Speaker 1: A right news round up and information overload hour. Here's
Speaker 1: our toll free telephone number if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. It's eight hundred and ninety
Speaker 1: four to one Sean if you want to join us.
Speaker 1: We are living through historic times. I guess the closest
Speaker 1: to watching the Berlin Wall come down to me with
Speaker 1: now new leadership. I mean watching after the capture of
Speaker 1: Nicholas Maduro in Venezuela and Venezuela and watching you know,
Speaker 1: the the remaining I guess supporters of him capitulate to
Speaker 1: every demand of Donald Trump fifty million barrels of oil
Speaker 1: that are going to be sold at market prices for
Speaker 1: the benefit of Venezuelan people, on top of also agreeing
Speaker 1: to only trade with the United States, on top of
Speaker 1: political prisoners being released. One of the next consequences of
Speaker 1: that is what we discussed earlier in the program today,
Speaker 1: and that is the Cubans were able to get cheap
Speaker 1: and even free oil in exchange for providing security for Maduro.
Speaker 2: That is over Cuban.
Speaker 1: Now teetering on the brink now of a total complete collapse,
Speaker 1: and inside of Iran where we're watching the likelihood of
Speaker 1: regime change, you know, growing hour by hour as protesters
Speaker 1: have been taken into the streets, and Donald Trump pledging
Speaker 1: to the Iranium people that if they continue to be
Speaker 1: murdered and slaughtered as has been going on, that the
Speaker 1: President will in fact involve himself nuke Gingrich.
Speaker 2: Who's going to join us in a minute?
Speaker 1: Put out an ex post says, it's not enough to
Speaker 1: sympathize with the Uranium people in their struggle to get
Speaker 1: free from the dictatorship, which is clearly killing dissidence and
Speaker 1: fighting for its very survival. It's not enough to have
Speaker 1: government leaders publicly talking about support for the Uranium people
Speaker 1: but failing to do anything real. It's also not enough
Speaker 1: to send token support but failed to take steps necessary
Speaker 1: to replace the dictatorship. In a few weeks, either the
Speaker 1: dictatorship is gone or the Iranian people will will have
Speaker 1: been defeated and suppressed in a campaign to find the
Speaker 1: ring leaders and kill them will have begun. There is
Speaker 1: no middle ground. The goal of every Western leader should
Speaker 1: be to destroy the Iranian dictatorship. He goes on, and
Speaker 1: he goes at this moment of vulnerability, and he further
Speaker 1: goes on to say that nothing will do more to
Speaker 1: move the Middle East towards peace, safety, prosperity than the
Speaker 1: destruction of the Ietolas dictatorship. And the time to act
Speaker 1: is now. Anyway, Former Speaker of the House, New Gingrich
Speaker 1: is with us. These are really historic times we're living
Speaker 1: in and you can't deny that Donald Trump has played
Speaker 1: a major role in all of it.
Speaker 3: Just say to yourself that Joe Biden has been re
Speaker 3: elected or the Kamala Harris have been elected. We've been
Speaker 3: in a totally different world.
Speaker 4: I mean, for all all.
Speaker 3: Of his complications and difficulties and things you and I
Speaker 3: could probably agree on in the end, when it really matters,
Speaker 3: President Trump is a truly historic figure, and he has
Speaker 3: the courage, and he understands that he has the power
Speaker 3: of the most powerful nation in the world, and so
Speaker 3: unlike his recent predecessors, which I would say would also
Speaker 3: include Obama, he is prepared to use the power of
Speaker 3: the United States to force change on the scale that
Speaker 3: nobody I included me, nobody could have predicted. It's amazing
Speaker 3: to watch it happen. He is so smart, as you
Speaker 3: know because you've done him for thirty years. He keeps
Speaker 3: absorbing information, he keeps learning from what's going on, and
Speaker 3: in a sense, he keeps mutating. He's more aware, control
Speaker 3: has a better sense of how the world works every
Speaker 3: single day. And it's as a historian, it's it's amazing
Speaker 3: to look through.
Speaker 2: It really really is.
Speaker 1: And you know, it's interesting because there are people even
Speaker 1: within our movement, although I would argue that most of
Speaker 1: the people that I can think of have been kind
Speaker 1: of fair weather supporters and friends of Donald Trump that
Speaker 1: are the most critical of him, but they have misinterpreted
Speaker 1: the Trump doctrine. Donald Trump clearly has a very clear
Speaker 1: understanding of the threat of radical Islam and radical islam is.
