WEBVTT - Garbage Time & The Mississippi Mustache

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from my Heart Radio,

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice.

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Now along with the guys from fanball dot com, here's

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the host for Fantasy Football Weekly. It is time for

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>America's longest running fantasy show, Fantasy Football Weekly and I

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio production. I am your host, Paul Charging from

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>fanball dot com and Coast Today, Christian Peterson and Matt

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Harrison also fanball dot Com. Hello, guys, good day Church.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Over the course. Now you're gonna go good day mate.

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>For a minute, I wish you had an opportunity loss

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>next time, get it right. Over the course of today,

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll break down every game fantasy styles. Always we don't

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>care about which team is gonna win other than your team.

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>So we'll tell you how all the players are going

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to do in these games. Yeah, give you a rationale

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>for why we feel that way. You can see if

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you agree or disagree and go with us or against us.

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll answer three tough questions. We'll give you nine players

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>upon whom you can take a chance, and we'll dump

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and jump into our time machine for the future and

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>identify the players that everybody's going to be trying to

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>pick up next week, but blamo, they're already on your

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>team because you picked him up this week. That is

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>a bit we call premature speculation. Time travel as a

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>new wrinkle for us. It is, um, welcome to flex

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>capacitor is flexing, Yeah, and it makes the sound blamo.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>That's that's that's what the time machine goes, Yes, blamo.

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>The cow goes move at the time machine goes blamo. Uh.

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's um, I want to dive into some matchups here,

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna sprinkle in some reaction to Thursday night's

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>game as well, and what to do about guys like

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton and O. J. Howard and some others throughout

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the show as well. But let's let's go right into

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the matchups fantasy style, beginning with Jacksonville and Houston.

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Mayhew at the helm of the Jacksonville Jaguars. I

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>once got a case of Gardner Mayhew from an Indonesian bathhouse. Well,

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you should get Gardner Minshew instead than Mayhew Mayhew. But

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I gonna talk about him in a later segment because

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he might be to take a chance on me kind

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of quarterback. Uh. As for the rest of the uh

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Leonard four Nett's getting an A grade, played six percent

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps in Week one, had seventeen of the

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>jags eighteen running back touches in The Houston run defense

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was the worst rated in Week one by Pro Football Focus,

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>allowing seven point three yards per carry. A grade. They're

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna try to keep the ball out of the hands

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of their quarterback. Maybe maybe, I think so, I don't know.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>D D Westbrook gets a B grade for me. Minshew

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>targeted the slot a ton last year at Washington State,

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's d D spot. Texans slot cornerback Aaron Colvin

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>did so well last week hundred and seventeen yards against

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and then they cut They cut them out right, which

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>means they're starting Philip Gaines against Westbrook and I like

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>those odds. The rest of the Jags, Chris Conley and

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>DJ Chark there on the bench. It's not a revenge

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>game for Chris Conley, so I'm not really interested in it.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And Marquise Lee might end up going in this game,

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>which would sap targets from both Conley and Chark. Chark

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>was only targeted two times last week, so he's not

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>worth it. And by the way I called it. Chris

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Conley touchdown on this show last Where's Where's a bird sound?

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>That we listen? You know we're not going to stop

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the show every time we got something right. Yes we are,

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>We're wrong when you can call it your Chris calmly

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:32.399
<v Speaker 1>shot that deserves the peacock right there. We've got two

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>hours and there might be a lot of peacocks in

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this one. Uh. DeAndre Hopkins gets an A grade. He's

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>scored or top two hundred yards in each of his

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>last four meetings with Jalen Ramsey, so I'm not worried

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>about him. Deshaun Watson's getting a B. I'm only nervous

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's only getting downgraded a little bit because he

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>was sacked six times last week, right back to where

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we were last year. He took eleven other hits, was

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>dinged up for most of the game in and out

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of the blue tent. That's not good. Still. The Chiefs

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>lit up this defense last week, and Watson isn't much

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of a stepped down from Patrick Mahomes, so he gets

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the beat. Will Fuller gets a sea. Fuller was on

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the field for of the snaps, but he only saw

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>three targets, so I think that some positive regression needs

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to come there. Kick Cutie might play but might not.

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>That means both him and Kenny Stills are on your bench.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And then Carlos Hide and Duke Johnson. I gave both

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of them a C grade. Both are kind of viable

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>here in a sneaky way. Hide to his second in

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the league and yards after contact per attempt at six

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>point three, and he has Pro Football Focus his highest

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>elusive rating after week one. Carlo Carlos Hide, you know,

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what else is gonna be elusive? Him staying

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>on top of that list is gonna be elusive. Duke

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>was targeted the second most last week of all Houston receivers,

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Jags gave up nine receptions to the Kansas

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>City running backs last week, so Duke's in a good

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>spot too. Arizona takes on Baltimore Christian Kyler Murray with

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the fantastic second half of last week's game, but a

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>much tougher matchup in Baltimore the time around. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>although there may be some garbage time stats to be

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>had in this one, just like there, Well, it was

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of garbage time last week for Kyler Murray until

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>he brought them all the way. Yeah, that's right from

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it somehow from from garbage to treasure were I was

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>working on Twitter on the name. Is it merbage time

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>or Kyle arbage time. I don't know if either one

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of those work. I think you're gonna have to just shopping.

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Come on, keep working, keep shopping. Uh. Yeah, Murray had

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>that over over three passing yards last week and needed

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty four passing attempts and and overtime to get there.

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>But it was interesting to see this offense get unveiled

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for the first time. They ran four wide receivers seventy

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>three percent of the time, so an interesting wrinkle there.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But this time, like you mentioned charts, it's gonna be

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot tougher against the Ravens. They were top five

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>against the past last year. They gave up just a

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety yards and one touchdown through the air

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in their Week one win over Miami. Granted that was

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Miami and it was also garbage time too. Yeah, so

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got Murray on a C grade here, and it's

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>purely because with the Ravens favored by almost two touchdowns

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in this game, I think there's going to be garbage time. No,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>come on, mur Murby m okay, let's move on to

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers. Christian Kirk and Larry Fitzgerald are really

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the only two we need to discuss here. Interestingly, both

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>of them are playing out of the slot most of

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the time. With four wide receivers, they have two guys

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on the outside and two on the inside. They were

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>both targeted heavily. Kirk targeted twelve times by Murray last week,

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>caught just four of them for thirty two yards. But terrible.

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>It is terrible, but it's a good sign that they're

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>using them that much. Baltimore did lose their starting slot

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>corner to injury after Week one. They also could be

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>without Jimmy Smith, another of their cornerbacks, so there could

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>be some some that's to be had here. For Christian Kirk,

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I gave him a B B minus ish starting grade.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>We don't do minuses. How this is we are. We

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>are firmly on whole grades around here. I go away

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years, come back all of a sudden,

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not doing minus. What about pluses? No, there's no pluses,

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and Fantasy football call it what it is. A B

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>or I'm gonna call it as see that. If you're

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna put a gun too, how about Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald gets

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to see too, just to spite you guys, because I

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>would have given him a B minus. But he was

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>targeted thirteen times last week, eight catches over a hundred yards.

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>But this is a tough matchup. Only three wide receivers

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>top two hundred yards versus the Ravens in all of eighteen,

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know that he needs the volume here.

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Fitzgerald and Kirk both need the volume. I don't think

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they're each going to see double digit targets, but I'm

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>willing to give him another chance. With just c grades.

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Fitzgerald sees Brandon Carr. Probably I didn't give up a touchdown,

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>not one last A tough matchup. Yeah, I would play

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Kirk over Fitzgerald if for some reason you saw fit

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to roster both of them. Nothing to see here with

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Keyshawn Johnson quite yet. He did have ten targets, but

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that was in garbage time and nothing to see what

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends, who aren't really even on the field

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in this offense on the Raven side, obviously, Lamar Jackson

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is an a grade after that ridiculous debut in Week

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>one where he was really effective through the air and

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>really didn't even bother to run the ball, which is

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>part of his fantasy appeal. So um, it's a massive

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>upside here in week two again, you could argue he

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>should be the number one quarterback. Charge I don't know

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>where's my number two behind only Tom Brady and that's

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's where I've got it. Yeah, the Cardinals

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>just gave up Matthew Stafford's best passing game in almost

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>two years, so a great spot for Jackson again here

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>his wide receivers, however, a little iffy um markis Brown

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>had the huge couple of touchdowns last week, but was

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>only targeted five times and only played fourteen snaps. Unbelievable.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But that's a mandate for more snaps. I mean he will,

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it'll at least double. I mean he's Scott

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to be sitting on twenty five snaps this week? Do

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you would think so? But Jackson only through to the

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers a combined total of ten times in week one,

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>so I'm a little worried about the volume here. Marc's

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Brown is a boomer bus play but you got to

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>get him in there. I gave him a B grade.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Miles Boykin just one target in one catching week in

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Week one. He may be relevant down the road, but

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>not quite yet. So he is on the bench Mark

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Andrews and A grade here eight catches for a hundred

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and eight yards and a touchdown. Jackson targeted his tight

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 1>ends fifteen times. The Cardinals just let Detroit rookie t J.

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Hockenson go off for a hundred and thirty yards in

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. So elite level start for Mark Andrews. The

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>running game. Mark Ingram also an elite level A start

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred seven yards and two touchdowns last week despite barely

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>even playing. Would you give him an US No, I

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. You should know that about I don't

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>into that. I would never do that. We are about

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>whole grades here. Cardinals last year were easily the worst

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>run defense in the NFL. They gave up league highs

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and rushing yards and rushing touchdowns. Mark Ingram is an

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>obvious that you can even bring Gus Edwards into play here.

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he had more carries than Ingram last week. Yeah,

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that was in a lot of garbage time. But I

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna be up again in the second half.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>So Gus Edwards, let's give him a desperation C grade. Yeah,

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>um for those that took the shot on Justice Hill

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, he's on the wrong side of that deal.

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 1>And it looks like Gus Edwards is available in like

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>every rookie running back outside of Josh Jacob, So practically,

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Devin Singletary, they you know, they all got

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>they all got back, Bernard. You're just gonna have to

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>have patience on them. Most of them I think are

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in good spots. Although Devin Singletary maybe playable today we'll

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>find out, like Dallas takes on Washington, and you know,

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, this won't take long because it's

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>basically start all your cowboys and bench all your red skin.

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But we'll dive in just a little bit here. If

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not treating dak Press Prescott like a fantasy superstar,

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't get it right now. In the past four games,

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>he's blown out the Giants twice, he's won a playoff

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>game and scored multiple touchdowns, and every one of those

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>four games Michael Gallup turning into a superstar. Amari Cooper

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>already is one. The Redskins corners not nearly up to

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the task of stopping those two guys. And you look

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>at what happened last week to the Redskins corners, Deshan

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Jackson all Sean Jeffrey just humbling them. Last year, Dak

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>posted two good, not great games against Washington. I think

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>they're up to great levels here. He is an A grade.

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Zeke is obviously in A grade. It goes without saying,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly with defensive tackle Jonathan Allen knocked out for this game.

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna gonna bounce back from last week's

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>middling performance with a much better game here as well.

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Love Amari Cooper obvious A grade for him as well.

0:11:53.559 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Since arriving in Dallas, he's been targeted per game game. Yes,

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins secondary got torched for three scores last week.

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>He's an A grade. Michael Gallop is He's is almost

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>an A grade, but we're gonna call him a firm

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>B for Michael Gallop. He's almost like we need some

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of designation in between A and no. We go.

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>He has actually had more receptions and yards than Cooper,

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but over the last two games this week, one of

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.719
<v Speaker 1>this year than going back to the last game last year.

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Um he more often runs from the left, where where

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Gallop will match up with cornerback Quintin Dunbar. Dunbar's got

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the hayte and what height and weight or hate and

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>white to hang with Gallop, but does not have the

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>skill set and last year Gallop posted eighty one yards

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown in the one game he played against them.

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pologist now on the bench for the Redskins. The

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>only startable players here case Keenum. It's mostly garbage time here.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't chase last week's box score on Keenum. Obviously maybe

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in a pinch. Dallas has allowed three hundred more passing

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>yards in three straight games going back to last year.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And watch the status of elite cornerback Byron Byron Jones.

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>If Jones does go, then we're just gonna bench Keena

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>out right. If Jones is out then I think Keena

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>becomes a dart throw here. You could try Trey Quinn,

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 1>who scored last week in garbage time, but another dart

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>throw at best with him. A lot of people picked

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>up Terry McLaurin. Terry McLaren, uh, the uh tough matchup

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>though this week against Shadobiawoozy, the cornerback was very good.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And then again, if Byron Jones comes back, he'd have

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to contend with him as well. Adrian Peterson, you're starting

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>running back and it will not matter that team cannot

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>run the ball. Right now, we will go to fanball

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>dot com, where you can find instant access to my

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>weekly rankings, my free one thousand dollar weekly contest, our podcasts,

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and Fambi all the coms you're portal to. Gil guillotine

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>E's These are are mini guillotine leagues that run every

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>single the week. It started as a seventeen man guillotine

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in the priest or not that many right now at

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they're they're getting teenier every week week. That's right. Famil

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash charts for all of that. Coming up

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>NeXT's It's a bit we like to call take a

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>chance on me. Nine players who you would not normally start,

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but you can. This week, you're listening to Fantasy Football

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Weekly and I Heart Radio production Fantasy Football Weekly Returns

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>courtesy of I Heart Radio, Puliciarchi and Matt Harrison and

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Christian Peterson with you. This segment is called Take a

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>chance on me. Nine players not normally in your starting

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>line up, many of whom are available on the waiver wire.

