Speaker 1: In regards to the looting in Ferguson, Missouri, or the
Speaker 1: looting in any circumstance like this, and the politics of it.
Speaker 1: You remember Occupy Wall Street. Occupy Wall Street was a contrived,
Speaker 1: made up, artificially created protest group to counter the Tea Party.
Speaker 1: The Tea Party came into existence, as far as anybody knows,
Speaker 1: in two thousand ten. The Tea parties average Americans fed
Speaker 1: up with with with fear and anger over what they
Speaker 1: saw happening to their country. The Tea Party originally was
Speaker 1: animated by the rapidly accruing debt and the oncoming Obamacare.
Speaker 1: The Tea Party was made up of people who were
Speaker 1: afraid of their kids and grandkids future that the country
Speaker 1: was going to go into such debt and the federal
Speaker 1: spending was going to consume so much that their tax
Speaker 1: rates would be so high that they would never have
Speaker 1: a chance to have a better life than their parents
Speaker 1: had had, which has always been part of the American dream.
Speaker 1: The Tea Party was just a group of citizens. There
Speaker 1: was never any leader, There was never any particular candidate.
Speaker 1: It was people that had never been formally involved in
Speaker 1: politics before showing up at town hall meetings, and because
Speaker 1: there was no leader, and because there was there was
Speaker 1: no Washington tie, the official Washington establishment became petrified and paranoid,
Speaker 1: scared the death of the Tea Party. The left which
Speaker 1: is totally consumed with pr and image and buzz because
Speaker 1: they have to avoid the substance of what their beliefs are.
Speaker 1: They cannot dare be honest about what they really believe,
Speaker 1: so they rely on substance and image uh lies about
Speaker 1: their beliefs and their philosophies. Occupy Wall Street was an
Speaker 1: artificially created made to look like another grassroots movement that
Speaker 1: had sprung up to defend Obama and Obamacare and the
Speaker 1: spending and our Occupy Wall Street was specifically created by
Speaker 1: wealthy Democrats behind the scenes make it look like it
Speaker 1: was genuine and spontaneous as an answer to the Tea Party.
Speaker 1: Now one of the animating features of Occupy Walston and
Speaker 1: it's still around, by the way, It's dormant, but it is.
Speaker 1: There's still people in it, still living in a shanty
Speaker 1: towns and so forth. But it's a you know, Occupy
Speaker 1: Wall Streets where Elizabeth Warren came from. Essentially, Elizabeth Warren
Speaker 1: with the you didn't build that. You you don't own that.
Speaker 1: You didn't make that happen. You factory owner, you business owner,
Speaker 1: you didn't make that happen. Why if we had an
Speaker 1: all manity together to build the roads and put in
Speaker 1: your sewage system for you could have never become rich.
Speaker 1: So you didn't do it yourself. You didn't do it
Speaker 1: on your own. You didn't build that in Obama picked
Speaker 1: it up. Well. That became the rallying cry of Occupy
Speaker 1: Wall Street. And if there was a seminal or a
Speaker 1: central foundational belief and Occupy Wall Street is that work
Speaker 1: is not how you got things. Because even that deck
Speaker 1: was stacked. Occupy Wall Street was originally aimed at the
Speaker 1: one percent on Wall Street, rich bankers, investment bankers, investment
Speaker 1: people on Wall Street, all these various financial houses, and
Speaker 1: the Occupy Wall Street people uh basically attempted to convey
Speaker 1: that things, the stuff that you get in life, does
Speaker 1: not come from work. That that's a fool's errand. And
Speaker 1: people who buy into the notion that you have to
Speaker 1: work to get your stuff are are are victims of
Speaker 1: a big con game. The one person ever worked, they
Speaker 1: have all the money and they share it only with themselves,
Speaker 1: and it's all a giant trick to get everybody toiling
Speaker 1: away for meager wedges to benefit the already rich. It
Speaker 1: was built on resentment of capitalism, anger at the unfairness
Speaker 1: of the distribution of resources and all of that crap.
Speaker 1: And therefore any act of civil disobedience was justified because
Speaker 1: they were fighting injustice and unfairness and unequal distribution of
Speaker 1: resources in a rigged game. This was made to buttress Obama.
Speaker 1: And this is, I guess, I say where Elizabeth Warren
Speaker 1: sprang up. Because the you didn't build that, you didn't
Speaker 1: make that, it directly traceable to the same kind of convoluted,
Speaker 1: perverted thinking and occupy Wall Street. Well, I think, using
Speaker 1: the snurdly doctrine when it comes to explaining looters, I
Speaker 1: think looters have much the same kind of thought process
Speaker 1: that stuff things, houses, cars, what have you. That the
Speaker 1: work is not going to give you those names because
Speaker 1: it's stacked deck. If you engage in work, you're just
Speaker 1: working for the man. You're working for the one percent.
Speaker 1: You're toiling away to make him richard. But you ain't
Speaker 1: getting any of it, you aren't seeing any of it.
Speaker 1: And indeed, social justice pretty much teaches this exact thing,
Speaker 1: and therefore social justice tells people who don't have things
Speaker 1: that they are entitled to take whatever the hell they
Speaker 1: want when they can and when they want it, because
Speaker 1: they are entitled to it, because it's being purposely denied them.
Speaker 1: So when an opportunity springs up, such as the unfortunate
Speaker 1: shooting in St. Louis or when your sports team went
Speaker 1: whatever it is, you make a bee line because it's
Speaker 1: all about justice. It's all about getting even, it's all
Speaker 1: about finally being able to grab some of what people
Speaker 1: are not letting you have. This is the beliefs that
Speaker 1: this is. And by the way, this is not just
Speaker 1: doccument in Wall Street. This is pretty much the left
Speaker 1: in general and the reason for their anti capitalist stance.
Speaker 1: It's rigged, it's unfair, and all this labor i e.
Speaker 1: Their jobs doesn't get them. Anything, doesn't get them healthcare,
Speaker 1: it doesn't get them. A TV set doesn't get it.
Speaker 1: Whatever he gets all that for the boss, the boss
Speaker 1: and the owner. That's the guy who gets rich and
Speaker 1: he's out playing golf every day or having three martini
Speaker 1: lunches or what. He's not working, and he didn't build
Speaker 1: his business on his own either, that's the latest scam
Speaker 1: to be revered. No, no, no, he didn't build that,
Speaker 1: the same duped labor rus who toil away for embarrassingly
Speaker 1: low Widge made the business owners business. They built it,
Speaker 1: they made it possible. And then yeah, and some of
Speaker 1: these occupy people actually believe, what do you mean going
Speaker 1: to college? I go to college, I go into debt
Speaker 1: and my first job isn't McDonald's. What a rigged game?
Speaker 1: You mean? I'm not gonna get Adie Grand out of college?
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not gonna be living in Shaker Heights
Speaker 1: right out of college. I'm not gonna be living in
Speaker 1: Pacific Heights right out of college. I can't move to
Speaker 1: the Upper east Side right out of college. I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna have a house in the Hampton's right out of college.
Speaker 1: Or what a rigged game? And so it's this entitlement
Speaker 1: to stuff that is purposely being denied, and they're right.
Speaker 1: There is the soft bigotry of low expectations and how
Speaker 1: successful it has been. They look around and they see
Speaker 1: all the evidence that they're wrong. Their success stories all
Speaker 1: over this country. People started with nothing and have what, however,
Speaker 1: they define success it's all around them, but yet they
Speaker 1: don't want to get rid of that victims status. It's
Speaker 1: just too comforting and it explains their failure as being
Speaker 1: somebody else's fault, not their own. That's the politics of
Speaker 1: all this