WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: How the MPAA Works

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, This is Chuck and welcome to this weekend's

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know Selects episode. This one I picked

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>out How the m p a A Works from June

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>just a few years ago, and I picked this one because, well,

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of because I'm doing my new show Movie Crush,

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>where I talked to people about their favorite all time movie,

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and my new episodes called Mini Crushes where I don't

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>have a guest, but it's just Nolan High in here

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of rapping about stuff, recommendations and calling Facebook questions

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that, and it just kind of got

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>me thinking along the lines of movies in This episode

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Motion Picture Association of America was a really

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>good one. And if you are just confused by the

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>mp A what they do, this will clear it all

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.919
<v Speaker 1>up for you. So please to enjoy How the mp

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a A Works. Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>House Stuff Works dot com. M Hey, and welcome to

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, Jerry.

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>But where's wal though right over there apparently, and I

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>wish people could hear in between stuff. I think Jerry

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was recording that last one. Oh yeah, I think so.

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>She used to give us a neat little outtakes, but

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't do that anymore. Those days are long gone.

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>They exist in the vault though. How you doing not good? No? No,

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's wrong with me. I am off today.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Out of your game. Yeah, it's weird. Well, I think

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the perfect podcast to set you straight. Why

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's something that we both have some passion about against. Yeah.

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I think anybody who's seen um the documentary this film

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is not yet rated, that would be uh very difficult

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to not be persuade, didn't to feel strongly about the

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>m p a A and its practices. Yeah, and at

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>least how they do things. But we're going to try

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 1>to be objective. Yeah, I'm gonna go ahead and say

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>up front, I have no problem with rating of films

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>content so parents can decide whether or not it's appropriate.

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>It's valuable, but I think there are ways to do

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>it that I don't think the mp A does. Yes,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>So how how I just wanted to float that early on. Okay,

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that was probably smart. Okay, Um, I don't

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>have kids, so I don't really whatever, But I mean

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I can understand the value of that kind of thing. Yeah,

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>but it gives you an idea of Like I like

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>having an idea what I'm about to see too. I

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>feel like I can tell just from watching a trailer

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>previusing a movie poster. I'm pretty um, I'm pretty intuitive

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the marketing techniques of movies. Yeah,

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>but I think like being a film nerd, it's like,

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>is the New Uh? Is the New Avengers movie gonna

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>be rated R? That really tells you something. It won't be. No,

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it never would be, because PG thirteen is the the

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>h that's the strike zone these days. It really is.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Apparently PG thirteen movies pull in more money than all

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>other ratings combined. And it's a relatively new phenomenon. You

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about its origin, let's do it. So

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:34.119
<v Speaker 1>back in a man named Steven Spielberg had two movies out.

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Who Steven Spielberg right? Uh? He directed one, Indiana Jones

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and The Temporary Doom, and he produced another, Gremlins, and

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>both of them caught. He caught a lot of heat

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>from both of them. Sure, Indiana Jones for the heart

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>removal scene specifically, Yeah, but also the snake, the live

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>snake at the feast thing, yea, all the snake babies,

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the eyeballs, all that stuff. Uh. And then with Gremlins,

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it was just downright terrifying in a lot of different places,

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're a kid. And the reason he caught

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>heat was because both of those movies were rated PG.

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And so, uh, Spielberg went to the m p a A,

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the Motion Picture Association of America, and said, let's do

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 1>something about this because he's clearly aren't our movies, but

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>they apparently aren't PG movies either, so maybe we should

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>come with something in between. And PG thirteen was born. Yeah,

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>and this was before he had all this way in

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>the world. He was influential, but it wasn't like Spielberg today,

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>who could have just waved his wand and made it happen. Yeah,

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think even at the time he was important.

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>He Yeah, there were very few directors at that time

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>who could have gotten something like that done too. But um,

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>so that's where PG thirteen came from. And uh that,

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like you said, that's the strike zone now. And the

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>reason why is because that is the kind of movie

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that caters to um, young teenage boys who apparently are

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the most successful at getting girls to go to movies

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>with them. So if you can get a movie rated

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>PG thirteen, you're going to make a bunch of money.

