WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Netflix Earnings, ECB Preview, TSMC

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world. Straight Ahead on the program,

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>a look ahead to US retail sales and what the

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 2>numbers might reveal about the health of the consumer. I'm

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm Karlin Hepge here in London, where the ECB looks

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 3>likely to cut rates again face with a weak economic

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 3>fact job in the continent's biggest economies.

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm Brian Curtisy in Hong Kong. We look ahead to

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 4>whether China is all in on stimulus or wavering, and

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 4>we preview TSMC's earnings.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 5>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 5>E Love Them Free Ow New York, Bloombergen ninety nine

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:54.279
<v Speaker 5>to one, Washington, DC, Bloomberg ninety two to nine, Boston,

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 5>DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius XM one twenty one, and

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 5>around the world on Bloomberg Radio dot Com and via

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 5>the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 6>Good day to you.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby, and we begin today's program with some

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 2>key economic data out this week. US retail sales for

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 2>September eight thirty am Wall Street Time on Thursday. So

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>what will the numbers reveal about the health of the

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 2>consumer and as we head toward the holiday season? Is

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 2>stubbornly high inflation keeping a lid on spending for a

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of Americans. Well for more, we're joined by Michael McKee,

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg International Economics and Policy correspondent. Well, Michael, retail sales

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 2>rose just a tenth of a percent in August, but

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 2>that was better than forecast. What are you expecting to

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 2>see in September.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, what e kindom is surveyed by Bloomberger expecting to

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 7>see is more progress in that regard. The forecast is

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 7>for a two tenths advanced month over month X autos

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 7>just a tenth, but the control group, which is basically

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 7>what goes into GDP up three tenths is last month,

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 7>which would be a fairly strong performance. Americans still are shopping.

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 7>We haven't seen a major impact on confidence in the

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 7>fact that they can pay for these things. So at

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 7>this point we're expecting to see some strong growth.

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about why we have that strong growth.

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 2>We have a very solid labor market, surprisingly strong numbers

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>the last month. Higher incomes as well. We've seen gas

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 2>prices low this past summer, still pretty low. Inflation has eased,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 2>and it won't have much of an impact on the

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 2>sales data that we'll see this week. But lower interest

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 2>rates right, all.

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 7>That right definitely won't have an impact on the data

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 7>we see this week. Credit Card rates have not come down.

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 7>I don't think anybody be surprised by that. They're very sticky.

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 7>They go off a lot faster than they come down,

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 7>so Americans are still paying that. But what we're looking

0:02:54.680 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 7>at is the higher wages people are getting is helping

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 7>because people tend to spend what they make and make

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 7>their spending decisions on what they make. They've had a

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 7>lot of money in savings for a while, and the

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 7>savings rate was revised higher, But it's the wages and

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 7>salaries that sort of determine the momentum that we see

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 7>in spending, and since they have been relatively strong, people

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 7>are still feeling like they can afford it.

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Now as we move into the holiday season. Do you

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>think there's indications this is going to continue on.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 7>It's beginning to look that way. The forecasts earlier this

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 7>year were that we would see a fall off in

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 7>the fourth quarter, and so far we haven't seen that.

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 7>This is September numbers that were getting next on Thursday,

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 7>and that's the third quarter, but it will set us

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 7>up for the fourth quarter. We'll see what kind of

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 7>momentum we have going into the fourth quarter, and so

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 7>far there doesn't seem to be a reason to think

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 7>people are pulling back. As you noted, gasoline prices are

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 7>down even though oil pres are up. We're in the

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 7>winter driving season the beginning of that and less demand

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 7>out there for fuel, and we've got some surpluses that

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 7>have built up in the USL Company's tanks out in Oklahoma.

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 7>So as long as people feel like they've got the

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 7>money and they don't have to put it to gasoline,

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 7>they should continue to spend.

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 2>Now, another surprise help is that dock workers strike. It

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 2>lasted three days and then put on pause.

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 7>That's a big help to the economy overall, because we

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 7>would have had a lot of people who were out

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 7>of work, and that would have slowed the economy and

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 7>probably raised prices after a couple of weeks because we'd

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 7>have shortages of things coming in we did see in

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.239
<v Speaker 7>the CPI last week that food prices food at home

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 7>went up by four tenths, the most in eight months.

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 7>And that's the kind of thing that would have been

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 7>affected fruits and vegetables coming in other foods if the

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 7>port strike continued, and we might have seen a sort

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 7>of a negative jobs report because this week is coming

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 7>up as the reference week for the October payrolls. And

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 7>if you had all those dock workers on strike, along

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 7>with the Boeing workers on strike and the people who

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 7>are out of work because of the hurricanes, we could

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 7>have had a negative print for October, which would probably

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 7>not go over well with public opinion.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 2>Well and those hurricanes. At least we're going to see

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 2>a big pickup in home building, construction, roads, schools. I mean,

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 2>we're going to see hopefully, hopefully very soon.