Speaker 1: That's why he defeated the Caliphate, took out Solamani and
Speaker 1: Bagadian associates, dropped the mother of all bombs on Afghanistan,
Speaker 1: and took out Iranian nuclear sites.
Speaker 2: That was not done in a vacuum. It was done
Speaker 2: with the understanding.
Speaker 1: That that convert or die and radical Islamist represent a
Speaker 1: clear and present danger to the United States, not just
Speaker 1: to Israel, not just to the region.
Speaker 2: And not only did.
Speaker 1: Israel benefit, but the world benefited, and every other country
Speaker 1: in the region was breathing a sigh of relief when
Speaker 1: he took out their nuclear sites. And I don't think
Speaker 1: some people understand it. They interpret the Trump doctorate of
Speaker 1: No Forever Wars to mean isolationism, and that's not what
Speaker 1: it means.
Speaker 3: I mean, in a real sense, he reminds me of
Speaker 3: Theodore Roosevelt, and the Roosevelt who had said, you know,
Speaker 3: carry a big stick and speak softly. Roosevelt understood you
Speaker 3: could use power very directly and very briefly and not
Speaker 3: get balled down. We got into the cycle with our
Speaker 3: elites where we just frankly, I would say starting with
Speaker 3: them was Vietnam. We fought sort of the academics wars,
Speaker 3: things that should have worked, things that should have been understandable,
Speaker 3: and they were disasters. You go to Vietnam, you go
Speaker 3: to Haiti, you go to Iraq, you're go to Afghanistan,
Speaker 3: and you realize that the intellectualization of warfare is one
Speaker 3: of the great failures of modern times. And when Trump
Speaker 3: is done, and what Hagsepp has done is they have
Speaker 3: stripped it away. So instead of trying to, you know,
Speaker 3: deal a little here, a little there, you go in decisively,
Speaker 3: you hit them, you force change, and you back out
Speaker 3: uh and you let other people then pick up the pieces,
Speaker 3: and I think so far it is, you know, there's
Speaker 3: a lot to go get. I'm actually writing a piece
Speaker 3: that the press conference and the final results aren't the
Speaker 3: same thing. I mean, they have begun in Venezuela, they
Speaker 3: have begun in Gaza, they have begun Iran in some ways.
Speaker 3: They've begun in Ukraine, but none of them are done yet.
Speaker 2: But they've begun in Cuba too.
Speaker 1: How do how does Cuba possibly survive without Venezuela and energy.
Speaker 2: I don't see any chance that they can.
Speaker 3: No. And I think in Marco Rubio, and actually he
Speaker 3: and Post and I happen to be together, had the
Speaker 3: vote count in West Palm on election night and we
Speaker 3: were standing waiting for the president, and we were chatting
Speaker 3: about this because I knew from Marco's own background, with
Speaker 3: his parents both from Cuba, being a South Florida politician,
Speaker 3: he had a deep personal interest in liberating Cuba, and
Speaker 3: he understood fully how badly the dictatorship was failing and
Speaker 3: how badly the economy was failing. And I thought it
Speaker 3: was fascinating. So you're now, look, you could imagine, with
Speaker 3: a little bit of luck, as you're going to roll
Speaker 3: up Cuba, Nicaragua and Colombia and then be in a
Speaker 3: position to confront Mexico, which is the biggest, hardest and
Speaker 3: most difficult. But I wouldn't be shocked over the next
Speaker 3: year to see that, and to have Manco Rubio as
Speaker 3: Secretary of State, given his unique knowledge of the region,
Speaker 3: I think gives you a tremendous leverage to actually get
Speaker 3: this done.
Speaker 1: There are many people that have been putting out all
Speaker 1: these memes on Marco Rubio, well, I think has really
Speaker 1: really come into his own as Secretary of State. I
Speaker 1: think he's done a phenomenal job. Let me ask you,
Speaker 1: let's stay focused for a second, if we can, on
Speaker 1: Iran and what its future is. Last week I had
Speaker 1: Reza Palavi, the Crown Prince of Iran, on my TV show.
Speaker 1: He's going to be back on tonight. When he was
Speaker 1: on last week, it went so viral in the region
Speaker 1: that I mean, he was getting millions and millions and
Speaker 1: millions of views. And he's not looking to take the
Speaker 1: position necessarily himself. All he wants is a democracy for
Speaker 1: the people of Iran. He said he is as soon
Speaker 1: as possible he wants to return. I know that tomorrow
Speaker 1: at the White House. The opposition leader who won ninety
Speaker 1: two plus percent of the vote, Maria Karina Machado, is
Speaker 1: going to be meeting with the President. Wants to give
Speaker 1: her the Nobel Peace Prize that she received. I wants
Speaker 1: to give it to President Trump. But Razid Paalab talking
Speaker 1: to me about the future of a ram being a
Speaker 1: secular democracy Sean.
Speaker 5: At the call of my compatriots, I stepped forward to
Speaker 5: lead this transition from this tyranny to a future democracy.
Speaker 5: My role is to help my competriot achieve that goal,
Speaker 5: to bring about a peaceful and by means of a
Speaker 5: national referendum and a constitutional assembly. I'm impartial as to
Speaker 5: what the ultimate result will be, so long as it's
Speaker 5: a secular democracy. I've trained all my life to serve
Speaker 5: my nation. I'm there to serve and help them achieve
Speaker 5: that goal, and I'm more than ever ready to step
Speaker 5: in Iran as soon as the situation warrants to south.
Speaker 1: But you are pointing out something very profound in your
Speaker 1: post on x and that is that there's a window
Speaker 1: of opportunity here. Otherwise too many people will die and
Speaker 1: then too many people will return to their homes.
Speaker 3: That's right. I mean you get to a point where
Speaker 3: either the regime starts to disintegrate or it rebalances itself.
Speaker 3: And if it rebalances itself, it will crush the opposition.
Speaker 3: And it will then methodically, and it's done this on
Speaker 3: at least two other occasions, I will methodically hunt down
Speaker 3: and kill all the people who are leaving the demonstrations.
Speaker 3: So that this is a very delicate moment where you
Speaker 3: could have a huge impact by insisting on replacing the dictatorship, which,
Speaker 3: after all, as late as Sunday had people chanting death
Speaker 3: to America. So we have some notion that this is
Speaker 3: a regime which is mortally closed to the survival of
Speaker 3: the Israel or United States. My point would be, we
Speaker 3: have enough tools, starting with various cyber weapons and with
Speaker 3: prom this straight out propaganda and all way if necessary,
Speaker 3: going to military capabilities. We have enough tools to guarantee
Speaker 3: that the dictatorship does not survive. But there's a time
Speaker 3: limit to that, and so we need to act. We
Speaker 3: need to replace words and say it's nice to have
Speaker 3: a senior political leaders say, oh, we're really with the
Speaker 3: Iranian people. The question then ought to be really, what
Speaker 3: is really what the Iranian people mean, what are you
Speaker 3: actually doing? Don't just tell me you're posturing. And I
Speaker 3: said this now several times today on x and gotten
Speaker 3: very strong response from people who understand that this is
Speaker 3: a historic turning point. And my hope is the President
Speaker 3: Trump will instruct this national security team starting with the
Speaker 3: number of non violent things we can do, including cyber
Speaker 3: attacks and propaganda, and a number of things designed to
Speaker 3: break up the regime. You don't have to go straight
Speaker 3: to military, but you should begin mobilizing through military capabilities,
Speaker 3: not just for us, but also for our European allies
Speaker 3: and for some of our Arab allies in the region.
Speaker 3: Of the number of people who would like to replace
Speaker 3: the dictatorship is extraordinary, and we should orchestrate that, bring
Speaker 3: it to bear, and two or three leafs from now,
Speaker 3: the iatola should be gone, and all the senior leadership
Speaker 3: should be gone, and Uranian people should be allowed them
Speaker 3: on their own, in a free and fair way, to
Speaker 3: choose the kind of leadership they want.
Speaker 1: A very big difference from the last time we saw
Speaker 1: people taking to the streets in Iran and Barack Obama,
Speaker 1: who had dropped cargo planes full of cash and other
Speaker 1: currencies to try to placate these radical malas offered no
Speaker 1: support at all whatsoever. But you know now the Iranian
Speaker 1: Revolutionary Guard has been unleashed on the people within Iran,
Speaker 1: and that's why the death toll is going up much higher.
Speaker 3: So as we sit, among other things, be prepared to
Speaker 3: start taking out the headquarters and the training facilities of
Speaker 3: the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. And we should make very clear
Speaker 3: that anybody who's engaged in violence should expect to be
Speaker 3: held accountable and all only potentially be put in prison.
Speaker 3: There are a lot of steps we could take that
Speaker 3: would rapidly undermine the regime and then prease it in
Speaker 3: place and cause it to become timid. And I think
Speaker 3: we also so the truth is we probably know where
Speaker 3: the Ayatola is and we should probably consider seriously taking
Speaker 3: out what her facility he's in.
Speaker 1: Well, I'll tell you these are fascinating times they're living in.
Speaker 1: The Only thing I can think of comparable in our
Speaker 1: lifetime is the fall of the Berlin Wallam I wrong?
Speaker 2: The other historian? We have about thirty seconds.
Speaker 3: Look, I think when you sweep the world from Venezuela
Speaker 3: to Iran to Ukraine, you have to say this is
Speaker 3: comparable to the end of the Soviet Union.
Speaker 1: No okay, former Speaker of the House, New King Rich
Speaker 1: fascinating times. We're living through eight hundred and nine four
Speaker 1: one seawn our number. If you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. All right, let's get to our
Speaker 1: busy phones. Let us say hello to Jim in Arizona.
Speaker 1: Jim High, how are you glad you called Sir Hi.
Speaker 6: Sewn and Lit. I just wanted to weigh in on
Speaker 6: the Minnesota incident and actually all incidents were officers have
Speaker 6: to pull their weapons out. Based on my own personal experience,
Speaker 6: and how.
Speaker 2: Come are you a former law enforcement or our current
Speaker 2: law enforcement?
Speaker 6: No, no, I owe my life to these guys because
Speaker 6: what I what ended up happening is I got arrested
Speaker 6: forty seven years ago when I was eighteen, and an
Speaker 6: agent got in my car and pulled his badge in
Speaker 6: front of me, and he put a gun and pointed
Speaker 6: at me and said don't move or I'll shoot you,
Speaker 6: and I complied I'm alive. I had several law enforcement
Speaker 6: officers tell me it's time to grow up, stop this
Speaker 6: illegal behavior and get your life on track. And I
Speaker 6: truly owe my entire life now to the cops, and
Speaker 6: they really do care about you.
Speaker 2: Listen.
Speaker 1: I don't know how in the minds of the left
Speaker 1: in this country that the police have become the enemy.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 1: There's always a few bad apples I've had. I used
Speaker 1: to do many, many years ago. I mean fifteen years ago,
Speaker 1: I had a heavy foot. I don't anymore because I
Speaker 1: never want to have an accident and hurt an innocent
Speaker 1: person just because I needed to get somewhere a little faster.
Speaker 1: Forget it. You don't get there faster anyway. It doesn't
Speaker 1: really work. But you know, in the times that I
Speaker 1: got pulled over, you know, cops, I'm always very respectful.
Speaker 1: I haven't been pulled over in years because I don't speak.
Speaker 1: It's just not worth it to me. But when I did,
Speaker 1: you always yes, sir, No, sir. If I had a firearm,
Speaker 1: because I've always had a license to carry with me,
Speaker 1: I put my hands outside the wind window in the
Speaker 1: first thing I would do is inform the officer that
Speaker 1: I had a weapon with me, which is complying by law,
Speaker 1: you know, with my hands outside the window, and you know,
Speaker 1: full compliance, total respect, and most occasions, if you're respectful,
Speaker 1: they will get returned, that respect back to you. And
Speaker 1: the idea that these people were clearly with the longer
Speaker 1: version of the tape haunting, aggravating, stalking, even these these
Speaker 1: ICE agents, it's unconscionable, you know. But when you heard
Speaker 1: tape the partner of this woman that got killed and
Speaker 1: it's a tragedy, but you know, drive, drive and she
Speaker 1: throws it in reverse and it accelerates right towards the officer.
Speaker 2: What is that person supposed to do?
Speaker 1: I mean by according to the book, according to that
Speaker 1: he had every right to defend himself. It's a tragedy,
Speaker 1: but a tragedy I would argue of their own making.
Speaker 1: And it didn't need to happen. And one of the
Speaker 1: saddest parts in all of this is the demonization of
Speaker 1: ICE agents constantly. If Tim Walls calling them a gestapo,
Speaker 1: you know, this idiot mayor French fry, you know, to
Speaker 1: get the fo to Minneapolis. Yet they are the ones
Speaker 1: that have been aiding in a bedding in the law
Speaker 1: breaking is institutionalized corruption within the Somali community and ICE
Speaker 1: agents they're not going to stop doing their job because
Speaker 1: of this. And DHS Secretary Nome and Tom Homan and
Speaker 1: others that they've sent more agents into Minnesota and there's
Speaker 1: not a damn thing that people of Minnesota can do
Speaker 1: about it. These elected officials, and they have a job
Speaker 1: to do. You know, there's too many known terrorists, murderers, rapists,
Speaker 1: gang members, cartel members, drug dealers that we have allowed
Speaker 1: into this country. Our country has been ripped off, institutionalized,
Speaker 1: you know, theft, you know, by by abusing the welfare
Speaker 1: system in this country. They you know, in the case
Speaker 1: of Tim Walls, as people testify to last week, he
Speaker 1: knew about it, did nothing about it. I think that,
Speaker 1: you know, a lot is being exposed here. You know,
Speaker 1: I read this today. I have an article about this
Speaker 1: that democrats.
Speaker 2: I got the article here.
Speaker 1: Let me pull an out of my stack and rushers
Speaker 1: to always talk about a stack of stuff.
Speaker 2: And it was on fake news CNN.
Speaker 1: They reported this that liberal Democrats want to make defunding
Speaker 1: ICE part of the next government shutdown this month. Okay,
Speaker 1: good luck with that, because most people support law and order,
Speaker 1: and I don't think it's going to work out. I
Speaker 1: think that's going to backfire. I'll I get backfired the
Speaker 1: last time, and we're not going to defund ice. President
Speaker 1: Trump will never do it and nor should he. Republicans
Speaker 1: will never allow it to happen, nor should they. But
Speaker 1: you bring up you know, I urge people be respectful
Speaker 1: if you if you have an encounter with police, whatever
Speaker 1: that encounter happens to be. You know, understand, they don't
Speaker 1: know what they're dealing with, They do not know who
Speaker 1: you are. They they have to assume the worst. They
Speaker 1: have their guard up rightly so because that's how they're trained.
Speaker 1: And you have to diffuse the situation. Let them know
Speaker 1: that you're being respectful, just common sense to be honest
Speaker 1: and not very complicated anyway, Appreciate the call eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one, Sean if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. Rick in Texas, God bless Texas. Rick,
Speaker 1: how are you?
Speaker 4: I'm good, Sean, Thank you very much. It's a little
Speaker 4: bit off subject, but it's been on my mind a
Speaker 4: long time. Follow up. Mister Comer and mister Jordan have
Speaker 4: done a fantastic job. Great work and doge and but
Speaker 4: then we never hear for we don't really always hear
Speaker 4: back the result like who who authorized those crazy payments
Speaker 4: that were made? Who did authorize it. Who was running
Speaker 4: the country. Did they figure that out with all the
Speaker 4: interviews that they did. And Adam shiff who I can't
Speaker 4: stand Russia, Russia, Russia, what happened to I don't hear
Speaker 4: himy more about him anyway. It's just curious on those things.
Speaker 4: And one other thing, I think you have President Trump's ear,
Speaker 4: you could suggest to him that he may be he
Speaker 4: gets on talks to the country and explainants to them
Speaker 4: why they started and what happened with all the you know,
Speaker 4: just remind them of it's not just about picking up people.
Speaker 4: It's about what happened when ten million people came across
Speaker 4: and we're getting the bad guys. I don't think he's
Speaker 4: ever come out and explain that to people on TV
Speaker 4: or anything.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 1: I mean, I thought he gave a good speech at
Speaker 1: the end of the year, going into great specificity in
Speaker 1: detail on all that he's done in his first year.
Speaker 1: There's never been a president that has given more time
Speaker 1: to the media, answered more questions than this president. I
Speaker 1: think he's made himself readily available and I did an
Speaker 1: interview with him last week. I've asked him every possible question.
Speaker 1: The world's changing before our eyes. I did focus a
Speaker 1: lot on what's going on around the world and the economy.
