WEBVTT - Appeals Court Allows Possible TikTok Ban

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 2>From Mahart where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Vallet NBN.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Live from New York. This is Bloombag Technology. Coming up.

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 5>TikTok still faces an austing in the United States after

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 5>a DC appeals caught upholds the divest or ban law.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 5>Plus more VC voices in the new administration. As Donald

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 5>Trump selects venture capitalist David Sachs to serve as his

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 5>AI and cryptos are and Hpe, which is a record

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 5>high after posting earnings, we talk AI servers with the

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 5>company's CEO. First, we check in on the markets and

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 5>other record highs than just Hpe. We have the Nazak

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and a new record up seven tens of percent.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 5>The macro picture being that of a resilient jobs market

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.559
<v Speaker 5>and even though there's sort some infrationery pressure, the market

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 5>almost pricing in some sort of rate cup for later

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 5>this month coming from the Fed.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 4>So we see stocks move high.

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 5>The SMP at a new record two fifty seventh that

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 5>we'd see have almost thirty percent year to date in

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 5>terms of points contributors. You're looking at Broadcom doing well

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 5>also met her as well, which we'll dig into in

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 5>a moment. And that's all because of TikTok's Chinese parent company,

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 5>Byte Dance, still facing that ban here in the United

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 5>States if it doesn't meet the January nineteenth deadline to

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 5>divest TikTok. This after a federal appeals court just came

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 5>out with its decision to uphold the ban. Blouembgs Alexandra

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Levine joins us now, who covers all things social, all

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 5>things TikTok, and you are surprised, ultimately by this ruling.

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 3>This is what we expected, but it still is very

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 3>surprising in the sense that we've never seen this happen

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 3>in the United States before. So if this band comes

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 3>to pass late in January, it will be the first

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 3>time that any foreign owned social media app has ever

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 3>been banned in this country. And again, it's not just

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 3>any social media app. This is a social media app

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 3>used by more than half the American population.

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm backed by some very powerful people potentially close to

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 5>the next administration, benure capitalists, pe funds. But what's interesting

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 5>is what's the effect this is happening on the company itself.

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, inside the company, I think the sentiment has been fascinating.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 4>It's sort of been twofold.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a lot of folks inside the company

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 3>who had been more actually scared the first time that

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>this happened with Trump's first administration, when Trump was originally

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the one who tried to ban it back in twenty

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty unsuccessfully, So that then when all of this has

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>been transpiring this year, you had a lot of people

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 3>who were like, we've seen this movie before. This is

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 3>sort of boy who cried wealth. They didn't actually believe

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 3>it would come to this, But I think the court

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 3>upholding the legitimacy of the law today could well change

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 3>people's tune.

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Just for our audience, we have a little live far

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 5>drill going on here in Lexington Avenue, New York, So

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 5>bear with us when we have some of these particular

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 5>announcements coming through the camera. At Alexander Levine, we thank you

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 5>so much on all things TikTok. Let's go to Blue

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 5>Meg Intelligence analyst Matthew Schunhelm for more. Who I'm pleased

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 5>to say, isn't that in New York so wouldn't get

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.839
<v Speaker 5>the sort of interference from a noise perspective, Matthew. From

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 5>the legal perspective here, what was the ruling from the judges? Ultimately,

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 5>they think that national security out trumps upon the pun.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 4>What's happening from a freedom of speech perspective.

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 6>That's exactly right, Carolina. Looking quickly at the sixty five

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 6>page opinion, this looks like a sweeping loss for TikTok,

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 6>where the court completely rejected its its First Amendment argument

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 6>and said that national security concerns trump all of those complaints.

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 6>The court said that this fails both intermediate scrutiny and

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 6>even strict scrutiny, which almost never works.

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 4>But the court said, look, the.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 6>Government's interest in national security trumps the First Amendment concerns

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 6>no matter what the test is. This is a tough

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 6>loss for TikTok, and I think it's going to be

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 6>difficult for TikTok to overturn it.

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 5>To that point, you had what a seventy percent chance

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 5>that TikTok would lose on this particular DC court. They're

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 5>only inning here now is to go to the Supreme Court.

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 5>What are your probabilities on that or is it too

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 5>early to tell?

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 6>No, I think that is going to be the option.

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 6>In theory, they could ask for rehearing at this Appeals Court,

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 6>but this decision leaves little hope of that. So I

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 6>think you're right that the next move is an emergency

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 6>petition to the Supreme Court to say justices hit pause

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 6>on this January nineteenth date. This is an important First

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 6>Amendment case. As Alexandra said, this is sort of novel

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 6>in American law, and so trying to entice the Justices

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 6>to at least look at it before the date take

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 6>comes up. It's the thing is, it's difficult to do

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 6>that though. It takes five justices to vote in support

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 6>of that, and with this sweeping decision, two of the

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 6>three judges who wrote this decision are Republican appointed. One

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 6>of them's President Trump appointed, and this Supreme Court tends

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 6>to agree with with those judges. I think there's a

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 6>real possibility the Supreme Court looks at this and says,

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 6>you know what, the d C. Circuit got it right.

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 6>We might not even need to take this up. So

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 6>there's a chance of that that they hit pause and

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 6>the Supreme Court has to rule on it. But there's

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 6>also I think a better chance the Supreme Court says no,

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 6>they got it right. This case is over let the

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 6>band take effect.

