WEBVTT - Artisan’s Samra Likens Value to Two-for-One Deal

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Inside Active, a podcast about active managers that

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond sound bites and headlines and looks deeper into

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 1>their processes, challenges and philosophies and security selection. I'm David cone, I,

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>lead mutual fund and active research at Bloomberg Intelligence. Today

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>my co host is Laurent Dulier, senior equity strategist at

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Laurent, thank you for joining me today.

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for inviting me.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>So you published last week your stock six hundred earnings outlook.

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>What can we expect for the rest of twenty twenty

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>five based on what you're seeing?

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I would say overall it's not that great

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>because the earning groups of the index has now for

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>them to lose single digit for twenty twenty five. At

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of the year it was around seven percent.

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 2>And two main reason for this downgrade in growth expectations

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 2>are further than certainty on US tariffs given that the

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>initial rate and on the by tramp at twenty percent

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 2>was much higher than initially expected. And also we have

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 2>seen significant cuts to the forecast of some of the

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>commodity related sectors in Europe, black energy and also the

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 2>mining industry, despite the announcement of the five hundred billion

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 2>euros fiscal stimulus in Germany and also all the rumors

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 2>about the ramp up in defense spending. I think it

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 2>will take some time for all the shovels to be

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>put into place and to really have an impact on

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.199
<v Speaker 2>the earnings level. So I think that is more twenty

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty six rather than twenty twenty five stories what the

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>impact of US stariff are likely to play in the

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 2>second half of the year. So one of the main

0:01:56.000 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 2>reasons why we have much lower growth expectations. Whoever investors

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 2>are looking through I would say is a short term

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 2>earnings weakness and now are really focusing on the recovery

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 2>potentially in twenty twenty six, and that's the main reason

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>why the shop I saw now back to where they

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 2>were before the announcement of Liberation Day.

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we'll be interesting to watch. I think we should

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>hear from our guest on the topic. I'd like to

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>welcome David Sama, founding partner of the Artists and Partner's

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>International Value Team. Thank you for joining us, David Well.

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me. David and Laurent so.

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you're looking at European companies. What are you

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.119
<v Speaker 1>seeing in terms of earnings for the year.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, there are only two large liquidity pools outside the

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 4>United States, both Europe and Japan, and so of course

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 4>our portfolio is heavily invested in Europe. And I think

0:02:53.600 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 4>what Laurent referred to in terms of earnings growth the

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 4>year backstopped by the stimulus spending by the German government.

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 4>So the headline number was about five hundred billion dollars,

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 4>which is about ten percent of Germany's GDP. But I

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 4>think you've got to think about that in slightly broader

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 4>terms because you're also seeing other European countries stepping up

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 4>with a little bit of stimulus spending. You saw Canada

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 4>come out with some numbers also that will support some

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 4>GDP growth, albeit a lot of that spending in less

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 4>productive parts of the economy, but it is supportive. But

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of the growth, you know, interestingly enough,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 4>is coming from widening spreads at European banks, which has

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 4>little to do with what's going on with deficit spending

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 4>and a lot to do with what's driving the underlying

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 4>equity markets in Europe so far this year. With respect

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 4>to the tariffs. It's it's really sort of interesting as

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 4>you go through the earnings results announced during the first quarter,

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 4>which is sorry post the first quarter, which was in

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 4>the middle of the Liberation Day announcements, what you saw

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 4>from most companies was an itemization of the impact that

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 4>tariffs would have on their twenty twenty five earnings. So

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 4>it's already embedded in whatever estimates the broker dealers or

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 4>the cell side are putting out there as consensus. What

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 4>is not fully baked into the earnings are whatever teriff

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 4>rates are eventually settled between the European Union and other

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 4>parts of the world. The other thing that's not baked

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 4>in there are what are the economic consequences of those tariffs,

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 4>because that's much less of a linear outcome, so it's

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 4>harder to get analysts to bake that into the earnings estimates.