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is a very special royalty free version of

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>take its ants on Me. With these three sleeper quarterbacks

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>running back to receivers when they hit pay dirt, you

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>pay us nothing. This is a royalty free segment, just

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the same amount that we pay for this song. Nothing

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in a very legally binding way, absolutely positively nothing for

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>this particular song of take a chance on Me. Guys

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>will start at the quarterback position. Who do you have, Christian?

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I have Derek Carr this week going up against the Chiefs.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>What happens in Chiefs games is that they put up

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of points early on and the other team

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>is forced to play catch up, or at least attempt to.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And what happens is the other team usually puts up

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>big stats as well. Last year, the Chiefs were a

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>bottom five pass defense. They allowed the most passing yards

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to a poison quarterbacks, nearly two touchdown passes per game,

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and Derek Carr is no exception. In his last two

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>home games against the Chiefs, twinter and eighty five yards

0:15:55.560 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and three touchdowns followed by four seventeen yards and three touchdowns.

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>He's coming off in efficient Week one performance where he

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was only asked to throw the ball twenty six times,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna have to throw the ball a lot

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>more in this one. And I like his chances of

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>putting up big numbers while trying to keep pace with

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs. One might call that carbage time carbas very man,

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>after which that term was called originally invented. Yes, all right, Matt,

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>who's your take chance of the quarterback? I've got Gardner

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Minshew the Mississippi Mustache fan Ball this week. By the way,

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>he's a sixth round rookie. He takes over for the

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>injured Nick Foles. Minshew was credited by Pro Football Focus

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>with a one percent adjusted completion percentage, which means that

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of the balls he threw we're on target. How

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>about that? Uh? He faces a Houston team that just

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>got pasted by Drew Brees last week for seventy yards.

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Six of the last seven quarterbacks who have faced the

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Texans have topped either three hundred yards or thrown from

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>multiple scores, with five of those accomplishing both of those feats.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Minshew, all Right, Gardner minshew. I thought he was

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:07.959
<v Speaker 1>the Indonesian Indian or something. No, No, he's the Mississippi mustache. Okay,

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen goes up against the Giants, he's only dollars

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>on fanball. It's over the last Giants. By the way,

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>if it we're not for the Dolphins, strandson of the

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>worst defense in the league, and they still might, I

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's still gonna be. This is a one A

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and one B situation. Over the last three games, going

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>back through last year, Giants are giving up an average

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of three hundred eighty three passing yards and three and

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a half touchdown passes per game. I don't need Josh

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Allen to get me a full three eight three and

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. How about two thirds of that?

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Give me like two seventy and two and a half,

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and I'd be pretty happy. He'll chip in more with

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>his legs, Giants. Giants defense still has not found suitable

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>replacements for Landon Collins, and then they lost Olivia Vernon

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in the off season. They were the dead last pass

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>rush defense by Pro Football Focus last week, Giants were

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, even Josh Allen cannot screw this up.

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna throw a bunch of deep balls and something

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to connect. Don't forget that he just got

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to spend time in New York all this week because

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>he was in the same stadium last week and away game. Great,

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>great point, just stayed there. Maybe that was it, and

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>then he might even rush in a little something extra

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for you as well, Josh Allen, take a chance on

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback. Just go to the running backs. Yeah, I'm

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna roll with Chris Thompson of the Redskins going up

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>against the Cowboys. Charter. You just callously dismissed the entire

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Redskins backfield when you when you talked about the matchup

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in the previous previous segment. And I agree, they can't

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>run the ball, but what they can do is throw

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the ball to their running backs. I was just leaving

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Chris Thompson for you, specifically Chris Thompson, who led who

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>led all Redskins players and targets last week with ten,

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>catching seven of them for sixty eight yards in the matchup.

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Here favors pass catching running backs. The Cowboys allowed the

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>fifth most receptions to opposing runners last year. They yielded

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>seven catches to the Giants in week one, and now

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>with Adrian Peterson in the game instead of Darius Guys,

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>he's even less of a threat to catch receptions than

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Geis was. So I think Thompson's gonna be in this game.

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be playing catch up. They're gonna be dumping

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.479
<v Speaker 1>it off to him quite a bit. Just on fan

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>ball this week. Malcolm Brown is only one fan ball

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this week, and he's become a true vulture with four

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.479
<v Speaker 1>carries from inside the ten and two short touchdowns last week. However,

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>yards after contact per attempt Malcolm Brown number seven in

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the league at four point six. That's not bad. He's

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not involved in the passing game at all, never having

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>more than two targets in a game in his entire career.

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't matter because the Saints made Carlos Hide

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and Duke Johnson looked like Todd Gurley and his prime

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>last week, allowing seven point three yards per carry, ten

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>carries eighty five yards in a score for Malcolm Brown

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this week. I like it. Darren Sprawls way off everybody's radar.

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Darren Sprawls, this is your one chance, probably on the year,

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to start him almost free in fan ball shalary cap system.

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.719
<v Speaker 1>He was more involved in last week's game plan than

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>anybody would have expected, I think on the field twenty

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>three plays, which was five more than Jordan Howard was,

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>and Howard was the presumed starter for this one. Now,

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously Sprailes is not going to chip in ground yardage

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in any meaningful way. But he might. He had like

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>nine carries last time. I well, probably not a meaningful way.

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe falcons have allowed You guys already know this. You

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>know where I'm going with this. Falcons have allowed the

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>most running back touchdowns last year, the year before that,

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the year before that, and the year before that. I

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's safe to say that we will always have

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>to take a chance on me pass catching running back

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>going against the falcon That's right, it's it always the tradition.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it this time because I believe Darren Spoils

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>should be in the Hall of Fame. He is number

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>six all time in yards. That's awfully impressive. So you're

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>basing his Week two prognosis on his entire career. That's right, good,

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>which now spans Darren Sprawls. Let's go to the receiver positions.

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>You take a chance of me receiver. Yeah, I'm gonna

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>roll with me Cole Hardman this week on the opposite

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>side of that Chiefs versus Raiders matchup that I talked about.

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>You may remember Hardman as the guy that the Chiefs

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>drafted this spring to replace Tyreek Hill when it wasn't

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>at all clear whether Tyreek Hill was ever going to

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>play in the NFL again. Then Hill came back and

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody forgot about Hardman, and now Hill is hurt again

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and here comes Hardman. He did play eight of the

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>snaps in Week one, even with Hill in the game

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>for at least part of it. But he's the guy

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>who's going to step into that role of playing deep threat,

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and anybody who's gonna get looks in this offense, especially

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>as a deep threat replacing Tyreek Hill, is worthy of

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>your attention this week, So go grab him. He's on

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire in most leagues, or at least was

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>as of earlier. This week, I've got Cole Beasley at

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>fan but it's almost a free space. He didn't put

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>up the huge numbers that John Brown did last week,

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.719
<v Speaker 1>but he did have nine targets, with which only trailed

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>John Brown by one. UM He caught four or five

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of his targets from the slot, but also ran ten

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>routes from out wide saw four targets on those ten routes.

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 1>The Giants defense is terrible. I'll highlight how awful they

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>are amongst outside receivers later, But every Cowboys wide receiver

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>had a great day, including slotman Randall Cobb, who had

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>his best day in years with sixty nine nice yards

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in a score. Um Josh Allens might take a chance

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>on me corner. Let's hook him up. Let's hook those

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>two up. Vance McDonalds might take a chance of me

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>receiver slash tight end in this case. He only had

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>two receptions last week, but was on the field for

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy one of the Steelers plays, and his backup Xavier

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Grimble was on the field for two plays in the

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>entire game. McDonald will be more involved in this game.

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Seattle allowed nine tight end touched receptions for ninety three

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>yards last week, and Seattle's allowed at least seventy tight

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>end yards and five of the last six games going

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>back to last year. This is gonna be a bounce

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>back game for Vance McDonald I am confident by the

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>way fan ball if you're wondering what you gotta pay

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>on fan ball to get a little vance McDonald action.

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not bad. I don't think Buffalo taking on the Giants.

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt we were We've just talked about this one in

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of detail. A little bill and might

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me. Quarterback Cold Beasley, you take

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a chance for me. Wide receiver, who's left to talk about?

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about John Brown. He's a a B grade,

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But if there was something between a B and an

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>A that I could give him, it's it's pretty close

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to something right between those two void right there. It's

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a chasm between those two grades. Slightly better than that

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>right there. Um Perimeter wide receivers torch the Giants defense

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 1>last week, as Michael Gallup and Amari Cooper totaled third

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>team catches two sixty four yards and a touchdown against

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this Giants d The Giants only managed one pressure on

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Doc last week and thirty two dropbacks. There's gonna be

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>plenty of time for Josh Allen to look around, get

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Brown downfield and hit him with a deep ball. Devin Singletary,

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually giving a B grade two as well with

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gore and t J. Elden on the bench. Devin

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Singletary leads the NFL in russias of ten plus yards

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>with four, which is about all the carries he had.

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>He had four Russian attempts um. He also did have

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>five receptions to Gordon out touch Singletary ten to nine.

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>But that ends. Now it's over. Now it should be well, okay,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we think you think it's over, it's gotta be over.

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt anything to say, come on, all right the other side,

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty easy. Sae Kwon Barkley easy A. Don't

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>even have to talk about it. He's an easy A

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in any lineup. Uh Evan Ingram a grade as well.

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd is out. That's seven vacated targets from last week,

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and I bet they all go to Angram, who already

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>had thirteen targets in his big performance. Say Kron and

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Ingram are literally their only chance to win. Eli Manning.

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the team is on the bench. Cody

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Lattimer isn't anyone's lineup this week, but he did have

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the most targets among wide receivers last week with eight,

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but he's still on the bench. He is on the bench.

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I worry a little bit. She's with the dearth of

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>receiving talent, no Golden Tate, no no Sterling Shepherd. That

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bills might just take away Evan Ingram and basically say,

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, go beat us with Cody Latimer. They might try,

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but Barkley is still there and Evan Ingram's playing in

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position. Wide receivers just working one more matchup. Indeed,

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple is taking on Tennessee. Marlon Mack was awesome last week.

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Leads the NFL and rushing yards with a hundred seventy four.

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Now he gets Tennessee. Yeah, he was. He was awesome,

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And it sure seems like the Colts without Andrew Luck

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>now have sort of turned their attention to the running

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>game and running behind their maweling offensive line, and it

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>worked like a charm in week one. You mentioned a

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy four yards on twenty five carries. When

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>these two teams meet met in weeks seventeen of last year,

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>so two games ago, two games ago, Mac had twenty

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>five carries for a hundred and nineteen yards and a touchdown.

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So I've got him as a solid a here, like

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>he's in that group of a's that's right all right there,

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a huge cliff down to the mac

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is right in there with the a's yet, So let's yes,

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>let's move to the passing game. Jacoby Brissette. I have

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench here. Just didn't have the attempts,

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the volume last week. Just twenty seven pass attempts,

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred ninety yards and two touchdowns. Really no reason to

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think about putting him in the lineup on the road

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>against a solid Titans pass defense. T Y Hilton is

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the only receiver you need to be concerned about here.

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Nine targets in Week one, eighty seven yards and two touchdowns.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>No other receiver had more than five targets, So it's

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>all t Y Hilton all the time. Hilton also had

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>nine catches for a hundred and fifty five yards and

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns the last time the Colts traveled to Tennessee. Still,

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>because of the lack of volume in the uncertain here,

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>just a B grade for Hilton. None the wide receivers

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>are worth anything. Tight ends we're targeted just six times

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in Week one. I know Scott Fish earlier went to

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>bat for the idea that Jacoby Brissette was going to

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>throw a lot to the tight ends, but we didn't

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>see it in week one, and we still we still

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>have Ebron and Doyle splitting looks there. So don't worry

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>about either one of them. On the Titans side, there's

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>really well, there's a couple of things that talk about.

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the easy one. Derrick Henry is an

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>easy a after last week's explosion eighty four yards and

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown on the ground, seventy five yards and a

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdown through the air. The Colts just got eviscerated for

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 1>two hundred nineteen combined rushing and receiving yards and three

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns by the Chargers running backs last week. So, Derrick

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Henry is he number one on your running back ranks?

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I haven't he's got he's yeah, he's not one, but

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>he's up there. Okay, passing game, I've got Marcus Mariota

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. I'm not fooled by last week's box score.

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It looks nice to eight yards and three touchdowns, but

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>he had just twenty four pass attempts. Thirty percent of

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>his yards came on a dump off that Derrick Henry

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>took seventy five yards for a Touchdow untouched at that

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>untouched right, So I'm not buying it on Mariota. I'm

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:49.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave him on the bench. I want to make

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>him prove it at least one more week. The wide

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>receivers were kind of a mess. They combined for just

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>four catches on hundred and five yards in Week one. A. J.

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Brown had three of those catches and a hundred of

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>those yards. So he's the guy that you have to

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>look at here if you're desperate to get in a

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver here, I'd give him a C grade. Corey

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Davis man three targets, although he was going up against

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Brown's cornerback Denzel Ward, who is legit. He's turning into

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a shutdown, shutdown type guy. But needless to say, you

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>can't have Davis in your lineup. The only other guy

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>were concerned about here, tight end Delaney Walker. Welcome back

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Delaney with two touchdowns in week one. The Colts allowed

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the most catches and yards to opposing tight ends in

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so let's keep it going with a B start on

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Delaney Walker this week. I'm mom listening to that. I

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>think it makes sense. By the way, if you're wondering

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Marlon mackw you just mentioned running back four this week,

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry running back five. Do you have one spot?

