Speaker 1: What if I told you that no matter what you
Speaker 1: think about bitcoin, whether you love it, you hate it,
Speaker 1: or you don't even understand it, well, either way, you're
Speaker 1: going to be completely underprepared for what's about to happen next.
Speaker 1: Because there's a new bill S. Four nine one two,
Speaker 1: and it's about to ignite a chain reaction that sends
Speaker 1: bitcoin further and faster than most anyone can imagine. M
Speaker 1: This isn't just a theory. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: this is already in motion. So in this video, I'm
Speaker 1: going to show you what this new bill is, how
Speaker 1: is going to change the global financial system forever, how
Speaker 1: a small nation's experiment gives us a glimpse of what's
Speaker 1: about to come, and why nation state FOMO is going
Speaker 1: to put us on a path to prices that make
Speaker 1: today's numbers look maybe laughable. Now real quick, my name
Speaker 1: is Mark Moss. I've been a tech focused VC investor
Speaker 1: for over a decade. I've been creating bitcoin educational content
Speaker 1: since it was only three hundred dollars. Today, I'm a
Speaker 1: partner at a leading bitcoin VC hedge fund, and I
Speaker 1: coach business owners on investing, and I'm sharing some of
Speaker 1: the data that we use to make long term decisions.
Speaker 1: So let's go all right, let's break this down. Why,
Speaker 1: no matter how bollish you are, you're not bullish enough.
Speaker 1: And if you think this is some big joke in
Speaker 1: a scam, well you're also underprepared. So let's break this down.
Speaker 1: We're talking about S four nine one two. This is
Speaker 1: a real thing. Now, let's rewind the clock. Just a
Speaker 1: few months ago, not too far back, before the presidential
Speaker 1: campaign ended and we still had a race going on.
Speaker 1: I was speaking at maybe the biggest conference in the
Speaker 1: world right now, at least probably the most culturally relevant
Speaker 1: event in the world. Over twenty five thousand people were there.
Speaker 1: Two presidential candidates, so at the highest level, Wall Street people, investors, coders, builders,
Speaker 1: entertainers were all there. I'm talking about the Bitcoin Conference.
Speaker 1: I got to speak on the main stage about two
Speaker 1: hours before Trump was there, and at the time RFK
Speaker 1: Junior was still running for president. We had Trump was
Speaker 1: still running for president, and they both came there and
Speaker 1: basically laid out their plan to have a presidency for
Speaker 1: the US, a direction for the US that would be
Speaker 1: very bitcoin now. RFK Junior laid it out in very
Speaker 1: great detail. Trump gave a little bit more of a
Speaker 1: vague overview of it. But now, of course they're together,
Speaker 1: working together, and basically what they said is they wanted
Speaker 1: to have a very pro bitcoin stands and part of
Speaker 1: that would be to have the United States establish a
Speaker 1: bitcoin reserve. Now since that's happened obviously, as I said,
Speaker 1: they both joined together the Trump administration one, and now
Speaker 1: they're working together to do this. But it's not a
Speaker 1: theoretical maybe we'll see it in a month or two
Speaker 1: when it takes office. No no, no, no, we're talking about
Speaker 1: something that's already in place right now. I'm talking about
Speaker 1: again four nine to one two. As you can see,
Speaker 1: this is already in Congress. To understand this a little bit.
Speaker 1: At the same event at the Bitcoin conference, we heard
Speaker 1: Senator Senator Lemmas from Wyoming, Cynthia Lemmas. She actually laid
Speaker 1: this out. Let's hear from her real quick, to.
Speaker 2: Establish a bitcoin strategic reserve to ensure the transparent management
Speaker 2: a bitcoin holdings of the federal government. Over five years,
Speaker 2: the United States will assemble one million bitcoin, five percent
Speaker 2: of the world's supply.
Speaker 1: All right, So you heard it directly from her of
Speaker 1: what she wanted to do. And again this is not theory.