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 4>And I also say that there is a fair amount

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 4>of speculation on the parts of corporates and temporary tactics

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 4>that have been deployed on the part of corporates to

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 4>diminish the impact of the tariffs in twenty twenty five,

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 4>the most common one being the acceleration of purchases of

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 4>certain raw materials or inventories or shipping inventory into the

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 4>United States ahead of the tariffs, and of course you

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 4>know in twenty twenty six, you know that will anniversary

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 4>and will have an impact that none of the companies

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 4>have yet to quantify.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 3>And is less likely to be embedded in earning.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think just in terms of, you know, what

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 4>is built into consensus From what we can see, it's

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 4>still unfinished business.

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Is there a process that you go in terms of,

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you find ideas or you know, for instance,

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us how an analyst's idea could make

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>its way into the portfolio?

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, we have so it's very important I think for

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 4>any successful long term active investor to have a certain discipline,

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 4>as implied by the name of our strategy, the Artists

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 4>and International Value Strategy. We are value investors and as

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 4>a result, the price that we pay is a very

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 4>large determinant of our investment outcomes.

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 3>So we look to.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 4>To find businesses out in the marketplace that are trading

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 4>at a significant discount to what our research is telling

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 4>us that a business is worth. Those are the fundamental

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 4>concepts behind value investing. You know, it's I love two

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 4>for one deals. Value investing is sort of a two

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.559
<v Speaker 4>for one deal because, on one hand, if you're able

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 4>to find an asset worth a dollar and you're paying

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 4>sixty cents for that asset, you get excess return, especially

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 4>if it's a decent business that grows that dollar slowly

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 4>but surely over time. You capture that underlying growth, and

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 4>you capture the unwind of the discount from sixty cents

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 4>all the way up to a dollar. Now, the second

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 4>part of the two for one deal is, let's say

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 4>you make a mistake, or the rules change, the government

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 4>does something like put a stimulus package, or does the opposite,

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 4>and the value of the business ends up being eighty

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 4>cents instead of a dollar. Because you've paid sixty cents,

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 4>you've built an emergin of safety, and you've avoided a

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 4>permanent loss of capital. So value investing, the fundamentals of

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 4>value investing allow you to effectively have that too for

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 4>one deal. Now we take it a step further. We

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 4>take a more thoughtful approach in terms of the types

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 4>of businesses that we want to be involved in. So

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 4>not only do we want to find a business where

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 4>there's a big spread between where it's trading and what

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 4>our research is telling us it's worth.

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 3>But we also want.

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 4>To have good businesses, that business where that dollar is

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 4>growing over time. That's because usually in order to get

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 4>a good deal out in the stock market during let's

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 4>say normal time periods like today, something has to be

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 4>wrong with the business. People don't give away a share

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 4>price at a cheap price when there's nothing wrong with

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 4>the business. When there's something wrong, the stock market generally.

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't like it.

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 4>People don't like bad news, people shy away from it,

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 4>would prefer to be involved with companies that have good

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 4>news and maybe with share price momentum. As a result,

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 4>it takes time usually before the market is able to

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 4>recognize the fact that the security is significantly undervalued, and

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 4>during that time period, you want the underlying value of

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 4>the business to be growing that way. When you finally

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 4>get that revaluation, inflation which as we all know is

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 4>ever present, doesn't erode your purchasing power. So we not

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 4>only focus on securities that are undervalued, but we focus

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 4>on securities that are undervalued that are attached to very

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 4>good businesses. Now stopped there. We are very particular and

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 4>that we're also looking for companies with strong balance sheets.

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:09.719
<v Speaker 3>So why do we do that.

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, most of the market is focused on companies

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 4>that have an appropriate amount of leverage. We don't think

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 4>there is an appropriate amount of leverage. We actually prefer

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 4>no leverage and companies with very very strong balance sheets.

