WEBVTT - Why did COVID Decision-Making Go So Wrong? (with David Zweig)

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:16.044
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:26.284 --> 0:00:29.364
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making better decisions.

0:00:29.564 --> 0:00:33.284
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nate Silver. My co host Maria Khannikova is off today,

0:00:33.284 --> 0:00:36.484
<v Speaker 2>but we do have a special guest. David Swag is

0:00:36.524 --> 0:00:38.764
<v Speaker 2>a journalist and author, most recently of the book An

0:00:38.804 --> 0:00:42.044
<v Speaker 2>Abundance of Caution, American Schools, The Virus and the Story

0:00:42.084 --> 0:00:45.724
<v Speaker 2>of Bad Decisions. He also writes a substack newsletter, Silent Lunch.

0:00:45.884 --> 0:00:48.644
<v Speaker 2>So welcome David. There are two reasons we're having you

0:00:48.684 --> 0:00:50.844
<v Speaker 2>on today. Why is I really like your book, In fact,

0:00:50.964 --> 0:00:53.724
<v Speaker 2>I endorse it. I blurred the back cover. And the

0:00:53.804 --> 0:00:56.164
<v Speaker 2>other is that it is Risky Business. It is a

0:00:56.204 --> 0:00:59.364
<v Speaker 2>show about making better decisions. That's our tagline, and this

0:00:59.444 --> 0:01:01.444
<v Speaker 2>is the case where a lot of really bad, high

0:01:01.484 --> 0:01:04.524
<v Speaker 2>stakes decisions were made. So welcome, Welcome to the show, David,

0:01:05.004 --> 0:01:09.084
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Nate, and to help you and the audience navigate,

0:01:09.524 --> 0:01:11.564
<v Speaker 2>we are covering quite a bit of territory today. I

0:01:11.604 --> 0:01:13.444
<v Speaker 2>want to kind of situate us at the start of

0:01:13.444 --> 0:01:16.284
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic, which may be a traumatic time frankly for

0:01:16.684 --> 0:01:18.244
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people. I want to talk through the

0:01:18.284 --> 0:01:21.884
<v Speaker 2>notion of cost benefit analysis and go through some terminology there,

0:01:22.404 --> 0:01:25.404
<v Speaker 2>talk about politics, and psychology talk about the model. So

0:01:25.404 --> 0:01:27.124
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot to get to. But I want to

0:01:27.164 --> 0:01:31.084
<v Speaker 2>first just ask, Okay, sometimes you'll hear this more often

0:01:31.124 --> 0:01:33.924
<v Speaker 2>from liberals who may be at made a Interesteff, we

0:01:33.924 --> 0:01:36.204
<v Speaker 2>didn't have the best possible COVID response, But why is

0:01:36.244 --> 0:01:39.084
<v Speaker 2>it important to talk about this? I mean, it's been

0:01:39.124 --> 0:01:42.564
<v Speaker 2>more than more than five years. What's your response to that.

0:01:43.284 --> 0:01:46.284
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'd say I have two responses. One is that

0:01:47.164 --> 0:01:52.684
<v Speaker 1>this was, to my mind, possibly the most important event

0:01:52.804 --> 0:01:55.964
<v Speaker 1>in some regards, you know, as far as infringing on

0:01:56.084 --> 0:01:59.684
<v Speaker 1>personal liberties of American citizens that we've seen in a

0:01:59.764 --> 0:02:02.724
<v Speaker 1>generation or more. And you know, when you compare it

0:02:02.724 --> 0:02:04.684
<v Speaker 1>to other events like I don't know nine to eleven

0:02:04.804 --> 0:02:08.964
<v Speaker 1>or the Iraq War, the amount of analysis and books

0:02:08.964 --> 0:02:15.244
<v Speaker 1>written and scholarly study of those events to me seems

0:02:15.284 --> 0:02:18.084
<v Speaker 1>like there should be that but times ten for this,

0:02:18.204 --> 0:02:21.524
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like the actual impact on every single person

0:02:21.524 --> 0:02:24.324
<v Speaker 1>in the country, and of particular interest to me children,

0:02:24.604 --> 0:02:29.164
<v Speaker 1>to my mind, has not remotely been adequately studied or

0:02:29.204 --> 0:02:32.084
<v Speaker 1>reckoned with one of the prime reasons I wrote my book.

0:02:32.444 --> 0:02:36.644
<v Speaker 1>And the second answer to your question is that, ultimately,

0:02:36.844 --> 0:02:39.204
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think, like any good books should be

0:02:39.964 --> 0:02:42.964
<v Speaker 1>my book is not really about the pandemic. That's the backdrop,

0:02:43.324 --> 0:02:46.964
<v Speaker 1>but hopefully what it's about is indeed to the topic

0:02:47.004 --> 0:02:49.684
<v Speaker 1>of your podcast. It's really, to use a medical word,

0:02:49.724 --> 0:02:53.124
<v Speaker 1>it's an anatomy of decision making, and my whole book

0:02:53.204 --> 0:02:58.684
<v Speaker 1>is interested in how do individuals, how do policymakers, and

0:02:58.684 --> 0:03:02.564
<v Speaker 1>how do we as a society make decisions, particularly when

0:03:02.604 --> 0:03:05.964
<v Speaker 1>we have limited information and in a time of crisis.

0:03:06.364 --> 0:03:08.844
<v Speaker 1>I use the pandemic as a case study or is

0:03:08.884 --> 0:03:12.324
<v Speaker 1>a back to kind of explore these these dynamics in

0:03:12.364 --> 0:03:16.644
<v Speaker 1>our country, where the reader hopefully comes away from the

0:03:16.684 --> 0:03:20.204
<v Speaker 1>book with an understanding about these kind of decision making

0:03:20.284 --> 0:03:24.884
<v Speaker 1>dynamics that can be applied really to any time that's happening,

0:03:24.964 --> 0:03:26.804
<v Speaker 1>not just a sort of retrospective.

0:03:26.804 --> 0:03:29.764
<v Speaker 2>Look, do you think there's some scar tissue where people

0:03:29.804 --> 0:03:32.564
<v Speaker 2>find it traumatizing it because, like so, we just had

0:03:33.204 --> 0:03:36.884
<v Speaker 2>two big books come out about Joe Biden, which is

0:03:36.884 --> 0:03:39.404
<v Speaker 2>a case that in certain ways is parallel where things

0:03:39.444 --> 0:03:42.244
<v Speaker 2>maybe people on the left kind of got wrong right

0:03:42.324 --> 0:03:47.924
<v Speaker 2>directionally speaking, do you think people are traumatized by this

0:03:48.004 --> 0:03:49.964
<v Speaker 2>experience and don't like talking about it?

0:03:50.084 --> 0:03:52.524
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't just think and I know it because

0:03:53.004 --> 0:03:57.084
<v Speaker 1>many people have told me so. But you know, a

0:03:57.164 --> 0:04:01.084
<v Speaker 1>reaction I've heard many times to the book is someone

0:04:01.124 --> 0:04:03.124
<v Speaker 1>said they wanted to put their fist through a wall

0:04:03.444 --> 0:04:06.204
<v Speaker 1>while they were reading it. Someone else said they cried,

0:04:06.404 --> 0:04:08.684
<v Speaker 1>people are cringing. Someone said they had to read it

0:04:08.724 --> 0:04:11.844
<v Speaker 1>in stages. But with all that said, to my mind,

0:04:11.884 --> 0:04:15.724
<v Speaker 1>this is something that is both a difficult but necessary read.

0:04:16.764 --> 0:04:18.204
<v Speaker 1>So Scar Tiss would be damned.

0:04:18.924 --> 0:04:21.364
<v Speaker 2>So I do want to take us back now five

0:04:22.004 --> 0:04:25.484
<v Speaker 2>plus years roughly. You know, for me, it was kind

0:04:25.484 --> 0:04:27.804
<v Speaker 2>of a crazy time. This is just the climax of

0:04:27.844 --> 0:04:31.364
<v Speaker 2>the Democratic primary campaign. So I'm like flying around like

0:04:31.404 --> 0:04:35.084
<v Speaker 2>New Hampshire and South Carolina and various events, big conference

0:04:35.084 --> 0:04:38.764
<v Speaker 2>in Boston. Increasingly you see every flight, every flight, it's

0:04:38.804 --> 0:04:41.044
<v Speaker 2>a little bit emptier every time. You get a little

0:04:41.084 --> 0:04:44.324
<v Speaker 2>bit more worried about, you know, maybe we shouldn't be

0:04:44.324 --> 0:04:48.804
<v Speaker 2>gathering all these people together. You are in Westchester County, correct,

0:04:48.884 --> 0:04:52.044
<v Speaker 2>which is if people don't know, it's the immediate northern

0:04:52.084 --> 0:04:57.724
<v Speaker 2>suburbs of New York City, stereotypically nice, leafy houses, liberal,

0:04:57.964 --> 0:05:01.524
<v Speaker 2>kind of pro democratic politics, middle class, upper middle class

0:05:01.524 --> 0:05:04.564
<v Speaker 2>depending on the precise community. Right, And you're a dat

0:05:04.604 --> 0:05:09.964
<v Speaker 2>of too Yep, everything you said sounds accurate. I live

0:05:10.004 --> 0:05:12.164
<v Speaker 2>part time in Weschester County two. My mom grew up

0:05:12.204 --> 0:05:15.124
<v Speaker 2>in a town called Crotons, so I can visualize this

0:05:15.244 --> 0:05:17.804
<v Speaker 2>and like, so one might say, it's like not the

0:05:17.804 --> 0:05:20.924
<v Speaker 2>worst place to be in a pandemic, right, It's kind

0:05:20.924 --> 0:05:24.124
<v Speaker 2>of medium density. There tend to be parks and places

0:05:24.164 --> 0:05:26.804
<v Speaker 2>to go jogging. So what's your sense at the very

0:05:26.884 --> 0:05:30.124
<v Speaker 2>start of the pandemic when do you start to worry

0:05:30.204 --> 0:05:33.084
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be severe? How are you behaving?

0:05:34.644 --> 0:05:38.204
<v Speaker 1>Like most people in my area when when things kicked off,

0:05:38.244 --> 0:05:41.364
<v Speaker 1>I listened to the experts. We locked down. I'm a

0:05:41.364 --> 0:05:44.004
<v Speaker 1>little embarrassed to admit we even wiped our groceries when

0:05:44.044 --> 0:05:47.284
<v Speaker 1>they came in. So I did not start out as

0:05:47.284 --> 0:05:50.844
<v Speaker 1>a contrarian on this. I had no political motivations in

0:05:50.924 --> 0:05:54.804
<v Speaker 1>this at all, and I had no reason to disregard

0:05:54.844 --> 0:05:59.884
<v Speaker 1>what we were being told simultaneously. However, within like day

0:05:59.964 --> 0:06:04.244
<v Speaker 1>one of so called remote learning, it was very obvious

0:06:04.284 --> 0:06:08.484
<v Speaker 1>to me that this was not going to work over

0:06:08.564 --> 0:06:12.004
<v Speaker 1>a long period of time. It seemed a reasonable trade

0:06:12.044 --> 0:06:15.444
<v Speaker 1>off initially based on the information we were given, so

0:06:15.484 --> 0:06:19.764
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't disregarding that, but Nevertheless, this still seemed like, whoa,

0:06:19.764 --> 0:06:21.884
<v Speaker 1>how is this going to play out? Because this is

0:06:21.924 --> 0:06:23.844
<v Speaker 1>not working. I had a third grader and a fifth

0:06:23.884 --> 0:06:26.964
<v Speaker 1>grader at the time, and it was just obvious this

0:06:27.084 --> 0:06:30.844
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a disaster, and that really led

0:06:30.884 --> 0:06:32.604
<v Speaker 1>me to start digging into this.

0:06:33.244 --> 0:06:35.764
<v Speaker 2>So when did you have these moments, David where you

0:06:35.804 --> 0:06:38.484
<v Speaker 2>felt like, oh my god, there's not a lot of

0:06:38.724 --> 0:06:43.724
<v Speaker 2>trustworthy information. What were those those inflections?

0:06:43.804 --> 0:06:46.204
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? So, like I said, I sort of had no

0:06:46.284 --> 0:06:49.844
<v Speaker 1>reason initially to disregard what we were being told. But

0:06:49.884 --> 0:06:54.124
<v Speaker 1>my nature, just my disposition is to always be somewhat skeptical,

0:06:55.284 --> 0:06:59.244
<v Speaker 1>and initially I wasn't pursuing this professionally at all. It

0:06:59.324 --> 0:07:03.364
<v Speaker 1>was just sort of my own need to feel informed

0:07:03.404 --> 0:07:07.244
<v Speaker 1>about what was going on. And what changed for me

0:07:07.444 --> 0:07:10.324
<v Speaker 1>was I started realizing the information was getting I started

0:07:10.364 --> 0:07:15.124
<v Speaker 1>emailing infectious disease experts and epidemiologists and others, almost all

0:07:15.164 --> 0:07:18.324
<v Speaker 1>of them in Europe because the ones in the States

0:07:18.364 --> 0:07:21.604
<v Speaker 1>weren't responding or didn't have the information. But I started

0:07:21.604 --> 0:07:23.924
<v Speaker 1>reaching out to people in Europe trying to get more information,

0:07:24.324 --> 0:07:29.124
<v Speaker 1>and I very quickly had this strange feeling. I'm like,

0:07:29.484 --> 0:07:32.244
<v Speaker 1>holy shit, like none of this stuff is really being

0:07:32.284 --> 0:07:35.124
<v Speaker 1>printed in the Times or I'm not seeing this elsewhere.

0:07:35.604 --> 0:07:37.804
<v Speaker 1>And then that's when I was like, all right, maybe

0:07:38.604 --> 0:07:40.804
<v Speaker 1>I need to do something about this. I'm in the media.

0:07:40.884 --> 0:07:43.804
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like the media is disappointing me. Well, okay,

0:07:43.844 --> 0:07:45.684
<v Speaker 1>then I guess it falls on my shoulders. And I

0:07:45.764 --> 0:07:48.524
<v Speaker 1>was writing another book at the time, obviously totally unrelated

0:07:48.564 --> 0:07:51.364
<v Speaker 1>to the topic. I just couldn't concentrate on anything. All

0:07:51.404 --> 0:07:55.324
<v Speaker 1>I could think about was this insane, you know, circumstance

0:07:55.644 --> 0:07:58.564
<v Speaker 1>that we were in. And then just more specifically, Nate,

0:07:59.524 --> 0:08:03.164
<v Speaker 1>toward the end of April, I was walking with a

0:08:03.204 --> 0:08:05.564
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine on the high school track here in

0:08:05.564 --> 0:08:09.204
<v Speaker 1>my town and we were dutifully separated on like lanes

0:08:09.404 --> 0:08:13.924
<v Speaker 1>one and four, wearing masks most likely. And by the

0:08:14.044 --> 0:08:18.284
<v Speaker 1>end of April, I think it was new cases in

0:08:18.364 --> 0:08:22.844
<v Speaker 1>New York had dropped by something like fifty percent. And

0:08:23.044 --> 0:08:25.204
<v Speaker 1>as you'll recall and everyone else will, you know, we

0:08:25.204 --> 0:08:28.524
<v Speaker 1>were told and the official slogan was fifteen days to

0:08:28.564 --> 0:08:31.604
<v Speaker 1>slow the spread that began in March, and then they

0:08:31.724 --> 0:08:34.484
<v Speaker 1>tacked another thirty days onto that, and you know, and

0:08:34.524 --> 0:08:37.524
<v Speaker 1>there was seemingly, to my mind like there was no

0:08:37.604 --> 0:08:39.804
<v Speaker 1>real debate or pushbackers, just like, oh yeah, I remember

0:08:39.804 --> 0:08:43.084
<v Speaker 1>how we told you fifteen days. Now we're adding another thirty.

0:08:43.124 --> 0:08:47.564
<v Speaker 1>And so the thing is, the reasoning behind the fifteen

0:08:47.644 --> 0:08:50.404
<v Speaker 1>days to slow the spread was we had to prevent

0:08:50.524 --> 0:08:53.004
<v Speaker 1>hospitals from being overwhelmed. And you know how, we were

0:08:53.044 --> 0:08:56.044
<v Speaker 1>shown this this graph of you know, if everyone just

0:08:56.084 --> 0:08:59.084
<v Speaker 1>follows instructions, you'll have this gentle slope, and if you

0:08:59.124 --> 0:09:01.604
<v Speaker 1>don't follow instructions, we'll have this spike and the hospitals

0:09:01.604 --> 0:09:04.404
<v Speaker 1>will be overwhelmed. So by the end of April, cases

0:09:04.444 --> 0:09:07.004
<v Speaker 1>had fallen, new cases had fallen something like fifty percent.

0:09:07.324 --> 0:09:09.804
<v Speaker 1>And I said to my friend, I'm like, oh, well,

0:09:10.324 --> 0:09:12.124
<v Speaker 1>do you think schools are going to open next week?

0:09:12.204 --> 0:09:13.444
<v Speaker 1>You know, I assume, And he's like, what are you

0:09:13.484 --> 0:09:15.684
<v Speaker 1>talking about. I'm like, well, we did it. We flattened

0:09:15.684 --> 0:09:18.484
<v Speaker 1>the curve, man. We we had a very specific goal

0:09:18.604 --> 0:09:21.164
<v Speaker 1>that we were told we needed to achieve. We achieved it.

0:09:21.284 --> 0:09:25.444
<v Speaker 1>We flattened like literally, and and then he was like, dude,

0:09:25.484 --> 0:09:27.844
<v Speaker 1>they're not going back. They're not going back to school,

0:09:28.164 --> 0:09:30.564
<v Speaker 1>and like, still, even though I've retold this story a

0:09:30.564 --> 0:09:32.364
<v Speaker 1>million times and talk about in the book The Hairs

0:09:32.364 --> 0:09:34.324
<v Speaker 1>on the back of my neck still stand up, because that,

0:09:34.484 --> 0:09:36.884
<v Speaker 1>to me was one of the in was like the

0:09:36.924 --> 0:09:41.844
<v Speaker 1>initial moment where I'm like, oh, like, so that's really

0:09:41.884 --> 0:09:44.364
<v Speaker 1>weird that we're in a country where the government told

0:09:44.404 --> 0:09:46.564
<v Speaker 1>us like, here's the thing you need to do, here's

0:09:46.604 --> 0:09:49.244
<v Speaker 1>the goal that we're trying to achieve. Then we achieved

0:09:49.244 --> 0:09:52.644
<v Speaker 1>that goal, but but then they just kept going anyway.

0:09:53.084 --> 0:09:58.044
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know, people forget how much goodwill there was, right, Like,

0:09:58.084 --> 0:10:01.244
<v Speaker 2>so when shit hit the fan, like kind of Rudy

0:10:01.284 --> 0:10:05.524
<v Speaker 2>Gobert Tom Hanks day, Right, I was flying to Kansas City,

0:10:05.844 --> 0:10:11.604
<v Speaker 2>where my partner's father was in hospice cares. So, you know,

0:10:11.884 --> 0:10:14.804
<v Speaker 2>to be in an environment like that, in a kind

0:10:14.804 --> 0:10:17.564
<v Speaker 2>of rural Missouri hospital at a time when this disease

0:10:17.604 --> 0:10:19.924
<v Speaker 2>is getting to spread around the country was I think

0:10:19.964 --> 0:10:22.844
<v Speaker 2>scary for everybody involved. Right, But we wound up staying

0:10:22.844 --> 0:10:25.964
<v Speaker 2>in Kansas City for a month because there's a giant

0:10:26.004 --> 0:10:28.524
<v Speaker 2>red circle around New York City. Of course, there's no

0:10:28.684 --> 0:10:31.884
<v Speaker 2>way to ascertain cases in Kansas City. I call the

0:10:31.964 --> 0:10:33.924
<v Speaker 2>Department of Health in Missouri. They're like, have you been

0:10:33.964 --> 0:10:36.124
<v Speaker 2>to Wuhan, China, Well, then you can't get a COVID

0:10:36.124 --> 0:10:38.524
<v Speaker 2>test kind of thing, right, But then it was that

0:10:38.644 --> 0:10:40.804
<v Speaker 2>question of like, what is the endgame here?

0:10:40.884 --> 0:10:41.004
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:10:41.044 --> 0:10:44.564
<v Speaker 2>I remember we had friends over like you. At first

0:10:44.764 --> 0:10:48.004
<v Speaker 2>I was very cautious, remember, like yelling at a stranger

0:10:48.004 --> 0:10:50.804
<v Speaker 2>for not wearing a mask on an elevator and some

0:10:50.924 --> 0:10:54.164
<v Speaker 2>carini ish behavior there, right, But gradually there was kind

0:10:54.204 --> 0:10:56.764
<v Speaker 2>of this thing where you start to I roll and

0:10:56.804 --> 0:10:59.284
<v Speaker 2>group chat and you're like, we can't really not do

0:10:59.364 --> 0:11:01.164
<v Speaker 2>and we don't even have kids, you do, right, we

0:11:01.204 --> 0:11:04.324
<v Speaker 2>can't really stay cooped up for the definite future, right,

0:11:04.364 --> 0:11:06.244
<v Speaker 2>because you could project fotward that like there was no

0:11:06.804 --> 0:11:08.804
<v Speaker 2>there was no plan at all.

0:11:09.524 --> 0:11:13.764
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things that was really important to me,

0:11:14.084 --> 0:11:15.964
<v Speaker 1>and you know what I call like a record scratch

0:11:16.044 --> 0:11:18.484
<v Speaker 1>moment in the book is when at the end of

0:11:18.524 --> 0:11:22.724
<v Speaker 1>April and beginning of May, twenty two countries in Europe

0:11:22.804 --> 0:11:27.164
<v Speaker 1>began reopening their lower schools. So this is not like

0:11:27.324 --> 0:11:30.444
<v Speaker 1>one tiny schoolhouse in the you know, in the countryside

0:11:30.484 --> 0:11:33.964
<v Speaker 1>of you know, Denmark, twenty two countries and this includes

0:11:34.444 --> 0:11:38.404
<v Speaker 1>massive cities like Paris and you know and elsewhere. And

0:11:39.484 --> 0:11:43.084
<v Speaker 1>toward the end of April, the education ministers of the

0:11:43.124 --> 0:11:46.964
<v Speaker 1>EU met or met you know, at least online and

0:11:47.044 --> 0:11:52.364
<v Speaker 1>they said, we've observed no negative consequences of this. They

0:11:52.404 --> 0:11:54.724
<v Speaker 1>met a second time in June and they hade the

0:11:54.804 --> 0:11:59.324
<v Speaker 1>same reaction and that for me, I remember watching the

0:11:59.444 --> 0:12:02.524
<v Speaker 1>video of this and like I just it was like

0:12:02.564 --> 0:12:05.444
<v Speaker 1>a sense of unreality because that is the type of

0:12:05.484 --> 0:12:08.724
<v Speaker 1>thing that should have been splashed across the front pages

0:12:08.764 --> 0:12:11.804
<v Speaker 1>of every newspaper. This should have been you know, crawling

0:12:11.844 --> 0:12:14.404
<v Speaker 1>on the screen on every cable news network. This was

0:12:14.444 --> 0:12:18.724
<v Speaker 1>the news. Ostensibly we were waiting for Europe looked at

0:12:18.764 --> 0:12:21.084
<v Speaker 1>all the same information we had and came to a

0:12:21.244 --> 0:12:26.044
<v Speaker 1>very different conclusion about what was wise, and for them

0:12:26.324 --> 0:12:28.284
<v Speaker 1>was we should open the schools. And it is not

0:12:28.484 --> 0:12:31.004
<v Speaker 1>because Europe controlled the virus, which is like one of

0:12:31.044 --> 0:12:34.484
<v Speaker 1>the false arguments about oh well Europe did that, because

0:12:34.484 --> 0:12:37.284
<v Speaker 1>they know they didn't. I give an analysis within my book.

0:12:37.644 --> 0:12:39.404
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe on a country level when you look

0:12:39.444 --> 0:12:41.204
<v Speaker 1>at it, but if you look at different you can

0:12:41.244 --> 0:12:44.684
<v Speaker 1>match up city to city, small town to small town,

0:12:45.004 --> 0:12:46.844
<v Speaker 1>and go on and on and on and see that

0:12:47.004 --> 0:12:50.484
<v Speaker 1>in Europe they had cases that were above, that were below,

0:12:50.684 --> 0:12:52.844
<v Speaker 1>and that were around the same. It was all over

0:12:52.884 --> 0:12:55.884
<v Speaker 1>the map, you know, literally and figuratively. So they didn't

0:12:56.004 --> 0:12:58.364
<v Speaker 1>quote control the virus. I think that you know, they

0:12:58.404 --> 0:13:00.884
<v Speaker 1>weren't doing mass mandates across the board, they weren't doing

0:13:00.924 --> 0:13:03.444
<v Speaker 1>distancing across the board of six feet. They didn't have

0:13:03.444 --> 0:13:06.044
<v Speaker 1>have the filters, they didn't have barriers across the board,

0:13:06.284 --> 0:13:08.964
<v Speaker 1>none of this stuff that we were told, and nevertheless

0:13:08.964 --> 0:13:13.204
<v Speaker 1>they said we haven't observed any negative impact. That is

0:13:13.244 --> 0:13:17.884
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary moment that this was ignored and then if

0:13:17.884 --> 0:13:20.684
<v Speaker 1>it was ever mentioned, was waved away. I ultimately wrote

0:13:20.684 --> 0:13:23.284
<v Speaker 1>about it in June I think that meeting, and you know,

0:13:23.364 --> 0:13:25.804
<v Speaker 1>and I talk about it in my book, but this

0:13:26.044 --> 0:13:30.484
<v Speaker 1>was not covered. Essentially, this was just memory hold. So

0:13:30.564 --> 0:13:34.004
<v Speaker 1>that was one key point, key moment. Another one was

0:13:34.324 --> 0:13:37.964
<v Speaker 1>when the cases had fallen in New York City, as

0:13:37.964 --> 0:13:41.164
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, you know, by the end of April dropped

0:13:41.164 --> 0:13:45.444
<v Speaker 1>something like fifty percent. Another key moment was an article

0:13:45.484 --> 0:13:49.084
<v Speaker 1>that had come out on NPR. Of all places where

0:13:49.124 --> 0:13:54.124
<v Speaker 1>they talked about the where they talked about the daycares

0:13:54.164 --> 0:13:57.724
<v Speaker 1>and the YMCAs, tens of thousands of kids were in

0:13:57.764 --> 0:14:02.124
<v Speaker 1>these programs early on and they observed no real outbreaks

0:14:02.204 --> 0:14:05.524
<v Speaker 1>or no kind of like overt negative impacts of this.

0:14:06.164 --> 0:14:08.324
<v Speaker 1>And then lastly there was the study out of Sweden

0:14:08.404 --> 0:14:10.964
<v Speaker 1>where they never closed the lower schools. And by the way,

0:14:11.044 --> 0:14:14.524
<v Speaker 1>Stockholm is, you know, that's a major city. We had

0:14:14.764 --> 0:14:18.884
<v Speaker 1>like empirical evidence just kind of like screaming at us

0:14:18.964 --> 0:14:22.244
<v Speaker 1>in the face, and it just kept being waved away.

0:14:23.324 --> 0:14:26.084
<v Speaker 1>So those were kind of like three or four really

0:14:26.124 --> 0:14:30.564
<v Speaker 1>important moments quite early in the pandemic when it was

0:14:30.684 --> 0:14:34.644
<v Speaker 1>clear that schools were not driving the pandemic, and indeed,

0:14:34.924 --> 0:14:38.084
<v Speaker 1>tons of studies later on showed how schools by and

0:14:38.164 --> 0:14:42.484
<v Speaker 1>large tended to mirror at most or or be below

0:14:42.964 --> 0:14:45.164
<v Speaker 1>the community rates of infection.

0:14:47.524 --> 0:14:48.884
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to talk a little bit, So, first

0:14:48.884 --> 0:14:51.524
<v Speaker 2>of all, it is an election year. Do you think

0:14:51.564 --> 0:14:53.884
<v Speaker 2>the polarity of this was inevitable? What if Hillary Clinton

0:14:54.324 --> 0:14:56.644
<v Speaker 2>had gotten a few more thousand votes in Wisconsin, Michigan,

0:14:56.684 --> 0:14:59.644
<v Speaker 2>Pennsylvania and Hillary Clinton had been president, do you think

0:14:59.644 --> 0:15:01.324
<v Speaker 2>this would have polarized in reverse?

0:15:02.004 --> 0:15:04.684
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a counterfactual, so who's to say. But

0:15:06.444 --> 0:15:09.684
<v Speaker 1>I do think, based on all the evidence that I

0:15:09.764 --> 0:15:15.324
<v Speaker 1>describe in my book, it seems impossible to not see

0:15:15.324 --> 0:15:18.684
<v Speaker 1>it that way. That and I you know, and I believe,

0:15:18.724 --> 0:15:21.084
<v Speaker 1>and you can tell me if you disagree, But I

0:15:21.084 --> 0:15:24.924
<v Speaker 1>think I make a pretty strong, like lawyerly persuasive case

0:15:25.364 --> 0:15:29.884
<v Speaker 1>that much of the response in America from the public

0:15:29.884 --> 0:15:32.684
<v Speaker 1>health establishment, from the legacy media, from the broader sort

0:15:32.684 --> 0:15:35.644
<v Speaker 1>of like left wing you know, elites, so to speak,

0:15:36.044 --> 0:15:40.684
<v Speaker 1>was reactionary against Trump and against Republicans. And you know

0:15:40.724 --> 0:15:42.884
<v Speaker 1>that's not just sort of like an opinion. There's all

0:15:42.924 --> 0:15:46.524
<v Speaker 1>sorts of like interesting data on this, and also you know,

0:15:46.604 --> 0:15:49.804
<v Speaker 1>my anecdotal experience of this, you know, and we can

0:15:49.844 --> 0:15:53.044
<v Speaker 1>get into it. You know, there's the countless numbers of

0:15:53.084 --> 0:15:55.804
<v Speaker 1>doctors and others who reached out to me saying that

0:15:55.884 --> 0:15:58.044
<v Speaker 1>they agreed with the stuff I was writing, but they

0:15:58.044 --> 0:16:01.764
<v Speaker 1>were afraid to say so publicly, or they were explicitly

0:16:01.844 --> 0:16:04.524
<v Speaker 1>told they couldn't say so. I don't make this statement

0:16:04.644 --> 0:16:09.084
<v Speaker 1>lightly about the left being reactionary. I think a lot

0:16:09.124 --> 0:16:11.444
<v Speaker 1>of people and left weren't even aware that they were

0:16:11.484 --> 0:16:14.044
<v Speaker 1>being reactionary. I don't even know how much they were

0:16:14.124 --> 0:16:16.324
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it. This is what the people from on

0:16:16.524 --> 0:16:18.844
<v Speaker 1>high were telling them. So, you know, we could get

0:16:18.844 --> 0:16:22.004
<v Speaker 1>into it. But it's like most these you know, most

0:16:22.044 --> 0:16:26.164
<v Speaker 1>experts in anyfield have a relatively narrow range of expertise.

0:16:26.564 --> 0:16:29.844
<v Speaker 1>But yet somehow this is slightly tangential to your question.

0:16:29.884 --> 0:16:34.084
<v Speaker 1>But somehow anyone who was a quote epidemiologist, anyone who

0:16:34.164 --> 0:16:36.964
<v Speaker 1>had MD after the name, they all of a sudden

0:16:36.964 --> 0:16:40.124
<v Speaker 1>became experts in like an entire way of living your life,

0:16:40.164 --> 0:16:42.684
<v Speaker 1>an entire sort of societal response.

0:16:43.044 --> 0:16:46.044
<v Speaker 2>I can't I can't resist the bait about the way

0:16:46.044 --> 0:16:48.284
<v Speaker 2>that experts were thrown around and they I mean, first

0:16:48.284 --> 0:16:52.644
<v Speaker 2>of all, sometimes it was just like blatantly exclusionary, where

0:16:52.644 --> 0:16:55.644
<v Speaker 2>if you're you know, like Jay Boicharia who now works

0:16:55.684 --> 0:16:58.284
<v Speaker 2>to the White House, right perfectly what credential expert, but

0:16:58.284 --> 0:17:00.604
<v Speaker 2>he was going against the consensus, so therefore was kind

0:17:00.644 --> 0:17:03.204
<v Speaker 2>of black balls too strong a phrase. He had a

0:17:03.204 --> 0:17:05.244
<v Speaker 2>strong voice and social media and so forth right, but

0:17:05.364 --> 0:17:10.124
<v Speaker 2>like who is an expert when it comes to COVID policy?

0:17:10.444 --> 0:17:13.604
<v Speaker 1>So that's an awesome question, and it's one of the

0:17:13.964 --> 0:17:16.164
<v Speaker 1>to my mind, I think key threads in my book

0:17:16.684 --> 0:17:22.284
<v Speaker 1>where I discussed the idea that only certain people were

0:17:22.604 --> 0:17:26.684
<v Speaker 1>allowed really within the public conversation and within the media

0:17:27.364 --> 0:17:31.524
<v Speaker 1>to weigh in on what we should be doing. There's

0:17:31.564 --> 0:17:34.404
<v Speaker 1>sort of two problems with that. One is that someone

0:17:34.444 --> 0:17:37.364
<v Speaker 1>like Anthony Fauci has a particular at least ostensibly a

0:17:37.364 --> 0:17:41.844
<v Speaker 1>particular expertise within infectious diseases and perhaps how to manage them.

0:17:42.644 --> 0:17:46.684
<v Speaker 1>He does not have an expertise in the values of

0:17:46.844 --> 0:17:52.284
<v Speaker 1>society and in second order effects of non pharmaceutical interventions

0:17:52.284 --> 0:17:55.404
<v Speaker 1>and mitigations that I know, that's like a mouthful, but

0:17:56.244 --> 0:17:59.764
<v Speaker 1>in plain English, he's not an expert on what happens

0:17:59.804 --> 0:18:04.844
<v Speaker 1>to children who when schools are closed and they won't

0:18:04.884 --> 0:18:08.204
<v Speaker 1>be able to graduate, you have kids stuck at home

0:18:08.284 --> 0:18:13.404
<v Speaker 1>with an abusive parent. Because child abuse cases had skyrocketed,

0:18:13.444 --> 0:18:15.524
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, we knew this data as early

0:18:15.564 --> 0:18:18.844
<v Speaker 1>as April of twenty twenty. They already had indications that

0:18:19.244 --> 0:18:22.244
<v Speaker 1>very very bad things were happening to a lot of

0:18:22.404 --> 0:18:27.924
<v Speaker 1>really vulnerable kids. So Anthony Fauci, you know, and others

0:18:27.924 --> 0:18:31.244
<v Speaker 1>sort of like within that lane, have a very specific

0:18:31.724 --> 0:18:35.484
<v Speaker 1>range of knowledge and expertise, and yet they were given

0:18:35.644 --> 0:18:40.004
<v Speaker 1>this mandate really on being the overall sort of director

0:18:40.284 --> 0:18:45.204
<v Speaker 1>of society. And then to make matters worse, Nate, there

0:18:45.204 --> 0:18:48.724
<v Speaker 1>were other people who sort of fashioned themselves as these

0:18:48.804 --> 0:18:52.284
<v Speaker 1>like COVID pundics, who really for much of the population

0:18:52.924 --> 0:18:57.044
<v Speaker 1>dictated how they were supposed to think about what was

0:18:57.364 --> 0:19:02.524
<v Speaker 1>prudent and what was critical or not critical about various

0:19:02.724 --> 0:19:05.244
<v Speaker 1>interventions that we had to be subject to.

0:19:05.724 --> 0:19:07.764
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, my model of this right, as you have kind

0:19:07.804 --> 0:19:12.604
<v Speaker 2>of one group of experts that might attempt to predict

0:19:13.324 --> 0:19:15.844
<v Speaker 2>how bad the disease will be, both in terms of

0:19:15.924 --> 0:19:19.364
<v Speaker 2>number of cases and mortality under certain scenarios. You might

0:19:19.404 --> 0:19:22.484
<v Speaker 2>have another group of experts, maybe more economists, who talk

0:19:22.484 --> 0:19:24.764
<v Speaker 2>about what the what the trade offs are, what are

0:19:24.764 --> 0:19:28.044
<v Speaker 2>the consequences of closing schools, And then it's a society's

0:19:28.164 --> 0:19:33.404
<v Speaker 2>job to, in our flawed democratic system way that expert

0:19:33.444 --> 0:19:38.924
<v Speaker 2>evidence and make what our ultimately political decisions. But I

0:19:38.964 --> 0:19:40.604
<v Speaker 2>want to set one thing up, and maybe it's kind

0:19:40.604 --> 0:19:44.884
<v Speaker 2>of an inside baseball question about the reporting of the book,

0:19:44.924 --> 0:19:48.484
<v Speaker 2>But so, why the decision to focus so much on

0:19:48.724 --> 0:19:50.524
<v Speaker 2>schools right? Why that focus?

0:19:50.884 --> 0:19:53.444
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I use schools right as a launch point

0:19:53.564 --> 0:19:55.764
<v Speaker 1>into this sort of larger Obviously I get into a

0:19:55.764 --> 0:19:58.964
<v Speaker 1>lot of mask mandate stuff and all these other interventions

0:19:59.124 --> 0:20:02.644
<v Speaker 1>imposed I would say schools and children in tandem, because

0:20:02.804 --> 0:20:05.444
<v Speaker 1>I'm really concerned about not just the school closures, but

0:20:05.484 --> 0:20:09.884
<v Speaker 1>the broader sort of view of children in society during

0:20:09.924 --> 0:20:12.524
<v Speaker 1>in America and the positioning of them as these sort

0:20:12.564 --> 0:20:17.084
<v Speaker 1>of like silent super spreaders and the interventions that were

0:20:17.124 --> 0:20:20.004
<v Speaker 1>imposed on them in our country in a sort of

0:20:20.404 --> 0:20:24.004
<v Speaker 1>somewhat uniquely aggressive medical culture that we have here, you know,

0:20:24.044 --> 0:20:26.604
<v Speaker 1>where it's like two year olds had to be masked

0:20:26.644 --> 0:20:31.644
<v Speaker 1>in America, whereas in Europe, the ECDC, that's their version

0:20:31.644 --> 0:20:34.284
<v Speaker 1>of the CDC, they didn't even recommend that kids in

0:20:34.324 --> 0:20:37.324
<v Speaker 1>primary school wear masks at all. And you know, the

0:20:37.364 --> 0:20:40.044
<v Speaker 1>World Health Organization they had mask mandate. I think it

0:20:40.084 --> 0:20:42.684
<v Speaker 1>was age six and up. So the fact that just

0:20:42.684 --> 0:20:44.844
<v Speaker 1>just one of the zillion examples, the fact that it

0:20:44.884 --> 0:20:47.724
<v Speaker 1>was like required for two year olds in America to

0:20:47.724 --> 0:20:52.244
<v Speaker 1>wear masks was you know, it was quite unusual and

0:20:52.324 --> 0:20:55.644
<v Speaker 1>worthy of comment. So the reason I mentioned this is

0:20:55.644 --> 0:21:00.444
<v Speaker 1>is to me, the kind of like biggest unforced error

0:21:01.164 --> 0:21:04.884
<v Speaker 1>in America was the long term closure of schools, and

0:21:04.924 --> 0:21:11.524
<v Speaker 1>then secondarily the impositions imposed on children when schools were open. Finally,

0:21:12.604 --> 0:21:16.164
<v Speaker 1>that of all the harms that happened, to my mind,

0:21:16.244 --> 0:21:18.964
<v Speaker 1>this one is, you know, and it's hard to quantify

0:21:19.004 --> 0:21:23.404
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, mate, but this was perhaps the most consequential,

0:21:23.764 --> 0:21:30.724
<v Speaker 1>and if not the most consequential, certainly the most unnecessarily

0:21:30.804 --> 0:21:33.884
<v Speaker 1>harmful of all the interventions that were imposed.

0:21:35.204 --> 0:21:37.284
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want to get one. So I guess I'm

0:21:37.284 --> 0:21:42.884
<v Speaker 2>going to ask you an epidemiological question, right. So one

0:21:42.924 --> 0:21:45.204
<v Speaker 2>of the first things that was there very early on

0:21:45.324 --> 0:21:49.564
<v Speaker 2>that this disease was hitting older people exponentially harder than

0:21:49.724 --> 0:21:54.004
<v Speaker 2>younger people, which is not true for all pandemics. So

0:21:54.324 --> 0:21:59.044
<v Speaker 2>can you explain why that was true for this particular coronavirus.

0:21:59.604 --> 0:22:02.564
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that that I'm really interested in

0:22:02.604 --> 0:22:05.244
<v Speaker 1>his narrative formation and you know, and I talk about

0:22:05.244 --> 0:22:07.124
<v Speaker 1>that a lot in the book is like how these

0:22:07.164 --> 0:22:11.604
<v Speaker 1>certain narratives and ideas were formed and then how they

0:22:11.644 --> 0:22:16.044
<v Speaker 1>were enforced. And one of them is even when you

0:22:16.124 --> 0:22:21.564
<v Speaker 1>think about the term novel coronavirus, even the word novel

0:22:22.204 --> 0:22:26.964
<v Speaker 1>adds on an immediate type of association for people. This

0:22:27.044 --> 0:22:30.764
<v Speaker 1>is new, and often with a disease, something that's new

0:22:31.004 --> 0:22:35.244
<v Speaker 1>is going to be particularly scary. Think about the word COVID.

0:22:35.564 --> 0:22:39.204
<v Speaker 1>It's written in all caps. It's different than just like

0:22:39.324 --> 0:22:43.164
<v Speaker 1>the flu, you know, in lowercase. These things, these things matter,

0:22:43.444 --> 0:22:46.844
<v Speaker 1>I think to some extent. And the reality is that

0:22:47.244 --> 0:22:51.244
<v Speaker 1>coronaviruses have been with us for a zillion years. Much

0:22:51.244 --> 0:22:54.084
<v Speaker 1>of the common colds that we get are from coronaviruses.

0:22:54.444 --> 0:22:58.284
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of literature that shows that SARS Kobe two,

0:22:58.524 --> 0:23:02.004
<v Speaker 1>which causes COVID, you know, the novel coronavirus, that it

0:23:02.044 --> 0:23:06.404
<v Speaker 1>behaved very similarly to way other coronaviruses had behaved. And

0:23:06.444 --> 0:23:10.324
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed this gentleman who's a specialist in actious diseases

0:23:10.364 --> 0:23:14.404
<v Speaker 1>and looking historically from an ethical perspective about how we

0:23:14.444 --> 0:23:17.324
<v Speaker 1>respond to these things, and he kind of went into

0:23:17.324 --> 0:23:20.644
<v Speaker 1>a whole thing with me saying like, look this, He's like,

0:23:21.124 --> 0:23:24.724
<v Speaker 1>this was positioned from the beginning as something that was

0:23:24.804 --> 0:23:28.284
<v Speaker 1>quote unprecedented. He's like, if I can tell you one thing,

0:23:28.364 --> 0:23:32.084
<v Speaker 1>please don't use the word unprecedented. It's not our reaction

0:23:32.364 --> 0:23:37.124
<v Speaker 1>was unprecedented. But having a highly contagious respiratory virus, that's

0:23:37.404 --> 0:23:41.004
<v Speaker 1>old news. And we shouldn't have been surprised that this

0:23:41.204 --> 0:23:44.164
<v Speaker 1>was particularly dangerous to old people. There are old people

0:23:44.204 --> 0:23:47.924
<v Speaker 1>who die every year from just common cold coronaviruses in

0:23:48.124 --> 0:23:52.004
<v Speaker 1>you know, long term care homes. It's very typical, and

0:23:52.164 --> 0:23:55.164
<v Speaker 1>children are largely unscathed. It's like a common cold. So

0:23:56.124 --> 0:23:59.724
<v Speaker 1>unless we were given evidence or shown a reason why

0:23:59.964 --> 0:24:03.724
<v Speaker 1>to think that this should be performing or acting differently,

0:24:03.964 --> 0:24:06.564
<v Speaker 1>we should have gone with what to expect. You know,

0:24:06.604 --> 0:24:09.964
<v Speaker 1>in medicine, there's that expression, if you hear or hoods,

0:24:10.044 --> 0:24:12.724
<v Speaker 1>think of a horse, don't think of a zebra. I

0:24:12.764 --> 0:24:16.164
<v Speaker 1>mean everyone and I talked about this in the book.

0:24:16.524 --> 0:24:19.084
<v Speaker 1>Everyone thought of the zebra, but we should have thought

0:24:19.124 --> 0:24:21.364
<v Speaker 1>of the horse. Whether this came from a lab or not,

0:24:22.364 --> 0:24:26.524
<v Speaker 1>it's still a coronavirus and still largely behaved similarly to

0:24:26.604 --> 0:24:30.644
<v Speaker 1>other coronaviruses, if perhaps more virulent for older people. Though,

0:24:30.684 --> 0:24:31.364
<v Speaker 1>of course.

0:24:38.244 --> 0:24:52.484
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back after this message. I'm going to

0:24:52.524 --> 0:24:55.604
<v Speaker 2>give you some phrases and you can kind of use

0:24:55.644 --> 0:24:57.764
<v Speaker 2>these as jumping off points. I think these are all

0:24:57.764 --> 0:25:01.884
<v Speaker 2>phrases where there was some degree of ambiguity or maybe

0:25:02.524 --> 0:25:05.364
<v Speaker 2>strategy and how they were employed. But let me start

0:25:05.404 --> 0:25:08.404
<v Speaker 2>with precautionary principle. It's kind of related to the title

0:25:08.444 --> 0:25:12.284
<v Speaker 2>of your book. What does that mean? What should it mean?

0:25:12.804 --> 0:25:15.244
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I spend a lot of time talking about the

0:25:15.324 --> 0:25:21.444
<v Speaker 1>precautionary principle. I think it's fascinating. I interviewed this scholar

0:25:21.524 --> 0:25:26.644
<v Speaker 1>named Eric Winsburg, who's a philosopher of medicine and particularly

0:25:27.244 --> 0:25:31.284
<v Speaker 1>of ethics in modeling, and we talked a lot about

0:25:31.324 --> 0:25:34.244
<v Speaker 1>the precautionary principle. And one thing I learned from him,

0:25:34.684 --> 0:25:36.204
<v Speaker 1>and that I talk about in the book, is that

0:25:36.284 --> 0:25:39.084
<v Speaker 1>a lot of philosophers don't even believe there's such a

0:25:39.124 --> 0:25:41.924
<v Speaker 1>thing as the precautionary principle, because it's based on an

0:25:41.964 --> 0:25:45.524
<v Speaker 1>assumption that you know how much harm may come to

0:25:45.524 --> 0:25:48.444
<v Speaker 1>you from doing one thing and how much harm you'll

0:25:48.484 --> 0:25:52.404
<v Speaker 1>avoid by doing this other thing that already within the

0:25:52.724 --> 0:25:56.044
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the precautionary principle. It's based on certain assumptions. Now,

0:25:56.164 --> 0:26:00.684
<v Speaker 1>the precautionary principle, as we conventionally understand it, is a

0:26:00.724 --> 0:26:04.684
<v Speaker 1>prudent and reasonable course of action in certain circumstances. But

0:26:06.084 --> 0:26:11.004
<v Speaker 1>those circumstances require a real kind of specific set of

0:26:11.924 --> 0:26:16.084
<v Speaker 1>data or information that you can be certain about, and

0:26:16.804 --> 0:26:20.564
<v Speaker 1>very very quickly within the pandemic, we no longer met

0:26:20.884 --> 0:26:25.324
<v Speaker 1>that specific criteria for the precautionary principle. Certainly so Nate.

0:26:25.564 --> 0:26:29.124
<v Speaker 1>By the end of April beginning of May, if particular,

0:26:29.124 --> 0:26:32.044
<v Speaker 1>if we're thinking about schools, millions of kids twenty two

0:26:32.124 --> 0:26:35.004
<v Speaker 1>countries reopen their schools. At that point, you can no

0:26:35.084 --> 0:26:38.444
<v Speaker 1>longer say that we are keeping schools closed. Here quote

0:26:38.644 --> 0:26:41.804
<v Speaker 1>out of an abundance of caution, you just can't so.

0:26:42.084 --> 0:26:45.324
<v Speaker 1>But this was the sort of like mic drop, It's like, well,

0:26:45.364 --> 0:26:49.084
<v Speaker 1>I'm just being cautious. It became very hard for most

0:26:49.124 --> 0:26:52.444
<v Speaker 1>regular people to push back against something when they're like,

0:26:52.484 --> 0:26:53.964
<v Speaker 1>who wouldn't want to be cautious?

0:26:54.484 --> 0:26:59.564
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. There's kind of this effective altruist slash rationalist adjacent

0:26:59.604 --> 0:27:03.244
<v Speaker 2>phrase called Chesterton's fence, which is the idea that if

0:27:03.244 --> 0:27:05.684
<v Speaker 2>you see a fence out in the middle of the wilderness,

0:27:06.444 --> 0:27:09.684
<v Speaker 2>then you probably shouldn't remove it, right, Maybe it's preting

0:27:09.724 --> 0:27:13.204
<v Speaker 2>you from bears or snakes or who knows what, right,

0:27:13.564 --> 0:27:16.964
<v Speaker 2>And that's I think a more coherent version of the

0:27:16.964 --> 0:27:22.364
<v Speaker 2>precautionary principle, or like be wary of uprooting society if

0:27:22.404 --> 0:27:25.084
<v Speaker 2>there might be unknown consequences. But it seemed like, if anything,

0:27:25.124 --> 0:27:27.324
<v Speaker 2>that might be the reverse of it, right.

0:27:27.724 --> 0:27:31.364
<v Speaker 1>Just to kind of dontail with your point there. In medicine,

0:27:31.364 --> 0:27:34.484
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows the cliche of first, do no harm, yea,

0:27:34.844 --> 0:27:39.924
<v Speaker 1>and we reversed that in the pandemic that typically what

0:27:39.964 --> 0:27:44.884
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to do ethically is you don't act first

0:27:45.124 --> 0:27:47.564
<v Speaker 1>and then try to figure out things you first. You

0:27:47.564 --> 0:27:49.924
<v Speaker 1>know there's a reason why the FDA's you know modo,

0:27:50.124 --> 0:27:52.724
<v Speaker 1>you know, or their mandate is first you have to

0:27:52.804 --> 0:27:56.724
<v Speaker 1>find out if something is safe and effective, then it

0:27:56.764 --> 0:27:59.924
<v Speaker 1>gets approved by the FDA. Yet we did the opposite

0:28:00.044 --> 0:28:03.884
<v Speaker 1>in the pandemic. We had all these interventions because the

0:28:03.924 --> 0:28:06.924
<v Speaker 1>school closure is an intervention. That's not the norm. The

0:28:06.964 --> 0:28:09.404
<v Speaker 1>norm is for kids to be in school, that's the default.

0:28:09.724 --> 0:28:12.884
<v Speaker 1>But we flipped the default. And again there could be

0:28:12.964 --> 0:28:17.484
<v Speaker 1>some argument made for that in you know, March tenth

0:28:17.924 --> 0:28:21.644
<v Speaker 1>of April twenty twenty. But once there was an enormous

0:28:21.644 --> 0:28:26.644
<v Speaker 1>amount of empirical evidence that millions of kids in school

0:28:27.004 --> 0:28:30.844
<v Speaker 1>was not having a catamoclysmic effect. The precautionary principle or

0:28:30.844 --> 0:28:33.604
<v Speaker 1>this quote acting out of an abundance of caution, like

0:28:33.644 --> 0:28:38.964
<v Speaker 1>I titled my book, this was just a complete bastardization

0:28:39.284 --> 0:28:43.164
<v Speaker 1>of what that actual sort of principle is about and

0:28:43.204 --> 0:28:44.804
<v Speaker 1>how it can or should be used.

0:28:45.364 --> 0:28:49.444
<v Speaker 2>The two word phrase quote no evidence. I came to

0:28:49.444 --> 0:28:52.444
<v Speaker 2>be very wary of, right, because you'd read things like, oh,

0:28:52.484 --> 0:28:56.764
<v Speaker 2>there's there's no evidence that children transmit the disease less

0:28:56.844 --> 0:29:00.404
<v Speaker 2>effectively than adults, right when like though the way that

0:29:00.404 --> 0:29:03.884
<v Speaker 2>we used to me, there's like there's no absolute proof, right,

0:29:03.964 --> 0:29:07.084
<v Speaker 2>when there's lots of evidence, right, there might be pulminary studies.

0:29:07.124 --> 0:29:10.364
<v Speaker 2>They're also you know, to use term that our listeners

0:29:10.404 --> 0:29:13.484
<v Speaker 2>will know there are Bayesian priors, right, you know, we

0:29:13.524 --> 0:29:15.684
<v Speaker 2>probably had strong priors to believe that, yes, if you

0:29:15.764 --> 0:29:18.204
<v Speaker 2>got this disease, like almost every other disease, you would

0:29:18.244 --> 0:29:21.604
<v Speaker 2>get some degree of immune protection from that. I mean,

0:29:21.644 --> 0:29:27.924
<v Speaker 2>how did a certain faction manage to wrangle the default

0:29:28.124 --> 0:29:31.964
<v Speaker 2>toward being on their side? How did that become the default?

0:29:33.204 --> 0:29:36.084
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of it has to do with that.

0:29:36.124 --> 0:29:43.324
<v Speaker 1>We have a very very large degree of homogeneity of

0:29:43.684 --> 0:29:49.004
<v Speaker 1>uniformity within certain very influential institutions in our country, and

0:29:49.044 --> 0:29:52.004
<v Speaker 1>in particular to the pandemic. We think about public health

0:29:53.204 --> 0:29:58.044
<v Speaker 1>and within the legacy media. And the uniformity, there's two

0:29:58.084 --> 0:30:01.924
<v Speaker 1>aspects to it. One is sort of political uniformity that

0:30:02.044 --> 0:30:05.044
<v Speaker 1>both of these kind of institutions tend to lean left

0:30:05.444 --> 0:30:09.644
<v Speaker 1>the people within them. And number two, they also to

0:30:09.764 --> 0:30:12.524
<v Speaker 1>self select for a certain type of person. So you

0:30:12.684 --> 0:30:16.204
<v Speaker 1>have this kind of thing where you had almost everyone

0:30:16.244 --> 0:30:20.004
<v Speaker 1>there on the left in these important institutions in our

0:30:20.084 --> 0:30:22.644
<v Speaker 1>country during the pandemic. And not only were they all

0:30:22.844 --> 0:30:26.004
<v Speaker 1>kind of largely of the same political persuasion, but they

0:30:26.004 --> 0:30:28.764
<v Speaker 1>were also most of them, not all, but most of

0:30:28.804 --> 0:30:31.804
<v Speaker 1>them are of the same type of personality type that

0:30:33.364 --> 0:30:36.084
<v Speaker 1>got to the level of success where they are so

0:30:36.244 --> 0:30:39.844
<v Speaker 1>all that merged together, Nate is it leads to a

0:30:39.884 --> 0:30:45.004
<v Speaker 1>situation where when Donald Trump tweeted in July, schools should

0:30:45.044 --> 0:30:47.484
<v Speaker 1>open in the fall or schools must open in all

0:30:47.564 --> 0:30:51.364
<v Speaker 1>caps or a bunch of exclamation points. That was immediately

0:30:51.484 --> 0:30:54.964
<v Speaker 1>radioactive to a lot of these people, and to whomever

0:30:55.084 --> 0:30:59.164
<v Speaker 1>else it wasn't radioactive. They got the message quickly that

0:30:59.484 --> 0:31:03.524
<v Speaker 1>you cannot agree with Donald Trump on anything. And there

0:31:03.604 --> 0:31:09.084
<v Speaker 1>was such a sort of enforced uniformity within these institutions,

0:31:09.084 --> 0:31:12.964
<v Speaker 1>within public health, and within the media that that's how

0:31:13.004 --> 0:31:17.444
<v Speaker 1>you get to a circumstance where something manifestly crazy is

0:31:17.524 --> 0:31:21.324
<v Speaker 1>accepted by a very large portion of society. Yeah.

0:31:21.364 --> 0:31:23.924
<v Speaker 2>The next phrase I wanted to ask you about, which

0:31:23.964 --> 0:31:27.204
<v Speaker 2>I think a quite complicated phrase actually, is scientific consensus.

0:31:28.764 --> 0:31:30.564
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean? What should it mean?

0:31:31.884 --> 0:31:35.324
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this was bandied about all the time, and this

0:31:35.564 --> 0:31:38.084
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's nice is your questions here. Everything kind

0:31:38.124 --> 0:31:44.284
<v Speaker 1>of threads together because the idea of a scientific consensus

0:31:45.004 --> 0:31:47.484
<v Speaker 1>was to a large extent, or at least to some

0:31:47.564 --> 0:31:52.044
<v Speaker 1>extent manufactured. Once I started writing some articles that were

0:31:52.524 --> 0:31:55.444
<v Speaker 1>challenging to some of the establishment views, but I was

0:31:55.444 --> 0:31:59.084
<v Speaker 1>writing them in largely kind of legacy media outlets, so

0:31:59.124 --> 0:32:02.364
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of had a different type of impromoter, you know,

0:32:02.444 --> 0:32:05.884
<v Speaker 1>attached to it that people could accept it. I started

0:32:05.884 --> 0:32:09.004
<v Speaker 1>getting emails from people around the country, including a lot

0:32:09.004 --> 0:32:13.044
<v Speaker 1>of doc and including some former CDC and former NIH people,

0:32:13.124 --> 0:32:15.484
<v Speaker 1>and they would say most of them would start off

0:32:15.524 --> 0:32:17.684
<v Speaker 1>something like, thank you so much for this, you know,

0:32:17.724 --> 0:32:20.164
<v Speaker 1>for writing this article. I agree with the points you're

0:32:20.164 --> 0:32:23.004
<v Speaker 1>making in here. This just doesn't seem like it's beneficial

0:32:23.044 --> 0:32:25.284
<v Speaker 1>for schools to be closed. I think it's really harmful.

0:32:25.404 --> 0:32:27.484
<v Speaker 1>I don't see the value in mask mandates on these

0:32:27.524 --> 0:32:30.324
<v Speaker 1>little kids, or barriers on their desks, on and on

0:32:30.404 --> 0:32:33.644
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be. And then they would say, but

0:32:34.204 --> 0:32:35.524
<v Speaker 1>all of this is off the record.

0:32:36.964 --> 0:32:37.164
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:37.244 --> 0:32:39.244
<v Speaker 1>And then the second part of that is some of

0:32:39.324 --> 0:32:42.964
<v Speaker 1>these people were told explicitly by their bosses, you know,

0:32:43.004 --> 0:32:44.924
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking like at you know, some of our

0:32:44.964 --> 0:32:48.284
<v Speaker 1>top university hospitals in the country. There was a particular

0:32:48.324 --> 0:32:50.804
<v Speaker 1>physician who I spoke with who worked in the nick you,

0:32:50.964 --> 0:32:54.724
<v Speaker 1>that's like the the pediatric or pick you pediatric intensive

0:32:54.764 --> 0:32:57.044
<v Speaker 1>care unit. And she had said to this was like

0:32:57.084 --> 0:33:00.004
<v Speaker 1>a small kind of like niche media outlet, so it

0:33:00.044 --> 0:33:02.284
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a big readership. But she had done an

0:33:02.284 --> 0:33:06.204
<v Speaker 1>interview after the vaccine had come out and was available

0:33:06.324 --> 0:33:10.404
<v Speaker 1>then for adolescents, and she said, look in our pick

0:33:10.484 --> 0:33:16.964
<v Speaker 1>you we've had more kids, more patients here from Meyer

0:33:17.044 --> 0:33:21.204
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Artists following the vaccine than we had COVID patients

0:33:21.244 --> 0:33:24.764
<v Speaker 1>in an entire year. Now this was someone I just know,

0:33:24.844 --> 0:33:27.324
<v Speaker 1>this shouldn't matter. She was like very much like a

0:33:27.404 --> 0:33:31.804
<v Speaker 1>lefty democrat, like she had no motivation behind this. She

0:33:31.884 --> 0:33:34.644
<v Speaker 1>was just telling the truth. This is just simply what

0:33:34.804 --> 0:33:38.604
<v Speaker 1>happened in the intensive care unit for pediatrics in her hospital.

0:33:38.684 --> 0:33:42.804
<v Speaker 1>This is what happened. Her boss told her, you are

0:33:43.284 --> 0:33:47.164
<v Speaker 1>never to speak to the media again about this. So

0:33:47.484 --> 0:33:50.484
<v Speaker 1>people need to understand when we are told there's a

0:33:50.564 --> 0:33:57.124
<v Speaker 1>scientific consensus on something, that consensus very much maybe manufactured,

0:33:57.204 --> 0:34:01.324
<v Speaker 1>it's an illusion. So I had people, you know, contacting me,

0:34:01.764 --> 0:34:04.404
<v Speaker 1>you know, because they self censored, or you had people

0:34:04.444 --> 0:34:06.884
<v Speaker 1>like this physician who I just talked about, where they

0:34:06.884 --> 0:34:09.764
<v Speaker 1>were explicitly told not to say things. And then the

0:34:09.804 --> 0:34:14.524
<v Speaker 1>third category, mate, aren't all the experts outside the United States.

0:34:14.724 --> 0:34:17.564
<v Speaker 1>It's quite remarkable when you think about in the modern

0:34:17.644 --> 0:34:19.884
<v Speaker 1>era it was. And I had some sort of joke

0:34:19.924 --> 0:34:22.004
<v Speaker 1>about this in the book. It was as if we had,

0:34:22.084 --> 0:34:25.244
<v Speaker 1>you know, rewound the clock like five hundred years and

0:34:25.324 --> 0:34:28.124
<v Speaker 1>the message from the continent hadn't reached us yet, you know,

0:34:28.164 --> 0:34:32.284
<v Speaker 1>across the Atlantic that like, there were plenty of public

0:34:32.284 --> 0:34:37.084
<v Speaker 1>health experts throughout Europe who viewed what was happening very

0:34:37.204 --> 0:34:40.844
<v Speaker 1>very differently from what was happening here, yet that somehow

0:34:41.164 --> 0:34:45.044
<v Speaker 1>was not included in the consensus. So the idea of

0:34:45.324 --> 0:34:50.524
<v Speaker 1>a consensus is almost always BS, or certainly was during

0:34:50.564 --> 0:34:51.164
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic.

0:34:51.884 --> 0:34:53.404
<v Speaker 2>For the next phrase, this would be the last one.

0:34:53.404 --> 0:34:57.644
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna give your pick between two, either flatten the

0:34:57.724 --> 0:34:59.564
<v Speaker 2>curve or social distancing.

0:34:59.644 --> 0:35:06.924
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, I'll pick social distancing. You know, I discuss

0:35:07.004 --> 0:35:08.884
<v Speaker 1>it at length in the book. I make a really

0:35:09.044 --> 0:35:11.364
<v Speaker 1>to my find valiant effort to try to track down

0:35:11.364 --> 0:35:15.124
<v Speaker 1>the origin of six feet of distancing. You know, as

0:35:15.164 --> 0:35:18.404
<v Speaker 1>everyone now knows, this was made up. And I would

0:35:18.444 --> 0:35:21.084
<v Speaker 1>just say on that point that I actually don't think

0:35:21.084 --> 0:35:25.804
<v Speaker 1>it's unreasonable to have benchmarks for like behavior, because we

0:35:25.884 --> 0:35:28.604
<v Speaker 1>need something to aim for. It's a bit too vague,

0:35:28.644 --> 0:35:30.964
<v Speaker 1>particularly if you're talking about like schools for example, or

0:35:31.004 --> 0:35:33.484
<v Speaker 1>it's like do your best. You know that's going to

0:35:33.484 --> 0:35:36.044
<v Speaker 1>be interpreted differently and it could lead to a contentious

0:35:36.084 --> 0:35:41.284
<v Speaker 1>and chaotic kind of environment. However, the way that these

0:35:41.764 --> 0:35:46.404
<v Speaker 1>interventions were presented to the public, they were presented with

0:35:46.644 --> 0:35:50.924
<v Speaker 1>such a degree of certainty about like their effectiveness and

0:35:51.124 --> 0:35:54.684
<v Speaker 1>a degree of certainty about the evidence behind them, that

0:35:54.724 --> 0:35:59.364
<v Speaker 1>it led to this perverse situation where you had people,

0:36:00.084 --> 0:36:02.764
<v Speaker 1>you know, I likened it to sort of like a

0:36:02.804 --> 0:36:05.924
<v Speaker 1>master carpenter, you know, the precision you had you know,

0:36:06.124 --> 0:36:09.524
<v Speaker 1>teachers and school janitors with with tape measures of r

0:36:09.884 --> 0:36:13.524
<v Speaker 1>up this is five feet and three quarters. Nope, this

0:36:13.564 --> 0:36:15.964
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to work, and they're measuring down to this

0:36:16.164 --> 0:36:21.244
<v Speaker 1>was madness. There was never anything particular about somewhere between

0:36:21.284 --> 0:36:24.404
<v Speaker 1>five feet and seven feet that made something magical. So

0:36:24.484 --> 0:36:27.444
<v Speaker 1>if they want to create a benchmark, that's okay, But

0:36:27.484 --> 0:36:30.004
<v Speaker 1>then you have to say, look, we don't have strong

0:36:30.084 --> 0:36:35.124
<v Speaker 1>evidence for this being a particularly magical distance, but try

0:36:35.124 --> 0:36:37.124
<v Speaker 1>to aim for it if you can. Here's why we

0:36:37.164 --> 0:36:40.044
<v Speaker 1>think it might be helpful. But you know, the American

0:36:40.124 --> 0:36:44.524
<v Speaker 1>Academy of Pediatrics, early on their initial guidance said, and

0:36:44.604 --> 0:36:46.204
<v Speaker 1>you know that one of the people from the AP

0:36:46.364 --> 0:36:48.884
<v Speaker 1>discussed this in an interview. He had said, look, if

0:36:48.924 --> 0:36:50.964
<v Speaker 1>you can do six feet, great, but if you can't,

0:36:51.084 --> 0:36:53.564
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about it. It's far more important to get

0:36:53.564 --> 0:36:55.764
<v Speaker 1>the kids in school. We don't think there's any real

0:36:55.804 --> 0:36:58.604
<v Speaker 1>good evidence that the benefit of an extra couple of

0:36:58.604 --> 0:37:00.884
<v Speaker 1>feet is going to matter in the scheme of things. That,

0:37:01.004 --> 0:37:05.324
<v Speaker 1>of course, was reversed after Donald Trump's tweet. So we

0:37:05.484 --> 0:37:10.844
<v Speaker 1>had inklings of a reasonable sort of idea about social distancing,

0:37:11.924 --> 0:37:15.564
<v Speaker 1>but those sadly kind of evaporated relatively quickly, and then

0:37:15.604 --> 0:37:18.244
<v Speaker 1>it became this very militant type of idea.

0:37:18.564 --> 0:37:21.564
<v Speaker 2>No, well, some of it is kind of is ritualistic, right.

0:37:21.604 --> 0:37:24.844
<v Speaker 2>I think I heard friends in Mexico that like, using

0:37:24.924 --> 0:37:27.604
<v Speaker 2>ultra violet technologies was kind of this ritual they used, right.

0:37:27.844 --> 0:37:30.364
<v Speaker 2>I mean, in New York City, we would put our

0:37:30.404 --> 0:37:32.884
<v Speaker 2>mask on to walk past the hostess sand in a

0:37:32.884 --> 0:37:35.604
<v Speaker 2>crowded restaurant, right, and then go eating a room full

0:37:35.644 --> 0:37:38.644
<v Speaker 2>of people. Everyone's mouths open, right, So you're reducing their

0:37:38.684 --> 0:37:41.204
<v Speaker 2>risk by zero point on one percent, But like I

0:37:41.244 --> 0:37:43.484
<v Speaker 2>do want to you know, I do want to get

0:37:43.524 --> 0:37:45.844
<v Speaker 2>into a little bit more of the evidence. Well, how

0:37:45.924 --> 0:37:50.084
<v Speaker 2>strong is the evidence on the effect of school closures.

0:37:50.164 --> 0:37:52.524
<v Speaker 2>So you'll see some studies saying it's really bad. See

0:37:52.564 --> 0:37:55.004
<v Speaker 2>another city is saying only sort of bad. Right, But

0:37:55.044 --> 0:37:57.844
<v Speaker 2>what's what's your best review of the evidence.

0:37:59.044 --> 0:38:04.524
<v Speaker 1>Our intuitions, and particularly our intuitions with medical matters are

0:38:04.684 --> 0:38:09.884
<v Speaker 1>often wrong. And I'm sympathetic to the idea of anyone

0:38:10.084 --> 0:38:13.204
<v Speaker 1>which included me in early on, who would think, well,

0:38:13.244 --> 0:38:15.444
<v Speaker 1>of course school closers are going to have some sort

0:38:15.444 --> 0:38:17.764
<v Speaker 1>of benefit. It's a bunch of snotty kids running around

0:38:17.804 --> 0:38:21.604
<v Speaker 1>or teenagers gathering. Of course, that you know intuitively makes sense.

0:38:22.004 --> 0:38:25.444
<v Speaker 1>Other people similarly, well, of course, having like a cloth

0:38:25.524 --> 0:38:27.844
<v Speaker 1>in front of your face strapped on, of course that's

0:38:27.844 --> 0:38:31.004
<v Speaker 1>going to have some sort of benefit. There's this intuitive sense.

0:38:31.204 --> 0:38:33.684
<v Speaker 1>But what I show in the book there's a zillion

0:38:33.764 --> 0:38:37.844
<v Speaker 1>examples throughout history, including recent history, where things that seem

0:38:38.244 --> 0:38:42.524
<v Speaker 1>really obvious, where it's like, well, if course, if kids

0:38:42.764 --> 0:38:45.604
<v Speaker 1>are we're seeing a spike in peanut allergies, well, of

0:38:45.644 --> 0:38:49.164
<v Speaker 1>course we should dial back exposure to peanuts in in

0:38:49.484 --> 0:38:52.284
<v Speaker 1>little kids because that's exactly what the American Academy the

0:38:52.324 --> 0:38:54.764
<v Speaker 1>Pediatrics told us to do, and that was the exact

0:38:55.244 --> 0:38:58.044
<v Speaker 1>wrong advice. It was literally the opposite of what they

0:38:58.044 --> 0:39:01.604
<v Speaker 1>should have done. You know, they said, uh, doctor Spaga,

0:39:01.604 --> 0:39:03.364
<v Speaker 1>you said, you know, put a baby on their stomach,

0:39:03.404 --> 0:39:06.564
<v Speaker 1>that'll prevent sids because they could choke. Wrong, bad advice.

0:39:06.604 --> 0:39:08.604
<v Speaker 1>We should actually do the opposite. There's a zillion things,

0:39:08.684 --> 0:39:11.284
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you know of of many examples where things

0:39:11.284 --> 0:39:14.204
<v Speaker 1>that seem obvious that they will be beneficial once you

0:39:14.284 --> 0:39:17.044
<v Speaker 1>actually use science, once you actually look at the evidence,

0:39:17.124 --> 0:39:19.164
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, oh my god, this thing that seemed

0:39:19.204 --> 0:39:21.964
<v Speaker 1>to be one way is not so. So the reason

0:39:21.964 --> 0:39:25.164
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned all of this is that you or people

0:39:25.164 --> 0:39:27.684
<v Speaker 1>listening might think, well, of course they had some benefit.

0:39:28.084 --> 0:39:32.644
<v Speaker 1>The reality is they had no benefit any intervention. There's

0:39:32.644 --> 0:39:35.844
<v Speaker 1>this phrase called voltage drop within medicine, which is like

0:39:36.204 --> 0:39:40.164
<v Speaker 1>that they expect when you do something that its impact

0:39:40.204 --> 0:39:45.044
<v Speaker 1>is going to wane over time. People don't comply with

0:39:45.124 --> 0:39:48.644
<v Speaker 1>things that are uncomfortable. Wearing a mask, human beings, you

0:39:48.684 --> 0:39:51.604
<v Speaker 1>tug at them, even if even unconsciously you're pulling on it.

0:39:51.684 --> 0:39:55.404
<v Speaker 1>You do things and also people, even the introverts among

0:39:55.524 --> 0:39:59.404
<v Speaker 1>us were social creatures, and there's cellular phone data that

0:39:59.444 --> 0:40:01.884
<v Speaker 1>I talked about in the book. Even well before they

0:40:01.924 --> 0:40:07.724
<v Speaker 1>started easing restrictions, people started moving around that closing schools

0:40:08.004 --> 0:40:10.644
<v Speaker 1>could have a benefit need for a week or a

0:40:10.684 --> 0:40:13.924
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, if done in conjunction with everything else

0:40:13.964 --> 0:40:17.964
<v Speaker 1>being closed. But there is zero evidence that over time,

0:40:18.124 --> 0:40:19.844
<v Speaker 1>having them close over a long period of time was

0:40:19.884 --> 0:40:22.564
<v Speaker 1>going to have any benefit at all, because everyone was

0:40:22.684 --> 0:40:25.804
<v Speaker 1>mixing anyway. And that includes, by the way, not just voluntarily.

0:40:26.004 --> 0:40:28.604
<v Speaker 1>As we know, a significant portion of the country were

0:40:28.644 --> 0:40:31.404
<v Speaker 1>never locked down. These were the people you know in

0:40:31.524 --> 0:40:34.524
<v Speaker 1>the in the slaughterhouses, the cashier in a store, the

0:40:34.564 --> 0:40:36.924
<v Speaker 1>people fixing the electrical lines and so on, and the

0:40:36.924 --> 0:40:39.604
<v Speaker 1>healthcare workers. So a significant portion of our country were

0:40:39.644 --> 0:40:42.804
<v Speaker 1>never even allowed to be locked down. So for all

0:40:42.844 --> 0:40:45.884
<v Speaker 1>of those reasons, it should make sense now to anyone

0:40:45.924 --> 0:40:50.324
<v Speaker 1>listening why extended school closures were never going to be beneficial.

0:40:50.564 --> 0:40:53.404
<v Speaker 1>When you had everyone moving about, and you had adults

0:40:53.484 --> 0:40:55.964
<v Speaker 1>going to restaurants and grabbing a drink at a bar,

0:40:56.084 --> 0:40:58.284
<v Speaker 1>while at the same time you have a healthy kid

0:40:58.484 --> 0:41:01.804
<v Speaker 1>locked in their bedroom for six months or for twelve months,

0:41:01.844 --> 0:41:06.204
<v Speaker 1>it made no sense epidemiologically or ethically.

0:41:06.844 --> 0:41:09.404
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Castinos were open, as I experienced a couple of times.

0:41:09.484 --> 0:41:11.124
<v Speaker 2>I only went after it got vaccinated. I was a

0:41:11.164 --> 0:41:13.684
<v Speaker 2>good boy on that. But I want to kind of

0:41:13.684 --> 0:41:16.644
<v Speaker 2>back up to something we've been kind of dancing around

0:41:16.964 --> 0:41:19.364
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. Why is it so difficult for people

0:41:19.364 --> 0:41:21.404
<v Speaker 2>to accept the notion that we need to do some

0:41:21.604 --> 0:41:24.684
<v Speaker 2>form of cost benefit analysis?

0:41:25.964 --> 0:41:28.844
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is perhaps, you know, a jaundiced view

0:41:28.964 --> 0:41:33.924
<v Speaker 1>of things, but people like to be told what to do.

0:41:34.444 --> 0:41:38.124
<v Speaker 1>Some portion of people in a certain way, and what

0:41:38.164 --> 0:41:40.444
<v Speaker 1>we saw are at least some people in our country.

0:41:40.524 --> 0:41:48.404
<v Speaker 1>What we saw was this very paternalistic, almost like infantilization

0:41:48.764 --> 0:41:51.684
<v Speaker 1>of the public. You had the equivalent of like a

0:41:51.764 --> 0:41:55.084
<v Speaker 1>mom wagging her finger at a three year old saying

0:41:55.324 --> 0:41:58.964
<v Speaker 1>because I told you so, you know, when they didn't

0:41:58.964 --> 0:42:03.244
<v Speaker 1>provide evidence for something. And that's how much of the

0:42:03.324 --> 0:42:07.284
<v Speaker 1>response was conducted and how people reacted. And most people,

0:42:07.804 --> 0:42:11.204
<v Speaker 1>at least in Blue America went along with this, this

0:42:11.324 --> 0:42:14.724
<v Speaker 1>sort of argument from authority. That they went along And

0:42:15.044 --> 0:42:20.124
<v Speaker 1>I can only surmise that that is because it's just

0:42:20.204 --> 0:42:24.564
<v Speaker 1>a it's just easier, it's less cognitive load on you.

0:42:24.884 --> 0:42:31.404
<v Speaker 1>Then everyone was just kind of externalizing a complex at

0:42:31.484 --> 0:42:36.964
<v Speaker 1>least you know, moral and logistical decision making. They were

0:42:37.124 --> 0:42:41.004
<v Speaker 1>just sort of farming it out to someone else, let

0:42:41.044 --> 0:42:44.444
<v Speaker 1>them decide for me. It's kind of amazing, mate, how

0:42:44.524 --> 0:42:48.844
<v Speaker 1>few people actually dug into the data, actually looked at

0:42:48.884 --> 0:42:52.124
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't even require much digging. This was an

0:42:52.164 --> 0:42:56.764
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary kind of like default to the experts, don't ask

0:42:56.804 --> 0:42:57.364
<v Speaker 1>any questions.

0:42:57.404 --> 0:42:59.084
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, there are a lot of books about kind

0:42:59.084 --> 0:43:01.604
<v Speaker 2>of when. I mean, if you read Daniel Kneman and

0:43:01.844 --> 0:43:04.164
<v Speaker 2>late now Dan Conman is sticking fast and slow. There's

0:43:04.284 --> 0:43:08.004
<v Speaker 2>like so someone fast sticking, which is more kind of

0:43:08.564 --> 0:43:13.164
<v Speaker 2>intuitive in the system too, thinking that requires more deliberation, right,

0:43:13.204 --> 0:43:16.564
<v Speaker 2>And if any problem required more deliberation, I think it

0:43:16.604 --> 0:43:19.044
<v Speaker 2>would be Covid right, that you have to kind of

0:43:19.884 --> 0:43:22.604
<v Speaker 2>go back almost the first principles and thing through things.

0:43:22.644 --> 0:43:26.204
<v Speaker 2>You know, to the extent people's had intuitions, they were

0:43:26.284 --> 0:43:28.884
<v Speaker 2>often very wrong intuitions, right. I remember Mary de Blasio

0:43:29.644 --> 0:43:32.004
<v Speaker 2>in New York told people we're gonna shut the bars

0:43:32.044 --> 0:43:34.444
<v Speaker 2>down for a while, right, so go out and have

0:43:34.484 --> 0:43:37.564
<v Speaker 2>a big night tonight, right, which is an intuition you

0:43:37.644 --> 0:43:40.124
<v Speaker 2>might have in New York if there's a hurricane coming

0:43:40.124 --> 0:43:42.404
<v Speaker 2>which we've had a couple of hurricanes, right, because there's

0:43:42.484 --> 0:43:45.364
<v Speaker 2>zero threat from the hurricane at one point in time,

0:43:45.444 --> 0:43:47.524
<v Speaker 2>then there's a window where it's threatening, and then hopefully

0:43:47.564 --> 0:43:50.324
<v Speaker 2>it's not too bad. Right. But that's probably the most

0:43:50.644 --> 0:43:52.844
<v Speaker 2>time of most transmission in New York, right. Or I

0:43:52.884 --> 0:43:55.284
<v Speaker 2>think you point out like a lot of people's intuitions

0:43:55.284 --> 0:43:57.564
<v Speaker 2>were based on it being an influenza pandemic and not

0:43:57.604 --> 0:44:02.524
<v Speaker 2>a coronavirus pandemic, which is dramatically different. Effects on how

0:44:02.564 --> 0:44:11.604
<v Speaker 2>transmisfold is in children, for example. And we'll be right

0:44:11.644 --> 0:44:25.204
<v Speaker 2>back after this break. Okay. The models. So I've built

0:44:25.804 --> 0:44:29.764
<v Speaker 2>models in the past. Sometimes I think skepticism of models

0:44:29.844 --> 0:44:35.804
<v Speaker 2>is unwarranted. I think people also have very difficult, very

0:44:35.804 --> 0:44:39.044
<v Speaker 2>difficult time telling from the outside what's a good model

0:44:39.084 --> 0:44:41.204
<v Speaker 2>and what's a bad model. When is a model reliable

0:44:41.204 --> 0:44:43.804
<v Speaker 2>and when is it just garbage in? Garbage out? But

0:44:43.884 --> 0:44:46.084
<v Speaker 2>these COVID bells were not very good, David, Can you

0:44:46.124 --> 0:44:48.604
<v Speaker 2>tell me kind of more about what you learned about them?

0:44:48.964 --> 0:44:51.004
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Well, you know, as you know, one of my

0:44:51.084 --> 0:44:54.604
<v Speaker 1>chapters is titled Geigo for Garbage and Garbage Out. And

0:44:55.444 --> 0:44:59.844
<v Speaker 1>the models were built upon an enormous kind of pile

0:44:59.964 --> 0:45:05.444
<v Speaker 1>of assumptions, and I started digging into them because I'm curious.

0:45:05.484 --> 0:45:07.444
<v Speaker 1>It was like, how did they come up with this model?

0:45:07.604 --> 0:45:10.964
<v Speaker 1>You know, showing that if you you do X, Y

0:45:11.084 --> 0:45:15.324
<v Speaker 1>and z actions, this will lead to such and such results.

0:45:15.404 --> 0:45:17.364
<v Speaker 1>That's what the models were showing. You said, if you

0:45:17.564 --> 0:45:21.484
<v Speaker 1>follow instructions, then we'll have this amount of case rates

0:45:21.564 --> 0:45:23.684
<v Speaker 1>or this amount of you know, transmission, and if you

0:45:23.724 --> 0:45:26.724
<v Speaker 1>are bad and you don't follow instructions, then it's going

0:45:26.764 --> 0:45:28.964
<v Speaker 1>to be this big spike. And they would show these visualizations.

0:45:29.084 --> 0:45:31.084
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, how did they figure this stuff out?

0:45:31.244 --> 0:45:35.244
<v Speaker 1>And I started reading some of the papers that went

0:45:35.284 --> 0:45:38.524
<v Speaker 1>along with the models and the methodology, and what I

0:45:38.564 --> 0:45:41.244
<v Speaker 1>always do is, because I'm a crazy person, I always

0:45:41.244 --> 0:45:43.204
<v Speaker 1>look at the citations. I'm like, well, where did they

0:45:43.244 --> 0:45:45.604
<v Speaker 1>get that from? So you see there's like a little

0:45:45.604 --> 0:45:48.964
<v Speaker 1>superscript citation. I see it there, you know, in that notes,

0:45:49.124 --> 0:45:51.564
<v Speaker 1>and I click on it. I'm like, okay, where did

0:45:51.564 --> 0:45:54.244
<v Speaker 1>they get this from? And then it leads me to

0:45:54.404 --> 0:45:58.084
<v Speaker 1>another model. I'm like what, so wait, this models based

0:45:58.084 --> 0:45:59.804
<v Speaker 1>another model. Okay, well where did they get that from?

0:45:59.844 --> 0:46:02.284
<v Speaker 1>So then I'm leading the second model, and then I'm

0:46:02.284 --> 0:46:05.404
<v Speaker 1>looking through and there's claims in there, and then I say, oh,

0:46:05.604 --> 0:46:08.924
<v Speaker 1>that's based on yet more models, And then I likened

0:46:08.964 --> 0:46:11.564
<v Speaker 1>it to this of like a never ending Russian Dolls

0:46:11.924 --> 0:46:15.124
<v Speaker 1>type of thing. It was just models upon models upon

0:46:15.244 --> 0:46:18.364
<v Speaker 1>models and one of them. Ultimately I get to like

0:46:18.404 --> 0:46:23.124
<v Speaker 1>the bottom and I'm reading in like the supplement buried

0:46:23.124 --> 0:46:25.764
<v Speaker 1>in the supplement of a paper where they had a

0:46:25.844 --> 0:46:29.244
<v Speaker 1>claim about transmission in schools as a certain portion of

0:46:29.284 --> 0:46:33.444
<v Speaker 1>overall kind of transmission activity and it was something like

0:46:33.924 --> 0:46:36.884
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven percent, and you go deep in, you know,

0:46:36.924 --> 0:46:39.204
<v Speaker 1>in my mind sort of metaphorically, it's in like six

0:46:39.244 --> 0:46:44.964
<v Speaker 1>point five it says this figure was chosen arbitrarily. Now

0:46:45.044 --> 0:46:48.564
<v Speaker 1>that's like you just are peeling back model upon model

0:46:48.644 --> 0:46:51.484
<v Speaker 1>upon model until finally in the supplement you get to

0:46:51.644 --> 0:46:54.924
<v Speaker 1>like actual data and then you find out that it

0:46:55.004 --> 0:46:58.284
<v Speaker 1>was made up. That's kind of wild.

0:46:59.004 --> 0:47:01.764
<v Speaker 2>What's so tricky about building models is like, yeah, they

0:47:01.804 --> 0:47:07.124
<v Speaker 2>are kind of a definition simplifications, right, and sometimes if

0:47:07.124 --> 0:47:09.724
<v Speaker 2>a point in a model, a data point, is non

0:47:09.804 --> 0:47:12.284
<v Speaker 2>central to the thesis of the model, then it's totally

0:47:12.324 --> 0:47:15.484
<v Speaker 2>fine to estimate, right. It's like, Okay, we could do

0:47:15.524 --> 0:47:17.044
<v Speaker 2>a more rigorous job with this, but it's probably not

0:47:17.164 --> 0:47:20.884
<v Speaker 2>very important. The model is like robust to different specifications

0:47:20.884 --> 0:47:23.764
<v Speaker 2>of this parameter. I'm using technical language here, right, there

0:47:23.764 --> 0:47:26.684
<v Speaker 2>are other times when like it just becomes littally garbage

0:47:26.684 --> 0:47:29.364
<v Speaker 2>in garbage out, where you know, you're just taking that

0:47:29.444 --> 0:47:32.844
<v Speaker 2>arbitrary back of the envelope number, feeding it through a

0:47:32.844 --> 0:47:35.284
<v Speaker 2>bunch of loops, right, and then spinning it back out

0:47:35.364 --> 0:47:38.324
<v Speaker 2>and pretending that you've done like real real science there.

0:47:38.404 --> 0:47:39.684
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, I mean there's the other big

0:47:39.724 --> 0:47:42.284
<v Speaker 2>problem with these models too, is so I call it

0:47:42.284 --> 0:47:45.124
<v Speaker 2>like the kind of like tyranny of the measurable. So

0:47:46.524 --> 0:47:50.764
<v Speaker 2>cases are easy to measure, actually not as easy as

0:47:50.804 --> 0:47:53.924
<v Speaker 2>they might be, because it was hard to find enough

0:47:54.004 --> 0:47:57.604
<v Speaker 2>tests and a lot of cases are you know, asymptomatic

0:47:57.684 --> 0:47:59.604
<v Speaker 2>and things like that, right, but you know, and you

0:47:59.604 --> 0:48:02.204
<v Speaker 2>can always try to make the red arrow on CNN

0:48:02.444 --> 0:48:08.924
<v Speaker 2>go down. Conversely, things like psychological harms of being isolated

0:48:08.964 --> 0:48:11.444
<v Speaker 2>from other people for months at a time are harder

0:48:11.884 --> 0:48:14.444
<v Speaker 2>to measure, you know, I know in baseball analysis, offense

0:48:14.524 --> 0:48:17.324
<v Speaker 2>is much easier to measure than defense in baseball, Right,

0:48:17.364 --> 0:48:19.684
<v Speaker 2>So some of these teams would build teams that hit

0:48:19.724 --> 0:48:21.884
<v Speaker 2>a lot of home runs but were terrible defensively because

0:48:21.924 --> 0:48:23.684
<v Speaker 2>we couldn't measure it well. It turns out as you

0:48:23.724 --> 0:48:26.284
<v Speaker 2>study it more carefully, it is important. So what are

0:48:26.284 --> 0:48:30.404
<v Speaker 2>the psychological harms to people of social isolation?

0:48:31.364 --> 0:48:34.164
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just before I get to that, just to your

0:48:34.204 --> 0:48:38.884
<v Speaker 1>point about the models is the modelers decide what goes

0:48:38.924 --> 0:48:42.404
<v Speaker 1>in and they can turn those dials whichever way they

0:48:42.484 --> 0:48:44.484
<v Speaker 1>want if the model doesn't put out what they want

0:48:44.524 --> 0:48:47.844
<v Speaker 1>to put it out. And I interviewed some really interesting philosophers,

0:48:47.964 --> 0:48:50.524
<v Speaker 1>Eric Winsburg, who I mentioned before, and a colleague of his,

0:48:51.044 --> 0:48:57.084
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie Harvard, who they study how models are made, in

0:48:57.124 --> 0:49:01.964
<v Speaker 1>the sort of ethical implications of models, and what does

0:49:02.004 --> 0:49:05.684
<v Speaker 1>it say about a society about what goes into the

0:49:05.724 --> 0:49:07.684
<v Speaker 1>models that they do, and what does it say about

0:49:07.684 --> 0:49:11.324
<v Speaker 1>the people who build the models. And it's quite astonishing

0:49:11.604 --> 0:49:14.204
<v Speaker 1>when you think about it that the people who built

0:49:14.244 --> 0:49:17.724
<v Speaker 1>the models are also the people who tended to fare

0:49:18.044 --> 0:49:21.364
<v Speaker 1>really well in the pandemic relative to the rest of

0:49:21.404 --> 0:49:25.844
<v Speaker 1>the country. That's not an accident. So we had models

0:49:26.324 --> 0:49:32.044
<v Speaker 1>dictating how we responded in America, and the models only

0:49:32.124 --> 0:49:36.444
<v Speaker 1>took into account certain factors that were of the most

0:49:36.444 --> 0:49:38.244
<v Speaker 1>interest to the people who are in this kind of

0:49:38.284 --> 0:49:41.484
<v Speaker 1>white collar profession if they were living If the people

0:49:41.484 --> 0:49:45.284
<v Speaker 1>who designed the models for IHME and Imperial College were

0:49:45.324 --> 0:49:49.444
<v Speaker 1>living in a studio apartment in the Bronx with no

0:49:49.604 --> 0:49:53.364
<v Speaker 1>air conditioning and you know, six children in there, maybe

0:49:53.404 --> 0:49:56.644
<v Speaker 1>they would have had an input on there. For school closures,

0:49:57.084 --> 0:49:58.964
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe they would if they were running a

0:49:58.964 --> 0:50:01.764
<v Speaker 1>little mom and pop business, et cetera, et cetera. So

0:50:01.924 --> 0:50:05.484
<v Speaker 1>all these things that are really important in society now.

0:50:05.524 --> 0:50:07.764
<v Speaker 1>Of course, if anyone's listening, really well, it's not as

0:50:07.804 --> 0:50:11.764
<v Speaker 1>important as death. But that's a false binary to draw,

0:50:12.164 --> 0:50:15.604
<v Speaker 1>and for a whole variety of reasons. We tolerate death

0:50:15.644 --> 0:50:17.564
<v Speaker 1>in a whole variety of ways in our country. For

0:50:17.844 --> 0:50:19.844
<v Speaker 1>because you know, on the highway we can make the

0:50:19.844 --> 0:50:22.924
<v Speaker 1>speed limits thirty five, but we don't because we want

0:50:22.964 --> 0:50:25.164
<v Speaker 1>to get places faster. There's all sorts of things going

0:50:25.164 --> 0:50:27.604
<v Speaker 1>on that they chose not to put these things in

0:50:27.644 --> 0:50:29.884
<v Speaker 1>the models, and one of them. So just kind of

0:50:29.884 --> 0:50:33.044
<v Speaker 1>getting now to your question, there's all sorts of evidence,

0:50:33.204 --> 0:50:35.644
<v Speaker 1>and this is quite obvious. We know this just as

0:50:35.684 --> 0:50:40.084
<v Speaker 1>people that isolation is incredibly damaging. It's also it's physically

0:50:40.164 --> 0:50:43.364
<v Speaker 1>damaging to people. We had people in hospitals, particularly the

0:50:43.364 --> 0:50:46.644
<v Speaker 1>elderly people who were not allowed to see their family.

0:50:48.004 --> 0:50:53.044
<v Speaker 1>We had children. The rates of depression and anxiety and

0:50:53.444 --> 0:50:57.124
<v Speaker 1>of eating disorders both B and I going up, and

0:50:57.324 --> 0:51:01.484
<v Speaker 1>also anorexia going up and bolimia going up. All these

0:51:01.524 --> 0:51:06.564
<v Speaker 1>things were directly tied to isolation and school closures. There

0:51:06.564 --> 0:51:08.804
<v Speaker 1>were people who've said, no, it's just because of the

0:51:08.844 --> 0:51:11.884
<v Speaker 1>pandemic overall, and they were upset. It's just simply not true.

0:51:11.924 --> 0:51:14.604
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of evidence and I cited in

0:51:14.604 --> 0:51:19.124
<v Speaker 1>my book that directly ties these effects to isolation to

0:51:19.404 --> 0:51:21.884
<v Speaker 1>school closures. It had nothing to do with the broader

0:51:22.044 --> 0:51:24.524
<v Speaker 1>kind of like experience of the pandemic.

0:51:24.924 --> 0:51:27.004
<v Speaker 2>There's this thing called the value of a cistical life,

0:51:27.084 --> 0:51:30.684
<v Speaker 2>which is like from empirical data on how many trade

0:51:30.724 --> 0:51:33.844
<v Speaker 2>offs people are willing to make, and like people have

0:51:33.924 --> 0:51:36.244
<v Speaker 2>well established trade offs for how much they're willing to

0:51:36.284 --> 0:51:40.164
<v Speaker 2>trade off length of life in essence for quality of life.

0:51:40.164 --> 0:51:44.084
<v Speaker 2>It gets complicated when like when I was, you know,

0:51:44.124 --> 0:51:48.084
<v Speaker 2>a pretty dutiful mascuer and indoor crowd avoid before I

0:51:48.124 --> 0:51:50.884
<v Speaker 2>got vaccinated, and I wasn't doing it for me. I

0:51:51.004 --> 0:51:53.324
<v Speaker 2>was doing it for because I would feel guilty as

0:51:53.364 --> 0:51:57.044
<v Speaker 2>fuck if I transmitted COVID right, but at some point

0:51:57.484 --> 0:52:01.804
<v Speaker 2>people it just people's tolerance for it lags. And anyway,

0:52:02.284 --> 0:52:05.644
<v Speaker 2>do you think the models were trying or the modelers

0:52:05.684 --> 0:52:07.044
<v Speaker 2>were trying to scare people?

0:52:07.684 --> 0:52:11.964
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, I mean it's unequivocal, and we know there's

0:52:12.124 --> 0:52:15.324
<v Speaker 1>more broadly, there are statements, you know, from Fauci saying,

0:52:15.524 --> 0:52:18.364
<v Speaker 1>if you think you're doing too much, that's probably the

0:52:18.444 --> 0:52:24.484
<v Speaker 1>right thing. There's some internal documents in the UK government

0:52:24.604 --> 0:52:27.924
<v Speaker 1>that I cite my book where they talk about specifically

0:52:28.244 --> 0:52:31.524
<v Speaker 1>like exaggerating and scaring people in order to get them

0:52:31.564 --> 0:52:34.364
<v Speaker 1>to comply. There are articles in the New York Times

0:52:34.364 --> 0:52:38.004
<v Speaker 1>that talked about this where they were fairly explicit about

0:52:38.244 --> 0:52:41.804
<v Speaker 1>having people be frightened in order to get them to

0:52:41.884 --> 0:52:47.164
<v Speaker 1>behave in a certain way. Ultimately, people people's experience of

0:52:47.244 --> 0:52:52.524
<v Speaker 1>reality was so divergent from what we were told was

0:52:52.604 --> 0:52:55.684
<v Speaker 1>the risk ratio and what we were told we needed

0:52:55.684 --> 0:52:59.564
<v Speaker 1>to do. At a certain point people just called bullshit.

0:53:00.204 --> 0:53:02.604
<v Speaker 2>I agree. At the same time, I do think COVID

0:53:02.724 --> 0:53:06.644
<v Speaker 2>was in this kind of like messy middle ground, where

0:53:06.724 --> 0:53:09.244
<v Speaker 2>like if it were an order of magnitude more deadly,

0:53:10.004 --> 0:53:12.364
<v Speaker 2>then people would comply on their own and then very

0:53:12.404 --> 0:53:16.044
<v Speaker 2>harsh protocols I think would be rational and justified and

0:53:16.084 --> 0:53:18.684
<v Speaker 2>passed most cost benefit tests. Right. If it were ten

0:53:18.684 --> 0:53:21.684
<v Speaker 2>times less deadly, then it would be you know, the

0:53:21.724 --> 0:53:24.244
<v Speaker 2>seasonal flu basically, and people would just kind of let.

0:53:24.204 --> 0:53:24.724
<v Speaker 1>It pass through.

0:53:24.804 --> 0:53:27.844
<v Speaker 2>We're kind of stuck in the middle, and then there's

0:53:27.924 --> 0:53:29.844
<v Speaker 2>kind of so much data to cherry pick, and you

0:53:29.884 --> 0:53:32.724
<v Speaker 2>kind of are forced to kind of figure things out

0:53:33.044 --> 0:53:36.084
<v Speaker 2>on your own. I think the problem at its core,

0:53:36.804 --> 0:53:39.804
<v Speaker 2>as I describe it in the book, is that it's

0:53:39.884 --> 0:53:43.644
<v Speaker 2>really kind of epistemological, isn't it. And it comes down to, like,

0:53:44.124 --> 0:53:45.844
<v Speaker 2>how do we know it is true? How do we

0:53:45.884 --> 0:53:51.604
<v Speaker 2>think about evidence? And what frustrated me, just endlessly and

0:53:51.804 --> 0:53:56.324
<v Speaker 2>enraged me and fascinated me was and still is the

0:53:56.404 --> 0:53:59.364
<v Speaker 2>fact that the idea of like anyone can cherry pick

0:53:59.364 --> 0:54:01.764
<v Speaker 2>stuff and you can have dueling studies. If I were

0:54:01.764 --> 0:54:04.044
<v Speaker 2>to debate someone tomorrow about school.

0:54:03.764 --> 0:54:06.364
<v Speaker 1>Closures, they could cite twenty studies if they want, then

0:54:06.404 --> 0:54:08.564
<v Speaker 1>I could cite twenty studies that you know, have an

0:54:08.564 --> 0:54:11.684
<v Speaker 1>opposite conclusion. And I spoke to a guy who an

0:54:11.764 --> 0:54:15.684
<v Speaker 1>oncologist who's but he's I don't think he's practicing anymore,

0:54:15.684 --> 0:54:18.004
<v Speaker 1>but he talks to patients about how to think through

0:54:18.204 --> 0:54:20.404
<v Speaker 1>like their treatment and what to do or not and

0:54:20.444 --> 0:54:23.524
<v Speaker 1>how to think about evidence. And I was talking with

0:54:23.604 --> 0:54:26.284
<v Speaker 1>him and I said, you know, I talked about you know,

0:54:26.324 --> 0:54:28.804
<v Speaker 1>the millions of kids in school in Europe and stuff,

0:54:28.804 --> 0:54:31.364
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, so does that not count though, because

0:54:31.364 --> 0:54:33.284
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, in the hierarchy of evidence, it's not

0:54:33.324 --> 0:54:36.564
<v Speaker 1>a randomized trial. And he was like, David, He's like,

0:54:36.884 --> 0:54:41.164
<v Speaker 1>that's better than a study. He's like, that's just reality.

0:54:41.924 --> 0:54:46.364
<v Speaker 1>Studies always have chosen parameters. And it like was really

0:54:46.404 --> 0:54:49.324
<v Speaker 1>an incredible like moment for me where it was like, right,

0:54:49.844 --> 0:54:55.444
<v Speaker 1>like empirical reality trumps everything. So the idea, like you know,

0:54:55.924 --> 0:54:57.564
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned like, oh, in five years from now, you

0:54:57.564 --> 0:54:59.044
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get into an argument with some and

0:54:59.164 --> 0:55:01.724
<v Speaker 1>again about like what the outcomes are this that or

0:55:01.764 --> 0:55:04.404
<v Speaker 1>the other thing. But it's like, I feel like we

0:55:04.444 --> 0:55:06.404
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. You don't have to look at tons

0:55:06.404 --> 0:55:10.324
<v Speaker 1>of studies. We can, but studies to just by their nature,

0:55:10.684 --> 0:55:14.524
<v Speaker 1>have some degree of subjective parameters, you know, put around them,

0:55:14.604 --> 0:55:17.444
<v Speaker 1>the timing that they run from X day to Y day,

0:55:17.924 --> 0:55:20.004
<v Speaker 1>you know, the inputs, et cetera. But when you just

0:55:20.044 --> 0:55:23.364
<v Speaker 1>look at reality, empirical reality. If millions of kids are

0:55:23.364 --> 0:55:27.204
<v Speaker 1>in school, nothing really happened that, you know. When I

0:55:27.204 --> 0:55:29.524
<v Speaker 1>spoke to this on college is, he's like, that's better.

0:55:29.644 --> 0:55:35.844
<v Speaker 1>That's actually above a randomized trial. We're just observing empirical, empirically,

0:55:35.924 --> 0:55:40.404
<v Speaker 1>something that's true. But instead of looking at that, we

0:55:40.684 --> 0:55:43.924
<v Speaker 1>favored theory, you know, and all of these things well

0:55:43.964 --> 0:55:46.444
<v Speaker 1>we well they didn't say we think, They said we know.

0:55:46.964 --> 0:55:50.364
<v Speaker 1>But implicit in this idea, remember the Swiss cheese model,

0:55:50.564 --> 0:55:53.084
<v Speaker 1>ny where of course, right, So they told us each

0:55:53.124 --> 0:55:55.484
<v Speaker 1>of these interventions was like a slice of Swiss cheese,

0:55:55.524 --> 0:55:58.084
<v Speaker 1>and if you do all of them, hopefully the holes

0:55:58.124 --> 0:56:00.604
<v Speaker 1>won't line up and the little very ons won't get

0:56:00.684 --> 0:56:03.124
<v Speaker 1>you know, won't make it through. But what's the implicit

0:56:03.164 --> 0:56:05.644
<v Speaker 1>message in that? It's that they don't know what works.

0:56:05.924 --> 0:56:09.244
<v Speaker 1>They were already admitting they didn't know which intervention worked.

0:56:09.244 --> 0:56:11.844
<v Speaker 1>Therefore we have to do all of them. But yet

0:56:11.924 --> 0:56:15.644
<v Speaker 1>no evidence was actually accrued to support them, and and

0:56:15.764 --> 0:56:20.204
<v Speaker 1>we had evidence to the opposite that in reality. So

0:56:20.324 --> 0:56:22.524
<v Speaker 1>that to me is the thing that I just find

0:56:23.164 --> 0:56:25.804
<v Speaker 1>endlessly fascinating, you know, and I know you do a

0:56:25.804 --> 0:56:28.204
<v Speaker 1>lot of work on kind of like human nature and

0:56:28.284 --> 0:56:31.644
<v Speaker 1>decision making and stuff like that, like on why and

0:56:31.844 --> 0:56:35.924
<v Speaker 1>how our country, by and large, or at least half

0:56:35.964 --> 0:56:40.284
<v Speaker 1>of it went along with favoring a sort of like

0:56:40.284 --> 0:56:46.524
<v Speaker 1>epistelological model of life that favored theory over evidence.

0:56:48.004 --> 0:56:51.444
<v Speaker 2>What did the contrarians get wrong?

0:56:52.804 --> 0:56:55.004
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question. Well, it depends who you define,

0:56:55.244 --> 0:57:00.644
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a contrarian, and what that means. I

0:57:00.684 --> 0:57:05.284
<v Speaker 1>think some of them overstated harms from the vaccine distills.

0:57:05.684 --> 0:57:08.964
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen that evidence yet. Maybe it exists and

0:57:09.004 --> 0:57:11.004
<v Speaker 1>it just had have been uncovered. I have not seen

0:57:11.044 --> 0:57:15.284
<v Speaker 1>strong evidence that that they caused the mass harm. You

0:57:15.324 --> 0:57:20.564
<v Speaker 1>know that some people purport them to be causing. I

0:57:20.604 --> 0:57:24.924
<v Speaker 1>think the contrarians. I think people on both sides, but

0:57:25.004 --> 0:57:33.644
<v Speaker 1>including the contraints, perhaps misjudged how to effectively argue for

0:57:33.724 --> 0:57:38.004
<v Speaker 1>their position. I don't know, tell me, maybe I'm missing something.

