WEBVTT - Tesla Takes the Wheel, Starlink Terminals Have a Black Market Problem

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, Elon Musk is now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 3>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 3>controlled by one man. Well, he's a legitimate, super genius, legitimate.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 4>He says.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 3>He's always voted for Democrats, but this year it will

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 3>be different.

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>He'll vote Republican.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 3>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 3>on ed Elon.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 5>Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 6>Anything he does, he's fascinating people.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Elanink, Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk. It's

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 3>March twenty six, twenty twenty four. I'm your host, David Papadopoulos.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Our colleagues here at Bloomberg have a big investigation out

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 3>this week into a black market problem that is vexing Starlink,

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 3>the satellite operation of SpaceX. We have a special story

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 3>from our sister show, The Big Take, that digs into

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 3>that investigation and all the places starlink kits are being

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 3>used where they shouldn't be. But before that, there's been

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 3>plenty of news in elon Land, and we're going to

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 3>round it up for you all rapid fire. First, Tesla

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 3>will now do full self driving mode demonstrations for every

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 3>new car buyer. Second, a federal judge tossed out a

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 3>lawsuit that Musk's X had filed against the Center for

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Countering Digital Hate. Last will unpack an intercept investigation that

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>found that X fought against the secrecy surrounding government surveillance

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 3>of social media users while it was profiting from user

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 3>data sales. To break all of this Elon News down,

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 3>we have Danahull, who's our full time Elon Musk reporter.

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Hello Dana, Hello, And Max Schaffkin, senior reporter and editor

0:01:57.960 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 3>at BusinessWeek.

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Good day, David, Good to see you.

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Max. Okay, so we're gonna start with these Tesla full

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 3>self driving demos that are now, according to mister Musk

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Dani Hall, are now mandatory before anyone leaves a Tesla

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 3>A lot explained.

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so full self driving is a feature that you

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>have to pay for. It currently costs twelve thousand dollars.

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And this is all about margins. I mean, we are

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the quarter. Tesla has got to

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>move cars. It is in their interest to move cars

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that are as fully tricked out with all the options

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>as possible, and so Musk is now basically saying via

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this email that we confirm that, like you know, the

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>salespeople have to give a demo because people don't realize

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just how awesome FST is.

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, sorry, so Danne to interrupt you. Sorry, So, I

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 3>actually thought erroneously that this was some way, somehow about

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 3>security and safety and making sure they're on the right

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 3>side of the law with regulators. You're telling me it's

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 3>actually them saying, hey, we really got to pedal this thing.

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, perhaps I am a cynic, but we have a

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>week left in the quarter, and this is like a

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>really important quarter in terms of moving vehicles and making

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that profit. I mean, both things could be happening simultaneously.

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>They want to be a little bit more careful about

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:23.119
<v Speaker 1>how they explain full self driving beta or full self

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>driving capability to prospective customers, given the regulatory environment, given

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we're on the eve of some of

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>these big autopilot lawsuits. But at the same time, twelve

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars that's just all gravy. That is a big

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>way for Tesla to make money. I mean, so I

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>think both things are happening, and they're really kind of

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>pushing this.

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 5>There's no nothing in this memo about being more cautious

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 5>or emphasizing the limitations of the technology, which is what

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 5>you'd expect if the goal were to like head off

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 5>potential litigation or regulation. Instead, it says just the opposite.

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 5>It says, people don't understand how great this thing is

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 5>from the point of view the regulators. Right, that's the

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 5>opposite message that that Tesla could potentially be conveying. So

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 5>I totally agree with Dana. I think this is about

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 5>this is a sales thing. It's like you're in the

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 5>car dealer and they want you to upgrade to the

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 5>you know, LX package or you know over the GX

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 5>and then whenever they're going to tell you how great

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 5>the leather seats are in the clearcoat. This is Elon

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 5>Musk's version of that. Right, This is a pure margin

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 5>product that if he is able to get more people

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 5>to adopt, would be very valuable, and of course has

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 5>additional value down the road because because at least by

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 5>by Tesla's account, all this data that they're collecting makes

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 5>the system better.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>And I just like to point out, like if you

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>go on the Tesla website today, and try to order

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a new model. Why it says you will receive one

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>month trial a full self driving capability with a new

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>vehicle purchase. So not only are they demoing it for

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you when you're there at the lot, but then if

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you buy the car, you get it for free. It's

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>like a subscription, and then the idea is that you

0:04:58.640 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>keep it.

