WEBVTT - Free Picks for EVERY Week 18 NFL Game (Ep. 420)

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in, everybody to betting pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It's me Joey p Joe Pi Zapia and

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.479
<v Speaker 1>it's week eighteen, and you know what that means. It's

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>time to look ahead at the final regular season week

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of the NFL. Can you believe it? We're here already,

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's some major playoff implications. Some teams are in,

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>some teams can get in, some teams need a lot

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of help, and some teams, well they can't be helped

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 1>at all. But this team is here to help you.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It's Sam Hoppin, It's Pat fitz Morris, and it's me

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to go through the sleigh talk about

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the early value on some of the lines in week

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>eighteen where we see these games going. And last week,

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Pat fitz Morris, it was another wild and wacky week

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, Arizona Cardinals getting the w against the Eagles.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>But luckily your packers have found themselves in a winning

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>get in scenario. But you, my friends, seem to be

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of little faithfull, he told me before the show.

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, yeah, I just have a little bit of

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 2>trepidation about that matchup against the Bears. Show just because

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>the Bears have been playing so well. And we'll talk

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 2>about it a little later. But like, the Packers are

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to truly earn their way into the playoffs.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 2>The Bears are not gonna lay down for them. So

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, if they win, they will have truly deserved it.

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, So Pat is hedging, but Sam is not.

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Sam is wrapping his Green Bay stuff right now. I

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can see it in the pox. You

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>might have to pull that up a little bit, but

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>there you go. There it is. The Green Bay Packers

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>sweater is on this morning. So Sam, uh, this is

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the unexpected, maybe the most unexpected potential playoff

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>appearance for the Packers. And what twenty five years for you?

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, but yeah, it's been a long time. I mean,

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what expectations I really had for the

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Packers going into the season. I mean, I think the

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 3>biggest thing was figuring out what Jordan Love is and

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I think we sort of have at least they're going

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 3>to keep them around for another season or two, it

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 3>seems like. But I'm excited about their potential to make

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs and and much more confident than my fellow.

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>She's had Pat's.

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Joe thirty five years, I think was

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 2>the last. Oh and actually I take that back. They

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>didn't make it. It was nineteen eighty nine with Don Makowski.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Imagine ten and six and they didn't make it in

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 2>that year.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Wow, you guys have had a good run. My

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Patriots had a good run too. But all good things

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>come to an end. At least they lost this past weekend.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So thank goodness for that. I thank goodness for all

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the coverage we have here. Don't forget if you were

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>having fun at Fantasy Pros and Betting Pros, subscribe to

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>our channels. But subscribe over a Betting Pros right now

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>because you will win a one year free premium upgrade

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>when you do. Just ring that bell for notifications, drop

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a comment below on any video and that's it. That's

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>all you gotta do. And it's not just NFL. We've

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>also got the NBA Action Fast Break bets Matt Mody

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>taking you through the NBA slate every single Wednesday, every

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>single Friday, eleven am Eastern live right here on the channel.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So don't miss that because that had NBA Betton's getting

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Hot woo wee. Good times. All right, let's start with

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>some good times, and all the games are on Sunday

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>because it's the last week of the season. Let's start

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with Pittsburgh and Baltimore. Baltimore asserted itself with dominant, so

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>any any concerns I had about the Mottimore raven have

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>been put to bed. So I apologize on half of

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>myself that I did not believe enough of the Ravens,

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and I had Miami on the money line because I

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>thought they were going to challenge them. They did not.

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>They did not. But here we are, so a lot

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of teams again a week eighteen, Sam, this is the

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>tough thing. You get teams that are sitting players. Seems that,

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can't do anything else. So when we're

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about this line right here, right now, you have

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore at four point underdogs, because the anticipation is they're

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to be, you know, putting anybody out there.

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>They're going to take some weeks off and maybe they'll

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>play half a game. We'll see thirty six and a

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>half is the number plus one sixty five. And Sam

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like this is the perfect example of a week eighteen

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>game already that is really difficult to gauge because of

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the variables and implications of teams that are in and

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>have things to play for, teams that are in have

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing to play for in teams that you know are

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>still fighting for their life. So what do you think

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about this line? This is a game you stay away

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>from because of the implications of it.

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Ravens already had the one seed in the

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 3>AFC line. I am wondering if they are going to

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 3>play some of the starters, given how twenty nineteen went

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago when they had the ones

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 3>he'd locked up going in the final week, they sat

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Lamar Jackson and some of their other starters and then

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 3>got the doors blown off them in the divisional round

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 3>against Tennessee. But I still think taking the double buy

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 3>for them is the optimal move. Mason Rudolph is going

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>to be starting again in this game for the Steelers.

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like can you pick it will be the backup,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 3>But I actually took the under thirty seven in this

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 3>game earlier this morning. Neither team is particularly fast paced.

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 3>The Ravens offense will obviously take a massive step back

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 3>without Lamar Jackson, and this Pittsburgh defense has still played

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 3>some decent games, the pass rush is still a force

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 3>to be reckoned with, and Pittsburgh has been on offense

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 3>a very run heavy team, especially over the last month.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 3>So I think all of this leads me to again

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 3>the under in this game and a divisional matchup with

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 3>one team really needing the win.

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Here, they need a win in some help, Pittsburgh needs

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a win and a Buffalo loss, a win and a

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville loss or tie, a win at Houston, Indye tie,

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh tie, Jacksonville loss Houston, Indy doesn't end at a tie,

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and then Jacksonville loss plus a Denver win plus a

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Houston Indianapolis not ending at a tie. So there's a

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of complicated things here, So Pat, let's make it simple.

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Your thoughts on this Pittsburgh Baltimore game.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I can't remember if it was like

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine percent or thirty two percent, right in that range.

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Basically a one third.

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Chance for the Steelers to get into the playoffs per

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 2>NFL dot Com. So yeah, no incentive for the Ravens.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 2>But Sam Rais is a really interesting point about their

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 2>last go round. Maybe John Harbaugh wants to take a

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 2>different approach after that and not totally lay down in

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Week eighteen. But they're probably gonna rest starters early if

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 2>nothing else, So I don't trust the Steelers to take

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 2>care of business in one of the most hostile road

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 2>venues for any team in the league. And I really

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>don't want to bet on the team that's probably gonna

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.679
<v Speaker 2>be resting players. But I do want to bet the under,

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 2>as Sam mentioned, and I got it at thirty seven

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 2>and a half. It feels like the totals should be

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 2>like thirty four and a half thirty five for this one,

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 2>so I think there is a lot of value on

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 2>the under.

