1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:12,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene 2 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg The 5 00:00:34,120 --> 00:00:37,360 Speaker 1: Big Story then worldwide, the President's men heading to Beijing, 6 00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:40,720 Speaker 1: top officials from the administration arriving for trade talks as 7 00:00:40,800 --> 00:00:43,280 Speaker 1: China says it's not willing to back down on key issues, 8 00:00:43,520 --> 00:00:47,000 Speaker 1: and investors are left asking what is the minimum condition 9 00:00:47,040 --> 00:00:50,479 Speaker 1: for success of this visit. We're joined now by Steven Stanley, 10 00:00:50,520 --> 00:00:54,040 Speaker 1: Amherst Pierpont Securities chief Economists. So Stephen, let's put that 11 00:00:54,160 --> 00:00:57,160 Speaker 1: question to you. What is the minimum condition for success 12 00:00:57,200 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 1: at this visit? Good morning. I think if they if 13 00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:03,360 Speaker 1: they get back home and they haven't started like a 14 00:01:03,880 --> 00:01:07,080 Speaker 1: an elean an escalation of the trade war, I'd probably 15 00:01:07,080 --> 00:01:09,320 Speaker 1: be pretty happy. I don't really expect much out of this. 16 00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:11,280 Speaker 1: That's how low the bar is. Stephen, Well, I just 17 00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:14,399 Speaker 1: I mean, as you said, the team is, uh, it's 18 00:01:14,480 --> 00:01:17,440 Speaker 1: kind of an unique team of individuals who aren't really 19 00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:21,160 Speaker 1: unnecessarily on the same page. Um and so I think, 20 00:01:21,319 --> 00:01:23,240 Speaker 1: you know, I'm not sure that the idea here was 21 00:01:23,280 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 1: to go over there and negotiate some huge agreement. I 22 00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:28,240 Speaker 1: think they're just trying to, uh, kind of set the 23 00:01:28,280 --> 00:01:31,319 Speaker 1: stage for the next, the next steps of this process. 24 00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:33,920 Speaker 1: Respected positions on trade seemed to have hardened, but on 25 00:01:33,959 --> 00:01:36,560 Speaker 1: other issues there things to be agreements. In fact, progress 26 00:01:36,680 --> 00:01:39,200 Speaker 1: on the issue with say, let's talk about North Korea. 27 00:01:39,600 --> 00:01:41,080 Speaker 1: That could be a positive, and it could be a 28 00:01:41,080 --> 00:01:44,040 Speaker 1: positive when when trade starts getting discussed as well. Do 29 00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:47,040 Speaker 1: you see those two issues folded into one another? Oh? Absolutely, 30 00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:49,520 Speaker 1: And and President Trump has been pretty explicit about that, 31 00:01:49,640 --> 00:01:52,040 Speaker 1: and uh, not only with China but with others, where 32 00:01:52,040 --> 00:01:53,640 Speaker 1: he said, We're willing to give you a break on 33 00:01:53,720 --> 00:01:56,440 Speaker 1: trade if you help us out in other areas. What's 34 00:01:56,440 --> 00:01:58,040 Speaker 1: your time horizon for how long it's going to take 35 00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:00,640 Speaker 1: to negotiate this This is a big visit it by 36 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:02,800 Speaker 1: any mates, it's an a pull and visit. But how 37 00:02:02,800 --> 00:02:05,480 Speaker 1: long would its tight two really sold? Well, it's gonna 38 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:08,160 Speaker 1: be months, I think before they figure out kind of 39 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:10,000 Speaker 1: what the deal is with these tariffs. And I think 40 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:12,400 Speaker 1: these are discussions that are gonna be going on for years. 41 00:02:13,919 --> 00:02:18,399 Speaker 1: Within this is the Steven Stanley view of the strength 42 00:02:18,560 --> 00:02:21,679 Speaker 1: of our economy. So let's start over on the right hand. 43 00:02:21,720 --> 00:02:25,160 Speaker 1: Started the equation net exports, which has to do with China. 44 00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:29,040 Speaker 1: We need more export growth. Isn't that the amorous Pierponts 45 00:02:29,080 --> 00:02:32,919 Speaker 1: solution to all this? Well? Certainly? Yeah. I mean we're 46 00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:35,480 Speaker 1: at a stage in the business cycle where the economy 47 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:38,520 Speaker 1: is pretty strong. Domestic demand is strong and probably stronger 48 00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:42,160 Speaker 1: than the overall global economy. So that we import German 49 00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:46,200 Speaker 1: BMW's you know, picked the vehicle from Germany volks Vegazin. 50 00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:50,480 Speaker 1: Isn't that a sign of a strong America? Sure? Sure? 51 00:02:50,639 --> 00:02:53,800 Speaker 1: And I think you know, certainly the the administration or 52 00:02:53,840 --> 00:02:56,600 Speaker 1: the President in particular, wants to get the trade deficit 53 00:02:56,680 --> 00:03:01,120 Speaker 1: down and very understandable, um thought. But in this stage 54 00:03:01,120 --> 00:03:04,720 Speaker 1: of the business cycle, typically the trade depsit is widening. Okay, 55 00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:07,920 Speaker 1: so we want to celebrate the imports coming in. I 56 00:03:07,919 --> 00:03:12,280 Speaker 1: guess we all get that. Then the solution is exports. 57 00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:16,239 Speaker 1: How do you boost the gradient of exports? Right? Well, 58 00:03:16,280 --> 00:03:17,880 Speaker 1: I think you know, one thing is you have to 59 00:03:17,919 --> 00:03:22,040 Speaker 1: make the US a a favorable place to do business, 60 00:03:22,200 --> 00:03:24,240 Speaker 1: and certainly I think the tax reform help that in 61 00:03:24,320 --> 00:03:27,800 Speaker 1: some in some aspects um, and you have to have 62 00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:30,320 Speaker 1: companies that can compete around the world. And then I 63 00:03:30,320 --> 00:03:32,320 Speaker 1: think what the administration would say is, then you have 64 00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:34,160 Speaker 1: to make sure that the rules of trade are fair. 65 00:03:34,440 --> 00:03:37,680 Speaker 1: And I think that's that's why they're going after China 66 00:03:37,720 --> 00:03:39,080 Speaker 1: and the way that they are is to try to 67 00:03:39,160 --> 00:03:41,400 Speaker 1: even the playing field in their minds. How important is 68 00:03:41,400 --> 00:03:45,160 Speaker 1: the FX market as a backstrop tool of this, Well, 69 00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:47,640 Speaker 1: you know, it's interesting the dollar has been weakening for 70 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:49,520 Speaker 1: the most part over the last year or two, at 71 00:03:49,560 --> 00:03:51,720 Speaker 1: a time when you would expect it to be strengthening. 