WEBVTT - F45 Training Goes Public 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Well, we had an

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I p O of this morning. Five Training Holdings fitness

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>company went public at a sixteen dollars A share has

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>not opened for trading. Bid bid his eighteen, ask his nineteen.

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>So looking to open up here on the first trade.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Adam Gilcrest, He's a co founder and CEO of F

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>forty five Training. Uh he joins us now, Adam, thanks

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. I know you're having a

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>busy day here watching to see when your stock opens.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Love free to give us the kind of a thirty

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>second view of F forty Training. What's the story? Well, Nessily,

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much for having me on your program. Obviously

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a very exciting day. And look at forty five is,

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think an incredible business. Because we tried

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>to answer a really simple question, which was you know

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>how do we get people to fall back in love

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>with the gym, and really f forty five is a

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>forty five minute workout. We do it in classes of

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>seven up to thirty six people. A typical franchise e

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you know has you know, on average, two hundred members

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and we charge our members somewhere between fifty dollars and

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty dollars a week, so we're a premium brand um

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And it was built on three key pillars. Number one

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>was innovation, where we have six thousand exercises in our

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>exercise and cyclopedia, so every day you turn up, it's

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a different workout. Number two is motivation, like training in

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>teams is just so much more enjoyable being, you know,

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in a community versus you know, sitting at home, you know,

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>running on a treadmill or going for a run around

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a park by yourself. And the third key pillar was

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, what we describe as simply as results and

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>results for us is via this simple modality of high

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>intensity interval training. So the workouts being forty five minutes,

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, change each day, but it's it's often like

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>forty seconds of work twenty seconds of rest, and you

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>can really get some effective results in a in a

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>short period of time. So look, we're great. It's a

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>great business because we changed so many lives. People love

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>coming to forty five and we've really achieved, you know,

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a wrap it up. One one major milestone is you know,

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>having more visitations with our members than any other gym

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in the world, so they turn up on average two

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>points seven times per week. I want to quickly just

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>get to the market dynamics of what we're seeing. Notable,

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, actor Mark Wahlberg is an investor Franchises member

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of the board. A year ago in June, you tried

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>to go public via a spack with Crescent Acquisition Corps.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Today of course, trying to just take the traditional I

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>p O route. Why this why the switch? We we

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we ran a dual process and we had a better

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>um structure that we we accepted, and we believe that

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a traditional IPO would be you know, positioning the business

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>um for more success. And you know, we're we're really

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>pleased with where we're at at the moment, and you know,

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we're really excited to hopefully watch the first trade come

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>through in the next half an hour. Hey, Adam, you

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>know I'm here with Taylor Riggs, and she's one of

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>those crazy nutty people that runs marathons all over the world.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I just can't relate at all. I did, in fact,

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic actually start getting on a peloton, so

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>at least I'm getting some exercise. Talk to us about

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>how your business has been impacted by this worldwide pandemic. Well,

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, it was an extremely challenging year last year,

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, at one period of time we had

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>our franchise is closed. Um. What we have noticed, however,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that you know, people want to get

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>back into the gym, but more importantly, people want to

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>be part of communities. People don't want to sit at

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>home on a bike. They don't want to sit at

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>home and do zoom dinner parties when restaurants are reopened.

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I asked that question all the time. You know, when

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>was the last time you had a zoom dinner party

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>if restaurants have reopened. And what we're finding now is

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>our cohorts that are two months reopened are performing better

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>with visitation than they were pre COVID. So what that

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>says to us is the fact that we're going to

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>bounce back far stronger than what we were pre COVID,

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And look, we think the most important thing in life

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is obviously number one, your family, but you know number

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>two should really be your health. And if you look

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>at the importance of health. You know, we were talking

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about of Americans this year will die of heart disease,

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>will die of cancer, and thirty percent of other things,

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>but of that heart disease. You know, we we look

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>at that and we say we can address that. We

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>can change people's lives. We can you know, what we

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>described as preventative health. So really, you know, we think

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic has been extremely challenging. We applaud our franchise

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Ease for pushing through it. We are the we're going

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to have the lowest rate of closures in the world,

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>with less than one percent of our studios not reopening

