WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Walmart Earnings, SailPoint IPO 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the facts?

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 4>These are two.

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 2>Big time blue chip companies.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 3>Window between the peak and cunt changing super fast.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steele and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 5>And the global markets.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 2>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 2>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 5>Our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at how one e commerce company is

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>being impacted by a US China trade war, Plus what's

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 2>guess why the retail giant Walmart forecasts a lower than

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 2>expected profit for the full year. But first we begin

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>with the auto sector. This week, shares a Rivian Automotive

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>tumbled after the company warning it's poised for a first

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 2>ever decline in electric vehicle deliveries in twenty twenty five.

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 2>For more on this and the EV sector, guest host

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Emily Griffey when I were joined by Steven men Bloomberg

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Global Autos and Industrials research journalist. We first asked

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 2>Steve how the company is doing.

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 6>I think they execute it very well in the fourth

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 6>quarter and for the most part in twenty twenty four,

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.199
<v Speaker 6>they actually had a gross profit in the fourth quarter,

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 6>first ever if you take out some of the non

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 6>cash items and if you take out credit, they still

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 6>broke even as they promised. But the only thing is

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 6>they've you know, they have huge operating leverage and improved costs,

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 6>but you know, they just can't get enough volume through

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 6>the plants to really benefit from the cost cutting initiatives.

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 7>And what do you attribute to that not being able

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 7>to to.

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 6>Do so, Yeah, you know, their guidance were were lower

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 6>than expected. Uh, there's some concerns about you know, Trump

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 6>Trump administration cutting the seventy five hundred EV tax credit

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 6>denting sales, so you know, and then the other thing

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 6>that you know they're planning to do is shut down

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 6>the plant for part of the fourth quarter to really

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 6>uh you know, bring to bring on the R two,

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 6>a smaller a smaller.

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 8>Mid sized vehicle next year.

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 6>So there's some kind of top line headwind that's impacting.

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 6>But then again, look, you know they've done a really

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 6>good job you step back, They've gonna done a really

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 6>good job in rationalizing their capacity, their costs. I think

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 6>it's just a matter of time that we're going to

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 6>see huge profit windfall for them when they get the

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 6>volume up.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 2>So, Steve, what's the feeling in the in the EV

0:02:55.520 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 2>marketplace these days about where demand is is on a

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>global scale.

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 5>Here for EV's.

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 8>It's still strong.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 6>Now we're actually predicting that EV sales will be up

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 6>single digits similar to last year. And then in twenty

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 6>twenty six, twenty twenty seven, I think that's when things

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 6>will improve. Like if the seventy five hundred dollars EV

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 6>tax credit goes away, there are a lot of new

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 6>affordable vehicles coming into the market, so I don't think

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 6>the consumer will need the seventy five hundred dollars. So

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 6>I think the man will improve, and I think we'll

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 6>have to wait until twenty twenty six and specifically Rivian.

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 8>We're very positive.

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 6>I think they are going to launch a new mid

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 6>sized vehicle that's gonna resonate well with the consumers.

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 7>What did you learn in Rivian's report about just how

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 7>the company is reacting to the prospect of terras.

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 6>It's something they can't control, obviously, but you know, I

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 6>think they were anticipating the seventy five hundred dollars going away.

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 6>They they don't expect that to continue forever, and that's

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 6>why they took that cost cutting initiative at the the

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 6>middle of last year and really reduce costs by more

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 6>than thirty percent, and that that will allow them to

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 6>actually have more flexibility on pricing. And the second thing

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 6>they're doing is they're you know, they understand what the

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 6>what the consumer wants, you know, they want a more

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 6>affordable vehicle, and that's why they're going to launch the

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.559
<v Speaker 6>R two in early twenty twenty six or late twenty

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 6>twenty five.

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 8>So they've anticipated that.

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Steve, we can't talk to you without talking about Tesla.

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's off about the fifteen percent year to date,

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's you know, almost seventy five percent, little more

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 2>than seventy five percent or the trilliing twelve months. It's

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of the typical volatility that we're I guess used

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 2>to with Tesla.

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Here, what's the feeling out there today?

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Is Elon Musk a net positive or or maybe even

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a net negative for this stock

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 2>right now?

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 6>I think I think the concern is really some of

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 6>the sales that's been pretty weak in the US and

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 6>as well as in Europe, and I think the rhetoric

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 6>and there's you know, there's news out there, there's surveys

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 6>out there saying that you know, Elon Musk is having

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 6>an impact, you know, his involvements with with Doge. But

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 6>at the end of the day, you know, if I

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 6>step back and look at you know, the product rollout,

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 6>the product rollouts that they're coming up with this year

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 6>with a new model why, I think that you know,

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 6>the model why rollout is having some impact on current

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 6>sales because customers are actually waiting for.