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Next one, here is a pick of Indianapolis hosting Houston.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Both teams are nine and seven Indie minus one right

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.239
<v Speaker 1>now at home. Forty seven and a half is the number.

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Pat you can get minus one to five or Houston

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>on the money line. You get minus one fifteen on

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the money line for Indianapolis. Just scenario wise, to kind

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of run through this real quick, Houston can clinch AFC

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>South Division title with a win a Jacksonville loss or tie.

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>They can clinch a playoff berth with a win a

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville or loss Anna Pittsburgh loss or tie, and then

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Indy needs to win, and then he got a Jacksonville

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>loss or tie or a Indie win a Jacksonville loss,

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>so either one that is a good situation. So they

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>can even tie and still make the playoffs. So wacky

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff here, But look, these teams have gotten this far.

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>She's do coaches on a great job pat all year

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to get these two teams nine and seven, considering the

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>obstacles they've overcome. That being said, do you have a

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>lean here on one of the sides of this game?

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, I really don't show it.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I find it interesting though that this opened with the

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Colts favored by two and a half and was quickly

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>beat down. And isn't it interesting, gentlemen, how the Texans

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 2>have become such a public team this year, And like

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 2>we've seen that a lot, Like there was a while

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I was kind of consistently going against the Texans because

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think we were getting any sort of value

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 2>on them. Like I feel like they have become a

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 2>public team. Everyone loves CJ. Stroud, everyone loves Damiko Ryans,

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>everyone loves the Texans. So yeah, I mean, the Colts

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>beat the Texans back in Week two. I don't know

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 2>if there are many takeaways. I mean, Anthony Richardson was

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 2>still playing at the time, and the Indie jumped out

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 2>to a big lead, but they were actually outgained in

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 2>that game. I believe the Colts are just so hard

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>to figure out. I mean, they've won six of their

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 2>last eight games, but they lost by twenty to the

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Jake Browning led Bengals, and they lost to the Falcons

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>by nineteen, So like, you don't know when they're gonna

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 2>come out and lay an egg. I think the opening

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 2>line of Colts minus two and a half was probably

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 2>closer to what it should be than where the line

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 2>is sitting right now. But I'm just not sure I

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 2>want to bet the Colts this week. Yeah, I'm probably

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>just staying away.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm leading to the Colts on this one, Sam, just myself.

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>They're at home. You know, you're asking a new head

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>coach and a rookie QB to go on the road

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to win the game. And I'm not saying CJ. Straus

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not up for that task. I think he is. But

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, if you look back at that

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>game earlier this year, you know, no, the Houston Texas

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't allowed one hundred yard rusher all season. The guy

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>who came closest was actually Zach Moss with eighty eight,

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a credit to the offensive line. I think

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Indianapolis Colts and now they have Jonathan taylorrun

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the football coming off a good game. I think Taylor

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>is the key to this game. His health and I

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>think they put the ball in Jonathan Taylor's hands in

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this one. I think that's how they win. What do

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you think.

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that they'll be able to run the ball.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, like you said, Houston's rushing defense has been great.

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>There.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>They rank second in success rate allowed over the last

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 3>four seasons. Excuse me, over the last four weeks this season,

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 3>their rush defense is first and success rate and second

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 3>in rushing DVOA. So I think the way that Indy

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 3>is going to need to attack Houston is through the air.

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 3>But give me CJ. Stroud and the point or give

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 3>me give me the Texans on the money line. I mean,

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 3>he's he continues to play extremely well. They or the

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Texans could have had a better day this past week

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 3>against Tennessee if not for their offense. Sort of sputtering

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 3>out in the red zone a couple of times, which

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 3>again makes me optimistic that they'll be able to move

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 3>the ball, especially against this Colts defense that doesn't really

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 3>have anything particularly special about them. So I love the

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Texans in this spot. I think CJ. Stroud steps up

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 3>to the moment and delivers.

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>All Right, two teams I want nothing to do with

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints and the Atlanta Falcons. They're gonna be

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in New Orleans. The New Orleans Saints are three and

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites in this one forty one and

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a half is the number, and then plus one fifty

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>for the Atlanta Falcons, who have not played well on

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the road all year. Sam, this is another you know,

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of we'll evaluate Arthur Smith's situation. So I'm sure

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>theoretically the effort level here for Atlanta is going to

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>be high in terms of playoff implications. Obviously, you know,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit different for them, so they're trying

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to stay alive and see if they can somehow, you know,

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>figure it all out. But in your opinion here, the

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>way this line is set, I mean, it's a tough

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>sell for me to have any sort of faith in

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>either of these teams. New Orleans can clinch NFC South

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>with a win and a Tampa loss or tie if

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they tie or Tampa loses, and then also they can

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>win and clinch a playoff berth with a Seattle loss

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>or tie, a green Bay loss or tie or no tie,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Seattle loss and green Bay life. So again complicated. But

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for Atlanta, they gotta win and Tampa's gotta lose, and

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>then they're still alive in this thing. Your thoughts on

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>this contest.

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I agree it's tough to really want to rely on

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 3>either side here, which is why I'm on the under

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 3>for this game as well. I expect we get Desmond

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Ritter in this game. It sounds like they're going to

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 3>try to get Taylor Heinike ready to play for Atlanta,

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 3>but seems like it's not a given. Both defenses are

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 3>top six in early down success rates, so they're putting

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 3>teams behind the sticks early in the drive, and I

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 3>just think these offenses, especially if you're gonna make Atlanta

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 3>have to pass the ball, are not going to be

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 3>able to move it very well against the Saints defense,

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 3>which has had some good good games in the past,

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 3>obviously had a great game this past week against Tampa Bay.

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 3>So I like the under forty one and a half.

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, the under for you? Sam? What about you? Pat?

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about this one? Just stick with

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the under two and avoiding the sides. I think that's

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>probably a good practice.

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure I like the under, and in fact,

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually like a little inclined to bet the over.

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 2>The last time these two teams played, it was twenty

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 2>four to fifteen, so only thirty nine points. But yeah,

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>so last time they played twenty four to fifteen, but

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 2>we saw these teams go up and down the field.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 2>There were over eight hundred yards of offense in that game,

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 2>only two offensive touchdowns, both of them by Bijon Robinson.

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 2>It's mainly because the Saints kept petering out near the

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 2>goal line. They had to settle for five Blake Groupie

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 2>field goals. So, boy, I don't know, Like, I think

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 2>this number is just low enough where I think there's

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 2>a smidge of value on the over, But I'm not

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 2>interested in either side. Joe, you said it two really

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 2>unpredictable teams, and you know, I just I don't know.

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not betting Arthur Smith and I don't want to

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 2>lay three and a half with the Saints either.

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, Now, Jacksonville can clench a playoff birth with

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a tie or a Pittsburgh lost or tie. If Pittsburgh

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>loses and Denver loses and Houston Indianapolis doesn't end to

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the tie, Jacksonville's in now. Jacksonville can clinch the AFC

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>South if they just win. Just handle your business against

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee Titans. That's all you gotta do here. So

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee Titans are at home, Jacksonville's going on the road.

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee is five point underdogs at home. It's a Mike

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Rabel team. So my guess is they are going to

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>show up despite the five wins, and they are going

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to play hard and try and ruin someone's day. Forty

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is the number for this one plus one eighty on

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the money line for Tennessee, which is a little tempting

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to me. Pat, I don't know about you, because you

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>know nothing. I'm sure Mike Rabel would love more than

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to stick it to somebody on the way out. Do

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you think Tennessee has that ability to do that against Jacksonville,

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>or does Jacksonville go on the road and get a

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>w and get themselves in.

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Tennessee absolutely has the ability to play spoiler

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 2>here at Joe and I didn't take them on the

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>money line, but I've already bet them with the points.

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 2>And look, yeah, first of all, the Jaguars had lost

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 2>four straight games before shutting out the Panthers twenty six nothing,

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not ready to say that their ship has

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 2>been entirely righted just by virtue of shutting out the Panthers.

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 4>The other point I.

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 2>Want to make about this game, like, and this does

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 2>apply to some of the other Week eighteen games as well,

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 2>don't be so quick to dismiss the teams that have

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 2>been eliminated from the playoffs and seemingly have nothing to

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>play for. They want to go into the offseason on

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 2>an upbeat note, feeling good about themselves, and a win

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 2>gets a lot of the bad taste from a failed

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>season out of your mouth. So maybe the season didn't

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>go the way the Titans wanted to, But rather than

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 2>end the season with yet the taste of another loss,

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 2>they can spoil the Jaguars playoff hopes here and you know,

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>go out on a triumphant note. So Mike Vrabel seems

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 2>like a players coach. I think it's good players are

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>going to be up for this one. And yeah, I

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 2>think the Titans are a very good bat here say,

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, I.

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Think that's true of some teams and some coaches, But

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I think other teams and other coaches, you know, don't

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>have their teams prepared. And that's why they're teams that

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>are out and those guys are thinking about their playing reservations.

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>They're not thinking about trying to get hurt. In Week eighteen,

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the Titans feel a little bit more like what Pat's

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about, like a team is going to be prepared.

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>That being said, do you think that you want the

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee side of this game with the points because five

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty decent number.

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I do like Tennessee with the points here. The Jaguars

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 3>are just on a downward trajectory right now. They continue

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 3>to struggle on defense, their offenses losing pieces. They just

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 3>lost Jamal Agnew so they are down to Parker Washington

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 3>as their wide receiver too now. And this past week

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 3>was their first positive EPA day on offense since they

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 3>faced the Bengals in Week thirteen, and that obviously had

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 3>to come against a Panthers defense that has not played

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 3>well at all this season. So I really like Tennessee

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 3>with the points here, all right.

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>The next one here, the Detroit Lions are eleven to

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>five hosting the Minnesota Vikings at seven to seven. The

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Lions are five and a half point favorites, and the

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>consensus betting pros line forty six and a half is

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the number Minnesota on the upset plus two zero five. Now, look,

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Detroit doesn't have much to play. Four. They try their best,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but the referees they're not having it over the weekend

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and now they're probably they're not in a position where

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they've really changed too much in terms of their stars.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So they've won the division, They've locked that up. Do

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you think you see Dan Campbell pushes guys further or

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>give him a little bit of a breather here, Sam,

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>as this game goes on and looking forward to the

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimate success of the playoffs, Yeah.

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I really can't tell, because that at worst they're going

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 3>to be the number three seed in the conference. They

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 3>only get to the number two seed if they win,

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Aunt Dallas loses and Dallas plays in the late afternoon slot.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we know who's starting from Minnesota. I

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 3>expect it will be Nick Mullins. But this Detroit offense

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 3>has gotten back on track after a brief stint underperforming

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 3>they've had. They had three straight games without a success

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 3>rate over forty percent, and they've been above forty two

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 3>percent in each of the last three weeks. So if

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the Lions are going to play their starters the full game,

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 3>which I think is what Dan Campbell will want to do,

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 3>given that's the only way that they can move up

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 3>to the number two seat, then I really like Detroit

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 3>with the points here because Minnesota's defense has has shown

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 3>some holes over the last couple of weeks, and again

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 3>I expect that the Lions to continue to click on offense.

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it seems like the season's taking its toll. Every

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>bounce that went their way last year has gone the

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>opposite way, and all the injuries finally I think mounted

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>against Minnesota. I'm where Sam is. I'm on the signs

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Lions of this game. And you know, Dan

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Campbell is that kind of coach who wants to play

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>every second of every game and bind every kneecap. I

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>mean it feels about right, doesn't.

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 2>It that it does show, and I feel like he's

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna want to get momentum back after not winning that

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>game in Dallas, even though they should have won that

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 2>game in Dallas, and even though that was disappointing to

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 2>those of us who were greedy and took the Lions

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 2>on the money line rather than taking the points in

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 2>that game. Yeah, what a disappointing result that was. So yeah,

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I do feel like the Lions are going to play

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>it out. And I mean the Vikings are a hot

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>mess right now. Like, not only do they have this

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 2>quarterback situation where we don't know whether it's gonna be

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Nick Mullins, maybe the return of Josh Dobbs. I don't

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 2>think it's gonna be Jaron Hall again. But no matter

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 2>who they put in, it's like resulting in turnovers galore.

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 4>And the Vikings.

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Defense was a hot mess against the Packers. There were

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 2>guys running wide open, like no one within twenty yards

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 2>of them. So I think the Lions are going to

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 2>take care of business here.

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 2>The lack of motivation is maybe holding this number down

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit.

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 4>I like him. If I can get him at minus five.

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>This next game, I gotta be honest, boys, I want

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with. The Patriots are at home four

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>and twelve minus two and a half against the New

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>York Jets. The number for this game is thirty and

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a half plus one twenty for the Jets of the

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>money line. My temptation, Pat is to look for the

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Jets here because there's something profound about the circle of

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>life where Bill Belichick dominates the Jets his entire career

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and all these things and wins all these Super Bowls

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff, and then maybe the last game

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>he coaches could be a loss to the New York

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Jets in New England. I like the symmetry of that.