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 7>That's the paradox of these natural disasters. You can never

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 7>make light of the suffering of the individual people who

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 7>have gone through this, who've lost their homes and all

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 7>the things that matter to them. But on a macro

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 7>national basis, natural disasters like this are good for the

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 7>economy because of all that spending on new stuff, and

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 7>it adds to GDP, so we will see that effect.

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 7>Seems like from Aleen, the stuff in the Carolinas may

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 7>take longer to fix because a lot of roads are

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 7>out and broken and that'll take a while to do.

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 7>But in a year or two you would look at

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.679
<v Speaker 7>the GDP figures and you wouldn't see a real dip.

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, you know, let's talk more about housing broader,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 2>not just from Helene and Milton, but housing prices still

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 2>making home ownership a little tough for a lot of people,

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and that has certainly got to impact retail sales and

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 2>impact and you say, you know, inflation.

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 7>Also, it's something to watch. We did see in the

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 7>CPI report that owner's equivalent rent, which is the weird

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 7>statistical way the government accounts for home prices. We're at

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 7>the lowest in about seven or eight months, just up

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 7>three tenths, and that's what the Fed has been waiting for.

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 7>If that continues, that's good news. It will help prices

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 7>level off. But prices have been going up and the

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.559
<v Speaker 7>big reason for that is that there's not enough homes

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 7>for sale because interest rates are high still for mortgages

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 7>and people don't want to move.

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, it's a cruel cycle, though September retail spending

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 2>data out this Thursday are thanks to Michael McKee, Bloomberg

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 2>International Economics and Policy correspondent. We move next to corporate

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 2>earnings from the world's leading streaming TV service, Netflix, posting

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 2>its third quarter results this Thursday. What will they reveal

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 2>about subscriber growth, revenue from advertising, possible plans to hike

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 2>subscription fees for more. We're joined by Geetha Raganathan, Bloomberg

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Analysts on US media. Geitha, Well, two hundred and

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 2>seventy eight million subscribers worldwide can't all be wrong. What

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 2>do you expect to see from Netflix's earnings this week?

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, Tom, thank you so much for having me so.

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 8>As always, you know, Netflix is still very much a

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 8>subscriber story. Consensus current currently expects about four point three

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 8>million new subscribers ADS for the third quarter, and that

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 8>momentum is expected to kind of continue into the fourth

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 8>quarter with them having lots of heavily anticipated content with

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 8>about seven million gains. So if you kind of just

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 8>look at the overall picture for Netflix, Tom, what we

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 8>saw was we saw a tremendous slow down in subscriber

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 8>growth in twenty twenty two, but twenty twenty three and

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty four we're seeing them add close to almost

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 8>sixty million subscribers, so thirty million subscribers in each of

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 8>those years. So I think, really, as investors kind of

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 8>start to think about the story, it's really about where

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 8>is subscriber growth? What is a normal level of subscriber

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 8>growth once you have taken into account these two initiatives

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 8>that they introduced, which was the advertising based tier as

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 8>well as the password sharing crackdown, And so I think

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 8>that is going to be one of the biggest questions

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 8>apart from, of course what you said, which was the

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 8>price increases, we are really banking on a big price entrase.

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Now besides the paid sharing members, the new ones you

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 2>know after that crackdown. Now, do you see more international growth?

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Are there new countries for Netflix to conquer?

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah? So majority of the growth tom is in the

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 8>international markets. You know, that makes up two thirds of

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 8>you know, the subscriber base. Most of the growth, of course,

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 8>is coming internationally. Not to say that the US market

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 8>is not growing. It has actually grown really well after

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 8>they introduced both the ads as well as the paid

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 8>sharing initiative. But yes, as they kind of expand to

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 8>more markets, we definitely expect you know, growth long growth

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 8>runway in a lot of these international markets. Remember, penetration

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 8>for Netflix in the US is very, very high, but

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 8>it is pretty low in some other markets. So if

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 8>you kind of look at Latin America again, penetation is high,

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 8>but if you look at you know, Asia Pacific, it's

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 8>only at about twenty one or twenty two percent. If

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 8>you look at Europe again, it's pretty low. So there

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 8>is substantial for growth. You know, it's just going to

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 8>depend on what are all the different subscription tiers that

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 8>they introduce there to kind of really rev up growth

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 8>in some of those markets now.

