WEBVTT - Taylorism: Work Faster! 

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's Chuck,

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 2>and Jerry's here too, timing us, telling us to hurry up,

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 2>scowling at us, even which makes this another average episode

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 2>of Stuff you Should Know. She said, get this in

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 2>forty five minutes on the nose, no more, no less,

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 2>and then she went uh and walked out of the

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 2>room holding a pillow.

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Was that me or Joe?

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 2>That was Jerry?

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm usually the timekeeper.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Are you? I'd never noticed with your new swatch.

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, I just feel like I'm the one that's

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>like forty five minutes and you're like, no, let's make

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it three hours.

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't like three hour podcasts, but I also don't

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 2>like living under the clock, which is why I probably

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>would not have personally liked Frederick Winslow Taylor.

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, should we talk about this guy?

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we have any choice. And by the way,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>this is not a biopic. It's not a biography or

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>a profile. It's about a man that you can't not

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>talk about. But really this is about his whole system. Okay,

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I just want to make that clear.

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>To you use people likely, Well, I don't want to

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>hear about that guy.

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, ts, you're gonna have to.

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Big thanks to Olivia because she pushed out another banger here,

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>thanks in part by this great, great article in The

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>New Yorker from Jill Lapour, who Lvia calls a genius,

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>absolute genius in fact, is a quote she definitely is

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>great article. Anyway, I think the setup that Livia gave

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is kind of worthy of going over a little bit

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:51.279
<v Speaker 1>because when you look at the you know, nineteen hundred

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>through the nineteen twenties and thirties, you looked at in

0:01:54.840 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>America that was really changing in that these huge Industrial

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Revolution born industries where all of a sudden, like, hey,

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>now we're kind of corporations and now we have middle

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>managers and CEOs and things, and it's a little different

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>than it used to be, right, And so we need

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to start kind of really thinking about how to squeeze

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>every dime out of this company we can and make

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>these workers. We'll call it efficiency, but between us, let's say,

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>let's call it working them to the bone until they're

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>near exhaustion so we can maximize profits.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I could just hear our left leaning listeners

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 2>going boo his. But efficiency was not in and of

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 2>itself a naughty word on either side of the political

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 2>spectrum at the time, because you could also hope that

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>a more efficient factory, or a more efficient workforce, or

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 2>a more efficient whatever would increase productivity but also give

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 2>workers like more free time and then ideally a larger

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 2>share of the profit in the form of higher wages.

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, that's how that works, right exactly.

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I can't imagine a more naive progressive movement

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 2>than that, But that's exactly what they were hoping for.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.839
<v Speaker 2>But not just hoping for. They were fighting for, agitating

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 2>for it, doing whatever they could, taking it to the courts.

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes they were successful, but I think we all know

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 2>spoiler alert, in the long run they lost thus far.

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.839
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and a lot of the work being done

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>on efficiency can be laid at the feet of a

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>person and then some other people. But initially, at least

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>this guy that you mentioned, Frederick Winslow Taylor, who was

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>from Philadelphia born in eighteen fifty six, had an attorney

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>father an abolitionists mother. It's a very smart guy and

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>was all set to take Harvard by storm before his

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>eyesight started to fail. Right after that got better. He

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>may not have gone to Harvard, but he was still

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a really smart guy and ended up studying engineering at

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>night and became a chief engineer for the Enterprise Hydraulic

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Works in Philly and then Midvale Steel Company.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, at Midvale Steel Company, that's where he really made

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>his name. I think that's where he became the chief engineer.

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things he did as he was

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>working his way up was he was, I guess, out

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 2>of the gate obsessed or at least deeply interested with

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 2>the idea of doing something in the least number of movements,

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the most precise way, the most foolproof way, and that

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 2>if you studied a task closely enough and understood it

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>well enough, you could find the most efficient way to

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 2>do it. And so over. Like his twenty six year

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 2>career at Midvale, he conducted more than thirty thousand experiments

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 2>in metal cutting, figuring out which tool went with, which

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 2>motion went with you know, know, how to grab the

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 2>tool the best way. And from that he ended up

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>writing a book called on the Art of Cutting Metals

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen oh seven. And from what I saw for

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>years and years, that was considered like a bible in

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 2>the metal cutting industry, and so he definitely put his

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 2>money where his mouth is, and that's how he first

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of got into the idea of becoming an efficiency expert.

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think this is a certain kind of brain

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>because I am on that spectrum a little bit and

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to weed out inefficiencies with certain things. But I'm

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>on the side of the spectrum that is also it

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>comes from laziness. Oh yeah, so I'll try and do

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>that because I'm inherently kind of lazy, I think. So

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I look for ways to cut corners to

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>still get the job done right. And I've had people

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>compliment me in the old days, like on film sets, like, hey,

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I see what you're doing there, and you're

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the kid I would hire twice, whereas the guy next

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to you who's just like, no, man, let's just make

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>eight trips and just hump it and do it right.

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I know, he thinks he's getting it done

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>just the old fashioned way. He's like, but you're the

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>guy we would hire a second time.

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>In your response is like, we'll kind of go home

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 2>early probably, so, but.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>That was always my aim. But it's interesting that, you know,

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I had that a little bit in my brain, but

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>not like this guy did. Like he was obsessed with

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>efficiencies such that he thought, and he's kind of right

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in some ways that one of the biggest threats to

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>getting something done in a productive efficient way was slacking

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>off in what he called systematic soldiering. And I kind

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of agree with that to a certain degree.

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Remember in our Peter Principal episode, we talked about

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 2>a corollary to that called Parkinson's law, which is like

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 2>a tongue in cheek law that work expanded to fill

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the time allotted.

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So yeah, if you're sitting there like making widgets.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Sorry to be cliche, but that's what I'm going With

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 2>eight or ten hours a day, You're not going to

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 2>be the most efficient you can be. You're going to

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>be about as efficient as as as ambitious as you are.

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Like your ambition how far you want to go is

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 2>basically equaled in some weird ratio to the amount of

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 2>efficiency that you produce at your job. Right, So if

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 2>you're like, I'm happy here, I'm not going to bust

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 2>my hump like that guy to go an extra half

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 2>mile because I'm not going to get anything in return,

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just going to do my job at a

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>pace that I find acceptable and that the people I

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 2>work for find acceptable. And I mean, if you want

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 2>to call that slacking off or being lazy, fine, and

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Frederick Taylor definitely did, But it's also just kind of

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 2>like being a human being, you know.

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And to be clear, because I think it seems

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>like I might have been mischaracterized here. The film set

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>thing was, I wasn't like, let's just do the minimum.

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I was in the situation, in this specific incident where

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to do a little extra work by

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>getting a cart loaded rather than just making a ton

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of trips, and the guys and he was like, now

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm mess with getting that cart out. Let's just hump

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff back and forth. And they were like,

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>hey guys, or to me, hey guy, And I said

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>my name is Chuck, right, and they said, hey, Chuck,

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you're the guy I would hire twice because you were

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>taking the time to do it more efficiently, not like, hey,

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I admire like the lazy side.

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Of you, right, And they appreciated your soft touch with

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the donkey that pulled the cart.

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, But it was lazy, and that I didn't want

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to do all those trips. So that's where it initially

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>sprang from, was I don't want to have to tote

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff eight times. Does that make sense?

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I think the reason you're man, we're really going

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 2>deep on this. But I think the reason that you're

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 2>feeling mischaracterized is because you're misusing the word lazy. That's

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>not lazy. That's what they call work harder or work smarter,

0:08:58.400 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>not harder.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you only do that if you get a

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>little laziness in you.

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 2>No, that's not necessarily true. I think it's just sensible.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but I'm also lazy. Then how's that?

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, there you go. But they're not necessarily inextricably tied

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 2>together in that instance.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, I don't think what you just describe qualifies as laziness.

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 2>But what Frederick Taylor considered laziness he called something called

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 2>systematic soldiering, which I still can't make heads or tails of.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 2>It does not make any sense to me, does it

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 2>to you?

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Well? What a soldiering mean?

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I mean you're you go off and

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 2>fight battles, or you go and follow orders. I don't know.

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what he means.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Did you look up soldiering?

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 2>No? I didn't. I just access to my brain data banks.

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Well I'm gonna look it up. Go ahead, we'll do

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a rare uh a rare look Okay, Well, serve as

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a soldier to aha. Oh well, no, that didn't make

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>any sense either, like soldiering on right persevering, Yeah, I

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense to me officially as.

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, it makes no sense because that was his term,

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 2>systematic soldiering.

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I would call it systematic leaning against something.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right, that's what he called slacking off. And like,

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 2>this guy was an aristocrat through and through right. His

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>mother's family came over in the early sixteen hundreds, I think,

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 2>to America. So like he was a wealthy, blue blooded

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Quaker boy who because his parents were like do gooders.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 2>His mom certainly was. She was a suffragette and abolitionist.

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 2>He was raised to care about humanity, but he also

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 2>didn't have that spark of compassion that it takes to

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 2>care about humans individually. So he cared about creating a

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 2>better society for humans, but he couldn't really help but

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 2>look down on other people. He considered lower than him,

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 2>including him. So he did notice things like, you're not

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 2>working as hard as you can. I'm going to see

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 2>to it that you work harder. And he felt totally

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 2>comfortable with filling that role and he actually created that

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 2>role for himself to phill which is pretty remarkable if

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 2>you ask me.

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So he was at Midvale and he sort

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of started breaking down the operations of the jobs that

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they had there at Midvale and he was like, you know,

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>there's some elementary operations that happen here. So we're going

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to form an estimating department where we're going to sit

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.719
<v Speaker 1>around and do time studies, which he got from a

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>class at Phillips Exeter, and we're going to time workers

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>doing all these little small tasks. We're going to add

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that up to the whole and kind of average it

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>out and say, hey, you should be able to do

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.359
<v Speaker 1>this in that amount of time, and we'll adjust accordingly,

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>we'll incentivize accordingly. And he said, and you know what else,

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>this is now a new career. I'm going to be

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a consulting engineer and management and I'm going to charge

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you to tell you how bad you're doing things.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so those management companies like KPMG and Mackenzie,

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 2>they would not exist ostensibly had Frederick Taylor not created

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 2>that field. Like that's what he created. These huge, just

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 2>mega world influencing companies came from this guy basically making

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 2>up the profession.

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know what we should We should give

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a good example here because what he was really most

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>or not most well known for, but something he became

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>very well known for was his work at Bethlehem Steel.