Speaker 1: This is in place right now. So let's pull this up.
Speaker 1: This is a bill that has been submitted already S.
Speaker 1: Four nine one two, and I want to show you
Speaker 1: just a little bit of what's in here so you
Speaker 1: can understand the mechanism and how this works. So it's
Speaker 1: a bitcoin purchase program. And basically the way they're breaking
Speaker 1: this down is that the Secretary of the US shall
Speaker 1: purchase two hundred thousand bitcoins per year over a five
Speaker 1: year period. Two hundred thousand times five years is a
Speaker 1: million bitcoins. So they want to buy, they have the
Speaker 1: US buy a million and then hold that hold the bitcoin,
Speaker 1: buy it, not try to sell it. Keep that there
Speaker 1: minimum holding period to ensure the long term stability and
Speaker 1: security of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve SBR, the Secretary shall
Speaker 1: hold all bitcoin acquired through the bitcoin purchase program for
Speaker 1: not less than twenty years twenty years stronghand Hoddler. Now
Speaker 1: there's precedence for this. Obviously. The US has strategic reserves
Speaker 1: of oil. For example, we talked about how Biden dumped
Speaker 1: the oil reserves to bring the price of oil down.
Speaker 1: We have gold reserves obviously, So this is not unnatural
Speaker 1: at all. And what the President wants to do and
Speaker 1: Senator Limmis wants to do is basically bring bitcoin as
Speaker 1: a strategic reserve to match the gold reserve that we
Speaker 1: have and by doing this, put the US on a
Speaker 1: strong financial footing and potentially maybe even pay off the debt.
Speaker 1: Now that may sound crazy, but again maybe you're not
Speaker 1: thinking big enough. Let's talk about this for a second.
Speaker 1: Now does that seem possible. Well, let's just take a
Speaker 1: look at a case study, shall we. Let's use some
Speaker 1: real factual stuff. As a matter of fact, I'm going
Speaker 1: to go back into history to show you some stuff.
Speaker 1: So hang on. You may think you know what we're
Speaker 1: talking about, but let me show you how big this is.
Speaker 1: So first off, let's start with a case study. Okay, Now,
Speaker 1: El salvad Or is a case today I want to
Speaker 1: break down. We'll look at a more historical examples. But
Speaker 1: El Salvador in twenty twenty one decided to make bitcoin
Speaker 1: legal tender, accept bitcoin as legal tender, and not just
Speaker 1: to accept bitcoin as legal tender, but actually have the
Speaker 1: government buy bitcoin and put it on its books. Now,
Speaker 1: when El Salvador did this, most of the world ridiculed them,
Speaker 1: told them it was stupid, it was ridiculous in all
Speaker 1: these things. But let me just tell you something about
Speaker 1: technology and people that think it's ridiculous. Now we can
Speaker 1: go back as far as you want to go, the
Speaker 1: term the Luedites. The Luedites were afraid of the power
Speaker 1: loom right, and every type of time there's new technology,
Speaker 1: people are afraid of it. In two thousand and one,
Speaker 1: after the dot com bubble had burst in two thousand,
Speaker 1: the next year, I decided to be a great Ida
Speaker 1: to start an e commerce business. Now wasn't easy, No Shopify,
Speaker 1: no Amazon. I had to hire a code or to
Speaker 1: custom build this e commerce website, super clunky. And I
Speaker 1: went to these brands and I said, hey, I want
Speaker 1: to sell your products on my website. And they laughed
Speaker 1: at me. They told me no one would ever buy
Speaker 1: anything online. I said, well, I beg to differ. I'll
Speaker 1: give you the money. No big deal, and we don't
Speaker 1: even want our products being sold on the internet. Because
Speaker 1: it was sort of a joke after the dot com boom,
Speaker 1: and so the Ludites also said that El Salvador was
Speaker 1: crazy for doing this. Well, jokes on them, because now
Speaker 1: we've seen the full benefit of this billionaire of venture capital.