72 00:03:51,840 --> 00:03:55,040 Speaker 1: If you're looking at the traditional things that I, as 73 00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:57,880 Speaker 1: an economist would look at, you're looking at rates, um, 74 00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:02,119 Speaker 1: you're looking at relative growth. Uh. Those with those things 75 00:04:02,120 --> 00:04:04,320 Speaker 1: would suggest that dollars should have been strengthening. It has 76 00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:06,920 Speaker 1: turned recently, and it'll be interesting to see if that 77 00:04:07,200 --> 00:04:09,280 Speaker 1: proved to be a sustained move. And John, I want 78 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:12,120 Speaker 1: to interrupt here. We have two tweets from the President 79 00:04:12,200 --> 00:04:14,800 Speaker 1: which implied a third tweet. We now have the third 80 00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:18,200 Speaker 1: tweet four minutes ago, which seems to have an ending 81 00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:21,320 Speaker 1: to it. These tweets are so lengthy, John, I'm not 82 00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:23,400 Speaker 1: going to read them all. It just takes too long 83 00:04:23,440 --> 00:04:27,360 Speaker 1: and too much valuable time from Stephen Stanley the President 84 00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:32,359 Speaker 1: and three lengthy John. Here's the key phrase, carefully written tweets. 85 00:04:33,279 --> 00:04:36,720 Speaker 1: Uh goes over this news to Mr Giuliani last night, 86 00:04:37,040 --> 00:04:41,520 Speaker 1: about Mr Cohen and about Ms Daniels Uh as well. 87 00:04:41,800 --> 00:04:45,960 Speaker 1: So we have three tweets out. I'll read the final sentence, John, 88 00:04:46,279 --> 00:04:50,560 Speaker 1: Money from the campaign or campaign contributions played no role 89 00:04:50,600 --> 00:04:54,240 Speaker 1: in this transaction. But it doesn't read. I will state 90 00:04:54,279 --> 00:04:57,520 Speaker 1: this not as an editorial comment, but just observing the 91 00:04:57,520 --> 00:05:01,560 Speaker 1: Bloomberg terminal, it doesn't read as a Trump tweet. There's 92 00:05:01,600 --> 00:05:05,320 Speaker 1: a typical Trump layout tweet. It looks very formable. I 93 00:05:05,320 --> 00:05:06,880 Speaker 1: think that's to take away from a lot of people 94 00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:08,920 Speaker 1: reading these tweets this morning. But I would also say 95 00:05:08,920 --> 00:05:11,600 Speaker 1: this just really isn't on wall streets radar, and it's 96 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:14,320 Speaker 1: absolutely But I think my point is we finally have 97 00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:17,280 Speaker 1: the third tweet I think of three tweets. I could 98 00:05:17,279 --> 00:05:20,200 Speaker 1: be wrong. Let's get to something that is on wall streets, right, John, 99 00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:23,360 Speaker 1: the effects market today some significant dollar weakness stunt. It's 100 00:05:23,400 --> 00:05:25,600 Speaker 1: come back through after a couple of weeks a dollar 101 00:05:25,640 --> 00:05:28,120 Speaker 1: strength Stephen. A lot of people thought a Federal Reserved 102 00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:30,719 Speaker 1: decision would be a total non event because there was 103 00:05:30,720 --> 00:05:33,679 Speaker 1: no news conference but the Federal Reserve. But being quite 104 00:05:33,760 --> 00:05:38,320 Speaker 1: clear about a symmetrical inflation target for less, can you 105 00:05:38,360 --> 00:05:41,800 Speaker 1: talk us through what a symmetrical inflation target is as 106 00:05:41,800 --> 00:05:45,320 Speaker 1: opposed to just targeting two sure? Well, I think traditionally 107 00:05:45,360 --> 00:05:48,840 Speaker 1: people have viewed a two percent inflation target as being 108 00:05:48,920 --> 00:05:53,640 Speaker 1: kind of lopsided. Anything above to the tolerance was very low. 109 00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:56,440 Speaker 1: So if it's one and a half, that's okay, But 110 00:05:56,520 --> 00:05:58,240 Speaker 1: if it's two and a half, that's a real problem 111 00:05:58,279 --> 00:06:00,320 Speaker 1: for the FED. And what the FED has based sickly 112 00:06:00,400 --> 00:06:03,920 Speaker 1: telling us is that they view themselves as having some 113 00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:06,240 Speaker 1: room on either side of two percent. So we've been 114 00:06:06,320 --> 00:06:09,480 Speaker 1: running below two percent now for the most part throughout 115 00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:12,440 Speaker 1: this expansion, um, and the FED is wanted to get 116 00:06:12,520 --> 00:06:15,040 Speaker 1: up to two percent. And what they're telling us is that, hey, look, 117 00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:17,320 Speaker 1: if we get to two point one, we're not hitting 118 00:06:17,320 --> 00:06:19,880 Speaker 1: the panic button right away. Um. And I think the 119 00:06:19,960 --> 00:06:23,440 Speaker 1: key there is partly is where you think the trend 120 00:06:23,520 --> 00:06:25,480 Speaker 1: is headed. So if we get to to one or 121 00:06:25,520 --> 00:06:28,120 Speaker 1: to two two, or even to two three, and the 122 00:06:28,120 --> 00:06:30,480 Speaker 1: FED thinks that we're going to level off, there that's 123 00:06:30,560 --> 00:06:33,279 Speaker 1: probably fine. If there were at two and at quarter 124 00:06:33,560 --> 00:06:35,120 Speaker 1: and they think we're headed to two and a half 125 00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:37,560 Speaker 1: or maybe even to three, that becomes a problem. So 126 00:06:37,560 --> 00:06:39,600 Speaker 1: here's the important question I think for for many people 127 00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:41,120 Speaker 1: in the market, and the reason we saw that we 128 00:06:41,120 --> 00:06:42,480 Speaker 1: could done it off the back of a lot of this, 129 00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:45,200 Speaker 1: that the Federal Reserve just endorse in inflation over shoot. 130 00:06:45,960 --> 00:06:48,320 Speaker 1: I think they did. I think they said and in 131 00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:51,159 Speaker 1: a number of individuals have have made that very clear 132 00:06:51,200 --> 00:06:53,920 Speaker 1: that hey, look we've run below two percent for years, 133 00:06:54,279 --> 00:06:56,479 Speaker 1: it's fine if we run above two percent for a while. 134 00:06:56,520 --> 00:06:58,600 Speaker 1: Which takes us to Europe where we have the inflation 135 00:06:58,600 --> 00:07:02,480 Speaker 1: print this morning, Tom Case, I mean East is important. 