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 8>The new vehicle.

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 6>And also there's an affordable model also from Tesla coming

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 6>out later this year. I think, you know, it's gonna

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 6>be a you know, a slower year for Tesla in

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 6>terms of sales. But I think in the second half

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 6>and in the fourth quarter it will definitely pick back up.

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 6>There's already signs of, you know, strong demand for the

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 6>Model Y. If you look at China, they start delivering

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 6>the new Model Y and and you know, and consumers

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 6>are really liking that vehicle.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 7>Right now, I have to ask about the cyber truck. Anecdotally,

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 7>I've seen this vehicle everywhere on the streets of New

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 7>York City. But I'm not sure if like I'm just

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 7>noticing it more, but what are the sales looking like

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 7>for the cyber truck.

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 6>The cyber truck is It's not going to be like

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 6>a high volume vehicle like the Model Wi or three.

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 6>It's still a niche market. I think it helps Tesla

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 6>build the brand as a high tech company. It doesn't

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 6>resonate with everyone, but it does resonate with a large

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 6>group of consumer that I do believe that Tesla has

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 6>the technology, the manufacturing technology and the vehicle technology. Autonomy

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 6>of technology are thanks to Steve Man, Bloomberg Intelligence, Global

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 6>autos and Industrials research analyst. We move next to the

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 6>enterprise security software company sale Point Technologies. Toma Bravo backed

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 6>sale Point recently completed its initial public offering on the

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 6>NASDAQ sale Point Race one point three eight billion dollars

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 6>in its debut, and this marked the first major tech IPO.

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 5>Of the year.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 2>For More, co host Alex Steele and guest host Norma

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Linda were joined by Mark McLain, CEO of sale Point Technologies.

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Mark's first asked whether sale Points IPO meshes well with

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the company's long term vision.

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think in general, we've tried to stay focused

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 9>as a business on building great business with our customers

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 9>and winning in the market. In some ways, what happens

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 9>in the financial ownership of the business matters a lot,

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:44.559
<v Speaker 9>but it doesn't actually affect our day to day lives,

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 9>if you will. In finding and securing customers and making

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 9>them successful, that's certainly always our focus. We do think though,

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 9>that the IPO gets us back out in the public.

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 10>Eye a little more.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 9>The importance of what we do and what's called identity

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 9>security is raising an awareness and important to the large

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 9>companies all around the world that we typically serve, and

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 9>this will help with our visibility, it'll give us future

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 9>fuel to grow the business. We've had a great run

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 9>as a private company with Tomo Bravo.

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 10>Some folks know this.

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 9>We were public before and before that we were runed

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 9>by Toma Bravo. It's a little bit of an interesting

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 9>story of a PE backed IPO, same PE backed IPO again.

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 9>But all the while, our focus continues to be on

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 9>doing great things for our customers and helping them secure

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 9>their enterprises with identity Well.

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 11>Cyber threats have continued to increase. How does sale Points

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 11>stay ahead in identity security?

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, what's happened in the world of cybersecurity. There's a

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 9>lot of shifting things in the landscape. A simple metaphor

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 9>that sometimes helps folks is that the.

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 10>Bad actors are the attackers.

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 9>Not so long ago, their metaphor was to break the

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 9>glass and grab the jewels and run. Quite often now,

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 9>and we've seen this in breach reports, they'll try to

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 9>sneak in the back of the jewelry store, poses an

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 9>employee and eventually try to quote clean out the jewelry store.

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 9>And that's because they've been able to impersonate, so to speak,

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 9>an employee, and that's a comp reized identity. What we

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 9>do is help businesses, typically mid to large enterprises around

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 9>the world, focus on understanding all the identities they have,

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 9>both human and non human, all the data they care

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 9>about protecting and making sure that at any point in time,

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 9>all of those connections are secure. It's a pretty complex

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 9>problem at scale.

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Who are your competitors right now and how can you

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 3>help differentiate?

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the truth is we've got more I like to

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 9>call them PowerPoint competitors than real competitors.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 10>I mean, there's folks that are.

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 9>Talking about this space quite a bit, but if you

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 9>look at what happens day to day when we're out

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 9>in the market, there's very few companies that are capable

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 9>of delivering the success at scale that we have. We're

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 9>fortunate to be in almost half of the Fortune five hundred,

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 9>about a quarter of the Fortune two thousand, and they're

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 9>generally throwing out older legacy products like from Oracle and IBM.

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 9>There really hasn't been a strong challenger to us in

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 9>this key space, and that's part of what I think

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 9>has gotten investors excited about our potential for long term,

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 9>durable growth.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 11>So another thing that's been in conversation, I'm curious, how

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 11>are you all planning to address your debt load?

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, one of the key use of proceeds

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 9>will be to pay down a lot of the debt.

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 9>We actually had a little more debt about six months ago.

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 9>Our backers Home of Bravo chose to take some of

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 9>that debt out with equity before the IPO, and we'll

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 9>use the bulk of the proceeds from the IPO to

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 9>pay that debt down significantly, putting ourselves in what they

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 9>call it debt zero, meaning we'll have as as much

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 9>more cash as we have debt, which from a financial

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 9>profile standpoint makes investors really happy.

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Why do you guys decide to do the IPO?

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 3>We were just talking about IPOs in general, and I

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 3>was talking about an LNG export that went public at

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 3>seemingly a great time and it didn't go so well.

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 3>So I wonder why strategically you guys chose right now.

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, we've been watching markets as everyone has, and I

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 9>think we were really pleased with the progress of the business.

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 10>We went private about two and a half years ago.

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 9>As part of our S one finaling, we talked about

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 9>the fact that as of our third quarter last year,

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 9>we'd grown the business at thirty percent. We've been able

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 9>to deliver non gap margins of about fourteen percent, and

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 9>had a strong sense that durable growth we can, and

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 9>that was at scale. We're over an eight hundred million

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 9>dollars revenue business now and investors don't see a lot

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 9>of profiles of growth at scale with profit. And I

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 9>think our sense was that the markets were kind of hungry,

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 9>so to speak, for new issuances, particularly I think in

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 9>technology security has been considered a.

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 10>Really good market for a long time.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 9>I think we looked like a company that would fit

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 9>many of their requests, so to speak, for a durable

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 9>growth company in the security space.

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 11>How are regulatory shifts driving demand for identity security solutions

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 11>as enterprises continue shifting to the cloud? How a sale

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 11>point evolving its offerings?

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's interesting you mentioned that regulatory is indeed part

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 9>of the landscape we're addressing. Sometimes, you know, audits or

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 9>the threat of failed audits or not being able to

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 9>comply with regulations is a driver. But increasingly our space

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 9>is less about that. Not it hasn't moved away from that,

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 9>but it's less about that than truly securing their data. Again,

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 9>what's happened is this concern that data can be compromised

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 9>through this lens of identity, if a bad actor can somehow,

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.599
<v Speaker 9>you know, get in, break in, steal an identity, or

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.359
<v Speaker 9>in some way get access to data through those identities,

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 9>they can do a lot of damage. So that focus

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 9>on truly protecting the data is really more of an

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 9>issue today than just regulatory compliance.

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 3>What's it like attracting talent right now in the market, Well, i'd.

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 9>Attracting talent is never easy in a very competitive technology market.

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 9>I think we're very fortunate at sale Point. One of

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 9>the things that we pay a lot of attention to

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 9>is our culture and our values and how that shows up.

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 9>And as you probably are familiar, a glass Door runs

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 9>around and surveys the world and tries to understand how

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 9>companies are doing. We're super pleased they released those results recently.

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 9>We were number seventeen in the world, and if you

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 9>want to cut it by an interesting factor, we were

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 9>the highest ranked tech company with under five thousand employees

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 9>on glass Door. I think that speaks a lot about

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 9>the kind of culture and the values we live out

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 9>in our company. It attracts and retains very good talent,

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 9>and we're very fortunate.

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Mark McClain, CEO of sale Point Technologies.

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, we'll look at how banks are nancing for

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 2>the energy transition.

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:03.599
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to Bloomberg.

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in research and data on

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 2>two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty industries. You

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>can access Bloomberg Intelligence via Bigall the Terminal.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg.

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Cocklay and Android

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 2>This week we focused on a Bloomberg Big Takes story

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 2>entitled tem News Rise was aided by Trump? Now he

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 2>poses a major threat. You can find it on Bloomberg

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 2>dot Com and The Terminal. The story looks at the

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>online marketplace Temu, operated by the Chinese e commerce company

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 2>p d D Holdings, and it talks about the obstacles

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 2>TU faces from US China trade war.

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 5>For more, guest hosts Matt Miller and I.

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Were joined by Spencer Soper, Bloomberg News Technology and e

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Commerce reporter First ass Spencer to tell us about Timu

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 2>and how it may be impacted by a China US

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 2>trade war.

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Basically, this is an online marketplace full of discounts. It's

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of like a dollar tree in your phone. You

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 4>can find all kinds of products. And the big differentiator

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 4>here is that they're just really really cheap in terms

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 4>of prices, oftentimes like half as much as say like

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Amazon or Walmart, or even even less than that. It's,

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, kind of sprang onto the scene in twenty

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 4>twenty two, and it really capitalized on this deminimous loophole,

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 4>which is basically a tariff loophole that originated in the

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 4>nineteen thirties, and it's it's mainly for like travelers coming

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 4>back with gifts and their suitcases and that sort of thing,

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 4>so they don't have to get bogged down and paying

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 4>tariffs and duties. But as e commerce emerged and cross

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 4>border e commerce emerged, it became a way to ship

0:14:56.720 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 4>products directly from like factories in China to shpe in

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 4>the US without paying tariffs and duties, which has helped

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 4>them beat some prices from US retailers.

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 12>I love the way your story starts out, which is

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 12>in a town that I'm not going to try and pronounce,

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 12>but a Chinese town that's twice the size of Chicago

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 12>with a lot of blade manufacturers. I actually looked on

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 12>the Timu dot com website and the first thing I

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 12>see is a sharp sword, a stainless steel sword for

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 12>four dollars and seventy five cents and a nail cliper.

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Probably says that probably says more about you because of

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 4>their algorithm than it does about FEMO.

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 12>Well, I'm looking to be fair, I'm using the Bloomberg

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 12>Radio Studio computer.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 5>I haven't logged on myself.

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 12>But if they also have a nail clipper manicure set

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 12>for a dollar eighty six which has twenty three different

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 12>tools in it, so what a price. But you talk

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 12>to a guy in China who has a clipper company, right,

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 12>and he said he saw an opportunity during COVID. He

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 12>used to manufacture and probably still does products for other brands,

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 12>but now he's selling direct to consumer with this.

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and that's the big thing is that the Chinese

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 4>factories are really looking to diversify on you know where

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 4>they sell, uh, and so this this factory in particular, Yeah,

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 4>they made a lot of these components that were used

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 4>in name brand raizors like Wall or Remington. Those sorts

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 4>of things, and then they realized, you know what, we

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 4>could actually sell direct to consumer, especially during the pandemic

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 4>when people were giving themselves haircuts at home and getting

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 4>pets and they need to give it, you know, groom

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 4>the pets. So it basically gave life to this uh uh,

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, direct to consumer push for this company. And

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 4>they had tried Amazon and they found that team who

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 4>was just a lot a lot simpler for them in

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 4>the sense that they weren't, you know, fighting for every

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 4>sale on Amazon and paying for all the advertising and

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, you you really have to run a sophisticated

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 4>business to sell on Amazon. And they found it a

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 4>lot easier on Temu and Sense where they could just

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 4>send the blades to Timu and tim who took care

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 4>of everything.

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 2>So what's the fate or the expected fate of this

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 2>international tax exemption, this loophole, this eight hundred dollars loophole,

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>because that seems a central strategy for TEAMU in terms

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 2>of undercutting Amazon and pretty much everybody else.

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 4>That's the million dollar question right now. I mean, it's

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 4>not the only Evantage team who has it's certainly one

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 4>of them, and it certainly helped them be a differentiator,

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 4>and we're still not exactly sure what's going to happen.

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, Trump made this mandate to eliminate the loophole,

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 4>but then backpedaled on it. You know, they have to

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 4>figure out exactly how this is going to work. And

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 4>once we know exactly how it's going to work, then

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 4>businesses are going to look for potentially other loopholes or

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 4>that sort of thing. So all of this stuff is

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 4>still shaking out. The bottom line is you could see

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 4>consumers take some price increases, you could see factories taking

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 4>a little bit less to try to share in the pain,

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 4>retailers cutting their profit margin. So generally, when these kind

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 4>of things hit, it's not like a one size fits

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 4>all solution. We'll see this. We'll see the pain of

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 4>any of these tariffs supply differently, you know, throughout throughout

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 4>all the players, depending on the position of strength that

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 4>they're in.

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 12>I mean, in reporting on this story, Spencer, did you

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 12>note that many of Amazon's products are made in China

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 12>as well. In fact, when I look through Amazon for

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 12>any specific goods, I tend to notice a lot of

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 12>brand names that I've never heard of or can't pronounce.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 12>A lot of times they are just a bunch of

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 12>consonants thrown together.

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 5>And those products are all made in China.

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 12>So Jeff Bezos or you know, the other shareholders he

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 12>only owns nine percent now, are also going to fall

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 12>victim to this tax if if it's enacted.

0:18:55.400 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. What the difference here is Misson wants to offer

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 4>you quick delivery. So oftentimes what you buy on Amazon

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 4>is already in a warehouse in the US, meaning it

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 4>was you know, put on a big cargo container shipped

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 4>into to a US port, and the value of that

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 4>cargo container was above this demnimous loophole, so they paid

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 4>the tariff on those goods. The difference here is it's

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 4>being you know, packed in China to be shipped directly

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 4>to you, in which case, uh, you know, that individual

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 4>item is coming in under this eight hundred dollars de

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 4>minimous threshold, in which case no tariff supply. So that's

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 4>the big that's the big differentiator. I mean, so much

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 4>stuff is made in China, whether you buy it in

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 4>a store, on Amazon or whatever. The the you know,

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 4>source of a lot of these goods is still the same.

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 4>It's just a matter of the of the you know

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 4>how how it navigates into the US, all right?

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Spenser Sober, Bloomberg News Technology and e Commerce Reporter.

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Each week we look at research from Bloomberg n EF.

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 5>They're the team at.

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg that tracks and analyzes the energy transition from commodities

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 2>to power, transport, industries, buildings, and agricultural sectors. This week

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 2>we look at how banks are currently financing the energy

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 2>transition for more. We were joined by Trina White, Bloomberg

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 2>b n e F Sustainable finance analyst. First ask Trina

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 2>how she looks at banks and how they finance energy projects.

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 13>So I focus on what's called our energy supplied banking ratios,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 13>and that's where we put bank financing for traditional energy supplies,

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 13>so for fossil fuels things like yeah, coal, oil and

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 13>gas into the context of what they're doing on sort

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 13>of the newer energy and the cleaner energy side, so

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 13>low carbon technologies like wind, solar, batteries, hydro, et cetera.

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 13>So we take and nuclear, Yes, nuclear, we would consider

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 13>it to be low carbon as well, and so that

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 13>would be in the numerator and then we put that

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 13>into the context of their continued support for fossil fuels

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 13>and the denominator. And we're looking at this across both

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 13>you know, a global average and then also for individual institutions,

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 13>and of course that differs significantly by individol bank and

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 13>the market that they're operating.

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 12>So tell me about the change in sentiment that we've seen.

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 12>Because last uh, in the last administration a few years ago,

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 12>when we were watching Senate hearings of any kind with

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 12>bank CEOs, the Democrats especially would gang up on these

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 12>bankers and say, how can you finance fossil fuels? You know,

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 12>almost as if it was somehow illegal to finance the

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 12>operations of oil and gas companies. Now, it seems with

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 12>this new administration like you're gonna see the exact opposite happen.

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 12>Right as we see banks pull back from for example, DEI.

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 12>There's a great story in the Bloemberg terminal about that.

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 12>I wonder if we're gonna see banks also pull back

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 12>on funding of solar and wind and other renewables.

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.959
<v Speaker 13>So when Wynn was boring, you know, in the opposite direction,

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 13>and it was you know, very favorable both here in

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 13>the US and internationally for banks to make these you know,

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 13>really strong commitments to climate. We saw these climate alliances

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 13>for financial institutions take off. So in twenty twenty one,

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.239
<v Speaker 13>we saw all the major banks sign up to the

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 13>Net Zero Banking Alliance and sign on to reduce their

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 13>emissions in line with one point five degrees their financed emissions.

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 13>We've actually now seen all of the major US banks,

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 13>Canadian banks, and a couple of other international banks pull

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 13>out of the Net Zero Banking Alliance in just the

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 13>past few months, and that's in direct response to the

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 13>sort of switch in political pressure. None of these banks

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 13>have actually you know, pulled back their internal commitments and

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 13>particularly their sustainable financing commitments. So while they may see

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 13>it very very difficult to decrease their financed emissions and

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 13>their support for fossil fuels when you know the administration

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 13>is pushing a drill baby, drill agenda, none of these

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 13>banks want to, you know, stop supporting what they still

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 13>of you as the future, which is these low carbon technologies.

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 13>And so if it is profitable, if the returns are there,

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 13>they're still going to be financing when they're still going

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 13>to be financing solar. But that key question remains here

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 13>in the US is you know, will the tax incentives

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 13>that made some of these projects profitable, Will they remain

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 13>in an administration that's not prioritizing it.

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 2>What banks are doing well, maybe which banks are kind

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 2>of lagging.

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So a lot of the banks in Europe have

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 13>really high ratios for all the reasons we might expect

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 13>a favorable policy environment for renewables. They're not oil and

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 13>gas exporting countries. So BNP Pariba had a ratio of

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 13>more than three times as much low carbon financing as

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 13>fossil fuels. That's actually up from one point four in

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 13>twenty twenty two, and so they've more than doubled their ratio,

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 13>and they did that primarily by shrinking their support for

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 13>fossil fuels. So they said, we're not underwriting bonds for

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 13>oil and gas expanders anymore. That is a pretty European

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 13>specific strategy. That's not going to work for a Canadian bank.

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 13>It's not going to work for a US bank. Among

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 13>the US players, the highest ratio is about one point

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 13>zero four. So Bank of America financed about equal parts

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 13>low carbon solutions and fossil fuels, and that's primarily in

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 13>part because of their long standing participation in the labeled

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 13>debt markets, so underwriting green bonds or green loans.

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 5>I wonder about specifically the finances to support a nuclear

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 5>kind of revitalization.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 12>I always think it's an exciting story because of the

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 12>vast amount of power it could provide, But it seems

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 12>like a moonshot in terms of how much it would

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 12>cost to build actually build nuclear plants, and how long

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 12>it takes, how much regulation red tape.

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 8>There is around it.

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we saw I think one plant open in.

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 13>Georgia and three Mile Island and three.

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 12>Miland is going to come back on, right, But it

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 12>just takes so much money and time to get these

0:24:57.800 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 12>things going.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, that's absolutely right. I mean it is, you know,

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 13>great that nuclear is sort of comparable in what it

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 13>can power to cold right baseload and sort of dispatchable

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 13>and and and cheap once it you know, once it's

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 13>actually generating, it's just bids into the market and about

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 13>zero but very very expensive upfront, very expensive, a lot

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 13>of political capital, a lot of time actually a lot

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 13>of the sort of intermittent renewables are much easier to build,

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 13>much much easier overall to build solar and wind. But

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 13>then we run into you know interconnection problems, so and

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 13>intermittency issues where you need you know, battery storage to

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 13>make up the gaps. So there's always straight offs to

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 13>different types of energy. I think nuclear would be fantastic,

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 13>but you know, wind and solar are probably what BDF

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 13>projects to be kind of the majority of this low

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 13>carbon solution.

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Trina White, Bloomberg b n e F

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Sustainable Finance analyst. Coming up on the program, a conversation

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 2>with the founder and CEO of Token Metrics.

0:25:57.800 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 5>On the crypto space. You're listening to.

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloom Burg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in research and

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>data on two thousand companies and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 2>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via b I go on

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the terminal.

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg.

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch the program

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Move next to the retail giant Walmart. This week Walmart

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 2>forecast a lower than expected profit for the full year.

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 2>This suggests that the uncertain economic environment is hitting even

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 2>the world's largest retailer. For more, guest hosts Emily Grafe

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 2>and I were joined by Emily Cohne, Bloomberg Consumer team Leader.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Emily for her take on the latest

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:52.719
<v Speaker 2>at Walmart.

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 14>This was a consistent guidance in line with what they

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 14>laid out last year for the full year as well,

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 14>but signaled that the you know, the world's largest retailer, Walmart,

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 14>isn't immune to the risks that are out there for

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 14>the broader economic environment. Granted, Walmart has historically given conservative

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 14>outlook to start the year off, but this definitely showed,

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 14>you know, and they they used the word uncertain. I

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 14>haven't checked, but a number of times on their analysts call.

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 14>That was sort of like the theme of the call.

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 7>What else did they say for this, I guess we

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 7>could call it, yeah, conservative or negative outlook? Did they

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 7>mention it's because consumers are pulling back, people are looking

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 7>for bargains. I guess, like, what did we learn about

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 7>the consumer in this report?

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it wasn't it wasn't negative. It was it was

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 14>in line with what they offered last year three to

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 14>four percent growth. But I think, you know, and I

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 14>think that's taking into account near term investments. So they

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 14>mentioned things is like consumer trends and near term investments

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 14>like the cost of the acquisition of the smart TV

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.959
<v Speaker 14>maker Visio. We're still seeing those costs take a hit

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 14>on the bottom line. But yeah, they said they haven't

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 14>incorporated yet the risk of tariffs into their guidance. We

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 14>also saw US retail sales dip in January and core

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 14>inflation pick up, So I think those are those are

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 14>all things that are weighing on retailers, and Walmart certainly

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 14>isn't immune.

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 2>How about on the tariff front, I mean they uh

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 2>am looking at your bloombergers right up here, talk about tariffs.

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Walmart imports food from Mexico and general merchandise products like

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 2>microwaves in China. What are they saying about tariffs? Is

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 2>that incorporated in their guidance.

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 14>They said they have not incorporated tariffs into their guidance before.

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 14>Tariffs aren't new for a company like Walmart. Obviously, we

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 14>saw import tariffs, you know, during the last Trump administration.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 14>But they're doing what we've seen most companies do so

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 14>far this year, which is say it's uncertain, we're not

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 14>sure what's going to happen, and we're not incorporating tariffs

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 14>into our guidance yet. But yeah, I mean, food prices

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 14>were up for them. General merchandising prices I think came

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 14>down a little bit.

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 7>I actually learned something new about Walmart, and that's that

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 7>you can buy a pre owned Chanel bag through their website.

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 7>So I guess they're getting into online sales. They're beefing

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 7>up their digital operation to include items like collectibles and

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 7>pre owned Chanel bags. Wow, you think about that, I

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 7>mean luxury items at like a discount retailer.

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 14>So Walmart is still small compared to Amazon, but in

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 14>terms of e commerce, but that's an area where they're

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 14>just continuing to see huge growth and e commerce in

0:29:55.240 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 14>their their marketplace. So that's that that is something that

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 14>you'll continue to hear them talk a lot about and

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 14>there's a ton of upside there. Pharmacy delivery was another

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 14>one that they shouted out. That's a new business for them.

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 14>So these newer businesses continue to grow a lot for Walmart,

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 14>and they would say there's still a big runway there

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 14>when it comes to competing with Amazon.

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting comparable sales excluding fuel rose four point six

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 2>percent at US Walmart, Star Wars open at least a

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 2>year for the quarter into January thirty first. That's higher

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 2>than Wall Street had been anticipating. So it doesn't seem

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 2>like the consumer per se, at least in this quarter,

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 2>was a problem.

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 5>The consumer was still spending.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 14>So an interesting thing about the growth this quarter and

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 14>actually last quarter as well, was that growth was mostly

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 14>coming from higher income households. So households that are earning

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 14>more than one hundred thousand dollars a year, not the

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 14>person you typically think of as your average Walmart shopper.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 14>These are like wealthier people who are looking for deals,

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 14>looking for value. Maybe they're coming to Walmart for groceries

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 14>as oppost to whole foods this quarter because prices on

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 14>food are so high. So that's really where the growth

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 14>is still coming from, our wealthier shoppers.

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 7>Does that tell you then that the consumers maybe weaker

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 7>if these high income people are having to move down

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 7>the spectrum, It's.

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 14>Possible, and I think, you know, we are looking forward

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 14>to the rest of the big Pox results coming this quarter.

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 14>We're looking at home depot, we're looking at Target. I

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 14>think they will tell us a bigger picture view of

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 14>how the US consumer is doing. But yes, I have

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 14>the same question, where are those shoppers coming from? Who's

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 14>losing here?

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Our Thanks to Emily Cohen, Bloomberg Consumer Team Leader. We

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 2>move next to the crypto space, and I was recently

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 2>joined by crypto expert Ian Balina, founder and CEO of

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Token Metrics. We discussed the state of crypto at the

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 2>start of the new Trump administration in the US and

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 2>how artificial intelligence is transforming the industry. I first asked

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Ian about how the crypto community views the Trump administration

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 2>and their current stance on crypto.

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 15>The new Trump administration being pro crypto, they've mentioned that

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 15>they anticipate having procrypto regulation within six months, so long term,

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 15>this is amazing for crypto. For the first time in

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 15>his history, cryptos running downhill, not uphill. But in the

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:18.719
<v Speaker 15>short term there has been a large correction in crypto

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 15>from different sectors, from AI to DeFi, but crypto hasn't

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 15>really taken off as people had anticipated. Trump entering office

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 15>has led to essentially buy the room has seldom news,

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 15>but long term this is bullsh for crypto long term.

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, how about you.

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned distributed finance AI crypto A lot of stuff

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 2>wrapped up in that. Where do you see or where

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 2>are you and your clients and your vests. Where do

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 2>you see the most opportunity here?

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 15>AI? AI still has the most opportunity. If you just

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:53.239
<v Speaker 15>take the total crypto mind share in the last one

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 15>year or so peaked at about seventy percent being fully AI.

0:32:57.640 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 8>What does that mean?

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 15>That means the attention, the awareness in the crypto space

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 15>was solely focused on AI sector AI projects, from products

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 15>like A sixteen Z to products like ARC and others.

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 15>People are seeing what's happening in just tech in general

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 15>with open AI, XAI and know these other competitors, and

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 15>that's leading into a rising tide loops all both kind

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 15>of mentality in crypto in the crypto AI space because

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 15>people see AI as the future. But why it's beautiful

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 15>in crypto Crypto and AI are marriage made in heaven

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 15>because in a digital world with digital AI agents, you

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 15>have Sam Altman saying that AI agents is the biggest

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 15>narrative in all of tech for this year.

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 5>So define what that is. AI agents basically.

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 15>Other AI is working together as a team of AIS.

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 15>These teams of AI is working together, how do you

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 15>trust each other? That's what crypto is about, cryptos built

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 15>on cryptography, having people online transact through different currencies without

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 15>having to trust each other. Applying that to AI agents

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 15>to me, is does naturally makes sense.