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to the rest of the industry which is

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>currently and that's really sad to see so many great

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, young entrepreneurs and business owners go broke. So

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>we hate seeing the industry contract, but we will see

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>some major beneficiaries. Forty five is one of them. Planet

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>is another, and we're really fortunate. A few months ago

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that Entrepreneur magazine ranked US in front of Planet as

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the world's fastest growing fitness franchise or so when we

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>sprinted past Planet, you know, that's one of the two

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>milestones I said. Obviously I wanted to be a faster

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>growing company in the Planet and the next one for

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>us is going to be our earnings. So when we

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>go past them in earning, that will be the next

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of goal that I've got for the head office here.

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>On that note, of course, you're pricing the shares at

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.239
<v Speaker 1>sixteen dollars a piece right now indicated open anywhere between

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>seventeen fifty eighteen fifty share. What are you doing with

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the proceeds um The first thing we're doing. I mean,

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we've been a very fiscally conservative company since two thousand

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and thirteen. In fact, there's no other company that's sold

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>more franchises than us uh and and look, we're we're

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>excited because we've never had an unprofitable quarter. And that

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>fiscally conservative approach has now been applied to the capital

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:38.239
<v Speaker 1>raising where we're number one paying back all of our debt.

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, that's that's that was my first and

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>my ultimate goal. We will have a revolver in place

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of a hundred million dollars and we're going to thirdly

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>also put some additional capital onto the balance sheet, so

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll have horsepower of eighty million on the

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet, hundred million dollar revolver and you know, if

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at our earnings into the future, we are

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>unleave it. So you know, our peers currently have you know,

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between four and six times, so we have a

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of capacity to look at opportunities in the future.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>We recently purchased Flywheel for five million dollars, which was

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>an incredible buy. So you know, the secondary is one

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>investor selling out. I'm not selling any any stock in

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this I p O and I think that really you know,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>spoke to the and really resonated with a lot of

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>our investors because I said, look, I'm here for the

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>long term. I'm not selling any stock. We're excited about

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>our future, but more importantly that the pipeline of potential

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>franchises buying has never been healthier. UM, so it's an

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>exciting period for us. All right, Adam, thank you so

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We know you're having an incredibly

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>busy day today as your company goes public on New

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>New York Stark Exchange. Adam Gilchrist, co founder and CEO

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of FT Trading, again that stock is bidding bid asks

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and a half, eighteen and a half after pricing

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>UH their shares at sixteen dollars to share. But it's

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see how that industry, um Taylor, is going

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to recover. You know, how will consumer behavior change in

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of going back to the gym and the innovation

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that's been going on in that industry. And you know, Paul,

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>he was talking about those statistics around heart disease. I mean,

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that's another pandemic frankly that we've been ignoring. I think

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>sitting around in this pandemic has made us realize we

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>all need to get back to the gym exactly right.

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.679
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully again we saw a contraction. Hopefully that industry

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>can continue to recover. Well, that more coming up. This

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg, all right. That was Charles Evans, the president

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, speaking

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg's own Michael McKee. And we also had FED

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Chairman j Pal He was UH in front of Congress

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>today making his comments as well. Let's get kind of

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>an overview a little bit of a recap. But what

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>we heard from these FED officials. We do that with

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>carlver Cadonna. He's our top economist for Bloomberg Intelligence. So

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Carl kind of piecing together what we heard from Mr

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Evans of Chicago and FED Chairman Pal. It doesn't seem

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like this FEDS incented to do anything other than kind

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of stay the course here. They feel like they're they

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>had the hand on the tiller. Yeah, that's a very

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>key theme to focus in on here, the kind of

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>central committee of the Open Markets Committee, so that the

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>centrists are that you know that the key leadership really

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>is not responding to the inflation data. Uh. The way

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that the kind of overall messaging from the Fed is

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>a sounding like the Fed has taken up more hawkers shifts.

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>So the hawks on the committee have become more vocal,

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>more concerned about what's happening, whether it's commodity prices, gasoline

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>or or consumer inflation. But that the j Pale's the

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Richard clarenas uh, the Chicago FED president, that Charles Evans,

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>who's a voter this year. Uh, they are confident. Uh.