136 00:07:02,640 --> 00:07:04,680 Speaker 1: We have to think about that East. The last year, 137 00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:08,320 Speaker 1: of course, was in a pro easter. This tion more 138 00:07:08,440 --> 00:07:11,280 Speaker 1: inflation in the United Kingdom as well. Right, Yes, so 139 00:07:11,400 --> 00:07:13,480 Speaker 1: it's a thief and we knew where easter was and 140 00:07:13,480 --> 00:07:15,960 Speaker 1: the economists still got it dead wrong. So the inflation 141 00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:19,600 Speaker 1: story in Europe is just not picking up. Stephen. I 142 00:07:19,680 --> 00:07:20,880 Speaker 1: just want to how much of a problem this is 143 00:07:20,920 --> 00:07:25,320 Speaker 1: for President Racky. Well, in many ways Europe has been 144 00:07:25,520 --> 00:07:27,960 Speaker 1: it felt has felt like Europe has been behind the 145 00:07:28,040 --> 00:07:30,400 Speaker 1: US in the cycle by a couple of years. Maybe 146 00:07:30,520 --> 00:07:32,200 Speaker 1: you see it in kind of where they are in 147 00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:35,600 Speaker 1: terms of monetary policy, and you also see that, I 148 00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:37,480 Speaker 1: think in terms of where the economy is in certain 149 00:07:37,520 --> 00:07:40,120 Speaker 1: ways you've seen stronger growth in Europe over the last year, 150 00:07:40,400 --> 00:07:42,880 Speaker 1: but where they're still having trouble getting inflation to move 151 00:07:42,960 --> 00:07:45,360 Speaker 1: up toward US target. And hey, that's exactly where the 152 00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:48,120 Speaker 1: FED was a few years ago. Stevens Stanley Amherst pypon 153 00:07:48,280 --> 00:07:50,920 Speaker 1: Securities Chief Economists. Great to have us with have you 154 00:07:51,040 --> 00:08:07,120 Speaker 1: with us on the program. It is without question the 155 00:08:07,160 --> 00:08:11,320 Speaker 1: publishing event of the season on China. Beyond timely here 156 00:08:11,360 --> 00:08:14,520 Speaker 1: with Secretary re minutions, trip to the daily back and 157 00:08:14,600 --> 00:08:17,920 Speaker 1: forth of what some would say as a mercantile Washington, 158 00:08:17,960 --> 00:08:22,960 Speaker 1: a mercantile Trump dealing with President G, this new, more definitive, 159 00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:27,600 Speaker 1: more entrenched leader of China. There is no one who 160 00:08:27,600 --> 00:08:30,520 Speaker 1: can brief us on this on what she calls the 161 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:35,640 Speaker 1: Third Revolution. That Elizabeth Economy of the Council on Foreign Relations, 162 00:08:35,640 --> 00:08:41,440 Speaker 1: Elizabeth congratulations on two d and fifty pages of update 163 00:08:41,559 --> 00:08:45,440 Speaker 1: on President G. What was the biggest surprise of President 164 00:08:45,520 --> 00:08:50,000 Speaker 1: G and putting together the Third Revolution? I think that 165 00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,959 Speaker 1: the biggest surprise really was just how transformative he's managed 166 00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:56,959 Speaker 1: to be in just five short years. You know, when 167 00:08:56,960 --> 00:08:59,520 Speaker 1: he came in, people this is going to be a 168 00:08:59,520 --> 00:09:01,800 Speaker 1: reform are along the lines of Dungho Ping. We're going 169 00:09:01,800 --> 00:09:04,120 Speaker 1: to see more reform and opening up the low profile 170 00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:07,280 Speaker 1: foreign policy and in fact, piece you know, move the 171 00:09:07,280 --> 00:09:10,200 Speaker 1: country a hundred and eighty degrees in the opposite direction, 172 00:09:10,520 --> 00:09:14,199 Speaker 1: you know, reasserting the Communist Party into the economy, into society, 173 00:09:14,600 --> 00:09:17,880 Speaker 1: much more ambitious foreign policy, much more more repressive and 174 00:09:17,920 --> 00:09:22,000 Speaker 1: authoritarian at home. So he's really the Third Revolution really 175 00:09:22,080 --> 00:09:25,719 Speaker 1: is all about the game changing nature. She didn't tan Uh. 176 00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:28,360 Speaker 1: Secretary Minution no doubt has a copy of your book 177 00:09:28,400 --> 00:09:31,400 Speaker 1: well foot noted and marked on the plane going out 178 00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:34,520 Speaker 1: when he's stopping the fist fights between Lawrence Cudlow and 179 00:09:34,559 --> 00:09:38,280 Speaker 1: Peter Navarro. If that's the case, how would you brief 180 00:09:38,360 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 1: the secretary on the relationship of Beijing to the major 181 00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:45,840 Speaker 1: Pacific RIM cities like Shanghai and Hong Kong. What's that 182 00:09:45,920 --> 00:09:51,080 Speaker 1: new dynamic? I think, you know, for Beijing has always 183 00:09:51,080 --> 00:09:53,760 Speaker 1: been the center of political power, and you know Shanghai, 184 00:09:53,800 --> 00:09:57,040 Speaker 1: Hong Kong or the economics centers I think underseaging Ping, 185 00:09:57,120 --> 00:10:01,559 Speaker 1: Beijing has only become stronger U. And we see Beijing, 186 00:10:01,600 --> 00:10:03,800 Speaker 1: you know, making a number of moves, for example, in 187 00:10:03,800 --> 00:10:07,480 Speaker 1: this relationship with Hong Kong to limit the autonomy of 188 00:10:07,559 --> 00:10:10,320 Speaker 1: Hong Kong and an essence saying, you know, we know 189 00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:12,960 Speaker 1: that you're a gateway to China, but we're not going 190 00:10:13,000 --> 00:10:16,040 Speaker 1: to need you, uh in that respect for very much longer. 191 00:10:16,400 --> 00:10:19,520 Speaker 1: And you've got to get yourselves in line politically. I 192 00:10:19,559 --> 00:10:22,840 Speaker 1: think the Shijunking, you know, is not a huge fan 193 00:10:22,880 --> 00:10:27,160 Speaker 1: of the go go economic growth. Uh that done Shoking represented, 194 00:10:27,200 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 1: that's embodied in Shanghai. He's got a different view. Well 195 00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:32,200 Speaker 1: what does that different view and what does it mean 196 00:10:32,760 --> 00:10:38,439 Speaker 1: for these Western business locations in the third the Third Revolution? Well, 197 00:10:38,480 --> 00:10:42,760 Speaker 1: I think, you know, again reinserting the party into the state, 198 00:10:42,760 --> 00:10:46,000 Speaker 1: don't enterprises, you know, telling joint ventures. You know, we 199 00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:49,240 Speaker 1: want to have our party representatives on your board reviewing 200 00:10:49,280 --> 00:10:53,200 Speaker 1: your investment decisions. Uh, you know, the entire push for 201 00:10:53,240 --> 00:10:58,440 Speaker 1: the status control of Chinese technology made in China. All 202 00:10:58,480 --> 00:11:03,240 Speaker 1: of these things are still wins for multinationals who had 203 00:11:03,280 --> 00:11:06,680 Speaker 1: hoped for a more open uh you know, market opening. 