WEBVTT - The Rise and Fall of Vine

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio,

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and how the tech are you? You know, there are

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a ton of stories that are just pouring out of

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter the company these days, thanks to Elon Musk cleaning

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>house and shaking things super hard so that you know,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>all the spare change comes flying out of pockets. And

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>one of those stories is that Musk is reportedly interested

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:44.919
<v Speaker 1>in bringing back the video sharing service Vine. He tweeted

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>out a poll asking if Twitter should bring back that

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>video platform, and Musk has a habit of creating polls

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>crafted to get high engagement, so at first it was

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a little tricky to gauge whether this was an earnest

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:04.119
<v Speaker 1>indication that the dead product is headed toward a resurrection.

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>But Axios reports that sources within Twitter have been told

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to get to work on a rebooted version of Vine,

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>with the goal of having it launched by year's end,

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>which is coming up pretty darn soon. So it's a

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>very aggressive timetable. But from what we hear inside Twitter,

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that seems like that's kind of Musk's m O right now,

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, you know what, in the meantime, how

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>about I talked about the previous incarnation of Vine, because

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it really felt like Vine was a product ahead of

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>its time, one that at its height was extremely popular

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and helped pave the way for TikTok later on, as

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>well as like Instagram reels and that kind of stuff.

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So what is the story on Vine. Well, it all

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>began back in two thousand and twelve at a company

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>called jet Center. There were three colleagues at this company,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hoffman, Russ Yusuprov and Uh and Colin Kroll, and

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>they were working for this hotel booking travel site. Kroll

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>was the CTO. Hoffman was a developer, Yusupov was a designer,

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>and this company would later get acquired by trip Advisor

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand thirteen. But by then these three guys

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>had moved on. They were all in their mid twenties

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>at this time in two thousand twelve, and they found

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>they had a common desire to create something of their own.

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>They all had had experience working at different companies and

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>they kind of wanted to make their own startup and

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they were gravitating toward social networks and services, which in

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve was pretty much what everyone was interested

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in tapping into. Moreover, while social media sites like Facebook

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>would let you share posts with your friends, and Twitter

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>would let you share what you were having for lunch

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>with friends and strange yours, and Instagram let you share photos,

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>no one had really landed on a good mobile app

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to create, edit and share videos. You know, this was

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a pretty tricky time to do that because we were

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>not yet in a really mobile broadband era, so there

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>was some opportunity there for someone to go in and

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>create something that could really make a big splash. So

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they decided they were going to create a smartphone video app,

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>an app made to create, edit and share videos. Uh.

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And they wanted something beyond just a point and shoot approach, right.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>They really wanted something where creators could make innovative videos.

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>They could actually do their video in a series of edits,

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>so they wouldn't have to just do one long take.

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>You can actually divide that up. And their approach was

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple when they designed it. They would have a

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>record feature where you would hold your finger down on

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the screen to record, and if you lifted your finger

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>off the screen, then the recording would pause and it

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>would be a cut, and then when you put your

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>finger down again, it would start recording again, so you

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>could create videos through a series of cuts. This way,

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>it was the simplest, most primitive type of in camera editing,

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>but it created an opportunity for really innovative people to

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>use the app to tell stories. In fact, there are

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>some truly uh phenomenal creators who use this very simple

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>approach to make really compelling or hilarious or inspiring videos.

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>In some cases now early on in the development process,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>this is before they launched the app, they weren't really

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking of a time limit for videos. They were just

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>letting you go for as long as you needed to go,

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and then once you were done, you could share your

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>video with others. But since they were focusing on smartphones

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and people were mostly sharing things like their friends who

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>were testing this, we're mostly sharing things that by texting

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>each other, limitations and bandwidth as well as storage meant

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that they really had to start thinking about setting a

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>time limit or else the videos created would be so

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>large that uh it would gum up your phone to

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>try and send one to someone else, and it would

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>be a frustrating experience. So they decided, well, we need

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to limit how long these videos can be for the

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>purposes of utility, and it had to be something that

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>could be share able. And you couldn't really just share

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a ten minute long video instantly from one phone to another,

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>like like sending a photograph was simple, but sending a

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>long video was another matter. So they started to experiment

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>with different time limits. They ultimately decided to limit the

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>videos to around six seconds, six and a half something

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>like that. And that is a short amount of time, Like,

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't do a whole lot in six seconds. You

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>can do more than you might think, but you know,

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously it is a strict limit. This would be long

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>enough to send a quick video. You know, maybe you

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>want to wish someone a happy birthday, or you have

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>a corny dad joke that you want to use to

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>make your buddies cringe. That would be my way of

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>using it if I were to take advantage of Vine today.

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But six seconds is really short. It would be really

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>easy to miss what's going on as you play a video. Right,

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you get a video and you push play.

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>If it's only six seconds long, and you're fumbling for

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>earbuds or something, You've already missed the video by the

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>time you turn back to it. So the team made

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>another decision that would give Vine it's particular kind of

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>twist its character. They designed the app so that when

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you opened the video, the video would automatically loop once

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it reached its end, so go right back to the beginning.

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, each video is just six or so seconds long,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>but it will keep looping until you stop bit. The

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>app would allow users to also comment on posted videos,

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>so it created a more social experience rather than just

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, sharing videos back and forth. That there was

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a user generated content part of the response as well,

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and that made a big difference. The three decided that

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>they would call the app Vine, and they founded their

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>company in the summer of two thousand and twelve. Now

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they were still working on that app four months later

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in October, but then they got an offer they couldn't

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>or at least didn't refuse, though at least one of

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the founders said in subsequent times that he wishes they

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>had refused it. We'll get to that. And the offer

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>came from Drumroll Please Twitter, and the offer was for

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a reported thirty million dollars, So you're looking at three

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>co founders. That's ten million apiece. Not bad, that's a

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of check. Also a side note, while I was

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>researching this, actually came across a site that has a

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>really bad typo in it because that site claimed that

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the sale was for thirty billion dollars. That is a

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a big difference. I think if the offer had been

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in the billions, the founders wouldn't have felt any regret

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>at all about selling out in two thousand twelve, I mean,

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>why would you. Anyway, Twitter was on a bit of

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a tear back in two thousand and twelve. The company

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>had already acquired several other companies and products. They included

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>ones like Summifi, Posterous, Daisy, and rest Engine, among several others.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>That's just for two thousand twelve. So Twitter was on

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>like this crazy growth streak and was in a boom period.

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of funny because while the company had

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>first started launching monetization strategies in twenty two years earlier,

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be until two thousand eighteen that Twitter would

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>post its first profitable quarter. So while they were generating revenue,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they were by no means profitable, and yet Twitter was

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>scooping up lots of other companies all along the way,

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>so that was kind of a crazy thing. In fact,

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:17.959
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the elements that people point to a

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter saying that perhaps this is a company that has

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a history of questionable management decisions. Uying at this point

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>was a jang Kee Unstable app that the three colleagues

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>had basically only really shared with their close friends, and

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>so they're close friends were acting as beta testers. They

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.199
<v Speaker 1>were trying out the app, creating videos, sending them to

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>each other, and then giving feedback on what their experience

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>was like. And initially the app had some pretty interesting

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>limitations too. For example, at first the app only allowed

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you to record with the back facing camera on an iPhone,

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, with your basic smartphone, the higher resolution

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>camera is on the back, so at least that means

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got the better of the cameras as your camera

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>for your vines. But it also meant that if you

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>want to make a vine of yourself, like in selfie mode,

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you would have to do it with the screen facing

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>away from you because only the back camera would work.

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's really hard to tell if you had framed

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the video up properly, and for a video with multiple cuts,

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.719
<v Speaker 1>if you screwed up a later cut, like you get

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>your first cut, you know, your first, your first segment,

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's perfect. You start your second and something goes wrong,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, whatever it may be, maybe you flubb a line,

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe a light goes out, whatever it is, you would

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have to go back to the beginning and start all

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>over again, or you would just have to live with

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever the mistake was in the video and send it

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>out that way, you could not delete a single segment

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and just redo that segment. You had to start from

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the beginning. Twitter saw potential in this product. The acquisition

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>would bring the three Vine co founders over to Twitter itself.

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>There they would continue for a time working on the

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>app with the goal of launching it under the Twitter umbrella.

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It also meant signing over the exclusive rights to their

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>creation to Twitter. So they took the deal, and uh,

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>like Lando Calrisian, some of them felt that that deal

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>was getting worse all the time. I'll explain more when

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we come back from this quick break. So Twitter acquires

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Vine in October two thousand twelve. Keep in mind the

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>app has not launched yet. People are starting to hear

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about it because it had some buzz. I mean, Twitter

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>heard about it, but it was in a closed beta,

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's not like it was in widespread distribution. What

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>followed Twitter's acquisition was three months of intense development and

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in January. In fact, on January two thousand thirteen, the

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Vine app would officially launch on the Apple App Store,

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and it became popular fairly quickly. In fact, it hit

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the top of Apple's charts by April. For the free

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>apps available on iOS, Android users would have to wait

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>until June second of two thousand thirteen, and Windows Phone,

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>which was still a thing back then, would get its

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>version in November two thousand thirteen. Now, the launch of

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Vine gave birth to a really wild and weird era

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 1>of user creativity. Some vines were pretty straightforward. You might

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>get a sixth second clip of someone singing or playing

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a song, for example, and that actually helped launch a

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>few careers in the music business. You had people who

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>got discovered because they had created a viral vine of

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>them singing some popular song. Other vines were comedy bits,

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>usually in bell with fun edits to emphasize an absurd punchline.

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 1>A few folks got really good at creating six second

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>long videos that used edit to editing these cuts to

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>create effects that would actually be impossible to pull off

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in the real world. Like you might be running toward

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a wall and then because of a cut, it looks

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like you've just passed through the wall by magic right

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>just magically telepoint to the other side of the wall.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>That was something that was possible if you were really

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>good at framing up your video and you had a

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>clever edit in there. A lot of these would take

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of trial and error to get just right,

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to get the angle right, to get the timing right,

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and the payoff was you would get these six second videos.

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>They're really awesome. I mean, six seconds isn't a long time,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>but it also means it's not enough time to get bored. Right,

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>if you watch a vine that's a bad vine, don't worry,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it's over in six seconds and you can watch something else.

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And the really good ones made you appreciate how much

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>work must have gone in to making just those six

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>seconds of entertainment. Now, creating a good vine took imagination,

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it took skill, at least took some sort of demonstrable

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>talent on screen. There were some arguably very dumb videos

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that became viral on Vine. Does anyone out there remember

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the series of vines featuring comedian Will Sasso inexplicably spitting

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>up whole lemons. There was an entire string of them,

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of ones that hit it big showed

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>incredible ingenuity. I don't know if the limit thing showed ingenuity,

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>It certainly showed absurdity, and I will admit that at

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the time I thought they were hilarious. I actually rewatched

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>them in preparation for this episode, and as I rewatched them,

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought boy passed Jonathan had a difference it's of

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>humor than current Jonathan does. Under Twitter's ownership, Vine got

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>some new features, so over to time the app evolved. Uh.

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>For example, eventually creators were able to put their content

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>into different categories so that it was easier to discover

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>their work. So instead of it just being a catch

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>all where you go to Vine and like all the

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>vines you're seeing are just random videos, you could explore

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>specific subcategories, so stuff like comedy. You know, all the

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>would be SNL writers could file their vines and comedy,

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>all the editing geniuses can make crazy effects and put

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>their work under the category of art and experimental that

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. They also had dedicated categories for things

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like cats and then dogs, which I appreciate because you know,

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're a if you're a dog person, you might

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be just tired of all the cat videos online. You

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>just want to go straight to the puppies. Another big

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>update was the long awaited support for front facing cameras

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that made it far easier to create selfie style videos,

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so that did emerge Under Twitter's ownership of Vine. Twitter

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>also introduced a retweet like feature, in fact, it was

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>called revine, where users could post vines that they loved

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to their own feeds and help boost the signal. They

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>could even post it to other platforms. At one point.