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Plus it makes sense, it's right there in the middle. Yeah,

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you know. But the problem is it's become a means

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of almost advertising that rating rather than cautioning parents. It's

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a way of attracting the audience. It's like, this isn't

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>some kids PG movie. This is as close to an

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>OUR movie as you can get in Yeah, and I

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>think filmmakers try to achieve that rating, um by either

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>scaling back their our rated movie, or juicing up their

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:53.239
<v Speaker 1>PG movie or adding more violence. Apparently PG thirteen movies

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>are um have tripled in violence over the last like

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a few decades, and um they now have, according to

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>one study, more violence than there are rated counterparts in

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of violence that you didn't used to see. Yeah,

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. Um, all right, I guess we should go

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>back in time a little bit. Let's is it way

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>back machine? Sure, let's go. Let's go a way back

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>in time in Hollywood. All right. It's Hollywood and Vine

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>is a viable intersection in Hollywood at the time, unlike now,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>although people are gonna say no, they built that area

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>back up. Yeah. Uh, And that is when the m

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>p A was born in the early nineteen twenties. And

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>at the time it was up to local authorities or

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>your state or your municipality to either stamps something as

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>moral or immoral. Um, there were no ratings on movies.

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And thanks to a guy named Will Hayes who was

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the first president of the m p A, he installed

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the Haze Code and said, um, you're either going to

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>pass or fail. It's either gonna be stamped demorl or moral. Right.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And the reason Will Hayes, who is the m p

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a A president, came up with the Haze Code, which

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>was really extensive. It was like if you, uh, if

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the government, it always has to be good. Uh,

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>sexuality has to be like repressed, and just basically how

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you think about all movies from like the thirties and forties,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>squeaky clean. Basically like the division between good and evil

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is very clearly defined that the good guy always wins.

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And if you didn't fall into that Haze code, like

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you said, your movie would be stamped immoral. But the

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>whole reason he came up with this code was because

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>local municipalities could pass their own obscenity laws and that

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>could be bad for business. So then not even get

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>your film exhibited. Um. So remember we're in the A c.

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>L U episode where we're talking about that one Um,

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that one movie that New York just the Catholic said no,

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't show that here, and the A C. L

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You went to work getting getting the Catholics beaten in court, right,

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>even though it was just a bad movie something to

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>do with well, I mean it did, but it shouldn't

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>have been shown because it was so terrible. Was it bad?

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. Yeah, I mean it was supposed to

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>be not very good. Um, but it happened like that

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing happened a lot like local, local town

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>said no, we're not going to show that movie. So

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Hayes figured out if if Hollywood policed itself, then they

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>could control what, you know, what movies came out, and

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>therefore everybody could make a bunch of money. That's right,

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's the point of the n p A. There

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the lobbying arm of six major Hollywood studios there there,

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they work for them. Yeah, well yeah, that's one way

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to say it. But they and it's just those six too,

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Uh well, yeah, I mean you. There's definitely

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>an argument. These days the independent filmmakers have a much

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>rougher time with the m B a UM, but most

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 1>of the indies too, are eventually distributed by the majors. Anyway,

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I got you. You know what I'm saying. Uh So,

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>flash forward a bit in our way back machine to

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties. Things changed a little bit after World

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>War Two and people, I guess the easiest way to

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>say is people loosen up a little bit and didn't

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>mind certain elements in their entertainment any longer. Yes, A

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>big example this article uses Frank Sinatra got an Oscar

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>nomination for playing a heroin Addict and the Man with

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a Golden Arm. And that couldn't happen in the nineties. No,

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>millions of people hadn't died in World War two yet,

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I imagine that kind of loosens you up

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>as far as the seeing Chris words and stuff in

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>movies goes. Yeah, like that's not a big deal, Like

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>World War two is a big deal. Get your haunches

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>down exactly. That was the that was the big one,

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the big first crack to the Hayes Code. Uh, and

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>then there were I think that you said he won

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>an oscar, right, Yeah, it was a really good movie,

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of opened the floodgate, so that by

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the end of the fifties you've got some like a

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>hot and Tony Curtis and Jack Lemon are dressed like

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>women hitting on Marilyn Monroe and um. At that point,

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty obvious the Hayes Code was dead. Yeah,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they weren't passing the code, but they were

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>still getting released. So once something is subverted like that,

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's dead in the water, right, So there was

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a that was fine for a little while. I think

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the Hayes Code just kind of fell to the wayside

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and people were releasing movies without any kind of moral

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>or immoral stamp. But the rating system as we understand

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it today hadn't come about yet, so it's kind of

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a limbo period until and a store owner in New

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>York with the last name of Ginsburg got busted for

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>selling nudy mags to sixteen year old boys, and he

