WEBVTT - School of Golf Architecture: Place with Blake Conant

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Frida Egg podcast

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and to the first installment of the School of Golf Architecture.

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain what that is in a minute, but first,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this episode is brought to you by our friends at

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>b Dratty. So a big priority for me is having

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>golf clothes that I feel good about wearing both on

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and off the golf course. And I found that b

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>drattypolos just hit that sweet spot exactly. I have their

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>classic original liampolo in a few different colors, and it's

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>all about the fabric, the Peruvian Pima cotton. It's super

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>soft and comfortable. It feels light and athletic for walking

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the course and playing the game. But it's also cotton right,

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it looks classy, It looks great outside of the golf context.

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>So the limpolo, among a lot of other good stuff,

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is available at bdradty dot com. At checkout use the

0:00:56.360 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>promo code Friday Egg fifteen. You'll get fifteen percent off

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and help support what we're doing here, all right, the

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>School of Golf Architecture. I'll introduce the idea for this

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>series in full once this episode gets underway, but basically,

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an introduction to golf course design, where I'm kind

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of standing in as the student heading out into the

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>world and talking to some experts like today's guest Blake Conan,

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and just trying to learn as much as I can

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>from them about this fascinating subject and delivering the results

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to you. Today's episode is about the idea of place

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>in golf architecture, and let's just get to it right.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 2>It requires a different technique.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>What you need to do is actually square the face

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so it'll dig down underneath that bad lie and propel

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that ball right out onto the green.

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing. Playing out of a buried line of

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 2>bunker is completely different than playing out of a night

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 2>and clean lion of green side buker.

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You need to be aggressive on any show weather it's

0:01:58.520 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting cleanly for it.

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Frida Egg, well, we've all faiked it.

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Regretted Frida Egg not to be cleared though it's actually

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a pretty easy shot to hit. So a little backstory.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Three years ago, Andy wrote a series for the Friday

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Egg website called Golf Course Architecture one oh one. There

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>are really fun articles and a lot of people seem

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy them and find them helpful. So recently we've

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>been brainstorming ways to update them or to revisit their

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>ideas from a different angle. Right on cue, we received

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a direct message on Twitter from the very smart Jamie Kennedy,

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>who works for Golf TV. Basically, Jamie said, hey, you

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>guys should do short episodes of the podcast explaining the

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>basics of golf architecture, and right away we thought, yeah,

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>we probably should, so thanks Jamie. From there, we came

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>up with what we're going to call The School of

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Golf Architecture. It'll be an occasional series and the installments

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>will cover one top for twenty five to forty minutes.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Each episode will include an interview with an expert, along

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>with opening and closing thoughts. For me, they'll be more

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>produced than the typical Frida Egg interview, but less produced

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>than Frida Egg stories, and we're hoping that they'll be

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>accessible enough for people who don't know much about golf architecture,

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but also offbeat and geeky enough for people who know

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot. It's a balancing act, but I think we

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>can pull it off. In addition to the audio, we'll

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>be posting companion articles on the Friday Egg website. That

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>cover the same topics, but with some visual accompaniment, so

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>make sure to check those out as well. Usually, if

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you're giving an introduction to golf architecture, you begin with

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a discussion of land, soil types, climate, topography, location. These

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>are definitely important things to understand, but I'm going to

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>start in a slightly different way. In this first episode.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to talk about a related but somewhat separate

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>concept and golf course design, the concept of place. You

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>may think you know what a place is. Everyone knows

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>what a place is, But when you really try to

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>define it, or to distinguish it from space, that's where

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>things get tricky. For now, though, let's keep it simple.

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>We can define a place as a segment of space

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>where life occurs. So golf courses, among other things, are places.

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>They're built and traversed by humans, and as a result,

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they take on a kind of identity or what we

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>often call a sense of place. That phrase, a sense

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of place has grown a bit stale in contemporary usage.

