WEBVTT - The Verdict is in for Theranos

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you? I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>workshop that for a while. So it is time for

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the tech news for Tuesday, January four, twenty twenty two.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Actually have to look at the date, because, as is

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the usual, it'll take me about a month to remember

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're actually in a new year. And let's get

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to the news. The trial of Elizabeth Holmes has concluded

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with a jury delivering the founder of Sara Nos a

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>mixed bag of verdicts. So for those who don't know,

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Sara Nos was a biotech medical startup founded by Holmes

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with the aim of producing a desktop technology capable of

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>running more than a hundred medical tests on a single

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>micro drop of blood. The company raised somewhere in the

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood of nine billion dollars in investments and turned homes

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>into a Silicon Valley celebrity. She also gained a lot

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of attention for seemingly emulating the late Steve Jobs, including

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>adopting the black turtleneck as her signature look. While the

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 1>company received a lot of attention and enthusiasm from investors

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>who were sold on the prospect that this tech could

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>disrupt the entire medical industry and represent a huge business,

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>things were not going so well at the company itself.

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>A Wall Street Journal expose a revealed that the company's

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>promises stretched far beyond its capabilities and led to investigations

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that bring us up to this trial, Holmes had faced

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven criminal charges of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>wire fraud. Of those, the jury found her not guilty

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>on four accounts, guilty on another four accounts, and they

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't come to a decision on the remaining three counts.

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>The judge declared a mistrial in the case of those

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>three counts. That means that technically prosecutors could bring a

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>new case against Holmes. She could face up to twenty

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>years in prison and hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines.

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised, however, if her lawyers appealed

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>her case. Meanwhile, her business partner and former romantic interest,

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Ramesh Sunny Balwanni, who served as the chief operating officer

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for the company, is to stand trial facing similar criminal

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>charges in February. Throughout the trial, Holmes maintained it was

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Balwanni who was at fault for the crimes. So this

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>story isn't over over, but the initial trial is. It

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>will be interesting to see what bal Wanne's arguments will

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be when that trial comes to pass. Okay, let's do

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a very quick round up on some news that has

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>happened since we went on break, and I'm going to

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>start with some news about politicians in the United States

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and social network platforms. First, there's the case of House

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Representative Marjorie Taylor Green from my state of Georgia. Now,

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to spare you my personal thoughts about Green,

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>and I'll just say I believe there may be no

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>position upon which the both of us agree. That's the

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>classy way to say it, I guess. Anyway, Twitter recently

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>permanently suspended Green's personal account it was a verified Twitter account,

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>even after that account received at least five strikes for

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>spreading misinformation about COVID nineteen. And y'all, my state's been

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>hit pretty hard by COVID, So the fact that a

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>rep from my own state is effectively working against her

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>own constituents is just playing crazy anyway. Following that, Facebook

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>removed a post from Green that was, you know, in

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>light of this suspend mention, uh you know, Facebook also

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>removed a post saying that it also violated their policies. However,

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they said that Green Green's transgressions did not merit a

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>full suspension from Facebook, so she's still active there. The

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>move has prompted a total crap storm here in America,

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>with some folks like Joe Rogan urging people to leave Twitter.

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>On Moss and late night talk show hosts are rejoicing

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>in her removal. So you know, that whole issue with

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the left and right growing further apart from each other

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is just going swimmingly well in my country. Anyway. Green

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't the only conservative to part ways with a social network, though.

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I should also add that her official account as a

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>representative for Georgia remains active, so her personal account has

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>been suspended, but she does still have access to her

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, official account as a representative of the House

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of Representatives. Anyway. U S Senator Ran Paul, another Conservative,

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>has left YouTube, but this time it's Paul's decision sort

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of see light Green Paul was dinged for spreading misinformation

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>about the COVID pandemic, and his account was suspended by

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>YouTube on two separate occasions. Paul now says he will

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>no longer post to YouTube unless it's two dunk on them,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and otherwise he will post his messages on other places,

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>going on to tell conservatives that because they make up

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>about half the country, they could put a real hurt

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on networks like YouTube just by not using those those platforms.

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how persuasive that argument actually is, either

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to YouTube or to is, you know, the people he's

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>speaking to. I do know it's pretty disgusting to make

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>arguments about freedom of speech when that speech in question

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is all about spreading misinformation that consequently leads to people

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>getting sick and dying. Uh. I think that is pretty abhorrent.

