1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:02,320 Speaker 1: But knowledge to work and grow your business with c 2 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:06,680 Speaker 1: i T from transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C i 3 00:00:06,760 --> 00:00:10,520 Speaker 1: T offers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management services for 4 00:00:10,600 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: small and middle market businesses. Learn more at c i 5 00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:26,880 Speaker 1: T dot com put Knowledge to Work. Hello and welcome 6 00:00:26,920 --> 00:00:30,720 Speaker 1: to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. I'm Joe 7 00:00:30,760 --> 00:00:35,159 Speaker 1: Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. So, Tracy, our podcast is 8 00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:38,280 Speaker 1: supposed to be it's there. It's a markets podcast, that's 9 00:00:38,280 --> 00:00:42,199 Speaker 1: what we both cover. But it seems like markets have 10 00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:45,600 Speaker 1: been kind of quiet lately. Don't you think, Oh my god, 11 00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:48,880 Speaker 1: tell me about it. Um there. There's only so many 12 00:00:48,880 --> 00:00:52,360 Speaker 1: times we can write about falling volatility and range bound 13 00:00:52,640 --> 00:00:56,200 Speaker 1: markets and like new highs and stocks. It's really really 14 00:00:56,240 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 1: frustrating as someone whose job it is to actually write 15 00:00:59,720 --> 00:01:03,080 Speaker 1: about these things. Right, we have we have a call 16 00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:05,920 Speaker 1: every day that we're on and we chat about the 17 00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:07,720 Speaker 1: themes and the markets, and we're like, all right, what's 18 00:01:07,720 --> 00:01:10,920 Speaker 1: the theme today? And every day it's like, uh, low 19 00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:15,080 Speaker 1: volatility again, when our rates going to move and break 20 00:01:15,080 --> 00:01:18,479 Speaker 1: out in a certain direction. It's getting a little repetitive. Yes, 21 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:23,360 Speaker 1: why are you reminding me of the futility of art challs. 22 00:01:24,080 --> 00:01:26,880 Speaker 1: It'll change eventually, you know. Right now we seem to 23 00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:30,400 Speaker 1: be in this mode where there's no volatility in almost 24 00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:33,480 Speaker 1: any asset class. But it's always good to be reminded that, 25 00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:37,280 Speaker 1: you know, things change. There's you go through periods where 26 00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:40,600 Speaker 1: things are very quiet and then things are crazy, and 27 00:01:40,640 --> 00:01:43,160 Speaker 1: then when things are crazy, it feels like things will 28 00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:46,399 Speaker 1: never be quiet again. But you know, things go in cycles. 29 00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:50,480 Speaker 1: One can only hope. I guess the key thing here 30 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:52,760 Speaker 1: is the timing, right, Like, how do we know when 31 00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:55,720 Speaker 1: things are going to change? That is always that's always 32 00:01:55,760 --> 00:01:57,640 Speaker 1: the trick. And if you knew the timing then you 33 00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:00,360 Speaker 1: would you would do very well in the markets. But nice, 34 00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:04,320 Speaker 1: So why are we talking about this? So today we 35 00:02:04,400 --> 00:02:07,400 Speaker 1: have a guest I'm very excited to talk about. He 36 00:02:07,480 --> 00:02:11,160 Speaker 1: is a long time veteran of the markets, lots of 37 00:02:11,200 --> 00:02:15,320 Speaker 1: experience in trading hedge funds. He's seen lots of these 38 00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:20,160 Speaker 1: different cycles over time. Uh, And in fact, he's also 39 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:25,320 Speaker 1: devoted some of his research specifically to studying market cycles 40 00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:28,280 Speaker 1: and the patterns that repeat over and over again and 41 00:02:28,639 --> 00:02:32,800 Speaker 1: figuring out how to time them. And um, you know, 42 00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:36,639 Speaker 1: I think, uh, it's sort of the perfect the perfect 43 00:02:36,639 --> 00:02:39,480 Speaker 1: guests to sort of figure out where we are and 44 00:02:39,520 --> 00:02:43,160 Speaker 1: what could be where we could go next. I'm yeah, 45 00:02:43,400 --> 00:02:45,200 Speaker 1: this sounds great, and he'll be able to tell us 46 00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:48,320 Speaker 1: when markets are going to get exciting again, right hopefully, hopefully, 47 00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:50,480 Speaker 1: hopefully we'll be able to get him to tell us 48 00:02:50,520 --> 00:02:52,560 Speaker 1: to the day when markets will get excited again. But 49 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:56,679 Speaker 1: we'll see if that happens. Our guest is Peter Borish. 50 00:02:56,960 --> 00:03:00,320 Speaker 1: He's a strategist at the Quad Group. He I've had 51 00:03:00,360 --> 00:03:02,880 Speaker 1: him on the TV show a couple of times, one 52 00:03:02,919 --> 00:03:05,680 Speaker 1: of my favorite guests, and so I was really excited 53 00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:08,400 Speaker 1: about the chance to talk longer with him and to 54 00:03:09,320 --> 00:03:11,880 Speaker 1: get to know a little bit more about his background, 55 00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:24,720 Speaker 1: which is extremely interesting. So I'll bring him in now. Peter, 56 00:03:24,840 --> 00:03:27,600 Speaker 1: thank you very much for joining us. Well, it's a pleasure. 57 00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:31,360 Speaker 1: It's really an honor when you talk about how uninspiring 58 00:03:31,400 --> 00:03:33,760 Speaker 1: and how uninteresting the markets are, that you can have 59 00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:38,320 Speaker 1: a guest that can join right in incredibly uninspiring and uninteresting. 60 00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:41,400 Speaker 1: Now it's just the opposite. We were bringing you in 61 00:03:41,520 --> 00:03:44,520 Speaker 1: because we hope that you'll remind us that just because 62 00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:47,840 Speaker 1: it feels a little quiet right now, uh, it won't 63 00:03:47,880 --> 00:03:50,840 Speaker 1: stay this way forever. So just the it's just the opposite. 64 00:03:50,880 --> 00:03:53,880 Speaker 1: But um, before we get into it, tell us a 65 00:03:53,920 --> 00:03:57,120 Speaker 1: little bit about your background. You've been a you're I 66 00:03:57,120 --> 00:04:00,560 Speaker 1: think you're a legitimate veteran in this industry at this point, 67 00:04:00,760 --> 00:04:04,760 Speaker 1: and so tell us how you got into trading and 68 00:04:04,880 --> 00:04:09,160 Speaker 1: markets and sort of your your path through. Well, first 69 00:04:09,160 --> 00:04:10,880 Speaker 1: of all, thank you. It's really fun to be here. 70 00:04:10,880 --> 00:04:13,280 Speaker 1: And I do very much like to go greater and 71 00:04:13,760 --> 00:04:17,120 Speaker 1: in depth and and and bring some substance to these 72 00:04:17,200 --> 00:04:20,640 Speaker 1: issues which are complicated. I sort of bring everything back 73 00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:23,240 Speaker 1: to Michigan. I'm a big Michigan guy. I went there 74 00:04:23,240 --> 00:04:27,240 Speaker 1: for undergraduate in graduate school, and I was very fortunate 75 00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:30,120 Speaker 1: to get a job at the New York Fed at 76 00:04:30,160 --> 00:04:34,960 Speaker 1: the real recession, which is in two i finished graduate school. 77 00:04:35,680 --> 00:04:40,800 Speaker 1: My career arc has been one of pure luck. I 78 00:04:40,920 --> 00:04:43,280 Speaker 1: started at the New York Fed, as I said, in 79 00:04:43,960 --> 00:04:48,400 Speaker 1: two that is the summer that SMP Future started, and 80 00:04:48,600 --> 00:04:51,719 Speaker 1: I was in research. And then I went down and 81 00:04:51,839 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 1: people didn't understand these new futures markets, and they created 82 00:04:56,040 --> 00:05:00,200 Speaker 1: a futures and options group right outside the desk where 83 00:05:00,200 --> 00:05:05,440 Speaker 1: they traded foreign exchange. And then three years later I 84 00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:08,520 Speaker 1: was recruited by this young guy from Memphis, coming off 85 00:05:08,560 --> 00:05:11,479 Speaker 1: the floor of the Cotton Exchange, who was starting something 86 00:05:11,520 --> 00:05:14,479 Speaker 1: at the time which people didn't really know about called 87 00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:16,800 Speaker 1: a hedge fund, by the name of Paul Tutor Jones, 88 00:05:17,360 --> 00:05:21,039 Speaker 1: and I was sort of his first research professional at 89 00:05:21,080 --> 00:05:26,320 Speaker 1: Tutor Investment Corporation, and we were lucky to apply what 90 00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:31,839 Speaker 1: I would say the discipline and methodology of futures markets 91 00:05:31,880 --> 00:05:35,240 Speaker 1: as financial futures around the world were being developed. So 92 00:05:35,320 --> 00:05:39,080 Speaker 1: the SMP Crude Royal started in eighty five, the Japanese 93 00:05:39,080 --> 00:05:42,160 Speaker 1: futures came on in in the later eighties, and then 94 00:05:42,200 --> 00:05:45,920 Speaker 1: you had the European futures markets in the early nineties, 95 00:05:45,920 --> 00:05:48,360 Speaker 1: and that's when it became very much a twenty four 96 00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:51,760 Speaker 1: hour world, not just in foreign exchange of course, but 97 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:54,840 Speaker 1: now in all the markets, and with the advent of 98 00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:59,880 Speaker 1: stock indecks, futures, treasury futures, UH trading in the inner 99 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:03,000 Speaker 1: actions among them. So give us some insight to what 100 00:06:03,279 --> 00:06:07,400 Speaker 1: trading was alike then and how the rules of future 101 00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:13,040 Speaker 1: markets futures markets kind of differed from other types of markets. Well, 102 00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:17,440 Speaker 1: the thing about futures markets, which are everything is a mirror. 103 00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:20,600 Speaker 1: It's what's a blessing can be accurse, but in futures 104 00:06:20,640 --> 00:06:25,240 Speaker 1: markets because they have this performance margin that you put up, 105 00:06:25,320 --> 00:06:29,760 Speaker 1: so there's an embedded uh more leverage in terms of 106 00:06:29,880 --> 00:06:33,240 Speaker 1: trading those markets relative to equity markets, So your risk 107 00:06:33,279 --> 00:06:38,279 Speaker 1: management has to be far more sophisticated because of if 108 00:06:38,320 --> 00:06:42,840 Speaker 1: there's volatility in one of those markets, then uh you 109 00:06:42,880 --> 00:06:46,640 Speaker 1: can lose money much more quickly. The success and every 110 00:06:46,680 --> 00:06:51,400 Speaker 1: trading business is about worrying about risk, not about the 111 00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 1: reward so much, because it's if you can limit your risk, 112 00:06:55,520 --> 00:06:58,480 Speaker 1: if you can stay in trade for another day, then 113 00:06:58,520 --> 00:07:02,760 Speaker 1: you have the opportunity to be successful. We're always talking 114 00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:05,480 Speaker 1: about that. We're interested in people that want to make money, 115 00:07:06,080 --> 00:07:10,360 Speaker 1: not wanting to be right, and making money means limiting 116 00:07:10,360 --> 00:07:15,120 Speaker 1: your losses. So that approach that most of the future traders. 117 00:07:15,160 --> 00:07:17,200 Speaker 1: So if you think of Paul Jones, if you think 118 00:07:17,200 --> 00:07:21,400 Speaker 1: of Louis Bacon, if you think of of Bruce Covener, 119 00:07:21,520 --> 00:07:25,120 Speaker 1: even George Sorrows, all of these people started and we're 120 00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:28,200 Speaker 1: more active in the futures markets, and the sophistication of 121 00:07:28,240 --> 00:07:31,960 Speaker 1: those risk management tools then could be applied to other 122 00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:35,120 Speaker 1: markets as they came online. So it's a certain discipline 123 00:07:35,200 --> 00:07:38,600 Speaker 1: that those guys had in terms of not losing, not 124 00:07:38,720 --> 00:07:41,440 Speaker 1: being carried on at a stretcher, being able to survive 125 00:07:41,560 --> 00:07:44,120 Speaker 1: to the next day. That really sort of made them 126 00:07:44,160 --> 00:07:48,080 Speaker 1: the cream of the crop. Yes, we always talk about 127 00:07:48,200 --> 00:07:50,600 Speaker 1: and and I sit down with all our traders now 128 00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:55,200 Speaker 1: that it's discipline before vision. You know when we talk 129 00:07:55,240 --> 00:07:58,160 Speaker 1: in your introduction, you were saying, well, the markets kind 130 00:07:58,160 --> 00:08:00,080 Speaker 1: of boring, and I think this is gonna happen, and 131 00:08:00,160 --> 00:08:03,400 Speaker 1: I think that's gonna happen. And I try to distinguish 132 00:08:03,560 --> 00:08:07,640 Speaker 1: very much between research and a discipline approach to markets 133 00:08:08,200 --> 00:08:12,160 Speaker 1: versus gossip. I'm a Mets fan. We can gossip about baseball. 134 00:08:12,240 --> 00:08:15,760 Speaker 1: The season just started their one and oh if I 135 00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:18,480 Speaker 1: project that out, they're gonna go a hundred and sixty 136 00:08:18,480 --> 00:08:21,000 Speaker 1: two and zero, And you would say, wait a second, 137 00:08:21,080 --> 00:08:25,360 Speaker 1: that's kind of ridiculous, that's not gonna happen. Well, Amazon's 138 00:08:25,480 --> 00:08:27,920 Speaker 1: up today, it was up yesterday. I guess it's gonna 139 00:08:27,960 --> 00:08:32,319 Speaker 1: be up every day. We also know that's ridiculous. So 140 00:08:32,440 --> 00:08:35,240 Speaker 1: the logic of I know I'm going to be right, 141 00:08:35,360 --> 00:08:38,440 Speaker 1: this is what's going to happen. No, you are wrong, 142 00:08:38,840 --> 00:08:42,680 Speaker 1: the market is right. That's where risk management and discipline 143 00:08:42,720 --> 00:08:46,040 Speaker 1: comes into play. You started working for Paul Tutor Jones. 144 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:51,480 Speaker 1: I think it's and two years later was the famous 145 00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:57,360 Speaker 1: crash of October or about two years later. And not 146 00:08:57,559 --> 00:09:01,800 Speaker 1: only did Paul Tutor did that? Did your fund do 147 00:09:01,920 --> 00:09:05,200 Speaker 1: extraordinarily well in that crash? And having called it right, 148 00:09:05,240 --> 00:09:09,240 Speaker 1: I believe, uh, Paul himself credited the work that you 149 00:09:09,320 --> 00:09:12,320 Speaker 1: did for helping the fund be on the right side 150 00:09:12,360 --> 00:09:15,240 Speaker 1: and anticipate that crash. So tell us a little bit 151 00:09:15,280 --> 00:09:17,920 Speaker 1: about specifically the research you were doing for him and 152 00:09:17,960 --> 00:09:22,360 Speaker 1: how you were able to anticipate what, you know, considered 153 00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:26,679 Speaker 1: one of the most pivotal market events in financial history. Sure, 154 00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:30,320 Speaker 1: I want to back up one second. Served fortunately that 155 00:09:30,440 --> 00:09:33,800 Speaker 1: what we thought was going to happen economically as a 156 00:09:33,840 --> 00:09:37,680 Speaker 1: result of the crash, in terms of you know, deflationary 157 00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:41,880 Speaker 1: pressures and things did not happen. Uh. So that was 158 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:44,600 Speaker 1: very much a positive because we thought that the economy 159 00:09:44,600 --> 00:09:47,280 Speaker 1: would contract far more than it did. But it goes 160 00:09:47,320 --> 00:09:51,320 Speaker 1: into the cycles where we were is that we were 161 00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:58,000 Speaker 1: looking at data and cycles, and back then their computing 162 00:09:58,040 --> 00:10:03,720 Speaker 1: power was expensive, ATA was expensive, trading was expensive. And 163 00:10:03,760 --> 00:10:05,920 Speaker 1: one of the great things that one has to give 164 00:10:05,960 --> 00:10:10,240 Speaker 1: credit to Paul and the other people at Tutor was 165 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:13,600 Speaker 1: the investment in all of those things. We were early 166 00:10:13,720 --> 00:10:17,000 Speaker 1: users of data computing power, and so we put this 167 00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:20,880 Speaker 1: together and and and I build a model, and we 168 00:10:20,880 --> 00:10:23,480 Speaker 1: were looking at early days. You know today you pull 169 00:10:23,520 --> 00:10:25,960 Speaker 1: up your Bloomberg, you can pull correlations up on anything, 170 00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:29,280 Speaker 1: a cross correlations, inverted matrices that back then it was 171 00:10:29,360 --> 00:10:32,200 Speaker 1: very difficult. We were doing that. We saw this pattern 172 00:10:32,240 --> 00:10:37,120 Speaker 1: which was incredible in terms of where we were both. 173 00:10:37,320 --> 00:10:41,040 Speaker 1: We started with the economic thought of technology innovation and 174 00:10:41,040 --> 00:10:45,600 Speaker 1: what was happening back in the early eighties relative to 175 00:10:45,679 --> 00:10:48,760 Speaker 1: what was happening with the innovation and technology in the twenties, 176 00:10:49,080 --> 00:10:52,000 Speaker 1: and then the markets were tracking that very much. And 177 00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:56,560 Speaker 1: when we first started this, the projection was sort of 178 00:10:56,760 --> 00:11:01,440 Speaker 1: it would go into early UH and then the data 179 00:11:01,559 --> 00:11:04,559 Speaker 1: and the patterns indicated that the market was likely to break. 180 00:11:04,600 --> 00:11:07,600 Speaker 1: One of the things about it was with the advent 181 00:11:07,760 --> 00:11:11,280 Speaker 1: of these derivative markets and futures markets that there's some 182 00:11:11,400 --> 00:11:14,600 Speaker 1: embedded misunderstanding. One can argue that to a certain extent 183 00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:17,080 Speaker 1: with some of these new volatility products. It's a little 184 00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:19,000 Speaker 1: bit like anybody that has a five year old. You 185 00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:21,040 Speaker 1: think you could talk to them, you think they're rational, 186 00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:26,000 Speaker 1: but they're not fully rational, and as markets develop and 187 00:11:26,080 --> 00:11:29,280 Speaker 1: people think they understand them, they don't always do that. 188 00:11:29,360 --> 00:11:33,280 Speaker 1: So that was part of the UH embedded sort of 189 00:11:33,760 --> 00:11:39,640 Speaker 1: market UH construction. The way that it worked in the 190 00:11:39,760 --> 00:11:44,160 Speaker 1: terms portfolio insurance and the assumption that there was always 191 00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:47,960 Speaker 1: going to be liquidity that led to even more acceleration 192 00:11:48,080 --> 00:11:52,320 Speaker 1: to the downside. So we were very, very fortunate, UH. 193 00:11:52,400 --> 00:11:56,560 Speaker 1: And all credit has to go to UH Paul and 194 00:11:56,600 --> 00:12:00,480 Speaker 1: the execution team at TUTOR, because even if I was 195 00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:04,120 Speaker 1: right and I gave the exact low and the exact high, 196 00:12:04,440 --> 00:12:06,800 Speaker 1: nothing goes in a straight line. And he's a far 197 00:12:06,840 --> 00:12:10,520 Speaker 1: better trader than I will ever be, so he would 198 00:12:10,520 --> 00:12:14,000 Speaker 1: make far more money. And UH we were fortunate as 199 00:12:14,040 --> 00:12:15,720 Speaker 1: a fund to benefit from that. And I think that 200 00:12:15,800 --> 00:12:20,520 Speaker 1: benefit of the entire industry in understanding the importance of 201 00:12:20,600 --> 00:12:25,960 Speaker 1: both risk management and understanding that these markets have a 202 00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:30,439 Speaker 1: place where they can be used for hedging. Peter, give 203 00:12:30,520 --> 00:12:36,040 Speaker 1: us some more insight into this idea of cycles, because um, 204 00:12:36,080 --> 00:12:39,600 Speaker 1: you know, I started researching this. UH. Joe basically gave 205 00:12:39,600 --> 00:12:42,439 Speaker 1: me some homework and told me to go read some articles. 206 00:12:42,760 --> 00:12:46,199 Speaker 1: So I've been learning about Martin Arms Armstrong and Edward 207 00:12:46,280 --> 00:12:50,760 Speaker 1: Dewey and thinking about Fibonacci sequences and things like that. 208 00:12:51,240 --> 00:12:54,760 Speaker 1: It kind of has a long history, right, Yes, I 209 00:12:54,800 --> 00:12:59,559 Speaker 1: am a a a firm believer in in in cycles. 210 00:12:59,600 --> 00:13:03,720 Speaker 1: Nothing works exactly, of course, but it goes back to 211 00:13:03,760 --> 00:13:08,760 Speaker 1: the nature of us as human beings, which is fear 212 00:13:09,000 --> 00:13:15,199 Speaker 1: versus greed, complacency versus uncertainty. And I look at where 213 00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:17,719 Speaker 1: we are right now, and and this is something I 214 00:13:17,840 --> 00:13:23,360 Speaker 1: talked about in Bloomberg Markets right after the election, that 215 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:26,360 Speaker 1: if you're a student of history, so you can't be 216 00:13:26,400 --> 00:13:30,120 Speaker 1: a student of markets without being a student history. And 217 00:13:30,480 --> 00:13:35,520 Speaker 1: there's always these long waves that appear to be obvious 218 00:13:35,679 --> 00:13:38,960 Speaker 1: after the fact. So by the way that I'm one 219 00:13:39,000 --> 00:13:43,440 Speaker 1: of the greatest traders of yesterday, I can tell you 220 00:13:43,480 --> 00:13:47,000 Speaker 1: exactly what happened. So after the fact, my batting average 221 00:13:47,240 --> 00:13:50,520 Speaker 1: is amazing. It's that pesky uncertain future that makes this 222 00:13:50,640 --> 00:13:54,360 Speaker 1: business much more difficult. So what am I referring to? So, oh, well, 223 00:13:55,160 --> 00:13:59,719 Speaker 1: the advent of of you know, Apple, Amazon, and the 224 00:14:00,040 --> 00:14:03,760 Speaker 1: obstitution effect. So if you line them all up, one 225 00:14:03,760 --> 00:14:06,920 Speaker 1: of the questions have they created more wealth than they've 226 00:14:07,080 --> 00:14:13,560 Speaker 1: destroyed in terms of stores, in terms of other uh markets, 227 00:14:13,559 --> 00:14:18,480 Speaker 1: Whether it's best Buy or BlackBerry in terms of Apple, 228 00:14:18,800 --> 00:14:21,120 Speaker 1: in terms of the retail stores that you're seeing. Now, 229 00:14:21,160 --> 00:14:23,800 Speaker 1: these are long waves and this is a cycle that's 230 00:14:23,840 --> 00:14:26,520 Speaker 1: taking place so in Bloomberg markets. To me, the broader 231 00:14:26,600 --> 00:14:29,360 Speaker 1: cycle that we're seeing in one of the most famous 232 00:14:29,440 --> 00:14:34,440 Speaker 1: ones historically are the Chndrati of wave and the schoom Painter. 