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You'll see it in ads and travel brochures, but it's

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>rooted in a notion that has been with us since

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:46.559
<v Speaker 1>ancient civilization. I'm talking about genius loci, which in Roman

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>mythology referred to the guardian spirit of a place. In

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the modern world, the term genius loci has evolved into

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a general way of describing a location's prevailing atmosphere, its

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>unique feel, which is derived no not only from its

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>sites and sounds and smells, but also from its community,

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>its history, and its everyday uses. Okay, so all of

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>this might be starting to sound a little bit abstract

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and academic, but it's really just an attempt to put

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>words to an experience that's instinctive, even visceral, and it's

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>one that you're probably familiar with. Think of what it's

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>like to go back to your childhood home, or to

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the main street in your college town, or even to

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the golf course where you learn the game. That feeling

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you get can be understood as your attachment to the

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>spirit of that place. How does all of this relate

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to golf architecture. Well, my favorite courses tend to be

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the ones that are especially good at cultivating those attachments

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>between a golfer and the genius low Side. How they

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>do this is far more art than science, but you

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>know it when you feel it. Some of the courses

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>where you feel it are highly ranked prairie dunes, sand Hills,

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Cyprus Point, while others are just local facilities that have

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a true and lived in sense of place. May be

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly because they were built in simple ways Pacific Grove

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in California, or Grindstone Neck in Maine, or any number

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of home made links courses in Great Britain and Ireland.

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>These courses may not excel in all of the criteria

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that we've grown accustomed to using when we assess golf architecture,

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>but we need a vocabulary to talk about why they're

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>so alluring. For me, that's the vocabulary of plays based design.

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>The term plays based design comes to us from the

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>field of landscape architecture, but I found out about it

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>from Blake Conan, a Nebraska based golf architect and builder

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>who owns the firm Dundee Golf and has worked with

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom Doak and Todd Eckenrode. Here's how he puts it

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>on his website. Plays Based design explores the connection between

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the natural and built environments and finds ways to integrate

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the two together. It requires immersing oneself into the setting,

0:06:54.600 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>studying its surrounding landforms, soil, existing vegetation, culture, community history

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to reveal the site's maximum potential. So to learn more

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>about these ideas and generally about how the concept of

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>place figures into golf architecture, I gave Bake a call.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's that conversation. You know, I'm sure these concepts overlap,

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but what for you is the difference between a golf

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>course's land and a golf course's place.

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, the land just seems to be the physical attributes

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 2>of it, right, like the site structure. So you're talking

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>about you know, vegetation, topography, hydrology. You know, once you

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 2>start defining it as a place, it's you take into

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>more considerations of well, what's what's the built environment around there,

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 2>what's you know, what's the culture, what's its history?

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>How is it different when you start to consider the

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>human element of a piece of land, Because if that's

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the difference between a piece of land and a place,

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>what are those things that you would look at beyond

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>just the physical attributes of the land if you were

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:09.679
<v Speaker 1>assessing a site.

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the first thing, even if it's not humans,

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 2>if it's just animals that occupy it, you know, that

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 2>could be a place and one of the cool things

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 2>to start to look at is circulation and just how

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 2>to humans or how to animals, how have they moved

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 2>around on this site before? I know, like Bill cor

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 2>has talked about that a lot where he tries to

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 2>find little rabbit tracks or sheep tracks to inform his routing, like,

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 2>because if they've already figured out the easiest way to

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 2>get around this place, then you know, that should certainly

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 2>inform my decision of how I want the golf course

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 2>to function and circulate. And then you know, the built

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 2>environment's a whole that adds another layer of complexity with

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 2>people then living there and how do they use that

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 2>space in daily life.

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Part of what I'm thinking about right now, based on

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying, is how certain golf properties are not

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>just completely natural. Sometimes they have the mark of human

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>intervention in them. I'm thinking of sites like Chambers Bay,

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>which used to be an old mine and elements of

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>that are still incorporated into the design that's there, or

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>at stream Song, where I believe the story is a

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people had already moved around the land there.

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>But instead of trying to deny that those human interventions happened,

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the designs of those two courses stream Song and Chambers

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Bay kind of embrace it. Is that something that you

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>like to see in courses?