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>took it all the way to the Supreme Court saying,

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't can't say anything about this there's federal laws

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>about obscenity, not local laws in the Supreme Court that

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we really think it's up the local

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>municipalities to decide what they want their miners exposed to

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>or not. That got Hollywood's attention because all of a sudden,

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>local municipalities could decide whether or not they wanted to

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>show movies to minors or not, so that what was

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>old became new again. And Jack Valenti, who was in

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>charge of the m p a A, said we need

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>another system of self another self policing system, and he

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>came up with the rating system that that we have today.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and he uh, I mean Jack Valenti was the

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>head of the NBA for close to forty years, and

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>he initially the intention was to stop censorship because he

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>feared that the movies were going to start being censored locally.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the the origins of the m

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>p a's rating system. We're we're arts centered, art center,

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>but also money centered, because again, if you have if

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you have town A showing the movie, but Towns B

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>through L deciding that the movie is obscene and not

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 1>showing it, then you're losing that money and be through L.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So what Valenti came up with was this idea that

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>let us tell you what is appropriate for minors or

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>not what movie is, and we'll just make a simple

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>rating system g pg R or X the old X

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and triple X, which wasn't even formally a rating, it

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>was just a marketing tool. Yeah. Yeah, because three x's

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that's like whoa. I wonder if anybody ever came out

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with one with four X or double X even yeah,

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>like we cut out that one part so X. Uh. Yeah. Christian,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>our colleague here wrote a great blog post about the

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>former X rated movie. Is that right? Yeah, let's to

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>check that out. It's good for brain stuff, for stuff

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of genius on the brain stuff blog earlier this year.

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And you actually recommended it on your blog the X rating,

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah the best remember this week? Yeah, I remember recommending

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>one of his things. I just don't remember that one.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>It's good. I thought about asking him in here, but

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>then I thought, yeah, we got it. Um so yeah,

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>back then it was G through X and um. Well

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about you know how that changed maybe after

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>this message break. All right, so no longer do we

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have X rated movies. Now we have something I guess

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we should just go through what these ratings mean today

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand fourteen. So you've got your G. She's

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>always been G. General audience. Anyone can see it. Yes,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's your your family cartoon that kids love and

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>parents are forced to go to. Right. Then you've got PG.

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Um that means no drug use. Um, maybe a little violence,

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>because as will learn, the m p A has less

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>problems with violence and more problems with language and sex.

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Huge criticism, huge criticism. Uh, PG thirteen, which we've you know,

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of been through. Um. Then you've got your R

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and that is no one under seven. This is a

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>suggestion that no one ever seventeen be admitted without a parent.

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And uh, these aren't laws, though, that's one thing. It's

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>supportant to point out those are suggestions. And then theaters

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>have policies. Yes, it's let's kind of dig into that.

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So none of this is legally binding. None of them

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>are anything more than recommendations. They're basically saying that this

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>movie has X amount of profanity or x amount of nudity,

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>or lacks any drug use or something like that. And

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>so for what the m p a A thinks the

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>average moral compass of the average American thinks about these

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>different things like sex, drugs, nudity, all that stuff. This

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.359
<v Speaker 1>movie falls into this rating. And again it's not enforceable.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't even need to have a rating to release

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a movie. But if you want to get your movie

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in theaters, there's basically no theater chain out there right now,

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>no major theater chain out there right now that will

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>show an unrated movie. Yeah, it's a completely voluntary system

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to submit your film to the m p A ratings board.

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's de fact though, but you have to do it. Yeah,

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the rub is that they say it's voluntary, but

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you actually have to pay a fee to submit your

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>movie if you ever want to have it shown in theaters,

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>right and the fee is anywhere from like twenty five

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars for a big budget movie to seven fifty dollars

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>for a short um. And so you're you submit your movie. Well,

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into it in a second. Let's talk some

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>more about the rest of the ratings. Yeah, well there's

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>only one more and that's n C seventeen, which replaced

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>X and that means, uh, this is and it basically

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>means that it's for adults on me and you should

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>not come in if you're under eighteen, right and also

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>means these days as foreign or about lesbian or gays. Exactly. Yeah,

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>not fully, but sure it's pretty close. Yeah. Um. And

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>NC seventeen. The first movie to come out with that

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>was Henry and June. Yeah, not to be confused with

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Benny and June. Uh. And it basically sunk that movie

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>because everybody was like, oh, this is X now right

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>n C seventeen. If you jumble it all together, it

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>looks like X. And the whole reason they came up

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>with NC seventeen was to replace X because X was

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>associated exclusively with pornography in the minds of movie goers. Yeah, exactly. Um. Alright,

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>so let's get into this. The actual ratings board. There's

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the m p a A, and then working for the

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>m p A is the Classification and Ratings Administration CARA,

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh. CARRA doesn't say whether your movie stinks or not.