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 5>Is this like an app TV thing where like you

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 5>get the three months and they start billing you if

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 5>you don't cancel, do they bill you the twelve grand

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 5>or do you have to like, you know, wire additional

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 5>funds to like maintain your subscription.

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, you can do a subscription or you can

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>just pay for it. I mean, I'd be very curious

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:16.679
<v Speaker 1>to see how the billing looks.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 3>What I will say is this, and then we will

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 3>move on to point number two here. But you know

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 3>this must be important for Elon and trying to drive

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 3>sales of this thing. The quote that we have from

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the memo he sent out to all staff was, I

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 3>know this will slow down the delivery process, but it

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 3>is nonetheless a hard requirement for Elon to do anything

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 3>that slows anyone down. That is anathema to him. Is

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 3>it not DNA. All.

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but this is a great way to like sandbag

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the quarter because if they have a lousy quarter, they

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>can be like, oh, well, we rolled out this new

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>thing where you've got where the sales process is longer,

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>and this slowed down some things towards the end.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 5>And it's not just about the quarter, because, as we've

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 5>talked about on this podcast many times, the self driving

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 5>story is crucial to Elon Musk's long term vision and

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 5>maybe even more importantly, the extremely elevated value of Tesla's stock.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 5>Like this, if the story that Tesla cars drive themselves

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 5>and they're that they're basically going to be robotaxis in

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 5>twelve months, which Elon uns Musk has essentially been saying,

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 5>you know for the last decade, almost if that were

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 5>to break down, the stock would fall apart. And so

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 5>so by demonstrating the value to people, it allows this

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 5>story to be maintained.

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And the stock Tesla stock has gone up today as

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a result. It's like up what five six percent, I.

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Stock that has mostly been going down of late having

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a rebound today. Okay, very good. Max's

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 3>topic number two on our discussion list, A court tossed

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 3>the lawsuit that X had brought against the Center for

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Countering Digital Hate, tell us what happened here?

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Center for Countering Digital Hate is an advocacy group

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 5>that had published a series of reports that other news organizations,

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 5>including Bloomberg, had written about and picked up on, essentially

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 5>talking about white supremacy and racism on X. X sued

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 5>the Center for Counting Digital Hate for, according to a lawsuit,

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 5>like hacking the service. Basically, they were attempted. What it

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 5>really felt like is they wanted to combat these reports,

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 5>essentially silence this nonprofit group. They came up with sort

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 5>of a novel way of doing so, which the judge rejected.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 5>The judge in the ruling said, it's really transparent, what's happening.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 5>This is about trying to silence a critic, That this

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 5>is essentially an attempt to do a defamation lawsuit without

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 5>filing one, and he tossed out a case.

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 3>So then what's the takeaway here on all of this?

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, this lawsuit always seemed like spretty thin. Yeah,

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't like it.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Really.

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 5>It seemed, as the judge wrote in the ruling, essentially

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 5>a way to threaten other critics. X has been trying

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 5>very hard to rebut criticism from media outlets, from non

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 5>profit groups, from anti hate groups that there's a lot

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 5>of hate speech on the platform and the problem is

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 5>the problem with this effort to shut down the criticism

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 5>is that some of the calls coming from inside the house.

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk himself has been essentially the vector for some

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 5>of this. And when you look at what is slowing

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 5>advertising down, it's not, you know, the Center for Countering

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Digital Hate, all respect to their research, it's what the

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 5>boss is doing.

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Max. Topic number three and our rapid fire list

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 3>a freedom and information request that was done by the

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 3>intercept that led to a big piece on a very

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 3>thorny topic explained for our listeners.

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so this is a story that is probably less

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 5>about Elon Musk and more about Twitter. Of course, Elon

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 5>Musk now owns the company that was formerly known as Twitter.

