WEBVTT - John Heilemann & Sen. Tammy Baldwin

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds and Democrats have staged a historic upset

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in Omaha, Nebraska. We have such a great show for

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you today. Pawkin News is John Heilman cuts through the

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>noise with a discussion about what happened in the twenty

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty four campaign and whether or not Biden's age was obfiscated.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Then we'll talk to Wisconsin Senator Tammy Baldwin about how

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we push back on Trump's many, many oversteps. But first

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the news.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Somali the Katari plane, the scandal is not landing at all.

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Trump blew his lid today in discussions about it, and

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 2>he did a whole lot of talking about the Middle

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 2>East today. What are you seeing here?

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think this plain thing is really a good

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>example of corruption that first of all, it cuts through

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the noise. Right, You've seen Trump do other corrupt things

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like the Trump coin and all of the sort of

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>family real estate dealings, but this is something different. It's

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a very clear bit of corruption, right, Like we've never

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.279
<v Speaker 1>had a president and try to take a plane from

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a Middle Eastern royal family before, Like, it's just so

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>beyond the pale of normal stuff that I do think

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>it's a standout. And if Trump were smart, he would

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.839
<v Speaker 1>just drop it. He would just say, who cares a wait,

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll get the plane from Boeing. I'm the president. Data

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>da da. But because Trump is Trump, and maybe this

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is how he got here a little bit. Because Trump

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is Trump, he cannot thread the needle on this. He

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>cannot let it go. So he just thinks that if

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>he keeps going with this, he's going to get this plane.

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>But it is There's nobody in the world, I mean,

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>even the biggest Trumper, even the bots on Twitter who

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>are saying, well, the Americans got the Statue of Liberty,

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>even those people know for sure understand that this is

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>not fucking right, that this is completely crazy. So we're

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>three days into this story or four days into the story.

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So this is a bad story for Trump, right, the

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that it keeps going and every time he he says, well,

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>they are just being nice. It's smart to take the plane.

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And this is my really my theory in life, when

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 1>you're defending yourself, you're losing. When you're trying to make

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the case that a Middle Eastern royal family should give

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you a plane. Okay, and everyone in the world, including

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Republican senators, are bursting into laughter. You're losing, so just

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>give up on the fucking plane. You're not getting the plane.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Every day you do it, you look like an asshole.

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Like give it up, man, You're welcome.

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 2>So today there is a disastrous hearing with Christino, who

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 2>many people have disastrous for her. For her, she looks

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 2>pretty pretty bad in this. Many people have talked about

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 2>how she's just the spokesperson for all these horrible, horrible

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 2>things I is doing. And well, I'm gonna let the

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 2>tape speak for itself.

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Madame Secretary. You have an important job. I

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 3>think you have one of the most important jobs in

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 3>the cabinet. Thank you for doing it. I want you

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 3>to have credibility and be taken seriously as you do

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 3>the job. And so I want to put to rest

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 3>this question about mister Garcia. In this photo that the

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 3>President posted on April twenty one, Madame Secretary, you agree

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 3>that the letters MS and the number thirteen in Times

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Roman numeral font that they are doctored on this photo.

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Right, Congressman Brego Garcia. No, no, I'm just it wasn't

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 4>based off of tattoos.

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 5>It was off an.

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Entire and accept I'll accept that for the purpose of

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 3>this question.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 6>You agree though, that this is doctor, Is that right?

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 4>The same protocols that are scary.

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I want you to have credibility, and I want you

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 3>to be taken seriously. Is this doctored or is it not?

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 4>I'm taken quite seriously.

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 6>Is it doctored or not? Doctor?

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 4>The importance that the President has given me.

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 3>To I understand is it doctored or nothing.

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 4>That's important to remember is that every single time a

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 4>case is.

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 2>Built, we stopped at about minute one oh five. That

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 2>goes on for two and a half minutes.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, by the way, I love that's Eric swall

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>while questioning her and I want you to have credibility.

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I'm not convinced Eric wants her to

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have credibility. But that is neither here nor there. No,

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that was just an incredible bit. Christy Nome

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is one of the inheritors of trump Ism, so she's

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>what's in the pike when Trump's term is over. So

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's something, well.

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's put some more color on it. I think Congressman

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Robert Garcia did some amazing work here.

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 7>Would you commit to just letting his mother know, as

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 7>a mother to mother, if Andrey is alive. He was

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 7>given an asylum appointment by the United States government. We

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 7>gave him an appointment. We said Andrey come to the

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 7>border at this time to claim asylum. He was taken

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 7>to a foreign prison in El Salvador. His mother just

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 7>wants to know if he is alive. Can we check

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 7>and do a wellness.

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Our asylum applications are different than the granting of asylum,

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 4>and I don't know the specifics of this individual case.

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 4>This individual is an El Salvador and the appeal would

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 4>be best made to the President and to the government

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 4>of El Salvador on this. We've made that under my

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 4>jurisdiction at METEM.

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 7>Secretary, you have said that you that in Ol Salvador

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 7>is one of the tools in the toolbox that you have.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 7>You have said that and has been quoted as saying

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 7>that you and the President have the ability to check

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 7>if Andrew is alive and if not being harmed. Would

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 7>you commit at least into looking and asking of Salvador

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 7>if he is alive.

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 4>This is a question that's best ask to the resident

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 4>and the government of l Salvador.

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 7>And I think it's I think you know very well

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 7>that you could ask that question, but you're choosing to

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 7>do medical secretary is disregard this young man's life, this

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 7>young man's family who was given an appointment by the

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 7>United States. I think it is shameful that you won't

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 7>even request to see if this young man is alive.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 7>His family has no idea, has no access to lawyers.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 7>I would hope that we would have that humanity, the

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 7>humanity to just check if this young man is okay.