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Carras eight to thirteen people, and they're called raiders, and

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>they are overseen by senior Raider and they sit down

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and watch these movies and take copious notes on what

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they think based on their standards. Is Uh, I don't

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>want to say offensive, but just noteworthy, Like maybe they're

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>not offended, but they think the average mom and Sheboygan

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>might be offended. Right, supposedly, but which is a kind

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of a thing because the whole rating system, as you

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just kind of pointed out, is a subjective, totally subjective.

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>They supposedly. Uh. Here, here's the other rub is it's

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>all secret, right. You can you can find out of

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>federal judges name and address, but you can't find out

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>who a raider is for your films. It's all conducted

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in private. None of the stuff is released. And that's

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the big rubs in that documentary and with

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>filmmakers in general, is it's all, you know, done behind

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>closed doors. There's never any explanations provided. These people are

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>supposed to have kids between ages of five and seventeen,

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>but many of them do not, right, either have kids

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>at all or have kids that are older than eighteen. Um,

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 1>it basically frees them up from any accountability. Yeah, to

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>do this all in private and in secrecy. And until

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that movie, um By Kirby, what is Kirby's last name?

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Henry and June No, No, the the documentary, Oh yeah,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>this film is not yet right, and yeah when until

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Kirby Dicks, um, this film is not yet rated came out,

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like all of this stuff was just conjection, conjecture and

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood legend. He was the first one to really basically

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>he tailed these people, tailed them to lunch to find

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>out who they were and eaves drop on them and

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>like did some digging and found like these anonymous people

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>did not fall into the requirements that the m p

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>A said they did, and so not only was it

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in secret, it was it was fraudulent. Basically, this rating system,

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>so according to the standards, you submit your film, this

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>group of people, this anonymous group of people, watch it,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>they rate it, and then they come together and vote

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>on a rating, and then they passed. There there um

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>vote along to a senior rat who talks to the

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>movies distributor or director or producer says, here's the rating,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>here's why we rated it like this, and then you

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you're faced with a choice. You can accept the rating.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>You can edit your film as per the uh C

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>A r a S recommendations. Take out these bad words,

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>cut the sex scene a little early, leave all the violence, yeah, um,

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>or you can reject the rating and just release your

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 1>movie is unrated, which, well, you can try to release it,

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but since no one will show it, it's really sort

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of a misnomer, right, But it's because, I mean increasingly

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a thing again, you need the rating to get your

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>movie shown in movie theaters. But what happens if you

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>don't care if your movie comes out in theaters, video

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>on demand, yeah, or just releasing it to the internet. Now,

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about that. How that's going to change the landscape. Well,

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's a huge threat to the m p

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>a A because all of the power they wield is

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>found in this rating system. And if for theaters, yes,

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>if no one's going to theaters, then the m p

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>a A A loses all of that power, which is a

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 1>big deal, especially now because the m p A is

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>needed more than ever as a lobbying group because of

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>online piracy, which we'll talk about some more. So it's

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a very precarious time for the m p A right now,

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's a terrible time for them to be under

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>as much scrutiny and public attack and critique as they are.

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's I mean, they got spears sticking out every

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>which way, and their trunk is flailing in their honking.

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>That is true. One thing I should point out I

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>said it is that there's no accountability. That's what the

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>n p A says. It's the good thing about the

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>secrecy is that it frees them up. That anonymity does.

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>It frees them up from accountability. Um, I just don't agree, right, Okay,

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>So the uh, if you want to appeal there there

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>was apparently a change made in response to Kirby Dick's movie. Um,

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the documentary before if you were appealing your rating, which

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>is very difficult. Um, almost never was done and you

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>never want that's for sure, right, And when you were appealing,

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't reference any other film. It was totally done

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum, which is pretty preposterous. Yeah, Like that's

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the only way to be able to sell us. Like,

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, if you said this about this, then

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>why not this for my movie? Which meant that there

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>was no real standard, yeah that that you could point to,

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>or there were standards you could point to, they just

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be considered. Yeah, or at the very least, if

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>they do have written standards, they don't release them, so

