WEBVTT - Tech News: Riots and Coups and Facebook, Oh My!

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. And this is the

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>news for Tuesday, February ninth one. On Monday, Facebook announced

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that the company would take a stronger stance against posts

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>containing misinformation regarding vaccines. This is an escalation of earlier

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Facebook policies. In October twenty, Facebook said it would no

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>longer sell ad space to parties that promoted misleading information

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>about vaccines. Then in December, Facebook upped the anti by

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>saying it would remove posts the elevated claims that had

0:00:56.080 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>been debunked by the World Health Organization or w HO.

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>But Monday's announcement broadens this approach behind vaccines for COVID

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and encompasses all vaccines period. While Facebook used to

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>flag misleading posts and then just down rank them, you know,

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>not remove them, but reduce their rank, that would just

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that they were less likely to show up in

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>users feeds. Now the company will actually remove posts promoting

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>false claims about vaccinations. Facebook worked with the World Health

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>Organization and other governmental agencies to create something like a

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>database of false or misleading claims. According to a Facebook

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>post on the matter, the company's stance on vaccines falls

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>under multiple user policies. For example, content that would promote

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>events intended to spread COVID nineteen on purpose, presumably in

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the belief that catching it is better than being vaccinated

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>against it, would fall under the coordinating Harm policy. Because

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it turns out Facebook is against coordinating harm, which frankly

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is news to me. So I suppose other things that

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>would fall into this category would include, uh, Facebook pages

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>dedicated for big public events in places that have a

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>quarantine or lockdown in place, you know, That would presumably

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>fall under the coordinating harm policy. Meanwhile, under the Regulated

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Goods policy, Facebook says it will prohibit posts that are

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>attempting to sell quote medical and respiratory face masks and

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen test kits end quote. Apparently there are a

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of parties out there selling stuff that's like a

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>counterfeit type of of medical mask or tests that haven't

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>actually been cleared by any regulatory agency, that kind of thing,

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's a real bear to wade through. The legit

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>versus the illegitimate one, so Facebook saying, all right, we're

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>just not going to run those ads. Under the hate

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>speech policy, Facebook will remove content that suggests people who

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>share a protected characteristic are in some way, you know,

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the virus, or they are spreading the virus

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and so on. But this doesn't include national origin as

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>an outright band because Facebook states that it wants to

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>allow for posts about health statistics that are not hate speech.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Rather they are giving important information such as x percent

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of Americans have caught COVID nineteen since the beginning of

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, something like that, And you wouldn't want to

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>put a full ban on uh nation of origin because

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the information could be really useful. And there's a whole

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>list of prohibited content that falls under Facebook's Community Standards barrier,

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and that includes a ton of stuff, including more broadly

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>debunked claims about vaccines in general, such as the claim

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that they cause autism, despite the fact that you know

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that claim has been thoroughly rejected and the researchers who

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>first proposed the link between vaccines and autism we're later

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>found to have essentially fabricated the whole thing, but the

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>idea has still stuck around and a lot of people

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>latch onto it. Facebook will now remove those posts when

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they catch them, though I should add the language indicates

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that this general policy really is only in effect for

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>as long as there is a COVID nineteen public health emergency,

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>so there's no telling if the company is going to

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>ease off on these restrictions later on down the road.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>According to Facebook, the reason behind these changes comes from

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook Oversight Board, which is the independent group that

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>would recently formed to review Facebook's content moderation policies. And

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>while we're talking about Facebook, Forbes published an article that

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>put claims made by the company's chief operating officer under

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the microscope. The CEO of Facebook is Cheryl Sandberg, and

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the specific claims were regarding the siege on the US capital.

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>On January six, Sandberg had said quote, I think these

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>events were largely organized on platforms that don't have our

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>abilities to stop hate, and don't have our standards and

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have our transparency end quote. Which yikes. Okay, as

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys probably have gathered, because I am not subtle

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>about it, I'm pretty critical of Facebook and how it

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>enforces or until recently, I guess it would be better

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to say, failed to enforce its policies. Forbes looked over

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>documents from the U s Department of Justice regarding the

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>charges against two hundred twenty three people connected to the

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>riots now part of the nation that they looked at.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Part of the information in those documents includes cases in

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>which they identified posts on social media that account for

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the evidence against the respective individuals with regard

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>to planning and you know, the various threats that were made.

