Speaker 1: All right, News round up and Information over Load hour.
Speaker 1: Thank you for being with us. Here's a toll free number.
Speaker 1: It's eight hundred and nine four one sean if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. So our
Speaker 1: friend John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief, chief investigative reporter
Speaker 1: justinnews dot com has a series of breaking news stories.
Speaker 1: That's the bigger headline that I can give you things
Speaker 1: now that the administration has been able to uncover, in
Speaker 1: other words, documents. In other words, someone might even call
Speaker 1: it evidence in this particular case. And you can read
Speaker 1: the entire article when you go to justinnews dot com,
Speaker 1: and the headline is the FBI secretly open to probe
Speaker 1: alleging that Donald Trump fired James call me because he
Speaker 1: was a Russian asset according to what are now declassified
Speaker 1: documents that John has gotten a hold of. It was
Speaker 1: now declassified by the White House. It shows the investigation
Speaker 1: code name Oxford Comma was launched in the immediate aftermath
Speaker 1: of Come's May ninth, twenty seventeen firing, and predicated on
Speaker 1: an allegation that previously released records showed that the bureau's
Speaker 1: own agents had mostly dismissed apparently that's in the documents too.
Speaker 1: Quote the FBI's opening a full investigation based on the
Speaker 1: factual basis or articulable factual basis that reasonable reasonably indicates
Speaker 1: the President Donald J. Trump may be or has been
Speaker 1: wittingly or unwittingly involved in activities for or on the
Speaker 1: behalf of the government of Russia Federation which may constitute
Speaker 1: violations of federal criminal law or threats to the national
Speaker 1: security of the US. According to this electronic communication opening
Speaker 1: the probe on May sixteenth, twenty seventeen, and the goal
Speaker 1: of the investigation is to determine if President Trump is
Speaker 1: or was directed by, or controlled by, or coordinated activities
Speaker 1: with the Russian Federation in a manor constituting a threat
Speaker 1: to the national security of the US or a violation
Speaker 1: of the federal criminal statutes. In addition, this investigation was
Speaker 1: also will also seek to determine whether President Trump and
Speaker 1: others yet to be named obstructed and or conspiracy to
Speaker 1: obstruct any associated FBI investigation. Right, so's that's John Solomon
Speaker 1: is with us?
Speaker 2: Now?
Speaker 1: Is that what the classified documents actually say?
Speaker 3: Am I?
Speaker 1: I mean you're quoting from actual FBI documents. You've uncovered.
Speaker 2: You are quoting from the opening electronic communication that opened
Speaker 2: Oxford COMMA on May sixteenth, twenty seventeen. To really appreciate
Speaker 2: this and Sean, your show has made it possible for
Speaker 2: us to unravel this whole scandal over ten years. We're
Speaker 2: five months into the Trump presidency. We are nine months
Speaker 2: into what is known as Crossfire Hurricane in the beginning
Speaker 2: of May twenty seventeen. At the moment this memo is written,
Speaker 2: the FBI has concluded they don't have any evidence from
Speaker 2: Christopher Steele of Russia collusion. They have concluded that Mike Flynn,
Speaker 2: one of the targets Acrossfire Hurricane, did not engage in collusion.
Speaker 2: They have been told that Carter Page, the other target
Speaker 2: of the investigation, was a CIA asset, good guy, not
Speaker 2: a compatriot of the Kremlin. They have used multiple informants
Speaker 2: to bump up against Trump people. On all of those bumps,
Speaker 2: all of those interactions found that people like George Papadopoulos
Speaker 2: and Carter Page were patriots. They weren't willing to sell
Speaker 2: out their country to Russia. They have, as one agent said,
Speaker 2: zero evidence of Russian collusion. That Donald Trump was somehow
Speaker 2: tied to the Kremlin in doing things on behalf of
Speaker 2: the Kremlin. That body of evidence, with the proof that
Speaker 2: they didn't have a callude case, they decide to accuse
Speaker 2: the President of the United States of firing James Comy
Speaker 2: while acting as an agent of Russia. That is what
Speaker 2: this document shows. They give it a code name Oxford Common.
