WEBVTT - Psychedelics Playlist: The Manifested Mind, Part 3

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.760
<v Speaker 1>My welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, are you

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind? My name is

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and we're back with

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>part three of our exploration of psychedelics. These compounds that

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>lead to the mind manifesting experiences which we've been describing

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in the past couple of episodes. Now, if you're just

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>tuning in, we recommend that you probably should go and

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>check out the previous two episodes. First, this is probably

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>one it's not best to jump in midstream, right, Yeah,

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a continuous, though at times meandering journey. The history

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of psychedelics not an all inclusive history, and so we've

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>stressed multiple times, you know, there's no way that we

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>can cover all of the studies, all the curious tidbits

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of history, all the various um traditional uses of psychedelic substances.

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So certainly we implore you to to check out some

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of the sources we've been ation to hear and explore

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>them for yourselves, as well as you know, additional resources. Right,

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and so in the previous episodes we mentioned some books

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that have been part of our guides on the way through.

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I know you've been enjoying some of the works of

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Terrence McKenna and Michael Pollen as well. Been reading on that. Yeah.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Michael Polland's most recent book, How to Change Your Mind,

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is a great book about psychedelics that covers a lot

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of the same ground as some some history, some science,

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and especially this recent renaissance in psychedelic research and how

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it there's renewed interest I think since like the early

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to mid two thousand's, especially about the clinical significance of psychedelics,

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>how they could actually be used to treat mental conditions, addictions,

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>various problems people have, UH, and that they're not just

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a recreational drug, though there are also plenty of people

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>who would make the case that it might not be

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing to use them recreationally. We're we're not

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>going to try to evangelize or demonize either way or

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>recommend that you use them. We just want to be descriptive, right,

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But we will we will discus us some of these

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>viewpoints that are brought up regarding UH, the beyond medicinal

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>uses of psychedelics, UH and UH as far as the

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>modern stuff, like again we're living in an exciting time

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>when they're they're all these these current studies going on,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're revealing more and more about how psychedelics can

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 1>be used to uh to help treat various UH problems,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>psychological problems, addictions, etcetera. We're probably gonna get into most

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of that in the following episode. This episode is largely

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>going to deal with some of the original studies that

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>we're taking place, especially in the nineteen fifties. Yeah, uh so, Yeah,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a thing that comes as a surprise to

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who, you know, if you think

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>about the the origins of the drug war, the counterculture

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteen sixties, and I don't know, maybe you

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>have some various ideas about the square nineteen fifties, it

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>might come as a shock to you that there was

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a flourishing body of psychedelic research going on during the

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties and early nineteen sixties, especially focusing on LSD

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and the treatment of things like alcohol is him in

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties and then later the use of psilocybin

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and various types of research in the early to mid

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties. YEA, Psychedelics did not just emerge from a

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>van at Woodstock and start corrupting the youth of America.

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh Now, now, before we go any further, I do

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 1>want to take a step back for just a little bit,

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to talk about about fun Guy or

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>fungi if you will, Um, just in fungi if you're

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>making a pizza. Isn't that the Italian way to say it.

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I've also watched like British documentaries where they for for fungi,

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'm I'm more of a fun guy, so I

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>like go like go for I tend to go for

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>fun Guy. Let's go with fun Guy, all right? So, um,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I just want to take you a step back and

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>just talk about just how weird and wonderful the entire

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom of fun Guy really is. Yeah. Well, and we

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>should say the reason for that, of course, if you've

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>been with us the last two episodes, is that of

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>all the psychedelics that we've looked at, the most focus

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>has been on psilocybin mushrooms, right, and even LSD is

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>derived from urgat, which is a fun Guy. So so

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.119
<v Speaker 1>that so the the fungal element here is is very

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>rich and second, so yeah, the kingdom fung gui because

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>fungi are their own kingdom. Uh. We often associate them

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>with plants in kind of an informal way. Um, you know,

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but we and they were considered plants of until the

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>later half of the twentieth century. But there's something different,

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>of course. Uh. They're thought to outnumber plants species on

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a scale of ten to one, and they all descended

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>from a single species that derived from a common ancestor

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>with animals about eight hundred million to nine hundred million

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Is it true that, uh, phylogenetically, humans are

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>more closely related to fungi than to plants. I think

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's that that is, that is what I have read,

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and and it's an amazing thing to think about. It's

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>also something that you know, it's that fact that leads

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>some people to wonder about our relationship with fung gui. Um.

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>You know why in some cases we have this uh,

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>this close relationship because ultimately fun guy have a lot

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>more in common with us than they do with plants. Um.

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And and again that's interesting considering the close relationship who

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 1>we have with them, and not only us, so there

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>are other animals as well. I mean think that the

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>leaf cutter ants that stand out is one of the

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>most impressive fung gui dependent species due to their practice

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of fungal agriculture, their mushroom farmers. Yeah, because you think

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>about how humans use fun guy. We've certainly been focusing

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>on psychedelics, but certainly fun guy factor into our cuisine,

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>into our medicines, both in in major ways, but in

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>also in ways we don't you know, major and obvious ways,

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but also in ways we maybe don't think about as much.

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Because certainly you think about cooking and mushrooms, you think

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>about culinary mushrooms that you buy at the store, which

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>I love mushrooms one of my favorite ingredients. Yeah, of course,

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>not every edible mushroom can be cultivated. I got to

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>learn about this over the weekend. I went with a

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>lie S servalists on a on a mushroom foraging walk

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and we get to pick a few different mushrooms that

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>cannot be uh cultivated at least can't be cultivated in

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a dependable manner, and got to bring

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>some home and eat them. Is that why chantrell's are

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>so expensive? You can't grow them on a farm. Yeah? Um, well,

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I forget the exact species you know, but there are

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>several varieties like that where if if local restaurant is

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>serving them, they have to depend on foragers bringing them

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in and selling them. And so a lot of a

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of foragers, a lot of mushroom enthusiasts kind of

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>pay for their hobby by selling their mushrooms to local restaurants. Interesting,

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, so there's that level. I would obviously we

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>eat them, but they're also you know, ingredients in many

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>different foods, especially modern processed foods, and they're an important part,

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>an essential part of the fermentation process yeast. Yeah, and

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to be drinking some sort of weird

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>mushroom tea to be partaking of medicinal fun guy, because

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>of course we have penicillin to get it, which you

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>know is I would love to do a future episode

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>of our other podcast, Invention on penicillin because in terms

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:12.239
<v Speaker 1>of fungal inventions or discoveries however you want to describe it,

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>like that is that is a major one and and

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it is totally fun. Guy depended it came from mold growth, right,

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>which of course is a fungus. And then on top

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of that, you know, we also have we talked about

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the microbiome a lot, but we also have a microbiome

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>which is a small but significant portion of the human

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>bodies overall microbiome. UH Fungi also play a crucial role

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in the nutrient exchange of trees, growing around their roots

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like fungal gloves and exchanging nitrogen for sugars. Uh and

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this forms the basis of what some researchers call the

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>wood wide web, which is kind of that that's a

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>little too cute. That's a little it's a little too cute,

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>because ultimately it's like really just mind blowingly weird to

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think about, because we're talking about a fungal network of hype.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Remember that a mushroom. We we often think of the

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>mushroom as the thing itself, but the mushroom is just

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the fruiting body um and the you know, the the

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>spores viewing death emergence of a larger organism. And so

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the these this network of hi fi underground and growing

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>around the trees and between trees. It allows for the

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>plants to distribute resources such as sugar, nitrogen, and phosphorus,

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, between one tree and another. Uh and by

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>some definitions, this comprises a form of communication these types

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of thinking can get really psychedelic on their own. Oh absolutely, Um,

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>mycologist Paul stainments, for instance, who did we mention the

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>previous several times? So yeah, he's he's like a mushroom

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>answer for everything. Guy, uh, you know, very important figure

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and modern mycology. And he's gone so far as to

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to suggest, according to Michael Pollen in his book, that

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>these networks are in some sense conscious, that they're aware

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.239
<v Speaker 1>of their environment and they're able to respond to challenges accordingly,

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and Paul and says that that initially he thought this

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>was mere metaphor you know that clearly statements is just

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>being overly enthusiastic and metaphoric about what's going on with

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the systems, but that he thinks that growing evidence actually

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>suggested it might be there might be more involved here. Well,

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this depends heavily on just simply what you

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>mean when you use the word conscious, because there I

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think you can definitely make the case that mushrooms, in

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>very interesting and surprising ways, are aware of their environments,

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, able to respond to to stimuli and stuff

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>like that. I think it would be much harder to

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>make the case that, you know, the thing that we

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.839
<v Speaker 1>think of as like the hard problem of consciousness, meaning

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that it is having a subjective experience. There's something that

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like to be the mushroom. H I'm not saying

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's not true, but I don't know what the

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence for that. I think it's much more of a

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>stretch to make that case. Now. On a on a

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>similar similar lines, though, I got to your Eduardo Cone,

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Associate Professor of Anthropology at McGill University UH speak on

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>basically the same topic at the twenty nineteen World Science Festival.

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>He's the author of a book titled How Forests Think,

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and he's worked extensively with Amazonian people in his work,

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>especially considering concerning their use of psychedelic substances. But he's

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>focused on the same issue of like the use of

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fungal networks in the soil within forests as a as

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a type of communication or even thought. Yeah, he gets

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>into this as well. So just to give you an idea,

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's ultimately, you know, kind of a heady concept,

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>but but it's basically this idea that not that you

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>have non human entities that quote unquote think via an

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>ability to represent, produce and interpret signs interesting and so

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that this is uh. This is a quote from his

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>book How Forests Think. Quote. Life is a constitutively semiotic.

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>That is, life is through and through the product of

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>sign processes. What differentiates life from the inanimate physical world

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is that life forms represent the world in some way

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>or another, and these representations are intrinsic to their being.

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>What we share with non human living creatures, then, is

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 1>not our embodiment, as certain strains of phenomenological approaches would hold,

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that we all live with and through signs.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>We all use signs as canes that represent part of

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the world to us in some way or another. In

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>doing so, signs make us what we are. Interesting semiotic

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>definition of life. I don't know if I've ever encountered

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>that before. And I took a class on semiotics. Oh yeah, No,

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I was that kind of Weirdough. Well, I'm very interested

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in his his thoughts and his work. I'd I'd love

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to actually see about having him on the show in

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the future. But like I said, he's worked extensively with

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Amazonian peoples and explore their use of ayahuasca, and he

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 1>said that Amazonians use several technologies including psychedelics, but also

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>dreams to connect with the mind of the forest, and

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>he says that these approaches break down the way language

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>tells us what we are. They help them find a

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>path forward, path of healing and problem solving. And he

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>also pointed out that the Shamans of the Amazon like

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>basically have a message for the rest of the world.

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>They want us to know that the world is a

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>living world and that we have to connect ourselves with

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the mind of the forest to save ourselves from the

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>planetary depression that we are now entering into. And I

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>found this really interesting because this is UH, even though

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Cone to my knowledge that never mentioned Terence McKinnon his work,

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>but some of this like lines up with the messages

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that mckinna had in The Food of the Gods and

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>his other work regarding UH. This idea of an archaic revival,

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a necessary reconvergence with the natural world through psychedelics and

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>UM and at least in mckinna's definition, and overall, you

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 1>know Bohemian thread of human cultures to save us u

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>from the you know, the doom of a nature deprived,

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>ego driven dominator culture, to save us from silent running. Yeah,

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>yeah in a way. Yeah, absolutely, yeah, there it matches

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>up with this theory. I mean this, uh, this viewpoint

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of modern life will come back to this that you

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>see this throughout a lot of the a lot of

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic literature and also just sort of counterculture nineteen sixties messaging,

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.599
<v Speaker 1>including Silent Running, which is very much a product of

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that time, the science fiction film that we've discussed previously

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Now Cone mentioned in the world Science

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Festivally he thinks even our modern fascination with psychedelics maybe

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a symptom of our disconnection with nature. And he says

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the solution isn't simply to to you know, take a

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>psyche cadelic substance, but to rather live psychedelically, to live live,

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to be in the emergent mind. What exactly do you

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>think he meant by that quote to, like, what is

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the emergent mind being there? Um my understanding, And like

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, perhaps we can get him on the show

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to discuss these these topics in greater depth. But I

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>think he's he's talking about this basic idea that again

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you see again and again in the among advocates of

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic that there's there's something wrong with modern humans, that

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we're cut off from each other, that we're we're sort

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of in these little individual cells of the mind, and

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>we are in many cases have great difficulty in being

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>part of some sort of a larger system. Uh, you know,

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it maybe a bit elaborate to you know, to

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think of it. I mean, I don't know if I

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>would I would describe it. And my understanding is like

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>an emergent mind, you know. But but but that's kind

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of the vibe I get from the idea that like

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we're we're cut off from each other, that we don't

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>understand each other, we don't understand nature. Uh, you know,

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we're all wrapped up in our own egos, and if

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we could break through those boundaries, uh, that we would

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have a better relationship with each other and with the world.

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Like so often in the world of psychedelics and stuff

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>coming from psychedelic enthusiasts, that that's the kind of statement

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that is either true, really profound, or extremely banal. Yeah,

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I yeah, I get it, because I know

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people out there are probably shaking their

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>hands as saying like, well, that just sounds like hippy nonsense,

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's not even new hippie nonsense. It's hippie nonsense

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I've heard time and time again. But for my own part,

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think, yeah, you can be overly optimistic

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of this stuff. But on the other hand,

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at the literature, the scientific literature

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that that is that shows us and is continuing to

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>show us what psychedelics can do. I think at this

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>point it's you know, it's it's more a question of, like,

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>at what level are psychedelics useful? Uh, you know, is

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it is it purely in the clinical world, Is it

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>purely among you know, people who are suffering from some

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>condition or another, or does it go beyond that? You know?

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I I think it depends on who's advocating on where

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that line should be drawn. I mean, some people draw

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it all the way at the horizon. Where you draw it,

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's clearly a source of the conflict that

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>led to the demonization of psychedelics and to the sort

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of closing of the psychedelic research regime in the in

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the mid to late nineteen sixties. Right. Yeah, Well, on

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that note, let's let's go to the nineteen sixties. In fact,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the nineteen fifties. Okay, let's go. Let's

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>go back. In fact, let's go to the nineteen let's

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>do it. I'll take you up, and that we'll go

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to the forties. And let's just

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>discuss twentieth century psychedelic research itself. So, as we've discussed,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>most of these substances are nothing. Humans have used them

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>for thousands of years, and even the synthesized substance LSD,

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of course is derived from a good fun guy that

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>has been around forever as well. Right, But there was

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly a period of time between Albert Hoffman's nineteen forty

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>three bicycle ride and Nixon's Controlled Substance Act of nineteen

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>seventy in which there were tons of studies that examined

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>psychedelics and and and especially LSD in many cases because

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it was more readily available at the time. One reason, also,

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, is that the pharmaceutical manufacturer that Albert hof

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>On worked for in the nineteen thirties and forties, uh Sandoz,

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>which I guess held the patent on LSD, was just

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>giving it out like candy. Basically, they were I think

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to find uses for it and their

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Their method of doing that was like, well, let's just

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>give it for free to tons of researchers and they'll

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>find a good way to use it. Yeah, it's kind

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of like in the Lorax, the sneed was invented, which

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone needs. Like, if you invented this thing that clearly

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>has some sort of use, but you're not exactly sure

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>how to market it, You're not sure what the the

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>uses for it, you you kind of just let everybody

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>play with it so you can figure out how you're

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>going to make your billions of dollars off of it.

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>But I don't say that to undermine the fact that

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it really does seem like some researchers were finding extremely

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>promising clinical uses for LSD in the nineteen fifties. Yeah,

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly in how they might be used to treat addiction, depression, UM,

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>obsessive compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, autism, and end of life anxiety.

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So in his book, Michael Pollen chats with Stephen Ross

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>m D at the n y U Psilocybin Cancer Anxiety Study,

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>which of course comes back to that end of life

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>anxiety question that was explored earlier. I guess we'll explore

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that more, probably in the next episode. Yeah, we will.

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>But in the book, uh Ross mentions to Pollen that

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, these efforts involved roughly forty research participants in

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>more than a thousand clinical papers. So when we're talking

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>about LSD studies of of the of the nineteen fifties,

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>for instance, you know, we're not talking about where we're

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna highlight a few isolated studies, but we're not talking

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>about like just a study here, study there. You know,

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of research going on. It was huge.

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just a blip. Yeah, And initially, reach the

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>researchers thought that LSD and later psilocybin, that they might

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>be used to understand psychosis, as they believe that individuals

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>who are using these substances to play displayed similar thoughts

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and behavior, And so clinicians also thought that, well, you

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>could take one of these substances yourself and therefore get

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a taste of what a psychotic episode is like and

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>then be better able to empathize with a patient exactly.

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And in this vein the same compounds we now refer

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>to as psychedelic were then referred to by many clinicians

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>as psychoto mimetics. Mimicking the state of psychosis, so your

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>therapists could take this in order to understand what you

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>were going through. Now, key figure from this period, uh English, Uh,

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>psychiatrist Humphrey Osmond entered the picture, and he figured that Okay,

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>if you had a substance like mescaline, and if it

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>could if it could induce this sort of symptom, that

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>these sort of symptoms in in a in a human

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>who took it, then perhaps uh, you know, schizophrenia was

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>due to a chemical and balance in the brain, which

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is kind of you know, ultimately an eye opening hypothesis. Right,

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>If if this substance makes my brain do this, then

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>perhaps what this patient's brain is doing is due to

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>something you know, very chemical in nature as well, something

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that could be addressed perhaps with another chemical. Well, yeah,

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and I think the middle of the twentieth

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>century period was actually a very important time for understanding

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the role of physical causes in mental phenomena. Like I mean,

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was of course the rise of Skinnerism

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>like B. F. Skinner and behaviorism, which you can have

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of criticisms about. Maybe it doesn't take into account

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>cognition and the mind and uh, enough about what our

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and emotions mean, because it was just about what

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>can we do to control and measure external behaviors because

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the only thing we have access to as scientists.

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>That that might not be the right approach, but it

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>was certainly useful in some ways to kind of clear

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>out I think a lot of the uh, the kind

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of almost religious, kind of metaphysical baggage that had been

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>coming along for the ride with some versions of psychology

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>up until then, with you know, Freud and Young and

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>all that. Yeah. It so so you know, ultimately we

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>have this this push for biochemical answers to you know,

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 1>concerning mental issues, and this prepared alls the the the

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>young field of neurochemistry, leading in time to our modern

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>understanding of neurotransmitters and their role in our mental states,

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>leading to the discovery of serotonin and the development of

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>s sr I antidepressant drugs. But then, you know, some

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>also made the connection between the symptoms of psychedelic use

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and delirium tremens or the d T s Uh. This

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is of course associated with alcohol abuse, alcoholism, alcohol withdrawal.

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I think so like if you you're used to extensive

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>alcohol consumption and then somebody stops, they might experience these

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>uh negative symptoms that have been referred to as the

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>delirium tremens. Yeah. So this led to a to the

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I think by modern from a modern viewpoint, kind of

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a weird idea, a weird seeming idea that you could

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>use LSD to sort of shock alcoholics into sobriety and

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>so osmond and a gentleman by the name of Abram

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Hoffer conducted these studies with hundreds I think seven hundred

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>according to pollen uh alcoholics, and they found it effective

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>roughly half the time. You mean using LSD to treat alcoholics. Yes, yes,

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And this particular study, by the way, was one of

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the ones that caught the eyes of Stephen Ross decades

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>later as an example of the therapeutic potential of psychedelics

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>quote buried in plain sight. Um. But anyway, the the

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>original researchers here, they expected that the trips in question,

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the psychedelic experiences in question, would be essentially just nightmare

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>fuel that would approximate the feelings of the d t s.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And this was seemingly based on physicians Sydney Katz's reports

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that Paul and summarizes as being something like you'd you'd

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>see in an an anti LSD propaganda from the nineteen sixties,

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.239
<v Speaker 1>just about how it's just just pure nightmare fuel and

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was running from demons sort of a thing. Um.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>But of course what happened is that they gave a

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>court in their study anyway, that they found that when

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>they gave these substances to people, they reported all manner

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of things, beautiful things. Even so, there was definitely some anxiety,

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>some depression, some hallucination uh in individuals when they were

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 1>administered psychedelics, but most reported feelings that were described as

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>transcendental in nature, so that, for instance, an ability to

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>see one's self objectively, almost as if for the first time.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And so this would seem to be the experience or

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this was possibly an experience that was was playing a

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>role in them then being able to cease their addiction.

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And of course, outside of the black box of experience,

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the research results spoke for themselves and indicated that, you know,

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 1>something was working here. So this opened up the idea

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>that there was something more to the experience and that

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it might be utilized as a treatment method. Now I

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>know it was especially in Canada that that LSD treatment

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>for alcoholism was picked up, and I think I think

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>this one, this particular study was in Saskatchewan, I believe. Yeah, well,

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that was where Humphrey Osmond was based for

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 1>a long time. But that another thing I think to

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>make clear is that it's it's not thought that just

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>giving somebody the drug triggers a change in the body

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that defeats alcoholism. That that there's something important going on

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>by about the nature of the experience that people have

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>on psychedelics that contributes to their recovery and and staying

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>sober over time. Right right, Yeah, this sort of this

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>metaphorical shaking of the snow globe, as as some call it,

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>is playing a role in allowing, uh, some sort of

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, curative therapy to take place. Now, I should

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>point out that in terms of this particular study, later

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on in the early sixties, the Addiction Research Foundation in

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Toronto set out to replicate these results with better controls,

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and they failed to reproduce the you know, the same

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>robust results. Uh, And this ended up giving fuel to

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>critics of of LSD, but also porters again stressed the

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>importance of set and setting, right, I mean, this is

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>something that I guess we'll come back to the sentiment,

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>so all, I'll save my tangent here for later. But yeah,

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll put a pin in that and just know that

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna come back to the importance of set and

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.360
<v Speaker 1>setting in research. But but still there there was enough

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>going on here that people were very encouraged, and by

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the by the end of the nineteen fifties, LSD was

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>considered like a miracle cure for alcohol addiction. A lot

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of people were excited about it, and Paulin points out

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that one of the people that it was that ended

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>up getting excited about it was none other than Bill Wilson,

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Alcoholics Anonymous, Yeah, who who incidentally created

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.959
<v Speaker 1>credited his own sobriety to a life changing mystical experience

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>he had on on belladonna, which also has psychoactive properties

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>and was used in a treatment in treatment at Town's

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Hospital in New York City in nineteen thirty four. That's

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>when when he had the substance as part of the treatment.

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 1>And so you can see that in a lot of

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>the Alcoholics Anonymous messaging, like the idea of the the

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>idea of acknowledging a higher power, you know. I think

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times people just interpret that as a

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>more traditional kind of like, you know, you need a

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>religion or something, especially if you're meeting in a church

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>basement or you know, or something. Yeah. But in fact,

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 1>it seems like this has something to do with the

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>common kinds of mystical experiences that people have on psychedelics,

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>where they, you know, they commune with some kind of

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>reality greater than themselves. They believe that they've encountered some

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>other being or some universal consciousness or the universe itself.

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>It might have something to do with the ego dissolution

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes people experience on psychedelics. Wilson, by the way,

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>would later try LSD with some researchers in l A.

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>And he actually thought that it might prove very useful

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in treating alcoholism, and that that it might even have

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a place in a A. But others in the in

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the organization struck down this idea, you know, for for

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>a few different reasons, one of which being that it

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>would perhaps m the like the messaging of the organization itself, right, like,

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, that you would turn to another chemical um. Yeah,

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And so for a time LSD assisted psychotherapy was considered

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a powerful, legitimate and evidence based method for treating alcoholism

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in Canada. Definitely, But maybe we should take a break

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and then when we come back we can discuss some

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>problems with scientific research on psychedelics. Thank thank Alright, we're

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>back now. I think this is a good place to

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 1>start discussing the fact that there are widely acknowledged inherent

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>difficulties with doing rigorous scientific experiments on the effects of psychedelics.

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.239
<v Speaker 1>And so one of these problems is the problem with

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>placebo control. Now, normally when you want to test and

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>see if a new drug works, you need to do

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>a placebo controlled test. You have to do this if

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 1>you want to sort out specific pharmacological efficacy versus the

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>placebo effect, you know, the effect that uh sometimes people

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>who are given a treatment, even if the treatment doesn't

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>have active ingredients, just the fact that they think they're

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>being treated appears to cause uh a feeling that their

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>condition has improved. They will report less, fewer negative symptoms

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. So, yeah, I imagine you give

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a hundred people a new anti nausea drug and then

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty of them report their nausea going away. Was it

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>because the compound in the pill relieves nausea fifty of

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the time, or could much shore all of that response

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>just be due to the placebo effect people thinking that

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>they're being treated. So if you placebo control your drug

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>trial to find out if there's a difference, subjects get

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>randomly sorted into multiple groups, with one group getting the

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>actual drug being tested and one group getting a pill

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that has no active ingredients, then you might be able

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to get a better idea. If the group who receives

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the drug gets significantly more of a desired outcome than

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the placebo group, then you can have confidence that the

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>drug probably actually works. So if you wanted to run

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a placebo controlled test of whether, say, psilocybin helps people

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>kick in alcohol addiction and then stay sober for six months,

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you'd want to run a test with people who actually

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>get psilocybin versus people who think that they might be

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>getting it but are actually getting a placebo. So why

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is this a problem with psychedelics, Well, that's because of

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the next issue, which is blinding. Uh So the thing

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got to do to have an effective placebo controlled

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>test is blinding and double blinding. This is to avoid

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>response biases from subjects and from the people who are

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>carrying out the test. You have to blind the experiment,

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>meaning subjects don't know which group they're in, and the

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>people working with the subjects to conduct the experiment don't

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>know who's in what group. Psychedelics make this hard because

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>most of the time you can definitely tell whether you've

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>received a large dose of psilocybin versus a placebo. Right,

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even even if the individual, the test subject

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in question, and has no experience of psychedelic use, there's

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a very good chance that they have been exposed to

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:10.719
<v Speaker 1>some representation of it, some expectation of what the uh,

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the the the the experience is going to be like,

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>just through media and culture. Yeah. Well, and the effect

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of the drug tends to be so powerful on the

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>mind that it's nearly impossible for you to think, like, no,

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get anything. I mean no, Like if if

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you are becoming a Comets tale of disembodied consciousness, you

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>watch your ego dissolve like sugar and a stream, you're

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>probably part of the active test group. Right. But but yeah,

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>even but even if the effects are not that strong,

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>if the dosage is lower, like it will be undeniable. Yeah,

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe not always because some people are very suggestible,

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, But but the majority of the time people

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to be able to tell what group they're in. Furthermore,

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the experiment ers can usually tell if the subject they're

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>working with is on LSD or psilocybin versus a placebo,

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>like if you know, people who are on these drugs

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>tend to act a certain way that's pretty different than

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are just getting a sugar pill. Now, there

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>are some ways of making this a little bit better.

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>For example, you can use an active placebo, which is

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a placebo that does something to the body that the

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>subject will be able to sense. One example that has

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>been used in historical research is niacin, which causes physiological

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>effects like flushing of the face and tingling in the body.

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But still a lot of subjects and experimenters can probably

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>still pretty easily tell the difference between if you've gotten

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a large dose of psilocybin or LSD versus niacin. So

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you still are going to have this blinding problem. But

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>then there's another problem that makes it worse, a problem

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>with conducting psychedelic research the same way you would conduct

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>other drug research. And that is as we mentioned a

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>minute ago, the importance of set and setting, And I

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>remember it was in the first episode, I think, where

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we talked mostly about the importance of set and setting. Uh,

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>people's takeaways from psychedelic assisted therapy seem hugely dependent on

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>their expectations on the environment and on the guide. Yeah.

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a Poulin who pointed out that

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>really the only person to ever take LSD without any

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>expectations of what it might consist of was Albert Hoffman himself. Yeah,

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>because he took it by accident and nobody knew what

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it was yet. Yeah, that's funny. But I mean it's

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly true that people's experiences on these drugs are highly

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>dependent on on priming and on stimuli from around them

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and what they're told going in and all that kind

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. Yeah, like, for instance, just maintaining a very

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like calm therapeutic in a physical environment, having people interact

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>with you, you know, the researchers in question in a

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>likewise manner, that sort of thing. In other words, I

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>would say, to get the most clinical use and the

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>most positive effects out of these drugs, it seems like

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you specifically want to do the opposite it of what

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you normally do in a drug trial. You explicitly do

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>want to bias the subject's expectations and interpretations of their

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>drug experience in a way that suggests it will help

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>them with their problems. Yeah. So basically, yeah, if you're

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>doing a psilocybin study in which the individuals taking psilocybin

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to be laying on a beam bag jair

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for instance, listening to some ambient music and attended to

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>by you know, you know, very courteous therapists, you would

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have to have the same situation going on with the

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>placebo group, and in doing that you have all of

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>these like situational effects that may well create like something

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>kind you know, certainly not the psychedelic experience itself, but

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>some sort of comforting, suggestible, um uh situation. But this

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>has also been invoked to explain some of the differences

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in like some of the replication difficulties that people have

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>had with psychedelic experiments, because sometimes, you know, people in

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>these experiments are given psychedelics with a certain kind of

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>set and setting, and then the replication attempt it just

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of gives them the psychedelics, but doesn't replicate the

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>set and setting and finds that, oh, in this in

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>this study that didn't replicate the original set and setting,

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>people are not getting nearly as positive a benefit. Uh,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And that just seems to show again how dependent the

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>experience is on set and setting. Well, it comes back

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to like what the substance does that you know, and

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>these even these early researchers, they they you know, pretty

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>early on, we're convinced that it was not something that

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the substance was doing to the body. It was what

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>it was the mind state it was creating. Exactly what

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>could be gain from that mindset. Yes, psychedelics seem to

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>be in into whatever extent that they are effective at

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>helping people and have clinical significance. They seem to be

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>more a facilitator of experiences than a direct action drug.

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not that you take psilocybin and the compound curious

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>your alcoholism, but that taking psilocybin allows you to have

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>an experience of profound emotional significance that helps people overcome alcoholism.

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 1>It seems it's the experience that actually matters. So just say,

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:14.359
<v Speaker 1>locking somebody in a sterile, uncomfortable white room, giving them

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a shot of psilocybin without a therapist or guide present

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>is maybe not a very good recipe for getting the

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>most positive effects out of the drug. But this is

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>frustrating if you're like, you know, if you're used to

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 1>running drug tests, because it seems that when psychedelics have

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a clinical significance, it is in some ways similar to

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>an active placebo. It just appears to be an extremely

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>effective active placebo. So yeah, there have been these kind

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of difficulties over the years. Like I'd say, the bottom

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>line is that objective research is so important in medical science,

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>but the standard methods that we have for objective research

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>don't apply especially well to psychedelics, and some methods of

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>achieving objectivity appear to directly counteract the most powerful clinical

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:03.240
<v Speaker 1>potentials of the compounds. Another problem we could talk about

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>from the history of psychedelic research is not a systematic

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 1>methodological obstacle, but it's more like a historical trend that

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not alone in observing other people who

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>observe this, which is that I would say, due to

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the unique properties of these drugs, a lot of researchers

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>who focus on this subject area appear over time to

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>tend to lose objectivity and become more endorsers and enthusiasts

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>than objective scientists just trying to find out what's true. Well,

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and I don't know to what extend. It's

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them, but I guess the problem is

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that the ones who do become certainly more noticeable voices

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>are often the loudest. Right now, and again, I want

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, I'm not saying all people, all scientists

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>who work with psychedelics to this or maybe not, probably

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>not even most, but but but some significant numbers do

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 1>follow this path, right and and and and again, their

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>voices are the loudest. And in terms of loud the

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic voices, few voices were louder than Timothy Learies. Um. So,

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like one example of of of what you're talking about

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>here Timothy Leary's work on the Harvard psilocybin project in

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the early sixties. Uh. Some of Lear's methodology there was

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>highly criticized, and it basically seems like he was intentionally

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>biasing the experiments to make psychedelics seem more clinically useful. Uh.

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, which is a shame because the research does

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>actually suggest that they're useful. It's just the uh, you know,

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>he was being hasty. He was being hasty, he was

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 1>taking shortcuts for example. UM. An example of this is

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the Concord prison experiment, which was aimed at studying recidivism

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and inmates that were administered psilocybin, and uh, you know,

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 1>this is basically the ideas like if you give them psilocybin, like,

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>how are they going to successfully transfer into uh, you know,

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.879
<v Speaker 1>back into normal everyday life or are they gonna wind

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>up in back in the prison system again? And so

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 1>he uh, you know, it sounds like a pretty interesting premise,

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but then the execution was flawed. He looked at recidivism

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>rates ten months after release for the psilocybin takers, but

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty months later for the control group. And of course

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>time is vital in all this because you're dealing with

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>somebody like returning to life. Uh, and so like the

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean not just like month to month, but like

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>day to day, week to week is vital in any

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of study having to do with recidivism. You know,

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:28.479
<v Speaker 1>you know because like the first day back, you know, what,

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.240
<v Speaker 1>what's somebody doing there be a visiting family or whatever.

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the as the days go by, as the

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>weeks go by, as the months go by, they're gonna

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 1>have to potentially deal with greater temptation and he and

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>he was widely criticized by colleagues at the time for this. Yeah,

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Richard Alpert, who was also known as Ramdas, would later

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 1>explain that, you know that the aim of the project

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>was solid and had a reasonable therapeutic model, but would

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 1>it would but it would have required long term application

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and study, and Leary just didn't have the patients for

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>long term studies. Ultimately, this is something you see throughout

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Leary's life. You know, this restlessness, this lack of patients, passion,

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>but then a tendency to rush things. And it's almost

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>like he had more system one thinking, you know, the

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>system to thinking. And of course, uh, this is not

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the preferable balance for serious scientific inquiry right now. There

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 1>was another classic experiment from the golden years of psychedelic

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>research in the nineteen fifties and early sixties, and this

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>one I think we should look at for a minute

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that this was done under the supervision of Timothy Leary's

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Harvard psilocybin project, But it wasn't, I think directly carried

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>out by Leary. It was directly carried out by a

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 1>guy named Walter Panky. And this was the nineteen sixty

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>two experiment with the use of psilocybin to occasion mystical

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>experiences that were subjectively perceived as positive and valid by

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:55.280
<v Speaker 1>religious people. And this is sometimes known as the Marsh

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Chapel experiment or the Good Friday experiment because it took

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 1>place on Good Friday, nine seen sixty two. So Walter

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Pankey at the time was a divinity student at Harvard

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Divinity School. And the basic details went like this, So

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you had twenty divinity students in the Boston area and

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>each got an injection before a Good Friday Service at

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the Marsh Chapel of Boston University. Half got psilocybin, half

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>got an active placebo, which was niacin. And remember Nia's

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>intends to cause flushing and tinkling, so they would feel

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>something going on. And the basic findings were that the

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>students in the test group overwhelmingly reported positive and in

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>some cases, life changing religious experiences, and some later rated

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:42.840
<v Speaker 1>this experiment Good Friday Service day as among the most

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>profound and significant experiences of their lives. But there were complications.

0:40:48.360 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 1>One subject on psilocybin had some kind of episode which

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>involved trying to leave the chapel to proclaim a religious message,

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 1>and he had to be tranquilized with thorazine. I think

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>they backed off with the franquilizing people with thorazine after

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>this experiment. And these were they These were the researchers,

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 1>not like the old church ladies right, who may also

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>keep thorazine on hand the pastor tranquilizing and so I

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was like, I was wondering, you know, how did this

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 1>experiment hold up over time? What do people think looking

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.320
<v Speaker 1>back on it. There have been some later attempts to

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:23.880
<v Speaker 1>analyze and follow up on the experiment. One was by

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Rick Doblin of of maps uh an organization. I don't

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>know if we've mentioned already, but I think you'll refer

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to later. Yeah, it's the Multi Disciplinary Association for Psychedelic

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Studies and they're they're involved in a number of research

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>efforts and involving psychedelics and also m D M a UM.

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, they also are involved in something called

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the Zendo Project, which aims to promote proper psychedelic peer support,

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>especially for individuals, especially first timers who are having a

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>difficult trip. So I think they've like set up operations

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that um major cultural festivities such as Burning Man before.

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is a really in our project.

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I like to see how it develops because I think

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it's an important step. If you know, we're going to

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>see decriminalization of psychedelic substances in the United States, Oh yeah,

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is something we should continue to explore

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>more as we go on. But I think, um, the

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:19.959
<v Speaker 1>idea of having the proper guides who know what they're

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>doing is and is a very important part of what

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:25.879
<v Speaker 1>might be considered legitimate psychedelic use. I mean, a lot

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of the research on the clinical significance of psychedelic so

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we should really stress is not just giving somebody a

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>compound and then leaving them alone, right, you know it is.

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 1>It is psychedelic assisted psychotherapy. So you might have a guide,

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a psychiatrist or a psychologist or somebody who is experienced

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in working with people. The therapist of some kind who

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>either like guides you through the experience itself or sort

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of holds the space with you while you have your

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>experience and then later helps you talk through it and

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 1>go through the integration SSS. I think the idea of

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>having positively socially chaperoned and uh and sort of like

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>expert guided psychedelic experiences is a very important thing that

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be under emphasized, and it's present in a lot

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:16.439
<v Speaker 1>of the traditional uses of psychedelics, Like when we talked

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>about the traditional uses with the curanderas in southern Mexico.

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean that this wouldn't be you just take a

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:24.320
<v Speaker 1>drug out in the void by yourself. I mean you

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>would be guided by someone who is a is a

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>religious leader. You would have a shaman and in these uh,

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 1>these test cases, you would have a therapist or you know,

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>or a researcher that was that was filling in for

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that role. And then outside of the you know, the

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>traditional usage or the research or medicinal or psychotherapist usage,

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>there is still room for an individual like that, like

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody that is guiding the experience and setting and attending

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to set and setting. Yeah. Oh, but so that was

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 1>important to mention, but we did get sidetracked, so I

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Dublin. Yeah. Well, the follow up and

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>analysis of the Origin Channel marsh Chapel experiment from nineteen

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty two. Rick Doblin followed up on it in the

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties, and he made some criticisms of the original

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>studies methodology, Like he pointed out that there were the

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 1>problems you would expect with double blinding that we already

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about earlier, um there were some imprecise questions and

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the questionnaire given to subjects to evaluate their experience, and

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a few other things, like the original study failed to

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>report the fact that one participant had to be tranquilized,

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>so it seems like something you probably should have mentioned.

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And there was also the fact that, while on the

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>whole the students viewed their mystical experiences on psilocybin as

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:40.720
<v Speaker 1>very positive and profound, many of them struggled with intense

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 1>bouts of fear and difficulty and negative emotions at some

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>point over the course of their trips, and this probably

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>should have been reported in more detail than it was,

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 1>though the experiences were positive overall, but also so. Dublin

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 1>conducted a twenty five year follow up with some of

0:44:57.040 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the seminary students from the original study, and he confirmed

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 1>that they reported sustained profound positive effects from their religious

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>experiences with psilocybin. And I think it's really notable of

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the marsh Chapel experiment that this was not like so

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:16.240
<v Speaker 1>many of the studies that came before, research into how

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 1>to treat people's problems like addictions or mental illness, but

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to use psychedelics in a way to enhance the experience

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of so called healthy normals. This was a case where

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, these people weren't like suffering and needing a treatment.

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:34.399
<v Speaker 1>It was like, could they have a profound religious experience

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that they deemed valid on with the aid of these substances.

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And the answer appears to be yes. But that's a

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>very different question than most drug trials investigate, right right, Yeah,

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:47.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean generally it is it is with the aim

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of curing a particular malady, of seeing if something that

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>those substances useful in treating a particular condition or symptoms.

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But this is more about, if anything, it's about treating

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the human condition itself, right, Uh, seeing what effect it

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:05.479
<v Speaker 1>could have on just sort of baseline human experience. Yeah,

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:07.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think maybe we should take another break and

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>then come back and explore that concept a little more

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:16.280
<v Speaker 1>than all right, so we sort of know the general

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>outline of what happened in the mid nineteen sixties. There

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 1>was this significant backlash to what had been for a

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:25.360
<v Speaker 1>while now, at least a decade and a half of interesting,

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in some ways very promising psychedelic research. But by nineteen

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 1>seventy or so, drugs were public Enemy number one and

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:36.319
<v Speaker 1>scientific research in them dropped off dramatically, encountered a lot

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of obstacles at that point, and it's only more recently

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen this renaissance of of psychedelic research. So

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess we might want to look at a question

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of like, and this is something that's hard to answer

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in a definitive way, but examining some possible reasons for

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the cause of the moral panic around psychedelics in the

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>mid nineteen sixties. First of all, I think some of

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it you could chalk up to a somewhat legitimate reaction

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to the perceived over enthusiasm of people like Timothy Learies,

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the scientists involved in psychedelic research. We're clearly

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>not practicing the most rigorous subjective science, and we're in

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 1>some cases turning into enthusiasts and gurus, something more like

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>alternative religious leaders. And it's not surprising at all that

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 1>this caused a lot of skepticism and and uh and

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>push back within the scientific community. Right, yeah, because here's

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 1>here's the leary, this kind of weird and at times

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:37.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of goofy character, um and and at times very

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:39.719
<v Speaker 1>profound and well spoken. I mean he was, he was

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a very charismatic guy. But you can you can understand

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, especially members of the older generation

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>and more traditional folks, uh, being a little suspicious of

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:55.399
<v Speaker 1>this character. Yeah. Another big part of the backlash I think,

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 1>which Paullen definitely acknowledges at length in his book, is specifically,

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this is what we were talking about before the break,

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 1>how scary it seemed that some psychedelic enthusiasts were recommending

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:12.000
<v Speaker 1>psychedelics to so called healthy normals, you know, just regular people.

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Like the ideas, well, we're going to tolerate a lot

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 1>of different methods of treating people who are facing problems,

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 1>people who have mental illnesses or addictions. Uh. And many

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of these solutions could include drugs, even drugs that have

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a potential for abuse, because we think, well, it's you know,

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:33.799
<v Speaker 1>it's fighting a problem and it's helping people get better.

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:37.799
<v Speaker 1>But what if a drug implies that the whole of

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 1>society is sick and there's something wrong with the baseline

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:45.840
<v Speaker 1>culture that's so called normal people could benefit from using

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 1>it to affect change on themselves. Yeah, I mean it's

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>quite a pilled, a hard pill to swallow, you know,

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to to hear, oh, there's something there's something terribly wrong

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:56.719
<v Speaker 1>with us, or there's something terribly wrong with the way

0:48:56.719 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we're conducting ourselves in the modern world. I mean, this

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>continues to be one aspect of you know, of the

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 1>problem with communicating the you know, the the dire threat

0:49:08.040 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of climate change is because there is a certain amount

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:13.279
<v Speaker 1>of judgment to be placed on the way that that

0:49:13.640 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 1>modern industrial society has conducted itself. Well, yeah, I think

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I mean, there's always going to be negative

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 1>reaction against any indictment that goes to our general way

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of life. Like we we want to indict you know,

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:32.240
<v Speaker 1>antisocial abnormality, like the murderer or the you know, somebody

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>who did something very unusual. But what if everybody is

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>doing something that's harmful. If if that's the case you

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:41.360
<v Speaker 1>want to make, you're gonna have a hard time getting

0:49:41.360 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>people to accept it. Absolutely. Yeah, Yeah, I mean ultimately nobody,

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody's gonna want. Everybody is afraid of change. And certainly

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen sixties were a time and where there in

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 1>which there was a great fear of various changes, not

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 1>only the changes that were uh you know, offered or

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>at least advertised by you know, the psychedelic counterculture, but

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:05.960
<v Speaker 1>also the fear of change via uh, political ideologies, the

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>fear of communism, the fear of racial integration. Uh, you know,

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:14.320
<v Speaker 1>all these various changes that were uh, that we're taking

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 1>place in society. Yeah, and so you can definitely see

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>why there's a lot of fear around the idea of

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>treating normality. So Altice Huxley and Humphrey Osmond they you know,

0:50:25.000 --> 0:50:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we're friends and wrote back and forth to each other

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:29.799
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen fifties. Uh. And there there was one

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>letter that was quoted in Pollen's book that I thought

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>was interesting where Huxley was writing to Osmond in nine

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about people taking compounds like mescal and an LSD, and

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Huxley wrote, quote, people will think that they are going mad,

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 1>when in fact they are beginning when they take it

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to go sane. And also, as Pollen notes from his experience,

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:53.799
<v Speaker 1>researching the book, that there's this quote drift from the

0:50:53.840 --> 0:50:58.759
<v Speaker 1>treatment of individuals with psychological problems to a desire to

0:50:58.840 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 1>treat the whole of society. And uh, this drift, he says,

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is a change that quote seems eventually to infect everyone

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 1>who works with psychedelics, touching scientists too, And so I

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:14.800
<v Speaker 1>think everyone there is probably an overstatement. I think he's

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, being a little casual, but it does seem

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to me to be a startling trend, maybe one that

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 1>should give us pause. I don't know, I mean, it's

0:51:21.640 --> 0:51:25.839
<v Speaker 1>worth considering that. But like how many scientists involved in

0:51:26.040 --> 0:51:30.839
<v Speaker 1>the UH in the investigation of psychedelics do end up

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:34.359
<v Speaker 1>thinking that it shouldn't just be used to treat people

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in a clinical setting who are experiencing one problem or another,

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:41.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's something that so called healthy normals should take

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to improve their lives and improve the whole of society. Well,

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:48.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it comes back to the traditional uses

0:51:48.480 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of these substances. In many cases they were they were

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily taken purely as as as medicine for an ailment.

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:56.920
<v Speaker 1>But in any case, it's just part of you know,

0:51:57.000 --> 0:52:00.640
<v Speaker 1>your continued uh, you know what will would we describe

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:03.399
<v Speaker 1>now as in a mental health Uh. Yeah. I mean

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. And while we certainly don't want

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to demonize these substances, I do think also we should

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 1>be skeptical of of that impulse. I mean, it's worth

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 1>asking the question, is that correct or is that just?

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that over enthusiasm based on positive personal experiences that

0:52:21.040 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 1>people have had. Yeah? Yeah, And then I guess you

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:25.279
<v Speaker 1>could also say it's it's kind of like if you're

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:28.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're acknowledging that they're big, almost impossible problems in

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the world, wicked problems as the uh you know, as

0:52:31.600 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we often refer to them, things that seem insurmountable, the

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of problems that make us, you know, the lead

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>us to be convinced that surely only you know, the

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:43.960
<v Speaker 1>return of a savior or the interference on by by

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 1>aliens could possibly help us solve Like humans are just

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 1>incapable of solving these problems on their own. Then perhaps

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we're putting, we might be putting too much stock in

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the powers of a psychedelic substance to somehow fix that

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:59.239
<v Speaker 1>for us on an individual level or a cultural level. Yeah,

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:01.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that a good point of comparison. I mean,

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:05.960
<v Speaker 1>while while we certainly don't want to deny the evidence

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of the potential positive uses of these things, you don't

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:10.279
<v Speaker 1>want to make them a god either. I mean, you

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:13.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to drift into the miracle cure mentality, because

0:53:13.960 --> 0:53:16.759
<v Speaker 1>one a lot of these studies show, quite frankly, is

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that there is a lot of potential for psychedelics in

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:23.279
<v Speaker 1>in treating things like addiction and depression and all that.

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:26.359
<v Speaker 1>But they're not miracle cures. It's not like you know

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that this fixes all your problems immediately and then the

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>world's a perfect place. Now, there's another reason that we

0:53:32.280 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 1>can go to to explain the anti psychedelic backlash that

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I think is probably the most obvious one, right, the

0:53:39.800 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 1>countercultural associations with and possible direct effects of psychedelic use.

0:53:46.000 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we all know these compounds came to be

0:53:48.040 --> 0:53:52.920
<v Speaker 1>associated with rebellion and rejection of mainstream culture and rejection

0:53:53.000 --> 0:53:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of political authorities. You know, Timothy Leary would would proclaim

0:53:57.000 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to people that kids who took acid, quote, won't find

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 1>your wars, won't join your corporations. I mean that that's

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:07.439
<v Speaker 1>scary to the authorities, right, You do you think they're

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to fight our wars anymore. How are we

0:54:09.160 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna how are we gonna fight? They're not gonna be

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a part of corporations. They're not going to found Silicon

0:54:13.719 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Valley corporations in the future. Yeah, well that's funny. I

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that turned out not quite to be true. A

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:22.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of the yeah, a lot of these acid takers

0:54:22.640 --> 0:54:25.319
<v Speaker 1>did turn out to be business leaders. It's obviously not

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a panacea against business. But I did want to quote

0:54:28.760 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of sections from Pollen that I thought were very,

0:54:32.239 --> 0:54:35.239
<v Speaker 1>very smart on this part. So first, the first one

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:38.800
<v Speaker 1>is where Paullen said, quote LST truly was an acid,

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:42.840
<v Speaker 1>dissolving almost everything with which it came into contact, beginning

0:54:42.840 --> 0:54:46.000
<v Speaker 1>with the hierarchies of the mind, the super ego, ego,

0:54:46.160 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and unconscious, and going on from their to society's various

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 1>structures of authority. And then two lines of every imaginable kind,

0:54:53.880 --> 0:54:58.760
<v Speaker 1>between patient and therapist, research and recreation, sickness and health,

0:54:59.080 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>self and other, subject and object, the spiritual and the material.

0:55:03.440 --> 0:55:07.080
<v Speaker 1>If all such lines are manifestations of the Apollonian strain

0:55:07.160 --> 0:55:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in Western civilization, the impulse that erects distinctions, dualities, and

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:17.440
<v Speaker 1>hierarchies and defends them. Then psychedelics represented the ungovernable Dionysian

0:55:17.520 --> 0:55:21.440
<v Speaker 1>force that blithely washes all those lines away. That's beautiful,

0:55:21.560 --> 0:55:24.239
<v Speaker 1>and that comes back to Terence mckinna's definition of them

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is boundary dissolving. Yeah, and I think that's largely correct

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:31.480
<v Speaker 1>based on everything we've read. But another passage that I

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:35.319
<v Speaker 1>thought was very interesting about this counterculture backlash is uh.

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:38.360
<v Speaker 1>It goes like this quote. For what other time in

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 1>history did a society's young undergo a searing right of

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:47.800
<v Speaker 1>passage with which the previous generation was utterly unfamiliar. Normally,

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 1>rites of passage helped knit societies together, as the young

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:55.960
<v Speaker 1>crossover hurdles and through gates erected and maintained by their elders,

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 1>coming out on the other side to take their place

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in the community of adults. Not so with the psychedelic

0:56:02.160 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Journey of the nineteen sixties, which at its conclusion dropped

0:56:05.680 --> 0:56:10.160
<v Speaker 1>its young travelers onto a psychic landscape unrecognizable to their parents.

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:13.240
<v Speaker 1>That this won't ever happen again is reason to hope

0:56:13.280 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that the next chapter in psychedelic history won't be quite

0:56:16.680 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>so divisive. Well, I mean it won't happen quite the

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 1>same way again. But as Paul himself points out, like

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:27.200
<v Speaker 1>he grew up in the dark times of of you

0:56:27.200 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 1>know that he basically grew up in the moral panic period. Yeah,

0:56:30.200 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>so didn't really experiment much with psychedelics when he was younger,

0:56:33.840 --> 0:56:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and really wasn't until quite recently as as an older

0:56:37.360 --> 0:56:40.160
<v Speaker 1>man that he was able to really experiment with them

0:56:40.160 --> 0:56:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and understand them in a greater sense. So I feel

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:45.759
<v Speaker 1>like there are still going to be generational gaps there. Well,

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that last sentence maybe far too optimistic. I mean, the

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:50.200
<v Speaker 1>main part I was thinking about was the beginning of

0:56:50.239 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 1>this where he points out the idea of rights of

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>passage that expand the consciousness. They are supposed to be

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 1>passed on from parents to children. And we've the generations together,

0:57:00.040 --> 0:57:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and if the young acquire a consciousness altering right of

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 1>passage that the older generations don't have, that can be

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:10.160
<v Speaker 1>terrifying to the older generations. It's like they're not our

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 1>children anymore. They've been initiated into some other tribe. No,

0:57:14.160 --> 0:57:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great point. I mean, yeah, this

0:57:15.719 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 1>was a new ride of passage that the older generation

0:57:18.920 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 1>by and large had no experience with there's one other

0:57:21.880 --> 0:57:24.240
<v Speaker 1>possible thing going on in the nineteen sixties that I

0:57:24.240 --> 0:57:27.880
<v Speaker 1>think might be worth mentioning, which is and well, maybe

0:57:27.880 --> 0:57:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into more detail about these studies in the

0:57:31.120 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in the next episode. But there are at least a

0:57:33.120 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of studies I've been reading from the last decade

0:57:36.560 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 1>or so, one from two thousand eleven and one from

0:57:39.440 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 1>eighteen that are about adult personality change occasioned by use

0:57:44.200 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of psychedelics. So you've got these various ways of measuring

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 1>personality traits, and and people might you know, your personality

0:57:51.400 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 1>might overtime sort of be in flux, but you know,

0:57:53.920 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 1>mostly your traits are going to be pretty set by

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the time you're an adult. You know, you're around a baseline.

0:57:58.880 --> 0:58:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You might hover. But there appears to be some evidence

0:58:02.000 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that using psychedelics can actually change adults personalities. And so

0:58:07.440 --> 0:58:10.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the many things that's been observed is that,

0:58:10.760 --> 0:58:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, use of psychedelics appears to increase people in

0:58:15.520 --> 0:58:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a psychological personality trait that's known as openness to experience.

0:58:21.000 --> 0:58:25.360
<v Speaker 1>People who take psychedelics appear to increase in openness, and

0:58:25.480 --> 0:58:30.120
<v Speaker 1>openness is actually a highly socially significant personality trade. Uh,

0:58:30.160 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 1>It's been associated with all kinds of other things in

0:58:32.840 --> 0:58:37.520
<v Speaker 1>societies in various research, Like openness is highly correlated with

0:58:38.080 --> 0:58:42.240
<v Speaker 1>with like lack of prejudice and lack of authoritarianism, and

0:58:42.280 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff like appreciation for art and for other cultures and things.

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you'd find the openness personality trait largely associated

0:58:50.720 --> 0:58:54.640
<v Speaker 1>with like environmentalism and multiculturalism. Yeah, I mean, just if

0:58:54.720 --> 0:58:57.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, Like if if you were to become more

0:58:57.160 --> 0:59:01.160
<v Speaker 1>neophilic and you know, uh, you know, attracted to new experiences,

0:59:01.400 --> 0:59:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you become more attractive to travel, and in traveling, you're

0:59:04.640 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 1>exposed to to uh. I mean, travel itself is kind

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of I think has a lot to in common with

0:59:10.160 --> 0:59:13.600
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic experience. You know, where you suddenly you're in in

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a place that is mostly the same but a little different,

0:59:16.760 --> 0:59:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh, people around you are different and yet the same,

0:59:20.600 --> 0:59:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and it forces you to sort of reconsider who you

0:59:23.520 --> 0:59:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are in the whole scenario. So if this is true, yeah,

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that that there are these cascading effects from the use

0:59:29.560 --> 0:59:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of psychedelics that maybe on a broad scale, say changing

0:59:34.280 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the personality is of a young generation, especially changing them

0:59:37.920 --> 0:59:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in ways that might not be so congenial to you

0:59:40.600 --> 0:59:44.400
<v Speaker 1>if you are Richard Nixon or something that these personality

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:47.600
<v Speaker 1>changes could be perceived as a direct threat to the

0:59:48.040 --> 0:59:50.840
<v Speaker 1>polity of the country. Yeah, and that's exactly how Richard

0:59:50.920 --> 0:59:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Nixon saw it. I mean, Richard Nixon is is the

0:59:54.080 --> 0:59:58.880
<v Speaker 1>anti psychedelic uh U S president by far? Yeah. I

0:59:58.880 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>mean it's difficult to unravel all this because on one hand,

1:00:02.440 --> 1:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to you have to sort of try and

1:00:04.360 --> 1:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out what the nineteen sixties were, you know, like

1:00:07.320 --> 1:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>what was the nineteen sixties experience? And certainly you and

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I were not around in the nineteen sixties, so we

1:00:13.320 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>can't attest to it. Um. We do have some listeners

1:00:16.160 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that were and so hopefully we'll hear from

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>from you on it. Um. I remember my my father

1:00:22.080 --> 1:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>told me once that Jefferson Airplane Somebody to Love captured

1:00:26.280 --> 1:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what the sixties felt like. I but I never had

1:00:29.280 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a chance to ask him what he really meant by that.

1:00:31.800 --> 1:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he just meant it was an iconic song of

1:00:33.560 --> 1:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, which you know it certainly was. Um. But

1:00:36.880 --> 1:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's one of the things with it with

1:00:39.000 --> 1:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the sixties. Two is that, like all times, you know,

1:00:41.360 --> 1:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the older generation is always going to be concerned with

1:00:43.400 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>what the young generation is doing and how what they're

1:00:46.040 --> 1:00:50.919
<v Speaker 1>doing doesn't reflect your values. Like I can't relate to

1:00:51.040 --> 1:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the experience of you know, of grown up uh in

1:00:54.520 --> 1:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen sixties. Uh. You know, you know, a middle

1:00:57.240 --> 1:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>aged person looking at the young generations and things and

1:00:59.760 --> 1:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>ask what are they doing with psychedelics? Uh? But like

1:01:03.080 --> 1:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe on some level, I I understand that in regards

1:01:05.480 --> 1:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to Pokemon, you know where I'm like, oh I I

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>had this was not part of my childhood, and yet

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it's highly influential for for for these kids. What am

1:01:13.080 --> 1:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I missing and why should I and to what extent

1:01:14.960 --> 1:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>should I be afraid of it? Wait? Were you one

1:01:16.520 --> 1:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of those preachers going on TV during the Pokemon craze

1:01:19.200 --> 1:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>saying it was causing devil worship? No? No, but but

1:01:22.520 --> 1:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I do love that kind of I love the sort

1:01:25.080 --> 1:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of mild moral panics like that that there arise out

1:01:28.840 --> 1:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of any new thing, be a Pokemon or Harry Potter.

1:01:31.880 --> 1:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there was one for Teletubbies. Teletubbies. Yeah, yeah,

1:01:36.280 --> 1:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>so so yeah. The fact that there's kind of a

1:01:38.360 --> 1:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>generational divide and a and a and a moral panic

1:01:40.920 --> 1:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>popping up around something like that in and of itself,

1:01:43.000 --> 1:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I think just is always going to be the case,

1:01:45.120 --> 1:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and we see shades with that. I mean, certainly, I

1:01:47.240 --> 1:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>think we have it was we've discussed, we've discussed in

1:01:49.840 --> 1:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the show before and will in the future. You know,

1:01:52.280 --> 1:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we certainly have some issues with with mobile technology and

1:01:56.200 --> 1:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>with social media and the effects that though uh technologies

1:02:01.440 --> 1:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>are having on culture, and certainly, you know, it can

1:02:04.800 --> 1:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>lean into some sort of you know, crankiness where we

1:02:08.520 --> 1:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>look at younger generations and say, oh, they don't even

1:02:10.920 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>know what it's like without social media. That's our grumpy

1:02:13.400 --> 1:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>old men issue. Yes, it's the tech. Yeah, uh, but

1:02:17.240 --> 1:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to come back to that. But but but yeah,

1:02:21.040 --> 1:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the the the older generation looked at the younger generation,

1:02:24.640 --> 1:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't see their values necessarily reflected their values

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that had just carried them through a World war and

1:02:31.080 --> 1:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of course threatened to carry into one final World war

1:02:33.880 --> 1:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. And so it makes sense that these typical

1:02:37.680 --> 1:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>generational concerns would be exasperated by the introduction of something new,

1:02:42.920 --> 1:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>or at least new from a Western perspective. There was

1:02:45.600 --> 1:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>not only consciousness changing, but but also foreign. And remember

1:02:49.880 --> 1:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>remember that most anti drug messaging in America has depended

1:02:53.120 --> 1:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>on xenophobic and or racist messaging. An association was also

1:02:57.080 --> 1:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>made between uh, psychedelics and radical leftist ideologies, so I

1:03:02.880 --> 1:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>think that was very much a factor as well. Well.

1:03:04.880 --> 1:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one thing that's interesting, I remember from reading

1:03:07.000 --> 1:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the individual testimonials of the people who were involved in

1:03:09.960 --> 1:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the marsh Chapel experiment. This is anecdotal, so this is

1:03:12.720 --> 1:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>only just you know, the happen things they happen to report.

1:03:15.240 --> 1:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think multiple members of the marsh Chapel experiments

1:03:19.240 --> 1:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>said that, you know, they had their psilocybin experience and

1:03:22.720 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it prompted them to go get involved in the civil

1:03:25.120 --> 1:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>rights movement. Uh so you know which, of course, by

1:03:28.080 --> 1:03:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the conservative authoritarian, uh you know, white

1:03:31.520 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>ruling class impulse at the time would have probably they

1:03:33.800 --> 1:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>would have seen that as a political threat. Speaking of

1:03:37.080 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>political threats, let's get back to Richard Nixon. Okay, So

1:03:40.440 --> 1:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Richard Nixon famously considered Timothy Leary quote the most dangerous

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>man in America. Okay, and uh and and he apparently

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>his handlers were even concerned at different times that leftists

1:03:51.040 --> 1:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>might try and slip Nixon lsd Uh. I'm sure somebody

1:03:55.400 --> 1:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>was working on a plan there, one of those sixties pranksters.

1:03:57.920 --> 1:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, yeah, Actually allegedly Jefferson airplane lead singer Grace

1:04:02.360 --> 1:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Slick uh plan to slip LSD into Nixon's tea at

1:04:06.840 --> 1:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a White House tea party because apparently she attended uh

1:04:10.280 --> 1:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the same college as Nixon's daughter, and there was going

1:04:12.400 --> 1:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to be an event there at the White House. But

1:04:14.320 --> 1:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>if the event turned out to be an all female event,

1:04:16.680 --> 1:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>so Nixon wasn't actually there, and I think she got

1:04:20.120 --> 1:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of she got scared off by the security and left. Anyway,

1:04:23.200 --> 1:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>she didn't try to give any to Pat apparently not uh,

1:04:28.480 --> 1:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>well she had they didn't quite make I think she

1:04:30.440 --> 1:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was accompanied by Abby Hoffman, who was this sounds like

1:04:34.200 --> 1:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>an Abby Hoffman's Yeah, so it didn't the the scheme

1:04:37.840 --> 1:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually make it through the front door, so they

1:04:39.680 --> 1:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually get to that level of of decision making.

1:04:43.720 --> 1:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>But this all does lead to an interesting question that

1:04:46.800 --> 1:04:49.840
<v Speaker 1>comes up from time to time, sometimes flippantly and other

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>times quite seriously. If certain world leaders could be tricked

1:04:53.440 --> 1:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>into having a psychedelic experience, could we change them? Could

1:04:57.000 --> 1:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>there be like a Scrooge moment? Right? Would they see

1:04:59.680 --> 1:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>themselves subjectively, would they connect with others or connect with

1:05:03.040 --> 1:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>nature in a meaningful and life changing way. I've heard

1:05:06.080 --> 1:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>people say this. In fact, I remember a lot of

1:05:08.080 --> 1:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>teenage stoners sings like this, like if you just get

1:05:11.240 --> 1:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>all these dictators and you know, we'd stop all the wars,

1:05:14.920 --> 1:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>if we could just get people to take acid, or

1:05:17.400 --> 1:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they'd even just say like smoke weed or something.

1:05:20.360 --> 1:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm I mean again, I'm I'm very open to and

1:05:25.040 --> 1:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and interested in the many of the reported positive effects

1:05:28.280 --> 1:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of psychedelic experiences, But I do not believe it is

1:05:31.280 --> 1:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a miracle drug in that way, right, that it can't

1:05:33.880 --> 1:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>just in and of itself cure human nastiness, especially because

1:05:37.680 --> 1:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>set and setting are so important. I mean, what if

1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you take a drug and the setting is the Nixon

1:05:42.440 --> 1:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>White House, Right, if you have a psychedelic experience where

1:05:45.400 --> 1:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you're just like all revved up on the idea of

1:05:47.920 --> 1:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>slaughtering your enemies and stuff that I don't know, I

1:05:50.800 --> 1:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>don't I'm not sure that would make things better. Yeah. Like,

1:05:55.480 --> 1:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>one specific version of this question that I've kind of

1:05:57.600 --> 1:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>tossed around in my own head from time to time

1:05:59.720 --> 1:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is not so much you know, what have we um,

1:06:01.880 --> 1:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, what if Hitler took acid? Kind of a thing.

1:06:04.560 --> 1:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, if we look at when l

1:06:07.960 --> 1:06:10.919
<v Speaker 1>s d uh came into being. It was first synthesized

1:06:10.960 --> 1:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen thirty eight in Switzerland, m D m A

1:06:14.040 --> 1:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>was first created in Germany in nineteen twelve, and in

1:06:17.120 --> 1:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>both cases no one realized what they discovered. You know,

1:06:20.120 --> 1:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it wasn' until later that they took him off the

1:06:21.960 --> 1:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>shelf and looked at him again. But what if these

1:06:24.560 --> 1:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>substances are leaked out into Europe, especially Germany before World

1:06:27.880 --> 1:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>War Two? And granted LSD would have only had like

1:06:30.000 --> 1:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a year to work its magic. But I'm not the

1:06:33.320 --> 1:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>only one who's thought about this. For instance, Terence mckinnay

1:06:36.200 --> 1:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and Food of the Gods wondered what would it have

1:06:38.680 --> 1:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>been like if the Nazis had found out about LSD

1:06:42.120 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>quote it is frightening to imagine some of the possible

1:06:44.960 --> 1:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>consequences had Hoffmann's discovery been recognized for what it was,

1:06:48.640 --> 1:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>even a moment earlier. So there, I mean, he's looking

1:06:51.720 --> 1:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>at it. It's not necessarily a good thing for everybody

1:06:54.280 --> 1:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>who takes it, but like that, it could be a

1:06:56.720 --> 1:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>facilitator of great evil. Yeah, yeah, I he may have

1:07:00.360 --> 1:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>gone into more detail on this in other works or lectures. Certainly,

1:07:04.720 --> 1:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh McKenna spoke a lot about these topics, but so

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but I am not aware of any additional thoughts he

1:07:11.440 --> 1:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>had on the matter. But I suspect that they would

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>have probably done much the same as the CIA did

1:07:16.120 --> 1:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in their experiments with with the LSD, you know, searching

1:07:19.600 --> 1:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>for ways to use it as a weapon or a

1:07:21.160 --> 1:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>mind control substance and then ultimately find it wanting in

1:07:24.600 --> 1:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that regard. Yeah, and then we've talked about this in

1:07:26.600 --> 1:07:28.479
<v Speaker 1>other episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind in the past.

1:07:28.520 --> 1:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that seemed to be the primary focus of

1:07:30.840 --> 1:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like defense based research on psychedelics in the nineteen fifties

1:07:34.000 --> 1:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>is can we get it to make people do what

1:07:36.480 --> 1:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>we want against their will or as a truth serum? Right,

1:07:39.800 --> 1:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and and certainly this was the deal with the Third Right.

1:07:42.040 --> 1:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>They were in a state of total war. They were

1:07:44.000 --> 1:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>interested in rockets, yes, but they weren't interested because of

1:07:47.000 --> 1:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>any space exploration advantages. They it was about weapon delivery.

1:07:51.600 --> 1:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It was about pursuing their own awful and uh and

1:07:54.920 --> 1:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>racist ideology um, this conquest mentality. Yeah, absolutely, But the

1:08:00.160 --> 1:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>other hand, Uh, you know, Hitler took a lot of drugs,

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>especially after is apparently taking a lot of stimulants, a

1:08:08.120 --> 1:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of opioids, and so, you know, one you can't

1:08:12.200 --> 1:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>help but wonder, right, like, what what if out Off

1:08:15.360 --> 1:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Hitler had taken a bunch of M D M A

1:08:17.080 --> 1:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and L S d UM in nineteen forty two would

1:08:21.120 --> 1:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>have had any effect. I'm suspicious that that it would

1:08:23.960 --> 1:08:26.559
<v Speaker 1>have any effect. Ultimately, Yeah, I don't. I don't think

1:08:26.560 --> 1:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I buy the Soner line that, you know, just get

1:08:29.200 --> 1:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the dictator to take a psychedelic and they will be cured.

1:08:32.160 --> 1:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's hard to know, but I'm I doubt it.

1:08:35.360 --> 1:08:37.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean it would be interesting as an experiment, though, Yeah,

1:08:38.000 --> 1:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>just just to poke one of them up out there. Well.

1:08:40.080 --> 1:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Another interesting question is instead of like these individuals say,

1:08:44.160 --> 1:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>like dose the dictator cases, if psychedelics and psychedelic culture

1:08:49.240 --> 1:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>were more widespread in general throughout the world, you know,

1:08:53.920 --> 1:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and throughout industrialized society is going way back. Yeah, I

1:08:57.640 --> 1:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>do wonder then, like if the you know, the calm

1:09:00.040 --> 1:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and if the common drug of choice among industrialized societies

1:09:04.800 --> 1:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteenth and nineteenth century had not been alcohol

1:09:09.080 --> 1:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>but had been psilocybin or something. Yeah, and I think

1:09:12.439 --> 1:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that's ultimately the more interesting question is not what if

1:09:15.200 --> 1:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Hitler had taken analysis D OR or M D M A,

1:09:18.080 --> 1:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>but what if they what if they had been at

1:09:20.040 --> 1:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>large in UM in German culture of preceding the war

1:09:24.560 --> 1:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>UM And you know, ultimately, like the counter argument to

1:09:27.479 --> 1:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that would be, well, there already was a strong bohemian

1:09:30.400 --> 1:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>vibe in pre war Germany, and it it was not

1:09:34.320 --> 1:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>sufficient to prevent the horrors of the Second World War

1:09:37.360 --> 1:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and beyond. But yeah, I think ultimately, when you see

1:09:39.880 --> 1:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>people like Terence McKenna arguing for an archaic revival, for

1:09:43.360 --> 1:09:46.799
<v Speaker 1>some sort of like return and the psychedelically assisted return

1:09:47.200 --> 1:09:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to nature and interconnectedness, like they are talking about a

1:09:50.560 --> 1:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>cultural movement, they're not talking about strategic doses, dosing of

1:09:55.560 --> 1:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>of of key individuals. Yeah. If only were that easy.

1:09:58.760 --> 1:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we've been going a while. Think we got

1:10:00.439 --> 1:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to wrap it up for this one, but we we

1:10:01.880 --> 1:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>gotta come back in the next. We were originally going

1:10:04.000 --> 1:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>to do just three episodes, but psychedelics took hold, and

1:10:07.720 --> 1:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>now we've been going for three and we still haven't

1:10:09.920 --> 1:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>gotten to the twenty one century revival In psychedelic research,

1:10:13.280 --> 1:10:15.479
<v Speaker 1>which we will focus on next time as right, So

1:10:15.640 --> 1:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>join us for part four of our psychedelic series here

1:10:19.760 --> 1:10:21.639
<v Speaker 1>on Stuff to Blow Your Mind. And I mean, who

1:10:21.640 --> 1:10:23.479
<v Speaker 1>knows there might be a part five. We just we

1:10:23.520 --> 1:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>have no idea, We have no idea when this is

1:10:25.160 --> 1:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna end, all right. In the meantime, if you want

1:10:27.080 --> 1:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind,

1:10:28.800 --> 1:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>head on over to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

1:10:30.439 --> 1:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the mothership, that's what we'll find it all Uh,

1:10:32.880 --> 1:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you'll find links out to various social media accounts. You'll

1:10:36.280 --> 1:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>find our t shirt store. Also, if you want to

1:10:39.040 --> 1:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>interact with us, and more importantly, interact with other folks

1:10:41.840 --> 1:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>who listen to the show and have insightful things to

1:10:43.840 --> 1:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>share about it and related topics, head out on over

1:10:46.920 --> 1:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook. They have the discussion group they're called we

1:10:49.880 --> 1:10:51.559
<v Speaker 1>call it the Discussion module and Stuff to Blow your

1:10:51.560 --> 1:10:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Mind Discussion Module. You can apply, join and discuss there.

1:10:55.680 --> 1:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>It's the only good thing on Facebook pretty much anyway.

1:10:58.720 --> 1:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Big thanks as always to are excellent audio producer Maya Cole.

1:11:02.720 --> 1:11:04.519
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

1:11:04.520 --> 1:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>with feedback about this episode or any other to suggest

1:11:07.200 --> 1:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a topic for the future, or just to say hello.

1:11:09.439 --> 1:11:12.639
<v Speaker 1>You can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

1:11:12.720 --> 1:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

1:11:24.160 --> 1:11:26.479
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more

1:11:26.520 --> 1:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

1:11:29.080 --> 1:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.