0:33:59.120 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 2>One of the areas that I a lot of folks

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 2>that maybe aren't as involved in AI, in crypto, in

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 2>some of these new technologies is does there need to

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 2>be regulation?

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 5>If so, how much and by hume, where are we there?

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 15>Yes, there's definitely does need to be regulation in the

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 15>cryptic space, also in the AI space as well, but

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 15>not to a level what it stops or restricts innovation,

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 15>right because AI, as mentioned by the administration, is essentially

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 15>a national security issue. China is basically just flying, but

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 15>it's by the by their pants, and we can really

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 15>allow the US to become backwards in terms of technology

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 15>with AI and the same thing with crypto. So I

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 15>don't think restriction that inhibits innovation makes sense. That's why

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 15>I think David Sachs the AI cryptos are was actually

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 15>a pointed to that role. Those two are tied together,

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 15>AI and cryptoi tie together because for America to stay

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 15>forward as a company, as a country in terms of

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 15>the economy and just technology and advancement, they have to innovate.

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 15>And for the last almost eight years in crypto, with

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 15>the SEC and other different regulators, they have forced US

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 15>entrepreneurs offshore, and now by the administration wanting to make

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 15>crypto or rather make America the crypto capital of the world,

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 15>they have to basically be open for business and they

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 15>have to welcome innovation, not try to social offshore.

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 2>So one of the uncertainties I guess of the Biden

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 2>administration was who in fact would regulate some of these technologies,

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 2>particularly across the crypto space. Was a Gary Gensler at

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the SEC. Was the CFTC, the Commodities Futures Commission Commission?

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 5>Where are we going now?

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 10>Where where's where's the.

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 15>Wind taking us now? Who's going to regulate this thing?

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 15>So right now it looks like it's basically a team effort.

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 15>It's both does CFTC kind of taken the lead and

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 15>also the SEC as well, But regardless of who's taking

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 15>the lead, they all have to really understand crypto at

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 15>a deep level. They can be crypto a sayers, yes,

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 15>they are risking and crypto. Yes, scripture is not perfect,

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 15>it's not ideal, it's new to technology is still being polished.

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 15>But you have to kind of take a very optimistic

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 15>approach in terms of seeing the future and the possibilities

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 15>of crypto.

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, Bloomberg News did a story a couple

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 2>of quarters ago when every single one of the S

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 2>and P five hundred companies mentioned AI in their quarterly

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 2>earnings release and comments that that's up from like, you know,

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 2>a handful a quarter or two before that. Where do

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:42.359
<v Speaker 2>you see the real I guess applications of AI where

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 2>most of us going to see it day to day?

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 5>How are you guys thinking about that?

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 15>So, what we're seeing with our customers and even people

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 15>in the cry crypto space is AI is unlocking a

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 15>completely new user experience. So, for example, take defined centralized

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 15>finance and crypto space, whether yield optimization, whether it's trading agents,

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 15>different complexities that you basically had to be a crypto

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 15>expert or quant expert to leverage. You can now just

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 15>use AI to help manage all that for you.

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 10>What does that mean?

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 15>Let's say you want to do a flash loan which

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 15>is basically complicated. Where in crypto of borring money and

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 15>making the trade and paying it back all in real time,

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 15>all in one transaction, very hard to execute. But now

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 15>with AI in the same way how Chad GPD has

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:33.240
<v Speaker 15>unlocked and given everybody pretty much a PhD on their computer,

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 15>you can now have that same PhD person doing all

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 15>kinds of innovations in the quipment space, from trading to

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 15>investing to rebouncing your portfolio. For example, I talking abouts

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 15>we're building trading agents to allow people to trade crypto

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 15>using AI in a passive way. So we're seeing this

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 15>completely unlock different elements that the average person didn't really

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 15>tap into or have access to.

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 5>And it's early in the Trump administration.

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Hell I guess domestic are folks in the crypto space

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 2>that President Trump and his team will in fact deliver

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 2>on being, you know, a very positive force for crypto.

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 15>Very very optimistic, because if you just kind of zoom

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 15>out and see the history of crypto, crypto has grown

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 15>to become a three trillion dollar asset class. We think

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 15>it can go to about eight to fourteen trillion by

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 15>twenty twenty six. But that entire time it's been basically

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 15>pushed down by an anti procrypto regulation. Right, and now

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 15>crypto finally has a seat at the table. From the

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 15>Crypto Ball to the Crypto Council to the AI Crypto Zar,

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 15>there's finally a pathway to crypto having a seat at

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 15>the table and to crypto becoming a much bigger asset

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 15>class o.

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Ian Balina, founder and CEO of Token Metrics.

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.