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Something else that happened over the break was the successful

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>launch of the James web Space Telescope. According to NASA,

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the mission so far has progressed as smoothly as could

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>be hoped, which must be a relief after the numerous

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>delays that pushed back the telescope's launch multiple times, including

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that scary moment late last year when vibrations moved through

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the telescope as it was being attached to its launch vehicle. Uh,

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>the telescope is so delicate that there was a concern

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that those vibrations could have misaligned things, which means that

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the process of the telescope unpacking itself could have been,

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, compromised. So it is currently on its way

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to its destination, which will take it beyond the moon,

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and teams are working on the process by which the

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>telescope will unpack and unfold itself. That includes unfolding a

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>five layer sun shield layer by layer, and each layer

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:52.119
<v Speaker 1>is about as thick as a human hair. And also

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>you've got all those numerous mirrors that will reflect light

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to the telescope's sensors. According to the BBC, the process

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>has three separate quote single point failures end quote involved.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Now that means that each of those points represents a

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>moment where if things don't go well, then nothing that

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>follows that step will work. So it's kind of like

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>if your plan is to go out and go shopping

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you want to go catch a movie, and

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna go out to dinner, but as you

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>leave the house you find out your car has just

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>been crushed by a meteor. Well, that medior crushing your

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>car was kind of the single point of failure because

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>none of the rest of your plans are going to

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>work out because your cars been crushed. Same sort of idea. However,

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>NASA reps have stressed that there's no reason to be

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>tense about this, that they've practiced this numerous times, they

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>know what they're doing, and the whole procedure is likely

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to be boring. That's actually their words, and you know what,

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>after years of setbacks, boring actually sounds kind of nice.

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>While the James Webb is in many ways the successor

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to the venerable Hubble space telescope, that does not mean

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the Hubble is done with adding to our scientific knowledge. Recently,

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>NASA released an image captured by the Hubble telescope showing

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the spiral galaxy in GC one oh five aligning with

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a second galaxy. And because it's impossible to really judge

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>depth just by looking at a two dimensional image, the

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>first impression you might have is that what we're looking

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>at is two galaxies colliding with one another. Now, that

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing does happen, but in this case, the

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>image shows the galaxies are just lining up from our perspective,

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like how Mars can line up with Jubiter.

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean Mars is crashing into Jubiter, just means

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that from our perspective they're in line with each other.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty cool image, which you can see on

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>NASA's website about the Hubble. And while we're talking about space,

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I have a fun story that involves satellites and one

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet's favorite topics. Not bacon because that pretty

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>much fizzled out like five years ago. I'm talking about cats. Okay,

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>So space Sex has this project called Starlink, and this

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>uses tiny satellites in orbit to provide satellite internet connections

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>down here on Earth. They're running a relatively small beta

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>program right now in a pretty uh constricted region to

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>test it out. So right now, the star Link network

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>consists of slightly fewer than two thousand satellites, so there

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>are a lot up there, uh, and the company plans

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to add more than twelve thousand additional ones in the future.

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So the goal is to provide internet service to rural

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and underserved regions areas that cannot get reliable internet access otherwise.

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, that's all the stuff that's zooming around

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in space, but down here on Earth, you need a

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>way to pick up those satellite signals. You have to

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have a way to beam information back and forth between

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the satellites so that you can you know, Internet good.

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>So you need an antenna and it's a dish antenna,

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>what we used to call us satellite dish back in

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the day. Well, the Starlink dish antenna has a kind

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of nifty feature. So essentially it has a thermometer and

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.599
<v Speaker 1>it can detect if the temperature drops below freezing and

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>if it does, the satellite dish will generate a little

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>extra heat surface heat on the antenna itself. So the

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>idea is that that heat will help melt any snow

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>or ice that would otherwise build up on the dish

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in freezing temperatures and could potentially interfere with getting a

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>satellite signal. And here's where the cats come in. A

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter user named Aaron Taylor shared an image of a

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>group of five cats perched on top of the Starlink

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>satellite dish, presumably outside of Aaron's home, stating quote, starlink

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>works great until the cats find out that the dish

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>gives off a little heat on cold day's end. Quote.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Trust me, the image is adorable and also very funny.