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a good story, but I don't know if I

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>can invest in it. At the end of the day,

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>look tough day at the office, probably for Breeze Hall,

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>because they're really good against the run. You take that away,

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>then you're making the Jets quarterbacks beat you, and I

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they're capable of that. I hate this game, Pat,

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm running away your thoughts.

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 4>I hate it too, Joe.

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 2>I initially thought I was going to betting the under

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 2>figure and we'd get a number at like thirty three

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 2>or thirty four.

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Nope, No, thirty.

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they set this bar really low, so I don't

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 2>even have any interest in betting that.

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm walking away like you.

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, So pat and I have left for the evening, Sam,

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>would you like to join us out at the bar.

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 3>No, give me the Patriots and Bill Belichick and potentially

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 3>his final game as the Patriots head coach. That is

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 3>my hard hitting analysis right there.

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>That makes me sad because the last thing I want

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to do is the Patriots fans win another game and

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>ruin any more draft position already that we've ruined, So

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that makes me even more angry. But let's move on.

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Carolina is gonna host the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Boy, Tampa

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 1>needs Carolina Panthers in the worst weight here. They had

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it right there for themselves last week. Now they've put

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>themselves in this scenario where they got to win this

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>week and keep that train going. Unfortunately, so they are

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>five and a half point favorites on the road, which

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. That feels about right to me. Thirty seven

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the number plus two hundred for

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina money line. Now, Carolina has nothing to play

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.719
<v Speaker 1>for here, Sam. They are misery. They are terrible. Do

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you think they can play spoiler here to Tampa Bay

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>or do you think Tampa just goes out there and

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>from a personnel perspective, just handles them. And considering you

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>know what we've seen sometimes from Mike Evans against Carolina,

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>this could be a lots of props on the overs

0:20:59.119 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>on Mike Evans.

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this one. I think there's a couple of ways

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 3>to attack this one. I think that the Bucks, I

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 3>think take care of business. But if Tampa Bay leans

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 3>too heavily into the run, then I think Carolina has

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 3>a chance to cover. Because Rashad White has been one

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 3>of the worst rushers in the league this year. He's

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 3>near the bottom and rushing yards over expectation. The Carolina

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 3>rushing defense has actually been pretty solid in their pass

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 3>defense is what teams are having success doing. So with

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Baker banged up a little bit, it sounds like he's

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 3>going to play, but and he has been playing really well.

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 3>I do think that, you know, two drives into the game,

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 3>if Tampa Bay is leaning on the run, I think

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 3>there's a potential live betting opportunity with the carol with

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Carolina and the points. But I don't see a way

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 3>that I want to attack it early on, before the

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 3>game starts.

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense to me here. I mean I don't

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have faith in Carolina to cover any number or really necessarily,

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>but Tampa, I just think is the better personnel. This is,

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a win in your in situation.

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Tampa handles their business. What do you think here, Pat.

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 4>I think they probably handle their business, Joe.

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>But like with the five and a half, they're good

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>enough to give you pause. If this was three and

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>a half, I think we feel much better about it.

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 2>It is, and it's another one of those instances where

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe we see the Panthers rally just because like it's

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 2>been a nightmarish season. Maybe you don't feel as bad

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 2>about yourself if you go into the off season with

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 2>like an upset win and really play the spoiler for

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 2>a divisional rival that needs this win badly. But yeah,

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 2>for that reason, the bet here that I would want

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 2>to make if I were playing it, I mean, forced

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 2>to make about it, I'd probably want to bet Tampa,

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 2>But I just I don't see enough value to do it.

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 4>Joe.

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 2>What sort of total are we getting on a number

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 2>of drinks? Thrown by David Tepper.

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.479
<v Speaker 1>This game, I'm gonna send it. I'm gonna set it

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>at one and a half because you know, you gotta

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine these double fit after last week for sure. By

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the way, the same Panther team that got shut out

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>by the Jaguars on Sunday. So I don't have too

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>much trade. I'll take Tampa in the points here. I

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>might close my eyes, but hopefully I get that one

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>big Mike Evans touchdown and that'll start to make me

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>feel better as this game goes on, Cleveland Cincinnati. The

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns are going to the playoffs, folks with elite

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe Flacco, I love it. The Bengals are eight and eight.

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>They're five point favorites, though at home, because Cleveland is

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>going to take their feet off the gas because there's

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 1>nothing they can dearly do to better their situation. Thirty

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half is a number plus one point

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty here on the Cleveland money line, which is kind

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of interesting here because, like I get it, Cincinnati pat

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>is another team. Maybe they're playing for pride, but is

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that enough here against the backups of Cleveland to cover five?

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the thing, Joe, I mean, the Browns have

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 2>no incentive whatsoever being locked into that five seed. But

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe they play their starters for a quarter and a

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 2>half just to keep a little bit of momentum going

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 2>into the first round. And as you said, really there's

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 2>no momentum, no incentive for the Bengals either, having been

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 2>eliminated from the playoffs.

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 4>So I'm just gonna walk away from this.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>One, all right. So Pat's walking away another game where

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't know exactly who's going to be on the

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>field for. How long do you see this one in

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the same Sam.

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think Cleveland plays any of their major starters.

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 3>There's really no incentive for them to. I understand that

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the rest versus RUSS debate here, but I think some

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 3>of the injuries that Cleveland has suffered on defense is

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 3>enough for them to say, Okay, we don't want any

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.959
<v Speaker 3>more of those to happen, especially with guys like Miles

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 3>Garrett and Joe Flacco. But I do think one bigger trend,

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 3>and I know I've mentioned this a number of times

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 3>on the show this year, is in these games with

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 3>very uncertain situations, just to bet the plus money odds

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 3>on these things to hopefully strike gold with the variants,

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 3>So I think again, Cincinnati or excuse me, Cleveland has

0:24:55.680 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 3>a slight coaching advantage over Cincinnati as well, And I

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I I think taking the Browns on the

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 3>money line is the better way to play it than

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 3>taking them with the points. So it's a weird situation

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 3>because we have, again, one team with no way to

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 3>improve their playoff seating and one team that's eliminated as well,

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 3>so there's really no incentive for either of them to win,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 3>though a confidence boost might help a little. So uh,

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 3>that's the way I'd be leaning for this game.

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>If Nick Chubb was healthy, would the Cleveland Browns be

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the most dangerous team in the AFC?

