WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: March 12th, 2026

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordernt. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App. Here's the view on

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street this morning. Keith Lenard of truest Rant in

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 2>the following, the bull market still deserves the benefit of

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>the doubt that we expect shoppy rangebound trading to persist

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 2>given the geopolitical bankdrop. Keith joins us now for more. Keith,

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 2>welcome to the program. Let's just get to that calm

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>in this secuity market. Compared to the tention elsewhere, what's

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>anchoring the bullish view?

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well for us, Good morning to yours. It's one

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>of those years, Jonathan, and I'm glad I didn't have

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 3>the headlines ahead of time writing the outlook because as

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned, we've had this kind of ongoing what I

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 3>call the carousel of concerns. Is one concern come or receives,

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 3>another one comes up, and obviously I ran as.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:14.279
<v Speaker 4>Front and center.

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 3>I think to your question, like, why is the market

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 3>somewhere stable?

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 4>Is you know, think about the.

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Last five years, everything the market has gone through, whether

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 3>it's you know, COVID, supply chain disruptions, the fastest rate

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 3>increased by the FED since the eighties, the highest inflation

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 3>since the seventies, and despite all that, the market is

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 3>still close to all time highs. And I think the

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>north star of this full market has been earnings. Earnings

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 3>at this point are still trending higher. And I think

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 3>to my overall point, I think investors are giving this

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 3>full market the benefit of the doubt because we've seen

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>so many corrections, and the wrong thing to do historically

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>during these big events at the time was ultimate to sell.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's why the market is being somewhat

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 3>come I'd actually like to see a little bit more

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 3>patent to set up a better buying opportunity relative to

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 3>where we are right now.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Steve Path the federated to Hermes yesterday came on and

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>said that when oil prices get on average above ninety

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars a barrel, that would change his constructive view because

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>would start to do damage to the underlying economy.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 4>Do you have a.

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 1>Thesis like that where suddenly you start to get more

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the cycle of the economy right now?

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know that there's an exact number, per se,

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 3>but you know, we do follow a way of the

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 3>evidence approach.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Part of that is on the economy.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 3>So if our economic group in general starts to shave

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 3>back our forecast, that would be a concern. You know,

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 3>we look at relative prices, we look at the credit markets,

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 3>and I think those earning trends and earnings momentum in general,

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 3>all things that we're watching closely to say, hey, should

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 3>we be adjusting our overall position right now? We still

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 3>maintaining a modest overweight to equities. But we also wrote

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 3>a note earlier this week, you know, suggesting that this

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 3>is not the time we haven't had enough of a

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 3>correction relative to the risk to say this is a

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, some type of buying opportunity. And you know

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 3>what's also notable is look at the indexes relative you know,

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 3>as Jonathan alluded to, like the Act, we our global

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 3>equities are still up about a percent, the S and

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 3>P's down one percent, the US dollars up one percent.

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 4>So if you didn't have the headlines, you thought you

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 4>would think this.

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Is kind of a normal, kind of uneventful year.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I'm just struck by the fact that people

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have been conditioned to buy the dip and they have

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a conditioned year after year after year, partly because there

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is a policy response that can be delivered. Right twenty

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty we got what we got from the FED as

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>well as the bazooka from the federal government. Twenty twenty two,

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>there was a sense that also there was going to

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be some response and there was more momentum in the economy.

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Is there that same policy lever this time around.

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's an open question.

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, a lot of debate right now is you know,

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>it looks like the administration may be looking for an

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>offern but it may not be fully up to them,

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 3>because I obviously the Iranians have a lot to do

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 3>with this as well. But I do think big picture

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 3>that you know, there is a focus from the administration

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 3>and then also China you know, there's a lot of

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 3>China's imports go through the Strait as well, so you know,

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 3>it may not just be US, it may be China

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 3>as well. So I think ultimately there is likely some

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>type of off ramp, and that doesn't mean that some

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 3>of the volatility and intentions go away. But listen, the

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 3>administration is focused we all know as the midterm elections.

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 3>I do think there's going to be some things they

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>can do, but obviously it's different than the terrorists where

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 3>they can basically just step away themselves as other partners

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 3>that they have to rely on.

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 5>But Keith, how do you parse through what the administration

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 5>is saying? Yesterday the President told Axios there's practically nothing

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 5>left to target and Iran, and then last night at

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 5>a speech he said, we don't want to leave early, right,

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 5>So the president is opening the door for a prolonged

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 5>conflict to what they before they would decide that it

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 5>is mission complete.

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, the one thing I would you be thinking about.

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, obviously, as you look at even consumer confidence

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 3>serves over time and inflation expectations, they correlate very highly

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 3>with gas prices. So I just think, again, no one

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 3>knows exactly how long, what the pain threshold is. But ultimately,

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, high gas prices isn't going to be helpful

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 3>going into a midterm election. So I think that's going

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.679
<v Speaker 3>to be front end center. And I mean the open

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 3>question that no one can really say is does that

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 3>mean the threshold is you know, two weeks, you know,

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 3>two months?

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 4>It's hard to say.

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 3>But I think ultimately, just like there was a focus

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 3>last year about hey, if a ten year treasury starts

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 3>going about four fifty four seventy five, there's really a

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 3>more increased focus and even more headlines that are dropping

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 3>from the administration, I.

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Think well likely would see that as well.

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Again, if oil stayed elevated at these levels and we

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 3>started this continue to see some of the polling data deteriorate.

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Keith, help me understand this one. We've had a major

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 2>move and crude by more than thirty percent so far

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>this month alone, and of repricing further out the curve

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 2>as well, and yet Keith and G Equities a runbinded

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 2>a more than one percent and she stucks on the

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 2>s and P five hundred have barely moved off the

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 2>back of this story.

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 4>What gives Yeah, Well, for one thing, that.

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Energy stocks had a big had a big rise going

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 3>into this, So I think that's one thing. I think overall,

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>the energy market is still relatively constructive. And there's also

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, some of the cost structure within the energy

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 3>complex will also go high, So there's some offices I

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 3>think all of me though, you know, the energy sector

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 3>on pullbacks is actually relatively attractive after not doing anything

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 3>for several years. But again cutting into this whole you know,

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 3>this whole tension, we saw the energy sector being among

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 3>the top sectors for the.

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 4>Year, and same with gold.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 3>Gold went into this being up about forty percent, you know,

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 3>year to date. So I think that's just kind of

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 3>the reason why we haven't seen more of these moves

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 3>in both energy and gold prices per se.

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Stay with US Multilemberg surveillance coming up after this. Brent

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 2>creag right now ninety six, Brent briefly toping one hundred

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 2>after more tank is were attanked in the Persian Gulf.

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>The IEA the war is causing the biggest ever disruption

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 2>to the market as it gives up for its largest

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>emergency release ever cohidly out of rightst energy rights, and

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the key variable is the duration of the war. If

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 2>it lasts two months, price it could pick at one fifteen.

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>If it goes on for four months, they could reach

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>one thirty five. Koha joins us now for more. Oh, hey,

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 2>we almost hit once Wednesday on Sunday evening a rope

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>pad self.

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Now, I think so.

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 6>I think it really depends on the on the duration,

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 6>and at least I correctly mentioned the idea of sporting vessels.

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 6>I think right now we don't see any progress there.

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 6>So at the end of the day, this really comes

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 6>down to mass. The straight over moves around ten million

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 6>barrels per day that we think are going to be

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 6>closed because of the of the of the.

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Of the situation.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 6>Sbr's four hundred million barrels that is not going to

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 6>upset any any upside press pressure that we're seeing right now.

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 4>And interestingly, when.

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 6>The announcement of the four hundred million barrels was done,

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 6>prices barely reacted because I think that the market already

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 6>assumed that something going to happen. But last time that

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 6>we saw spr's being released was in March twenty twenty

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 6>two in the middle of the Russia Ukraine War. And

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 6>back then when the announcement was made. Prices failed by

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 6>five dollars per viral right now they didn't. And this

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 6>really shows how important, how critical the situation is at

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 6>the moment.