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 5>But essentially what this is about is two things. One

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 5>is a long standing effort by Twitter to essentially stop

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 5>the US government from requesting information about users without disclosing

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 5>those requests. And at the same time, Twitter's data is

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 5>being sold to these data brokers that are then turning

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 5>around and selling them to governments. So there's kind of

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 5>a whiff of hypocrisy here. I'll say this issue is

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 5>not exclusive to Twitter, although it has been a big

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 5>deal with Twitter for like a decade the company. When

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 5>you think about what it does, it's this real time

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 5>social network. You're seeing what's happening. That's valuable to advertisers.

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 5>That's valuable maybe to pollsters and to journalists. It's also

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 5>of course valuable to police and to you know, in

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 5>certain countries authoritarian governments who might want to monitor protests.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 3>This data that.

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Is being mined is essentially public data, but it's being

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 5>aggregated through this through what is known as Twitter's fire hose,

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 5>essentially the data feed of all the tweets, and that

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:01.599
<v Speaker 5>is sold.

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 2>To third parties.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 5>And it can, as news outlets have pointed out, and

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 5>as this intercept story is saying, can be misused or

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 5>can be used in ways that are somewhat uncomfortable if

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 5>you're a pro free speech maximalist, as Elon Musk says

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 5>he is. So now we have two stories essentially in

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 5>which you know that call in a question in some

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 5>sense how serious Musk is about his commitment to free speech.

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Right and so as you were saying, this case predates

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Musk and X. It began under the previous management when

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 3>the company was Twitter. But Musk and his crew have

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 3>continued to push it. Is that right?

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And it's understandable why they've done it because it's

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 5>always been this somewhat uncomfortable situation where social media companies

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 5>are asking users to trust them, but of course you're

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 5>giving all this information to third party, and then that

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 5>third party can be asked by the government.

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 3>To turn it over for the government. Right.

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 5>So, I don't think it's like hugely surprise causing that

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 5>they continued the litigation. It does, I will say that

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 5>to the point that the intercept makes, if you were

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 5>really committed to free speech, and if you were a

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, somebody who's worth you know, pushing, you know,

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 5>over one hundred and fifty billion dollars, you might question

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 5>whether that data brokering business, the business of selling fire

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 5>hose data to third parties, is worth pursuing.

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's a it's a little reminder to everyone

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 3>out there that anything you post publicly can and potentially

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 3>will be used against you. That was great, Dana Max,

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much for happing on.

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having us, always a pleasure.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So now, as promised, we're going to hand the

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 3>microphone over to our colleagues and the Big Take podcast,

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 3>who have a story about Starlink with huge geopolitical consequences.

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 6>Hovering hundreds of miles above Earth is the largest single

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 6>constellation of satellites. It's called Starlink.

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Falcon Starlink LDS go for launch, and.

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>There is that call out that we are go for launch.

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 1>Watch as Falcon nine takes our stack of Starlink satellites

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>into orbit.

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 6>Starlink is part of Elon Musk's company SpaceX. It's thousands

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 6>of satellites provide Internet all over the world through portable

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 6>kits about the size of a home computer monitor. The

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 6>idea is to reach even the hardest to reach places,

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 6>places where other providers can't operate or don't. On its website,

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 6>Starlink proclaims that it's available almost everywhere on Earth, and

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 6>that's a big selling point for the service. But there

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 6>are some places starlink isn't supposed to be.

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 4>If you look at Starlink's website, they have a very

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 4>good map of global coverage. They duet to fully have

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 4>certain countries blacked out, or they'll have dates when starlink

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 4>services will become available, and some of the countries where

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 4>it's more controversial, they will have no data available.

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 6>That's Alan Crawford, a senior editor at Bloomberg. Some of

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 6>those blacked out countries he's talking about represent places where

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 6>Starlink's services don't have a licensing agreement, haven't been approved

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 6>by their governments, or where the devices have been barred

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 6>for sale because of US sanctions. But a Bloomberg investigation

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 6>has found that those barriers haven't stopped Starling's kits from

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 6>getting into the hands of folks on the ground through

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 6>a burgeoning black market.

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 4>What really struck me was the extent of this issue,

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 4>that it's not just an isolated case here and there,

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 4>it's pretty much everywhere.

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 6>Today on the show, what starlink kits seeping into illegal

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 6>markets could mean for the company and the geopolitical stakes

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 6>of letting that market continue or trying to shut it down.