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 5>What then, legally speaking, does TikTok do? What does Bite

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 5>Dance do?

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 7>Yes?

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 6>So, so the question then is will it Will it

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 6>do a divestiture? You know, the law gives it a

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 6>path around an effective van by by by by selling

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 6>the service to someone who's not located in China. The

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 6>problem is that China has said it won't approve a

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 6>sale with of the algorithm, So so TikTok's in a

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 6>bit of a tough spot in that sense. The other

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 6>big question is what will President Trump do with this?

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 6>Will he enforce this law? The enforcement mechanism is the

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 6>Department of Justice here, and President Trump in theory could

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 6>direct his Department of Justice say don't worry about enforcing

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 6>that one. That would be highly unusual and the companies

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 6>that host TikTok would be taking enormous risk. He wouldn't

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 6>change his mind, But it's at least a possibility.

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 5>We don't rule out anything, of course, for the future,

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 5>and I'm i am interested as to whether you know

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 5>from behind the scenes ultimately what it could look like

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 5>if they did divest and legally speaking, how that might

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 5>have to ultimately.

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 6>Look, yeah, I mean there's a big question. I think

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 6>the biggest question around the divestiture is whether TikTok would

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 6>or potential buyers would look at a transaction that doesn't

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 6>involve the algorithm. And if China won't approve a sale

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 6>of the Algori Rhythm, maybe you're looking at selling you

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 6>just the users and the platform, but without the secret

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 6>sauce that makes it work and so well, I think

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 6>you could see the company exploring those sorts of alternatives

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 6>in the near term.

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 5>We will wait to see whether indeed it does get

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 5>pushed onto the Supreme Court.

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 4>But can you give us a feeling of timing him?

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 5>I think January the nineteenth feels incredibly close. Now it

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 5>is one day before the new administration is sworn in.

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Here we go with the fire alarms again.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 5>But what are you thinking in terms of just an

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 5>extension past January nineteenth exactly?

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 6>So, what I expect we'll see here in maybe today,

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 6>maybe in a matter of days, is this emergency petition

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 6>to the Supreme Court asking the justices to hit pause

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 6>on that January nineteenth date. And I think the Supreme

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 6>Court will take that petition. It will ask for briefs

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 6>on that leading into January, and then the the Supreme

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 6>Court is either going to say yes or no, probably

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.559
<v Speaker 6>in mid January, about whether it will grant this case,

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 6>take the case and hit pause on that January nineteenth date.

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 6>So that's where the legal action is likely to be

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 6>in this pushing the justices to hit pause on that

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 6>January nineteenth date. And as I said, I kind of

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 6>think that the justices might say, no, we don't need

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 6>to step in here. Let's let the law take effects.

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 5>The DC Circuit got it right, and then it's over

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 5>to Trump and then your administration. Matthew Shettenham fascinating you

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 5>called it right this time. We'll check in with you later. Meanwhile,

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 5>here's another Trump pick, David Sachs as White House, AI

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 5>and cryptos are Trump posting on truth Social that the

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 5>venture capitalist will quote guide policy for the administration in

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 5>artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency. Two areas critical to the future

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 5>of American competitiveness. Romost Katie Ruff helps cover all things

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 5>venture and once again we have another venture capitalist. Then

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 5>of course we have who's the deputy the Vice president

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 5>elect as well being one.

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 4>David Sachs has been close to Trump. Of late. Can

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 4>you just tell us how we got here, sir?

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 8>He was a big fundraiser, you know, for the presidential campaign,

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 8>and he's also quite close to Daily Vance. The vice

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 8>president elect, David Sachs was hosting fundraisers and also getting

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 8>other Silicon Valley supporters to come on board and support Trump.

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 8>So it's not surprising that there's some sort of role

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 8>or partnership here.

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 5>And indeed not a full at the seat role in

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 5>politics that means he has to step away from Craft ventures.

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 5>We know that he has sort of ultimately focused there

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 5>because he's got a key man risk. His venture capital

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 5>history is extraordinary. He's been in the angel rounds of

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Facebook now Meta, in Pan and Teer in some of

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 5>the most successful exits that we've seen coming out of

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Silicon Valley. He built his own company that was exited Microsoft,

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 5>earning him one point two billion dollars, well earning at

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 5>least the sale price of one point two billion dollars.

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 5>How intimately is he interweaved within AI and crypto because

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 5>he has Bitgo bit Wise Lightning Labs for example, within

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:13.599
<v Speaker 5>his portfolio.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 8>Sure, there's already questions where people are asking does he

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 8>have a conflict of interest here, but given that this

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 8>is a less formal role, it's unclear if there's any

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 8>roadblocks there. He's you know, certainly, you know, very much

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 8>a part of the ecosystem. He has a popular all

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 8>in podcast that many people in Silicon Valley and beyond

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 8>listen to, where he airs controversial opinions. But I would

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 8>see this as a sign of deregulation. He is definitely

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 8>very tech friendly, you know, with crypto and AI. He

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 8>is going to want to move to make moves to

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 8>prevent anything that is obstructing the growth of these technology companies.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 4>kJ Ruth, we thank you, HPE.

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 5>We're wanting strong fourth quarter results and we're seeing shares

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 5>at a new record high. It's all around the sales

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 5>strength that we're seeing for service to power AI workloads.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 5>How resilient is that, Let's ask Antonio and airing HPE CEO.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 5>So what's interesting about the AI server business was that

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 5>it's still growing fast. But is it cool sequentially, are

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 5>you feeling confident about the purchases here?