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 2>And other growth is advertising revenue, and I know you

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 2>could talk about a couple of deals that they have

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>with with major sports networks that's coming up won't be

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 2>reflected in the numbers we're going to see just you know,

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 2>this week, but looking ahead it could really explode.

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely. So they have kind of downplayed the role of advertising,

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, at least for the near term, but we

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 8>know that they are doing so many things that is

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 8>really going to kind of turbo charge that business. So

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 8>one of the big things that the industry is kind

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 8>of looking for, is that Netflix is entering the sports arena.

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 8>They have two NFL games on Christmas Day. Now that

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 8>is going to be big, not just in terms of viewership,

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 8>but obviously they are going to those are That's a

0:10:55.640 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 8>highly anticipated content when it comes to you know, advertising,

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 8>So you know that is obviously creating a lot of buzz.

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 8>Then you have the much anticipated Mike Tyson versus Jake

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 8>Paul boxing event which is going to happen sometime in November.

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 8>That should drive the subscriber editions, it should enhance Netflix's

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 8>overall reach. So all of those, you know, they're basically

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 8>prepping for advertising to take off in a big way.

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 8>And then remember, starting in January, you have WWE content

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 8>that is going to come to the platform globally for

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 8>the very first time. So they're really investing heavily in

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 8>sports content and sports adjacent content and that should be

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 8>a big draw for the advertising community.

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, since Netflix last hiked prices it's a first standard

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.479
<v Speaker 2>tier January of twenty twenty two, a number of competitors

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 2>have done the same. Do you think Netflix is poised

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 2>to increase the cost of both of its tiers? The

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 2>standard and the ad supported one more revenue coming in.

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 8>So I think right now, if you kind of look

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 8>at con census estimates and if you just look at

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 8>sentiment in general, everybody is kind of banking on this

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 8>price increase. They are definitely overdue for a price hike

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 8>on the standard tier, that is the one that costs

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 8>about fifteen and a half dollars in the US. They

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 8>haven't raised prices for almost three years, as you just

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 8>pointed out, Tom, and remember before that they had a

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 8>steady cadence of price increases. It was coming every eighteen

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 8>months or so. It was about a ten to eleven

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 8>percent price increase. So we are definitely looking for a

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 8>pretty big bump this time around. They have the content

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 8>to support it. All of their competitors are raising prices,

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 8>and we know that in general the competitive intensity across

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 8>the board has come down quite a bit.

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 2>Okay, third quarter earnings from Netflicks out this Thursday, are

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:51.479
<v Speaker 2>thanks to Geet the raganathin Bloomberg Intelligence Analysts on US media.

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 2>Coming up on Bloomberg Day Break weekend, we'll look ahead

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 2>to a meeting of European Central Bank policy makers and

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 2>whether another rate cut may be in the cards, Tom Busby,

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, our

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 2>global look ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 2>the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York. Up

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 2>later in our program look ahead to a cavalcade of

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 2>economic data out of China and earnings from one of

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Asia's biggest chip makers. But first, the European Central Bank

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 2>has already cut interest rates twice in this cycle, and

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 2>markets are expecting another move lower when policymakers meet this week.

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 2>As inflation slows and near's the ECB's target focus has

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 2>shifted to the weakness in Europe's biggest economies. For more,

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Banker Caroline hepgar Tom.

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 3>The European Central Bank has not delivered many surprises on

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 3>its rates cutting journey. The first move in June was

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 3>widely telegraphed, as was the second in September. Now, as

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 3>we can out down to the next meeting, all signs

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 3>point to another twenty five basis point move lower. September's

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Euro Area inflation print came in at one point eight percent.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 3>That's below the ECB's target, but that good news has

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>come with much less positive information when it comes to

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 3>the continued weakness in the major economies in Europe, in

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 3>France and Germany. Now we've been discussing this with Eric

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 3>why Tennis, who is the EMEA head of investment strategy

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 3>at JP Morgan Private Bank, and we began by asking

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 3>him why markets are not currently pricing a recession for

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Europe right now.

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 9>There's definitely been an unfortunate loss of momentum. Economic surprises

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 9>have been surprising to the downside. However, the overall trajectory

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 9>of the economy I would categorize as remaining buoyant enough.

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 9>What happens with the consumer is going to be key

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 9>as we go forward. The ECB likely support with interest

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 9>rates to the downside is also likely to help keep

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 9>things afloat. Linkages to the US are also constructive. The

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 9>US economy has been outperforming most expectations across the board,

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 9>so the degree of linkages across the pond should also

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 9>be at least relatively helpful to keeping Europe, you know,

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 9>sort of carrying forward through, albeit with a lower level

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 9>of growth relative to the US and and other key

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 9>economic areas.