204 00:11:06,760 --> 00:11:09,760 Speaker 1: You know, less I t theft. They hope to see 205 00:11:09,760 --> 00:11:13,560 Speaker 1: progress on some of these major institutional types of changes 206 00:11:13,559 --> 00:11:15,839 Speaker 1: that are needed, and they're not seeing them if you're 207 00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:20,160 Speaker 1: just joining us, Elizabeth, Economy, the Third Revolution, Jping in 208 00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:24,720 Speaker 1: the New Chinese State mustery fifty pages terrific briefing. Ian 209 00:11:24,720 --> 00:11:27,880 Speaker 1: Bremer raves about it, and far more importantly, I think 210 00:11:27,960 --> 00:11:31,600 Speaker 1: Dr Bremer would agree with me. Orville Shell says simple, 211 00:11:31,920 --> 00:11:35,439 Speaker 1: simply a well researched book, which is shell isk for 212 00:11:35,600 --> 00:11:38,880 Speaker 1: she nailed it, Elizabeth. When you did this, you've got 213 00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:41,719 Speaker 1: to fold in the new military might of China. You've 214 00:11:41,720 --> 00:11:44,440 Speaker 1: got to fold in the fears that Peter Navarro has 215 00:11:44,480 --> 00:11:49,000 Speaker 1: about the economics of China as well. How transparent, how 216 00:11:49,160 --> 00:11:55,000 Speaker 1: knowledgeable is our true intelligence of the Chinese government system? 217 00:11:55,120 --> 00:11:59,240 Speaker 1: Do we actually know what they're doing? I think in 218 00:11:59,520 --> 00:12:02,480 Speaker 1: summers spects we're pretty knowledgeable. We have a pretty good 219 00:12:02,480 --> 00:12:05,480 Speaker 1: sense for you know, how China's developing its military. It's 220 00:12:05,480 --> 00:12:09,319 Speaker 1: new technologies, it's new modes of operation. The really significant 221 00:12:09,320 --> 00:12:12,720 Speaker 1: advances that they've made under Shi Jinping. He's a big 222 00:12:12,760 --> 00:12:15,559 Speaker 1: supporter of the Chinese military, and you know said when 223 00:12:15,559 --> 00:12:17,439 Speaker 1: he first came to power, you know, I'm going to 224 00:12:17,480 --> 00:12:20,440 Speaker 1: develop a people's liberation army that's capable of fighting and 225 00:12:20,440 --> 00:12:23,240 Speaker 1: winning wars. Uh. So, you know they've they've been a 226 00:12:23,280 --> 00:12:26,120 Speaker 1: real beneficiary under sheet. You know, I think where we're 227 00:12:26,200 --> 00:12:29,800 Speaker 1: less good certainly is understanding the internal dynamics at the 228 00:12:29,920 --> 00:12:32,520 Speaker 1: very top level. How do you know the seven members 229 00:12:33,360 --> 00:12:36,040 Speaker 1: and the committity berro get along. You know, what are 230 00:12:36,040 --> 00:12:39,200 Speaker 1: the real differences of opinion around Chi jin Ping? He's 231 00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:42,520 Speaker 1: just amassed so much power that it's really tough to tell, 232 00:12:42,920 --> 00:12:45,600 Speaker 1: you know, where there might be some dissenting views. Does 233 00:12:45,640 --> 00:12:49,240 Speaker 1: that make this economic soire that we're in right now 234 00:12:49,360 --> 00:12:53,400 Speaker 1: nothing more than a show? He won't be there right well, 235 00:12:53,440 --> 00:12:56,000 Speaker 1: I think it doesn't, you know, mean that it's just 236 00:12:56,080 --> 00:12:57,880 Speaker 1: going to be a show. The Chinese has said, you know, 237 00:12:57,920 --> 00:13:00,840 Speaker 1: we're not going to negotiate, you know, under these threats. 238 00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:05,520 Speaker 1: They pitched their position when their top economic guy, Leo 239 00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:07,760 Speaker 1: Hook came to the United States back at the end 240 00:13:07,800 --> 00:13:10,520 Speaker 1: of February UM and they've said, you know, we're gonna 241 00:13:10,559 --> 00:13:12,800 Speaker 1: stand tough. You know, this trade war isn't going to 242 00:13:12,920 --> 00:13:16,439 Speaker 1: impact us that much. We're strong and resilient. So that 243 00:13:16,520 --> 00:13:19,760 Speaker 1: their negotiating stance they've learned from Trump, right there playing 244 00:13:19,840 --> 00:13:23,120 Speaker 1: the brinksmanship at this point. But I think, look, they've 245 00:13:23,120 --> 00:13:25,760 Speaker 1: got their own domestic economic problems. You know, she didn't 246 00:13:25,760 --> 00:13:28,760 Speaker 1: things trying to de leverage. They want to know, address poverty, 247 00:13:28,840 --> 00:13:31,079 Speaker 1: they want to address the environment. They've got a lot 248 00:13:31,200 --> 00:13:33,760 Speaker 1: of things on their dockets. They're not they don't have 249 00:13:33,800 --> 00:13:36,160 Speaker 1: a big appetite for a big trade war. But I 250 00:13:36,200 --> 00:13:39,200 Speaker 1: definitely think there's room. But really quietly, folks, only thirty 251 00:13:39,640 --> 00:13:43,240 Speaker 1: seventy pages into the Third Revolution, Elizabeth, you have that 252 00:13:43,480 --> 00:13:49,000 Speaker 1: single sentence that's timeless. Their number one driving force is 253 00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:53,560 Speaker 1: to keep people employed and to keep rising incomes, and 254 00:13:53,760 --> 00:13:57,800 Speaker 1: that regard it's no different than the first the Second Revolution, 255 00:13:57,960 --> 00:14:01,680 Speaker 1: is it, Well, there's no different than the Second Revolution. 256 00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:06,040 Speaker 1: The first Revolution wasn't all that exact concerned about right. 257 00:14:07,000 --> 00:14:10,120 Speaker 1: He was more concerned about political correctness. But definitely, uh, 258 00:14:10,320 --> 00:14:14,840 Speaker 1: dun Shoping, that was his major objective. I think Hijenping 259 00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:17,240 Speaker 1: just has a different vision of how to get there 260 00:14:17,679 --> 00:14:20,400 Speaker 1: than Dune Shopping. Did you know? Dun Shopping wanted to 261 00:14:20,480 --> 00:14:23,960 Speaker 1: unleash the capitalist and entrepreneurial spirit of the Chinese people. 