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And Evans specifically said he's confident that the inflation flare

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>up will be transitory. Powell has echoed that theme. So

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they're acknowledging maybe that the price pressures have written more

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>than they anticipate did and it looks like it will

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>be able slightly longer duration than they anticipated. But they

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>still are very much of the view that things will

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>moderate in the back half of the year as we

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>start to see some moderation in overall economic growth. We

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>were chuckling a little bit yesterday. If members of the House,

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>members of the Senate are asking about inflation, you know,

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>it's something that their constituents are going to them and saying, hey,

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we're feeling this. There are real world inflation pressures. And

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>then there's the economic models. How does Powell square the two? Well,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the you know, the models anticipated that we

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 1>would see an opening here, but they under anticipated the

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>magnitude of the price pressure. So, you know, very difficult

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to model what reopening a twenty one trillion dollar economy

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like micro chip shortages and those sort of factors. So,

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we kind of understand as we look at

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>economic growth relative to potential growth, you know, how that

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>inflation plays out. Um, But what's interesting here if we

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>think of, you know, what the models would forecast, inflation

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is a lagging indicators. So if we're seeing great growth now,

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going to cause inflation further on down the road.

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And typically the lag is about six quarters, so a

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>year and a half. Right. The inflation we're seeing now

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is not the result of an economy operating beyond its potential.

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just this kind of supply, the growing pains of

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of reopening, turning the key, and restarting the economy. So

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a very different type of inflation, and that's why

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the FED is responding it in such a different capacity.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Another way of thinking of this, if we take you know,

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>consumer inflation. So yes, prices are rising, but we have

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>to divide between goods and services. Services are things the

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>FED can very much control because service price pressure reflects

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in the domestic economy. A lot of goods

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sector inflation merely reflects what's happening with exchange rates or

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>inflation coming from overseas. So the price of goods coming

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>from China getting unloaded at the port of Long Beach

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>on the West Coast. Uh, that's not an lation the

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>FED can really control, nor do they want to control

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that inflation. If we look at what's happening right now,

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>CPI goods is off the chart, flaring up, CPI services

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>very much running in line with the average of the

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>five years prior to the pandemic. Well, we just heard

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a real inflationary data point today, Greg Jarrett Bloomberg Radio

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco paying more for his taco and his

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>taco flower rice is an extra dollar. So it is real.

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure, but I'm going to call you out

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>here because this is food away from home, restaurant meals,

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>which are part of this labor shortage that we're seeing

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>in leisure and hospitality sector, restaurant whatnot. If we look

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>at food at home, so grocery store prices, I continually

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>hear everyone's saying, oh, prices are going up. Prices are

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>going up. They're going up, but they are going up

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>at a very very slow pace. So if we look

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>at grocery food, we can see that there's actually a

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>deceleration taking place. So we keep talking about categories that are,

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of the re opening, while there are

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>some categories that are actually decelerating as we reopen. In

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>grocery prices for the most part, are are in that category.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>So they were high during the pandemic when everyone was

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>scrambling for grocery deliveries and whatnot. They are very significantly decelerating.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And yesterday, as I was looking through the CPI basket

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at those food categories, most of them are running

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>below one percent even so my kale is cheaper. Paul, Oh,

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>good for you. I know what kale is. Come so Taylor,

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>stop complaining about those restaurant prices and go home and

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:37.599
<v Speaker 1>cook your food. When we do see tapering, what's it

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna look like. I think it's gonna look very boring

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to financial market. So the Fed is being very clear

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that this will be signaled well in advance, and so

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll have time to refine that message if the market

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>does kind of react to the news. But what we're

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>hearing from folks like Evans and also from j. Powell,

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this is not something that we're going to be hearing

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>about at the lie FO MC meeting right there. Going

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to discuss this for several meetings, so the July meeting

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>into September, we might hear about it at Jackson Hole,

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we might hear about it at the September FOMC. I

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>suspect that the delivery of that message is going to

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>come later than a lot of market participants are thinking

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. I think still the best case scenario

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has probably deliver the message in the fall. UH start

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the program at the start of next year, so in

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>early and you taper basically over the course of next year.

