WEBVTT - POTUS Rips Mr. Never Trumper

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. Why didn't Muller make

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the call? Why did he defer? And is trying to

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>now hand it off to Congress for impeachment while the

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Barr has an answer for us that I

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>think sheds a lot of light on what's really at

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>work here. Plus should Facebook have to take down a

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>video that's mean about Nancy Pelosi? Journalists and of course

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>democrats thing? So we got that and more coming up

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>on The Buck Sexton Show. Buck SEXTONSI decoding the news

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Mag no mistake, American,

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>You're a great American. Again. This is the Buck Sexton

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>shows Analysts, I can speak for three hours without a

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>phone call. Try doing that some time. It is book Sexton.

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>No council yesterday makes that statement. He analyzed eleven instances

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>where there were possible obstruction and then said that he

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>really could make a decision. Do you agree with that interpretation?

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I personally felt he could have reached the decision. In

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>your view, he could have reached a conclusion. Right, he

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>could have reached a conclusion. The opinion says you can

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>at indict a president while he's in office, but he

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>could have reached a decision as to whether it was

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>criminal activity. But he had his reasons for not doing it,

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>which he explained, and I'm not going to argue about

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>those reasons. But when he didn't make a decision, the

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein and I felt it was

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>necessary for us as the heads of the department, to

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>reach that decision. Well, I mean, he seemed to suggest

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>yesterday that there was another venue for this, and that

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>was Congress. Well, I'm not sure what he was suggesting,

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>but the Department of Justice doesn't use our power of

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>an investigating crime as an adjunct to Congress. Welcome to

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the buck Sexton Show. Most important takeaway from today about

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>this whole post Muller press conference mess is what was

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>just said there by Bar which you've heard me say

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>many times before. I'm surprised there that he very well,

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>he being Muller, could have and should have said whether

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there was a crime committed. There's a difference between we

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>believe a crime was committed here and therefore are bringing

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>charges and what you know what Muller did, which was

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to just pretend like he couldn't even say that we

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>think the law was broken. Why is it better for him?

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>How is it more fair to the president to make

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this say, well, somebody else can decide whether the law

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was broken. Well, let's give it to Congress to decide

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>with the law is broken. That's not That's not what

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Mueller was set up to do. That wasn't the mandate.

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't run Democrat oppo research to the tune of

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>tens of millions of dollars for two years and then

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>we'll decide what we're going to do with it in

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>time for the election. That's that was never the mandate.

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 1>But Muller treats that like it is the mandate. Why Well,

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>because he is part of the get Trump chorus. He

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is somebody that is opposed to this president and wants

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to finish off his presidency. He probably thinks he's righteous

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in doing so. He thinks that this is helpful to

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the country. He's doing a great public service by wounding

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's chances of reelection, and he thinks this is

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the right thing to do. Meanwhile, you and I sit

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>here and say the president was put through this hell

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>based on a lie, based on a conspiracy theory fabricated

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>by angry Democrats sore losers who can handle the fact

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that there was a repudiation of their politics and a

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>repudiation of their sense of their own importance in the

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen election, and that Queen Hillary was not going

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to reign overall, they couldn't process it and handle like

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>normal people. So what they do They had to come

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>up with this an alternate reality and then try to

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>voice that alternate reality and the rest of us. The

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.239
<v Speaker 1>President colluded with Russia. He did all this terrible stuff

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>through such a bad bad man, and Mueller will let

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this thing go on and on and on, and his team,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>of his team of anti Trump Democrats came up with

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a perfect way to give maximum political benefit, which is

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>what this was always about, maximum political benefit to the Democrats.

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Make it so that the only way there can be

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>a real final answer, a final decision on this is

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>through the Congress, which the Democrats just happened to have

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a majority of votes in. Let me tell you this,

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I do not believe that mul Or would have deferred

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in this way of Republicans had a majority, because then

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>he knows they would have never been an impeachment lingering

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in the background. With all of this and the reasoning

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>for Mueller not saying there was a criminal charge is

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>he laid out or what was it ten or eleven?

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>I think it was ten, but some people have been

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>saying eleven recently, ten different instances where there could have

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>been obstruction. We were past the Russia collusion fairy tale,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least in terms of charges against the president,

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but these ten possible obstruction if he hones in on one,

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and then we really look at that, and then there's

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the competing legal analyzes of whether or not that's truly obstruction,

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and the preponderance of the evidence or of the majority

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of people hearing it at least don't believe that it

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>was obstruction, and then then that's case closed and it's

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>all over with. Much better to let this thing just linger,

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just like the Muller investigation itself was meant to linger.

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Go on. The processes, the punishment. Now the process it's

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>gone from the Mueller probe itself to the process of

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the congressional should we or shouldn't we impeach him? This

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is all it is. It's it's narrative building, it's dirty politics.

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>It's meant to harm this president and undermine the chances

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of his reelection. That's all this has been about from

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>day one. There is no good faith, there is no

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>honesty or integrity in this from the Democrats. It's the

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is an utter disgrace. But we have to

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>keep fighting because if we don't, they will. But I

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>do want an answer. I want Muller on the stand.

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I want Democrats to have to defend Muller when he

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>won't answer the question about why didn't you just say

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>whether a crime was committed? Because if the answer is

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>that even Mueller doesn't really know if a crime was committed,

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>then then there wasn't a crime. If a seasoned prosecutor

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>who is in charge of the most politically explosive investigation

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly since the Clinton era and probably since Watergate, if

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that guy isn't sure there's a crime, then you're darned

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>sure that nobody else out there could reasonably say that, yeah,

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a crime. But so he didn't say that

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>left it open, Better leave it vague. We'll get more

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>political mileage out of it, more damaging to Trump. Gives

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>all these people in the Democrats side and on the

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>left all this leeway, all this room to run. Well,

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you know the president. We think he probably obstructed, but

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we got to talk more about this. Let's talk more

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>about obstruction. It's just a giant propaganda fight. They know that,

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we're going to be waiting into. Anyway,

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Muller should have said crime or no, crime doesn't mean

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that there had to be charges. He should have said it.

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>He didn't because he is a dishonest anti Trump hack.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And I will say it because it is true. Anny

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy's gonna join me to talk about this in a

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Plus, we've got a whole lot more stuff

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>coming your way. Stay with me, now, Russian did not

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>help me get elected. You know who got me elected.

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.679
<v Speaker 1>You know who got me elected. I got me elected.

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Russia didn't help me at all. Russia, if anything, I

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>think help the other side. What you want to ask

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is this, do you think the media helped Hillary Clinton

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>get elected? She didn't make it. But you take a

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>look at collusion between Hillary Clinton and the media, you

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>take a look at collusion between Hillary Clinton and Russia.

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>She had more to do in the campaign with Russia

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>than I did. I had nothing to do. That's true.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Nobody ever seems to focus in on this This is

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>one area where I keep asking the various libs that

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I have to debate on all the Russia collusion hoax nonsense,

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>keep saying, you know, if foreign interference in the election

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is some terrible, unpardonable sin, then what do we make

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>of Christopher Steele, a foreigner get paid by the campaign

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>or by the DNC on behalf of Hillary's campaign to

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>use foreign subsources Russians, to compile a dossier and then

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>run that dossier to the intelligence community and to the

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>American press. Let's understand that that a standard that was

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>set up by the media in all of this was

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that just the the meeting at Trump Tower, the possible

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>acceptance of opposition research or opposition information OPO if it

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 1>comes from a foreigner, that's illegal. They were saying, it's

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a it's a campaign finance violation. I mean, this is

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just they're just making this stuff up as they go along.

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Never mind the fact that if as I as I've

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>told you before, Let's say that in that meeting with

0:09:53.840 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Vezo Niitskaya and Maniford Jared Kushner U. Let's say that

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>at that meeting, the vesilan Sky had provided information that

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton was laundering millions of dollars from her ridiculous access,

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>selling speeches through a Russian bank. Would would that have been?

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that information that the Trump campaign should ignore? No,

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>of course not that that would be information that very

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>much should be a part of the discussion of who

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>should be the next leader of the free world. It

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>would be. It's incumbent on a campaign to look through

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the information they have, to take information about the opponent

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and try to capitalize on that. That's what the whole

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>game is. But they set up the standard we're just

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>taking information from a foreigner was automatically some not just

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>unethical behavior, but was criminal. That's what they're saying. It

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>was criminal. And yet we know it is a matter

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of record. It is a matter of fact that they

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>did this on the Hillary Clinton side, that they took

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>information from foreigners, that they use that information to try

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to take down the Trump campaign and even passed it

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on to the FBI and made its way to the

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>intelligence community. Isn't that information? Isn't that a thing of

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>value under their own? But see, the standards that they

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>set up are all temporary. The narratives that they use

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in order to attack the president. Are you can't take

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>them and and flip it around on the other side

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>no matter what the facts are, because it's not about

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>what's right and wrong, it's about what damages President Trump.

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's keep this in mind. Is today there was a whole, oh,

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole flurry of freak out over Trump deleting a tweet.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's here's what he tweeted out. Russia, Russia, Russia. That's

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>all you heard at the beginning of this witch hunt hoax.

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>do with Russia helping me to get elected. It was

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a crime that didn't exist. So now the DEM's in

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>their partner, the fake news media, say he fought back

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>again this phony crime that didn't exist, this horrendous false accusation,

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and he shouldn't fight back, he should just sit back

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and take it. Could this be obstruction? No, Muller didn't

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>find obstruction either, presidential harassment. Now. I think that everything

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that Trump is saying in this tweet, by the way,

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is true. But what did they what did the press,

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the anti trumpers, the left, what they what they hone

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>in on? Right away? Russia has disappeared because I had

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>he wrote. They're saying, oh, well, see, now he's admitting

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>that Russia helped him to get elected. No, what he's

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>saying is that he had nothing to do with the

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>narrative that they have been pushing, which is that Russia

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>helped him to get elected. Now, did Russia try to

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>help him? I'm sure? I mean, do I think that

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they use their social media accounts to advance Trump at

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the expensive Hillaryah, But it didn't matter the moment you

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>put this into any kind of im text and add

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>just a tiny bit of perspective to it, it is

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>quite clear that there's no conceivable way that the minuscule

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Russian Facebook advisor or releasing information about Bernie Standers and

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton. We already knew all this about Hillary more

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>or less. We already knew the fix was in against Bernie.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Didn't didn't tell us. This wasn't some earth shattering revelation.

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't all of a sudden Oh my gosh, I

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>loved Hillary before, but now that I found out about Bernie.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not, absolutely not. But they're saying, oh, he's admitting

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>that Russia helped him to get elected, and that's why

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he deleted this. You know, the president's tweeting, I generally

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>find him using. He does open himself up though to

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>some some problems sometimes, but look, there's always a risk,

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>there was a risk in any communication of miscommunication or

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of missing the mark with what the point is that

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to make. And the President sometimes his tweets

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>are spot on and they're fantastic and I really can't

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>get enough of it. And yeah, times you see that

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a president who can be a little bit,

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a loose cannon. Sometimes that's that's

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a true thing. He can be a loose cannon. That

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is a reality. But the Russia collusion thing, it's still here.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>We are, after the Mueller probe finishes, after all the

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we've been through, you still have Democrats who,

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>most of the Democratic Party, clings to this. They act

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>like it's true. They are impervious to facts. They do

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>not allow, they do not allow information that has contrad

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>this narrative to seep into their minds and change their

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking on anything. It's just still far too comfortable and

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>far too comforting for Libs to believe that Donald Trump

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>cheated and that that's how he won, and that we're

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not for Trump cheating. There would never have been a

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump presidency. And you'll you cannot convince them otherwise,

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you cannot. We've got I know, I've been talking about

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>bar and his very important comm that basically Mueller is

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>full of it. Muller's full of it, and Mueller is

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>not has not been a good guy in this process,

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>has shown us who he really is. And we should

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>understand that all this stuff about how Mueller is like

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the last honest man in America was just propaganda that

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the Left was thrown out there because they really, they

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>really wanted they wanted to believe it. They wanted as

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>many people as possible to buy into it because it

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>just would have given more power to whatever charge Mueller

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>did go with. But because he didn't go with charges,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, we've learned even more about his motives.

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>We've learned even more about who he is and what

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to do here, which is that this was

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>all this was all men as a handoff to the

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Congress for impeachment. It's not Mueller's job, it's not his prerogative.

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you have these these partisan players that

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>were at the top of the US law enforce in

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>pure oxy for a long time, Kobe and Mueller, and

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>these are not people that should have had the powers

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>they did. They should not be trusted, They should not

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>be treated like these paragons are virtue because they're partisans, Folks.

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Andy McCarthy's up next. Why didn't he investigate Struck and

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Paige at McCabe and called me and all the lies

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and brand him and the lives. Why didn't comb me

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>come clean? Why didn't Colly come clean and say the

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>things that he knows are fact? Why didn't Muller investigate

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>combing his best friend? President fighting back here, folks, doesn't

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>like to take this stuff lying down? What should we

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>make of you know, the aftermath after Muller's press conference,

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and now we're waiting for this IG report. Andy McCarthy's

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>with us now, Andy, great to have you, obviously, Andy's

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>from National Review and Fox News. What did you meet?

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I really want to ask you this yesterday, but we

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>got you today. This press conference that Muller put on there,

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>What the heck was that? Well? I think Buck that

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>he was probably unhappy with the way that he was

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>criticized after the report came out for not deciding the

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>one thing that he was even arguably needed to decide.

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there should have been a special counsel

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>at all, But even if you if you think there

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>should have been one, by the time he got the case,

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this is mainly an impeachment investigation. I think collusion went

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 1>by the boards pretty quick. So the one thing he

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>was arguably needed for is to decide whether the president

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>obstructed justice, and he didn't decide it. So he got

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of criticism for that, I think rightly so,

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's not happy about it. So he's out there

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to number one, explain himself. But number two, Buck,

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I think this was always an impeachment investigation, and I

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>think his parting shot going out the door was to

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>try to make it clear that that was the way

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>he saw it. What do you make of bars comments

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that there was nothing stopping Muller from saying, yeah, no

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>laws were broken here, But the DJ guidance is that

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 1>we can't bring charges. That's been my take on this

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>all along. But am I missing something? No, you're absolutely right.

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>The prosecutor's job, there's two levels that we need to

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about this. The prosecutor who's assigned to the case,

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and then there's the supervision and the special counsel regulations

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.719
<v Speaker 1>buck are designed to make the relationship between the special

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>counsel and the Attorney General pretty much the analogous to

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>any relationship between an assistant US Attorney and the US

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Attorney or his supervisor in a US Attorney's office. So

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>what happens is the line prosecutor who is investigating the

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>case comes to a conclusion about whether there's enough evidence

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to charge or not, and then you bring that to

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>your supervisor, who number one decides yes or no, I

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>agree with you about whether there's enough evidence to charge,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and number two, whether there are any institutional or policy

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>reasons who are not going forward. And that's not to

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>say that those can't be flagged by the line prosecutor.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>But the line prosecutor's job is to decide do we

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>have a case or not? And if the Justice Department

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>as an institution at that point, if you have a case,

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>so you think you have a case, wants to jump

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in and say yes, but we have these policies that

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>don't enable us to bring the case, then that's the

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department's call. But there was no reason either why

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Muller couldn't or shouldn't have made the bottom line call.

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And the claim that you couldn't evaluate the sufficiency of

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the sidence because there was this guidance against indicting a

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>sitting president is absurd, I would point out to people,

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and I have been trying to point out to people.

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Notice the guidance buck doesn't say that the president can

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>never be indicted. It simply says that a sitting president

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>can't be indicted, which means at some point he can

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.959
<v Speaker 1>be charged. So somebody has to decide that. And what

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Mueller seems to be saying is it shouldn't be the

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>guy who just spent two years investigating it. What is

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>supposed to happen when when Trump is out of office?

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Are we supposed to have another two year investigation at

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that point where the prosecutor who's actually going to make

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the decision that he's charged. To me, I mean, that's absurd.

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So you don't even think and I mean this is

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>again I've taken this position for days here on the show,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's not even really a good It seems to

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>me like Muller's not operating in good faith here. That's

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>he's playing politics, and his whole justification for why he

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't make the call doesn't hold up. Yeah, well, I

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think Buck, that's not only exactly true, it's obvious if

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you look at the record of what happened here. Let

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>me make two points because they're a little bit schemy,

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>but but I think it's important to understand in my view,

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>this is what happened here. Number one, the reliance on

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>The best you can say from Maller is that the

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>reliance on the Office of Legal Counsel guidance that a

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>sitting president may not be indicted is something he settled

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>on at the last minute, long after he decided not

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>to decide. And the reason we know that is Muller

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't contend that Barr was wrong. When Barr said that

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>on March fifth, which is two and a half weeks

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>before he delivers the final report, Muller was emphatic that

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the Office of Legal Counsel guidance was not his reason

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>for not making the decision, and when Barr asked him, then, well,

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>what is your reasoning, he said that their staff was

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>still formulating the reasoning. So I think the best interpretation

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>here from Muller's point of view is that they're backwards reasoning.

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.959
<v Speaker 1>They basically are results oriented. They had already decided not

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to decide, and they were trying to come up with

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a reason, and at the time that he first talked

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to Bar, the OLC guidance was not the reason they

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to rely on. But by the time they did

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the report, it turned out to be the reason because

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't come up with anything else. More Over, and

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>this goes a little bit deeper into it, what's the

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>reason for not deciding? And this is what I think

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>people should focus on. If Muller had come to Bar

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and said, I think we have a prosecutable obstruction case,

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>what would have happened? There would have been a brawl

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>inside the Justice Department about what the proper standards for

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>evaluating obstruction are. Because Barr and Mueller clearly do not

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>agree on this. I mean, that's that's clear from not

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>only we've seen Bar's reasoning on this in that memo

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that came out before he was confirmed. We've seen Mueller's

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>reasoning in the report, and we've heard Barr say that

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>he disagreed with Mueller and Rosenstong apparently also disagreed with

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Muller on what obstruction law is. So if they had

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>come to the Justice Department, they come to Bar and said,

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>we think we have an indictable case, what would have

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>happened is that would have gotten bolloxed up in the

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department and they would have had a big brawl

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>over whether over you know, what the correct standard was.

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>What Mueller wanted, I think was to get this evidence

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to Congress. So what he did instead of provoking a

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>big fight that would have settled this at the Justice

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Department level, is he said, I've decided not to decide.

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm gonna do is I'll give you the

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>evidence on one side of the question, and then I'll

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>give you the evidence on the other side of the question.

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to exonerate him, wink wink. That means

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I might I think there may be a case here,

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>but I won't decide. And that way he didn't provoke

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>a fight over what are the impeachment standards in the

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department. In fact, when Barr decided this when he

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on his own, because Muller abdicated. When Barr decided there

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>was no obstruction case, he didn't desturb Mueller's legal framework.

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>He said that he was deciding this assuming even though

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>he didn't agree with it, that Mueller was right on

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the law. But because prosecutors always have to prove corrupt

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>intent beyond a reasonable doubt, he didn't think on the

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>facts that no matter what the legal standard was, you

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to prove intent beyond a reasonable debt.

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>But what Mueller accomplished your book was he end ran

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>what would otherwise have been a big fight in the

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department over obstruction and got his evidence to Congress

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:59.719
<v Speaker 1>under circumstances where he now tells Congress, gee, you know,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I would have charged them, or I might very well

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>have charged them, except there was this OLC guidance. But

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>wink wink. In this system, the way it works is

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the Congress is the only body that can deal with

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a sitting president. A federal prosecutor can't do that. So

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>let me give you my two hundred pages of obstruction evidence.

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I think there may be celonies

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in here. And isn't it the case though, that that's

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>not his job. That's you know, for people who want

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to tell me that Muller's such a great guy. If

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>he's making that decision, he's going well beyond his brief. Yes, well,

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>here's the problem there, Buck, he was not given one

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>hat to wear. You know, he should have been. He's

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a special castle, so he's supposed to be a subordinate

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>federal prosecutor in the Justice Department chain of command, but

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>at any given time, he alternatively wears the hats of

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>counterintelligence investigator. Because this whole investigation took under the place

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>since there was no crime to predigate a criminal investigation,

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it took place under the guise of counterintelligence, right, which

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>allowed them to look for a crime without having to

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have one when they started out. So he's part counterintelligence investigator,

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>he's part counseled to a congressional impeachment committee, which is

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>what I think he ultimately wanted to be, And he's

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:26.919
<v Speaker 1>part federal prosecutor. And he switches from one hat to

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the next depending on what he needs to accomplish at

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>any given moment. Andy McCarthy, everybody check him out on

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>National Review. Also you will see him on Fox News. Andy,

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>great stuff, and not just because I agree with everything

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you said, and we've agreed with each other on this one.

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much. We sure have. Thanks Buck, Yeah, thanks Eddie. Yeah, man,

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even go to law school. And I'm saying

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff isn't that funny, but it's true. It's

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>when you reason these things through. You see, I mean,

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Muller as smaller as a hack, very clear why he

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>made these decisions, why he's done what he has done.

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, people just need to come around to

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the reality of this and stop. We need to stop

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>living in some fantasy where you know, Saint Muller would

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>he would never Oh, I see, Muller would never do

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>something to besmirched the office of the Special Council. Please,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>just like Comey was a saint until he wasn't. There

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>were no charges none. If you look at if you

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 1>look at Bill Clinton, that very nice gentleman who has

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>been so much on my side, as you know, his

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>special prosecutor, it was guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, so

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>many guilty with me. There was no guilty. Comparing the

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump and Clinton Special Council situations or you know, independent prosecutor,

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>dependent Council, all the stuff that basically the same thing, right,

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Comparing them is problematic for a lot of reasons. One

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of them is that Bill Clinton was very much guilty,

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and ken Starr said in his report that Bill Clinton

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was guilty of breaking laws. And it is as stretch

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>at best to think that charges could have been brought

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>against President Trump under a very expansive and I would

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>offer to you very flimsy understanding of obstruction and obstruction

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is a bit like conspiracy, Isn't that interesting? They looked

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>at conspiracy with the Russians to hack into the or

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, to mess with the election, and they looked

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>at obstruction in terms of the investigation of that. Those

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>are two of the most malleable statutes at the federal

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>government that federal agencies have at their disposal. They can

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>come up with some very novel interpretations to get people

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>on either conspiracy or on obstruction. And often if you

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>ask a skilled prosecutor, they'll say, well, what's what's conspiracy

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>or what's obstruction? It's kind of whatever the prosecutor says

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it is. And even in that environment, even with that

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>being true, they have not been able to come up

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump broke the law. And the one place

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>where they seem to think they've got the strongest case

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:17.479
<v Speaker 1>is on telling Don McGann to fire, to fire you know,

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>UM personnel over DJ and that didn't happen. So now

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you're now it's attempted obstruction. But if the president wanted

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to fire somebody, he could just fire them. So what

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>was he just venting? And he was talking to an advisor?

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And can you even obstruct an investigation of something that's

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a fraud? You know, is that something that you can

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>even do? These are all the questions that are that

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>still remain, And yet what they offer to us is, oh,

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the president's so guilty they have to impeach them. We'll

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>get an appeachment a little bit. But Bill Clinton, this

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>was as as clear and egregious of a violator, or

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't say egregious. This is as clear a violation

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>as you're gonna find, you know, lying under oath about

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>something that we now know. And he even admits a

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>lot under oath about just thought that he could play

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.479
<v Speaker 1>these weird definition games to get around it's not going

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to I wasn't going to cut the mustard. But Trump

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>also was going on offense a bit here because he

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>realizes that this is now just a battle of narrative.

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>This has turned into a political fight it's not really

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a legal fight anymore. It's really about politics involved here.

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And Trump said, look, Muller's a conflicted guy. You know,

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Muller's somebody who should never have been trusted in this role,

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>should never have been put in this position. Placlap eight.

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>He wanted the FBI job and he didn't get it,

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and the next day he was picked a special counsel.

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So you tell somebody I'm sorry, you can't have the job,

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and then after you say that, he's gonna make a

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>ruling on you. It doesn't work that way. Plus we

0:30:55.720 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>had a business dispute. Plus his relationship with Tomy was extraordinary.

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's saying that this is a guy who's

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>opposed to him, it's a guy who doesn't like him.

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a lot to you know, a

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>lot to suggest that Komy doesn't like him, Mueller doesn't

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>like him. You know, these are guys who are part

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of the establishment. These are guys who are part of

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>what you'd consider the permanent class, the permanent bureaucracy in DC.

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And they have very high opinions of themselves. I think

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>they're really important, and they're big players in history. And

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.719
<v Speaker 1>they both Komey and Muller have inserted themselves pretending to

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>be these nonpartisan Oh it's just about doing what's right

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>public servants, but they've inserted themselves in very political ways

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in this whole process. So, you know, I think the

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>President's on solid ground when he's making making this case.

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>But I also want to point out that the president

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to get much in the immigration today.

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>The President's promising a major an nowtment having to do

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>with the border. He's saying that something big is in

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the works for the border. Play clip seven. This is

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a big league statement, but that we are going to

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>do something very dramatic on the border. Democrats will not

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>give us laws. They will not change laws, they will

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>not meet, they will not do anything. They want to

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>have open borders, they want to have prime they want

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to have drugs. Boring it. We have brought something to

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the light of the people. They see now it's a

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>national emergency and most people agree. The Democrats agree to,

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but they won't give us the legislation you need to

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>fix them. No place in the world has what we

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>have in terms of ridiculous immigration laws. So I will

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>be making a major statement. I would say, my biggest

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>statement on the border, probably today or tomorrow's promising major statement,

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe his biggest statement. It's a guy who's saying, build

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the wall, Build the wall. Big statement coming up on

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the border. I don't know what it is. I'm going

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to call some of my White House sources and see

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>if I can get a little bit of a you know,

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of an inside track to it. But

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>President saying big things coming, So we'll have to wait

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and see on that one. But you know what else

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>might be coming. Impeachment. We will discuss that coming up

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>here in a moment. Nothing is off the table, but

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we do want to make such a compelling case, such

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>an iron cloud cast case, that even the Republican Senate,

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>which at the time seems to be not an objective jury,

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>will be convinced of the path that we have to

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.959
<v Speaker 1>take as a country. I still think this goes back

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to democratic talking points. So what they want, and this

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is what the truth is. Their impeachment to their base

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is like the wall is to our base. This is

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>their fundraising thing. And the truth is this is a

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>made up, false problem in crisis, but our wall is

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a real crisis. I'm glad that Brad Parscal who's running

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the Trump re election re election effort, out of that

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the end that this is not like the

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>wall for the base, because the base really wants the wall.

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>That's people like me are saying, Hey, we were promised

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a wall, but let's let's dig in a bit more

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>into this impeachment issue. I don't want to get diverted

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to a wall. You know, we haven't talked about immigration

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>much on the show. Hasn't gotten better, folks, Still a crisis.

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Just I'm just reminding everyone still has not been not handled,

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 1>not settled by the administration. But we have to deal

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>with impeachment right now. Nancy Pelosi says, nothing is off

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the table. We want to make an ironclad case. Do

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>they really expect does any Democrat expect us to believe

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that they believe they'll be able to make a more

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>compelling case about Trump's shortcomings and the reasons for Trump

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>being a peach than what Muller has already done. And

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>we know Muller's a partisan. We know Muller hates Trump.

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>He showed us this. There can be no surprise anymore

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>about this. But Pelosi's not sure she wants to tell everybody.

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to do it. They're going to

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>impeach the president. I think they're going to do it.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they can help themselves. This isn't

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a normal presidency for them. This is a moment where

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 1>they think that everything that the Democrats, everything the left

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>believes and holds dear and sacred, if they really hold

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>anything sacred, they think that that is threatened by Trump.

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And given that mindset, it's just I think very unlikely

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that they'd be able to pass the opportunity to impeach him.

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And they're going to do it just so they can

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>say they did it. They think it's going to be

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>useful tactically against the president in his reelection campaign. And

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a big part of this that is Catharsis

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>for them. You know, this is they're working out their

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 1>issues here. There's a sense of a vindication and validation

0:35:54.440 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that will come from an impeachment of the president. And

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that's why when when she says, you know, Republicans are

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be convinced of the path you have a day,

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's this is so disingenuous. Nancy knows whether

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:13.959
<v Speaker 1>she's slowing down a few steps or not. Nancy knows

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are never in a million years, based on all

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the information we have right now, going to go along

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 1>with voting against, voting to impeache Trump in the House

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and then certainly to remove him in the sentence. She

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>knows that's not going to happen. Justin Amash aside, you

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>know that guy always always kind of struck me as

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a smarmy grandstander. Anyway, he cares a lot about about FISA, right,

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>He's he's been a big Oh I'm mister libertarian. I

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>worry about spying. No spying on Americans. What about the

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>spying on Carter Page, Amash, you got any thoughts on that?

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>What about the spying on George Papadopoulos. The not yet

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 1>has proved, Well, there was spying on General Flynn. It's

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 1>just that we believe that was probably the at least

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the theories that that was incidental because he was speaking

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Russian ambassador. But you know, there was surveillance obviously,

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>That's how they got that leaked conversation that they had

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the conversational League in the first place. But I don't

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>see Amash raising any alarms, but any of that, and

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>mister libertarian man seems to me that's something that he

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>skips right past. I give Rand Paul credit at least

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for saying that we do need to look in it.

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, Rand Paul has always been somebody that he

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the political skills needed to win the presidency,

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 1>never mind I think, to run the country. But his

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>ideas in general appeal to me because I think he

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 1>comes from this place, this really rarefied place in politics,

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this this very and it feels like it's evaporating with

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>every passing year. He comes to this place of you

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>know what, I don't want to tell you what to

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>do all the time. I don't want to make you

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>do lots of things you don't want to do. I

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>don't want the government in charge of every aspect of

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>your life. And I like that. I find that comforting.

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe Rand Paul wants to be a benevolent

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>dictator in some capacity. I think a lot of Democrats

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and even some Republicans kind of do if they had

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 1>their ability, if they had the ability to do so.

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>But but Rand has been all over the FISA issue,

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>which there's no way we're going to come out of

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this Inspector General report from the DOJ and all the

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Russia collusion origin stuff. There's no way we come away

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>from this without realizing the FISA was abused, because it

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>was abused, and then understanding that that means there has

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to be some changes so that it cannot be used

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for spying purposes, for political spying purposes again in the future.

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Here's here's a Rampaul had a real libertarian Rand Paul

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 1>versus amash A. I think opt opportunistic libertarian. Here's a

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Rampaulsey by thirteen. I think the President has the ability

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to do it by executive order. He could say to

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the FBI that from now on, our policy is that

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the FBI has to go to get a court order

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:08.319
<v Speaker 1>or a warrant in a public court to search this

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>database for an Americans information. Now it's different for foreigners.

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>We spawn foreigners all the time and there's a lower standard.

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 1>But for an American, it's extraordinary that our own intelligence

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>community that's supposed to spawn foreigners was spying on the

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump campaign. So this shouldn't happen either to President Trump

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>but to any future president of either. This is such

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a profoundly important point he makes that there was spying

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on a presidential campaign, and we need to not accept

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that there's nothing okay about this. You know, we're we're

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>lectured by Democrats and leftists about how, oh, Russian interference

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in the election. What about the deep state interference in

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the election, which is real, unlike the Russian interference, which

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>was minimal from the Russian side. When I say minimal,

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean of minimal impact. Oh no, we could argue

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 1>about this all day long. We all know it didn't

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>do anything. It didn't change anything. It was it was

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.919
<v Speaker 1>really essentially the equivalent of like a Russian prank. I'm

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>not saying it was funny, but there's no serious argument

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that this changed the ut in the election. But the

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump team had nothing to do with it. We all

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 1>know that now. But on the other side of things,

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 1>there was foreign interference in the election. Christopher Steele's a foreigner.

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Steele used Russian therefore for in subsources and pass

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 1>that information to contacts in the media to run a

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>smear campaign, but also brought the dacier made its way

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>into the government apparatus itself, and federal spy agencies or

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.399
<v Speaker 1>federal agencies with the ability to spy. In the case

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of the FBI, they used it. This is the big,

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the big fear, and this is why I think you

0:40:56.400 --> 0:41:02.760
<v Speaker 1>see Komey and so many of these once incredibly sanctimonious.

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>That's why we call him sanctatomy. Incredibly sanctimonious officials. Some

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:07.439
<v Speaker 1>of them have toned it down a little bit because

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that they realized that they're going to have

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>some splaining to do. They're going to have to sit

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:17.760
<v Speaker 1>down and answer questions in front of the American people

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>about why would you use OPO research for a spy

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a secret spying court and think that that's okay. You know,

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the real scandal in all this, I mean we've been told, oh,

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the Russian you know, the Russians and this and that.

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>The real scandal on this is that the Trump campaign

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>was spied on under false pretenses. We were lied to

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>about that. We were actually told that anybody who believed

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>they were spied on, and this was a year a

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>year after the election, and who believe it there was

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 1>spying was crazy and lying. And then it turned out

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>there was spying where they said that it was justified.

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna find out very soon. This is going to

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>come out of the Inspector General report this month. I

0:41:56.560 --> 0:42:00.080
<v Speaker 1>believe that there was spying and it wasn't just to

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 1>find What do we do then, we want to talk

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>about undermining our institutions and protecting the sanctity of our democracy.

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>What do we do when we find out, as we will,

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that the fires A court and the FBI, the DOJ

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.280
<v Speaker 1>were used as a partisan weapon in a presidential election?

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>How do we handle that? You are the ones who

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>will invent and define the next generation of air warfare,

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and you are the ones who will secure American victory

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>all the time, victory to dominate the future, America must

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>rule the skies. And that is what your time at

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this great academy has been all about. Preparing you to

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>do whatever it takes to learn to adapt and to win, win, win,

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:50.320
<v Speaker 1>win so much you're going to get so tired of winning.

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>But not really, not really, we never get tired of

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 1>winning doing, not tired of winning yet. President Trump, he

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was speaking at the Air Force Academy. And you know

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 1>one one aspect of this presidency that is I believe

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:19.800
<v Speaker 1>intentionally underreported on and skipped over by the psychotically hostile press.

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they really do have a problem. I mean,

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>they hate this president in a way that is that

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:30.879
<v Speaker 1>is unnatural, unhealthy. It's not just about politics. It's much

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>deeper than that. And trumped arrangement syndrome is a is

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 1>a real and I would argue, and I'm sure you

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 1>could get some professionals to weigh in on this an

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 1>identifiable phenomenon. It is far too powerful in the minds

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 1>of some people. You know, I know about some of

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the different mental illnesses that are out there, and a

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is based on the sense of exaggerated

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>threat or And this is how people get anxiety and

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>people get OCD. You know, they worry aboh this is

0:43:57.480 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 1>this might have happened, or that might have happened. You know,

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:02.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody will think that I would they're driving a car

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:04.959
<v Speaker 1>and they they ran somebody over, but they just didn't

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>know they ran somebody over. I mean, this is this

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is the way liberals think about Trump. They must know

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:11.760
<v Speaker 1>at some level that their lives are going to be fine,

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing is really going to happen. That's but Trump is

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:18.760
<v Speaker 1>destroying the world and ruining the country and undermining our republic.

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And they take all that stuff as some kind of

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 1>personal affront, but putting that, casting that aside for a moment,

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump is very well liked. And maybe it's just because

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 1>most of the military folks that I know tend to

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 1>be conserved anyway. But it's very well like with the

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 1>military and is certainly deeply, deeply respectful of the military.

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the Trump really does hold people

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that serve this country in incredibly high esteem, which which

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we would want for any commander in chief. And I

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>think that that's that that tends to have been the

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>case historically. But this brings me to the controversy around

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the USS John McCain, all right, which is a navy

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 1>ship that people were saying as of what was it

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>as of yesterday that the John McCain. I want to

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>make sure I get some of these details right for

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you here. It's it's pretty remarkable that they covered up

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the name of the John. The initial story was that

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they covered up the you know, the the John McCain

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:34.439
<v Speaker 1>name on the ship with a tarp and they gave

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the sailors on this naval vessel the day off because

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 1>when Trump was in Japan, it was it was docked

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in Japan, there was a sensitivity to Trump seeing this

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>at all. I mean, I just I never believed this.

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I never thought that this was a real thing. I

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 1>never thought that this was what happened. It was so

0:45:57.400 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>interested to see many, including many conservatives, who were usually,

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>if not favorable toward Trump, at least not infected with

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump derangement syndrome. Right. I mean, usually there are people

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that would give him some kind of benefit of the doubt.

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>But here's what they say. Officers were told to keep

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:22.800
<v Speaker 1>USS John McCain from Trump's view during Japan visit. CBS

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 1>News has confirmed this. CBS News Senior Nation Security correspondent

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 1>David Martin reports that a US Indo Pacific Command official

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:31.839
<v Speaker 1>wrote an email to Navy and Air Force officials before

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>mister Trump's arrival and included instructions for the proper landing

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 1>areas for helicopters and preparations for the USS Wasp, the

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>ship on which the President was to speak. The official

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>then issued a third instruction, the USS John McCain needs

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to be out of sight. According to the email, which

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>was first obtained by the Wall Street Journal and then

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 1>other news outlets confirmed its existence. The Washington Post is

0:46:56.719 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dawzy tweeted that administration official confirms the story request

0:47:00.480 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 1>was made to make sure mccainship wasn't visible, but aid

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>say Trump wasn't involved in the request, but it was

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>meant to prevent any potential ire from POTUS from the

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 1>president United States and the Journal reporter that when a

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Navy commander expressed surprise at the instruction, the US in

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>No Pacific Command official answered, first, I heard of it

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 1>as first. I heard of it as well, and the

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 1>officials said he would talk to the White House Military

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Office to get more information. Trump has said he was

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>not informed about anything having to do with the Navy

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 1>ship USS. John McCain, during his visits to Japan, noticed, Now,

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a This is a manufactured controversy, entirely manufactured.

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing to indicate whatsoever. We have zero evidence

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:49.879
<v Speaker 1>of any kind, and zero indicators that President Trump himself

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>was asking for this, that President Trump wanted this to

0:47:57.440 --> 0:47:59.959
<v Speaker 1>be covered up. So then why is it Trump's fault?

0:48:00.160 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Why is it oh, because someone else assumed that he

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:05.839
<v Speaker 1>would be And look, it would be a very petty thing.

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 1>There's no question about it. You know, if Trump were

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to make a scene about this or to be angry

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. It's very petty, but you can't blame him

0:48:14.239 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for what somebody else thought might be going on in

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump's head. This is yet again another version, another manifestation,

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a symptom of the Trump's arrangement syndrome that has become

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>such a powerful force in American politics. It's not it's

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>not the president's fault that somebody thought that he's going

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to be hypersensitive about this, and yet there was all

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:39.839
<v Speaker 1>this trashing of the president around it, as though this

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>was a request that he made. Well, he didn't make

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the request. No one says otherwise. Yet it's just it

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:51.919
<v Speaker 1>really is just maddening. And you know, there's so many

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 1>areas where I think you could have a you could

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 1>have very legitimate criticism, very legitimate criticism of this president.

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>There are things that he has not delivered on yet. Look,

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he's doing a very good job, but there

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>are areas with any president. You know, I'm not here,

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:09.400
<v Speaker 1>not here to worship a politician. We're here to push

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 1>forward agenda and try to find the truth and understand

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:17.359
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in the world around us. But what they

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:20.959
<v Speaker 1>left keeps doing is coming up with fake reasons fake

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:24.319
<v Speaker 1>news to hate Trump, and then they wonder why we

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>take everything all their criticisms with a grain of salt. Well,

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:29.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's because they are not to be trusted on this.

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they have shown us quite clearly that Donald Trump

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>is someone who they cannot object never mind objectively cover.

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:45.320
<v Speaker 1>They can't cover him without showing venom. I'm just showing hatred, bile.

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump likes the military. There if there are some things

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm quite sure of. He takes the trade deal with

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 1>China very seriously. He loves his family. He doesn't like CNN,

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but he really respects the military. Jerry, there's never been

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 1>anything people say, oh Buck, but what about when he

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 1>criticized this veteran of that veteran. Yeah, he has beefs

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:10.319
<v Speaker 1>with individuals. Does anyone really think that somebody who serves

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 1>them in the military, who becomes a political opponent of

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:17.360
<v Speaker 1>someone else's is beyond is beyond being attacked? Now, I

0:50:17.360 --> 0:50:19.319
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have attacked some of the people that serve the

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 1>way that Trump has. You know, he looked. Trump fights

0:50:23.160 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>dirtier than I would. But he's the president and I'm not.

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's probably a pretty good reason for that. But

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 1>he does respect our military. I mean this is just

0:50:32.640 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>also from the Air Force Academy graduation yesterday, just to

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 1>hear the President talking about this play twenty one to

0:50:42.200 --> 0:50:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the nearly one thousand kiddets who I have agreed to

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:55.319
<v Speaker 1>shake every single hand. They gave me a choice, hey said, sir,

0:50:55.400 --> 0:50:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to shake any hands. Some people do that.

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Those are the smart ones too. Out of you. You

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:05.000
<v Speaker 1>can shake one hand to the one person top of

0:51:05.040 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the class. You could shake ten fifty or one hundred,

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:11.799
<v Speaker 1>and you could also stay for a thousand, and I'm

0:51:11.840 --> 0:51:16.919
<v Speaker 1>staying for a thousand. Okay, it's your commander in chief.

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Everybody staying in shake a thousand Air Force graduates hands.

0:51:22.400 --> 0:51:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Just remember that because the press doesn't want to talk

0:51:24.360 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>about it. There's this fascinating lawsuit that has been filed

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in New York City on privilege theory or the end

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 1>result of privilege theory, which ties into white privilege, and

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:42.239
<v Speaker 1>on one of these ideas that has exploded in popularity

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on the left. I saw some interesting statistics yesterday and

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a researcher had gone through and looked for things like

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:53.600
<v Speaker 1>using lexis nexus. So it just pulls up all the

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 1>different times that it appears in news publications and in

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the media, and looked up usage of terms like white supremacy,

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 1>white privilege, unconscious bias, and what you find is that

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 1>these are terms that all of a sudden explode in popularity.

0:52:12.840 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 1>And in the last few years there have been a

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>number of these where this might have existed before, but

0:52:20.040 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden. The left asides that it's it's

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:25.160
<v Speaker 1>almost a campaign just to use the word or use

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the phrase enough that it becomes seared into our minds,

0:52:29.280 --> 0:52:32.719
<v Speaker 1>that there's this thing called white privilege, for example. But

0:52:32.920 --> 0:52:36.879
<v Speaker 1>this is the This is a specific lawsuit in New

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 1>York City against the New York City Department of Education.