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, we've got some more news stories to go through,

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>but before we get to that, let's take a quick

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>break and we're back. US telecom companies A, T and

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>T and Verizon recently agreed to delay their planned rollout

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of five G systems by a couple of weeks uh

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>this The request of delay came from the United States

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Federal Aviation Administration or f a A, which sites concerns

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that five G signals could interfere with some airplane systems,

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 1>notably stuff like a radio altimeter. There's been a lot

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of back and forth between the aviation industry and the

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>telecom industry about the effects of delays as well as

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the potential effects of five G transmissions. The telecom companies

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>are eager to move forward and deploy their five G networks.

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>They really want to make good on certain promises they

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.239
<v Speaker 1>have with customers, as well as just to remain competitive

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>with companies that have already started to deploy five gen networks.

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 1>And obviously they've also been experiencing delays anyway due to

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>problems like COVID and of course, the aviation industry is

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:06.479
<v Speaker 1>concerned with safety and avoiding problems like flights getting delayed, canceled,

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>or diverted, saying that if there is this UH interference,

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 1>then that could severely hamper flight flight control, and that

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>would not be great like flight control in the sense

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of everything could get messed up. And once you start

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>having flights canceled at one airport, there's this cascade effect,

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>right because that plane was on its way somewhere and

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>now it's not going to get there at that time.

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So this ends up having like a domino effect, even

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>if you have airports that are not being affected by

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>this interference. So up until yesterday, A T and T

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and Verizon appeared unwilling to give up their rollout plans,

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>but that has changed and now they've agreed to a

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>two week delay. I'm not sure what difference the two

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks makes, but I will continue to look into the

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>story as it develops. In a serious case of deja vous,

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft has had to release a fix for a bug

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in their Exchange server product that shut down on premises

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>email delivery at thousands of locations around the world. So

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>what happened, Well, it's all because Exchange Server two thousand

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and Exchange Server two thousand nineteen have a date

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>check feature, and that date check has a maximum value

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of to one four seven four eight three six four seven.

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>If I were to read that out, it would be

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>two billion, one hundred forty seven million, four hundred eight

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>three thousand, six hundred forty seven, also known as two

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to the thirty first power of minus one. But Microsoft

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>would use the first two digits of that number, the

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>T one in this case. What that's the maximum? They

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>would use those first two digits to denote the last

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>two digits of the current year, which you know, that

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>works fine as long as the last two digits of

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the current year are not greater than to one. And uh,

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the first two digits in the number are you know,

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that's as high as they can go as to one. Well,

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm told this year is two thousand, twenty two, so

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we would use twenty two to designate the year. That

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>means if you put two two at the end, you know,

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the front end of that very long number, it's actually

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>outside the range allowed. So when midnight rolled over from

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>New Year's Eve to New Year's Day, the systems attempted

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to verify a date designated as to to zero one

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>zero one zero zero zero one, and on premises, email

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>servers looked at that and said, oh, heck no, I

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>don't get paid enough to deal with numbers bigger than

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I can handle. And they quit, or rather they crashed. Meanwhile,

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I t professionals around the world, We're trying to suss

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>out why the heck their email servers were going offline.

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft had a fix ready to go on January second.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's some pretty serious hustle right there. But that

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>fix has to be initiated it on every single server

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>running Exchange two thousand sixteen or Exchange two thousand nineteen

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in order to get them working again. And that deja vue,

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, I felt, well. That refers to the old

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>y two K panic, in which programmers around the world

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>hurriedly tried to fix millions of lines of code to

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>account for the fact that the year was going to

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>change from nineteen nine or just ninety nine to two

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand or zero zero. The fear was that by going

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>from zero zero, computer systems would just assume that we

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>had somehow flip back to nineteen hundred. I've done whole

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>episodes about this. So anyway, this does seem to be

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty similar in history has a tendency to repeat itself,

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and I blame the conventions we used to denote what

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the date is. C e S is about to go

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>into full swings starting tomorrow, January five. Several high profile

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>companies had pulled out of appearing in person at the event,

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>citing concerns about COVID. But the show must go on,

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>according to the Consumer Technology Association, that's the group that

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>organizes the huge trade show, and we're hearing about some

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff that's going to be shown off at

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the event. One of those things is the new Eco

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>remote from Samsung. Last year, Samsung introduced the first Eco remote,

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>which has a small solar panel on it, so you

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>can actually recharge your your remote batteries by you know,

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>leaving it in the sunlight. This year, Samsung has also

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>incorporated radio frequency harvesting capabilities, meaning that the remote has

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a small antenna inside it and it can pick up

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>radio frequency waves from your home's WiFi network and then

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>convert those radio frequency waves to electricity, and that electricity

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>can go towards charging the battery. Now, I'm sure lots

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of people will liken this idea to that of Nikola Tesla,

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the one you know he had talked about transmating electricity

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>through the air more than a century ago. Here's the thing,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the basis for a lot of wireless charging technology,

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and radio itself actually works on a very similar principle. Anyway,

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Samsung's move is to get away from the use of

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>triple A batteries, and using a rechargeable battery could mean

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>cutting down on a great deal of waste over time,

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>which I think is a pretty good thing to aim for.

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>In other ce s, news Wired reports that a company

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>called Smarty Pair has introduced Leo's LU two. And if

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what that is, where the heck have

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you been. So it's a smart cat litter box. Yep,

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a self cleaning cat litter box that also monitors

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff like your cat's weight and you know how frequently

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>your furry little friend is heading to the toilets and

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>you can access the information with an app. Now, I

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>know that on the surface of it that might sound

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like crazy, but that's actually really useful information to have

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>if you need to, say, talk to a vet about

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>your cats health. So while on the surface, This might

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>seem like overkill or perhaps you know, a gross in

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>vage asian of your kitty cats privacy. It's actually a

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty smart idea for those who want to make sure

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>their pets are healthy. Also, it is compatible with Alexa

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and um a an assistant at rhymes with schmoogle. I

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>don't say it because I actually have a smart speaker

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>in this room, and when I tried to do it before,

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it activated and interrupted my recording, so this is technically

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the second take of the sentence. Anyway, My point is

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that the cat smart cat litter boxes also compatible with

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>those you know, the virtual assistance, so you can control

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 1>settings on the cat litter box using those devices. It

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>also has a UV radiation method of sanitizing the cat

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>litter box. It also has sensors that can detect when

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a cat is nearby, so it doesn't just automatically turn

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>on and scare your kitty cat. So kind of a

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>neat idea. I don't own any cats, and I frequently

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>smack my head when I run into smart appliances, thinking

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that they might go a little too far or be

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a little ridiculous. But I actually can see the use

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>for this one, so while it on the surface made

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>me laugh, the more I thought about, the more I thought, no, wait,

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a practical use. T. S. Eliot would

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>be proud, and I'm sure we'll have a lot more

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to say about C E S later in the week.

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>So on Thursday, I'll try and do a roundup of

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the more interesting things that were shown off

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>during the event. In the meantime, I'll be glad that

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I am covering it from my home rather than in

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. Well, we've got a little bit more news

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to cover, but before we get to that, let's take

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>another quick break. Okay, international news. The German Minister of

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Justice announced that the country is moving to abolish any

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>data retention from telecommunications activities if there are no good

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>reasons for holding onto that information, or rather that the

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>minister is inclined to do as much. The minister said,

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>quote I reject data retention without any reason and would

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>like to remove it from the law once and for all.

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>It violates fundamental rights end quote. This would be bring

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>German law more in line with European Union law, so

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the stuff that is in German law

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is superseded by EU law. Anyway, So a lot of

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the elements about data retention have been suspended, and this

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is really more of a move to just say, let's

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and make it our law as well, not

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>just EU law. But it also means that if there

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is a specific and presumably legitimate reason to retain data

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that would still be on the table, you would still

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to do that. But should the Minister's desire

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>be made into law, it would be illegal under German

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>law for companies to collect any and all data and

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>just store it indefinitely while possibly just waiting around for

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>a way to exploit that information. This actually reminds me

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of the early days of smartphone apps, in which app

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>stores did not place restrictions on developers, and developers could

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>essentially create any kind of app that could collect all

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>sorts of data, not just the information that the app

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>needed to do whatever it was it was doing. So,

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, you might download a game on your smartphone

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and it turns out that it's also tracking your location

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, all this other stuff uh in the

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>background without your knowledge. And in the early days that

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>was kind of you know, just it was happening, and

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't until you know, Schmoogle and Apple really started

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to crack down on that and say no, you can

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>only get access to the data that your app actually

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>needs to work, and you have to ask permission first.

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It's only when that happened when we started to see

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>this change. In fact, this was kind of what was

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. But we're

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing a rejection of that practice in many places as

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>there is a growing concern that this data could be

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>abused and it could violate the privacy of citizens and consumers.

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Over in China, the government has continued the suspension of

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>new game licenses within the country, and this means that

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>app developers who are working on games intended for various

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>platforms are kind of stuck. The government requires anyone who

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 1>is developing a game or updating a game to first

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>acquire a license to sell games within China, so with

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>this suspension, there's effectively a halt on all new game

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>developers within the country. Apparently, this has led to nearly

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty thousand small game studios to shut down

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>because there's just there's no way for them to operate

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a business without obtaining a license, and all licenses are

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>currently suspended all new licenses. That is, the suspension actually

0:22:55.640 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>began last year, but a lot of people were hoping

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>that China would lift it by two and instead it

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>appears to be set to continue at least in you know,

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in the near future, possibly indefinitely. As for why there's

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>suspension in the first place, the government has not issued

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:19.239
<v Speaker 1>a formal explanation, but the general guess is that this

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>ties into the government's campaign to battle what it calls

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a gaming addiction. The government has previously passed laws that

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>restrict the amount of time young people are allowed to

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>spend playing games, so it's probably tied in with that. Again,

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been an official explanation. Car manufacturing company hun

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Day has ended all development on internal combustion engine vehicles,

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>shifting engineers over to develop new electric vehicles also known

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>as e vs. Engineers will refocus to develop new electric

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>power trains for cars, and the move makes sense. More

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and more countries are setting deadlines in which all new

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>vehicles sold within those countries will have to be electric

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>vehicles at some date, and this is on an effort

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>to cut back on CEO two emissions and meet global deadlines.

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>In the fight against climate change. The general thought is that, uh,

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you will still be allowed to sell used vehicles that

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>are internal combustion engine vehicles, but no new cars on

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the market will be allowed to be I sees. They

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>have to be electric vehicles or possibly hybrids. Um, that's

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the play here. Now, one thing that

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>has been part of the conversation around this switch to

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles is whether they are actually more quote unquote

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>green than internal combustion engine vehicles. Now, it's obvious that

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>a gasoline or diesel powered engine is going to generate

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 1>emissions and an electric vehicle isn't. Right, evs don't generate emissions,

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But then you have to take in the bigger picture,

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>like the manufacturing processes, and then you have ask okay, well,

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>does it still make sense our e vs still more

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>environmentally friendly than combustion engine vehicles or is the process

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to build e vs more harmful than operating a fleet

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of gas powered cars. Well, the International Council on Clean

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Transportation recently released a report that shows producing a medium

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sized gas powered car would create around seven point two

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>tons of carbon emissions. That's just the manufacturing process. Building

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a similarly sized electric vehicle creates nine point to carbon emissions,

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>so an ev would generate two more tons of c

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>O two in the production process than an internal combustion car.

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Most of that comes from the production of the e

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>VS battery. It's a carbon intensive process. However, the same

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>study found that a car in England would make up

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>for that carbon debt and electric car after driving just

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand, sixty one miles. In the UK and in England,

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the average distance traveled per year for the first three

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>years of a new car is ten thousand, four hundred

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>miles each, So, in other words, for the first three

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>years of owning a new car, the average person is

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>driving ten thousand, four hundred miles per year. That means

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>that the production side of evs is front loaded with

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions. It does generate more CEO two than building

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 1>combustion engine cars. However, after just one year of use,

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the electric vehicle would be responsible for fewer carbon emissions

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>than a gas powered car would, because, of course, the

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>gas powered car continues to emit c O two as

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it's being operated. Of course, there are other factors that

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.479
<v Speaker 1>you have to bring into consideration as well, such as

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>where the electricity that charged the EV's battery came from UH.

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>This is why stuff like carbon emissions gets really tricky,

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>because there's so many different factors to consider. But with

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>more of an emphasis on renewable energy sources, the ecosystem

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>for evs can be one that produces far less carbon

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>than our old gas guzzlind ways. And that is the

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>news for Tuesday, January two. We'll be back on Thursday

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>with some more news, hopefully some more stuff about c

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>e s. I'll keep an eye out on it. If

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in touch with me, you can

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>always drop me a line on Twitter. The handle for

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the show is text Stuff H s W and I'll

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.