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So by the end of the FED will no longer

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>be purchasing securities to expand their balance sheet. They'll just

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>be replacing things that are maturing. Just quickly twenty seconds

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you go equal taper, nbs and treasuries. That's a very

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting question. J Pow was pushed on that a little

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>bit today and he said that probably mortgage purchases are

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>having more of an impact on the housing market than

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>treasury purchases, although both are impacting. So I think that

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>there is an incentive to move more aggressively on mortgages.

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>All Right, car ricka Donna, senior economist for Bloomberg Intelligent

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>joining us here helping us break it down. Here we

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>have FED Chairman pal Uh and Mr Evans from Chicago

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>FED looking at these markets. Here. Works just started, you know,

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>week one of what is going to be a very

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>active earning season, and again, a lot of investors are

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for numbers that come in really strong to kind

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of support the multiples we're seeing in this marketplace. Let's

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>bring in a professional that does it for a living.

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Johnson, Chairman, ce IO and member of the Investment

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Strategy Committee of Hugh Johnson Advisors. It's about one point

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars in assets under management based in Albody,

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>New York. Here, thanks for joining us once again here,

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, what are you really looking for in this

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>earning season? He needs to see some really big beats

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to justify these valuations. Uh, not real big beats, but

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly beats. We've gotten very used to the fact that

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>when we've been looking at earnings, and I'm not talking

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>about just this earning season, but we've had a continuous

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>outpouring of earnings for the last three months, and in

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>each case, the earnings have been coming in a little

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>bit better than not significantly so, but a little bit

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>better than expected. And every time we see that, um

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it gives a little bit of a boost to the market.

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So the market has been really driven by good earnings

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>reports for the last three months, and I think really

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for the same thing in this earning season,

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a let's just say, a beat

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>on the upside. Now, Now, remember keep in mind that

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>more recently, about a little bit less eight percent of

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the companies that have been reporting have been reporting earnings

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that have beaten estimates, and that compares with the number

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the long term number of six. So companies are

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>getting used of reporting earnings a little bo expectations and

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that's kept the kept the bull market alive, even though

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>we're a little bit concerned about valuation. Before we get

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to valuations, I wouldn't ask if we're in on earnings

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>peak margins as we're thinking about some of these inflationary

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>costs that ceo s are mentioning, and they are mentioned

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>mean them a lot. They certainly are. And if you

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the Beige Book yesterday and the

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>reports from all the districts of the Federal Reserve UM,

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the one thing that jumps out at you is

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 1>that companies are telling us that there's a little bit

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>of margin pressure. And there's a little bit of margin pressure,

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>largely because the upward pressure that they're starting to see.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not significant, But they're seeing upward pressure on wages.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Number One, they've had to compete very very actively in

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the markets to try to get people to come to

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>work for them. They've given a lot of non cash

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>benefits for those to those people to get them to

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>come to work for them. And then of course there's

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the supply problems, which we hear about every day. The

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>supply problems of course, meaning that of course that they're

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>not getting the supplies. The backlogs are very significant. Uh.

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>And and that's creating some a little bit upward pressure

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>on the prices that purchasing managers have to pay. So

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>you bet margins are under pressure. And uh if we

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>believe German Paul that a lot of these pressures, labor

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>pressures as well as the supply pressures, are gonna obey

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>as we moved through the remainder of two thousand twenty one.

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>All Right, you, given that you're in the camp with

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that chairman Pow, where are you guys allocating capital these days? Um?

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Given where we are, well, I tell you, you know,

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a good, great question because we're still bullish on

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a long term basis. We really do believe in our

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of mantra, which is time not timing is a

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>secret to success in the financial markets. But on a

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>short term basis, we think things are a little bit high.

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've had really great markets and two thousand

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty and of course the first part of two thousand

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, and I think the markets a little bit

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>ahead of itself. Particularly now. Remember we're we've really seen

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>the peak and g d P and ernest growth in

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter, and they're those numbers are gonna still

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>be positive, but they're gonna come down. We're not gonna

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>see those kinds of growth rates. So we really think

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we're a little bit ahead of ourselves and they're due

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for I don't want to say a major correction, but

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a pull back, and we're waiting

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>for a pull back to prices that make a little

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>bit more sense. When we do see that pullback, we're

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to be the inflation team. We're gonna be

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>looking very hard at consumer discretionary stocks, very hard at

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>communication services, some of those companies you know, the facebooks

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of this world. We're looking very hard at those, and

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>those are where we're going to start to add to

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>our portfolio. Google is another one. Apple is another one.

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>We'd be adding to those, but not at these levels.

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>We want to see a little bit of a pull

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>back to levels that make a little bit more sense

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and a little more compelling. Are you going to be

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>adding to those based on a call that yields may

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>not rise. Yeah, we would be probably adding to them,

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and I would say in a longer term basis, keep

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in mind something very important, and that is when you're

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at Apple, Facebook, you're looking at these companies, some

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of them communication services, some of them technology. We've often

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>referred to them as being volatile and economically sensitive, that

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>they depend very heavily on the economy doing well. That's

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>no longer the case. These companies have been doing well,

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>giving us the kind of revenue growth, that kind of

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>cash flow on their balance sheets, that kind of free

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>cash flow, and their earnings reports that spen very steady,

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>even though the economic conditions, as you know, have been

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>very volatile and difficult. And and that's the kind of

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>company that's almost I hate to say it, it's not

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>an offensive or bowl. Market sectors. These are starting to

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>act like defensive sectors are good places to be if

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the economy goes into a period which I think it's

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna and that is where we see the growth rates

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of the economy of earnings, employment, you name it, are

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna slow down. They're gonna be positive, but they're gonna

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>slow down. And those are the kinds of companies I

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>think you want to all Right, you thanks so much

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>for joining us to really appreciate that. Hugh Johnson, Chairman

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>CEE IO and member of the Investment Strategy Committee of

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Johnson Advisers, based in Albany, New York. It's gonna

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>be interesting a tailor to see, how you know, to

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the extent we do get a pullback in this market,

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>which some people are calling for, including Hugh Johnson. You know,

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 1>where will people put their money? Will be still in

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that rotation trade into the cyclical names, it's the reopening

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>names into the reflation trades, or will it be into

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the tried and true apples and amazons and facebooks of

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the world. You know. John author is of our bloom

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Bergers Opinion out with a great note this morning saying

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that guilds aren't behaving the way we might think. If

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.439
<v Speaker 1>you think inflation is going to be higher, maybe you

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>get some of that cyclical trade. Yields should be risering,

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're not. So are we pricing in a Fed

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>policy mistake? Really really good column here debating the future

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>of yields. Yeah, exactly right, And you know it's it's

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>tough to see where a pullback comes. We've had so

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 1>much uncertaint yet the market continues to pool hire. Would

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>there be a mistake perhaps from the Federal Reserve? Would

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that be the catalyst? We'll have to see more coming up,

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Let's bring in David Diets here. He's

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>managing principal senior portfolio manager at Pepack Private Wealth Management,

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>nine point four billion dollars under management, located in Bucolic Summit,

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. Hey, David, let's start with the bond market. Boy,

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>ten year one point three four, the thirty year still

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>below two percent at one point nine. What's the treasury

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>market telling us about growth? Do we need to be

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>concerned about growth on the back side of this pandemic? Well,

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you put your finger on it. This is

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the most perplexing problem because we've got all sorts of

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>metrics suggesting there's inflation. All the economists are telling us

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're coming out of the pandemic induced slumber and

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>growth is ahead of us for seeing great corporate earnings.

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>But that bond market that yields just keep falling, and

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>typically yields fall when fixed income investors see, uh, the

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>lack of inflation, lack of growth, and so which is

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>right here? I still think that all signs point for

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and expanding economy. And here's the thing. If you go

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, uh, Matt, you know you're you're interest

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>rate to attain your treasury about a half of one percent.

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>At the start of the year, we're under one percent.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Now that is true. We ratchet quickly all the way

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>up to about one point seven top in March. Now

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we're just over one point three. But still I think

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>the end is up. Remember two thousand nineteen we saw

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the ten years highest two point nine. All signs are

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>saying that ultimately we're going to normalize, maybe not in

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the next three months, but over the next twelve months.

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So I gotta see interest rates ultimately moving up. And

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I think actually the stock investors will appreciate that. Are

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you positioning a portfolio for higher inflation? Because I hate

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to say it, every single question that Powell is getting

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's on inflation. Um, so you know, no one knows

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for sure whether it's transitory or more permanent. I mean,

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in some things, everything in life is transitory ultimately. But

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's a risky game that they're playing here,

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>because if it turns out that it's not transitory, the

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>problem with monetary policy is to act for the lag

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and so they would be very much behind the eight ball.

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And of course the real wild card is how to

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>consumers act here. If consumers start to think inflations around

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the corner and they rush out the stuff and order,

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it will become self fulfilling. So we are certainly tilting

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>towards areas of the market I think can benefit UH

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>from inflation. I think if there's inflation, ultimately higher interest rates,

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that's manner from heaven for the financials. Of course, you've

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>got your cyclicals, your industrials, your materials, your energy place

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 1>all should do it better with prices going up. All right,

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates in your scenario good for financials, as

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned. I know in the past we've talked

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>about Wells Fargo, that's a name you've liked, and that

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they reported some numbers this week stock's done really well

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>this year, up nearly fift What is your calling the

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>financials and Wells? Well, so, the financials, I do think

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that they are trading at about discount in terms of

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 1>price to earnings, price to book than they normally do,

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and of course the overall stock markets elevated, so I

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:53.479
<v Speaker 1>think that financials could provide an opportunity. But I do

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think it all comes down to the economy and interest rates.

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>If the economy picks up, then the loan demand will

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>kick in. That the kind of a thorn in the

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>side right now, not a lot alone demand. Of course,

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.719
<v Speaker 1>they're build to charge higher rates. The fitnesstrants to go up,

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>So then uh like generally would overwege financials drilling down

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>why Wells Fargo? You know, Wells Fargo has one of

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the best franchises here in the country. Coast to coast,

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>gives the tremendous economies to scale. I actually like the

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that they're not focused on a lot of trading

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>activity that some of the New York banks focused on

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>because that tends to be cyclical. They're kind of middle

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>market um consumer lending and so forth, and historically they've

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>been good judges of credit quality have been conservative. Uh,

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they've of course still associated with a lot of bad activities.

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>A couple of years ago, a new guy in there

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>from Bank of New York I think is writing that ship.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And of course, as you pointed out, just had a

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>great earnings announcement. They got they went through the stress

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>test with flying colors, They doubled the dividend. They announced

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>the stock buyback of eighteen billion. That's about ten percent

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of the value the overall companies. Another ten percent of

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the shares go away. That's good for stock investors. Finally,

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>here when we talk about some of the loan demand

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.880
<v Speaker 1>with the banks, you have to talk about housing prices

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>and some of the housing stocks that have started to

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>roll over. I'm just taking a look at the I

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>t B for example, the E t F of housing stocks,

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>as lumber has also started to roll over. What do

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you make of the housing sector? Well, you know, I

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>think it's a little bit like with the the the

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>interest rates and the tenure treasury. I think there was

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>too much acceleration too quickly. We're seeing a pullback. Marcus,

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>do not go on a straight line. I gotta believe

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that the two or three years from now lumber prices

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>will be higher. Of course that's a tricky indicator because

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of relationships between Canada United States. Um. You, you are

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. The housing stocks, the paulties and Lenar's have

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of come back down here, but remember they practically

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>doubled from a year ago, so they were due for

0:26:56.480 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a pause here. Um uh. In with with better employment situation,

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think people that demand for housing will continue to

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>stay strong. All right, David, Thanks as always for checking

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.479
<v Speaker 1>in with us. We always appreciate getting your thoughts and opinions.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>David dts And, Managing Principal Senior PM for p Peck

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Private Wealth Management, getting his thoughts on this market. Still

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>likes the cyclical trade, still likes that reflation trade, that

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>reopening trade, and again with rates where they are lots

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of questions there, but we'll have more coming up. Thanks

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller three. On fal Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg radio