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, you know, And I think what that is

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 2>is it's starting to embrace the historical, the history and

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 2>the culture of the place, right how it was used,

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 2>how people before you used it. So I think that's

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 2>great to try to melt that with its new use,

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>and particularly think of inventive ways to use that, like

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 2>those big cement structures at Chambers Bay, you know, I

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 2>think they're off the right of the eighteenth hole or

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 2>seventeenth hole, the railroad track that runs by it. You know,

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff adds character and then it also doesn't

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 2>wipe out the previous history and culture of the place.

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Like an example that I'm sure everybody knows of on

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 2>a golf course is an old quarry. Most golf architects

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 2>throughout time, I think, have tried to utilize a quarry,

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 2>and they're routing if one existed previously, whether it's having

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 2>a tee or on it, or routing over it or

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 2>through it or in it. That is very much an

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 2>idea that everybody wants to stick with and try to

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 2>figure out a way to use because it's cool. It

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 2>creates variety on the site, and it's doing exactly what

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about. You're respecting the previous history of what

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 2>was there, even though it was man made or manipulated,

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 2>trying to find a cool, unique use for it.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back a couple of steps here. Say you

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 1>were looking at a property that had potential for golf.

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>What would be your process for coming up with a

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>set of characteristics of the place to respect as you

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>were building the golf course.

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of that is spending time on

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 2>site and you know, doing your site analysis. If you're

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 2>trying to learn more about the place, it ultimately means

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 2>you've got to spend a little more time not only

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>on site trying to find the cool things about it,

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the way the way water works, the way it reacts

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 2>during storms, things like that, but then also what's the

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 2>surrounding area, like what are the off site influences, Who

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 2>are the people that have used this space before, what

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 2>are the you know, the towns or the people around it.

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Getting to know those areas.

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Part of the process that you're proposing is not just

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>being focused completely on the terrain, but also investigating the

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>community and the history around the land, and I find

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that really interesting. How would you go about doing that?

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Would you look into archives, would you spend some time

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in the community itself, would you talk to people? Is

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that part of the site analysis process for you?

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, certainly, I mean you would want to You would

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 2>want to find as much history on the place as possible.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, you could find out that two hundred years

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 2>ago it served as something completely different. You know, there

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 2>might have been like, say, a Civil War battle there

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>and nobody knew, or it was like indigenous settlements, and

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 2>then you can start rooting around in the woods and

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 2>trying to find stuff that may inform your design. And

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I think what that also does is helps you. It

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 2>just helps you get attached to the place in a

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 2>way of finding the more subtle details of it, and

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 2>then you could figure out how to circulate around there

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think it's important to do that kind

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of work? How does it manifest itself in the final

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>product of whatever you design?

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 2>How do you mean like the what's the outcome or

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 2>from doing all that?

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what's what's the advantage? So you know, there's the

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>option of just designing a golf course based on a

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>topo map, in an office versus spending a ton of

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>time on site doing a kind of ethnography even of

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the surrounding community and history. It just seems like a

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>much more in depth process. What are the kind of

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 1>fruits of that labor that you see as the golf

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>course gets designed. What's the goal of going to that

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>extra effort.

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the goal is to get all those

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 2>little details right and at the at the end of

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 2>the day, make it feel as much like the place

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 2>that it is as you can. Once you start studying

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 2>wind patterns, you figure out where areas one of a road,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 2>like where would a sand pattern actually get exposed on

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 2>that land? Are we actually putting in at a place

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 2>where it's just going to go crazy and sand's gonna

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 2>blow everywhere and this thing's gonna expand five times at

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 2>size in a matter of three seasons, or is mother

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 2>nature going to continually try to grasp that over So

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I think once you get to know more about the

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 2>details of that stuff, how how mother nature wants to

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 2>manipulate that place and how it wants to form that land,

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 2>you know that can start to inform design decisions of

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 2>like bunkers facing southwest want to be flashed high and

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 2>bunkers facing northeast need to be you know, tucked down

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 2>low because the wind is going to do this. You

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 2>could start to see weird landforms in areas that you

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 2>weren't using for golf and incorporate them more into the

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 2>site to try to give it that feel of the