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Three two one Sarah than.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 3>I lived.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 6>This is the big take from Bloomberg News. I'm Sarah Holder.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 5>Alan.

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 6>Can you start by just telling us about starlink.

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, Starlink is a system of high speed Internet. It's

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 4>very dependable, and it's based on satellites. The company is

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 4>launched over five thousand satellites and it's using these to

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 4>provide high speed Internet in parts of the world where

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 4>connectivity is not very good.

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 6>Essentially, SpaceX launched the first Starlink satellites in twenty nineteen.

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 6>In just a few years, it's become the largest satellite

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 6>network in orbital space. It's also become a major source

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 6>of revenue for SpaceX, along with government contracts and contracts

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 6>with other companies to launch their satellites.

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 4>The issue here for Starlink is that a lot of

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 4>countries where they don't have good current are kind of

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 4>keen to get access to this for obvious reasons, but

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 4>at the same time, they're not willing to just freely

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 4>give over control to the company, and this has led

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 4>to an issue that it's come up in the reporting

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 4>for the story that there are many countries around the

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:25.359
<v Speaker 4>world where there's no licensing agreement between the government and Starlink,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 4>and the trouble is that people are turning to the

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 4>black market to obtain Starlink devices.

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 6>Anyway, your reporting found that Starlink terminals have ended up

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 6>in places that are under US sanctions, where starlink is

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 6>barred from operating, or just where starlink does not have

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 6>a licensing agreement. Can you give us a brief overview

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 6>of what your team found is happening.

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the starlink kits. These are the kind

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 4>of dish and receiver. They're widely advertised over social media,

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 4>usually like WhatsApp groups on Facebook groups. There's countries like

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 4>Sudan in North Africa, which is subject to US sanctions.

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 4>There's a brutal civil war underway there and there have

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 4>been allegations of genocide. Millions of people have been displaced,

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 4>and our reporting shows that the rebel forces which have

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 4>been accused of committing these human rights abuses are using

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 4>starlink because again, this is like a vast country with

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 4>poor internet systems in parts, but the internet's been brought

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 4>down and the two sides are, you know, accusing each

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 4>other of having done that, and in the meantime they're

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 4>using starlink.

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 6>What can starlink itself do about these kits ending up

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 6>in the wrong hands.

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, that is really the numb of the matter. We

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 4>put a set of quite extensive questions to starlink and

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 4>they have yet to respond. Nevertheless, people we spoke two

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 4>who are experts in the industry, who work in the industry,

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 4>they said that it is feasible to geolocate these systems

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 4>as soon as they're activated. You can see where they

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 4>are in theory, you flick the switch and you turn

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 4>it off.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 6>Right, I mean, is that something they've done in the past.

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 6>They have that capability, they have they used it.

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 4>What we were told was that they have moved against

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 4>illegal use in South Africa, and so the technicalities of

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 4>how they're doing that I'm not clear, but they have

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 4>attempted to clamp down on the illegal use there. But

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 4>equally we were told that it hadn't been very successful,

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 4>that they had only managed to shut down some ten

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 4>percent of the terminals that were in use.

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 6>So Dan is just one of the conflict torn countries

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 6>where starlink terminals are being used and where they're banned.

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 6>It's not just that militias want communications devices, it's also

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 6>that ordinary people need access to the internet, and that

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 6>dynamic is not so unique to Sudan. All over the world,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 6>in places under crisis where blackouts and connectivity issues are common,

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 6>people are trying to get their hands on Starlink kits.

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 6>You mentioned Sudan, and you've got a lot of detail

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 6>about how Starlink is getting into Sudan and then how

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 6>it's being used there. Can you walk us through that trajectory.

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 4>In terms of Sudan, there are intermediaries who are obviously

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 4>looking to make money and selling this in the black market,

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.959
<v Speaker 4>and they're bringing it in from Gulf countries that are

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 4>apparently bringing it through Dubai and there are roots that

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 4>they go through Darfur and South Sudan and bring them

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 4>into the country that way. You know, when you buy

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 4>a starlink system, you get the physical equipment and then

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 4>like a mobile phone, you get a tariff a plan

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 4>and you can pay extra for roaming. And they're using

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 4>it in these territories where there's no agreement to do so.