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 4>That way, if something goes wrong or we have some

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 4>bad luck, or if the company needs to repair a problem,

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 4>that they have the resources available to them to be

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 4>able to fix that problem, invest back in the business,

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 4>create competitive advantages, and grow over the long term. And

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 4>the fourth thing that we look for is a management

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 4>team that has a track record and history of building

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 4>per share per share shareholder value over time. And if

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 4>you think about the combination of an intelligent manager with

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 4>a strong balance sheet that knows how to effectively allocate capital,

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 4>what that can do, if executed well, is actually accelerate value.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, instead of you know, buying company at a

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 4>dollar and it's growing at five percent per year. So

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 4>in normal time periods you go from a dollar to

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 4>a dollar five of underlying value. If you take excess

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 4>capital and you invested, you could accelerate that value creation

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 4>to a dollar ten or a dollar fifteen. And that

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 4>is a very powerful driver of return. So if you

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 4>think about what we're trying to do is we're trying

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 4>to stack the odds in our favor. Right, we want

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 4>an undervalued security, a very good business in the hands

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 4>of a great management team with a strong balance sheet

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 4>to try to maximize the potential for us to.

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Have a very successful investment. And our process is one

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 3>where we focus on.

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Companies that have that characteristic, those characteristics in combination, and

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 4>then take our time to do intensive first hand research.

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 4>So we don't use any sell side research. We don't

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 4>use any databases we build. You know, we're sort of

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 4>like pre ai dinosaurs. We build all of our own

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 4>financial models. We use firsthand data because we need to

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 4>exercise judgment on the underlying economics of this business. We

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 4>can't outsource our judgment to an algorithm or of course

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 4>we use these tools for data gathering. But once we

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 4>get that data, we analyze it firsthand. We talk to

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 4>management teams, we talk to competitors, we talk to customers,

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 4>we talk to former employees, we talk to anybody who

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 4>will help us understand the long term underlying economics of

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 4>that business. And we use all of that information along

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 4>with the data that we gather to create an estimate

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 4>of intrinsic value, and then we look to purchase shares

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 4>only in the case where there is a meaningful discount

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 4>to intrinsic value, and that's our process. We have a

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 4>group of seven very experienced securities analysts on our team.

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 4>We are all generalists with regional responsibilities, and we're all investors.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 4>We don't really have analysts here. We have investors who

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 4>can allocate capital across multiple industries, across different geographic locations,

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 4>in both develop markets and in emerging markets. So I

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 4>think David and Laurent that gives you a pretty good

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 4>sense for the way that we think about the world

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 4>and how we approach finding securities.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>We talk a little bit about the intrinsic value. You know,

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned you have a bunch of different information that's

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of going into that. Are there metrics that you

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>use as well or is it kind of you've got

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like a proprietary system to determine its intrinsic value.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, I don't think there's any magic to

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, the value of a business is the present

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 4>value of its future cash flows, and you learn that

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 4>in your first finance class. And we haven't really varied

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 4>from using a very simplified diskind of cash flow model

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 4>to perform our let's say, formal valuation of the business.

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Most of the stuff you could.

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Do on the back of a napkin, you know, and

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 4>when you know, when we think about metrics, there's shorthand

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 4>that comes from the analytical process.

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, pe ratio is ev to e bit pre.

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Cash flow multiples, all of those are sort of shorthand

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 4>methods to evaluate the attractiveness of a company. And of

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 4>course everything is relative, right, So if you think about

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 4>the quality of let's say LVMH, which is a large

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 4>luxury goods company, the quality of that business relative to

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 4>let's say BASF, which is a large German chemical conglomerate.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Of course, those are two different businesses, one with significant

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 4>brand value that results in very high levels of profitability,

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 4>and the other one that operates and commoditize, you know,

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 4>businesses that are tough competitively and they operate with unionized labor,

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 4>which is a much more difficult, capital intensive, lower return business.

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 3>They're not worth the same thing.

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 4>If they were both at eight times earnings, of course

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 4>you'd far prefer to own LVMH. Then you would prefer

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 4>to own BASF. And you know, I don't use those

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 4>two companies to pick on them, but I use them

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 4>to point out that, uh, you know, we we can

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 4>look at shorthand metrics, David, to help us put shorthand

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 4>valuations on companies. But everything has to be taken into

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 4>context based on the type of business that you're looking.

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 2>At, David. I mean in terms of marketing efficiencies, I mean,

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 2>based on your long experience. Where do you think the

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 2>market or the saleside get it wrong. Is it more

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 2>in understanding the underlying value or the interesting value of

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the business, or is it more in how it should

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 2>be valued? How your experience I mean, is making you

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 2>look for more opportunities in one way or the other.