0:52:40.480 --> 0:52:46.080
<v Speaker 1>There are three employees who are are all white, although

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>their names are Lois Herrera, Jay Murray, and Laura phi

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 1>ju um I. Maybe Lois Herrera's maiden name isn't Herrera,

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:56.800
<v Speaker 1>but that strikes me as usually if your name is Harrare,

0:52:56.880 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you're Hispanic. But they're apparently white or whatever. And they

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 1>have sued the City of New York because they claim

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that they were demoted dramatically and replaced by non white

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 1>employees who had lesser qualifications for the post and that

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this is not something that occurred in a vacuum, That

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:26.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of rhetoric and a lot of teachings

0:53:26.960 --> 0:53:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and theorizing and all this stuff that they're subjected to

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:32.719
<v Speaker 1>in the New York City Department of Education, which I

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 1>imagine is kind of like a time work back into

0:53:36.200 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union in terms of its bureaucracy and the

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:41.919
<v Speaker 1>assaults on truth that I'm sure are a regular part

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of what goes on there. But they say they had

0:53:46.320 --> 0:53:50.439
<v Speaker 1>people replaced them with lesser qualifications, and they would would

0:53:50.480 --> 0:53:56.799
<v Speaker 1>hear things from their supervisors like, quote, white people had

0:53:56.840 --> 0:54:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to white employees had to take a step back and

0:54:00.360 --> 0:54:05.359
<v Speaker 1>yield to colleagues of color and recognize that values of

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:13.799
<v Speaker 1>white culture are supremacist end quote. M. There's so much

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 1>there isn't there That we usually think of the efforts

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:26.319
<v Speaker 1>at at a kind of racial equity balancing. We think

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of affirmative action, right, We think of fairness through race

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:34.719
<v Speaker 1>as as it's practice with different legal mechanisms, as being well,

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to advance some people. And now I have

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:42.360
<v Speaker 1>been and always and always will be. I mean, I

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>think affirmative action is ethically and legally wrong. I do

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 1>not agree with it. I do not believe in it.

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:50.839
<v Speaker 1>And everyone who hears me say that on Lefell of course,

0:54:50.880 --> 0:54:53.600
<v Speaker 1>because you would. Yeah, that's right. I'm white and everything

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 1>everything has been handed to me. I've never had to

0:54:55.719 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 1>work hard. My white privilege has just coasted me through everything.

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, and the people that I know who have

0:55:02.520 --> 0:55:04.360
<v Speaker 1>had a really tough time in life, and I know,

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 1>struggle with addiction and homelessness and who are white. You know,

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they just didn't capitalize enough on their white privilege. I

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 1>guess you know that most of the desperately poor in

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this country are white. In fact, doesn't seem to matter

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that that's their fault. I guess the left says, because

0:55:19.120 --> 0:55:22.359
<v Speaker 1>they didn't really maximize that white privilege. You know, they didn't.

0:55:22.360 --> 0:55:24.040
<v Speaker 1>They didn't turn in that white privilege card to get

0:55:24.080 --> 0:55:26.360
<v Speaker 1>all the goodies that come with it. I mean, this

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:31.759
<v Speaker 1>is an offensive but now very widespread and really powerful

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:35.120
<v Speaker 1>social theory that's foisted, that has been foisted on the

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:37.040
<v Speaker 1>American people. And if you don't, as a white person,

0:55:37.360 --> 0:55:39.759
<v Speaker 1>if you push back, oh, of course, of course you do.

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:43.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to admit your privilege. This, this is

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a stupid idea. It's unethical to judge people based upon

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:51.680
<v Speaker 1>their skin color any context as unethical. But what you

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have now is not just some people get an advantage

0:55:54.520 --> 0:55:57.240
<v Speaker 1>because of their non whiteness. But that's not a privilege,

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you see, that's just fair when you get something and

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:04.319
<v Speaker 1>you're not white. And this is explicitly what happens on

0:56:04.360 --> 0:56:07.319
<v Speaker 1>college campuses, and you know you are. There have even

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:09.359
<v Speaker 1>been points systems, now they got rid of that. There

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:10.919
<v Speaker 1>have been quotas, Oh they got rid of that. Acts

0:56:10.960 --> 0:56:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that's too obvious. But non white students, for example, we'll

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:17.560
<v Speaker 1>get into a school with lower grades, lower SATs, and

0:56:17.600 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 1>we all know what's going on, and people pretend, oh,

0:56:19.520 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we can't figure this out. No, we know what's going on.

0:56:22.040 --> 0:56:27.799
<v Speaker 1>But that's not privilege, that's just fair. Huh. It's a

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 1>very convenient way of describing a process by which some

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:35.480
<v Speaker 1>people are given privileges over others. But as I look

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:38.520
<v Speaker 1>at this situation, the department education which you have, are

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:42.160
<v Speaker 1>people who are demoted, you know. And this is a

0:56:42.520 --> 0:56:48.680
<v Speaker 1>logical extension of this white privileged theory, meaning that if

0:56:48.719 --> 0:56:51.759
<v Speaker 1>you think that some people should be advanced in order

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to balance out the white privilege that their peers enjoy.

0:56:56.160 --> 0:56:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Then you should also probably you should also prepare yourself

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for the possibility that some people who enjoy white privilege

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 1>must be pulled back, must suffer a bit, their careers

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 1>must suffer. They must be paid less than they've been,

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:12.800
<v Speaker 1>They've become a customer getting paid. They must be removed

0:57:12.880 --> 0:57:15.360
<v Speaker 1>from the prestigious position or the more advanced position that

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they have. I mean, because you gotta make room. You

0:57:18.080 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta make room for those without the white privilege. Well,

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in New York this is now being fought, and I'm hoping,

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:32.280
<v Speaker 1>although I'm very skeptical that this will be the case,

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping that this will be a successful a successful case.

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 1>You cannot have this. You cannot have a well functioning, honest, strong,

0:57:46.360 --> 0:57:51.560
<v Speaker 1>espree to core organization that's going to demote people in

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>order to play kate this theory of well, some people

0:57:56.040 --> 0:57:57.800
<v Speaker 1>have had it easy because of their skin color, and

0:57:57.800 --> 0:57:59.520
<v Speaker 1>other people have had it had it hard because of

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 1>skin color. Okay, how much harder? What's enough? Why? You know,

0:58:04.520 --> 0:58:08.560
<v Speaker 1>if they really believe this, meaning, if the left is

0:58:09.520 --> 0:58:12.800
<v Speaker 1>on board with this thinking, why not make why not

0:58:12.840 --> 0:58:14.400
<v Speaker 1>say that everyone at a heart you know that Harvard

0:58:14.400 --> 0:58:17.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to just go non white, No more white students

0:58:17.720 --> 0:58:19.160
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard. You got to balance it out. There's been

0:58:19.200 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>so much oppression, it's been so racist for so long.

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:24.040
<v Speaker 1>People would laugh and say, oh, Buck, that's such a

0:58:24.120 --> 0:58:27.320
<v Speaker 1>dumb idea. Okay, but why is it a dumb idea?

0:58:27.440 --> 0:58:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Why shouldn't there be more drama. Why shouldn't we have

0:58:29.520 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 1>these more dramatic gestures, you know, why shouldn't we do

0:58:32.480 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 1>things that incur obvious costs to individuals who have quote

0:58:39.120 --> 0:58:41.280
<v Speaker 1>white privilege. I mean I reject. I think white privilege

0:58:41.320 --> 0:58:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is not a thing. I do not think it is.

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:47.160
<v Speaker 1>It is a real it is a real concept worthy

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of certainly any government action, because what is it really

0:58:52.320 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 1>saying that when you have a majority, Well, a majority

0:58:54.720 --> 0:58:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in any culture is going to be treated in some

0:58:57.120 --> 0:59:01.360
<v Speaker 1>capacity like the majority. But you can't mandate through law

0:59:01.760 --> 0:59:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a change in that cultural reality. And you certainly shouldn't

0:59:06.480 --> 0:59:11.600
<v Speaker 1>mandate through law changes in hiring, in college, you know,

0:59:11.600 --> 0:59:15.040
<v Speaker 1>college admissions and all these things, because there's some amorphous

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>there's some amorphous notion of this is more fair the

0:59:20.600 --> 0:59:24.600
<v Speaker 1>government acting in ways that is that is unconstitutional, that

0:59:24.760 --> 0:59:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is unfair, that is violation of the Equal Protection Clause.

0:59:29.280 --> 0:59:31.000
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to make things better. It's only going

0:59:31.040 --> 0:59:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to make things worse. Teaching the whole generation coming up

0:59:35.760 --> 0:59:39.120
<v Speaker 1>now through school that there is this thing called white privilege,

0:59:39.320 --> 0:59:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and then not really ever addressing well, what would that

0:59:41.680 --> 0:59:43.640
<v Speaker 1>mean if it were true? What are we supposed to

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:47.520
<v Speaker 1>do about that? Is just a recipe for a lot

0:59:47.560 --> 0:59:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of victimology thinking and also opens the door to a

0:59:54.560 --> 0:59:57.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of resentment. Let's be honest resentment on all sides.

0:59:57.480 --> 1:00:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you tell someone that that the individual

1:00:00.880 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>sitting across from them has a lot of unearned a

1:00:05.320 --> 1:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of unearned advantages, the persons sitting there, especially if

1:00:09.840 --> 1:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>they feel like they've had a they've had a tough

1:00:11.560 --> 1:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>go in life, is going to not think very highly

1:00:14.720 --> 1:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of the individual with the unearned advantages. And at the

1:00:17.040 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>person who is being told that he or she has

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>these unearned advantages, looks across the table and says, well,

1:00:21.840 --> 1:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>hold on a second, you who does you? The person

1:00:25.240 --> 1:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>who does not enjoy white privilege in this situation, as

1:00:28.200 --> 1:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a matter of law, have privileges that I do not have.

1:00:32.480 --> 1:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Qualify for programs, qualify for admissions, but but I'm the

1:00:38.400 --> 1:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>one with privilege. Is this tears at the fabric of

1:00:44.960 --> 1:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the social fabric of this country. And it really does

1:00:47.320 --> 1:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>also undermine the rule of law. You know, where are

1:00:50.080 --> 1:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>they're all equal in the odds of law or not.

1:00:52.000 --> 1:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>There is only one kind of still mandated legal racial

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>discrimination that exists in this country, and it is punishing

1:01:03.400 --> 1:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>those who quote have white privilege. That is the only

1:01:05.720 --> 1:01:10.439
<v Speaker 1>legitimate or rather legal discrimination that is still in the books.

1:01:10.480 --> 1:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>There's no other discrimination. Non white people do not get

1:01:13.080 --> 1:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>discriminated against, but white people because and you say, Buck,

1:01:16.760 --> 1:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>why do all these liberals, why do all these leftists

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>who are many of whom the majority of whom are white,

1:01:22.800 --> 1:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>why do they go along with this? Oh? Because it

1:01:24.600 --> 1:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>is so useful for their power structure. They benefit from this.

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>The identity politics that the left has embraced is a

1:01:32.560 --> 1:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>base of power and a base of votes. And it's

1:01:36.120 --> 1:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a very simple proposition for any guilt guilt ridden white

1:01:42.280 --> 1:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>liberal to embrace, which is just become one. Become one

1:01:46.800 --> 1:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of the people that says this stuff, believes this stuff,

1:01:49.600 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>promotes this stuff, and you're not part of the problem anymore.

1:01:53.640 --> 1:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>You cleanse yourself of your white privilege sins by agreeing

1:01:57.560 --> 1:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that white privilege needs to be confronted, and you have

1:02:00.280 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to do nothing beyond that. This is like from the

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>al Gore school of just you know, make a lot

1:02:05.040 --> 1:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of money by scaring a lot of people over climate change,

1:02:07.920 --> 1:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>don't make any changes to your own life about climate change.

1:02:10.200 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And you've done your part. And if you just go

1:02:12.680 --> 1:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>see the al Gore movie about climate change, you know,

1:02:15.000 --> 1:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and say that you believe in climate change, you've done

1:02:17.040 --> 1:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>your part. It's cheap virtue the left so effectively in

1:02:25.080 --> 1:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>many ways, but it's a it's a recurring theme in

1:02:29.680 --> 1:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>all left wing politics in this country. It appeals to

1:02:33.520 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>individual vanity. I'm such a good person. I'm such a thoughtful,

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>care and considered person. So that's why I believe that

1:02:42.760 --> 1:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>taxes should be higher. Oh wow, that's but do you

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>pay higher taxes? Do you send the government more money?

1:02:48.600 --> 1:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to set an example? No? No No, no, no,

1:02:50.120 --> 1:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of course not. You just support in the macro sense,

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in a theoretical way. You support, you know, taking dramatic

1:02:59.360 --> 1:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>action to back climate change. You're not going to take

1:03:01.480 --> 1:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it yourself, but you support the idea of you know,

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>do you confront white privilege? Well, you know a lot

1:03:07.240 --> 1:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of rich Libs still belong to you know, private clubs

1:03:10.520 --> 1:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that are not very interracially diverse. They send their kids

1:03:12.800 --> 1:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to schools that are overwhelmingly white, they send their kids

1:03:15.040 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to universities that are overwhelmingly white. But but but they

1:03:17.680 --> 1:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>confront their white privilege. You see, they say that, and

1:03:22.160 --> 1:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that's all they have to do. Must be nice to

1:03:26.360 --> 1:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>go through life such a self satisfied fraud. How will

1:03:29.040 --> 1:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you protect Row v. Wade. We need a federal law

1:03:32.840 --> 1:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to take every principle that's in the Supreme Court decision

1:03:36.920 --> 1:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and just make it federal law. Let's give women all

1:03:39.440 --> 1:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>across this country preaching the wealth gap between white families

1:03:44.920 --> 1:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and black families, reparations or not. So I support the

1:03:49.720 --> 1:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>reparations bill that's in the House to start a commission.

1:03:53.760 --> 1:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So we kept to look at all of the options

1:03:56.320 --> 1:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>fifteen billion dollars put into the historically black colleges and university.

1:04:06.080 --> 1:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of frauds, racial frauds in particular, Elizabeth Warren comes

1:04:10.400 --> 1:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to mind folk haunts herself, and I'm so I'm so

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>happy that the President does not back down, say, oh, Pokahonas,

1:04:18.920 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it's racist. No, it's not racist's making fun of it's

1:04:21.560 --> 1:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>not making fun of Pokehonas I do prefer sometimes the

1:04:24.920 --> 1:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>folk hauntess to play on words, but we can call

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>our pocahonas too. Two issues here that she tackles. Let's

1:04:32.320 --> 1:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>start first with the the reparation. The reparations component of this.

1:04:39.040 --> 1:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Nobody really believes I think, I mean, I could be

1:04:42.960 --> 1:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>wrong here. No one who knows anything about how government

1:04:47.280 --> 1:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>programs work and the history of any of any effort

1:04:50.080 --> 1:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>like this in this country. No one really thinks that

1:04:52.560 --> 1:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that will change it. Again, the fifty billion dollars to

1:04:55.040 --> 1:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>historically black colleges, what's that going to do? Is the

1:04:59.560 --> 1:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is the are the historically black colleges right now? Do

1:05:02.000 --> 1:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they not have large enough endowments for good professors and

1:05:05.560 --> 1:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>good text with the answers? No. By the way, historically

1:05:07.480 --> 1:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>black colleges have a particularly high graduation rate for African

1:05:12.520 --> 1:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>American students for four years and also in life, African

1:05:17.560 --> 1:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>American students from historically black colleges do very well relative

1:05:21.440 --> 1:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to similarly situated colleges and universities in terms of earning

1:05:25.280 --> 1:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>power and career potential. And what do you know, there's

1:05:30.640 --> 1:05:35.959
<v Speaker 1>there's no issue of affirmative action, right so this we've

1:05:35.960 --> 1:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>seen this experiment play out the university California system where

1:05:39.680 --> 1:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>they got rid of racial preferences in schools, and all

1:05:42.480 --> 1:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it meant was that there were fewer black and Latino

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>students at the very very very elite schools. But the

1:05:47.720 --> 1:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>graduation rate at some of the more middle tier but

1:05:50.480 --> 1:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>still very good California schools went up because you can't

1:05:54.640 --> 1:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just force people into a program they're not prepared for.

1:05:58.160 --> 1:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So there was a greater match of sALS in preparation,

1:06:01.240 --> 1:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>which meant greater success in getting through four years of college,

1:06:05.560 --> 1:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>which you'd think is a good thing. But no, the libs,

1:06:07.360 --> 1:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>they like the band aid approach. They like that let's

1:06:09.480 --> 1:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>just give people the fancy degree that they didn't really

1:06:12.480 --> 1:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>earn on their academic merits. But you know, white privilege

1:06:15.880 --> 1:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>needs to be confronted. Don't even get me started with

1:06:18.600 --> 1:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Asian privilege. Is their Asian privilege? Who knows it's worse

1:06:22.920 --> 1:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to be Asian applying to elite schools, especially a place

1:06:25.200 --> 1:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>like well, now they got rid of racial preferences, but

1:06:28.640 --> 1:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>some of these, you know, schools like Stanford, some of

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>these very elite universities, you do not want to be.

1:06:35.600 --> 1:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>You do not want to be an Asian American that's

1:06:37.360 --> 1:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the worst category. That's the worst category to be in.

1:06:41.160 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And then just so this reparations, this is just Elizaeth

1:06:45.560 --> 1:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Warren trying to build a greater enthusiasm in the minority community.

1:06:49.360 --> 1:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>First off, isn't that this bill is going nowhere. No

1:06:52.400 --> 1:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>one's even clear on what should happen or what it

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 1>should do. And ultimately, you know, the government's money is

1:06:57.760 --> 1:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>your money. So whenever they decide, whenever the Left is saying, well,

1:07:00.840 --> 1:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to redistribute a bunch of money to people,

1:07:03.080 --> 1:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that's coming from the American people, that's money appropriated from taxpayers,

1:07:07.720 --> 1:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>taken from you by force, and then given to people

1:07:10.080 --> 1:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to do other things with. And that's how we should

1:07:14.440 --> 1:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>do that. Oh, then our federal law that's going to

1:07:17.920 --> 1:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>reinforce Roe v. Wade. That is never going to happen.

1:07:22.320 --> 1:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>And she knows that's never gonna happen unless they try

1:07:24.720 --> 1:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to pull an Obamacare maneuver where by the slimmest majority

1:07:28.600 --> 1:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>when they have a supermajority, they just forced the other

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>side to to just just stomach whatever it is that

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>they want to jam down our throats. Um maybe they

1:07:41.240 --> 1:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe that'd go that direction. But this is this is

1:07:43.040 --> 1:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>unserious stuff from Luzeth Warren. But she's an unserious candidate

1:07:45.720 --> 1:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point. In my mind, she's shown us who

1:07:49.200 --> 1:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>she really is, and I think that she's uh, it's

1:07:52.600 --> 1:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it's always it's always been about her. I think her

1:07:54.800 --> 1:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>ego is apparent with these little crusades she goes. You know,

1:08:00.200 --> 1:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>her husband. They're making close to a million dollars a

1:08:01.880 --> 1:08:03.439
<v Speaker 1>year between the two of them, but she's all about

1:08:03.480 --> 1:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>class warfare. Come on, give me a break. She's not

1:08:06.800 --> 1:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>running around doing community organizing for thirty thousand dollars a

1:08:09.600 --> 1:08:11.959
<v Speaker 1>year on the South side of Chicago, right. She's gone

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:15.439
<v Speaker 1>to a lead institutions, gotten paid very well, and now

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>she wants to tell everybody else about how they need

1:08:17.200 --> 1:08:19.559
<v Speaker 1>to pay higher taxes and let her determine what they

1:08:19.560 --> 1:08:22.599
<v Speaker 1>can do with their money. I don't think so, e Dubbs.

1:08:22.640 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I think E Warren is toast in this primary. Say

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>retweeted a misleadingly edited video of Nancy Pelosi, edited to

1:08:29.960 --> 1:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>highlighting exaggerated stuttering. Another fake video is also circling circulating online.

1:08:35.520 --> 1:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>It's been slowed down to make Pelosi per incoherent ill,

1:08:39.360 --> 1:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>perhaps drunk. The video is fake. It's manipulated. Numerous audio

1:08:43.200 --> 1:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and video experts and fact checking organizations have confirmed that,

1:08:46.600 --> 1:08:48.719
<v Speaker 1>But that video in particular has been viewed by millions

1:08:48.720 --> 1:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of people on Facebook, and in fact, it's still up

1:08:51.160 --> 1:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, even though Facebook knows it's fake. They've added

1:08:55.000 --> 1:08:58.519
<v Speaker 1>comments from independent fact checkers to inform people who watch

1:08:58.560 --> 1:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it and have made it less cominent, but it is

1:09:01.080 --> 1:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>still up there, and YouTube took it down, but it's

1:09:03.880 --> 1:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>still up on Twitter. They're not even commenting about it.

1:09:07.920 --> 1:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>The CDN commentariat no longer even really pretends to be

1:09:13.360 --> 1:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>about the First Amendment. I mean, they view themselves as

1:09:17.439 --> 1:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a kind of priesthood of truth, the journalism clergy, if

1:09:24.080 --> 1:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you will, though a lot of them would reject the

1:09:25.880 --> 1:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>notion of being in any kind of religious organization. But

1:09:28.600 --> 1:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>they think of themselves as a cast, as an elite

1:09:32.720 --> 1:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>ordained to bring us the information we need to be

1:09:36.680 --> 1:09:44.599
<v Speaker 1>informed citizens. And beyond that, our opinions, our little gripes

1:09:44.640 --> 1:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with how they present things, that's all irrelevant to them.

1:09:49.080 --> 1:09:51.599
<v Speaker 1>The video in questionnaire has to do with Nancy Pelosi,

1:09:52.320 --> 1:09:54.479
<v Speaker 1>and it all comes from the same press conference, and

1:09:54.600 --> 1:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I haven't I can't say that I've seen all of

1:09:56.880 --> 1:09:59.639
<v Speaker 1>the videos. But in one case, I saw a video

1:09:59.680 --> 1:10:01.599
<v Speaker 1>that was not slowed down. It was not. I mean

1:10:01.720 --> 1:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>when they say things like edited, and they did this

1:10:04.560 --> 1:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>with the Center for Medical Progress, they kept saying heavily edited,

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>heavily edited. Yeah, because they took twelve hours or whatever

1:10:09.920 --> 1:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it was. I forget how many hours. Don't quote me

1:10:11.600 --> 1:10:13.479
<v Speaker 1>on that, but you know, hours and hours of undercover

1:10:13.600 --> 1:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>video and edited it down so they actually had something

1:10:16.040 --> 1:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that people could watch and see and know what's going on.

1:10:18.600 --> 1:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>All news broadcasts that you see are in some way

1:10:21.439 --> 1:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>or another edited. They've got commercial breaks, they run pre

1:10:24.439 --> 1:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>roll packages that every piece of writing you see goes

1:10:28.880 --> 1:10:32.439
<v Speaker 1>through an editor to edit. Something is not, in and

1:10:32.479 --> 1:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of itself any admission of dishonesty. But notice how they

1:10:35.960 --> 1:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>do that. Oh it's been edited. Edited video of Nancy Pelosi.

1:10:41.920 --> 1:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Edited video of Nancy Pelosi. I mean, she looks like

1:10:43.680 --> 1:10:46.519
<v Speaker 1>a clown at any speed. The thing she says we

1:10:46.600 --> 1:10:49.439
<v Speaker 1>don't have about dishonest and dumb. The things that she

1:10:49.520 --> 1:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>says are an embarrassment no matter what you do with

1:10:53.520 --> 1:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the editing process. But here you have a prominent, wildly overpaid,

1:10:58.960 --> 1:11:02.519
<v Speaker 1>famous for reasons that are beyond my comprehension journalist and

1:11:02.520 --> 1:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Anderson Cooper who is saying that Facebook should take it

1:11:07.720 --> 1:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>upon itself to police truth, and he skips right over

1:11:13.760 --> 1:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this is well within the boundaries of

1:11:17.360 --> 1:11:21.479
<v Speaker 1>what you could consider satire. And just because you taken

1:11:21.520 --> 1:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you an edited videw should we ban everything The Daily Show? Ever?

1:11:24.439 --> 1:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Did libs love The Daily Show? You know? The Daily

1:11:28.040 --> 1:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Show used to do sit down with people and interview them,

1:11:30.760 --> 1:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and they thought they're in a normal interview, but then

1:11:32.320 --> 1:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>they would add in questions that weren't asked during the interview,

1:11:36.240 --> 1:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>cut things, and the whole point was to make a

1:11:38.880 --> 1:11:40.479
<v Speaker 1>mockery of and make the person, if they were a

1:11:40.520 --> 1:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>conservative in particular, look stupid, all post edited, all out

1:11:45.439 --> 1:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of context, and the whole thing. They thought that was hilarious.

1:11:48.760 --> 1:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Now they might say, well, buck, that's satire, that's comedy, Okay,

1:11:52.000 --> 1:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>this Pelosi thing is satire. Comedy. They think Facebook should

1:11:56.320 --> 1:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>take it down? Why should Facebook take it down? Not

1:12:00.200 --> 1:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>threatening anyone, it's not breaking any laws. But this is

1:12:04.160 --> 1:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a window and this is a journalist, This is somebody

1:12:05.960 --> 1:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>who makes a living in the trafficking of information. Well

1:12:09.040 --> 1:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>because at CNN, the trafficking of fake news. But this

1:12:12.120 --> 1:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is what they do they have. They have no defense

1:12:17.320 --> 1:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever of the First Amendment comes to mind for these people,

1:12:20.520 --> 1:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>these these uh pampered multi millionaires, not just at CNN,

1:12:24.439 --> 1:12:27.519
<v Speaker 1>it's some of these other places too. But they all

1:12:27.560 --> 1:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>they care about is that the ideas they don't like

1:12:29.439 --> 1:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are suppressed. All they care about is that the other

1:12:33.880 --> 1:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>side loses, and they're a part of sticking it to them.

1:12:38.840 --> 1:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That this would mean that Facebook is now responsible for

1:12:42.720 --> 1:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>deciding what is even just in good taste content. If

1:12:47.479 --> 1:12:50.599
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is left with deciding what's in good taste, I mean,

1:12:50.640 --> 1:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I would just say that they should probably ban CNN altogether,

1:12:54.000 --> 1:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>because CNN is a joke. As I've been telling you,

1:12:57.880 --> 1:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>CNN International is an embarrassment. It's an embarrassment to this country.

1:13:02.320 --> 1:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>It is anti American propaganda that is being blasted all

1:13:05.600 --> 1:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>over the world, and the people who are a part

1:13:08.200 --> 1:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of it, and those who work for it should be ashamed.

1:13:10.760 --> 1:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course they're not, but they should be. But no

1:13:14.640 --> 1:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>one's saying, oh, Facebook needs to takedown seeing an international

1:13:17.560 --> 1:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Facebook needs to because this where does that end? And

1:13:22.520 --> 1:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they're so upset about you know, they're so upset about

1:13:25.240 --> 1:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi looking so foolish and dumb because Nancy Pelosi

1:13:28.000 --> 1:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is getting old and she's missing a step or two.

1:13:29.720 --> 1:13:32.599
<v Speaker 1>And she did stutter a lot in that press conference.

1:13:32.600 --> 1:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I saw it. She did have a you know, doesn't

1:13:37.400 --> 1:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>seem that shark. And this the people who say, well,

1:13:43.000 --> 1:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you can't say that about her, or

1:13:45.040 --> 1:13:47.599
<v Speaker 1>you're not a psychiatrist or you're not a medical doctor. Yeah.

1:13:47.640 --> 1:13:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I hear about how Trump is going to be removed

1:13:49.520 --> 1:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>by the twenty fifth MM and all the time from

1:13:52.040 --> 1:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>people that now say that Nancy Pelosi's you know that

1:13:55.120 --> 1:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that's beyond the pale. Remember when Hillary just passed out

1:13:59.200 --> 1:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and flopped in the back of a van and people

1:14:02.400 --> 1:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>try to cover it up during the election, and then

1:14:04.840 --> 1:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>we were told, oh, that's terrible and you can admit,

1:14:07.280 --> 1:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, But but Trump is crazy, they say, is

1:14:10.200 --> 1:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>actually crazy. These people have absolutely no ethics whatsoever, no decency,

1:14:19.320 --> 1:14:23.679
<v Speaker 1>no honor. Speaking of no decency or honor, Hillary also

1:14:23.800 --> 1:14:27.519
<v Speaker 1>jumped in on this bandwagon, slamming Facebook, saying that they

1:14:27.560 --> 1:14:30.759
<v Speaker 1>should have removed this place seventeen. The big social media

1:14:30.840 --> 1:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>platforms know their systems are being manipulated by foreign and

1:14:35.200 --> 1:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>domestic actors to sew division, promote extremism and spread misinformation,

1:14:41.000 --> 1:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But they won't get serious about cleaning up their platforms

1:14:45.040 --> 1:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>unless consumers demanded. And we saw why it's so important

1:14:49.200 --> 1:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>just last week when Facebook refused to take down a

1:14:53.120 --> 1:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>fake video of Nancy Pelosi. It wasn't even a close call.

1:14:57.439 --> 1:15:01.639
<v Speaker 1>The video is sexist trash, and YouTube took it down,

1:15:01.760 --> 1:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>but Facebook kept it up sexist trash, so it should

1:15:08.240 --> 1:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>be taken down. Who's going to make those determinations about

1:15:11.800 --> 1:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>what constitutes sexist trash. Who's going to make the determination

1:15:16.280 --> 1:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>about what is just mean spirited and shouldn't be out

1:15:19.720 --> 1:15:24.559
<v Speaker 1>there in the marketplace of ideas. The left likes to

1:15:24.800 --> 1:15:29.759
<v Speaker 1>censor because the left must control. They do not trust

1:15:30.280 --> 1:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>individual agency and human freedom. They do not trust it.

1:15:33.040 --> 1:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>They think there must be a governing body that determines

1:15:36.080 --> 1:15:40.479
<v Speaker 1>everything about what you can do, about what freedoms you have,

1:15:40.760 --> 1:15:42.599
<v Speaker 1>what you can think, what you can say. They want

1:15:42.600 --> 1:15:45.439
<v Speaker 1>control of all of it. They want maximum control, whatever

1:15:45.479 --> 1:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that means. I prefer to live in a world and

1:15:49.080 --> 1:15:52.799
<v Speaker 1>in a country where people get to make decisions about

1:15:52.880 --> 1:15:57.519
<v Speaker 1>themselves to the maximum extent possible. I take the opposite

1:15:57.520 --> 1:16:01.519
<v Speaker 1>point of view, but slant Facebook because they won't remove

1:16:01.560 --> 1:16:05.719
<v Speaker 1>an embarrassing video of Nancy Pelosi. What guideline did it violate?

1:16:05.760 --> 1:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>She says, it's obviously fake because they slowed it down

1:16:09.040 --> 1:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. It's it's obviously fake. It's not fake.

1:16:14.240 --> 1:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a real video of Nancy Pelosi. And even if

1:16:16.800 --> 1:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it were fake, you know, if they were to photoshop

1:16:20.280 --> 1:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and image of you know, a chicken over Nancy Pelosi's face,

1:16:27.120 --> 1:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is that something that needs to be taken down? The

1:16:30.360 --> 1:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>left says yes, you know why, because they can't stand mockery.

1:16:33.520 --> 1:16:37.679
<v Speaker 1>They can't stand it. He really gets to them because

1:16:37.720 --> 1:16:40.679
<v Speaker 1>they're so used to having cultural dominance. At anytime, a Democrat,

1:16:40.720 --> 1:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a Leftist really feels like they're the butt of a joke.

1:16:44.760 --> 1:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>We realize they have no sense of humor either. They

1:16:46.720 --> 1:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>think they're the funny ones, but they actually don't have

1:16:48.400 --> 1:16:51.439
<v Speaker 1>any sense of humor about themselves. Well, I think if

1:16:51.439 --> 1:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it becomes law, it'll be very difficult producer, or rather

1:16:54.760 --> 1:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>doubt we will. Many people who work for us will

1:16:57.320 --> 1:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>not want to work there, and we'll have to heed

1:17:01.000 --> 1:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>their wishes in that regard. Right now, we're watching it

1:17:04.360 --> 1:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>very carefully. I think it's also likely to be challenged

1:17:07.439 --> 1:17:09.439
<v Speaker 1>in the courts and that could delay it, and we're

1:17:10.360 --> 1:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>being careful and cautious about it. But if it becomes law,

1:17:14.760 --> 1:17:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how it's practical for us to continue

1:17:17.800 --> 1:17:23.519
<v Speaker 1>to shoot there. Disney CEO Bob iger on An on

1:17:23.560 --> 1:17:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the abortion bill there in Georgia. This is just something

1:17:27.479 --> 1:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>that we've become accustomed to as conservatives that I don't

1:17:30.640 --> 1:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>think we should have to be accustomed to anymore. I

1:17:33.439 --> 1:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>am sick of all of us just assuming, oh, corporate

1:17:38.160 --> 1:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>America is going to lash out at the right and

1:17:42.120 --> 1:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>never lash out at the left. I mean, Disney is

1:17:45.600 --> 1:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a great American company. It's a huge company,

1:17:50.280 --> 1:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>controls a tremendous amount of contents, bought up all kinds

1:17:52.840 --> 1:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of stuff recently, I know. But if it's a great

1:17:55.920 --> 1:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>American company, shouldn't it represent the American people and their wishes,

1:18:01.360 --> 1:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>or at least shouldn't it be respectful of the American

1:18:04.040 --> 1:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>people in their wishes? Not half of the American people.

1:18:07.880 --> 1:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And when you're talking about some of these abortion extremists,

1:18:11.200 --> 1:18:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it's much much much less than half. You know, the

1:18:14.400 --> 1:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the true left, I mean, the the planned parenthood version

1:18:19.080 --> 1:18:20.479
<v Speaker 1>of what the law should be when it comes to

1:18:20.520 --> 1:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>abortion is supported really by only about fifteen to twenty

1:18:24.080 --> 1:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>percent of the country. It's the hard left view of things.

1:18:27.960 --> 1:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>It is the ideologically rigid progressive approach, and and it's

1:18:34.120 --> 1:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>very doctrinaire. It's very based in a leftist orthodoxy. But

1:18:39.720 --> 1:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>why is it just the assumption that Bob Eiger is

1:18:43.920 --> 1:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>going to threaten the state of Georgia for doing what

1:18:46.840 --> 1:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it's completely within its rights to do, passing a state law,

1:18:49.880 --> 1:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and say that they're going to take business away. So

1:18:51.800 --> 1:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to punish people that are going to work

1:18:54.200 --> 1:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on different sets and you know, as cameramen and craftsmen

1:18:59.240 --> 1:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and key grip and all these things that you do

1:19:01.360 --> 1:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>at these at these film places. I can't even think

1:19:03.960 --> 1:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of all the jobs you're going to punish them because

1:19:07.400 --> 1:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a bunch of progressive ideologues, not just in

1:19:10.760 --> 1:19:13.519
<v Speaker 1>your audience, but clearly in the company. You know. That's

1:19:13.520 --> 1:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>where this that's where the rubber really meets the road

1:19:16.320 --> 1:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>on all of this, is that the c suite at

1:19:19.400 --> 1:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>so many major corporations is full of people who are

1:19:25.240 --> 1:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>left wing ideologues and they don't have any problem inflicting

1:19:31.280 --> 1:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>their beliefs on other people and punishing people who don't

1:19:35.360 --> 1:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>agree with them. And I mean I remember, for example,

1:19:39.680 --> 1:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>being told, look, I'll even tell you where it was.

1:19:42.680 --> 1:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>It was at CNN. I remember being told by a

1:19:44.200 --> 1:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>CNN executive who was involved in the hiring of people

1:19:47.840 --> 1:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>at CNN that he would would not only oppose, but

1:19:52.479 --> 1:19:54.479
<v Speaker 1>do everything in his power to sync the chances of

1:19:54.520 --> 1:19:56.559
<v Speaker 1>anyone who was going to work at CNN on air

1:19:56.960 --> 1:20:01.360
<v Speaker 1>who was not in favor of gay rite. Now, whatever

1:20:01.400 --> 1:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you think about gay marriage and all the rest of it,

1:20:04.479 --> 1:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>just think about that for a moment, though you And

1:20:06.680 --> 1:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that was years ago. That was before um what was

1:20:09.680 --> 1:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it before? And it was right after oberg fell the

1:20:13.880 --> 1:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>decision screen court decision. But he's like, if you you cannot,

1:20:17.960 --> 1:20:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this guy was like, you will not be able to

1:20:19.720 --> 1:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>work there. He will do everything he can to stop you.

1:20:22.960 --> 1:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>They went after Brendon Ike from Mozilla for his previous

1:20:27.200 --> 1:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>support Years ago, Brandon Ike of Mozilla, the CEO and

1:20:31.160 --> 1:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>founder of Mozilla, was chased out of his corporate position

1:20:35.680 --> 1:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>by other people at his company and by the media

1:20:38.840 --> 1:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>because he was supporting in California traditional marriage the same

1:20:43.120 --> 1:20:46.519
<v Speaker 1>at the exact same time that Barack Obama was running

1:20:46.560 --> 1:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>as a traditional marriage candidate. But the left always makes

1:20:49.439 --> 1:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>exceptions for people on their side who are doing the

1:20:52.040 --> 1:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>head fake, or who are a trojan horse, or who

1:20:55.479 --> 1:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>who abandoned the position. As soon as they're in power,

1:20:57.640 --> 1:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they're okay with that. In fact, they like that, They

1:21:00.160 --> 1:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>courage that, that kind of dissembling, that kind of intellectual dishonesty.

1:21:08.840 --> 1:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm gonna say this until I get into power,

1:21:10.760 --> 1:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna do something else. But we have to, we

1:21:13.840 --> 1:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>have to fight back against this. This should not be

1:21:16.200 --> 1:21:19.759
<v Speaker 1>something what Bob Eiger is saying here is that Disney

1:21:19.800 --> 1:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>takes a political position as a company against conservatives, and

1:21:24.240 --> 1:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>this should not be okay. This should not be something

1:21:27.439 --> 1:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that goes without pushback and without organized dare I say, resistance.

1:21:33.400 --> 1:21:36.479
<v Speaker 1>This is also just culturally on the left. They they're

1:21:36.720 --> 1:21:41.360
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable doing this. They're very comfortable making examples of

1:21:41.400 --> 1:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>people for political reasons that have nothing to do with

1:21:43.720 --> 1:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the company's business, that have nothing to do with you know,

1:21:47.400 --> 1:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>whether or not someone is going to be a good

1:21:49.280 --> 1:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>customer of theirs, just like the left will boycott. It

1:21:53.120 --> 1:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is known. It is known throughout the media industry that

1:21:58.040 --> 1:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>leftists can say all kinds of crazy stuff and they'll

1:22:02.040 --> 1:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>still get blue chip, very uh you know, very wealthy sponsors.

1:22:09.200 --> 1:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>They'll they'll get the Coke, Mercedes, McDonald's, etc. But on

1:22:14.360 --> 1:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the right, oh, you're all you're always put on notice.

1:22:17.160 --> 1:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you if you step out of line,

1:22:19.120 --> 1:22:21.479
<v Speaker 1>if you say something that's a little too conservative, if

1:22:21.520 --> 1:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you you know, if you if you don't dance to

1:22:24.920 --> 1:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the tune that the leftists tell you too, you may

1:22:27.960 --> 1:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>find yourself getting all your sponsors pulled. In fact, you

1:22:30.160 --> 1:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>might find yourself getting your bank account uh pulled. You know,

1:22:34.600 --> 1:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they may say, sorry, you know, we're gonna give you

1:22:36.280 --> 1:22:38.519
<v Speaker 1>your money back or whatever, but you can't do use

1:22:38.520 --> 1:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>our banking services. They obviously will go after people for

1:22:43.120 --> 1:22:46.559
<v Speaker 1>the platform, for the platforms they use as well. They

1:22:46.560 --> 1:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>want they want they want speech police for the left,

1:22:50.400 --> 1:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>or the left wants to be the speech police on Facebook,

1:22:53.800 --> 1:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, on Twitter. They know how powerful these things are.

1:22:56.920 --> 1:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>For those of you that say, oh buck those platforms,

1:22:59.479 --> 1:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't it over blown? No, the future generations, the cable

1:23:02.920 --> 1:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>news environment is going to go away as we know it.

1:23:07.240 --> 1:23:09.559
<v Speaker 1>They'll still be shows and I mean maybe the networks

1:23:09.560 --> 1:23:11.759
<v Speaker 1>will still exist, but you're gonna be watching it digitally.

1:23:12.120 --> 1:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna be watching an ala carte, and increasingly the

1:23:16.560 --> 1:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>major social platforms are going to be determining. They already

1:23:19.320 --> 1:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>are largely determining the news cycle, but they're going to

1:23:22.200 --> 1:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>be almost entirely deciding what people see as tremendous power

1:23:27.240 --> 1:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in it. And the left wants to use that power

1:23:29.560 --> 1:23:31.559
<v Speaker 1>to censor. They want to use that power to push

1:23:31.640 --> 1:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>ideas that they not only think are correct, but those

1:23:34.800 --> 1:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>who don't hold those ideas aren't worth listening to. They

1:23:38.080 --> 1:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are to be silenced, they are to be silenced. And

1:23:42.960 --> 1:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a constant frustration for me that we just,

1:23:49.280 --> 1:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, in half the country roughly speaking as Republican

1:23:52.200 --> 1:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>or conservative, and we don't We don't try to even

1:23:56.400 --> 1:23:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the score. We don't try to hold them to account.

1:23:58.160 --> 1:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>We let them get away with this crowd, with this

1:24:00.560 --> 1:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>nonsense of politicizing corporate America, politicizing sports. It's always a

1:24:06.960 --> 1:24:09.479
<v Speaker 1>one way street. We just take it, We take the abuse.

1:24:10.640 --> 1:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it will require for us to

1:24:12.960 --> 1:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>decide that enough is enough. You know, maybe we do

1:24:15.960 --> 1:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>have to fight fire with fire. Maybe some really painful

1:24:18.320 --> 1:24:20.479
<v Speaker 1>boycotts of some companies is the only way to get

1:24:20.479 --> 1:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>them to stop this stuff. I mean, you want to

1:24:23.800 --> 1:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>know how biased they are about things like abortion. I mean,

1:24:26.439 --> 1:24:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the media is the praetorian guard of abortion for nine

1:24:31.720 --> 1:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>months of a pregnancy and even after the pregnancy, on

1:24:34.520 --> 1:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>demand for any reason or no reason. The media is

1:24:38.240 --> 1:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, boomers in the media, who unfortunately control the

1:24:41.439 --> 1:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>news media. The boomer generation of liberals in the media

1:24:45.640 --> 1:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>are the abortion radicals more so than any other generation.

1:24:52.320 --> 1:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And these boomer abortion radicals do not want, especially in

1:24:56.080 --> 1:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the waning years of their careers, to have a country that,

1:25:01.320 --> 1:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>by its actions and by the laws that it passes

1:25:03.920 --> 1:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and by the polls that are taken, repudiates abortion as

1:25:08.760 --> 1:25:11.759
<v Speaker 1>a women's rights issue and treats it as a life issue.

1:25:12.840 --> 1:25:16.479
<v Speaker 1>And that's how you have someone like, for example, Alison Cama,

1:25:16.760 --> 1:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Allison Camarada over at CNN, who makes a look just

1:25:22.640 --> 1:25:24.519
<v Speaker 1>a little slip here, a little slip, but it tells

1:25:24.520 --> 1:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you a lot, doesn't it play eighteen issue. Lots of

1:25:28.680 --> 1:25:31.479
<v Speaker 1>families do have to make that decision based on the

1:25:31.560 --> 1:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>single characteristic of finding out that their children that their

1:25:34.680 --> 1:25:39.759
<v Speaker 1>fetus has a severe abnormality. Oh oh gosh, I said, children,

1:25:39.800 --> 1:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm in fetus. Now she had it right the first time.

1:25:44.160 --> 1:25:48.479
<v Speaker 1>Fetus is a child. That's what it is. Fetus is

1:25:48.520 --> 1:25:51.679
<v Speaker 1>a child. But they know they have to control the language.

1:25:51.680 --> 1:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>They know they have to use words that obscure what's

1:25:53.840 --> 1:25:59.519
<v Speaker 1>really happening. They cannot discuss openly, clearly, honestly what these

1:25:59.560 --> 1:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>abortion procedures involve. And they know that they're they're paymasters,

1:26:05.439 --> 1:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the people that determine who in the mainstream

1:26:07.960 --> 1:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>media is going to get these big fat paychecks and

1:26:09.760 --> 1:26:12.599
<v Speaker 1>be important and be famous. They're all pro they're all

1:26:12.600 --> 1:26:15.599
<v Speaker 1>pro choice. They're all pro choice, a whole lot of them.

1:26:16.160 --> 1:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's why Camarada, how to catch yourself there right away.

1:26:19.720 --> 1:26:22.799
<v Speaker 1>But it's time. It's time we fight back, my friends.

1:26:23.520 --> 1:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't sit around and just let them abuse us

1:26:25.680 --> 1:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for our beliefs anymore, because that's what they're gonna keep

1:26:28.040 --> 1:26:30.599
<v Speaker 1>doing unless we put a stop to it. I guess

1:26:30.600 --> 1:26:33.719
<v Speaker 1>because it's summertime and I'm gonna be spending more time outside.

1:26:33.760 --> 1:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been a little more uh what's the word consistent

1:26:38.520 --> 1:26:40.559
<v Speaker 1>about trying to be active. You know, you do't wanna

1:26:40.600 --> 1:26:43.839
<v Speaker 1>be that guy who's running around like, yeah, if my bellet,

1:26:45.200 --> 1:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it's huge game, my bellet at the beach, you're want

1:26:48.280 --> 1:26:49.559
<v Speaker 1>to be that or maybe you do want to be

1:26:49.600 --> 1:26:52.799
<v Speaker 1>that guy. You'd probably make friends with all sorts of folks,

1:26:52.880 --> 1:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, wants to rub the bellet for a good look. Glad,

1:26:58.000 --> 1:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>but trying to trying to get the belly shrinking a

1:26:59.800 --> 1:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And so I've been working out more and

1:27:02.800 --> 1:27:05.679
<v Speaker 1>doing more active things for the last well last couple

1:27:05.720 --> 1:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of months, except for when I was traveling and I

1:27:08.320 --> 1:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>got to say one thing that that's really come to me.

1:27:10.280 --> 1:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is a function of getting old, but I

1:27:13.280 --> 1:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like my I have to get myself used. Idea

1:27:18.280 --> 1:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of just playing hurt so to speak, right, you know,

1:27:20.600 --> 1:27:22.400
<v Speaker 1>when you're when you're playing sports. I used to play

1:27:23.080 --> 1:27:25.519
<v Speaker 1>organized sports back in the day. That sounds like a

1:27:25.560 --> 1:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>nerdy way of saying it, but I played basketball and

1:27:28.320 --> 1:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>soccer and tennis pretty much anything without a helmet because

1:27:31.720 --> 1:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>my head. You laugh, but it's true. My head was

1:27:34.040 --> 1:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>too big for the helmets and they'd always try to

1:27:37.160 --> 1:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>jam my head into a helmet that was too small,

1:27:38.880 --> 1:27:40.479
<v Speaker 1>and it gave me. If you've ever had that happen

1:27:40.560 --> 1:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to give you a terrible headache, that's kind of like

1:27:42.960 --> 1:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>having a shoe on. That's way too tight, you your

1:27:44.760 --> 1:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>foot will cramp. You know, same thing with a helmet

1:27:47.360 --> 1:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that's too tight, your head will just you'll get a

1:27:49.800 --> 1:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>really vicious headache from it. So I played non helmet sports,

1:27:53.600 --> 1:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>which a lot of you are like laughing at me

1:27:55.520 --> 1:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, and you should. You should laugh at me.

1:27:57.479 --> 1:28:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Buck's poofy hair prevented him from ever playing football or

1:28:00.160 --> 1:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>lacrosse or ice hockey. But you know, you have to

1:28:04.160 --> 1:28:07.880
<v Speaker 1>play hurt, right Like I I my senior year, broke

1:28:08.040 --> 1:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>my fifth metatarsal bone in my foot, which is very common.

1:28:11.640 --> 1:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>It's a stress fracture. You don't have to do anything

1:28:13.439 --> 1:28:15.599
<v Speaker 1>to it, it'll just break. And I didn't know that,

1:28:15.640 --> 1:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and I played an entire season of soccer with a

1:28:17.920 --> 1:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>broken bone in my foot, which later on when a

1:28:20.760 --> 1:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>doctor X rated, it was like that is insane. How'd

1:28:22.840 --> 1:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you do that? And I was like, well, by the way,

1:28:25.240 --> 1:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I do not recommend it, because then you have pain

1:28:27.320 --> 1:28:29.519
<v Speaker 1>in your foot and you know, I limp a little

1:28:29.560 --> 1:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>bit and it's not good. You want to get your

1:28:32.000 --> 1:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>fifth metatarsal fixed if you break it. But you get

1:28:34.800 --> 1:28:37.479
<v Speaker 1>used to having to play hurt, just in life in

1:28:37.520 --> 1:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>general and trying to avoid injury. I find now that

1:28:41.080 --> 1:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I have the discipline and the knowledge to do what

1:28:44.240 --> 1:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I need to do physically to keep myself feeling healthy

1:28:47.000 --> 1:28:50.759
<v Speaker 1>and active. But now it sounds like I'm I'm almost

1:28:50.760 --> 1:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>doing an advertisement for a retirement home to keep myself

1:28:53.360 --> 1:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>feeling healthy and active. But playing hurt man, it's such

1:28:56.920 --> 1:29:00.559
<v Speaker 1>a big part of it, you know, just avoid bad

1:29:00.600 --> 1:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>injury too. I saw recently that are my old colleague

1:29:06.160 --> 1:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>from The Blaze, Matt Walsh. He was tweeting out about

1:29:09.000 --> 1:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>how he ruptured his achilles tendon. I don't know what

1:29:12.120 --> 1:29:13.559
<v Speaker 1>to do to of what I am. That is a

1:29:13.640 --> 1:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>fear that I have. I've thought about getting back into

1:29:16.120 --> 1:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>doing wind sprints because intermittent intermittent training and wind sprints

1:29:22.160 --> 1:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>or interval training rather not intermittent training, it's intermittent fasting.

1:29:24.960 --> 1:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But interval training with wind sprints I have found in

1:29:28.040 --> 1:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the past is among the most especially when you add

1:29:30.920 --> 1:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>inclines into it. So you go at very high speed

1:29:33.400 --> 1:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>at a steep incline, and then you'd go at a

1:29:35.720 --> 1:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>more resting rate run and then you keep switching back

1:29:37.920 --> 1:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and forth. One of the most effective things for I

1:29:42.840 --> 1:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>found for weight loss and just overall health. But I

1:29:45.880 --> 1:29:47.479
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm old enough now, or if I just

1:29:47.520 --> 1:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>try to do some wind sprints, I might rupture my

1:29:49.320 --> 1:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>achilles tendon. You know, So I Mark, what's the worst

1:29:52.280 --> 1:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>injury you've ever had from sports? Birth? Birth? Yeah, when

1:29:58.160 --> 1:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I was born. That's not that's not an injury from sports. Dude,

1:30:02.200 --> 1:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>back on your I had a friend who did that,

1:30:03.840 --> 1:30:07.679
<v Speaker 1>who ruptured as achilles really yeah, and I was involved

1:30:07.680 --> 1:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in the in the race. It was hilarious, makes a

1:30:11.000 --> 1:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>pop noise from what I understand it. Really, man, he

1:30:14.200 --> 1:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't he wasn't right for like a year. Yeah, yeah,

1:30:18.320 --> 1:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to see. This is a thing like I'm

1:30:20.240 --> 1:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>at this point now where you know, I used to

1:30:21.920 --> 1:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to play her, but now I just don't

1:30:23.280 --> 1:30:25.639
<v Speaker 1>want to get hurt. I sound so whimpy right now,

1:30:25.680 --> 1:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's true. You know, I'll do some like weights

1:30:27.960 --> 1:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. I used to take like an

1:30:29.680 --> 1:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Olympic bar and throw it around and you're all rare,

1:30:32.080 --> 1:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm like, maybe I'll just use the five pounders,

1:30:34.200 --> 1:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, just yeay, like get a little get the

1:30:36.360 --> 1:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>heart pumping. I gotta get. I gotta get back into

1:30:39.800 --> 1:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>beast mode. Beast mode for buck. None of this whimp

1:30:43.200 --> 1:30:45.479
<v Speaker 1>mode stuff. But I'm trying so those of you who have,

1:30:45.800 --> 1:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>if you have team and exercise routine that has worked

1:30:48.840 --> 1:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>fantastically for you and you care to share it, I

1:30:51.120 --> 1:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>will tell you this. Whoever sends me the best exercise

1:30:53.880 --> 1:30:56.559
<v Speaker 1>and meal plan routine at Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton,

1:30:56.840 --> 1:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll get a shout out on the show. How about that.

1:30:58.920 --> 1:31:01.439
<v Speaker 1>We'll make this almost a little a little contest. But

1:31:01.520 --> 1:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>did you know, and don't give me one of the

1:31:02.760 --> 1:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>things we were like, you're gonna eat seven hundred calories

1:31:05.400 --> 1:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a day and you're gonna work out for six hours

1:31:07.160 --> 1:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a day. I got a life, I got things I

1:31:09.040 --> 1:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta do. Keep it, keep it realistic, all right for

1:31:12.240 --> 1:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>those of you, and don't send me photos of your abs.

1:31:14.360 --> 1:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>For all I know there's like amateur and even some

1:31:16.760 --> 1:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>professional weightlifters who listen to this show. All right, you

1:31:18.920 --> 1:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>don't need to make the radio host feel bad. I

1:31:21.040 --> 1:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>don't need to see your six pack, but do share

1:31:22.960 --> 1:31:26.479
<v Speaker 1>your meal plan and your workout tricks. I'll take all

1:31:26.479 --> 1:31:28.559
<v Speaker 1>that stuff because I don't want to rupture my achilles.

1:31:28.560 --> 1:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. Hey, Team Buck, it's time for roll.

1:31:39.960 --> 1:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Call Facebook dot com slash Buck Sex in. That is

1:31:59.720 --> 1:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>how we get the roll call action going. Very easy.

1:32:04.400 --> 1:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Just go there, send a message. I love when people say,

1:32:07.280 --> 1:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is this where we send the role call message? And

1:32:08.960 --> 1:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll read that on air of course, of course it

1:32:12.479 --> 1:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is where we send the roll call message. Dale is

1:32:15.000 --> 1:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>first up, Buck, What do you think the odds are

1:32:17.920 --> 1:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that Muller's stunt yesterday was the result of negotiations between

1:32:23.000 --> 1:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>himself and Nadler as a way to avoid testifying. He

1:32:27.360 --> 1:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially gave Nadler and the leftist what they wanted while

1:32:30.240 --> 1:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>avoiding being grilled by the Republicans. You know, Dale, I

1:32:34.880 --> 1:32:39.519
<v Speaker 1>give you points for creative outside the box thinking. I

1:32:39.560 --> 1:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>would just say that there's the reason I think that

1:32:43.360 --> 1:32:46.559
<v Speaker 1>did not happen is that it is too much risk

1:32:46.640 --> 1:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>for too little gain for Muller. There's no reason for

1:32:51.200 --> 1:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>him to put himself in a position where something like

1:32:55.080 --> 1:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that could come out and be a big problem for him.

1:32:58.280 --> 1:33:02.479
<v Speaker 1>But I can't to borrow from Muller. If I could

1:33:02.520 --> 1:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>conclusively prove that you were wrong, I would say so.

1:33:06.120 --> 1:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I am merely saying I don't think that happened, But

1:33:10.479 --> 1:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that. I'm not saying it. I'm not

1:33:12.880 --> 1:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>saying it did not saying it didn't. You know, I

1:33:14.760 --> 1:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>do want to don't. So that's what I got for

1:33:17.680 --> 1:33:22.439
<v Speaker 1>you on that, my friend, TJ. Right Buck, I'm kind

1:33:22.439 --> 1:33:25.599
<v Speaker 1>of glad to hear you're leaving Rising, especially on days

1:33:25.640 --> 1:33:28.519
<v Speaker 1>like today when Jamal fills in for Crystal. While the

1:33:28.520 --> 1:33:30.479
<v Speaker 1>two of them may be of the same political bent,

1:33:30.560 --> 1:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at least Crystal is mostly respectful of guests, especially pro

1:33:33.960 --> 1:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>life guests. Unlike the way Jamal treated Jeanie this morning despicable.

1:33:38.600 --> 1:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>At least let her talk. I've never heard more interruptions.

1:33:41.000 --> 1:33:45.959
<v Speaker 1>He's got a lot to learn about hosting. T J. Yeah,

1:33:46.000 --> 1:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I look, I called Jeanie afterwards to apologize for the

1:33:51.320 --> 1:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>way she was treated on and I did try and

1:33:54.400 --> 1:33:57.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, bring the temperature down at that table a

1:33:57.520 --> 1:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Although it's a very hard thing to get

1:34:01.160 --> 1:34:04.519
<v Speaker 1>a co host to not be so riled up, I've

1:34:04.840 --> 1:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>something that I've learned. It's just because then all of

1:34:06.880 --> 1:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you become the problem too, and you can

1:34:08.880 --> 1:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>make it much much worse. So unless you're just gonna

1:34:12.040 --> 1:34:15.519
<v Speaker 1>bail on the segment, Yeah, TJ, I'm not going to

1:34:15.560 --> 1:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>disagree with you, but it was I have very rarely

1:34:18.760 --> 1:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>had to call someone to apologize for the way they

1:34:21.000 --> 1:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>were treated in my presence and the head of the

1:34:27.280 --> 1:34:30.519
<v Speaker 1>March for Life. She was not given the respect that

1:34:30.680 --> 1:34:33.599
<v Speaker 1>she was due as a guest, and I tried, and

1:34:34.040 --> 1:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately it wasn't enough to make that happen. So yeah,

1:34:39.000 --> 1:34:42.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm it's time to go for me, TJ from the Hill.

1:34:42.840 --> 1:34:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's where it is. I am moving on and focusing,

1:34:46.880 --> 1:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>quite honestly, just focusing on this radio show. I have

1:34:51.040 --> 1:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>some other projects that are around the radio show that

1:34:53.640 --> 1:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll be able to announce very soon, really exciting, very

1:34:56.200 --> 1:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>cool stuff. We're going to be jumping Team BA. We're

1:35:00.200 --> 1:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be jumping into the digital world. So that's that's

1:35:04.920 --> 1:35:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest preview I can give you right now. But

1:35:06.800 --> 1:35:08.639
<v Speaker 1>we're going to jump in it. That doesn't change anything

1:35:08.640 --> 1:35:14.439
<v Speaker 1>on radio. I'm just saying, think video, think podcasting, think

1:35:14.479 --> 1:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>things like that, all right, Benjamin, Right Buck. I enjoy

1:35:19.200 --> 1:35:23.679
<v Speaker 1>your television and movie reviews. It saves me from wasting

1:35:23.720 --> 1:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>time and being disappointed when a show ends up being

1:35:26.080 --> 1:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>liberal trash propaganda. My wife and I both appreciate it.

1:35:30.240 --> 1:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Shields high well, Benjamin' I'm so happy to provide that

1:35:33.160 --> 1:35:37.240
<v Speaker 1>additional service, my friend. Thank you. Sometimes people say to me,

1:35:37.400 --> 1:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not a movie critic, Well are you criticizing movies

1:35:40.160 --> 1:35:42.439
<v Speaker 1>on you? Well, you know, I just talk about things.

1:35:42.560 --> 1:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I try to share worthwhile, interesting, entertaining information. I mean,

1:35:49.880 --> 1:35:53.439
<v Speaker 1>that's that is what I try to manage. That is

1:35:53.479 --> 1:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>what I try to do here on the show. So

1:35:55.360 --> 1:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that's my mandate, that is my mission. And if that

1:35:59.120 --> 1:36:01.559
<v Speaker 1>means that I can also Oh man, I was trying

1:36:01.560 --> 1:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to watch it wasn't deep Water Rising yesterday, which is

1:36:08.439 --> 1:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a Let me see if I can pull this up

1:36:10.080 --> 1:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>real quick. Um, I think it's called is it deep

1:36:13.360 --> 1:36:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Water Rising or what is it? Uh? No, deep Water Horizon? Oh,

1:36:18.760 --> 1:36:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember what this is? What this is called? Um?

1:36:24.560 --> 1:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It had man, It's it's about a it's a movie.

1:36:28.160 --> 1:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually finding this in real time movie. But a

1:36:31.160 --> 1:36:34.679
<v Speaker 1>giant squid from the ninth attacking a cruise ship. Yep,

1:36:34.720 --> 1:36:38.320
<v Speaker 1>here we go. It's called deep Rising. There we go

1:36:38.520 --> 1:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>deep It's funny. We're just talking about my show rising

1:36:41.240 --> 1:36:46.240
<v Speaker 1>deep Rising? Wait? Is that it? Um? I think this

1:36:46.400 --> 1:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is right? It is? It is? It is terrible. It

1:36:52.960 --> 1:36:57.559
<v Speaker 1>is terrible. Um, it's a really really bad movie. So

1:36:57.680 --> 1:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I would not go about watching that any anytime soon.

1:37:01.439 --> 1:37:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I would I think that you'll be very very happy

1:37:05.439 --> 1:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>if you skip that one. But I did think it

1:37:07.640 --> 1:37:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was kind of funny that, you know, when when I

1:37:11.360 --> 1:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>was watching it, you see people who back in the day,

1:37:14.160 --> 1:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>they whenever they're firing an automatic weapon, they would shoot

1:37:18.360 --> 1:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>from the waist and kind of move the weapon back

1:37:20.920 --> 1:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and forth, like side to side, as though that was

1:37:23.040 --> 1:37:25.240
<v Speaker 1>going to make the bullets go faster. There's a lot

1:37:25.240 --> 1:37:30.679
<v Speaker 1>of that in in Deep Rising. Um. Yeah, such such

1:37:30.720 --> 1:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a yep famkagens And this is the movie such nineteen

1:37:33.840 --> 1:37:37.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight, Such a bad movie, not not worth anyone's time.

1:37:37.840 --> 1:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I was amazed at how cheesy and garbage it was.

1:37:41.760 --> 1:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>All right. Next up is Jeremy Buck with companies like

1:37:47.160 --> 1:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Uber and Open Table rating their customers. Is this not

1:37:50.280 --> 1:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a precursor to China's social rating system we've been hearing

1:37:52.880 --> 1:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>about shields high Jeremy, Well, Jeremy, I don't think it's

1:37:56.920 --> 1:38:00.519
<v Speaker 1>a precursor to that. I think that you know, you

1:38:00.560 --> 1:38:02.479
<v Speaker 1>look at how much of your life is already determined

1:38:02.520 --> 1:38:05.519
<v Speaker 1>by your record and by you know, your driving record

1:38:05.560 --> 1:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>influences how much you pay for insurance, your academic record

1:38:10.120 --> 1:38:12.200
<v Speaker 1>where you go to school, what jobs you get, your

1:38:12.240 --> 1:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>employment record, your criminal record. These are all This is

1:38:17.200 --> 1:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>all data about humans. That about humans, that affects what

1:38:22.240 --> 1:38:24.559
<v Speaker 1>we can do and what our options and opportunities are.

1:38:24.640 --> 1:38:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's already happening. What China has is are you

1:38:30.760 --> 1:38:33.439
<v Speaker 1>supportive of the state and doing what the state wants?

1:38:33.600 --> 1:38:36.639
<v Speaker 1>And that's different than Uber in my mind at least,

1:38:36.680 --> 1:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that's different than Uber saying this person is polite and

1:38:38.760 --> 1:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>friendly and shows up when they say they're going to

1:38:40.920 --> 1:38:47.760
<v Speaker 1>show up for pickup stuff like that. Laurel all rights, Hey, Buck,

1:38:47.760 --> 1:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were reading an ad for podcasts or

1:38:49.640 --> 1:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>joking when you started about encouraging social credit through Uber Dude. Seriously,

1:38:54.400 --> 1:38:57.679
<v Speaker 1>that is ripe for abuse, if I'm not mistaken. Wow,

1:38:57.720 --> 1:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>another person who compares this to China, you are against this.

1:39:00.120 --> 1:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>China started this nonsense. The problem we have in society

1:39:02.960 --> 1:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't that people are rude, is that we force everyone

1:39:05.400 --> 1:39:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to be positive, resulting an outburst when our internal emotional

1:39:08.320 --> 1:39:11.240
<v Speaker 1>state gets out of hand. No one wants to be angry, mean,

1:39:11.400 --> 1:39:14.439
<v Speaker 1>or rude. Empathy and compassion or how you change the society,

1:39:14.520 --> 1:39:16.880
<v Speaker 1>not more punishment for things that we perceive as wrong.

1:39:17.360 --> 1:39:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Watch the Black Mirror episode episode nosedive, and remember we're

1:39:21.000 --> 1:39:25.360
<v Speaker 1>all human. I don't know, Laurel, I'm gonna agree to

1:39:25.400 --> 1:39:28.519
<v Speaker 1>disagree with you on this one. I think that people

1:39:28.800 --> 1:39:30.800
<v Speaker 1>engage in a business trends. I mean, should we not

1:39:30.840 --> 1:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>have Yelp reviews for businesses? Is that, big brother? Or

1:39:34.200 --> 1:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is that? I like to know if a place where

1:39:36.920 --> 1:39:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to conduct business has a reputation of being dishonest,

1:39:42.560 --> 1:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>doing bad work, overcharging people. So if that's true for businesses,

1:39:46.880 --> 1:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>why can't it be true for your interactions with a business.

1:39:49.920 --> 1:39:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand, in fact, what is a credit score

1:39:53.200 --> 1:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>other than a compilation of your trustworthiness in paying your

1:39:59.240 --> 1:40:01.559
<v Speaker 1>debts and looking at the level of debt you maintain.

1:40:02.840 --> 1:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is already out there, I don't so I

1:40:05.720 --> 1:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>don't agree that this is the Chinese social credit system,

1:40:09.479 --> 1:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>which is far more invasive and intrusive and has to

1:40:13.160 --> 1:40:16.599
<v Speaker 1>do with state mandated policy and the support of state

1:40:16.640 --> 1:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>mandated policy. So and then also it helps you for

1:40:19.680 --> 1:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>dating apps and stuff. I should probably read. There's a

1:40:21.640 --> 1:40:23.479
<v Speaker 1>couple of good books out right now about the Chinese

1:40:23.479 --> 1:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>social credit system, and maybe I'll dig into those. Wow,

1:40:28.000 --> 1:40:30.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot a lot of people, A lot of people

1:40:30.520 --> 1:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>got really thought the Uber conversation yesterday, the whole inbox

1:40:34.360 --> 1:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is full of this stuff. Book. You talked about ranking

1:40:37.000 --> 1:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>people on niceness or nastiness. Does this sound a lot

1:40:40.200 --> 1:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>like the Chinese social ranking system? No, guys, it's not

1:40:44.439 --> 1:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>ranking you as a person in general for your niceness

1:40:47.400 --> 1:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>or nastiness. It's a it's not a totalitarian surveillance state

1:40:52.000 --> 1:40:56.479
<v Speaker 1>that's assessing. It's when you ask for an Uber ride pickup?

1:40:57.000 --> 1:40:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Are are you at the place you're supposed to be?

1:40:59.840 --> 1:41:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And are you a reasonable person in that in that interaction?

1:41:03.439 --> 1:41:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why. Oh man, Well, it's a good

1:41:06.800 --> 1:41:08.439
<v Speaker 1>idea and thought. I think that if libs are a

1:41:08.520 --> 1:41:10.559
<v Speaker 1>high percentage of restaurants to have, how would that work?

1:41:10.600 --> 1:41:13.240
<v Speaker 1>If you're a conservative, you get a bad ranking from them.

1:41:13.640 --> 1:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But I mean this is true of anything. I mean,

1:41:15.160 --> 1:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>any ranking system. You can get someone who wants to,

1:41:18.600 --> 1:41:20.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, mess with you or mess up what's going on.

1:41:20.720 --> 1:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So I disagree, folks, I know a lot of you

1:41:24.160 --> 1:41:28.400
<v Speaker 1>are are you going right to the China thing here? China?

1:41:29.720 --> 1:41:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Michelle right? Buck M good to hear your show. Thank you, Michelle,

1:41:34.720 --> 1:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that very much. Next up here we have

1:41:41.280 --> 1:41:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Valerie who writes movie talkers. They covered your social behavior

1:41:44.880 --> 1:41:48.439
<v Speaker 1>idea in the Fox series The Orville. By the way,

1:41:48.920 --> 1:41:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you have an enjoyable program. Well, thank you so much, Valerie.

1:41:51.760 --> 1:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. We hope the program is very much enjoyable.

1:41:55.880 --> 1:41:58.400
<v Speaker 1>That I'd already say, Valerie, I think maybe that was

1:41:58.439 --> 1:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the one that Alan Rights hey Buck enjoyed seeing you

1:42:02.600 --> 1:42:04.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Hill. But it's for the best that you

1:42:04.360 --> 1:42:07.080
<v Speaker 1>can pursue your convictions without compromise. You'll be leaving the

1:42:07.120 --> 1:42:09.479
<v Speaker 1>swamp and going back to NYC or maybe even coming

1:42:09.479 --> 1:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>out to La Alan TBD, my friend TBD. But I

1:42:14.920 --> 1:42:19.479
<v Speaker 1>am leaving the Hill Fae show. So that is now

1:42:19.520 --> 1:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>out there and people know it. All that hasn't up

1:42:22.600 --> 1:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>been aficial. It'll be officially announced on Monday. Those you

1:42:24.640 --> 1:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to the radio show, you get a little sneak

1:42:26.160 --> 1:42:29.720
<v Speaker 1>prev because you're like my family. Debra Rights, I love it.

1:42:29.760 --> 1:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Dems are focused on getting Trump. They cannot even run

1:42:32.040 --> 1:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a good campaign based on that. Yes, Debra, they're not

1:42:37.120 --> 1:42:40.880
<v Speaker 1>really running a campaign at all. They're just running a

1:42:42.000 --> 1:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of emotional smear effort. I mean, they're just they're

1:42:46.360 --> 1:42:51.320
<v Speaker 1>they've completely lost themselves in Trump hatred that knows no

1:42:51.920 --> 1:42:56.599
<v Speaker 1>limitations or rationality, and they think you and I are

1:42:56.640 --> 1:42:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the crazy ones. That's what's so interesting about at least

1:42:59.720 --> 1:43:02.479
<v Speaker 1>to me. So what do we have tomorrow Friday? Oh

1:43:02.479 --> 1:43:04.519
<v Speaker 1>that's right, man, it's gonna be a little freestyle Friday.

1:43:04.560 --> 1:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>You know. Let me know on the comments today, folks,

1:43:06.160 --> 1:43:08.280
<v Speaker 1>if you want us to bring back action movie quote Friday.

1:43:08.320 --> 1:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It's been a long time. I feel like some of

1:43:10.080 --> 1:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you really enjoyed that we'd open the phone lines for it.

1:43:12.080 --> 1:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Let me know, Facebook, dot com, slashbuck Sexton or anything

1:43:14.840 --> 1:43:17.599
<v Speaker 1>else you think you want for Friday shows. I want

1:43:17.600 --> 1:43:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to you know, I want to make sure that you

1:43:19.320 --> 1:43:21.320
<v Speaker 1>guys are getting what you want on the Friday. So

1:43:22.080 --> 1:43:25.799
<v Speaker 1>send me those thoughts and we'll be talking tomorrow, same time,

1:43:26.040 --> 1:43:28.439
<v Speaker 1>same place. Team. You know how we roll, you know

1:43:28.479 --> 1:43:30.839
<v Speaker 1>how we keep it real, shields high,