262 00:14:24,280 --> 00:14:26,680 Speaker 1: I have corruption flourished. It was bad, but it's not 263 00:14:26,760 --> 00:14:30,360 Speaker 1: the end of the world inequality grew. Okay, hi Jinping 264 00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:34,160 Speaker 1: has a different idea. No corruption, you know, address inequality 265 00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:36,800 Speaker 1: and if it cost the Chinese economy a little bit, okay, 266 00:14:37,000 --> 00:14:41,160 Speaker 1: address right now. Are listeners who say, look, the human 267 00:14:41,240 --> 00:14:44,640 Speaker 1: rights is appalling. We don't really know the protests. Uh, 268 00:14:44,680 --> 00:14:47,320 Speaker 1: this is a country that really we don't have anything 269 00:14:47,880 --> 00:14:51,400 Speaker 1: in common with in terms of culture and values, and 270 00:14:51,440 --> 00:14:53,840 Speaker 1: we should take a rigid stance. What do you say 271 00:14:53,880 --> 00:14:57,720 Speaker 1: to those people? I think, um, You know, pushing back 272 00:14:57,760 --> 00:15:01,520 Speaker 1: against China when it comes to human rights is essential 273 00:15:02,040 --> 00:15:04,520 Speaker 1: because it's not just about what China is doing on 274 00:15:04,560 --> 00:15:07,080 Speaker 1: the home front and places like Shinjong into bed and 275 00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:10,480 Speaker 1: even more broadly with their new surveillance systems and the 276 00:15:10,680 --> 00:15:13,480 Speaker 1: penetration of the Communist Party into every detail of the 277 00:15:13,520 --> 00:15:17,000 Speaker 1: people's lives. But it's that they're trying to export an 278 00:15:17,040 --> 00:15:21,680 Speaker 1: element of this autocracy abroad, their training officials in Africa 279 00:15:21,720 --> 00:15:25,520 Speaker 1: and Latin America and Southeast Asia on how to manage populations, 280 00:15:25,520 --> 00:15:28,400 Speaker 1: on how to do propaganda, and they're trying to rewrite 281 00:15:28,400 --> 00:15:30,600 Speaker 1: the rules of the game globally. You know, it's one 282 00:15:30,600 --> 00:15:32,840 Speaker 1: of the things that to look at the book is 283 00:15:32,880 --> 00:15:36,320 Speaker 1: you know, changing the way that the human rights regime 284 00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:39,760 Speaker 1: operated in the United Nations. Okay, but critically this is 285 00:15:39,800 --> 00:15:42,400 Speaker 1: really really important. Then how do we respond to this 286 00:15:42,840 --> 00:15:46,560 Speaker 1: If we have an administration that says essentially we're bilateral 287 00:15:46,640 --> 00:15:49,680 Speaker 1: or maybe even unilateral, that we've got a State Department, 288 00:15:49,720 --> 00:15:53,280 Speaker 1: at least with Mr Tillerson that was removed, how do 289 00:15:53,360 --> 00:15:57,280 Speaker 1: we affect our policy? How do we pivot or show 290 00:15:57,360 --> 00:16:00,240 Speaker 1: our flag if the Chinese are more asserted of with 291 00:16:00,320 --> 00:16:04,560 Speaker 1: their culture. Absolutely, and I think it's a big challenge 292 00:16:04,560 --> 00:16:06,720 Speaker 1: for us right now. We have to rely on people 293 00:16:06,760 --> 00:16:09,920 Speaker 1: like Frankly, you know, Nikki Halley in the United Nations. 294 00:16:09,920 --> 00:16:13,080 Speaker 1: She really does wave the flag, you know, very vigorously 295 00:16:13,240 --> 00:16:16,120 Speaker 1: on issues of human rights when it comes to China. Uh, 296 00:16:16,160 --> 00:16:18,640 Speaker 1: you know, we have to hold uh, you know, work 297 00:16:18,680 --> 00:16:21,680 Speaker 1: with our allies who also care a lot about these issues. 298 00:16:21,760 --> 00:16:24,720 Speaker 1: And the Europeans have stepped up significantly on issues of 299 00:16:24,800 --> 00:16:27,720 Speaker 1: human rights as well. So I think there are others 300 00:16:27,720 --> 00:16:30,400 Speaker 1: out there in the international community who seemed to be 301 00:16:30,600 --> 00:16:33,360 Speaker 1: stepping into the breach. Of course, nobody can speak with 302 00:16:33,520 --> 00:16:36,280 Speaker 1: as loud and as important to voices the United States. 303 00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:38,640 Speaker 1: So um, you know, it would be great if President 304 00:16:38,640 --> 00:16:42,320 Speaker 1: Trump would begin to understand the value of human rights, uh, 305 00:16:42,320 --> 00:16:45,480 Speaker 1: and what that means in terms of promoting America's vision 306 00:16:45,480 --> 00:16:49,920 Speaker 1: and strengths. Congratulations Elizabeth Economy, the Third Revolutions, she's in 307 00:16:50,040 --> 00:16:54,000 Speaker 1: Ping and the New Chinese State without question, the New musty. Uh. 308 00:16:54,200 --> 00:16:57,400 Speaker 1: Very it's very terse, folks. It's a very direct book 309 00:16:58,080 --> 00:17:02,080 Speaker 1: of great benefit about really focused on Mr g and 310 00:17:02,080 --> 00:17:05,359 Speaker 1: and with a lot of perspective that I haven't seen before. 311 00:17:05,520 --> 00:17:09,200 Speaker 1: Elizabeth Economy, After the River Runs Black, after wonderful books 312 00:17:09,200 --> 00:17:13,000 Speaker 1: on energy, the Third Revolution, j Ping and the New 313 00:17:13,080 --> 00:17:29,800 Speaker 1: Chinese State. I'll feature that out on Twitter, uh today. Well, 314 00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:33,440 Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged yesterday, 315 00:17:33,440 --> 00:17:37,360 Speaker 1: but acknowledged that inflation is beginning to creep higher. Well 316 00:17:37,440 --> 00:17:41,359 Speaker 1: with that, in that increase mean increases in interest rates 317 00:17:41,640 --> 00:17:43,600 Speaker 1: and when would they come? Well here to help us 318 00:17:43,600 --> 00:17:47,000 Speaker 1: answer this question is that Kate Warren, the Edward Jones 319 00:17:47,040 --> 00:17:49,840 Speaker 1: Investments Chief market strategist. She joins us here in our 320 00:17:49,840 --> 00:17:52,800 Speaker 1: eleven three oh studios. Kate, thanks very much for being here. 321 00:17:52,880 --> 00:17:56,360 Speaker 1: What did you take away from yesterday's Federal Reserve sort 322 00:17:56,359 --> 00:17:59,720 Speaker 1: of report? I think the main takeaway is that they're 323 00:17:59,800 --> 00:18:02,680 Speaker 1: not very concerned with the uptick in inflation that we've 324 00:18:02,720 --> 00:18:07,199 Speaker 1: seen that they sort of emphasized that they wanted to 325 00:18:07,240 --> 00:18:10,160 Speaker 1: see a balance around their two percent targets, so they 326 00:18:10,200 --> 00:18:14,720 Speaker 1: didn't highlight that increasing inflation might be more interest rate increases. 327 00:18:15,080 --> 00:18:18,720 Speaker 1: They didn't give any kind of signal about how many 328 00:18:18,920 --> 00:18:21,520 Speaker 1: they'll do in the future. And uh, I think it 329 00:18:21,640 --> 00:18:26,440 Speaker 1: was actually a relatively reassuring and if anything, uh, slightly 330 00:18:26,680 --> 00:18:31,120 Speaker 1: less hawkish uh set of a you know, announcement than 331 00:18:31,160 --> 00:18:33,119 Speaker 1: I would have expected. But we're still going to twenty 332 00:18:33,160 --> 00:18:35,399 Speaker 1: five basis points in June. Yes, I think that was 333 00:18:35,480 --> 00:18:39,200 Speaker 1: quite clear. I think they telegraphed that quite clearly before 334 00:18:39,240 --> 00:18:42,879 Speaker 1: this as well as in the statement. You are hardwired 335 00:18:43,440 --> 00:18:47,960 Speaker 1: to a retail audience that has a monthly statement that 336 00:18:48,040 --> 00:18:52,000 Speaker 1: comes in and they see bond prices down and yields up. 337 00:18:52,440 --> 00:18:55,479 Speaker 1: How many months in a row of that grind do 338 00:18:55,560 --> 00:18:58,359 Speaker 1: we need until all of a sudden it's a bond 339 00:18:58,359 --> 00:19:03,199 Speaker 1: bear market for bond America. Well, I think that, uh, 340 00:19:03,520 --> 00:19:08,320 Speaker 1: it doesn't take very many months because most most investors 341 00:19:08,320 --> 00:19:10,840 Speaker 1: are pretty sensitive to down prices on their statement. And 342 00:19:10,880 --> 00:19:12,760 Speaker 1: what's so good with your work at Ellase where you 343 00:19:12,800 --> 00:19:16,040 Speaker 1: know the history is three months in a row of 344 00:19:16,160 --> 00:19:20,880 Speaker 1: bond prices down on statements is different. It's seven percent 345 00:19:21,000 --> 00:19:25,919 Speaker 1: nominal than it is three nominal. Yes, I think the 346 00:19:26,040 --> 00:19:29,280 Speaker 1: other thing is there's a flip side to it, which 347 00:19:29,400 --> 00:19:33,200 Speaker 1: is many investors have been waiting for higher interest rates, 348 00:19:33,840 --> 00:19:36,840 Speaker 1: and they're actually a little bit pleased to see the 349 00:19:36,880 --> 00:19:40,680 Speaker 1: fact that on a two year treasury you're now getting 350 00:19:40,680 --> 00:19:43,280 Speaker 1: two and a half percent, and that actually looks pretty 351 00:19:43,280 --> 00:19:45,639 Speaker 1: good compared to other things out there in the marketplace. 