233 00:14:34,560 --> 00:14:37,400 Speaker 1: Schum Painter is a famous economist that talked about this 234 00:14:37,840 --> 00:14:42,680 Speaker 1: creative destruction. And where we are if you think about it, 235 00:14:42,800 --> 00:14:46,920 Speaker 1: is the Berlin Wall went up. Ironically, it started its 236 00:14:46,920 --> 00:14:53,320 Speaker 1: construction August thirteen, UH Ninette below in the stock market, 237 00:14:53,360 --> 00:14:58,080 Speaker 1: by the way, was August thirteen of Fibonacci, twenty one 238 00:14:58,160 --> 00:15:02,400 Speaker 1: years later. So if we talk at eighty two, excuse 239 00:15:02,440 --> 00:15:07,120 Speaker 1: me sixty two, and then you move forward twenty seven years. UH. 240 00:15:07,240 --> 00:15:11,920 Speaker 1: Ronald Reagan's most famous line was Gorbatov, tear down this wall. 241 00:15:12,680 --> 00:15:18,240 Speaker 1: The wall came down, uh November nine, twenty seven years 242 00:15:18,280 --> 00:15:24,920 Speaker 1: after that, November nine, ninety two thousand and sixteen, UH, 243 00:15:25,080 --> 00:15:29,600 Speaker 1: President Trump is elected. Now, if you look at history, 244 00:15:29,720 --> 00:15:34,000 Speaker 1: we haven't seen too many economies that have grown uh 245 00:15:34,040 --> 00:15:38,880 Speaker 1: by building walls and and looking inward. I like to say, 246 00:15:38,880 --> 00:15:42,960 Speaker 1: how the Great Wall of China work out, so we're 247 00:15:43,040 --> 00:15:47,120 Speaker 1: here potentially at the end of another long cycle. It 248 00:15:47,200 --> 00:15:51,840 Speaker 1: completes from sixty two to eighty nine to sixteen contralty 249 00:15:51,920 --> 00:15:55,960 Speaker 1: of fifty four years. Now, that just keeps something very 250 00:15:56,040 --> 00:15:58,560 Speaker 1: deep in the back of your mind, because that has 251 00:15:58,600 --> 00:16:02,120 Speaker 1: nothing to do with trading some p futures today, where 252 00:16:02,600 --> 00:16:05,320 Speaker 1: you know, if there are twenty three sixty do I 253 00:16:05,360 --> 00:16:08,480 Speaker 1: think they're going to before I think they're going to 254 00:16:10,280 --> 00:16:14,800 Speaker 1: But in terms of the Ralph Laurent announcement in the UH, 255 00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:18,400 Speaker 1: the pay less hues closing more stores, and you're seeing 256 00:16:18,440 --> 00:16:23,440 Speaker 1: that and you're saying, Okay, the deflationary pressures continue to 257 00:16:23,560 --> 00:16:26,360 Speaker 1: build up. We talked about a DP this morning and 258 00:16:26,400 --> 00:16:29,920 Speaker 1: being strong. Where are all these retail workers going to go? 259 00:16:30,000 --> 00:16:34,000 Speaker 1: Where's the marginal consumption going to be? From what we've 260 00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:37,000 Speaker 1: seen in this last cycle, which has not been addressed 261 00:16:37,000 --> 00:16:40,760 Speaker 1: at a policy perspective nor per se in the markets, 262 00:16:40,760 --> 00:16:44,240 Speaker 1: which is the things that you don't need have gone 263 00:16:44,280 --> 00:16:46,880 Speaker 1: down in price, the things that you do need have 264 00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:50,120 Speaker 1: gone up. So what do you need, education, healthcare? What 265 00:16:50,280 --> 00:16:54,040 Speaker 1: you don't need? I can skip a good meal, and 266 00:16:54,120 --> 00:16:56,800 Speaker 1: I can get an iPad, I can get an iPhone 267 00:16:57,240 --> 00:17:01,040 Speaker 1: because for a few hundred dollars, that's the difference. The 268 00:17:01,040 --> 00:17:02,880 Speaker 1: things that you don't need have really gone down the 269 00:17:02,960 --> 00:17:06,600 Speaker 1: quality of life, whether it's a fifty five inch television 270 00:17:06,760 --> 00:17:11,000 Speaker 1: or not. So that's what the dichotomy, and that's what's 271 00:17:11,040 --> 00:17:14,440 Speaker 1: leading some of these deflationary pressures, and you're seeing that 272 00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:20,400 Speaker 1: through lower real wage growth and the bond markets telling 273 00:17:20,440 --> 00:17:23,679 Speaker 1: you that as well. So just to wrap up, because 274 00:17:23,800 --> 00:17:26,200 Speaker 1: there are a lot of important ideas there, one thing 275 00:17:26,320 --> 00:17:29,959 Speaker 1: that really stuck out to me was this idea. You know, 276 00:17:30,119 --> 00:17:33,040 Speaker 1: as you said it, from the construction of the Berlin 277 00:17:33,119 --> 00:17:39,280 Speaker 1: Wall through the election of Donald Trump Key, events have happened, 278 00:17:39,320 --> 00:17:43,399 Speaker 1: as it turns out, on interesting annual or interesting intervals. 279 00:17:43,680 --> 00:17:47,199 Speaker 1: You mentioned the Fibonacci sequence, which is of course a 280 00:17:47,240 --> 00:17:50,280 Speaker 1: well known sequence that also appears in nature. You see 281 00:17:50,280 --> 00:17:53,840 Speaker 1: it in flowers and stuff. So the idea being that 282 00:17:54,280 --> 00:17:58,240 Speaker 1: these various events in history have a sort of deep 283 00:17:58,320 --> 00:18:01,000 Speaker 1: natural rhythm to them, and that it's sort of not 284 00:18:01,119 --> 00:18:06,280 Speaker 1: an accident that they appear at these certain intervals. Well, 285 00:18:06,480 --> 00:18:10,040 Speaker 1: think about us as as human beings. We we go 286 00:18:10,200 --> 00:18:15,480 Speaker 1: through cycles and things take place at at also that 287 00:18:15,800 --> 00:18:21,440 Speaker 1: natural rhythm. Uh, But it's really a build up of 288 00:18:21,440 --> 00:18:27,000 Speaker 1: of time, and that the innovation takes place over a cycle, 289 00:18:27,080 --> 00:18:31,639 Speaker 1: so that we were always planting the seeds today for 290 00:18:32,080 --> 00:18:35,000 Speaker 1: the next substitute, and and and it's it's funny so 291 00:18:35,080 --> 00:18:38,840 Speaker 1: you think of, well, thirteen years old right on. I'm Jewish, 292 00:18:38,840 --> 00:18:40,720 Speaker 1: so you have a bar mitzvah when you look at 293 00:18:40,760 --> 00:18:45,879 Speaker 1: twenty one, which is a year, you know, Huh, they're 294 00:18:45,920 --> 00:18:50,760 Speaker 1: both Fibonacci numbers as well. It's kind of it's I 295 00:18:50,800 --> 00:18:53,119 Speaker 1: don't know why it's there. That's not I'm not smart 296 00:18:53,240 --> 00:18:56,680 Speaker 1: enough to figure that out. But I just try to 297 00:18:56,720 --> 00:18:58,960 Speaker 1: sit back and be an observer, which is why I 298 00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:03,120 Speaker 1: said before, Uh, if you want to be uh student 299 00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:04,840 Speaker 1: of market, you have to be a student of history. 300 00:19:04,840 --> 00:19:08,000 Speaker 1: But you also have to be a student of people 301 00:19:08,520 --> 00:19:11,800 Speaker 1: because of the behavior. If we go back to the 302 00:19:11,880 --> 00:19:15,840 Speaker 1: markets for one moment, the one thing that was missing 303 00:19:15,920 --> 00:19:19,760 Speaker 1: to sort of indicate a potential inflection point or top 304 00:19:19,800 --> 00:19:24,360 Speaker 1: before the election was sentiment. And now sentiment is off 305 00:19:24,400 --> 00:19:28,760 Speaker 1: the charts. Everybody is particularly bullish. That to me is 306 00:19:28,800 --> 00:19:32,440 Speaker 1: a little bit of a contrary signal. The market hasn't 307 00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:36,840 Speaker 1: gone anywhere. We talked about uh, you know after the election, 308 00:19:36,880 --> 00:19:40,800 Speaker 1: when I was on uh that likely five percent move 309 00:19:41,080 --> 00:19:46,040 Speaker 1: to one thousand in the dow around March expiration. That 310 00:19:46,200 --> 00:19:49,080 Speaker 1: some of the largest turning points have taken place in March, 311 00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:52,680 Speaker 1: and that's what we've seen. And we haven't taken out 312 00:19:52,680 --> 00:19:56,679 Speaker 1: those highs yet. From March one, we've been meandering the 313 00:19:56,760 --> 00:20:00,040 Speaker 1: nastic Has you had that divergence between the nasty A 314 00:20:00,200 --> 00:20:05,480 Speaker 1: in the SMP back at the two thousand high uh, 315 00:20:05,520 --> 00:20:08,440 Speaker 1: and everybody talked about how you know, sort of under 316 00:20:08,440 --> 00:20:11,920 Speaker 1: President Obama there was all this uncertainty. There was an uncertainty. 317 00:20:12,560 --> 00:20:14,320 Speaker 1: They laid out a path, there was a route. You 318 00:20:14,359 --> 00:20:16,880 Speaker 1: may not have liked it, but you kind of knew 319 00:20:16,960 --> 00:20:21,760 Speaker 1: with Dodd Frankin. Now the uncertainty is even wider. So 320 00:20:22,000 --> 00:20:28,080 Speaker 1: it's likely that what's happened previously is unlikely to continue. 321 00:20:28,160 --> 00:20:31,240 Speaker 1: And we make this mistake all the time as participants 322 00:20:31,280 --> 00:20:35,040 Speaker 1: in the marketplaces. I said earlier is trying to, you know, 323 00:20:35,480 --> 00:20:38,560 Speaker 1: draw one line and assume that it's going to be 324 00:20:38,680 --> 00:20:41,960 Speaker 1: a linear UH movement, which is why I said the 325 00:20:41,960 --> 00:20:43,960 Speaker 1: Mets will be undefeated this year, which will be great. 326 00:20:44,640 --> 00:20:47,200 Speaker 1: I want to take a quick break for a word 327 00:20:47,240 --> 00:20:53,280 Speaker 1: from our sponsor, but knowledge to work and grow your 328 00:20:53,320 --> 00:20:57,840 Speaker 1: business with c i T from transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. 329 00:20:58,080 --> 00:21:00,960 Speaker 1: C i T offers commercial lending, the seeing and treasury 330 00:21:01,000 --> 00:21:04,640 Speaker 1: management services for small and middle market businesses. Learn more 331 00:21:04,680 --> 00:21:08,720 Speaker 1: at c i T dot com Put knowledge to work. 332 00:21:12,400 --> 00:21:15,639 Speaker 1: And we're back with Peter Borsch of the Quad Group. 333 00:21:15,680 --> 00:21:21,400 Speaker 1: We've been talking about markets and history and cycles. Um 334 00:21:21,440 --> 00:21:24,960 Speaker 1: I wanna. Tracy in her last question to you talked 335 00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:28,119 Speaker 1: about some of the early people who worked on who 336 00:21:28,160 --> 00:21:34,080 Speaker 1: started seeing cycles and markets and economics. You mentioned Edward Dewey. 337 00:21:34,119 --> 00:21:36,919 Speaker 1: Who was he? And uh, what did what did he 338 00:21:37,359 --> 00:21:39,520 Speaker 1: learned in his work and what have you learned from 339 00:21:39,520 --> 00:21:46,000 Speaker 1: studying his work? So Edward Dewey was actually worked for 340 00:21:46,080 --> 00:21:50,439 Speaker 1: the US government and was one of the early people 341 00:21:50,520 --> 00:21:56,760 Speaker 1: that innovated and collected government data. His passion was cycles, 342 00:21:56,840 --> 00:21:59,639 Speaker 1: and he started this foundation called the Foundation for the 343 00:21:59,640 --> 00:22:04,080 Speaker 1: Study of Cycles. I served on so when I was 344 00:22:04,119 --> 00:22:08,480 Speaker 1: at tutor again, we would scour the world for data 345 00:22:08,960 --> 00:22:13,400 Speaker 1: literally because you couldn't download it there. There wasn't the internet. 346 00:22:13,440 --> 00:22:16,199 Speaker 1: I mean I flew to Zurich to collect, you know, 347 00:22:16,320 --> 00:22:19,639 Speaker 1: foreign exchange data, and got around and turned around the 348 00:22:19,680 --> 00:22:22,399 Speaker 1: next day, and and and and came back and we 349 00:22:22,400 --> 00:22:26,119 Speaker 1: would hire summer interns to punch in all that data 350 00:22:26,520 --> 00:22:31,000 Speaker 1: in spreadsheets. Dewey was doing all this by hand. How 351 00:22:31,040 --> 00:22:35,240 Speaker 1: I met Tom Demark if you talk about another data person. 352 00:22:35,960 --> 00:22:39,480 Speaker 1: He was in Wisconsin and he had by far and 353 00:22:39,520 --> 00:22:42,320 Speaker 1: away the cleanest data. He had these to mark chart 354 00:22:42,400 --> 00:22:44,800 Speaker 1: books that he would put out which were better than 355 00:22:44,920 --> 00:22:48,919 Speaker 1: Value Lyne and others. And we needed clean data. And 356 00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:52,359 Speaker 1: that's how we met. And we would try to gather 357 00:22:52,520 --> 00:22:56,440 Speaker 1: every book that we could that went over history and 358 00:22:56,560 --> 00:22:59,480 Speaker 1: collected data both from the original source, whether it was 359 00:22:59,560 --> 00:23:02,880 Speaker 1: doubt owns and in their library or people like Edward 360 00:23:02,920 --> 00:23:07,639 Speaker 1: Dewey or Martin Armstrong and others that were, you know, 361 00:23:07,880 --> 00:23:12,399 Speaker 1: passionate about clean data. What were some of the most 362 00:23:12,560 --> 00:23:16,280 Speaker 1: interesting um sort of cycles or data sets that you 363 00:23:16,320 --> 00:23:21,560 Speaker 1: can remember either collecting or studying over the years. Well, 364 00:23:21,760 --> 00:23:24,719 Speaker 1: the most important one in terms of doing the model 365 00:23:25,600 --> 00:23:30,760 Speaker 1: was getting the UH open high low and clothes, which 366 00:23:30,840 --> 00:23:34,720 Speaker 1: was unusual at that time for the Dow Jones. And 367 00:23:35,119 --> 00:23:38,320 Speaker 1: there was also Saturday sessions, so we needed to have 368 00:23:38,400 --> 00:23:41,399 Speaker 1: all that. You couldn't make all these assumptions. We wanted 369 00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:46,080 Speaker 1: to go to the pure source. At the same time, 370 00:23:46,720 --> 00:23:52,800 Speaker 1: when of SMP futures started trading and even then understanding 371 00:23:53,560 --> 00:23:57,240 Speaker 1: the SMP cash index versus the futures index, and we 372 00:23:57,280 --> 00:24:01,879 Speaker 1: would look for movements in and in fair value as well. 373 00:24:02,160 --> 00:24:05,679 Speaker 1: That was an early thing people doing index arbitrage because 374 00:24:05,720 --> 00:24:08,520 Speaker 1: that was a sentiment indicator to a certain extent. When 375 00:24:08,520 --> 00:24:12,280 Speaker 1: people were selling futures and they went to a discount, 376 00:24:12,560 --> 00:24:16,200 Speaker 1: then that probably was an indication of too much negativity 377 00:24:16,359 --> 00:24:20,159 Speaker 1: out there. Uh And so that was another area of 378 00:24:20,359 --> 00:24:24,439 Speaker 1: data that we would collect. But we also did things 379 00:24:24,600 --> 00:24:28,120 Speaker 1: which related to economic fundamental data which is relevant even 380 00:24:28,119 --> 00:24:31,920 Speaker 1: to today. So the unemployment number comes out on Friday, 381 00:24:31,960 --> 00:24:34,520 Speaker 1: that's the number that the market sees. But if you 382 00:24:34,560 --> 00:24:37,320 Speaker 1: go back and you look at your database and you say, 383 00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:42,360 Speaker 1: what's the unemployment for uh March that comes out this 384 00:24:42,520 --> 00:24:46,680 Speaker 1: Friday in April, the number you pull off the database 385 00:24:46,800 --> 00:24:50,480 Speaker 1: is the revised number. That's not the number that the 386 00:24:50,520 --> 00:24:52,840 Speaker 1: market saw. We would have to go back and we 387 00:24:52,880 --> 00:24:55,680 Speaker 1: would work with people that did newsletters and things like that. 388 00:24:56,000 --> 00:24:59,280 Speaker 1: We wanted to see. We wanted three numbers. We wanted 389 00:24:59,320 --> 00:25:03,119 Speaker 1: the number of what the expected number was, what the 390 00:25:03,160 --> 00:25:07,199 Speaker 1: actual number that the market saw, and then finally what 391 00:25:07,320 --> 00:25:10,760 Speaker 1: the revisions. So we needed that all that data you 392 00:25:10,840 --> 00:25:14,880 Speaker 1: keep expanding the size of your database. So we then 393 00:25:14,960 --> 00:25:19,520 Speaker 1: had to invest in smarter uh technology people to build 394 00:25:19,520 --> 00:25:23,880 Speaker 1: those databases. It took a serious investment. But that's where 395 00:25:24,000 --> 00:25:26,199 Speaker 1: people often make a lot of mistakes that they just 396 00:25:26,280 --> 00:25:28,400 Speaker 1: download data from the internet and they go, oh, I'm 397 00:25:28,400 --> 00:25:31,120 Speaker 1: going to run a model on this. No, it's completely irrelevant. 398 00:25:31,160 --> 00:25:32,960 Speaker 1: Joe was telling me before we went on the air 399 00:25:33,000 --> 00:25:36,200 Speaker 1: about the ADP number. The number that the market saw 400 00:25:36,280 --> 00:25:40,600 Speaker 1: last month was just revised down by fifty thou Well, 401 00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:46,360 Speaker 1: that is what a revision. That's enormous, And if you're 402 00:25:46,359 --> 00:25:49,879 Speaker 1: building your model on something that's different than the market 403 00:25:49,920 --> 00:25:52,840 Speaker 1: first saw, you're likely to have mistakes. So you really 404 00:25:52,880 --> 00:25:55,560 Speaker 1: have to roll up your sleeves and get into the 405 00:25:55,600 --> 00:25:59,000 Speaker 1: weeds on this stuff. It's it's not easy. It takes 406 00:25:59,359 --> 00:26:02,480 Speaker 1: a tremendous amount of investment, which is one reason why 407 00:26:02,520 --> 00:26:07,080 Speaker 1: today the quantitative firms that are successful get bigger because 408 00:26:07,119 --> 00:26:10,320 Speaker 1: they can invest in the time, the data, the cost 409 00:26:10,600 --> 00:26:14,359 Speaker 1: that's involved in building a really outstanding model. I find 410 00:26:14,400 --> 00:26:18,280 Speaker 1: this really fascinating because obviously, to some extent, we take 411 00:26:18,440 --> 00:26:21,560 Speaker 1: for granted the ability to just pull up data, even 412 00:26:21,600 --> 00:26:23,719 Speaker 1: revised data. It's not that hard to find, but the 413 00:26:23,760 --> 00:26:27,720 Speaker 1: idea of really having to do legwork to get it all. 414 00:26:27,760 --> 00:26:31,000 Speaker 1: And in your case, you know, talking about going back 415 00:26:31,040 --> 00:26:33,399 Speaker 1: to the early days of the Dow Jones and figuring 416 00:26:33,400 --> 00:26:36,919 Speaker 1: out those quotes when they had the Saturday session. What 417 00:26:37,000 --> 00:26:39,520 Speaker 1: did that tell you when you when you say it's 418 00:26:39,760 --> 00:26:42,160 Speaker 1: you found this data, you had some of the best 419 00:26:42,240 --> 00:26:45,159 Speaker 1: data anywhere. Then you had to actually do something with it, 420 00:26:45,200 --> 00:26:47,320 Speaker 1: because it's not enough to just have it. So what 421 00:26:47,400 --> 00:26:50,040 Speaker 1: were the kind of things that looking back at that 422 00:26:50,320 --> 00:26:54,000 Speaker 1: old Dow data and finding Saturday numbers and high low 423 00:26:54,040 --> 00:26:56,520 Speaker 1: and clothes that other people hadn't seen. What were the 424 00:26:56,560 --> 00:26:59,840 Speaker 1: kind of insights that enabled you to look at that 425 00:27:00,000 --> 00:27:02,800 Speaker 1: and then profit in present day markets? Well there, So 426 00:27:02,880 --> 00:27:04,840 Speaker 1: there's one other thing I want to add. And when 427 00:27:04,880 --> 00:27:06,560 Speaker 1: it comes to data, because when you look at the 428 00:27:06,640 --> 00:27:09,400 Speaker 1: high low close of the Dow, and if you took 429 00:27:09,400 --> 00:27:12,520 Speaker 1: the high low close of the thirty components of the Dow, 430 00:27:13,800 --> 00:27:16,679 Speaker 1: they would not be the same. So we went a 431 00:27:16,720 --> 00:27:20,000 Speaker 1: step further. There was a theoretical high and the actual 432 00:27:20,119 --> 00:27:24,760 Speaker 1: high because the theoretical high H means that the high 433 00:27:25,080 --> 00:27:29,280 Speaker 1: print for each of the individual components doesn't happen at 434 00:27:29,320 --> 00:27:32,480 Speaker 1: the same time that the actual high for the doubt 435 00:27:32,520 --> 00:27:36,240 Speaker 1: Jones index takes place. So we thought, originally we could 436 00:27:36,280 --> 00:27:40,280 Speaker 1: just get the thirty components and create our own Dow index. 437 00:27:40,320 --> 00:27:43,040 Speaker 1: It's a price weighted index. You you you, you know, 438 00:27:43,160 --> 00:27:45,879 Speaker 1: you get the divisor and and build it. No, that 439 00:27:45,960 --> 00:27:49,000 Speaker 1: didn't work. So there were mistakes there. Each point along 440 00:27:49,040 --> 00:27:52,560 Speaker 1: the way. You have to realize that you're likely to 441 00:27:52,600 --> 00:27:54,800 Speaker 1: make a mistake one of the things that you will 442 00:27:54,800 --> 00:27:57,240 Speaker 1: apply models and you think, okay, I'm ready to do it. 443 00:27:58,080 --> 00:28:01,720 Speaker 1: And no, today, when I'm looking at models, I've never 444 00:28:01,760 --> 00:28:04,440 Speaker 1: seen a bad simulated model. Nobody ever comes to me 445 00:28:04,560 --> 00:28:07,040 Speaker 1: and says, you know, Pete, this is the worst model 446 00:28:07,080 --> 00:28:09,679 Speaker 1: you ever saw. It's got a minus three sharp ratio. 447 00:28:10,080 --> 00:28:12,760 Speaker 1: You should invest in it because it can only get better. No, 448 00:28:13,080 --> 00:28:17,320 Speaker 1: because there's what I call this creeping intellectual cheating. It's 449 00:28:17,320 --> 00:28:20,359 Speaker 1: not that you intend to cheat, but because you don't 450 00:28:20,400 --> 00:28:24,520 Speaker 1: fully understand because you haven't made those mistakes yet, that 451 00:28:24,680 --> 00:28:30,200 Speaker 1: things are over optimized. And and where that's where experience 452 00:28:30,200 --> 00:28:33,480 Speaker 1: comes into place. So when you ask about these things, yeah, 453 00:28:33,680 --> 00:28:37,760 Speaker 1: that's where having a person that's implementing the model, like 454 00:28:37,800 --> 00:28:41,200 Speaker 1: a great trader like Paul Jones and the team around 455 00:28:41,280 --> 00:28:45,240 Speaker 1: him you have to pick it apart. And so I 456 00:28:45,320 --> 00:28:47,320 Speaker 1: would think that I would have a great answer, and 457 00:28:47,360 --> 00:28:50,040 Speaker 1: sometimes I'd work, you know, on shorter term stuff all 458 00:28:50,160 --> 00:28:53,720 Speaker 1: weekend and I'm like all excited about this the market open, 459 00:28:55,200 --> 00:28:57,200 Speaker 1: it's in the trash can, and I'm like, wow, I 460 00:28:57,200 --> 00:28:59,080 Speaker 1: could have had a much more fun weekend and staying 461 00:28:59,080 --> 00:29:01,920 Speaker 1: in the office all we again working. So that's that's 462 00:29:01,960 --> 00:29:04,480 Speaker 1: part of it too, is realizing it's a very humble 463 00:29:04,960 --> 00:29:08,240 Speaker 1: business that you think you're smart, but you're really not 464 00:29:08,360 --> 00:29:11,160 Speaker 1: that smart. So all those little different subtle things with 465 00:29:11,280 --> 00:29:13,720 Speaker 1: the data, as you just talked about putting us in 466 00:29:13,880 --> 00:29:16,880 Speaker 1: open high low clothes trying to do that. So the 467 00:29:17,000 --> 00:29:18,920 Speaker 1: question that we had to do and talk to dal 468 00:29:19,040 --> 00:29:21,880 Speaker 1: Jones and go back is is was it the actual 469 00:29:22,000 --> 00:29:24,680 Speaker 1: high was it a theoretical high? Because those are two 470 00:29:24,680 --> 00:29:27,400 Speaker 1: different things. We'll talk to us about how best to 471 00:29:28,120 --> 00:29:32,520 Speaker 1: use models or cycles because a lot of these underscore 472 00:29:32,640 --> 00:29:35,400 Speaker 1: modern finance, right, like there are models everywhere, there are 473 00:29:35,440 --> 00:29:39,360 Speaker 1: all these quantitative funds. Um technical analysis is really popular, 474 00:29:39,760 --> 00:29:43,160 Speaker 1: but people always levy a bunch of criticisms at those things. 475 00:29:43,200 --> 00:29:46,479 Speaker 1: You know they can be wrong or history doesn't always 476 00:29:46,480 --> 00:29:49,719 Speaker 1: repeat itself. This time is different, So how do you 477 00:29:49,880 --> 00:29:55,120 Speaker 1: actually apply those things? So a model or cycle, it's 478 00:29:55,160 --> 00:29:58,719 Speaker 1: literally it's a map. You pull up Google Maps and 479 00:29:58,800 --> 00:30:02,120 Speaker 1: you're gonna go and you're going a look. But until 480 00:30:02,240 --> 00:30:04,960 Speaker 1: they've perfected self driving cars, you still need to be 481 00:30:04,960 --> 00:30:08,320 Speaker 1: behind the wheel because there is likely to be a 482 00:30:08,360 --> 00:30:13,280 Speaker 1: pothole or there's likely that the weather is gonna change 483 00:30:13,680 --> 00:30:16,680 Speaker 1: and a bridge is gonna be out, and therefore you 484 00:30:16,720 --> 00:30:19,920 Speaker 1: have to uh change your route. You kind of the 485 00:30:19,960 --> 00:30:23,000 Speaker 1: map and the model tells you here's where I think 486 00:30:23,040 --> 00:30:24,960 Speaker 1: we're going from A to B, but it's not a 487 00:30:25,000 --> 00:30:30,000 Speaker 1: specific uh timing of that aspect. That's where your risk 488 00:30:30,080 --> 00:30:33,360 Speaker 1: management comes into play. And that's where you probe and 489 00:30:33,440 --> 00:30:37,840 Speaker 1: you probe and you probe. And so let's say I'm 490 00:30:37,880 --> 00:30:41,360 Speaker 1: super negative here, I'm like, Okay, I'm gonna sell, but 491 00:30:41,600 --> 00:30:43,520 Speaker 1: if we make new highs, I'm going to get out 492 00:30:44,120 --> 00:30:47,000 Speaker 1: because then my thesis is wrong. So if I risk 493 00:30:47,040 --> 00:30:49,240 Speaker 1: a little bit, if I'm wrong ten times in a row, 494 00:30:49,840 --> 00:30:52,760 Speaker 1: but then when i'm right, I can make it all back. 495 00:30:53,240 --> 00:30:56,480 Speaker 1: That's how you want to trade. Unfortunately, most people participate 496 00:30:56,520 --> 00:31:00,440 Speaker 1: in the market and it's upside down because they think 497 00:31:00,480 --> 00:31:02,920 Speaker 1: they're right. So they're like Okay, well we just made 498 00:31:02,920 --> 00:31:05,920 Speaker 1: new highs. It's just a little bit, it's no big deal. 499 00:31:06,080 --> 00:31:08,800 Speaker 1: Or I'm going to get out, or the market shortcovering 500 00:31:08,840 --> 00:31:11,080 Speaker 1: in front of the unemployment number we talked about earlier 501 00:31:11,120 --> 00:31:14,920 Speaker 1: on Friday, so I'll wait. Then you lose your discipline. 502 00:31:15,120 --> 00:31:18,760 Speaker 1: It's all about maintaining your discipline and your process and 503 00:31:18,800 --> 00:31:22,160 Speaker 1: what the cycles can say and where the roadmap is, 504 00:31:22,200 --> 00:31:25,959 Speaker 1: both whether it's a an economic cycle or whether you 505 00:31:26,000 --> 00:31:29,000 Speaker 1: think it's a fundamental cycle, or whether you think it's 506 00:31:29,000 --> 00:31:32,680 Speaker 1: a political cycle. It's when they come together. When I 507 00:31:32,800 --> 00:31:38,240 Speaker 1: sit with our traders and portfolio managers, the best approach 508 00:31:38,520 --> 00:31:43,640 Speaker 1: is when both the fundamentals and the technicals are coming together. 509 00:31:43,920 --> 00:31:46,880 Speaker 1: So we can argue now that the fundamentals are disconnected, 510 00:31:47,240 --> 00:31:49,920 Speaker 1: but they can go for a longer period of time. 511 00:31:49,960 --> 00:31:52,560 Speaker 1: What the technicals say is get out of the way, 512 00:31:52,640 --> 00:31:56,760 Speaker 1: because this is it's not telling you that it's breaking down. 513 00:31:57,120 --> 00:31:59,560 Speaker 1: When they come together, that's where you do it. A 514 00:31:59,640 --> 00:32:02,800 Speaker 1: great trader, and I've been fortunate to be around some 515 00:32:02,880 --> 00:32:06,560 Speaker 1: of the best, that's when they push it. My favorite 516 00:32:06,600 --> 00:32:10,120 Speaker 1: line is by Stanley Drucker Miller, which always says you 517 00:32:10,160 --> 00:32:15,360 Speaker 1: have to earn the right to trade big and when 518 00:32:15,400 --> 00:32:18,800 Speaker 1: you're there and that's when you put on the big position, 519 00:32:19,120 --> 00:32:22,440 Speaker 1: when the things line up, not when you think you 520 00:32:22,520 --> 00:32:24,560 Speaker 1: know more than the market, because you never do. You'r 521 00:32:24,720 --> 00:32:27,880 Speaker 1: there's one of you and there's millions of people participating 522 00:32:27,920 --> 00:32:31,520 Speaker 1: in the market. Something I've always been curious about. You know, 523 00:32:31,560 --> 00:32:35,040 Speaker 1: you talked about these long term cycles and things that 524 00:32:35,120 --> 00:32:37,680 Speaker 1: go on many years. You also see and I think 525 00:32:37,760 --> 00:32:39,920 Speaker 1: you kind of alluded to it, but you also see 526 00:32:39,960 --> 00:32:43,720 Speaker 1: these very short term ones. And you see charts that 527 00:32:43,760 --> 00:32:46,840 Speaker 1: are literally are intra day and that someone will annotate 528 00:32:46,880 --> 00:32:49,560 Speaker 1: and that will have five waves of a cycle within 529 00:32:49,640 --> 00:32:51,880 Speaker 1: the course of a day or the course of a week. 530 00:32:52,440 --> 00:32:55,880 Speaker 1: Do you see this sort of like fractal nature of cycles. 531 00:32:55,880 --> 00:32:59,680 Speaker 1: So we talked about Fibonacci sequences starting in the early sixties, 532 00:32:59,720 --> 00:33:04,480 Speaker 1: But do you find value in finding those same patterns 533 00:33:04,480 --> 00:33:07,640 Speaker 1: and the span of a few hours or a day 534 00:33:07,840 --> 00:33:11,880 Speaker 1: or a week. Well, so when you talk about five waves, 535 00:33:11,880 --> 00:33:15,160 Speaker 1: that you talk about, uh, the Elliott wave and the 536 00:33:15,200 --> 00:33:18,680 Speaker 1: motion again, that's a great way to have a discipline 537 00:33:18,720 --> 00:33:23,280 Speaker 1: to approach the market and look for potential inflection points. 538 00:33:23,600 --> 00:33:26,600 Speaker 1: In today's world with the speed of technology, what I 539 00:33:26,680 --> 00:33:29,800 Speaker 1: call man versus machine and shorter run trading, that's not 540 00:33:29,880 --> 00:33:33,520 Speaker 1: a space that we can compete in at quad group 541 00:33:33,640 --> 00:33:37,920 Speaker 1: and in long run trading, you basically become it's difficult 542 00:33:37,960 --> 00:33:40,240 Speaker 1: to outperform the index. Why do you want to pay 543 00:33:40,280 --> 00:33:43,160 Speaker 1: me two percent to be long Google? There's lots of 544 00:33:43,160 --> 00:33:46,040 Speaker 1: other ways markets work. So whether it's an et F 545 00:33:46,120 --> 00:33:49,200 Speaker 1: for directly or through yourself. Where we try to be 546 00:33:49,440 --> 00:33:53,120 Speaker 1: is that combination of man and machine one week to 547 00:33:53,320 --> 00:33:56,480 Speaker 1: three months what I call an earning cycle. And yes, 548 00:33:56,880 --> 00:34:00,560 Speaker 1: these things are all applicable for that, particularly when you 549 00:34:00,600 --> 00:34:05,320 Speaker 1: think about an earning cycle and in a market movement. 550 00:34:05,680 --> 00:34:08,839 Speaker 1: Now on the way down, this is where nothing goes 551 00:34:08,840 --> 00:34:11,000 Speaker 1: straight down or straight up. But if you think about 552 00:34:11,000 --> 00:34:13,719 Speaker 1: some of the retail stocks, and if you look at 553 00:34:13,760 --> 00:34:16,080 Speaker 1: Macy's and then it went down and oh someone's gonna 554 00:34:16,080 --> 00:34:18,000 Speaker 1: buy it, or there's an act and then there's a pop, 555 00:34:18,560 --> 00:34:21,719 Speaker 1: they tend to go back down because you know what 556 00:34:21,880 --> 00:34:24,320 Speaker 1: are they always say, the trend is your friend. Human 557 00:34:24,400 --> 00:34:27,480 Speaker 1: nature is we want to be smart. I've learned long 558 00:34:27,520 --> 00:34:31,239 Speaker 1: ago that I'm not, so I try to stay with 559 00:34:31,320 --> 00:34:33,680 Speaker 1: the trend and I'm not smart enough to pick the 560 00:34:33,719 --> 00:34:37,040 Speaker 1: bottom or pick the top. But that's where if you're 561 00:34:37,080 --> 00:34:40,120 Speaker 1: trying to do that something like the Elliott wave where 562 00:34:40,160 --> 00:34:43,120 Speaker 1: you have disciplined or what we talked about before, where 563 00:34:43,120 --> 00:34:45,040 Speaker 1: if I think the market is topping and I'm gonna 564 00:34:45,040 --> 00:34:48,640 Speaker 1: sell it, then I need to have a risk management 565 00:34:48,640 --> 00:34:50,439 Speaker 1: tool that's going to take me out so I don't 566 00:34:50,480 --> 00:34:54,400 Speaker 1: get buried. Okay, one more question. I know you just 567 00:34:54,480 --> 00:34:56,759 Speaker 1: said that you don't want to try to pick the 568 00:34:56,800 --> 00:34:59,560 Speaker 1: top or the bottom, So I'm going to rephrase this slightly. 569 00:35:00,520 --> 00:35:03,280 Speaker 1: When do you think markets are going to get more interesting? 570 00:35:05,600 --> 00:35:09,520 Speaker 1: I think we're in the process of them getting more interesting. 571 00:35:09,600 --> 00:35:12,680 Speaker 1: So we worked out this game plan, as we said 572 00:35:12,719 --> 00:35:14,719 Speaker 1: at the end of the year, and I've spoken about 573 00:35:14,760 --> 00:35:17,200 Speaker 1: and I just mentioned about how we thought that that 574 00:35:17,360 --> 00:35:19,400 Speaker 1: would go five percent from the election, it would get 575 00:35:19,400 --> 00:35:23,799 Speaker 1: to twenty one by March expiration. We're here and we've 576 00:35:23,840 --> 00:35:27,720 Speaker 1: been in this trading range. When you do something ahead 577 00:35:27,719 --> 00:35:31,960 Speaker 1: of time, when you do it intellectually and unemotionally, then 578 00:35:32,000 --> 00:35:33,600 Speaker 1: when you get to the point where you have to 579 00:35:33,640 --> 00:35:37,799 Speaker 1: implement it, you can think about a thousand reasons why 580 00:35:37,880 --> 00:35:41,560 Speaker 1: it's not gonna work out. We try to maintain our 581 00:35:41,640 --> 00:35:45,040 Speaker 1: discipline and say the thesis when I created it on 582 00:35:45,160 --> 00:35:48,120 Speaker 1: emotionally is going to work out until the market tells 583 00:35:48,160 --> 00:35:50,600 Speaker 1: me I'm wrong. So right now I think we're at 584 00:35:50,640 --> 00:35:55,680 Speaker 1: that inflection point. I think we're rolling over and until 585 00:35:55,760 --> 00:35:59,160 Speaker 1: the market tells me I'm wrong, And that would be 586 00:35:59,600 --> 00:36:03,360 Speaker 1: you know, the Dow making new highs uh closing above 587 00:36:03,440 --> 00:36:07,520 Speaker 1: the high, and the SMPS closing above March one high, 588 00:36:07,640 --> 00:36:11,080 Speaker 1: which could easily happen by the way between now and 589 00:36:11,080 --> 00:36:15,920 Speaker 1: and Friday afternoon, assuming the unemployment is very strong. But again, 590 00:36:16,000 --> 00:36:18,879 Speaker 1: I look at the bond market, I look at dollar yen, 591 00:36:19,400 --> 00:36:23,080 Speaker 1: I look at the commodity markets, and if I recommend 592 00:36:23,120 --> 00:36:26,160 Speaker 1: for all your listeners to look at the be calm. 593 00:36:26,640 --> 00:36:29,880 Speaker 1: I'm a big fan of the commodity index and what 594 00:36:30,080 --> 00:36:33,600 Speaker 1: that's been telling us that there's underlying weakness. I think 595 00:36:33,640 --> 00:36:36,640 Speaker 1: that is a perfect note to wrap up the conversation, 596 00:36:36,800 --> 00:36:40,680 Speaker 1: starting from your early work at the New York Fed too, 597 00:36:41,120 --> 00:36:44,600 Speaker 1: where we are exactly today in the markets. Peter Boris 598 00:36:44,640 --> 00:36:48,000 Speaker 1: really appreciate you coming on, fascinating conversation with pleasure. Thank 599 00:36:48,000 --> 00:37:01,400 Speaker 1: you very much. So trades see, are you are you 600 00:37:01,440 --> 00:37:05,839 Speaker 1: optimistic now that perhaps our morning market conversations will soon 601 00:37:05,960 --> 00:37:08,239 Speaker 1: start to get a little bit more interesting. I mean, 602 00:37:08,440 --> 00:37:11,560 Speaker 1: I don't want a big sell off, like I don't 603 00:37:11,600 --> 00:37:15,960 Speaker 1: want people to lose money, but something other than low 604 00:37:16,040 --> 00:37:20,360 Speaker 1: volatility and range bound markets would be very, very welcome. 605 00:37:20,640 --> 00:37:23,000 Speaker 1: I mean, I have to say, we do this a 606 00:37:23,000 --> 00:37:25,920 Speaker 1: lot on odd lots, right, We talk about past history 607 00:37:25,960 --> 00:37:28,880 Speaker 1: because we think it tells us something about the present. 608 00:37:29,120 --> 00:37:33,160 Speaker 1: So I am into the cycle idea. I'm not sure 609 00:37:33,440 --> 00:37:38,480 Speaker 1: I'm totally into, you know, the notion that Fibonacci sequences 610 00:37:38,560 --> 00:37:41,759 Speaker 1: hold like the secret to nature and you know, the 611 00:37:41,760 --> 00:37:44,960 Speaker 1: inner workings of markets. But I feel like there might 612 00:37:45,000 --> 00:37:47,919 Speaker 1: be something there maybe well, you know, as you say, 613 00:37:47,920 --> 00:37:51,440 Speaker 1: we talk all the time on the podcast about historical 614 00:37:51,600 --> 00:37:55,440 Speaker 1: episodes in markets, and so it intrigues me these this 615 00:37:55,520 --> 00:37:58,480 Speaker 1: idea of taking it to the next level and to say, Okay, 616 00:37:58,600 --> 00:38:02,120 Speaker 1: we acknowledge that at least to some extent, history repeats 617 00:38:02,239 --> 00:38:07,040 Speaker 1: or rhymes or whatever. So is it plausible to quantify 618 00:38:07,239 --> 00:38:10,920 Speaker 1: those repetitions as opposed to just saying that history repeats 619 00:38:11,040 --> 00:38:13,799 Speaker 1: and leaving it at that. Can you take it to 620 00:38:13,880 --> 00:38:16,760 Speaker 1: the next level and say, okay, well, let's let's actually 621 00:38:16,920 --> 00:38:19,799 Speaker 1: put some rigor behind this and see if history can 622 00:38:19,840 --> 00:38:22,839 Speaker 1: provide real guides to right now Yeah, that's a really 623 00:38:22,880 --> 00:38:25,160 Speaker 1: good way of putting it. Um. The other thing that 624 00:38:25,239 --> 00:38:29,440 Speaker 1: interested me was the idea of the importance of data, 625 00:38:29,760 --> 00:38:31,719 Speaker 1: I guess, and the notion of you know, flying to 626 00:38:31,840 --> 00:38:34,040 Speaker 1: Zurich to get a data set that maybe not many 627 00:38:34,040 --> 00:38:37,200 Speaker 1: other people have. And that's something that we've talked about 628 00:38:37,239 --> 00:38:41,440 Speaker 1: previously on the show. How proprietary data seems to becoming 629 00:38:41,440 --> 00:38:45,239 Speaker 1: more and more important in the market, right, Yeah, we've 630 00:38:45,239 --> 00:38:47,480 Speaker 1: talked about it, and I think a number of different 631 00:38:47,560 --> 00:38:50,000 Speaker 1: ways on the show. I think we've talked about satellites 632 00:38:50,120 --> 00:38:52,919 Speaker 1: and the attempts to get faster real time data. We've 633 00:38:52,920 --> 00:38:57,400 Speaker 1: talked about the bond market and how difficult it is 634 00:38:57,480 --> 00:39:01,319 Speaker 1: to really get clean sort of real time data on 635 00:39:01,400 --> 00:39:03,919 Speaker 1: what's going on there. And I think it's always sort 636 00:39:03,920 --> 00:39:06,959 Speaker 1: of worth reminding that in this current age, we take 637 00:39:07,000 --> 00:39:10,520 Speaker 1: the existence of data for granted, like it's oxygen or water, 638 00:39:11,160 --> 00:39:13,360 Speaker 1: but that even still, you know, I think we actually 639 00:39:13,400 --> 00:39:15,560 Speaker 1: have a hope we're trying to get another episode in 640 00:39:15,600 --> 00:39:19,560 Speaker 1: the future. There's still important economic data points that people 641 00:39:19,560 --> 00:39:22,279 Speaker 1: look at all the time, where people have to call 642 00:39:22,400 --> 00:39:26,040 Speaker 1: up operators on the phone or message him and say, hey, 643 00:39:26,040 --> 00:39:28,319 Speaker 1: what's the price of this today? Like It doesn't just 644 00:39:28,360 --> 00:39:31,480 Speaker 1: appear on a blinking screen. It really takes legwork to 645 00:39:31,520 --> 00:39:34,320 Speaker 1: get it right. Okay, well, don't give our future episodes, 646 00:39:35,680 --> 00:39:38,120 Speaker 1: but we will do more on this. Well, this has 647 00:39:38,160 --> 00:39:42,400 Speaker 1: been another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm Joe Wisn'thal. 648 00:39:42,480 --> 00:39:45,239 Speaker 1: You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart and 649 00:39:45,280 --> 00:39:48,600 Speaker 1: I'm Tracy Alloway. I'm on Twitter at Tracy Halloway and 650 00:39:48,640 --> 00:39:51,479 Speaker 1: Peters on Twitter too. He should tweet more, but he's 651 00:39:51,560 --> 00:40:11,640 Speaker 1: at p Borish. Thanks for listening. Put knowledge to work 652 00:40:11,640 --> 00:40:14,840 Speaker 1: and grow your business with c i T. From transportation 653 00:40:15,000 --> 00:40:19,160 Speaker 1: to healthcare to manufacturing. C i T offers commercial lending, leasing, 654 00:40:19,200 --> 00:40:22,880 Speaker 1: and treasury management services for small and middle market businesses. 655 00:40:23,080 --> 00:40:25,760 Speaker 1: Learn more at c i T dot com. Put Knowledge 656 00:40:25,800 --> 00:40:26,200 Speaker 1: to Work