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 6>So they're buying a kit in a place where Starlink

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 6>does have a licensing agreement, but they're buying this roaming

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.199
<v Speaker 6>plan so they can use it in places that are

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 6>perhaps not under that agreement.

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 4>Exactly. The reporter Sam and Marxy actually caught up with

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 4>traders and spoke to them in person, and so in

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 4>terms of social media, These are essentially like small traders

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 4>that are online that are taking advantage of a loophole

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 4>or black market to import these devices and sell them

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 4>at a markup. In some cases we found they were

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 4>offering advice on how to shelter these devices so that

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 4>they're not detected by the authorities, not digitally but physically.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, they were giving advicely, don't put it in

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 4>an obvious part of your roof, you know, keep it

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 4>to one side. And at certain times.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 6>This raises questions about local regulators and their responsibility to

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 6>catch that these kids have been smuggled in and are

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 6>being used.

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Governments and countries like South Africa where there is no

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 4>licensing agreement with Starlink then they have issued the Telecoms

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 4>Regulator has issued clear warnings against people using this because

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 4>it's illegal.

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 6>Let's talk about the implications of this, Especially in a

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 6>conflict like the Russia Ukraine War. Starlink can have a

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 6>massive impact on battlefield communications. What role has starlink played

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 6>already in the Ukraine Russia War.

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 4>At the onset of the war. Back in February twenty

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 4>twenty two, Elon Musk offered the starlink system to the

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Ukrainian government military, which they were obviously more than happy

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 4>to accept. There was subsequently a deal done between the

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 4>Pentagon and the Ukrainians, and in terms of that were

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 4>never made public. But nevertheless, we've seen plentiful evidence that

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 4>Starlink terminals are used in Ukraine. But what is new

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 4>is that as of February this year, the Ukrainians said

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 4>that Russia is now starting to use it as well,

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 4>which would be very much against US sanctions. And Musk

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 4>said on X his social media platform that they were

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:11.239
<v Speaker 4>not knowingly selling any terminals to Russia. But nevertheless, there

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 4>are posts on Twitter or video of Russian soldiers opening

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Starlink kits. It's impossible to verify these, but the point

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 4>is that it's a widespread phenomenon.

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 6>Finding the technology and shutting it down is one thing,

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 6>but any attempt to systematically address the problem could mean

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 6>dealing with the big man at the top. When we

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 6>come back, how SpaceX's controversial CEO Elon Musk factors into

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 6>any attempts to rein in Starlink's black market boom.

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 3>We're back.

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Senior editor Alan Crawford has been telling me about

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 6>how Starlink kits have been circulating in countries where the

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 6>system doesn't have agreements in place, and efforts to rein

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 6>that in haven't been wholly successful. But there's one person

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 6>we haven't really talked about much yet who's a big factor,

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.959
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk himself. He's the CEO and founder of SpaceX,

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 6>the private company behind the Starlink satellite system. Here's what

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 6>Alan had to say about Musk.

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Musk is known to weigh in on not just the

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 4>war in Ukraine caused by Russia's invasion, but on various

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 4>different aspects of US foreign policy, and that's what gets

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 4>to some of the concerns that we heard voiced. There's

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 4>the perception of a potential conflict of inter interest because

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk is a private sector he is a supplier

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 4>of services to the US government, not to play NASA,

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 4>and he's taking these satellite payloads for the US government

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 4>into space, and so there are obvious national security implications

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 4>if a company like Starlink were to lose control of

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 4>a satellite based system, or we're even just to exercise,

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, limited patrolling of its own system.

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.479
<v Speaker 6>To dig into these possible security risks and the broader

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 6>question of Musk's role in all of this. I spoke

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 6>with my colleague Dan Flatley, a national security reporter at

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg who's covered the government contractor relationship between Musk and

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 6>the US.

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 2>Musk has a ton of contracts. I mean, there's an

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 2>argument that could be made that Elon Musk would not

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 2>be Elon Musk without the US government. I mean he is,

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, starting in the early two thousands with SpaceX,

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 2>done lots of contracts with NASA, with other parts of

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the US government in terms of launching satellites and other

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 2>types of things into space. He does business with the military.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Starlink is being used in Ukraine, but he also has

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 2>links to the Chinese government through Tesla, So he's sort

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 2>of has his hands in a lot of different spaces.