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 10>So what markets are pricing in is sort of quarter

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 10>steady pace of quarter points rate cuts from the European

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 10>Central Bank. Does that tally with how you think that

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 10>the response should go given the weakness in the European economy.

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it basically does. The you know, the Europeans have

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 9>the more singular focus on you know, price stability i e.

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 9>Battling inflation. In the US they categorize it more so

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 9>as both price stability i e. Battling inflation and additionally

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 9>helping to ensure full employment. So by that methodology, it

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 9>suggests that the Europeansentral Bank really should just be focusing

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 9>on inflation and inflation alone. But I guess the reason

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 9>I bring that up is even though it's not officially

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 9>part of their mandate to help facilitate the labor markets

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.239
<v Speaker 9>and try to be cognizant of supporting the regional economy,

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 9>I do think that they have that lens and do

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 9>want to try to be helpful if inflation allows them to.

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 9>And the subsiding of inflation in the region and on

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 9>a global level is really helpful because it allows central

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 9>banks to become more accommodative with softer interest rate policy,

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 9>which should.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Help how far behind the curve is the ECB? What

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 3>is the neutral rate? Has that shifted to your mind?

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 9>I actually think they're doing okay. We don't believe that

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 9>they're behind the curve, and we think that a steady

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 9>as she goes pace feels reasonable to us. There was

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 9>certainly an argument that the FED was behind the curve

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 9>looking over there in many forecasters' minds, and that's part

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 9>of why they did that kind of quote jumbo sized

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 9>cut of fifty basis points. Most recently, I would more

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 9>so categorize that one as not necessarily being behind the curve,

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 9>but a little bit of a twenty five plus twenty

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 9>five catch up there. So now that they are kind

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 9>of started with that larger initial sized cut, I think

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 9>that you know, both major central banks probably can go

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 9>with a bit of a steady as she goes regular

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 9>type of cadence.

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 10>Thinking about the start of earning season in Europe, I

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 10>wonder where you'll be looking for signals around the European consumer,

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 10>given you know what you've just been selling us about

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 10>their centralgy to the European economic picture.

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 9>Consumer always matters that it really matters in the US.

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 9>It for sure matters here in this region as well.

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 9>There has been some softness across the board in conjunction

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 9>with what you know, the general trajectory of economic growth

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 9>has been. Wages have been solid though, and ideally, you know,

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 9>robust enough wages allow consumers to continue to do their

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 9>thing and consume, which is going to be incredibly important

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 9>for how this earning season goes. It is still a

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 9>very nice story in terms of equity market performance on

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 9>a mostly global level in twenty twenty four, so it's

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 9>going to be very contingent upon earning's delivery or lack thereof,

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 9>to see how we do in the remaining two and

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 9>a half months or so of the year.

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 3>That was Eric why Tennis in me ahead of investment

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 3>strategy at JP Morgan Private Bank, speaking to me Andrew

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Stephen Cowell on Bloomberg Radio. So that's an investor

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 3>perspective on the economics here in Europe. Let's hear now

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 3>from Bloomberg Economics on this as we look ahead to

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 3>the next European Central Bank decision just in the next

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 3>few days. I've been speaking to our senior your area economist,

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 3>David Powell. David, is there any doubt over whether the

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 3>ECP will actually cut by twenty five basis points.

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 6>The markets have completely pricedt and we think that's going

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 6>to happen. And those expectations have been reinf forced by

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 6>words from members of the Governing Council. Even some of

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 6>the most hawkish members of the Governing Council in recent

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 6>days have come out saying they support a cut in October.

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 6>So it's pretty clear that that's going to come.

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 3>So any potential surprises.

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 6>Then well, I think what people are going to be

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.959
<v Speaker 6>focusing on is what's said at the press conference, in

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 6>particular where the ECB sees the risks and their risk

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 6>assessment to GDP growth and inflation. Up until now, they

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 6>have seen the risks to inflation as balanced, listing both

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 6>upside and downside risks. I think the biggest surprise might

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 6>be something like if the ECB were to emphasize to

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 6>a greater extent downside risks to inflation given the economic

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 6>weakness in the Euro Area.

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that has been the real concern, isn't it the

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 3>slowdown in the economy in terms of the hints that

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 3>we get about what happens further down the road in

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 3>terms of right cuts in Europe. What might we hear

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 3>as for the the US, people are dialing back the

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 3>idea of big rate cuts from the Fed.