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Seventy three of those documents name Facebook as one of

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the social platforms upon which an associated suspect posted material

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>relating to the assembly in d C and the riot

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Capitol, which puts Facebook in the lead for

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>platforms that were cited by the d o J as

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>having hosted material related to the riots. In a distant

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>second place is YouTube, which had twenty four appearances in

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>these documents, and Instagram takes up spot number three, with

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty of the documents citing Instagram posts, and since Facebook

0:06:55.800 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>owns Instagram, you could arguably add those twenty two Facebook's account,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>although to be fair, some of these documents probably referenced

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>more than one social network, So while Facebook appeared seventy

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>three times, and Instagram appeared twenty times. Some of those

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>may have been in the same documents, there might be

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>some overlap. There's what I'm saying as for Parlor or Parley,

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the free speech social network that largely catered

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to extremists and the far right, that one the d

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>o J only cited in eight documents. Now, that does

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily mean that everyone involved in the riots used

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Facebook primarily, and hardly anyone used Parlor, But it also

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>seems to undercut Cheryl Sandberg's claims that Facebook was somehow

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in a better position compared to these other platforms. It's

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>true that Facebook had been working to remove groups, you know,

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>hate groups and and posts that violated its policies against

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>militarized social movements. But it's also true that the platform

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>was still hosting a lot of communication and organization related

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to the riots on January six. So I'm not saying

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook is more responsible than these other platforms, or

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that the vast majority of planning happened on Facebook. Rather,

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that Sandberg's claims that somehow Facebook is elevated

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>above these other platforms just doesn't hold water when we're

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at the evidence that the d o J has

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>been bringing together. In other news, zd net reports that

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft is going to add a new type of threat

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>alert for its Defender product for Office three sixty five,

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and the alert is for nation state cyber attacks. So

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>if Microsoft detects that a nation state backed hacking group

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>is targeting a particular companies, employees, or its systems, it

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>can send up the alert through Defender for Office three

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty Microsoft has already been kind of doing this on

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a more granular approach, since if the company detected that

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a nation state backed attack was targeting one of Microsoft's customers,

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>then Microsoft would send an email to that specific person,

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>alerting them of the attack and providing advice on how

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they should secure their account. Now, according to Microsoft, it

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>was sending out around ten thousand alerts per year since.

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>But there is a problem with this approach, and that's

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that not everyone stays up to date on

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>their emails. You know, I'm kind of guilty of that.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I get a lot of emails every single day, and

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm frequently busy researching or recording, so I'll miss a

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of messages or you know, read them in batches

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, and considering that a

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>nation state backed hacking attack is what I would call

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a super high priority and urgent matter, people like me

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>can be a real problem. And so this new feature

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>will allow Microsoft to send out an alert through the

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Office three sixty five dashboard, which should pop up on

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the screens of various system administrators and I T personnel,

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>who can then take steps to address problems, including proactively

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>changing the settings on affected accounts and then contacting the

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>affected employees. So then no time is wasted in responding

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to the threat. It would be better for an employee

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to get locked out of their account by their system

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>administrator than to have it, you know, compromised by a

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>nation state backed hacker. And I really wanted to include

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>this news item today, not because I want to advertise

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>for Microsoft, but rather point out how the rise of

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>nation based hacker groups has really become a serious and

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>persistent threat around the world. And just to be clear,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 1>tons of countries do these kind of cyber attacks. Here

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, we typically hear about groups that

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>are backed by China and Russia in North Korea, but

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind that the United States has engaged in

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>this kind of cyber warfare too. Cyber warfare is real,

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is quietly raging online all the time, and

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>we typically only become aware of it when someone discovers,

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, a big flaw in security, such as the

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>solar Winds hack. So it's a pretty scary world out

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>there and wild to think that there needs to be

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>an official alert built into an Office three product to

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>let you know about a nation state based hacking attack

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>on your company. That's I mean, it's this is like

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>like spy movie type stuff. Bloomberg reported that Twitter is

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at some potential ways to generate revenue for the

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>company in addition to its normal route. Right now, Twitter's

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>main source of revenue is through advertisements, such as promoted posts.

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you've ever been on Twitter and you thought, huh,

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember following Taco Bell. Did I follow Taco Bell?

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Did I get loopy last night and follow Taco Bell,

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Well there's a chance you never followed Taco Bell, but

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>rather Taco Bell had paid for a promoted post and

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter then posted that to your feed. And while Twitter

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>had a rocky road early in the pandemic, as companies

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>began to kind of cut back on their advertising, budgets.

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It did bounce back. Recently, Twitter announced that second one

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar quarter. That's one billion dollars in revenue, I

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>should add, not profit. And there are questions about whether

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that trend will continue, you know, because after all, most

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>recently Twitter purged tons of accounts from its platform due

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to the aforementioned riots at the US Capital, among other things.

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So that means it's a good idea to diversify. If

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>your growth isn't going on the up and up, like

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're not expanding the number of users to your service,

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>then you have to figure out how you're going to

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>generate revenue beyond just advertising, because advertisers are more interested

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in seeing those numbers go up. So in this case,

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is reportedly considering introducing some features that users can

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>access if they cough up the dough. One possible change

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is that Twitter will start charging for tweet Deck, which

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>is an alternative way to view tweets. Uh. It's it's

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>its own little kind of dashboard. For one thing, you

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>get all the tweets in reverse chronological order, so there's

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 1>no confusing little segments of stuff like labeled. You might

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>have missed this. That's nestled in the middle of more

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>recent tweets. I know that whenever I use Twitter directly,

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I will run into tweets that were posted, like, you know,

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hours ago, and I'll think, wow, that's a big gap.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>That's because Twitter has kind of aggregated those, thinking, hey,

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe you want to see these. I prefer it in

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>reverse chronological order. Tweet deck does that. If you manage

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>multiple Twitter accounts, you can set up tweet deck to

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>actually show all those various feeds side by side, including

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>things like replies and direct messages. So I use tweet

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>deck to manage Twitter accounts for myself, for tech stuff

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and for large nerdron collider. So one option Twitter is

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>reportedly considering is making the service a subscription based service.

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Another feature that could be a paid option is an

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>undo send button. I'm not sure how it's different from

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a delete tweet option unless it actively removes the tweet

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>from displaying in various feeds in real time. Because sometimes

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>if you send out a tweet and you delete it

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and somebody else has an older, unrefreshed Twitter feed up,

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>they can see that undeleted tweet. Maybe this deals with that.

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, and another pitch would allow accounts to

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>offer up exclusive content to people who tip the accounts,

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a tiered subscription that you would find

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>on platforms like YouTube. Twitter responded to a request from

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg to clarify the strategies, and the company essentially said

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that any plans right now are in the very early

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>stages of discussion. Nothing is said in stone, and you

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't really expect to see anything implemented this year. Now.

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I say all that knowing that Twitter is going to

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>hold its quarterly earnings called later the day. This goes

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>out on Tuesday, the ninth of February, so it's possible

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that I'll have some updates for Thursday's episode. We'll see.

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And one big story that I've yet to touch on

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff is uh the ongoing political upheaval in Myanmar. Now,

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this country in Southeast Asia was formerly a British colony.

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>For several decades, it existed under military rule. It transitioned

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to a civilian based government, used to be known as

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Burma in the United States. It frequently is referred to

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>still as Burma, and until very recently, the leader of

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the country was on San su Ki, who won a

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>re election campaign in a landslide. She she was originally

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>elected in one reelection this past year, and the military's

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>justification for taking over the government hinged on charges of

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>nationwide voter fraud, and those are charges that have no

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>evidence behind them, which sounds a bit familiar and indicative

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of a general trend in world politics that we've seen

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>in many places not too long ago. And this isn't

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the first time that sue Ki has seen this kind

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of resistance. She had served around fifteen years in detention

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>as punishment for efforts to organize a democratic government in

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the country. She also received the Nobel Peace Prize for

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>her efforts in nineteen one. Now, the reason I bring

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>up the story here is that the military has been

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>steadily cracking down on Internet platforms within the country. One

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of the big changes between the last era of military

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>regimes and this current one is the proliferation of the

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Internet and affordable technology that citizens can use to access

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. This ends up giving people a lot of

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>options when it comes to doing stuff like organizing protests

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and sharing information, something the military has been keen to squash.

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>As such, the military has moved to cut off citizens

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>access to the Internet. The BBC reported over the weekend

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>that nationwide connectivity fell to sixteen percent of what it

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>normally would be. The military also moved to block citizen

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>access to platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Some citizens

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>switched to using virtual private networks or VPNs in order

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>to get around those blocks, and that prompted the military

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to go for the more brute force approach of essentially

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>shutting down internet service entirely within the country. Essentially, the

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>military are taking the philosophy of the founders of the

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Internet and trying to do the opposite in order to

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>restrict speech and organization. Citizen in the country continue to

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>speak out against the coup, organizing in the streets. Apparently,

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the three finger salute from Hunger Games has become a

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>widely adopted symbol representing a rejection of authoritarianism. There's a

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>growing international pressure against the military to reverse course and

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge the democratically elected leaders. And this story is ongoing,

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sure we'll have more updates in future episodes. Okay,

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we've got a lot more news to cover, but before

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>we get to that, let's take a quick break. We're back.

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times published a piece about the gig

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>economy in general, and Uber, Lift and Airbnb in particular.

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Over the course of twenty twenty. Clearly, the pandemic has

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>had a major effect on these companies and their employees

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>or contract workers as the case may be, and their customers.

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Uber and Lift have never had a profitable year, though

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the typical response to that criticism has been that they're

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, both companies have invested more in growth year

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>over year, which made costs outpaced revenue, but both have

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>had I p o s or you know, initial public offerings.

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>They're both publicly traded companies, which typically brings along with

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it a certain general expectation that the companies will become

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>profitable and represent a return on investment for shareholders. And

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 1>of course was a much different year than any of

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>us had planned thanks to the pandemic. Usage of ride

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>hailing services and Airbnb dropped significantly in the spring. It

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>recovered a bit and then had a second dip in

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the fall, though not as drastic as it could have been,

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and the gig workers have had a lot of concerns

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>during that whole time. There's a higher risk for them

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to get sick as they can encounter a lot of

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>people on a single shift. And what's more so, gig

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>workers intentionally sought out gigs around larger public events, you know,

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>potential super spreader events. Because people needed transportation, a lot

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of gig workers stopped working those types of jobs completely.

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Others would swap over to stuff like driving deliveries rather

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>than passengers, and you know, Uber really did a major

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>shift towards delivery. In with that change came lower paychecks

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and lower risk of getting sick. According to Lift and

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>its ten largest markets, the drivers who you know kept

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>picking up passengers were working at a fairly steady pace

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>through most of the year because there were a reduced

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>number of drivers out there, which meant there was a

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>smaller supply, so a smaller demand was okay, But in

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>other places, drivers spent a lot of time just waiting

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>idly in their cars for potential fares. And apparently tipping

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>was down in as well. Oh and drivers often had

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.959
<v Speaker 1>to supplement masks and cleaning products that were supplied by

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>their companies, and they had to add in stuff that

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>they bought with their own money because it wasn't enough

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to cover their their work, which represented another cost for

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the driver. Both Uber and Left will be announcing their

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>financial results for twenty twenty later this week, and we'll

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>learn more about how these companies have been doing. Currently.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Both Uber and Left have stocks priced in the fifty

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to sixty dollar range, which is a pretty drastic increase

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>from the lows that their stocks hit in. And now

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of Tesla stories. First up as a

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>story in the Wall Street Journal. Their reports. China has

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>criticized Tesla for the build quality of the US built

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>vehicles the Tesla has been trying to sell in China.

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>China's State Administration for Market Regulation has rebuked Tesla for

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent build quality, which is something that the company has

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>faced over here in the United States on occasion. Is

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent build quality. The company has issued a few recalls

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>on US built models, like the Model S and the

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Model X. One of those recalls was about the touch

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>screen that was incorporated into the dashboard of these vehicles,

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and another recall was for an issue with the suspension

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>systems of the vehicles. Interestingly, the Tesla vehicles that are

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>actually built in the company's Giga factory in Shanghai are

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>clear of these problems or appear to be so. This

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>seems to be an issue specifically with the American made

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Tesla vehicles. Tesla apparently greased a lot of wheels to

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>open up operations in China. It received funding from Chinese banks,

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>which are stayed owned and operated, and it also sidesteps

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>some regulations that normally it would have to go through

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in order to get you know, approval in China, and

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it was all in an effort to get the production

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>even faster. So it's kind of rough to get all

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of favors from a foreign country and then

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>turn round and kind of mess up. It's too early

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to say if there will be further consequences, but they

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>could escalate up to and including an import ban on

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>US built Tesla vehicles. So it's not, as the kids say,

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a good look. And our second Tesla story is that

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the company is really into bitcoin, like really into it,

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>as in making a one and a half billion dollar

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>investment into the cryptocurrency kind of into it. And in

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>its tin K report to the SEC, we learned that

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the company apparently plans to accept bitcoin as a form

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of payment in the future to some degree. Now, personally

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I find this whole thing ridiculous, but I find almost

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>everything about bitcoin to be ridiculous. As I have pointed

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>out on numerous occasions in my old grouchy Man voice,

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin's value fluctuates so much that it's hard for me

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to see it as a valid currency. I mean, yes,

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>people have used bitcoin to make transactions, particularly for stuff

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that they would rather not have on the books anywhere else.

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>But on January twenty one, the value of a single

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin was thirty thousand, four hundred seventeen u s. Dollars.

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot, right, Well, this morning it was just

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>above forty three thousand dollars, and as a record this

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>episode in the night of February eight, the current value

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>for a bitcoin is forty six thousand, four hundred twenty

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>seven dollars and fifty cents. So in two weeks, the

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>value of a single bitcoin increased by more than sixteen

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars, and it increased by nearly three thousand dollars

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just over a few hours for one bitcoin. So let's

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.239
<v Speaker 1>say that you've got some bitcoins, maybe you invested in

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>them and purchased them, maybe you mind them. It doesn't

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>really matter or how likely are you to spend a

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin if you know that in two weeks, the bitcoin

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you spend might have increased in value by more than

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand dollars. I mean, you would have already spent

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin, so none of that value would come back

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to you. You would have spent that money already. It

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>would be out of your wallet and in someone else's

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and that person would see the money they received from

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you increase in value dramatically. Now that doesn't seem like

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a very viable currency to me. I would be

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>terrified to spend money, thinking what if I held onto

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>this for two weeks and it increased in value, you know,

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>by sixteen thousand dollars, I would never spend it. So

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could think of it more as an investment,

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know, not really currency anyway. Tesla essentially acknowledged

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that the company is diversifying its investments with money that

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't need for their regular operating expenses,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin represents one of those investments. Now, this next

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>story isn't a Tesla story, but it does involve Elon Musk,

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>who is currently the richest person in the world. He's

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>putting money, a hundred million dollars of it, toward a

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>prize pool for a special contest. No, he is not

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>inviting five children to a Tesla factory to get gobbled

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>up by various machinery until he takes one of them

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on a glass elevator ride, though I do continue to

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>pitch that movie instead. The contest is for teams to

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>propose carbon removal solutions to reduce the amount of carbon

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 1>dioxide in the atmosphere and then to lock it up

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in some form to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>that are out there and help fight climate change. The

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>prize pool totals one million dollars. But this isn't a

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>winner takes all kind of game. There will be a

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollar grand prize, and second and third place

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>we'll get twenty million and ten million dollars respectively. The

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>remaining twenty million bucks will be divvied up between small

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>teams to help fund their solutions. It's incantive to get

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>people thinking about ways to combat climate change and hopefully

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>come up with some practical solutions that can be actually

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>implemented and make a real world difference. It's part of

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the X Prize series of events. X Prize is itself

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a nonprofit organization and X Prize events have covered tons

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of different challenges, from space exploration to building more efficient

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 1>automobiles to improving literacy among adults. Generally speaking, the contests

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>tackle really big problems that require a lot of innovative solutions.

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>And to learn more about x Prize, specifically the carbon

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>removal one, but other ones as well, uh, you can

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>go to x prize dot org. Just know that when

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>we're talking carbon removal, we're talking big picture because the

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>goal is to come up with solutions that can remove

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>carbon on the gigaton scale that's a billion tons. And

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the last little bit for this new segment, Bloomberg reports

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that Dan Richio, who used to lead Apple's hardware division,

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>has moved over to Apple's mostly secret department that oversees

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the company's work in augmented and virtual reality technologies. And

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>just for a quick refresh. Virtual reality is when you're

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>using technology to create a simulated reality, so the stuff

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that you can see and hear, and sometimes even touch

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and smell is all created by technology to create the

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>sensation that you are in a different kind of environment.

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Augmented reality is when you use technology to create a

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>digital enhancement to the real world around you, and you

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>might access this using a headset where you can see

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the real world around you, but there's a year old

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>display that is on top of your view of reality.

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>You might just use a smartphone, so you hold up

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone and you're looking at the world through the

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>smartphones camera with a digital overlay added. Or it might

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.719
<v Speaker 1>even be something like headphones where you get digital information

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>through audio cues. But the whole idea is that the

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>technology identifies your location and your orientation, so in other words,

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>where you happen to be and what you happen to

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>be facing, and then provides information on top of that

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>environment around you. The information might be for entertainment, I

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>mean you might just be looking at people and seeing

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>bunny ears pop up on everyone's head. Or it might

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>be informative, like giving you digital instructions overlaid on top

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of your view of say and otherwise incomprehensible pile of

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>furniture pieces from Ikea. The rumors about Apple mostly suggests

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that the company would first build out a really premium

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and really expensive VR set up before moving into the

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>augmented reality technology G for a consumer space. And I

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>can kind of understand that VR is a small market

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's a market. It has actually had some success,

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>though I would call it modest success are at least

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in a robust implementation has seen less success, with companies

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>like Magic Leaps still struggling, and the Microsoft Hollow lens

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>restricted more for developers and enterprise customers, and the whole

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>mixed reality thing that Microsoft was behind kind of just

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>faded away. So a R is gonna probably be in

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a holding pattern for a little while. But when we're

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>talking VR and we're saying expensive, how much do we

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>mean by that? Well, the website the Information estimates that

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a VR set from Apple might have a price tag

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the neighborhood of three thousand dollars. Yikes. I mean,

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you could build a really good gaming rig for three grand,

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, not a like bleeding Edge it'll rip the

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>skin off your face kind of gaming rig, but still

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a really good one for three thousand dollars. Now, maybe

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple is building out a better VR implementation than anyone

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>else has ever managed. That is possible, but the company

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>has had some missteps in the past as well, So

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing is certain except that you'll definitely be paying the

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple tax if you want to buy one, because nobody

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>gets out of that. We have a few more stories

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to cover in this episode. Before I get to those,

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:41.959
<v Speaker 1>let's take another quick break. You know, if I weren't

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>making podcasts, I would be pitching big budget blockbusters to

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood types. You heard me do one with Elon Musk's contest.

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>If you listen to large nerd Dron Collider, you know

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I do it every week, and I would make really

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>groundbreaking stuff. For example, here's one for you for free.

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I got this idea. There's a robot from the future

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and it comes back to present day because it has

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>one mission to make a really good salad. That's my

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>way of introducing this next story, which is that door

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Dash is set to acquire a company called chow Botics,

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>which tech Crunch describes as quote a Bay Area based

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:28.959
<v Speaker 1>robotics company best known for its salad making robot end quote.

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>That robot, by the way, is named Sally, so in

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>my movie Pitch, Arnold Schwarzenegger would clearly be playing Sally,

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the salad making robot. Chow Botics first got its start

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in and according to tech Crunch, it has raised more

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>than twenty million dollars so far. The salad making robot

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>looks kind of like a vending machine and also kind

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of like one of those claw games that you see

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in arcades, except instead of being filled with garfield plush toys,

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it's filled with these columns of containers that are filled

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:07.479
<v Speaker 1>with leafy greens or other veggies and stuff like salad

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>dressings and croutons and cheese. The earlier incarnation of the

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>robot had a touch screen ordering interface, so you'd walk

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>up to the device and you could pick from a

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>selection of salads or you could, you know, customize your

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>own and choose which elements would go into your mix,

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and you'd make your choices. Then the robot would spin

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a carousel of containers, each filled with stuff like spinach

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>or kale or carrots or whatever, and it would dispense

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the stuff into a bowl and it would measure it

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>by weight, so you get a consistent salad from serving

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to serving, and you just put the bowl into a

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>little outlet for the robot and it would shoot the

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>salad into your bowl. With the pandemic, robots like Sally

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>clearly had an advantage over other options like salad bars

0:33:56.160 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>or people prepping salads for you, and chalbotics also introduced

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>an interface that would work with an app so that

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you could actually order your salad with your phone instead

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of having to touch the touch screen on the robot,

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty clever. Now, how that company is going

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to fit into door dashes strategy isn't totally clear yet,

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>but I imagine it's going to be along the lines

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of door Dash offering up its own products to consumers

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in addition to those found in local restaurants. So when

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you open up door Dash, you might order a salad

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>from door Dashes army of merciless killer salad robots for

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a slightly lower price than you would spend if you

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>were to get it from kill Me maybe or whatever,

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, some salad place. I got some more bad

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:52.439
<v Speaker 1>news for Google Stadia owners, which includes myself. I mean,

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, there's a general feeling that this service

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.720
<v Speaker 1>might not be around for much longer. Google already killed

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>off it's internal Stadia development division, the people who were

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:08.359
<v Speaker 1>working on, uh, the exclusive games for Google Stadia. Now,

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know, no one actually working on

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 1>the division has been you know, targeted for early retirement

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>or anything. But now we hear that the developer for

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the indie game Terra Area has decided that his company

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to cancel all plans to port that game

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>over to Google Stadia and wherefore should it be thus well.

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Ours Technica reports that this move was in response to

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>YouTube banning Andrew Spinx's channel, and Spinx is the lead

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>developer for Terrarium, and YouTube banned the Relogic Game Developer

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>channel for a terms of service violation. But it gets worse.

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 1>The Terra Area Twitter account elaborate that first their YouTube

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 1>channel was banned despite the fact that no one had

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>actually added anything to that channel for several months, so

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing new there to be objectionable, and the

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>email message that they received said that there was some

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:12.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of undefined terms of service violation, and the email

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>itself even said that it was probably an error on

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>Google's part and that they should not get any strikes

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.879
<v Speaker 1>against the channel because of that. But then, just three

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>days later quote the entire Google account, YouTube, Gmail, all

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Google apps, even every purchase made over fifteen years on

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the Google Play Store was disabled with no warning or recourse.

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>This account links into many business functions and as such

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the impact to us is quite substantial. End Quote yikes

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Spins took Twitter to air his grievances and formally canceled

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the port of Terraria for Google Stadium, which, honestly, given

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the extent of the issues with having a total ban

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on all Google services, I wouldn't call that an extreme reaction.

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the downsides to Google's approach to

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>having a single sign in account system for all Google services,

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>because a single band can potentially affect everything else, which,

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>as ours technic up points out, creates a disproportionate kind

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of punishment. And when you're being punished for something that

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is likely not your fault, it's just an accident, that's

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>extra harsh. In happier news, at least for TikTok fans,

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the app has secured a music license for Universal Music

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Group's entire catalog of music from around the world and

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for those who have never used TikTok except maybe to

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>sing along to see shanties, which is how I use it.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>A very popular use of the app is creating lip

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>SYNCD videos to various clips of audio, which frequently includes music,

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and those licenses are important because it grants users permission

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to make videos of themselves, you know, dancing or lip

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>syncing or singing along with copyrighted music without fear of

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:06.240
<v Speaker 1>having their videos flagged or their accounts banned for unauthorized

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>use of copyrighted material, or at least that's how it's

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 1>supposed to work. In the first six months of twenty

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>TikTok received more than ten thousand, six hundred copyright takedown requests,

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and earlier in Universal was one of the music publishing

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>companies threatening to sue TikTok for copyright infringement, arguing that

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the company lacked the proper licenses to allow its users

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to create the kinds of videos that they were making.

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 1>The music companies argued that without the agreements in place,

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the artists who create the songs that fans love don't

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.280
<v Speaker 1>get paid for the use of their music, and yeah,

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that is a raw deal. But I do want to

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>point out that when it comes to altruistic philosophies, music

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>publishing companies rarely rank really high on my list of

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 1>candidates for most thoughtful of the year. Anyway, it looks

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>like Universal and TikTok negotiated to a common ground, which

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>probably means TikTok is shelling out big oh buckos the

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Universal in order to make the music available to TikTok creators.

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>TikTok has reached similar agreements with Sony Music and Warner

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Music Group, as well as lots of independent labels. Now

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>does this mean you can upload a video to TikTok

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and use the music from TikTok's database without ever worrying

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 1>about a takedown? Notice? Maybe it sometimes happens anyway, which

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 1>has to be frustrating to creators. Meanwhile, old timers like

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>yours truly say stuff like where reminds me are the

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>old days of YouTube? Shutter down? Let me tell you

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about them? So no one ever settles down and everyone

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>leaves me. Finally, entrepreneur Mark Cuban is co founding a

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>new podcast platform called Fireside. Apparently, the idea behind this

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:53.439
<v Speaker 1>venture is to create a platform in which creators can

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>record and or broadcast conversations, monetize them, and use analytics

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>tools to see how different content performs on the platform.

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be a curated platform as well, so

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not like an open mic night at the local

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>CD comedy club. I think the sales pitch here is

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that it takes a lot of stuff for probe podcasters

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to do their jobs. And it takes all those duties

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and aggregates it into a cohesive service. So rather than

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:29.879
<v Speaker 1>a podcaster having to do marketing, analysis and sales all

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on their own, you know, landing sponsors for their shows

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of thing, this platform would handle that

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff for them, at least to some degree. Now I

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much control the creators on the platform

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to have, So for example, with my show,

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I typically get to have a say with regard to

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>which sponsors are allowed to advertise on tech stuff, and

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>I generally avoid sponsors that I don't feel are a

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>good fit for the show are or maybe they're in

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the type of business that I'm not a fan of.

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So for example, if an ad for any alternative medicine

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:07.760
<v Speaker 1>company plays on my show, you can be pretty certain

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that I did not get the chance to shoot that

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>one down, because I would never have something like that

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>run during one of my episodes. But I don't know

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>if people working on Fireside are going to be given

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that level of authority to make those kind of decisions.

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And just to be clear, they're actually already is a

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>company called Fireside that is in the podcast business. It's

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a company that hosts podcasts and provides analytics for those podcasts,

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 1>which frankly surprises me that no one over on the

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>New Fireside project thought to check out that you know,

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the name was available, because I mean, it's one thing

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 1>to take a company name that's already in use. It's

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>another thing to take a name that's already in use

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in the exact same industry that you are getting into.

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>That's just bad form. According to the Verge, Fireside that is,

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the New One has already reached out to some established

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>podcasters to talk about being part of the founding group

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of creators on the platform. I am not one of them.

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I'm hurt, but I'm not not saying

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it either. And that wraps up this episode of tech

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Stuff News. I know I got a little loopie there,

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 1>but it is ten fifteen PM as I record this,

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So my day has been a long one. Give me

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>some slack, but don't put me on slack. I just

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't do another project management tool right now.

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I just can't. All right, guys, if you have any

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff, whether it's a

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 1>topic about a company, a technology, a person in tech,

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a trend in tech. Maybe you just want to know

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 1>how something works let me know. The best way to

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:54.839
<v Speaker 1>reach out is over on Twitter. The handle I use

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>for the show is text stuff H s W and

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon Y. Text Stuff

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:09.399
<v Speaker 1>is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:15.280
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.