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, good morning, Carol, and thank you for having me today.

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 2>We have an exceptional quarter and obviously one of the

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 2>flagship elements of that quarter was AI, but I have

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 2>to say it was more than AI. It was also

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 2>a hybrid cloud business performing exceptionally well, and the sort

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 2>of in general because all the matter we have growth

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 2>both on the traditional CPU and obviously on the I side,

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 2>but on the I demand continued to be very, very strong.

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, as of today we have more than three

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 2>and a half billion dollars in backlog. That shows the

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>moments that's there in the market. Now we're seeing a

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 2>significant uptake in the pipeline in enterprise AI, but in

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 2>total we have a pipeline that's a multiple of the backlogs.

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 2>So as we go into twenty twenty five, obviously there

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 2>is a transition to the direct liquid cool set of

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 2>technologies with Blackwell and Grace Blackwell, and as you know,

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 2>two months ago we announced a new architecture which is

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent fund less. Direct liquid cooling is the

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 2>industry first and one third more than one third of

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 2>that three and a half been under a backlog is

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 2>already on black Bell, So we expect continue growth as

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 2>we go into twenty five.

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 5>How are those Blackpole shipments looking how certain.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, definitely is all very consistent to what we have

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>seen the number of customers continue to grow. The demand

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 2>across four different segments continue to be very solid. You know,

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 2>when I think about THEI I think about four distinct segments.

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I call it the model builders and the hyperscalers, then

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the Tier two, Tier three service provider, the sovereign which

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 2>is growing very rapidly in terms of interest, and the

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 2>cell cycles a little bit longer there. But in talking

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 2>about large scale deployment, and we are in the process

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 2>to building in the UK the UK Bristol AI Cloud

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 2>and in Japan the ais T and then the enterprise

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>which obviously the order value is significant lower, but the

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 2>number transaction is significantly higher.

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 5>But the supply side has been the issue with Blackwell

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 5>in particular. How swiftly are those shipments arriving? How on

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 5>track do you now feel it is?

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I will say, you know, the supply will come

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>in due time because of the transition that Jensen and

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 2>team are driving. I will not say it's problematic, it's

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 2>just the transition in early parts of twenty twenty five.

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Today we continue to ship you know H one hundreds

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and the H two hundreds. But as I said earlier Carolyn,

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 2>we already have more than one third of that more

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 2>than three and a half billion dollars of the Blackwell,

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of that has to do with companies

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 2>that lead with that technology because they want to get

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 2>better performance, better image density, and ultimately lower the cost

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 2>per training.

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 5>You were really interesting articulating just the breadth of demand

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 5>coming from there, mentioning sovereign as well as enterprise for example.

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 4>How resilient is that demand?

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 5>What's interesting about your backlog, which you say is very

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 5>resilient and strong, but there was a seven hundred.

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 4>Million dollar d booking. How confident are you in.

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 5>Some of these purchases, in some of these deals that

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 5>have been signed.

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so in our current more than three and a

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>half billion dollars, are very very confident. In Q four,

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 2>we booked one point two billion dollars of new orders,

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 2>and we decided to book a specific orders because we

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 2>had specific concerns about the risk associated with that order,

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 2>and we have very very strong controls in place, and

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 2>we felt that because of the risk associated with even

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the finance inside, we felt this not worth the headache,

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and honestly, we decided to focus on the number of

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 2>growing customers we have and allocated supply to the right customers,

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 2>So that's why we decided to debook the specific order.

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 5>Caroline, you're also doing deals, of course, we are hearing

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 5>confidence on June and Pan Networks acquisition for the early

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty five. Is that just going to sell through DOJ?

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 5>Do you expect with the next administration?

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, first of all, we have received pretty much

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 2>all the approvals around the world with you know what

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I call unconditional support. Basically, it tells you that the

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 2>rest of the world sees this pro competitive and with

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 2>the DOJ, we have had a very collaborative process through

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 2>throughout the last several months, and we expect the transaction

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 2>to close in the early part of twenty twenty five,

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 2>which still is within the original timelines we stated when

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I announced the deal on January tenth, which was end

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 2>of calendar twenty twenty four or early part of calendar

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. And so nothing gives me post that

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 2>will not be the case. And then in addition, for

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the United States, this is good not just pro competitive,

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 2>but also for US national security because ultimately the combination

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 2>and Juniper HP provides a better ability for US to

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 2>compete outside the United States, particularly when you have Chinese

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>competitor around the globe, and remember a part of that.

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 2>For the United States, we provide the largest supercomputers that

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 2>are doing also AI and that requires a lot of networking.

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 2>And today i Qula pack and Enterprise owns seven of

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the top ten supercomputers. Number one, number two, and number

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 2>three are HP Systems.

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 5>Well being reflected in a new record high on the

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 5>share price and augustanding sounding very upbeat about eventually what

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 5>Juniper does in terms of accretion. We thank you Antonio

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 5>and ery c Hpeco today. I meanwhile coming up us

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 5>Haring picked up in November, adding two hundred and twenty

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 5>seven thousand jobs. We've discussed the resilience in the tech sector,

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 5>what it means in terms of impact. We are just

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 5>reflecting on a couple of stories out of France today.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.239
<v Speaker 5>Ubersoft up twelve let's call it thirteen percent this as

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 5>we get an articulation and potentially what some sort of

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 5>management buyout could be looking like the Gilamott family holding

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 5>talks with ten cent as of room reported by Reuters

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 5>and other investors. We're up thirty percent there, and boy

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 5>are we down on Athos. Look, we're basically nil nil

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 5>point ninety eight percent lower that you're seeing for a

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 5>price point on at ours stock. This as we are

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 5>expecting a subscription price of its recent rights offering sinking,

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, ultimately coming to a very low number stocking

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 5>trading as you see at zero. This is blombog technology

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 5>time now for talking tech. First up, NASA hasn't landed

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 5>on the Moon in fifty years. The next one now

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 5>won't happen until at least twenty twenty seven. The newly

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 5>announced delays come as engineers raised the crucial safety issue

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 5>related to hardware now. The agency also announced it will

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 5>delay a moonfly by until twenty twenty six. The scheduling

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 5>setbacks are the latest in the program plagued by spacecraft

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 5>cost overruns and technical hurdles. Meanwhile, Uber launching its first

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 5>robo taxi service in Abadami, making good on a partnership

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 5>struck with Chinese vehicle partner we Ride. Customers are able

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 5>to request autonomous vehicles around key tourist areas in the UAE,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 5>and Uber expects to fully launch its driveraler's service.

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 4>In twenty twenty five.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 5>And the dramatic events in South Korea this week has

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 5>catapulted a year old movie to the top of the

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 5>Netflix charts. The film twelve twelve The Day, became at

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 5>the number one Korean film streamed since South Korean President

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 5>unsub yul stunned the nation by imposing Marshall Law. The

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty three blockbuster depicts the events surrounding.

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 4>A coup in nineteen seventy nine.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 5>Now, there have been some big market moves today and

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 5>in large part is on the back of US job

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 5>Stata November payrolls coming in strong two hundred and twenty

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 5>seven thousand added.

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 4>But we want to get the ten perspective.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 5>Sarah frankpin Let, us CEO, joins US now and Sarah,

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 5>we are fascinated by ultimately how resilient this US job's

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 5>data looks, and how that resilience is.

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 4>Potentially being born out in tech. Is it so what

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 4>you're saying is true.

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 9>We're seeing this resilience, we're seeing predictability, and we're seeing

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 9>balance in the data, and we're seeing incredible time and

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 9>tech not just with the jobs report and the two

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 9>hundred twenty seven thousand jobs, but also with a new

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 9>entrant to the labor force, with digital labor.

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 5>Let's just talk about how augmenting digital labor is or not.

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting your Alma Mater salesforce coming out saying they're

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 5>going to be reallocating a thousand workers to be going

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 5>out and selling their agent force. How much are we

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 5>having to see people work in tandem with the growth

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 5>of generative AI.

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 9>You're definitely seeing this new world where AI is working

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 9>together with humans and where people are successful working together

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 9>with AI technology. And every CEO is looking to the

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 9>future in saying, how do I reshape my workforce? How

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 9>do I bring AI in to help us be more productive,

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 9>more efficient from the public to the private sector.

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so where are some of the worries that are

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 5>still overhanging in CEOs? That it does seem to be

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 5>this disconnect that we've got all of these generative AI

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 5>tools fit for use to buoy our productivity, but actually

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the workforce are either scared to use

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 5>it because they think they'll be deemed lazy or do

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 5>you just don't getting the training?

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Is that something to change?

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 9>So AI literacy and AI proficiency are more important than ever,

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 9>And yes, every CEO is saying, how do I bring

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 9>my workforce along my people along, to skill them, to

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 9>train them, to make them proficient, not just literate, but

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 9>proficient in these technologies. It's critical for every job function,

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 9>whether you're doing customer service, sales, accounting, data operations. AI

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 9>is a part of everyone's jobs and so the skilling

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 9>and the training is hand in hand with the implementation

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 9>of the technology.

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 5>I ask it short each time you'll run, but I

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 5>ask it again, is it affecting the number of people

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 5>that companies can have?

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 9>So there's definitely efficiency gains that we'll see, and companies

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 9>are looking to have a way to scale their workforce

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 9>in ways that meets their needs. And so we're going

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 9>to see shifts in the labor and jobs will change,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 9>some jobs will be created, some jobs may go away.

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 9>But the future is one where AI and digital labor

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 9>is here. The reports coming out of Deloitte say that

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 9>a quarter of enterprises next year are going to be

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 9>deploying digital agents and so it's important that everybody learned

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 9>this technology and every CEO is looking how they shape

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 9>their workforce with both people and with the new digital

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 9>labor entrance LATICS.

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 5>Number one AIPAD people platform. Someone to listen to your serf,

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 5>thank you so much, Lattice CEO the on jobs in

0:21:52.640 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 5>tandem with AI, Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology. I'm

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 5>Caroline Hide in New York and in New York markets

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 5>are training in a new record high and as that

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 5>one hundred continues to grind higher, up three percent over

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 5>the course of the last five training days. Today, the

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 5>moon music continues to the upside because of jobs data

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 5>looking resilient but not too hot to cause unnerve to

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.479
<v Speaker 5>any fulfilling of a fed rate cut Outlook, we're currently up,

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 5>as you see, three point one percent on the five days.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 5>Where has crypto gone over the last five days, It

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 5>has been a volatile ride at one point eclipsing one

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 5>hundred and three thousand dollars. We're still up one point

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:34.959
<v Speaker 5>four percent for the last five training days. We're currently

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 5>back at ninety nine thy one hundred and seventy eight,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 5>as we call it, just inching higher on the day.

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 5>We're basically stabilizing after what had been a bit of

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 5>a pullback after reaching that psychologically important number. Let's dig

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 5>into that number and into what else is riding behind

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 5>it Isabelle Lee joins us, what's interesting, of course, we

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 5>get that new cryptos are crypto in AIS.

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 4>Are David Sachs coming in?

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 5>That's going to be yet more positive moon muse around crypto.

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 5>It was the SEC announcement we'll not use quote your attention.

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 10>That everything is aligning, The stars are aligning for the

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 10>crypto space. Everything is just nothing can beat it. It's

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 10>like the perfect holiday for them. We have bitcoin soaring,

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 10>but we have various wagers actually taking up. Of course,

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 10>investors are taking back their profits. I mean who wouldn't,

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 10>especially if you put in a lot of it. But

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 10>I want to bring our attention to the Bitcoin ETF.

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 10>Black Rocks ie bit is the fifth most active ETF

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 10>option underlying when it approved options just less than a

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 10>month ago. It now is the fifth most active according

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 10>to ASIM. So that's really impressive because it's only behind

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 10>the biggest ETFs from SPY to QQQ to TLT, and

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 10>it's the most successful ETF so far. It officially hit

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 10>fifty billion, so you really see institutional demand going into that.

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 10>We have Wall Street investors are not scared anymore of

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 10>bitcoin ETF.

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, they're not scared of really quite leverage plays as well.

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 5>People getting into micro strategy playing the volatility around it,

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 5>we dug into that where are we starting to see

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 5>other areas growth from institutional and retail, So that's what

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 5>we're not seeing yet for the out coin et So

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 5>we have Ether ETF.

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 10>It debuted mid this year and it really saw kind

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 10>of lamb inflows, but when Trump was elected as president,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 10>that's when it's all massive inflow. So now we have

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 10>a lot of pending ETFs from XRP to Solana, fourth

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 10>and fifth largest odd coins, So it remains to be

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 10>seen whether we will see inflows for them.

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 4>But judging by Ether, it's.

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 10>Not such a promising start. But with the Trump presidency

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 10>and to your point, David Sachs and the new SEC pick,

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 10>maybe investors will pil into those ETFs.

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 5>And what's interesting is, of course this is becoming so

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 5>much more of a macro picture now. This is an

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 5>asset class that people do feel that they almost ought

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 5>to have exposure to, not should do as a risky propensity, at.

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 4>Least for a bitcoin.

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 10>Because if you talk to my mother or anyone who

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 10>is like gen Z or whatever label generation you have

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 10>digital goal, they get find that supply, they get inflation

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 10>heads they get But how do you sell eather XRP Solana.

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 10>So those are a bit more complex, but you're right,

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 10>Bitcoin at least now is becoming a little bit more mainstream.

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 10>It's easier to accept, easier to digest. Black Og Investment Institute,

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 10>in fact, in their twenty twenty five outlook included bitcoin

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 10>for the first time. They said it's a great diversifier

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 10>because of the erratic stock one relationship. So it's getting

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 10>their conversation is moving into crypto for now.

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.479
<v Speaker 5>I literally was at the station yesterday and two police

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 5>officers were telling each other how they were in bitcoin

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 5>and how it was going to go higher.

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 4>So there we have it.

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 5>Everyone's talking is bully, Thank you so much on all

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 5>things crypto. Let's turn from crypto to data security now.

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 5>Because data security software firm Rubrics come out with its

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 5>numbers and the company beat earning expectations, boosted its full

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 5>year revenue guidance. You can see the market reaction extraordinary,

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 5>up thirty four percent on the day, and of course

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 5>that's a record high. Let's talk to Rubrics CEO and

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 5>Cofanna Bevolsina.

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, congrats on the numbers.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 5>Analysts really liking what you've been able to show in

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 5>terms of cross selling here that many saying, look, you're

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 5>the only game in town when it comes to cyber

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 5>and data security.

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 4>How are you seeing in your client's pick up?

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 11>Thanks Carlin, we had another outstanding quartern. We are very

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 11>pleased to not only have a strong growth at a

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 11>scale top line, but we also improved the profitability and

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 11>generated free cas flow. So exciting time, exciting time for us.

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 11>What is fueling Rubik's demand is really this realization that

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 11>folks have spent a lot of dollars in stopping attacks

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 11>across network, endpoint, cloud, but you can't stop the unstoppable.

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 11>You need to have a resiliency strategy to ensure that

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 11>when the inevitable breach happens, you can still run your business.

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 11>The kids can go to school because your schools are open,

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 11>hospitals can admit patients, and that's what we are focused on.

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 11>And we are helping businesses make sure they are a

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 11>continuing operation even when they're confronted with cyber attack. And

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 11>that's what is fueling our demand.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting today a really well lend story on bloombog

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 5>by Ryan Gallagher is all about ransomware gangs really targeting

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.959
<v Speaker 5>not just really big institutions, but smaller medium sized enterprises.

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 5>And when you've got ransomware attacks up seventy twenty twenty three,

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 5>what is the outlook for everyone having to adopt some

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 5>sort of protection Hendry.

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 11>Brit Ransomware continues to be a huge problem because there's

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 11>some monetizable way for cybergangs and criminals to actually make

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 11>use of cyber attack. So the issue is like who

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 11>are they targeting? And they are targeting the weakest link,

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 11>which is our local government's local schools. They are targeting

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 11>the hospitals and other healthcare institutions because these organisms are

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 11>not protected properly. If you just think about healthcare, there

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 11>is so much sensitive data in healthcare, three times more

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 11>sensitive data than average enterprise, and the amount of digital

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 11>transformation that is happening in the healthcare space to reduce

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 11>the cost of healthcare, to deliver better services. It it's

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 11>creating more surface area of attack and as a result,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 11>we are focused on really protecting the unprotected.

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 4>We're just going to break some news.

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Hold on for a minute, people, what we have news

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 5>out of our own Mark Gum and regarding Apple with

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 5>a breaking news that Apple is preparing in fact to

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 5>finally bring one of its most ambitious projects to market,

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 5>basically the cellular modem chips that we've been hearing about

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 5>that's going to replace components for its partner, but also

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.719
<v Speaker 5>basically let's call its adversary Qualcom call come off by

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 5>a percentage point, Apple up three tenths of a percent,

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 5>more than half a decade, more than five years. They've

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 5>really been focused on this in house modem system and

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 5>it's going to be debuting next spring, according to people familiar.

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 4>We will bring you more in that story.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 5>But let's just get back to a people of rubric

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 5>because we're just talking about how the expans expansionary nature

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 5>of these attacks, ransomware attacks.

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Unfortunately, can you paint the picture.

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 5>Of what it looks like going into a next administration

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty five. Are we likely to see in any

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 5>way the narrative their change around data protection, data security, cybersecurity.

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 11>The next administration will be America first administration, and that

0:28:55.760 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 11>will actually spur more industrial espionage, more cyber warfare, more

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 11>cyber activities, both insider attacks, cyber attack and so we

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 11>believe that as we are digitizing faster and the next

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 11>administration will be quite business focused administration. So we believe

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 11>that the outlook for cybersecurity is obviously grim, and we

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 11>are ready and prepared to help businesses protect themselves as

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 11>they expand internationally, as they expand their business, as they

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 11>create more digital transformation. Our goal is to help every

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 11>business confidently transform themselves digitally without worrying about how they

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 11>can keep their services up and running.

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 4>We haven't mentioned Jenai yet. How much are you having

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 4>to reference it to your clients?

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 11>Look, Geni is a big driver to our business because

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 11>Genai applications actually data hungry and they are pulling data

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 11>from all the nooks and crannies of business applications into

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 11>a centralized place and ensuring that that data doesn't fall

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 11>into the wrong hand who uses the Genai applications. You

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 11>don't want sale people in a hospital to have access

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 11>to the patient record, and this is where we are

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 11>focused on really delivering data security, ensuring that the Genai

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 11>applications are trusted and responsible.

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 5>Rubric soaring thirty four percent on the back of your

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 5>numbers today, great to has some time with you before

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 5>Seena Rubric, CEO, Now more earnings coming up. Docu signed

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 5>CEO and Tigerson is going to be joining US as

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 5>next after the firm also beats expectations on its earnings.

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 5>This is BlueBag Technology, electronic signature software company DocuSign.

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 4>It's third quarter numbers really did beat expectations.

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 5>The company is boosting its revenue forecast for the full

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 5>year as well. We're up again twenty five percent on

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 5>this particular company. Let's have a talk about it with

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 5>the docu signed CEO and antiquson who ultimately is displaying

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 5>what seems to be a growth here that is not

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 5>just coming from early contract renewal but also new products

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 5>that you're offering. How much are they to be said

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 5>for the galvanization and growth.

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, first of all, it was a very positive

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 7>quarter for us. I think we beat on all the

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 7>metrics and we're able to raise for the full year

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 7>and that was really a reflection of strength across the board.

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 7>So in our existing business and signature of business, everyone

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 7>knows well, we significant improve retention and reduced churn. We've

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 7>grown our channels from being predominantly direct sales to now

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 7>also having a very strong digital channel and building out

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 7>our partner channel. And then, as you mentioned, our new

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 7>products which we launched at the end of May to

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 7>a limited distribution to the mid sized customers in North

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 7>America started contributing in this quarter as well, So it's

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 7>still early, but I think Doug Sun's on a very

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 7>positive trajectory of rejuvenation.

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 5>Rejuvenation, let's talk about that, because the acceleration of billings

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 5>are basically coming from a very depressed level, and everyone

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 5>is saying that this is really encouraging. But when I

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 5>look at Pypasuna and in particular, they're sort of waiting

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 5>for really the new solutions and new offerings to make

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 5>meaningful difference to your revenue.

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 4>When will that happen? Will that happen?

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Well, it's a journey and we're working on that.

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 7>Our goal is to return to double digit growth. We're

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 7>not putting this particular timeline on that, but as we

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 7>roll out these new products across more geographies and segments.

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 7>We just launched around the world here about a month

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 7>ago and just started shipping to enterprise rollouts and departmental

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 7>level rollots and enterprises, so we're still adding customer segments

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 7>and geographies and as that impacts more and more of

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 7>our book, we can drive more growth. And of course

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 7>any continued improvement in our core business also helps, and

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 7>so you're starting to see some early signs of that.

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 7>We got more work to do, but it's very encouraging

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 7>the progress that we're making.

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 5>You've got some more convincing to do, because when I'm

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 5>looking at the Bloomberg terminal, it points out what the

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 5>revenue expectations are for your business going out to twenty

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 5>twenty seven. I'm afraid we're staying in single digits for

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 5>all of those expectations. As far as we go, what

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 5>do you think really catalyzes back to I'm not saying

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.239
<v Speaker 5>the forty percent increase in revenue we used to be

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 5>having in twenty twenty one twenty two, but at least

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 5>the double digit What gets you there?

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 7>Alan, Yeah, I think I think we get there through

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 7>that through the combination of continued improvement and retention to

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 7>our core and then the full rollout and adoption of

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 7>our new products. We can call it intelligent agreement management.

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 7>It's a much broader value proposition the Dockshine has had historically.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 7>It's a true C suite cell. It's across the entire enterprise,

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 7>and we have I think tremendous green field opportunity are

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 7>in the best position to really help transform how agreements

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 7>get done. That's our opportunity. As we execute on that,

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 7>then we can deliver on that growth opportunity.

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 5>You've got about a billion news is one and a

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 5>half million customers. What sort of numbers do you end

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 5>up getting to do you think?

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, so we already have, as you mentioned, over a

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 7>billion signers. I'm sure we will add more signers, but

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 7>we've got a lot of people who are already used

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 7>to sign Docusigne documents. And from a customer perspective, we're

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 7>adding about ten percent, growing our customer base ten percent

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 7>year every year, every quarter. But those tend to be

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 7>smaller customers. We are already present in most large companies

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 7>in the world. I believe over eighty five percent of

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 7>the Fortune five hundred are already docks signed customers. So

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 7>our opportunity is more adding breath, basically cross selling and

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 7>up selling our new broader solutions into clients that are

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 7>already generally happy customers are docusigned. So fantastic starting point.

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 5>Where is the competition for you? Who do you put

0:34:57.680 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 5>yourself most often up against?

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Historically we've had some competition in the electronic signature space,

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 7>where by far the market leader I think the preferred

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 7>branded solution, but we have some lower price competition there.

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 7>I think increasingly, as we move into this broader agreement

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 7>management space, those competitive dynamics changed, and as I mentioned,

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 7>we believe that's mostly open field running and we're the

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 7>first to I think, articulate this broader vision and execute

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 7>on it. So if we can keep that going, I

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 7>think we're in a We're in a very good position competitively.

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:30.720
<v Speaker 4>And just give us a bird side perspective.

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 5>When you're in one hundred and eighty countries where is

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 5>growing most geographically, how resilient does the US look when

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 5>we're entering a new administration.

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, the year's economy has been the strongest of

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 7>the major development markets, and so we're certainly benefiting from that.

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 7>On the other hand, the US is also the furthest

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 7>along in the adoption of electronic signature, which still remains

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 7>the bulk of our revenue, whereas some other major markets,

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:57.800
<v Speaker 7>for example Germany and Japan are a much earlier state

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 7>of adopting various forms of electronic contract so we have

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 7>a lot of growth opportunity there. We're growing faster, namefully

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 7>faster outside the US than we are in the US,

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 7>and I think that will continue to be the case

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 7>for years to come.

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Dokus signed CEO al An Tikison. It's great to having

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 5>some time with the congratulations on the share pop on

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 5>the numbers. We appreciate your time Meta AI using it,

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.439
<v Speaker 5>probably because six hundred million people are using it every

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 5>single month Meta platforms and a new record high. Also

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 5>on the back of the TikTok news. Of course, that

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 5>TikTok span or divest will continue to January the nineteenth

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 5>and maybe gets pushed over to the Supreme Court, but

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:44.280
<v Speaker 5>the Washington Court upholds it. But also happening with Meta

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 5>now is the CEO Mark Luckberg saying in a post

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 5>on Threads the company is releasing its Lama three point

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 5>three seventy billion text model, saying it perform similarly to

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 5>previous models, and the CEO is also noting that Meta

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 5>ai has nearly six hundred million monthly active users. As

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 5>an inter leaves Generative AI across its entire product range,

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 5>will delve into Generative AI in the competition there right

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 5>now because Elil muks Xai has raised six billion dollars

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:13.879
<v Speaker 5>in new capital, wrapping up a funding round that has

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 5>been in the works for basically months now. It was

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 5>said to value the AI startup at about forty billion dollars.

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 5>This is all according to a regulatory filing which indicates

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 5>the equity financing came from some ninety seven investors who

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.359
<v Speaker 5>were not named. Noma's Kirk Wagner has been going through

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:30.240
<v Speaker 5>those details and Xai is more about the generative AI

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 5>models being built, large language.

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Models, and plenty more. What is he using the money for.

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, a big portion of this money is expected to

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 12>go towards this supercomputer that Xai has been building in Memphis, Tennessee.

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 12>You may remember, I believe they announced it over the summer,

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 12>the idea that this would be possibly the largest supercomputer

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 12>in the world, with tens of thousands of Nvidia chips

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:54.839
<v Speaker 12>all sort of running at the same time. So that's

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 12>obviously a very expensive project. It's a very you know,

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 12>ambitious project. And that sort of explains why Elon Musk

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 12>not only raised or six billion dollars here for Xai

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 12>in the filing that we just saw yesterday, but also

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 12>six billion additional dollars in funding back in May right.

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 12>So this is twelve billion that has been raised just

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 12>in the last six months or so.

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 5>And we know who previous investors have been. I mean

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 5>one of them is now the Ai and cryptos are

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 5>to the next administration. David Sachs has been putting money

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 5>into Xai and every other mask business really, but who

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 5>else has previously wanted to write checks for this company?

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, we see a similar roster almost every time Elon

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 12>goes out to raise money. You know, Andrees and Horowitz, Sequoia,

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 12>Capital valor Equity. These are the sort of you know,

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 12>the continuous or regular investors in Elon's businesses, not just XAI,

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 12>but also x formerly Twitter, SpaceX Tesla. Right, so we

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 12>see the same names kind of crop up every time.

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 12>We don't know exactly who's in this latest round, but

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.359
<v Speaker 12>you can bet that's it's most likely the same names

0:38:58.360 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 12>we see regularly with him.

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 5>And what's been so interesting to understand what XAI means

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the businesses because we have at one

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 5>point concerns that some of the GPUs or at least

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 5>spending that was heading towards Tesla was being pinched over

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 5>to Xai. But then you have perhaps how much Ai

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 5>is going to help Tesla's business model, how much it's

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 5>going to continue to innovate on Grock for example.

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, this is sort of the thorny world in which

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 12>Elon operates with all of his businesses, right where he

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 12>tends to borrow resources from one company to help another company.

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 12>In this case, he's talked about you know, obviously x

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 12>and all the posts that are showing up on x

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 12>as being the data that's powering Xai and the chatbot

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 12>groc that they built. He's talked about using Xai with

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 12>Tesla and maybe even investing in Xai via Tesla. So

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 12>you know his universe, as you know, Caroline, it's just

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 12>everything kind of blurs together. And so we're seeing this

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 12>as sort of the AI layer for I think a

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 12>bunch of his companies, and I think the more funding

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 12>they get, especially from investors who are already invested in

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 12>the other businesses, you'll see this continue, this kind of

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.280
<v Speaker 12>connection between Xai and everything else in Musk's empire.

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 5>And meanwhile, let's just talk about the ecosystem that surrounds it.

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 5>Because we've had Sam Altman on stage at the deal

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 5>Book conference this week talking about how he's not too

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 5>worried or perturbed about el Musk hitting in on open

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 5>AI's future success. But what about you know, we've got

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:22.240
<v Speaker 5>Meta just announcing how many people are using their generative

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:25.760
<v Speaker 5>AI products across the whole gamut of their product offering.

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:29.240
<v Speaker 5>Where are people going at the moment from genera offerings

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 5>more broadly.

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, I think Chat GPT from open ai

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 12>still sort of is maybe the first thing that comes

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 12>to mind when people think about this. It's probably the

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 12>most well known. But Meta, as you point out, they

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 12>just had announcement literally a few minutes ago, six hundred

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 12>million monthly users of their Meta AI bot. Now they

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:48.720
<v Speaker 12>benefit from the fact that they put that bot into

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 12>Instagram and Facebook and WhatsApp, so they're reaching you know,

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 12>billions of people just by putting the product in something

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 12>that they are already using. But I do think that,

0:40:57.840 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 12>you know, we're getting to this place where there's going

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 12>to be a couple or winners or a couple you know,

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 12>companies kind of coming out in front. I think Chat GBT,

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 12>Meta AI, and then GROCK obviously is built into X.

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 12>So those are the three that come to mind for

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 12>me when I when I think of these generative AI bots.

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Co Wagner across the space.

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:16.359
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate it, and look, let's just dig a little

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:18.320
<v Speaker 5>bit more into these models. Because of the tech industry

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 5>has kind of been hitting a bit of a wall

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 5>when it comes to building better generative AI modelsmost Sharon

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 5>Gafari has been writing about this your latest newsletter Q

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 5>and AI.

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 4>And what's interesting is Mark.

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 5>Zuckerberg just released Lama releases LAMA three point three, and he's,

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 5>you know, seeing it as the next base model. How

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 5>have people been heading up against improvements here though?

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 4>So here's the thing.

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>AI is certainly getting better, but we have to think

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>about the kind of bold bets and predictions that the

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 1>leaders of these AA companies are making, which is that

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we are going to reach some kind of all knowing,

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, very powerful, matching or surpassing human intelligence level

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>AI in the next few years. And so that is

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the kind of intense race that these companies are going

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 1>against right now, and that is why there are some

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of missed expectation around the pace of which they'll

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:10.399
<v Speaker 1>be able to actually deliver on that.

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 5>But some am in this week just briefly saying twenty

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 5>twenty five, right.

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and you know, again we are seeing progress,

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 1>but by now some people were hoping. You know, we

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:22.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet seen a GPT five level model. We haven't

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 1>yet seen the next big model from anthropics. So that's

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>what sort of the end goal is.

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 5>Go read your newsletter, Sharon KAfari, thanks for joining us today.

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 5>That does it for this edition of Blue Meg Technology.

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Don't forget to check out our podcast. Find it on

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 5>the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify, and

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 5>iHeart