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, hey, we've seying production bank cup, You've seeing certain

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 2>shot sains taking place in certain places. Restarting from there

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 2>isn't necessarily painless, And I wonder from your perspective, what

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of damage we're already doing to supply chains.

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 6>That's the key supply chain. I mean, you really hit

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 6>the supply chain. And more importantly, from the geology point

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 6>of view, the moment that you shut in production, you

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 6>are changing the pressure of the reservoir and that could

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 6>potentially damage your reservoir forever. So we think that coming

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 6>back to to you know, normal production states, state production

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 6>is not a matter of days, is essentially a matter

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 6>of weeks, if not months.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 4>So yes, the straight Orf almost could be reopened tomorrow.

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 6>It will take a few weeks to clear up all

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 6>the logistic backlock. But then you also have the problem

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 6>of rumping up production again. In some countries, especially Iraq,

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 6>might have severe problems doing that.

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 4>In response to higher.

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Oil prices, You've seen a lot of flights that have

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>neither canceled, the prices of the tickets go up substantially.

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>You've seen mandates to use either car pooling or bike

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to work in certain places, particularly in Southeast Asia. How

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>much demand destruction have you already started to see a merge?

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Excellent point.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 6>I think that the man destruction is one of the

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 6>important leavers that how the market is going to react.

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 6>We've seen during March to start the conflict, around one

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 6>point four million barrels per day of the man destruction.

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 4>That is quite quite significant.

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 6>One point four million barrels per day initially aviation and

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 6>now gradually that impact is going to be translated into

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 6>transport fuels and heating oil. And if the conflict lasts

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 6>for longer, then we are probably going to see a

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 6>refueling of inflation, which could change the attitude of central

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 6>banks around the world. To give you a data point,

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 6>before the war, we thought that oil demand was going

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 6>to grow by one million barrels per day. Even the

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 6>war extends for around four months, let's say oil demand

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 6>growth is cut down to just four hundred thousand barrels

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 6>per day.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 4>So that's really showing you.

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 6>How important the demand destruction could be in the coming

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 6>days and weeks.

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 1>One of the other leavers Orge is more production from

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>other areas that aren't as affected, like Russia. Do you

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>have a sense of how much more Russia is earning

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>as a result of higher energy prices, in the fact

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's actually increasing production to help meet the needs

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of its allies like China.

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 6>Sure, we've seen the waivers that India received to continue

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 6>inputting Russian could. Before the sanctions, Russia was exported around

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 6>one point six million barrels per day to India. Then

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 6>last numbers before the war was around eight hundred thousand

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 6>barrels per day, so quite a significant decrease, and.

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 4>With the waivers, think that there's a little bit of.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 6>An upside potential around one point two medium barrels per day.

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 6>But importantly, there's a lot of Russian oil right now

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 6>in offshore storage. So the fact that India is going

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 6>to be able to increase its purchases of Russian could

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 6>does not directly mean that Russia could start bumping up more.

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 6>I think what it means is that the offshore storage

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 6>will be gradually clear up and going forward, we think

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 6>that the upside potential for Russia is actually quite limited.

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 6>No more than two hundred three hundred thousand barrals per day.

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 6>Apart from that, you don't really have much reaction in

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 6>the very short term. Yes, shale can react, but that

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 6>is something towards the end of the year and again

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 6>very limited.

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't think more than three hundred thousand barrels per day.

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 5>There was a report even just this morning about Indian

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 5>oil purposes from Russia increase by nearly forty five percent

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 5>in March. So basically, does Russia just get back their

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 5>entire export capacity that they had in India before the

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 5>United States started putting pressure on your.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 6>DELI probably yes. Now the big question there is what

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 6>happens when the war ends. Will those waivers expire at

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 6>among those waivers are supposed to expire at the end

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 6>of April. Now, when the war ends, will those sanctions

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 6>be put back into place or not? And my hunch

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 6>here is that once you lift the waivers, once you

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 6>lift the sanctions, it is pretty difficult to go back

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 6>and implement in them again.

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 5>I remember when the Red Sea was shot basically for months,

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 5>and tankers and cargo ships didn't want to go through

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 5>it because it was going on with the who thies

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 5>even if the United States Jorge is able to reopen

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 5>the Strait of Hormuz, when we'll go back to quote

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:39.359
<v Speaker 5>unquote normal.

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 6>That's the key variable here. I don't think that, first

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 6>of all, the scenario of the US is coating vessels.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 6>We don't see appetite from shipping companies to take that

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 6>option at all right now. The mechanism is still not

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 6>in place, and we don't think that this.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Is likely to happen anytime soon.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 6>So to me, the only way forward for this street

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 6>door foremost to be reopened east through two channels, regime

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 6>chinch which at the moment doesn't seem very visible, and

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 6>the other one needs to through US fire.

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 2>Stay with US. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this.

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 2>So here's the lass this morning. Crude climbing even as

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 2>President Trump vows the lower prices with a massive release

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 2>from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Lebby cancel a PIMCO

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 2>with this to say, the longer this conflict plays out,

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 2>the more ugly the political environment may become. Lebby John's

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 2>surround the table, let me good morning, it's going to

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 2>see you. What do you make of the policy response

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 2>so far? Yeah, so I think.

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.599
<v Speaker 7>I mean, the expectation was that there would be a

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 7>dramatic release from the strategy petroleum reserve, and of course

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 7>that's what we have seen. I do think that, as

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 7>your previous guests have pointed out, that is only so effective.

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 7>In terms of other tools, the president is pretty limited.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 7>There are obviously Russian sanctions that he can tweak with

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 7>a little bit of that last week export controls that's

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 7>really an extreme, some modifications or exemptions to the Jones Act.

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 7>But outside of this is sort of all nibbling around

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 7>the edges in terms of really addressing the what it

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 7>looks like maybe one hundred dollars oil and of course

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 7>then the price of gas, which is really the issue politically, domestically.

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 7>And this is exactly the opposite of what Republicans plan

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 7>was for twenty twenty six. It was going to be

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 7>all about affordability. It was going to be pushing their agenda,

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 7>even if maybe they weren't able to get things done,

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 7>they were going to be at least rhetorically talking about it.

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 7>And now that's been completely kind of undermined by this.

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 5>We came into the new year with the White House

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 5>squarely focused on affordability. How do they change their message

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 5>now going into the summer and going to the midterms

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 5>where it's clear the House likely is going to flip.

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 5>But I'm talking to people who think that there is

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 5>a chance Republicans lose the Senate.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So, I mean again, I think this is sort

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 7>of their their sort of best laid plans here, have

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, gone a bit of rye. I mean, I

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 7>think what the hope is is that this is going

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 7>to be able to be finished right going into the

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 7>summer months now. Of course, I mean it's it sounds

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 7>sort of flippid, but you know, wars or conflicts are

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 7>easy to start, much much harder to finish, particularly given

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 7>the complexity of this of this region. So you know

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 7>that intention, of course, may not be realized. I do

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 7>think though, just you know, again, you saw a little

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 7>bit of this yesterday with President Trump trying to get

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 7>back onto that sort of affordability you know mantle. But again,

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 7>I mean people you know, voters are are or not

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 7>I'm not stupid, right, they see what's happening. The price

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 7>of the p I just can't reinforce this enough because

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 7>if you go back to spring of twenty twenty two,

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 7>and you had, you know, almost five dollars oil June

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 7>of twenty twenty two. The president's approval reading President Biden

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 7>at that point, I mean, it took a huge hit.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 7>And they're basically inversely correlated. If you look at the

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 7>graph of a presidential approval rating versus the price of gas,

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 7>these things, you know, gas and groceries. People really care

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 7>about these kitchen table issues, and so you know, people

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 7>may not be paying attention to exactly what's happening from

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 7>a foreign policy perspective and in terms of some maybe

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 7>the wins that the US may ultimately achieve, but they

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 7>really do care about the price of the pump. And

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 7>this is going to be a big, a big headwind

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 7>going into the.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 5>And Biden was then forced to abandon another foreign policy priority,

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 5>which was to make Saudi Arabia or Muhammed ben Salmon

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 5>a Priya, and he actually went to Jetta. When it

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 5>comes to potentially what the US is going to have

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 5>to or the Ministration is going to have to have

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 5>Congress for is their appetite for more or defense spending

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 5>going to the maternal This.

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 7>Is going to be a very difficult vote, I think,

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean that what it looks like is that the

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 7>White House is preparing what's called the supplemental package. You know,

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 7>could be fifty billion dollars, could be more. Honestly, just

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 7>given sort of the pace of spending and the extent

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 7>of the conflict, they will probably you know, as Anne Marinos,

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 7>they usually like to add sweeteners in order to get

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 7>that sixty votes.

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 3>That's what they need.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 7>In the Senate, Republicans only have fifty three votes right now,

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 7>so you kind of by definition you need eight Democrats

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 7>because Paul will probably vote against it. It will be a

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 7>very difficult vote, and it just means that more deficit spending,

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 7>right it means that we could see a supplemental and

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 7>sort of the one hundred billion dollar range, you know, potentially.

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 7>So I think it's going to be a very very

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 7>tricky vote, you know. I think going back though to

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 7>your excellent point though about the Senate, and this is

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 7>something we've been looking at. Two big indicators going into

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 7>the midterm elections that sort of have correlated with previous

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 7>election outcomes. One is just called the generic ballot, sort

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 7>of the general view of one party over another, and

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 7>the other's an enthusiasm gap. How enthusiastic are one set

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 7>of voters over another, and you know, the generic ballot,

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 7>it's sort of plus five for Democrats. That's sort of

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 7>like pointy to a fine night. Probably the House flipping,

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 7>but Republicans keeping the Senate. The enthusiasm gap, however, that

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 7>is suggesting a wave of election, and so that is

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 7>just those are just two variables to sort of look

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 7>at as we go into the midterm election. But to

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 7>your point, I think that the conventional wisdom Republicans would

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 7>keep the Senate because of that challenging map. For Democrats

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.959
<v Speaker 7>that could be thrown out the window again the longer

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 7>this persists.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>The Iron War has definitely taken a lot of the

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>energy of everyone's agendas recently, but the government's still impartial shutdown,

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and if you want to travel, not only is it

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>going to cost you more because of higher oil prices,

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but also the lines are going to take you potentially

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>substantially longer because TSA agents are not showing up.

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 4>What are they going to get reopened?

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, this is I think fault on both sides, honestly,

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 7>and Republicans and Democrats you can probably say that about

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 7>a lot on Washington.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 4>These days, you.

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 7>Know, and again, the people's view of Congress just in general,

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 7>it's like at you know, all time lows, and this

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 7>is just going to make them more angry, right, I

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 7>mean this again, and this is just if you the

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 7>way to sort of disenfranchise voters is to like make

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 7>things that used to be more convenient less convenient. So again,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 7>price of the price of gas, now if you can afford,

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, an airplane ticket, which is obviously going to

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 7>be higher now, making you in a way in line.

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 7>So you know, I think we all hope that there

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 7>is some resolution, but it does feel a little bit

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 7>intractable because of what Democrats want on the ice.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 7>I think that politically speaking, if you look at sort

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 7>of the breakdown of President Trump's approval readings, one issue

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 7>where he did consistently pull above water was on immigration,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 7>and that has changed over the last three months. And

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 7>you were already seeing this this pivot away from some

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 7>of this more the stronger rhetoric about deportations to kind

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 7>of a softer Jetlar immigration approach, and so you could

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 7>actually I think you could sort of see the White

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 7>House trying to kind of come to a deal on

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 7>this on immigration to sort of maybe pivot some of

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 7>that that more draconian.

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Right I turn around is crazy there.

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Survendments podcast, bringing you the best

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, and geopolitics. You can watch the show

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on the

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.