Speaker 1: Investor Tim Draper recently said that earlier this week, Kim
Speaker 1: Draper claimed at a rally that on this Bitcoin rally,
Speaker 1: if bitcoin gets to one hundred thousand dollars, which it's
Speaker 1: almost there time this recording more a few thousand dollars away,
Speaker 1: Bitcoin would allow the country El Salvador to repay its
Speaker 1: IMF loans and never have to talk to the IMF again. Now,
Speaker 1: the IMF gives money to countries to basically in debt
Speaker 1: them forever. There's a book written titled The Confessions of
Speaker 1: an Economic Hitman that sort of breaks all this down
Speaker 1: in great detail, and instead of allowing nations to get
Speaker 1: out of debt, they just give them more debt. But
Speaker 1: what Tim Draper's saying here is this move that El
Speaker 1: Salvador made could now allow them to pay off the
Speaker 1: IMF debt and never need debt again. Let's break down
Speaker 1: the math. Claim sparked the discuss about how much debt
Speaker 1: El Salvador owns and how much Bitcoin can contribute to
Speaker 1: easy and it's burden. Now. Specifically, El Salvador owes one
Speaker 1: hundred and seven point seven million SDRs to the IMF,
Speaker 1: which are worth about one point three five usd apiece.
Speaker 1: So if we break that down, basically the country owes
Speaker 1: approximately eighty million dollars to the IMF. Now here's where
Speaker 1: the math gets interesting. So Al Salvador bought a bunch
Speaker 1: of bitcoin and it's now going up in value. El
Speaker 1: Salvador claims to own five thousand, one, five thousand, nine
Speaker 1: hundred and thirteen almost six thousand bitcoin. Now currently this
Speaker 1: was written in when it was sixty seven thousand. Now we'
Speaker 1: over ninety thousand. But if bitcoin were to rally and
Speaker 1: hit Draper's one hundred thousand threshold, El Salvador would gain
Speaker 1: one hundred and eighty nine million from its holdings. So
Speaker 1: it gains one hundred and eighty nine but it only
Speaker 1: owes eighty through the math. Okay, so now that sounds amazing, right,
Speaker 1: But here's the thing. In the world of game theory,
Speaker 1: you have to understand. The world is very competitive. Now,
Speaker 1: if you're a business, or you're a Wall Street fund,
Speaker 1: or you're a nation, you're competing against others. Now, on
Speaker 1: Wall Street, if I were to do something different like
Speaker 1: bring gold into my portfolio or do high frequency trading
Speaker 1: or use bitcoin, and I would get ahead of other funds,
Speaker 1: and other funds would sort of be forced to copy
Speaker 1: a lot of what we're doing. And the same is
Speaker 1: true with nations. Now. The thing is with El Salvador
Speaker 1: is they are one of the poorest nations in the world,
Speaker 1: so they're not like a big influential nation. They're not
Speaker 1: influencing the top countries, the G seven countries. If you will,
Speaker 1: you can see here on this chart right here that
Speaker 1: Al Salvador out of the North American countries, not the
Speaker 1: whole world, but the North American countries, it's about what
Speaker 1: is the fourth poorest country in the North American hemisphere,
Speaker 1: So it's not really influenced a lot of countries. However,
Speaker 1: given the pace study that El Salvare's have, other small
Speaker 1: nations are starting to pay attention, and not just a
Speaker 1: couple as a matter of fact, it's a lot. So
Speaker 1: what we can see right here is that President Bouquetley
Speaker 1: of El Salvador with forty four countries. In May of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two, Elsavadoro hosted a meeting with financial institution
Speaker 1: representatives from forty four countries. I'm not going to read
Speaker 1: them all to you. We'll link this in the show
Speaker 1: notes down below. Argentina visited in October of twenty twenty four,
Speaker 1: so just recently expressed interest in El Salvador's experience with bitcoin.