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 2>place and accentuate that a little bit. I'm thinking of

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>like at Memorial Park down in Houston, there was this

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 2>cool ravine that Tom found and cleared out and routed

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the second hole a par three over, and the landforms

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 2>in there were awesome, just because such steep land, you

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 2>get such fast water moving through there, and then these

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 2>tree routes basically have to grip onto the side of

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 2>a steep slope and they create these weird little knobs

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>at formations. So I think Don and his crew were

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 2>really informed by that when they were doing a lot

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 2>of the ravine work, and we were informed by that

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 2>when building holes near the ravine. It's like, well, we

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 2>could sort of borrow from these landforms that have been

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 2>covered up for fifty years and try to incorporate them

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 2>into the golf and that helps sell the golf course

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 2>as being a part of this place even.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>More, and in that case, you were restoring the sense

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of place to a golf course that had perhaps over

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.479
<v Speaker 1>the past few decades lost.

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 2>It certainly, yeah, at least exposing what was lost exactly.

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of what we're talking about philosophically is

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>rooted in the concept of place based design, which comes

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>from landscape architecture and has been practiced obviously in fields

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>outside of golf architecture. So tell me a little more

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>about the concept of place based design, where it comes from,

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>how you learned about it, what it means to you.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So, place based design is sort of what we've been

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 2>talking about. It's designing with and around characteristics that make

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 2>a place special and unique. You know, not only the

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 2>structure of the site, but the native ecosystem, the culture,

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 2>just local experiences, and design decisions then reflect that analysis.

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 2>The way I learned about place based design was in

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 2>landscape architecture school. You start to study old landscape architects,

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and one that really caught my eye was a Danish

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 2>immigrant named Jens Jensen who was from Chicago. Came to

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Chicago in the early twentieth century, sort of on the

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>heels of the First World's that Chicago had the Columbian Exposition.

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 2>You know, classical architecture was all the rage, like the

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Beaux Arts French style of landscape architecture was really popular,

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 2>really formalized landscape architecture. And this guy came in and

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 2>was just sort of blown away by the diversity of

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the Illinois landscape, and he proposed this idea that design

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 2>should be harmonious with nature and its ecological processes. He

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted to sort of incorporate a place based design at

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 2>a time when it was sort of unpopular. You know.

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Now he's responsible. He became the parks commissioner for Chicago,

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 2>so he's responsible for all those small parks in the

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 2>city that maybe Andy's familiar with. He's also responsible for

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 2>identifying all the state parks, including the dunes parks. He

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 2>found some really cool dunes land so he preserved those

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 2>and they've become state parks. So he just had he

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 2>had this process as a landscape architect where he wanted

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 2>to I've got his five points of his sort of

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 2>five key points. He wanted to understand local culture, use

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 2>native plants and local materials, create space and view, mingle

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 2>light and shadow, and he preferred organic forms in large

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 2>scale landscapes. I was like, well, a ton of that

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 2>stuff is useful in golf course architecture as well.

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>What did some of this work look like in its

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>finished form for the parks and the urban architecture and

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever he was doing.

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>I think a big park of his is Columbus Park

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 2>in Chicago. One of the things that he was really

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 2>known for in the way that he tried to create

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 2>more of this play spased design. He would have these

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 2>these circle pits where people could sit around, like communities

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 2>could come together and have a space within the park

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 2>to meet, which only then reinforce and emphasized this idea

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 2>of community. And then they very much. It was like,

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.959
<v Speaker 2>you've got lots of green space, You've got these organic

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 2>shapes in the park, a variety of spaces and areas

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 2>to do different activities, and then just being aware to

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 2>always use native plants to reinforce this idea of here

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>is what Illinois always has been, even though right now

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 2>you're surrounded by a bunch of buildings and plethora built environment,

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 2>like you can come to this park and all the

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>stuff here is native to the place where you are,

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 2>so trying to maybe reconnect you to the land a

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And so as you were learning about this kind of

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>work in landscape architecture school, did a bell sort of

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>go off for you at some point and you thought, hey,

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>this is really what should be done in golf course architecture.

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>No it wasn't. I mean, it wasn't really a bell.

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 2>It was just like, man, this is the term that

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 2>people should be using, Like, minimalism is the term that

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 2>was applied to this movement that Tom and Bill sort

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 2>of started, right But to me, it's like, I also

0:19:59.920 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 2>have an art background, and minimalism is not the best

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 2>term for what that is. Minimalism is is it's like

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 2>a highly purified form of art. It condenses it down

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 2>to its essential elements, very little ornamentation, simple design. It's

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 2>often geometric and repetitive. So when I started learning more

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 2>about plays based design, and you know, reading about Jens

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 2>Jensen or Aldo Leopold or Robert Barvin or people like that,

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 2>it's like, man, this is you know, it's not reinventing

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 2>the wheel. It's just a better thing to describe the

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 2>way people have been designing courses since the Golden Age.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>If you think about it, a lot of the work

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that's called minimalism in golf architecture is really anything, but

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 1>not just in the sense of the intervention in the landscape,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but just in the in the style that you often

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>see in these courses that are called minimalists. They're they're

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>very kind of complex and filigreed and and have a

0:20:58.320 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>concentration of detail.

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 2>You know, Minimalism may even be just that weird Victorian

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 2>style where it's like there's a bunker one hundred and

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 2>fifty yards, a cross bunker one hundred and fifty yards

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 2>off the tee, three hundred yards off the tea, and

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 2>then one right in front of the green. It's like,

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.479
<v Speaker 2>we never change that pattern. Everything's just repetitive and simple

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 2>and very black and white, like if you do not

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>do this, then you will be penalized by this. And yeah,

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.719
<v Speaker 2>it's like once you started entering that variety and complexity

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 2>and strategy into golf is when it changed. And so

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 2>to me, it's like place based design encapsulates that perfectly.

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, So, what are some ways in which you can

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.959
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the course you're building is respecting the

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>spirit of the place that it sits in.

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's what a lot of people who are

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 2>good at routing golf courses and designing golf courses. Do

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 2>you know you're trying to provide variety, You're trying to

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>start to play with how people interact with that space.

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 2>You're respecting the natural hydrology, so you're not you know,

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 2>you're not just putting a green anywhere and then building

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of catch basins around it, because you're just saying,

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 2>screw it to the natural hydrology. It's like you're working

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 2>with the land in a way that it can function

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 2>as it always has, but then still just be used

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 2>for this fun little game we like to play.

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And to come at this from a different direction, What

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:35.959
<v Speaker 1>are some ways in which golf architecture can violate a

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>sense of place?

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 2>My main one has always been Shadow Creek in Las Vegas,

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 2>just because it's so not of desert golf. It's basically

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 2>like somebody took a helicopter and imported parkland golf of

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 2>like even some weird form of southwestern mountain golf into it,

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, And ultimately what that does is it's going

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 2>to drive up maintenance costs in the long run, like

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 2>if nothing else, and only thinking of it economically, like

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 2>it's just going to be so much more to maintain

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 2>every year if you're constantly trying to put a square

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 2>peg in a round hole. You know, if you're if

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 2>you're starting to work with the place and appreciate what

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 2>that place is and designing around it, it's going to

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 2>be much more. It's going to be much easier to maintain.

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 2>You know. One of the things, it's like, I really

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed Kingsbarns, and I think the golf there is excellent

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 2>and the way that the golf holes play, But to me,

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 2>that's a place where it's like several of those holes

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 2>we're just on pretty flat ag land, not even gently rolling,

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 2>and so trying to create a links theesetic throughout in

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 2>top soil just didn't work for me as far as

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 2>creating a sense of place. It just like it's always

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 2>felt a little weird to me because of that, where

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe let the three or four links holes

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 2>they have down near the water be the Lynx holes,

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 2>and then you could try to do something different that

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 2>nobody's really executed before on that ag land. Not to

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 2>say you need to do it in a McDonald or

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.199
<v Speaker 2>Rainer style, but I think coming at it from a

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 2>point of view of like, you know what, we're not

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 2>going to try to just blow everything up and recreate

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 2>these full links because the Scots aren't gonna buy it.

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 2>It's not believable in that place, and it also doesn't

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 2>speak to what that land was before.

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You've seen that in a few recent high profile Scottish

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>courses in fact, where the design isn't exactly corresponding to

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what the place was because some of the new properties

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that are available are not your classic dunesland properties.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can't and it's like I get it, the SSSI.

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 2>You can't build on links anymore. And they're the hardest

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 2>thing to recreate because they've just weathered through wind and

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 2>waves and nature for thousands or millions of years and

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 2>formed these cool, delicate little rimples. It's like it's sort

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 2>of impossible to recreate. And that's why the Links courses

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 2>are so good. It's because they were, you know, divinely created.

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>The hand of man isn't good enough to recreate that stuff.

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 2>So I would almost want to approach it from a

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 2>completely different way and try to give the scott something

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 2>that they've never had before, rather than constantly trying to

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 2>recreate links land that I know, I'm not going to

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 2>recreate it, as well as the four links courses that

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 2>are within a twenty mile drive of them.

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, are there circumstances in which you think it's proper

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>or or advisable even to leave behind a certain properties

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>spirit of place to kick out its genius lows? I say,

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you see you later. We're going to try to create

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>something new here. We're going to try to create a rich,

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>artificial environment that has its own spirit of place, that

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is made by the hand of man. Some who like

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Shadow Creek would say that's exactly what it does. It

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>took an incredibly unpromising property for golf right flat desert

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>basically and built an entirely new environment out of nothing. Now,

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question is whether you like that environment

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>or not, or think it's responsible or not to take

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>on that kind of project. But you know, do you

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>think there are circumstances in which that sort of approach

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is the best approach?

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Absolutely. You know there are a number of examples

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 2>where a designer or an architect has taken a crummy

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:46.479
<v Speaker 2>piece of land and done something pretty cool with it,

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 2>like Trinity Forest. You know, you wouldn't want to preserve

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the sense of place there that it was a landfill.

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 2>You may want to look to what the land was

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 2>before it was even a landfill and see if there's

0:26:56.480 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 2>some cool historical significance that you could try to recapture

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 2>or bring back. Modern design and modern equipment has definitely

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 2>given people the option to take worse piece of worse

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 2>pieces of land and do something cool with them. You know,

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 2>I still disagree that you needed to put pine trees

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 2>in the desert it you probably could have met somebody

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 2>halfway with it, made a cool like desert landscape golf course.

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Shadow Barancas instead of Shadow Creek.

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. So I still I still disagree with that place.

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 2>But I also like, I'm young, and I'm an idiot,

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 2>and I've never done it before, so I also understand

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 2>that there's still a lot more to learn as well.

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 2>And the ability to manipulate a site in a way

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 2>that can give people an interesting golf course to play

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 2>is is cool.

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 2>It's like the more the more we can just try

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to compromise on that. I think it's like, yeah, you

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 2>might have to do something with a dead, fat piece

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.239
<v Speaker 2>of land, like like Tom at the Rawles course. In

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Texas to make it interesting and to provide the game

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 2>of golf to that college in that town. That's great.

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 2>You wouldn't want to take that away.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it takes a tremendous amount of skill to

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>build something that is not inherent to the landscape. I mean,

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>it takes a lot of skill to build a course

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that respects the landscape as well and is place based

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in its approach. But if you're going to create something

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>artificial in order to make it good and compelling, you

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>really have to have mastery, right, and you really have

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to have artistic ability. And when I look at a

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>course like the ones that Mike Strants built. A lot

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of those courses, including NPCC Shore, which is in a

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>beautiful place. I don't know if the property is all

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that amazing, especially compared to what's just down the road,

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:56.479
<v Speaker 1>but that course doesn't really feel like Monterey necessarily. It

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>is something different. But I find it udibly interesting to

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>look at. And part of that, I think is that

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Strants was a boundary pushing artist as well as a

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>golf architect. And what he did there, what he created there,

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the artificial elements there are compelling and have their own

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of sense of place, even if it isn't the

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>original spirit of that landscape. Can you think of any

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>examples like that that you've seen of courses that are

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>able to pull off that feet.

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think NBC is a good example.

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 2>And you bring up Mike Strands, and the thing that's

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 2>so cool about him is how intentional he was. I

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 2>think if you don't have something great to work with,

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 2>or if your neighbors are Pebble Beach and Cypress Point,

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe you've got a little bit more of a chip

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 2>on your shoulder to try to differentiate yourself. But it's

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 2>that idea of being intentional rather than, you know, trying

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 2>to recreate the dunes. I'm not going to be able

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 2>to do it as well as Cypress Point does it naturally.

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's like I'll just be very intentional that instead

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 2>of trying to honor what this place was, I'm just

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 2>going to make myself a part of its story. And

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 2>that is very cool as well. You know, I think

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 2>National Golf Links moved a ton of earth when they

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 2>were constructing, and a lot of things about it are

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 2>very intentional and they're not trying to hide it either.

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's where you start to see that

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 2>compromise come in.

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. All right, So just to wrap things up here,

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we've mentioned a few courses as examples so far, but

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>what are some golf courses that really come to mind

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>when you think of plays based design done well?

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's not coincidentally. I think it's a lot

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 2>of the great golf courses in the world are center

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 2>around this idea of plays based design. Whether they knew

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 2>anything about that concept or had thought about it, they

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 2>just worked in a way that was consistent with the

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 2>ideas that we've basically described. Now, places like Cyprus Point

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 2>or National Golf Links or Royal Melbourne or sand Hills,

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're all sort of of their place. And

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'm I'm sort of limiting that to golf

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 2>courses that were built by man because so many of

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the Link's golf courses, probably all of them are just there.

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 2>They're naturally of their place because they the most design

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 2>input that was put into a lot of them were

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 2>just the locals gathering around and agreeing on the number

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 2>of holes to play or which route to play them,

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe doing a little tweak to agree here there,

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 2>or making sure a bunker stays the same. But it's like,

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 2>for the most part, links courses are all of their place,

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 2>and it's why they're so interesting to study to this

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 2>day because they were designed five hundred years ago by

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 2>mother Nature. Yet through all the advances and technology, they've

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 2>still lasted the test of time. You know, we've done

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 2>a good job in the United States since guys like

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 2>McDonald and Travis and Herbert Leeds, all these old great

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 2>amateur golfers were informed by the principles of links courses

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 2>and then just became good at executing them on the

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 2>pieces of land that we had in the United States.

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Pine Valley is another great one. Something like Somerset Hills

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 2>is very much just of the place.

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, even though Somerset Hills has some of those what

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>people would consider artificial shapes on it.

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, it's like there's old grassover roads going through there.

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 2>You know. Garden City is the same way, where it's

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 2>like there's a lot of these intentional design features, but

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 2>you're very much using what the place was and incorporating

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 2>that indie your design, Like, well, we're not going to

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 2>take the time to fill in this road, Let's just

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 2>make the road a cross hazard for this hole and

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 2>we'll call it good.

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, I mean allied to this concept of plays

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>based design is the idea of vernacular architecture, and I

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's part of what you were talking about before,

0:32:56.320 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>with links courses designed by their communities, essentially by amateur

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>designers that have a true and lived in spirit of

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>place because they were built locally, using local materials i e.

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>The land, and not doing much to it.

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 2>And that's what I want to go. I want to

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 2>continue always to go over to the British Isles and

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 2>study the Links courses over there. But I'm also sort

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 2>of curious about this idea that the nature of the

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 2>people in these different towns gave a different character to

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the golf course. So, you know, we're the hardened people

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 2>of Northern Scotland. Were they creating, you know, more difficult

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 2>courses and they would go to the pub every night

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and they would have a beer and figure out a

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 2>way to be more masochistic. And then while some people

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in Ireland maybe they're more witty or clever or playful

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 2>group and so they create more playful routings. I think

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 2>that's part of the reason why, like learning about the

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 2>people and learning about the culture is interesting. You can

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of get to know who these people are and

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 2>what place they are, and place obviously informs who people are,

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 2>so just always trying to connect those things and study them.

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it would be interesting for links courses because

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, Robert Hunter, I was just I just got

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 2>done reading the links for that golf Club Atlist book Club,

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and it was interesting because he talked about the ability

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 2>to identify players who are from different links courses just

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 2>by the way they played golf. He said, guys who

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 2>came from Sandwich always produced good drivers of the ball.

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Guys who played at Saint Andrews were always great at

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 2>the pitch and run. Prestwick players had light hands for

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 2>delicate pitches. Deal players were excellent putters from off the green.

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Like it's so interesting that they could play in a

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 2>competition at one course and be like, oh, that guy

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.240
<v Speaker 2>must be from Deal because he's always got good weights

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 2>on it, good weight on his putts from off the green.

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 2>It's like stuff like that just interests me and that

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 2>speaks more to the place than anything. Really.

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's localism, right, which is something that's been lost

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.720
<v Speaker 1>in a big way since the early days of golf

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in the mid nineteen hundreds, I mean sorry, in the

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>mid eighteen hundreds through the early nineteen hundreds, the world

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 1>was so much more local than it is now and

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the result of increased transportation and communication globalization.

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>All that stuff is a kind of standardization of a

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of things, including it sounds like golf and golf courses.

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:29.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you hit the nail on the head too.

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Like place based design just just helps you stay away

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 2>from any standardization. You want it to be as unique

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 2>as it possibly can be and be of that place.

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, you're right. The more connected we become,

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 2>the more standardized everything everything becomes, and you don't want

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 2>one hundred years from now, every golf course to play

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the same way.

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I really liked where Blake and I got at the

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>end of that conversation. Basically, what he helped me realize

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>was that golfer can texture could be a kind of

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>countercultural force in the modern world. What I mean by

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that is, you know, in the twentieth century, building design

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and urban planning became more standardized. We've gotten away from

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the vernacular architecture of earlier periods of history, where local

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>materials and local modes of construction were all that was

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>available to most communities. The result is that what we

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>build today tends to function more predictably and more safely,

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but it often lacks a local and distinctive sense of place.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Just think of like malls in big box stores. Those

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 1>look and feel more or less the same whether they're

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 1>in Maine or New Mexico. So golf courses could serve

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>as a contrast to those kinds of places, especially if

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they're designed with a place based approach. They could remind

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>people of the indigenous terrain of a region, like Jens

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Jensen's parks do in Chicago, or they could just feel unique.

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>They could provide a break in the sameness of most

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>urban and suburban landscapes. That's a powerful thing that golf

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>courses can do, and that some older, more vernacular courses

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>do without even really trying. So I'm a fan of

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>play based design, not only as a practice, but also

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 1>as a piece of vocabulary. I think it is, as

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Blake said, a better and more accurate way of describing

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>what we've been calling minimalism in golf architecture. I also

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>like that it's borrowed from another field, even if it's

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>an overlapping field. In landscape architecture, golf can be pretty insular,

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's encouraging to see a young designer like Blake

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>drawing inspiration from other disciplines. Now, the way I'll usually

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>wrap up these School of Golf Architecture episodes is by

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>teasing out a question that the interview encouraged me to

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>think more about. For this one, it's whether or to

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>what extent place based design can be artificial. I think

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd hold to my position that it can be, but

0:37:56.520 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the architect had better be really good, really artistics persuasive.

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned Mike Strants as a designer who gave artificial

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>environments their own senses of place, but Pete Die at

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:11.839
<v Speaker 1>his best could do that as well. The fact remains, though,

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that for me, a course that sits lightly on a

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>great property and derives its sense of place from the

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 1>natural environment that's tough to be. Conversely, the courses that

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>don't resonate with me tend to be the ones that

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>are artificial and that fail to do anything super interesting

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>with their artificiality. And I think that's because, again, just

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's very rare that an architect can compete

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>with mother nature. But of course i'd love to know

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>what you think. You can find me on Twitter at

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 1>g Ford Golf and the general Frida Egg account at

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the frieda Egg with underscores between each word. Let's keep

0:38:50.239 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the discussion going