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't even know what they are. Right. So, Um,

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>the m p a A is Uh, they've got their

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>rating system, they've got the appeals process, which was also

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in secret, unless that's changed, right I think. I think

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the appeals board not only was the appeals board and secret,

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>but they weren't even just raiders. They were people from

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the industry, right, and the Theater Owners Association exactly, whereas

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the people who were raiders are supposedly unaffiliated with the

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>movie industry and are just like average ordinary parents representing uh, Europe,

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Middle America. We'll just call it, even though I think

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that's insulting. The thing is, though, is a lot of

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>people criticize the mp A and say, these raiders are

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>UM really representing the six major studios who rake in

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the ten point nine billion dollars made in the United

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>States UM in theaters alone, just ticket sales, not DVD

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. UM. And that's what the m

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 1>p a A does in addition to rating. They are,

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like we said, the lobby arm for these six studios,

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that's right, And they I guess we should talk about

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>piracy now, huh. That's one of their other big besides

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>from rating movies, they are heavy in the lobby against

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>UM well, especially now with online piracy because the digital

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>distribution network is uh, it seems like the way forward

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>as far as distribution goes, right, Like it's the future.

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>It's not the future, it's the present and the future.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And the m p A has a they're accused of

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>UM basically trying to quell new technology. Yeah, by just

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>saying like, well, let's just keep people from peer to

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>peer file sharing in total so that they can't steal movies.

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>In part UM and if you go back to the

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>early eighties, Jack Valenti was known to have UM railed

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and lobbied against the legality of VCRs. UM people are

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be recording things and handing them out to

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>their friends exactly, So there was a The n p

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>A is a long history of basically like just doing

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>anything at Canada stifle innovation in order to protect the

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>profits of these big movie studios. The other problem with

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>them lobbying UM in favor of the six movie studios

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is that they inherently have a conflict of interest against

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the studios that are not part of these six that

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>they represent, but whose movies they still rate. So they've

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>been accused of UM more scrupulously or scrutinously rating the

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>movies of rival studios or foreign studios when assigning a rating. Well,

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's why filmmakers call consistently for transparency. It's it's

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there are many filmmakers out there saying

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>there should be no rating, we should just maybe some

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>like a large Fontier, you know, verna Hertzog. They're probably

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>no way things at all, But I think they just

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>want transparency, like open it up and let everyone know

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>how this is all done, who these people are, and

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>give us an idea on what in the world we're

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>submitting to voluntarily, quote unquote. Pretty interesting. So you were

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about online piracy um and with digital distribution being

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a big deal now, the m p AS needed more

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>than ever because they have to lobby Congress to fight

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>online piracy at a time when more and more people

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>are distributing online and going around the m p a A.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's losing its power, but it needs its power

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 1>more than ever. So, like we said, it's a precarious

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>time for the m p a A. And they tried

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a few things. They were successful with the uh what

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>was the first one in two thousand, the Digital No

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which basically that up until

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>then it wasn't a federal crime to share movies on

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>peer to peer networks. That one did it, and they

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>got that passed. The m p a A lobbied and

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>got that passed. They've cracked out on camcorder recording, yea.

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Like when you're in New York City and someone has

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a brand new copy of Godzilla on a video cassette

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for you, it's because, if you've seen Seinfeld, someone went

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and set in that theater with a camera recorder and

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just made a stupid, awful quality pirated version. Yeah, and

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it says that those are the most common. I guess

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I kind of believe that they're also the worst quality.

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Like sometimes people will like get up and move in

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>front of the camera, like to go to the bathroom

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>or something, and yeah, it's I've never seen one, but

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they're terrible. Um much. I don't want to say.

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>More common, but probably more common these days are like

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>copies of screeners, Like they send out DVDs to everybody

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>who's members of the Academy to vote on move these

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and so. Around Oscar time or before Oscar time, it

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>seems like the Internet gets flooded with way more high

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>quality copies of these major movies that are up for awards. Yeah,

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I think now they have, um, thanks to the n

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>p A, have something coded to your name now on

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>your copy, so like they'll know who leaked it or whatever.

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I think so, but I'm not surprised by that. Um. Apparently,

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>if you want to show uh Frozen at your church, yeah,

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 1>you better have a public performance license because it is

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>illegal to show a movie outside of your home. Yeah,

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that surprised me. But there are a lot of especially

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in the summertime, a lot of community screenings, like every

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>city now has uh. You know, Atlanta shows them in uh.