Speaker 2: That was the code name for the investigation. It gets
Speaker 2: approved by the man who fired James Comy. This is
Speaker 2: a very important fact. Rod Rosenstein, the Attorney General, and
Speaker 2: for the purpose of Russia collusion, the acting Attorney General
Speaker 2: is the man who approved fires James Comy. He knows
Speaker 2: that James Comy was fired for cause for not following
Speaker 2: Justice Department roles in the Hillary Clinton email case, not
Speaker 2: Donald Trump's case Hillary Clinton, despite the fact the.
Speaker 1: Way just for just to help people get their recollections straight. Here,
Speaker 1: Rod Rosenstein, did he not sign one of the four
Speaker 1: fives applications?
Speaker 2: John he did? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Okay, And let me ask you another question, just to
Speaker 1: be very clear, because I want to give the timeline
Speaker 1: here after the twenty sixteen election, didn't we have professional
Speaker 1: intel intelligence officials, long serving professional intelligence officials make a
Speaker 1: determination about this allegation of Trump Russia collusion, and they
Speaker 1: came their career assessment came to there was absolutely no
Speaker 1: collusion at all whatsoever. And the only thing that changed
Speaker 1: that was a meeting at the White House in December,
Speaker 1: December eighth of My mind serves me well, my memory
Speaker 1: serves me well, December eighth of twenty sixteen, in Barack
Speaker 1: Obama's Oval office that Joe Biden attended. I believe that
Speaker 1: Brennan was there. I believe Clapper was there, Joe Biden
Speaker 1: was there, and did they not say, forget about the
Speaker 1: career professional intelligence assessment. We don't like the conclusion. Therefore
Speaker 1: we will make our own conclusion, which would contradict the
Speaker 1: original assessment by career intelligence officials.
Speaker 2: That's right. Let me walk it through that. So there
Speaker 2: are two things going at once. Is Donald Trump colluding
Speaker 2: with Russia. That's the FBI's call. And as I just
Speaker 2: laid out, by early twenty seventeen, they know there's no
Speaker 2: collusion efforts. They've done the spreadsheet on the Steele dossier,
Speaker 2: they've done the Mike Flynn closed down the investigation. They've
Speaker 2: got that. Separately, there's a separate intelligence community assessment. Did
Speaker 2: Vladimir Putin prefer Donald Trump or Hillary Coot in the election.
Speaker 2: The career people, and you have the date exactly right,
Speaker 2: your memories amazing, December eighth, twenty sixteen. The career people
Speaker 2: provide an intelligence commute assessment reports saying no preference. In fact,
Speaker 2: Vladimir Putin dropped out of the election, didn't try to
Speaker 2: help one of the other candidate in the fall. Before
Speaker 2: Barack Obama could be briefed on that. Before Barack obama
Speaker 2: could be briefed on it, Barack Obama's people say, we
Speaker 2: all like that conclusion, do it over and come up
Speaker 2: with a different conclusion. We wanted to say Donald Trump
Speaker 2: was helped by Vladimir Pute, which is not what the
Speaker 2: career people did. They didn't believe that, they didn't have
Speaker 2: any evidence that. In fact, they knew it wasn't true
Speaker 2: because in the October timeframe, when Russia could have been
Speaker 2: most effective, they dropped all their active measures, they stopped
Speaker 2: engaging in the US election. So you're right, Barack Obama.
Speaker 3: But it runs a little deeper.
Speaker 1: And I'm only laying the foundation for where you're now
Speaker 1: taking this. Because remember the first PISA application, everybody was warned,
Speaker 1: even Bruce or warned everybody, and everybody was aware that
Speaker 1: what became the foundation of the FISA application was Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton's bought and paid for, ironically Russian disinformation dossier. That's so,
Speaker 1: and actually, if there's any Russia implications, collusion, if you will,
Speaker 1: whatever term is appropriate in terms of setting up this narrative,
Speaker 1: it came from her, and she bought and paid, and
Speaker 1: they knew it was bogus.