352 00:19:46,240 --> 00:19:48,760 Speaker 1: There's another side to this, Okay, So then when they 353 00:19:48,760 --> 00:19:52,159 Speaker 1: see all the advertisements for certificate is a deposit offering 354 00:19:52,200 --> 00:19:55,840 Speaker 1: two percent for whatever many years? Uh, do they give 355 00:19:55,880 --> 00:19:59,119 Speaker 1: you a call and say, tell us what products you 356 00:19:59,200 --> 00:20:01,360 Speaker 1: have that can get us this kind of interest rate? Well, 357 00:20:01,400 --> 00:20:03,840 Speaker 1: we do offer CD. So we are I mean you're 358 00:20:03,840 --> 00:20:06,840 Speaker 1: getting those calls. Yeah, we're getting those calls. People are saying, hey, 359 00:20:06,880 --> 00:20:10,000 Speaker 1: this looks attractive, especially compared to the fact that many 360 00:20:10,080 --> 00:20:12,879 Speaker 1: rates at the bank are still near zero. What's a 361 00:20:12,960 --> 00:20:17,639 Speaker 1: five year CD not roughly. I don't have any, but 362 00:20:17,680 --> 00:20:21,600 Speaker 1: the answers hired than it was. You could see that 363 00:20:21,680 --> 00:20:25,680 Speaker 1: my hands on radio tenC. Weans that's what we're doing. 364 00:20:25,720 --> 00:20:27,280 Speaker 1: What you are you can pull out the paper and 365 00:20:27,280 --> 00:20:29,800 Speaker 1: look at the yield. I'm going to show you the ads. 366 00:20:29,880 --> 00:20:32,480 Speaker 1: They are full page ads in newspaper, in the in 367 00:20:32,520 --> 00:20:35,520 Speaker 1: the journal, and a lot of talking about how much 368 00:20:35,560 --> 00:20:37,160 Speaker 1: that you can get and it says, you know, two 369 00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:39,880 Speaker 1: point x percent and that's a lot of money. Well, 370 00:20:39,920 --> 00:20:42,440 Speaker 1: when you think about it, with inflation still at two percent, 371 00:20:42,640 --> 00:20:46,120 Speaker 1: at least you're getting a positive yield. And let's meld 372 00:20:46,160 --> 00:20:48,800 Speaker 1: your economics in now with this, this real world yield 373 00:20:48,840 --> 00:20:52,240 Speaker 1: dynamic for the public, and that is, okay, rates higher, 374 00:20:52,600 --> 00:20:55,719 Speaker 1: but every single person listening is going to go, I 375 00:20:55,760 --> 00:20:58,919 Speaker 1: get it. But inflation is going up to So where's 376 00:20:58,960 --> 00:21:01,119 Speaker 1: the real yield go? What is the Edward D. Jones 377 00:21:01,200 --> 00:21:05,280 Speaker 1: bat on a larger inflation adjusted yield? Is it going 378 00:21:05,320 --> 00:21:09,720 Speaker 1: to happen? We think inflation actually stays pretty contained because 379 00:21:09,840 --> 00:21:14,840 Speaker 1: of all the extraordinarily high competition in marketplaces. Companies keep 380 00:21:14,880 --> 00:21:18,439 Speaker 1: saying they're not able to raise prices, uh and in 381 00:21:18,480 --> 00:21:22,080 Speaker 1: many cases their input costs are going up. We're seeing 382 00:21:22,119 --> 00:21:27,400 Speaker 1: disruptive competition in markets. Think Amazon. But high real full 383 00:21:27,440 --> 00:21:31,960 Speaker 1: faith and credit yield, high real corporate yield, quality corporate bond, 384 00:21:32,119 --> 00:21:34,280 Speaker 1: You're gonna see a real yield. Yes, we think that 385 00:21:34,440 --> 00:21:38,440 Speaker 1: it's not high is not exactly the term idea better 386 00:21:39,960 --> 00:21:43,400 Speaker 1: And and so I'm saying, I think there's lots of dynamics, 387 00:21:43,440 --> 00:21:46,840 Speaker 1: including global growth and the fact we're seeing more products 388 00:21:46,880 --> 00:21:51,880 Speaker 1: services from more places that keep prices moving up very slowly. 389 00:21:52,400 --> 00:21:55,320 Speaker 1: And therefore you do get we don't see a dramatic 390 00:21:55,359 --> 00:21:57,960 Speaker 1: increase in long term rates or short term rates even 391 00:21:57,960 --> 00:22:01,119 Speaker 1: as the FED raisers rates. And that's why, yes, you 392 00:22:01,160 --> 00:22:04,240 Speaker 1: get a better real yild. You're saying, say shorter on 393 00:22:04,280 --> 00:22:08,480 Speaker 1: the on the yield curve on the duration in order 394 00:22:08,520 --> 00:22:10,600 Speaker 1: to not get hit by the rising rates. Do your 395 00:22:10,600 --> 00:22:12,439 Speaker 1: customers have a lot of cash to do all the 396 00:22:12,480 --> 00:22:15,840 Speaker 1: things you're describing? They have some cash. They stayed pretty 397 00:22:15,840 --> 00:22:18,920 Speaker 1: fully invested, so they're not where does all the new 398 00:22:18,920 --> 00:22:20,719 Speaker 1: money come from? What do they have to sell in 399 00:22:20,840 --> 00:22:23,840 Speaker 1: order to execute? Um? I think it's that they still 400 00:22:23,920 --> 00:22:28,679 Speaker 1: have cash, uh, you know, sitting in savings accounts or 401 00:22:28,720 --> 00:22:32,119 Speaker 1: in in cash accounts in other places that they didn't 402 00:22:32,119 --> 00:22:34,560 Speaker 1: really think of investment money and now looks more tractic 403 00:22:34,680 --> 00:22:37,160 Speaker 1: to invest their money. Really, And even with the idea 404 00:22:37,200 --> 00:22:39,800 Speaker 1: that interest rates will continue to increase, you just said 405 00:22:39,840 --> 00:22:43,200 Speaker 1: they're going to increase in June Basis points, why not 406 00:22:43,520 --> 00:22:47,280 Speaker 1: wait and get a higher interest rate? Why do anything, 407 00:22:47,359 --> 00:22:49,520 Speaker 1: let's say between now and the end of the summer. Well, 408 00:22:49,520 --> 00:22:51,640 Speaker 1: I'd say it depends on what you're doing. We'd still 409 00:22:51,680 --> 00:22:56,119 Speaker 1: be saying putting money, put money inequities, stay money in inequities, 410 00:22:56,240 --> 00:23:01,480 Speaker 1: and keep some in the short term fixed income accounts, 411 00:23:01,560 --> 00:23:04,639 Speaker 1: because what you're trying to get is a better return 412 00:23:04,680 --> 00:23:07,000 Speaker 1: than what you've gotten recently. Thank you so much, but 413 00:23:07,440 --> 00:23:25,800 Speaker 1: it's greatly, greatly appreciated. It has been far too long 414 00:23:26,240 --> 00:23:31,600 Speaker 1: since I harass Shannon Cross of Cross Research, who writes brilliant, 415 00:23:32,119 --> 00:23:36,840 Speaker 1: detailed reports on all these technological wonders we talk about 416 00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:40,960 Speaker 1: every day. Her acuity is off the chart. We're thrilled 417 00:23:41,000 --> 00:23:44,560 Speaker 1: the Shannon Cross will join us today on a company 418 00:23:44,600 --> 00:23:49,360 Speaker 1: shifting from growth to valuenus is Dennis Gartman said yesterday, 419 00:23:49,359 --> 00:23:51,720 Speaker 1: maybe it will be a widows and orphan stock someday, 420 00:23:52,240 --> 00:23:56,960 Speaker 1: and that would be Fortress Cook. Shannon, good morning, is Apple? 421 00:23:57,760 --> 00:24:00,399 Speaker 1: Is it a widows and orphan stock now or is 422 00:24:00,440 --> 00:24:03,440 Speaker 1: it going to be one someday? Well, I think what 423 00:24:03,440 --> 00:24:05,679 Speaker 1: what Apple has done? And it's nice to speak with 424 00:24:05,720 --> 00:24:08,480 Speaker 1: you again, By the way, Um, what what Apple has 425 00:24:08,520 --> 00:24:12,040 Speaker 1: done is is basically moved into and trying to move 426 00:24:12,040 --> 00:24:16,280 Speaker 1: into this concept of recurring revenue stability. You know, we've 427 00:24:16,280 --> 00:24:18,720 Speaker 1: talked about it for years about the ecosystem and the 428 00:24:18,800 --> 00:24:22,040 Speaker 1: value that's there. But you know, they really have put 429 00:24:22,080 --> 00:24:25,399 Speaker 1: together a very very solid platform and so you know 430 00:24:25,640 --> 00:24:29,440 Speaker 1: over time, you know, especially with an increasing dividend yield 431 00:24:29,480 --> 00:24:32,239 Speaker 1: which weeks or wealth increasing divid in payment we should say, 432 00:24:32,240 --> 00:24:34,560 Speaker 1: because it depends on what stock price is at. You know, 433 00:24:34,800 --> 00:24:37,200 Speaker 1: it's one of those that I think can be I 434 00:24:37,200 --> 00:24:39,480 Speaker 1: don't know if widows and children sort of makes it 435 00:24:39,560 --> 00:24:42,040 Speaker 1: sound really boring, but you know, I think I would 436 00:24:42,080 --> 00:24:45,159 Speaker 1: go as stable and predictable. Have you've done as some 437 00:24:45,280 --> 00:24:48,480 Speaker 1: of the parts evaluations some of your partners in crime, 438 00:24:48,800 --> 00:24:51,480 Speaker 1: I think as Gene Monster years ago, Piper Jeffrey have 439 00:24:51,640 --> 00:24:54,679 Speaker 1: done as some of the parts analysis of the Apple 440 00:24:54,840 --> 00:24:58,600 Speaker 1: his cross research wandered through that exercise. We haven't because 441 00:24:58,600 --> 00:25:00,840 Speaker 1: we don't when you look at of the parts and 442 00:25:00,840 --> 00:25:03,560 Speaker 1: and honestly, I mean going back twenty years ago when 443 00:25:03,560 --> 00:25:05,520 Speaker 1: I was on you know, Wall Street at a big bank, 444 00:25:05,600 --> 00:25:07,880 Speaker 1: and and we did some of the parts and came 445 00:25:07,960 --> 00:25:10,800 Speaker 1: up with huge valuations that never came to fruition because 446 00:25:11,080 --> 00:25:13,439 Speaker 1: you have to be willing to separate the company. And 447 00:25:13,480 --> 00:25:16,480 Speaker 1: I don't think Apple, you know, once step they're much 448 00:25:16,480 --> 00:25:20,560 Speaker 1: stronger as you know, a whole Uh, Shannon, I want 449 00:25:20,560 --> 00:25:23,520 Speaker 1: to understand a little bit about Apple and it's pricing, 450 00:25:23,600 --> 00:25:26,560 Speaker 1: because there were a lot of comments about the iPhone 451 00:25:26,600 --> 00:25:28,800 Speaker 1: ten and how it was miss priced. Do you believe 452 00:25:28,800 --> 00:25:32,280 Speaker 1: it was miss priced? You know, I think that it 453 00:25:32,400 --> 00:25:36,320 Speaker 1: was priced appropriately for the units that they are selling. 454 00:25:36,440 --> 00:25:38,760 Speaker 1: I think the street, though, kind of got it wrong 455 00:25:38,840 --> 00:25:41,520 Speaker 1: in terms of thinking about you know, there was this 456 00:25:41,720 --> 00:25:44,560 Speaker 1: huge addressable market at over a thousand dollars. I think 457 00:25:44,600 --> 00:25:47,879 Speaker 1: for Apple, they want to have product at all, you know, 458 00:25:47,960 --> 00:25:51,040 Speaker 1: at many different levels along the price line, and so 459 00:25:51,119 --> 00:25:53,560 Speaker 1: you know, they go down below four hundred and they 460 00:25:53,560 --> 00:25:56,399 Speaker 1: obviously go above a thousand now and so you know, 461 00:25:56,480 --> 00:25:59,080 Speaker 1: I think that they were testing a new price point. 462 00:25:59,119 --> 00:26:01,480 Speaker 1: We now know sort of the elasticity of demand is. 463 00:26:01,920 --> 00:26:04,520 Speaker 1: And frankly, the company was very happy because they noted 464 00:26:04,560 --> 00:26:08,000 Speaker 1: that the iPhone ten was the best seller during every 465 00:26:08,040 --> 00:26:10,920 Speaker 1: week during the quarter all the way through March, so 466 00:26:11,280 --> 00:26:13,040 Speaker 1: you know, there's a lot of demand for it. I 467 00:26:13,080 --> 00:26:15,159 Speaker 1: think what it indicated to us is that there was 468 00:26:15,240 --> 00:26:18,000 Speaker 1: a fair amount of demand for the iPhone seven and 469 00:26:18,080 --> 00:26:20,800 Speaker 1: perhaps not as much for the iPhone eight. Shannon, does 470 00:26:20,840 --> 00:26:24,119 Speaker 1: it also indicate that Wall Street analysis of Apple is 471 00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:28,200 Speaker 1: basically flawed. I'm not sure it's float. I think people 472 00:26:28,240 --> 00:26:31,560 Speaker 1: get pretty you know, there there's a hype factor around it. Um. 473 00:26:31,600 --> 00:26:34,520 Speaker 1: You know, our numbers were always, frankly a little bit 474 00:26:34,560 --> 00:26:36,280 Speaker 1: below where where people were at, and they kind of 475 00:26:36,280 --> 00:26:38,840 Speaker 1: came in closer to us UM. But you know, again, 476 00:26:38,960 --> 00:26:41,560 Speaker 1: it's such a stable company, was such cash flow that, 477 00:26:42,040 --> 00:26:44,119 Speaker 1: you know, investors I think see through some of the 478 00:26:44,200 --> 00:26:46,080 Speaker 1: hype that comes out of the cell side on the name. 479 00:26:47,560 --> 00:26:51,320 Speaker 1: I mean, I look Shannon at the company, and part 480 00:26:51,359 --> 00:26:54,240 Speaker 1: of it comes down, as you say, recurring revenue. I 481 00:26:54,359 --> 00:26:59,120 Speaker 1: take real offense when the media particularly goes breathlessly, oh 482 00:27:00,000 --> 00:27:02,280 Speaker 1: dollars or four hundred dollars or whatever a cell phone. 483 00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:05,840 Speaker 1: Nobody I know is doing that. Everybody signs up for 484 00:27:05,880 --> 00:27:10,000 Speaker 1: this monthly plan racket. That's a source of recurring revenue, 485 00:27:10,080 --> 00:27:12,919 Speaker 1: isn't it? It is, um, you know, from from a 486 00:27:12,960 --> 00:27:15,560 Speaker 1: carrier perspective, clearly that's been going on for a long time. 487 00:27:15,600 --> 00:27:19,040 Speaker 1: Apple now has the upgrade program. You know, this concept 488 00:27:19,040 --> 00:27:22,040 Speaker 1: of device is a service is not um you neque 489 00:27:22,040 --> 00:27:24,920 Speaker 1: to Apple alone. I mean it obviously started with smartphones 490 00:27:24,960 --> 00:27:27,360 Speaker 1: and that with the carriers, but all of the companies 491 00:27:27,400 --> 00:27:29,320 Speaker 1: we cover are starting to talk more and more. Where 492 00:27:29,359 --> 00:27:33,040 Speaker 1: there's PCs, if it's data centerspend everything is going to 493 00:27:33,119 --> 00:27:36,399 Speaker 1: irradible Well, they would like it to go to irradible 494 00:27:36,920 --> 00:27:40,680 Speaker 1: kind of pricing because again, it provides predictable, stable revenue. 495 00:27:40,880 --> 00:27:42,479 Speaker 1: Is that true? That was where I knew you were 496 00:27:42,480 --> 00:27:44,920 Speaker 1: going to go there, Shannon. But is there evidence that 497 00:27:45,040 --> 00:27:49,280 Speaker 1: Apple has more persistent cash flows and dividend growth and 498 00:27:49,320 --> 00:27:53,200 Speaker 1: share buy back because we're spending forty five ten cents 499 00:27:53,240 --> 00:27:56,000 Speaker 1: for one of the eight iPhones we're paying for. I 500 00:27:56,000 --> 00:27:58,159 Speaker 1: think absolutely. And I think that the other thing that 501 00:27:58,240 --> 00:28:01,240 Speaker 1: happens is when you go to un monthly see again, 502 00:28:01,240 --> 00:28:03,800 Speaker 1: whether it's Apple or others, people are seeing it much 503 00:28:03,840 --> 00:28:06,800 Speaker 1: easier to upsell the customer because you know, really you're 504 00:28:06,800 --> 00:28:14,399 Speaker 1: paying forty dollars, it's easy, you miss spoke Shannon. You 505 00:28:14,400 --> 00:28:19,720 Speaker 1: mean to upsell the teenager, Yeah, upsell the teenager. Frankly, 506 00:28:19,840 --> 00:28:23,159 Speaker 1: you know it's yes, it's easier for me. They can 507 00:28:23,160 --> 00:28:26,720 Speaker 1: get a better phone. I mean upsell basically, upsell everybody 508 00:28:26,760 --> 00:28:29,719 Speaker 1: that really isn't paying for the whole the whole planet? 509 00:28:30,280 --> 00:28:33,800 Speaker 1: Uh is Shannon? When is Tom King going to wake 510 00:28:33,880 --> 00:28:38,560 Speaker 1: up with Apple earpod earbuds in his ears? Good questions? 511 00:28:38,960 --> 00:28:41,800 Speaker 1: You know, I have to say, net of the I 512 00:28:42,400 --> 00:28:44,360 Speaker 1: for what it's worth, nett of the iPhone. I think 513 00:28:44,400 --> 00:28:46,960 Speaker 1: the air pods are the best product that apples. You're 514 00:28:48,720 --> 00:28:52,520 Speaker 1: sc rip up the scripts here. Tell people. Tell people 515 00:28:52,600 --> 00:28:55,120 Speaker 1: why and why Tom is going to be wearing one 516 00:28:55,720 --> 00:28:58,760 Speaker 1: care in a couple of months. I ski with them, 517 00:28:58,840 --> 00:29:01,880 Speaker 1: I ride my bike was them. I can do conference 518 00:29:01,880 --> 00:29:05,440 Speaker 1: calls with them on a tram and an airport. They're 519 00:29:05,520 --> 00:29:08,200 Speaker 1: they're a really really good product. They're not cheap, and 520 00:29:08,240 --> 00:29:09,920 Speaker 1: you have to make sure you don't lose them. Wait 521 00:29:10,440 --> 00:29:14,640 Speaker 1: if I get your what do you call them? Your poet? 522 00:29:14,680 --> 00:29:16,280 Speaker 1: Your pos? Does that mean I have to work out? 523 00:29:18,280 --> 00:29:20,360 Speaker 1: It means you have to return phone calls? I guess. 524 00:29:20,360 --> 00:29:24,840 Speaker 1: But you music, they're they're great. Um, I mean they 525 00:29:25,040 --> 00:29:27,480 Speaker 1: just work really really well and they work well with 526 00:29:27,560 --> 00:29:29,480 Speaker 1: my phone too. And am I watch and now I 527 00:29:29,520 --> 00:29:32,000 Speaker 1: sound like I'm I'm, you know, selling Apple products, but 528 00:29:32,720 --> 00:29:35,560 Speaker 1: they are really good. But channel But here's the point, 529 00:29:35,600 --> 00:29:38,840 Speaker 1: and you make it very anecdotally, is that they have 530 00:29:39,040 --> 00:29:42,280 Speaker 1: created this system where they've got your ears, your wrist, 531 00:29:42,480 --> 00:29:46,239 Speaker 1: and your eyes and I don't even want to think 532 00:29:46,280 --> 00:29:48,400 Speaker 1: about other parts of your anatomy that they might end up, 533 00:29:48,440 --> 00:29:51,920 Speaker 1: you know, taking over. But Apple has managed to do 534 00:29:52,000 --> 00:29:55,040 Speaker 1: something that I can't imagine any other company at least 535 00:29:55,120 --> 00:29:58,440 Speaker 1: currently being able to do. Yeah, it's it's interesting. You know, 536 00:29:58,480 --> 00:30:03,240 Speaker 1: they really are again very sort of comprehensive in terms 537 00:30:03,240 --> 00:30:05,200 Speaker 1: of how we work with it, you know, and think 538 00:30:05,240 --> 00:30:07,280 Speaker 1: about it like wearables are now the size of a 539 00:30:07,280 --> 00:30:10,080 Speaker 1: Fortune three company, which you know they weren't a few 540 00:30:10,200 --> 00:30:12,400 Speaker 1: years ago. So it's not just me. I mean there's 541 00:30:12,400 --> 00:30:14,600 Speaker 1: a lot of people who are who are buying the 542 00:30:14,640 --> 00:30:19,440 Speaker 1: incremental products that Apple provides. What's your target? Please? Our 543 00:30:19,440 --> 00:30:22,440 Speaker 1: target is two hundred UM And you know, I think 544 00:30:22,480 --> 00:30:25,360 Speaker 1: it's going to be a nice, uh nice year for 545 00:30:25,400 --> 00:30:28,480 Speaker 1: Apple sort of slow and steady upward, especially with the 546 00:30:28,760 --> 00:30:34,480 Speaker 1: Sherry purchase support of Apple. Are one so headed to two? 547 00:30:35,120 --> 00:30:37,400 Speaker 1: Can I want to ask one of one quick question here? 548 00:30:37,440 --> 00:30:41,040 Speaker 1: Apple Watch? Was this a footnote that the Apple Watches 549 00:30:41,080 --> 00:30:44,400 Speaker 1: the best selling watch in the world, Shannon, I don't 550 00:30:44,400 --> 00:30:46,160 Speaker 1: know if it's a footnote, but I think it's it's 551 00:30:46,160 --> 00:30:48,680 Speaker 1: indicative of you know, I think Apple over time wants 552 00:30:49,120 --> 00:30:51,240 Speaker 1: at whether if their's or somebody else, is everybody to 553 00:30:51,280 --> 00:30:53,680 Speaker 1: have a device on their watch on their wrist that 554 00:30:53,840 --> 00:30:56,920 Speaker 1: tracks your health and that helps you communicate. And I 555 00:30:56,920 --> 00:30:58,720 Speaker 1: think the Apple Watch gets you part of the way 556 00:30:58,760 --> 00:31:00,960 Speaker 1: they're obviously they're f d A and other issues that 557 00:31:00,960 --> 00:31:03,800 Speaker 1: they have to get through from more of the hard perspective. Shannon, 558 00:31:03,840 --> 00:31:06,560 Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Shannon Cross Cross, researcher on Apple 559 00:31:06,640 --> 00:31:11,640 Speaker 1: over Jefferies, Mr. Litveck. Previous conviction also reversed on appeal, 560 00:31:12,520 --> 00:31:22,600 Speaker 1: serving a two year prison sentence. Thanks for listening to 561 00:31:22,680 --> 00:31:27,200 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on 562 00:31:27,240 --> 00:31:33,080 Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm 563 00:31:33,120 --> 00:31:36,440 Speaker 1: on Twitter at Tom Keene before the podcast. You can 564 00:31:36,480 --> 00:31:39,680 Speaker 1: always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio