WEBVTT - #579 Packers Unscripted: It's showtime

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot Com. I am Mike Spofford, joined as always

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>by my partner in crime, West Hot Courts were coming

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to you here from socially distant locations at lambeau Field West.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It's almost here. Saturday, three thirty pm Central time, kickoff

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>at lambeau Field the NFC Divisional playoff between the Green

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers and the Los Angeles Rams. We might as

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>well get right into it. Keys to victory here for

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay. If you want to start offensive side defensive side,

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you pick. But what's it going to take

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>for the Packers to come out victorious? First and foremost?

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Not getting caught up in the narrative. And what I

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>mean by that is there's been a lot of consternation

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>about Aaron Donald. What status, What is his status gonna be?

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>What is he gonna look like? Is he gonna be

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Aaron Donald that everybody's accustomed to see in the

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>term inator that everyone's accustomed to seeing. And my my

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>best advice for that is, don't pay attention to it.

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald is showing up on Saturday afternoon. He is

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be ready to play. And it was funny

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this earlier this week, Mike someone mentioned inside Ringbox like, Hey,

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, with him having the rib injury, does that

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>mean they should maybe gear their game plan towards him. Like,

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>if you ever find yourself in a position where you

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have to gear your game plan towards Aaron Donald, I

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's a very good game plan. Your What

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the Packers need to do is is you've said multiple times,

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>do what they do best and respect the opponent that

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going to see. Be prepared for the league's top defense,

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the league's top scoring defense. Be prepared for a unit

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that is going to challenge you, particularly in the in

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the trenches and the line of scrimmage. If the Packers

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>come out in respect Aaron Donald and understand the threat

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that he presents and down in the front, I feel

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>like Green Bay will be able to find its magic,

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to, you know, figure out where its offense

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>needs to go to succeed and make those adjustments. And

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>then whatever happens with Aaron Donald the rest of the way,

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that's up for the the Los Angeles Rams to figure out. Yeah,

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's where I keep coming back to with this game.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And you said it is the do what you do best.

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And when I look at I look at the offensive

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball. For the Packers. There are three

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>things the Packers have done really really well offensively to

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>get to being the top scoring offense in the league.

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>They've protected the football, They've converted on third down, and

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they've scored touchdowns when they're in the red zone or

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the gold zone, whatever you want to call it. But okay,

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. Third down the Packers are like second

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in the league and third down conversions the conversion percentage,

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are third in the league. In third down defense.

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>That might end up kind of being a wash as

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you go through this game, because both the Packers offense

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Rams defense very very good. But in turnovers and in

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>red zone play, the Packers have a distinct advantage. Green

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Bay was plus seven, I believe plus seven, yet in

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>turnover margin through the regular season, the Rams were minus three.

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Now to be minus in the turnover margin for a

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>full regular season and still win ten games, that doesn't

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>happen very often. But if the Packers continue to protect

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball, you can't discount how important it was for

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>the Rams to win the turnover battle. In Seattle to

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>zero last week and knock off the team that was

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the division champ in their own division in the NFC West.

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>As far as the red zone goes, Packers number one

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in the league, and it's been even higher than that

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>during this winning streak to close out the regular season.

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>The Rams, they're not bad in the red zone defensively,

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but twelveth in the league. That's a pretty big discrepancy there,

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>number one versus number twelve. As far as the Packers

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>offense versus the Rams defense, that's where green Bay has

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>an edge. You have to play to where you have

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>your edge in the playoffs, and I think that's where

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this game can be decided for the Packers. Yeah, I

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>agree with you in the other aspect that I think

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at with green Bay too, and

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the way that their offense is built is they've found

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>ways to establish drives to shore and ball games and

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of been the blueprint for the Rams two

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways. I mean, they are number

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>two to Green Bay's number one in time of possession.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>But last week, if I'm Matt la Fleur in this

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff and I'm looking at that footage from the

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Seattle game. I'm looking at and going, you know what,

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the way the Rams played that for all the different

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>problems that they had, the quarterback issues that they had,

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that was a pretty good blueprint. If you're looking at

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>your Sean mcvain, you're saying, Okay, I want to make

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a run. We want to win a super Bowl with

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this team. They kind of set that out when with

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>what they did against Seattle. And it's another reason why

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they have to be respected because, as you said,

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>they won the turnover margin that was huge, But what

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>did they do with that turnover margin? It was cam

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>akers then turning out all of these total yards, all

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of this production, being able to extend drives and and

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>find ways to control the clock. Yeah, you lost John Wolford,

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and John Wolford looked pretty good early on. Jared Goff

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>has been limited. How much that's the thumb, how much

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of that is golf, we don't know. But the fact

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>of the matter is is the packers. You talk about advantages,

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>decided advantages, distinct advantages, advantage advantages. One of the things

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that plays into that is Green Bay knows exactly who

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>they are and what they need to do to win

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>They've done it all season long, Mike. To get to

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and three, they have probably most likely the National

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Football League's m v P at the most important position

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>on the field where the Rams have some question marks

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>going into this game, regardless of who they put out there.

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>The fact that they haven't said it, the fact that

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we even have to ask about them saying it,

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>it tells you that there are questions there. Green Bay

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have those questions. They need to have the answers

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday and show that the team that won the

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>NFC regular season that was the top seed, they can

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>be the unit that goes out and carries that over

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>into the postseason. Yeah. Absolutely, And and I'm with you

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>with the where you started the conversation about don't get

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>caught up in the narrative. There are all kinds of

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>potential distractions here, whether you're talking about Aaron Donald's injury,

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>whether you're talking about Cooper Cups injury, whether you're talking

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>about the quarterback situation for the Rams, whether you're talking

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>about Jalen Ramsey and all his trash talking and what

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>he might do to try to throw Davante Adams off

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>his game. Don't get caught up in any of those distractions.

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're the Green Bay Packers, you have to do

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>what you do and to switch things to the defensive

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball. I think you and I are

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>on the same page here. This all starts with clamping

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>down on cam Acres, the rookie running back, second round

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>pick out of Florida State. He's been a revelation for

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that Rams offense. He was He's exactly what the Rams

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>offense did not have last year. The year before, they

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>had Todd Gurley Offensive Player of the Year, they went

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to the Super Bowl. Last year, the Rams didn't have

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>this kind of a running game. And there's so much

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of this offense, particularly with a quarterback like Golf and

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Wolford falls into the same category. The play

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>action game is huge for these guys, and they are

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>very very effective as play action passers. I from what

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>I've seen of the Rams, and I've been saying this

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>all week, I think Jared Goff, if he's a straight

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>drop back pastor I'm not saying he's a bad quarterback,

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>but I think he becomes a very ordinary quarterback in

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a straight drop back passing game. If you clamp down

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>on the run and take away the effectiveness of the

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.559
<v Speaker 1>play action and turn whoever's that quarterback for the Rams

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and do a straight drop back passer without that play

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>action game. I think that completely plays to Green Bays

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and fan Well, let's go back in the archives. Let's

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>go back to the multiple seasons of Packers Unscripted, the

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>West Hogkwitz, let's be real moment of the week. Let's

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>bring it back. Let's talk about it for a second.

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>The let's be real moment of the week is there

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>was a reason why John Wolford fit what Sean McVeigh

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do offensively and why they felt okay about

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.119
<v Speaker 1>him if they didn't have Jared Goff because he also

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that has some mobility to him and

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>he can thrive in a play action type scheme. But

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>everything that McVeigh does, and even to some extent, what

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay does with wanting to establish the run, it

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>has to start in that first and second quarter. It

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>has to begin with being able to sort of impose

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>your will and allow your quarterback to adapt off that

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that that's when Goff becomes dangerous. Jared Goff is at leven.

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a hundred and eleven passer rating in

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>two games I believe against Green Bay. I mean, he

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>has had respectable performances and it's been built on explosive making,

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>taking advantage of explosive plays, opportunistic happenings in the game,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and also just being able to establish the run. Cam

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Akers is a guy I've been I've loved since the draft.

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>He's been one of my favorite guys on the board.

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I draft him my own fantasy football league and he

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>was there the entire season. I mean, I just felt

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>like when push came to shove, even though they worked

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>with Henderson for a while and obviously Malcolm Brown has

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>been there for a few years, it felt like Acres

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 1>is where this thing was trending. And when they finally,

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of took the reins off and just

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>let him go. You saw the impact he made. Now

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that being said, he's not a wonder kind. I mean,

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not this guy that's just gonna be uh, you know,

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't stop him, you know, like we're looking at

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>with with Derrick Henry. Last month he was held the

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty four care thirty four yards and twenty one carries.

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 1>There are answers for him, but the Seattle Seahawks did

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>not have those in the wild card round, and it

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>bit them, man. I mean that was ultimately as much

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>as the turnover has hurt, the fact that they couldn't

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>solve the first and second downs and end up being

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>in multiple manageable situations. That's why the Rams were able

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to move the ball as wall as they did. Yeah,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and when you look at the Packers right now defensively,

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about it for the last several weeks.

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>The Packers run defense is in a very different place

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>than it was earlier in the season, in a very

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>different place than it was in the postseason last year.

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about that fifty seven yard run by David

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery on the Chicago Bears first handoff of the game

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>back in Week twelve, that Sunday night game at lambeau Field.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>That's what That's been a turning point for this Packers

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>run defense because since that fifty seven yard run by Montgomery,

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs over the last six games have averaged

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>only three point nine yards per carry. Against Green Bay,

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that's all that the opposing running backs have been able

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to do in in essentially traditional run game situations. The

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Packers will take that any day of the week. And

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what it's going to take to try to take

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>away this this uh, this play action game of the Rams.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And then to further the point I was making earlier

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>about the red zone, Okay, the um It's interesting you

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>look at the statistics West, the Rams red zone offense

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven point nine percent, the Packers red zone defense

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven point seven percent. That's almost identical in terms

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of those percentages. If the Packers can play

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>to that now and and just to tell you those

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>percentages being identical, the Packers defensively eighth in the league,

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the Rams offensively nineteen in the league. The Packers have

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>an edge there, and and and the Packers red zone

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>defense has been better down the stretch these last three

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>or four games than it was earlier in the season

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. So again that's another thing. I see both

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of these teams being able to move the ball between

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the twenty yard lines. I think both of these offenses

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the coach the coaches are creative that there's playmakers on

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>both sides, but when the ball gets inside the twenty

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>yard line, this game comes down to are you gonna

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>score touchdowns? Are you're gonna settle for field goals, and

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where the Packers have to win this game. Yeah,

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to get into the whole bend

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>or brank Brand bend, but don't break easy for me

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to say, uh, mentality stuff. But I thought one of

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that Dom Capers didn't get nearly enough credit

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for was the fact that the Packers were exceedingly good

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone throughout his tenure. They were when

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>they were at their best. It was when they route

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>rose up and answered in that area the field. The

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>problem ultimately became down the stretch, just too many explosive plays. Well,

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at what Petton has done this year. Mike

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Petton has done this year with his unit, Packers have

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>not had very many explosive plays, especially with the deep

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 1>passing game. They've been able to curtail that. And while

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>there have been instances, mostly in the first half of

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the season, where teams move the ball a little too much,

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>probably for green Bay's liking, green Bay in the last

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>six seven weeks has really, as I've said before and

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>gotten some people making fun of me, batting down the hatches.

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say it again in that area. Because here's

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing, like we've seen it time and time again.

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>You can pull out multiple examples pass Packers games. There

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is a huge difference between three and seven seven and

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it changes the complexion of the game. Just look at

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that matchup against Chicago too, and in the fact that

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bears weren't able to punch some of those in

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and the way it changed things. So that's where this

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>comes back to me. For Green Bay being able to

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>finish eighth in that category and also have that uptick

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the season, that bodes well. It

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>shows that guys are on their assignments. They're being able

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to have their containment, protect their edges. Chris Barnes is

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>crashing down into gaps, he's staying clean. The cornerbacks aren't

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>making foolish mistakes getting too handsy with with the receivers.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>They're all those type of things that play into playing

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>eleven man solid red zone defense, and the Packers need

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to be able to bring that against the Rams. Yeah,

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and you mentioned like the Bears game for the Packers

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>was a really good example. They did give up the

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>one deep ball over the top about a fifty plus

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>yard play or whatever. It was, but then the defense

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>rose up and forced a field goal attempt. When defense

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of lee We've talked about this a lot. When you

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>when you do give up an explosive play, when you

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>can recover from that and not let it lead to

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, you're fine. You know those those don't hurt

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you as much, and you know that's a that's certainly

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>an area of the Packers have improved on in I

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>thought as the year has gone along, the other thing,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you just have to be ready for and

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>this is where I think these last couple of games

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>have have been good for the Packers in terms of

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to be ready to handle momentum swings in

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>these playoff games that things are gonna swing wildly back

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and forth. You look back at the Rams and the

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks in the wild Card round last weekend, when Darius

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Williams got that pick six, which I believe was the

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>rams fourth pick six of the season, if you can

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>believe that, I mean, that's really impressive. So again, we're

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>not stressing the turnover thing too much here as we

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>go into this, but it just felt like Seattle never

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>recovered from that momentum swing when the Rams got that

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>pick six, took it to the house. It just felt

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like the Rams were in control of the game the

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>rest of the way. And these last couple of weeks

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the Packers have gotten off to a fast start against Tennessee.

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee climbs back in, but then the Packers regained control

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and finish it. Same thing kind of happened in Chicago.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>You have to be able to handle those momentum swings

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and snatch it back when when you have those opportunities.

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the Packers have done a good job of that.

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>They have to continue to do a good job of

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that in the playoffs. Yeah, and and and this is such,

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be a momentum game, Mike. I mean,

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you've seen it already. That stat was brought out to

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>me and I haven't corroborated yet, so I hope I'm

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>not spouting false knowledge. But that stat that when the

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>readers brought up about Sean McVeigh and his team's their

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>record in the second half when they lead at halftime,

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they threw it out at thirty seven to nothing.

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's factually true, but it is

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>startling when you look at that type of production, and

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you follow the Rams enough the last few years, you

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>understand the way they play and why they've been successful

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>with Sean McVeigh as their head coach, and that's played

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>into it. The fact that they can shorten games, the

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that they can take the momentum and if they

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>get it, they'll seize it, they'll hold on to it.

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And they have veteran players now that have been in

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>this system for three or four years that understand what

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>their role is in those instances. Green Bay. I thought

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that's where they've made the big jump this year, in

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>year two underneath Matt Lafleur. Last year, the construction was there,

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the foundation had been built, but it was everybody still

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>settling into it, understanding what is being required of them.

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>This year they do Aaron Rodgers playing faster, the running

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>backs seeing their lanes and and understanding the wide zone

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>scheme and what the Packers are looking for there, and

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>then ultimately the passing game with Davantae Adams doing Davantae

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Adams things. And then you've got your Robert Tonnions of

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the world stepping up and making huge contributions when I

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>think expectations are rather modest for him going into the season.

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>That's where this team to me is different than the

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and three team a year ago. And it's why

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this game at lambeau Field, with green

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Bay having a full week and a half extra time

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to to get ready for this in the Rams, making

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a flight back to l A, practicing in l A

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>other and also coming out here on a short week

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>with dealing with the injuries that they are. Everything points

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to green Bay. But that doesn't matter if you don't

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>show up on Saturday afternoon. Yeah, you've got to play

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>your game, absolutely you. You have to be able to

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>do that well before we go. I do want to

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts West on the other divisional games. I've

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>always considered this, you know, maybe the best weekend of

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>NFL football of the entire year, when you're down to

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the final eight four in each conference. The other one

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC, of course, is the NFC South Showdown

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Showdown number three of this season between Tom Brady's Buccaneers

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and Drew Brees Saints. What are your thoughts on this one.

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>It's funny when everybody was talking about Brady moving over

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to the NFC. I think these are the type of

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>matchups that people started salivating over right away, right, I

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>mean they wanted to be able to see primetime Aaron Rodgers,

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady, Drew Brees. Those type of matchups happened before

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl because everybody's gonna watch the Super Bowl,

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and then as it brought out, and when I were

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>discussing this over the weekend, as we were setting our

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>schedules and trying to figure out, Okay, when where the

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Packers are gonna play. When you knew it was gonna

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>be Brady versus Brees, that things going in primetime, You

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and I had a ticket book towards an afternoon football

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>game on Saturday, and and here we are Low and Behold,

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and both of these teams, though they just didn't dominate

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>all year, they had to kind of work through some things.

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>They have had their moments, and this is sort of

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways, like that rubber match between

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the two understanding Okay, who's one who's lost. Certainly the

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Buccaneers have something to prove in this game.

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I just look at New

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Orleans and this is what it's all about. Everybody knows

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>what their salary cap situation is like for next season,

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 1>it's not pretty. Uh. They invested heavily into winning a

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl this year, they got healthy breezes back, Michael

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is back in their defense, has been able to

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>maintain uh an air of dominance here that I think

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>some people were wondering a couple of ago if they

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>were going to be able to do that. So it's

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup in that regard. And then certainly from

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady's perspective, do you look at the way he's

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>played over the last month and a half as he

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>settled in the Bruce Arians and Byron Leftwich is scheme. Um,

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be fireworks. It's gonna be an absolute banger

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of a game that I hope you and I on

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Sunday afternoon are going to be eager to watch for,

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, packers ramifications. Yeah, you just this. This is

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a matchup, and and you just wonder here,

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>here's the one thing I'll say with regard to the Saints,

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>because you're right, they've they've gone all in. They know

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that Drew Brees is nearing the end, possibly at the

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>at the very end here if he if he retires

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in the offseason. You wonder what the psyche of this

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Saints team is going to be if they are in

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>a close game down the stretch. Because they lost the

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Minneapolis Miracle, you know, they lost on the bad call

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Rams in the NFC Championship game that one year,

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they lost in overtime to the Vikings. Again last year

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>in the wild card round. They've they've got some night marriage,

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>they've got some demons to exercise here and uh and

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>to do it against the division rival and with a

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>with a matchup like Drew Brees against Tom Brady. Um, yeah,

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's absolutely going to be one to watch, Mike.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to mention this to this tells you how

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>precious these moments are as well, because over the last decade,

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I would challenge anyone to debate me on this, Green

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Bay in New Orleans have been the cream of the

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>crop in the NFC. I mean, they are the most consistent,

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 1>viable title contenders in all those regards. But yet they

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't made it back to the Super Bowl. Um, you've

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>had I'm not calling them fleeting, you know, moments or

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>flashes in the pans. But you saw Seattle pop up

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and you saw you know, San Francisco and New York

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, and and certainly a championship to Philly,

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta getting there and now San Francisco getting back again.

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 1>But it's been Green Bay. In New Orleans, it's been

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Rogers and Breeze. And uh again, I'm not looking ahead.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to see all this weekend plays out. But

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>if it comes down to Rodgers versus Breeze for a

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>spot to go back to the Super Bowl, uh, those

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>those storylines will write themselves. In addition to the fact

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>that if it would end up being Rogers versus Brady,

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I get that too. But the Packers and in Saints,

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>in their administrations, their brass have kept themselves in this

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>hunt for a decade in the league. That stresses parody.

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>That's incredible. Yeah. Absolutely. On the a f C side,

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore is at Buffalo, Cleveland is at Kansas City. Um.

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>The the Baltimore Buffalo game really really intrigues me because

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>especially because of what we saw last week from Baltimore,

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>where Tennessee was kind of having their way early, their

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>offense was getting things going. They got a couple of scores,

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>they got up tend to nothing and then all of

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, here come the Ravens. It was like it

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>was like this, this train started cranking up, coming down

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the tracks, and then and then Tennessee could not stop it.

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Um And you know, Baltimore will probably try to use

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>that that same type of formula. I mean, Josh Allen,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he'd probably gonna be able to come out and drive

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>the Bills down the field on the first possession of

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the game and get some points on the board. But

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>can you do can you play like that for four

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>quarters against a defense like Baltimore's and then, you know,

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>try to contain the singular most unique, nobody's liking quarterback

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL in Lamar Jackson. This uh, this, this game,

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>this game from a matchup standpoint, is really really intriguing.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>It's fantastic. And in the other aspect of this too, Mike,

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you and I all weak were asked from people. You know, Hey,

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the NFC, you know they have a bunch of older

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks and a f C has a bunch of younger quarterbacks.

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of that? Well, what I make

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of it is you're seeing Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson, who,

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>by all accounts, are gonna be guys that are gonna

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>give the National Football League a lot of problems for

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the next decade. In one shape or form, they are.

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>They are two of the guys I think really stood out.

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>And then you have Baker Mayfield over in Cleveland too.

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.959
<v Speaker 1>That those recent draft classes that have produced this talent

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C. Now you're trying to see, Okay,

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>other than Patrick Mahomes, reigning MVP the league, who was

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, drafted a few years ago too, Can any

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of these young guys guide a team to a super Bowl,

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to a to a ring, you know, much like Aaron

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers did a decade ago when when he got that opportunity.

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>That that's what I'm looking for in this matchup. And

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>for Buffalo, as i'm gonna say that, I'm gonna echo

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the same thing I said last week going into that game,

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>is that they are a team that has been building

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>towards this moment. It hasn't been an overnight success story.

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been a long, gradual process, finding their quarterback, finding

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>their defense even before that, and now here they are,

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going up against the Ravens. And for the Ravens,

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.719
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned earlier this week, a chance to exercise

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>some demons from last year as well. So it's gonna

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>be a very compelling matchup. Yeah, the other one in

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the a f C, Cleveland is at Kansas City, just

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like you wrote it up at the beginning of the Yeah, exactly. Well.

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I I give the Cleveland Browns a heck of a

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of credit for getting forgetting this far. They've certainly

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>dealt with you know what they had to deal with

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>last week with the COVID issues and the coaching staff,

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and then they go on the road to a division

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>rival at Pittsburgh and and uh and you know, blow

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>them out of their own yards, so to speak. But

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if Cleveland's defense can really hang

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in there against Patrick Mahomes in this Kansas City offense.

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I think this Chief's offense it's just it feels like

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it feels like it's too much for what Cleveland

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>has on the defensive side of the ball. And Baker

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield he probably is gonna really enjoy and have a

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun in a shootout maybe with Patrick Mahomes.

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But I just I think the Chief's offense is too

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>much in this game. Yeah, I get so many two

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven Packers vibes from Kansas City's offense, not saying

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 1>that they're even remotely similar, but just in terms of

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>their production in the way they've gone about that. This year,

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>they were Super Bowl champions, they succeeded, they thrived, and

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>here they come right back and they're every They're up

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in everybody's business again. And Mahomes certainly doing what he's

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>done at his age is just remarkable. But for the

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Browns perspective, the great thing about this is that, I mean,

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>do they've won the lottery already? They They've They've been

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>able to get back to the postseason for the first

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>time in eighteen years. They want to playoff game now

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in twenty six years. Right, They

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>now are in a position where they're playing with house

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>money and you're going up against the best team that

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody's had in their power rankings all season long. What

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>do you have to lose? So Yeah, to mention your

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield thing there, I would totally embrace this. I

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>wish the best of luck to Cleveland's defense trying to

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>find a way to to find the answers here. But

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for Mayfield, for Stefan Stefanski for Alex van Pelt, who

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>was calling plays last week. This is go go have fun,

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>see what happens, make a miracle happen. I don't know

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>what the line is like on this game, but you know,

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like the Cleveland Browns, for everything they've

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>been through last year, everybody thinking it was gonna be

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>their year. This year, everybody jumped off the hype train.

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>It was it wasn't fun to talk about the Browns anymore.

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It was last year was about the Browns. We gotta

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>find our next team that we're gonna overestimate. And here

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you are. They're right back in this thing and there

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>they're really become the team that I think everybody felt

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they could, you know, since the day that Baker Mayfield

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>became a Cleveland Brown. Yeah. Well, it should be a

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>whale of a weekend of NFL football the Divisional Playoffs.

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Two games Saturday, two games Sunday. It starts with Packers

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Rams at lambeau Field PM on Saturday afternoon. With that,

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we will call it a wrap on this edition of

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Packers Unscripted. Be sure to follow all of our coverage

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of Saturday's big playoff game on Packers dot com for

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>wes I am Mike, thank you for tuning in. Everybody,

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time.