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 6>How could starlink terminal's bypassing sanctions, for example, cause national

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 6>security concerns for the US if they're so entangled with

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk's companies.

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, starlink is both a tool of communication

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>and could be viewed as something that's an asset in

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 2>terms of national security by the US, but it could

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 2>also be a detriment to US national security depending on

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 2>how it's used. And when you have someone who's as

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 2>unpredictable and mercurial as Elon Musk is, but is also

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 2>so technically proficient and offers a service that nobody else offers,

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 2>you're sort of right on the bleeding edge of what

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 2>could be used for good or what could be used

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 2>for ill. And I think that what US national security

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 2>officials that we talked to in Washington, d C. Feel

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 2>like is that they don't have enough of a sense

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 2>of where Elon Musk is on any given day on

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these issues, that he is both a

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 2>trusted partner in somebody that US national security officials are

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 2>somewhat wary of at the same time, but there's no

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 2>alternative really to him for a lot of things, especially

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 2>against SpaceX and stuff like starlink. You know, there's not

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of other comparable sort of providers out there.

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 6>What could it mean for Musk and his companies if

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 6>they aren't able to address this issue, if it does

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 6>become more of a priority of the US government to

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 6>stop this and Starlink is enable to stop it, that's

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 6>a really good question.

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I think you have to start with the question of

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 2>does the US government want to stop this, and it's

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 2>not totally clear whether they do, because there are some

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 2>instances where the US government actually wants to encourage the

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 2>use of starlink in some countries, whether it's Ukraine or

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Iran potentially, you know, there is a school of thought

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 2>that more communication in some of these countries is better

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 2>because it sort of opens it up to US markets

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 2>and you know, sort of the US way of thinking

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 2>about certain things. I think the question is are these

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 2>terminals being used for military operations, are they being used

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>to coordinate attacks? Are they being used in some way

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 2>that would represent a significant threat to national security? And

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 2>at that point does the government have a vested interest

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 2>in getting involved. You know, anytime you have a technology

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 2>like starlink that is so far advanced compared to what

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 2>else is available out there, you're going to have people

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 2>trying to get their hands on it. And that's one

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 2>of the things that in some cases the US government

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 2>wants to prevent and in other cases wants to encourage.

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Take Venezuela, for instance, where starlink terminals are showing up.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Venezuela is under heavy US sanctions, but not every individual

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 2>in Venezuela is sanctioned, so you know, if somebody is

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 2>using a starlink terminal to access the Internet and they're

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 2>not under sanctions and they're not under export control restrictions,

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 2>then that's really a question for that country's government. If

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 2>they are under US export controls, then that is a

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 2>question for the US government.

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a really complicated web of responsibility global interests,

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 6>and ultimately it comes down to who has the control

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 6>and who has the will to exert that control.

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 2>It seems like, yeah, absolutely, And again, this is not

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 2>a traditional company. This is not a traditional individual that

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 2>you're dealing with. I think, by any metric, Elon Musk

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 2>is not your typical, you know, entrepreneur. He's very outspoken,

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 2>he's very unpredictable, and at the end of the day,

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the government, the US government in this case, is relying

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 2>on him for a lot of different things and is

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 2>not able to exert as much control over his activities

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 2>as it might in a more traditional relationship.

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks to the entire Big Take team who worked

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 3>on that episode, especially Sarah Holder, Adriana Tapia, Aaron Edwards,

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Naomi Ing, Veronica Rodriguez, Beth Ponzo, Nicole Beemster Boor, and

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 3>our very own Naomi Shaven, and thank you to the

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 3>elon In Team. As always, this episode was produced by

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 3>Magnus Hendrickson, who is also our supervising producer. Naomi Shaven

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 3>and Rayhan Harmanci are our senior editors. The idea for

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 3>this very show also came from Rayhon Blake Maples handles engineering,

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 3>and we get special editing assistants from Jeff Grocott. The

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 3>Elon Inc. Theme is written and performed by Taka Yasuzawa

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 3>and Alex Sugi Yurra. Brendan Francis Newnham is our executive producer,

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 3>and Sage Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcasts. I'm

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 3>David Papadopoulis. If you have a minute, rate and review

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 3>our show, it'll help other listeners find us. See you

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 3>next week.