WEBVTT - Week in Tech: Are You There God? It’s Me, AI

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for tunion to techt Stuff. If you don't recognize

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>my voice, my name is Ozvoloshan, and I'm here because

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the inimitable Jonathan Strickland has passed the baton to Kara

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Price and myself to host tech Stuff. The show will

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>remain your home for all things tech, and all the

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>old episodes will remain available in this feed. Thanks for listening.

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production of iHeart Podcasts and Kaleidoscope.

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Osvoloshan. Today will bring you the headlines, including supersonic planes,

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with four or four Media's Joseph Cox about

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the aftermath of quote the largest sting operation ever on

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Today's Tech Support. Then we're back with another When did

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>this become a thing? This time we're looking into Google's

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>new assistant Gemini. All of that on the Weekend Tech.

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>It's Friday, February seventh, So this week I'm hosting solo again.

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Kara Price is out for a few weeks, but our

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>producer Eliza Dennis is here to help me through the headlines. Eliza,

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>welcome back.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Thanks, happy to be here.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>We've got an exciting potpourri. We've got planes, fridges, and

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholicism.

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>This list is giving me jeopardy vibes.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with fridges, but we're going to do all three.

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But we'll start with fridges. These aren't ordinary fridges. They're

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>smart fridges. And I read a story in Bloomberg by

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Austin Carr under the headline Walgreens replaced fridge doors with

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>smart screens. It's now a two hundred million dollar fiasco.

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>It all started a few years ago when Walgreens began

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>installing smart refrigerators in some of their stores.

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I ever saw one of these in

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 2>the many, many Wilgreens I've been in. How about you, os.

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I haven't actually seen them in person either, but the

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg article was very well written and visually described. Most

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of these fridges are actually in Chicago, and they're not

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>really smart fridges, they're actually smart doors. Picture a door

0:01:55.880 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>size computer screen, and the screen mimics exactly what you'd

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>see through at last door into the space, so basically

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>rows of gatorade or energy drinks. But instead of the

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>actual product, you're now looking at a digital image of

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the product that's inside the fridge. And that means digital prices,

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>no more sticker price tags.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so is this just trying to make sure that

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 2>employees don't have to walk around with those guns and

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 2>re stick prices every time there's a sale.

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Probably a bit of that. And also dynamic pricing, so

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the ability to change in real time.

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Kara talked about this a few weeks ago, This dynamic

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 2>pricing where prices can fluctuate at a moment's notice. And

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 2>it's also a side effect of the smart shopping carts

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that she talked about, you know, those being piloted by Instacart.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the screens, both on the caper cuts and on

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>these fridges can do smart pricing, but they also play ads,

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and per Bloomberg, this is called quote unquote retail media advertising,

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which is a gold rush right now. So you know,

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the fridges are interesting, but there's a legal aspect here too.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So Walgreens signed a ten year contract with the startup

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>behind the screens, Cooler Screens, Inc. After an early pilot

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>showed that the screens could boost sales about to five percent. However,

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>early gains turned into a month's long contentious legal slog.

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's the overview. So Walgreens installed ten thousand smart doors

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and planned to install thirty five thousand more, but back

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three, things started to go a little wrong.

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>The screens started advertising the wrong items, They flickered, they

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>went blank, some even called on fire. Yeah, and they

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>weren't popular with the higher ups at Walgreens. According to Bloomberg,

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Walgreens at the time asked her team,

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>why do our stores look like an effing casino? And

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>not only that, maybe a casino would have been tolerable

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>if it also boosted sales hugely, but Walgreens claimed there

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was practically no boost in sales.

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so ugly and ineffective, you know, that's that's the take.

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And so Walgreens had enough and started this legal process

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to try and get out of the contract. Early Cooler

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Screens didn't like this, and back in June twenty three,

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>they sued Walgreens for a breach of contract. Walgreens then

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>counter sued for monetary damages.

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 2>This is the.

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Baldoni Lively of smart fridges. But Cooler Screens then found

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>another way to fight back. According to Bloomberg, they secretly

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>cut the data fees to these smart screen doors. In

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred Walgreens locations in Chicago.

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 2>How did that affect Walgreens?

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean these stores had dozens of doors that

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>look kind of glazed over, and customers obviously couldn't see

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>what was inside anymore, so employees had to physically and

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>valiantly but vaguely describe what was behind each door, like

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>there would be hand pasted signs saying assorted sports, drinks

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:56.119
<v Speaker 1>and coffee. This went on for about a week until

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Walgreens got a judge to issue a temporary restraining order

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>against Cooler Screen, and this forced the company to restore

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the data feeds. So Walgreen's got their unwanted smart doors back,

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>but the screens were still not performing as hoped, so

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Walgreens started physically removing them in early twenty twenty four,

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and uninstallation was completed in August last year.

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 2>What's your takeaway as well?

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's always these tech fails are always amusing.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>There was a great little side in the Bloomberg article

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>about a Reddit post which went viral showing a customer

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>joking if only there was some other technology that would

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>let us see what's inside there lah exactly. So for me,

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the takeaway here is that, you know, the latest consumer

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>technology can be exciting, specific can boost sales for corporations,

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>exciting for corporations, But sometimes the best tech is centuries old,

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.679
<v Speaker 1>and in this case, the good old last display case

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>still does the job.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I love that story. Let's hear about planes.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so this one was. I heard about this last

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>week and I personally spend way too much time on play,

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>so I was very intrigued to read about a team

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>who've just had a breakthrough in potentially making flying much

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:06.799
<v Speaker 1>much faster.

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 2>How fast are we talking?

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, take flying from San Francisco to Tokyo usually an

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>eleven hour flight. What if I told you there was

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a way to make that flight only six hours.

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I still wouldn't be able to afford it,

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 2>but I would want to go all the time. Fair.

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is an aviation startup called Boom, and what

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do is to create a modern commercial

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>supersonic flight, as in a plane that flies so fast

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it breaks a sound barrier quote, displacing sound waves so

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly that they can press into a single thunderous lap,

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>forming the so called sonic boom. That's the name Boom.

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is according to an article this week in

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco Standard.

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 2>So how far are we from Boom? Kind of like

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, taking me to London.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, Boom had its first successful test flight that broke

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the sound barrier just last week, flying high over California's

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Mojave Desert. This XB one prototype broke the sound barrier.

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>But to be clear, the XP one is just a prototype,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and it is a scale model. In fact, it's a

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>single seater, whereas the planned aircraft called the Overture, which

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>has yet to be built, is going to be eighty seats. Now,

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, military jets break the sound barrier all day,

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>every day, and this isn't that new in this sense,

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>has a history of supersonic passenger aircrafts in commercial use.

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 2>So this is the Concord as.

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>The Concord exactly, and I think one of the most

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>iconic planes in history. The Concord was first put into

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>flight in the sixties. It was a supersonic jet that

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>shuttler likes of Michael Jackson, Phil Collins, Paul McCartney, the

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Pope and even the Queen back and forth across the Atlantic.

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>But per the San Francisco Standard, it costs twenty thousand

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars per round trip adjusted for inflation, So yeah, not

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>for us. They're also environmental concerns. I think it consumed

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.559
<v Speaker 1>I read, four times as much fuel as a seven

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>four seven and carried only a quarter of the people,

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's sixteen times less efficient for any mental math nerds,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>they would be able to get much quicker than me.

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>And then there are also some crashes and fires. Okay,

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>so all of this meant that the Concord flew its

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>last flight more than twenty years ago, in two thousand

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and three. But now there's Overture gunning to take its place.

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And what they're trying to do over at Boom is

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to build a supersonic plane that would be accessible to

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>regular people. And they're trying to do this by using

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 1>modern tech that will cost less than the concords of

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>yester year, and also using more sustainable fuel. So this,

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>perhaps unsurprisingly, has caught the eye of Silicon Valley luminaries,

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>people like Sam Altman, Read Hoffmann, Mike Morritz have all invested,

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and if things go to plan, Boom says that Overture

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>could begin commercial flights in five years.

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, okay, how is that going to happen?

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, they're not going to operate the planes themselves. They're

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>doing deals with the airline industry, and according to the standard,

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>they've actually made deals with three airlines, including American Airlines,

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>who have put down a nonrefundable deposit on twenty overtures,

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>which is I guess a bold move given that one

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been built yet. Yes, and of course there's a

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>big question about the boom, with the clue being in

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the name flying over Land, whether or not that will

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>be allowed.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not ready for that. Sound. Let's move on

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 2>to the next thing. You already mentioned the Pope, but

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 2>you have something else to tell me.

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So it was actually John Paul the Second May

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>He Rest in Peace, who was the Concord passenger, but

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>actually said, this story is about the current Pope Francis.

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not my all time favorite papal Ai story. Do

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you remember the deep fake Pope Eliza.

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 2>In the Yes, absolutely wearing the.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Coat, wearing the white Montclair puffer jacket in the mountains,

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the papal puffer.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 2>What a fashion easter.

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>But this is a more serious one because right now

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems like there's a throwdown brewing between God and

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>God in the Machine Akai. Pote Francis has raised concerns

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>previously about the ethical and moral implications of AI and

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>its effect on relationships and education, and warfare and work.

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>According to a story in The New York Times with

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the fabulous headline citing shadow of Evil, Vatican warns about

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the risks of AI. Those statements have now been synthesized

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>into a document called Antiqua et Nova Ancient and New,

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's meant to warn those of the Catholic Faith

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that AI is both a source of tremendous opportunities but

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>also profound risks.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so kind of threading the needle there, What else

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 2>did it say? Yeah?

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the paper pointed out that there is potential

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>for misinformation, eroded trust, harm in the social development of children,

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>the replacement of human work, and the development of autonomous weapons,

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>all of which, you know, franklier themes of this show.

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But the Papal warning tried to bring into focus what

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>it means to be human and the ethical considerations we

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>should bear in mind when using AI. For example, the

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>document says, quote in all areas where humans are called

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to make decisions, the shadow of evil also looms here.

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So what this kind of says to me is that

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the paper is as much about how we choose to

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>use AI than about AI itself. And you know what's

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting was the Vatican of your you know, may have

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>tried to ban this, like the Catholic Church banning the

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>printing press and burning the people who try to print stuff. Happily,

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>five hundred years later we've you know, the Church has

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>moved on and they're not trying to say, you know,

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>don't use AI. They're trying to say, think about what

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>makes you human when you're using this.

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's actually a really nice reminder that we can

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 2>all decide how we want to move through the world

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 2>and also how we interact with both human and machine.

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's well put. Well, thanks for joining me, Eliza.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm missing Cara, but I'm enjoying chatting to you each week.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 2>That's my pleasure.

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Us Coming up, we hear from our friends at four

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>or four Media about a plea deal in one of

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the largest sting operations ever. That's next on tech support.

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us today for our tech support segment, We're

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>turning to four or four Media's Joseph Cox to discuss

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a story he's been reporting on for years. It's about

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a sting operation with ripple effects throughout some of the

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>biggest criminal organizations globally, and a raid made possible by

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the tech that we just can't live without our phones.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 1>But this isn't about your iPhone, Pixel or Galaxy. It's

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>about encrypted phones. Joseph wrote a book called Dark Wire

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>about the Encrypted Device Company a NOM, it's unique relationship

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>with the FBI, and the biggest criminal raid in recorded history.

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>And now some of the people arrested in that sting

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>operation are pleading guilty, which calls into question if there'll

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 1>be a trial. Joseph is great to see.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 3>You, Thanks for having me.

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't mind, let's start at the beginning.

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>What is a non.

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So, a NOOM was part of the encryptis phone industry.

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 3>And as you say, it's not like the normal apply

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 3>I phones or Google androids that we all use. These

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 3>are very special phones that have sometimes a microphone removed,

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 3>the camera taken out, sometimes even the GPS removed, because

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 3>basically they're marketed to serious drug traffickers and criminals.

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And do they look like old you know, like plip

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>phones or nockia old phones, or what's the physical appearance

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of these phones.

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's the funny thing. They do look like ordinary phones.

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Back in the day when there was a company called

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Phantom Secure that was a sort of BlackBerry with a

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 3>quirity keyboard. Nowadays they will look like a Google Pixel,

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 3>but they will operate very differently.

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And a non was basically a handset manufacturer.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to describe. It was almost like a software developer,

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 3>a tech startup, a hackefon as well. But basically what

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 3>they would do is that they would make their own software,

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 3>which is sending encrypto messages, wiping data from the phone,

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 3>redacting parts of photos you may take and send across

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the device, and then installing that onto Android's phones. So

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 3>they're almost like an operating system developer and app developer

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 3>as well. But I would say it's mostly on the

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 3>software side.

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned that these were very popular with criminals.

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>These are non phones. What was the advantage of them?

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Why did you want these phones?

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 3>So criminals are of course always trying to stay one

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 3>step ahead of law enforcement. Back in the day, that

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 3>would have been something like the TV series The Wire

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 3>right where they're using payphones or they're using pages, but

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 3>of course cops got wind of that, so then criminals

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 3>turned to encryption, And to me, it's the biggest technological

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 3>leapf criminals since the inventure of the mobile phone. If

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 3>you are a serious criminal, you're only going to be

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 3>taken seriously if you have one of these phones. It's

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 3>almost essential to be a cocaine or a heroine or

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 3>a methamphetamine trafficka today.

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Wow, obviously it's not just criminals who rely on encryption.

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>We had Mariuth Whittaker on the podcast, and you know,

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>she made the case for the benefits of encryption.

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Absolutely, And I think that's the important thing in

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 3>that encryption is beneficial to everybody. I use it every

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 3>single day. Ironically, I use Signal and other encrypted messaging

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 3>apps to talk to criminals who are using these encryptive

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 3>phones as well. It's a messy for the issue, but

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 3>I think we can all agree that, you know, there

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 3>is a net positive and overwhelming net positive for us

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 3>being able to use encryption. That being said, law enforcement

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 3>are not just going to sit by and let that happen.

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 3>They're going to think of new ways to sort of

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 3>penetrate the secret system.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned that, you know, the old mafia techniques

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of payphones and pages. Basically law enforcement got ahead of them.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>How did the FBI find out about a NOM?

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 3>So what happened first was the FBI shut down Phantom Secure,

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 3>this other encryptive phone company very very popular with the

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Similarer drug cartel, Australian bikers, that sort of thing, and

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 3>they wanted to get a backdoor into it which would

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 3>have allowed them to read all of the messages. That

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 3>didn't happen. But then what did basically fall into their

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 3>lap was that someone who was selling phones for Phantom

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Secure and some other companies, they were making their own

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 3>next generation of encryptive phone called a NOOM, and they

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 3>offered it to the FBI, and they said, look, would

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 3>you like to take this and use it for your

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 3>own investigations. Of course, in return, I would like not

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 3>to be prosecuted. Ideally I would also like to get

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 3>some money for it. But I can't overstate how exciting

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 3>that was to the FBI. Rather than trying to put

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 3>a backdoor into an existing app or into an existing company,

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>they could just make their own encryptive phone company and

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 3>then read the messages.

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Of criminals incredible drinking directly from the fire hoods, so

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to speak. Do you know exactly how how the deal

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:06.439
<v Speaker 1>was struck.

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 3>So their pseudonym is AFGU AFG double Low, And my

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 3>understanding is that the deal came around fairly quickly and

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 3>the main thing for the FBI and the Australian Federal

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Police that were also part of this investigation, they just

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 3>wanted to make sure that it worked. Basically, it's one

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 3>thing for AFGU to promise, oh, sure you can backdoor

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 3>this phone, It'll all be okay. It's another for it

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 3>to actually, you know, work out in practice in the

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 3>real world. I go into this in much more detail

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 3>in the book. There's a series of events where they

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 3>do verify it is working. There's a scene where someone

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 3>from AFP is laying down on their sofa at home

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 3>and they're seeing messages flash up on their laptop screen

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 3>when they're being intercepted in real time. So this wasn't

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 3>just a pipe dream anymore. It was going to become

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 3>a reality, you know, if the criminals bought the phones.

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>At least on the cover of your book, which is

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>called Darkwoir, this is described as quote the largest sting

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>operation ever which makes you wonder just how large was

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it and how ubiquitous were a NON phones in the underworld.

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, a non grew to the same size, if

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 3>not bigger than some of the actual encryptive phone companies

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 3>for criminals. They got to something like twelve thousand devices,

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 3>which doesn't sound like that much to us ordinary people,

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 3>but Phantom Secure was only something between seven and ten thousand,

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 3>So the FBI was almost better than some of the

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 3>criminal organizations at this At this as well as for

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 3>why I called it the largest thing operation ever, it's

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 3>not just sort of the audacity of it, but when

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 3>law enforcement around the world eventually acted on this information,

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 3>they did sort of a worldwide relay race of raids

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 3>all across the planet. Something like nine thousand law enforcement

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 3>officers acted in one single day, which is almost difficult

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 3>to put into words. And now there's a challenge because

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 3>you can't even imagine law enforcement activity on that scale.

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>No, what an incredible scene. How did it rise to prominence?

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, did the FBI have other people who were

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of promoting in the criminal underworld? Was it entirely organic? Like,

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>how did this become the encryption phone of choice.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 3>With a norm you can only speak to other and

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 3>NOM users in the same way, if you're on a

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.719
<v Speaker 3>phantom secure phone, you can only speak to phantom secure

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 3>users as well. That's especially interesting when it comes to

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the world of drug trafficking because if you get somebody

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 3>who's really really big in the world of cocaine trafficking,

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 3>or maybe one of these kingpins who's hiding out in Dubai,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 3>if they switch over to a NORM, then everybody underneath

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 3>them needs to switch as well, and you basically have

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 3>this multi level marketing scheme essentially, where it's the people

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 3>at the top who dictate what everybody else underneath has

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 3>to use as well. And then that's how they did it.

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 3>The FBI wasn't sending out agents itself to sell the phones.

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 3>They let the phones organically spread among serious drug traffickers.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 3>And one of the most important people for that was

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 3>a guy called hak An Aik. He was Australia's most

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 3>wanted man and he's a top tier drug trafficker, I mean,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 3>getting billions of dollars worth of product into Australia. And

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 3>when he switched over to a NORM and started using

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 3>the phones and selling the phones as well, I mean

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 3>what better ambassador for your phone company than one of

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 3>the most wanted traffickers.

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 2>In the world.

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>The raids were in twenty twenty one, and there are

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>arrests made, But you publish a story just this week.

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>What's happened since twenty twenty one, and what was the

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>story from this week?

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So, in a sort of cruel twist, the FBI

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 3>and the US and the lover authorities didn't just charge

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 3>the criminal users of a norm as in the drug traffickers,

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 3>the hit men, the money launders, that sort of thing.

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 3>US authorities also charged the people who sold a Noom

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 3>phones the hest of the FBI. And the reason was

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 3>in the FBI eyes that, well, a Noon became a

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 3>criminal entity in its own rights, so we're going to

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 3>charge you as well. So there was almost a double

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 3>whammy there. And we were all getting ready for this

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 3>big trial coming up in March where a few of

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 3>them were going to go on the stand essentially and

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 3>try to defend themselves. But now they are pleading guilty essentially,

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 3>And that is really important because at the trial, the

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 3>US authorities were preparing to name Afku, They were going

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 3>to name their informant, which to me is crazy but

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:37.959
<v Speaker 3>that was something that we're going to have to do,

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 3>and now Afgu's identity will probably remain secret.

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinated by this story, Joseph, been grateful for you

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and for coming on to Day to talk about it.

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm also interested in it because it's this kind of

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of there's this ironic element to it, right where

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the very thing which is supposed to keep these criminals

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>safe ended up getting them caught. It makes me think

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>about the Hezbollah exploding Pages story, where Israeli intelligence had

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:07.239
<v Speaker 1>understood that Hezbollah were using pages because they thought they

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>were safer than mobile phones, and then Israel essentially inserted

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>themselves into the production of these pages and inserted explosives

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and in so doing killed Hezbela operatives with collateral damage

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. These two stories have an interesting connection, which

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is about how the tech we use and how the

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>tech we trust can be turned against us. And I'm curious,

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're not a Hezbollah operative or a drug dealer,

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>what should you be thinking about when you read this story.

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, in the case of a NOOM, it was

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 3>drug traffickers. In the case of the Pages, it was

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 3>a designated terrorist group. It can for us though, I

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 3>think make people ordinary people suspicious of software they should

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 3>be able to trust. I want people to still have

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 3>that trust. I don't want people to feel like, well,

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 3>who do I know who's actually running this? Maybe it's

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.120
<v Speaker 3>a whole honeypot or something like that. And I think

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 3>these operations where authorities attack the supply chain could so doubt.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 3>And I mean from the drug traffickers I've spoke to

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 3>and the people who sell these phones to criminals. More

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 3>and more of the drug traffickers are moving to ordinary

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 3>apps that we all use because they don't trust the

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 3>encryptophones anymore. There's been so many operations where even the

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 3>drug traffickers are saying, well, I'm just going to move

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the signal or something. And what does that mean for

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 3>us now? Because I don't think law enforcements are just

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 3>going to put themselves in the back and go home.

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 3>They will be looking for the next thing to compromise

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 3>or investigate.

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Joseph, thank you, thank you so much. Coming up and

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>look at the uses of Gemini in your Gmail and

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>its similarities to a polarizing office assistant from decades past.

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>That's on when did this become a thing? Stay with us?

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>It's time for our next segment, When did this become

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a thing? Where we bring you a story or observation

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>from our lives and try to figure it out. In

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>other words, ask the question when did this become a thing?

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>And if you've got an email account with Google, which,

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>according to Google, around one point eight billion people do,

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you might have noticed something pop up on your screen recently,

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a sparkly little feature called Gemini. Now Gemini isn't new,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>per se, It's a new name for Google's a I tool.

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>You may remember Barred, which was Gemini's predecessor, But about

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a year ago Google gave their chatbot a glow up.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 1>And now we're being aided by Gemini, which is a

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>constellation of stars, of course, and many people's least favorite

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>sign of the zodiac. I went to Google's own blog

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>called the Keyword to learn more, and I found out

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that once again, studying Latin pays dividends. I wish I had,

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Gemini is actually Latin for twins. And then, to my amazement,

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the blog made reference to a stronger quote. A key

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>characteristic of the Gemini zodiac sign is a dual natured

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>personality capable of adapting quickly connecting to a wide range

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:13.479
<v Speaker 1>of people and seeing things from multiple perspectives. Apparently, earlier

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>versions of the name for this product included Titan, which

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is the name of Saturn's largest moon, but also a

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>rather more intimidating name. Remember this AI is your friend

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and partner.

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Kids.

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't seen Gemini in your inbox yet, you've

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely seen it on Google dot Com. Whenever that aioverview

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>pops up after performing at Google Search, that's Gemini doing

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>its thing. When I first saw those AI overviews, they

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of shocked me. I do find them pretty useful

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>when I want to know how to do something like

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm having trouble getting audio output from my microphone into

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>my recorder. What should I do? But if I'm researching

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in a more open ended way, I don't find it

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>very useful at all. However, recently, Gemini actually entered my

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>work email inbox and it felt a little intrusive. When

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I would go to write or apply to an email,

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 1>next to my cursor, a little message appeared saying help

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>me write. I've actually never tried it before, but I

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>thought today would be a good day to give it

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a whirl. So I'm pulling up my work email, clicking compose,

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's a little little thing saying help me write,

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>which I'm going to click on, and I'm going to

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>say I would like to interview the Pope about his

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>views his views on AI for the Tech Stuff Podcast.

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Please write an email to the Vatican Communications Office asking

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>for an interview and making the most compelling case as

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to why he should do it. Let's see what happens

0:26:54.200 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>create just thinking. Okay, Dear Vatican Communications, my name is

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>os Voloshian and I am reaching out from the Tech

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Podcast. We will be honored to have the opportunity

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to interview His Holiness, Pope Francis about his views on AI.

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>We believe that His Holiness's perspective on AI would be

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>incredibly valuable to our audience. As a global leader and

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.959
<v Speaker 1>voice of moral authority, his insights on the ethical and

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>societal implications of AI will be particularly impactful. The Tech

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Podcast reaches a wide audience of tech enthusiasts, industry professionals,

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and policymakers. An interview with His Holiness undoubtedly generates significant

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>interest and spark important conversations around AI. We will be

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>happy to accommodate His Holiness's schedule and preferences for the

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>interview format. We're also open to discussing any specific topics

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 1>or themes that he would like to address. Thank you

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>for your timing consideration. We eagerly await your response. Sincerely,

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>oz Well, I do like I wouldn't have thought about

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>referring to him as his Holiness, but I like the

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>use of his correct title. I'm not sure that that

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>email quite do the trick. The tone is so obsequious,

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many his Holinesses you can fit

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>into one email, but also so grandiose. I mean, I

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>love hosting text stuff, but the idea that tech stuff

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>could be the perfect platform for the Pope to start

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a global conversation is also kind of absurd. So there's

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this kind of mismatch of tones and a demonstration of

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental misunderstanding of the task at hand. Now, Gemini

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't just write emails. It's supposed to be a kind

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of full suite virtual office assistant. And don't get me wrong,

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I would love it if it really helped me be

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>more productive. But either I'm not using it right or

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just not there yet. Because in all of these capacities.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a little meh, But why did Gemini just show

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>up in my work email one day? And the answer

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to that is that Google had originally hoped that businesses

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>would pay twenty dollars per month on top of their

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Google Workspace enterprise price, but the adoption of that was

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>very low, so instead Google decided to increase workspace costs

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>by two dollars per month for all users and into

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>great Gemini everywhere, a case of the good old maxim

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>if you build it, make them come. All of this

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>made me think about my best friend growing up. Clippy.

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>For those too young to remember, Clippy was an anthropomorphized

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>paper clip that was introduced into Microsoft Office in nineteen

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety six as part of a project spearheaded by Melinda Frenchgates,

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates's wife at the time. And by an anthropomorphized

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>paper clip, I mean he was an animated cartoon paper

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>clip with large, shifty eyes and bushy floating eyebrows, and

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Clippy would be there, bouncing on a piece of ruled

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>paper which almost looked like a magic carpet, making eyes

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>at you, and every so often a little cartoon text

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>bubble would appear and ask if you needed any help.

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>This happened over and over and over constantly throughout the

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>day when using Microsoft Office Suite. And this might shock you,

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but Clippy isn't his real name. It's clip It. I

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>think we all just decided he needed to be cuter,

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps because he was so annoying. I don't know the

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>psychology behind it, but we all mind melded and decided

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Clippy was Clippy and that he was a he. And

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this actually came up during the preliminary focus groups. During testing,

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>women in particular didn't like Clippy's appearance because they found

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>his stare unsettling, and by unsettling, I mean unsettling. There

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>was a story in The Verge a couple of years

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>ago under the headline Microsoft ignored focus group feedback about

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>leering Clippy. Women did not like leering Clippy, according to

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>focus groups, but in the nineties, the guy's green lighting,

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the bouncing paper clip didn't care. They were willing to

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>throw away the negative focus group data to get Clippy

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>onto people's computer screens, and they did so. Clippy was

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>included in Microsoft Office for Windows ninety seven, and like Gemini,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Clippy was supposed to be helpful. For example, if you

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>type the word dea into a word document, Clippy would say,

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it looks like you're writing a letter. Would you like help?

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And you could either opt to get help or say no,

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to type out this letter without help. But

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if you took Clippy up on his offer, he points

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you towards introducing yourself in the letter and giving you

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>pointers about how to phrase sentences. The problem was most

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>people didn't actually need or want help writing letters or

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>with the other basic tasks that Clippy was offering to

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>assist with, at least not more than once. So people

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>got really really frustrated with this smiling, bouncing, possibly creepy

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>paper clip in the corner of their word documents, and

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the vitriol did finally get to Microsoft, with Clippy put

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to rest in two thousand and seven. He certainly was annoying,

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but I do understand why there's so much Clippy fan

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>art out there to this day. Clippy truly was a

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>touchstone of my youth. But why we're talking about Clippy

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>today and why it's relevant is that Clippy was an

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>early example of consumer facing AI. And while Gemini is

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>much smarter than Clippy and less creepy, at least visually,

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>there is the same sense of intrusion the way Jen

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Womini shows up and asks me if I want my

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>emails to be summarized, is giving me flashbacks help me write?

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>May as well be it looks like you're writing an email,

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>would you like help? People have tried to find ways

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to opt out of Gemini's presence on Gmail, citing concerns

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>about privacy. I mean, if you let your emails be

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 1>summarized by Gemini, where does that data go? Google has

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a set of privacy commitments online that says, quote, your

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>data is your data. The content that you put into

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Google workspace services, emails, documents, etc. Is yours. We never

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>sell your data, and you can delete your content or

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>export it, but it's still being processed on Google servers. Now. Sure,

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>all my emails are there anyway, but there's another layer

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of unease which comes with them being read over by

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a machine and interpreted by a machine without my request

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>or consent. And Google just can't sume to get the

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>optics quite right. During the twenty twenty four Olympics, Google

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>ran an ad for Gemini where a dad used AI

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to help his daughter write a letter to the American

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>track star and the idea of using a chatbot to

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>help write a fan letter. This kind of innocent form

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of human connection between a kid and how idol was

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>off putting to a lot of people. Google ended up

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>pulling that ad much like Apple did its ad, which

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>crushed a whole bunch of musical instruments and paint pots

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and other artifacts of human creativity into a sleek iPad.

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>This also calls up raw because it revealed a deep

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>dissonance between how engineers think about their creations and how

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>real people think about their lives. Take a look through

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the r slash Google community on Reddit and you'll see

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>what real people think. There are users calling Gemini quote

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely worthless, and others said quote mostly nonsense, but occasionally

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it gets lucky and says something correct. Maybe Redd it's

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>being a bit too hard on Gemini here. I mean,

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>looking back at the Clippy error, so many people in nostalgic.

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, no one actually wants Clippy back in their

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>word documents, but there's a kind of yearning for a

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>simple time, and I do wonder how we'll look back

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Gemini era. I mean, after all, it's still

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a time when we sit in front of our computers,

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>typing on our keys, telling the computer what we want.

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, fast forward twenty five years, when perhaps

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll be chiogenically frozen and my brain will be uploaded

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to the cloud, and that mind will wistfully think back

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to sitting in front of my computer in my apartment,

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>thinking I remember Gemini. That's it for this week for

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, I'm oz Vloshin and this episode was produced

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>by Eliza Dennis, Victoria Domingez, and Lizzie Jacobs. It was

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>executive produced by me Kara Price and Kate Osborne for

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Kaleidoscope and Katrina Norvel for iHeart Podcast. But He'd Fraser

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is our engineer. Kyle Murdoch mixed this episode and he

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>also wrote our theme song. Join us next Wednesday for

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff the story when we have a very special

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>conversation with the Godfather of AI and the twenty twenty

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>four Nobel Laureate Jeffrey Hinton about his remarkable life and

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>how it intersects with building AI. Please rate, review, and

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>reach out to us at tech Stuff Podcast at gmail

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com. We want to hear from you.