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Vine also introduced a web based version, so you didn't

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>have to just use your smartphone too, you know, search

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>all the vines and watch them. You could actually do

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it from your desktop computer. It also introduced a counter

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that would register every single loop of a video, so

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it was a loop counter, and that definitely helped with

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>engagement too, because I don't know about you, but if

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I see that there's a video that has a huge

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>number of views under it, and I'm already kind of

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>interested in the topic. I'm more likely to click on

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the video because the implication there is this video is

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>one that's worth watching. Look at how many people have

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>seen it. Now we all know that that's not necessarily

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the case. Sometimes you watch one of those videos you think,

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>while this was garbage, but you know it's it's kind

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>of a natural inclination. You see something that's popular, you

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>get curious about it, so you check it out for yourself.

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>At its height, Vine saw two hundred million monthly active users.

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>It was a rousing success from that perspective, with brands

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and celebrities jumping onto Vine in order to take advantage

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of the apps reach, because obviously, anytime we have any

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:35.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of communication tool that ends up being remotely successful,

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>you typically see people try and take advantage of it

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in order to extend their own brand, whether that's a

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>company or a celebrity. I did not, despite the fact

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>that I arguably have a brand, something that's difficult for

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>me to reconcile on a day to day basis, I

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>never got into Vine. I mean I watched them, but

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I never created them, uh, which probably explain pans my

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>limited reach anyway, it was also making brand new celebrities.

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Not only were celebrities making use of Vine, Vine was

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>creating celebrities itself, like the Paul Brothers and a lot

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of popular Vine creators went on to create even bigger

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>success in other venues from music to Twitch, to YouTube, etcetera.

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>As Vine was launching on Android, Facebook, the company, so

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we would call it meta today, was doing what Facebook

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>does best. And by that I mean the company is

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>famous for either acquiring any competition out there that could

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>potentially pull eyeballs away from Facebook products, or it launches

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>its own version of whatever the popular thing is in

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.239
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to grab some of those eyeballs. So in

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>this case, Facebook, in the form of Instagram, introduced a

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>way to record short videos and then share them through Instagram.

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>So this became uh kind of a competitor to Vine.

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, a lot of people called it out as

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>a blatantly obvious attempt of Facebook trying to get in

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on Vine's game. Now, this spurred of back and forth

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of tug of war between Twitter slash Vine and

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Facebook slash Instagram. Instagram initially allowed users to record videos

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that were up to fifteen seconds long, so more than

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>twice the length of Vine. A little bit later, Instagram

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>increase that to a full sixty seconds, so you could

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>record an entire minute of video. Twitter slash Vine responded

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 1>by allowing a certain subset of creators, like some of

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the more popular creators on the platform, to record videos

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>that were up to one hundred forty seconds long. And

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you might say, well, that seems like an arbitrary number

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of seconds, but then you need to remember that at

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>at that time, back in those days, Twitter had a

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>strict character limit of one forty This was before Twitter

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>stended that to to eight, so you can only post

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter messages that were up to a hundred forty characters long.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So it was kind of consistent, right, a hundred forty

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>characters videos could be a hundred forty seconds cute. Another

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.719
<v Speaker 1>competitor to Vine at this time was Snapchat. Snapchat had

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>actually launched before Hoffman, Yusupov, and Kroll got the idea

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>for Vine, so that had already been out. But Snapchat

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>started as a a photo sharing app where the photos

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>would disappear after a certain amount of time, and Snapchat

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>then introduced the ability to take videos of up to

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>ten seconds in length towards the end of two thousand twelve,

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>so still before Vine even launched. By two thousand fifteen,

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Snapchat was adding other features to its video creation tools

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>to set it apart from Instagram and Vine, which created

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>more competition in the space. And I think there were

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:01.479
<v Speaker 1>two major factors that ultimately doomed Vine. One was that

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>while Twitter added some features to the app, the company

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>never really put full support behind Vine. They never made

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it a leader in the video sharing space once competition

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>began to ramp up. You know, they enjoyed the number

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>one spot briefly, but they didn't do anything to hold

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>onto that, or they didn't do enough. I guess they

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>did do stuff, they just didn't do enough. But another

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>reason that it was doomed was because of something Twitter

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>had been struggling with since, which was finding an effective

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>way to monetize the product. Creators were starting to migrate

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to other platforms, with some of them going to YouTube

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>where they could create longer videos and see direct benefits

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>from monetization. You know, Vine, the best way of of

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>really profiting from it was to leverage your popularity to

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>make money in some secondary way. You know, maybe you

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>get a sponsorship deal. Maybe someone discovers you, but you're

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>not really making money from Vine itself, and in late

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>two thousand sixteen, Twitter announced it would be shutting down

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Vine in the coming months. Initially, Twitter would keep vines

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 1>available for people to search and to watch, but the

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>ability to upload new content would go away. Twitter did

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>attempt to resuscitate Vine in two thousand seventeen by integrating

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the features of Vine into Twitter. The company launched a

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>new app called Vine Camera, which would allow users to

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>create Vine style videos, but there was no longer a

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Vine app that you would use to share those videos too,

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>so instead you essentially had two options. You could either

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>keep your videos on your your Vine cameras camera roll,

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>where I guess you could enjoy it yourself whenever you liked,

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>or you could share your new Vine style video on Twitter.

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The Vine community died out pretty quickly. Creators had already

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>started to move to other platforms, and Twitter's lackluster support

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>really meant that there wasn't much there there. Twitter did

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>allow folks to continue to access an archive of Vine

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>videos until two thousand nineteen, and at that point Twitter

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>even shut down the archive, and Vine itself was dead.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>There's some vines that that live on because people downloaded

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>them and then shared them to YouTube, but otherwise they're

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>lost to the the mists of time. We're gonna take

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>another quick break. When we come back, we'll talk about

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>what happened with the Vine co founders, as well as

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about Twitter's plan to bring Vine back.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>But first let's take a break. Okay, let's have a

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>quick rundown on what happened to vines three co founders.

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And before I get into it, I do want to

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>give a trigger warning couple of them. Actually this story

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>includes tragedy. I will warn you again when I get there.

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll save that for the third of the three co founders.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>So first up is Dom Hoffman. Initially, he served as

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the lead general manager for Vine while he was at Twitter,

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>but he made the decision to leave Twitter in two

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen to go and work on another startup. For

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>several years, he teased something that he was calling v

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>two and in he announced Bite b y t E,

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>which was a short form video app that would let

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>folks create, edit, and share short, looped videos. Sounds familiar,

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I bet Bite went into a closed beta in two

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen, it became an official app both on Google

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh an Apple. At this point, whendows Phone was

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>bye bye in early a year later. In fact, almost

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly a year after the app launched on Apple and Google,

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>another short form video app company called Clash acquired Bite.

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Very curious about that. I didn't find a whole lot

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>of information about that because it didn't dig too deeply

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>into this part. But I do want to follow up

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>on that because I wonder what Dom Hoffman's thought process was,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>because he had already gone through this before, where he

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>had sold Vine to Twitter, now Bite to Clash. Clash

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and Bite would ultimately merge together. Initially it was an

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>app that was still called Clash, but later it got

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>rebranded into one called Huddles. Next up, we have russ Yusupov.

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I might have said us of prov previously.

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>There is no r in his last name up, So

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>if I did do that, which I suspect I did,

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>my apologies. When Twitter announced it was shutting down Vine,

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Yusupov famously tweeted, don't sell your company, which that was

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the person who expressed regret that I alluded to earlier

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>in this episode. Now at that point, Usupov had already

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>left Twitter himself. In late two thousand fifteen, Recode reported

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that Yusupov was fired as part of widespread layoffs. So

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't like he was fired for any specific reason,

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>but rather Twitter was downsizing and he was part of that.

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>But he then went on to co found a company

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>called Intermedia Labs. This company would launch an app called

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>h Q Trivia in the summer of two thousand seventeen.

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I could do a full episode on

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>HQ Trivia because whole golly that story. If you're unfa

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>emilier with HQ Trivia, the way it worked was this,

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you would use an app to tune into a live

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>trivia broadcast, so it was happening in real time. You

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>would join a crowd of however many other players as

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you try and answer increasingly difficult trivia questions. I think

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 1>there were twelve per game, and if you made it

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>all the way through, then you got a share of

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the cash prize for that contest. How much you got

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>depended upon not just the purse for the game, but

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>how many other people made it all the way through, right,

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>because he would just divide it up at that point

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in early HQ Trivia shut down. This was in February

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of investors refused to pour more money into it, and

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>without the money then there was no way to continue

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>supporting it, so it temporarily went down. The app had

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>seen a huge spike in popularity early on when it

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>launched in two thousand seventeen, but even a year later

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>that had dropped significantly. The viralty had worn out, it

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>had dropped and then plateaued to a much smaller user base,

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and Yusupov was ultimately able to bring the game back

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>online in a slightly different incarnation after securing another deal,

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's not really the same experience as it once

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>was now. Within that time frame of Yusupov leaving Twitter,

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>found co founding this company, the launch of HQ Trivia,

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it's subsequent shutting down and then relaunch, there was scandal

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and a tragedy that we have to talk about that

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>involves the third vine, co founder, Colin Crawl, And this

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is the bit that has the trigger warnings associated with it,

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of them. They relate to sexual harassment and

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the issue of drug overdose. So if you don't want

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to hear any right totally understand. I just want to

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>give that trigger warning out before we get into it now.

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Unlike Hoffman and Yusupov, or possibly Yusupov, Kroll didn't leave

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter on his own terms. It's possible that Yusupov also

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>was laid off. Recode reported that, but other reports say

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Yusupov chose to leave Twitter once it became clear that

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Vine was not going to get the support he felt

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it needed. Either way, Kroll definitely did not leave Twitter

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>by choice. According to multiple news outlets, he was fired

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>from Twitter. Why was he fired, Well, the main reason,

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>according to all these sources is that he was just

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:45.719
<v Speaker 1>bad at his job. He had a bad management style,

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>so however he was managing people, was rubbing everyone the

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>wrong way. But on top of that, there were multiple

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>reports that he was making women at Twitter very uneasy,

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that he was being creepy and creating a hostile work environment.

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the language points at him engaging in

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>various forms of sexual harassment, although nothing goes so far

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>as to say that outright, at least nothing that I

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>came across, you know, maybe like third hand reports kind

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of go there. But the stuff I saw that was

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>reporting directly upon his his leaving of Twitter. And you

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>know how this came up because it came up during

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>due diligence when companies investors were looking into intermediate labs.

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>That's where you start seeing these reports that he made

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>women uneasy. So again, at the very least, he made

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a hostile work environment, and it was bad enough for

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter to give him his walking papers in two thousand

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen. Again, whether that was because of the harassment

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>issue or if it was over because of bad management,

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Like what the the straw that broke

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the camel's back, so to speak, I don't know what

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that was. I will say it's pretty rare to read

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>about companies firing people for being bad managers. In Silicon Valley.

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of bad managers out there, and you

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:13.719
<v Speaker 1>don't hear about most of them getting fired. So this

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>was kind of an outlier. But Krall went on to

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>co found Intermedia Labs with russ Yusupov, so the two

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of them made the company together. So he was also

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>involved with this company that launched HQ Trivia. In two

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen, Kroll and Yusupov got into a really nasty

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>battle for control of the company, Yusupov had been CEO,

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and Kroll had reached a point where he was in

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>disagreement with the way Yusupov was was running the company.

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>HQ Trivia had already started to come down from its

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>viral hit from the year before, so again in ten

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the was a very different picture than so things were

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>uncertain and the two co founders disagreed on the direction

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that the company should take, and specifically on what to

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>do about HQ Trivia. Kroll then reportedly found a sympathetic

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>board member, and with that board member they were able

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to force Yusupov to resign as CEO and Kroll took

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:25.479
<v Speaker 1>his place. So now Colin Kroll became CEO of Intermedia Labs.

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>An employee had actually filed a complaint against Kroll before

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>he became CEO, calling his management style aggressive, So this

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't relate to, you know, sexual harassment claims, but it

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>did say that Kroll was not a good manager, which

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>again was what we had heard when he left Twitter.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But despite that hr filed report, the board approved Colin

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Crawl to move into the CEO position. This was September two,

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>eighteen three months later, he be dead on December seventeen,

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen, news outlets reported that police had found

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Colin Kroll unresponsive and dead inside his New York apartment

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>when they were called in to do a wellness check

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>on him. Found in his apartment was an envelope containing

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>white powder, which obviously led to suspicions that Kroll had

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>died from an overdose. Those suspicions were later confirmed when

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the medical examiner revealed that traces of heroin, cocaine, and

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>fetnel were found in his system, among other things. In

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the wake of Kroll's death, Yusupov came back to Intermedia

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Labs and was reinstated as CEO. That whole story is

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>quite dramatic and will be part of a documentary that

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe is slated to come out next year. So

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we should see a whole documentary about HQ Trivia, I think,

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is the way they're they're framing it. So they're probably

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at, you know, how successful it was upon launch.

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:08.280
<v Speaker 1>This really dramatic turn as two co founders turn against

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>each other, the subsequent tragic death of one of them,

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and then the slow, agonizing fading of the of the

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>game over the following two years, so that's what's happened

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:28.439
<v Speaker 1>with Vine's co founders. As for Vine itself, Musk does

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>seem interested in bringing it back, and in a world

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>that already has TikTok in it as well as Snapchat, Instagram,

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Reel's YouTube shorts. I really wonder if Vine could make

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a comeback and carve out a place of its own.

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I suspect the move is one of those that's seen

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>as necessary because of Twitter wants to attract more users

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to the platform. It's got to do something in order

0:34:55.719 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to make that happen. If we're to believe the numerous

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>people who have said that they're leaving Twitter. Now that

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Musk is in charge, the platform is going to require

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>all the help it can get. For the record, I

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 1>suspect that a ton of people who talk about leaving

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.240
<v Speaker 1>are not actually going to leave, a significant fewer number

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 1>will actually leave the platform, But we'll have to wait

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and see. As for myself, I am very rarely on Twitter.

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm mostly just there to check the tech stuff hs

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>w handle to see if you've reached out, to give

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>me suggestions for future topics of episodes. And that's how

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we end this episode, reminding you that if you do

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 1>want me to talk about something specific, One way is

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to send me a message on Twitter. So if you're

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, if you're still there, if you haven't walked away,

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>then you can send a message to tech Stuff HSW

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>That's how you can get in touch with me. The

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>other way to get in touch is to download the

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app, which is free to download and use.

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>You can navigate over to tech Stuff by putting tech

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Stuff in the search field. It will pop on over

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast page and there you'll see a little microphone.

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>If you click on that microphone, you can record a

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>message up to thirty seconds in length. Let me know

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>what you would like me to talk about in the future.

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>You can also let me know if you would like

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>me to include your message in a future episode. I

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>do not do that by default. I will only do

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it if you tell me it's okay. So if you

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 1>would rather not have your voice heard on a future podcast,

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that's totally fine. Just you know, don't tell me I

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 1>can use it and I won't. That's it. I hope

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you are all well, and I hope you enjoyed this

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 1>look back on Vine and influential Flash in the Pan

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>app that may see it returns in the near future,

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Text Stuff

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>is an I heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>or where are you listen to your favorite shows?