:53:50,399 Speaker 1: Kyle a little bit about this. He was like, well, 971 00:53:50,440 --> 00:53:53,239 Speaker 1: he was like, I'm starting to believe that this is 972 00:53:53,239 --> 00:53:57,040 Speaker 1: a real possibility because the case he laid out to 973 00:53:57,080 --> 00:54:01,279 Speaker 1: me is basically like, because I think she's gonna want 974 00:54:01,600 --> 00:54:05,640 Speaker 1: a rematch with Trump, yeah, and the political circle around 975 00:54:05,640 --> 00:54:09,920 Speaker 1: her has vested like personal financial interest in continuing, you know, 976 00:54:10,040 --> 00:54:13,760 Speaker 1: continuing the dream, and that the Democratic Party is stupid 977 00:54:13,880 --> 00:54:15,640 Speaker 1: enough to think that this could be a sort of 978 00:54:15,719 --> 00:54:19,560 Speaker 1: unifying candidate, and the other candidates are totally total failures 979 00:54:19,560 --> 00:54:22,200 Speaker 1: and obviously unpopular. So he was like, you know, I 980 00:54:22,200 --> 00:54:25,160 Speaker 1: think she really may be actually thinking about it. I 981 00:54:25,280 --> 00:54:28,920 Speaker 1: just I just can't you know. The biggest to me, 982 00:54:29,760 --> 00:54:31,959 Speaker 1: I want to say, I can't believe the Democratic Party 983 00:54:32,000 --> 00:54:34,680 Speaker 1: is stupid enough to do this, but oh I can 984 00:54:34,719 --> 00:54:37,960 Speaker 1: believe that actually, yeah, I think the biggest problem for 985 00:54:38,080 --> 00:54:41,000 Speaker 1: her is that her fan base would be the type 986 00:54:41,000 --> 00:54:43,760 Speaker 1: that would say, how can you push aside the first 987 00:54:43,800 --> 00:54:46,839 Speaker 1: woman of color vice president. I think for her that 988 00:54:46,880 --> 00:54:50,440 Speaker 1: would be a real stumbling block and very difficult to overcome, 989 00:54:50,800 --> 00:54:53,640 Speaker 1: which would make her a divisive figure even among her 990 00:54:53,680 --> 00:54:57,440 Speaker 1: own like sort of most hardcore lib fans in the 991 00:54:57,480 --> 00:54:59,600 Speaker 1: Democratic base. Yeah, I think you're right. You know, it's 992 00:54:59,640 --> 00:55:02,759 Speaker 1: just the the entire thing is, I don't see how 993 00:55:02,880 --> 00:55:06,799 Speaker 1: it could happen. That being said, it's more of vidicative 994 00:55:06,880 --> 00:55:09,080 Speaker 1: of the mindset from which they are now going to 995 00:55:09,160 --> 00:55:13,480 Speaker 1: try and find whoever it does come to ultimately replace Biden, 996 00:55:13,560 --> 00:55:16,239 Speaker 1: be it twenty twenty four or be it twenty twenty eight. 997 00:55:16,680 --> 00:55:18,799 Speaker 1: This is the brain which leads you to say Pete 998 00:55:18,840 --> 00:55:21,400 Speaker 1: Budhajeddge is the person to save. I think they the 999 00:55:21,520 --> 00:55:25,200 Speaker 1: Democratic Party. I agree. I agree, And we're gonna for 1000 00:55:25,320 --> 00:55:28,040 Speaker 1: tomorrow we're gonna be talking to a daily poster about 1001 00:55:28,239 --> 00:55:30,239 Speaker 1: the millions of dollars of dark money. I mean, there 1002 00:55:30,239 --> 00:55:33,640 Speaker 1: are donors who are really behind this guy, their imaginations, 1003 00:55:33,680 --> 00:55:35,600 Speaker 1: behind the scene. I mean the challenge for him too, 1004 00:55:35,680 --> 00:55:40,680 Speaker 1: is how do you displace the first black woman vice president? 1005 00:55:40,719 --> 00:55:42,759 Speaker 1: I mean that Listen, if you I love that he's 1006 00:55:42,800 --> 00:55:46,120 Speaker 1: in this predicament, well that's what you lean hard into. 1007 00:55:46,160 --> 00:55:50,640 Speaker 1: This just totally hollow, shallow, content free identity politics, and 1008 00:55:50,680 --> 00:55:52,600 Speaker 1: it can get weaponized right back at you. And so 1009 00:55:52,719 --> 00:55:54,840 Speaker 1: I think that's the conundrum that he's going to find 1010 00:55:55,160 --> 00:55:58,080 Speaker 1: himself in. That being said, Democratic Party has you know, 1011 00:55:58,200 --> 00:56:01,680 Speaker 1: ways of moving people aside and strong arming, especially someone 1012 00:56:01,719 --> 00:56:05,560 Speaker 1: like Kamala who ultimately is like her only relevance comes 1013 00:56:05,600 --> 00:56:09,120 Speaker 1: from her proximity and power within the Democratic Party, So 1014 00:56:09,160 --> 00:56:11,160 Speaker 1: she's going to be reluctant to go against them or 1015 00:56:11,239 --> 00:56:13,920 Speaker 1: like say anything negative about them in any sense. I 1016 00:56:13,920 --> 00:56:15,759 Speaker 1: think it still has to be karm law. I don't 1017 00:56:15,760 --> 00:56:17,680 Speaker 1: see a way that it can't be. It has to 1018 00:56:17,719 --> 00:56:20,440 Speaker 1: be hers. It's hers for the taking. The Democrats are 1019 00:56:20,480 --> 00:56:22,960 Speaker 1: just too cowardly in the elite in order to say anything, 1020 00:56:23,239 --> 00:56:25,520 Speaker 1: and they're just too susceptible to the attack that they're 1021 00:56:25,560 --> 00:56:29,400 Speaker 1: stopping a black woman from accusing from achieving her dreams. 1022 00:56:29,440 --> 00:56:31,120 Speaker 1: So that is just going to be it's the most 1023 00:56:31,120 --> 00:56:35,839 Speaker 1: politically powerful force amongst elites as accusations of racism, and 1024 00:56:36,120 --> 00:56:39,000 Speaker 1: that is going to be something that is weaponized to 1025 00:56:39,040 --> 00:56:41,920 Speaker 1: the extent that you have never even seen anybody who 1026 00:56:41,960 --> 00:56:44,839 Speaker 1: questions it is going to be accused of, you know, 1027 00:56:44,920 --> 00:56:47,560 Speaker 1: of some of the most heinous things, and that is 1028 00:56:47,560 --> 00:56:50,160 Speaker 1: going to then lead to her losing in a proportion 1029 00:56:50,440 --> 00:56:53,240 Speaker 1: of which the likes of which we have not seen 1030 00:56:53,880 --> 00:56:57,560 Speaker 1: in almost a century dr level blowout. It's going to 1031 00:56:57,600 --> 00:57:01,279 Speaker 1: be bad, and they will embrace her even knowing that, Yeah, 1032 00:57:01,320 --> 00:57:04,160 Speaker 1: they will because because they're cowards, Because they're cowards, because 1033 00:57:04,440 --> 00:57:09,239 Speaker 1: to them, signaling their personal virtue is way more important 1034 00:57:09,239 --> 00:57:13,080 Speaker 1: than achieving power, or certainly achieving power and actually doing 1035 00:57:13,120 --> 00:57:16,080 Speaker 1: something with it. So I think you have a good 1036 00:57:16,080 --> 00:57:18,040 Speaker 1: point there. It's going to be it's going to be. 1037 00:57:18,360 --> 00:57:20,480 Speaker 1: It's going to be kamala, guys. It'll be fun to watch, 1038 00:57:20,640 --> 00:57:24,760 Speaker 1: very likely, it'll be fun to watch. All right, Sager, 1039 00:57:24,800 --> 00:57:26,600 Speaker 1: what are you looking at? Well? As you all know, 1040 00:57:26,720 --> 00:57:28,560 Speaker 1: something I keep a close eye on here at breaking 1041 00:57:28,600 --> 00:57:31,600 Speaker 1: points is how corporate America has become fully ensnared with 1042 00:57:31,640 --> 00:57:35,480 Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party. That ensnarement is almost complete in 1043 00:57:35,520 --> 00:57:39,520 Speaker 1: the areas of finance and manufacturing, where our industrial capitalists 1044 00:57:39,560 --> 00:57:42,600 Speaker 1: were happy to loot their own domestic enterprises in exchange 1045 00:57:42,600 --> 00:57:45,760 Speaker 1: for big payoffs from Beijing. Now that transfer of wealth 1046 00:57:45,880 --> 00:57:48,480 Speaker 1: is by and large complete, the best we can do 1047 00:57:48,600 --> 00:57:50,920 Speaker 1: is put a final end to it. But the area 1048 00:57:50,960 --> 00:57:54,320 Speaker 1: where I remain most concerned is on technologies of the future. 1049 00:57:54,560 --> 00:57:57,320 Speaker 1: That's why I pay a lot of attention to Elon Musk. Now. 1050 00:57:57,320 --> 00:57:59,640 Speaker 1: It is because of my respect and admiration for the 1051 00:57:59,680 --> 00:58:02,840 Speaker 1: company that Musk has built to prominence that he deserves 1052 00:58:03,040 --> 00:58:05,080 Speaker 1: the scrutiny that I'm about to give him. I have 1053 00:58:05,200 --> 00:58:08,120 Speaker 1: detailed in the past how intertwined Elon has become to 1054 00:58:08,200 --> 00:58:10,680 Speaker 1: the Chinese regime, but one of the latest moves by 1055 00:58:10,680 --> 00:58:13,640 Speaker 1: his company, Tesla, shows just how much he's decided to 1056 00:58:13,680 --> 00:58:17,320 Speaker 1: cast his lot with the foreign adversary. Tesla announced last 1057 00:58:17,360 --> 00:58:20,120 Speaker 1: week that it would open a showroom in Jinjang Province 1058 00:58:20,160 --> 00:58:23,320 Speaker 1: of China, now the very site of the worst atrocities 1059 00:58:23,480 --> 00:58:27,040 Speaker 1: within China towards its ethnic Weager minority. Now, you make 1060 00:58:27,080 --> 00:58:29,480 Speaker 1: no mistake, this was not done out of the growing 1061 00:58:29,560 --> 00:58:33,560 Speaker 1: customer base for Tesla in Jinjang, but as an explicit 1062 00:58:33,760 --> 00:58:37,160 Speaker 1: mark of faith by Tesla to the Chinese regime at 1063 00:58:37,160 --> 00:58:40,480 Speaker 1: this critical turning point. Let me explain. In recent days, 1064 00:58:40,480 --> 00:58:42,560 Speaker 1: the House of Representatives in the Senate have passed a 1065 00:58:42,600 --> 00:58:45,560 Speaker 1: bill banning imports to the United States of any product 1066 00:58:45,560 --> 00:58:48,720 Speaker 1: made in Jinjiang Province by Chinese slave labor. Primarily it 1067 00:58:48,760 --> 00:58:51,880 Speaker 1: applies to cotton. Now over the past two years, Western 1068 00:58:51,880 --> 00:58:55,600 Speaker 1: companies have come under major governmental pressure to ensure the 1069 00:58:55,600 --> 00:58:59,160 Speaker 1: integrity of their supply chain, leading brands like Nike, h 1070 00:58:59,200 --> 00:59:03,080 Speaker 1: and M, Walmart and Intel to expressly assure shareholders and 1071 00:59:03,120 --> 00:59:07,280 Speaker 1: regulators they have no connection to Jinjang Province. This has 1072 00:59:07,320 --> 00:59:12,360 Speaker 1: provoked massive backlash in Beijing, who use their massive hold 1073 00:59:12,640 --> 00:59:15,880 Speaker 1: over American companies to try and compel their speech in 1074 00:59:15,920 --> 00:59:19,040 Speaker 1: the other direction. In effect, they have brought their regime 1075 00:59:19,080 --> 00:59:22,720 Speaker 1: of political censorship to our shores in addition to their own. 1076 00:59:23,440 --> 00:59:27,200 Speaker 1: Now certain companies who are shameless have seen there's actually 1077 00:59:27,240 --> 00:59:30,080 Speaker 1: a lot of profit to be made in embracing slave labor. 1078 00:59:30,320 --> 00:59:32,960 Speaker 1: Like Hugo Boss out of Germany, who once made uniforms 1079 00:59:33,000 --> 00:59:37,360 Speaker 1: for the Naziss, They proudly proclaim they buy Jinjang cotton, 1080 00:59:37,640 --> 00:59:41,400 Speaker 1: and Tesla on New Year's Eve opened its showroom there 1081 00:59:41,640 --> 00:59:45,240 Speaker 1: to send the same message, which is we stand with 1082 00:59:45,280 --> 00:59:48,640 Speaker 1: you Chinese Communist Party. It was the ultimate act of 1083 00:59:48,680 --> 00:59:51,400 Speaker 1: fealty to the Chinese government, who, as I have detailed 1084 00:59:51,440 --> 00:59:55,560 Speaker 1: here have ruthlessly captured and exploited Tesla in their country 1085 00:59:55,640 --> 00:59:59,520 Speaker 1: to build up domestic manufacturing. Elon gets filthy rich, they 1086 00:59:59,520 --> 01:00:02,840 Speaker 1: get the sup Apply chain. Everybody wins, except for America. 1087 01:00:03,000 --> 01:00:05,840 Speaker 1: But what's particularly gross about this is how much it 1088 01:00:05,880 --> 01:00:08,960 Speaker 1: shows that Elon's bad boy image here at home is 1089 01:00:09,120 --> 01:00:12,280 Speaker 1: mostly an act actually born of the freedom that he 1090 01:00:13,360 --> 01:00:16,880 Speaker 1: was given in his adopted country. Elon likes to tweet 1091 01:00:16,880 --> 01:00:19,520 Speaker 1: irreverently its senators. He likes to say the government here 1092 01:00:19,560 --> 01:00:22,560 Speaker 1: in the US is useless and a terrible allocator of capital, 1093 01:00:22,800 --> 01:00:26,480 Speaker 1: and yet at the exact same time he cowtows to 1094 01:00:26,560 --> 01:00:30,960 Speaker 1: a foreign government who tolerates no dissent. Elon must Tesla 1095 01:00:31,080 --> 01:00:34,480 Speaker 1: put electric vehicles on the map, probably two decades before 1096 01:00:34,480 --> 01:00:37,120 Speaker 1: they would have emerged naturally. It was a stunning effort 1097 01:00:37,200 --> 01:00:41,800 Speaker 1: in moving humanity forward, and by letting his company get 1098 01:00:41,840 --> 01:00:45,520 Speaker 1: co opted by that foreign government and worse, controlled by them, 1099 01:00:45,800 --> 01:00:49,120 Speaker 1: we as Americans have to ensure our integrity and access 1100 01:00:49,240 --> 01:00:51,720 Speaker 1: to what will be a major contest of the future. 1101 01:00:51,960 --> 01:00:54,520 Speaker 1: But electric vehicles aren't the only area in which Elon 1102 01:00:54,560 --> 01:00:58,520 Speaker 1: has moved the ball. He's revolutionized revolutionized space technology, and 1103 01:00:58,560 --> 01:01:01,920 Speaker 1: he has given how much NASA has gone woke right now, 1104 01:01:02,120 --> 01:01:03,960 Speaker 1: and right now they care more about putting a woman 1105 01:01:04,000 --> 01:01:06,520 Speaker 1: in space than actually putting a human on Mars. He 1106 01:01:06,720 --> 01:01:10,440 Speaker 1: is likely our best shot at interplanetary travel in my lifetime. 1107 01:01:10,760 --> 01:01:13,920 Speaker 1: This again is a major problem. If the Chinese can 1108 01:01:13,960 --> 01:01:17,440 Speaker 1: squeeze Elon through his Tesla ownership and a huge portion 1109 01:01:17,480 --> 01:01:19,480 Speaker 1: of his net worth, does that mean that they can 1110 01:01:19,520 --> 01:01:22,640 Speaker 1: now control one of our national champions in the space domain. 1111 01:01:22,880 --> 01:01:26,240 Speaker 1: The answer is actually yes, and already we see tensions 1112 01:01:26,240 --> 01:01:29,720 Speaker 1: bubbling to the surface. The Chinese government recently complained that 1113 01:01:29,760 --> 01:01:33,720 Speaker 1: two SpaceX satellites came too close to Chinese astronauts while 1114 01:01:33,760 --> 01:01:36,960 Speaker 1: in space, and critically the Chinese messaged the story at 1115 01:01:36,960 --> 01:01:39,920 Speaker 1: home saying that SpaceX and its Starlink efforts were to 1116 01:01:39,960 --> 01:01:42,160 Speaker 1: provide high speed which is to provide high speed internet 1117 01:01:42,160 --> 01:01:45,240 Speaker 1: across the globe is part of a US rogue project, 1118 01:01:45,400 --> 01:01:48,920 Speaker 1: that the US was monopolizing the space race. In other words, 1119 01:01:49,000 --> 01:01:52,400 Speaker 1: the Chinese are upset which Starlink and with SpaceX, which 1120 01:01:52,440 --> 01:01:55,480 Speaker 1: is controlled by Elon. Now while they use their leverage 1121 01:01:55,760 --> 01:01:59,520 Speaker 1: over into the Tesla manufacturing supply chain of huge supply 1122 01:01:59,640 --> 01:02:02,920 Speaker 1: that is, vehicles to compel change in another area, what 1123 01:02:03,000 --> 01:02:05,400 Speaker 1: happens in the space race between China and the United 1124 01:02:05,440 --> 01:02:07,880 Speaker 1: States from Mars when the US relies right now on 1125 01:02:07,960 --> 01:02:11,200 Speaker 1: Elon's company just to get us into space. What happens 1126 01:02:11,200 --> 01:02:13,280 Speaker 1: if we want to become a nation of electric drivers? 1127 01:02:13,400 --> 01:02:15,680 Speaker 1: Can we even do such a thing if our flagship 1128 01:02:15,760 --> 01:02:18,520 Speaker 1: company works for another government over the interests of the 1129 01:02:18,520 --> 01:02:21,400 Speaker 1: citizens from where that company was born and is based. 1130 01:02:21,680 --> 01:02:24,960 Speaker 1: These are all great questions that Elon doesn't want to answer. 1131 01:02:25,160 --> 01:02:27,120 Speaker 1: I again say this as somebody who is a fan 1132 01:02:27,160 --> 01:02:29,800 Speaker 1: of him and respects him. But I respect the country 1133 01:02:29,880 --> 01:02:32,680 Speaker 1: that Musk built much more than Musk himself. And it 1134 01:02:32,720 --> 01:02:36,520 Speaker 1: has become clear that the Chinese impression that Elon is 1135 01:02:36,560 --> 01:02:40,000 Speaker 1: a rootless cosmopolitan who cares more about making money than 1136 01:02:40,080 --> 01:02:44,160 Speaker 1: patriotism could be very well true. And the solution is simple. 1137 01:02:44,320 --> 01:02:47,040 Speaker 1: I've outlined it here for every business, not just Elon. 1138 01:02:47,320 --> 01:02:49,760 Speaker 1: Let's just make the choice for him. I believe in 1139 01:02:49,760 --> 01:02:52,320 Speaker 1: the Elon Electric future. I also believe the control of 1140 01:02:52,360 --> 01:02:55,560 Speaker 1: that future lies with supply chains. So mandate Elon do 1141 01:02:55,880 --> 01:02:58,120 Speaker 1: what he did in China, that he make his business 1142 01:02:58,160 --> 01:03:01,240 Speaker 1: decisions at the political He cannot make political decisions at 1143 01:03:01,280 --> 01:03:04,520 Speaker 1: the behest of a foreign adversary, or he loses his 1144 01:03:04,520 --> 01:03:08,400 Speaker 1: security clearance and access to lucrative government contracts. In effect, 1145 01:03:08,640 --> 01:03:10,800 Speaker 1: he's got to choose. You can have it both ways. 1146 01:03:10,800 --> 01:03:13,280 Speaker 1: In the twenty first century, we made this mistake once 1147 01:03:13,320 --> 01:03:15,920 Speaker 1: when it came to manufacturing and finance. Look where it 1148 01:03:15,960 --> 01:03:18,080 Speaker 1: got us. To win the future, we have to at 1149 01:03:18,160 --> 01:03:19,840 Speaker 1: least make sure that we have a say in it. 1150 01:03:20,000 --> 01:03:22,080 Speaker 1: And it is time to say that that is clear 1151 01:03:22,160 --> 01:03:24,280 Speaker 1: when it comes to mister Elon Musk. I mean it's 1152 01:03:24,320 --> 01:03:26,680 Speaker 1: pretty clear, Crystal, what he's doing here. And I think 1153 01:03:26,680 --> 01:03:28,960 Speaker 1: what pisss me off the most is the whole bad 1154 01:03:29,680 --> 01:03:32,560 Speaker 1: And if you want to hear my reaction to Sager's monologue, 1155 01:03:32,640 --> 01:03:38,880 Speaker 1: become a premium subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot Com. Crystal, 1156 01:03:38,960 --> 01:03:40,480 Speaker 1: what are you taking a look at? Well, guys, As 1157 01:03:40,480 --> 01:03:42,880 Speaker 1: we discussed, we've just got some new inflation numbers and 1158 01:03:42,960 --> 01:03:46,320 Speaker 1: they are pretty rough. In twenty twenty one, annually inflation 1159 01:03:46,440 --> 01:03:50,800 Speaker 1: spiked seven percent. That's the steepest rise since nineteen eighty two. Energy, cars, 1160 01:03:50,800 --> 01:03:53,400 Speaker 1: food prices, those all led the way for price spikes 1161 01:03:53,400 --> 01:03:55,440 Speaker 1: in that year, All things with a whole lot of 1162 01:03:55,480 --> 01:03:58,800 Speaker 1: relevance to your average American, a whole lot of Americans 1163 01:03:58,840 --> 01:04:02,600 Speaker 1: surveying this chaotically andscape of wage increases, low unemployment on 1164 01:04:02,600 --> 01:04:05,320 Speaker 1: one hand, but price spikes and empty shelves on the other, 1165 01:04:05,720 --> 01:04:09,320 Speaker 1: they believe we could be headed into another recession. In fact, 1166 01:04:09,400 --> 01:04:12,680 Speaker 1: a new poll found that a stunning seventy five percent 1167 01:04:12,800 --> 01:04:15,960 Speaker 1: of Americans believe that we will enter into a recession 1168 01:04:15,960 --> 01:04:18,880 Speaker 1: in the next twelve months. That includes thirty three percent, 1169 01:04:18,920 --> 01:04:21,600 Speaker 1: so a third of Americans who said that outcome is 1170 01:04:21,880 --> 01:04:25,400 Speaker 1: very likely. Now, the Biden administration wants to convince these 1171 01:04:25,440 --> 01:04:29,000 Speaker 1: Americans that they're crazy and actually everything's really great. After all, 1172 01:04:29,080 --> 01:04:31,840 Speaker 1: look at the stock market, it's soaring. But there's some 1173 01:04:31,840 --> 01:04:34,480 Speaker 1: pretty good reasons to believe that the American people kind 1174 01:04:34,480 --> 01:04:37,320 Speaker 1: of onto something when they see troubled economic waters ahead 1175 01:04:37,400 --> 01:04:40,800 Speaker 1: for twenty twenty two, and to really understand how the 1176 01:04:40,880 --> 01:04:44,720 Speaker 1: year is likely to unfold, don't listen to the White House. Instead, 1177 01:04:45,000 --> 01:04:47,720 Speaker 1: listen to the Fed. You see Jerome Palace. FED is 1178 01:04:47,840 --> 01:04:50,960 Speaker 1: in an extraordinarily tricky position right now, one that is 1179 01:04:51,000 --> 01:04:53,560 Speaker 1: explained in detail in Christopher Leonard's new book, The Lords 1180 01:04:53,600 --> 01:04:56,200 Speaker 1: of Easy Money. We just interviewed him on Crystal Kyle 1181 01:04:56,200 --> 01:04:58,680 Speaker 1: and Friends. I highly recommend both that conversation and the 1182 01:04:58,680 --> 01:05:02,200 Speaker 1: book itself to you. But the extremely simplified version of 1183 01:05:02,240 --> 01:05:04,840 Speaker 1: the problem is this, The FED since the two thousand 1184 01:05:04,840 --> 01:05:07,800 Speaker 1: and eight financial crash has engaged in truly historic and 1185 01:05:07,960 --> 01:05:12,120 Speaker 1: unprecedented behavior, pumping trillions into the stock and into the 1186 01:05:12,120 --> 01:05:14,920 Speaker 1: bond markets at the same time that they kept interest 1187 01:05:14,960 --> 01:05:17,680 Speaker 1: rates at zero or very close to zero. Now, this 1188 01:05:17,800 --> 01:05:20,919 Speaker 1: easy money did not spread evenly across the economy, though 1189 01:05:21,280 --> 01:05:24,280 Speaker 1: not even close. Instead, it went where the FED could 1190 01:05:24,320 --> 01:05:26,919 Speaker 1: put it, which is to the very top. Remember these 1191 01:05:26,960 --> 01:05:30,440 Speaker 1: headlines from a year or so ago. Market edges towards 1192 01:05:30,440 --> 01:05:35,080 Speaker 1: euphoria despite pandemic's toll. America got a huge lesson in 1193 01:05:35,320 --> 01:05:37,760 Speaker 1: just how fake the stock market really was when they 1194 01:05:37,760 --> 01:05:41,120 Speaker 1: were watching the destruction, desperation, and job loss in their 1195 01:05:41,160 --> 01:05:44,320 Speaker 1: own lives unfold against the split screen reality of a 1196 01:05:44,360 --> 01:05:48,720 Speaker 1: stock market breaking record after record after record. Well, the 1197 01:05:48,760 --> 01:05:52,720 Speaker 1: Fed's extraordinary and unprecedented moves were a big part of 1198 01:05:52,760 --> 01:05:56,040 Speaker 1: that very perplexing story. They shot a money cannon at 1199 01:05:56,080 --> 01:05:59,320 Speaker 1: Wall Street while Congress pissed down a small trickle for 1200 01:05:59,360 --> 01:06:01,520 Speaker 1: the rest of us. Take a look at this chart 1201 01:06:01,520 --> 01:06:02,720 Speaker 1: and you can get a bit of the sense of 1202 01:06:02,760 --> 01:06:05,360 Speaker 1: the scale of FED action. That we are talking about here. 1203 01:06:05,880 --> 01:06:08,240 Speaker 1: This is a graph of the fed's balance sheet. That's 1204 01:06:08,440 --> 01:06:10,680 Speaker 1: just a way of tracking how much money the FED 1205 01:06:10,720 --> 01:06:13,400 Speaker 1: pumped into the pockets of rich people through something called 1206 01:06:13,480 --> 01:06:16,280 Speaker 1: quantitative easy. In two thousand and five, that balance sheet 1207 01:06:16,320 --> 01:06:18,120 Speaker 1: looks more or less the way it has looked the 1208 01:06:18,240 --> 01:06:21,680 Speaker 1: entire FED history. Then there's a big jump starts in 1209 01:06:21,720 --> 01:06:24,240 Speaker 1: two thousand and nine, continues to about twenty fifteen. Those 1210 01:06:24,320 --> 01:06:27,800 Speaker 1: numbers stabilize, they even slowly decline a little bit before 1211 01:06:27,840 --> 01:06:31,480 Speaker 1: shooting skyward like a rocket during the pandemic. Bringing us 1212 01:06:31,480 --> 01:06:33,800 Speaker 1: to the present day and the landscape that is now 1213 01:06:33,880 --> 01:06:37,600 Speaker 1: facing Jerome Powell's Fed. To make things even easier to understand, 1214 01:06:37,920 --> 01:06:41,400 Speaker 1: really what that graph is, it's charting socialism for the rich. Now, 1215 01:06:41,440 --> 01:06:43,760 Speaker 1: the FED has to decide if it's going to continue, 1216 01:06:43,840 --> 01:06:47,480 Speaker 1: and with inflation spiking to extraordinary levels, Jerome Powell is 1217 01:06:47,520 --> 01:06:50,400 Speaker 1: stating pretty clearly that the free money party is about 1218 01:06:50,440 --> 01:06:53,360 Speaker 1: to stop. Now. In one sense, that's actually good, because 1219 01:06:53,400 --> 01:06:56,320 Speaker 1: these policies have massively spiked in equality and they have 1220 01:06:56,400 --> 01:07:00,000 Speaker 1: ultimately done damage to working class people. Here's the fear, though, 1221 01:07:00,400 --> 01:07:03,000 Speaker 1: Christopher Leonard and other analysts believe that all of that 1222 01:07:03,040 --> 01:07:06,240 Speaker 1: FED money has created huge asset bubbles. Asset bubbles are 1223 01:07:06,240 --> 01:07:09,479 Speaker 1: what happens when investors buy up stocks, bonds, properties, things 1224 01:07:09,520 --> 01:07:12,920 Speaker 1: like that, bidding up prices based not on those assets 1225 01:07:13,000 --> 01:07:16,320 Speaker 1: underlying value, but on the logic that since prices have 1226 01:07:16,360 --> 01:07:18,120 Speaker 1: been going up in the past, they are likely to 1227 01:07:18,200 --> 01:07:20,920 Speaker 1: continue going up in the future. Asset bubbles have a 1228 01:07:21,000 --> 01:07:23,200 Speaker 1: kind of logic of their own. They're a feedback loop 1229 01:07:23,200 --> 01:07:27,240 Speaker 1: where past price increases fuel speculation on future price increases, 1230 01:07:27,480 --> 01:07:29,240 Speaker 1: which is all well and good, I suppose, until the 1231 01:07:29,320 --> 01:07:33,080 Speaker 1: music stops. Then the exact reverse dynamic takes hold. Speculators 1232 01:07:33,120 --> 01:07:35,840 Speaker 1: believe that prices will fall, so they start selling. That 1233 01:07:35,880 --> 01:07:38,439 Speaker 1: causes prices to fall even more, which leads to even 1234 01:07:38,440 --> 01:07:41,280 Speaker 1: more selling. And while regular people may not have benefited 1235 01:07:41,360 --> 01:07:43,880 Speaker 1: much from the fed's asset bubbles while they were being inflated, 1236 01:07:44,200 --> 01:07:47,640 Speaker 1: they sure as hell get hurt badly when those same 1237 01:07:47,680 --> 01:07:50,920 Speaker 1: bubbles burst, throwing the economy into a recession. With no 1238 01:07:50,960 --> 01:07:53,280 Speaker 1: further than the dot com bubble burst or the housing 1239 01:07:53,360 --> 01:07:56,680 Speaker 1: bubble bursts to understand the profound pain and damage inflicted 1240 01:07:56,840 --> 01:08:00,600 Speaker 1: on regular folks when asset bubbles burst. So that is 1241 01:08:00,640 --> 01:08:03,280 Speaker 1: the context for understanding what FED shared drowne Palace hinting 1242 01:08:03,280 --> 01:08:06,280 Speaker 1: at this week With his most recent comments, Inflation concerns 1243 01:08:06,280 --> 01:08:09,240 Speaker 1: have led pal to signal pretty clearly that he plans 1244 01:08:09,280 --> 01:08:11,480 Speaker 1: to put the brakes on in a major way over 1245 01:08:11,520 --> 01:08:13,920 Speaker 1: the next year. Most of the coverage of pals commons 1246 01:08:13,960 --> 01:08:16,559 Speaker 1: focused on the feds long expected intent to hike interest 1247 01:08:16,640 --> 01:08:19,000 Speaker 1: rates three or four times over the coming year. But 1248 01:08:19,040 --> 01:08:21,240 Speaker 1: what you should really focus on is what the Fed 1249 01:08:21,280 --> 01:08:23,280 Speaker 1: is going to do about all of those assets they 1250 01:08:23,360 --> 01:08:25,360 Speaker 1: put on their balance sheet while they were funneling money 1251 01:08:25,360 --> 01:08:28,679 Speaker 1: to the top one percent. Take a listen. The economy 1252 01:08:28,720 --> 01:08:33,880 Speaker 1: no longer needs or wants the very highly accommodative policies 1253 01:08:33,880 --> 01:08:35,919 Speaker 1: that we've had in place to deal with the pandemic 1254 01:08:35,960 --> 01:08:39,639 Speaker 1: and the aftermath. So that's what that's really about. We're 1255 01:08:39,680 --> 01:08:42,080 Speaker 1: really just going to be moving over the course of 1256 01:08:42,080 --> 01:08:46,200 Speaker 1: this year to a policy that is closer to normal, 1257 01:08:46,240 --> 01:08:48,479 Speaker 1: but it's a long road to normal from where we are. 1258 01:08:50,240 --> 01:08:52,840 Speaker 1: When mal talks about a long road to normal, he's 1259 01:08:52,880 --> 01:08:55,920 Speaker 1: talking about that massive balance sheet that needs unwinding. What's more, 1260 01:08:56,080 --> 01:08:58,000 Speaker 1: he went on to say that this process should happen 1261 01:08:58,080 --> 01:09:01,519 Speaker 1: quote sooner and faster. That much is clear. In other words, 1262 01:09:01,560 --> 01:09:03,040 Speaker 1: the FED is claiming that it might be time to 1263 01:09:03,040 --> 01:09:05,120 Speaker 1: pay the piper, and Americans are right to believe we 1264 01:09:05,160 --> 01:09:08,280 Speaker 1: are entering right now very dangerous territory because too much 1265 01:09:08,360 --> 01:09:11,719 Speaker 1: unwindinged and too fast could easily trigger a recession, popping 1266 01:09:11,800 --> 01:09:14,360 Speaker 1: those asset bubbles rend and slowly letting the air out. 1267 01:09:14,600 --> 01:09:17,599 Speaker 1: And these new inflation numbers are putting increased pressure on 1268 01:09:17,720 --> 01:09:20,880 Speaker 1: Powell to do exactly that. Now, listen, if you didn't 1269 01:09:20,920 --> 01:09:23,960 Speaker 1: follow all of this, at least understand this. Our economic 1270 01:09:23,960 --> 01:09:26,400 Speaker 1: destiny this year and for many to follow, is really 1271 01:09:26,400 --> 01:09:28,240 Speaker 1: in the hands of the Fed. Pay less attention to 1272 01:09:28,280 --> 01:09:30,600 Speaker 1: pundits and the inept Biden people, and much more to 1273 01:09:30,600 --> 01:09:32,960 Speaker 1: people liked your own pal. I also want to say 1274 01:09:32,960 --> 01:09:35,639 Speaker 1: one more thing about this, which is questions of monetary 1275 01:09:35,640 --> 01:09:38,519 Speaker 1: policy used to be matters of fierce public debate. They 1276 01:09:38,560 --> 01:09:42,960 Speaker 1: sparked mass populist movements. Think of William Jennings Bryan's famous 1277 01:09:43,000 --> 01:09:46,080 Speaker 1: Cross of Gold speech as the quintessential example. It has 1278 01:09:46,120 --> 01:09:48,120 Speaker 1: not always been the case that you had to search 1279 01:09:48,160 --> 01:09:50,559 Speaker 1: the financial press to get in depth discussions of this 1280 01:09:50,640 --> 01:09:53,120 Speaker 1: type of stuff, and it certainly hasn't always been the 1281 01:09:53,160 --> 01:09:55,960 Speaker 1: case that the masses are made to believe that the 1282 01:09:56,040 --> 01:09:58,360 Speaker 1: wise men and women of the FED should just crunch 1283 01:09:58,400 --> 01:10:00,040 Speaker 1: their numbers and do their thing, that the rest some 1284 01:10:00,040 --> 01:10:02,040 Speaker 1: of us peons are too stupid to really get it. 1285 01:10:02,439 --> 01:10:05,800 Speaker 1: This cloistering of the FED. It was done intentionally over 1286 01:10:05,920 --> 01:10:09,479 Speaker 1: many years, including by the famous former FED chairman Alan Greenspan, 1287 01:10:09,520 --> 01:10:12,519 Speaker 1: who created his own inaccessible FED Speak language, so you 1288 01:10:12,560 --> 01:10:14,680 Speaker 1: had to be a PhD candidate to understand what the 1289 01:10:14,720 --> 01:10:17,439 Speaker 1: hell he was talking about. In fact, none of this 1290 01:10:17,560 --> 01:10:20,320 Speaker 1: is that complicated to grasp, and the consequences of FED action, 1291 01:10:20,479 --> 01:10:22,960 Speaker 1: especially in the modern era, are way too massive to 1292 01:10:23,040 --> 01:10:25,320 Speaker 1: just turn our brains off and outsource to a handful 1293 01:10:25,479 --> 01:10:29,280 Speaker 1: of Wall Street connected elites. Resolved to learn more, engage more, 1294 01:10:29,320 --> 01:10:32,320 Speaker 1: and pressure more. In twenty twenty two, let's make debates 1295 01:10:32,320 --> 01:10:35,800 Speaker 1: over monetary policy populist again. And that was one thing, 1296 01:10:35,800 --> 01:10:36,960 Speaker 1: as I dug in, and I know you talked to 1297 01:10:37,040 --> 01:10:39,760 Speaker 1: Christopher Leonard too, whose book I really highly wrote it. 1298 01:10:40,200 --> 01:10:43,040 Speaker 1: And if you want to hear my reaction to Crystal's monologue, 1299 01:10:43,040 --> 01:10:49,400 Speaker 1: become a premium subscriber today at breakingpoints dot com. Joining 1300 01:10:49,439 --> 01:10:53,360 Speaker 1: us now we have best selling author, former presidential candidate, 1301 01:10:53,439 --> 01:10:56,280 Speaker 1: and many other wonderful things. Mary and Williamson is always 1302 01:10:56,280 --> 01:10:57,960 Speaker 1: great to see you. Oh, great to see you, and 1303 01:10:57,960 --> 01:10:59,920 Speaker 1: thank you so much for having me. Of course, Marian, 1304 01:11:00,080 --> 01:11:02,320 Speaker 1: you've been creating a little bit of a stir recently, 1305 01:11:02,400 --> 01:11:04,320 Speaker 1: so we'll get to that in a moment, but I 1306 01:11:04,360 --> 01:11:06,120 Speaker 1: wanted to start with I thought you had a really 1307 01:11:06,160 --> 01:11:10,880 Speaker 1: excellent and thoughtful post about January sixth on your sub stack, 1308 01:11:10,920 --> 01:11:12,800 Speaker 1: which you guys should be subscribing to, by the way. 1309 01:11:12,840 --> 01:11:14,960 Speaker 1: Let's go ahead and throw that up on the screen 1310 01:11:15,720 --> 01:11:20,200 Speaker 1: and you talk about how the real dichotomy in American politics, 1311 01:11:20,240 --> 01:11:21,920 Speaker 1: this is your quote, is not between the right and 1312 01:11:21,920 --> 01:11:24,000 Speaker 1: the left. It's between the powerful and the powerless. The 1313 01:11:24,040 --> 01:11:28,200 Speaker 1: political media industrial complex, headquartered in both parties, has created 1314 01:11:28,200 --> 01:11:30,920 Speaker 1: the left right culture wars to distract Americans from the 1315 01:11:31,000 --> 01:11:34,759 Speaker 1: truth of who and what actually oppresses them. Our fellow 1316 01:11:34,800 --> 01:11:37,879 Speaker 1: citizens are not our enemy. Greed is our enemy. Abusive 1317 01:11:37,880 --> 01:11:41,280 Speaker 1: power is our enemy, injustice is our enemy. Unfettered corporate 1318 01:11:41,360 --> 01:11:45,160 Speaker 1: influence is our enemy. You don't think the Democrats really 1319 01:11:45,160 --> 01:11:49,519 Speaker 1: got that point across on januarously, think I don't think 1320 01:11:49,560 --> 01:11:54,439 Speaker 1: that The songs from Hamilton and Lynn moorell Manuel Miranda. Yeah, 1321 01:11:54,560 --> 01:11:57,640 Speaker 1: as much as I admire him and admire that show if, 1322 01:11:58,160 --> 01:12:03,200 Speaker 1: if ever there was a performative response literally going on, Yeah, 1323 01:12:03,240 --> 01:12:05,439 Speaker 1: it was very sad to me that day. If we 1324 01:12:05,520 --> 01:12:08,800 Speaker 1: really wanted to make a stand for democracy that day, 1325 01:12:10,080 --> 01:12:13,000 Speaker 1: the president would have declared a national medical emergency and 1326 01:12:13,000 --> 01:12:16,200 Speaker 1: expanded medicare to everybody. It would have canceled the college 1327 01:12:16,200 --> 01:12:18,200 Speaker 1: loan Dad, It would have given a speech talking about 1328 01:12:18,200 --> 01:12:20,760 Speaker 1: the importance of raising the minimum wage. It would have 1329 01:12:20,800 --> 01:12:23,040 Speaker 1: talked about the importance of the Proact. There were so 1330 01:12:23,080 --> 01:12:25,479 Speaker 1: many things that they could have talked about that would 1331 01:12:25,479 --> 01:12:29,000 Speaker 1: have truly been making a stand for the possibilities of 1332 01:12:29,000 --> 01:12:32,840 Speaker 1: democracy and how the system of our government can be 1333 01:12:33,000 --> 01:12:38,120 Speaker 1: used to make people's lives better. And until we do 1334 01:12:38,240 --> 01:12:43,880 Speaker 1: stand as a people in absolute insistence that our government 1335 01:12:43,960 --> 01:12:46,759 Speaker 1: returned to that core value, we will be in trouble 1336 01:12:47,520 --> 01:12:49,280 Speaker 1: because we're not a government of the people, by the 1337 01:12:49,320 --> 01:12:52,720 Speaker 1: people for the people right now. And that rage, the 1338 01:12:52,800 --> 01:12:55,599 Speaker 1: rage about that is legitimate. Think. You know, I found 1339 01:12:55,600 --> 01:12:57,599 Speaker 1: it really interesting when you went on Jesse Waters Show, 1340 01:12:57,760 --> 01:13:00,439 Speaker 1: Marianne and you said that the real political divide, as 1341 01:13:00,479 --> 01:13:02,200 Speaker 1: Crystal said, is not left and right, and that's a 1342 01:13:02,200 --> 01:13:05,320 Speaker 1: cartoonish version of our political reality. And we're talking about 1343 01:13:05,360 --> 01:13:10,200 Speaker 1: powerful and powerlessness. Why is it that this statement does 1344 01:13:10,240 --> 01:13:13,800 Speaker 1: not seem to emanate whatsoever from the Biden administration. I mean, 1345 01:13:13,840 --> 01:13:15,920 Speaker 1: I think it's so central as to why he is 1346 01:13:15,960 --> 01:13:19,400 Speaker 1: so unpopular with the American public right now, because unfortunately, 1347 01:13:19,479 --> 01:13:23,880 Speaker 1: more than we even feared the Democratic Party, at least 1348 01:13:23,920 --> 01:13:26,680 Speaker 1: the corporate establishment, elite elements of it seem to be 1349 01:13:26,880 --> 01:13:30,840 Speaker 1: as held hostage by corporate donors, whether it has to 1350 01:13:30,880 --> 01:13:34,639 Speaker 1: do with big insurance companies, big pharmaceutical companies, big agricultural companies, 1351 01:13:34,640 --> 01:13:38,360 Speaker 1: big chemical companies, big oil companies, and defense contractors as 1352 01:13:38,400 --> 01:13:41,840 Speaker 1: the Republicans. I mean, we can argue, you know, well, 1353 01:13:41,880 --> 01:13:44,439 Speaker 1: they're worse, but at this point the fact that the 1354 01:13:44,479 --> 01:13:49,720 Speaker 1: Republicans are worse isn't enough because that fact, the fact 1355 01:13:49,760 --> 01:13:54,880 Speaker 1: that this corporate aristocracy basically holds Washington hostage, means that 1356 01:13:55,640 --> 01:13:58,960 Speaker 1: has become the core value of the Republican Party, which 1357 01:13:59,000 --> 01:14:02,280 Speaker 1: represents and knows dive for our democracy. But the way 1358 01:14:02,320 --> 01:14:05,360 Speaker 1: the Democrats try to have it both ways represents a 1359 01:14:05,479 --> 01:14:09,439 Speaker 1: managed decline of our democracy. Either way, it is the 1360 01:14:09,479 --> 01:14:12,280 Speaker 1: opposite of once again a government of the people by 1361 01:14:12,280 --> 01:14:14,840 Speaker 1: the people for the people, government of the corporations by 1362 01:14:14,880 --> 01:14:18,040 Speaker 1: the corporations and for the corporation there's a new pull out. 1363 01:14:18,080 --> 01:14:20,040 Speaker 1: And look, this is a bit of an outlier, but 1364 01:14:20,200 --> 01:14:22,960 Speaker 1: these numbers were stunning from Quinnipiac. We can throw those 1365 01:14:23,000 --> 01:14:26,360 Speaker 1: up on the screen. First of all, they found political instability, 1366 01:14:26,520 --> 01:14:29,200 Speaker 1: not US adversaries are seen as the biggest threat. Nearly 1367 01:14:29,280 --> 01:14:32,600 Speaker 1: six and ten. I think the nation's democracy is in 1368 01:14:32,720 --> 01:14:35,479 Speaker 1: danger of collapse. But kind of the headline number here 1369 01:14:35,720 --> 01:14:41,519 Speaker 1: was Joe Biden's approval rating at thirty three percent. Thirty 1370 01:14:41,520 --> 01:14:44,200 Speaker 1: three percent, And again it's an outlier, and we like 1371 01:14:44,240 --> 01:14:46,200 Speaker 1: to look at averages and all of those things, but 1372 01:14:46,240 --> 01:14:49,280 Speaker 1: there is zero doubt that from the beginning of his administration, 1373 01:14:49,360 --> 01:14:51,920 Speaker 1: when he actually had pretty good marks with American public, 1374 01:14:52,320 --> 01:14:57,360 Speaker 1: to now, he has really fallen far and fallen fast. Well, 1375 01:14:57,600 --> 01:15:00,240 Speaker 1: the two questions I have for is is this the 1376 01:15:00,280 --> 01:15:04,240 Speaker 1: Biden administration you expected? And why do you think that 1377 01:15:04,360 --> 01:15:07,720 Speaker 1: the assessment of him has been so profoundly negative from 1378 01:15:07,760 --> 01:15:10,439 Speaker 1: the American public? Because people stood in line for seven 1379 01:15:10,600 --> 01:15:13,280 Speaker 1: eight hours thinking that this was going to help them, 1380 01:15:13,320 --> 01:15:15,920 Speaker 1: thinking that this was going to at least reduce their 1381 01:15:15,960 --> 01:15:19,679 Speaker 1: college loan debt, if not cancel it. People were hoping, 1382 01:15:19,800 --> 01:15:21,519 Speaker 1: you know, if you look at the polls you were 1383 01:15:21,520 --> 01:15:24,320 Speaker 1: talking about. Polls. The American people want universal health care. 1384 01:15:24,560 --> 01:15:27,559 Speaker 1: The majority of Americans want at least the serious, substantial 1385 01:15:27,640 --> 01:15:30,760 Speaker 1: reduction in the college loan debt. The majority of Americans 1386 01:15:30,840 --> 01:15:34,840 Speaker 1: want that fifteen dollars an hour minimum wage. The American 1387 01:15:34,880 --> 01:15:37,960 Speaker 1: people want poll after poll shows they want free college. 1388 01:15:38,080 --> 01:15:40,880 Speaker 1: The American people want a government that serves them so 1389 01:15:40,920 --> 01:15:43,720 Speaker 1: they can thrive, so they can be productive, so they 1390 01:15:43,760 --> 01:15:46,599 Speaker 1: can be creative. And that, by the way, is how 1391 01:15:46,640 --> 01:15:50,000 Speaker 1: our economy and everything else about our society would repair itself. 1392 01:15:50,400 --> 01:15:52,200 Speaker 1: So in a way, you know, I have a friend 1393 01:15:52,240 --> 01:15:54,479 Speaker 1: who said the other day we thought Trump was the 1394 01:15:54,880 --> 01:15:57,120 Speaker 1: was the wake up call. It turns out Biden is 1395 01:15:57,160 --> 01:15:59,040 Speaker 1: the wake up call, the wake up call to the 1396 01:15:59,080 --> 01:16:02,160 Speaker 1: fact neither one of them are helping us the working class, 1397 01:16:02,200 --> 01:16:04,800 Speaker 1: and America is going Will the Republicans do it? Will 1398 01:16:04,800 --> 01:16:07,559 Speaker 1: the Democrats do it? And now people are like need 1399 01:16:07,560 --> 01:16:10,360 Speaker 1: one of them? The status They both represent a status quo. 1400 01:16:10,720 --> 01:16:12,559 Speaker 1: The real issue is not where they're different, but where 1401 01:16:12,600 --> 01:16:15,320 Speaker 1: they're way too much the same, and the status quo 1402 01:16:15,520 --> 01:16:18,880 Speaker 1: will not disrupt itself. And when you see this in 1403 01:16:18,920 --> 01:16:21,559 Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, Marianne, why do you think it is 1404 01:16:21,600 --> 01:16:23,479 Speaker 1: that only you and a few others are even willing 1405 01:16:23,520 --> 01:16:26,080 Speaker 1: to say it. I mean, we see anonymous quotes in 1406 01:16:26,120 --> 01:16:29,120 Speaker 1: the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, people saying, oh god, Gomella, 1407 01:16:29,200 --> 01:16:32,120 Speaker 1: she's terrible. Oh Biden, I mean, it might be awful 1408 01:16:32,160 --> 01:16:34,000 Speaker 1: if they run again, But nobody's willing to just come 1409 01:16:34,000 --> 01:16:36,320 Speaker 1: out and be like, look, the president is very unpopular. 1410 01:16:36,439 --> 01:16:37,920 Speaker 1: There are a lot of different reas the stories we 1411 01:16:38,000 --> 01:16:39,479 Speaker 1: tell ourselves as to why. I mean, we get it's 1412 01:16:39,479 --> 01:16:41,639 Speaker 1: all up for debate, but it's just a matter of fact, 1413 01:16:41,680 --> 01:16:43,360 Speaker 1: and this is not going well. Why is it so 1414 01:16:43,439 --> 01:16:45,599 Speaker 1: difficult for so many of these people because they're held 1415 01:16:45,640 --> 01:16:49,679 Speaker 1: hostage by Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and this whole 1416 01:16:50,040 --> 01:16:53,920 Speaker 1: elite establishment leadership which has been saying for far too long, look, 1417 01:16:53,960 --> 01:16:57,160 Speaker 1: we got this, we got this. I cannot the audacity 1418 01:16:57,240 --> 01:17:00,200 Speaker 1: of the establishment in this town that's still today, with 1419 01:17:00,240 --> 01:17:03,320 Speaker 1: our democracy in peril, with our environment in peril, still 1420 01:17:03,400 --> 01:17:06,160 Speaker 1: has the outrageous added, ude, look we got this. No, 1421 01:17:06,320 --> 01:17:09,360 Speaker 1: you don't got this. And you know, so much of 1422 01:17:09,360 --> 01:17:11,960 Speaker 1: the conversation about force to the the vote, the squad they 1423 01:17:12,000 --> 01:17:15,559 Speaker 1: played along from day one. They they and this is 1424 01:17:15,960 --> 01:17:19,200 Speaker 1: what many people told them was going to happen, and 1425 01:17:19,640 --> 01:17:22,760 Speaker 1: it's it's all brand protection, it's all job protection. One 1426 01:17:22,800 --> 01:17:24,960 Speaker 1: of the things that blows my mind about politicians is 1427 01:17:24,960 --> 01:17:27,479 Speaker 1: they act like they're the only people who have to 1428 01:17:27,479 --> 01:17:31,160 Speaker 1: make ethical decisions at work. But we all do. We 1429 01:17:31,200 --> 01:17:32,960 Speaker 1: all make decisions. Say, well, you know, if I do 1430 01:17:33,000 --> 01:17:35,599 Speaker 1: the right thing, I might lose my job, lose your job, 1431 01:17:36,840 --> 01:17:40,479 Speaker 1: lose your job, right than what you were talking about, 1432 01:17:40,560 --> 01:17:43,800 Speaker 1: your mask and the Chinese Communist Party lose some money, 1433 01:17:43,840 --> 01:17:47,040 Speaker 1: Ye lose some money. Well. Also, they also always play 1434 01:17:47,080 --> 01:17:49,519 Speaker 1: the game. AOC was kind of the worst defender of 1435 01:17:49,560 --> 01:17:52,320 Speaker 1: this during the Force to Vote conversation of like, you 1436 01:17:52,439 --> 01:17:55,439 Speaker 1: just don't understand. Yeah, we're doing grown up things here 1437 01:17:56,160 --> 01:17:59,360 Speaker 1: the scene. Really it's just don't get it. Well, here 1438 01:17:59,400 --> 01:18:02,439 Speaker 1: we are. You're later, and you can see the results 1439 01:18:02,479 --> 01:18:04,960 Speaker 1: of their strategy. The Biden strategy was a failure, and 1440 01:18:05,000 --> 01:18:06,960 Speaker 1: the Progressive strategy was a failure. I mean, it seems 1441 01:18:06,960 --> 01:18:09,679 Speaker 1: like Bernie's like kind of admitting this at this point, saying, 1442 01:18:09,680 --> 01:18:12,200 Speaker 1: you know, the Democratic Party saying they need to reassess, 1443 01:18:12,240 --> 01:18:14,160 Speaker 1: saying they've turned their back on the working class. But 1444 01:18:14,720 --> 01:18:16,960 Speaker 1: you know, it was apparent to some of us from 1445 01:18:16,960 --> 01:18:19,200 Speaker 1: the beginning that this direction of trying to play ball, 1446 01:18:19,280 --> 01:18:21,599 Speaker 1: trying to go along to get along, you were never 1447 01:18:21,720 --> 01:18:23,680 Speaker 1: going to be in the power position that way. All 1448 01:18:23,680 --> 01:18:25,599 Speaker 1: you're going to get is your run clean, you know, 1449 01:18:25,640 --> 01:18:29,640 Speaker 1: tweets liked or whatever, gratulations on Twitter. Well, also, to me, 1450 01:18:29,760 --> 01:18:33,639 Speaker 1: it was so transparent the psychology to me, we're adults 1451 01:18:33,640 --> 01:18:36,080 Speaker 1: and we're playing it right. Here was code for she 1452 01:18:36,160 --> 01:18:40,840 Speaker 1: gave me her cell number. It was so obvious, the seduction. 1453 01:18:41,520 --> 01:18:42,920 Speaker 1: You know, we're going to take care of you, honey, 1454 01:18:42,960 --> 01:18:44,920 Speaker 1: and you're here with us at the big kids table. 1455 01:18:45,240 --> 01:18:48,519 Speaker 1: Just we'll show you how it's done, and the code 1456 01:18:48,520 --> 01:18:51,280 Speaker 1: for that is, and then maybe you'll be in leadership 1457 01:18:51,360 --> 01:18:55,320 Speaker 1: in two thousand and thirty two thousand and thirty six. Yes. Meanwhile, 1458 01:18:55,320 --> 01:18:58,360 Speaker 1: they're playing a long game while we don't have that time. 1459 01:18:58,439 --> 01:19:01,880 Speaker 1: I don't know how long a long people think that 1460 01:19:02,000 --> 01:19:04,880 Speaker 1: they have before the masses will reach the gates of 1461 01:19:04,880 --> 01:19:07,240 Speaker 1: the best steal. Because that's what's going to happen. It's 1462 01:19:07,240 --> 01:19:11,639 Speaker 1: going to be something is going to fundamentally correct itself 1463 01:19:11,920 --> 01:19:15,600 Speaker 1: or become fundamentally horrible. It seems to me that what 1464 01:19:15,800 --> 01:19:20,360 Speaker 1: is considered sort of the neutral idling of today is unsustainable, 1465 01:19:20,400 --> 01:19:22,160 Speaker 1: it's going to break, It's going to go one direction 1466 01:19:22,280 --> 01:19:23,920 Speaker 1: or the other. Yeah. And you see this in so 1467 01:19:24,000 --> 01:19:27,799 Speaker 1: many different metrics. Which are you know, violence against the government, 1468 01:19:27,840 --> 01:19:29,920 Speaker 1: which people say is you know, one sided. It's actually 1469 01:19:29,920 --> 01:19:33,040 Speaker 1: a pretty big partisan. I mean you look at dissatisfaction 1470 01:19:33,160 --> 01:19:36,720 Speaker 1: with and faith and institutions all across the board. You 1471 01:19:36,800 --> 01:19:39,640 Speaker 1: talked a lot during the campaign about restoring almost a 1472 01:19:39,680 --> 01:19:42,920 Speaker 1: spiritual sense of Americans. Why is it do you think 1473 01:19:42,960 --> 01:19:47,639 Speaker 1: that that politicians are so disconnected from the as you say, 1474 01:19:47,640 --> 01:19:50,280 Speaker 1: the general sense of just dissatisfaction. I hear it from 1475 01:19:50,280 --> 01:19:52,760 Speaker 1: so many people anytime somebody comes up to me on 1476 01:19:52,800 --> 01:19:54,479 Speaker 1: the street or whatever. And Chrystal, I'm sure you say 1477 01:19:54,479 --> 01:19:55,920 Speaker 1: the same things like thank you for just like making 1478 01:19:55,960 --> 01:19:58,240 Speaker 1: me feel not crazy. I don't feel like any I 1479 01:19:58,280 --> 01:20:01,680 Speaker 1: feel like I'm crazy for feeling dissatisfied about this or 1480 01:20:01,720 --> 01:20:04,759 Speaker 1: that you know, nobody is talking about it. Why is that? 1481 01:20:05,000 --> 01:20:08,680 Speaker 1: Because this town is you know, righteous living is a 1482 01:20:08,760 --> 01:20:12,920 Speaker 1: balance between tough thought and an empathetic heart. And this 1483 01:20:13,040 --> 01:20:15,479 Speaker 1: town there was some wonderful things that go on in 1484 01:20:15,479 --> 01:20:19,760 Speaker 1: this town as well, but the sort of official imposture 1485 01:20:20,360 --> 01:20:23,639 Speaker 1: is tough thinking with this closed heart. It is so 1486 01:20:24,080 --> 01:20:28,960 Speaker 1: divorced from a recognition of human suffering, even though you 1487 01:20:29,000 --> 01:20:32,400 Speaker 1: see these tints of the homeless everywhere. They literally pass 1488 01:20:32,720 --> 01:20:34,960 Speaker 1: all this on their way to the capitol every day. 1489 01:20:35,680 --> 01:20:40,120 Speaker 1: So without empathy, with a without an open heart, you 1490 01:20:40,160 --> 01:20:43,200 Speaker 1: don't see suffering. If you don't recognize suffering, then you're 1491 01:20:43,240 --> 01:20:46,440 Speaker 1: not going to recognize the rage that will inevitably emerge 1492 01:20:46,680 --> 01:20:49,559 Speaker 1: from all that suffering. Nothing is so dangerous as large 1493 01:20:49,560 --> 01:20:52,479 Speaker 1: groups of desperate people. We even knew that after World 1494 01:20:52,520 --> 01:20:56,520 Speaker 1: War two, because after World War One, the crushing economic 1495 01:20:56,560 --> 01:21:00,200 Speaker 1: conditions in Germany created the Petri Dish, out of where 1496 01:21:00,280 --> 01:21:03,920 Speaker 1: Hitler arose. Large groups of desperate people end up doing 1497 01:21:03,960 --> 01:21:08,280 Speaker 1: desperate things. They are more vulnerable to ideological capture by 1498 01:21:08,320 --> 01:21:13,599 Speaker 1: genuinely psychotic forces because they see no hope. Yeah, and anybody, 1499 01:21:13,600 --> 01:21:16,280 Speaker 1: you know, people really need to read history. People in 1500 01:21:16,320 --> 01:21:18,840 Speaker 1: this town need to read about Germany. People in this 1501 01:21:18,920 --> 01:21:21,959 Speaker 1: town need to read about the French Revolution. The arrogance 1502 01:21:22,000 --> 01:21:24,599 Speaker 1: of thinking, no, it's different now. It is so not 1503 01:21:24,760 --> 01:21:27,559 Speaker 1: different now. Yeah. Well, and we can see it very 1504 01:21:27,560 --> 01:21:30,280 Speaker 1: clearly when we look at other countries. Yeah, and other countries. 1505 01:21:31,000 --> 01:21:33,519 Speaker 1: Somehow we're very confused when we look at her at 1506 01:21:33,560 --> 01:21:37,880 Speaker 1: our own country with the same discontentment brewing. Obviously, there's 1507 01:21:37,880 --> 01:21:40,559 Speaker 1: a big political piece that floated you or Nina Turner 1508 01:21:40,600 --> 01:21:43,320 Speaker 1: as a potential primary opponent of Joe Biden. I know 1509 01:21:43,360 --> 01:21:45,480 Speaker 1: you're not going to like, you know, having made decisions 1510 01:21:45,479 --> 01:21:47,639 Speaker 1: and not going to divulge anything here, but I don't 1511 01:21:47,680 --> 01:21:49,919 Speaker 1: do you. First, I did want to ask you about 1512 01:21:50,520 --> 01:21:53,880 Speaker 1: what you think of that direction, whether you think you 1513 01:21:53,920 --> 01:21:56,760 Speaker 1: know what a goal of such a primary effort should be, 1514 01:21:57,040 --> 01:22:00,320 Speaker 1: and what you think is realistically possible there. I'm not 1515 01:22:00,520 --> 01:22:02,880 Speaker 1: enrolled in the idea that we should just assume that 1516 01:22:02,920 --> 01:22:05,920 Speaker 1: Biden will be running again. Yeah, I agree. I mean 1517 01:22:06,040 --> 01:22:07,960 Speaker 1: nobody and you know what, people in this town are 1518 01:22:08,000 --> 01:22:11,800 Speaker 1: not exactly campaign exactly. Yes, exactly. And this is one 1519 01:22:11,840 --> 01:22:14,360 Speaker 1: of those other disconnects. They say in public, are you 1520 01:22:14,400 --> 01:22:17,200 Speaker 1: going to primary? In private, they're obviously not running yet, right, 1521 01:22:20,160 --> 01:22:22,240 Speaker 1: So I think that there will be many, many voices. 1522 01:22:22,240 --> 01:22:24,040 Speaker 1: To me, the issue is not the who, but the what, 1523 01:22:24,760 --> 01:22:28,800 Speaker 1: and the what is someone who is standing within the 1524 01:22:28,840 --> 01:22:31,639 Speaker 1: electual space for the kind of agenda that will really 1525 01:22:31,680 --> 01:22:35,519 Speaker 1: create the course correction the terrible imbalanced social and economic 1526 01:22:35,600 --> 01:22:38,639 Speaker 1: imbalance of opportunity in this country between a very very 1527 01:22:38,640 --> 01:22:41,800 Speaker 1: few people versus the vast majority of people, and what 1528 01:22:41,840 --> 01:22:44,400 Speaker 1: a danger that is not only do individual lives, but 1529 01:22:44,439 --> 01:22:46,720 Speaker 1: to the state of our democracy in our future. How 1530 01:22:46,720 --> 01:22:48,439 Speaker 1: do we you know, there are a lot of people 1531 01:22:48,439 --> 01:22:51,760 Speaker 1: who kind of had their hearts broken by various political idols, 1532 01:22:51,920 --> 01:22:53,800 Speaker 1: whether it was you know, really investing a lot of 1533 01:22:53,800 --> 01:22:56,120 Speaker 1: hope in the squad and AFC thinking Okay, now we've 1534 01:22:56,120 --> 01:22:57,840 Speaker 1: got a voice in Congress. They are going to be, 1535 01:22:58,200 --> 01:22:59,680 Speaker 1: you know, the voice of the people, are going to 1536 01:22:59,720 --> 01:23:02,479 Speaker 1: stand up to the powerful institutions that are there, and 1537 01:23:02,520 --> 01:23:04,960 Speaker 1: that not working out the way that we thought, whether 1538 01:23:05,000 --> 01:23:07,960 Speaker 1: it was Bernie Sanders, you know, immediately endorsing Joe Biden, 1539 01:23:08,040 --> 01:23:10,960 Speaker 1: not really extracting any concessions, playing a part in what 1540 01:23:11,200 --> 01:23:13,880 Speaker 1: ultimately ended up being a failed strategy this year. And 1541 01:23:13,880 --> 01:23:16,240 Speaker 1: this isn't to say these are like bad people or 1542 01:23:16,280 --> 01:23:18,800 Speaker 1: corrupt people, or they had bad intent, but just to say, 1543 01:23:18,800 --> 01:23:20,840 Speaker 1: at the end of the day, they didn't fulfill the 1544 01:23:20,960 --> 01:23:24,160 Speaker 1: role that people were hoping that they would ultimately fulfill. 1545 01:23:24,840 --> 01:23:27,920 Speaker 1: How do you give people sort of hope that they're 1546 01:23:27,920 --> 01:23:31,120 Speaker 1: not going to have their heartbroken again if they invest 1547 01:23:31,160 --> 01:23:35,080 Speaker 1: their emotional energy in another similar project. I think hope 1548 01:23:35,120 --> 01:23:38,960 Speaker 1: is born of participation and hopeful solutions. And none of 1549 01:23:38,960 --> 01:23:41,200 Speaker 1: this would have happened if the American people hadn't taken 1550 01:23:41,240 --> 01:23:42,559 Speaker 1: eye out of the ball the way we have in 1551 01:23:42,600 --> 01:23:45,200 Speaker 1: the last forty years. So we, the American people, need 1552 01:23:45,240 --> 01:23:48,320 Speaker 1: to take some responsibility for the part that our complacency 1553 01:23:48,320 --> 01:23:51,280 Speaker 1: played in a lot of this, our distractedness, our lack 1554 01:23:51,320 --> 01:23:54,559 Speaker 1: of civic responsibility. You can't heal anything in your life 1555 01:23:54,560 --> 01:23:57,080 Speaker 1: by making it all about how other people have disappointed you. 1556 01:23:57,640 --> 01:24:00,840 Speaker 1: And the issue is we were a sleep for too long, 1557 01:24:01,000 --> 01:24:05,200 Speaker 1: but we are awake now. You know. Churchill is famous 1558 01:24:05,240 --> 01:24:08,480 Speaker 1: for having said that you can always count on Americans 1559 01:24:08,520 --> 01:24:10,880 Speaker 1: to do the right thing after they have exhausted every 1560 01:24:10,920 --> 01:24:14,479 Speaker 1: other option. And history shows that we as a nation 1561 01:24:14,720 --> 01:24:18,479 Speaker 1: are often slow to get there, but once we get there, 1562 01:24:18,520 --> 01:24:21,000 Speaker 1: we slam it like nobody's business. And this is the 1563 01:24:21,080 --> 01:24:22,880 Speaker 1: year to do that. I think there is so much 1564 01:24:22,920 --> 01:24:26,680 Speaker 1: awakening going on right now, and the hope is not 1565 01:24:26,720 --> 01:24:29,320 Speaker 1: about what they're going to do, it's what we are 1566 01:24:29,360 --> 01:24:32,519 Speaker 1: going to do. I hope it to me. One last 1567 01:24:32,560 --> 01:24:34,840 Speaker 1: question for you, okay, because this is one of this 1568 01:24:34,880 --> 01:24:36,400 Speaker 1: is a personal question. It's one of the things that 1569 01:24:36,439 --> 01:24:39,439 Speaker 1: I really admire about you is you were talking about 1570 01:24:39,479 --> 01:24:41,960 Speaker 1: how people in this town have really hardened their hearts. 1571 01:24:42,040 --> 01:24:44,519 Speaker 1: It's like they don't even see the tents of the homeless. 1572 01:24:44,520 --> 01:24:46,960 Speaker 1: They don't even see the pain and suffering of them 1573 01:24:47,160 --> 01:24:52,280 Speaker 1: is right around them. Yes, you have remained and we're 1574 01:24:52,520 --> 01:24:54,439 Speaker 1: personal friends, so I know you're on a professional and 1575 01:24:54,439 --> 01:24:57,760 Speaker 1: also a personal basis. But you've remained this very vulnerable 1576 01:24:58,120 --> 01:25:02,040 Speaker 1: like you allow yourself to be vulnerable. You engage with 1577 01:25:02,600 --> 01:25:09,919 Speaker 1: criticism oftentimes unfair of yourself. You have maintained your deep compassion, empathy, 1578 01:25:09,960 --> 01:25:13,320 Speaker 1: and humanity, which I think are your strongest assets. How 1579 01:25:13,320 --> 01:25:15,760 Speaker 1: do you do that without just not like breaking down 1580 01:25:15,800 --> 01:25:17,680 Speaker 1: because I think I have such a thin skin. I 1581 01:25:17,720 --> 01:25:20,280 Speaker 1: don't know that I could maintain that sense of engagement 1582 01:25:20,680 --> 01:25:23,519 Speaker 1: and vulnerability and empathy that you seem to have been 1583 01:25:23,560 --> 01:25:26,439 Speaker 1: able to do. It's a cliche, but they say you 1584 01:25:26,479 --> 01:25:29,679 Speaker 1: get better or you get better, otherwise they really win. 1585 01:25:30,000 --> 01:25:33,040 Speaker 1: You become someone that you almost. You become what they 1586 01:25:33,080 --> 01:25:37,680 Speaker 1: say you are. You become that's the ultimate. You know, 1587 01:25:37,680 --> 01:25:40,240 Speaker 1: what are this? You know, it's like the ultimate. Not 1588 01:25:40,479 --> 01:25:46,200 Speaker 1: allowing all that to win is not allowing it to 1589 01:25:46,200 --> 01:25:50,240 Speaker 1: to pervert your humanity. Yeah, no, I think You're right, 1590 01:25:50,320 --> 01:25:52,160 Speaker 1: And I think that if you have any kind of 1591 01:25:52,200 --> 01:25:55,360 Speaker 1: a whether you see it in religious terms or spiritual terms, 1592 01:25:55,479 --> 01:25:59,160 Speaker 1: or even secular terms, you know it doesn't matter if 1593 01:25:59,240 --> 01:26:00,960 Speaker 1: you if you're a e ocean is to love and 1594 01:26:01,000 --> 01:26:05,200 Speaker 1: forgiveness and righteousness and ethics. You know that that's just 1595 01:26:05,240 --> 01:26:08,519 Speaker 1: another way that you and yourself are being tested, hamed, 1596 01:26:09,000 --> 01:26:12,720 Speaker 1: and given the opportunity to become a strong person. Yeah, 1597 01:26:13,000 --> 01:26:14,559 Speaker 1: very well said. Always lovely to have