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I think at Oakland Cemetery, some other places in New York.

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 1>They have them all over the place. And technically, yeah,

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to have a license to do so, I'm

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>sure they do the big ones. Yeah, the big ones,

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure due. But like at your COMMUNNY pool when

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to show E T and Uh, the Feds

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>could come kick the gate down around the pool. I

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>bet they don't love HBO these days because you know,

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>HBO go um people steal that. They're just like, hey, dude,

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>what's your log in? And HBO came out and there, like,

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>who cares people are watching it? Yeah, go watch a

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>True Detective. Maybe you'll sign up for HBO because you

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>liked it, or maybe you'll just support the show period

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>on social media, even though you're getting it for free.

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Like we're making enough money basically, yes, And that's something

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people say, you know, film industry,

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't really feel that bad for you, Sean Austin

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>sit down, because you guys made ten point nine billion

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars in America in ticket sales alone in two thousand thirteen.

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>We don't feel that bad about this whole conundrum that

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the m p a a Is facing here the voices

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.959
<v Speaker 1>or yeah, yeah, okay, yeah, I don't think I knew that.

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he was. I can't remember that. There was like

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a whole um kind of push an anti piracy pushed

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a few years back, and he was the face of it,

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>part of it. Yeah, and he looked really mad about

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>things too. But um, speaking of piracy, I remember there

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>was a story that came out recently. It was if

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you think about it at first, it's like wow wow,

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But then if if you really kind of lend lended

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>some thought, it's really disturbing. Um, there were there was

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a report of prisoners at a prison being shown pirated movies,

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and some of the prisoners were there for pirating movies,

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and I like, really think about the injustice behind that, Like,

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that's just crazy town. Imagine if you've been like selling

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>counterfeit first and you go to prison and all of

0:29:56.400 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the all the guards are wearing counterfeit for co would

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be pretty swing in prison. It would be weird, but

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it would also be unjust. Yeah, yeah, true. But in

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>relation to this is just more and more widespread every day.

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>It feels like it's it's a losing battle. I think

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that the m p A is fighting right now. Well,

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I read somewhere today that they think they

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>might release a few of the Raiders names per film,

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.479
<v Speaker 1>not all like thirteen. But I need to look up that.

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Look that up again, because that I don't know. I

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>don't see the while releasing a three out of thirteen names,

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>does anybody any good? It does zero good? Uh? And

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>speaking of doing zero good? Um, the this there's kind

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of a new attachment to the rating system that they

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>have now. It's called check the box, and um it's

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it's basically a brief description of why a movie is

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>like PG. Thirteen, so it'll say like intense sci fi

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>action or something like that, or yeah, that kind of thing. Um.

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And some critics of the m p a A say

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just basically like shooting a laser beam into like

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen year old boy's brain, like brief nudity. Come

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>see it PG thirteen. Check that out, kid, Um. And

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people are looking at it

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's just kind of a disingenuous advertisement, cynical advertisement,

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>because the the m p a A is accused of

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not regulating or even potentially directly marketing to kids under

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the age of the movies that are being advertised. So

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like you're seeing a lot of ads for like R

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>rated movies on websites that are like very popular among

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>like the seventeen and undercrowd. Um, there's a lot of

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>tie ins for PG thirteen movies with like kids toys

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>for kids who are under who are under thirteen. Um.

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And so there's like this idea that there's the m

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>p a A is supposedly serving America's moral moral compasses,

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>but really at the same time they're undermining that morality

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're supposedly defending. By marketing and exploiting kids. Yeah,

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that'd be like a cigarette company having a cartoon animal

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as their mascot. Can you imagine the weird? Uh? Well,

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>one thing about the the subjectivity of it and the

0:32:57.760 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that it is a closed book, and they filmmakers

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and even know, you know what, how to tailor their

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>movie to achieve a certain rating, I mean to within

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a certain degree. But they've learned how to manipulate it

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>because there is no set standard by if you watch

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that film is not irrated. And you've heard plenty of

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>stories over the years about filmmakers intentionally putting in things

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that they never intend to be in the final movie

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>just to sort of distract from some of the other things.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So they'll shoot something kind of really outrageous, uh, to

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>get the m p A's Raiders haunches up and what

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they were never going to keep that part anyway. So

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they're subverting the system because there is no set standard,

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're just the stuff they want to keep in

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>is comparatively exactly more palatable. And if you don't have

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the set standard, where you can go and I wonder

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>what those sheets look like on the interior, you know,

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the great mystery. Surely they have their

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>own interior standards. They're not just like watch it and

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>see what you think. Well, they have group discussions. To man,

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to sit out on those, so the uh

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I read. Another criticism of the m p A is

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that the difference between PG thirteen movies and our movies

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:15.439
<v Speaker 1>these days is the profanity and the sexuality. Um, that

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>they're similar in violence, if not more violent in PG

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>thirteen movies, and that this is kind of messed up

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that the m p a A has very little problem

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>with violence, but when it comes to bad words or

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:34.760
<v Speaker 1>sexuality of almost any nature except for women being objectified

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and men being gratified. Um, then the m p a

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:44.720
<v Speaker 1>A suddenly puckers up. Well, yeah, and any a woman

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a cheating receiving sexual gratification or homosexual couple n Yeah,

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>virtually like guaranteed or depending on how they do it,

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>are if it's coming out of like one of the

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>major studios. So in other words, a man can receive

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>pleasure from a woman, and of course it's scrutinized somewhat,

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>because any kind of sex is more heavily scrutinized than violence.

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 1>But if a woman does like you said, or if

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a gay couple, it's all over so homophobic, misogynistic,

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:25.439
<v Speaker 1>do you decide right? And um fetishistic of violence, you know, yeah.

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Like here's one example. There's a great article called don't

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 1>expect any major changes to the n p A rating System,

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's basically Chris Dodd, who's the new head and

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the gang, digging in and saying, you know what, we

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>talked to your average parents and we pull them and

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this is what they want. Um. But they released none

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 1>of those studies released, none of those conversations released. Um.

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>A movie like Filomena, which you saw, was rated to

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>our Yeah. It was about a lady looking for a

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>long lost son. It was so far from an our movie.

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>It was ridiculous. Yeah. But it had a couple of

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>F bombs in it. Um, So they cut those out

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>and they bring it to a PG thirteen. You might think,

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>who cares cut up the F bombs make it PG thirteen.

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 1>But there's something bigger going on here, you know. Yeah,

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:19.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a great A V Club article about, um, how

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just totally out of step. A lot of the ratings

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>are and they have fifteen movies listed and basically talk

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>about their ratings. Um, like the first one they talk

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>about once that romantic. Um, it wasn't like a romantic comedy, wasn't. No,

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say it was a sweet just a modern

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>day romance told through music. It wasn't a musical, but

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of musical numbers. Highly inoffensive love story. Yeah,

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>very sweet movie. Uh, it had the same rating as

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>hostile to just basically torture porn. They both got the

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 1>same rating. Yeah should we should read this first line

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 1>from the A B Club. In early summer of two

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, two films were released with R ratings. One

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>featured a scene where a naked woman is suspended from

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a ceiling while another naked woman slashes her with a

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>scythe and base in her blood. The other featured to

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Dublin musicians singing songs together, falling in love and opting

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:22.439
<v Speaker 1>not to act on it, like there was never any

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>sex scene. They didn't even get together. Really. They're both rated.

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Are both rated are because of profanity Rushmore rated R

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for the scene at the end whether Max is putting

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on the play the Vietnam play, and there is a

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>shot of a couple of little kids looking at on

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on the set. There's some Playboy centerfolds up in the

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>locker like on the Vietnam set, and these it shows

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>these little kids like looking at those like a twelve

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 1>year old would probably do an for that, got an

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>R for that happiness. Todd Solins one of my favorite

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.359
<v Speaker 1>movies of all time. Yeah. Uh, they tried to give

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>it an n C seventeen rating, and he said, you

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'm not cutting anything. You can just go

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>take a long walk off a short pier, is what

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he famously said to them. And uh, he

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>released his movie as unrated. Really, yep, I don't think

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I knew that the way to go, Todd Solins. Or

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at some serious homophobia, um, the great

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 1>N nine movie A Longtime Companion features no real sex

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>acts at all, nothing explicit. Um. In fact, the A

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>B Club says it could show on network TV today

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>with just a few alterations. Um, but it was about

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a gay couple and uh so I got an n

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>C seventeen. Yeah. There's something called Afternoon Delight, which was

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a um a movie about a woman who hires a

0:38:54.360 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 1>gigelow and apparently is heavy on the The woman receiving

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 1>sexual gratification. It got an R rating despite and it

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>got an R rating after apparently the director cut a

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff out and the director said, what the

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>hey after um Wolf of Wall Street came out, like

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 1>have you seen this movie with like some very graphic

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>apparent sex scenes between a man and a woman. But

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Leonardo DiCaprio is the one enjoying it the most, So

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it's fine. It's an our, right, blue is the warmest color. Yeah.

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Last year that a teenage lesbian love story and got

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention, And there were some theaters that allowed, uh,

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>high school age kids to go see that anyway, because again,

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 1>this is in law, it's not binding. It's up to

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the theaters. Yeah, it's just so strange that such a

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>small group of people have such influence on such a

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 1>large industry. And yeah, the more you dig into it,

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>the more conflicts of interest arise, and the more r

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 1>trary the standards become, the more blood boiling it is.

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend you go read some stuff like rated

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>R for ridiculous by Kirby Dick his Little uh his

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Little um op ed about the m P A a

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>UM that one u s news and World Report article

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you wrote or suggested was good. I wish I wrote

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it had you been Uh, there would have been used correctly.

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 1>How did they misuse it? What? Yeah, I know, and

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that's terrible. Uh So the mp A will defend themselves

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and they say that there's no such bias and that

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we all these objectionable scenes are rated on the graphic

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>quality and how graphic it is. Um But if you

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>just look at the you'd have to be a dummy

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>nut to see these correlations. And the fact that they

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to care that much about violence in this

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>age where I don't know, does it influence people to

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>go shoot up a school? Who knows? Did you see

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that John Oliver quote that's a going around, Yes, but

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>what was it? It's like somebody unsuccessfully tries to carry

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>a bomb onto a plane in their shoe. We all

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>take our shoes off. There's like thirty something school shootings

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>after Columbine and absolutely nothing's changed. Or the onion article

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that's going around two now is this is something that

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>can't be prevented, says the only country where this kind

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of thing happens all the time, something like that. I'm paraphrasing. Oh, Yeah,

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the onion. Yeah, good stuff. Np A. Keep keep

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 1>doing the fighting, the good fight. Yeah good check out, Like,

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>just go start reading up on it. It's funny how

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>much we just take this stuff for granted, but when

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.400
<v Speaker 1>just start digging just slightly beneath the surface at the

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>very least. See this film is not yet rated. It's

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:53.240
<v Speaker 1>really good, um, really engrossing. And you know, for every

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred documentaries that come out, what five of them are

0:41:56.280 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>like really great? Most of them are pretty good Summer terror. Well,

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 1>so any really good one is worth seeing just in

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 1>and of itself. Agreed. Uh. If you want to learn

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.240
<v Speaker 1>more about the m p a A, type those letters

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>into the search part house to works dot Com and

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, search parts, it's time for listener mail. Uh.

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this wild Parrots um. Josh mentioned in

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the Tattoo podcasts that he had heard parrots like to

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>hang together wind free, and I wanted to burst in

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the podcast booth and tell you about the wild parrots

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of San Francisco. I'm not gonna get into it except

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to say that over the course of my life, the

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 1>parrots in San Francisco were sort of living legend that

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.720
<v Speaker 1>one would occasionally get the privilege of spotting now and then. However,

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>about three years ago, I moved in with my aunt

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>in the little San Francisco suburb of Brisbane, and apparently

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the famous flocks of parrots were also making their home there.

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Since it was warmer unless windy. Uh, these parrots were

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.760
<v Speaker 1>often hanging right outside my bedroom window, which is pretty amazing.

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, she says, amusing. I say it's amazing,

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but also somewhat annoying, especially since my first son was

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>just a little guy then and a very light sleeper.

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And these suckers are loud, That is true, they are

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>very loud. Also, guys, I'm sending you the link to

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>watch the preview of the two thousand three documentary The

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Wild Parents of Telegraph Hill. So I didn't know there

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was a documentary. I've heard that. I've heard of that before,

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I never knew what it was about. Amy. I will

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>check that out. Thank you, thank you for writing it. Yeah,

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot, Amy. Uh. If you have a documentary recommendation,

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we are always interested in those. Yeah. You can tweet

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:31.880
<v Speaker 1>them to us a s Y s K podcast. You

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>can post them on Facebook dot com, slash stuff. You

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.280
<v Speaker 1>should know uh, And you can send us an email

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff podcast at how stuff Works dot com and

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>has always joined us at our home on the web,

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the Beautiful Stuff You Should Know dot com. For more

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics, is it how

0:43:53.760 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com.