0:16:55.480 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would say, broadly speaking, the non US market

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 4>or less efficient than the US market. So first, there's

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot less liquidity outside the United States than there

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 4>is in the United States. So that's one. Two, you

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 4>have the complexity associated with you know, various currencies that

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 4>you're dealing with. Three, you have complexity with respect to cultures.

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, what does it mean to be invested in

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 4>a French company versus an Indonesian company versus a Japanese company.

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 4>And then you have different corporate governance structures, right, different.

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Rules of the game.

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 4>What does it mean to be a shareholder of a

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 4>South Korean company versus a shareholder of a Swiss company?

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, what is the construct of a board of

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 4>directors in Japan versus the construct of a board of

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 4>directors in the United Kingdom. So then you have different

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 4>time zones, you have different languages, you don't really have

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 4>different There's a little bit of accounting differences that exists today,

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 4>but they're not.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Nearly as as big.

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 4>But they're they're out there, right, and and that level

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 4>of complexity makes it much more difficult for the average

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 4>investor to truly understand what they're getting themselves involved in.

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 3>So that's that's step one.

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Step two UH is with respect to the cell side.

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 4>The cell side, you know, they make their money on

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 4>the corporate clients, right, So their clients are the LVMH's

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 4>of this world, not the David Sammers of this world.

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 4>And uh, and they have over the years realized that

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 4>in terms of brokerage commissions, their their their bread is

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 4>buttered by fast moving hedge funds, and so they love

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 4>to have you know, short term movements based on earnings

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 4>estimates and things like that, and has nothing to do

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 4>with the long term in during intrinsic value of a business.

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 4>And so the cell side tends to be very short

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 4>term oriented, which is an advantage for somebody who's actually investing. Right,

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 4>So let's let's talk about investing to build wealth over time,

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 4>which is a very different concept than just owning a

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 4>security to take advantage of a trend. Now, what else

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.719
<v Speaker 4>is also driving in efficiency is the advent of ETFs.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 4>ETFs have become you know, have played into the gamification

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 4>of investing. It has sort of dumbed down investing and

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 4>provides things like exposure to financial advisors and broker dealers.

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 4>I think if you, you know, go over to your

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 4>friend's house and ask to see their statement from their advisor,

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 4>you know it's likely to have ten or fifteen ETFs

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 4>in there. And so what do they own, Well, they own,

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 4>they own products, they don't own businesses or investment investments.

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 4>And all of these inputs into the way that the

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 4>equity markets operate today, plus the added inefficiencies of investing

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 4>out the outside the United States, that's what creates opportunities

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 4>for long term investors, and David and Laurent let's use

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 4>you know today is a really good example, because it's

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 4>really interesting to see, you know, the European markets rallying

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 4>so significantly in the first part of this year. And

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 4>it is fantastic that you know, some of the banks

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 4>and the defense contractors and the utilities are likely to

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 4>have growing earnings on the back of what's happening. But

0:20:55.200 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 4>if you think about the relative quality of those businesses

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 4>compared to you know, other potential long term compounders, those

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 4>aren't fantastic businesses. You know, that's not like Google or Facebook.

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, you know, these.

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Long term fantastic compounders rising very rapidly because their earnings

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:18.959
<v Speaker 4>are growing and they have a very bright future.

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 3>These are pretty.

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 4>Ugly businesses that went from horribly undervalued to now still undervalued.

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 3>But they're not, you know, they're not long term compounders.

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the banking industry and in Europe is is

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 4>fragmented and it needs to consolidate. And you know, the

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 4>regulatory environment, though less hostile than it has been over.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 3>The last decade, is still reasonably unhelpful.

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 4>So you know, you're not and and what's being left

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 4>behind during this rally, are uh, you know, some of

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 4>the better businesses that are out there, which creates opportunity

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 4>for long term investors. So that gives you a sense,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Laurent in real time, you know how stock markets can be,

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, incredibly short term oriented and as a result,

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 4>inefficient in our view.

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to ask you about you know, you

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>were talking about, you know, the fundamental aspects and balance sheets,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and I guess, in your opinion, what is the best

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>indicator of a business's you know, what is their their quality?

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I should say, yeah, well so that's a good question.

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 4>In fact, I along dialogue with somebody yesterday about this.

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 4>You can see in the financial metrics, the historical financial

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 4>metrics of a business whether or not it has historically

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 4>been a high quality business, so it shows up in

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 4>return on capital employe. There are other things to look at,

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, if it's a financial would be an ROE

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 4>you have to You can look at operating profitability, you

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 4>can look at in the rate of growth, and so

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 4>you can see it generally speaking in the historical financials.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 4>But that is just the beginning of the analysis rather

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 4>than the end of the analysis. Of course, you have

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 4>to make because the value of the business is the

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 4>present value of the future cash flows, not the past

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 4>cash flows. It is imperative that you are able to

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 4>make some level of determination as to whether or not

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 4>the conditions that allowed for that fantastic level of profitability

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 4>and returns in the past will continue to exist in

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 4>the future.

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 3>And that's that's what we're here to do.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's what separates, at least today, the difference

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 4>between an algorithm and a human being is that, you know,

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 4>we have to take the information that's available to us

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 4>and make some judgments around that information. And that's what

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 4>fundamental research is for. We're looking at the competitive position

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 4>of the company, the quality of the management, the quality

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 4>of their products, who their customers are, whether or not

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 4>their customers will still have the capability and the desire

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 4>to buy their products. What are the raw material inputs,

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 4>what are the substitute products, what is the status of

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 4>their competitors' products and their competitors' strategy. And when you

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 4>bundle in all this analysis, you make some assessment as

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 4>to whether or not this business will still be able

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 4>to grow and create strong levels of profitability without having

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 4>to put so much capital in the business. Where the

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 4>returns of the business might decline over time, in which

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 4>case it's worth far less than you know it was

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 4>worth in the past when it did not have to

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 4>do that. And so it really is that that last step,

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 4>that fundamental analysis step, which we'd call last but certainly

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 4>not least, part of the process that helps us determine

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 4>whether or not this business is actually a quality business.

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 2>One question. I mean, sometimes some of your investment in

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the initial stage may turn out badly, I would say,

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how do you review I mean for them,

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean positions which are not going the way you

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 2>fought it could go. I mean, because of antc in

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 2>as cutting glasses early is one way to avoid disasters.

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 2>So how do you process the review of investment which

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 2>unfort can it be observed stage I'm not going in

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 2>the right direction.

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a very good question, and it's something that

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 4>we call reinvestment risk, and it's sort of the bane

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 4>of the value investor generally speaking. Is a value investor,

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 4>you're selling securities where the news is very good and

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 4>the share price is going up and everybody's happy and

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 4>people are jumping on the bandwagon, and you're getting involved

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 4>in securities where the news is very bad and people

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 4>are selling. Now, there are a couple components to your question, Laurent,

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 4>and so that you use the word disaster, and we

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 4>try to avoid disasters by some of those fundamental characteristics

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 4>that we spoke about. I mean, generally speaking, if you're

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 4>buying a pretty high quality business with a strong balance sheet,

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 4>very hard, not impossible, but very hard to have a

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 4>disaster associated with the business that looks statistically cheap, that

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 4>has a strong balance sheet and is fundamentally a pretty

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 4>good business. The other thing that to sort of internalize

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 4>about what value investors do is that we're very aware

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 4>of this reinvestment risk. So you make a certain level

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 4>of assumptions around what the trajectory of the business should

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 4>look like, and as long as the business is moving

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 4>in that direction, and we are able to separate the

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 4>facts and circumstances that are dictating how the underlying value

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 4>of this business is moving over time from the noise

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 4>in the marketplace. Because you know, there's there's you work

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 4>at Bloomberg, there's a lot of reporters, and reporters like

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 4>to put out headlines and say lots of things, which

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 4>is fun, and but you have to be able to

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 4>separate yourself and look at what's on a sober realistic basis,

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 4>what's happening to the underlying value of the business, and

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 4>as long as that moving in the direction that's pretty

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 4>consistent with your underlying assumptions, there's no reason for.

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 3>You to change.

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, your expectations and value investors as a result,

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 4>are very good at averaging down. You know, it's it's

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 4>part of the process.