0:57:38.364 --> 0:57:42.804
<v Speaker 2>I do think there was over optimism among the speed

0:57:42.844 --> 0:57:47.684
<v Speaker 2>with which HERD immunity would be reached. Right. Look, a

0:57:47.724 --> 0:57:50.444
<v Speaker 2>lot of transmission was not being picked up. It was asymptomatic,

0:57:50.484 --> 0:57:53.964
<v Speaker 2>and you'd have these waves and there are complicated patterns

0:57:54.004 --> 0:57:55.764
<v Speaker 2>that you know that every time you feel like you

0:57:55.844 --> 0:57:58.484
<v Speaker 2>kind of got the hang of modeling, them. Then they

0:57:58.524 --> 0:58:01.324
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't quite hold up, right, But like I thought, they're

0:58:01.364 --> 0:58:03.124
<v Speaker 2>you know, there are people that thought, okay, well, actually

0:58:04.004 --> 0:58:06.924
<v Speaker 2>sixty percent of people have already been infected, we think,

0:58:06.964 --> 0:58:13.724
<v Speaker 2>and therefore there's heard immunity, you know, notwithstanding evidence about reinfections.

0:58:13.764 --> 0:58:15.924
<v Speaker 2>You know, kind of I was in, I think the

0:58:15.924 --> 0:58:20.564
<v Speaker 2>little denial about that. Clearly these reinfections were a problem.

0:58:20.884 --> 0:58:23.044
<v Speaker 2>So I need to start wrapping up here. So let

0:58:23.084 --> 0:58:26.524
<v Speaker 2>me kind of let me ask this. Let's say that

0:58:26.524 --> 0:58:31.644
<v Speaker 2>there is a COVID twenty five pandemic, and let's say

0:58:31.644 --> 0:58:33.964
<v Speaker 2>that we know this is going to be have roughly

0:58:33.964 --> 0:58:39.204
<v Speaker 2>the same characteristics as COVID nineteen. For some reason, any

0:58:39.244 --> 0:58:43.524
<v Speaker 2>immunity you had from previous COVID nineteen infections or vaccines

0:58:44.204 --> 0:58:48.324
<v Speaker 2>provide no protection. So we're starting from scratch. How do

0:58:48.324 --> 0:58:50.164
<v Speaker 2>you think the United States would react today?

0:58:50.964 --> 0:58:54.444
<v Speaker 1>It'll be it'll be a nightmare, right, I mean, it

0:58:54.564 --> 0:58:58.244
<v Speaker 1>was just I think the one area where there has

0:58:58.324 --> 0:59:01.284
<v Speaker 1>been a softening though, is certainly on kids in schools.

0:59:01.844 --> 0:59:05.204
<v Speaker 1>That's like the one kind of like the narrative initially

0:59:05.324 --> 0:59:07.124
<v Speaker 1>was we have to do this, we got to protect

0:59:07.124 --> 0:59:09.164
<v Speaker 1>the kids. Then the narrative shifted to well, the kids

0:59:09.204 --> 0:59:11.564
<v Speaker 1>are OK, but we need to protect teachers. And then

0:59:11.564 --> 0:59:14.124
<v Speaker 1>once it became obvious that like that, didn't you know

0:59:14.164 --> 0:59:17.124
<v Speaker 1>that teachers were not at any greater risk than other professionals, which,

0:59:17.124 --> 0:59:19.284
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Sweden had a study on this very

0:59:19.324 --> 0:59:22.164
<v Speaker 1>early that showed this that teachers there were not at

0:59:22.244 --> 0:59:25.564
<v Speaker 1>higher risk than the average professional, and on and on.

0:59:25.564 --> 0:59:31.404
<v Speaker 1>Once once like all that's established, it's like then the

0:59:31.484 --> 0:59:34.204
<v Speaker 1>narrative shifted to which like a year or two into

0:59:34.204 --> 0:59:38.204
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, it then shifted to, well, this was a

0:59:38.324 --> 0:59:41.764
<v Speaker 1>regrettable decision, but they were building the plane as they

0:59:41.764 --> 0:59:44.124
<v Speaker 1>fly it, you know, as a fog of war. But

0:59:44.164 --> 0:59:46.244
<v Speaker 1>the key part, just to answer your question, is though,

0:59:46.444 --> 0:59:50.124
<v Speaker 1>but the narrative did shift, at least to the extent

0:59:50.164 --> 0:59:52.644
<v Speaker 1>that there was an acknowledgment that this was a mistake.

0:59:53.004 --> 0:59:55.284
<v Speaker 1>They then come up with some you know, very kind

0:59:55.284 --> 0:59:57.884
<v Speaker 1>of like exculpatory reasons for why it was a mistake

0:59:57.884 --> 1:00:03.604
<v Speaker 1>that I think are are convenient and untrue. But the

1:00:03.724 --> 1:00:06.724
<v Speaker 1>fact that this is now acknowledged that it's like even

1:00:06.764 --> 1:00:10.924
<v Speaker 1>in like normy kind of liberal circles, most people I

1:00:11.004 --> 1:00:14.764
<v Speaker 1>think today say like, yeah, that was a mistake. I

1:00:14.804 --> 1:00:17.884
<v Speaker 1>think that suggests that if there's some you know, virus

1:00:17.924 --> 1:00:20.964
<v Speaker 1>that behaves in exactly the same way, that there's going

1:00:21.084 --> 1:00:25.964
<v Speaker 1>to be far far less tolerance for these kind of

1:00:26.004 --> 1:00:29.164
<v Speaker 1>like long term closures and other interventions on kids. Like

1:00:29.404 --> 1:00:31.164
<v Speaker 1>people just aren't going to tolerate it.

1:00:31.364 --> 1:00:32.924
<v Speaker 2>You know. Look, I'm gonna be honest. I think they

1:00:32.924 --> 1:00:37.804
<v Speaker 2>are like a certain number of people who uh might

1:00:37.884 --> 1:00:40.764
<v Speaker 2>be more introverted, right, which is normal, But it felt

1:00:40.764 --> 1:00:44.044
<v Speaker 2>like it felt like people weren't able to extrapolate from

1:00:44.364 --> 1:00:46.724
<v Speaker 2>their situation. Where if you have like a nice home

1:00:46.764 --> 1:00:49.004
<v Speaker 2>in the suburbs and you're someone who loves nothing more

1:00:49.044 --> 1:00:51.964
<v Speaker 2>than like snuggling on the couch with your partner and

1:00:52.004 --> 1:00:54.244
<v Speaker 2>your kids or whatever, right and watching movies, and you

1:00:54.284 --> 1:00:59.284
<v Speaker 2>don't like going out, then maybe this seems good. You

1:00:59.284 --> 1:01:02.084
<v Speaker 2>don't have any more fomo or guilt for like not worse,

1:01:02.244 --> 1:01:04.604
<v Speaker 2>you know, Whereas other people I know where like they're like,

1:01:04.684 --> 1:01:06.004
<v Speaker 2>this is not gonna work for even a week the

1:01:06.044 --> 1:01:08.404
<v Speaker 2>social distancing thing, and are already going to like illicit

1:01:08.484 --> 1:01:12.204
<v Speaker 2>parties in New York, and people vary along those dimensions.

1:01:12.284 --> 1:01:13.964
<v Speaker 2>I'm not even sure what my point.

1:01:13.764 --> 1:01:16.764
<v Speaker 1>Was, but my point is, so I know we're bouncing

1:01:16.804 --> 1:01:18.964
<v Speaker 1>around here but just one more thing, you know, but

1:01:19.044 --> 1:01:21.404
<v Speaker 1>much of this also has to do with class and

1:01:21.644 --> 1:01:25.804
<v Speaker 1>and you know, social and economic class. That regardless of

1:01:25.804 --> 1:01:28.684
<v Speaker 1>whether you're an introvert or not, if you had the

1:01:28.804 --> 1:01:31.444
<v Speaker 1>means of living in a comfortable home and doing your

1:01:31.484 --> 1:01:35.004
<v Speaker 1>work from home and not losing your income, that you

1:01:35.044 --> 1:01:38.164
<v Speaker 1>were just going to experience the pandemic very differently from

1:01:38.204 --> 1:01:40.684
<v Speaker 1>someone who had to leave their home to work, from

1:01:40.724 --> 1:01:44.084
<v Speaker 1>someone who lives in a dump somewhere and you know,

1:01:44.204 --> 1:01:47.204
<v Speaker 1>and their kids are jammed in some tiny apartment with them.

1:01:47.484 --> 1:01:50.124
<v Speaker 1>It's just so it's like it wasn't just about an introversion.

1:01:50.164 --> 1:01:54.924
<v Speaker 1>It's also about class. And this was a remarkably class

1:01:55.324 --> 1:02:00.524
<v Speaker 1>based policies that were put in place during the pandemic

1:02:00.604 --> 1:02:06.804
<v Speaker 1>that dramatically favored those who were comfortable and dramatically escalated

1:02:06.644 --> 1:02:10.084
<v Speaker 1>the harms to the people who to not have those

1:02:10.084 --> 1:02:12.884
<v Speaker 1>same means. I want to talk or close by talking

1:02:12.964 --> 1:02:16.604
<v Speaker 1>about the United States and kind of social solidarity in

1:02:16.644 --> 1:02:19.964
<v Speaker 1>the United States, because look, I am certainly like a

1:02:20.004 --> 1:02:24.724
<v Speaker 1>libertarian leading person by acknowledge that pure libertarianism becomes problematic

1:02:24.764 --> 1:02:29.564
<v Speaker 1>in a pandemic, right, So you could say, for example, okay,

1:02:29.604 --> 1:02:32.284
<v Speaker 1>well if it is a time of high transmission.

1:02:32.324 --> 1:02:34.724
<v Speaker 2>I want to go to a restaurant. The owner wants

1:02:34.724 --> 1:02:37.324
<v Speaker 2>to keep the restaurant open. The waiter and the servers

1:02:37.364 --> 1:02:39.804
<v Speaker 2>want to make money noon tomic income for their families,

1:02:39.844 --> 1:02:42.484
<v Speaker 2>And so what's so bad about that we're all assuming

1:02:42.484 --> 1:02:45.204
<v Speaker 2>the own risk. However, we are also creating a negative

1:02:45.204 --> 1:02:48.604
<v Speaker 2>externality for like people in our community. More broadly, right,

1:02:48.644 --> 1:02:51.644
<v Speaker 2>and these questions become easier to solve when the countries

1:02:51.644 --> 1:02:53.804
<v Speaker 2>are more united, right. I mean, you have a quote

1:02:53.804 --> 1:02:56.524
<v Speaker 2>in the book that you kind of flight at the top.

1:02:56.604 --> 1:02:58.004
<v Speaker 2>All of this is not a book about COVID, It's

1:02:58.044 --> 1:03:01.284
<v Speaker 2>about a country ill equipped to ac sensibly under duress.

1:03:01.644 --> 1:03:04.044
<v Speaker 2>How much of this is about the United States? And

1:03:04.084 --> 1:03:07.124
<v Speaker 2>has that made you more pessimistic about the United States's

1:03:07.364 --> 1:03:11.884
<v Speaker 2>leadership abilities? State capacity is a fancy term for it

1:03:11.964 --> 1:03:12.644
<v Speaker 2>going forward.

1:03:13.404 --> 1:03:20.444
<v Speaker 1>I'm very pessimistic. I'm hoping my vook will act as

1:03:20.484 --> 1:03:22.724
<v Speaker 1>some sort of corrective for people and serve as a

1:03:22.764 --> 1:03:27.684
<v Speaker 1>record and also as a means of thinking through how

1:03:27.724 --> 1:03:31.764
<v Speaker 1>these things happen, which will hopefully act as some degree

1:03:31.844 --> 1:03:35.484
<v Speaker 1>of like a countermeasure. But the reality is, you know,

1:03:35.764 --> 1:03:38.764
<v Speaker 1>when you have this kind of like constellation of all

1:03:38.764 --> 1:03:45.044
<v Speaker 1>these different influential institutions, and through both political and kind

1:03:45.044 --> 1:03:50.884
<v Speaker 1>of like personality inclinations, it created a very bad environment

1:03:50.924 --> 1:03:54.884
<v Speaker 1>with bad incentives for people to be afraid to either

1:03:54.964 --> 1:03:57.884
<v Speaker 1>think critically, or if they were thinking critically, then be

1:03:58.004 --> 1:04:00.724
<v Speaker 1>afraid or told explicitly that they were not allowed to

1:04:00.724 --> 1:04:07.804
<v Speaker 1>go against the purported consensus. Well, it certainly certainly permanently

1:04:07.804 --> 1:04:12.284
<v Speaker 1>shifted my priors as far as kind of how wrong

1:04:12.364 --> 1:04:17.564
<v Speaker 1>the expert consensus can be, and how wrong motivated by

1:04:17.724 --> 1:04:22.204
<v Speaker 1>I think somewhat banal and obvious political motives, how how

1:04:22.964 --> 1:04:26.204
<v Speaker 1>unsubtle the effort to maintain the consensus was. And you

1:04:26.244 --> 1:04:29.804
<v Speaker 1>absolutely would get screamed at if you expressed views that

1:04:29.884 --> 1:04:33.204
<v Speaker 1>were very centrist a and later proved to be mostly

1:04:33.244 --> 1:04:36.364
<v Speaker 1>correct B. But they were very careful about how they

1:04:36.364 --> 1:04:38.964
<v Speaker 1>are drawing, drawing the lines between what was acceptable and

1:04:38.964 --> 1:04:42.164
<v Speaker 1>what and what was not. And I will never forget it,

1:04:42.364 --> 1:04:44.324
<v Speaker 1>but I'm glad we're not going through it anymore.

1:04:44.524 --> 1:04:46.404
<v Speaker 2>So, thank you so much for joining us, David.

1:04:46.364 --> 1:04:48.284
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me, Nate, it's good to chat with you.

1:04:51.604 --> 1:04:54.924
<v Speaker 2>That's all for this week. Premium subscribers can seek around

1:04:54.924 --> 1:04:57.124
<v Speaker 2>for our answer to one of your burning listener questions

1:04:57.164 --> 1:04:59.924
<v Speaker 2>after the credits, and if you're not subscribing yet, consider

1:04:59.964 --> 1:05:02.684
<v Speaker 2>signing up for just six ninety nine a month. You've

1:05:02.684 --> 1:05:05.564
<v Speaker 2>got access to premium content from us every week and

1:05:05.724 --> 1:05:09.644
<v Speaker 2>if you're listening across Pushkin's entire network of shows. Steve

1:05:09.684 --> 1:05:12.724
<v Speaker 2>Business is hosted by me Nate Silver along with Maria Kanakova.

1:05:13.204 --> 1:05:16.244
<v Speaker 2>The show is a co production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia.

1:05:16.884 --> 1:05:20.364
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Isabelle Carter. Our associate producer

1:05:20.404 --> 1:05:23.204
<v Speaker 2>is Sonya Gerwit Sally helm As our editor, and our

1:05:23.244 --> 1:05:27.604
<v Speaker 2>executive producer is Jacob Goldstein. Mixing by Sarah Bruguer. If

1:05:27.644 --> 1:05:29.884
<v Speaker 2>you like the show, please rate and review us. You

1:05:29.924 --> 1:05:32.404
<v Speaker 2>know we like we take a four or five. We

1:05:32.524 --> 1:05:34.764
<v Speaker 2>take the five, rate and review us to other people.

1:05:34.804 --> 1:05:35.604
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening.