WEBVTT - Tomato, Tomato, Part 1

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick and Robert.

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I was going to start off today by saying that,

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of course it's the most wonderful time of the year,

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>but I think I'm actually already on record saying October

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is the most wonderful time of the year. And of

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>course October is because that's you know, monster madness, but

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>monster season aside, I think tomato season is the second

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>most wonderful time of the year, and we're right in

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it now. Tomato season is pretty wonderful. Um. We're we're

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>big tomato fans here in the house. Given the confines

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of imposed by the pandemic, we're actually growing more tomatoes

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:53.279
<v Speaker 1>at the house than ever before. Um, and yeah, it's

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>been fabulous. We're big fans of panzanella, which is a

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I think a Tuscan chopped salad or originally but it's

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>like soaked or soaked stale or toasted bread. We throw

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>in basil and then of course the tomatoes. Uh. Similarly,

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>we really love a good caprice salad because yeah, a

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>great tomato just elevates anything. In my opinion. You know,

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you can do a great tomato. All you need is

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>just a little salt and pepper, maybe a drizzle of

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>olive oil, and you're good to go. A great tomato

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is I think, in the same class where people think

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of like a great steak. It is just like a

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>complete food in itself that is so good, you know,

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it kind of makes people moan when they eat it.

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And I definitely grew up thinking that I did not

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like tomatoes. I thought I hated tomatoes. I'd always pick

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>them off of a sandwich if if they were on there.

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But I realized later in life the issue was just

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that I hated bad tomatoes. And almost every tomato you

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>get in a you know, in a subway or what.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to single them out, but you know,

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>any sandwich shop, whatever, it's almost never going to be

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a good one. It's going to be kind of a white, mealy, tough,

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>flavorless thing that doesn't have all of the beautiful aromatic

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>tomato ee compounds, that doesn't have that perfect juicy texture,

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>A ripe, home grown or or you know, farmer's market

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>summer tomato that has never been refrigerated, never had to

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>be shipped on a big truck any of that stuff.

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>It is a thing of beauty. And if you've never

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>experienced a tomato that way, you don't know what you're

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>missing yet. Yeah, absolutely, you just you're not going to

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>get the same thing with a grocery store tomato generally,

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>unless you know they are actually servants selling like local

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>airlimb tomatoes. I'm a big fan of box meal kits.

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm a subscriber to one of them right now. But

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.399
<v Speaker 1>you're just not gonna You're not gonna get a wonderful

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>tomato through the mail like that. It's gotta it's got

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to come from your own garden. It's got to come

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>from a local um garden. It and when you get

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to dig into it, it is like nothing else. It's

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>just miles above uh, the sort of mundane canned tomato

0:02:56.400 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>grocery store tomato experience. Yeah. And I think one reason is, uh,

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>just the sheer mechanics of like shipping products. Right, have

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you ever had a really good ripe summer tomato As

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>soon as you handle it, you know, like this would

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>not survive the like the rough process of getting from

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a farm to the grocery store to my house. It's

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a delicate baby bird. It's the thing that that you know,

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's barely going to survive the trip from the

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>vine to your kitchen counter. Oh yeah, and again speaking

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>is a very amateur tomato grower here. But the ones

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we bring in from the backyard, like they we have

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to like knock the bugs off of them. They're already

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>oozing a little bit. Yeah, this is a very delicate

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>balance between the plate and the compost heap. You've got

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to get there just the right time. But on the

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>other hand, I'm also actually I'm a pretty big fan

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of canned tomatoes for cooked applications. If if it's a tomato,

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're making tomato sauce or something like that,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a decent can of of whole peeled tomatoes that you

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>puree yourself from ash to whatever consistency you want works

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just fine. I mean, you know that they're picked when

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>they're ideal, and you know they go ahead and can them.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's much better than trying to make a say, a

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>tomato sauce from tomatoes that are fresh in the off season. Yeah. Yeah,

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it it ultimately depends, like what is the role of

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the tomato in the dish is is this a starring

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>vehicle for a fresh tomato. If so, nothing but a

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>really good fresh tomato is going to work. But if

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's something where the tomato is more of a supporting player,

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>then perhaps one of these other things will work. And then,

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>of course there's not just one tomato. Obviously, there's so

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>many different types. For my own purposes, I find that

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>when it's not tomato season, those little like grape tomatoes

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>are pretty good if you have to get some of

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the store. Absolutely, I'm a hundred percent in agreement, cherry tomatoes,

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>grape tomatoes are the much better option if you need

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>fresh tomatoes in the off season. So listeners, as you

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>can probably tell, we're going to be talking about tomatoes

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>not for one episode, but for two whole episodes. And

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're thinking, well, the tomato is just so mundane,

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it's so every day, this is gonna be a you know,

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>two episodes of of backyard um um like hoakery here

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that I can just skip on stuff to blow your mind.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Nothing could be further from the truth, because there is

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>so much weirdness in these episodes. There's quackery, there's myth making,

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they're tall tails, and there's all space colonizations, yes, space colonization.

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's going to cover really like a broad area of

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 1>stuff to blow your mind content, even though at the

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>center of it is this fruit that has become just

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>such a staple of most of our diets in one

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>form or another. So maybe we should start off just

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>by looking at the tomato plant as an organism. What

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>what is this organism and how did we end up

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>with the modern cultivated tomato. Yeah, this is a great,

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>great place to start, because this is another one of

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>those stories where if you don't think about it too close,

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>if you don't research it yourself, you just might think, oh, well,

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes have always been everywhere, they have always been a

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>part of our diet because they're just so ubiquitous now.

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>But this is not the case. Okay, So, first of all,

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you've probably just heard us say the word fruit. This

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 1>is one of those facts I think most people know

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point. You probably learned this before. But in

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 1>biological terms, a tomato is a fruit rather than a vegetable,

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and part of this comes down to the different ways

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>that we use the term fruits and vegetables in a

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of culinary or nutritional sense versus in a botanical sense.

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Um like we in a culinary or nutritional sense, we

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>intuitively sort things into categories of fruits and vegetables, I think,

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>largely based on sugar content and whether they're primarily used

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>in sweet or savory preparations, So plants that are savory

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>or vegetables plants that are sweet or fruits. However, even

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this is somewhat arbitrary as a cultural convention, because there

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>are ways in which these these types of groupings can

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>vary widely from culture to culture. One example is avocad

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>oos our avocados a sweet food or a savory food.

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I think for me and for most Americans, the answer

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly would be its savory food. They go in guacamole,

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you pair them with lime and salt, you put them

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on toast, you put them in a burrito. But for

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>millions of people in like South America and Asia, avocados

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>are primarily a sweet food, used more often in dessert dishes,

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>which seems very strange to us. But I don't know.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>If you think of it as kind of basically just

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a buttery substance, it starts to click in place. Yeah, yeah,

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I always grew up thinking of it certainly

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>something you add a little salt and pepper two against

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>some olive oil two and you have a great dish.

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>But we're big fans of going to local like bubble

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>tea places, uh and Asian dessert places, and you will

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>find like avocado smoothies as a as a you know,

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a standard item you encounter on menus and I've tried

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it before. It's it's delicious, But yeah, you wouldn't you

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't necessarily think about it from a Western perspective of

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>being the dessert item. But either way, these culinary distinctions

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>often just don't have a biological basis. In fact, other

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>culinary vegetables things we think of as vegetables in a

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>cooking sense, are biologically fruits. Cucumbers, chili, peppers, eggplants, all fruits.

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But to go even better, the tomato is not only fruit,

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it is technically a berry and one thing that I

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>think you could probably even into it just looking at say,

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're growing a variety of heirloom tomato

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in your backyard and you see this monstrous fruit hanging

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>off of a vine that you have to prop up

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>on a steak or a cage or otherwise, this gigantic

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>fruit is just gonna make it drooped down on the ground. Uh.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>And it's the you know, it looks like a thing

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that should not be in a way. Um. So you

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>might be able to into it that tomatoes have not

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>always been this way, like many of the modern fruits

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and vegetables we eat, it had to be adapted from

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a naturally occurring fruit or vegetable that did not necessarily

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>grow as large in the edible part um. And it

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>appears that modern cultivated tomatoes, which have the scientific name

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Solanum lycopersicum, are descended from a wild berry that grew

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in northwestern South America, maybe around the area of Peru

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 1>or a little farther north. And the research tracing these

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>biological origins has been summarized in a few sources. I

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>looked at, for example, in the Oxford Companion to Food,

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>which was edited by Alan Davidson. Uh. They looked at

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>studies by, for example, Sophie co in N and other

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>researchers over the years that found that the wild ancestor

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of the tomato was very likely. They identify a couple

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>of species, one Lycopersicon seraciform. And then another one, so

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Lantum pimpanellifolium, which is today known as the current tomato.

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Not current as in timely, but current as in the

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>fruit a current. And it's called this because in a way,

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>these these wild tomatoes, the Slanum pimpanilla folium, sort of

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>resemble currents. They're these tiny little berries, almost kind of

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>current or blueberry sized. Yeah, So some of the examples

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I was reading was that if you went back to

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>pre Columbian Peru, you would encounter, if you knewhere to look,

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you would find these wild growing, essentially yellow berries that

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>were the predecessor, the likely predecessor to the modern tomato. Yes,

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>now exactly how it went from that wild berry to

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the cultivated varieties that people eat that that's still um.

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>We know some things, but it's still a somewhat open question.

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>That there have been some genomic studies that I'll talk

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>about in just a minute, but we know that such

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>a thing as the cultivated tomato existed by the time

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the Spanish arrived in Mesoamerica. By that time, the az

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>tech people are the no waddle speaking people, were eating

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes that they grew as crops, and they were eating

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>them in dishes, often prepared in conjunction with chili peppers.

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But of course we we know that this wild ancestor

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of the tomato, this berry grew in northwest South America.

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>It was you know, this wild fine and so there's

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>still a question of how exactly that wild fruit made

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>its way up north to Meso America in order to

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>be cultivated as a food crop by the Aztecs. Yeah,

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>there's already even at this early stage in the history

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of of the global tomato. It's kind of a botanical

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>game of telephone, right. Uh. So I was trying to

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>look up what is some of the most recent scientific

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>work on this, and there was a new study about

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the domestication history of the tomato that was published just

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>this year, published in the journal Molecular Biology and Evolution

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 1>by Razafard at All. And so what they present is

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a little complicated. I'm going to try to do the

0:11:55.720 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>simplest version I can. So the authors say that before research,

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>our best guess about the domestication history of the tomato

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>went like this, So you had this wild berry in

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>South America. It's growing up in the andes up in

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the northwest corner of South America, and this is Solanum

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>pimpanella folium. Here again, this is the one we mentioned earlier.

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>The fruits are going to be about the size of

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a blueberry. Then in this older understanding, this was transformed

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>into the semi domesticated plant Clanum Lycopersicum saraciform or SLC.

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you see SLC and tomato literature, don't confuse

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that with Salt Lake City. It means this species, and

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this would have happened within South America. These fruits would

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 1>have been about the size of a cherry, so kind

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of similar to cherry tomatoes or grape tomatoes that you

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>could buy at the store today. Obviously somewhat different, but

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>similar somewhat in in look, in size. And then finally,

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this middle species, the s l C, was transformed into

0:12:55.960 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the larger, fully domesticated clandum Lycopersicum very lycopersicum. And this

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>was the Aztec food crop that was developed into the

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes that people eat all around the world today. And uh,

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>strange fact lyco persicum. I think Robert you might have

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a note about this later, but it means literally wolf peach. Yes, um, yeah,

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and yeah that it's this is interesting because this was

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a fruit that was described by Galen

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>who lived two hundred C, which obviously as well before

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes actually came to uh To, uh To to Europe,

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>so obviously Galen was not describing a tomato. But this

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>just this description ends up getting wound up in the

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>classification of tomatoes in the West later on. Yeah, but

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>so anyway, the authors of this study from US population

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>genomic methods to try to reconstruct a genomic map of

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the modern tomatoes domestication history, and they conclude quote A,

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>results suggest that the ore gen of SLC may predate domestication,

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and that many traits considered typical of cultivated tomatoes arose

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in South American SLC, but we're lost or diminished once

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>these partially domesticated forms spread northward. These traits were then

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>likely re selected in a convergent fashion in the common

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>cultivated tomato prior to its expansion around the world. So

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a little complicated. Basically, they're saying that the semi domesticated

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>breed of tomato that may have been used as as

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>not not a cultivated crop but a semi domesticated food

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>by some people in South America. It had some traits

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that arose naturally, and then those traits were re selected

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and emphasized by growers in meso America before the tomato

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>finally spread all over the world. Interesting, Now, we've already

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>touched on the fact that the tomato isn't the only

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>case of this. There there's a whole thing about what

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you call breeds of plants and how to and how

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to know whether you talking about the same fruit or plant.

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>When you're using different names throughout history, it can become

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>very confusing. Um. But just about the history of the

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>word tomato itself. The English word tomato, of course comes

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>via the Spanish tomate, which was adapted from the original

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>now Wattle word tomadel. Now I've seen a lot of

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sources claimed that to model was simply the Noattle word

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for the fruit for the tomato. But the entry and

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the Oxford companion actually goes a little deeper. And this

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is kind of interesting again about linguistic confusion. So apparently

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in the now Wattle language, tom model simply meant plump fruit.

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So to indicate the ancestor of our tomato you had

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to add the prefix z. So the word was z

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to model that was the ancestor of the tomato we

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>have today, and this distinguished it from the husked ancestor

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to modern tomatos, which the as texts called meal to model,

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and then the Spanish ended up using the word tomata

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for both tomatillo in Spanish that just means little tomato,

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>though they are not actually large and small versions of

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the same fruit. They're totally different species but that but

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they are related. Um these are all in the nights

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>shade family, and we'll get into to that. Um into

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that in a bit. But the authors of the Oxford

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Companion point out this led to a bunch of confusion

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for Spanish chroniclers who just didn't always seem to understand

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>which fruit was being talked about. Uh. THEO and I

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>have mentioned this before, But they also point out that

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in as Tech cuisine, tomatoes were consistently linked with chili peppers,

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and I gotta say it's a good combination. Tomatoes and

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>chili peppers are are two fruits that go well together. Absolutely.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>But here once we have contact between the hemispheres, this

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>opens up the doors of of of spread of this

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>plant all over the world, and eventually it does spread.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Now I have to say that the way that the

0:16:56.560 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>tomato spreads uh through and around the world is it

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>both is it was it once alarming, like it's really

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really a success story. But it's also not one

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>of these situations where you can say, oh, well, this

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>individual brought the tomato to Europe and then it was

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>an enormous success and here we are like, it's not

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that simple and uh and and we we certainly encourage

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>people are interested in this to seek out some of

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the books were going to mention here in a bit

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>because they'll get into a lot more detail about this.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>It is um, I guess you would say it is.

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of touch and go uh, false starts, um.

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And as we'll discuss a little bit too, there's some

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>myth making involved in some some legend regarding just how

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the tomato takes off and what is standing in its way.

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I would also say that the tomato has a somewhat

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>complicated and murky uh. If it were a text, we

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>would call it the reception history. Yeah. Absolutely, So we're

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break, but when we come back,

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we are going to dive into some of the issues

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of its spread through Europe. And then paradoxically like back

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>into North America. Alright, we're back. So, uh, we may

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have talked in the past, you and I about doing

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a tomato episode, Uh, doing something about the tomatoes. Tomatoes

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have definitely come up on the show before, but my

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>wife this summer had had specifically mentioned She said, you

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>guys should do tomato episode. You should do it, you should,

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you should really dive in there. And I think something

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that helped encourage this is that we encountered a sign

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>at a botanical garden that was describing tomatoes. Then it

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that in the past people thought they were poisonous.

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So I have to admit that that was like, that

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>was a real key area of interest for me going

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>into this episode, getting into you know, just just discussing

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>whether people ever actually considered the tomato to be poisonous

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>and what does that mean, because it just seems ridiculous

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>on the face of it, Right, the tomato has conquered

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the planet. We know the tomato is not poisonous, and

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea of people being afraid to eat it because

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they think it is poisonous, Uh, it just seems completely looney. Well,

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's funny because even once you investigate it, I

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>would say that this irony remains, because the irony remains

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>because we are going to encounter people who are saying

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the tomato is poisonous, but they're not saying it at

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a time when nobody was eating tomatoes because everybody thought

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they were poisonous. They'd be like, well, some people eat them,

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>but they're poisonous, right, Yeah, you didn't have like single

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>voices with a global reach saying we do not eat

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes or no one should eat tomatoes, because you have

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of um, you know, a lot of division

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>based on like who's talking about it, what country they're in,

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what you know, what levels of society they're at, etcetera.

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of additional legends that pop up.

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>But but this basic idea that people specifically, you'll see

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>like Europeans or Americans used to be afraid to eat

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes because they thought they were poisonous. You see this everywhere.

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>You see this again it but uncle gardens. You see

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>this popping up in um news stories about the tomato,

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and it is often just presented as just a straight

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>up fact. Uh. But again, when I started looking into it,

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I became increasingly less sure because on one hand, yeah,

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>it sounds too good to be true, and then you

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>do encounter these um these are these, these wrinkles in

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the description that really um drive home that Okay, not

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody thought this at the same time. So again we're

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to cover the entire history of the tomatoes

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>um influx into Europe and then it's um it's acceptance

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>by European societies. But the first known European reference to

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes comes in four from Italian herbalist Peito Andre Matthioli,

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and he wrote of the mala aria the golden apples

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we she described as ripening from green to yellow. Now

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he classified the tomato with the man drake, which was

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of course part of this big night shade family. And

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>this is, of course this is accurate. I mean they

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>are in this family. We consider the tomato to be

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>a night shade, along with things like the eggplant. Um.

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>But this is often held up is one aspect of

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the poisonous reputation that tomatoes gathered in European society, with

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>botanists signifying that they were a part of this family

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that contained things um uh like deadly nightshade or like

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like the man drake. Root, which of course has all

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>these connotations with various medicinal and sort of magical practices,

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, at the only discussed how

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes were cooked and eaten at the time much in

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the same way as eggplants, which were another imported food,

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>only this this eggplants came from Asia um And and

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>they were again part of the night shade family. And

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>this has to be this seems to be a major

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>sticking point for a large portion of of the tomatoes

0:21:56.400 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>European tradition uh with it and the related egg plant

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>not traveling all that well into New European cuisines, or

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>not all of them anyway, because of their association with

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>man brakes and poisons as well as I would imagine

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.239
<v Speaker 1>just sort of a a general hesitation to take up

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>new plants into a into a pre existing culinary tradition.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>One one really interesting example of this UHM. I was

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>reading about UH regards the seventeenth century German garden. I

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>was reading when the tomato was purely ornamental considering New

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>World foods in seventeenth century Berlin. And this was by

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Millie Taylor Pulaski, published in Transatlantic Trade and Global Cultural

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>transfer since fourteen. This was published in twenty nineteen. So

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the author mentions that tomatoes were purely ornamental summer plants

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in most Berlin gardens in sixteen fifty six, and this

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>was due in large part to a German naturalist by

0:22:54.920 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>the name of Johann uh Sigismund el schotz Um, who

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>highlighted its connections first of all to the vile eggplant

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>which uh um, which was also present in the gardens

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of Berlin, but not consumed, just grown so you could

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>look at it. But Taylor at Polinski also points out

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that el Schultz didn't argue that either of these plants

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>was poisonous, only that they were unhealthy. And he also

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>seems to mention with some disdain that Italians eat them

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and Spaniards did too at the time. So um, the

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>idea is that there was likely um a large amount

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of anti Catholic sentiment here as well, Like this is

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a plant. Yes, you can eat it, the

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Italians eat it, the Catholics eat it, but Protestant Germans

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>should not eat it because it's bad for you. Yeah,

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that seems to go along with some of the things

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>I was reading. And and and this is interesting because we

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>see a similar trend actually if you look at potatoes,

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>which are also part of the large night shade family. Again,

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>where a new food is destined just destined for widespread

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>popularity and ultimately is going to have a life sustaining success. Um.

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You know. With the potato particularly, it ends up being

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 1>embraced by um lower levels of the socio economic um

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>uh ladder first and those communities that take up the

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>potato benefit from them like nutritionally uh and and and

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>dietarially um and then of course ultimately it it just

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>takes over. But initially something like the potato as well,

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's grown only for decoration before it is ultimately embraced

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>by everybody for decoration. Potato for decoration. Yeah, I mean,

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I could I guess I could see it.

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I see it less with the two with with the potato,

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>but certainly to tomato is a bright plant. It is

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>pleasing to look at. But it's impossible for for me

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to really imagine like a guarden, walking into a garden

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>where you have ripe tomatoes and eggplants and you're just

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna stand back and say, oh, look at that. Isn't

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that isn't that beautiful. Isn't that nice? No, you need

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to harvest that stuff and make a raditui. Yeah. Now,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the really wonderful text that we were both

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at for for this pair of episodes, uh is

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a book by Andrew F. Smith titled The Tomato in America, which, again,

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>if you if you're tantalized by our discussions in these

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>episodes and you want more about the tomato, this is

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the book for you. Highly recommended. But Smith points out

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>that some Renaissance herbalist when they were considering the the tomato,

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they looked at these other sources, one of which is

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Galen and the idea of the wolf peach. And that's

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>again when we have the scientific name that we have

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for the tomato. But also there were descriptions of um

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of of glossium by Pedanius Dioscorides who lived forty through nineties,

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and this was a Syrian herb that was so named

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>because it was recommended as a treatment for eye ailments.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Um So that was another sort of pre existing classification

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that helped inform how we thought about tomatoes, or certainly

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>how naturalists and botanists thought about them at the time.

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 1>But neither of these, Uh is the tomato, just to

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>be clear, but they do tie into some of the

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they frequently mentioned associations that were made at the time

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>with tomatoes. Now, to get into some of the myth

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>making a little bit, here's another frequently mentioned tail that

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I imagine a number of you have heard, and this

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:26.959
<v Speaker 1>is how it goes. Uh, this is the story. I'm

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>not saying this is this correct. We'll get into that

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>in a second. But the story goes that when the

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>tomato originally found its way onto European plates, you had

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>aristocrats who were like, oh, I'm gonna try out this.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>This sounds great, and they started eating these tomatoes. But

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>then they started becoming very sick, and they end up

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>pronouncing the fruit to be poisonous. But it would turn

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>out that the acid in the tomatoes was leaching lead

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>out of the plates they were served on, which incidentally

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>made poorer members of society um less susceptible to the

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>poison because they would be eating off of the wooden

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>plates or earthenware plates. Now, whether or not this claim

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>is true, it is actually true, of course, that that

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>acidic fruits and vegetables, when cooked in or eaten on

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>certain types of pots, of pans or plates can actually

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>react with the material. One example is if you cook

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>overly acidic foods, including tomato based foods, in for example,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:25.360
<v Speaker 1>aluminum cookware. Sometimes this isn't great, like they can react

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>with each other. The food can pick up a kind

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of nasty metallic taste from the aluminum. The acid can

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of damage the surface of the aluminum. So so

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>there are reactions like that that can't happen, right, And

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we have discussed lead making its way into food and

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>lead poisoning in at least a couple of episodes in

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the past. I know we did Cupids leaden Arrow, which

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>discussed lead quite a bit, and then we also did

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 1>one of one of our three or four Dangerous Foods

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>episodes touched on lead poisoning. But anyway, this idea of

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes sucking the lead out of your your your plate

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>where uh. This ended up being circulated in the United

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>States as well, um, with commentators highlighting the lead issue,

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and there were also concerns over the general effect of

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the acidity of the tomato on the stomach, with some saying, oh, well,

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the the acidity and the tomatoes dangerous

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to the stomach, others saying no, no, it's really beneficial.

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Another thing I've read, Actually, I don't know if this

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>overlaps with the lead issue or not, but the specific

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>substance I saw mentioned was pewter plates. Was that like

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>that they would discolor. When you put tomatoes on a

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>pewter plate, it would allegedly discolor the plate, and this

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:36.959
<v Speaker 1>led to concerns. Yeah, now, Andrew F. Smith does right

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that the acid content of tomatoes was a topic of

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>concern in Europe and the United States for a while.

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>The Paris Society for Horticulture published a paper warning about

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of leaching with metal plates uh including copper,

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>recommending that you should use wooden and earthenware plates instead.

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>But but I looked into this a bit more, reading

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>from a book titled Death by petticoat American His Three

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Myths Debunked by Mary Miley Theobald, and the author points

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>out that in British barber surgeon published a botanical book

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that claimed tomatoes were actually poisonous, while also noting that

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the French and Italians did eat them. So I guess

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it was like, these are dangerous to humans unless you're French.

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Or Italians somehow, I don't know. Apparently this uh that

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this was this was no expert um, this particular barber surgeon.

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess it would be like the modern equivalent of

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>say a a like a YouTube based dietary expert. I'm

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>not positive, but I think that's referring to somebody who

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>cited in another paper by Andrew F. Smith. Not that

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>book we're looking at, but a paper I'm gonna sighten

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit. I think that is John Girard, a barber

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>surgeon and the superintendent of the gardens of the College

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of Physicians in Holborn. And Smith says of of of

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>this barber surgeon guy, that in addition to repeating the

0:29:56.520 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>claims of others that the tomatoes poisonous, he also made

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>strange comments such as quote the temperature of the tomato

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>was in the highest degree of coldness, which he said

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was left quote to every man's censure. What does that mean?

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, well, I know about the censure. It

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>just seems like, okay, yes, disdain in the tomato alright, Well,

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, Um theobald of contends that quote this

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>book set the state for the negative view of tomatoes

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>among the English that lasted more than a century. However,

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the seventeen hundreds, tomatoes had overcome

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>this bad press. Yeah, that seems in line with a

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of what I was reading as well, that it's

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>not that everybody thought that tomatoes were poisonous, but that

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>there were some prominent writers that had made or repeated

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>these allegations that the tomato was in some way potentially

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>poisonous or unhealthy, and that these misimpressions trickled down to

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>some people in society, but not everybody. So some people

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>were reading tomatoes, other people we're saying, no, that's dangerous,

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>don't do that, And over time the non dangerous faction

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>grew in numbers. Yeah, I think, you know, it's easy

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to look back at history and assume that there would

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>be sort of weirdly to think there would be some

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of consensus at the time about whether you know

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>wrong or correct about particular foods. But obviously we just

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>look around the world today and we see how um are,

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of the nutritional values of various foods shifts

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>with our understanding, and also just sort of the popular

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>idea of what we should be eating, what is good,

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>what is tasty, what is stylish, and even what is

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>healthy shifts as well. Yeah, you're exactly right, and and

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>there is a grain of truth here at least in

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, uh that plants in the soul and

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a C family, including you know, say potatoes for instance,

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to do sometimes in some parts of the plant have

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>do accumulate toxins that can be dangerous. For example, if

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you consume the leaves or something, or even um, we've

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>talked before about there there are ways that toxins can

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>accumulate in potatoes if they say, left out for a

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>long time, if you have a really old potato, it

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:14.719
<v Speaker 1>can get a lot of soulanine in it, which can

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>lead to potato poisoning. Yeah, it turns green on the

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>sunlit countertop, that sort of thing. Um. Yes. Smith points

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>out that well, first of all, as far as um

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>acidity goes, it's gonna very quite a bit across the

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>varieties of tomato. But then in terms of um potentially

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>dangerous alkaloids, those are going to be mostly in the

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>leaves and stem. That's where the highest concentrations are going

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to be in a tomato plant. And there have been

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>cases where say a child consumed a tea made from

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>those leaves, and it has resulted in severe reactions. But

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as you can guess from the like billions of pounds

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever of catchup and other tomato products that people

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>eat around the world every day, the tomato itself is

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>over elming le safety. There's just yeah, there's nothing to this,

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>right and and certainly any of these cases where we're

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>discussing a place or a people or a community that

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>was afraid of the tomato, or did not eat the tomato,

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>or only grew it ornamentally, there was an all likelihood

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>um people or a place not too far away where

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it was just a part of the It had already

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>become part of the culinary tradition. So yeah, you would

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>have english people or Germans that were not eating the tomato.

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But meanwhile, in Italy and Spain and France and Portugal

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>they were already all in I mean, it was already

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a food crop when Europeans first encountered it. Yeah. Absolutely. Now,

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a really interesting paper I mentioned a minute ago

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>by also by Andrew F. Smith, from from the nineteen

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>nineties that was about the history of how perceptions of

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the tomato changed in the United States during the first

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>half of the nineteenth century, and there are some some

0:33:56.200 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting reasons involved in that transition that Smith gets into.

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we're probably gonna explore that paper in the

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>second episode here, but it's got a lot of fun

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>quackery in it, so so pulled on for that one.

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd say one of the stumbling blocks to understanding the

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of the tomato as is being received as poisonous

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>or beneficial is that sometimes the best seeming examples, the

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>best stories about about this are actually just legends, so

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, are completely apocryphal, uh, such as the this

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>famous story that I imagined a lot of people have heard, uh,

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the apocryphal legend of Robert Gibbon Johnson. Uh. So they

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>are multiple versions of this, and they concern a real

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>life individual named Robert Gibbon Johnson who have seventeen seventy

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>one through eighteen fifty and he was a notable farmer

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and horticulturist in Salem, New Jersey. He was an actual

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>tomato grower, uh and is sometimes credited with having introduced

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the crop into the area in eighteen twenty, and certainly

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>they become a major crop around that time. In southern

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. But this is was discussing a second like,

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't seem to be the case either. He didn't

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually introduce the crop. But in this particular story, Um,

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that he said he was defending the

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>tomato and he announced I will publicly eat a basket

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of tomatoes on the old Salem County Courthouse steps. Uh

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>that this is the uh in order to demonstrate that

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they are not poisonous. And then and then the town's

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>folk burned him as a witch. Wrong Salem. But um,

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the idea is that people were like, oh,

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna eat a basket and tomatoes and die publicly.

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I've got to see that. So people gather to watch

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the spectacle. They come from far and wide. And then

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>he eats the tomatoes and does not die. That's the story,

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and it makes for a great story. But everyone seems

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to agree that this is just not true as uh.

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And Andrew F. Smith actually gets into this in the

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>first few pages of the book, um, pointing out that

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:01.760
<v Speaker 1>there's some pretty good records from the time in Salem

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>and Johnson being a prominent citizen was mentioned quite a

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>bit for his other activities and exploits, like he was

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>also in the military and so forth, like he was

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 1>a major deal at the time. But there's nothing about

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>him introducing the tomato. There's nothing about him um uh,

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, eating tomatoes and as a matter of public

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>spectacle to to to prove that they're not poisonous. And

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like that would be written up if

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>he had done that, Like the papers were not shy

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 1>about writing about about this guy at the time. Anyway.

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Smith goes on to note that as far as the

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea of him introducing the tomato, this is just

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>one of some five hundred different myths about tomato introduction

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in America, and that they often end end up involving

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the the Great Man trope, in which someone such as

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Jefferson, He's another individual that sometimes is erroneously cited

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>as being the introducer of tomatoes is responsible. But in

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>reality we don't know who is responsible, you know, specifically

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 1>for introducing tomato. There is no actual American King Tomato

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to credit. I do love the idea though, that if

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>this story were true, I mean, so imagine this guy

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>sits out in front of the courthouse and eats a

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>bushel basket of tomatoes. Like, I don't think that would

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>kill him because they're not poisonous, but surely that would

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>give him just like horrible diarrhea. What you eat a

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>basket of tomatoes with nothing else? Yeah? Maybe so, I

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:33.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Supposedly this whole incident has even been um

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>recreated in various past documentaries, but I didn't get a

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>chance to look them up and see how they presented it,

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>if if, because there are different versions of it. So

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe in some versions it's just like one tomato, uh,

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and in others it's a whole bushel. I don't know.

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So I've got another story like this about the supposed

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>reputation of tomatoes as poisonous, And this is the rumor

0:37:55.960 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 1>about the George Washington assassination attempt. Okay, so one version

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>of the story, as collected in the Snopes article on

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>this rumor quote. I remember one of my junior high

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>history teachers reading us a suicide note by George Washington's cook.

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>The author of the note said that he could not

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>forgive Washington's treason against the British and had therefore decided

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to poison him then kill himself. The poison he used

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>on Washington was a tomato. That's great story, right, yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's comedic, it generates laughter, and it ties into

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 1>this this ridiculous idea that people once thought that the

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 1>tomato was harmful and and exaggerated to the point where

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it could be used as a lethal weapon. Yeah. Unfortunately,

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>as great of a story as this is, this one

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is fiction in a literal sense. It comes from a story,

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 1>a short story called the Murder of George Washington by

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Richard im Gordon, which was published in Ellery Queen's Mystery

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>magazine in April nineteen fifteen. Mine, I think the author

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is this guy, Richard Gordon, who was also a surgeon

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and uh an enthusiologist who who wrote historical fiction underpen names.

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.959
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, in the story, uh this, this cook wants

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to kill Washington because he's a British loyalist, and so

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>he waits until Washington is quote afflicted with a cold

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in his head which has seriously impaired his sense of taste. Okay,

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:28.959
<v Speaker 1>so perfect opportunity, right, He's not going to be able

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to taste the poison that the cook adds to his stew,

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.720
<v Speaker 1>which comes in the form of quote the scarlet flesh

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 1>of a fruit of a variety of the deadly nightshade.

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>And then, after serving what he assumes to be the

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>deadly poison, the cook writes a ps to his suicide

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.720
<v Speaker 1>note quote. As a cook, I have a prejudice against

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 1>dying by poison. I am too corpulent to hang. But

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>by reason of my calling, I am expert with a

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>carving knife. So it is alleged that he takes his

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>own life somehow with the aid of a carving knife.

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course, I think the reader is just

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 1>left to assume that this guy's scheme does not work

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>because the poison does not work, because it is a tomato.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>That's great, but no basis in history whatsoever. It sounds

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>like the author was merely having fun with some of

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.399
<v Speaker 1>these very these very topics that we've been discussing here.

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, on that note, we're going to take one

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>more break, but when we come back, we will discuss

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the killer tomato worm. Than all right, we're back now, Robert.

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Before we went to the break, did you say something

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>about a killer tomato worm. Yes, killer tomato worms, which

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is another interesting area that combines like actual um actual

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:49.399
<v Speaker 1>in this case entomological fact with a fair amount of

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>myth making here. Uh and and just uh you know superstition,

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess. So it is a fact of life that

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to raise some crops, uh, you're going

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:02.919
<v Speaker 1>to have to deal with other organisms that also want

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to eat said crops. And uh. Again, we've been growing

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:09.280
<v Speaker 1>some tomatoes in our own backyard here, so so we've

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>gotten used to this. As again we're growing tomatoes. We

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:16.840
<v Speaker 1>also have some volunteer summertime pumpkins from our compost. We

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't know what they were gonna be. It turns out

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they're useless pumpkins, but they're still fun. Are pumpkins useless? Well,

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>most of these are those little ornamental pumpkins. Uh, you

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>know the kind uh that you you you buy around

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>um Halloween and you set out for decoration and you

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>put on the basket on the dining room table. Um.

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what's been growing in our backyard. But can you

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>can can you imagine a future culture that looks back

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>on us with the same disdain that we had for

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>people who would have grown tomatoes and eggplants only as decorations,

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and they think that about us about pumpkins. It's true,

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I may be completely off on this. I could be

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 1>wasting these um Like. It does remind me of a

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 1>time time when I was helping deliver for a C.

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 1>S A here in in our area, and you know,

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>so I would vote, we would volunteer, and we would

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>would get like a free basket of vegetables in return

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:14.919
<v Speaker 1>for our service. But we would deliver baskets of fresh

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>vegetables to various households, and there's a lot of good

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff in there. There's stuff like sun chokes that I

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think I've ever had before. Um. But then we

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>would also have a lot of squash, and one of

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>them I particularly remember they were acorn squash, which can

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>be quite delicious. And I delivered one week to this household,

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and then the next week when I came back, there

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 1>were the acorn squash, uh, not served up inside in

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a dish, but on the porch as decorations. And I

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, oh my god, those are so delicious and

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you're just gonna use them as porch decorations. Did they

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 1>carve a jackal interface and do them at least? No? No,

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 1>just they just set them out there. But it's possible

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing the same thing with my summertime pumpkins. Um

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>so I do I do not know. Um, But at

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>any rate, growing all this stuff in the backyard, um,

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 1>other organisms are interested. Various bugs make a go at it.

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:09.839
<v Speaker 1>The squirrels, I think, get a little bit bored and

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 1>we'll eat like part of something here and there. And

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>we've also even had a rabbit shown up, show up,

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>which has been a lot of fun because you get

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:19.800
<v Speaker 1>anytime you get to watch a rabbit in your own yard. Uh,

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of magical, at least for me. Yeah, they'll

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they'll gnaw on your fruits, but they bring bunny magic

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 1>with them in return. Yeah, they're they're fun to watch,

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>they're cute. Um. But but then there's but there's a

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:32.919
<v Speaker 1>different pest we're gonna be talking about here and um

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's uh, it's quite interesting. According to Smith, there's

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>no beating the large green tomato worm, an alarming pest

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that is three to four inches long or can grow

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the three to four inches long. And it has this

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 1>weird horn sticking out of its back, kind of out

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of the final portion of its body. And uh, I've

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:55.479
<v Speaker 1>included a picture here for you to look at. Joe.

0:43:55.520 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>It's It's really quite impressive, right, it is generally not spiky.

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>It just has one giant buttthorn. Yeah, that has kind

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 1>of a crimson or scarlet color to it, as if

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it has already like stabbed a muppet or something. Anyway,

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it is is, so it's pretty impressive. It's closely related

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to the tobacco worm. So if you've seen one or

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the other, you may have an idea what I'm talking

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>about here. Smith points out that Ralph Waldo Emerson even

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>bemoaned these quote young entomologies that we're eating up his

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:32.359
<v Speaker 1>tomato plants. So this particular, these particular worms, they are

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the larval stage of the five spotted hawk month and

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it is in fact a different species from the tobacco hornworm.

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But they're closely related. And the confusing thing is that

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>both organisms feed on a variety of species that include

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>both tomato and tobacco leaves. Oh interesting, but they got

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>what different kind of specialties? Uh? Yeah? Or just one

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is in one is more associated with tomatoes and one

0:44:56.960 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 1>is more associated with tobacco. But the you know, either

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>one will eat the leaves of both plants now, will

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 1>will strip your nerves screamingly raw? Yes, apparently so, or

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at least that seems to have been the panic around

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:13.800
<v Speaker 1>them back in the uh certainly the mid nineteenth century.

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Apparently in eighteen forty five New York Farmers Club report

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>described them as quote positively shocking to weak nerves. Well,

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I think there were a lot of weak nerves back then.

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Smith has a bit more on this, you just have

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to read in in the book. But but he includes

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:36.440
<v Speaker 1>these quotations where people were talking about how like the

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>worm just ruins tomatoes for them forever, Like they're just

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>like they're just too gross. I'm not even going into

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>my tomato garden ever again. Oh I see you like

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:47.799
<v Speaker 1>you see the worm once and it like turns you

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 1>off of the entire fruit. Right. But on top of that,

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>some even considered it to be poisonous as well, including

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>such claims that the bite could cause instant death, or

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:01.919
<v Speaker 1>that the spittle, the mere spittle from one of these

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>creatures could kill a small child dead. Um, so it's

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's not only is is it like a

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>foul creature to behold? Budd It befouls the entire tomato

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:15.800
<v Speaker 1>garden and makes it a dangerous place in which to venture.

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So is there any truth to this? Where's this coming from? Uh?

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.319
<v Speaker 1>The thing is apparently not. The idea ran rampant through

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteenth century until you had an Illinois based

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:30.439
<v Speaker 1>intomologist by the name of Benjamin Walsh who pointed out

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>and apparently this made the papers and all saying like, look,

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this is hard, this is harmless to humans, This is

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:38.719
<v Speaker 1>not going to kill you. This is it's a past. Yes,

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe a little big, it's a little maybe alarming

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.319
<v Speaker 1>to look at, but it's not going to poison you. Uh. Though,

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>as Smith points out, you still you had publications uh

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in um Illinois based papers pointing out Walsh's um uh

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 1>facts here. But then you had other columns where people

0:46:56.120 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>were saying, oh, there was a girl that was killed

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>by one of these tomato worms. So it took a

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:03.360
<v Speaker 1>while for this idea to really go away. Yeah, my

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>roommates cousin's friend died from a tomato hornworm. Yeah, now

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I've got another poison tomato rabbit hole to run down here.

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Because I was trying to think, okay, well, what if

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you do want to poison somebody with a tomato allah.

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>The you know, the early European misunderstandings, or or the

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:25.399
<v Speaker 1>fictional account of George Washington's cook I do have a

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 1>possible candidate for you. It's not confirmed how lethal this

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:33.720
<v Speaker 1>tomato would be, but it's at least suspected with good reason.

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And that candidate is the tomaco Now. Weirdly, whereas the

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:44.719
<v Speaker 1>George Washington story takes a historically factual misunderstanding as the

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>inspiration for fiction, this story takes a modern fiction as

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the inspiration for a fact. So there's an episode of

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>The Simpsons that aired in called Ei Ei annoyed grunt

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 1>as an e I e I dough uh. And in

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this episode, Homer I guess he's trying his hand at farming,

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and he attempts to farm tomatoes and tobacco plants, but

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:14.280
<v Speaker 1>he fertilizes his crops with plutonium from the nuclear power plant,

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and this produces a hybrid plant that is basically a

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:22.800
<v Speaker 1>tomato stuffed with tobacco, which tastes bad but is highly addictive.

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Bart says it's so refreshingly addictive, and he

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 1>sells it as tomacco, and everybody gets addicted to it.

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And then I think there's some calamity where where all

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:36.400
<v Speaker 1>his crops are destroyed. Okay, I'd forgotten about this episode,

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 1>but now that you summarize it, I do remember it.

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:42.719
<v Speaker 1>But apparently reality caught up because I was reading a

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:46.359
<v Speaker 1>report in Wired from November of two thousand three by

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Kristen Philip Cooski, and it was about a man named

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Rob Bauer of Lake Oswego, Oregon. Now Bauer, I believe

0:48:55.400 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 1>he worked in wastewater management, and he had some scientific training, uh,

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and he remembered reading about a similar procedure when he

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>had been in college, when I think when he was

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in graduate school, and he decided to try to create

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>such a plant in reality, which he did by grafting

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>together a tomato plant and a tobacco plant. Apparently, he

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>initially experimented with with grafting in in one direction, which

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>was putting a tobacco plant on a tomato root, but

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the graft didn't take and when he removed the wrapping

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that held them together, the plant kind of fell apart

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and died. But the inverst grafting procedure did work. He

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 1>put a tomato plant on a tobacco root, and Bauer

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:44.959
<v Speaker 1>claims that this process was successful and the tomato plant

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:48.880
<v Speaker 1>with the tobacco roots actually bore fruit, though nobody ate

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the fruit, because he suspected it was at least possible

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that one of these tomatoes could contain a lethal amount

0:49:55.239 --> 0:50:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of nicotine. Wow. Well, on one hand, that's alarming, But

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:01.840
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, it's I guess it's not completely

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>surprising because tobacco is a part of this large night

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:08.239
<v Speaker 1>shade family. Yeah, exactly, and that's probably why, yeah, why

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the grafting worked out. Uh. So, to be clear, I

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:13.880
<v Speaker 1>don't I couldn't find any evidence that it was ever

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>confirmed that the tomato itself would have been poisonous with

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the lethal amount of nicotine. But it seems like a

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 1>reasonable thing to worry about, at least good reason enough

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:26.360
<v Speaker 1>not to eat the tomato. Uh And Bower, speaking to Wire,

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:29.320
<v Speaker 1>had said, quote, I've got this one plant growing and

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's blooming again. I accidentally left the tobacco on the

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 1>kitchen table, and my wife yelled at me, get that

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 1>thing out of the kitchen, you knuckle head, because it

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 1>looks like a regular tomato. Yeah, don't leave your secret

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 1>poison tomatoes just laying around. But but as I mentioned earlier,

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Bauer was apparently not the first person to try this

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:53.880
<v Speaker 1>plant hybridization. He He mentioned that he had actually read

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 1>about this when he was in college, I think in

0:50:56.800 --> 0:50:59.800
<v Speaker 1>an article that was published in Scientific American in nineteen

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 1>forty nine that described a similar procedure to what end.

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not exactly sure. I don't know what what you

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:11.759
<v Speaker 1>really gain by creating a tomato that possibly has nicotine

0:51:11.840 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in it. I mean, and that's probably ultimately the reason

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't see a tremendous amount of effort go into this, right,

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, what is the payoff? What's the incentive?

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps there's some I just don't know. I couldn't find

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>anything else about that. But hey, if you know of

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a good reason to create a tomato tobacco hybrid right in,

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:30.320
<v Speaker 1>let us know. All right, Well, we we've reached the

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 1>point we're gonna have to stop and uh and come

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:37.320
<v Speaker 1>back in another episode to continue our exploration of the tomato.

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But but real quick, Joe, Uh, fresh tomatoes are in

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 1>your kitchen. What's what's one of the first dishes you

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you think you'll you would try to make? Like what

0:51:45.680 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 1>something is popular right now in your household with tomatoes? Oh?

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Answer to that is extremely easy. Um toast with a

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit of mayonnaise with tomato on top, salt and pepper,

0:51:55.160 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, unbeatable, Like just tomato sandwich with mayonnaise is

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the most delicious thing if it's a good ripe summer tomato.

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Also just a good ripe summer tomatoes sliced with like

0:52:06.040 --> 0:52:08.640
<v Speaker 1>olive oil, salt and pepper, maybe a bit of torn

0:52:08.680 --> 0:52:11.799
<v Speaker 1>basil leaves. I mean, keep it simple. A good ripe

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:14.919
<v Speaker 1>summer tomato is it's like a steak. It's a dish

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 1>unto itself. Yeah, yeah, that sounds great. I mean it

0:52:18.000 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 1>reminds me that one of the things we like to

0:52:19.680 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 1>do here at our house is make a sort of

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:25.440
<v Speaker 1>b LT. We don't. We don't eat bacon anymore, but

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:29.360
<v Speaker 1>we will will use um like store bought soysage like

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you get from like Morning Star or t J's. Put

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that on there instead of bacon, and with a really

0:52:34.160 --> 0:52:38.040
<v Speaker 1>good tomato, it's fabulous. I've actually been wondering about trying

0:52:38.080 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to create a vegetarian version of a b LT, and

0:52:41.520 --> 0:52:43.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the ideas that came across for the bacon

0:52:43.520 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 1>substitute were like, um uh, sort of dried out charred

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 1>strips of eggplant or smoked strips of eggplant, but then

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:53.920
<v Speaker 1>also just the idea of using like smoked tempe. That

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds good, It sounds good. All right, we're gonna we're

0:52:57.000 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna close out then, but obviously we want you to

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:03.000
<v Speaker 1>come back for the next episode on tomatoes, and in

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the meantime you can certainly right in and give some

0:53:06.400 --> 0:53:11.080
<v Speaker 1>feedback on the journey thus far, share some insight based

0:53:11.120 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 1>on your own experience with tomato growing with tomato consumption.

0:53:15.560 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. If you want to

0:53:17.680 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 1>check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind,

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 1>you know where to find us absolutely anywhere you get

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:25.120
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts and wherever that happens to be. Make sure

0:53:25.160 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>you rate, review and subscribe. Huge thanks as always to

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like to get in touch with us with feedback on

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this episode or any other, to suggest a topic for

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the future, just to say hello, you can email us

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:42.000
<v Speaker 1>at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind's production of I Heart Radio.

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my Heart Radio, visit the iHeart

0:53:55.000 --> 0:53:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your

0:53:57.760 --> 0:54:10.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows, The Three four thou