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And he started looking at the process of loading iron

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>onto railcars pig iron, and said, all right, we need

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how much of this stuff is reasonable

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>for one of these men to load onto a railcar.

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>The average right now is twelve and a half tons

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a day. So what I'm gonna do is I'm going

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to get ten large, powerful Hungarian workers to and say,

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>heyde as much as you can, as fast as you can.

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Sixteen and a half tons is your goal. And they

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>did that in fourteen minutes, whereas twelve and a half

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>tons was the daily rate for their average worker. So

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that's seventy one tons in a ten hour day. He

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>rounds it up to seventy five and then said, yeah,

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>but you know what people get tired and they need breaks.

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's whack off forty percent of that and we'll

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>just make we'll just call it even at forty seven

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half tons per day, which is four times

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>as much as you've usually been doing. That's that's the

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:32.599
<v Speaker 1>new expectation.

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that thing about people getting tired he called

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the law of heavy laboring. And from what I can tell,

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 2>he made up that law that I'd put into scare quotes,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>and this is a really good example of what he did.

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Like he was supposed to be precise in finding like

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 2>ultimate efficiency, but he was arbitrarily rounding up and arbitrarily

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 2>coming up with forty percent off based on this law

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 2>that he made up. And now you kind of start

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 2>to get to see like the veil or like the

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>meat that's on the bones. I don't know the analogy

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking for, but you can pull back the curtain,

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 2>that's the one, and see that this stuff is actually

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 2>not what Frederick Taylor cracked it up to be.

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>The Great Oz exactly so much.

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Right. It wears no clothes, all right.

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So when this happened, some people said, I ain't doing this.

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>They quit, they got fired. Some people tried and couldn't

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>do it. Some people were so tired from trying to

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>load that much or that they couldn't come back the

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>next day, and things got really heated. He needed he

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>hired arm guards to walk him home at night. Taylor

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>did because he was so worried. And then he said,

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm going to create a new fake scenario.

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that I've seen businesses do that

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I hate when they create, like, you know, here's our

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>worker Todd and Todd you know, and it's all just

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>made up bs. And that's what he did with Schmidt.

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.479
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing though, So Schmidt, yes, was a fictional

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 2>invention essentially of Taylor's making. But he went around the

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 2>country giving this this lecture or wrote in his books

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 2>like as if Schmidt this actually.

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Happened about Schmidt.

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was a great movie. I really felt uncomfortable

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 2>when he made a pass at the wife of the

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 2>fiby couple that he met. Other than that, I thought

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 2>it was a great movie.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 2>I think at that point that was actually just an

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 2>outtake of Jack Nicholson doing his thing.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Keep rolling the cameras. This is great.

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 2>So like so he was he put out there that

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 2>the Schmidt character was like a real deal thing, not

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 2>a made up thing, not a made up anecdote to

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 2>prove his point, and he actually did consult at Bethlehem Steel,

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 2>where Schmidt supposedly worked. But the upshot of all of

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 2>it was this, there was this guy named Schmidt who

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 2>was known to work very hard, and he was also

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 2>very motivated by money because he was building his own

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 2>house and he he needed as much money as he

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>could get to build said house.

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But not too bright, right, not too bright.

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 2>That's a really important point that Taylor would hammer home

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 2>any chance he got. This guy was sluggish mentally speaking,

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 2>is the way that he put it. But he got

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 2>through to him with a pep talk, whereas essentially he said,

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>are you a high priced man? And Schmidt was like,

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what you're talking about. And when he

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 2>wrote about Schmidt, he replaces w's with VS and stuff,

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 2>and he's a German immigrant. And he said, well, this

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 2>is what a high priced man does. He does everything

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 2>that his manager tells him to do. If your manager

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 2>tells you to pick up that pig iron and take

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>six steps and then set it down over there, you

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 2>do that. If your manager tells you to sit down

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and rest for ninety seconds. Then after ninety seconds he

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 2>tells you to get up and then go grab that

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 2>piece of pig iron. You do that too, with no

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 2>backtalk whatsoever. That's a high priced man.

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>You want to be a mister big boy pants.

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. Press men make more money. So we'll give you

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 2>not just the dollar fifteen an hour that you're making,

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 2>we'll give you a dollar eighty five for making this

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 2>forty seven and a half tone quota. And all you

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 2>have to do is do what your manager tells you.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 2>And this is the other thing that I guess Frederick

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Taylor revolutionized in a way. He divided the workforce into

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 2>two parts, managers who had the brains and did the

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 2>bossing around, and workers who were, according to Taylor, meant

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 2>to do exactly what their managers told them. And if

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 2>you put the two together, you would have the most

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 2>efficient way to say, like load pig iron onto a

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 2>railroad car.

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.239
<v Speaker 1>That's right in this anecdote, who that he, you know,

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of reached around as if it were real. He said,

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Then I did this. It works so great. Schmid was

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>so happy, and Roland in dough I got all of

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>his coworkers to jump aboard because I showed him what

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a mister big boy pants look like, and everybody wanted

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>big boy pants and so everybody, as long as you

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>just do what your boss says, then you're going to

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>make more dough and forget the fact that I'm choosing,

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the very strongest workers to set the standard

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. And then in nineteen eleven a US House

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>committee said, yeah, but we can't just forget that, because

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't just pick the strongest worker and say that's

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the standard for everyone. And so he got into a

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of a tit for tat in that committee meeting,

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess with the chairman, William Ballshop Wilson, and he said,

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what about if you don't have big boy

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>pants men on your staff and like or all big

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>boy pants men. And he said, well, it has no

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>place for a bird that can sing but won't. And

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>he kind of got smacked down for that because he

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>was just lifting lines out of books that he had written.

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Well. Yeah, also, William Wilson said basically like, we're not

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 2>dealing with singing birds. We're dealing with men here who

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>are part of society and for whom or for whose

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 2>benefit society is organized, right, so you can't essentially, you

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 2>can't treat people like automatons and drones and robots. You

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 2>have to consider them as human beings. And the lines

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 2>from his book that you mentioned, apparently Jillipoorr reported that

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 2>he did so poorly in this committee hearing that by

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the way, if you want to ever be nervous about

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 2>a committee hearing, you have to go testify at go

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 2>to one that's literally named after you. This was this

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 2>hearing was called the House Committee to Investigate Taylor, not Taylorism,

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 2>Taylor and other systems of shop management. And so he

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 2>actually ordered one of his underlings to go steal William

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Wilson's copy of his book, and I guess didn't wasn't successful,

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 2>and just kind of went ahead with the terrible testimony.

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 2>But as we'll see, he used it to turn bad

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 2>publicity into any publicity, which is good publicity.

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right. The long inshort with Bethlehem Steele, at least

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>was that they fired him. They quit the tailor's and

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>methods that he had brought in, and he said, all right,

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>pay me one hundred thousand dollars and we'll call it even,

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>which is about three and a half million bucks today,

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's probably a good time for a break, eh, agreed.

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll come back and move on from Taylor

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>for a moment to talk about the Gilbreaths right after this.

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Chuck, you mentioned that we're going to talk about

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 2>the Gilbreaths, So I say we do that. Now. We're

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 2>talking about Frank and Lillian Gilbreath, and anyone who has

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 2>ever read the book or seen the movie or the

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 2>remake Cheaper by the Dozen, this is the family that

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 2>that movie and that book were based on. Frank, Lily

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 2>and Gilbreath were one of the more amazing interesting couples

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 2>that came out of the twentieth century.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. And two of their kids wrote that

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>book in nineteen forty eight, and you know, it was fun.

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a classic for a reason.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 2>They remade it for a reason, for sure, to make money.

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Frank was a bricklayer in his earlier life, and he

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>was one of these people that thought, including too but

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>not limited to cat skinning, that there was one best

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.239
<v Speaker 1>way to do any task. And so he was one

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of those guys where he was like, hey, that scaffold

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for laying bricks is kind of great, But what if

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>there was a shelf on the scaffold for those bricks

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and mortar. You don't got to bend over and pick

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that stuff up. And what if you had some really

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>low paid laborers that would stack the bricks on the

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>frames for them, positioned in the right direction so they

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to turn the bricks. Like really drilling

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>down on these efficiencies.

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it seems like Frank kind of came up

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 2>with this interest independently of Frederick Taylor, even though he

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and Lillian and Taylor would essentially form kind of a

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 2>cadre of cohorts. I guess, yeah, this is like an

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 2>independent thinks this is an independent. These were two independent

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 2>groups who eventually came together because they helped develop this

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 2>field out of thin air. So what the Gilberts did.

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Lillian and Frank together they formed the Gilbert Inc. A

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 2>management consulting firm. They got really, really in the weeds

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 2>about the movements it took to carry out a task,

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 2>and they figured out that you could break any task

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 2>down into eighteen different kinds of movements. Right, so you're

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily going to have all eighteen but no matter

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 2>what task you're talking about, it's going to be made

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 2>up of no more than those eighteen specific kind of movements,

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 2>things like I'm searching for an object with your eye,

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 2>grasping an object, reaching for it, disassembling it. And they

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 2>called these things third bligs, which is their name roughly

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 2>spelled backwards.

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you think when they met Taylor initially they were

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>just like, oh my god, you're into efficiency, and so

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>are we. And Taylor said, I think you mean a

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>fish and they just like fainted.

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think they're right. They're like, you're our guy.

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah. Third bligs. So they were also big into

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>rich hall and sniglets. Uh not to date myself, but

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah. They made up a word, and they said

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>any action you can take is a third blig, and

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we want to get rid of as many third bligs

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>as possible to make efficiency the most, to maximize it

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>as much as one possibly can.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and to do that so they would use their kids.

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 2>They ended up having a dozen kids, eleven of whom

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 2>made it to adulthood. One of them died at age

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 2>five of diphtheria. Sadly, and I don't know how, but

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 2>they planned to have six boys and six girls, and

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I think they were successful at that. No idea how

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 2>they did that, because we're talking about the beginning of

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the twentieth century.

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>It's called luck. Okay, there is no way to do that.

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 2>And they decided to raise their kids in the under

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 2>these principles of efficiency. But they weren't weirdo clinical types,

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 2>like this was a tight, cool family. Like the kids

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 2>were participatory, Like they would have family meetings and each

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 2>kid had a vote, and so they would have a

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 2>family meeting and someone would put forward a motion like

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 2>I say, we get a dog, and someone would second it,

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and then they put it to a vote, and then

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, the eyes had it. So they ended up

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 2>getting a dog they named mister Chairman. Like that was

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 2>how they ran their family. But they were all very

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 2>focused on efficiency because they were obsessed with it, but

0:24:56.400 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 2>not in a dileterious way or a deletrious way. They

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 2>were I guess the best way to put it is

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Lilian was searching for the most efficient way to do

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 2>something so that you have more free time to go

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 2>do happy things, she said, So it can increase your

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 2>happiness minutes essentially. So it was a really different viewpoint

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 2>of the same thing compared to Frederick Taylor.

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean Taylor you kind of talked about a

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit early on, but he did think it was

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a win win. He was like, this is great because

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it'll run more efficiently and you know, it'll trickle down essentially.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>They didn't call it that yet, but that's sort of

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the same notion that like it'll just trickle down to

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the worker all this efficiency and they'll get better wages

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and stuff will be cheaper and stuff like that, Like

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>management will never ever take advantage of that and make

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>you work harder just to increase profits exactly, And of

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>course that's exactly what happened in every case. But I don't, like,

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of wondering about Taylor's heart and like what

0:25:58.359 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>was in there? You know?

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think I explained it already. I'm sticking

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 2>with my idea.

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think he's one of those guys

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>that was so brain obsessed on efficiency. I don't know

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that he had like I don't know if he thought

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>that part through such that he was like some evil

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>person set out to exploit a worker.

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't think he was evil. I don't think

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 2>that he set out to exploit workers. But I think

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 2>even after he saw what his invention was being used for,

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 2>he was indifferent to that, and that says volumes about him.

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 2>He never denounced it, he never called people out for

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 2>misusing it, and he actually helped foster it's misused to

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 2>exploit workers. So I think he was a bit of

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 2>a misanthroat, not evil, and that wasn't ever his intention

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 2>to be evil. But when it turned kind of evil,

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 2>he was he was like, sure, let's keep going if

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 2>you guys are giving me money.

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if he might have been in an age

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>where there weren't certain diagnoses available for what he, you know,

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>may have had going on.

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe, for sure. I mean it's possible. I think

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 2>that we're barreling toward a future where every single person

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 2>has a diagnosis of some sort or another.

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Maybe.

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it'll be interesting.

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>You mean, like there's no perfect person and everyone has

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>an issue that they're dealing with.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, for sure. And I think we already know that,

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 2>but we haven't. We haven't come up with a label

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 2>for every single one of those tests of issues that

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 2>people are working with. That's the difference that I'm talking about.

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, for sure. I don't know. I think sometimes

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that thing empowers people.

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 2>I agree. I don't think. I'm not saying there's anything

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>wrong with it. I'm just entanted to see like where

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 2>we're going. Yeah, but yes, I agree, But we've in

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 2>large part of the society scuttled the idea of the

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>uber minch and Nietzsche is very unhappy about that.

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know what Nietzsche can do. What I'll tell

0:27:55.119 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>y'all fair, Okay. Ironically, though, it was a Supreme Court

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>justice who we've talked about I feel like quite a

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>bit on the show, who kind of bumped Tailor up

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to celebrity status. Yeah, how did we pronounce his name

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>the first twenty five times we said it?

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>It's brand Ice. Okay, that sounds right like light ice,

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 2>but a little different.

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Right like bud Ice.

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, didn't Miller Light have an ice too? Didn't everybody

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 2>have an ice for a.

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>While light Ice? I don't know.

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I screwed it up then because I should have

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 2>said bud Ice. But yeah, that's what I was going for.

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 2>I know Milwaukee's best had an ice.

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>What does it deal with that ice brewed? What even

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>was that?

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it got you tanked faster. Really, yeah, I

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 2>think it had something that it messed with the alcohol

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 2>content or the way it was delivered or something like that.

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>So you had to drink seventeen Miller lits instead of fourteen.

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, exactly, No, the opposite, you had to drink twelve

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 2>instead of fourteen.

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right. Anyway back to nineteen ten, brand Ice

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Lewis brand Ice, Supreme Court Justice, called a meeting with

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the Gilbreaths and the tailor Rights. Taylor couldn't come, but

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>he sent his representatives and said, I want to talk

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>about what I'm calling scientific management. And I am concerned

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>because I see what's happening with big business and I

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's getting out of hand. I want to break

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>up these monopolies, and I think the consumer and the

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>workers should be served. And I think I called one

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>couple here who's probably interested in that, and another group

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of people who sounds like they probably aren't.

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And Brandeis is ironic because he was died in

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the world progressive. Like you said, he was worried about

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 2>big business, and so the idea that he's the one

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 2>that made this concept that's historically viewed as exploitive of

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 2>workers famous and like introduced to the world and essentially

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 2>gave it it's like breakout moment. It's just terribly ironic.

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 2>But the whole basis of that is that he was

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 2>arguing before the Interstate Commerce Commission, which was holding hearings

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 2>on railroad rate hikes. The railroad said stuff getting expensive.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 2>We need to increase the prices that we charged to

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 2>carry freight to move freight, and of course that has

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 2>cascading effects all throughout society, and prices we're going to

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 2>go up, and Brandeis represented a bunch of companies that

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna have to pay those increased rates. And Brandeis's

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>argument was that the railroad companies don't need to raise

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 2>their rates, they need to get more efficient. And here's

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 2>how they can do it. This guy named Taylor has

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 2>figured out a scientific way of getting more efficient and

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 2>that's how they can keep their prices low and still

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 2>keep their profits high. Yeah.

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I know, it's a lot of press coverage on this,

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is really what pushed Taylor over the edge

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>as far as becoming kind of famous for what he

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>was doing. And that is the year, I'm sorry. The

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>next year is when he put out The Principles of

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Scientific Management, which was probably easily the biggest business book,

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe at the twentieth century, but at least the first

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>half of the twentieth century.

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. And he was riding on the publicity

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 2>from that inter State Commerce Commission hearing, but also that

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Congressional hearing that came I think later that same year.

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 2>He saw an opportunity to get his name out there,

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 2>even though his name was kind of being dragged through

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 2>the mud.

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And one thing about Taylorism that we would

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>learn soon enough. And I guess Gilbreatheism. Did they even

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>call it dot No.

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. They weren't. They weren't those types.

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm gonna I'm gonna call it that gil Breath.

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Theism was that it didn't have to be kept to

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the workforce because Lily and Gilbreath found herself alone for

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the last forty eight years of her life when Frank

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>died a heart attack at the age of fifty five

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen twenty four, and she said, all right, don't

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>tell any money. I'm no homemaker myself, not into it

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>at all. I don't even do the cooking in my house.

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think I can shift these efficiency ideas to

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the house and make the home place a more efficient

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>workplace for getting everything done from like back, came in

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to baking biscuits.

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, have you ever heard of the work triangle in

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 2>a kitchen?

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's a classic kitchen chef thing.

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 2>She came up with that as far as I know, Yeah,

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 2>for those who did not know that, but yeah, but

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 2>for those of you who don't know what it is,

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 2>the kitchen triangle is like the places where you do

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the most work, and so the ideas that they should

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 2>be all within a step or two from one another.

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 2>The sink, the oven, and the ice cream maker. I

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 2>don't remember what the third one is the dishwasher.

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Dishwasher.

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, I think those are the three today at least. Okay,

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, she came up with that. If you have

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 2>a kitchen island, you can thank her. I've seen. So. Yeah,

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 2>she's just kind of pivoted because people were finding out

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 2>that there was a woman that ran Gilbert Inc. The

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 2>management consulting firm, and we're just walking away from their

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 2>accounts because it was run by a woman. So she

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 2>had no choice. She had twelve eleven kids to raise,

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 2>and had to provide forms she wanted to set model

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 2>to college. So yeah, she pivoted to home EC. But

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't just her. It's not like she invented homeck

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 2>out a whole cloth. It was already being developed by

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 2>a very famous or should be famous, a lesbian couple,

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Flora Rose and Martha Van Rensselaer. Yeah Rensselaer, right.

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea how to pronounce.

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 2>It r e n s s e l a e R. Rentler. Yeah,

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 2>that's what I'm going with. And the reason I specifically

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 2>called them out as a lesbian couple is because they

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 2>were out as a lesbian couple in I believe the

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 2>nineteen twenties or thirties. I had a I mean, you

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 2>just did not do that, and they were like, say something,

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 2>just just bring it, and they were They just went

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:48.719
<v Speaker 2>unchallenged for their lifetime from what I knew. But they

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 2>they wanted to turn working in the home into something scientific,

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 2>domestic science, which kind of elevated at status as well

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 2>as made things easier for the woman working at the home.

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and eventually you could even find Taylorism in public

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>public schools. And it's interesting to think of it this way.

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>There was a Massachusetts superintendent who told the National Education

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Association that educators needed to analyze the returns of their investment. Rationally,

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>we ought to purchase no more Greek instruction at the

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>rate of five point nine pupil recitations for a dollar.

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>The price must go down, or will she, or we

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>shall invest in something else. And it sounds silly, but

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I get that. It just sounds like a funny way

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it. But it's basically like, we need

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to invest in these kids the things that really matter,

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and not necessarily reciting a Greek poem or something like that.

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Sure, the only question is who decides what really matters?

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think one of the things about that is

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 2>that at the time when that guy was talking like that,

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 2>kids in public schools were viewed as being trained and

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 2>molded into the workers of tomorrow. So it was the

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 2>government and the economy who decided what was important. And yeah,

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 2>we weren't making a lot of money off of reciting

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Greek poems like you were saying, so that would get

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 2>scuttled in the face of say, I don't know shop class,

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe what class?

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Shop?

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Shop?

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I had shop. We didn't have a car

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>auto shop though, did you guys have that?

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 2>No. I was just fascinated by that they had one

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 2>unsaved by the bell, and I always thought that was

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 2>the coolest thing.

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>It felt like something that was in generation's previous to us.

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>We just had shop class where you made lamps and

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that.

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, there was a huge shift in the American economy

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 2>from car making to lamp making the early eighties, so

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that's what the result was.

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Shall we take our second break or soldier through.

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Systematic soldier? Yeah, I say we take our second break.

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's do it. Be right back. Okay, we're back

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way. I think the kitchen triangles is probably

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the fridge and not the dishwasher, would be my guess.

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, I forgot about the fridge. Yes, yes, absolutely, than.

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I bet it's I bet you're right, though, I bet

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it's sink, stove of and fridge would be my guess.

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Sure, yeah, I think you're right, because what if you

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 2>don't have a dishwasher, right, And I'm sure that she

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't have a dishwasher in the nineteen thirties and forties,

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 2>so you know, yeah, so you're you're right. Chuck just

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:51.760
<v Speaker 2>say it again.

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the fridge. Okay, all right, So

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk a little bit about just sort of

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>what like what Detaylor is accomplish. Ultimately, there is a

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of irony in that. You know, a lot of

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>it was so scientific supposedly, but a lot of the

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff was made up or just sort of you know, yeah,

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>made up or kind of a sham. Right, This wasn't new.

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Stuff like timing people on tasks and teaching people to

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>do do more specific things had been around for a

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>long time. But one of the effects of tailorism is

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>definitely like you know, de skilling a worker making them

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>feel and not that working is all about emotions, but

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to make your employee feel like a

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.919
<v Speaker 1>robot that can be replaced by a robot. You want

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to give them a little bit of agency ideally and

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a job and not just say move your body this way,

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>move your hand that way, punch that thing and then

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:52.959
<v Speaker 1>return back to position one.

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so de skilling workers taking away the overall

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 2>understanding of making say like oven and just giving them

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the one job of putting the door on the oven

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 2>as it's coming down the assembly line, not only does

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 2>that take away from job satisfaction, it also makes you

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 2>way more replaceable because you don't have to train somebody

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 2>to build a whole oven. All you have to do

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 2>is train them to put that oven door on, and

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 2>then you train somebody else to put the thermostad in

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the oven, and so on and so forth. And you,

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.240
<v Speaker 2>the owner of the factory, has that oven you want,

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 2>but you have a bunch of replaceable workers that you

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 2>can pay fairly low wages even combined compared to somebody

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.280
<v Speaker 2>who builds the oven from scratch. That is a huge

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Like you said, that was already underway, but Taylorism and

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the fact that it was so pervasive and widespread, especially

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:44.920
<v Speaker 2>in America in the first half of the twentieth century,

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 2>really solidified that as like a basis of the American workforce.

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, another effect, I mean, I guess we've kind of

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 1>said it in several different ways from the beginning, but

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the idea that the Gilbress had that there

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 1>would be a happiness quotient involved and where you could

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>do work more efficiently so you could just have more

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>time and better wages to spend with your family. It just,

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it didn't work out that way. Even though

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea of Taylorism at its base isn't inherently

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 1>anti worker, it sort of ends up being that way

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>when the profits are being spread around the top tier

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and all they want is more and more of those profits.

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And so to be clear, it wasn't like every

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 2>single time Taylor showed up like that's just how it went.

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 2>There were some successful pushbacks over the years. There's one

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 2>specifically at the Watertown Arsenal in Massachusetts in nineteen eleven.

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 2>They make guns, I think for the government. It was

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:47.439
<v Speaker 2>a federal arsenal, and Taylor sent one of his emissaries

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 2>essentially told him to just make up a number. You

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 2>don't even need the stop watch part, and I think

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 2>word of that got out and really kind of undermined that,

0:39:56.600 --> 0:40:02.280
<v Speaker 2>but also just the process of being time doing your job.

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 2>One of the workers said, I'm not doing that. You

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:06.800
<v Speaker 2>can't time me, and he was fired on the spot,

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 2>and the rest of the workers were like, oh yeah,

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 2>well we're going on strike. And they ended up being

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 2>successful because again this was a federal arsenal and those

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 2>congressional hearings to investigate Taylor. One of the results of

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:24.919
<v Speaker 2>them was that the US federal government banned Taylorism from

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 2>being used in any way, shape or form in any

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:29.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of federal facility or agency.

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but overall, I mean, Taylor certainly won the day.

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's that's just how the economy is in

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:42.879
<v Speaker 2>America and other like minded countries. Like, even though we've

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of walked away from it overtly, it's just gotten

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 2>more and more entrenched over the years, rather than further

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 2>and further away.

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, I mean probably the most you know,

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the biggest contribution was it just raised the awareness and

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>an obsession with productivity, and productivity is great, it's not

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>like that's a bad thing. But again, like when you're

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>dealing with human beings, to feel like a cog and

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to feel completely replaceable, there's no way like you're not

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>serving your own purpose as a as a business owner,

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>because you're not gonna have good and happy employees ultimately,

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and replacing employee after employee, even if you're just training

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>them to put the oven door on, that's still an inefficiency,

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, No, for sure, And yeah, that's a really great point.

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to keep employees?

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I'm sure some being counter at some company

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 2>somewhere was like, oh, yeah, I still make more money

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 2>hiring and training employees than you do making them happy,

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 2>although that seems to not be the case. I was

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 2>reading up on management consulting, which I think deserves its

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 2>own episode down the line because apparently it's just totally fraudulent,

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think it'll be a really great interesting episode.

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 2>But some studies have shown, from what I saw just

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 2>briefly reading about this, that the happier your workers are,

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 2>or I should say, economies that have happier workers, like

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 2>more fulfilled workers, typically have their richer For the most part.

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:21.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess America as an outlier because I think overall

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 2>workers are not necessarily happy with their jobs or lack

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 2>of job. But supposedly if you make if you invest

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 2>in your workers well being and actual happiness and fulfillment

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 2>with their job, they're going to work more for you.

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 2>They're going to work harder because they care about what

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 2>they're doing.

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Totally.

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.280
<v Speaker 2>So yeah. And then one of the other big things

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:46.240
<v Speaker 2>that shows that Taylorism is still alive and well today

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Chuck is computers, AI, whatever you want to call it,

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 2>is they've fulfilled or they're fulfilling the role of managers

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 2>that Taylor envisioned. So remember the manager was in charge

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 2>of figuring out the best way to do something and

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 2>then instructing the worker to do it exactly that way

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 2>at exactly that time. That is what computers do today

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 2>for workers, which is a bizarre reversal of authority, I

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 2>guess if you think about it, but that's the way

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 2>it is, especially in places like you know, big warehouses

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 2>or call centers. Computers essentially running the.

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Show, yeah, for sure, and it created the management consultant industry.

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we should do one on that. I don't

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you remember, and I won't be very specific here,

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but because we've been owned by a lot of companies

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>over the years, but one of one time, one of

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>the companies that I'm just hired a dude that came

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 1>in and we were like, who's this guy? And I

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>can't remember someone who knows how these things work? Took

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 1>us aside and they were like, he's I guess, I

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he was a management consultant or what

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>his official job was, but they're like, his job is

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>to come in here and fire people and rip this

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>place apart and then probably get a nice exit and

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>move on to another job where he'll do that exact

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>same thing.

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's what the industry.

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Does. You remember that guy?

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:11.359
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't remember that guy. You got to tell me, please,

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:12.360
<v Speaker 2>do I know?

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Jerry is like screaming his name off air? Right now?

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Just one last thing. Do you have anything more about taylorism?

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:25.319
<v Speaker 2>No, okay, great, well then I do have just one

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:28.439
<v Speaker 2>last thing. If you want kind of a lighthearted look

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:32.879
<v Speaker 2>comedy with heart efficiency, check out the nineteen ninety one

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 2>film The Efficiency Expert starring Anthony Hopkins. Oh.

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought you're gonna say, gung ho.

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:42.439
<v Speaker 2>That was Yeah, kind of a different one, but yeah,

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure there's a lot of crossover for sure.

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 1>What's this Tony Hopkins picture? What is it?

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 2>The Efficiency Expert? It's exactly what you never described. And

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 2>he ends up in a I think a factory where

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the workers make they change his view of things. I

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:03.600
<v Speaker 2>think they kind of turn him around. Oh I remember, correctly,

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen it.

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:06.280
<v Speaker 1>That wouldn't have worked with the other guy that I mentioned.

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>He was unflappable.

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, anyway, we're about to end, well, wait, hold on,

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:13.360
<v Speaker 2>we got to do listener mail, don't we Yeah, and

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 2>then I'll tell you by the way, Chuck, I gotta

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 2>tell you that we ended on forty five minutes on

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:19.720
<v Speaker 2>the nose.

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Holy cal yep.

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 2>Way to go champ. Oh. Since I said way to

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 2>go champ of course, that means it's time for listener mail.

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>This is just a nice thank you. Hey, guys, heartfelt

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:35.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Started listening in twenty twelve, and my time.

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Although my time spent listening to podcast is fluctuated, yours

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 1>has been one of the constants. Started listening to keep

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 1>my mind occupied when I had hours of mundane tasks

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 1>in the lab where I worked after college, and I've

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>continue to listen through a career change, relationship changes, getting

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:52.720
<v Speaker 1>my first dog, Luna. He sent a picture of Luna sweet,

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and becoming a homeowner. I'm listening still as I'm planning

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a second career change and going through a little lonelier

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 1>stretch of my life. In your podcast kept me laughing

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and feeling connected to the world through challenging times. And

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I sometimes feel like there isn't the right combination of

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:08.320
<v Speaker 1>words to express my gratitude completely.

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I feel like they just put those words together.

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you're right. Some of my favorite moments

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in recent shows have been Chuck's throwaway line about a

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>fairy hoax confession happening at a Men Without Hats concert.

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.240
<v Speaker 1>It's got Josh chuckle not once twice, but three times.

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And in the fifteenth annual s YSK Halloween Spectacular, the

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>curious sound like laughter yet not laughter that Josh made,

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>which sounded like it had Chuck literally crying with laughter,

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 1>which is absolutely true. That maybe the most I've ever

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>laughed at something that you did.

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it is man.

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I hope that you know for some of your listeners,

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>your podcast has been as meaningful to us as the

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Simpsons or Peanuts may have been to you.

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Wow Wow, Wow? Who was that?

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Stanley knows how to drive it home. He signs it

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>all the best Stanley A seed.

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh nice. I thanks, Stanley. You're a true listener through

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 2>and through, aren't you. I love that humble like I

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 2>can't figure out how to put the words together, but.

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Here they are, yeah, in perfect order, exactly.

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you want to be like Stanley and make

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:16.279
<v Speaker 2>me say wow, not once, not twice, but thrice, then

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:19.359
<v Speaker 2>you can try your hand at it. Send us an

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 2>email to Stuff Podcast at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:35.280
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.