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 3>You're you're there early. The news is likely to continue.

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 4>To be bad if you've if you've baselined your expectations properly,

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 4>you understand the business deeply, You understand what the trajectory

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 4>of the business is likely to be, and the business

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 4>is following in that trajectory, and the share price continues

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 4>to go down. That creates an enormous opportunity and is

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 4>also an you know, part of that process. You know

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 4>that we talked about earlier in terms of the market

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 4>being inefficient. You know, if the underlying business is improving

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 4>and the share price is going down, that makes no sense, right,

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 4>But it is very very common when you're getting involved

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 4>with a company that's having some sort of issue, where

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 4>there are headlines being created where the share price is

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 4>going down, yet you know the changes that the management

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 4>team are making are all very positive in the companies

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 4>headed in a much better direction.

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 2>In one of your earlier questions answer, you mentioned about

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 2>understanding the culture of the country you invest in, the

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 2>different style of corporate governance. So I think for me,

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Japan or Japanese equities is a good business case of

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 2>there is so much open the market that changes, structural

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 2>changes happening in this market with a return of inflation,

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 2>apparently corporate changes in corporate governance making the market much

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 2>more shareholder friendly. I mean, what is your view? I mean,

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 2>do you think this is for real and it offers

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 2>really good investment opportunities for value investors, or do you

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 2>think that given the readies that we saw in Japanese

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 2>equities over the past two and three years, in fact

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 2>most of it is already priced in. So what is

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 2>your view on this market?

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Japan's an interesting place.

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 4>I've been investing there for thirty years, and for most

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 4>of that time period.

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 3>The country offered extraordinary valuations.

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, net nets companies trading blow cash value, and

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 4>some of that still exists, although as you said, there

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 4>have been at least in yen terms, right, and I

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.959
<v Speaker 4>have to think of dollars. My shareholders are American and

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:00.040
<v Speaker 4>I have to make money in dollars and so and

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 4>yen terms. There has been a significant rally in Japanese equities,

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 4>but in US dollars it hasn't been nearly as as

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 4>positive as market commentators make it make it seem to be.

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, I can't, I can't offer my clients returns

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 4>in Turkish lera. You know, it just doesn't, It doesn't work.

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 4>But Japan has been a fascinating place to invest in

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 4>over the years. There was a Prime Minister came into

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 4>office five or six years ago named Shinzo Abe who

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 4>made a number of positive changes to Japan. There was

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 4>some legislation pass that started to improve corporate governance. He

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 4>changed the dialogue around where shareholders sit in the pecking

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 4>order of priorities for companies. So traditionally the shareholder was last,

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 4>it was, it was society, it was customers, it was employees,

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:08.959
<v Speaker 4>and then shareholders in the pecking order, and and the

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 4>way that that displayed itself practically speaking, David and Laurent

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 4>was in the boardroom and with respect to the shareholding structure,

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 4>of the companies. So the board of directors was traditionally

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 4>all employees, and the chairmen and the CEO were the

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 4>same person, and all the rest of the board members,

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 4>as I indicated, were employees will all owed their job

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 4>to the chairman and the CEO. So if the company

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 4>wasn't operating as effectively as it could be, it was

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 4>basically a waiting game for the chairman or the CEO

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 4>to retire, and then you had to hope that the

0:32:55.320 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 4>next person in line, you know, was better. Now why

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 4>would the outside shareholders, who presumably have a vote.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:06.239
<v Speaker 3>Put up with this?

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, first of all, there was a culture for domestic shareholders,

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 4>domestic Japanese shareholders of cohesion and if this is the

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 4>way the company wanted to operate, then we as shareholders

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 4>are aligned with what they want to do. And in

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 4>addition to that, you had cross shareholding. So there was

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 4>a structure, a historical structure that was put in place

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 4>after World War two called a CORRETSU structure where there

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 4>were groups of businesses that are all held together by

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 4>a parent treating company and a parent bank, and they

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 4>all had cross shareholdings with one another, and so a

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 4>large part of the voting block was within the group

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 4>that also protected the board and foreign shareholders. The result

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 4>had you know who who were the most likely cohort

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 4>to complain about poor returns or a very small force

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 4>in this equation and sully but surely and accelerated based

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 4>on the reforms that shinzo Abe had put in place,

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 4>these structures are starting to unwind, so you see some

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 4>of the very large companies now will have a majority

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 4>of their board will be independent directors. Even many of

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 4>the smaller companies will have a couple of independent directors

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 4>on the board. The vast majority of the board still

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 4>are employees. You've also seen reforms at the stock exchange,

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 4>which is not normally the part of the market where

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 4>you're expecting reforms, where you know the exchange has put

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 4>out certain return hurdles and valuation hurdles, where you know

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 4>you can be on the first section of the Tokyo

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 4>Stock Exchange if you meet certain price of book and

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 4>return on equity hurdles, and if you don't, you're off.

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 4>And you know that of course has liquidity and valuation implications.

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 4>And then that you know the third thing is you

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 4>know the willingness on the part of companies to create

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 4>incentive compensation that's equity based, and typically there have been bonuses,

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 4>but people have been paid seventy or eighty percent on

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 4>fixed in fixed salaries and very small bonuses that were

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 4>largely paid every year, you know, because there's nobody on

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:37.399
<v Speaker 4>the board that's not going to pay the president and CEO. Right,

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 4>So you know, all of these changes are happening. It's

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 4>created excitement, some justified, some not. And it's also one

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 4>of the other changes that Abe has allowed for is consolidation,

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 4>is so there's more private equity, there's more consolidation. I

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 4>think that there's one final step that he was unable

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 4>to finally execute on, which is labor reform. The ability

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 4>and the cultural willingness to actually reduce employees.

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 3>You know they have.

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:19.359
<v Speaker 4>The Japanese system was one around loyalty.

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Where you you know you and there's a lot to

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 3>be said for this.

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 4>It's it's nice you take a job somewhere and you

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 4>work there for the rest of your life and you're

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 4>devoted to that company. It creates a very loyal family

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 4>like environment at working at a company, and.

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, the longer you were there, the more.

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:43.959
<v Speaker 4>Responsibility that you got no matter if you were good

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:50.280
<v Speaker 4>or bad at it. So it definitely had its downside.

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:51.280
<v Speaker 3>And the downsides are worse than the upside.

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 4>I mean, companies were horribly inefficient, overmanned and it's still

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 4>to this day that's the case. And in order to

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 4>generate very good returns and the way that we as

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Americans think about, you know, we want companies that have twelve, thirteen, fourteen,

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 4>fifteen percent return on equity. You know that's rare in

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 4>Japan to get those sort of returns. And if you

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 4>sort of internalize, and I'm going to sort of bring

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 4>it back to our strategy, if you internalize, you know

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 4>what our strategy is, which is to own very good businesses.

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 4>You can imagine that over the course of many years,

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 4>it's been a difficult market for us, even as value investors,

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 4>to find a preponderance of businesses that we find to

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 4>be very attractive. Over the last few years, it's been

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 4>virtually impossible.

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 3>We've only owned a.

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Couple of companies because of the end based appreciation of

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 4>securities in that market. But this year it's actually been

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 4>much better with that market again in yen terms coming

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:02.879
<v Speaker 4>off and we're starting to see some larger better businesses

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 4>starting to trade at valuations that we're finding more attractive,

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 4>so we can be a little bit more productive there.

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 4>But I think that sort of embeds you know, what's

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 4>happened in Japan, and now that's spilling over into Korea.

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 4>You've seen that we've had a new election recently and

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 4>the interestingly, the the you know what we would call

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 4>in the United States a democratic party or the more

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 4>liberal leaning party is coming into power and as part

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 4>of what they're doing is they're implementing reforms that in

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 4>the end will create better returns for investors over time

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 4>in a similar manner to Korea has different issues than

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:55.399
<v Speaker 4>Japan had, but it's sort of a very similar path

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 4>to what Japan did to try and get companies to

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 4>improve their returns.

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I mean another market which I think is also

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:09.399
<v Speaker 2>quite interesting as an international investor is China because there

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 2>was about a year ago the question is China equities

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 2>in uninvestable or not? I mean, the market is still cheap.

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean what is your view on that? I mean,

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 2>do you think it is a market that you are

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 2>avoiding at all costs because of lack of transparency or

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the geopolitical risk or do you think, in fact, it

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 2>may offer some good value investments.

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that market is unquestionably the cheapest market in

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 4>the world. I think the Chinese economy under different leadership

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 4>definitely has the ability to be the dominant economy in

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 4>the world. Unfortunately, this leadership has imposed a government control

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 4>structure that will impede their ability.

0:39:59.239 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 3>To get there.

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 4>However, you have the cheapest valuations and some of the

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 4>best businesses in the world in China. Now, if laurent

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 4>I was sitting where you're sitting, as a European, I

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 4>would have no problem having fifteen or twenty percent of

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 4>my portfolio invested in Chinese securities. But given that my

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 4>clients are American, we have a geopolitical rivalry that could

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:35.720
<v Speaker 4>at any moment be subject to an executive order barring

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 4>us from owning Chinese securities.

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 3>And you know, that's.

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 4>That's a risk that is hard to handicap and one

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 4>that puts us in a position of severely limiting our

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 4>exposure to Chinese securities. And I you know, because America

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:57.720
<v Speaker 4>is the largest source of capital invested in almost every

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 4>stock market outside the United States, I think that's part

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 4>of the reason why valuations there are far lower than

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 4>they than they are in other parts of the world.

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 4>It's it's an opportunity for people who live and who

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 4>live and are domiciled and invest from outside the United States.

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, interesting, My last question will be on European iniquities.

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you did mention about many of those businesses

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 2>not being high quality, but they are a nice run

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 2>over the past two to three years. So what is

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 2>your latest view, I mean, what are the sectors or

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 2>industries that potentially you think are still good to invest

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:42.760
<v Speaker 2>in Europe?

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you know, we we as value investors, we generally find,

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, markets to be very attractive to us when

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 4>there's some sort of pain that's going on.

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 3>And today it seems like.

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Equity markets have chosen to focus on two things. One

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 4>is the dramatic potential of AI, which is fantastic. And

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:17.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, we we spend a lot of time trying

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 4>to understand what's happening and what the impact could be

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 4>to the many businesses we own about forty businesses, the

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 4>many businesses that we own, in addition to other companies

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 4>that we don't own. The market has has preferred to

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 4>focus there, and the market has preferred to focus on,

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 4>especially in Europe, the short term implications of lower interest rates,

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 4>higher spreads, and the stimulus that's mainly coming.

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Out of Germany, and so markets are pretty buoyant.

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 4>And as a result, you know, we don't find any

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 4>particular country, we don't think by country anyway, but any

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 4>particular industry to offer seriously attractive outcomes. The opportunity set

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 4>in markets that aren't in distress generally comes from, you know,

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 4>companies that are having their.

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:26.439
<v Speaker 3>Own particular issues. Right.

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 4>So in our last shareholder letter we outlined the purchase

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 4>of two securities. So one is an Irish company called Icon,

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 4>which is in the contract research business, and you know,

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:46.839
<v Speaker 4>it's having its own particular issues based on problems with

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 4>its customers and customers spending less, and that's creating an

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 4>opportunity to buy what is a fantastic business at a

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 4>very attractive multiple company with a strong balance sheet and

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 4>a experienced and value creating management team, and they're actively

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 4>buying back their own shares. And it really the opportunity

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 4>set for value investors like us in an environment like

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 4>this comes from particular companies rather than any broad swath

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 4>of the market, geography, or industry that is offering a

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:28.799
<v Speaker 4>big opportunity set aside from the China, you know, opportunity

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 4>set that I mentioned earlier, which we effectively can't take

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 4>advantage of.

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is great. I really appreciate you coming on, David.

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 3>It was nice to be here. David and Laurent. It

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:43.600
<v Speaker 3>was a fun conversation.

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, and Laurent, thank you for being

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 1>my co host.

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh welcome.

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe if

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to, if you're interested in our research, don't

0:44:57.960 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>forget to go on the terminal either b I Fund

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>or b I Stocks until our next episode. And this

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is David Cone with Inside Out.

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm