Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. The Walt Disney Corporation
Speaker 1: has been vocal in its opposition to Florida's Parental Rights
Speaker 1: and Education Bill. Their opposition could just be chalked up
Speaker 1: to corporate virtue signaling, but a recently leaked video from
Speaker 1: a meeting about the bill shows that agree to its
Speaker 1: sexuality and gender theory have become an obsession for those
Speaker 1: working behind the scenes and at the very top of
Speaker 1: the House of Mouse. We have the videos for you
Speaker 1: and my reaction and tonight's holding on welcome to hold
Speaker 1: the one. I'm Buck Sexton. They oppose the Parental Rights
Speaker 1: in Education Bill that much, we know. They call it
Speaker 1: that don't say gay bill. They had to come up
Speaker 1: with a new name for it because if people just
Speaker 1: read the bill, they might say, this doesn't seem extreme
Speaker 1: at all. But now we know. This isn't just the
Speaker 1: company best known for creating timeless, classic, family friendly fair
Speaker 1: whether it's Sleeping Beauty or Aladdin or you name it,
Speaker 1: obviously Mickey and Minnie Mouse. No, now this is a
Speaker 1: company where they don't just bend the knee to the wokeness.
Speaker 1: They are taking orders at the very top from woke
Speaker 1: corporate officers. Now, there are a bunch of videos that
Speaker 1: have come out, and hat tip to Christopher Ruffo for
Speaker 1: finding and sharing them online. Videos from inside a Disney
Speaker 1: all hands meeting about the parental Rights bill. And this
Speaker 1: is some of what you see here. Here's Disney corporate
Speaker 1: President Carrie Burke, who has promised, quote, more queer leads
Speaker 1: in Disney stories. Watch. We have many, many, many lgbt
Speaker 1: QIA characters in our stories, and yet we don't don't
Speaker 1: have enough leads um and narratives in which gay characters
Speaker 1: just just get to be characters, um and and not
Speaker 1: have to be about gay stories. And so um that's
Speaker 1: been very eye opening for me. Um and and I
Speaker 1: can tell you, UM it's something that I feel perhaps
Speaker 1: had this moment not happened, UM, I as a leader
Speaker 1: and me as my colleagues, would not have focused on
Speaker 1: and and going forward, UM, I certainly will be more
Speaker 1: so I know that we will be. And um and
Speaker 1: I hope this is a moment where shout of the tears,
Speaker 1: sorry coming um uh, we don't we just don't allow
Speaker 1: each other to go backwards. You have the chief president
Speaker 1: of Content Entertainment at Disney, a massive and storied American
Speaker 1: company that's created some of the most beloved programming, particularly
Speaker 1: for families and children of all time, saying, you know,
Speaker 1: it's really time to have more LGBTQI a lead roles
Speaker 1: as part of let's be honest here a political agenda
Speaker 1: to push these ideas, to push ideas of transgenderism, for example,
Speaker 1: on kids, because that's what this is really about. Worth
Speaker 1: noting that Burke claimed in the video as well that
Speaker 1: she is the mother of one transgender child and one
Speaker 1: pan sexual child, which I'm sure was a term that
Speaker 1: got a lot of googling today. Pan sexual What the
Speaker 1: heck is that ninety nine point nine percent of Americans thought?
Speaker 1: But remember Disney thinks that this is completely normal. In fact,
Speaker 1: this should be celebrated, that pan sexuality is something your
Speaker 1: child should know about and perhaps considered down the line
Speaker 1: as they become adults for their own possible gender identity
Speaker 1: or their their gender preference in seeking a partner or whatever.
Speaker 1: And then there was this executive producer LaToya Raveno saying
Speaker 1: her team has implemented a quote gay agenda and is
Speaker 1: regularly quote adding queerness to children's programming. Watch. The showrunners
Speaker 1: were super welcoming, Meredith Roberts and like our leadership over
Speaker 1: there has been so welcoming to like my like not
Speaker 1: at all secret gay agenda, and so like I feel
Speaker 1: like I felt like it was I mean, like maybe
Speaker 1: it was that way in the past, but I guess
Speaker 1: like something must have happened in the last like like
Speaker 1: they are turning it around, they're going hard, and then
Speaker 1: all that like momentum that I felt like that sense
Speaker 1: of I don't have to be afraid to like, let's
Speaker 1: have these two characters kiss. Let's in the background. Like
Speaker 1: I was just wherever I could, just basically adding queerness
Speaker 1: to like the if you see anything queer in the
Speaker 1: show Proud. But like I just was like no one
Speaker 1: would stop me, and no one was trying to stop me. Huh.
Speaker 1: So this is the Walt Disney Corporation, and they, as
Speaker 1: you see here, are having this meeting because it's not
Speaker 1: that they really think that you can't say gay as
Speaker 1: a result of the law in Florida. That's just that's
Speaker 1: the propaganda talking point. That's just what they say to
Speaker 1: justify the hysteria, to mobilize people, to turn people against this,
Speaker 1: and to create the perception that if you support this bill, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, fifty two percent of Democrats, let me repeat,
Speaker 1: of Democrats in the state of Florida support the parental
Speaker 1: Rights and Education Bill, and huge majorities of Republicans do. So.
Speaker 1: Here we have a moment where you'd say, wait a second,
Speaker 1: this isn't just about the lie of the don't say
Speaker 1: gay bill. There really is an agenda, and Disney is
Speaker 1: pushing this agenda in every way that at ten that
Speaker 1: your children should be exposed to very complicated and often
Speaker 1: politically divisive gender theory, things like pant sexuality, sis, gender, heteronormativity, etc.
Speaker 1: All these concepts should be things that little kids. I'm
Speaker 1: not talking about adults here, folks, little children should be
Speaker 1: seeing in their programming, brainwash them, get them while they're young,
Speaker 1: it seems, is the Disney mantra about this. Here's Disney
Speaker 1: production coordinator Alan March saying his team is committed to
Speaker 1: quote exploring queer stories, and he's created a tracker to
Speaker 1: make sure there are enough gender nonconforming characters. I've had
Speaker 1: the privilege of working with the Moon Girl team for
Speaker 1: the last two years, and they've been really open to
Speaker 1: exploring queer stories. And part of I'm on the production side,
Speaker 1: part of the work that I feel like I can
Speaker 1: put in is making sure that we take place in
Speaker 1: modern day New York, so making sure that that's like
Speaker 1: an accurate reflection of New York. So I put together
Speaker 1: like a tracker of our background characters to make sure
Speaker 1: that we have like the full breadth of expression. Especially
Speaker 1: with like trans characters. You can't see if someone is trans.
Speaker 1: There's not one way to look trans, and so kind
Speaker 1: of the only way to have these like canonical trans characters,
Speaker 1: canonical asexual characters, canonical bisexual characters, is to give them
Speaker 1: stories where they can like be their whole selves. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's so much going on here, but let's just go
Speaker 1: back to this for a second. You know how they
Speaker 1: used to start out ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls
Speaker 1: in theme parks. They have people in Mickey Mouse costumes,
Speaker 1: you know announcing this, well, they're Diversity and inclusion manager
Speaker 1: Vivian Ware has announced that because they want to be
Speaker 1: more inclusive, they'll no longer say ladies and gentlemen's boys
Speaker 1: and girls, because you know there are other are options
Speaker 1: out there. Watch last summer, we removed all of the
Speaker 1: gendered greetings and relationship to our life skills, so we
Speaker 1: no longer say ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls. We've trained,
Speaker 1: We've provided training for all of our cast members in
Speaker 1: relationship to that, so now they know it's it's hello
Speaker 1: everyone or hello friends. We are in the process of
Speaker 1: changing over those those recorded messages, and so many of
Speaker 1: you are probably familiar when we brought the fireworks back
Speaker 1: to the Magic Kingdom. We no longer say ladies and gentlemen,
Speaker 1: boys and girls. We say dreamers of all ages. We
Speaker 1: don't want to just assume because someone might be in
Speaker 1: our interpretation maybe presenting this female that they may not
Speaker 1: want to be called princess. So let's think differently about
Speaker 1: how do we really engage with our guests in a
Speaker 1: meaningful and inclusive way that makes it magical and memorable
Speaker 1: for everyone. It's really just stunning stuff, isn't it. This
Speaker 1: is Disney, This is the leadership of Disney. These are
Speaker 1: the people that are making determinations about this company. And
Speaker 1: you see the agenda very clearly at work. We're not
Speaker 1: exaggerating the agenda. It's very real. And this is also
Speaker 1: why Disney has canceled Disney or boycott Disney trending today.
Speaker 1: All right, we'll continue to talk about this comm up
Speaker 1: here in a moment with my friend Rob Smith of
Speaker 1: the First TV. But first, you know, we're living in
Speaker 1: chaotic times, and identity thieves abroad in particular, love all
Speaker 1: the chaos. American homeowners are a big target for criminals.
Speaker 1: And it's not just your credit cards and bank accounts
Speaker 1: they're after. That's small time stuff. These hackers want your home.
Speaker 1: Crime is home title theft. It's exploding in the US,
Speaker 1: and no, you're not covered by homeowners Insurance or common
Speaker 1: ID theft services. The problem is the title to our
Speaker 1: homes are kept online, and identity thief knows his big
Speaker 1: payday is as easy as forgeing in signature stating you
Speaker 1: sold your home to him. Now hotel At loans after
Speaker 1: your home on your home, and you won't know until
Speaker 1: the collection calls start and you get an eviction notice.
Speaker 1: How do you protect yourself from title theft? Go to
Speaker 1: your county recorder's office every day check the homes title,
Speaker 1: or just register address now at hometitlelock dot com. See
Speaker 1: if you're already a victim. This is how we protect
Speaker 1: our most valuable asset, our homes. Go to hometitlelock dot
Speaker 1: com again. That's home titlelock dot com. The First TV's
Speaker 1: Rob Smith stops by when we return. There's a battle
Speaker 1: going on right now, but maybe the most important fight
Speaker 1: our countries had since the Revolutionary War. Once again, it's
Speaker 1: about our freedom. People like you and me are being canceled,
Speaker 1: our speech increasingly censored by big tech and corporate media.
Speaker 1: Can't let that happen. Un To fight back. Please stand
Speaker 1: with us and support the First TV. Be a part
Speaker 1: of our team dedicated to preserving the very essence of
Speaker 1: who we are free Americans. The hashtag boycott Disney was
Speaker 1: trending on Twitter today after videos of the companies all
Speaker 1: hands meeting about the Florida prentrol rights bill leaked online.
Speaker 1: Videos featured employees discussing sex and gender in Disney programming,
Speaker 1: and one company executive saying she wants half of all
Speaker 1: characters to be LGBTQI A plus or minorities by the
Speaker 1: end of the year. Earlier this week, Disney published an
Speaker 1: open letter in which the executive promised executives promised to
Speaker 1: work for the repeal of the bill, which prompted this
Speaker 1: response from Florida Governor rondassentis for Disney to come out
Speaker 1: and put a statement and say that the bill should
Speaker 1: have never passed and that they are going to actively
Speaker 1: work to repeal it. I think one was fundamentally dishonest.
Speaker 1: But two, I think that crossed the line. This state
Speaker 1: is governed by the interests of the people of the
Speaker 1: state of Florida. It is not based on the demands
Speaker 1: of California corporate executives. They do not run this state.
Speaker 1: They do not control this state. Amen to that join.
Speaker 1: I mean now, as the founder and president of the
Speaker 1: Douglas Society, mister Rob Smith. Rob, good to see him.
Speaker 1: Let see you, Bud. I mean, I just saw the
Speaker 1: governor last night here in Tallahassee. We had dinner and
Speaker 1: we're talking about this and he was on Tucker's show
Speaker 1: last night as we're talking about this issue. It's amazing
Speaker 1: to me. I shouldn't say amazing. It is noteworthy, certainly
Speaker 1: that the theme park operator operators here of Disney in
Speaker 1: Florida seem to think that they get to call the
Speaker 1: shots the governors telling them not so fast. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: you know, look good for governor. Desantists were standing up
Speaker 1: to these woke corporations. You know, we have this conversation
Speaker 1: a lot about these corporations, and at some point they're
Speaker 1: gonna have to realize that the woke Twitter mob doesn't
Speaker 1: represent the vast majority of the American public. And when
Speaker 1: it comes to the Parental Rights and Education law, there's
Speaker 1: this really interesting poll that m fifty seven percent and
Speaker 1: this is of registered Democrats and Florida actually agree with
Speaker 1: this law. So when they're open and honest with people
Speaker 1: about exactly what this law says, most sane people, whether
Speaker 1: there are you know, Henro's actual or saying gays and lesbians,
Speaker 1: if there's a few of them left, agree with what
Speaker 1: this law is saying. So I think we should be
Speaker 1: asking ourselves is why are all of these alphabets whop activists,
Speaker 1: some of which who have obviously infiltrated the executive board
Speaker 1: and a lot of the creative people at Disney. Why
Speaker 1: are they so obsessed with the idea of inserting the
Speaker 1: far left alphabet ideology into programming that is geared for children.
Speaker 1: Why is the left so obsessed with teaching five to
Speaker 1: nine year olds. And this is what we're talking about
Speaker 1: when we talk about this bo We're talking about five
Speaker 1: to nine year old children. Why are they so obsessed
Speaker 1: with teaching them far left alphabets, whop ideology? Why are
Speaker 1: they so obsessed with teaching them one hundred genders? And
Speaker 1: yet another Disney diversity person whatever was caught on in
Speaker 1: another one of these videos talking about her pan sexual
Speaker 1: and transgender child. I mean, this is utter lunacy, and
Speaker 1: good for Rhonda Santis for standing up against it. This
Speaker 1: is what I really do think. I think that there's
Speaker 1: gonna be a lot of lip service from Hollywood and
Speaker 1: the left and a lot of these activist organizations. But
Speaker 1: I think if Disney really wants to stand up against this,
Speaker 1: I really do think that they will lose. And like
Speaker 1: I said, good for De santists for not backing down.
Speaker 1: And I want to make one more point. I don't
Speaker 1: want to go off on a tangent for too long ago.
Speaker 1: Foot this is one of the rare occasions and this
Speaker 1: is why Governor De Santis is so good that the
Speaker 1: left is actually responding to legislation that was passed by
Speaker 1: a Republican, except you know, instead of us always responding
Speaker 1: to things that the left they're putting forward. They hate
Speaker 1: Ron de santist because Ron de Santis plays offense, and
Speaker 1: offense is how you win the culture wars. So every
Speaker 1: week's sauce Republican governor, including that Republican governor that sort
Speaker 1: of vetoed this women in sports bill that came up
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks ago. So every week saws Republican
Speaker 1: governor across this country needs to be taking notes from Ron,
Speaker 1: because that is what we need moving forward. Speaking of
Speaker 1: Rondas Sentis, he also pointed out that somehow Disney is
Speaker 1: so upset about this bill, but as it was passing
Speaker 1: through the Florida legislature, and as this was being publicly
Speaker 1: discussed and debated in the Florida State House, they didn't
Speaker 1: seem to care at all. Watch I talked to the
Speaker 1: Speaker of the House yesterday afternoon, and he said Disney
Speaker 1: never called him while they were putting this through the house.
Speaker 1: They didn't seem to have a problem with it when
Speaker 1: it was going through. If this was such an affront,
Speaker 1: why weren't they speaking up at the outset? And yet
Speaker 1: they won't. And then for them to say they're going
Speaker 1: to actively work to repeal substantive protections for parents as
Speaker 1: a company that is supposedly marketing at services to parents
Speaker 1: with young children, I think they crossed the line on
Speaker 1: a sentis not pulling any punches there. It is interesting, though,
Speaker 1: isn't it that the activists name it that don't say
Speaker 1: gay bill, which is not in the bill. In fact,
Speaker 1: the word gay doesn't even appear in the bill, So
Speaker 1: how could you ban the word gay if it doesn't
Speaker 1: actually show up anywhere? But beyond that, Rob it seems
Speaker 1: like the activists or the lgbt QIA plus community on
Speaker 1: the left got upset and Disney all of a sudden
Speaker 1: decided this was a big deal. Well, here's the thing.
Speaker 1: The reason that you know, there was no issues with
Speaker 1: this while I was going up to the legislator legislature
Speaker 1: is because the left had in their activists on the
Speaker 1: left hadn't had the chance to sort of, you know,
Speaker 1: pervert what the bill was and to kind of brand
Speaker 1: it as something so that they can launder this stuff
Speaker 1: through the mainstream media. What happened was that you know,
Speaker 1: like you said, gay is not in the bill, and
Speaker 1: We've been talking about this for the past couple of weeks.
Speaker 1: But what happened is the far left alphabet soup activists.
Speaker 1: You have to understand that there are no game lesbian
Speaker 1: pro game lesbian organizations in this country anymore. These are
Speaker 1: all trans organizations, and these are all qi A T
Speaker 1: alphabet super organizations that have very literally do with the
Speaker 1: lives of actual game lesbian Americans. Right. So they found
Speaker 1: out about this legislation, they said that we are going
Speaker 1: to brand this bill as this We're going to lie
Speaker 1: about it, and we're going to launder that lie through
Speaker 1: the mainstream media who dutifully carries the water for this,
Speaker 1: from the NBC News to MSNBC to the Associated Press,
Speaker 1: all of them did this. And by the way, even
Speaker 1: some conservative outlets and conservative outlestening to get a little
Speaker 1: bit better about this stuff as well. And so that
Speaker 1: is why Disney didn't have an issue with this until
Speaker 1: it was laundered through all of this stuff. People are
Speaker 1: lying about this, and then of course the far left
Speaker 1: woke Twitter mob and all of their alphabets who woke
Speaker 1: exec decided to say, oh, this is the next battle.
Speaker 1: And what you have to understand is that this is
Speaker 1: all about. And Tucker made a really good point about this.
Speaker 1: I'm last time of surprised that you brought this up
Speaker 1: because the Human Rights Campaign and all these organizations since
Speaker 1: is generally only something that you know, gains and lesbians
Speaker 1: in this country really paying attention to. Is that these
Speaker 1: are not gaining lesbian organizations anymore. They are now pro
Speaker 1: trans organizations and they need something to keep the gravy
Speaker 1: train rolling. They need for people in this country to
Speaker 1: continue to be more and more oppressed so that they
Speaker 1: can launder their donation just through the Democrat Party, which
Speaker 1: is exactly what is going on right now. It is
Speaker 1: all fake, It is all gend up sort of outrage
Speaker 1: and people shouldn't fall for it. And Ron de Santis
Speaker 1: should continue to stand up for it, because if he
Speaker 1: does not back down from this, I believe that he
Speaker 1: will win. By the way to Santas also called out
Speaker 1: Disneys hypocrisy, comparing their response here to the issue of
Speaker 1: slave labor in China. Watch this. People ask me, you
Speaker 1: know kind of about you know, their posture on the bill.
Speaker 1: I said, you know what if we would have put
Speaker 1: in the bill that you were not allowed to have
Speaker 1: curriculum that discuss the oppression of the wagers in China.
Speaker 1: Disney would have endorsed that in a second. And that's
Speaker 1: the hypocrisy of this. And you know, we're going to
Speaker 1: make sure we're fighting back when people are threatening our
Speaker 1: parents and threatening our kids. Real quick, Rob, We're real quick, Rob.
Speaker 1: What do you think again? I think he's absolutely right.
Speaker 1: I know this is sounding a lot like the Governor
Speaker 1: De Santa's fan club coming from one end right here.
Speaker 1: But I'm telling you, he plays offense, and we need
Speaker 1: people to play offense, because let me tell you something.
Speaker 1: These people the left is losing right now. Okay, So
Speaker 1: all of they have are these petty culture war issues
Speaker 1: because their guy in the White House is screwing things
Speaker 1: up in some very fundamental, fundamental and very easily recognizable
Speaker 1: ways to average Americans. So all they have are these
Speaker 1: silly little culture war things. But Ron de Santis plays offense.
Speaker 1: He makes it about his citizens, he makes it about
Speaker 1: the parents, and Disney is just really being put in
Speaker 1: a bad place. And these far left alphabets, sup backtivists,
Speaker 1: they're really choosing the hill that they're want to die on.
Speaker 1: Is teaching comprehensive sex education alphabet super insanity in one
Speaker 1: hundred gen trans radical nonsense to prekate through third graders.
Speaker 1: It's absurd, rob always illuminating. Thanks for being with us,
Speaker 1: Thanks budd Us. Border Patrol is warning that the country
Speaker 1: is on track to pass one million migrant encounters for
Speaker 1: the first half of this year, a clear sign the
Speaker 1: Biden administration has been ineffective, to say the least in
Speaker 1: stemming the tide. At our Southern Border Center for Immigration
Speaker 1: Studies Executive director Mark Kricorian joins US Next for an
Speaker 1: update on the ongoing border crisis. The first I want
Speaker 1: to talk to you about protecting your online data. A
Speaker 1: lot of companies promise your privacy is guaranteed, but we
Speaker 1: know that's not true. That's why you need a new
Speaker 1: privacy and cybersecurity application tool called Secure. It's spelled SEK.
Speaker 1: You are. Secure is using proprietary encryption and offering secure
Speaker 1: instant messaging and email with Secure all of your communications
Speaker 1: based on servers and data centers hosted in Switzerland without
Speaker 1: using any of the big tech platforms. Privacy is a
Speaker 1: big issue. Without real secure, people can read your emails, messages,
Speaker 1: even your bank information. Secure will never mind your data
Speaker 1: never ask for your phone. You can send emails your doctor, banker, lawyer,
Speaker 1: anyone else with total confidence you're not being spied on
Speaker 1: by your internet provider or big tech. Secure is your
Speaker 1: solution to stop the constant theft of your digital identity.
Speaker 1: Cost only five dollars for the messenger, only ten dollars
Speaker 1: for the messenger and email combination package. Go to secure
Speaker 1: dot com and take back your privacy today. That's sekure
Speaker 1: dot com. Use promo code buck for twenty five percent off.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back with more. Hold the line. The
Speaker 1: US Border Patrol chief warned Tuesday that the country is
Speaker 1: on track to pass a staggering one million migrant encounters
Speaker 1: for the first half of this year. The crisis that
Speaker 1: our southern border could get much worse, though, as agents
Speaker 1: there are bracing for a massive influx if the Biden
Speaker 1: administration decides to end its COVID policy. Lots to unpack here,
Speaker 1: Let's get right to it with the executive director at
Speaker 1: the Center for Immigration Studies, Mark or Corey and Mark,
Speaker 1: thanks so much. Thanks for having me, Mark. Seems like
Speaker 1: the numbers are pretty staggering here. One million migrants in
Speaker 1: six months puts us on track to shatter. It seems
Speaker 1: every border crossing apprehension record at the southern border for
Speaker 1: what over sixty years or so. I mean, we'll put
Speaker 1: these numbers in context for US now, these are historically
Speaker 1: high numbers. What we're talking about when you maybe the
Speaker 1: way to kind of look at it in a more
Speaker 1: digestible sense is that over the past six months, the
Speaker 1: border patrol has averaged five thousand arrests per day on
Speaker 1: the border, and that the Obama's head of Homeland Security,
Speaker 1: Jay Johnson, who you know it was a Democrat, but
Speaker 1: he was serious about his job. He said, if you
Speaker 1: get much above one thousand arrests a day at the
Speaker 1: southern border, that starts to get unmanageable. We've been at
Speaker 1: five thousand a day for the past six months. And
Speaker 1: the administration is announced that they're going to lift a
Speaker 1: particular policy it's in the shorthand they call a Title
Speaker 1: forty two, which lets border patrol just bounce some of
Speaker 1: those people back with no hearings. Once they get rid
Speaker 1: of that policy, DHS is actually preparing for a possibility
Speaker 1: of as many as eighteen thousand arrests a day, triple
Speaker 1: what they're dealing with. Now, and even if it's only double,
Speaker 1: it's already completely unmanageable. Any increase will make well essentially
Speaker 1: erase the border. I want to ask you more about
Speaker 1: title forty two in a second, but I just want
Speaker 1: to know Mark who he is. Man. I was down
Speaker 1: at the border of Nacallen, Texas about eighteen months ago,
Speaker 1: if memory serves something like that, and it was these
Speaker 1: family units mostly that we're showing up their women with
Speaker 1: small children, sometimes adult males with small children, and so
Speaker 1: that was that was a big part the influx of
Speaker 1: the five thousand arrest of a day this year so
Speaker 1: far that we're seeing. Are there a lot of single
Speaker 1: adult males? I mean, who's coming and how men and
Speaker 1: what percentage are being allowed to stay as of now,
Speaker 1: and we'll get the title forty two at a moment.
Speaker 1: Over the past six months, the majority, but not that
Speaker 1: bigger majority, had been single adults. But what that means
Speaker 1: is you've got a huge share of families and what's
Speaker 1: called unaccompanied miners who really aren't on accompany, and sometimes
Speaker 1: not even miners, but that's what they call them. And
Speaker 1: the fact is that the only people who are being
Speaker 1: turned away under this title forty two mostly are single adults.
Speaker 1: So I looked at it and it was close to
Speaker 1: half of all the people arrested over the past six months,
Speaker 1: that's the first half of the fiscal year. We're in
Speaker 1: some way or another, led into the country. Some of
Speaker 1: them were detained briefly and then let go. Some were
Speaker 1: just plane let go, dropped off in the bus station.
Speaker 1: Others were these miners who were delivered to their illegal
Speaker 1: immigrant parents who paid to have them smuggled, delivered at
Speaker 1: taxpayer expense. So close to half we're simply let go.
Speaker 1: And if this Title forty two change happens, which is
Speaker 1: supposed to be in May, then the majority, a large majority,
Speaker 1: would probably just be let go. And I'm just it's
Speaker 1: fascinating that this continues to play out. There's so little
Speaker 1: media attention on this. But let's get to Title forty
Speaker 1: two for a second. Under Title forty two, authorities are
Speaker 1: allowed to turn away asylum seekers as part of an
Speaker 1: effort to combat the spread of COVID. Earlier today, the
Speaker 1: White House Communications Director Kate Beddington suggested that Biden is
Speaker 1: not in charge of his own border policy, saying they
Speaker 1: defer to the CDC and that the administration has every
Speaker 1: expectation there will be influx of people to the border
Speaker 1: when Title forty two is eliminated. Let's watch this mark,
Speaker 1: have you react to it? This is a decision that
Speaker 1: we have long deferred to CDC. Title forty two is
Speaker 1: a public health directive. It is not an immigration or
Speaker 1: migration enforcement measure. So the decision on when to lift
Speaker 1: Title forty two we defer to the CDC. That being said,
Speaker 1: of course, we are planning for multiple contingencies, and we
Speaker 1: have every expectation that when the CDC ultimately decides it's
Speaker 1: appropriate to lift Title forty two, there will be an
Speaker 1: influx of people to the border, and so we are
Speaker 1: doing a lot of work to plan for that contingency. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a betting field, the White House Comps director there.
Speaker 1: So what happens when Title forty two goes away as
Speaker 1: it looks like it, Well, you said, there'll be thousands
Speaker 1: and thousands of people that could come over all at once.
Speaker 1: There'll be a big surge of our Where are these
Speaker 1: individuals we're going to surge across the border? I mean,
Speaker 1: tell us more about how this is, how this is
Speaker 1: shaping up. They're waiting in Mexico. Some of them, in fact,
Speaker 1: are they know all about Title forty two, because the
Speaker 1: smugglers know more about immigration policy, American immigration policy than
Speaker 1: most Americans. And in fact, there's a journalist who is
Speaker 1: in contact with one of my people who is in Mexico,
Speaker 1: and he says every time he says that he's a
Speaker 1: journalist and is interested in immigration issues, whatever, he gets
Speaker 1: mobbed by people, you know, from Central America, Africa, the
Speaker 1: Middle East, whatever, mobbed by people who are waiting there
Speaker 1: for Title forty two to end, and they're like pressing
Speaker 1: him for information. You know, when's it gonna end? When's
Speaker 1: it gonna end? I guarantee you that by the time
Speaker 1: people see this program, everyone in Mexico who's interested in
Speaker 1: sneaking across our border is already knows the date of
Speaker 1: when Title forty two will end, which is May twenty third, supposedly.
Speaker 1: And I don't believe for a minute that the White
Speaker 1: House is just deferring to CDC. I mean, if you
Speaker 1: believe that I have swampland to sell you the cause
Speaker 1: they're ending it on May twenty third, But that's almost
Speaker 1: the same time as a new asylum rule goes into effect,
Speaker 1: which will in essence allow the Homeland Security to just
Speaker 1: rubber stamp every supposed asylum seeker run the spot right
Speaker 1: at the border. Meaning to tell you more about that
Speaker 1: that's real, that's really not worthy, Mark, I haven't heard
Speaker 1: about that, haven't seen it reported. A new asylum policy
Speaker 1: goes into effect. Tell us what the news called how
Speaker 1: this will work. It's a new asylum rule which, frankly,
Speaker 1: maybe I guarantee you it's going to be challenging the
Speaker 1: courts and it may get held up. But instead of
Speaker 1: having to go to an immigration judge, this rule would
Speaker 1: let the bureaucrats in Homeland Security just interview you at
Speaker 1: the border and give you asylum right there, without the
Speaker 1: government any other part of the government presenting counter countering information.
Speaker 1: So what that means, and I guarantee this is the
Speaker 1: whole point is to dramatically increase the percentage of people
Speaker 1: getting asylum and to speed it up so they get
Speaker 1: it right there. My point is, if you have these
Speaker 1: people crossing and you let them go, but before you
Speaker 1: let them go, you give them asylum, they're not illegal
Speaker 1: aliens anymore. This is the way they're solving the problem
Speaker 1: by defining away illegal immigration rather than actually protecting the
Speaker 1: border with a surgeon migrant encounters comes an influx of
Speaker 1: illegal drugs coming over the border as well. Take a
Speaker 1: look at these pictures mark last week's CBP officers in
Speaker 1: Arizona found over one hundred and thirty thousand tablets of
Speaker 1: fentonnel hidden inside a crop pod. Fentanyl overdose debts in
Speaker 1: the US hit an all time high last year. I mean,
Speaker 1: the border is porous, not just from an illegal immigration perspective,
Speaker 1: but also from drug smuggling, isn't it. Yeah, And those
Speaker 1: are related because remember, the border patrol's job is to
Speaker 1: stop anything from coming over between those legal ports. Event well,
Speaker 1: under this administration, the border patrol has been turned into
Speaker 1: kind of like Walmart greaders where illeal immigrants are coming over,
Speaker 1: there's a big group. All the border patrol agents on
Speaker 1: the line have to be taken off to process these people. Well,
Speaker 1: then there's nobody patrolling the border. And guess what. That's
Speaker 1: when the cartels move their drugs across, move people that
Speaker 1: don't want to turn themselves in, whether they're terrorists or
Speaker 1: criminals or who knows what. So the point is these
Speaker 1: are intimately related. If the border patrol wasn't playing, it
Speaker 1: wasn't on diaper duty. With all these illegal immigrants, it
Speaker 1: would actually be able to patrol the border. Nothing would
Speaker 1: be perfect, but they do a much better job of
Speaker 1: stopping this fentanyl and everything else from coming over the border.
Speaker 1: And just so I'm clear, Mark, real quick, I mean
Speaker 1: without a change in policy and effectively in the enforcement
Speaker 1: of the law, even if you had sent out, even
Speaker 1: if we send down a lot of national garbage Biden
Speaker 1: is not going to do. It would help a little
Speaker 1: bit with the problem you just dressed about patrolling the
Speaker 1: border when it comes to crime, to the influx rather
Speaker 1: of drugs. But it wouldn't do anything for the people
Speaker 1: who are apprehended, right because they're just surrendering themselves. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it wouldn't actually help much. I've talked to border patrol
Speaker 1: guys on the border and they can't arrest anybody really,
Speaker 1: And even if you know what they do is they
Speaker 1: basically their eyes and ears. They have binoculars and phones
Speaker 1: and what have you. But if there's no border patrol
Speaker 1: agents to respond to somebody that the National Guard sees
Speaker 1: something they can do about it. They're not shooting people.
Speaker 1: So really, the National Guard thing it. I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: not against it, but there's a limit to how much
Speaker 1: good is to marginal marginal benefit. That's what I saw
Speaker 1: when I was down there too, exact same thing. Mark.
Speaker 1: It's going to be interesting in the months ahead. Appreciate
Speaker 1: you joining us. We'll talk to you soon. Thank you.
Speaker 1: With crime in the Big Apple continuing to rise, New
Speaker 1: York City Mayor Eric Adams is calling the city a
Speaker 1: dysfunctional laughing stock, apparently forgetting that fighting crime is his responsibility.
Speaker 1: We have more on that with former NYPD detective Harry
Speaker 1: Howe when we come back. Kiln't miss American scandal Hunter Biden,
Speaker 1: a new First TV exclusive special hosted by Buck Sexton,
Speaker 1: available right now only on the First TV app. With
Speaker 1: New York City crime up nearly sixty percent from this
Speaker 1: time last year, Mayor Eric Adams has some harsh criticism
Speaker 1: for his own city. Adams ran his campaign on the
Speaker 1: promise to slow down and defeat the crime surge, and
Speaker 1: yet assault, robbery, and larceny still remain a huge problem today.
Speaker 1: In a statement by the New York City Mayor, he said, quote,
Speaker 1: anything goes in the City of New York, the most
Speaker 1: important city on the globe has become the laughing stock
Speaker 1: of the globe, and the dysfunctionality of our entire city
Speaker 1: has cascaded through the country. Joining me now to discuss
Speaker 1: former NYPD detective Harry Howe, Harry, appreciate you being with us.
Speaker 1: How are they? I'm good? So what happened here? Man?
Speaker 1: I mean, so all of a sudden the new mayor
Speaker 1: is figuring out, Oh, there is a big crime problem.
Speaker 1: It wasn't just COVID causing some spike in these numbers,
Speaker 1: and the city's a mess. Well, if you read that
Speaker 1: article on the New York clots he claims as a
Speaker 1: wartime general. Now, well it looks more like a Russian
Speaker 1: general who is losing to the street thubs. Is it
Speaker 1: general without a superiority artillery? Which means that the purpose
Speaker 1: or released without bail to commit crimes almost instantly. All right,
Speaker 1: he doesn't have the courts behind him, so, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: law and order is not a one way street here.
Speaker 1: You know, the cops can do their job, but if
Speaker 1: the courts don't do their job and these people are
Speaker 1: released again, they're just gonna go get another gun to
Speaker 1: go and commit a crime. And they're laughing at the police,
Speaker 1: police officers out there who are putting their lives in danger,
Speaker 1: all right, and punishment doesn't fit the risk, and police
Speaker 1: officers put into stopping the crime. Week to date, by
Speaker 1: the way, we've got a chart that shows the crime
Speaker 1: rate in America's biggest city. The percentage rise over twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one. Robbery is up forty eight percent, felony assault
Speaker 1: up twenty two percent, burglary thirty nine percent, grand larceny
Speaker 1: up thirty three percent. I mean, I feel like those
Speaker 1: we're talking about a year over year here, Harry, that
Speaker 1: just seems staggering to most people. When you've got forty
Speaker 1: eight percent increase in robbery and what is going on?
Speaker 1: And I's been four years in robbery in the East
Speaker 1: Village of New York. Let me tell you, a forty
Speaker 1: eight percent increase is astronomical. I mean, a lot of
Speaker 1: people think robbery is somebody when they break into somebody's home. Now,
Speaker 1: that's when somebody comes up to you on the street,
Speaker 1: puts a gun in your face or a knife in
Speaker 1: your face, it says, give me your wallet. That's a robbery,
Speaker 1: all right, And that is that's just making New York
Speaker 1: City is so damned dangerous, because not only that when
Speaker 1: you when you're a victim of a robbery, that you've
Speaker 1: got a good chance of being killed or shocked. So
Speaker 1: they really need to do something about these robberies. And
Speaker 1: if you don't put people in jail for robbery, they're
Speaker 1: just gonna go out there and keep on doing it
Speaker 1: anytime they want to. So, yeah, tell me this, how
Speaker 1: how can you actually start to turn those numbers around
Speaker 1: specifically on robbery. I know you said you worked in
Speaker 1: the East village of the of New York City on
Speaker 1: that specific issue. So what do you do, I mean,
Speaker 1: when you got you got a robbery problem. The mayor says,
Speaker 1: all right, Harry, I want you to run a task
Speaker 1: for us. I want you to bring the robbery numbers
Speaker 1: way down. How do you do that? Well, based on
Speaker 1: the environment that we're seeing today. Uh, you know, you're
Speaker 1: a robbery detective to investigative robbery or you go out
Speaker 1: there looking for robberies in progress, you catch a couple
Speaker 1: of guys, you lock them up, you put them in jail.
Speaker 1: You got a good case. What happens is, though, if
Speaker 1: these guys get out right away, you know, if they're
Speaker 1: not you know, they're not, you know, have bailed for
Speaker 1: like a half a million dollars. You know, these guys
Speaker 1: aren't staying in So with what happens is these guys
Speaker 1: go back out and commun another robbery, and communother robbery
Speaker 1: and community robbery. We have revolving door justice like we
Speaker 1: did back in the early eighties, and we're back to
Speaker 1: that now. The cops can do only so much buck.
Speaker 1: You know, we can keep on making a rest, We
Speaker 1: can keep on the rest of the guy, you know,
Speaker 1: five six times in a seventy eight month period. But
Speaker 1: if the courts don't keep them in jail, all right,
Speaker 1: and if they don't pay for their crimes, there's nothing
Speaker 1: the police can do. It's a joke. Here's Mayor Adams,
Speaker 1: and I think this was a surprise to some folks
Speaker 1: that it's already gone to this point. He says that
Speaker 1: the state levels doing their job on violence, but they
Speaker 1: need federal help. Here, federal government help to deal with
Speaker 1: violence in the city of New York. Watch this one.
Speaker 1: We're dealing with a sea of violence and many rivers
Speaker 1: are feeding you know, this sea. We're going to do
Speaker 1: our job, but we need help on the federal level.
Speaker 1: And I'm in our federal entities assists we're dealing with.
Speaker 1: Are you surprised that he's saying, well, what's he talking about?
Speaker 1: I mean you must be wow, what do you think
Speaker 1: about this? We're dealing with the see of incompetence based
Speaker 1: on the Democrats. He's not saying that his people put this,
Speaker 1: that the Democrats created this problem in New York And
Speaker 1: like I said, it's a sea of incompetence. You know,
Speaker 1: back in the early eighties when or actually when Julie
Speaker 1: Any came in, we didn't need defense to come in
Speaker 1: and change things, all right. All we need to do
Speaker 1: was to be able to have a government that backed
Speaker 1: the police. Court said back the police, all right, and
Speaker 1: we took care of the problem. We took care of
Speaker 1: it pretty quickly. I don't know what he's talking about
Speaker 1: and wanting federal aid or federal help for this, because
Speaker 1: we really don't need it. We need competency is what
Speaker 1: we need. Do you think that Adams is he's only
Speaker 1: in the job a couple of months so far, he's
Speaker 1: the new mayor. What do you think is his process
Speaker 1: his thought processes here? Because he came in and there
Speaker 1: was a lot of fanfare around how he's going to
Speaker 1: turn things around, But now it sounds like he's almost
Speaker 1: surprised to find out what bad shape the city's in,
Speaker 1: which to everybody's like, you're the mayor and you ran
Speaker 1: for mayor, how is this a shock to you? Oh? Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm shocked. I'm shocked to see that the
Speaker 1: crimary is so higher in New York, even though I
Speaker 1: was a cop there for twenty seven years, and the
Speaker 1: fact that the last mayor totally destroyed the city. How
Speaker 1: is it a shock to this guy? You know, why
Speaker 1: won't he point the fingers at the city council. Why
Speaker 1: doesn't he point the fingers at the courts? You know why?
Speaker 1: Because they're old Democrats and there's buddies. He is slowly
Speaker 1: becoming a politician, a Democrat politician. And if he's so
Speaker 1: worried about six and seven year old kids getting shot
Speaker 1: out there like happened last week, all right, then you
Speaker 1: better get the courts behind us and bring in that
Speaker 1: just a goo attorney and give him a good talking to,
Speaker 1: because he can put the blame on the courts, and
Speaker 1: he can put the blame on the city council. And
Speaker 1: that's where the crime is so high in New York.
Speaker 1: Do you think, Harry, going forward this year, it's gonna
Speaker 1: at least start to level off and maybe start to
Speaker 1: get a little bit better or do you not? Are
Speaker 1: you not seeing the moves necessary for that? Now? Like
Speaker 1: I said, you know, it's in general without power. You
Speaker 1: know he's out there. You know we can make all
Speaker 1: the US to one. We can take we can take
Speaker 1: five hundred guns off the street tomorrow, all right. The
Speaker 1: fact is it'll be five hundred more guns on the
Speaker 1: street and then go out and buy another gun right
Speaker 1: away and come in another crime. It's becoming Wallace New
Speaker 1: York City. And if he don't take it into hand,
Speaker 1: and the city council don't take it in the hand,
Speaker 1: and the courts don't take it seriously, I don't see
Speaker 1: any changes none, Buck, until the courts and the city
Speaker 1: council and the statia behind him none. Harry, appreciate you
Speaker 1: joining us, Thanks for the perspective, Thanks for having me Buck. Today,
Speaker 1: President Biden said that access to monoclonal antibodies isn't partisan,
Speaker 1: it's medicine. Remember when Republican governors pushed this life saving
Speaker 1: treatment earlier this year and Biden revoked its use what's
Speaker 1: going on here? We'll get into out of more in
Speaker 1: quick hits. Doctor Faucci is out of hiding and coming
Speaker 1: in hot with BS, like Americans must be prepared for
Speaker 1: another round of restrictions. So we also said there's no
Speaker 1: doubt COVID lockdowns worked. Yeah, there's tons of doubt. Actually
Speaker 1: that didn't work, totally false. But we'll get into all
Speaker 1: this in quick hits. Look, I told you little tyrant
Speaker 1: Faucci isn't done with you, and I wasn't kidding. He's
Speaker 1: now emerging again with the same broken bullcrap ideas. And
Speaker 1: you see that there's COVID cases, there's this new BA
Speaker 1: two variant of omicron, and cases are rising. Faucci's out
Speaker 1: there saying Americans need to be prepared for another round
Speaker 1: of COVID restrictions. Watch, we need to be prepared for
Speaker 1: the possibility that we would have another variant that would
Speaker 1: come along. And if things change and we do get
Speaker 1: a variant that does give us an uptick in cases
Speaker 1: and hospitalization, we should be prepared and flexible enough to
Speaker 1: pivot towards going back, at least temporarily to a more
Speaker 1: rigid type of restriction such as requiring masks indoor ridge
Speaker 1: restrictions like masks indoors, which have never worked. They never worked.
Speaker 1: This guy is a lunatic. What's he going to say?
Speaker 1: His entire career came down to this one big challenge
Speaker 1: and he failed miserably. That he's the worst public health
Speaker 1: bureaucrat and the history of possibly the world. I'm not
Speaker 1: going to say that. No, it said, he's going to say,
Speaker 1: do more of what I've already told you, even though
Speaker 1: it didn't work, because I said so. Fauci also said
Speaker 1: this that there's no doubt that COVID lockdowns worked. Watched
Speaker 1: this one. Do you think two years on that they
Speaker 1: were worth it? Or were they too severe? You know,
Speaker 1: I don't think we're ever going to be able to
Speaker 1: determine what the right balance is. I think the restrictions,
Speaker 1: if you want to use that word, which I tend
Speaker 1: to shy away from, lockdown, there's certainly prevented a lot
Speaker 1: of infections, prevented a lot of hospitalizations, and prevented a
Speaker 1: lot of deaths. There's no doubt about that, no doubt. No,
Speaker 1: there's actually tons of doubt because people have done real
Speaker 1: studies of this. Looked at the data, and there has
Speaker 1: been no discernible benefit really whatsoever from the lockdowns. They
Speaker 1: were never even full on lockdowns. There were partial lockdowns.
Speaker 1: A lot of people were considered essential workers, continued to
Speaker 1: go about their day to day lives and still contract
Speaker 1: the virus, bring it home to their families. Look at
Speaker 1: the numbers of infections of seniors, including in nursing homes.
Speaker 1: Look at all these different things. And to believe that
Speaker 1: lockdown's work is to live in a fantasy land. And
Speaker 1: that is what doctor Anthony Fauci wants you to continue
Speaker 1: to do. Or you can accept you can see the
Speaker 1: reality here, which is that the Fauciites were wrong all
Speaker 1: along about everything, and that they have been absolutely unwilling
Speaker 1: to be held accountable for those failures. And now they
Speaker 1: want to do more. They're not done. They want you
Speaker 1: to suffer more. Mask up peasant, even though the masks
Speaker 1: didn't work. And then there's the big lies that are
Speaker 1: being told by the Democrat A line corporate media, and
Speaker 1: they well they lied before by Hunter Biden's laptop. And
Speaker 1: here's what the reality is right now. The Washington Post,
Speaker 1: this is their headline. Here's how the Post analyze Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden's laptop. Two experts confirmed the veracity of thousands of emails,
Speaker 1: but say a thorough examination was stymied by missing data. Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is another way of slow walking toward reality. Here
Speaker 1: with the laptop was real everything on it. Now they're saying, oh,
Speaker 1: we can only tell some of it's all this stuff
Speaker 1: on there is reel. Okay, there's no reason to believe otherwise.
Speaker 1: They have Hunter Biden's laptop and there's real corruption. Their
Speaker 1: hunter is under serious federal criminal investigation right now, and
Speaker 1: there are some people who say he could even face
Speaker 1: criminal charges. It looks like he may have engaged in
Speaker 1: tax evasion, money lawn during failure to register as a
Speaker 1: foreign agent. These are all remember that last crime too,
Speaker 1: doesn't sound like a big deal. It's a big deal
Speaker 1: under Trump. They went after anybody in Trump's who are
Speaker 1: a bit for fairer violations for an Agent Registration Act.
Speaker 1: So will Hunter Biden's son be treated to a different
Speaker 1: standard of justice? I think we all know the answer
Speaker 1: to that. Joe Biden says access to monoclonal antibodies is
Speaker 1: in partisan it's medicine. Watched this one. The monoclonal antibody.
Speaker 1: Take monoclonal animbodies for example, They've helped save lives. This
Speaker 1: isn't partisan, it's medicine. But Congress hasn't provided enough money
Speaker 1: to keep purchasing these monoclonal Anybody remember there's some Republican
Speaker 1: governors who are pushing monoclonal antibodies, and Biden actually provoked
Speaker 1: their use earlier on. I was changing tune on that,
Speaker 1: no doubt, because you know who cares about what actually happened.
Speaker 1: They've got a narrative to run. That's everything. That's hold
Speaker 1: the line. The no spinows is up next, Shi'll tie.
Speaker 1: There's a battle going on right now, but maybe the
Speaker 1: most important to fight our country's had since the Revolutionary War.
Speaker 1: Once again, it's about our freedom. People like you and
Speaker 1: me are being canceled, our speech increasingly censored by big
Speaker 1: tech and corporate media. Can't let that happen Unter fight back.
Speaker 1: Please stand with us and support the first Team. Peep
Speaker 1: be a part of our team, dedicated to preserving the
Speaker 1: very essence of who we are free Americans.