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, but they actually graded out with the

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>exact same grade note and a half out of ten

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>because you can use halfs apparently in my grade, yes,

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>but not in the You've probably heard us talking about Team,

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the hottest new format and Fantasy sports. Each the low

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>scoring team gets cut from the league and their entire

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>roster goes the waiver wire. It makes for insane waiver

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.479
<v Speaker 1>wire runs. People are tweeting me about Sae Kwon Barkley

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hitting the hitting the waiver wire, Alvin Camara hitting the

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire. This week. You can learn more and even

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>join a Guillotine League by going to Guillotine League dot

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>com powered by fanball dot Com. Coming up next on

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly, we will break down more matchups, including

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers and the Lions. Austin Ekeler awesome last week?

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>What about this week? We'll tight when we come back.

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to Fantasy Football Weekly and I Heart

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Radio Production. I am Paul Charchi and my co hosts

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>are Christian Peterson and Matt Harrison. Christian Peterson is at

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Cooler Heads twenty nine and Matt Harrison is

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>at Explosive Output. I am at Paul Charchie and you

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>can hear us over the year on many stations around

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the country, and this show is also a podcast available

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>every Friday and all the major podcasting platforms, including the

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>number one destination for podcasts, the I Heart Radio app.

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Chargers take on the Lions, and it was a great

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>game Frost and Ekeler last week. But I'm a little

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>more cautious this week around because the Lions committed to

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>beefing up their defensive line over the last year. They

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>traded for snacks Harrison. Then in the off season they

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>added a Matt Patricia favorite going back to his days

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Patriots and Trey Flowers. But those two got

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>off to a very slow start after combining from the

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>three tackles last week, and they let David Johnson pile

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>up one D thirty seven total yards. Still, Johnson was

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty involved in that past and that's your best that's

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>your best angle for Ler for sure. It Eckler is

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a very good receiver, and so that's your angle and

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>why he's still a B grade here. If you're just

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about running up the middle. I don't like Eckler

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>so much, and that's a lot of why I don't

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>like Justin Jackson at all. And he is a on

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the bench. He only got of the snaps last week,

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and then again he's trying to run up the middle

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>right at snacks Harrison and that's more. His bit is

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>between the tackles. So I'm out on Justin Jackson. Let's

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>go to the passing game where no Hunter Henry Mike

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Williams probably does not play with the knee injury, although

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think technically a game time decision for him. That

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>leaves Philip rivers with Travis Benjamin maybe, and Benjamin's gotta

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>take the sleigh ride Darius Sleigh in this one. So

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't we need some sleigh bells by the way

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.479
<v Speaker 1>for the sleigh ride. That would be pretty great, all

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>right it Rianna is making a note right now, get

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to get the sleigh bell signs for us slay. I

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>don't what would the what would the Joe Iron Hayden

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>sound be like a clink like like the league's vault

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>closing maybe, but it's a creaking sound right as the

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but the what about the pokey part of the Iron

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Maiden that ouch anyway, Philip Rivers is is just a

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>C grade here, although we're interesting to note the Lions

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>go from last week trying to stop Kyler Murray, right,

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this really raw, amazing athlete with all the speed, and

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>now they go to a savvy veteran with two career

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>starts and as as mobile as a statue. So uh

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that Larry Fitzgerald terrorized the Lions from the slot last year,

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and Keenan Allen still has a good opportunity here who

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>runs his routes from the majority of the time from

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the slot, and without Hunter Henry and Mike Williams. I

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>think that becomes really the whole game for Philip Rivers

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is whether or not you you trust Keenan Allen. I do.

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got to. I've got a B grade on Rivers,

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Keenan Allen in the hopes that they

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>can do enough there. I wouldn't try Travis Benjamin. Let's

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>go to the Detroit side. Carry on Johnson epic disappointment

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>because he's not that good. No, I think he is good, um,

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and I do I like him again here I'm going

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the well I liked him last week and

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>liked him here. Marlon Mack just hammered the Chargers for

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>one seventy four yards. As Christian elucidated moments ago, the

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Chargers have allowed nearly two running back touchdowns per game

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>over their last five games. Johnson got a two to

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>one ratio of usage and snap counts over c. J. Anderson,

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>so he he's my preferred guy. But I still have

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and an A grade on Carrie on Johnson, I gotta

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>c n c J Anderson because he did wasn't It

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>was a two to one snap count and that's not

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that bad. He carried the ball eleven times last week,

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and the great game script here should be tilted much

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>more towards the run than last week. So I like c. J.

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Anderson as a sneaky starting grade of a C. Let's

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>go to the passing game for Matthew Stafford. Do not

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>chase last week's box score against Arizona. Arizona was missing

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>both their starting cornerbacks. This time, it's gonna be a

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of running. Last year, the Charges were an inconsistent

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>run defense, and then, as I mentioned earlier, Marlon mac

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>ripped him last week. I just don't think that there's

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a passing game. There's not gonna be a

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of volume. Just to see grade on Matthew Stafford,

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>see grade on Kenny Golladay. Unlike last week, he's got

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a brutal matchup. He gets Charges cornerback Casey Hayward, who

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>allowed the least separation to wide receivers last year and

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>the sixth lowest catch rate to wide receivers in his

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>coverage last year. Casey Hayward is awesome and he likely

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>shadows Kenny Golladay for much of this game. Let's go

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to t J Hockenson last week setting the all time

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:43.760
<v Speaker 1>tight end debut yardage record and didn't need the overtime

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it. He said it in regulations, So don't

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 1>anybody put an asterix on the end of that record

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of t J Hockenson's. The Charges held the Colts excellent

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>tight ends only three receptions last week. Um, and so

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>when I look at that, I gotta figure this is

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna be the then close to last week's game.

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>By volume and again run heavy script. I don't think

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have anywhere near the kind of success for

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>t J Hockenson this week. But still startable with a

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>C grade and Marvin Marvin Harrison only lightly involved. Marvin

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Harrison still in Thervin Harrison, Marvin Harrison coming out of retirement. Um, wait,

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is he still in prison? I don't think he ever

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>went to prison. They never go to prison. After all,

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the Shenanigans and the guns in every game, all right,

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones only lightly involved last week coming off his injury,

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and again game script is not ideal for him. He

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is on the bench, New England taking on Miami. Matt Start.

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Everybody from the Patriots bench, everybody from the Dolphins. Can

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we just move on? Yeah? Almost. I would like to

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>propose a new Fantasy football weekly rule. We're not going

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to mention the Dolphins until there is a starter starter,

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy on the bench. So I don't even get

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to say the name like the Patriots are playing. No what, well,

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>we can say the name, the name of Dolphins. We

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.439
<v Speaker 1>just don't ever like toss on the Dolphins side of it. Yeah,

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to. Uh do you want me to

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Dolphins? I don't really want to talk

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>about all on the bench. Even garbage time. You can't

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>count on garbage time against the secondary, So No, I

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a startable Dolphin. No, it's gross. Uh.

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots A starts for Tom Brady, Julian Edelman, Josh

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Gordon and Antonio Brown if he plays. Obviously, the allegations

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 1>against him are serious. And uh, I did see that

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to put him on the Commissioner's exempt list.

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And the Patriots haven't said whether or not they're playing.

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>They're playing playing, um, so fire him up in your

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 1>lineup if he sits. Somehow, Edelman and Gordon go up

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to an A and a half grade. Uh, it's Philip

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Dorsett gets a ce point sixth grade that would uptick

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to a full how you know why? Now you know

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>why we don't do the plus? Is the halfs there

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>any of that stuff? This is why it turns well,

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a B minus minus plus minus. Dorset plays a

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>similar style to Hollywood Brown, who logged two long touchdowns

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Fins last week, and then the running backs

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.479
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle James White. James White's a little bit dinged

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>up and now or actually no, not d He's got

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the possible birth of a child, so he might not go.

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>They're all bees anyway, Michelle White and Rex Burkhead. Michelle

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>led the backfield with fifteen carries. There should be plenty

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:31.359
<v Speaker 1>of garbage time here where they're just grinding clock. Uh.

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Both Birkhead and White had five catches, although Burkhead had

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.760
<v Speaker 1>one more target than White. Burke had led the running

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>backs and opportunities with the eight targets plus eight carries.

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>He logged five point five yards per carry on the

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>ground as well. So Burkhead's kind of a sneaky play,

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>like a bonus take a chance on me here. Uh.

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:50.879
<v Speaker 1>He could have more run in the game too, since

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it's probably gonna be a blow up in the second half.

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>It might be just all Rex Burkhead in the second half.

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's it. Sony Michelle had the was fifteen carries

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:01.959
<v Speaker 1>for fourteen. It was. It was pretty bad. There's gonna

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>be a get right Yeah, it doesn't it feel that way. Yeah,

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get him right here. Yeah. I think it's

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I had to put an a grade on him. San

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Francisco taking on Cincinnati, Um, there was not a lot

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to love about the San Francisco offense and the first

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the first week of the season, you feel any better

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>about them as they travel to Cincinnati. No, not particularly uh,

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>certainly not about the passing game. I mean charts. These

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>are your guys, Garoppolo, Dante Pettis, What's what's happening here?

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and sixties six yards and one touchdown in

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Week one against a bottom five past defense in the

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Bucks that he should have been able to move the

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:41.720
<v Speaker 1>ball against. The Bengals were also not a good past

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:45.240
<v Speaker 1>defense last year. But I just have no confidence in Garoppolo.

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 1>So he's on the bench, along with all of his

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers who combined for twelve targets. The most targeted

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>was Deebo Samuel with three. We'll talk more about him later.

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got Marquis Goodwin, who was second in

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:02.919
<v Speaker 1>snaps amongst San Francisco Whiteouts, which I bring up mainly

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>because I like the word amongst to say. And then

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Dante Pettis, he's practically dead, charging two snaps to snap,

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 1>but each it's a groin injury, and they say he's

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 1>fully healthy now and he'll get more snap You like

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>him so much. They caught him in our Empire League. Man,

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 1>what a disaster. Tight end is not a disaster though,

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle ten targets last week, caught eight of them.

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>If you don't if you weren't watching, you may not

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.720
<v Speaker 1>have noticed that he had two touchdowns called back because

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of penalties, so he was all over this game. He's

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>an easy a start against the since defense that allowed

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>more tight end touchdowns than any other team last year.

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>So let's go to the running game. Matt Brada now

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>steps into a mostly full time role with Tevin Coleman

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 1>out with that high ankle spraying. Coleman looks like he'll

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:52.280
<v Speaker 1>be out four to six weeks, so this is brightest

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 1>chance until he gets injured. Last week's game still most

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 1>most shirt most Steed could be in the mix as well,

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 1>but I think you will be Yeah, probably, uh, you know, really,

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you can look at Breda this week as an interesting

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 1>option because Cincinnati was bad against the run last year.

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Opponing running backs average nearly five yards per carry. They

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 1>did hold Chris Carson to forty six yards on fifteen

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>carries in Week one, so maybe they've started to figure

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>some stuff out. But I've gotten scored twice. I've got

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Breto with a B level start here and most diret

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I have on the bench just because He's probably gonna

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>get sixty eight touches unless Breta gets hurt and we

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 1>can't predict that, so I've got him on the bench.

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>The other side of this matchup for the Bengals, let's

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 1>start with Andy Dalton. Fire up the peak, baby, take

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me quarterback last week. You're welcome, You're welcome.

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure all of you started Andy Dalton in your

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>league's last week. I did in one. I started in

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>a two quarterback league. I did say to start Andy

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Dalton over Jared Goff to several people. If it's not

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>on this show, I really don't want to hear your

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>muttering Twitter around the plater. Baby. Nicely done by explosive output,

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:06.359
<v Speaker 1>the career high four and er in eighteen yards last week.

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And let's not forget that Dalton has had a couple

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of top ten quarterback you know, Fantasy seasons three and

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:18.399
<v Speaker 1>four and five years ago, back when played a lot. Yeah,

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it looks like this new offense, this new coaching staff

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit more willing to air it out,

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit so, and the matchup hears pretty good.

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>The forty Niners were able to flummox Jamis Winston last week,

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 1>although he's flummox prone. I do. I do, in fact,

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 1>but last year they allowed the most quarterback passing touchdown

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so this is a matchup Dalton can exploit again. I

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:45.399
<v Speaker 1>gave him a B level grade along with Tyler Boyd

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and John Ross, each of his top two wide receivers

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>bees for both of those guys. Boyd had eleven targets

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>and eight catches. Ross, of course, erupted seven catches for

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a d fifty eight yards and two touchdowns. I certainly

0:41:57.719 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're going to see a repeat of that,

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>But just the fact that those two guys are so

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>heavily involved without a J Green here, I think that

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>brings them into the mix. Forty niners were bad against

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers last year. They allowed a league worse twenty

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>seven wide receiver touchdowns. So both of those guys are

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in play. The tight ends are not. They split eleven

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>targets and nine catches between c. J Uzoma and Tyler Effort,

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>so those guys are on the bench. That brings us

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to the running game. And Joe Mixon sprained ankle in

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Week one, knocked him out, didn't practice until Friday. He

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>did return to practice on Friday, so that gives him

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a chance to play. You're gonna have to keep an

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>eye on the injury report just to make sure this

0:42:35.680 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>is a good matchup. Tampa running backs averaged over five

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:40.919
<v Speaker 1>years uh five yards per carrying a hundred and seventy

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:44.399
<v Speaker 1>combined rushing and receiving yards against the forty niners last week,

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't go Geo. Bernard is an auto star,

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Last year, Mixing sat out a couple of games.

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 1>In those two games, Bernard got every running back touch

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and had at least sixty five combo yards and a

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in both. So have Bernard ready just in just

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in case mix and doesn't play to actually your best play,

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.359
<v Speaker 1>best case scenario for fantasy would be preferable. Yeah, if

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>if mixings out, which removes all question about whether you

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>should even start Mixing or whatever else. And then if

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got you Bernard, you just you and you deploy him, right,

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I agree, It makes it much much simpler, unless, of course,

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you own Mixing and you don't have Bernard. Yeah, but

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 1>then but somebody else owns Bernard and he's listening right now,

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and then he gets to go start him, which isn't

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:31.479
<v Speaker 1>half bad? Um, Thursday night game, Cam Newton drop herbal

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or not? Let's go to the Cam Newton desk in

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Christian Peterson. You know, it's getting nothing, nothing on the ground,

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's been this way, getting nothing on the ground

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>for him anymore. And that's the problem. It's sure it

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:47.439
<v Speaker 1>sure seems that way that they've just completely gone away

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:49.800
<v Speaker 1>from any pretense of of running with him. And that

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>was where a significant portion of his fantasy, his fantasy

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>excellence came from. So I'm not dropping him quite yet.

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him another week or two to see

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>what happens. But he's uh yeah, he's Rivera will be

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the first coach fired in the NFL this year. Wow,

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you it's not impossible that you're right about that new owner,

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>don't They won and nine in their last ten. Today

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>they lost? They lost some things six or last seven.

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 1>We're only a couple of weeks away from this coming

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>up next. Let's answer three tough questions beyond the Cam

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Newton one. You can play along. Try to go hey,

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>perfect three and oh on Fantasy Football Weekly. It is

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly on Paul arch fanball dot com. My

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 1>cohorts are Christian Peterson and Matt Harrison. You are my

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>panel of experts, gentlemen, and that means it's time to

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 1>get into the grinder with three tough questions. Listeners you

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>can play along, Stee if you can go three and

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>question number one with Antonio Brown now on board? Is

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady and every single week automatic starter? Christian, Yes,

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say yes, although I mean, is Antonio

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Brown on board? Looks like he's gonna be for Week two.

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't know beyond that, But honestly, even even without him,

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the way that this offense functioned in Week one was

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive. And let's recall, Brady has been a top

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve at least a top twelve, if not, you know,

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>top three fantasy quarterback every single uninjured year since two

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:41.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven. Really, the only reason that he wasn't

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>coming into this year is because we weren't sure who

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he was going to throw to. Josh Gordon hadn't been reinstated,

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown wasn't around, Gronk retired, so it wasn't clear.

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>They had Julian Edelman and a bunch of question marks.

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, now Gordon's back, Brown is in

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the fold. So yeah, absolutely, he's he is an easy

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>every week starter at this point. Yeah, CP took most

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of my thunder, but I want to tell her. I

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you to tell me when they're going

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to lose in this schedule this week at Miami, next

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 1>week against Trevor Simeon and the Jets, then at Buffalo,

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>then at Washington, then the Giants at home, then at

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. That's seven and oh they don't play another

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:26.800
<v Speaker 1>moderately tough team until week eight at home against Cleveland,

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and who knows if Cleveland's good. So Tom Brady is

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:33.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be a start just about every week until

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 1>then at Baltimore. I think week nine is that's it.

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's gonna be a juggernaut. And that

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>was you guys took all my I was gonna go

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>right to the schedule. You took all my all my points.

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 1>No playoff team on the schedule until week nine. Yep.

0:46:47.480 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It's it's unbelievable. They're just the rich get richer with that,

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>with that particular organization. It wasn't that tough a question.

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 1>The correct answer is yes. Tough question Number two, should

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owners hold Hunter Henry or drop him Matt, This

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>question was tougher. Charge Yeah. In fact, on Twitter, John

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>de Nunzio told me to guard my broca's lobe during

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this question because it would be a shame if I

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:18.360
<v Speaker 1>weren't able to move my tongue or facial muscles to

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>produce the sounds of speech. John, that would be about

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 1>that would be unfortunate at this moment. Good thing I

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>guarded it well. For those of us that have been

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>listening to you, we'd actually welcome you being unable to

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 1>form words. Wo uh. You can drop Hunter Henry and Redraft.

0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a tibia plateau fracture which can be afford a

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:39.800
<v Speaker 1>six week injury. Although J J. Watt had this injury

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in and missed the rest of the season, and he

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>had it early as well. The Chargers honestly don't know

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:47.839
<v Speaker 1>when and if he can come back. And let's say

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>he comes back in late October. He gets the Bears, Packers, Broncos, Jaguars,

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and Vikings defenses on his schedule. His only easy game

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 1>games are a game against the Chiefs and two games

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Raiders. Those are probably the only starting grades

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>he gets unless he's a dred percent healthy, So I

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you can drop him. Okay, yeah, I agree.

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the original timeline here four to six weeks

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:14.799
<v Speaker 1>seems optimistic based on what we've heard from other people

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 1>who have suffered this injury. And another factor here is

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that there are now other tight ends that you can

0:48:21.000 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>go and get. There are legitimate tight ends that might

0:48:23.160 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have been on your waiver wire, including Darren Waller after

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 1>week one, t J. Hockenson who erupted in week one,

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>even Delaney Walker who most people probably weren't drafting, and

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>he had two touchdowns. He looks like he's back. So

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the fact that there are legitimate tight ends

0:48:37.239 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>actually that you can go and get, means that you

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 1>can't waste the roster spot for Hunter Henry Okay, Doctor

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Harrison and Dr Peterson you know, by all means feel

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 1>free to override every you know, all the team doctors

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 1>who have actually looked at his knee and set the

0:48:51.120 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>timetable for recovery charge. I consulted online doctors, and the

0:48:55.600 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>online doctors are never wrong. Nick Riviera online doctor Uh,

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he's expected to come back in four to six weeks,

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>it could just as easily be four as six. In

0:49:05.360 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 1>either way, that's enough that you're gonna hold him. There

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:09.800
<v Speaker 1>just aren't enough good tight ends to kick one to

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the curb a rosters. T. J. Hockenson is on a

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 1>ROS and redraft. Know not after your perennial advice that

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't trust rookie tight ends. Some some of the

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 1>tight ends that we were counting on look super dubious

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. O. J. Howard, Kyle Rudolph, Jared Cook, Jack Doyle,

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they all underwhelmed. We don't know that you can go

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to war with those guys you're really gonna bring into this.

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 1>You're asking you can't find a tight end? Average is

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:49.719
<v Speaker 1>half a touchdown per game anywhere else. It costs you

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:52.359
<v Speaker 1>a roster spot for a month. Big deal, because when

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>he comes back, you've got a potentially top five tight

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:58.360
<v Speaker 1>end the rest of the year. You can't walk past that.

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So askue you a question. Yes, if you have Hunt

0:50:02.480 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry, Yeah, wait what is this? If you have

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry Kareem Hunt, a guy who you told everybody

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:10.759
<v Speaker 1>to draft, and maybe a J. Green on your bench

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, then what do you do? Are you dropping

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry that who's got that combination of players you got?

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I would advocate holding all all any one of those players. Okay,

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but most people don't have enough rosters hold all three,

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 1>and most people Hunter Henry don't have Kareem Hunt tough.

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Question number three? Should fantasy owners beholding any Jets receiver? Christian?

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you a question, now, just kidding, I

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 1>would never do that to you, Dare. What was the question,

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 1>should be holding any Jets receivers? Yeah? I mean this

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 1>question comes up because of the Sam Donald news where

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:49.719
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be out three to four weeks with

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:52.239
<v Speaker 1>and let me let me just get ahead of the story.

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I gave it to him. I know there was a

0:50:55.640 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of internet rumors. It was me.

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 1>It was me, Hey, just let's just move on, and

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 1>we're now ahead of the story. Guess I gotta go

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:09.320
<v Speaker 1>get Mono tested now bad news? Uh? Yeah, So so

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that's where this question comes from, right. But I think

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Crowder is the only guy that you can hold

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>here after his seventeen target Week one performance. I mean,

0:51:17.000 --> 0:51:18.920
<v Speaker 1>he's the guy in this offense that's gonna play in

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the slot. They're gonna If anything, I think Trevor Simon

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:24.319
<v Speaker 1>is going to focus on him as much or more

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>because he's incapable of throwing the deep ball. So Robbie Anderson,

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you can let get rid of him. Da Marius Thomas,

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly not jumping on him right away, but I

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>will hold Jamison Crowder. I just want to talk about

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 1>how Jamison Crowder was might take a chance on me

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver last week. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I get a

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:50.359
<v Speaker 1>happy trombone to Sam Donald. Likes to target the slot,

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but Sam Donald has mono. When Donald does return, it's

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:57.799
<v Speaker 1>likely that's about when Chris Herndon returns, and I think

0:51:57.880 --> 0:52:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that SAPs a lot of what was making outer super targetable. Uh,

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the inside targets. Herndon's the guy I want the most

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:07.319
<v Speaker 1>spent in a redraft league. You won't have to pick

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:09.839
<v Speaker 1>him up until we tell you to pick him up

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in premature speculation next week. It's probably come by the way,

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Go get Herndon now, because you can afford to sit

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 1>on him for four This is a this is a

0:52:18.680 --> 0:52:25.440
<v Speaker 1>speculation and un Tyreek Hill and Tyreek Kill. Uh, you

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:29.279
<v Speaker 1>should drop them all, Sam Donald. Sam Donald's mono is

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be two to four weeks, right, So he's basically

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 1>nuke dollar receivers. For four weeks, and now the bio

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is week four. Now it's week five, and here comes

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles, then the Cowboys, then the Patriots, and then

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars. Those are all negative matchups for the passing game. Eagles, Cowboys, Patriots, Jaguars.

0:52:49.080 --> 0:52:52.319
<v Speaker 1>But allow me to note this, after everybody has at

0:52:52.360 --> 0:52:56.399
<v Speaker 1>that point wash their hands of the Jets receivers, their

0:52:56.440 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 1>schedule becomes the easiest passing schedule in the NFL. Breathe

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the way, and at that point it's

0:53:03.719 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the week seven, week eight, you're gonna be

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:08.239
<v Speaker 1>able to strike on a bunch of Jets and get

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>hot in the second half. Did they happen to get

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins twice in the playoffs? So they don't they

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>get I think the Dolphins are Week ten or or so.

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Not twice in the fantasy playoffs. I would have been handy.

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Not the case. You better wash your hands with that

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:22.719
<v Speaker 1>mono going around. Well, there's a good point. It's a

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>good point. Vikings take onto the Packers. Let's let's try

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to break down this game a little bit from the

0:53:28.239 --> 0:53:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Viking side. Dalvin Cook extraordinary in the first game, got

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:34.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight percent of the place with Vikings are running plays.

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 1>They only threw ten passes in the game, they were

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:39.839
<v Speaker 1>still running him like deep into the fourth quarter by

0:53:40.200 --> 0:53:42.760
<v Speaker 1>three touch I was like, let's get some Alexander Madison

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in here, and Maxtuale Madison looked good too, and the

0:53:44.560 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 1>average five yards to carry um last week the Bears

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a band in the run against the Packers instantly, And

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think I got a really good feel

0:53:52.280 --> 0:53:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Packers run defense and how good it really

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:57.280
<v Speaker 1>might be and if it's whether or not it's particularly

0:53:57.320 --> 0:53:59.439
<v Speaker 1>improved from last year. You couldn't get a good feel

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for anything on that first game between the Packers. It

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:04.800
<v Speaker 1>was so weird, all right, um, and Mr Bisky was

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:06.880
<v Speaker 1>so bad. So I think you know there will be

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a considered effort to get cook going. He's getting He

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:10.320
<v Speaker 1>gets an A grade here, And let me mention this

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. The Bears backs had fifteen receptions in the game,

0:54:15.160 --> 0:54:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and that coming off a six reception game last week.

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:21.279
<v Speaker 1>That's just Tarik Cohen, who played slot receiver more than

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:23.799
<v Speaker 1>anybody who all highlight in the next matchup. But there

0:54:23.840 --> 0:54:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you go, Uh that was that was still fifteen receptions.

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Tarik Cohen was eight of them or whatever, so there's

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:31.440
<v Speaker 1>still plenty of receptions to go around. Cook said obvious

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a the passing game has got a lot of people

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:37.240
<v Speaker 1>worried because of the just the ten the ten attempts

0:54:37.360 --> 0:54:40.120
<v Speaker 1>last week by Kirk Cousins. Plus the offensive line looked bad,

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:43.719
<v Speaker 1>finished dead last Vikings offensive line in past protection by

0:54:43.760 --> 0:54:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus after Week one, and I worry about

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Cousins finding time to hit his receivers downfield. The Packers

0:54:50.680 --> 0:54:55.800
<v Speaker 1>pass rush looked amazing on Thursday, and the Vikings offensive

0:54:55.840 --> 0:54:58.920
<v Speaker 1>line isn't nearly as good as the Bears is, so

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm of us here. Cousins was good in both matchups

0:55:02.280 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 1>last year, but this Packer's defense feels so much better

0:55:04.800 --> 0:55:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and so much faster. I've got just a C grade

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:09.880
<v Speaker 1>on Cousins. I've got a B grade on Adam Finland.