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, there is a big difference between the US and

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 6>the EU Area, which is a story that has persisted

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 6>throughout this period of monetary tightening and now monetary loosening,

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 6>and that is the US economy is held up much

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 6>better than the Euro Area economy, and so we haven't

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 6>had those positive economic surprises in Europe that the US

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 6>has had, which kind of has reduced those expectations for easing.

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 6>So a December cut is probably you know, it's essentially

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 6>a done deal the markets of price that it's pretty

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 6>much universally expected. And the reason that that is so

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 6>expected is the ECB will have another quarter than of

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 6>data from the National accounts on wage growth, in particular

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 6>compensation per employee, which is the most comprehensive measure of

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 6>wage growth, and in all likelihood that will have decelerated again,

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 6>giving the ECB further confidence that price pressures are ebbing

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 6>and that they can cut without doubts of inflation remaining

0:20:59.520 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 6>at tark.

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and of course inflation is the central mandate for

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 3>the European Central Bag, so how much can they really

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 3>consider growth as a factor given that mandate.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, inflation is essentially determined by supply and demand, and

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 6>growth is aggregate demands. So growth is the primary determinant

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 6>of inflation.

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 9>So while there are.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 6>Times when the two objectives are not are not calling

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 6>for the same thing, boosting the economy and keeping inflation

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 6>at target. And the ECB, unlike the Foot Reserve, does

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 6>have a mandate of just inflation. They can't ignore growth

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 6>because at the end of the day, if the economy

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 6>remains weak, if aggurate demand remains weak, inflation will be

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 6>below target. And that's something that we really only just

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 6>got over at the time of the pandemic. Don't forget

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 6>before that inflation was below target for nearly a decade

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 6>and Droggy tried a lot of things in order to

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 6>return inflation to target. And one thing we know from

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 6>the UAE is experienced even more clearly from the Japanese experience,

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 6>is that when you have persistently low inflation for a

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 6>long period of time, it becomes kind of embedded and

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 6>that's a difficult situation to get out of.

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh yes, Japanification of Europe is a really big worry.

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it In terms of the economic picture. What is

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 3>your assessment now of how weak Europe is in terms

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 3>of France and Germany. I mean, we know there's been

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 3>political uncertainty, there are enormous global pressures and geopolitical kind

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:32.719
<v Speaker 3>of tectonic plates that affect what's your concern around economic

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 3>growth in Europe now?

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 6>Well, the main source of weakness in Europe is Germany actually,

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 6>and in particular Germany's industrial sector, which has never really

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 6>kind of recovered in recent years and it's facing a

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 6>number of problems. One is the economic slowdown in China,

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 6>which is a huge destination for German exports. And also

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese are moving up on the value ladder in

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 6>terms of their own production, so they're less fewer things

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 6>from Germany, like cars, for example, that they're now making

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 6>in China themselves. So there's a structural change going on

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 6>there that's impacting Germany. So that's something that's going to

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 6>persist for a while. But when you take Germany out

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 6>of the picture of Isabelle Schnabel is, a member of

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 6>thecb's executive board, recently did in a presentation that your

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 6>area looks much healthier so other countries are doing better.

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 6>In particular, Spain has had very strong growth, France has

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 6>had growth that's much better than Germany, although that's probably

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 6>been boosted by the Olympics, and that boost will fade.

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 6>So the real worry right now is Germany, and that's

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 6>not going to be easy to solve, given that some

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 6>of these problems are structural.

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 3>And yet, of course, very soon, if not now, focus

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 3>on the US presidential election, and we know that European

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 3>officials are worried about the possibility of a second Trump

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 3>White House. What that might mean to the European economy

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 3>is that also something that people are thinking about. Is

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 3>very split in the very uncertain in terms of the

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 3>US presidential race. But what US policy emerges will surely

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 3>be important for growth in Europe.

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the your area is a big exporter, in particular Germany,

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 6>and what we've heard from the Trump campaign is talk

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 6>of tariffs if Donald Trump were to be re elected.

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 6>And when you export a lot of goods, you don't

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 6>like tariffs because that essentially reduces for in demand for

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 6>what you're producing. So undoubtedly that's creating some fears amongst

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 6>policy makers in Europe, and we've heard those aired. Various

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 6>policy makers from around the different areas, not only the

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 6>Central Bank but also the European Commission except for have

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 6>voiced concerns about what that might mean for the Your Area.

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Economy, even as there've also been worries about European protectionism

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 3>versus China, and that is also kind of shaping up

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 3>as quite a big battle line between Europe and China.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 3>Does that help in the short term hin doing the

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 3>long term ev tarifs on China for example.

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, as I mentioned, the German industrial sector is having

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 6>a lot of problems right now, and one of those

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 6>problems is China. One is kind of cyclical, there's a

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 6>cyclical slow down there, but the other is structural, and

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 6>that changes to the Chinese economy and what they're producing.

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 6>In Europe wants to shield the economy from the short

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 6>term impact of those changes, and tariffs are a good

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 6>way to do that, at least in the short term,

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 6>but in the long term they've rarely been helpful as

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 6>a kind of as a strategy to boost the economy.

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 3>My thanks to our senior Euro Area economist David Power

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 3>for joining me ahead of the ECB rate decision in October.

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hepge here in London. You can catch us

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 3>every weekday morning for Bloombag Daybreak. Youre at beginning at

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 3>six am in London. That's one am on Wall Street.

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 9>Tom.

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 2>weekend and look ahead to earnings from one of Asia's

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 2>largest chip makers, TSMC. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global look ahead

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 2>at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York. A slew of economic

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 2>data coming out of China this week, including important trade data.

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to Bloomberg Daybreak Asia co host Brian Curtis

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 2>for more.

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Tom. China appears to be at a key inflection point

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 4>on coaxing the economy out of the doldrums and back

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 4>onto a solid growth path. Coming back from the recent

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 4>week long holiday, doubt was creeping in to whether or

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 4>not this is truly a whatever it takes moment for policymakers.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Amid those doubts, we've seen a lot of market volatility.

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 4>Now the coming week brings more data on, among other things,

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 4>inflation and trade. China is still suffering from weak consumer

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 4>spending and an ongoing property crisis. Until we start to

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 4>see a pickup in data, it may be hard to

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 4>convince investors that times have truly changed. Let's get to

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 4>James Mager Bloomberg, Senior reporter for the Chinese Economy and Government. So, James,

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 4>nice to have you with us here for this segment.

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 4>It's probably too soon to see any tangible evidence of

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 4>a revitalization in the economy from the official data, but

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 4>we do have some other ways to look at this,

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 4>perhaps confidence from consumers, some of the high frequency and

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 4>anecdotal data that you could be gathering. What are you see?

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 11>I think the first thing that we want to look

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 11>at is we just came out of a week long

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 11>holiday in China, and you know, people traveled more than

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 11>they did last year. I think number of trips was

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 11>out ten percent, but the actual amount of people spent

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 11>on those trips was down two percent compared to prior

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 11>to the pandemic in twenty nineteen, and so I think

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 11>what you're seeing there this year in the Chraine economy,

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 11>people are willing to go out, they are traveling around

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 11>the country. They are you know, some people are going overseas,

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 11>but when they do that, then not willing to spend

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 11>as much. And you're also seeing that in the housing market,

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 11>people aren't willing to buy houses, that walling to make

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 11>those kind of investments. So you know there is activity,

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 11>but people are holding onto the purse stream very tightly

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 11>because they're not confident that things are going to get better,

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 11>and so they're not confident to spend.

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.479
<v Speaker 4>I've heard anecdotally that people have noticed the big gains

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 4>in the stock market and that that could actually convince

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 4>them to spend a little more. But it seems like

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 4>what you're saying is yeah, maybe down the road, but

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 4>still caustious at the moment.

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 11>I think some investors are happy about the stock market

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 11>increases we've seen since the PBOC announced that big stimulus

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 11>package at the end of September, but a lot of

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 11>other stock investors that I've spoken to are still staying, well,

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 11>it's great that stocks are rising, but I'm still underwater.

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 11>You know, my portfolio is worth half what it was

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 11>five years ago, So even if you see a big

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 11>spike in prices now, it's going to take another sort

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 11>of similar size gain for me to even get back

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 11>to being may all again, let alone making any kind

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 11>of profit. So you know, if we see this continue

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 11>over time, that may lead to a wealth effect and

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 11>that may make people more confident, but I think at

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 11>the moment people are still looking at it cautiously.

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, in order for some momentum, you have to keep

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 4>coming up with innovative ideas. And we saw a couple

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 4>announced by the pbocs, such as the swap facilities where

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 4>institutions can exchange holdings for cash and can potentially buy

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 4>back shares. And I know we don't have a lot

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 4>of details on that, but that is an idea that

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 4>came forward that I think did catch a few people

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:38.719
<v Speaker 4>by surprise. And then recently we also had Premier Lee

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 4>Chung asking experts for innovative ideas. That seems a little unusual.

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm curious, you know, what they're expecting there.

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 11>And I think with the swaps, the swap thing that

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 11>the PBOC announced, it is innovative idea and we'll have

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 11>to see whether companies actually take them up on that

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 11>offer or not. For Premier Le Chang asking for suggestions,

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 11>you know, there has been a lot of crackdowns on

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 11>Chinese economists, you know, criticizing government policy, and there's been

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 11>you know, there was reporting that one economists have arrested

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 11>for making comments criticizing Hiji Pink's policies. And so coming

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 11>out now and saying, hey, we'd like to get your

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 11>ideas about how we can fix the economy. Some people

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 11>may take that opportunity, but other people still I think

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 11>we'll be very cautious about becoming, you know, making too

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 11>many critical suggestions.

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it brings back memories of the one hundred flowers

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 4>campaign back in nineteen fifty six. People might be wary.

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, exactly, come out and tell us your ideas, and

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 11>then the people who speak out too loudly then get

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 11>their heads locked off. I guess figuratively, I just think people,

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 11>you know, there are economists who're making a lot of

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 11>suggestions about the government should do. The question then, is

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 11>is the government really going to listen to them or not.

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Now, when we look at the data that's coming in

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 4>the next week, I mentioned earlier that it's probably too

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 4>soon to see a lot of tangible evidence here, but

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 4>exports have actually been reasonably solid for this year. Has

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 4>been one of the areas that hasn't been too bad

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the inflation numbers. Are we still kind

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 4>of teetering on the line, particularly on the producer prices side,

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 4>between inflation and deflation.

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean on the data for September that we're expecting,

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 11>it still shows that producer prices are inflation will be

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 11>even deeper than it was in August. Consumer prices positive,

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 11>but the only just and again that's probably being pushed

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 11>up by high vegetable prices, so really not a sort

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 11>of a sustainable increase in consumer inflation. And yeah, we will.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 11>The expectation is we will continue to see strong exports. Obviously,

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 11>this is the pre Christmas season now, so lots of

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 11>companies are trying to get Christmas goods and Christmas presents

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 11>out the door and onto ships to the US or

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 11>to Europe. So we should continue to see strong exports.

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 11>But imports are looking very weak, as you know, continuing

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 11>to look very week. The expectation is that they're actually

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 11>going to fall, and actually fall in September, which I

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 11>just go to underscore how bad Chinese domestic demand is.

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 4>All right, James, thanks so much for joining us. Jims

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Mager Bloomberg Senior reporter for the Chinese Economy and government.

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Now let's turn to the chip sector with Doug Krisner

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 4>and a preview on TSMC earnings.

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 12>Thanks Brian. In the week ahead, TSMC will disclose its

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 12>full results for the latest quarter. This is interesting because

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 12>we already have the company's revenue figures. Quarterly sales were

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 12>above forecast, a thirty nine percent increase from last year.

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 12>I think the fair question now is how will those

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 12>sales figures translate into profit. For a closer look, I'm

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 12>joined by Katherine Thorbeck Bloomberg, a columnist covering tech in Asia.

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 12>She joins us from our studios in Tokyo. Thank you

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 12>so much for making time, Catherine. I think now that

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 12>we can focus on what these sales figures really mean

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 12>in terms of the way in which AI spending, the

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 12>hardware spending, has been driving a lot of the positivity

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 12>in TSMC. Is this assuaging worries maybe that people feared

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 12>that AI spending would begin to wane a bit.

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, as you mentioned, TSMC's quarterly sales beat forecasts

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and beat even their own forecasts, and so you know,

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>there has been some concern over this year over whether

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>this is sustainable, whether the generative AI boom is sustainable,

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but TSMC's figures are showing that it's still going very

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>strong and the demand for a hardware is still going

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>very strong. You know, In the long run, we'll sort

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of have to see if the companies that are buying

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>these AI chips will be able to make money off

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of all of their AI investments. But for now, I mean,

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>TSMC seems to be really cashing in and really doing

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>well and doesn't show any signs at the moment of

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>slowing down.

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 12>What about capacity, particularly with the facility on Taiwan, are

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 12>they able to keep up with demand we own?

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's going to be a big question

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see with the guidance that they

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>give us, you know, whether they will be able to

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>keep up with demand. And I think another question going

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>off of that is when they will bring on the

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>two nanometer chip mass production. So we'll get some of

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>those answers on Thursday. So far, they've been sort of

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>assuasion concerns about not being able to meet demand, but

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we spoke about earlier, demand has been

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>very very high for their products.

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 12>This is the main foundry making chips for in Nvidia

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 12>and Apple. Do we know which company is more important

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 12>to TSMC?

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So, I think that's a good question. I mean, Apple

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and Nvidia are the two biggest customers for TSMC, and

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Vidia is obviously sort of the AI darling at the

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 1>heart of this generative AI boom. At the same time,

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>TSMC is the sole manufacturer for the chips that go

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>into the iPhone processors. There was some concern from some

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>analysts about softer demand for the latest iPhones, the iPhone sixteens,

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and how that could impact TSMC. But I think, you know,

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>they've gotten so many orders from other customers such as

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Nvidia and such as Intel, and I think that'll sort

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of really booy their earnings this quarter.

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 12>One of the things that we've spoken a lot about

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 12>on the show the fact that people have been worried

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 12>for some time about the over concentration of semiconductor production

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 12>on Taiwan, particularly when you look at the geopolitical tensions

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 12>between the US, China and Taiwan on and we've also

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 12>spoken about the need for the company really to demonstrate

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 12>it's been able to diversify away from Taiwan a bit.

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 12>I know TSMC is trying to build facilities in the

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 12>United States. They've also got some facilities underway from what

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 12>I understand, in Japan. You're in Tokyo. Can you tell

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 12>me a little bit about what is happening in Japan

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 12>as it relates to TSMC.

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Sure. So, TSMC is building fabs in Qshu, in Kumamoto

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Southern Island in Japan, and from what I've heard,

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going very very well. You know, it's actually planning

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>on opening on time. They're building out another one, and

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they even have plans to build out a

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>third one that will really bring the sort of cutting

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>edge chips manufacturing to Japan and outside of Taiwan. And

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you mentioned, I think that this sort

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of US China geopolitical tensions has been casting a shadow

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>over TSMC, a sort of longer term shadow. And you know,

0:35:55.239 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the current presidential elections candidate Trump has sort of express

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>some concerns about you know, continuous continual US support for Taiwan.

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think if you were to take a

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>step back though, in my opinion and sort of the

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>broader picture, and TSMC's founder Morris Chang has actually said

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>this himself, I think if China does invade Taiwan. I

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>think we'll have, you know, far bigger concerns than just

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks and and sort of chip production. But I

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>do think that, you know, this has been sort of

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a theme for TSMC since it's been founded, and as

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, they're also trying to build capacity in Arizona.

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>There were some rumors early on that that was they

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>were having a little bit of a struggle there, some

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of culture clashes and some labor disputes and getting

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that fab off the ground. They've sort of assuaged some

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of those concerns and said that you know, it does

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>seem to be going smoothly. You know, we will see.

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I think bringing on shoring chip manufacturing into the US

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is a very very difficult task for so many reasons.

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, getting the equipment and getting you know, skilled

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>labor force, and you know, it's obviously been central to

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration's sort of Chips Act and their efforts there.

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:09.439
<v Speaker 1>But that's it's a very very difficult, if not impossible job.

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're going to have to see how

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:11.879
<v Speaker 1>that plays out in the long run.

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 12>We've talked a little bit now just about the expansion geographically,

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 12>but I'm wondering in terms of CAPEX spending, whether or

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 12>not TSMC really has to spend a lot more for

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 12>the current operation in Taiwan in order to keep up

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:29.760
<v Speaker 12>with a level of sophistication being demanded by a company

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 12>like in Nvidia and having to invest more in the

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 12>sophisticated equipment that comes from the Dutch company ASML. Do

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 12>we know anything about that.

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I think TSMC is really at an advantage

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 1>because it is currently making the most advanced chips and

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>then you know, able to get more CAPEX to be

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>able to spend more on sort of research and development

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and building out capacity. And so I think compared to competitors,

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>TSMC is sort of in the best position. I mean,

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 1>they are already so far ahead of the game and

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, have a virtual monopoly on the most advanced

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 1>chips out there, and I think that really sets them

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>up in a good place going forward.

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 12>Catherine, thank you so much for making time to chat

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 12>with us about TSMC. As we look ahead to earnings

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 12>in the week ahead, we already know how a revenue

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 12>performed in the last quarter, a thirty nine percent increase

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:19.760
<v Speaker 12>from last year. Catherine Thorbeck is a Bloomberg columnist covering

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 12>a tech in Asia. Joining us from our studios in Tokyo.

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 12>I'm Doug Krisner. You can join Brian Curtis and myself

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 12>weekdays here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, beginning at eight am

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 12>in Hong Kong eight pm on Wall Street.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Thank you Doug, and thank you Brian. And that

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:38.760
<v Speaker 2>does it for this edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend.

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Join us again Monday morning at five am Wall Street

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 2>time for the latest on markets overseas and the news

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 2>you need to start your day. I'm Tom Busby. Stay

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 2>with us. Top stories and global business headlines are coming

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 2>up right now.