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 7>With that, I yep back, it's shameful.

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>The problem that these people have is that you can't

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>ever go against Trump. So if something is photoshopped and

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows it's photoshopped, but Trump says it's not photoshopped,

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to say it's not photoshopped, so right, I mean,

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what it is. You can't she can't be like

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>just like the people in the hearings where they would say,

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, they'd ask questions like, well, will you do

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.559
<v Speaker 1>what the president tells you or will you follow the law,

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And then they say, I can't deal with theoreticals, because

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>what they mean to say is we're going to do

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>what the president tells us to and we don't give

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a shit about the law. So that's where we are here.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the way in which these people are painted themselves

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>into corners they cannot get out of.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Sob The New York Times has this blockbuster report that

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Miller is running the DOJ and Pam Bondy is

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 2>just a figurehead that she is like an actor. And

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 2>when I think of headlines, I don't want to see.

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 2>That's very high up in the echelon of ones I

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 2>would not like to see.

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So today I've had this conversation with six different people,

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>like what is scarier Trump at the rains or Trump

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>slightly diminished and Stephen Miller at the rains? And yes,

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of reasons to fear a Stephen

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Miller presidency. But just like one Marco Rubio, the guy

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>has fifty seven jobs. Okay, Stephen Miller is running the administration,

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>He's running this, he's running that he's running the DOJ.

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>For sure, I'm sure that's true. That Pam Bondi is

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>just to pick your head. I'm sure you know if

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the reporting, I think that's probably right. But I

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>do think that this guy can't do It's just one person, right,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>unless they have really sophisticated AI. There's only so much

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>damage one person could do. Now, Canny do a lot

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of damage, yes, but it is only one person.

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just one person with really, really really bad morals.

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well no, I me and I think we can

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>all agree that this is not the person that any

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of us want in charge. But that said, it is

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>only one person. John Heilman is an NBC National News

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>correspondent as well as a Puck News partner. Welcome, Welcome, John.

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 6>Hi, how are you?

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'm just living the dream.

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 6>You don't seem like super energetic this morning, Molly, What's

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 6>what's going on?

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm energetic. I went to a party last night. I'm energetic.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 6>Or was the party?

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Was it the high Line?

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 5>It was good.

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>American life grinds on despite the fact that our political

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>system is in what is what do you think the

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>what would you say this sort of word is for

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>this moment in American politics?

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 6>Surreal? I mean just sort of terror, incognita if you

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 6>want to be like Latin, this has been true in

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 6>both Trump terms. This movie, it's not different, but it's

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 6>just like there's just so many things for which there

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 6>is no precedent, and I'm like tediously. It's not like

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 6>I'm some like, you know, some great historical scholar or something,

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 6>but just like I'm always like looking for some precedent,

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 6>like how do how do we evaluate this thing? Well,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 6>this has happened before, and this is how it kind

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 6>of came out, so there's a guide to this, or

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 6>this has happened a lot before, or well it has

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 6>happened very often, but there have been times when this

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 6>has happened or something like this has happened. But you know,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 6>that's just constantly. Every day, there's like five things that

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 6>there's no metric or artstick where you're kind of like, well,

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 6>here's how we could we can get some general sense

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 6>a how this might unfold on the basis of this

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 6>thing that happen in nineteen sixty four. It's like just

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 6>like I don't know, I mean, what do you think

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 6>is gonna happen? John fucking Idea?

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Well there is, But it does feel like with trump Ism,

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>there's always this sort of feeling that maybe someone will

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>do something right like the Republicans, there's sort of a

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>wish and I mean that ship is I.

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 6>Don't have that. I don't have that feeling at all.

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 6>I gave up on that feeling a long time ago.

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So we talk about the guard rails. We talk about

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of I mean, their courts continue to say, hey,

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the courts. The courts stopped the court the courts

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 6>routinely regularly. Thank God for that branch of government, because

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 6>the other one's totally suphine, meaning the legislative branch. Yeah.

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 6>Uh so the courts continue to operate. That is a

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 6>thing for which there is precedent. The courts, you know,

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 6>I continue to act like the courts mostly, and they

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 6>keep Trump from doing various things that he wants to do.

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 6>And I guess I here's here's the thing that's worth

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 6>thinking about. I guess in this text. And maybe you

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 6>have an insight on this that I because I've just

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 6>started thinking about it. It's like, if you look at

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 6>what what has happened just in the last few days

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 6>around the big beautiful bill. You know, there's these things

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 6>that Trump, you know, campaigned on, right, you know, no

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 6>taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime.

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 6>You know, he recently, as you know, last week, came

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 6>out and said, having kind of been towing and throwing

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 6>about it for a while, finally came out and said

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 6>to Mike Johnson, let's raise taxes on the rich. I mean,

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 6>he set that he set the limit really high at

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 6>two and a half million, but he said he'd be

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 6>open to, he'd be He wants that, not just the

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 6>he'd be able to. He wants that. That's not going

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 6>to happen. And nor nor are a lot of things

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 6>that he campaigned on, you know, pretty vocally, like no

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 6>tax on tips and you know, his unfeasible. It's not

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 6>like but it's not like the it's not like the

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 6>Republicans are standing up and saying, you know, getting in

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 6>his face about it. They're just not going to do that.

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's the thing he wanted. They're not going

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 6>to do it. He's you know, he capitulated on on

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 6>the US Attorney for uh, the District of Columbia. You know,

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 6>Tom Tillis said, no, I'm not gonna this, this is

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 6>fucking nuts, and Trump was like, all right, no. He

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 6>put in Jeanine Perrot, you know, how long that will last,

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 6>who knows. But it's like there's things where he's kind

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 6>of giving up on things, you know, rather than stomping

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 6>his feet and saying I must have this, I must

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 6>have that, there's more things that he's willing to kind

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 6>of like when somebody says no to him, he kind

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 6>of goes all right. The interesting question is like what's

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 6>going to happen with the with the plane and just

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 6>all of the obvious corruption, right, because there's more Republicans

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 6>speaking out about that than I've heard speak out about

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 6>almost anything.

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Cynthia Cynthia Loomis burst into hysterical laughter when she heard

0:12:57.960 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>about it.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I mean, you know, Laura Lumer is attacking him,

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 6>Ted Cruz, Ben Shapiro, all these people are now taking

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 6>are Like I said, what this is like? You can't

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 6>take this plane from from Cutter. That's crazy. And you

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 6>know what happens now? And here's the interesting the thing

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 6>that ties the two things together for me. Do you

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 6>think that Trump being willing to kind of give up

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 6>on shit he doesn't really care about that much, like,

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, does he really care about like raising text

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 6>on the wealthy? You know, if Trump were really running

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 6>for a third term, like really thought he was gonna

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 6>that he had a political future. I think he might

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 6>not take the plane from Cutter, you know, because the

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 6>corruption of his really so naked, that is, it's a

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 6>political If Trump were really running for a third term,

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 6>he might want to like really press for raising taxes

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 6>on the rich, because that's like a good band and

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 6>esque like populist economics. I wonder whether we're starting at

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 6>like and both that his behavior and the fact that

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 6>Republicans are starting to either just kind of ignore him

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 6>on certain things or openly criticize him, like on the plane,

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 6>whether what's sinking in with people. And I say this

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 6>as someone who's thought for a long time Trump was

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 6>going to stay in the White House until he was

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 6>dead or taken out either either leave the ovalops with

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 6>a toe tag or an handcuffs. Those are the only

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 6>ways you're going to get him out. I wonder whether

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 6>it's starting to have like on both sides, people are

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 6>kind of going, yeah, you know what, two term, Like

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna we got another four years to get to

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 6>do whatever the fuck I want. But I'm not gonna

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 6>try to press it here and try to stick around

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 6>for a third I wonder I'm right.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is the real open question, right is

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>how much energy does he have for the authoritarianism he

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is very delighted and curious by.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 6>And that's the question, and whether he and whether he thinks, yes,

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 6>that's certainly right. And I don't mean to suggest at

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 6>all that the authoritarian threat is receded, but just that

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 6>on certain things he just seems more exhausted, you know,

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 6>than than he has in the path. He just sort

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 6>of seems kind of like, you know, the answers to

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 6>some of these questions, you know, than these interviews he's

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 6>done recently. He has just seemed so flaccid to me,

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 6>like he's kind of like Steve Miller, still out there

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 6>talking about repeal it, taking back, about getting rid of

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 6>Habeas corpus and that's super dangerous. And but I just

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 6>there are times when you look at Trump and you

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 6>kind of go, he looks like he's just like a

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 6>little like he's a little like kind of had it,

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 6>you know, He's Okay. I'm just like, I just don't

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 6>have that much energy anymore. Let's just get on, like money,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 6>give me the money, let me build it, let me

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 6>build the giant hotel and cutter and let my family

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.359
<v Speaker 6>get really rich. You can't prosecute me because I got immunity.

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 6>It's just like, you know, let me give me, give

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 6>me as much shit as I can get a hold

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 6>of in the next four years, and I'll like go off,

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 6>thank you.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And and my man is in his late seventies. I mean,

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this is not a young guy.

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 6>Yes, and a lot of mileage on those tires too, moy.

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you know, if you if you get to

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 6>be that age, I don't care what kind of genetics

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 6>you have, you get to be that age and you've

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 6>only eaten like Big Max and not done any exercise

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 6>other than what he would pass us for him playing

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 6>around the golf, right, you know that body is not

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 6>cannot be like in the I don't care what doctor says.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 6>That body cannot be in the best shape well.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And also he doesn't sleep. I mean, the guy looks

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a very frenetic, high stress life. So there's a book

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that's coming out that says that basically there was a

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>cover up about Biden's age. I have yet to see

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>anything that threads a needle for cover up. It just

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>seems like that, you know, if I could you know,

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it all seems like people were you know, the things

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>people do when other people are in power or they

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>want them to stay in power. It doesn't seem in

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>my mind like there's if only Democrats were organized enough

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for a cover up, is my hot take.

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 5>But I'm curious.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 6>You're talking about Tapa Thompson.

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>The Taper Thompson book.

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so I've read it. I haven't. I haven't. I'm

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 6>going to interview those guys on my podcast and as

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 6>I'm sure you are, and others or are they're going

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 6>to publicize the book like crazy, I'm eager to read it.

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 6>Those are two serious people with who are good reports

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 6>and or well sourced. And Alex Thompson was was, you know,

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:16.479
<v Speaker 6>commendably resistant to the aggressive White House pushback on biden

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 6>age and health stories.

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, over the everybody like, didn't you read a

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>ton of stories about how Biden was old and doddering?

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 6>And I think that you didn't know? Now, I mean, yes,

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 6>you what you read was a lot of people. First

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 6>of all, you've heard a lot of people on the

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 6>right saying that all the time, right, I don't think

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 6>that you would say that in that on MSNBC CNN

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 6>and otherwise that there was a lot of like aggressive

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 6>coverage like that kind of made that point. I spent

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, we've talked about this before, I'm sure on

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 6>this podcast, but you know I spent when I would

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 6>say on television not like doing investigative trying to investigate this,

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 6>but just would say there is a consistent through line

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 6>starting in October of twenty twenty one through whatever point

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 6>you were talking that the American public things Joe Biden's

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 6>too old for run for a second time. I would

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 6>get it, but I would say that and then get

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.479
<v Speaker 6>there and get brutalized. And there were not a lot

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 6>of people brutalized in social media and by Democrats, and

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 6>you would get you wouldn't get a chorus of people

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 6>who are like, yes, this is a giant problem for

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 6>Joe Biden politically, and and why isn't the Democratic Party

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 6>running a prime? Why isn't there a real primary? Why

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 6>is no one taking them on that? That was not

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 6>something that you heard of. There was not something that

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 6>was like uh, that was front of the center and

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 6>the coverage going forward and so but your point is

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 6>about cover up. So I don't know what the book alleges.

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.239
<v Speaker 6>So it's it's I don't want to like knock down

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 6>a straw many right, you know, My sense of it

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 6>is that it's a much more interesting, complicated thing. It is.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 6>There is no doubt that the White House did what

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 6>every White House always does for any income and president,

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:52.959
<v Speaker 6>which is to try to push reporters away from their

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 6>political vulnerabilities and towards their political strengths.

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, And it would be malpractice to not that's what

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they did.

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 6>So that's what they did. I think there were a

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 6>lot of reporters who the Biden press shop, and and

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, was there openness about you know, when you

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 6>started to hear things like I'll give you an example

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 6>in like the fall of twenty twenty three, actually more

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 6>like the winter of twenty twenty four. Was when people

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 6>at who were donors started saying to me they thought

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 6>it was that Biden looked really bad even in small groups.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 6>And what was it was even for like a ten

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 6>minute off the record thing with big donors was reading

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 6>off a teleprompter. Yeah, I didn't see that that was

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 6>not reported widely? Now was that because those were closed fundraisers?

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 6>The White House obviously didn't want people to know that

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 6>that's what any White House would have done to try

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 6>to protect their boss on an issue of political vulnerability.

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 6>Reporters didn't seem to really super aggressively pursue it. The

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 6>questions around why the Democratic Party, which is a political

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 6>party last I checked, and as a political party, should

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 6>be interested primarily in two things. One it's preferred policies, programs, values, ideology, whatever,

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 6>but prior to that, having to win elections so that

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 6>you could institute your policies, priorities, values, and ideology. Why

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 6>the Democratic Party all these congressman, senators, donors who saw

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 6>Biden with some frequency in various settings and now have

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 6>come out and said that they had private concerns. Why

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 6>those people didn't speak up and say, hey, if we're

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 6>a serious political party, we should consider you know, someone

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 6>should come forward and challenge the president, like, why, you

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 6>know what we have concerns about this? Why did that

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 6>raise the alarm earlier? I think that's a really good question.

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 6>But I think that speaks more to the way that

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 6>the system works to you know, it is the case

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 6>that challenging a sitting president is really hard for a

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 6>lot of reasons. It's hard because it's hard to raise

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 6>the money to challenge that person. It's hard because if

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 6>you challenge that person and don't win, your future is

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 6>fucked in the party, And there's all this institutional stuff

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 6>that basically protects incumbents. And I think that there were

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 6>a lot of Democrats who were in denial about his situation.

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 6>There were a lot of Democrats who didn't want to

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 6>really know the details, the kind of thought. He looked tired,

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 6>but then he would give a good state of the Union.

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 6>They'd be like, Okay, cool, we can get through. Trump

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 6>is fucking crazy. He's fulfilling also, And there were a

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 6>lot of Democrats out there who might have challenged Biden

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.719
<v Speaker 6>who looked at it and said, you know the way

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 6>I asked a juggernaut, they have a lot of money,

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 6>there's gonna there's really hard to beat an incumbent. Do

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 6>I want to mortgage my future or risk my future

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 6>as a presidential candidate in twenty twenty eight, twenty thirty two,

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 6>twenty thirty six to taking on a sitting president where

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 6>if I don't win, everyone in the institutional Democratic Party's

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 6>going to hate me forever. I think like there's much

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 6>more like was it much more that the story here

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 6>isn't so much a giant cover up in the way

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 6>we think of a cover up, as a series of

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 6>institutional things that led a lot of people to forget

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 6>what the point of being the Democratic Party was, which

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 6>is or any party is, which is You've got to win,

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 6>you know, and it's as not you shouldn't mortgage your

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 6>values or your preferred policies. Shouldn't you know, you shouldn't

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 6>do anything to win. That's not win at all cost,

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 6>that's not stop believing. But you have to win. If

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 6>you don't win, you this is what happens. You get

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 6>Donald Trump for the next four years. So you know,

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 6>you have to first things first, consistent with your priorities,

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 6>consistent with your values, consistent with your ethics. You have

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 6>to do anything you can, everything you can to win.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 6>And that the Democratic Party was not operating on that

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 6>principle when it looked just as Joe Biden's poll numbers

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 6>forget about what people saw behind the scenes. If you

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 6>just looked at his poll numbers, you would have said,

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 6>we have a problem. Yeah, you know, for like two

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 6>years you would have said we have a problem. And

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 6>you know there were again we go on forever here

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 6>about this, But you have some countervailing things. Biden was

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 6>able to look up after the midterms and say, hey,

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:06.719
<v Speaker 6>y'all said that we were going to get killed the midterms.

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 6>We didn't get killed in the midterms. Y'all think I

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 6>can't give a decent speech. I did okay at the

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 6>State of the Union. He had things to point to.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 6>But again, two and a half years of polling, and

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 6>what you could see, which was that without saying the

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 6>guy had Alzheimer's or had dementia or had just think

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 6>I was old, and he looked his age. He looked

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 6>his age. And if you look, if you looked at

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 6>that guy and say, looked his age, he's not his best.

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 6>He's lost a lot of miles per hour of his fastball.

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 6>We probably, if we really think democracy is on the line,

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 6>we probably should consider some other alternatives, because this is

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 6>not who you put forward in an existential election.

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>But it is interesting now. So Biden was the oldest

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>person ever to be president. Now Donald Trump is the

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>oldest person to ever be president. And this sort of

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 1>dovetails back to what we were talking about before, which

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is that as someone who has dealt and just wrote

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a book about aging parents and my experience with my

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>aging parents and et cetera, et cetera. Getting old is

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not a conspiracy theory. It's what happens to all of them.

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 6>Yes, And anybody who's ever dealt with anybody in their eighties, yeah,

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 6>knows that. It is not agism. Nor is it disrespectful

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 6>to say people in their eighties are not who you

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 6>want driving a Formula one car, you know, flying your

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 6>airplane or being president of the United States. It's not

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 6>They are diminished in various ways. Do they have wisdom

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 6>that we don't have? Maybe sometimes yes, if they're wise,

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 6>like they have certain like some of them do, not

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 6>all of them. I'm like, I'm not ready to say

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 6>everyone who's eighty is wiser than me, but I'm saying

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 6>some are. Some are, but they don't have the reflexes

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 6>of a of a forty year old, and they don't

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 6>have the energy or the stamina, and they don't have

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 6>the sharpness or they don't have to recall, they have

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 6>a lot of things that are diminished by that age.

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 6>And so you have to ask that question. It was,

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, to say someone is it's not like you know,

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 6>you would say you know he's getting out of yours people.

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, you're saying that that people in their agies

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 6>are worthless. I'm no, I'm not saying they're worthless. I'm

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 6>just saying they probably are not the best person to

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 6>have the hardest job in the world.

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean.

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>The one thing I would say, and I'm not trying

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to be argumentative here, is I do think that Nancy Pelosi,

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>as I hold of a yellow crayon, God help me,

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that Nancy Pelosi is pretty sharp.

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I'm not saying there aren't exceptions to the rules.

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, but there are exceptions to the rule.

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 6>Is there are there exceptions to the rule. There are

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 6>exceptions to every rule. I'm just trying to say as

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 6>a general thing. You know, I am very much in

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 6>the John Stewart camp, which was when he first came back,

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 6>and was like, both of these guys are too old

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 6>to be president. In three hundred fift I heard this

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 6>all over the country, which was people would come up

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 6>to me and go, whether they were Democrats or Republicans,

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 6>would be like, really, two octagenarian dudes, for both of

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 6>whom when you watch them, one of whom seems bonkers.

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 6>That's right, And the other of whom seems like pretty

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 6>as I watch him shuffle across the south lawn, Yeah,

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 6>is this really the best we can do? That was

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 6>what the question that people we give and I and

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 6>I was always like, that's a totally reasonable question. That's

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 6>like and again, it's not a dis to Joe Biden

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 6>or his years of service or the various things that

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 6>have made him wise, but like you know.

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>At this point, it's just a truism. Yes, about twenty

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty four.

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 6>And and people who would make this point most most

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 6>appointedly to me, people in their eighties who would say,

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 6>I am not what I was, what I once was,

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 6>I wouldn't want this job, and proas like, what are

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 6>we talking about here? Was it like old? Was it

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 6>like elderly? People were like you are rallying around Joe

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 6>Biden constantly? They were kind of going, they we should

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 6>look at someone younger.

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it's true. And and I think a really

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>good point, John. I hope you will come back.

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 6>I'll always come back. Yeah, always come back back. And

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 6>if I didn't tell you this story before, please I'll

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:57.959
<v Speaker 6>tell you it now. It's my last is exactly are

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 6>the point were we're just on I've told one hundred times,

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 6>but I'll tell it now because it was. It was

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 6>literally the funniest thing that happened in the whole of

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 6>the twenty twenty four election cycle. To me that Saturday night.

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Anything funny happened to you during that anyway, go on yes.

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 6>Saturday night after the Republican Convention. You'll recall this weird

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 6>span of time where Trump assassination, attempt a convention in Milwaukee,

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 6>and then other things that happened immediately there after. So

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 6>the Saturday night after the Republican Convention ended on a

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 6>Thursday Saturday night, Dave Chappelle and John Stewart did a

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 6>comedy set at the kind of like a freends and

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 6>family show at the Apollo Theater at Harlem, and John

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 6>told this story in his set. He said to the crowd,

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, I just came back. I've been back on

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 6>six months. I've been getting a lot of crap from

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 6>Democrats because I came out at the very beginning it

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 6>said that both of these guys are told to be president.

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 6>And you know, it's been really hard for me because

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 6>how many people in the crowd have had someone in

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 6>their eighties who they've had to do something hard in

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 6>their family, you know, an uncle, a grandfather or a grandmother,

0:27:58.080 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 6>a mother, a father, or whatever, where they've had to

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 6>do something like take away their driver's license to their

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 6>car keys. Everyone's hand went up in the room and

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 6>Stuart said, you know, yeah, what happened with me with

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 6>my nana. My nana was in her nineties and we

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 6>had to take away a driver's license and it was

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 6>the hardest thing we'd ever done. It with the last

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 6>shred of her independence. She just like, look, was clinging

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.360
<v Speaker 6>to this one thing. She was kind of like, don't

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 6>take my driver's license. That's basically like putting me in

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 6>the grave. But my family rallied, We did the hard thing,

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 6>We had the hard conversations, and we finally got her

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 6>to give up her driver's license. It was really painful,

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 6>but it was the right thing to do, but it

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 6>was really painful, and you know, and then he said, now,

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 6>just imagine we were trying to do that with twenty

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 6>million people going. Let the bitch drive, Like that's how

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 6>it s felt with me and Joe Biden. Let the

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 6>bitch drive. That made me laugh and will make me

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 6>laugh forever.

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Let the bitch drive. Thank you, thank.

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 6>You, bye, mollie Ie.

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Tammy Baldwin is the junior Senator from Wisconson. Welcome to

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Fast Politics, Tammy Paldwin. It's great to be There's a

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>big beautiful bill. Is it called one big beautiful bill?

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that what it's called?

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 8>You know, if you're a billionaire, you might think so,

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 8>But this is good for the wealthy and bad for you.

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 5>And that's kind of what we're dealing with, right.

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 1>I would love you to explain to us where it is,

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>where it's going, and a little bit about sort of

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>how it's being put together right now.

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely.

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 8>So, the way they start the reconciliation process is they

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 8>tell all these committees in the House of Representatives, you

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 8>got to find some cuts here, or in some cases

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 8>they're saying you even have more money to spend here,

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 8>like for the tax breaks for the billionaires, right, And

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 8>so they instruct all these committees to do this, and

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 8>this week all the major committees that deal with big

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.719
<v Speaker 8>pieces of this are doing their work. So they are

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 8>looking at the medicaid budget, they are looking at the

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 8>agriculture budget and nutrition programs. They are looking at more

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 8>tax breaks they can get to corporations, and billionaires in

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 8>the various different.

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 5>Committees in the House, and that's happening this week.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>And the nutrition benefits that you're talking about, that's SNAP,

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that's supplemental nutritional assistance. So there's an eight hundred and

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty billion dollar cut to Medicaid and medicare right, talk

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>me through. That was like the top line number they

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>needed to pay for the tax cuts that are already

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:22.959
<v Speaker 1>in place.

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so let me tell you a little bit about that.

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 8>That was the instruction, the goal set for the Energy

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 8>and Commerce Committee in the House. I used to sit

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 8>on it, so I know a little is something about this,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 8>and so they have met their goal, or that's what

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 8>they are in the process of doing this week, by

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 8>cutting Medicaid about seven hundred and fifty billion dollars and

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 8>then making some other cuts, particularly some of the energy

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 8>things like clean energy tax credits. They've taken some pieces

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 8>out of other areas too. But let's talk about the

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 8>big one, Medicaid. We predict that somewhere close to fourteen

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 8>million people will lose their healthcare because of the cuts

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 8>that are being proposed this week. Some of those people

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 8>will lose their healthcare because of the work reporting requirements

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 8>that they are putting forward, which by the way, is

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:25.719
<v Speaker 8>just a scheme and I'll be happy to tell you

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 8>more about that later.

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 5>And the other big group.

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 8>Of people will lose their health insurance because Republicans have

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 8>turned away from a tax credit that helps people afford

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 8>their healthcare in the Affordable Care Act. This is a

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 8>really important premium tax credit that really makes healthcare super

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 8>affordable for those who otherwise would probably choose to go

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 8>without because they just couldn't afford the monthly premium.

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also sort of reason more money for

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the military. More money, give me the kind of breakdown

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of where it is.

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So the places where you will see more spending

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 8>according to Trump, priorities are the military, homeland security, and

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 8>of course they will allow the committees that deal with

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 8>tax policy to spend more in order to both continue

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 8>some of the Trump one point zero era tax cuts

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 8>for corporations and the wealthy, but also they are looking

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 8>seriously at adding some more tax cuts that benefit the

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 8>wealthy in America. And so those are sort of the

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 8>three major areas where you're seeing the committees freed up

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 8>to spend more money. In fact, they predict next year

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 8>that for the first time ever, the Defense Department will

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 8>spend over a trillion dollars. That is like unfathomable in

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 8>so many different ways. But in any event, they're cutting

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 8>everything else. But when you put everything else together, it

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 8>is much smaller. In order to achieve the type of

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 8>savings that they're talking about to pay for their tax

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 8>breaks for the wealthy, it would be.

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 5>Crippling to so many programs.

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 8>We talked about nutrition programs, snap in particular, Medicaid, et cetera.

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 5>And what I would say is that a lot of.

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 8>Republicans that I'm hearing from say quietly at this point,

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 8>but are uncomfortable with the deep cuts that are being

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 8>proposed for Medicaid. And I think if people keep doing

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 8>what they've been doing and speaking out and sharing their

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 8>stories and writing their particularly their Republican representatives, but write

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 8>all of us. But I think we can make some

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 8>headway in getting them to back off some of the

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 8>worst of their proposals.

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>So you've been in the Senate a while, you know

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.760
<v Speaker 1>all of these people. Clearly there has to be some

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>regret for letting these cabinet picks slide through. And you

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to tell me who. But I'm sure

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you know there are some good Republican senators right. They

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>may not agree with us, but they're good people, largely

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>who have gone into government service to serve and not

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to profit with the RFK stuff. I mean, are you

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing a little buyer's remorse here from some of these

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Republican senators.

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 8>Mollie, I want to answer this in a couple of

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 8>different ways. You're saying, I've served in the Senate a while,

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 8>I've served with some of these people. I want to

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.280
<v Speaker 8>tell you that a whole bunch of new Republican senators

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 8>that have been elected in the past couple of cycles,

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 8>and many of them are supercharged LAGA people, so you know,

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 8>I'm getting to know them, but they're not the ones

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 8>we're talking about. Absolutely, there are senators who are having

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 8>buyers remorse with regard to some of the confirmation votes

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 8>they've cast, also for the amount of cruelty and harm

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 8>this budget reconciliation process is teeing up. But I also

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 8>want to just mention one other thing that I that

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 8>I'm keeping in the back of my mind because you know,

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 8>every so often I have to be reminded of this

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 8>both in the House as they're trying to figure out

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 8>how to put together a majority to advance this reconciliation bill.

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 8>You have some who have said, and I'm not going

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 8>to call them moderates, these are just maybe more traditional

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 8>Republicans who have said, oh, some of these cuts go

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 8>a little too far, and then have this right flank

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 8>that says, we are not voting for any bill unless

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 8>you cut five trillion dollars out of domestic spending, because

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 8>we're not going to vote for a bill where the

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 8>tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations aren't completely paid for.

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 8>Now in the Senate, interestingly, my counterpart in the United

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 8>States Senate run Johnson has recently said the same thing.

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 5>He says he will.

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 8>Not vote for a measure where the tax breaks for

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 8>the wealthy and corporations are not fully paid for. And

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 8>so it makes for strange bedfellows, if you will that

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 8>there are folks who say, I'm not going to support

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 8>it because the cuts are too deep and it hurts

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 8>my constituents too badly. And you know, at the end

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 8>of the day, if it ends up being some super

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 8>right wingers who join with a couple of more traditional Republicans,

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 8>and then all the Democrats in opposing this.

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 5>Who knows what's going to happen, But we.

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 8>Have a lot of hard work to do between now

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 8>as we're speaking and the houses marking up all their

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 8>bills and the final votes in each House of Congress.

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 8>So got a lot of work on all of our

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 8>shoulders to make sure that we put a stop to

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 8>the cruelest and most harmful of these proposers.

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that's a really good and I

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.479
<v Speaker 1>mean we saw this with the tariffs, too, right. I

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 1>mean Rand Paul, who is hardly anyone's idea of a liberal,

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>is staunchly against the tariffs, and he turned out to

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>be a sort of ally there. I feel like what

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:16.919
<v Speaker 1>we've seen with Trump is that if you push back

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in a big, loud way, right, you get the attention

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>of a Laura Luhmer or someone like that, right, one

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of his people, for example, cutting these social safety net stuff.

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the kind of thing that there are populas

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:32.439
<v Speaker 1>in Trump's camp who don't like this kind of thing.

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm wondering, do you think that that's sort

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the play. And then also I want to add,

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>if this doesn't pass, what does that look like?

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 5>Boy? A lot of great questions there.

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 8>So I do think our most powerful tool is elevating

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.760
<v Speaker 8>the stories of the people who would be harmed by

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 8>the worst provisions. And for the last months we've been

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 8>trying to organize folks and uplift their stories, not knowing

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 8>exactly what shape or form the final cuts would take.

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 8>And this week is really the first week where we've

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 8>seen them put things into writing and now can assess

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 8>with much greater specificity, assuming they pass what's before them,

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 8>how it's going to harm people. And you know, when

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 8>you're talking about fourteen fifteen million people losing their healthcare,

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 8>that's something that as soon as that knowledge gets out,

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 8>we have a way of fighting back through the population.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 8>So first question is what happens in the House. We've

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 8>seen this before where the more traditional Republicans are at

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 8>a breakpoint with the right wing flank that is insisting

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 8>on massive cuts to government spending, as they say, so

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 8>they're going to have to work through that first, and

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 8>we'll see it in real time as it happens over

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 8>the next week or two, and that will be predictive obviously,

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 8>if they can't get their act together and can't do

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 8>it by Memorial Day, which is their goal. Then they'll

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.399
<v Speaker 8>take another stab at it when we get back after

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 8>the Memorial Day recess if they are able to come

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:15.760
<v Speaker 8>to some fragile agreement and send it over to the Senate. Again,

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 8>this is budget reconciliation, so they get around the filibuster.

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 8>It only takes a simple majority vote, and there we're

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 8>going to be working really hard to persuade both flanks

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 8>of that Republican caucus, the ones who won't vote for

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 8>it unless it's fully paid for, and the ones who

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 8>think that the proposals that are out there right now

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 8>are too cool and too harmful for our neighbors and

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 8>are willing to help us fight.

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>When you cut these programs like Medicare Medicaid, they will

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be larger things like closing of nursing homes and rural hospitals,

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>largely in red states where there's less state tax. There

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 1>are certainly Republican senators who understand this and what is

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>their feeling on this? So can you use this to

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>prevent it?

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 8>So I think the answer is yes. Really, until we

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 8>saw the specifics about the cuts they were intending, we

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 8>were organizing folks who rely on Medicaid in their families

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 8>because you know, they have a relative who's a senior

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 8>in a nursing home, and the majority of seniors in

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 8>nursing homes rely on Medicaid, or people who have, say

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 8>an adult child with significant disabilities, and they rely on

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 8>Medicaid for both services and healthcare. A third of all

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 8>children are on Medicaid. So we were elevating those stories.

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 8>But one of the points I was also trying to

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 8>draw out is there's a lot of people whose employment

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.439
<v Speaker 8>is paid for it by Medicaid. The people who work

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 8>in nursing homes, the people who work in rural critical

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 8>access hospitals, the people who work in nonprofits that serve

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 8>adults and children with severe disabilities.

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 5>All of those people their jobs.

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 8>Are there and part of their salaries come from the

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:08.800
<v Speaker 8>Medicaid program. And so I think because of the nature

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 8>of some of the specifics they're now proposing, we are

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 8>going to be able to get a whole new group

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 8>of people speaking out. Hospital administrators and nursing home administrators,

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 8>but also the frontline nurses and nurses assistants who provide

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 8>care every single day under very tough circumstances, you know,

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 8>because they're dedicated to the health and well being of

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:33.240
<v Speaker 8>their Naghbin.

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It would be malpractice if they did not ask you

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>about the plane. Donald Trump wants to take a four

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollar plane from the royal family of Qatar

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and use it as Air Force One. Cynthia Lumis was

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 1>asked about this. She's quite a trumpy Republican and she

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>burst out laughing, Yes, that's my question. Is me just

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>without speech?

0:41:57.640 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 8>I know? And there's so many different ways you can

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 8>respond to this. You know, this is corruption at its highest.

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it a violation of the emoluments cause?

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, But let me give you the anecdote that I

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:11.320
<v Speaker 8>just heard from a colleague.

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna I'm not gonna give you attributes.

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 8>To who it was, but it's like, would you let

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 8>the Katari royal family rebuild the White House situation room,

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 8>rebuild the press conference room, rebuild the Oval office, because

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:30.359
<v Speaker 8>that is what Air Force one is. It has all

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 8>of those things in it. This is so ridiculous. And

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 8>then the amount of money that it's going to take

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 8>to take out what the Kataris have installed in terms

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 8>of communications and security, et cetera, and replace it with

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 8>stuff that we know is secure and impenetrable. Is probably

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:55.320
<v Speaker 8>going to cost more than just waiting two more years

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 8>for the new air Force.

0:42:57.600 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Like the conversations I had with people who's taught me

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in this stream, how grid are you about securing the

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>midterms and having free and fair elections for the midterms,

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:09.360
<v Speaker 1>because this is the thing that a lot of people

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I know are word about.

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 8>So I'm looking at a whole bunch of things that

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 8>I think we've seen throughout history in the demise of

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 8>other democracies, are signs that something really bad is happening.

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 8>And part of it is election denial, trying to disenfranchise

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 8>parts of the electorate, trying to make it harder to

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:34.879
<v Speaker 8>vote in various ways. Part of it is corruption and

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:40.720
<v Speaker 8>the mass movement of taxpayer dollars to the very wealthy,

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 8>the oligarchs of a society, other types of corruption. There's

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 8>hallmarks of what happens when a democracy is in trouble.

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 5>And boy, I can tell you I see.

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 8>Action after action in this administration that overreach, that cross

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 8>those lines that make me very concerned, and we've got

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 8>to be vigilant about it.

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 5>At the same.

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 8>Time that we're fighting to make sure that our constituents

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 8>have access to healthcare and have access to nutrition programs.

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 5>We have to do it all, but we.

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.920
<v Speaker 8>Have the courts, we have the Congress when it acts,

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 8>we have our constituents who we are fighting alongside on

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.959
<v Speaker 8>all of these fronts, and that's how we are going

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 8>to push it.

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Things really get like a situation where you start to

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 1>really panic. Do you think that there are enough Republican votes?

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Because I think there are, but I'm not in there

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>enough for Publican votes to run a check on Trump

0:44:41.280 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>if he starts doing really out of the box staff.

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I do.

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:49.879
<v Speaker 8>I have heard a number of my Republican colleagues ask

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 8>a question that almost all of my Democratic colleagues have

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.919
<v Speaker 8>been asking, and that is, when faced with a law

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 8>that Congress has passed or a ruling of a court,

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 8>would you follow that law or follow that ruling over

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 8>an order from the Trump administration to the contrary? And

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:11.839
<v Speaker 8>I heard that question asked by a Republican colleague at

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:16.440
<v Speaker 8>a Commerce Committee hearing earlier this week, And I'm hearing

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:22.479
<v Speaker 8>increasingly Republicans saying to Trump nominees, there's only one right

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:26.399
<v Speaker 8>answer to this question. It's crossing a line too far.

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:26.839
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 8>Is that many of my Republican colleagues. No, but if

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 8>it's a simple majority vote, we only need four to

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 8>stand strong. If it's something that can be decided, you

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 8>know that has a subject to a filibuster, we need

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:42.319
<v Speaker 8>a few more.

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Tammy Baldwin, I am so delighted to get to have

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you on this podcast. I hope you will come back

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>because it's just you know, you are answering these questions.

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I ask these very nerdy questions because I'm like, so

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:56.320
<v Speaker 1>interested in the procedural, where I feel like most people

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 1>are not so interested in. I'd well, you're making them

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:04.879
<v Speaker 1>as this is crying, So please come back, senitor, Thank you.

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:13.800
<v Speaker 1>No moment fu Jesse Cannon smile.

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's say your Health and Human Services director has just

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:21.320
<v Speaker 2>gotten back from a nice swim and some sewage.

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:22.320
<v Speaker 1>In Rock Creek Park.

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Yes, what would you like the quote for them to

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 2>be at their next press conference? Because if I was

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 2>in the Trump administration, I don't think i'd want that

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 2>quote to be. I don't think people should be taking

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:38.800
<v Speaker 2>medical advice for me when you're in charge of medical policy.

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite things about RFK Junior is that

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>he really does seem like he doesn't know what is

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:54.279
<v Speaker 1>going on, You know what I mean, Like he really unhinged.

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Like he also said earlier this week that it's because

0:46:57.600 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump gets money.

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Remember that, Yes, yes, yes, we discussed that on the

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 2>last episode.

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so, I honestly think he's like still kind of

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat secret weapon, despite the fact that he is

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:15.239
<v Speaker 1>disassembling much of the federal government. Yeah no, I mean

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:19.840
<v Speaker 1>RFK Junior, this guy, you know, he is the guy

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:24.920
<v Speaker 1>who goes to the bathroom without wearing shoes on an xplane.

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 6>You're welcome.

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune in

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Saturday to hear the best

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:41.839
<v Speaker 1>minds and politics make sense of all this chaos. If

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this podcast, please send it to a friend

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and keep the conversation going. Thanks for listening.