0:55:10.640 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>In the two divisional matchups with Green Bay last year,

0:55:14.360 --> 0:55:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Finland put it caught twenty passes for two hundred fifty

0:55:19.360 --> 0:55:22.720
<v Speaker 1>six yards and two touchdowns. Now, the beauty of feeling

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is he will play the X, Y and the Z

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 1>positions so they can match him up against the aged

0:55:28.640 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Termont Williams or the Rusty Kevin King. They can find

0:55:32.080 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 1>their matchups with him, so I give him a B grade.

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Digs less as much, and I think he's gonna get

0:55:36.719 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of j Or Alexander. I don't like that

0:55:38.680 --> 0:55:40.759
<v Speaker 1>matchup as much, and I think Diggs wants to get

0:55:40.840 --> 0:55:42.960
<v Speaker 1>free down field more and again not sure if he's

0:55:43.120 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 1>if Cousins will have the time for that. So I've

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:48.120
<v Speaker 1>only got a C grade on Stefon Diggs. Also, Theelan's

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 1>last two trips to Lambo twelve receptions in each game.

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Dang uh, Stefa. We just mentioned step On Diggs. Cole

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Rodolph zero catches last week, despite playing one hundred percent

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Vikings snap. He had no catches in one target.

0:56:02.160 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>He'll I think he'll catch a pass, so I'm gonna

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:06.439
<v Speaker 1>go on a limb he will have at least one pass.

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:08.640
<v Speaker 1>He did have one called back on penalty. He had

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a pass called back on. He had a reception called

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:15.240
<v Speaker 1>back on penalty. Last week, the Bears tight ends combined

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for one catch for six yards against Green Bay. And

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:21.239
<v Speaker 1>now they've got these speedy linebackers who are perfectly well

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:23.880
<v Speaker 1>suited to cover a guy like Rudolph. So I've got

0:56:24.000 --> 0:56:26.200
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench until we have a better read

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:28.640
<v Speaker 1>on how he's going to fit into this Vikings offense.

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Green Bay side. Aaron Rodgers gets

0:56:33.600 --> 0:56:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a Mike Zimmer defense that has absolutely throttled him as

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:40.360
<v Speaker 1>well as any team in the past. He has thrown

0:56:40.520 --> 0:56:45.080
<v Speaker 1>zero or one touchdowns in five of the past six games.

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:47.759
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings secondary may be shorthanded, well, they will be

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>shorthanded without slot cornerback McKenzie Alexander, which does give some

0:56:51.320 --> 0:56:54.840
<v Speaker 1>help for Aaron Rodgers here. He can target potentially Geroni

0:56:55.000 --> 0:56:58.479
<v Speaker 1>Allison in the slot against safety j Ron Curse, who's

0:56:58.480 --> 0:57:00.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna get moved to slock cornerback. That could be a

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:03.319
<v Speaker 1>plus matchup for him. So I kind of like him

0:57:03.400 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 1>there for that for that particular reason. Also potentially a

0:57:07.200 --> 0:57:09.480
<v Speaker 1>nice game and by the way, be great for Aaron Rodgers.

0:57:09.760 --> 0:57:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Be great on Marques Valdez scantling in a speed versus

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:18.640
<v Speaker 1>speed matchup with Trey Waynes. Now Trey Waynes gave up

0:57:19.000 --> 0:57:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple, gave up a long long dish touchdown, and

0:57:22.360 --> 0:57:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in a speed versus speed matchup last week ended up

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:29.320
<v Speaker 1>giving up a touchdown to Calvin Ridley. Also a very

0:57:29.440 --> 0:57:32.320
<v Speaker 1>fast player and somebody that concerns me at least a

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:34.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Davante Adams has had a fair and by

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, Marquez Velde Scantling gets a B grade, Davante

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Adams gets a B grade. Um he draws Xavier Rhodes

0:57:42.200 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 1>primarily in this matchup, but mostly He's been pretty good

0:57:46.280 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings last year. Average game seven catches, sixty

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:53.920
<v Speaker 1>seven yards, found the end zone in both of those games,

0:57:54.280 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So I've got a B grade on him. Then there's

0:57:57.040 --> 0:57:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones, and this one is a little bit trickier.

0:57:59.520 --> 0:58:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Joe Owns did absolutely nothing in the Thursday night opener,

0:58:05.280 --> 0:58:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and now he gets another very good run defense. The

0:58:08.360 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Vikings have allowed just to one hundred yard rushers in

0:58:11.480 --> 0:58:16.560
<v Speaker 1>their last thirty three games. Think about that underappreciated part

0:58:16.640 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>about the Aaron Jones situation. People. A lot of people

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 1>were really high on him this year, but realize now

0:58:21.080 --> 0:58:22.960
<v Speaker 1>he has to play the Bears twice and the Vikings

0:58:23.040 --> 0:58:27.800
<v Speaker 1>twice in Detroit. Who's no picnic either, Snax Harrison, right,

0:58:28.000 --> 0:58:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean this The time to trade for Aaron Jones

0:58:30.960 --> 0:58:34.760
<v Speaker 1>might be after this week, with a frustrated owner who

0:58:34.840 --> 0:58:37.720
<v Speaker 1>might be owing to the Vikings and Lynn Vaal Joseph.

0:58:37.760 --> 0:58:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Their run stuff are completely shut down. DeVonta Freeman last

0:58:41.280 --> 0:58:43.760
<v Speaker 1>week and looked very fast and impressive in the opener.

0:58:44.240 --> 0:58:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Um I've got I've got just a C grade on

0:58:47.040 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones in this game. And also, by the way,

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 1>stop using Jamal Williams. To the love of God, he's terrible.

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:57.000
<v Speaker 1>People are using well the team is in real life

0:58:57.080 --> 0:59:00.800
<v Speaker 1>fantasy players, aren't. Um. I mentioned Geronimo Allison. I just

0:59:00.880 --> 0:59:02.960
<v Speaker 1>want to drill down on this for a second. I

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 1>love the juicy matchup in the slot against a backup

0:59:05.880 --> 0:59:08.600
<v Speaker 1>slot cornerback. But he had a juicy matchup last week

0:59:08.600 --> 0:59:10.400
<v Speaker 1>against Buster Screen in the slot and they didn't throw

0:59:10.520 --> 0:59:12.800
<v Speaker 1>him one time. So I got a bench grade on

0:59:12.880 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Jon Allison, even though I really think they should correct

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that and go back to Allison here. But I'm rattled

0:59:19.200 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 1>after last week, and I just I can't. I can't

0:59:21.400 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 1>get myself to advocate for that. I am I deeply

0:59:25.960 --> 0:59:28.880
<v Speaker 1>rattled to my core. Every week. You can play the

0:59:29.040 --> 0:59:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Crush Charch Championship for free at fanball dot com. When

0:59:32.400 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you assemble a better salary cap team than mine, you

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:38.400
<v Speaker 1>get a shot at this week's prize pool thousand bucks

0:59:38.440 --> 0:59:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's free to play, and more importantly, when you

0:59:40.880 --> 0:59:43.600
<v Speaker 1>beat me, that gets you an entry into our week

0:59:43.680 --> 0:59:46.880
<v Speaker 1>seventeen Championship where you battle me for the ten thousand

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar grand prize. Go to fanball dot com slash charch

0:59:51.080 --> 0:59:55.040
<v Speaker 1>fanball dot com slash chart. When we come back, dig

0:59:55.120 --> 0:59:58.360
<v Speaker 1>back into the matchup Chicago takes on Denver. Will we

0:59:58.440 --> 1:00:01.360
<v Speaker 1>get better results for your Chicago Bears when they have

1:00:01.480 --> 1:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to go up against their former defensive coordinator Vic Fangio?

1:00:06.280 --> 1:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Find out next. It is a regular season edition of

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. We are breaking down every Sunday and

1:00:34.160 --> 1:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Monday NFL game fantasy style. We put letter grades and

1:00:37.400 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>all the players explain who we like who we don't like.

1:00:41.240 --> 1:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>You can decide if you agree or not. That's the

1:00:42.960 --> 1:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>beauty of this. And if you think we're right, then

1:00:44.800 --> 1:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you should go along with our grades. If you think

1:00:46.320 --> 1:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we're stupid, then don't. That's up to you. You can

1:00:49.560 --> 1:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>get even more of all of this if you If

1:00:51.720 --> 1:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you like this sort of approach, you want to check

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>out all of my player rankings available for free when

1:00:56.320 --> 1:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you go to famball dot com slash charts. Every meaningful

1:00:59.440 --> 1:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>player broken down rank and explained, maybe some people are

1:01:03.320 --> 1:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>listening just because of our stupid Well, yeah, that's the

1:01:06.440 --> 1:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>best part of the ongoing stupidity. Uh. Speaking of stupidity,

1:01:11.320 --> 1:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>let's let's switch this up to Sad trombone Ski. I

1:01:17.040 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>know couldn't have looked worse on Thursday night. Um, well

1:01:20.800 --> 1:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>two Thursday nights to go. Now Mitch Robinsky, and now

1:01:24.080 --> 1:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>he has to face the defensive coordinator that he practiced

1:01:27.440 --> 1:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>against that knows everything about him. This is a very

1:01:32.040 --> 1:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>tricky spot for him to try to rebound in. What

1:01:34.920 --> 1:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>do you think, Matt is there's something to be salvaged

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>from that Bears offense. Uh, maybe a little bit, But

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the lowest over under of the week with fourty

1:01:43.600 --> 1:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And an interesting stat since two thousand,

1:01:46.880 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos are twenty two and one in home games

1:01:50.720 --> 1:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in week one or two of the season. They're super

1:01:53.680 --> 1:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>good mile high in September. They just keep winning. Um,

1:01:57.280 --> 1:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>so Rubinsky, I got him on the bench. Uh. He

1:02:00.680 --> 1:02:02.919
<v Speaker 1>dropped back to pass the third most in the league

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>last week, fifty three times. That's good dropping back fifty

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>three times. It's good for for fantasy. It's a lot

1:02:11.080 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but yes, but he averaged a horrible five point one

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>yards per attempt and had a hideous game ending pick.

1:02:16.960 --> 1:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>He was also sacked five times. Obviously, he plays against

1:02:20.520 --> 1:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the coach that practiced against him every day for the

1:02:22.520 --> 1:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>last two years. It's bad for Traubinsky. I am going

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to give Allen Robinson a B. If anybody gets going,

1:02:28.440 --> 1:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a rob He had one hundred

1:02:30.920 --> 1:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>fifty three air yards last week, which was sixth best

1:02:34.040 --> 1:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in the league, and was targeted thirteen times, which was

1:02:37.080 --> 1:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>more than all other wide receivers and tight ends combined

1:02:41.640 --> 1:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>on the bear So and by the way, Trubisky still

1:02:44.560 --> 1:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>missed him open on several plays. Yeah, it was a

1:02:47.560 --> 1:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit erratic. Slightly um, Allen Robinson should see Chris

1:02:51.640 --> 1:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Harris shadow coverage went on the outside of it. But

1:02:54.360 --> 1:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that worries me. Naggy sent Robinson to the slot on

1:02:57.360 --> 1:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>forty percent of his plays last week. When he wasn't

1:03:00.760 --> 1:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in the slot, it was Tarik Cohen playing the slot

1:03:04.120 --> 1:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>almost the rest of those plays. He gets a C grade. Uh,

1:03:08.080 --> 1:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>he's listed as a running back, but he's playing wide

1:03:10.160 --> 1:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>receiver and he's ahead of Anthony Miller on the wide

1:03:12.360 --> 1:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>receiver depth chart right now. Um Cohen was on the

1:03:15.520 --> 1:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>field for seventy of the plays last week, so I

1:03:18.960 --> 1:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>think that he's in a He's in an interesting little

1:03:20.920 --> 1:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>spot because as kind of weapon X on that team,

1:03:24.200 --> 1:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>he's the only running back i'd start, though Mike Davis

1:03:26.480 --> 1:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and David Montgomery are on the bench. Davis out snapped

1:03:29.080 --> 1:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Monty fifty six to thirty six percent last week out

1:03:32.440 --> 1:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>touched him eleven to seven. I don't get it. Naggi's

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep using Davis as the feature back until he

1:03:37.960 --> 1:03:40.439
<v Speaker 1>figures out Montgomery is better. And it's a shame because

1:03:40.480 --> 1:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>fellow rookie Josh Jacobs just torched the Broncos defense for

1:03:44.400 --> 1:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirteen total yards and two scores last week.

1:03:47.280 --> 1:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Should mention Trey Burton Is still has a groin injury

1:03:49.840 --> 1:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of status is up in the air, but he's on

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the bench. On the Broncos side, everybody's on the bench,

1:03:55.880 --> 1:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay and Royce Freeman. It was an almost even

1:03:58.280 --> 1:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>split last week, almost fifth d fifty. Lindsay got of

1:04:01.840 --> 1:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the snaps, Freeman got forty seven. And the Bears defense

1:04:04.760 --> 1:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is still legit. They held Aaron Jones the thirty nine

1:04:06.800 --> 1:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>total yards on fourteen touches. Joe Flacco is the worst

1:04:10.160 --> 1:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback in the league, so he's on your bench,

1:04:12.560 --> 1:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and Courtland Sutton and Emmanuel Sanders are both gonna be

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>on your bench to the Broncos are facing the Bears,

1:04:18.040 --> 1:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>not the Raiders. The Bears held Davante Adams to four

1:04:21.440 --> 1:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>catches in thirty six yards last week, and despite Sutton

1:04:24.160 --> 1:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and Sanders each putting up decent fantasy points, it was

1:04:27.000 --> 1:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>mainly in garbage time. This game is going to be

1:04:29.320 --> 1:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>insanely low scoring. There will not be a moment for

1:04:31.720 --> 1:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos to open it up. So both on the bench.

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>M I'm with you, man, Kansas City takes on Oakland.

1:04:37.560 --> 1:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with the running backs. I was

1:04:39.400 --> 1:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>skeptical about Lashawn McCoy because he looked just so spent

1:04:45.080 --> 1:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>when he was in Buffalo the last couple of years.

1:04:48.320 --> 1:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, he's it seems rejuvenated. Maybe it's just,

1:04:51.480 --> 1:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of being in this amazing offense for

1:04:53.760 --> 1:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. What do you think about Lashawn McCoy in

1:04:56.360 --> 1:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this matchup? Well, yeah, let's do a little comparison of

1:05:00.080 --> 1:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>coy and Damian Williams, because both of them were certainly involved.

1:05:03.040 --> 1:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>McCoy was only on the field for of the snaps

1:05:05.960 --> 1:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>compared to sixty six percent for Williams. McCoy was clearly

1:05:09.640 --> 1:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the superior runner. He had ten carries for eighty one yards.

1:05:13.160 --> 1:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Williams game just twenty six yards on his thirteen carries.

1:05:17.200 --> 1:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But Williams got all of the important fantasy point scoring action.

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>He was the guy catching passes. He was the guy

1:05:25.480 --> 1:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone. He had four of the five

1:05:27.480 --> 1:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>red zone carries. He was targeted in the passing game

1:05:30.880 --> 1:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>three times in the red zone. He scored a short touchdown.

1:05:33.960 --> 1:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>He had six pass receptions. So I think you can

1:05:37.520 --> 1:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>play McCoy here. I've got a sea level starting grade

1:05:40.360 --> 1:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on him, but it's gonna be all whatever he can

1:05:42.840 --> 1:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>do on the ground, and he may need to score

1:05:44.720 --> 1:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>from distance because it feels like Williams is the red

1:05:47.000 --> 1:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>zone guy. So nothing better than a see I've got

1:05:49.800 --> 1:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to be on Damian Williams in part because of the

1:05:52.640 --> 1:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>split he's given, clearly giving up enough of the work

1:05:54.880 --> 1:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to McCoy, but he is getting the important looks. So

1:05:58.000 --> 1:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>still a B level grade here against a very middling

1:06:01.760 --> 1:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Raiders defense, they're gonna put up all sorts of points,

1:06:04.320 --> 1:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be in scoring position, so Williams can be

1:06:06.480 --> 1:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in your lineup the passing the passing game is obvious

1:06:09.400 --> 1:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>here A plus on Patrick Mahomes, A plus plus on

1:06:14.520 --> 1:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins, who all of a sudden, by the way,

1:06:16.640 --> 1:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>congratulations if he took Sammy Watkins as like your second

1:06:19.560 --> 1:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in the third or fourth round now that

1:06:22.360 --> 1:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill is out, and an a plus plus plus

1:06:26.440 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>plus to Travis Kelsey. This is why, because you give

1:06:30.160 --> 1:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>people an inch and this is what they do. In

1:06:33.720 --> 1:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the Week thirteen matchup to the power of seven. In

1:06:36.680 --> 1:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Week thirteen matchup with the Raiders last year, all

1:06:39.440 --> 1:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kels did was a hundred and sixty eight yards

1:06:42.280 --> 1:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns. So he's obviously in your lineup. And

1:06:44.640 --> 1:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>even me Cole Hardman, he was might take a chance

1:06:46.520 --> 1:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>on me wide receiver, So start them all, start all

1:06:49.120 --> 1:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>your Chiefs on the Raiders side. Derek Carr Carbage time,

1:06:52.800 --> 1:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it was might take a chance on me quarterback. That

1:06:55.600 --> 1:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>also brings Tyrell Williams, the new number one wide receiver

1:06:59.000 --> 1:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>into play head over a hundred yards and a touchdown.

1:07:02.040 --> 1:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>The Chief's got just abused last week by d J.

1:07:05.320 --> 1:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Shark and Chris Conley, of all people, they combined for

1:07:08.560 --> 1:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty three receiving yards and two touchdowns.

1:07:12.360 --> 1:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So Williams is A is a good play here. I've

1:07:14.600 --> 1:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>got to be I've got to be on him, maybe

1:07:17.520 --> 1:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>B and a half, maybe B point five up bay

1:07:22.400 --> 1:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Bay an ab get an ab on him, and then

1:07:26.680 --> 1:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller. I put an A on Waller. He looked

1:07:29.280 --> 1:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>fantastic last week, played every single snap, led the Raiders

1:07:32.480 --> 1:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>with eight targets. The Chiefs had the NFL's worst tight

1:07:35.400 --> 1:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>end defense last year. They allowed the fourth most yards

1:07:37.960 --> 1:07:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and the most touchdowns to the position. So get Darren

1:07:41.040 --> 1:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Waller in your lineup again this week. That leaves us

1:07:43.640 --> 1:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>with the running game and Josh Jacobs. He had a

1:07:46.600 --> 1:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty spectacular debut, at least by the box score. Scored

1:07:50.520 --> 1:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. Wasn't that involved in the air. As we've mentioned,

1:07:54.320 --> 1:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the Chief's defense not great. They're not great against the

1:07:56.480 --> 1:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>run either. They allowed the fifth most rushing yards and

1:07:58.560 --> 1:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the sixth most rushing touchdown owns last year. The problem

1:08:02.080 --> 1:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>here could be game script. I think we're gonna see, Hey,

1:08:05.000 --> 1:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see if Josh Jacobs has some receiving game club.

1:08:08.640 --> 1:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see if it's just gonna be a Jalen

1:08:10.400 --> 1:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Richard game as the Raiders are trying to play catch up. So, uh,

1:08:14.520 --> 1:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Richard could be a sneaky play here, but the Raiders

1:08:18.200 --> 1:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't use them much against Kansas City last year. He

1:08:20.360 --> 1:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>had just three catches in one game and two in

1:08:21.920 --> 1:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the others. So I gave Jacobs a B starting grade

1:08:24.920 --> 1:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>because he's a clear workhorse here. But there is a

1:08:27.720 --> 1:08:30.559
<v Speaker 1>there's a little risk that this becomes a Richard receiving

1:08:30.600 --> 1:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>game for sure. Seattle takes on Pittsburgh. Let's start with

1:08:35.680 --> 1:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the running game for Seattle, because my guy Chris Carson

1:08:37.920 --> 1:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>scored twice last week and he has now found the

1:08:40.200 --> 1:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>end zone in five straight games and eight of his

1:08:43.000 --> 1:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>last ten games. And Pittsburgh has allowed rushing touchdowns two

1:08:48.000 --> 1:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>backs in seven of their last nine going back to

1:08:50.520 --> 1:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>last year. I like him to score again here. Now.

1:08:53.000 --> 1:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>The Steelers were great against the run last week, even

1:08:55.240 --> 1:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>a blowout, and I don't know that it gets a

1:08:57.479 --> 1:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>lot easier through the air for Chris Carson either. The

1:08:59.720 --> 1:09:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Steve have allowed deposing running back to top forty six

1:09:02.600 --> 1:09:07.919
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards in just eight of their last forty seven games,

1:09:08.760 --> 1:09:11.479
<v Speaker 1>so it's gonna be I think Carson scratches out a

1:09:11.560 --> 1:09:13.479
<v Speaker 1>meaningful game with a touchdown here, but I don't know

1:09:13.560 --> 1:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that even gets to one total yards. It might be

1:09:16.120 --> 1:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like last week, or the artag isn't great,

1:09:18.080 --> 1:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>but the touchdown. The touchdowns help you out. Let's go

1:09:20.920 --> 1:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to the passing game, by the way, be great for

1:09:23.160 --> 1:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson. A B grade on Russell Wilson. If the

1:09:26.479 --> 1:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Steelers secondary wants to rebound from last week's nationally televised embarrassment,

1:09:30.520 --> 1:09:33.799
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna need to do it without cornerback Joe Iron Hayden.

1:09:34.160 --> 1:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Clink clink. Oh, there we go. Hayden's injuries only half

1:09:40.800 --> 1:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the problem, though. Opposite him is Stephen Nelson, who was

1:09:43.840 --> 1:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>disastrous last year with Kansas City and a lot of

1:09:46.720 --> 1:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in his coverage on Sunday Night as well. Now,

1:09:50.240 --> 1:09:53.639
<v Speaker 1>ty The Lockett probably plays here, but if he does

1:09:53.760 --> 1:09:56.519
<v Speaker 1>not go, then Russell Wilson drops down to a C

1:09:56.760 --> 1:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>grade and maybe even a bench grade at that point,

1:09:59.240 --> 1:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>because they're they just don't have much in the way

1:10:01.840 --> 1:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of depth here at all. So let's go to Tyler Lockett.

1:10:05.200 --> 1:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>He's a game time decision. Watch his back injury and

1:10:07.680 --> 1:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>back injuries or something. You have to watch all the

1:10:09.240 --> 1:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>way up to kick off because the back injury flares up,

1:10:11.800 --> 1:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>tightens up or whatever, and they're la. You know they do.

1:10:14.040 --> 1:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>You think they're gonna go, and then they don't go,

1:10:15.800 --> 1:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so be careful. Lockett faces a Steelers team that gave

1:10:19.080 --> 1:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>up three touchdowns of at least twenty two yards to

1:10:22.880 --> 1:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots in Week one, and here comes Lockett, known

1:10:25.640 --> 1:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>for his deep speed, So I gotta like that matchup.

1:10:28.600 --> 1:10:32.479
<v Speaker 1>And he played six of his snaps from the slot

1:10:32.640 --> 1:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>last week, and if that holds up, he'll be facing

1:10:35.200 --> 1:10:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh cornerback Mike Hilton, who struggled to contain Julian Edelman

1:10:39.800 --> 1:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>last week. A B grade on Tyler, Lockett C grade

1:10:43.000 --> 1:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and DK Metcalf, which actually surprises me. If Lockett doesn't go,

1:10:46.920 --> 1:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>by the way, then I'd like Metcalf even less because

1:10:49.400 --> 1:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>he gets extra coverage here. But I thought Metcalf was

1:10:52.360 --> 1:10:54.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a guy that was going to really struggle

1:10:54.520 --> 1:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>out of the gates because he was very raw. The

1:10:57.320 --> 1:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>number of routes he could run his thought to be

1:10:58.960 --> 1:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>very limited. They threw to him plenty, and he looked

1:11:01.560 --> 1:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty good Steelers secondary gash last week, as I already mentioned.

1:11:05.080 --> 1:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>And he's his size frame comparison similar to Josh Gordon,

1:11:08.880 --> 1:11:11.639
<v Speaker 1>who had a nice big game in the opener. So yeah,

1:11:11.800 --> 1:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I can see a C grade on DK Metcalf here.

1:11:14.080 --> 1:11:16.599
<v Speaker 1>And he was on the field seventy percent of the snap.

1:11:17.560 --> 1:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>That is surprising for the first start rookie. Will DISLI

1:11:20.800 --> 1:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>probably will not play in this game. Let's go to

1:11:23.160 --> 1:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers side again with Ben Roethlisberger, who looked dreadful

1:11:28.240 --> 1:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday night. Um, he kept throwing the ball. Did

1:11:31.800 --> 1:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Dante Moncrief, for the love of God, just just stop

1:11:35.400 --> 1:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>with the Dante moncreef oh Man. Now, the good news

1:11:40.600 --> 1:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is going up against Seattle. Andy Dalton just put up

1:11:43.400 --> 1:11:46.479
<v Speaker 1>a four hundred yard or on Seattle last week. But

1:11:46.640 --> 1:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, that old John Ross too long touchdowns thing

1:11:49.280 --> 1:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>feels like kind of a fluke and the Steelers don't

1:11:51.320 --> 1:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>have the same speed guy on roster. John Ross was

1:11:54.280 --> 1:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in a homecoming game last week Washington was that there

1:11:59.280 --> 1:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you go. Um, so I don't. I'm I'm luke warm

1:12:03.479 --> 1:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>on Ben and I've just got to be And it

1:12:05.560 --> 1:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>was for a while ahead as a C grade, but

1:12:07.439 --> 1:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>as Juju appears to be at full healthier, I've moved

1:12:10.240 --> 1:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Ben back up to a B grade and um and

1:12:13.360 --> 1:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>remember his home splits are bonkers since seen his average

1:12:19.080 --> 1:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>home game three hundred nine yards and two and a

1:12:22.200 --> 1:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>half touchdowns per game. So on fanball, Steeler stack is

1:12:27.040 --> 1:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>an interesting stack that nobody's going to be thinking about.

1:12:30.400 --> 1:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith Schuster, Jujuan Donald and James Conner Vans McDonald

1:12:36.160 --> 1:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>was might take a chance guy, Let's talk about Juju

1:12:38.680 --> 1:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>h the toe injury. He should play though he's playing

1:12:41.200 --> 1:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>both the slot where he had always played before and

1:12:43.439 --> 1:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they're breaking him out wide. From the slot. He has

1:12:46.200 --> 1:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a very favorable match up against rookie cornerback Hugo Amandi.

1:12:51.360 --> 1:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Hugo Amadi, you just like to say, go Amati. And

1:12:55.160 --> 1:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>when he's outside, he can match up with Tray Flowers,

1:12:58.400 --> 1:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>who gave up one read seventy yards in his coverage

1:13:02.520 --> 1:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>last week. How about that? So there's your Steelers, your

1:13:06.360 --> 1:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Steelers staff there right there. Juju Smith Schuster did not

1:13:09.880 --> 1:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>just pull him off the field at some point. How

1:13:12.479 --> 1:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>do you watch just how do you watch that happen

1:13:14.360 --> 1:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and unfold in front of you. Um. The only other

1:13:18.000 --> 1:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>receivers I'm gonna mention Dante Moncrief, just don't do it.

1:13:20.760 --> 1:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Deante Johnson, We're gonna talk more about later. Vince McDonald's

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>may take a chance of me guy. James Conner though

1:13:26.200 --> 1:13:29.519
<v Speaker 1>a B grade Seattle stuff the Bengals runners last week,

1:13:29.600 --> 1:13:32.479
<v Speaker 1>but Cincinnati's offensive line is on the other side of

1:13:32.560 --> 1:13:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum from the Steelers, and Connor should have success

1:13:35.920 --> 1:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>through the air here. Last season, the Seahawks allow the

1:13:38.000 --> 1:13:42.479
<v Speaker 1>sixth most receptions, third most receiving yards, and the most

1:13:42.600 --> 1:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>receiving touchdowns to opposing running backs. James Connor can catch.

1:13:47.200 --> 1:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So can Jalen Samuel, who you could be as a

1:13:49.720 --> 1:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>dark horse potential dart throw you could start here as well. Um,

1:13:53.920 --> 1:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'll mention this last week, Mixing and Bernard caught

1:13:56.200 --> 1:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>all five of their targets. James Connors a beast start

1:13:58.840 --> 1:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in Parks. I think he's gonna chip in meaningful numbers

1:14:01.479 --> 1:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>through the air. Our final topics are ahead when we

1:14:06.160 --> 1:14:09.639
<v Speaker 1>provide you with three guys we believe will be hot

1:14:10.000 --> 1:14:13.599
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire pickups next week, so you can grab them.

1:14:13.760 --> 1:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>This week, we're jumping in the time machine and how

1:14:17.000 --> 1:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>does the time machine sound. You can blamo time machines,

1:14:25.280 --> 1:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>go blammo on this shell, whether you are ready for

1:14:28.200 --> 1:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it or not. Premature Speculation is happening next on Fantasy

1:14:32.120 --> 1:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. I think premature Speculation is the most popular

1:14:54.400 --> 1:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>segment on Fantasy Football Weekly. This is the bit where

1:14:58.000 --> 1:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>each of our host provides a player that will be

1:14:59.840 --> 1:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a waiver wire pick up next week that you're going

1:15:02.280 --> 1:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to want to grab this week to frustrate the rest

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of your league because you already got all the good guys.

1:15:07.840 --> 1:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>For about ten minutes at the beginning of Sunday's games

1:15:12.560 --> 1:15:15.559
<v Speaker 1>last week, I looked brilliant because I said, Dontrell Hilliard

1:15:16.160 --> 1:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the Browns running, he scores a goal line rushing touchdowndown

1:15:20.680 --> 1:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and then immediately gets a concussion, gets He's gone for

1:15:22.680 --> 1:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the game, and I'm like, oh, I had it for

1:15:25.280 --> 1:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>for ten minutes. I'm like, oh, brilliant. My premature speculation

1:15:28.680 --> 1:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>came in hard right off the bat man. Look, mine

1:15:32.120 --> 1:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out last week. But we're not going to

1:15:33.720 --> 1:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about what we'll tell what do we want to

1:15:36.200 --> 1:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about? Who is your premature speculation? I can't believe

1:15:38.880 --> 1:15:43.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing this. It's Jason Witten. Yeah, Jason Witten scored

1:15:43.880 --> 1:15:46.639
<v Speaker 1>last week, although it was a quiet four targets, three catches,

1:15:46.720 --> 1:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen yards. This week he faces Washington, which is a

1:15:50.200 --> 1:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>neutralish matchup. But Witten did score the last time he

1:15:53.120 --> 1:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>faced them. But next week, which year was that? It

1:15:57.800 --> 1:16:01.599
<v Speaker 1>was only one one year removed? Uh? Next week he's

1:16:01.640 --> 1:16:05.839
<v Speaker 1>facing Miami in Dallas, and you want to start everybody

1:16:05.880 --> 1:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>against Miami the Dolphins on the road. Sign me up

1:16:08.960 --> 1:16:11.479
<v Speaker 1>for that. The Dolphins gave up fourteen receptions for one

1:16:11.560 --> 1:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy five to tight ends in Week one, and the

1:16:14.040 --> 1:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>only two good players on their roster, Xavian Howard and

1:16:16.760 --> 1:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Minca Fitzpatrick. They're gonna be on the outsides covering Michael

1:16:20.040 --> 1:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Gallup and Amari Cooper, leaving the middle of the field

1:16:22.880 --> 1:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>wide open for Witten. He's going to score in that

1:16:25.160 --> 1:16:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Miami game. And if you need some tight end help,

1:16:27.439 --> 1:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe Hunter Henry went down. Maybe O J. Howard sucks.

1:16:30.560 --> 1:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten is a guy that you can pick up.

1:16:32.280 --> 1:16:34.559
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll be happy that you did, all right, Christian,

1:16:35.040 --> 1:16:39.599
<v Speaker 1>your premature speculation player is I'm gonna go with Deonte Johnson,

1:16:39.720 --> 1:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the rookie wide receiver for Pittsburgh. You we just talked

1:16:43.200 --> 1:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>about how awful Dante Moncrieff looked in week in week one.

1:16:48.280 --> 1:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it would have been nice to know

1:16:49.720 --> 1:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that he's been battling a dislocated finger since early in

1:16:52.840 --> 1:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>training camp. I didn't see that news until he failed.

1:16:56.680 --> 1:16:59.479
<v Speaker 1>He dropped seven of the targets from his way in

1:16:59.560 --> 1:17:03.719
<v Speaker 1>week one. Meanwhile, James washing Washington I think has established

1:17:03.800 --> 1:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>himself this point. It's just a deep threat and nothing more.

1:17:06.760 --> 1:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And he's an inconsistent guy. So that leaves room for

1:17:10.040 --> 1:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody to emerge opposite Juju Smith Schuster, and I think

1:17:13.280 --> 1:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that somebody is Johnson, who is basically an Antonio Brown clone.

1:17:18.520 --> 1:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Like literally they're the same height, the same weight, they have,

1:17:21.760 --> 1:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the same reach, the same hand size, they both have

1:17:25.280 --> 1:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>almost much almost identical. Forty times they both had their

1:17:30.120 --> 1:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>feet frost bitting in a cryotronic chamber. They were I mean,

1:17:34.400 --> 1:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers drafted this guy as Antonio Brown's replacement, and

1:17:38.400 --> 1:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like I've had charged. Actually, you found an

1:17:40.960 --> 1:17:44.719
<v Speaker 1>article with some some quotes from the Steelers coaching staff

1:17:44.800 --> 1:17:46.519
<v Speaker 1>that were like, yeah, we gotta get this guy more

1:17:46.600 --> 1:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>involved and with Moncrief not impressing and James Washington kind

1:17:50.240 --> 1:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>of a bit player. I think that starts as early

1:17:52.720 --> 1:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>as this week. You're gonna see Deonte Johnson get more

1:17:54.920 --> 1:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>involved and being the receiver on the opposite side of

1:17:58.040 --> 1:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith. Schuster always a good u It was Isaac

1:18:01.720 --> 1:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Newton who said, for every action, there is an equal

1:18:05.040 --> 1:18:08.599
<v Speaker 1>and opposite reaction. See on the Steeler staff. You can't

1:18:08.720 --> 1:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>argue with the law of physics, my friends, it's against

1:18:11.400 --> 1:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the law and argue with the law of physics. When

1:18:13.560 --> 1:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Dante Pettis plays two snaps, there's an equal and opposite reaction.

1:18:18.040 --> 1:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel playing sixty snaps in the game, leading the

1:18:23.240 --> 1:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>whole team by a wide margin. For the forty Niners.

1:18:26.760 --> 1:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Every wide receiver who leads his team in play should

1:18:29.479 --> 1:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>be on a roster. Deebo Samuel un rostered in most leagues,

1:18:33.760 --> 1:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>especially if your coach is Kyle Shanahan, you must be rostered.

1:18:38.640 --> 1:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Deebo caught all three of his targets last week. This

1:18:41.400 --> 1:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>week he draws an aging fading Drake Kirkpatrick. He could

1:18:45.040 --> 1:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>post a night's game here, but you'll he'll already be

1:18:49.040 --> 1:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>on your roster because that's the law of physics, New

1:18:54.280 --> 1:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Orleans takes on the Rams and an epic rematch from

1:18:58.000 --> 1:19:01.519
<v Speaker 1>two different games last season, but actually the NFC Championship game.

1:19:01.680 --> 1:19:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Matt tell us about it. Jared Goff gets an A grade.

1:19:04.800 --> 1:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I told you about his negative road splits, especially in

1:19:07.120 --> 1:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>outdoor games. He did not disappoint well, wait, he did

1:19:09.920 --> 1:19:13.479
<v Speaker 1>disappoint fantasy owners. Disappointment didn't disappoint me because I knew

1:19:13.520 --> 1:19:16.479
<v Speaker 1>it one eight, six, one and one last week. That

1:19:16.680 --> 1:19:19.559
<v Speaker 1>last year at home, though, Goff enjoyed a twenty two

1:19:19.680 --> 1:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to three touchdown interception ratio and three forty two passing

1:19:23.439 --> 1:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>yards per game, and the Saints gave up three passing

1:19:26.000 --> 1:19:29.519
<v Speaker 1>scores to Deshaun Watson last week. Robert Woods he's getting

1:19:29.520 --> 1:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a be He led the team in targets with thirteen,

1:19:32.240 --> 1:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>only managed five catches for seventy one and six for

1:19:35.240 --> 1:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty three and the two meetings last year, but he

1:19:37.320 --> 1:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>has had five catches in sixteen of his last nineteen starts.

1:19:41.080 --> 1:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Might see a little bit of Marshawn Lattimore, although it

1:19:43.560 --> 1:19:45.679
<v Speaker 1>looks like it will be a fairly good split between

1:19:45.800 --> 1:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>him and Cooks, and Cooks gets an A grade. He's

1:19:48.840 --> 1:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>played two games as a Ram against the Saints and

1:19:52.360 --> 1:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>he's revenged them both times seven for one oh seven,

1:19:55.840 --> 1:19:58.559
<v Speaker 1>six for one fourteen and one, and he wasn't utilized

1:19:58.640 --> 1:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>much last week. This is a get right spot for him.

1:20:01.520 --> 1:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup I'm also giving an a grade looked healthy

1:20:04.320 --> 1:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>on field of the Snaps ten targets, logged five catches

1:20:08.120 --> 1:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>for eighty nine yards and to score when these teams

1:20:10.520 --> 1:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>met in the regular season last year. And he faces P. J.

1:20:13.560 --> 1:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Williams in the slot. That's the worst rated cover corner

1:20:16.800 --> 1:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>for the Saints. Uh, Todd Gurley and Malcolm Brown. Malcolm

1:20:21.439 --> 1:20:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Browns might take a chance on the runner. Todd Gurley,

1:20:23.760 --> 1:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a beat. Uh, the NFL leader in yards

1:20:26.920 --> 1:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>after contact. Well, he's number three right now. Todd Gurley

1:20:30.479 --> 1:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>five point two. And it's worth noting that the Rams

1:20:33.080 --> 1:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>offensive line was the second worst run blocking unit in

1:20:36.280 --> 1:20:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Week one, Hence the early contact on the runners. Gurley

1:20:39.800 --> 1:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and Malcolm Brown were making things happen despite the offensive line. Um,

1:20:44.240 --> 1:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna try to keep touches off Gurley though, which

1:20:47.200 --> 1:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to see. But the Saints gave up

1:20:49.200 --> 1:20:52.160
<v Speaker 1>eight point three yards per carried a Carlos hide last week.

1:20:52.439 --> 1:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And a healthy Carlos Hide is the same as a

1:20:54.640 --> 1:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>part time Todd Gurley with the last year. I believe

1:20:58.040 --> 1:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we're three point two yards per ca re on the season. Yeah,

1:21:01.160 --> 1:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that's it, and they just got steamrolled by Carlos freaking Hide.

1:21:05.880 --> 1:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Come on, the elusive Carlos freeing high suddenly elusive. Yes,

1:21:10.120 --> 1:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not chasing Tyler Higbee's touchdown either. Alvin Kamara gets

1:21:13.880 --> 1:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>an A grade. How did uh Christian McCaffrey fair against

1:21:17.080 --> 1:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the Rams defense last week? It was pretty good. Michael

1:21:19.880 --> 1:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Thomas gets an A grade twelve for two, eleven and

1:21:23.000 --> 1:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>one in the regular season matchup last year, but only

1:21:26.040 --> 1:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>four for thirty six in the playoffs. I'm not worried.

1:21:28.439 --> 1:21:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas is great. Drew Brees B grade. We know

1:21:31.560 --> 1:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>about his negative road splits. Yards per tempt went from

1:21:34.920 --> 1:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half in New Orleans to six point

1:21:37.200 --> 1:21:39.519
<v Speaker 1>nine on the road, so he only gets the B

1:21:39.680 --> 1:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>grade here. But it is a shootout potential game, so

1:21:42.240 --> 1:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you still gotta like Breeze a little bit. Jared Cook

1:21:44.800 --> 1:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>gets a C grade. Only three targets, two catches in

1:21:47.400 --> 1:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven yards. That was a bummer. The Rams were

1:21:50.240 --> 1:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>one of eight teams to allow over a thousand yards

1:21:52.680 --> 1:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to the tight end last year, and I'm hoping that

1:21:54.840 --> 1:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>was just a weird game off and not the trend

1:21:56.680 --> 1:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Saints not using the tight end position anymore. Finally,

1:22:00.040 --> 1:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Ted Gain in tray Kwon Smith, I'm giving both of

1:22:01.920 --> 1:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>them a sea. Smith ran six of his routes out

1:22:05.040 --> 1:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of the slot last week, which would mean he'd draw

1:22:06.880 --> 1:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the most favorable match up against Nickel Robie Coleman. But

1:22:10.439 --> 1:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the Saints move their wide receivers around more than just

1:22:12.840 --> 1:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>about any team, so in a shootout potential game, Tedgain

1:22:16.240 --> 1:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>looked good. Had over a hundred yards last week. I

1:22:18.720 --> 1:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>think he's a good point. Let's go to Cleveland taking

1:22:20.880 --> 1:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Jets. Christian Yeah, let's is the Monday nighter.

1:22:24.360 --> 1:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the Monday night er. Let's let's see if

1:22:26.360 --> 1:22:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland can have a bounce back after an ugly, ugly

1:22:29.920 --> 1:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Week one performance by Baker Mayfield three interceptions. They did

1:22:34.200 --> 1:22:36.839
<v Speaker 1>not look like the high powered offense everybody was expecting

1:22:36.920 --> 1:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>coming into the year. But there's a chance here against

1:22:39.920 --> 1:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. The Jets were bottom ten last year in

1:22:41.960 --> 1:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>QB yards and touchdowns allowed, and they just let Josh

1:22:45.360 --> 1:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen throw for a career high two hundred and

1:22:47.640 --> 1:22:50.599
<v Speaker 1>fifty four yards in Week one. So I've got Baker

1:22:50.680 --> 1:22:52.519
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield in a bounce back here. I gave him a

1:22:52.600 --> 1:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>B level starting grade. Odell Beckham Jr. Was highly involved,

1:22:57.080 --> 1:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>led the team with the leven targets. He's going to

1:23:00.120 --> 1:23:02.439
<v Speaker 1>go nuts against the Jet secondary. That let the Bills.

1:23:02.479 --> 1:23:04.599
<v Speaker 1>John Brown go for a hundred and twenty three yards

1:23:04.640 --> 1:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown last week. A grade on Odell Beckham

1:23:07.400 --> 1:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>homecoming game of sorts to his old home field. That's

1:23:12.040 --> 1:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>a good point. That's a little bit of a reach,

1:23:13.880 --> 1:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>just a little same stadium. Jarvis Landry, I've got a

1:23:18.160 --> 1:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>B level starting grade on. He had four receptions for

1:23:21.160 --> 1:23:24.759
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven yards on seven targets in the Week one matchup.

1:23:24.880 --> 1:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And the slot is is something you can exploit against

1:23:28.360 --> 1:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. Slot corner Brian Poole was Pro Football focused

1:23:31.960 --> 1:23:35.479
<v Speaker 1>one hundred hundred and twelve ranked cornerback last year, So

1:23:35.800 --> 1:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I like Jarvis Landry to bounch back as well. David

1:23:38.920 --> 1:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and Joko was pretty much the only guy who did

1:23:41.360 --> 1:23:44.479
<v Speaker 1>anything last week. Scored a touchdown. The Jets were very

1:23:44.520 --> 1:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>good against opposing tight ends last year, though I would

1:23:48.040 --> 1:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>start him if you usually would. I gave him a

1:23:50.360 --> 1:23:54.559
<v Speaker 1>B level starting grade here. Nick Chubb, I've got an

1:23:54.720 --> 1:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>A grade on He was quiet in week one, but

1:23:57.920 --> 1:24:01.479
<v Speaker 1>I think the game script here with Sam Donald out

1:24:01.560 --> 1:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Jets. On the other side, I think the

1:24:03.280 --> 1:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Browns are gonna be ahead in this game. They're gonna

1:24:05.080 --> 1:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>be grinding the clock. The Jets are also potentially missing

1:24:08.880 --> 1:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>key defenders Quinny Quinnin Williams and C. J. Mosley. Mosley

1:24:13.360 --> 1:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>last week after he got hurt, their defense fell apart.

1:24:16.240 --> 1:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So if he doesn't play, there's especially a good chance

1:24:18.840 --> 1:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that Chub is gonna go bonkers here. I've got an

1:24:20.920 --> 1:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>A grade on him. On the Jet side, we really

1:24:23.200 --> 1:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>already talked about the passing game. We said you should

1:24:25.320 --> 1:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>literally drop them all, everybody, every Jet passing player, everybody

1:24:30.080 --> 1:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>but Leavy on Bell basically, so needless to say, don't

1:24:32.240 --> 1:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>start any of them this week because they're not on

1:24:33.840 --> 1:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>your roster. Levian Bell, I've got to be great on

1:24:36.720 --> 1:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>him just because of the somewhat scary shoulder injury. He

1:24:40.200 --> 1:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>he missed practice on Thursday, had to get an m R.

1:24:43.080 --> 1:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I He's gonna practice Saturday. It sounds like he's gonna

1:24:45.920 --> 1:24:49.519
<v Speaker 1>play Monday. Cleveland had a bottom ten run defense last year.

1:24:49.840 --> 1:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>They were just roasted by Derrick Henry for a hundred

1:24:52.120 --> 1:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and fifty nine combined rushing and receiving yards and two touchdowns.

1:24:55.439 --> 1:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>B level start on Levan Bell. All right, let's go

1:24:57.640 --> 1:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>to the Eagles taking on the Falcons for our final

1:24:59.760 --> 1:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>match up of the show, that is the Sunday night game.

1:25:02.120 --> 1:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz gets an A grade here even though the

1:25:04.479 --> 1:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Vikings didn't test the Falcon secondary at all, the Eagles will,

1:25:08.320 --> 1:25:11.759
<v Speaker 1>and I like the matchup for the Eagles receivers. Cornerback

1:25:11.840 --> 1:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Oliver is a serious liability for the Falcons and

1:25:14.800 --> 1:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>he was exploited by the Vikings last week. Desmond Travant

1:25:18.000 --> 1:25:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Trufont has speed, but he only plays one side of

1:25:20.520 --> 1:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the field, so the Eagles can scheme to Shawn Jackson

1:25:23.040 --> 1:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to go against Oliver, and so Deshan Jackson after the

1:25:26.400 --> 1:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>explosive game in week one, gets a B grade and

1:25:29.160 --> 1:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>week two because I do believe he's going to have

1:25:31.200 --> 1:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that speed advantage over slot, especially if he goes out

1:25:34.120 --> 1:25:36.479
<v Speaker 1>of the slot where it will beat demonte Kazi as

1:25:36.560 --> 1:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>well as a converted safety. So I think Jackson can

1:25:39.280 --> 1:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>win from a few places, and I like him a

1:25:40.840 --> 1:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>lot here all Shan Jeffrey at a nice game last week.

1:25:43.560 --> 1:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>He can avoid cornerback Desmond Truffont by lining up on

1:25:46.320 --> 1:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the field if he wants to,

1:25:48.040 --> 1:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>but he might not want to because he can just

1:25:49.920 --> 1:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>out muscle Trufont if he wants. So I think he

1:25:51.720 --> 1:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>can win from both sides of the field too, So

1:25:53.960 --> 1:25:56.479
<v Speaker 1>be great and all Sean Jeffrey here, and staying with

1:25:56.600 --> 1:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the passing game, Zach Ertz a grade second on the

1:26:00.240 --> 1:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>team and targets receptions and yards. Last week, Vikings didn't

1:26:03.800 --> 1:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>even try it, didn't even throw. They threw one pass

1:26:05.880 --> 1:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that was called back to a tight end. They even

1:26:07.240 --> 1:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>try the tight end Urts though targeted ten times when

1:26:10.479 --> 1:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>these teams met last year. He will be just fine.

1:26:13.479 --> 1:26:17.519
<v Speaker 1>All three of the running backs startable here with C grades.

1:26:18.000 --> 1:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders is the most interesting one. He had a

1:26:21.280 --> 1:26:26.479
<v Speaker 1>nineteen yard run, but his other ten carries gained six yards.

1:26:27.200 --> 1:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried that the coaching staff is gonna give him

1:26:30.200 --> 1:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a lesser role here, and that makes Jordan Howard startable

1:26:33.720 --> 1:26:36.479
<v Speaker 1>because this is a bad off A defense against the

1:26:36.560 --> 1:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>run that gave up over five yards per carry to

1:26:38.800 --> 1:26:40.599
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings last week, and the Eagles have a better

1:26:40.680 --> 1:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>offensive line by a lot. So even Jordan Howard gets

1:26:43.360 --> 1:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a C grade and Darren Sprowles was might take a

1:26:45.760 --> 1:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>chance on me runner. Let's go to the Falcon side.

1:26:50.200 --> 1:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Beginning with the running game. Devanta Freeman gets a seat.

1:26:53.080 --> 1:26:56.479
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons lost guard Chris Lindstrom for first rounder. That

1:26:56.640 --> 1:26:59.599
<v Speaker 1>is a big loss. The Eagles countered that by losing

1:26:59.640 --> 1:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>their own offensive tackle, Malik Jackson, so maybe those two

1:27:02.760 --> 1:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>things neutralize each other. But make no mistake here, the

1:27:05.840 --> 1:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage belongs to the Eagles, and Atlanta's line

1:27:09.240 --> 1:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>was brutal last week. Eagles have been extremely rough on

1:27:12.439 --> 1:27:15.799
<v Speaker 1>runners over the past four games, allowing less than twenty

1:27:15.880 --> 1:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>eight rushing yards per game. That worries me, and that's

1:27:18.200 --> 1:27:20.719
<v Speaker 1>why we're down to a C grade on DeVonta Freeman.

1:27:20.880 --> 1:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's moved to the passing game. Matt Ryan gets a B.

1:27:24.360 --> 1:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>I am worried about the offensive line. As I mentioned

1:27:26.680 --> 1:27:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Kris Lands from out, Ryan's gonna be harried by an

1:27:29.479 --> 1:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>excellent front four anchored by Brandon Graham and Fletcher Cox,

1:27:34.400 --> 1:27:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's faced the Eagles in three straight SKI seasons

1:27:37.400 --> 1:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and the results are discouraging, just with per game averages

1:27:40.000 --> 1:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of just two two yards and zero point seven passing

1:27:43.160 --> 1:27:46.679
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns for Matt Ryan. So it's barely a C grade,

1:27:46.720 --> 1:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and really only because Julio Jones, who's got a B grade,

1:27:49.640 --> 1:27:52.519
<v Speaker 1>matches up against Ronald Darby who just got worked by

1:27:52.600 --> 1:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Redskins rookie Terry McLaurin for a hundred twenty five yards

1:27:56.280 --> 1:28:01.519
<v Speaker 1>and Mary mc mary Jones has a height size advantage

1:28:01.560 --> 1:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of four inches and thirty pounds over Darby, so I

1:28:03.880 --> 1:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>like Julio in this game too. And then Calvin Ridley

1:28:07.520 --> 1:28:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Falcons can get Ridley on lead footed cornerback Resul Douglas

1:28:11.920 --> 1:28:13.519
<v Speaker 1>at will by putting him on the right side of

1:28:13.560 --> 1:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the field, and that's a positive matchup. So I like

1:28:16.280 --> 1:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the receivers. I just gotta hope Matt Ryan stays upright

1:28:18.800 --> 1:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>long enough. And finally a C grade on Austin Hooper

1:28:23.080 --> 1:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>silent in last year's meeting between these two um and

1:28:26.280 --> 1:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles were outstanding against tight ends last year, so

1:28:29.080 --> 1:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit nervous even though we had a

1:28:30.840 --> 1:28:35.479
<v Speaker 1>good game last season, and it's start thirteen players from

1:28:35.520 --> 1:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. It's it is crazy. Um guys, we've had

1:28:39.280 --> 1:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun on the show. Thank you very

1:28:40.960 --> 1:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>much for listening and all of your help with it.

1:28:42.680 --> 1:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, go to family dot com

1:28:44.240 --> 1:28:47.599
<v Speaker 1>slash charge for my free player rankings, my free one

1:28:47.680 --> 1:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar weekly contest for Guillotine Leagues, more podcasts, and

1:28:51.720 --> 1:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>everything else that you would want fantasy football related. And

1:28:54.400 --> 1:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>for more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i

1:28:56.680 --> 1:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

1:29:00.040 --> 1:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows. Thanks everybody who takes time to rank

1:29:02.920 --> 1:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and review the show on your podcasting platform of choice

1:29:05.439 --> 1:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. Talk to you next week, everybody. Bye bye

1:29:09.080 --> 1:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>h