WEBVTT - MLB Futures: May Update (Ep. 87)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to betting pros, and it is me,

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Joey p Joe Pizipo. We got a great show for

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you today, if you can believe it.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Already a quarter of.

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>The way through the Major League Baseball season and it's

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>time to take some temperatures. So we're gonna take a

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>look at some MLB bets thanks to betting pros consensus numbers,

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna take a look at the World Series. We're

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a look at division winners, or we're even

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a look at some MLB awards with a

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>very very special guest and good friend of mine. You

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>can see him every single Sunday on Sportscried with Me

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>joeyp for the last year. How he put up with

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>me for an entire year plus every single Sunday of

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>his life, nobody knows. You could also check him out

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on The Better's Eye, which is a new show on

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>MLB dot Com. It's also made appearances on MLB Network

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and some other cool MLB advanced media where they go

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>through the best bets of the day. And you may

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>also remember him and see him currently in the wrestling

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>world calling matches on Impact Wrestling, and of course he

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was a WWE superstar, but he's always a superstar in

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>my heart. He's the one, the only Matt Striker. Matti

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>bonus time with me. What kind of bet did you lose?

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the question.

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>And then the glowing accolades you forgot to include, friend,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 3>But fair enough, man, that of all the things I've

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 3>achieved in my life, I think I'm having the most

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 3>fun right now. Baseball betting is the thing. Everyone is

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 3>accepting it, States are understanding it, and I think just

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 3>as a society collectively, we're looking at it differently. This

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 3>is fun and this can be done well if you

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 3>have some inside information.

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm down, man, absolutely, And you know what I

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>should have led with friend, But and I usually like

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing you in public too. Yet yet I missed this opportunity.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll be sure on Sunday to do it again. But

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt and I do a show every Sunday together. If

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you this kind of banter on sports grew from eight

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to ten am every single weekend, recapping the week that

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was a Major League baseball and looking ahead. And I

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>think that new show you've got right now, The Better's

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Eye is terrific.

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 2>You and Keith do a phenomenal job on it. I

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 2>have seen it. You guys are crushing it.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And like Matt said, I mean, betting on baseball now

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is such an acceptable thing, which is such a culture shock.

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but coming from this world

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 1>where all betting on baseball was such taboo to now

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>on the bottom of MLB network, when you get the

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers, you get the lines for the games, isn't

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that a little culture shock for you?

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Two? Yes and no.

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Again, As a society, we're moving to systemically remove things

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 3>or remove things that we interpret to be systemic part

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 3>of me. So with that said, there's good and bad

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 3>in everything. But when you look at the joy of

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 3>wagering on baseball, using math, using knowledge, using fandom, there

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 3>is nothing back room about it. There is nothing wrong

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 3>with it. So I think, with that regard, if that's

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 3>the culture shocked, then good, let that shock dissipate. It's

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 3>about knowing that Clay Ray really hits that slider seventy

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 3>three percent of the time, and picture A really throws

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 3>that slider.

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Here's some money on math.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Ah, money on math from the teacher, from the former professor.

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I love that money on math. That's gonna be his

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>new hashtag and all right, stuff like, so write it down.

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Get it in there.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's start with some player futures here for MVP,

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and we'll start in the American League. The consensus betting

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>pros number is plus one sixty for Mike Trout. He

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is still the favorite and still a wide favorite at that.

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It varies in place to place, but typically one sixties

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>about that number you're getting, You're getting Shoyotani now creeping

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in is the number two consensus at plus seven hundred,

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Vladgermero at ten to one, and then young Carlos Stanton

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>after this incredible hot two weeks that he's put together

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>at plus eighteen. Now, Stan would be a great story

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>for MVP, but we all know all the injuries are

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>concerned Byron Buxton just a week ago before his injury

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>was actually the number two or three guy, and my

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>guy show Hao Tom. He's still sticking around now. I

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>know he's got to start tonight. We'll see how that goes.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But is it still Trout or the field for you?

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And is there somebody in the field that you think

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>right now is set up as a good wager, is

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it Otani because he's so unique at seven to one.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>So I was really excited when you text me to

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 3>tell me the content of this discussion, because when you

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 3>make futures, especially on divisional winners, and we're going to

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 3>talk about that. I have a particular system that I've used.

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 3>It seems to work as far as individual awards. Yes

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 3>you have your chalk guys, and yes you can throw

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 3>down on them at the beginning of the season, a

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 3>quarterway through the season, halfway through the season, so on

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 3>and so forth, barring injury. But this is such a

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 3>thickle category you mentioned Otani. No one really had a

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 3>grasp on what this was going to look like, and

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 3>we still don't because the pitching is still in question,

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 3>and that definitely lends itself to this conversation. I got like,

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 3>Vlade Guerrero is a guy that I think people would

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 3>be looking at before a first pitch was even thrown,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 3>and you're.

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Continue to look at him.

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Is there anyone else that's creeping up that you can say, hmm,

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe maybe be careful with the maybies you're giving your money.

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Snake shock in these MVP and cy Young type of

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 3>plays until someone really emerges that you didn't see coming.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Because again, if you're watching shows like this, chances are

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 3>you know who these players are. The guy waiting for

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 3>the bus might not, and that's whose money we're taking.

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm, yeah, it's a look to me.

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>When Otani was it I think twenty to one or

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to one in most places before the year, that

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>was the time to take a shot on it.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:23.559
<v Speaker 4>For sure.

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>You know you lay one hundred on that. That's a

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>lovely return because he has something that nobody else can offer,

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>which is that two way player thing. It's just a

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>matter of whether or not he can be good enough

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>at both to really make that sort of headway. And

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>it's so ironic that the favorite is the guy on

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>his own team, which we often say, oh, it's so

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to separate when you have two guys on the

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>same team. But right now, Jared Walsh might be the

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>best angel swing in a bat currently, So who knows

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. Let's go to the National League side.

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of a wrinkle here lately because de Gram,

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>who you and I have been talking about as a

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>possible MVP candidate. He goes to the IL, but Ron

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Lacuney is still the favorite plus two seventy five. De

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Grom still can census around eight hundred. Some places might

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>even take that down depending on the injury. Right now

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and wait and see what goes on. Tatis is at

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>plus eight to fifty and then my boy Juan Soto

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>has floated all the way at ten to one.

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 2>So here's my question.

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>We know this is a narrative award, a media award.

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt Striker, do you think that this whole to Fernando

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Tatis playing through this shoulder injury, this very intense injury.

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>If the Padres do continue to play well and the

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers continue to play under expectations, and let's say something

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>magical happens where the Padres are right there even last

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>week or two of the season with them, is Tatus

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>at plus eight fifty. The way to get in right

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>now on that, because that is a narrative that certainly plays.

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 4>It does, but again, please use logic and not emotion.

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 4>I grew up with four sisters.

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, how did you ever get out? Where was any

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 2>of the logic?

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 4>So it's all aside.

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Actually, there are times where where rule with your heart

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 3>is the right thing to do, but in this regard

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 3>it's not.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Let's not get philosophical. I think you make up a

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 4>great point here, though.

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 3>If it continues to be the way it is and

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the padres are there at the end of the conversation,

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>in a perfect world both soda and akunya are at

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 3>least somewhere on a portion of someone's tongue in this conversation,

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 3>then yes, I can certainly see people saying, wow, I

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 3>got in on tatoos at that number right in the

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 3>middle of May. I'm the smartest person in the world.

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 3>The thing about the nl MVP race is that there

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 3>was always going to be three or four places where

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 3>you could put a chip.

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Now you're trying to narrow it down.

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 3>There's still three, maybe four places you can put a chip.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Let's have this conversation again.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully I'll come back on maybe June first, because right

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 3>now I'm walking past this table and I want to

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 3>put a chip down. I just don't know where to

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 3>put that chip. So I've learned in my years on

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 3>this planet. I put that chip back in my pocket.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 3>I wait, let these players show me something I can't

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 3>show them anything.

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Acunya has done that much to

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>separate himself that much from the herd, which is kind

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of interesting to me. That's actually the chalk is the

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>one I like the least amount here, Whereas that's why

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I kind of go towards Tatis, because you know, the

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>first week back, everybody was questioning, oh, my goodness, is

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna work? And then he's been hitting home runs. He

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like tattis maybe two hands on the bat is.

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Actually a good thing. Who would have thought that?

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know what a Juan Soto? Yeah, and fundamentally

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it is. And then there's one soda at the ten

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to one. Who I mean right there, he was at

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the season, right neck and neck with

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>all these guys.

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 2>So this is an interesting time and Matt's kind of

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 2>right here.

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>National League really hasn't shown itself enough yet where there

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been even a clear separator, and the guy that

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they got at the top, I don't know how much

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of a separator he is. Speaking of tight races too,

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you've got al Cy Young's pretty tight right now. Plus

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>one fifty for Garrett Cole, plus three twenty five for

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber, and then plus four fifty for Tyler Glass,

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>now with a ten to one Carlos Rodon, who's got

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a better er than anybody, and may and d be

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the leader for comeback player of the Year. But in

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>your opinion, does he have a shot here at cy Young?

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, statistically speaking, he's right there with these guys,

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>if not better in some categories. But Bieber, Cole, Glass

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and I will certainly get a lot more pub I

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like.

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 3>One thousand percent. Now your feelings are correct. It goes back.

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes ruling with emotion is a good thing. So but again,

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 3>look at the calendar man middle of May. If Rodn

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 3>gives me sixteen and eight and an era under four

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and the no hitter and no one else is really

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 3>lights out, Oh my goodness, gracious, Like for some reason,

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 3>if Cole or Bieber falter in their last six starts

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm making it up, then maybe, But do you see

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 3>how far fetched even the it is, the illogical pontification

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 3>is but interesting on numbers. And this is what I've learned,

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 3>especially now that betting is becoming more and more public,

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 3>and more and more people are putting their eyes and

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 3>their talents on it. Look at Cole's number and look

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 3>at Bieber's number. It's pretty much double, isn't it. You

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 3>mentioned it's.

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Fifty plus three twenty five. It varies in some spots.

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 4>But you're right. So think of what the book is saying.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Now, is that so much on the picture or is

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 3>it about the win equity and the team that they're on.

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 3>And if that's the case, was Cleveland is Cleveland? Who

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 3>you thought they were in April or March? You have

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:11.839
<v Speaker 3>to ask yourself that question. The Yankees are exactly where

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 3>they're supposed to be in May, so I get why

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 3>that numbers there.

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 4>But the Bieber thing, it feels too good.

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 2>It feels too good.

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I didn't realize that was a problem. I always thought,

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 2>we want to think.

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's a problem, my friend, Oh it's a problem. Okay,

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>there's always something. It's always a catch every single time,

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>all right. So when we're looking at the AlSi young

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and again, this is why you go to betting pros,

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>because if you like Bieber, there's some spots, like, for instance,

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on Fandle, you can get them at plus three eighty.

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 2>Right now, that's that's great, And.

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why Betting Pros is so good because you get

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity to say, well, I kind of like this,

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>where can I find the best odds? And again I

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>encourage everybody to go to bettingpros dot com to do that,

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>because that's how you kind of find the best book

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for the best bet that you want to put out there.

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's move and switch gears here to the Nash for

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a second, if we may. And obviously the National League

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>de Grom has been so dominant, but now we have

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a question that's creeped in here

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>with this injury. Now Mri was clean, they say they're

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him a real Iyel stint instead of trying

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to short term it. We'll see if that rectifies the problem.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Minus won thirty six is the consensus betting Pro's number

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>for him. Corbyn Burns is at five to one. He

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is just now coming back from his COVID stint, and

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>then you got basically Trevor Bauer thirteen to one and

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Nola thirteen to one. Now, Aaron Nola has pitched

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>incredibly well this year, and I feel like nobody's really

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about it. It's kind of why the Phillies have

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>hung around where they have in the standings, and Corbyn burns.

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>We all know how good he's been, so right now

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>is it a matter of wait and see on this

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>de gram health or do you want to take action

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>now and maybe go with somebody not name Jacob de

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Gram before possibly this number starts to shrink if de

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Gram misses any significant time or struggles on his return.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 3>So this is what the sharks or the smart people

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 3>in the betting world are talking about. I think it

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 3>was just yesterday Keith, myself and Colin Wilson were talking

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 3>about it on the Better's Eye and yes, now is

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the time to see where you can get some value.

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 3>I believe was Colin brought up look at Brandon Woodriff,

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 3>maybe for a hot session. See if everything's starting to

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 3>melt away. Who remains standing? I posited Jack Flaherty. His

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:22.719
<v Speaker 3>whip is just.

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 4>To tick over one. I think like one point two.

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 4>Maybe that's the last start.

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 3>But these are some guys that when everyone else falls away,

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 3>should de Gram be injured and miss.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Some time, and I don't want to say it's like,

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 4>don't say no hitter.

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 3>These are the names you gotta start to look at

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 3>and they're gonna have some nice plus numbers right next

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 3>to their names.

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>So now's the time to start shopping. I like it shopping,

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>But you put stuff in the cart. Maybe you're not

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the check out yet?

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you mean?

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Sure? How many times have you done that? I mean, listen,

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 4>in college, I used to go shopping under the influence.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't you get that?

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 3>And you realize how much mine do I have? Do

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 3>I need seven box of the fudge covered Oreos? Yes,

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 3>let's put back the milk and break you know what

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean?

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>You choose important choices. Actually, I'm going food shopping right

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.599
<v Speaker 1>after this show is oil yea. I will pick you

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>up a box for sure. All right, let's switch gears

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>here and talk about some teams. Let's do a little

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>al East. The Yankees still the favorites at minus one twelve,

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox plus three point fifty, wh've had a

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>really good start that I think surprised a lot of people.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 4>And then you've got the.

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Blue Jays of four to twenty five and the Rays

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>who are in the World Series last year plus five hundred.

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, the thing with.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>The Rays is you're gonna see Louis Patino start to

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>make some more starts here. He's starting actually today, and

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how he continues to ramp up. If he

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>becomes a guy in that rotation consistently, they can add

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a Wander Franco. The Blue Jays right now still waiting

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for their big time investment, George Springer to pay dividends.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>So what do you make of the Al East here?

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Because the Yankees have gotten back on track, but their

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>pitching is still suspect. I don't think any of these

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>teams has the depth of rotation right now that you

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>really feel good about. So what is the difference maker

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>in this division for you? If you're trying to make

0:13:58.720 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a wager.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 4>So here's full transparency.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 3>This is how I bet division winners, and this is

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 3>how I've done it ever since I really learned how

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 3>to do this.

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 4>So at the start of the season, let's just call

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 4>a dollar a chip.

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Just for easy, I put a chip down on each

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 3>team I think within a division has a chance, and

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 3>then I revisit it four times a year. So at

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 3>forty games, I then make another play. But during the

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 3>time every ten games, I go back and I look

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 3>at the team. So as of for instance, the Yankees.

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 3>I had a chip down on them on April first.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 3>After ten games, I went back and look, I put

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 3>an X next to them because they weren't performing the

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 3>way I wanted them to going After another ten games,

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe they are.

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 4>You put a check next to them. Come forty games.

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 3>The team that I originally had intended upon has as

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 3>many checks upon it as it should. I double down

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 3>on that team, and that's a good way to look

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 3>at it. So with the Yankees, they weren't doing it

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 3>in April, but I knew that here's may check check check.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Continue to double down on them as far as depth

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 3>and things like that, they'll find a way. They're the

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 3>The Blue Jays are the team I had so many

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 3>x's next to them. I was disheartened. Here come those

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 3>check marks. Nate Pearson did not have a good start.

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 3>That troubles and worries me. But on the other side,

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these guys are stead Look at Marcus

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Simi and he has an amazing on base streak that

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 3>no one is talking about. La Guerrero is coming alive,

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Boba Sheet's doing what he should do, and Kevin Bigio's

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 3>bad hasn't even woken up.

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Yet I'm sure it will.

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'm looking at these odds and seeing there's ways

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 3>I can make some money here. The cream will always

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 3>rise to the top show you know that.

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And you know what.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I like what you're saying too, of making small incremental

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>investments over time, because that does kind of allow you

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to have exposure. But at the same time, like you're saying,

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>if you really like one thing it's going well, you

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to double up on it. And I think that

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is a great way over the long period of time.

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's see how that affects the central and how you

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>want to do this one, because this one chuck me.

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I was White Sox from the beginning of the year

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and they were not the favorites, and I said, this

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is insane. The White Sox should be the favorites. They've

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>lost Louise Robert, they have lost Elia Menez, yet they

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>still continue to win games and they are still the

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>consensus favorite minus two hundred. Cleveland's at plus three fifty,

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland has a hard time I feel like generating runs

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>outside of home runs. Ramirez and Franmil are hitting outside

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of that, it's kind of tough for them. If they're

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>not hitting Dingers and then the Twins who you know,

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Kent tamai Ada struggle.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, kier Lof came.

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Up for a hot minute and got hot and then

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>he went on the il. The Twins number has dropped

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>all the way to plus eight hundred. Now that is

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>very tempting because the Twins historically are always around. But

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm still kind of just sticking with the White Sox.

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the time to bet the White Sox has passed. Personally,

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it was before the season. What do you

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>think right now? Is there some case you want to

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>make for Cleveland or Minnesota or is it just already

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a White Sox division to lose?

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 4>How do you know? I'm not all in on the Tigers?

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 4>How do you know?

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've been hitting ahead with a lot

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of chairs. That's the only thing I know that is

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that is that is what.

0:16:58.160 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I got, because I'm gonna lose my thought because of that,

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 3>as well as all those happened in college. Okay, Chicago,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 3>you talked about losing a player and so on and

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 3>so forth. Yeah, but gaining Michael Kopek and Dylan Seese

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 3>have been wonderful. The public is just learning about them again,

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 3>people like you and I we knew about them. So yes,

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 3>that money remains what I call true. The true event

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 3>is there. The team you're seeing that is the team. Okay, Cleveland,

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Find me anyone that could tell you before our first

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 3>pitch was thrown to start the season that this is

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 3>going to be a team that was going to come

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 3>back and have an astronomical plus run differential in the

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 3>final six innings of every game. These they have been

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 3>the comeback kids along with the Red Sox. All right,

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 3>the bullpen had problems and then Class A stepped up

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 3>and now everyone is starting to step in line here. Yes,

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I hear you as far as the offense goes, but

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 3>nobody saw this team. And if Bieber can continue to

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 3>do what he does, and Soavali please sack something that

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Tristan McKenzie's a bright spot, they could be there.

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Man, the Al Central is fickle. Look at the Royals.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Did you think they were gonna do what they've done

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 3>in the first half of the season. I know they're

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 3>riding an eight game losing streak right now, but still

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 3>there's no way you can handicap this division like that.

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 3>And that's the beauty of baseball his name, right, that

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 3>thing I think you did.

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 2>It's it's class A. You said it in a very

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>class A way. That's all they need.

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But the Cleveland Indians have the pitching, as you're pointing out, too,

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and over time that's what wins out, whereas Minnesota's back

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of that rotation can be spotty at times. In ma

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Ada hasn't been the same guy who was last year.

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Well hopefully last start. Is that back on track and

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>things are gonna go better for him. Let's move to

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the west for a second and talk about the Athletics,

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>who are even.

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Right now in betting pros.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's interesting because they went on that incredible tear.

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course, like everything in baseball, it's a

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>game of streaks.

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 2>You hat the highs and the lows.

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, the Astros are plus one ten and the Angels

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>that are at plus six point fifty as the betting

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>pros consensus number. Now I ask you this match striker

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>six point fifty right now. You know the Angels did

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of jettison pool holes and you know Dylan Bundy

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been great, but Walsh has been terrific. I know

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Rend has the knee issue, but Otani and Trout, You know,

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. It's like these two giant stars, along with Walsh,

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>have really kind of carried this team. Is this an

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>intriguing number to you at six point fifty? Because the

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Astros have been a lot of up and down. They

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>can't seem to get everything right at the right time.

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>They get this going, and then that falls apart starting

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>catching good, the offense goes away. You know, any guys

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>on COVID lists and all this stuff's going back.

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 2>And forth with them. Are the Angels the sneaky wager

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 2>in this division? Right now? At six point fifty?

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 4>This is gonna sound like a terrible answer. It's a

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 4>great way to start an answer.

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 3>But putting the Angels in a vacuum, You've got to

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 3>come back to me after the six game stretch that

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 3>they are on right now. So it's encouraging to see

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 3>what they did against the Dodgers. Now they go on

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 3>a six game stretch against teams that are either first

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 3>or second in their respective divisions. I believe a Boston

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 3>All Glenn Cleve. But watch these games, folks, if you're

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 3>on the East coast. So I'm in New York, Queens

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 3>New York. So some of these games you can really

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 3>see a lot about a team. Look at their bullpens,

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 3>look at how they play matchups. Then come back if

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 3>this number is still there after the six game stretch,

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 3>which is not going to be, but if you can

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 3>find it in a nice, favorable, desirable place with.

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 4>Some pitching, I'm not doing it, but I could see

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 4>how a lot of people are gonna get on this team.

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be if you like him at all,

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the time because before after the stretch, if

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>things go well for them in the next let's say

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>six to ten games, that number is probably gonna get

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>cut in half. I think there's a real good chance

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that's going to happen. And here's the thing, you know,

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned all these American League teams. The Yankees, of

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>all these teams, is actually in the best position because

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>not only can they afford to pay anybody they want

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>because they're the Yankees, but they can also they have

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>enough depth in that organization to make a move for somebody.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>And that's where I kind of worry about teams like

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the Angels. I don't know if Joe Adele plus plus

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is enough to get a deal done.

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it is.

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple guys in that system I'm looking at,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Indian system. They're not gonna deal some

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of these young guys because they're a smaller market team.

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So the Yankees are kind of in the driver's seat.

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And obviously they're still the favorite for the American League.

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>And I can understand why, because again, you control their

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>own destiny if you're the Yankees, because you have the

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>best of both worlds, and it's not a sixty game

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>season anymore. Now from the National League standpoint, we're in

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the East here with the Mets are still favorites at.

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Plus one fifteen. I don't know how this is true,

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 2>but it is.

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Then you got the plus one eighty with the Braves

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and the plus four hundred with the Phillies.

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 2>The Nats have clearly struggled here.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 1>They haven't been able to get on track in Strasbourg

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>being hurt and Corbyn being bad. I just think the

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Nats have now gone by the wayside. We know it

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>was boom er bust for the Nats. So now there

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>are three as great as the Marlins pitching is, we're realistic.

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Now there are three Phillies, Braves, Mets. The four to

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>one Phillies are an interesting wager here because Wheelers pitch

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. Nolah's been lights out. But I don't understand

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>how the Braves are not the favorite here. Plus one eighty,

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a great simple investment. You can

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>put a large number on that. Do you feel confident

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Atlanta Braves at what you've seen because guys

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>like Yonoah and Anderson have stepped up when guys like

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Freed and Morton have struggled.

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 4>Braves in the team. I've been saying it since April.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 4>They're just built for it.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.360
<v Speaker 3>And again in April as a better as a gambler.

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 3>You know, the dogs barked, they ate. It's April, like

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 3>it's the first time you're doing this. Totally cool, come

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 3>along and you know, be our friend because we love that.

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 3>But there are people that have been doing this for

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 3>all that understand it's April. Joe, you and I talked

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 3>about Everyone was all about Francisco and or Francisco and Door.

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 4>It's April. He's historically bad in April. The Yankees are

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 4>an older team. It's April. Give it. It's like an

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 4>older car. Give it a chance. To warm up.

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 3>The Braves are my team here and I've always said that,

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, has been a great, great revelation for them,

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 3>both with the bat and with the arm. And yeah,

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 3>to your point, like like Morton hasn't been doing what

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 3>they thought he would be able to do, at least

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 3>in the last two starts. Give this whole team time.

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 3>They're going to be there, and don't count out Washington

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 3>just yet.

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>Man, well, I gotta eat some crow here in the

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Central because you know me, I was very pro Milwaukee

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>going into the year. But now that Christianelwich came back

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>for one day and went back on.

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 2>The il, I'm out. It's over. I'm out. This lineup

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 2>is not enough.

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>They didn't do enough outside And the problem is now,

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have Yellich and you're not playing good

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>baseball and you're not scoring runs, it doesn't matter how

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>good the pitching is, because what happens is now you're

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>at a deficit because you can't justify moving more young

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>pieces to bring you more pieces.

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's almost like chicken in the egg.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like, if you don't have Yelick playing well and

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you're not things are going well, how does the organization

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>justify going out there making a trade for a trade

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>man seat you're bringing in somebody like that. So right now,

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals are at plus one ten, the Brewers minus

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>one twenty, the Reds are at eight to one, and

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I know it's the Reds, and I know they've got

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>a whole host of problems, but they've also got an

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>incredible young pipeline of pitching. Molly's been great, Sonny Gray's

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>been really good, Wade Miley just threw a freaking no hitter,

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and Luis Castillo we all know eventually is going to

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>write the ship. At least I feel pretty confident in that.

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got an offense here where Suarez hasn't hit

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>it all, Cassianos has been good, Mustakus. I mean, this

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is a really good team. I know it's a long shot.

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>It feels like the Cardinals division to lose at plus

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>one ten, and I think this is gonna be a

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>minus number by the time we hit June.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Like the Cardinals, I think this is your last shot.

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you agree.

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Here's the thing about divisional winners. You have to trust

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 3>your baseball knowledge. And again, if you're just out there

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 3>listening to there's A thousand and one shows like this,

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 3>Let's just be honest.

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 2>As what you and I are doing.

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 4>But here's the thing. Exactly who's telling you? Where have

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 4>they been? One have they done? So you have to

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 4>look when things are backed up by math.

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 3>You can't beat that, Okay, I'm sorry you can't.

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 4>The Cardinals are built for this division. Everyone knows it.

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 3>So yes, at some point that number is going to

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 3>get even and it might even drop into the minus.

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 4>So there you go.

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, love and math always win. There you go. That's

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 2>what it is, all right.

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's hit the West two horse race. Here, the

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers met minus four hundred. Now that number has.

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Been adjusted a little bit after this bad stretch for

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the Dodgers.

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 4>It's the weird bit.

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And then you got the Padres of plus two point

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>fifty here. Now, the Padres are a fascinating team because

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Snell's pitched poorly, but Joe Musgrove has kind of given

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you what you thought Snell was going to. I don't

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>know what the heck's gonna happen with Lamette and Paddock.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I hope that Paddick comes back healthy, is good. I'm

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>terrified Lamette's of Tommy John waiting to happen. The good

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>news is they've got some other guys like Weathers, and

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>they've got some other guys like Mackenzie Gore who might.

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Be able to step up.

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>But the Padres are all in the question is can

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>they catch the Dodgers. I know Bellinger is on his

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>way back. Is this just to stay away here in

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>this division? Or do you like the Padres? Chances of

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>catching the Dodgers.

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 4>Depends on what kind of better you are. Are you

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 4>conservative then yeah? Sure? Ooh, I don't know what likes?

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Are you aggressing off looking in on everybody? Are you

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the contrarian? The San Francisco Giants have disrupted everything in

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 3>that division. The San Francisco Giants have disrupted everything for

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the last forty five days in baseball.

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 4>Just go look at their.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Numbers and tell me that anyone thought they were going

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 3>to do that. I'm still waiting for the market correction.

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 3>I personally, I think it's coming right. I mean, it's

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:52.959
<v Speaker 3>just baseball again. Guys are always gonna do with the back

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 3>of their baseball car tells you they're gonna do at

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:56.719
<v Speaker 3>least nine and a half times out of ten. But

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 3>the Giants have disrupted everything here now, so look for

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 3>them to pull and tug on those Padre and Dodger numbers.

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 3>And if you can catch them where they're being pulled on,

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 3>and it puts you in a good spot. Like Joe

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 3>was talking about, there's ways to get the best line.

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Take advantage of it. Man, Please, being ignorant during the

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 3>time of information is a choice.

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 1>That is good stuff right there. And you're right man,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that giant's pitching. Where'd that come from? Alex Wood, Kevin Gossman.

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just it's crazy. And every night somebody

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>goes out there and they're just, you know, spinning good

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>baseball games despite all the injuries they've had at different times.

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 2>It's crazy.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the big one here. Right now, the

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>consensus favorite for the World Series is still the reigning, defending,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>undisputed Los Angeles Dodgers at plus three twenty five. The

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Yankees are at seven to one, which I think is

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating number. That's a pretty big number right now.

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Consensus wise, it's still early. The Padres at plus eight

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to fifty, who have the pitching in a short series

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and they could get very hot. The Mets are at

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 1>plus nine, and then before we get to the long shots,

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the other plus US nine is the White Sox. So

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>these are kind of the favorites under ten to one.

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Where would you put a chip and how would you

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>do it?

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 2>At this point?

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen enough out of any team to feel

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>like I'm confident this team is going to be there

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>through the regular season and is built for the postseason.

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 2>Who stands out to you?

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 3>So when I did my World Series futures, I put

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 3>two chips, one on an AL team, one on ANL team.

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 3>I didn't have any secondary teams. And it remains the

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 3>same to this day, and I'm actually getting ready to

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 3>double back on it. Yankees, Atlanta Braves, Okay, built to

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 3>do it. They've been there, they understand it. When everything

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 3>else falls away, I think that's going to be the

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 3>World Series.

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Well if you do like that, because right now, the

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>consensus number on the Atlanta Braves. Who was the first

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>one in the quote long shots fifteen to one. Now,

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the Braves historically they've been that great regular season team,

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but they fail all the time in the short series.

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>What is about this team that you think is different

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>this year?

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 4>You and I have talked about this a lot.

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.959
<v Speaker 3>The games completely changed now it's about having three stud

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 3>starters and then a bullpen and playing matchups. Atlanta had

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 3>that at least on paper in April, and I do

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 3>believe they still have it and never rule out that

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 3>late season acquisition. With that said, when it comes down

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 3>just the minutia to the micro, just think the organization

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 3>and the team is better suit than anyone else. And yes,

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I understand the Dodgers are the chalk, but I'm in

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 3>this to make money.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, baby, that's what we're in.

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of making money, where can everybody check out

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>The Batter's Eye? I know it's on every single day now, right,

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>they've actually got you working like five days a week.

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know you were a guy to do that

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of Thing's not work all right?

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 2>So what's going on? When is the show every day

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 2>that people can catch it?

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's awesome, So it's BETTER'SI It's on MLB dot Com.

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 3>It's also on at MLB Picks six pm Eastern time.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 4>We're alive.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Never know what any of us are gonna say or do,

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 3>and we do something called walk off winners at the

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 3>end of every segment we give our best bets for

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.479
<v Speaker 3>the day. I'm happy to say, Man, as of right now,

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm like ten games over five hundred four or five

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 3>games over five hundred. We have guests coming in all

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 3>the time, the guys coming over from Vegas vs. In City,

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Matt Veskurcheon's been on the show. It's just it's great

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to have all those resources there because you have information

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 3>and as Newman said, you control the man.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 4>You control in misshow.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>There's no way we're getting out of the show together

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>with at least one Seinfeld reference and all these guests.

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Yet, Hey, I don't remember being asked to be on

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 2>the show. I don't know.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 4>I just sit in the chair.

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And when you sit at the top of the show,

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you said your words were my friend.

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, no invitations for your friend. But again,

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I see what this was.

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 4>I see what this was. This is all just showed me.

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 4>Now I got a shat.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh Lord.

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>On that note, let's remind everybody you can follow Matt

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, even though he doesn't care at a sleep

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>on the beach, and you can also again check him

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>out on the Better's Eye every day on MLB dot com.

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And you should also check out Impact Wrestling where he's

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>calling some fantastic matches with.

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 2>D Lo Brown.

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Some really cool stuff going on to Impact right now,

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and of course Mattie Striker Joey p Sunday mornings, get

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a cup of coffee, you know, and watch a little

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Diamond Bets with Matt Striker myself on Sports Grid eight

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a m. Eastern to ten, two hours of baseball talk. Maddie,

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you so much for taking the

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>time out today to join us on betting Pros to

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>talk a little baseball and we'll check in with you

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>again soon. That'll do it for us, but the story

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of the game goes on for Matt Striker.

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm joe Piezopia. We'll see you next time, gibbz