Speaker 2: You got it exactly right. Remember, Barack Obama gets warned
Speaker 2: at the end of July or early August of twenty
Speaker 2: sixteen that Hillary couldn't set up this dirty trick, that
Speaker 2: she came up with a plan to hang a fake
Speaker 2: scandal on Donald Trump called Russia collusion. In September, the
Speaker 2: CIA tells him the person you're looking at, the person
Speaker 2: that Carter page, you know, who's a sided in the
Speaker 2: Steele dossier, he's our guy. He's a CIA guy. He's
Speaker 2: a good guy, not a Russian collaborator. In October they
Speaker 2: do the first visit, signed by James Comy. By December,
Speaker 2: they've created the spreadsheet. They've fired Christopher Steele for leaking.
Speaker 2: They've done the spreadsheet and conclude there's nothing in the
Speaker 2: Steele Dassier that's real, nothing that's actionable. It's bogus, it's
Speaker 2: intelligence garbage. In January, guy closed it down on Mike
Speaker 2: Flint January twenty seventeen, they closed out no evidence of
Speaker 2: no derogatory evidence found about Mike Flynn and his dealings
Speaker 2: with the thing. That's a direct quote from the document
Speaker 2: I made public this morning. Then you get to May,
Speaker 2: James Comy gets fired. He's got his and he's in
Speaker 2: a cranny. He's not an appy about it. He leaks
Speaker 2: his memo suggesting Donald Trump is a bad guy. And
Speaker 2: then the FBI opens up an investigation on a predicate
Speaker 2: that they know is false. Their own files know to
Speaker 2: show that this is a false predicate. Donald Trump did
Speaker 2: not fire James Gomy at the Behest of Russia. He
Speaker 2: fired him because Rod Rosenstein concluded he violated the OJ policy.
Speaker 2: They know that there's no connections between Trump and the
Speaker 2: Kremlin in terms of criminal collusion or political collusion. I'm
Speaker 2: going to point something out. There's an incredible quote in
Speaker 2: today's story. It's from an FBI agent who worked the
Speaker 2: case just beneath struck. He's about as important to the
Speaker 2: case as Pete struck is, and he gives an interview
Speaker 2: to the Justice Department at some point saying, this is
Speaker 2: like being in a bad game of the board game Clue.
Speaker 2: They would just put two people in a room and
Speaker 2: say that must be collusion. And he said, quote, this
Speaker 2: is a guy named Bill Barnett. I did not see
Speaker 2: any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the
Speaker 2: Russian government. That is the clarendon. He's an expert. He's
Speaker 2: been doing this for decades. Later on, he goes and
Speaker 2: tells the Justice Department that he wanted out of the
Speaker 2: case because he saw the FBI just being abusive. Quote.
Speaker 2: He and others joked about the investigation into conclusion that
Speaker 2: could be made into a game, which they referred to
Speaker 2: as collusion Clue. In that hypothetical game, investigators are able
Speaker 2: to choose any character, conduct the activity in any location,
Speaker 2: impair this individual with another character, and interpret it as
Speaker 2: evidence of collusion. He called out his own bureau for
Speaker 2: playing a bad game of Clue, which, by the way,
Speaker 2: harmed the reputations and infringe the celebrities of all the
Speaker 2: people they were investigating. These are the documents that are
Speaker 2: now public. When the FBI opened up Oxford comment. They
Speaker 2: had no basis to claim Donald Trump fired Comy because
Speaker 2: of Russia. They didn't. They fired him over Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 2: And no basis to say that Donald Trump was wittingly
Speaker 2: or unwittingly under the control of Russia. Their own agents
Speaker 2: by that time had rolled it out.
Speaker 3: I mean, it's so remarkable.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you this question, because you know we
Speaker 1: have a very smart audience here. My question to you is,
Speaker 1: can people see these documents number one? And where are
Speaker 1: the consequences?
Speaker 3: Yeah? Where's the accountability? John?
Speaker 1: And that's what I get asked so often, because you know,
Speaker 1: we've talked about this now for a long time, and
Speaker 1: we have all these documents now coming out confirming corroborating
Speaker 1: everything we told people is true.
Speaker 3: It's so frustrating to me.
Speaker 2: I will never forget the day in March twenty seventeen
Speaker 2: when I was sitting with you in New York and
Speaker 2: you said to me, let's peel back this onion. Something
Speaker 2: doesn't feel right. And that's nine years ago, nine plus
Speaker 2: years ago. Sean and Sarah and all the other greg
Speaker 2: and all the great people that worked with us, and
Speaker 2: we sued. We got documents, we want Now, the President
Speaker 2: has made it easy to release these documents because he
Speaker 2: gave me control of this task force, and I can
Speaker 2: go get them for the American publics. So let me
Speaker 2: answer two questions. One, the documents are sitting on the
Speaker 2: White House website under the Election Integrity Site. You can
Speaker 2: download them, hold them in your hands, and read them yourself.
Speaker 2: Nothing special for anyone. Everybody gets treated the same. I
Speaker 2: can look at it. Two, I wrote a story for
Speaker 2: the first time in my life for the White House
Speaker 2: that's sitting on the White House website in the press section.
Speaker 2: You could read the story I wrote. All the documents
Speaker 2: are also embedded in there, so we make it easy
Speaker 2: to understand. Now let's get to the act, the question
Speaker 2: of accountability. This is I've talked to several lawyers this morning.
Speaker 2: This isn't. This particular case is a strong case of
Speaker 2: what we would call an overt act. In the conspiracy
Speaker 2: case Donald the conspiracy is the Justice Department intelligence can
Speaker 2: be repeatedly violated Donald Trump's civil liberties and civil rights
Speaker 2: by investigating them without cause and merit, raiding his home
Speaker 2: without cause and merit. This would be an overt act.
Speaker 2: You could build that case now, I'm going to tell
Speaker 2: you something. I don't know this as a government playee.
Speaker 2: So this is not me speaking as the chairman of
Speaker 2: the White House Task Force on Government Transparency. This is
Speaker 2: talking to you as John Solomon, the reporter at just
Speaker 2: the News. The current investigation by Joe Degenevan has been
Speaker 2: obstructed or months or months by Republicans. I'm going to
Speaker 2: call them out by name and give you the specifics.
Speaker 2: In the end of January, the Senate received a request
Speaker 2: from the Miami US Attorney's Office, where Joe degennival would
Speaker 2: go to work, saying we need the transcripts of John
Speaker 2: Brennan's Senate Intelligence Committee of interviews so we can finish
Speaker 2: our investigation. These are crucial documents. Nine months have been
Speaker 2: passed in the Senate. John fun and Senator Tom Cotton,
Speaker 2: the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, have not produced
Speaker 2: these documents, and for nine months, the Trump Justice Department
Speaker 2: has not allowed a grand jury subpoena to go to
Speaker 2: the Senate to compel the production of these documents. If
Speaker 2: there is no accountability, if there is no indictment of
Speaker 2: a Brennan or a Comy, we will look back and
Speaker 2: say Senator John fun Senator Tom Cotton, Attorney General Todd Blancher,
Speaker 2: acting Attorney General soon to be Attorney General. You'll be
Speaker 2: partly responsible because any other Justice Department in history, if
Speaker 2: Congress resisted this long on a piece of evidence, you
Speaker 2: would have subpoened them and you would have compelled the
Speaker 2: courts to get it. They did it in they did
Speaker 2: it in Watergate, they did it in Whitewater. They did
Speaker 2: it for Donald Trump. But for some reason, they've allowed
Speaker 2: nine months to elapse or eight months to elapse when
Speaker 2: they came out.
Speaker 3: I'm kind of shocked.
Speaker 1: A couple of the names that you're talking about here,
Speaker 1: Tom Cotton, that you know, I've always found them would
Speaker 1: be a straight shooter.
Speaker 2: Well, tell you he has the request. He's had it
Speaker 2: since January, end of January, early February. He has not
Speaker 2: turned it over. There are people in the administration that
Speaker 2: have tried to call him. He hasn't returned the calls.
Speaker 2: They have not produced this document. I wrote a kind
Speaker 2: story back in May saying, hey, this has been going
Speaker 2: on for five months. Nothing happened. John soon Wift, Tom
Speaker 2: Cotton didn't deliver, and Todd blanche did not subpoen him.
Speaker 1: Well, now that he's about to be the attorney general
Speaker 1: who maybe have changed those things.
Speaker 3: I hope so.
Speaker 1: I wish i'd more time, you know, always doing the
Speaker 1: legwork again. You can go to John Solomon's site justinews
Speaker 1: dot com. You can go to the white House website
Speaker 1: what is a white House dot CoV and all of
Speaker 1: this is up there, the documents. You can read them
Speaker 1: and make your own conclusions. We appreciate it as always,
Speaker 1: John Solomon, thank you, my friend.
Speaker 2: See you soon.
Speaker 3: Great work.
Speaker 4: Thanks for listening to Sean Hannity.
Speaker 1: Alec Baldwin's favorite radio talk show host is on the
Speaker 1: air right now, right mister Baldwin, Sean Hennity, all right,
Speaker 1: we have a couple of calls from Michigan. Let's get
Speaker 1: to them. Peggy, Well, first, let's go to I'm sorry
Speaker 1: Tisham Michigan. Peggy's in Wisconsin. Will ask her about Francesca
Speaker 1: in a minute, Tish, how are you.
Speaker 3: Glad you called?
Speaker 5: Hi?
Speaker 2: Sean? Thank you.
Speaker 3: How do you feel about the results of your primary
Speaker 3: last night?
Speaker 5: Scared?
Speaker 3: I like that.
Speaker 1: I like that you have a certain healthy degree of fear.
Speaker 1: This guy is now on the ballot for this midterm election.
Speaker 1: I would like every person in Michigan to understand what
Speaker 1: is at stake in this midterm and what it would
Speaker 1: mean for the people in You're a great state of Michigan.
Speaker 1: I'm very fond of the people of Michigan. You should
Speaker 1: have a healthy dose of concern and fear that this
Speaker 1: radical is on the ballot and he must be defeated.
Speaker 1: Mike Rodgers is a great candidate, and I hope people
Speaker 1: will wise up and be very aware what is at
Speaker 1: stake here.
Speaker 5: I voted for Rogers. I was when I went to
Speaker 5: bed last night what his face was down a point
Speaker 5: or two, and I was hoping it was going to
Speaker 5: stay that way. And when I got up this morning,
Speaker 5: he was.
Speaker 6: A point and it was much closer than what they
Speaker 6: were predicting because they were.
Speaker 3: Saying, listen, I expected he was going to do better.
Speaker 1: What I didn't realize is how much money, how many
Speaker 1: tens of millions that the Democratic establishment, Chuck Schumer, Whitmer
Speaker 1: and the rest of them had poured into this campaign
Speaker 1: to defeat elsaied. Now they'll never criticize him publicly, they're
Speaker 1: all afraid to. But but look at Mike Rogers distinguished army,
Speaker 1: that former FBI special agent, chaired the House Intel Committee,
Speaker 1: spent fourteen years in Congress. You know, pro America America first,
Speaker 1: and you know what. Look, I'm honored to endorse Mike Rogers.
Speaker 1: He was on the program last week. We'll have him
Speaker 1: on often between now an election day. And by the way,
Speaker 1: I'll even invite El Sayad on. Let's see if Elsayad
Speaker 1: has the courage to show up on the show.
Speaker 7: He scares me that whole.
Speaker 5: They say they're Democrats, but they're not. They're communists, and.
Speaker 3: That is correct. They are. They I agree with you.
Speaker 5: They want to take away your rights they want and
Speaker 5: it's like, if that's what you want, then go to
Speaker 5: those countries that have that political.
Speaker 7: Parties that are ruled by those parties.
Speaker 3: I have a better idea.
Speaker 1: I think, see if you agree with me, okay, because
Speaker 1: I hear what you're saying. You know, it kind of
Speaker 1: goes back in a little bit of a spin off
Speaker 1: of Love It or Leave It, meaning America. Here's my
Speaker 1: prescription for dealing with these lunatics because there are two
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty of them nationwide now since nineteen ninety
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, since twenty nineteen, and we're going to have
Speaker 1: over forty of these lunatics on the ballot this year.
Speaker 1: They now dominate the Democratic Party. The silence is deafening
Speaker 1: from every other Democrat, but for one elected Democrat, John Fetterman.
Speaker 1: You know, forget about Bill Maher and James Carvill and
Speaker 1: Van Jones and Mark Penn. I mean, elected officials won't
Speaker 1: take them on there too cowardly. Here's the better option
Speaker 1: to me. Defeat them. Defeat them. Take this threat seriously,
Speaker 1: look at their agenda. Understand it is a threat, a
Speaker 1: direct threat to the America that we know and love
Speaker 1: and that inherited because of the blood, sweat, tears, sacrifice
Speaker 1: of so many.
Speaker 3: And if you don't want the.
Speaker 1: Presidency eliminated and the Senate eliminated and judiciary changed the
Speaker 1: amnesty for illegals and abolishing borders, abolishing ice to funding
Speaker 1: the Department of War, ending all deportations, eliminating cash bell
Speaker 1: a wealth tax, you know, phony cradle to grave, womb
Speaker 1: to the tomb promises that will never be fulfilled, Abolishing
Speaker 1: prisons and police and public ownership of business. The answer
Speaker 1: is the antidote is to beat them, and everybody to
Speaker 1: make that happen has to do one little thing vote.
Speaker 1: So my message to all of my friends in Michigan commit,
Speaker 1: in your heart, mind and soul, you're going to take
Speaker 1: this guy elseide I add seriously, and as a clear
Speaker 1: and present danger to our way of life.
Speaker 3: That's it.
Speaker 1: He wants to radically change this country. He has radical,
Speaker 1: sick beliefs. And this is not somebody that is qualified
Speaker 1: to be a US Senator. And Mike Rodgers would be great.
Speaker 6: And when New York voted in Mandami, three million people
Speaker 6: voted out of eight million people, and what happened to
Speaker 6: the other five million people that were voted that could vote.
Speaker 1: I understand New York's a very different state, a very
Speaker 1: different city than the state of Michigan. It just is
Speaker 1: I have confidence that the people of Michigan by the
Speaker 1: time November rolls around, are not going to elect this guy.
Speaker 1: I do, and it is one of the most important
Speaker 1: Senate races now in the country. And I'm I'm tell
Speaker 1: your friends name, I'm going to actually print out a
Speaker 1: sheet of what the DSA Lunatics stand for, and then
Speaker 1: you could just print it out and hand it out
Speaker 1: to all your friends, your neighbors, your co workers. I
Speaker 1: don't know anybody who run into for crying out loud. Yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, Tish. Let now your heart be troubled instead
Speaker 1: of you know being, you know, living in fear. Let
Speaker 1: this be a internal motivation for you. You're on a
Speaker 1: mission to help save the great state of Michigan. Okay, yes, sir,
Speaker 1: all right, God bless you. Peggy is in Wisconsin. Well,
Speaker 1: they've got their primary coming up, and you got Francesca
Speaker 1: running for governor.
Speaker 3: There another lunatic. What's up, Peggy? How are you?
Speaker 8: I'm fine?
Speaker 2: Thank you for asking.
Speaker 8: I was calling in response to the interview that you
Speaker 8: had yesterday with mister Pruitt.
Speaker 3: And yes, yes, ma'am.
Speaker 8: Yet what he dealt with with his child in school,
Speaker 8: and how he was talking about how the teachers have
Speaker 8: this agenda and the schools have this agenda that was
Speaker 8: not in align with what he wanted for his own children.
Speaker 8: And as a teacher myself, I become irritated a little
Speaker 8: angry with those statements because not all teachers are part
Speaker 8: of that. There are so many wonderful teachers that all
Speaker 8: we want to do is educate your child. I don't
Speaker 8: care about your politics, I don't care about your agenda
Speaker 8: versus their agenda. I don't need to get involved with that.
Speaker 8: I need to teach your child how to read, how
Speaker 8: to write, how to communicate. And I know that parents
Speaker 8: have come to this point that they feel like they
Speaker 8: don't have allies in the school anymore. It's for them
Speaker 8: versus us, and that's not true. There are so many
Speaker 8: of us. We don't want to get involved in your politics.
Speaker 8: We just want to help educate your child. And unfortunately
Speaker 8: there aren't enough teachers who feel that they can speak
Speaker 8: up and say I'm not part of that.
Speaker 1: So I wanted to remember this is why parents try
Speaker 1: to get involved in schools. And then you have tiger
Speaker 1: moms like Linda, and I don't blame her at all.
Speaker 1: I mean, remember the FBI was investigating and wasting resources,
Speaker 1: you know, investigating parents at school board meetings that we're
Speaker 1: speaking out against curriculum that really should have no business
Speaker 1: in school as far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 8: You're right, parents should be asking questions, parents should be involved,
Speaker 8: But I want them to know that there are some
Speaker 8: teachers who are actually conservative minded, who are thinking along
Speaker 8: the same lines that they are. That my purpose in
Speaker 8: the classroom is to teach your child. The three ares
Speaker 8: it is not to push some other agenda, And unfortunately,
Speaker 8: teachers don't feel that they can speak out about that
Speaker 8: because we feel that we're in a position that week
Speaker 8: to lose our jobs if we don't tell the party line.
Speaker 8: And it can't be further from the truth. I don't
Speaker 8: know a teacher that doesn't teach or doesn't treat students
Speaker 8: with respect and dignity and kindness. I don't have to
Speaker 8: fly a rainbow flag in my classroom to get that
Speaker 8: message across. I treat all my students the same.
Speaker 1: You have the right idea reading, writing, math, science, computers,
Speaker 1: artificial intelligence. Focus on the basics. Let the values be
Speaker 1: instilled in children by their kids. You have a right
Speaker 1: to demand that they treat others the way they want
Speaker 1: to be treated. They follow the Golden Rule. Beyond that,
Speaker 1: let's focus on getting their test scores up without lowering standards,
Speaker 1: which they are notoriously known for doing in states like
Speaker 1: New York. All right, Peggy, I'm counting on you. Stop
Speaker 1: Francesca in Wisconsin, God help you if you don't. Back
Speaker 1: to our busy, busy telephones as we say hi to
Speaker 1: who's next? Tier Brenda in Indiana, what's up? Brenda, how
Speaker 1: are you glad you called?
Speaker 7: Its honored to talk to Sean.
Speaker 3: The honor is all mine. What's going on?
Speaker 1: You had on what are my.
Speaker 7: Fellow Hoosiers yesterday?
Speaker 2: Say?
Speaker 7: It's from Indiana? And so your question you were talking
Speaker 7: about the whole thing with Sophie Cunningham and some of
Speaker 7: what happens to Caitlin. But you asked him if he
Speaker 7: was a Fever fan, and I can't even remember his answer,
Speaker 7: but what he went off on is the WNBA and
Speaker 7: he said they don't even play the national anthem at
Speaker 7: the games, and even for All Stars, they didn't play
Speaker 7: the national anthem. So I'm here to correct that information
Speaker 7: that got out on your airways and probably made a
Speaker 7: lot of people upset.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I had never heard that, and I would assume
Speaker 1: that if that were true, would I would have read
Speaker 1: it somewhere, But I I you know, I just listened
Speaker 1: to people. I've watched w NBA games, I watched the Fever.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, I'm going to I'll tell
Speaker 1: you that Fever is my favorite team now because I
Speaker 1: think that I like Sophie Cunningham and Caitlin Clark. I
Speaker 1: wish Caitlin would have had a little more encourage to
Speaker 1: back up her teammate.
Speaker 3: Though.
Speaker 7: Well, here's how I know that for sure. My husband
Speaker 7: and I work for the Fever.
Speaker 3: Oh you do, what do you do?
Speaker 7: We're ushers, work for the Pacers. So we're there for
Speaker 7: all the events at Gamebridge field House, which is a
Speaker 7: wonderful venue. You need to come to a game, you
Speaker 7: and Linda. Sometime it is a blast.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go. I'm not taking Linda, but okay, I.
Speaker 7: Can tell you what happens is that we stop for
Speaker 7: the national anthem. We have a wide range of guests
Speaker 7: who come to perform all the way from elementary school
Speaker 7: choirs to professional people nationally recognized, usually sung, sometimes just played,
Speaker 7: even by our Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra members. And people are
Speaker 7: invited to stand take off their hats. And we also
Speaker 7: have a memorial in our field house for our patriots
Speaker 7: who never returned from war, and it's an empty chair
Speaker 7: and during the national anthem that is always shown at
Speaker 7: some point and everything stops. As ushers, we do not
Speaker 7: let people pasted us to be seated. And many of
Speaker 7: the other additional employees in the buildings, the claim chains,
Speaker 7: the security people, servers for suits. Everybody stopped. So it
Speaker 7: made me angry when I heard this gentleman yesterday saying
Speaker 7: something that he really didn't know.
Speaker 3: I'm so glad you correct that.
Speaker 1: I kind of my heartfelt I would have heard about this.
Speaker 1: This would not be that go unreported in my view.
Speaker 1: But you know, I just didn't know because I'd never
Speaker 1: been to a game. I have watched them on television.
Speaker 1: We appreciate you being with us eight hundred nine for one.
Speaker 1: Shawn is on number. If you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. Look the health, wellness, fitness, nutrition,
Speaker 1: longevity all important to all of us, but many of
Speaker 1: us are guessing our way when it comes to our health.
Speaker 1: All right, What foods to eat? What supplements you may
Speaker 1: want to take? Vitamins? You know, you wonder, you know
Speaker 1: why does some foods that you eat bloat you or
Speaker 1: give you You're tired after a big meal, or you get
Speaker 1: brain fog a lot of times. You know, that's not
Speaker 1: about getting older, It's about messages your body is sending
Speaker 1: you if you'd only listen.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: Your fingerprint remains the same throughout your life, as does
Speaker 1: your DNA, but your RNA can actually show what's happening
Speaker 1: in your body right now. Now, that's where the science
Speaker 1: of vyome comes in. Viome is a simple at home
Speaker 1: gut health test. They use advanced RNA technology to analyze
Speaker 1: your gut microbiome and understand how your body's functioning at
Speaker 1: any given moment. And from there, from there, viome, by
Speaker 1: the way, will then create a personalized food supplement plan
Speaker 1: designed specifically for your body, so you won't be guessing anymore.
Speaker 1: You'll be using their science, their data, and when people
Speaker 1: follow their plan, like Linda has been following hers, and
Speaker 1: she got rid of those you know, projectile vomit, disgusting
Speaker 1: puke kel shakes of hers and started eating more red meats.
Speaker 1: She feels better and you can see it, you can
Speaker 1: hear it on the air. She has more energy, her
Speaker 1: mood has improved dramatically. Anyway, if she would have listened
Speaker 1: to me just a few years ago. Anyway, go to
Speaker 1: biome that's vi i ome e dot com slash Hannity
Speaker 1: that's vi i o me dot com slash Hannity. Use
Speaker 1: the promo code Hannity fifty. You get fifty bucks off.
Speaker 1: Stop guessing and start now knowing a daily heat seeking
Speaker 1: missile of information that you won't get anywhere else.
Speaker 4: Sanity is on now, all right, that's going.
Speaker 1: To wrap things up for today. Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern
Speaker 1: on the Fox News Channel. Senator John Fetterman reacts to
Speaker 1: the DSA domination around the country. We will debate a
Speaker 1: DSA congressional candidate Chris rab Steven Miller tonight, Trey Goudi tonight,
Speaker 1: Victor Davis Hansen, Clay Travis offering ten million dollars for
Speaker 1: last year's WNBA championship team to play a team high
Speaker 1: school boys team anyway, nine Eastern Tonight, See you then
Speaker 1: back here tomorrow. Thank you for making the show possible.