Speaker 1: I don't know what else he can do in terms
Speaker 1: of communicating. He's given an inordinate amount of time. I
Speaker 1: would argue, if we the minutes up, probably more time
Speaker 1: in his first year in office than Joe Biden did
Speaker 1: in his four years in office by a long shot.
Speaker 1: So you know that the answer is who was running
Speaker 1: the country under Biden? It wasn't him, there's your answer,
Speaker 1: especially in the final years in office.
Speaker 2: I mean, as bad.
Speaker 1: As he was going in And I pointed out his
Speaker 1: cognitive decline in twenty nineteen, and you know I was
Speaker 1: excoriated for doing so. Turns out I was right. I
Speaker 1: wish I wasn't you work all right? Rick, appreciate it,
Speaker 1: my friend, God bless you. Eight hundred ninety four one Sean.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: let's say hi to THEO in Western New York, THEO.
Speaker 2: How are you glad you called? Sir?
Speaker 7: Thank you, mister Hannity. It's a pleasure to speak to you.
Speaker 2: Pleasure is all mine. What's going on?
Speaker 7: I was just calling because with I wanted to talk
Speaker 7: just a little bit about what's going on in Minnesota
Speaker 7: and with the violence, and I just wanted to say
Speaker 7: I think the most important part from and I'm not
Speaker 7: the smartest guy in the world. I don't really lean
Speaker 7: that far left. I don't lean right, but I think
Speaker 7: a bit more than anything, I think we just need
Speaker 7: to be taking a moment, to take a pause in
Speaker 7: the moment and look at situations and let the dust
Speaker 7: settle before we kind of all run out and say,
Speaker 7: you know, this ice guy is the worst guy in
Speaker 7: the world, or this protesters the worst person in the world,
Speaker 7: because I feel like we fill everything up with this
Speaker 7: you know what we want to hear, and then it
Speaker 7: makes it so hard for us to come back to
Speaker 7: the middle. And I guess that's sort of well.
Speaker 1: The rush to judgment is a phenomenon that we've spoken
Speaker 1: of a lot on this program, and I've told the
Speaker 1: whole story about how I learned my lesson. I was
Speaker 1: right about Richard Jewell when everyone would you know, AJC,
Speaker 1: you know, went out with a story that he fits
Speaker 1: the profile of a lone bomber because he lived with
Speaker 1: his mother. It turned out not to be true that
Speaker 1: he was not the terrorist domestic terrorist, you know, it
Speaker 1: goes to every single case. Ferguson Missouri, Freddie Gray and Baltimore,
Speaker 1: uv A Duke Lacrosse, George Zimmerman down in Florida, and
Speaker 1: my they it happens all the time. They rush to judgment,
Speaker 1: you know, in the case. You know, look at Ferguson Missouri,
Speaker 1: I mean, hands up, don't shoot. Never happened. And we
Speaker 1: and every one of these cases, we get it right.
Speaker 1: They get it wrong. I never get credit for it.
Speaker 1: I'm not looking for credit. It's just they never learn
Speaker 1: their lesson. And just like you know, if you look
Speaker 1: at this video and you look at this extended video,
Speaker 1: you see exactly what the truth is. And it's like
Speaker 1: they live in a different reality. I mean, even though
Speaker 1: their eyes show them something very different, they don't care that.
Speaker 1: They just care about a narrative. And meanwhile, how many
Speaker 1: people die every weekend and shot and shot and killed
Speaker 1: in Chicago. They never say a word because they can't
Speaker 1: weaponize that or politicize it. And if they did, they
Speaker 1: would be criticizing themselves.
Speaker 6: I agree with you.
Speaker 7: However, if we go back to twenty sixteen and you
Speaker 7: pull all the FBI statistics under every presidency, including Trump's
Speaker 7: you'll find that ninety five percent of the violence that's
Speaker 7: happening is actually from the right wing. Two hundred plots
Speaker 7: against the government in that amount of time, there's only
Speaker 7: five on the left hand side. And we're creating this
Speaker 7: myth somehow at the right the guys that don't have
Speaker 7: ninety five percent of the guns are somehow committing most
Speaker 7: of this violence. So I don't quite understand why we
Speaker 7: have the myth of that violence on the right or
Speaker 7: on the left rather when all the data, even under Trump,
Speaker 7: shows that the majority of that actual lethal violence seems
Speaker 7: to be coming from the right. And if we're telling
Speaker 7: everybody on the right that it's the left it's so violent, well,
Speaker 7: that's just going to make them get more violence. And
Speaker 7: I'd like to figure out what we could do to
Speaker 7: take the temperature down.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I don't think the right is doing
Speaker 1: anything to take the temperature up. I mean, in the
Speaker 1: case of ice, they're enforcing the laws of our land.
Speaker 2: Well they're in the case of.
Speaker 7: Over five hundred I'm so sorry for interrupting, but there
Speaker 7: are over five hundred cases of abuse, a type of
Speaker 7: abuse I don't know I can say on air and
Speaker 7: other things that are happening, and they're.
Speaker 1: Also talking about a ledged abuse and has is law
Speaker 1: enforcement perfect?
Speaker 8: No?
Speaker 2: They're not perfect? Are there? Are there occasionally bad apples? Yes?
Speaker 1: You have to weed them out when you see them.
Speaker 1: Do I think the ninety nine point nine percent of
Speaker 1: agents are there to do a very difficult, hard job
Speaker 1: enforcing the laws of the land, which they were hired
Speaker 1: to do, while being simultaneously being called a Nazi or
Speaker 1: Gestapo or a fascist. Tell the left to shut down
Speaker 1: their rhetoric and shut their mouths and stop us, you know,
Speaker 1: verbally assaulting these officers and physically assaulting them and threatening
Speaker 1: them because that's the that's what they've been living under,
Speaker 1: and doxing their homes and putting their families at risk,
Speaker 1: and you know, passing laws that they can't wear a
Speaker 1: mask to protect their identity. Meanwhile all other law enforcement can. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I got a role. Appreciate the call eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine four one, Sean. If you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. Let's say I had a Matthew
Speaker 1: in Arizona. Matthew, how are you glad? You call?
Speaker 8: Hey?
Speaker 2: Sean?
Speaker 8: How you doing?
Speaker 1: I'm good, sir. What's going on Happy Monday. There's no
Speaker 1: such thing, but happy Monday anyway.
Speaker 8: Happy Monday to you, Sean Hey, longtime listener. Our family
Speaker 8: loves you, We love what you do. Good question. I'm
Speaker 8: concerned about the Supreme Court decision on the terroriffs and
Speaker 8: what what what would things look like if they ruled
Speaker 8: against Trump? Do we with that entail giving money back?
Speaker 8: Do you have any idea what what that might entail
Speaker 8: should they rule against them on the tariffs?
Speaker 5: Uh?
Speaker 1: I have I have a complusion. I know exactly what
Speaker 1: they're going to do, but I don't feel at liberty
Speaker 1: to share it because it was told to me off
Speaker 1: the record. But what they But let me put it
Speaker 1: this way. It's very clever and I believe it would work.
Speaker 1: How's that? Does that help you at all? And B
Speaker 1: But I'm cautiously optimistic. I mean, Howard Lutnik, We've had
Speaker 1: him on the program, he was there for arguments. I'm
Speaker 1: cautiously optimistic we're going to win that because I think
Speaker 1: it definitely goes right to the heart of the Article
Speaker 1: two Constitutional powers. By using tariffs, it is it is
Speaker 1: part of the president's role. It's a weapon, if you will,
Speaker 1: in terms of his role as commander in chief. And
Speaker 1: I think that's the best argument they have, but there
Speaker 1: are other ways to thread that needle. And I don't
Speaker 1: think that Donald Trump will miss a beat, but it
Speaker 1: would be better if we won that case for sure.
Speaker 8: Okay, okay, all right.
Speaker 2: Buddy, appreciate the call.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and nine foot one Sean if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program.
Speaker 2: All right, that's going to wrap things up for today.
Speaker 1: We got a great Hannity said you DVR nine eastern
Speaker 1: on the Fox News channel. Rez of Palavi, the exile
Speaker 1: Crown Prince of Iran is Iran on the brink of falling.
Speaker 1: Lindsey Graham thinks America should kind of push it over
Speaker 1: the edge. We'll talk to him about it. Energy Secretary
Speaker 1: Chris Wright. We'll talk about Venezuela, the impact on Cuba. Also,
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan, Emily Compano, Kevin Cork, much more so ADVR
Speaker 1: News you'll never get from the Legacy Media mob nine
Speaker 1: eastern on Fox. Don't miss it. We'll see you tonight
Speaker 1: back here tomorrow. Thank you for making the show possible.