Speaker 1: Other nations. Bhutan has put in over one billion dollars
Speaker 1: into bitcoin, so forty four nations, Argentina, Bhuton has already
Speaker 1: got a billion dollars. So El Salvador is influencing countries.
Speaker 1: This is happening that they've paid off the debt trap
Speaker 1: and now this gamble's paid off. Now. Of course, in
Speaker 1: the competitive world that we have in the world of
Speaker 1: game theory, like I said, competition's real. Other people are
Speaker 1: starting to pay attention. But again, El Savador's not very influential.
Speaker 1: What if the most influential country in the entire world
Speaker 1: were to do this, of course we're talking about the
Speaker 1: United States. Now we'd see something very different if the
Speaker 1: US moves the US having the US dollar right reserve
Speaker 1: currency of the world, the global financial system of the world.
Speaker 1: If the US were to do this, which as I said,
Speaker 1: it's already submitted, the bill's already there. We have a
Speaker 1: red Now, a Republican led Senate and House and presidency
Speaker 1: and there's a very strong chance this bill will go through.
Speaker 1: I'm going to show you why I think that in
Speaker 1: a minute. But if this happens, if the US moves,
Speaker 1: then the entire G seven, the top seven country of
Speaker 1: the world, the G twenty, the top twenty country of
Speaker 1: the world, would basically be pressured into this. Now this
Speaker 1: is not my speculative guess this, don't rely on me.
Speaker 1: Let me show you the receipts. Let's look back in history.
Speaker 1: So there's a couple of times this has happened. Now
Speaker 1: for your history, buffs, you might know this, but there's
Speaker 1: been lots of money throughout the world, and at one
Speaker 1: point the world was on a silver standard, all right,
Speaker 1: but then the world started to transition from a silver
Speaker 1: standard to a gold standard. A small business owner, are
Speaker 1: you buried in all types of work keeping you from
Speaker 1: the real thing that makes you money? Well, that's where
Speaker 1: Just Works comes in. They're the all in one platform
Speaker 1: that supports small business growth. You can get all their
Speaker 1: tools that help with benefits like payroll and HR and
Speaker 1: compliance with transparent pricing. Now they helped you hire top
Speaker 1: talent internationally internew markets, quickly scale international operations without the
Speaker 1: workload and forevery how do I do it? Question? You
Speaker 1: can reach out to their expert staff from sole proprietor
Speaker 1: or a team of twenty. Just Works empowers all kinds
Speaker 1: of small businesses with real human support. So visit justworks
Speaker 1: dot com slash podcast to join the thousands of small
Speaker 1: businesses that trust just Works to take care of payroll, benefits,
Speaker 1: compliance and more. Again that's Justworks dot com slash podcasts.
Speaker 1: All right, So the money suppli has changed many times,
Speaker 1: the reserve currency of the world has changed many times.
Speaker 1: And here we have when the world started going to
Speaker 1: a gold standard. This was in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries,
Speaker 1: and it was a goold rush and a gold rush,
Speaker 1: and then each nation started to do this, and we
Speaker 1: can see here that Portugal quickly implemented the gold standard
Speaker 1: in eighteen fifty four. Germany had already started doing the
Speaker 1: gold standard as well. By eighteen seventy one, the US
Speaker 1: adopted the coinageac of eighteen seventy three. So by nineteen
Speaker 1: hundred most countries had begun using the gold standard except China.
Speaker 1: This is a very key piece to understand here in
Speaker 1: the world of game theory. It's very important so the
Speaker 1: whole world started leaving silver to go to gold, as
Speaker 1: I said, but China decided not may doing that. We
Speaker 1: have a lot of silver, We're not going to trade
Speaker 1: it for gold. We're going to stick with what we have.
Speaker 1: The problem with game theory is they were left out.
Speaker 1: So there's a whole global financial system moved to gold.
Speaker 1: China was out, and they lost their position as a
Speaker 1: global leader. Now I made a video a long time
Speaker 1: ago talking about how now China has been trying to
Speaker 1: get back to that position for about one hundred years
Speaker 1: and now maybe have cornered the gold market. But just
Speaker 1: as they've cornered the gold market, now the whole world
Speaker 1: is starting to shift again, or it could if this happens,
Speaker 1: then I'm going to show you that. Now again, it's
Speaker 1: not just gold. Game theory is real. Let me give
Speaker 1: you a couple other historical examples. So here we have
Speaker 1: the space So when the US and Russia were in
Speaker 1: this Cold War, they were both rushing to get to space,
Speaker 1: to who could get up satellites and things like that,
Speaker 1: who could control space. Now we see the space race
Speaker 1: was a competitive competition between the United States and the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union. It began in nineteen fifty five when the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union responded to the US's announcement to launch artificial satellites.
Speaker 1: So it was a race who's gonna win this, and
Speaker 1: the first mover, of course, always has the advantage. There
Speaker 1: was no set rules at first, but President Kennedy, and
Speaker 1: this is a key piece here, there are no set
Speaker 1: rules for this at first, but somebody threw down the gauntlet.
Speaker 1: That was President Kennedy. He set a clear goal for
Speaker 1: the US, which was land demand on the Moon before
Speaker 1: the Soviets, sort of like the President now is also
Speaker 1: thrown down the gauntlet and said, we have a clear
Speaker 1: plan to establish a reserve of one million bitcoin. Once
Speaker 1: it's down, it's laid out on paper. Now it gives
Speaker 1: people a target. So once that happened, then the race
Speaker 1: was on and we can go back. I'll give you
Speaker 1: one more example. We can go all day on this.
Speaker 1: We can also see the same thing happened with nuclear
Speaker 1: So there was the United States versus the Soviet Union,
Speaker 1: which is called the prisoner's dilemma, which is basically this
Speaker 1: nuclear arms race. So we're trying to build up our
Speaker 1: armies as fast as we can. But basically it caused
Speaker 1: both nations to pour trillions of dollars and resources into
Speaker 1: manufacturing nuclear weapons. And the reason why this is the
Speaker 1: prisoner's dilemma. It's basically a situation showcasing why two players
Speaker 1: may act selfishly, even if acting selflessly appears to be
Speaker 1: in their best interest for the two options. And so
Speaker 1: that's exactly what's happening. We've seen this happen over and
Speaker 1: over and through history. We understand incentive mechanisms, we understand
Speaker 1: game theory. So that's why this is not speculation. The
Speaker 1: gauntlet has been thrown down, the bill is put forward,
Speaker 1: and the chance of it going through is extremely high.
Speaker 1: And now every nation is trying to figure out, well,
Speaker 1: who's gonna move first and how fast are they going
Speaker 1: to move? Now, the interesting thing to understand about this
Speaker 1: is that this is all I'm all creating what I'm
Speaker 1: calling sovereign fomo. Right, each sovereignation has fear of missing out,
Speaker 1: And we have sovereign fomo where demand is going parabolic,
Speaker 1: but it's going into an immovable object or basically a
Speaker 1: fixed supply. So the thing with commodities so oil, uranium, copper, silver,
Speaker 1: et cetera. The thing with commodities and bitcoin as a
Speaker 1: commodity is that it's unlike an equity. We set the
Speaker 1: price of a commodity based off of supply and demand. Now,
Speaker 1: the supply of oil is it's very hard to dictate, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, we have all these different nations pumping in
Speaker 1: different schedules and different timeframes. But with bitcoin, we have
Speaker 1: a fixed supply twenty one million, so it takes the
Speaker 1: supply side out of the equation. So all we have
Speaker 1: to really pay attention to is the demand side. So
Speaker 1: we know that, like I said, bitcoin has twenty one million.
Speaker 1: Now here's where things get interesting. Let me break down
Speaker 1: a little bit of math for you. So here's just
Speaker 1: two buyers. Now, I've done videos talking about Michael Sailor
Speaker 1: and micro Strategy. I talked to about the infinite money glitch.
Speaker 1: Maybe we can link that video in the show note
Speaker 1: down below you should understand what Michael Sailor micro Strategy
Speaker 1: is doing. But here we have some math. So there,
Speaker 1: right now, we have about one hundred and sixty four
Speaker 1: thousand bitcoin being produced per year through mining. One hundred
Speaker 1: and sixty four thousand per year. Now, per Michael Sailor,
Speaker 1: they plan micro Strategy plans to buy one hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy five thousand bitcoin per year for the next three years.
Speaker 1: Just one company, just one then, Senator Lumus is built
Speaker 1: in the United States government says they want to buy two
Speaker 1: hundred thousand bitcoin per year. So just two people, just
Speaker 1: the US and micro Strategy planned to buy three hundred
Speaker 1: and seventy five thousand bitcoin per year. The problem is
Speaker 1: there's only one hundred and sixty four thousand being created
Speaker 1: per year, which means there's way more demand there supply. Now,
Speaker 1: this is just two buyers. This is not accounting for
Speaker 1: the sovereign FOMO that's about to happen. And now you
Speaker 1: can start to see how quickly this can run away. Now,
Speaker 1: let me show you a couple other things. Now we
Speaker 1: can see right here, this is bitcoin on the exchanges.
Speaker 1: So this gold line is the bitcoin price, and this
Speaker 1: green line is the amount of bitcoin that's available to
Speaker 1: buy currently on exchanges. And you can see as the
Speaker 1: price goes up, the available bitcoin in the ecosystem to
Speaker 1: buy right now is going down. Now, there's always going
Speaker 1: to be bitcoin to buy, So for everybody that's gonna
Speaker 1: go yeah, then everyone's going to hoard it and all
Speaker 1: these people that get a first move advantage, lucky for them. No,
Speaker 1: there's always going to be bitcoin available at the right
Speaker 1: price supply and demand. That's how this works. But we
Speaker 1: can see how this is already set in the stage
Speaker 1: for fomo. Now we can look at this charge, which
Speaker 1: I think is pretty interesting, and this shows the amount
Speaker 1: of bitcoin addresses that have at least one bitcoin in them.
Speaker 1: And what we can see is there's about one million
Speaker 1: addresses wallets that have one bitcoin in them. Now, let's
Speaker 1: think about this for a second. In the United States,
Speaker 1: there's about twenty two million millionaires. Twenty two million people
Speaker 1: have at least a million dollars, okay, but there's only
Speaker 1: twenty one million bitcoin, and only one million so far
Speaker 1: have even one bitcoin. In the world, there's about sixty
Speaker 1: million millionaires and there's only twenty one million bitcoin. Do
Speaker 1: the math. You can see. And now this is not
Speaker 1: accounting for the micro strategies and all the other corporations
Speaker 1: coming on board. It's not accounting for the sovereign phone.
Speaker 1: Well that's about to happen. And what this does is
Speaker 1: it sets a floor on the price. Okay, so this
Speaker 1: is very interesting. So when you think about buyers, whether
Speaker 1: it's me or you or maybe a hedge fund. Right,
Speaker 1: you're like a price conscious buyer. I want to buy
Speaker 1: on dips. The price goes up, maybe I'll sell a
Speaker 1: little bit. I won't sell a little bit, but I'll
Speaker 1: certainly buy on dips. I'm trying to sort of trade
Speaker 1: around and find the right price floor. But some buyers,
Speaker 1: like nations, for example, are not price sensitive. So Michael
Speaker 1: Sailor with micro Strategy, for example, is not price sensitive.
Speaker 1: They just bought. Micro Strategy just acquired another two billion
Speaker 1: dollars worth of bitcoin just a week ago at eighty thousand,
Speaker 1: and he says he's going to continue to buy every
Speaker 1: top along the way, So no matter what the price is,
Speaker 1: they just buy on a regular basis that allar cost
Speaker 1: averaging in nation states are very similar. They will just
Speaker 1: continue to buy. They're not trying to trade around the price.
Speaker 1: So what that does is it sets a floor. So
Speaker 1: we have nations who are not pro sensitive. Corporations like
Speaker 1: micro Strategy are not pro sensitive, and they're buying more
Speaker 1: than is being produced, So that means there's more demand
Speaker 1: a floor of more demand than there is available supply,
Speaker 1: which is pretty interesting and as I said, we know
Speaker 1: there is certainly not enough to go around. So what
Speaker 1: does all that mean? What does that mean for us?
Speaker 1: What does that mean for us whether we think we're
Speaker 1: bullish on bitcoin or using bitcoin is stupid and ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Either way, let's show you what this means. So what
Speaker 1: happens is Bitcoin sort of moves in these cycles. Right,
Speaker 1: Nothing's ever gone up in a straight line. There's never
Speaker 1: been an asset that's gone up in a straight line.
Speaker 1: And so we have peaks, and we have valleys, and
Speaker 1: a new peak in a valley, and it sort of
Speaker 1: works like that. Now, as this goes up, it sort
Speaker 1: of moves in this line. But we have a high
Speaker 1: point and a low point where this could be. So
Speaker 1: if this goes through, I believe we'll be on the
Speaker 1: high side. I'll show you what the high site is
Speaker 1: in a second, but let's just talk if if this
Speaker 1: goes through. So what we can see is we already
Speaker 1: know the bill has already submitted, We know that we
Speaker 1: have a Republican bill by with a Republican president and
Speaker 1: a Republican Senate and a House, the chance of this
Speaker 1: going through is extremely high in my view, And we
Speaker 1: can see that Senator Lumpus is already saying that this
Speaker 1: bill could maybe should pass in the first one hundred
Speaker 1: days of being president. So this puts us into the
Speaker 1: end of Q one next year. All right, get ready
Speaker 1: the end of Q one. Now she's already talking about
Speaker 1: maybe we need to get this done in sixty days
Speaker 1: or even thirty days of the presidency. We don't know
Speaker 1: how fast it is gonna happen, but probably within one
Speaker 1: hundred days is what they're looking for. Now, is that realistic? Well,
Speaker 1: we know that it's not just the US. Remember, the
Speaker 1: US will influence everybody else. So now we have independent
Speaker 1: states in the United States who are already doing the
Speaker 1: same thing. For example, just this week we saw Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: introduces the same bill where Pennsylvania as a state wants
Speaker 1: to move a bunch of their money their treasury indo bitcoin.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, they want to move seven
Speaker 1: hundred million into bitcoin. And this is through bipartisan support.
Speaker 1: Is not a Republican thing. This is Republicans and Democrats
Speaker 1: both want to do this. And so even if even
Speaker 1: if it doesn't go through the House or through the government,
Speaker 1: through the United States government on the first try, even
Speaker 1: if it doesn't. It's not my base case. We still
Speaker 1: have states moving to do this on a bipartisan level,
Speaker 1: and we know that it'll come back through. Now, even
Speaker 1: if this bill were to fail, it looks like Trump
Speaker 1: could still do it even without this bill. Another way,
Speaker 1: Trump could put billions into the US Bitcoin reserve without
Speaker 1: Congress's approval. David Bailey talks about how ten billion we
Speaker 1: put into a reserve before needing to get Congress's approval
Speaker 1: for funding. So President Trump could potentially already move this
Speaker 1: way even if it fails, because there's lots of ways
Speaker 1: you can do it, and we have this controlled House.
Speaker 1: So again, my probability is there is an extremely high
Speaker 1: probability this goes through again within the first hundred days
Speaker 1: of the presidency. And again I'm not the only one
Speaker 1: seeing this. Other nation states are watching this, and other
Speaker 1: nation states are already trying to FOMO in and that's
Speaker 1: why you're starting to see the price go up, but
Speaker 1: you're not ready yet. Now let's think about this again.
Speaker 1: So you can see the price goes up and down
Speaker 1: and up and down and up and down and up
Speaker 1: and down, but it moves in this range. And so
Speaker 1: we have a high part of the range, and we
Speaker 1: have a low part of the range, and so we
Speaker 1: can look at if we follow this same trend, what
Speaker 1: would be the high end the low that we could
Speaker 1: expect in the future. Let's just look one year out,
Speaker 1: So by the end of twenty twenty five, potentially we
Speaker 1: can be as low as ninety six thousand. So right
Speaker 1: now we're about ninety so we'd be a little bit higher,
Speaker 1: about ninety six. That'd be the low end. The high
Speaker 1: end would be five hundred and eighty four thousand per
Speaker 1: bitcoin that'd be at the end of next year. Depending
Speaker 1: on this range, this channel that we've been in now,
Speaker 1: given the institutional fomo and now the sovereign fomo that's happening,
Speaker 1: I'm betting that we're going to be much more on
Speaker 1: the high end of that now. If we look out
Speaker 1: to twenty thirty, which us through another having cycle, another
Speaker 1: liquidity cycle, the high and the low. The low is
Speaker 1: three hundred and sixty five thousand by twenty thirty, and
Speaker 1: the high would be five million. I don't think it's
Speaker 1: going to be anywhere in near that high. My numbers
Speaker 1: are much lower than that, but even still, it's going
Speaker 1: to be enormous but we really can't say. Because when
Speaker 1: we have this sovereign fomal coming in who are not
Speaker 1: price countess buyers, and they all want to get their
Speaker 1: bags full into an asset that has very very limited supply,
Speaker 1: the price can move really fast, as we've seen. We
Speaker 1: saw almost a ten thousand dollars move just the other day.
Speaker 1: So what do we do about this? Even if you
Speaker 1: think this is ridiculous, as Satoshi told us, you might
Speaker 1: want to get some just in case it catches on.
Speaker 1: So how do we do that? We can either DCA
Speaker 1: dollar cost average in this is sort of what MicroStrategy
Speaker 1: is doing. They just buy on a regular basis, regardless
Speaker 1: of what the price is, so you get paid every
Speaker 1: two weeks. You can put a little bit of your
Speaker 1: paycheck in every single two weeks, maybe every month, every
Speaker 1: quarter or whatever that is. Or you could just lump
Speaker 1: some like, hey, I'd like to move five percent of
Speaker 1: my portfolio in. I think five percent is sort of
Speaker 1: the minimum that you should have. Paul Tudor Jones legend
Speaker 1: on Wall Street says five percent, and so maybe I say, hey,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna move five percent over and let's just move
Speaker 1: that right now. So that'd be like a lump sum
Speaker 1: or I could just move in regularly. Now, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to spend time going into this. If you want
Speaker 1: a video on this, I can. Once we started buying it,
Speaker 1: then where do we buy and how do I take custody?
Speaker 1: Do I want to take personal ownership and secure this
Speaker 1: on my own or do I want to leave it
Speaker 1: an ETF or leave it on an exchange like coinbas
Speaker 1: or Gemini. That's a whole another topic. If you'll make
Speaker 1: a video on that, leave me some comments down below.
Speaker 1: We can do that if you want. But as I said,
Speaker 1: you are not prepared for where this is going. And
Speaker 1: if you want to know what else is fueling this, again,
Speaker 1: not just sovereign fomo, but we also have to understand
Speaker 1: the debt cycles, liquidy cycles, then you might want to
Speaker 1: watch this investing black hole video right here. And that's
Speaker 1: what I got, all right, to your success, I'm out,