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.479
<v Speaker 3>SAM, I honestly don't know that Nick Chubb changes things

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 3>that much, and I know that I know that's a

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 3>little spicy to say, but they're they're passing the ball

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 3>so well. Like the the Amari Cooper connection, the Elijah

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Moore connection has been working well. David and Joku is

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 3>having a great you know, last month.

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>After all these years to unlock David Joku. Who'd have

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>thought that was coming? Not not me, not me?

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 3>But I think I don't know, I don't I don't

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 3>think it changes that much. I think the health on

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 3>defense is what worries me the most for my Browns

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 3>AFC championship future.

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Patt, do you think of Nick

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Chubb was still kicking around here? I mean, it's great

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to be throwing the football, but imagine having Nick Chub

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>running it too, with that passing attack and running the

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>play action off him. I mean, geez, what could have been?

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's kind of the question.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, and make the Browns offense a little

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 2>more dangerous. But you know, there's the whole how much

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 2>do running backs matter?

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Debates?

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 2>And Jerome Ford is actually yeah, Jerome Ford's good though,

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Like I like Jerome Ford, So I mean, no question,

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 2>nick healthy Nick Chobb is the better running back. But

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 2>it's not like they don't have a running game with

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Ford and a little bit of Kareem Hunt sprinkled in.

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 2>So like, the Browns are going to be one of

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the I can't wait to watch their first round playoff game,

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Like this is one of the teams I'm most excited

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 2>about watching. In the first weekend of the playoffs.

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Seattle can clinch a playoff berth with a win or

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>a and a Green Bay loss or tie, or a

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>green Bay loss and a Tampa Bay loss or with

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a tie of their own and a green Bay loss,

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and in New Orleans ties. So I hope you're all

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>keeping track at home of all these scenarios here. Basically,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're Seattle, you gotta win a football game here.

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what you got to do and hope for the best. Now,

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the problem is they're in that later window, so I

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much it's going to change effort level wise,

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but they are eight and eight going to Arizona. This

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is the first of the four o'clock games we're going

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>to talk about here. Three point favorites. They are on

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the road against Arizona. Forty seven and a half is

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the total plus one thirty five for Arizona on the

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>money line. Sam will start with you on this one here,

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Seattle on the road with the three or do you

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:38.719
<v Speaker 1>like Arizona for the upset?

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 3>My one note is no idea. I think I take

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the Cardinals here. I mean they've they've played well against

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles, who I know are struggling quite a bit,

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 3>but Seattle's defense has taken a big step back here.

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Kyler Murray is playing Okay, I don't know. Yeah, I'm

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 3>staying away from this game right.

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, understandably. So, Pat, are you also somebody who's letting

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 1>this one go in week eighteen, because well, it's complicated.

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I am letting this one go, Joe. It is complicated.

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a really interesting line. And man, the Cardinals are

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 2>plucky and kind of have been all year for the

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 2>most part, Like even when they didn't have Kyler Murray,

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 2>they were scrappy with Josh Dobbs and you know, taking

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 2>down the Eagles. What a feather in Jonathan Gannon's cap,

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 2>pardon the pun with the Eagles. But so now they

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 2>get another Bird team that they could knock off.

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 4>The Seahawks.

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, still have a chance to squeeze into the playoffs.

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.239
<v Speaker 2>They're highly motivated. But I can't bet the Seahawks here

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 2>with the way their defense is completely fallen apart. I mean,

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 2>they are having some major issues, Like this was a

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 2>pretty good defense earlier in the season, and right now, man,

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 2>they are just they have gone to seed. So no,

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 2>thank you, I'm just I'm not going to bet this one, all.

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, Pat. Here we go Green Bay Packers at home

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>against Chicago. They aren't home though they are three point

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>favorites understandably, so the number for this game is forty

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>four plus one. Forty on the Chicago side. And that's

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>where you seem to be living these days. So let's

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>expand a little bit more on your take on this game.

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, literally living on the Chicago side here in enemy territory.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 2>So the Bears have won for their last five show

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 2>and they slapped around the Falcons last week in a

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 2>big way. Their nice little month long run also includes

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 2>victories over the other two teams in the NFC North,

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 2>the Lions and the Vikings, and as well as the

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Packers played against the Vikings on New Year's Eve, and

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Vikings quarterback problems finally gave the Packers

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 2>an offense that could make them look good because the

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Packers have really struggled on DEFENSI of late, you know,

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 2>allowing almost four hundred passing yards to Baker Mayfield, then

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 2>over three hundred passing yards to Bryce Young. I am

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 2>worried about what might Justin Fields might be able to

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 2>do to the Packers, and the Chicago defense has been

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 2>terrific lately. So I hate to say it, but I

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>do see value in the Bears at plus three, and

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, for personal reasons, rather than take the field goal,

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I've got it on the money line. I've got the

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Bears at plus one forty eight. That way, I'm either

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 2>happy about the Packers winning and making the playoffs or

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 2>I win some money.

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I think that's a very healthy thing to do here,

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Pat Sam, your confidence is now going to be tested.

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Both these teams coming off wins in Week seventeen, pretty

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.239
<v Speaker 1>decisive ones too. So where do you stand with the

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>lines when it comes to Packers and Bears?

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Give me the Packers and the points. I know Jordan

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Love had a bad game against the Giants a couple

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 3>of weeks ago, but he's played phenomenally over the last

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 3>half of the season. He has five games with a

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 3>PFF grade in the seventy fifth percentile in his last

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 3>nine games. He's really clicking with these receivers. Obviously, Jordan

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Reid potentially being out would be a huge hit because

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 3>he seems like they're most dynamic player on offense right now.

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 3>But the depth, while again the level of receiver that

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the Packers have is not necessarily at the top tier,

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 3>but I think the depth that they have and that

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 3>all of these guys can step up has been a

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 3>true testament to how they've grown over the second half

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 3>of the season. So, you know, imagine thinking that the

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Chicago Bears are going to come into Lambeau in Week

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 3>eighteen with a future Hall of Fame quarterback and are

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 3>going to win the game, Like, come on, give me

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.719
<v Speaker 3>the Packers go pack up.

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 4>There's no hedging for Sam.

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 2>So you know, Sam, if the Packers lose this, I'm

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to drive down to the city to buy

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 2>you a beer with my winnings apparently, so you can drive.

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Your Well that's a very nice thing of you to

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>do there, Pat. I'll say this, My favorite thing is

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.479
<v Speaker 1>to take the Packers on the money line and combine

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that with anytime touchdown for Jaden Reed just a tough guy.

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>He scores every single week. I know he's got another injury.

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll play through because this is a very

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>important game here. You win, you get in So Reed

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>has been money seven touchdowns and seven games. I mean

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>put those two things together, you're probably getting the plus money.

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the way I attached this one right here and

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna attack it all right. Next one here, the Philadelphia Eagles.

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Rough times for the Philadelphia Eagles lately, gentlemen, They're gonna

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>go to New York to take on the New York Giants.

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>The Giants are five point underdogs at home, as they

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>theoretically should be. Forty one is the number plus one

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>ninety five on the money line for the Giants. Now, Sam,

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but Taylor putting up twenty

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points last week, Taylor throwing the football, Taylor rushing

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Giants would have a great wide receiver corp.

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But I don't if it matters right now. This Eagles

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>defense just seems to be falling apart of the seams.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I like the Giants and the points on this side.

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying the Giants went outright, but I'm taking

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the points. What are you doing with this one?

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't have a leaning on the side to

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 3>your point, like, the Eagles secondary is still a mess

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 3>in then they just got gashed on the ground by

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 3>the Cardinals and racked up over two hundred rushing yards

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 3>against them. Again, the Eagles have been playing extremely well

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 3>in terms of rushing defense this year, but I think

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 3>the way I want to attack this is some of

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 3>the player props with the Giants wide receivers. I know

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 3>we don't talk about player props much on this show,

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.959
<v Speaker 3>but just looking at again the way to attack the Eagles,

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I think wide receivers are targeted at the highest rate

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 3>against the Eagles, So that's the way I'm looking. You know,

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 3>the Giants got a little bit lucky with the punt

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 3>turn touchdown against the Rams this past week, So if

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 3>it's Tyrod Taylor, I'm certainly more bullish on the Giants

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 3>than if it's Tommy DeVito or someone else.

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>All Right, your thoughts, Pat Fitzmorris on this contest here,

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I tell you I'm on the Giant side of this

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>when the Eagles are not making me feel real good.

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe I'm walking into a snare trap, Joe, but

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 2>I've already bet the Eagles here, okay, and they I mean,

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 2>no question, they are staggering. They have lost for their

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 2>last five and their only win during that stretch was

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 2>against these Giants, but they only won by eight and

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 2>didn't cover in that game. So I just feel like

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 2>this Eagles team still has a great deal of talent,

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 2>even though the recent results have not reflected that. There's

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 2>no way they should have lost to a team like

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals at this late date in the season with

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 2>so much on the line. Hopefully that loss fires up

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 2>this team, and I think Nick Siriani is going to

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 2>want to build some momentum going into the playoffs. So

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna lay the points and take the Eagles.

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you look back here, not that long ago too.

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've got a scenario where you know, they

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>played the Eagles a couple of weeks ago and the

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Eagles won thirty three to twenty five. You know, I

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>always hate when teams play each other twice in a

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>short period of time too. That's never typically a good thing.

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Usually it's very close there, all right, Next one here

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>on the Slaves, we continue to roll through the Rams

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 1>and forty nine ers. The forty nine ers have put

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>themselves on a good spot here, but the Rams, Mike goodness,

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>if they come on hot of late. The number for

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this game is forty two and a half if you

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>like the Rams and the money lines plus one fifty

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>minus three and a half here for the San Francisco

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>forty nine Ers. Pat your thoughts on this one. Obviously,

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>yesterday last week, I should say they handled their business,

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>but the Christian McCaffrey injury certainly something to keep a

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>close eye on.

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the forty nine Ers are locked into the number

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 2>one seed. The Rams are locked into a playoff spot,

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 2>and the only motivation for them is trying to get

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 2>the sixth seed rather than the seventh seed. I don't

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 2>know that that is that much motivation. I'm sitting this

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 2>one out, Sam.

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this is a measuring stick game

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>for the Rams? Even if the forty nine ers are

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>sitting people where, you know, they start to say, hey, look,

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we are good enough to compete here, let's go in there.

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>It kind of, you know, harken back to you know,

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>back in the day where the New York Giants took

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>on and lost that perfect season against the New England Patriots,

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>but they realized that they could hang with the big boys,

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was a big confidence builder for them. Is

0:35:57.239 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>that the kind of game we could be looking at

0:35:58.880 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>here for the Rams?

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't necessarily think so. I mean, they took the

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Ravens toe to toe and lost in overtime just a

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 3>couple of weeks ago, and the Ravens, some might consider

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 3>are are the best team in the NFL. And I

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 3>think again, especially if San Francisco's players, I would expect

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 3>they they do in this game because when they all

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 3>of their key starters have been healthy this year, they

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 3>have been an absolute wagon. And so I don't think

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 3>they want to risk players like Trent Williams, like Rock Purty,

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Debo and all those other guys getting hurt because health

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 3>is the number one thing for them. So I like

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.919
<v Speaker 3>the Rams on the money line here. Again, the one

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 3>point went over the Giants is not all that inspiring.

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 3>It was probably Matthew Stafford's worst game in quite some time.

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 3>But I think again the sixteed versus seven seed probably

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 3>doesn't sound huge, but it could be the difference in

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 3>them to play San Francisco in the divisional round if

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 3>whoever ends up being the seven seed wins their game.

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 3>So I think they they have all the more motivation

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 3>than San Francisco does. And again, Matthew Stafford could be again,

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 3>if not for Lamar Jackson, could be in the MVP

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 3>consideration as well.

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Denver at eight and eight to Las Vegas

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>at seven and nine. How Denver is eight and eight,

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll never know. I don't understand how that's possible. In fact,

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I sometimes they have to rub my eyes just to

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 1>make sure that I'm actually seeing that correctly. But Vegas

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is at home. They're two and a half point favorites.

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Thirty eight is the number plus one twenty on the

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Denver money line. Now, look, Vegas, you know, can't really

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>do anything here. But at the same time, I think

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this is Antonio Pierce trying to continue to make statements

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that he deserves to have this job. So I think

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get full effort out of this team.

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why I like the Raiders side of this game.

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot of faith in the Denver Broncos.

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I know they eked out a win last week. I

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:56.839
<v Speaker 1>don't care. I think this is the perfect trap where

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna say, oh, look, Denver eked out or win,

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>they have something to potentially No, I'm gonna go with

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders here, just putting an end to the Denver

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Bronco season. Your thoughts, Sam, do you agree or disagree

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>with that notion?

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 3>I agree. I this is probably my strongest conviction play

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 3>of the week is the Las Vegas Raiders minus two

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 3>and a half. The Las Vegas defense continues to play

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 3>really well under Antonio.

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Peers.

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 3>The now third in early down EPA per play this season.

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Their rush defense is first in EPA per play allowed

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 3>over the last four weeks, despite Las Vegas using the

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 3>second highest rate of light boxes on defense. I used

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 3>to think that, you know, having a defensive guy at

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 3>coach is not the right way to go about building

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 3>a team, But in my opinion, Antonio Pierce has earned

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 3>that job. Again, if you're going to have a defensive

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 3>coach as your head coach, at least have someone who

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 3>can be a culture builder. And I think he's done

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 3>that in Las Vegas. I think he's earned the job.

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 3>I think trying to find someone outside of the organization

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:06.839
<v Speaker 3>is going to be a tough task, especially, you know,

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 3>with some of their best players on defense right now,

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.399
<v Speaker 3>especially Max Crosby. So I love the Raiders. I love

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 3>what Antonio Pierce is doing. I think a huge credit

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 3>to him getting this team to where they are right now.

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Pat, we're both on the Raiders. Are you coming with us? Man?

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I think I might have to piggyback you guys. As

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 2>convinced as you are. I had a slight leaning toward

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders, but have not bet this one early, and

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.360
<v Speaker 2>you guys are selling me like I do. Think the

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Raiders defense is vastly underrated, and that's actually part of

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 2>the reason why the play I like more in this

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 2>game is the under. I think this is going under

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight. I mean, we've got Jared Stidham against Aidan

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 2>O'Connell in this game and that underrated Raiders defense, So

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, you can absolutely interest me in the under here.

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, Joe, the Broncos season, what an

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.720
<v Speaker 2>interesting Bell Curve season. They've just terrible out of the gates,

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 2>then actually pretty good for a while at mid season,

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 2>and then terrible again to end things.

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 4>So it's been an early usual season.

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>It's so funny they're eliminated from the playoffs at eight

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and eight, and this does is a matter of pride,

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 1>like you get that, you know, that winning season with

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that last w and then Sean Payton can say, hey,

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I went in there, I won, I cleaned up the mess.

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Here we're gonna move on from Russell Wilson. This was

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>my year of evaluating and like the end of season

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 1>nine to eight, taking over a team that was such

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 1>a huge mess last year, I think is an accomplishment.

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.239
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think he's gonna get there. I think

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Vegas at the end of the day is gonna you know,

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>they're both gonna be eight to nine teams when the

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>dust settles on a week eighteen. That's just kind of

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:42.240
<v Speaker 1>where I see them. The Kansaity Chiefs, Boy boy, the Chiefs.

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:46.319
<v Speaker 1>They finally got a victory there. They're gonna take on

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers this week. Now. The Chargers are two point

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:53.359
<v Speaker 1>favorites at home because there's really not too much here

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to play for for the Kansady Chiefs. Thirty six is

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the number for this one plus one ten, So Pat,

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess there's two arguments here. You know.

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it smart for the Chiefs to kind of just

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 1>sit back and regroup and rest their weary heads a

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 1>little bit, or should they be going out there and

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what's going on and go beat

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 1>up on a bad Chargers team and have some confidence

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>going into the playoffs.

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 2>You could make a case for that, Joe, But I

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 2>actually think, like against the Bengals, we saw that offense

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 2>function probably better than it has at any other point

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 2>last month and a half. So maybe they just rest

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 2>on their laurels, and I think you got to rest

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:33.399
<v Speaker 2>the franchise at this point and not take any risks,

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:36.280
<v Speaker 2>because if you lose Patrick Mahomes, that's it. Your season

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 2>is over. So I really doubt we see him there.

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 4>But you know, just no real.

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Incentive for the Chiefs being locked into that third seed.

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 2>But do I trust the East and stick led Chargers

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 2>to beat that you? I do not, especially with I mean,

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 2>they could not generate anything in the passing game last

0:41:56.360 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 2>week with no Keenan Allen, no Josh Palmer. I don't

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 2>see what the incentive is to bring Keenan Allen back.

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 4>No the veteran. Yeah, so I just I'm not interested

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 4>in playing this game at all.

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 1>That's fair enough. Sam. Are you out on this one too? No?

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 3>I like the Chiefs money line here again for some

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 3>of the reasons Pat mentioned, Just that the Charters offense

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 3>has been abysmal. I think the Chiefs, with even some

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 3>of their backups on defense, will be able to lock

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 3>this one up again. And Andy Reid is still a

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 3>good play caller. I think whoever backs up I don't

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 3>even know who backs up Patrick Mahomes at this point,

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 3>but there's no reason to start Patrick Mahomes in this game.

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 3>As long as he's healthy, he gives the Chiefs a

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 3>chance to win, and winning a meaningless Week eighteen game

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 3>is not nearly as important as winning in the wild

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 3>card round.

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I think we're getting blame Gabbart, aren't web.

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>That seems to be the case. Dallas at Washington, Dallas

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is thirteen point favorites of this one. Forty four and

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a half is the number plus five point fifty Sam.

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a big number on the road. We talked about

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the big number on the road last week in Washington.

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So it feels like we're right back where we started

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>from in Week seventeen. Your thoughts on this one here?

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>That was seventeen points where they were behind, and of

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>course the last minute we thought we were going to

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>get Jacoby Brissett all the way up until Sunday and

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that was not the case.

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Give me the Cowboys and the points. I mean that

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the Commanders kept it close against the forty nine ers

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 3>this past week up until halftime, and then it was

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 3>just the forty nine Ers are like, Okay, we need

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 3>to put this out of reach, and they did so

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 3>with ease. Again, I think with this game and potentially

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:42.720
<v Speaker 3>you know some of the other games too, with these

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 3>you know games of how much again are they going

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 3>to start their starter or play their starters? All that

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 3>sort of stuff is to keep an eye, you know,

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 3>do some scoreboard watching yourself, and look, if the Eagles

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 3>are trailing, I mean, look, you know, possibly place a

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 3>bet on the Commanders to cover because the Cowboys might

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 3>sit they're starters for you know, the last quarter or

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 3>something like that. So that's it. Give me the Cowboys at.

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>The points, all right, Pat too many points for you

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>or you like the Cowboys as well?

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 4>Oh man?

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean the Cowboys need this one. They're the far

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 2>superior team. The Commanders have lost seven straight. Sam Howell

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 2>has been kind of a train wreck over the last

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 2>month after playing pretty well for much of the season.

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm leaning Cowboys, but I haven't bet it yet. This

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 2>is it's just in that zone where I do not

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 2>like laying this many points in NFL games. It's just,

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:43.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, and maybe the Commanders do have that thing

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 2>where they want to go out on a good note

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 2>and play really hard one last time and try to

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 2>mess with a division rival. So I may yet bet

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys, but I haven't done it yet, and I'm

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:57.320
<v Speaker 2>not sure whether I'll be able to pull the trigger

0:44:57.400 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 2>or not.

0:44:58.200 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, last one here is a fun one. The

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Night Game A twenty. You get Miami eleven to five

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>hosting Buffalo ten to six, winning the AFC East. That's

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 1>what's on the line here between these two teams. Now

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you do have Buffalo getting another way to get into

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 1>They can clinch a playoff berth if they tie, if

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh loses, if Jacksonville loses, or if Houston and Indianapolis

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>ends in a tie. So this is kind of like

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know that last ditch here. Can you win the division?

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you lock it all up? Pat? Who do you

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>like in this contest? Because we're looking at the lines

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 1>here right now, it's three on the side of Buffalo.

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>They are the favorites in this one? Is they I

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.880
<v Speaker 1>think should be? I actually think this is right. Miami

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>get their doors blowing off by Baltimore last week. That

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>sets them rilliing a little bit. They've had some injuries

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>on defense too lately. That's hurt. Fifty is the number

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:46.319
<v Speaker 1>for this one. It's a very high total plus one

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:48.479
<v Speaker 1>forty for Miami at home and the money line, Pat

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts.

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think at first blush people are going to

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 2>see this and want to maybe take Miami as a

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 2>home dog. And it does sound as if Mike McDaniel

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 2>expects too a tongue of I looa to lay through

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the shoulder injury he sustained against the Ravens, but Bradley

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Chubb towards ACL in that game, Xavin Howard is going

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 2>to be out with a foot injury. That's a lot

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 2>of defensive firepower the Dolphins are going to be missing here,

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 2>even though that defense has been playing really well, or

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 2>at least it was until it ran up against the Ravens.

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 2>So also, we have seen the Bills consistently get up

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 2>for games against top notch opponents this season, like they

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:30.719
<v Speaker 2>have done it all year, and they've thrown their best

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 2>punch in most of those games, whereas the Dolphins.

0:46:33.800 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Not so much.

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 2>We have seen them consistently shrink from the challenge of

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:41.439
<v Speaker 2>playing the best teams in the league. So I think

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 2>this line is right. Like you, Joe, it does feel

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 2>like it's probably set where it should be. I'm not

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:50.720
<v Speaker 2>gonna bet this game. I just would warn people against

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 2>like seeing the Dolphins getting points at home and being

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 2>quick to jump on that one.

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm not anxious to do that.

0:46:57.520 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sam, are you anxious to bet at other

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>side of this game?

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that I am, uh, you know kind

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:07.720
<v Speaker 3>of with with Pat here that having to lay three

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 3>points in an away game is again. I know the

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Dolphins have struggled a little bit the last couple of weeks,

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 3>but they still have some firepower on offense, and obviously

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:22.479
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Wattle being banged up as well, who will see

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:25.360
<v Speaker 3>if he goes. It's it's just such a funny scenario

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:28.320
<v Speaker 3>because the Bills, I believe, had the second best odds

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 3>in the AFC to win the Super Bowl, and if

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:33.279
<v Speaker 3>they lose this game, they could be out of the

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 3>playoffs completely. Like there there's well that's.

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 1>The thing, right standone game, so you're gonna know if

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you're Buffalo kind of if Tampa loses this, it's not Tampa.

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me. If if you had Jacksonville lose, you have

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh lose, you haveah a couple of things happen already,

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you kind of know your your fate. So then it

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:53.280
<v Speaker 1>becomes the pride of the division. How much that matters?

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, but the two seed versus the sixth

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:58.879
<v Speaker 3>seed is also a massive sure too. Like you, you're

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 3>getting one, possibly two home games if if you win,

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 3>instead of having to go on the road to point again.

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:08.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they might have to go on on the

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:12.719
<v Speaker 3>road to the Dolphins then again and again coming off

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 3>of a loss, or or going up on the road

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 3>to the Chiefs. So I knew they just beat recently,

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 3>but that game could have gone either way too. So

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 3>I think Buffalo, regardless of the outcome of those the

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Steelers and the Jacksonville games, they're gonna be up for

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 3>it and are gonna want to win. There's I mean,

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:35.360
<v Speaker 3>they're not gonna rest any starters by any means. But

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 3>I think the key here is how much the Bills

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:43.399
<v Speaker 3>passed the ball, because since Joe Brady took over, they

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 3>have gone one game with a positive pass right over expectation,

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 3>and that was against the Chiefs. And the way to

0:48:49.040 --> 0:48:51.920
<v Speaker 3>attack this Bill's defense, or excuse me, this Dolphins defense,

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:55.439
<v Speaker 3>especially with the injuries that you guys mentioned, is through

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 3>the air. I mean, we saw what Lamar Jackson just

0:48:58.080 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 3>did to the Dolphins this pass last week. So I

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 3>don't really know understand why they're not passing the ball

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 3>so much. I mean they haven't really had to a ton,

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 3>but they've dropped back on just over fifty percent of

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 3>their plays the last four weeks, which is dead last

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:18.160
<v Speaker 3>in the league over that span. So if they let

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen loose, then I feel more confident about the

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Bills taking in this one.

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Stay on top of all the lines with

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros app. Download it now if you haven't already,

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 1>sync up your sports book and start betting smarter, not harder.

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget too. If you have iOS, you get three

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:37.479
<v Speaker 1>free days of premium to check that out. Perfect time again.

0:49:37.560 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 1>This is that time of year. We got so many

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sports going on. It's an incredible group of systems here

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that we have over at Betting Pros. The app is

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>just tremendous and it's a great way to stay on

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 1>top of all these lines as they move to with

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:50.719
<v Speaker 1>the line alerts so you can set the game notifications

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 1>so you know, because you know, we all know there's

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot of line movement this week with

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:56.839
<v Speaker 1>all the news of who's in, who's out, who's gonna play,

0:49:56.840 --> 0:49:58.720
<v Speaker 1>who's not, So it's gonna be one of the trickier

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 1>weeks in the NFL, but that's what we're here for.

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:02.799
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're here to support you. They'll be more

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:04.880
<v Speaker 1>coverage later in the week, of course, on Thursday and

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Friday for the NFL side, But in the meantime that'll

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 1>do it for us, but the story of the game

0:50:08.560 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 1>goes on for Sam and Pat. I'm Joey P. We'll

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:12.880
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Kids.

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 5>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 5>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:50:24.920 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 5>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:50:28.680 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 5>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros