WEBVTT - Week 8

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly on k f a N,

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>presented by Devanny's, your weekly source for the nation's best

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>fantasy speculation and advice. Fantasy Football Weekly is also brought

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to you by Green Belt Premium, No name Butcher Quality

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>meets Honda, town Hall Family, and by the Park Tavern.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Now now along with fan Ball and League Saves, Matt

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Harrison and Brian Johnson, here's Paul Charchy in good morning,

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan. I am

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchy in uh No, Matt Harrison. We've got Scott

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Fish back. Hello, Scott, what's going on? Good to talk

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to you. Brian Johnson I would normally say as always,

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>but not the case. Took last week off slacker. I know,

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>sorry about that. It's good to be back though I

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>missed you. Guys. It is our annual deer hunting Would

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>those show every year for now, I don't know, fifteen

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>years and Tony, this is important for you for fifteen

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>years on deer hunting opener, Ladies, it's all about you.

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>We are dedicating our phone lines to you. You've got

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>first priority all day and we only go to the

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>guys if you don't show up and most most every

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>year you guys show up. I've already feel free to

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>keep doing it. Um it's chick chat week at Fantasy

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>football week weekly, and now deer hunters. That doesn't mean

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.279
<v Speaker 1>we don't love you. We totally understand you've got dual

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>passions in your life, fantasy football and deer hunting. We

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>we've got another tradition going where people text me if

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you're listening, not text me, they tweet me photos of

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>what their their dear stand right now. So here's what

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for. If you're in the deer stand and

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you're listening, you're streaming the show right now, I am

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>retweeting your your tweets of what you're seeing right now

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in your deer stand. Now, it's got to be a lie.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I want a photo. I want a photo from today,

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>don't show don't send me a photo from last week

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>with sunny skies and fifty or last year sunny skies

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty degree weather. It should be miserable like it is

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>here and throughout most or not all of Minnesota. UM,

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and we'd like to we'd like to celebrate the fact

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that you listen from the deer stand. I almost took

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a deer out with my car as a celebration last

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>night of all places on one hundred. That's crazy. Uh

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>so we'll retweet to all fifty summit thousand of my

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>followers will be like, why, why in the world has

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Charged doing this? You'll find out. So there we go

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>plenty to get to. Now. Oh, by the way, ladies,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the phone number six five one nine five three to six. Now,

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>when you're twenty plus years of doing the show, charges

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a guy ever called in after maybe like taking himself

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or hit himself in the junk to know. More commonly,

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the six year old girl who's trying to in fact,

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in classic fashion, trying to find out if her dad

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>if she quote should start chris fulm falla And so

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, that's the tricky one, remember, because it's

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>so adorable. So with a six year old it's pretty cute.

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't encourage that because seriously, we want we want

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>more women to play. We love the women play. This

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is a great opportunity for us to um to help

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>make a comfortable environment for our female listeners. Before we

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>dive into all of the meat of the show, let

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>me mention this ran into this on Twitter and was

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>surprised that this is even a thing. But there are

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a handful of people out there. When the Deshaun Watson

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>news broke, was it Wednesday, I think it was Wednesday.

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>On Wednesday, some people immediately as the news was breaking

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>traded away to Shaun Watson at full value, not disclosing

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the injury. That's a d bag move right there. Commissioners,

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this all the time about how you

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we think you should basically never veto

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a trade unless it's extraordinary circumstance that has nothing to

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>do with the judgment of the two players. But this

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>is a scenario where Commissioners, you can jump in and

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you can undo that trade. Because if you're trading somebody

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>who is hurt or maybe hurt and you just have

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you happen to find out before the recipient of the trade,

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not that's not a legitimate trade. You have to

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>disclose that. Also, the trades that are already you know,

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>hanging out there that had been proposed with Watson involved,

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and then that same thing, yes, the same thing, that's

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a great point, same exact thing. So commissioners, yes, you

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can get involved. Oh, we're already getting our

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:08.239
<v Speaker 1>first our first pictures from deer hunters in the deer

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>stand in the middle of the fields and forests. We

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>love it. That's fun um at Paul Charchion. By the ways,

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter feed for that Commissioners, you can get involved

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>on the Watson deal and you can undo those trades,

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and you should. When I said this on Twitter, outrage

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>from people whore like caveat emptor you know, if you're

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the buyer, it's your job to make sure that everybody

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>in this deal is healthy and you should be googling

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it and blah blah blah, what what is wrong with you?

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>That's absurd. People that help trades that are already sitting

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>right and trades that are already out there or whatever else.

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't hit the submit button until you've done your research.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's not that's not accurate. People have

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>jobs and lives and you can't always know. All right,

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>let's move on plenty you get to in the course

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>of the show. We've got take a chance on me,

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>five tough questions, premature speculation, Lightning, and we'll break down

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the matchups light week, which is great. We

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>love that part um and ladies, we've talked about taking

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>your calls today just the the reality is that will

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>probably happen in about forty minutes. So we already have

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of a couple of female colors on hold. Howe,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.679
<v Speaker 1>I hope you will continue to hold, but the reality

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>is that that's probably coming up. In the third segment

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>of the show, we begin with our first matchup of

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the day, and that is Falcons taking on the Panthers.

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Scott Falcon's offense obviously has been extremely frustrating and now

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>they face a very good defense in the Panthers. So

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like this is an opportunity to get healthy.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, it's rough. I don't like this matchup at

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>all for really anybody. But I am giving a se

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>grade to Ryan in the passing game. He couldn't get

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>out of his funk against the Jets. The Panthers are

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>top five against the past. It's gonna be tough. They've

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>They've held seven of their eight quarterbacks they've faced under

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>two and thirty yards. Brady the only one over that,

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>but Matt Ryan has had at least two on thirty

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown every game. He's been fairly consistent lee

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>average this year, so I'm still going to give him

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a starting grade. Julio Jones, He's had at least seventy

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>yards in five last six games, but no opposing receiver

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>has been above ninety on the Panthers, so I think

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's gonna land right in there. I'm giving him

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. I I'm still a little positive about

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Jones this week. I don't know that he scores though.

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget what was it three hundred yards in his

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>last game against Well It was actually the that was

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the first of the two games. That was the game

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in which ben ad been Wickery was summarily fired. After

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the game and we we we started a whole new

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>adjective or a whole new now we have been That's right,

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Julio ben wickerized him. Wow. Yeah. So also Mohammed Sannu,

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a B grade to mostly because he's going

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to be in the slot going up against captain Munerland,

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>who's terribly graded by PFF, and he's got a five

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>inch height advantage averaging eight and a half argets and

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards per games since he's come back into the lineup.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I like that matchup. I thought the Vikings might miss

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>captain Manlin more than it turns out they have. That

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>was I think that. I think the front office got

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it right. Yep, I do too, Hooper, I'm I'm putting

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. I said last week he's been hot

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and cold. This week he gets a top ten defense

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>against that ends Freeman. I would give him a C grade,

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but I know that you have Jordan Howard, Melvin, Gordon McKinnon,

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Bell Pats running backs all on by, So I'm gonna

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>give him a low B grade against a very tough defense.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>But they haven't allowed to running back over ninety total yards.

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But Freeman's gaining seventeen touches a game and the Panthers

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>are allowing five receptions for a game, So maybe there's

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>some Maybe there's just enough to get him to a

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>low B. There. Coleman, I'm probably benching, but I'm probably bench.

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>We're letting the fact that it's a brutal bye week

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>affect our ranking. It's terrible it is. In a full week,

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Coleman would probably be an exactly because he

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is getting ten touches at game, and he does even

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>though he hasn't cut a lot of passes recently. He

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>does get pass catching, so maybe he has just enough

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to get you a CE this week. Alright, on the

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Panthers side, Newton man. The Falcons defense is holding quarterbacks

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to two yards. Over the last five, They've only allowed

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>one yard game. But I think Newton can get enough

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>rushing even though he's only averaging two game over his

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>last three, I think he can get enough rushing to

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>give you a C grade there. Uh. Over to the

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>passing game and receiver Samuel and Shephard, I'm benching. I

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know what their role is going to be now

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>with with Benjamin gone, I don't know where the volume

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is actually gonna go. I'm also benching Dixon twenty six

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:42.719
<v Speaker 1>yards a game over the last three in Atlanta's top

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>ten against That ends. No thanks, Bunches, I this is

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't This is the only time you're ever gonna hear

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>me say this. I hate I cannot stand Bunches, but

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I might give him a grade this week. I know

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to give him a B plus, but you

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't are no pluses, and there are no pluses

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>in this show. Yeah, there's no crying in baseball, there's

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>no pluses. And still he was already the target leader

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on the team with eight point three targets per game

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>with Greg Olson out, so he's gonna draw top coverage.

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But Atlanta has given up a touchdown to the number

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>one receiver in sixth straight. Fungus is the red zone

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>threat here and they've allowed sixty yards to three straight

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>number one receivers. I think he's just gonna get ten

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>plus targets and have the volume. I'm benching Stewart because

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>he's terrible this year. I don't care that he scored

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>last week. McCaffrey. Atlanta gets torched by pass catching running backs.

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why I was all over Terry Cohen week one

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>on fanball dot com articles. It still holds true. They're

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>bad last year, they're bad this year. There McCaffrey, that's

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>his own. Atlanta is allowing seven catches and fifty five

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>yards receiving the running backs. McCaffrey. I'm giving an a

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>grade to all right, nice um. I like McCaffrey a lot.

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>He's inside my top ten overall at the running back position.

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>This week, Bengals take on the Jaguars, and this is

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a super dicey matchup, lowest grade of the year for

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>for A J. Green. For me, the Bengals have arguably

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the worst offensive line of football and the Jaguars have

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the most sacks in the league by a mile. This

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 1>feels like a very dicey matchup for the passing game

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>to me. Brian, you see it that way? Oh yeah,

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 1>no doubt. This is one of those times or A. J.

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Green definitely doesn't get an A. I'm still going to

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>give him a B here just because he is an

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>elite talent. But yeah, this is basically the worst matchup

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>for wide receivers going up against the Jaguars. Jalen Ramsey

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and A. J. Bouyer probably the best cornerback duo in

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the NFL right now. But Green is elite. Like I said,

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>he does have several inches of height advantage on each guy,

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh elite wide receivers faired okay against the Jaguars.

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins had seven for fifty five yards and a touchdown.

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown caught ten balls for a hundred fifty seven yards,

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So some hope for Green, not for the other wide

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>receivers though they are on the bench. The Jaguars have

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>allowed one opposing wide receiver touchdown all year. That was Hopkins,

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 1>and they're allowing less than ten catches and a hundred

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and ten yards per game to wide receivers as a whole.

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>That is a awful. So they're on the bench, as

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is Tyler Croft. Uh he will get Sea grades in

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the future and has in the past. Uh is averaging

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>more than five targets over his last four games, has

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 1>scored three touchdowns in that span, but only one of

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>posing tight end it's top fifty yards against the Jaguars.

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>That was Delaney Walker in Week two, and only one

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Titan has scored against Jacksonville in their last four. So

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Croft is on the bench, as is Andy Dalton for

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty much obvious reasons. Jacksonville has allowed four passing touchdowns

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and seven games no quarterback has thrown for multiple touchdowns

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and only one has topped two hundred twenty five yards

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Jaguars this year. It's almost an auto bench

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>or any quarterback I've got, I've got Dalton below guys

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>like well, I think probably all of our take a

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>chance a mean quarterbacks. He's ranked like twenty three in

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a in a in a week in which there are

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>six teams on by. It's that bad for Dalton. It's

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it's that good for Joe Mixon this week though, probably

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>give him an A. The Jacksonville ranks dead last and

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards allowed a hundred and sixty nine per game. UH,

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it's no surprise. They are also dead last in d

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>v O d v O A against the run by

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>football outsiders. UH. Running backs have also exposed Jacksonville through

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the air in recent weeks. Marlon Matt caught four passes

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>for forty yards. Levy on Bell caught ten passes. Low

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Powell and Elijah McGuire combined for six catches sixty five yards.

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Your boy Buck Allan caught five passes. Charge that's so yeah,

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>there's hope hope for mixing through the air here. UH.

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Geo Bernard might snipe some of that pass work, but

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>he's still on the bench for me, as is Jeremy Hill.

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>You can find him on the bench like you find

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Forrest Gump on the bench bus stop most weeks over

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to Jacksonville. Leonard four net practicing in full. That means

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>he's back to an automatic A grade. You start him

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>against eleven werewolves on steroids. UH. Cincinnati has allowed the

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>fourth most red zone touches to running backs in four

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>net is a ruler of those rushing opportunities when healthy

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>as he is right now. So sh wouldn't have been

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>eleven werewolves at midnight probably, But uh, I just scribbled

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that down real quick. Okay, I mean, I'm just trying

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to help you out here, But how can they can

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 1>be on steroids at midnight during the full moon? Face,

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I really want to play this thing out. Let's bake

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that in much of an auto start letard for it is, Yes,

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>where was at midnight on Royds now cycle? Alan Hearns,

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Mark Eastley and d D. Westbrook all on the bench?

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Um Hearns is going to play? Mark east Lee might

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>might not. D D. Westbrook might might not. Um. All

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I know is when you see t Y Hilton go

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>for two catches in fifteen yards against the Bengals, you're

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to start any of these three. Uh. Just

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the fun fact, Geronimo Allison, of all people, the only

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver at to top seventy five yards against the

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Bengals this year. And then water is wet, the sky

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is blue, and Blake Portals is on the bench. Yes,

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Ravens take on the Titans, and a handful of C

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>grades here for the Bengals, do not chase last week's

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>forty point uh explosion, in part because two of the

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>two of the touchdowns came from the defense and Joe

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Flacco looks like he's gonna start, but he's been Fantasy

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Football's worst starting quarterback by a mile, and when he's

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Jeremy Macklin from the passing game gets

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a C grade, but as much as anything else, it's

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>just because everybody else is hurting, there's nobody else to

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>throw too. He does have a He's got a tougher

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>matchup out of the slot against Tennessee slack cornerback Logan Ryan,

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but because of all the injuries, they've actually split him

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>out wide a little bit, and if Mike Walls doesn't go,

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which could happen, then he gets a much more favorable

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>matchup on the outside against the Dory Jackson and Sean Simms,

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>both below average cornerbacks. So a C grade barely for

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Macklin. C grades for the running game. I know

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to chase. Alex Collins is a big explosion

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>from last week, but this team has been oddly reticent

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to give him the ball despite his league leading average

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of six yards per gary. Fortunately, Collins dominated last week

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and you've gotta figure he's gotta show get a few

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>more looks this week. But the matchups brutal. Tennessee is

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>allowing the seventh fewest rushing yards, the fourth fewest yards

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>per carry, just three point six. No runner against Tennessee

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is top seventy seven yards and no runner has scored

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown since Week four against Tennessee. Brutal matchup for

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Alex Collins, but you still start him with a C grade.

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Bunk Gallen is a PPR option only he's managed at

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>least four receptions in five games this year. He faces

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the Titans defense that has allowed the six most receiving

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>yards to backs, and in their last game Tennessee before

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>last week's by Cleveland, runners total ninety two receiving yards total.

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's an angle for bunk Gallen right there. Let's

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>go to the Tennessee side. It's only a handful of

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>SEA grades and that's it. C grades for the two runners,

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>de Marco Murray and Derrick Henry. Unfortunately, the Ravens defensive

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>tackle Brandon Williams is back, and that means they've stopped

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>serving up free one yard games to opposing runners. Uh.

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee's offensive line is massively underachieving this year. They have

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>on paper like one of the three best offensive lines

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in football, but they just aren't. They are not great

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>this year, and Murray and Henry are locked into Fantasy

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Football's most frustrating time share. Normally, Murray gets a slide

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>edge over Henry because of his PPR potential, but the

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Ravens are elite against running backs through the air. They're

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>giving up the fourth fewest receptions to runners. No running

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>back has scored through the air against the Ravens this year.

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>So just ce grades here for Murray and Henry. Let's

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>go to the passing game. C grades abound here as

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>well well, actually just from just from Marcus Mariota C grade.

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Last time we saw Mariota, he was going belly up

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>against the Browns, and now he faces a much tougher opponent.

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens the number three past defense and yards allowed,

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the number four past defense and touchdowns allowed. They've also

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed just three passing scores total in the last five games,

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>so brutal matchup for Mariota here it really only giving

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>him a C grade because six teams are on by

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>and I know you're in a pinch and you just

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>lost to Shaun Watson, and it's the only reason he

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:07.959
<v Speaker 1>gets to see. All his receivers are on the bench. Matthews, Davis,

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Deck are his wide receivers. The Ravens have yet to

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>allow wide receiver to top ninety five yards all season.

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>They ranked fourth in yards to wide receivers allowed, second

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and touchdowns allowed to wide receivers. I can't recommend any

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>of them here. They haven't allowed a wide receiver touchdown

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in three straight games. Decker, Davis, Matthews all on the bench.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>What about the Laney Walker, you may ask, Well, he

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>hasn't scored all season, and he's a game time decision

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>with a foot injury. So and the Ravens have allowed

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a league high six tight end touchdowns, but three of

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>those six were that crazy London game where they gave

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>up three of them to Marcedes Lewis inexplicably in one game.

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if they're really that bad. Now,

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>if Walker doesn't go, then you could pivot to his backup.

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna say this right, JOHNU. Smith. I

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's John. I'm a Joni guy, but I guess

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll I'll fix that. John, go with John Oh John Smith.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Now here's your weird factory to the day. John H.

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Smith currently leads all Tennessee receivers and touchdowns right now,

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and he hasn't scored in four games. He leads with

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>two so you could pivot there if you're looking for

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a cheap fan ball DFS angle, or you're just in

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a desperate spot for at the tight end position. We'll

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>take a break when we come back. Take a chance

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>on me. Nine players not normally in your starting lineup.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you who they are when we come back.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It was just a matter of time. Sooner or later

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a listener would send in their own version of take

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me, And that has happened. Like on

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the key tar. No, this is some synthesizer, but it's

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>got a very eighties to me. This has got an

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>eighties John Carpenter feel to it. Do you remember The

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Escape from New York, The Thing, Halloween? All those epic

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>John Carpenter movies from the eighties which he did his

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>own soundtracks. By the way, you don't see directors do

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>their own soundtracks anymore, and probably rightfully. So take a chance.

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, thank you listener, Mike by the way, um,

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>take a chance. I me nine players not normally in

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup. Let's go to the quarterback position. Many of

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>these available on the waiver wire, and god you need it.

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>This week we begin right here. Scott Fish quarterback. I'm

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Tom Savage. Oh yeah, yeah, he's He's

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>just got a great matchup this week. The Colts have

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 1>allowed either three yards passing or multiple touchdowns to every

0:20:54.480 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback they faced. It's in Tom Savage is three career games.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>He's played the Jags twice end of last season when

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they were very good and to start this season, and Cincinnati.

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>At the end of last year, Cincinnati held six quarterbacks

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>under two hundred yards. I'm not a hundred percent positive yet.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>That Savage is just terrible. He's got a couple of

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>great weapons. It's just such a good match up here. Okay,

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish, Hi won't let you down, Humble Rusty. I'll

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>get it better next week. Alright, Well, I have, unfortunately

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>brock Osweiler, who now plays with the Broncos, which comes

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>courtesy of the Browns. Or the Texans Satan himself. I

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know who is paying his salary at this point,

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's not Denver. But get this, here's a stat

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 1>for you. The last time Brock Osweiler put on a

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Broncos jersey, they won the Super Bowl. Even play in

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.479
<v Speaker 1>that game. But don't let that stop you, all right,

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in all somewhat seriousness, in non Northeastern conditions, when playing

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, opposing quarterback where the temperature decks below, opposing

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks that've actually done pretty well against Philly, uh, chasing

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>points in Philadelphia Kirk Cousins at three hundred three yards

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and three touchdowns, Carson Palmer to one. Eli Manning had

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and sixty six yards and three touchdowns. Osweiler

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>is a little mobile too, Don't forget when he's not

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.479
<v Speaker 1>running out of town, uh, you know, dodging bricks being

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>thrown atam or whatever. Cam Newton ran for eleven eleven

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>times or seven one yards and a touchdown against the

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Eagles in Week six. Philly also owns the highest opponent

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>passing play for senterge, a whopping seventy of the time

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:31.479
<v Speaker 1>opponents pass against them. So Brock Osweiler. Yeah, I might

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>help you out this week. All right, Jacobe Prisette going

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>up against Houston, I'll take the precent side of the

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of the of this matchup as opposed to Scott Fitch

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback battle. At the quarterback battle, only New England

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>has allowed more fantasy points to opposing passers than the Texans,

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>who have yielded two or more touchdowns to quarterbacks and

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>four of their last seven games. While percent is somewhat

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>limited as a pastor, which I think we can all agree,

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>he is tied for the league lead with three rushing scores.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>He is a threat to hurd of Houston defense that

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>surrenders over twenty one rushing yards per game to quarterbacks.

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's play for the rushing angle of nothing else

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>with Pert Sette. Let's go to the running back position, Scott,

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm going with the Orleans dark On. Every

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>running back that's had at least twelve touches against the

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Rams has had at least ninety yards and a score.

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Dark was probably gonna get that. He had twenty two

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>against Denver. He's led the team in his tempts three

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>straight weeks. All Right, I'm staying with the Broncos and

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>going to Vante Booker at the Eagles. UM, here's the stat.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Over Denver's last three games. C J Anderson has one

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>rush from the red zone inside the red zone, DeVante

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Booker had three runs inside the ten yard line last

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>week and scored on one of them, scored on one

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of them. And during that same three games, fan Booker

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>has catched totals of four or three and three. The

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Eagles have allowed over eight receptions pretty game to running

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>backs over their last three games. So Booker is gonna

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>get a decent amount of work here. It could help

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you out. I like books he was, Yeah, he was.

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>He flashed in the preseason, looking better than I thought.

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>He has to look better than c J. That's a

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>savvy pickup. Andre Ellington dropped in mostly because he's been

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>hurt for the better part of a month. But remember

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>before his injury, he was averaging nine targets per game

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and Adrian Peterson is not gonna it's not gonna take

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>receptions away from him. He goes up against San Francisco

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and get this, the forty Niners dead last in receptions

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>allowed to running backs, receiving yards allowed to running backs,

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>receiving touchdowns to running backs. I want the running back

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>who's averaging nine targets a game, Andre Ellington. This week,

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the receiver position, Scott. I'm going with

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>more of a dart throw here with Brandon Coleman. He

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>played sent of the snaps last week. Snead did not

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>get a target. He's a six ft six big play

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>threat that Breeze has been raving about. There's a chance

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for a big play, all right. I'm going on Oakland

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>tight end Jared Cook at Miami. Opposing tight ends are

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>averaging more than eight and a half targets, six catches,

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and fifty yards per game against the Dolphins, who have

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>snowflakes spinning in his Tunican grave right now, how bad

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>they are playing. Jared Cook has has also seen at

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>least five targets in every game but one this year,

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's top six among tight ends in red zone targets.

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins have allowed a tight end touchdown on three

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of their last four games, and in the one game

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they did in Austin, Hooper had seven catches. So I

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like Cook. Can we refer to the Dolphins home stadium

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>as the Tunican I like that I think that's pretty brilliant.

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>My receiver Tyke take a chance of me. Player is

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Higbee. If you don't even know who he is,

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't blame you. Um he is your Rams starting

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>tight end and he goes up against the Giants. Brian,

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>how are the Giants against tight ends awful? And that's

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>being generous. They are dead last against the tight ends

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in yardage allowed? They have allowed a tight end touchdown

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>in eight consecutive weeks. How do you do that? How

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>do you give up a tight end touchdown in every

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>game of the year, which they have done? Higbee totally inconsistent,

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>wildly want some good games, some terrible ones, and absolutely invisible.

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>But if there's ever time to start him, it is

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. When we come back, we'll dive back into

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the matchups including Rams versus Giants. Will tell you if

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you can get back on board with Jared Goff in

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 1>this passing game when we come back your distinct Fantasy

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly on the Fan, Welcome back to the show

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan. It's our special chick

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Chat Ladies edition. We do this every year and honor

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of our dear hunting widows. Ladies we encourage you to call.

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna try to take calls in this segment for you.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Six one, nine, five three two six Rams take on

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, Scott, I, I'm back on board the Rams

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>passing game. What do you think? So I here, Jared

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>goff had a tough game against the Jags and the

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks and whatnot, But the Giants are the worst past

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>defense in the NFL since Week four, averaging allowing nearly

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>three thirty yards and two and a half touchdowns per

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>game to quarterbacks. Oh and guess what genera Jenkins is

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>now suspended. So that's gonna help out the wider's eivers,

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>especially Watkins quite a bit. For the wide receiver. I

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>give Goff an a I'm giving all the wide receivers

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>bees though they I think all of them. I love

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Watkins, I I like I like a lot of

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers, but they spread the ball around so much.

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Watkins without Jenkins him right, but he's still just seeing

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.239
<v Speaker 1>four targets per game on the season, correct park as

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>he's seen all these number one cornerbacks. True, but there's

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>no Jenkins, so you know, typically the path of leash

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>resistances with the other guys. All right, continue, alright? Uh,

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.919
<v Speaker 1>for Woods, he's the target leader. He's got five catches

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and at least fifty five yards and four of his

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>last five games. I'm giving him be maybe these are

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.239
<v Speaker 1>all really high bees. And Cooper Cup is I know

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cooper Cup is the guy I probably like the most.

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I know you like Watkins. Cup is tied for third

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL and red zone targets with eleven and

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and Doug Baldwin just a couple of weeks ago from

0:27:56.200 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the slot torched the Giants. So Higbee was your take home.

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>And Gurley he has over a hundred twenty total yards

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in four of his last five games, and every running

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.719
<v Speaker 1>back that's got at least twenty touches against the Giants

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred thirty plus total yards. Yeah, Todd Gurley averaging nearly

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty five a game. A grade there on the Giant side,

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm benching Manning. I'm sorry, man, you go under a

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty passing yards two straight games and you play

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a top ten past defense, I'm benching you. Shepherd. I'm

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>giving him a C grade because every wide receiver that's

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>had at least eight targets against the Rams has at

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>least eighty yards. I think he could sleep walk sleepwalk

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>into eight targets. Yeah, Evan Ingram, he has at least

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>four catches and at least forty yards and seven of

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>his eight games and he's been there in primary weapon

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>ten plus targets each the last few weeks. It's a

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>good defense against ted Ends, but he's getting so much volume.

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Might give him a C and dark one was my

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>take home. Right, let's go to the Bucks in the Saints.

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>The normally playing against the Saints, it was just start

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the passing game, but the Saints secondary has

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>suddenly gotten to be a legit and now Jamis Winson

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is not a sure start here. What do you think? Yeah,

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you can suddenly get legit when you're facing Mitch Trubisky

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and Brett Huntley over the last So let's start with

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans. I'm giving him the easy A. Still Marshawn

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Lattimore has gonna standout rookie at corner half, but at

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>six ft one two, he's about the size of one

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of Mike Evans Teddy Bears. I think, so I still

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>like Evans in this matchup. I do like the Sean

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Jackson as well. He'll see Ken Crawley, who's also played

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>very well at corner this year. But Jackson has been

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>more involved lately, with eight or more targets and three

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of his last four games. And here's his career averages

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>indoors as they will be this week at the Superdome

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>reverence the Shawn Jackson. Shawn Jackson five catches ninety six

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>yards zero point seven touchdowns per game indoors, whereas outdoors

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>he has four catches sixty six yards and zero point

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>three touchdown this year. This is career he's never played inside,

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>not a lot, not as much as outdoors obviously, but

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a decent enough sample size. You like Jackson on the

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>fast track, Let's just leave it at that, and wide

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>rep whide re super duos have burned the Saints digs

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>feeling Golden Tate Marvin Jones both had big games. So

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I like Jackson and Evans Cameron Brad. I don't like

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>him as much, Gonna give him a see. New Orleans

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is allowing you third few s yards two tight ends

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this year, but tight end is just too thin to

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>bench the guy who was fourth in yards at the position.

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.479
<v Speaker 1>So you can start break but not O. J. Howard.

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>He is on the bench. Jamis Winston gonna give him

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a B. Cam Newton, J. Cutler, Brett Hunley, Mitch Hubiski

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>all failed to throw a touchdown against New Orleans, but

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bradford, Tom Brady and Matt Stafford each through for

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns against the Saints. Winston fits better with the

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>ladder there, so I like him this week only if

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>his shoulder holds up, So we'll cross our fingers there.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And Doug Martin also gets a BU. The Saints are

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>ranks twenty nine against the run by Football Outsiders and

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>have allowed a hundred yards and he touchdown to a

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>running back and back to back weeks. They've also allowed

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the fifth most receptions running backs where Martin can catch

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball when needed. Uh. Going over to these Saints,

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees gets an all, let's just move on. Michael

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Thomas gets an A as well. Thomas caught six balls

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>for nine gate yards and his loan meeting with Tampa

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Bay last year. He has at least seven catches and

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>four of his last five games, and Tampa Bay is

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>ranked twenty seven against number one wide receivers by Football Outsiders.

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Ted ginn not in A, almost in A, but i'

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him a B. He should be the primary

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>beneficiary of Brent Grimes his absence. We will miss this game. Uh,

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>he'll see a lot of Ryan Smith will be making

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>only his second start at cornerback. Over his last three games,

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>again has five catches of twenty plus yards, and three

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of those have gone for over forty. The Bucks are

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>allowing more than a hundred nine yards per game to

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, so Gain should continue to shine here, as

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>should Brandon Coleman. Scott's take a chance on me. Wide

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver Willie Snead only saw four snaps last week, probably

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>won't be ramped up fully, So I do like Coleman,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Warden sneed here. Uh, Kobe Fleaner is on the bench

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>just because he he sucks, sucks, sucks so bad. I'm

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>sorry for that call a few weeks ago. Yeah, yeah,

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.719
<v Speaker 1>how about that? And then mark Ingram I'm gonna give

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>him an A. And Alvin Kamara almost in A, but

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get a B. Uh Ingram averaging twenty seven

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 1>touches per game, and the Bucks are allowing a hundred

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and thirty four combo yards per game to opposing backs.

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Ingram also scored twice in his last meeting against Tampa

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bay and Alaman Kamaras should eat through the air. Tampa

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Bay is allowing seven catches and fifty four yards per

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>game to oppose and running backs. Yeah, we said it

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>last week, and it's starting to materialize. They can't keep

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.959
<v Speaker 1>using Ingram as a workhorse guy getting twenty seven touches

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a game. Camara is gonna start picking up more touches.

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>The regression is coming. Washington takes on Seattle in Seattle,

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup for the Redskins. I've got a handful of

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Sea grades and that's it. Chris Thompson gets a C grade.

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>As good as he has been, by the way, averaging

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>one total yards per game since week two, he's still

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of a matchup play. You've gotta find teams that

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>struggled to stop running backs out of the backfield, and

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is not that team. They have a top five

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>ranking against running backs in catches allowed to running backs,

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>targets allowed to running backs, receiving yards to running backs,

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and receiving touchdowns allowed to running backs. So I don't

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>much love Thompson here and he's just a C grade.

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm keeping Rob Kelly on the bench, WHI always day

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>with running backs still playing hurt and he actually he could.

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>He's a sneaky game time decision. There's a scenario where

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Kelly doesn't play in this game. Uh, he's had double

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't had even double digit touches since Week two.

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Just not getting enough work here. You could try to

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>gamble on the touchdown, but Seahawks are still a decent

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>enough run defense that I don't think you want to

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>start Rob Kelly. Let's go to the passing game. Kirk Cousins.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, this is this hurts all of them.

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Offensive line devastated by injury. They're missing two starters for sure,

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and probably three starters across the offensive line for the Redskins,

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Crowder and Jordan's Jamison Crowder probably will not go.

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Reid's already been ruled out. So Cousins is really

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>really short suited in this one. Only a C grade here,

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and even that is a tentative C grade. Seattle secondary

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>did just get crushed by Deshaun Watson last week, but

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>note before that game they were averaging two D two

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>passing yards allowed and zero point eight passing touchdowns allowed.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins not DeShawn Watson. This is a very tough matchup.

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>You could try to start Vernon Davis, He'll start in

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>place with Jordan Reed, but mom worrid, He's gonna have

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>to block because I don't have any lineman left. That's

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a concern Seattle middle of the road tight end defense,

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and so I show caution. I have a tentative S

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>grade on Vernon Davis. That's it. Josh Dockson is on

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the bench. He's only averaging one and a half catches

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>per game. Let's go to Seattle side Russell Wilson. I

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.399
<v Speaker 1>mostly in obvious a here, but I'll note that the

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Redskins have allowed just two hundred eleven passing yards in

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>less than one passing touchdown per game to every quarterback

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>other than Carson Wentz this year. And Russell Wilson just

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>eviscerated a really good Houston secondary. So maybe it doesn't matter.

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But Wilson's accounted for three hundred thirty three total yards

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>or more and three total touchdowns and four of the

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>past five games he's red hot. Totally wrong about my

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 1>earlier predictions of doom. For for Russell Wilson, he's he's great,

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>keep him in your lineup. Jimmy Graham also an obvious

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a to the point that I'm not going to spend

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time on this, especially because the Redskins

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of all of the most yards two tight ends eighty

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>one yards per game. So he is a great great

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>start this week. A grade for Jimmy Graham be great.

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>For Doug Baldwin, he has a tough matchup against emerging

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>slot cornered Kendall Fuller, who's currently ranked fourteenth by Pro

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus. Although I'll note this, in the last three weeks,

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>two slot corners have found the end zone against Washington,

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Aldrick Robinson and Nelson Aghilar, so there is an angle here.

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Skins have not a lot of receiver to top sixty

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>six yards since the opener at you, and so that

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 1>does worry me for Doug Baldwin, who gets a B grade.

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>It also worries me for Paul Richardson, who has a

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>C grade. I know he blew up last week. But

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>before you get too confident about remember you only caught

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>two or three passes in the previous five games, so

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>only two or three in the previous five. So let's

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>not go crazy chasing last week's box score for Paul Richardson.

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Then Tyler Locketts on the bench for many of the

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>same reasons. No receivers top sixty six yards against the

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Skins since the opening game, and he is getting Lockets

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>getting more looks of late, but he's still the fourth

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>option in this passing game, so I think you gotta

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 1>be cautious about him. And I'm putting all the runners

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. This is the worst rushing attack in

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. Chris Carson is still your leading rusher for

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Seahawks and he hasn't played since October one.

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Rawls and Lacy both under two point six yards per carry.

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our next matchup, and that is the

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals at the San Francisco. We've already found some

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 1>take a chance, I mean, guys that we like here

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in this game. But what do you think about the

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Arizona offense now without Carson Palmer. I'm scared. Even though

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it's got a gray matchup, I think I still have

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to bench Stanton. I don't even know if I don't

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>know if he's going to play the whole game. I mean,

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Gabert might come in for a revenge game, but he's

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a sub fifty percent passed over the last three years

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in relief. No, no thanks, despite the great matchup. Same

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>with most of the passing game, and I was the

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>top three against Ted Ends I'm mentioned Gresham Brown. I

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 1>can't trust Fitzgerald. I'm going to give him a C,

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and just barely. He's only got one game over fifty

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>yards with Stanton and last week and three quarters of work,

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Stanton only targeted him twice. That's scary as heck. But

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the matchup is so good it's got to be some

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>volume somewhere. I'm giving Fitzgerald a hesitant C. Running game

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Ellington was your take. M love him this week, and

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Super Sneaky has been dropped in. I love him too.

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I like that call. And and Peterson they want to

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 1>feed him this week. The forty nine Ers defense has

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>allowed a league high tied for the league high ten

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns running backs hundred thirteen rushing yards per game. I'm

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>giving Peterson a B grade. It would shock me if

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>he has an A grade. I would give him an

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>A if it wasn't for last week and I got scared.

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>So on the other side for passing game, I'm giving

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>better to see And it's mostly because he can get

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>some work done on the ground and his two starts

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown and the Cardinals have let up a

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>couple of touchdowns to rushing quarterbacks. The matchup isn't is

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, you know, bottom five against quarterback's methods, not

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>throwing for a lot of passing yards. But he can

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>make it up there real quick. Do you buy that?

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan said that Garoppolo will not play this year. I

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>don't buy it. There's no way, right, I just don't

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>buy it. I don't believe you. Kyle, sorry all right.

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>For the wide receivers, I'm benching them all I I

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>just can't decide what's going to happen with them. Where

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Peterson is gonna play if he's going to cover both

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Robinson and Goodwin at times. Uh, the slot is only

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.800
<v Speaker 1>giving up forty five yards per game. That makes Taylor tough. Kittle.

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>He's disappeared over the last couple weeks. I thought the

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Iowa thing was going to be a thing, but not

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:39.760
<v Speaker 1>three catches in the last two weeks. But great matchup,

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>good matchup, Yeah, that's it. Still under fifty yards per

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>game to tight ends, but yeah, they have a lot

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of few touchdowns. Carlos Hyde a grade this week. In

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>his last meeting with the Cardinals, he had total yards

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and five catches. At the time of that game, the

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals were allowing eighty five yards per game to running backs.

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Since that game, we're talking after that game, they're now

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 1>allowing over a hundred and twenty yards per game to

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>running backs and have fallen to become a bottom ten

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>run defense. For Carlos Hide, I like it. Let's let's

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>work in a few calls again. It's deer hunting opener,

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and that means we celebrate deer hunting widows, ladies. We

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>encourage you to call in your first priority on the

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>phones all day six nine, five, three to six. And guys,

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not that we don't love you deer hunters. I

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:28.879
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of your streaming the show right now,

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe on I Heart Radio, KA fan dot com. Um,

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>if you send me photos from your deer stand right

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.439
<v Speaker 1>now at Paul Charging on Twitter, I've seen something good.

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:43.839
<v Speaker 1>They are good. Chancey is it Chancey? Hi? That's part

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Jan and part Nancy. I like it. All in one. Yeah,

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>that's about it. What can we do for you? Um?

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I have basically two questions, Um, I need two of them.

0:39:54.880 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>These people in the Standard League? Um, wove Fuller, Robert Woods,

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed's an new or one of of your take chances? What? What? What?

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>What is your call? I'd probably lean with Fuller and

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Woods this week. I love Woods this matchup, and I

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>think I love both Woods and Fuller's matchups. Actually, yeah,

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what we would do. Anything else we can help

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you with, yes, yes, yes, yes? Um? What is your

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>two cents on Miami's Saks Field avoid that don't like

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:35.839
<v Speaker 1>any of it? Yeah? If you had to pick one,

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it's Kenyan Drake right now though, if you really want

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to pick one up, yeah, let me write this one down,

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but don't don't get too excited about it when you

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>have ah, okay, um okay, all right, thank you, appreciate

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you listening, Thank you, thank you for listening. Let's go

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to Katherine. Hello Katherine to keep your patience this morning. Hi, hi, um,

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:11.439
<v Speaker 1>thanks for taking my call. I have an issue with quarterbacks. UM.

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I have Brissette and Flacco going and I'm just wondering

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>if there was somebody else or two others that you

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>would choose over those two quarterbacks that I have right now.

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I would choose the rest of the league over Flacco. Yeah,

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>literally have every other available starting quarterback. To me, it's

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 1>better than I don't think he's anyone else besides anybody

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>but Flacco. Brissette was might take a chance on a quarterback,

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 1>so I like him. Do you have anybody else knows

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I woul Yeah, I would say any of our tet

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>coms over Flacco, but I would agree that Brissette is

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:52.280
<v Speaker 1>probably has the best chances this week of those three guys. Okay, Brissette, Savage,

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and Swaller, I got from you the best of those. Yeah, yeah,

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we are okay. Yeah. Um. And then also

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I have Mike Wallace uh and wily Sneed. Do you

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>think any of those I would drop? I would drop

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 1>them both from your roster, Catherine, Yeah, you can. You

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>can find better help on the waiver wire, including our

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me guys that we that we

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>just discussed. Although two of them were tight ends, but

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you can find you can put your waiver

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.800
<v Speaker 1>wire has probably got better guys on it. Okay, thank you,

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. We're gonna try to sneak in a quick

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>one here with Erica. Hello, huh um. I was wondering

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody is offering me a trade for either of my

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. I have both Chelsea and Grunk. Wow, whatever

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you want, Yeah, and you can. You can get a

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:49.399
<v Speaker 1>lot for them. Do you need to win this week,

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>ericaor is your team in good shape? My team is

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>into shape. And it actually wouldn't even take place until

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>next week, all right, so this would be after the

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Patriots by week, which was part of why I was asking,

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you think Scott do have a preference between

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the two. I'd probably keep Kelsey. I just think he's safer. Well,

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you can get more for Grounk exactly. You can get

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>more for ground. Kelsey has nine yard games in the

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.720
<v Speaker 1>last year and a half. It's the most of any players,

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:17.319
<v Speaker 1>more than Antonio Browns. I think Kelsey's safer injury wise too,

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And you get more for Grunk. Yeah. Thanks, Erica. Appreciate

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>your patients. On hold, when we come back, five hot questions,

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 1>play along, see if you can go five and against

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 1>our panel of experts. When we return to Fantasy Football

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Weekly on the fan, you're distinct to Fantasy Football Weekly

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:57.279
<v Speaker 1>on the fan. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm a fan.

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchie and Scott Fish and Brian Johnson in with you.

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:04.360
<v Speaker 1>It is time for a bit we call five tough questions,

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>which we typically like to begin with hot question number one.

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It's hot questions, not tough questions. And giving myself the

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>entire year to get that straight because it's been we've

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>been saying it for twenty years. From this point forward,

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:24.320
<v Speaker 1>will New Eagles running back j and g I finish

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 1>as a RB one, r B two flex or bench player? Scott,

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with r B two. I think he is

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 1>was brought in to be the lead dog, kind of

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Marshawn Lynch to Seahawks steel uh and Blunt

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>has been terrible in short yardage and especially around the

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>goal line. He's only scored on one of his eight

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.440
<v Speaker 1>attempts inside the five and one of his twelve attempts

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>inside the ten. That's where most of the scoring goes down.

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention, in Miami, he was only averaging Miami

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>allow averages one point two yards before first contact. Philadelphia

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is closer to two point two which is the league average.

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So he's gonna get a lot more room to run.

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And his schedule is kind of, you know, the middle

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of the pack. So RB two. Okay, Yeah, let's pile

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:11.359
<v Speaker 1>on Blunt a little more here. He's just a bad fit.

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>In Philly, the Eagles run seventy percent of their plays

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and shotgun formation. That's just not blunts m O meaning

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 1>normally yet to run outside the tackles in that scenario then,

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>yet Blunt just does not excel. There a g I

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Ken and now here's a good stat I got from

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Graham Barfield on Twitter. Since the start of last season,

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there are just three instances of an Eagle's running back

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 1>playing six of the snaps in a single game. And

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>all we're dinner and sprawls and j GI is far

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 1>more more sprowlsy and than Garrett Blunt is. So I

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>like him seeing the majority of the touches moving forward,

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and he does have a pretty good schedule. Uh, they

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>did lose left tackle Jason Peters. The Eagles did as

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 1>a huge loss, but the schedule is decent after there

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 1>by Dallas, Chicago, Seattle, the Rams, Giants in Oakland. Some

0:45:51.960 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 1>of those teams sound scary on paper, but they're really not.

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>What is your answer here? AREB two? Y alright? RB

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:03.320
<v Speaker 1>two correct answer? It's flex. Here's why one blunts not terribles.

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Averaging four point seven yards per carry you know where?

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 1>That is way above average starting running back yards per

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>carrey and Gi joins the team with the sixth most

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 1>carries in the NFL. The Eagles are gonna want to

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 1>unleash a fresh Agi in the playoffs, and more importantly,

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Blunt is an is a UFA. At the end of

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>this year, They're gonna run Blunt into the ground the

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 1>way Dallas did with DeMarco Murray because they don't care

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 1>about what happens to Blunt after this season. They need

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a Gi, a fresh, healthy, ready to go at the

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:40.319
<v Speaker 1>beginning of and in the playoffs. The best case scenario

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for JAGI is a split load backfield, and you can't

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Those guys aren't r B ones or r B Two's

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:53.240
<v Speaker 1>question number two. From this point forward, will New Bills

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver Kelvin Benjamin finishes an wide receiver one a wide

0:46:57.000 --> 0:47:01.319
<v Speaker 1>receiver to flex or bench. Bryan's trying to go first

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:04.520
<v Speaker 1>prime so Buffalo doesn't throw a lot. Uh, that's why

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't even with the road to except Shady McCoy

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and Charles Clay when he's healthy. But uh, but still

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:11.919
<v Speaker 1>despite not throwing a lot, Tyrod Taylor has the third

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:14.360
<v Speaker 1>most passing touchdowns from inside the ten yard line, and

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 1>he's also top five and attempts and completion percentage from

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 1>inside the five. Um. He's never had a red zone

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 1>target quite like Kelvin Benjamin, and he does now, so

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna utilize him a lot when they're in the

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:26.360
<v Speaker 1>red zone. And I just don't trust Charles Clay to

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 1>be healthy. All those passes were going to him, but

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I think on one's canna eat into that big time.

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So he used a wide receiver too wide receiver to

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm right there with you, wide receiver two.

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much everything he said that about Tyrod not having

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a weaponless he had Clay, but now Benjamin can fill

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that role. Uh. And their schedule, they played the Chiefs,

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the Pats, the Colts, and the Paths over the course

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:50.280
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the season, all bottom five against

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:52.759
<v Speaker 1>the pass. I think there's some good games there at

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of the season. The correct answers flex Benjamin

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 1>goes from Cam Newton to Tyrod Taylor, and Newton falls inconsistency.

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Is a better passer than Taylor is. Benjamin doesn't have

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the speed to separate from defenders, and Taylor is not

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a precision passer. And the biggest problem though, is Benjamin,

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 1>who's built for end zone goal line receptions, and the

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Bills love to run the ball at the stripe and

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they do it super effectively, so there's not a mandate

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to use Benjamin's size in the end zone. Davanny's hot

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>question number three is Devin funchis helped, hurt or neither

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>by the trade of Calvin Benjamin Scott. I'm going with neither. Uh.

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:36.240
<v Speaker 1>He was already the leading target getter before when Olson

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:39.399
<v Speaker 1>went out, and with Benjamin there. Now that Benjamin's gone,

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:41.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe he gets a few more targets, but he's gonna

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>be drying top coverage and Olsen will be coming back.

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's enough hits there to go against

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the the extra potential targets that I'm going neither neither. Okay,

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>let me reiterate that Tyrod Taylor has the third most

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:58.879
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns from inside. The founder was kidding they throw

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 1>inside the five charge bail run inside five bunch of bunches.

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Funcious is gonna get hurt. He has played in twenty

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 1>two games with Kelvin Benjamin, in sixteen games without him,

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you think he does better in the sixteen games without him?

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't the average less targets, receptions, yards, and touchdowns

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>without Kelvin Benjamin. So this is going to hurt him

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. I say, neither Funius turns into the go

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to wide receiver for the Panthers, and that's as much

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of a curse as it is a blessing. He's been

0:49:22.960 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 1>struggling against second tier coverage. Now what happens when he

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:30.440
<v Speaker 1>faces the best coverage an opponent can give every down?

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And to make matters worse, there aren't any other receivers

0:49:35.000 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>worth double covering. I mean, if a team is going

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to give double coverage to anybody, it's all gonna go

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to Funchius. So we've never seen an opportunity for him

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:47.919
<v Speaker 1>to really step up and and take the mantle when

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:50.839
<v Speaker 1>given the opportunity. When Benjamin missed a bunch of time

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, funch just didn't do anything with

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity. I'm not certain he does here either Devanny's

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 1>hot question number his Time Montgomery, drop Herble Brian and

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.759
<v Speaker 1>non PPR absolutely uh not that will ever see double

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>digit double digit carries again anytime soon. But in the

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>four games he did this year, he failed to average

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:13.799
<v Speaker 1>more than three and a half yards per carry. He's

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:16.279
<v Speaker 1>just not a running back running back, and that is

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a fact. Uh Now in PPR land, I'm still dropping

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:23.040
<v Speaker 1>him to only has two catches over his last two games.

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 1>That's what Brett Hunley a quarterback. So there's not a

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of chemistry there. And don't forget when he was

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:29.759
<v Speaker 1>really catching a lot of passes last year. That's when

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Randall Codd was injured. That's not the case right now.

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm dropping Time Montgomery in all formats. Okay, yeah,

0:50:35.000 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everything he said. I like to say a

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 1>rising tide lifts all boats, and well, this is a

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:41.360
<v Speaker 1>low tide for the Packers right now. The whole offense

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:44.720
<v Speaker 1>should be downgraded. And he's only played of the snaps

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:49.520
<v Speaker 1>since Aaron Jones has taken over the control. I'm dropping

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Time Montgomery everywhere. Yeah, you guys have hit on all

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the key salient points here, and I've got a few

0:50:53.920 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 1>extra stats. I can throw in Since Week two, his

0:50:57.200 --> 0:51:01.319
<v Speaker 1>average game thirty one total yard and no touchdowns if

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 1>he if it weren't for the fact that you invested

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a third round pick in your draft or something in him,

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:08.239
<v Speaker 1>you'd dropped him a long time ago. Based just on

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the stats, it's not even clear. And this is also

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:14.480
<v Speaker 1>important that Montgomery is even the handcuff to own if

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>something were to happen to Aaron Jones. I'm not sure

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams doesn't turn into the starter even in PPR

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>one catch each of the last two weeks disastrous. Devon's

0:51:24.040 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>hot question number five, Are you holding DeAndre Hopkins and

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller or you're trading him away? Scott, I'm holding him.

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm holding him at this point, and mostly because of matchups.

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:38.320
<v Speaker 1>They have the Colts and the Cards and the Titans

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and the forty Niners early on, and then I'm gonna

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:42.920
<v Speaker 1>try to trade him before he has to face the

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Jags and the Steelers in the playoffs. I don't know

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:46.960
<v Speaker 1>at what point I'm going to trade them, but for

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:50.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, hold and then I'm gonna trade in a

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:53.040
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. I'm kinda with you, but if I can

0:51:53.080 --> 0:51:55.480
<v Speaker 1>execute a trade today, I'm gonna do it, and then

0:51:55.480 --> 0:51:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to use the indie matchup as the selling point,

0:51:58.239 --> 0:52:01.920
<v Speaker 1>like you said, Jack c Villan Pittsburgh in the Fantasy playoffs.

0:52:02.239 --> 0:52:05.040
<v Speaker 1>As for Hopkins, he has Pat Pete of the Cardinals

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 1>coming up on his schedule as well. And uh, you know,

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller is not going to catch a touchdown on

0:52:10.080 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>every other reception like he did with Tom Savage. You're

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:18.759
<v Speaker 1>still I would still high on Fuller even if I

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:20.560
<v Speaker 1>would try and sell them today. All right, so you're

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so you're you're going with the yes on cell today. Yeah,

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going yes as well. Uh Tom Tom Savage has

0:52:26.239 --> 0:52:28.840
<v Speaker 1>thrown one five passes in the NFL, which is a

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:31.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty big sample size. I mean that's the equivalent of,

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:36.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, three games worth no touchdowns, not zero. And

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, last year with Brick Osswidler destroying his season,

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Bill O'Brien refused to use Tom Savage until the bitter

0:52:45.320 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 1>end of the season weeks sixteen and seventeen. And and

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill O'Brien, why was he so reticent to insert Savage

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:56.840
<v Speaker 1>when when Osswiler was so bad and was killing their season.

0:52:57.280 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>It's because Bill O'Brien sees every single throw that Tom

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Savage has in practice and still didn't trust. I think

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Tom Savage is just weird with quarterbacks. He watched Deshaun

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Watson all preseason and said, oh, I'm just gonna go

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with Savage to start the season. John Bill O'Brien that

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I I that end up a very confusing decision. Obviously, Um,

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know we're only eight games are removed from seeing

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:25.000
<v Speaker 1>how little value fantasy value Deshaun, de Shaun uh sorry,

0:53:25.200 --> 0:53:29.200
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins and Will Fuller would have under with bad quarterbacking.

0:53:29.480 --> 0:53:31.239
<v Speaker 1>We're only eight games away from that, and it was

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>bad last year. Will Fuller was not even rosterable. DeAndre

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins was came finished last year like wide receiver forty.

0:53:38.480 --> 0:53:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think you got a trade away right now,

0:53:41.719 --> 0:53:44.279
<v Speaker 1>strike while the iron is hot, and to Brian's point,

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:46.960
<v Speaker 1>strike while you've got Indie on the schedule this week.

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 1>You've got twenty four hours to pull off that trade.

0:53:51.480 --> 0:53:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's working to match up Broncos taking on the Eagles. Brian,

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:58.839
<v Speaker 1>you already told us you like Brick Brick Oswiler in

0:53:58.880 --> 0:54:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this game, so only like one of his receivers, if

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:04.520
<v Speaker 1>not more. Who are the Who's startable here. Uh like

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that's well never mind, Yeah kay. I like Brick, but

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to Mary's Thomas, you gotta give him a B here.

0:54:10.640 --> 0:54:12.920
<v Speaker 1>He did catch five touchdowns in seven games with the Brock,

0:54:12.920 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and Philly has been tough on paper against wide receivers

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, but it was San Francisco and

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the Northeaster and the washed up Washington wide receiver corps

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of weeks before that. So I do like Thomas here. Uh,

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles are top five and catches and yards allowed

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers. I will give Emmanuel Sanders a C

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:30.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. You should make his return from a sprained ankle.

0:54:31.120 --> 0:54:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Even though brick Oswidler is his quarterback. This is a

0:54:33.320 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 1>favorable matchup on paper, so he is startable in a

0:54:35.920 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 1>game where the Broncos would probably be chasing points. Um

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>uh no, no tight end, I'm not pointing to tighten

0:54:41.200 --> 0:54:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Broncos. Is two modeled there um and over

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the running game. CJ. Anderson has looked kind of bad

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks. Um, and that's why Davante Booker

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:50.960
<v Speaker 1>has might take a chance for me running back. He

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 1>had three carries inside the ten yard line last week.

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>CJ has one red zone carry in the last three weeks,

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 1>so I like Booker a little more than Anderson. MS

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:02.320
<v Speaker 1>still gets the se um over to the Eagles. Carson

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Wentz usually an automatic A, but he got to give

0:55:04.719 --> 0:55:06.799
<v Speaker 1>him a B against Denvery efter to respect him. There

0:55:07.040 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 1>no need for wins his stats. He's winning leagues right now,

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:12.879
<v Speaker 1>but the Broncos do warrant some stats. No quarterback has

0:55:12.920 --> 0:55:16.680
<v Speaker 1>topped two forty passing yards against them, but Tyrod Taylor,

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott, and Philip Rivers through for multiple touchdowns against

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos this year, so wins can do the same.

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Zach Ertz gets an A despite the hammy issue he

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:27.360
<v Speaker 1>was dealing with this week. Ertz has scored six times

0:55:27.440 --> 0:55:29.719
<v Speaker 1>this year, and Denver has given up six tight end

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:32.799
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns through seven games. They ranked twenty seven against the

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:36.040
<v Speaker 1>position by Football Outsiders, so Urts is still an elite start.

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Alshon Jeffrey is not an elite start. Uh. Denver gave

0:55:40.719 --> 0:55:43.279
<v Speaker 1>up seven wide receiver touchdowns all of last year, which

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely insane. That is not a lot of touchdowns

0:55:45.640 --> 0:55:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers. They had given up six already this year, though,

0:55:48.440 --> 0:55:51.120
<v Speaker 1>so they softened a little bit, but most of these

0:55:51.120 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver touchdowns have been very random, John Colton, Andre Holmes,

0:55:55.920 --> 0:55:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Travis Benjamin twice. So it's just kind of like this

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>rando receiver will catch up touchdown. Alshon Jeffrey is gonna

0:56:01.520 --> 0:56:03.719
<v Speaker 1>get the most attention from the wide receiver, so he

0:56:03.800 --> 0:56:06.879
<v Speaker 1>just gets a sea here. I just said random wide

0:56:06.880 --> 0:56:09.520
<v Speaker 1>receivers have scored. But I'm still putting Aglar and Torry

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Smith on the bench. I do like you do like him?

0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I was borderline. Yeah, he has touchdowns in three of

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:17.840
<v Speaker 1>his last four games. Well wait, wait, wait, now he

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:21.799
<v Speaker 1>draws Chris Harris dead. Yeah. Sorry, I was on the

0:56:21.800 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong side of that. It's close, but he's still rosperable

0:56:25.000 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and he will be startable in coming weeks for sure.

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:28.440
<v Speaker 1>But Chris Harris is the best of their of all

0:56:28.520 --> 0:56:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of their cornerbacks, and he's their slot guy. I don't

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:34.879
<v Speaker 1>like it. And then, uh, let's go to the running backs.

0:56:34.880 --> 0:56:36.720
<v Speaker 1>We just talked about, Legarrett Blunt and j J I.

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I do like Blunt more in this game. I mean

0:56:38.440 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 1>give him both the sea in this one is a

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup. Denver ranked second overall against the rush and

0:56:43.239 --> 0:56:47.200
<v Speaker 1>as yet to surrender a rushing touchdown this season, I

0:56:47.200 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 1>almost want to bench both. I would actually bench a

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:52.200
<v Speaker 1>gi here. I'm benching both your right now, benoth Ben,

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I may have he may only get five carries in

0:56:55.719 --> 0:56:58.400
<v Speaker 1>this game. Beat writers there think he's gonna do nothing,

0:56:59.400 --> 0:57:01.719
<v Speaker 1>don't start it, gi here. Let's find out. Let's find

0:57:01.760 --> 0:57:04.319
<v Speaker 1>out what they're how this thing is shaping up. First? Good,

0:57:05.080 --> 0:57:07.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's go to Chiefs taking on the Dallas Cowboys.

0:57:07.920 --> 0:57:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt isn't is an a even though he hasn't

0:57:10.200 --> 0:57:13.440
<v Speaker 1>scored now in five weeks, this thing is starting to

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:15.680
<v Speaker 1>feel a little bit like last year. Do you remember

0:57:15.719 --> 0:57:19.160
<v Speaker 1>how last season Spencer where like through week four was

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like RB one overall and fantasy points, and then he

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:25.320
<v Speaker 1>trailed off Cree months of much better talent um. Now,

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the good news is the Dallas defense has given up

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:31.840
<v Speaker 1>one dred, thirty four or more yards from scrimmage and

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 1>at least one touchdown to every back who's gotten twenty

0:57:35.360 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 1>touches or more. Hunt averages twenty two touches, So workhorse

0:57:39.560 --> 0:57:41.960
<v Speaker 1>backs are getting it done against the Cowboys. Dallas is

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>also giving a four and a half yards per carry,

0:57:44.000 --> 0:57:48.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a ton, so A grade Kareem Hunt. Let's

0:57:48.000 --> 0:57:50.640
<v Speaker 1>go to the passing game. Be grade for Alex Smith.

0:57:51.040 --> 0:57:54.040
<v Speaker 1>All of Alex Smith's multiple touchdown games have come on

0:57:54.080 --> 0:57:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the road this year. The Dallas secondary is healthy again though,

0:57:57.280 --> 0:57:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and they've been much improved over the past two weeks.

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:02.320
<v Speaker 1>They held Kirk Cousins and c J. Beethner to one

0:58:02.520 --> 0:58:06.680
<v Speaker 1>combined touchdown pass when healthy. There's a pretty good Dallas

0:58:06.760 --> 0:58:09.320
<v Speaker 1>secondary and they are healthy now. Alex Smith just a

0:58:09.360 --> 0:58:12.320
<v Speaker 1>B grade. Tyreek Hill, though I like a lot. He

0:58:12.360 --> 0:58:14.800
<v Speaker 1>has a good opportunity gets back on track last week

0:58:14.840 --> 0:58:17.200
<v Speaker 1>only two only two catches, but he faces a Cowboys

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:19.680
<v Speaker 1>team that's given up the fourth most receptions to wide

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:24.480
<v Speaker 1>receiver nine touchdowns to wide receiver. This game is in

0:58:24.560 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Dallas and Hills with three biggest games, and all three

0:58:26.880 --> 0:58:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of us touchdowns have come on the road. He goes

0:58:28.960 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 1>up against corner Anthony Brown, who when targeted, is giving

0:58:32.800 --> 0:58:35.440
<v Speaker 1>up a passer rating of one hundred five. So I've

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:37.720
<v Speaker 1>got an A grade on Tyreek Hill, B grade on

0:58:37.760 --> 0:58:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey because it's a tough matchup. Cowboys are giving

0:58:40.560 --> 0:58:42.760
<v Speaker 1>up just have given up just one touchdown to the

0:58:42.840 --> 0:58:46.120
<v Speaker 1>tight end position. They've held all opposing tight ends to

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:50.280
<v Speaker 1>under fifty four receiving yards. That's it. I look through

0:58:50.320 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends they faced and they've been garbage. Kelsey

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is by far the best. I've got a B grade

0:58:56.680 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>on Kelsey, but he trends towards an A. Let's go

0:58:58.520 --> 0:59:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to the Dallas side. Zeke is an obvious A, and

0:59:00.920 --> 0:59:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he's my number one ranked running back this week. If

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you missed the news yesterday, Zeke's playing, it's back on

0:59:07.840 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 1>his average game. Zeke's average game over the last month

0:59:11.200 --> 0:59:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of games one hundred sixty one yards and two touchdowns.

0:59:17.120 --> 0:59:21.200
<v Speaker 1>That feels good. We take that here. Dak Prescott is

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:23.800
<v Speaker 1>um as an A start as well. The chief secondary

0:59:23.840 --> 0:59:26.959
<v Speaker 1>really struggling, giving up two hundred seventy three passing yards

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns per game. Only four teams have allowed

0:59:30.000 --> 0:59:33.800
<v Speaker 1>more rushing yards to quarterbacks. That suits Dak Prescott's game

0:59:33.800 --> 0:59:36.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. He's an A start. So is Dez Bryant,

0:59:36.600 --> 0:59:39.400
<v Speaker 1>my number one wide receiver this week. Bryant lines up

0:59:39.440 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>mostly on the left side. That means he's gonna avoid

0:59:41.400 --> 0:59:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Peters, He's gonna get the feast on Terrence Mitchell,

0:59:44.400 --> 0:59:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and then sometimes in the slot against Philip Gaines. Both

0:59:47.520 --> 0:59:50.840
<v Speaker 1>have been liabilities and coverage, and the Chiefs have allowed

0:59:50.880 --> 0:59:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the most touchdowns and the most yardage to wide receivers

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this year. I loved as Briant in this game as well.

0:59:57.280 --> 0:59:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I like the Cowboys in this game overall too. They're

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna I think they will win and win handily. Uh.

1:00:02.800 --> 1:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten be great. It's been all or nothing with Whitten,

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but this feels like one of the all games. The

1:00:07.800 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have allowed the third most yard to tight ends.

1:00:10.640 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>A j Derby scored against them last week. The prior week,

1:00:14.840 --> 1:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook rumbled for one yards against them, so this

1:00:18.680 --> 1:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>feels like a great opportunity for Witten as well. We'll

1:00:22.600 --> 1:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>take a break when we come back, plenty more matchups.

1:00:25.200 --> 1:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>We still lightning round looming again. It's all female caller week,

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Rosemary Mulaney and Ava and Lila continue to hold. We've

1:00:35.560 --> 1:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>got one free phone lines lady if you want to

1:00:37.400 --> 1:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>chime in nine six your distinct of Fantasy Football Weekly

1:00:45.400 --> 1:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Fan. Welcome back to the show Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:01:13.080 --> 1:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm the fan, Paul charchy In, Scott Fish, Brian Johnson

1:01:16.560 --> 1:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>with you many thanks for a decade long sponsor grain

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Belt Premium, the official beer of Fantasy Football. Don't forget

1:01:22.600 --> 1:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to play the free crush charts challenge at grain belt

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Get to play against me cost you nothing.

1:01:28.600 --> 1:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Easy to set a roster and the best part is

1:01:30.600 --> 1:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you know a sour cap or anything. Just pick your favorite,

1:01:33.400 --> 1:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>put together your favorite lineup anybody you want. And if

1:01:36.200 --> 1:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to this show, you already got a bunch

1:01:37.760 --> 1:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of insight as to who to start. Many thanks to

1:01:40.000 --> 1:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>our friends at the brewery, Shawn, Ryan, Ted and Jody Marty.

1:01:43.120 --> 1:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Our Week nine winner last week, Mick McCumber, who will

1:01:47.400 --> 1:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>be joining me at the winner's banquet at Manny Steakhouse

1:01:51.800 --> 1:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in January and his chance for the two thousand dollar

1:01:53.880 --> 1:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>grand prize. Many thanks also to the general manager Manny's,

1:01:57.600 --> 1:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Dave Wilson, nice enough to provide a unbelievable banquet meal

1:02:03.800 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at at Manny's Steakhouts. Indianapolis takes on Houston. No small

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of chaos on the Houston side, but let's start

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on the Indie side for just a minute. Jacoby Brissette

1:02:15.680 --> 1:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>was might take a chance, I mean quarterback? What do

1:02:17.600 --> 1:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you think about t Y Hilton this week? I love him?

1:02:21.000 --> 1:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I love him and Doyle. I'm giving him both a's.

1:02:23.880 --> 1:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I know Hilton has been very hot and cold, lady,

1:02:26.400 --> 1:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>but his good games were against Cleveland, San Francisco bottom

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>ten defenses when they played. His bad games against Seattle,

1:02:32.240 --> 1:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville and Cincinnati top ten when they played. This one's

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a bottom ten and he's averaging eight targets a game.

1:02:38.840 --> 1:02:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Hilton with an A, Doyle with an A. Since coming

1:02:41.440 --> 1:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>back from injury, he's an average eleven targets per game

1:02:44.680 --> 1:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>as a tight end. That that is amounted to eight

1:02:47.880 --> 1:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>catches for seventy two yards per game, scoring twice. Texans

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>have allowed three touchdowns over the last four games, seven

1:02:56.000 --> 1:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>seven receptions seventy eight yards receiving a lot. It's a

1:03:00.320 --> 1:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>lot over the last four games, Doyles, I think my

1:03:03.560 --> 1:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>tight end number five this week. I think I should

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>look at I think I might admire you. I think

1:03:10.600 --> 1:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm all right. I'm benching Gore and Mac. Texans are

1:03:16.080 --> 1:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>top five versus the run. They've only allowed one running

1:03:18.720 --> 1:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>back over sixty yards rushing since Week one, and that

1:03:21.240 --> 1:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>was Kareem Hunt. They will They have not allowed a

1:03:23.880 --> 1:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>single running back over twenty five yards receiving except well,

1:03:27.360 --> 1:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I suppose one single one Trey Madden's fluke sixty six

1:03:30.600 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>yards reception. Otherwise they're not even allowing it in the

1:03:32.800 --> 1:03:36.959
<v Speaker 1>receiving game, So just too tough here. Uh Gore doesn't

1:03:36.960 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>even have a game over six yards rushing. I'm benching

1:03:39.040 --> 1:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>them both on the Texans side. Savage is my take.

1:03:42.560 --> 1:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Hom I like him this week, and that makes me

1:03:45.400 --> 1:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like Hopkins and Fuller still, Uh, Coults are bottom five

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>versus wide receivers. And get this, against the Colts. In

1:03:52.120 --> 1:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the last four straight weeks, multiple wide receivers have had

1:03:55.760 --> 1:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>at least seventy yards or a score. So two different

1:03:57.960 --> 1:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers every week are produced against the Colts. That's

1:04:01.560 --> 1:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins and Fullers Fuller here in Week one, Savage targeted

1:04:05.440 --> 1:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins eight times in the first half. Granted, you know

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Fuller wasn't there, so we'll see what that amounts to.

1:04:10.760 --> 1:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>But number two receivers against the Colts. Three yard games

1:04:14.360 --> 1:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>and five touchdowns, So I think both are in play

1:04:17.080 --> 1:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit here. Yeah, they're still startable, both Fuller

1:04:19.760 --> 1:04:24.439
<v Speaker 1>and Hopkins still startable. Even absolutely, I'm still I'm still

1:04:24.440 --> 1:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>starting Griffin too on a C grade. He's averaging five

1:04:27.360 --> 1:04:30.919
<v Speaker 1>targets of games since Week two. He's Fedoraitz isn't back yet,

1:04:31.000 --> 1:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and Colts have allowed six tight ends over the last

1:04:33.280 --> 1:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>seven games to have forty five yards or a touchdown.

1:04:35.920 --> 1:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a little bit of opportunity there, even

1:04:38.760 --> 1:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>with Savage in Lamar Miller. Uh, the Colts have allowed

1:04:43.920 --> 1:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the most rushing touchdowns in the NFL, and they're tied

1:04:46.240 --> 1:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>for the most touchdowns total in the NFL two running backs.

1:04:50.480 --> 1:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Miller has fifteen touches in every single game. He's

1:04:55.040 --> 1:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>just getting the volume. I'm still giving him an a

1:04:57.880 --> 1:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>grade here, all right, I'm you're a little less. I'm yeah,

1:05:02.080 --> 1:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm a lot. I liked Miller a lot more when

1:05:04.240 --> 1:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the threat of the passing game was there for the

1:05:06.400 --> 1:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Flights to have to defend a lot more than what

1:05:08.240 --> 1:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Tom Savage and Dwayne Brown who finally came back and

1:05:11.200 --> 1:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>then left and then left. Yeah, there's that too. Over

1:05:13.520 --> 1:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the last four games, they've allowed three receptions to running

1:05:16.080 --> 1:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>backs two touchdowns the last four running backs Like no,

1:05:20.440 --> 1:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I look the defensive opportunities there. I'm not sure they

1:05:23.720 --> 1:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>have the trigger man in Um and Tom Savage. Let's

1:05:27.800 --> 1:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>go to our next matchup. Raiders taking on the Dolphins

1:05:30.640 --> 1:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>um a lot of people concerned or questioning whether or

1:05:35.040 --> 1:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>not they can trust the Raiders passing game. It's been

1:05:38.080 --> 1:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>hot and cold all year. Dolphins secondary has been good.

1:05:41.000 --> 1:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of Car, Cooper and Crabtree. I

1:05:44.360 --> 1:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>really like Derek Carr. I'm giving him an A. Looks

1:05:47.080 --> 1:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like his old self with two straight big games, uh

1:05:49.840 --> 1:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this could be his third in a row. Miami's ranked

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>against the past by Football Outsiders and they own the

1:05:55.320 --> 1:05:59.439
<v Speaker 1>second highest opponent average passer rating allowed. Uh. Women Joe

1:05:59.440 --> 1:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Flacco and Ryan Mallett can combine to throw multiple passing

1:06:02.320 --> 1:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns against the Dolphins. I think that Derek car will

1:06:06.760 --> 1:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>be just fine here. I don't like his receivers as

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>much though. Michael Crabtree I like more. I'm gonna give

1:06:11.840 --> 1:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>him a B. He's the safer play. Obviously. Crabtree has

1:06:14.400 --> 1:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>topped eighty yards or scored in six of his seven

1:06:17.160 --> 1:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>games this season, but it doesn't really appear to be

1:06:19.560 --> 1:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>an ideal matchup for wide receivers. Only two opposing wide

1:06:22.960 --> 1:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>receivers have been targeted more than eight times against the Dolphins,

1:06:25.840 --> 1:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>who have allowed just nine total wide receiver catches over

1:06:28.160 --> 1:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the last two games, but they've surrendered four wide receiver

1:06:31.240 --> 1:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns over their last three games, So there is hope

1:06:33.800 --> 1:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>for Crabtree, who is the better red zone option over

1:06:36.680 --> 1:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a Marii Cooper, who I will begrudgingly give a b to. Uh.

1:06:39.800 --> 1:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Twenty nine targets over over the last two weeks for Cooper,

1:06:42.920 --> 1:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>but he is a human roller coaster ride always right,

1:06:47.280 --> 1:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>lots of highs, lots of loaves, So just be aware

1:06:50.080 --> 1:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're starting Cooper this week. But you do have

1:06:51.920 --> 1:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to start him. But I do like Jared Cook maybe

1:06:54.120 --> 1:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>more than both wide receivers he was. Might take a

1:06:56.040 --> 1:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>chance on the receiver and then over to Marshawn Lynch,

1:06:58.840 --> 1:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>who I'll give it? Who I will they c two.

1:07:01.360 --> 1:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>He's coming off his longest run of the season, which

1:07:03.720 --> 1:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is when he ran from the sideline to the scrum

1:07:05.880 --> 1:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>at the center against the Chiefs. Nice. Uh, So you

1:07:09.800 --> 1:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>should be ready to roll against the Dolphins in this one,

1:07:12.400 --> 1:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>but it might not be good times that are rolling here.

1:07:15.000 --> 1:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Miami is ranked third against the run by Football Outsiders.

1:07:18.080 --> 1:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>They've only left three rushing touchdowns to running backs, and

1:07:21.120 --> 1:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>before the Dolphins blowout loss last week, they were allowing

1:07:24.160 --> 1:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>only seventy nine rushing yards per game. So I'm only

1:07:26.520 --> 1:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>giving Lynch a sea here and DeAndre Washington and Jalen

1:07:29.160 --> 1:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Richard are back on the bench. Over to Miami and

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>their brand spanking new starting running back Kenyan Drake, who

1:07:35.720 --> 1:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess I will give a C two because he's

1:07:37.360 --> 1:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a starting running back in the NFL. The Raiders had

1:07:39.920 --> 1:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>given up a hundred plus rushing yards for posting running

1:07:42.240 --> 1:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>backs in four of their last six games. Drake appears

1:07:45.160 --> 1:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to be the guy over Damian Williams. I don't know

1:07:47.160 --> 1:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>about that. I think this thing is really up in

1:07:49.640 --> 1:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the I think this is like right now, you can't

1:07:53.320 --> 1:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>get too excited about either. Really, that offensive line is

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>just awful. So but I'm give Drake a C in

1:07:59.480 --> 1:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>this one. See what happens with that backfield, Like Jarvis

1:08:02.560 --> 1:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Landry a little more, he gets to be borderline a.

1:08:05.560 --> 1:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Oakland has given up three touchdowns to opposing wide receivers

1:08:08.400 --> 1:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>over the past two games, and those are guys like

1:08:10.400 --> 1:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Andre Holmes and Albert Wilson finding pay dirt. Uh and

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Oakland slot corner T J. Kerrey has allowed the third

1:08:15.920 --> 1:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>most catches and six most yards and slot coverage so

1:08:18.760 --> 1:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Landry is a strong start. Uh. Maybe DeVante Parker is

1:08:22.160 --> 1:08:24.759
<v Speaker 1>as well, should make his return from an ankle injury

1:08:24.800 --> 1:08:27.519
<v Speaker 1>this week and is hopefully near a hundred percent because

1:08:27.520 --> 1:08:30.439
<v Speaker 1>when healthy, Parker was averaging nine targets and six catches

1:08:30.439 --> 1:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a game. Oakland is top ten and catches and yards

1:08:33.000 --> 1:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed to wide receivers, so Parker is a good play

1:08:35.960 --> 1:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>if healthy. Oakland, also without two cornerbacks starter David Anderson

1:08:40.200 --> 1:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and Demetrius McCrae. Kenny Stills is a tough one obvious

1:08:44.080 --> 1:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>start if Parker doesn't suit up or if he's a

1:08:46.439 --> 1:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>surprise scratch. But Parker's yeah, and that's it for still run.

1:08:52.600 --> 1:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>He was He did nothing when when Parker was healthy,

1:08:55.000 --> 1:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>he blew up when Parker was gone. I think it's

1:08:57.280 --> 1:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>that simple. Yeah, I'm with you there. And Julius Thomas,

1:08:59.760 --> 1:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>still on the bench, has yet to top three catches

1:09:02.360 --> 1:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>or score a touchdown this year. Julius is also only

1:09:04.760 --> 1:09:06.799
<v Speaker 1>top to thirty yards once, so he's on the bench,

1:09:07.200 --> 1:09:09.519
<v Speaker 1>as is Jay Cutler. He'll make his return from a

1:09:09.600 --> 1:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>rib injury, but Marcus Mariotta, Joe Flacco, Joe Flacco, Philip Rivers,

1:09:14.320 --> 1:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and Tyrod Taylor all posted poor numbers against Oakland. I

1:09:17.800 --> 1:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>fear that Tuler Will is in that same category of

1:09:20.360 --> 1:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterback unfortunately, and that might be being generous. Ladies. We

1:09:23.760 --> 1:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>have full phone lines, which is terrific. We're excited to

1:09:25.720 --> 1:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>take your calls. Next segment, Lightning Round looming, along with

1:09:28.439 --> 1:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other things, including our final matchup, Packers

1:09:31.400 --> 1:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Lions. All of that between now and

1:09:33.840 --> 1:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the top of the hour when we come back, your

1:09:36.760 --> 1:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>distinctive Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan. Final segment of

1:09:57.880 --> 1:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly, well this week, and we got more

1:10:02.120 --> 1:10:06.639
<v Speaker 1>shows to come. We'll be on next week at seven am. Reminder, gentlemen,

1:10:07.320 --> 1:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it's our annual deer Hunting Widows show. We call it

1:10:10.680 --> 1:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>chick Chat here at Fantasy Football Weekly. Ladies, you've got

1:10:13.920 --> 1:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>priority on the phones all day. That includes Lightning Round

1:10:16.760 --> 1:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>coming up in just a couple of minutes. Now, for

1:10:18.840 --> 1:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the deer hunters who are out there, I know a

1:10:20.760 --> 1:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of your streaming the show live from your deer

1:10:23.080 --> 1:10:25.759
<v Speaker 1>stands right now. I heart radio k fan dot com.

1:10:25.960 --> 1:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Send your photos, your action photos, as much action as

1:10:29.680 --> 1:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>there is in a deer stand, of which there's almost none,

1:10:32.120 --> 1:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>but uh to me at Paul charching on Twitter and

1:10:34.720 --> 1:10:36.479
<v Speaker 1>retweeting them over the course of the show. It's been

1:10:36.479 --> 1:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>fun seeing everybody out there in the deer stands listening

1:10:39.240 --> 1:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to the show. Premature Speculation is a bit we do

1:10:44.360 --> 1:10:47.479
<v Speaker 1>every week where we've identified players you should pick up

1:10:47.520 --> 1:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>now one week before we think they're gonna be hot

1:10:50.160 --> 1:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>pickups next week. We've unearthed tons of of good opportunities

1:10:55.520 --> 1:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>over the course of this show this season. Let's see

1:11:02.280 --> 1:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>what we got this week, Scott, premature speculation guy, Well,

1:11:05.720 --> 1:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>this one might have been better had Ezekiel Elliott been out,

1:11:09.840 --> 1:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it would have been better. I'm going with Rod Smith.

1:11:12.400 --> 1:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I actually think he's the best running back in that backfield. Uh.

1:11:15.720 --> 1:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>He went for eight for sixty one against San Francisco

1:11:18.400 --> 1:11:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and Relief a few weeks ago. He had two preseason

1:11:20.920 --> 1:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>games over a d r S three catches in each

1:11:22.960 --> 1:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of them. It's preseason, but he's shown a lot of flashes.

1:11:26.240 --> 1:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>And I know what Alfred Morris and Darren McFadden are

1:11:29.200 --> 1:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>like them done, Yes, exactly what Morris springs out is

1:11:33.000 --> 1:11:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the confidence of the coaching staff, which counts for a lot.

1:11:35.800 --> 1:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>He's not going to cost them a win and all

1:11:37.880 --> 1:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, turn a win into a loss in all

1:11:39.439 --> 1:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>probability and and also Charles Clays to do back next week.

1:11:43.240 --> 1:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>You should probably pick him up if he was dropped

1:11:45.080 --> 1:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in your league. He could be a top twelve tight end.

1:11:47.160 --> 1:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>He might play this week, might play tomorrow. Go get him, Yes, Brian,

1:11:52.280 --> 1:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>here's another tight end you could Abuh. It's been a

1:11:56.240 --> 1:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>while since we gave a tip of the Fedora to

1:11:59.080 --> 1:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>c J. Fedora, but I could make his return next

1:12:02.240 --> 1:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>or he should make his return next week against the

1:12:04.400 --> 1:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>rams Um. Long story short with bad quarterback with bad

1:12:08.320 --> 1:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacking last years was basically a top ten tight ends

1:12:11.720 --> 1:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and guess what, Houston Texans aren't that bad the rest

1:12:15.280 --> 1:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of the year, so tight end has been a waste

1:12:17.080 --> 1:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>land outside of five, six, seven guys, No, not even yeah,

1:12:20.680 --> 1:12:23.519
<v Speaker 1>four guys, and I'm probably being generous there. You're right.

1:12:23.760 --> 1:12:25.479
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't have one of those four guys,

1:12:25.640 --> 1:12:27.439
<v Speaker 1>go ahead for door wits. Now, how about a third

1:12:27.439 --> 1:12:32.479
<v Speaker 1>tight end recommendation, Greg Olsen. I think he's in my opinion,

1:12:32.520 --> 1:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he's the best out of the three that we've given

1:12:34.280 --> 1:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you so far. He's practicing this week, he's eligible to

1:12:37.720 --> 1:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>come off i R in two weeks, and so if

1:12:40.479 --> 1:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you can sit on this for a couple of weeks.

1:12:42.320 --> 1:12:45.479
<v Speaker 1>It's a great opportunity for him. No, Kelvin Benjamin, that

1:12:45.800 --> 1:12:48.879
<v Speaker 1>certainly works in his favor. Greg Olson last year averaged

1:12:49.040 --> 1:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>eight targets per game. That would be tremendous production in

1:12:52.840 --> 1:12:55.559
<v Speaker 1>this offense. So Greg Olsen a guy you can go

1:12:55.600 --> 1:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>get right now, be ahead of the curve. Also, Danny

1:12:59.320 --> 1:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>woodhead also practicing already, and the belief is he is

1:13:03.320 --> 1:13:05.519
<v Speaker 1>fully healed from the hamstring injury that he suffered in

1:13:05.560 --> 1:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the preseason then reinjured in Week one, that he's one

1:13:08.680 --> 1:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>right now and could play drive he did. If you

1:13:11.760 --> 1:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>were to extrapolate his first drive of Week one before

1:13:15.400 --> 1:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>he got hurt, that would extrapolate to eighteen thousand receptions

1:13:20.479 --> 1:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for two hundred sixty seven thousand receiving yards this season.

1:13:26.439 --> 1:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>That would have been a really good season for Danny Wood.

1:13:29.600 --> 1:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Had practicing also eligibley to return in week number eleven.

1:13:35.880 --> 1:13:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Final matchup is the Monday nighter that is Detroit taking

1:13:39.840 --> 1:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on green Bay. Let's start on the green Bay side.

1:13:43.240 --> 1:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't have anybody graded above a sea. Let's start

1:13:47.320 --> 1:13:49.680
<v Speaker 1>with the running game. Aaron Jones since taking over the

1:13:49.760 --> 1:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>lead runner role, Jones has been good for an average

1:13:52.160 --> 1:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of ninety total yards, which I like, almost a touchdown

1:13:55.040 --> 1:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>per game. I like that too, Um, and they're going

1:13:57.120 --> 1:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to continue to run him a lot. You can't count

1:13:58.920 --> 1:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>on They count on the corner comic in a quarterback position.

1:14:01.200 --> 1:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I think there's nothing they would like more than for

1:14:03.479 --> 1:14:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones to run the Packers to victory here. If

1:14:06.680 --> 1:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>history is any indication, he's gonna need a lot of carries.

1:14:09.479 --> 1:14:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Though Detroit only gives up three and a half yards

1:14:11.760 --> 1:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>per carry last week, for Levy on Belle to get

1:14:14.960 --> 1:14:19.479
<v Speaker 1>to seventy five yards, it took him twenty five carries

1:14:19.520 --> 1:14:22.639
<v Speaker 1>to get there. There's a good Detroit run defense. So

1:14:23.160 --> 1:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I see great and Aaron Jones from I think he'll

1:14:25.960 --> 1:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>get plenty of use here, but I don't know if

1:14:27.439 --> 1:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get enough to to get him into anything

1:14:29.400 --> 1:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>too terribly meaningful. Let's go to the passing game. Oh,

1:14:32.479 --> 1:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, time, Montgomery, we already, as we already

1:14:34.880 --> 1:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>established in a previous segment of this show, dead drop

1:14:38.120 --> 1:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>him out right. Let's go to the Let's go to

1:14:40.320 --> 1:14:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. I got Brent Hunley on the bench,

1:14:43.840 --> 1:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>brutal in his first start of the year before last

1:14:46.760 --> 1:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>week's by I hope he spent this week's bye week

1:14:49.600 --> 1:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay. I hope he didn't like keep his

1:14:51.439 --> 1:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>plans on going to Cancoon for the bye week. I

1:14:54.040 --> 1:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>hope he stayed in Green Bay and did nothing but

1:14:56.720 --> 1:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>practice and work on getting to be better, because what

1:14:59.479 --> 1:15:01.639
<v Speaker 1>we saw this week was bad or the week before

1:15:01.640 --> 1:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that was bad. Um. The Lions have two terrific cornerbacks

1:15:05.040 --> 1:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Darius slay KeAndre Diggs, that they're largely going to take

1:15:08.800 --> 1:15:12.479
<v Speaker 1>away Davante Adams and Randall Cobb, and that means that

1:15:12.479 --> 1:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what those are two less good targets for Brent Hunley,

1:15:15.080 --> 1:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know that he's got enough Jordy Nelson

1:15:17.040 --> 1:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and him to cobble together a decent fantasy game. So

1:15:19.760 --> 1:15:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I've got Hunley on the bench, so let's now talk

1:15:22.720 --> 1:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams. Top cornerbacks have been taking Davante Adams, not

1:15:27.320 --> 1:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Nelson all year long. An example here locally, Xavier

1:15:31.160 --> 1:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Rhodes shadow Davante Adams for most of the Viking game,

1:15:34.400 --> 1:15:37.679
<v Speaker 1>so I expect him to get the sleigh ride this week.

1:15:38.080 --> 1:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Darius slay is gonna has held Julio Jones, Antonio Brown,

1:15:42.040 --> 1:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Thomas to per game averages of just sixty

1:15:45.160 --> 1:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>yards and none of them scored. So and those guys,

1:15:48.200 --> 1:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you've got Matt Ryan, Ben Roethlisberger and

1:15:50.280 --> 1:15:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees throwing to them, not Brett Huntley. So Davante

1:15:53.479 --> 1:15:56.599
<v Speaker 1>Adams is just to see start here. Randall Cobb gets

1:15:56.640 --> 1:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Candary Diggs has been a lot better this year, um,

1:16:00.120 --> 1:16:02.639
<v Speaker 1>although slave receivers have had a handful of good games,

1:16:02.640 --> 1:16:06.519
<v Speaker 1>including Juju Smith Schuster blew up last week. So but

1:16:06.680 --> 1:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Tob has been only is only getting four targets per

1:16:10.360 --> 1:16:12.519
<v Speaker 1>game over the last month, and some of those are

1:16:12.560 --> 1:16:14.639
<v Speaker 1>with Aaron Rodgers, so I've got him on the bench.

1:16:15.720 --> 1:16:19.639
<v Speaker 1>So let's not Jordy Nelson. If Darius Slay is gonna

1:16:19.640 --> 1:16:23.479
<v Speaker 1>be on Adams, that puts Nelson on Nevin Larson, who has,

1:16:25.320 --> 1:16:27.439
<v Speaker 1>by the way, he's got all the covered skills of

1:16:27.479 --> 1:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Nevin who was getting beat up on

1:16:29.840 --> 1:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>playground pretty much. Nevin Lawson is quarterback one hundred and

1:16:37.880 --> 1:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>seven by Pro Football Focus, So I kind of like

1:16:41.040 --> 1:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Nelson here, but I still can't get him above

1:16:43.000 --> 1:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a sea grade. UM. Hopefully he can be better than that,

1:16:46.920 --> 1:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know that it's going to happen. Let's

1:16:48.920 --> 1:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>go to the Detroit side. We'll start with the running

1:16:52.800 --> 1:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>game there as well. Amir Abdula just a C grade,

1:16:55.520 --> 1:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>averaging just three point two yards per carry over his

1:16:58.040 --> 1:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>last three games. He isn't allowed near the ball when

1:17:01.000 --> 1:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they get to the stripe, although yesterday I think it

1:17:03.640 --> 1:17:05.559
<v Speaker 1>was to a reporter he said he wants the ball

1:17:05.600 --> 1:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>more near the goal line, and he can want it

1:17:07.280 --> 1:17:09.439
<v Speaker 1>all he wants, but I don't think that changes anything.

1:17:09.840 --> 1:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to get the ball near the stripe. That's

1:17:12.240 --> 1:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to change anything. Abdulah is gonna average or

1:17:15.120 --> 1:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>has averaged forty five yards and no scores in two

1:17:18.200 --> 1:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>games against the Packers last year. Green Bays just the

1:17:21.120 --> 1:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>middle of the pack run defense are giving a four

1:17:22.840 --> 1:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>point two yards per carry and the sixth most rushing yards.

1:17:26.000 --> 1:17:27.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know the bit on Himdula. If you

1:17:27.520 --> 1:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>like your fifty yards on the ground and you like

1:17:29.720 --> 1:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>another fifteen through the air, he's your guy. I will

1:17:32.320 --> 1:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll give Abdula this And this is from the RB

1:17:34.479 --> 1:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>scout on Twitter, who you've mentioned a few times in

1:17:36.320 --> 1:17:39.479
<v Speaker 1>the show. Abdullah is third in um yards per carry

1:17:39.600 --> 1:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>after the potential tackle point over two and a half meeting.

1:17:42.800 --> 1:17:44.759
<v Speaker 1>He gets it done on his own, so he passes

1:17:44.760 --> 1:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the eye test. He's actually I think he's he's looked.

1:17:47.160 --> 1:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>He's having the best year of his career, but doing

1:17:49.840 --> 1:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it very quietly. And he's had some juke moves that

1:17:53.200 --> 1:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>have been sick this year. And and just just to

1:17:55.680 --> 1:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>add on real quick, before the potential tackle point, he's

1:17:59.040 --> 1:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>second to last with one point one yards would carry

1:18:01.439 --> 1:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>meing his offensive line is failing him miserably well. And

1:18:03.960 --> 1:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>they still have all kinds of problems across the offensive

1:18:06.040 --> 1:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>line with injuries as well. Let's talk Matthew Stafford, who

1:18:10.280 --> 1:18:13.559
<v Speaker 1>I've got an A grade on. He's absorbed the fourth

1:18:13.600 --> 1:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>most sacks, but the Packers have only had only registered

1:18:17.320 --> 1:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>twelve sacks all year, So think about this. They have twelve,

1:18:20.880 --> 1:18:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars have thirty three. That's how bad twelve sacks

1:18:25.640 --> 1:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is this year. That's third worse than the NFL. So

1:18:28.080 --> 1:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Staffords is comfortable in the pocket on Monday Night.

1:18:32.320 --> 1:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>He's thrown the ball in the last two weeks nine

1:18:36.880 --> 1:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>seven times. So there, it's all about high volume here

1:18:42.000 --> 1:18:45.519
<v Speaker 1>and he's gotten consecutive three passing yard games. I think

1:18:45.560 --> 1:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this is another high volume game for him. He roasted

1:18:48.240 --> 1:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the Packers secondary for almost four hundred yards and three

1:18:51.080 --> 1:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in his last trip to Lambeau last year, so

1:18:55.600 --> 1:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the environment does not intimidate him. Now. The Packers do

1:18:59.439 --> 1:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>get back Organ Burnett, that's a big plus for them.

1:19:02.120 --> 1:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>But there's still a lot of bad cornerbacks. And let's

1:19:04.240 --> 1:19:07.599
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of these individual matchups, including Golden Tate,

1:19:07.760 --> 1:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>who gets an A grade. Even last week when he

1:19:10.880 --> 1:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>came in all banged up, he finished with a solid

1:19:13.000 --> 1:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty six yards. He's a week healthier now and he

1:19:15.960 --> 1:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>gets to face slot corner da Marius Randall, who's been bad.

1:19:19.840 --> 1:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus ranks him his cornerback one hundred to

1:19:23.560 --> 1:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the last four slot receivers to play the Packers have

1:19:27.880 --> 1:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>scored or topped nineties seven yards. I love Golden Tate

1:19:32.080 --> 1:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this week. He's in my He's in my great chart

1:19:35.920 --> 1:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Chase chart Chase lineup at fan ball dot com. Uh

1:19:40.320 --> 1:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones gets a C grade. Over the past two

1:19:42.479 --> 1:19:45.599
<v Speaker 1>weeks with Golden Tate hurt, he had seen twenty five targets,

1:19:45.640 --> 1:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>just one fewer than he accrued in the first five

1:19:48.120 --> 1:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>games of the season combined. Now that resurgence happens to

1:19:51.160 --> 1:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>coincide with him returning to lambeau Field. What did he

1:19:54.680 --> 1:19:58.759
<v Speaker 1>do at lambeau Field last year? Marvin Jones two hundred

1:19:58.840 --> 1:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>five yards and two top downs last year. He'll draw

1:20:02.000 --> 1:20:04.519
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Devon House, who is the best of

1:20:04.560 --> 1:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the Packers lackluster cornerbacks though, So I'll mention that. So

1:20:08.640 --> 1:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>then we get to one of the sneakiest plays of

1:20:10.720 --> 1:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the week, maybe the sneakiest play of the week. T J. Jones.

1:20:16.760 --> 1:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay is gonna miss another game with his hamstring injury.

1:20:20.120 --> 1:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna earn a starting grade here based on his

1:20:23.560 --> 1:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>seven team targets the last two weeks eight and nine

1:20:27.320 --> 1:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>target games. And he goes up against rookie cornerback Kevin King,

1:20:31.760 --> 1:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>who grades out as Pro Football focuses one best cornerback.

1:20:37.439 --> 1:20:40.519
<v Speaker 1>If you are in a deep pinch, consider t J.

1:20:40.760 --> 1:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Jones at wide receiver. Nuts, are you gonna do it?

1:20:44.560 --> 1:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna mention No, No, there's no mention is not

1:20:50.120 --> 1:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>even worthy of the time it takes to say don't

1:20:53.120 --> 1:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>start him. That wraps up our matchup portion now it

1:20:59.000 --> 1:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is time for Lightning Round again. I can't keep repeating myself,

1:21:03.400 --> 1:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but let's be really clear about this, Ladies, you have

1:21:06.240 --> 1:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>priority for all of Lightning Round. Unless you get to

1:21:09.439 --> 1:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a point where you stop calling. Then I'm gonna let

1:21:11.160 --> 1:21:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the guys chime in. But otherwise, all ladies, it's deer

1:21:15.280 --> 1:21:17.599
<v Speaker 1>Hunting Opener. We do this every year. It's been this

1:21:17.640 --> 1:21:22.839
<v Speaker 1>way for twenty years now on this show. Deer Hunting Opener. Ladies,

1:21:22.960 --> 1:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to you, your deer hunting widows. You need

1:21:25.680 --> 1:21:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the consolation of a win on Sunday. And also reminder, ladies,

1:21:32.680 --> 1:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>one question between two players. Only two players. We don't

1:21:37.320 --> 1:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>want to hear your whole roster. That's how Lightning Round works.

1:21:40.520 --> 1:21:43.679
<v Speaker 1>So let's jump in and we'll begin with let's see

1:21:43.680 --> 1:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>who's been holding the longest. Catherine, Hello, hi, Hi, I

1:21:50.320 --> 1:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>have a different cud of league. We played two quarterbacks,

1:21:54.080 --> 1:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>three wide receivers to running back, the tighten the flex.

1:21:57.080 --> 1:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>My question is about the flex, rob woods or blunt?

1:22:02.360 --> 1:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Nicely done. One question between two players. Thank you for

1:22:05.280 --> 1:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>knowing the rules here, Katherine. I'm taking a long time

1:22:08.040 --> 1:22:11.599
<v Speaker 1>listener for time color excellent, Thank you. I'm taking Robert Woods.

1:22:11.600 --> 1:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I love love that matchup, and I'm just worried about

1:22:14.400 --> 1:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>what that split is going to be in week one.

1:22:15.960 --> 1:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Blunt should still get the majority, but I

1:22:17.960 --> 1:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>like Woods and a really tough matchup for Blunt against

1:22:20.400 --> 1:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Denver too. Thank you, Catherine, Melanie, you are next. Hello, Hi, Hi,

1:22:26.160 --> 1:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a big one for me. Um. I played my husband.

1:22:30.400 --> 1:22:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Whoever loses to clean all three bathrooms in our house?

1:22:33.920 --> 1:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Every every league that's got couples who play.

1:22:37.240 --> 1:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>When it's your turn on the schedule to face each other,

1:22:39.960 --> 1:22:42.599
<v Speaker 1>there ought to be steaks on the line, and I

1:22:42.640 --> 1:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>love that. I love it, love that, Melanie. We're gonna

1:22:45.160 --> 1:22:50.719
<v Speaker 1>help you win, all right. Um. Carson Wentz or Derek Carr, WHOA,

1:22:51.280 --> 1:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that's tough, back to Blunt real quick. Wentz is from

1:22:55.240 --> 1:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>my alma mater. I graduated from India, So I have

1:22:58.000 --> 1:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a you have a spot for him in your heart.

1:23:01.320 --> 1:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>But we need we need ice cold rational logic right now, Brian. Yes,

1:23:06.479 --> 1:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm asking you. I'm gonna do my best

1:23:09.280 --> 1:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep you out of the bathroom in the cleaning sense. There,

1:23:12.120 --> 1:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Car. I like Car a little more

1:23:14.200 --> 1:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>than wins. It's just an easier matchup for Car wins

1:23:16.960 --> 1:23:19.360
<v Speaker 1>against Denver. That's one of the matchups where I would

1:23:19.360 --> 1:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>go Car over Wins. I gotta say. I mean, if

1:23:21.439 --> 1:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Wentz put up a zero touchdown game against Denver, we'd

1:23:24.439 --> 1:23:26.719
<v Speaker 1>be like, yeah, it was Denver that happens. So Plus,

1:23:26.720 --> 1:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it's nice having that Sunday night hammer. If she's behind,

1:23:29.320 --> 1:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>she can rub it in his face while he comes back.

1:23:32.800 --> 1:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Katie Hello, Hello, Hi, Dak Prescott or Russell Wilson. I

1:23:39.320 --> 1:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>love both of them this week, and they're both inside

1:23:41.760 --> 1:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>my top four at the quarterback position. Um, Dak press

1:23:47.200 --> 1:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I've got Russell one spot high. They're both in side

1:23:49.080 --> 1:23:51.559
<v Speaker 1>my top three. You can't go wrong. I've got Russell

1:23:51.560 --> 1:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Wilson one spot higher in a very good matchup with

1:23:54.760 --> 1:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Washington and he's been red hot. They've both been great.

1:23:57.439 --> 1:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>You can't You're not gonna go wrong either way. Let's

1:24:00.439 --> 1:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>see Lilah. Hello, Hi, Hi Lilah. Um. I'm oh, you

1:24:12.800 --> 1:24:17.519
<v Speaker 1>did a good job for your dad. Thank you. Joe Mixon,

1:24:18.000 --> 1:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon. Okay, there we go. Rosemary, you're next on

1:24:21.479 --> 1:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the show. Hi. I'm thinking of putting a green and

1:24:26.120 --> 1:24:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I can put in either Cooper Cup or Jack Doyle,

1:24:30.640 --> 1:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>but it broke in the rules are kind of breaking

1:24:32.880 --> 1:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the rules on this one, Rosemary. She sounds way too

1:24:35.360 --> 1:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>nice to hang up on her. I'm oh, man, I

1:24:38.680 --> 1:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>hate sitting a j Green, I hate it. I'd play

1:24:42.040 --> 1:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, I'm a matchup guy at heart. I'd

1:24:44.640 --> 1:24:49.759
<v Speaker 1>play Doyle. So I'm playing the matchup. It is Doyle. Okay,

1:24:50.080 --> 1:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm a mountain numbered, but I can't argue it too much.

1:24:52.920 --> 1:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, let's go Doyle, alright quick breaking the calls,

1:24:56.320 --> 1:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to Avon just a second. Don't forget to

1:24:58.920 --> 1:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>play the Great arch Chase for free at fan Ball

1:25:02.080 --> 1:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>fanball dot com slash chart. You play against me and

1:25:05.320 --> 1:25:07.400
<v Speaker 1>my roster. If you beat me, you get a ticket

1:25:07.400 --> 1:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to our week seventeen Grand Entry thing and you win

1:25:14.800 --> 1:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>cash this week to in addition to three contest so

1:25:18.280 --> 1:25:22.839
<v Speaker 1>check it out. Thank you. Hey, Hello, But my question

1:25:23.040 --> 1:25:27.599
<v Speaker 1>is fifty PPR League, and I felt so I start

1:25:27.680 --> 1:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson just twenty niners or Aaron John the Joy.

1:25:32.400 --> 1:25:34.519
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson should get a lot of work in a

1:25:34.640 --> 1:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>very juicy matchup. We'll go with him, is it? Jenny Genie? Hi,

1:25:40.360 --> 1:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Genie Hi, I lost Deshaun Watson this weekend. I need

1:25:44.280 --> 1:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Goff or cam Oh go for me? We love God.

1:25:49.000 --> 1:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I think my top seven or eight this week. Yeah,

1:25:52.280 --> 1:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he is my number five quarterback this week. Maryland your next? Yeah, Hi,

1:25:58.240 --> 1:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a PPR question and this is only going forward,

1:26:01.400 --> 1:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>as I don't eat a running back this week. You

1:26:04.200 --> 1:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>need to pick up an I d T if I'm

1:26:06.240 --> 1:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at wondering if I should keep Matt Brada or

1:26:09.280 --> 1:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry Wow, I DP, I like this Breda or

1:26:13.760 --> 1:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Henry Uh. I don't know, Hi, it is still in

1:26:16.280 --> 1:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the going forward. I'm still gonna I'll stick with Hunter Henry.

1:26:20.160 --> 1:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I doesn't He'll be utilized more unless Hide gets hurt.

1:26:23.160 --> 1:26:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But right now he's healthy, so I'd stick with Henry. Megan,

1:26:27.439 --> 1:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you're next on the show, Hi, for the TPR league,

1:26:32.360 --> 1:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller or Joe Mixon. Ah, that's mixing. Yeah, I

1:26:39.120 --> 1:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna I think we're gonna go mixing on

1:26:41.120 --> 1:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>this one. You know. I want to believe that Will

1:26:43.360 --> 1:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Fulllor is gonna be okay here, but in a PPR league,

1:26:45.720 --> 1:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't. He wasn't getting a lot of volume anyway. Yeah, Hi, Heather, Hi,

1:26:51.080 --> 1:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>what's on your mind? Well, my husband has begged me

1:26:55.280 --> 1:26:58.519
<v Speaker 1>to call in because it's our tenuar anniversary. Well it's

1:26:58.640 --> 1:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of a cheesy because we prefer

1:27:00.880 --> 1:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the women that we talked to actually play. But in

1:27:03.720 --> 1:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>light of the fact that it's your tenure anniversary, we're

1:27:05.920 --> 1:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna let it slide this time. Thank you. I really

1:27:09.040 --> 1:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. Okay, um, rest of the season, Orleansqua or

1:27:14.760 --> 1:27:19.519
<v Speaker 1>the Vontae Booker. Oh you know what, I think I

1:27:19.640 --> 1:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>might actually go book or book Booker surging man. Yeah,

1:27:23.200 --> 1:27:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean whoa man? Yeah. I don't think charts agrees

1:27:25.920 --> 1:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>by the faces, No I do. I'm it's more of

1:27:28.320 --> 1:27:31.559
<v Speaker 1>a perplexed thing. It's it's offensive line crumbling before our eyes.

1:27:31.600 --> 1:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>They just put their starting center on I R a

1:27:33.360 --> 1:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of minutes ago. It's dark is their starter. But

1:27:35.800 --> 1:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Gullman might step up. I like Booker better than c J. Right,

1:27:38.960 --> 1:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably go on Booker and congratulations. You don't have

1:27:42.040 --> 1:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to get him a present now that Yeah, that is

1:27:43.840 --> 1:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the president. That's right off. What is the what is

1:27:46.880 --> 1:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the ten year gift? Deep tissue massages? It's like I

1:27:51.439 --> 1:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>don't remember, Yeah, I don't remember. Either it's a lightning

1:27:53.760 --> 1:28:05.599
<v Speaker 1>round question, not Ali Helloa, Hi, Ali, Im if I could, Yeah,

1:28:05.760 --> 1:28:07.519
<v Speaker 1>your phone's breaking up, Alley, give it to me one

1:28:07.560 --> 1:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>more time. Davante Adams, Who are Doug Baldwin? I think

1:28:13.120 --> 1:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it's stuck Baldmink. You're right, I think it was Doug Baldwin.

1:28:16.560 --> 1:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Tin or aluminum, we're told by Tony is the gift

1:28:18.840 --> 1:28:23.479
<v Speaker 1>of aluminum. I even give the gift of aluminum other

1:28:23.560 --> 1:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>than foil. But yeah, Doug Baldwin is the answer. He

1:28:26.600 --> 1:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>should avoid Josh Norman all right for the most part. Right,

1:28:29.960 --> 1:28:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Paula Hello, Paula, Hello, Paula, No, Paula, all right, Marcy Hello, Hi,

1:28:43.240 --> 1:28:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Ppru Brita or Marlen Matt. We have bench grades on both.

1:28:50.160 --> 1:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Ye don't you take Mac? I guess I would take Mac.

1:28:54.000 --> 1:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>He's out snapped over the last couple of weeks, but

1:28:56.880 --> 1:28:59.479
<v Speaker 1>I hate the matchup. Yeah, I guess Mac. But for

1:28:59.560 --> 1:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Booker on your waiver wire Booker and hello, Hi, I

1:29:05.320 --> 1:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>need Blunt or Drake in a standard league, I could

1:29:09.880 --> 1:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>use my blunt joke. Denver certainly knows how to handle blunts,

1:29:13.200 --> 1:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going with Drake and this one. Al Right,

1:29:16.320 --> 1:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>There you go, even joking aside, you still like the

1:29:20.800 --> 1:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>like we put we put a blunt on the bench, right,

1:29:23.160 --> 1:29:26.639
<v Speaker 1>did I gotta see for drake? Ladies, you are performed

1:29:26.720 --> 1:29:30.639
<v Speaker 1>admirably today. Excellent job, um and don't be a stranger.

1:29:30.680 --> 1:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And you don't have to wait for the Deer Hunting

1:29:32.040 --> 1:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Show to call in. We love hearing from you and

1:29:34.600 --> 1:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>uh we uh we encourage you to call in every week.

1:29:37.800 --> 1:29:39.639
<v Speaker 1>And guys hope had a great time in the Deer

1:29:39.720 --> 1:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Hunting stand as well. If you missed any part of

1:29:42.040 --> 1:29:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the show, check out the podcasts cafan Fan on demand

1:29:45.960 --> 1:29:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Don't Forget to rank and review the show as well,

1:29:49.680 --> 1:29:52.599
<v Speaker 1>also available on I Heart Radio. We are on at

1:29:52.760 --> 1:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>seven a m. Next week Gopher game will bump us

1:29:56.200 --> 1:29:58.679
<v Speaker 1>to seven o'clock seven am. I will not be here Matt.

1:29:59.000 --> 1:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Funny how that works out. We'll see Matt Harrison and

1:30:01.200 --> 1:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson for that show. Uh and we'll talk to

1:30:04.120 --> 1:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you next week. Bie everybody, m h you're listening to

1:30:17.800 --> 1:30:20.559
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly on the Fan