WEBVTT - Apollo's Europe Credit Head Talks Football Financing, Making Private Markets Accessible

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Private credit is now a serious rival to mainstream lending

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>for all kinds of businesses, from real estate firms to

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>tech startups, but the market in Europe is yet to

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>take off in quite the same way as the US,

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and concerns remain about the industry's opacity and its ability

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to cope with a prolonged recession. Joining us now to

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>discuss in studio, Tristram Leach, partner and head of Investments

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>for Credit in Hybrid and Europe at Apolot. Just great

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to see you. Thanks so much for joining us on

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. I want to know how you're thinking about

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the rest of this year. There's been massive upheaval in

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>trade and geopolitics in the first half of twenty twenty five,

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but stock markets have been hitting repeated record hies in

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>recent weeks, so private market's just as bullet So yeah.

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>You're right that the public markets are obviously not reflecting

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>a enormous amount of risk. Premium credit spreads in public

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>credit are painfully tight. I'd say there's definitely some premium

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>available in private credit markets, and I think people's focus

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 2>is how much deal flow and volume there is for

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the remainder of the year. I think also when we

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 2>think about private credit, and we think about it in

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 2>a pretty expanded way, not just traditional sub investment grade lending,

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 2>but also lending to large corporates, investment grade corporates, et cetera.

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>And frankly, that's probably where the most scaled opportunity lies

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>going forward, especially as we see Europe's need to invest

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of these areas infrastructure, defense, energy, etc.

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>And so I think that's an opportunity set we're really

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>ready to lean into.

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 3>But is there sufficient risk appetite for investors in Europe

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 3>for this?

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean I think so, look, investment grade private credit.

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 2>To me, you know, we're not talking about an enormous

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 2>amount of risk. We're talking about safe companies, large companies,

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 2>and really the returns you can access by being able

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>to provide solutions at scale with long dated and flexible capital.

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 2>So you know, for me, it's not a question of risk,

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 2>it's a question of being able to deliver those opportunities

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 2>at scale. And certainly we have pocketive capital, our own

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>balance sheets, you know, from Athene and Athora, which are

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 2>very keen to deploy into that opportunity set.

0:01:58.440 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Where are those opportunities?

0:01:59.800 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Then?

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's lots of focus in Europe on things

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like the massive ramp up and defense spending. Are you

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>getting in on that act?

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 2>So it's certainly an area we're engaging with them where

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 2>we think there's a lot of opportunity. I think it's

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 2>fair to say we haven't yet seen large scale financings

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 2>and private financings in the defense space in Europe.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that is?

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Europe's wake up call on defense was relatively recent. It

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 2>was kind of this year that really Europe realized that

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>it needed to catch up in terms of defense spending,

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 2>it needs to make good on its commitments to NATO

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and probably go a little bit further. So I think

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 2>we're very very early in an evolution into an environment

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 2>where there's more defense spending in Europe, and we certainly

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 2>stand ready to engage with that, but it's the early days.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>What sort of engagement are you getting from that industry?

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Are they open and do they Are they aware of

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities that can come from tap in private markets?

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they are, and I think it's a space where

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 2>you're going to see more engagement, You're going to see

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 2>deals happen, And we've certainly been on the front foot

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>with engaging both with pol makers and with individual companies

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 2>such that they know that the capital is there.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Is this something that you feel that there is you know,

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>particular countries where you're going to see more interest in that.

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm thinking about, you know, France and Germany.

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Where should we be looking to see where the next

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>developments are going to come in that area?

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Across the European continent. There's needs to invest more in defense.

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 2>I think there have been a lot of headlines around

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 2>Germany's immediate willingness to expend more on defense and to

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 2>drive its defense industry forward. So that's probably a place

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 2>I'd be looking, But honestly, it's continent wide, Okay.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, in the US, there's also been a lot of

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 3>discussion about private capital being used for For one case, I

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 3>wonder if there's any equivalent in Europe, you know, where

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 3>a part of retirement savings could be used in private

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 3>credit or do you think that the industry is too isolated.

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 2>No, Clearly, we feel that the risk return is more

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 2>compelling in private credit than in public markets, especially at

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the moment, and so the idea that you'd want savers

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 2>to be denied the opportunity to benefit from the incremental

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 2>return that's available seems to us, you know, bizarre. So

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>so certainly making those products available to a broader swathe

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 2>of the market is something that we feel strongly about,

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>be that the wealth market or be that, you know,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 2>working with institutions to make those products available.

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And how does that work? I mean, how are those

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>conversations going about trying to get that expanded base opened.

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 2>We have been advocating for the availability of private credit

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and for the attractiveness is that as a product from

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, from the top of the house, and I

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 2>think there's a pretty you know, widespread discourse around how

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 2>attractive that product is, and certainly the relative value versus

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 2>public markets yeah, becrourse.

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 3>The flip side to this is the discussion of systemic risk,

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 3>and over the past year you've had increasing discussion from

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 3>the lights of Moody's and the IMF saying that private

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>credit does pose this systemic risk. Is that fair? Are

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 3>we going to see some fun collapse?

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is that what we just discussed was the

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 2>relative value of private credit versus public credit looking attractive,

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and yet you don't see these same points made about

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 2>public credit markets. We've noticed liquidity in public credit markets declining,

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 2>So for us to focus exclusively on private credit markets

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 2>as a place where all the risk is doesn't make sense.

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to see funds a differentiation in fund performance?

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.119
<v Speaker 2>I think you are. You know, the last twenty years

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 2>have been an environment where there hasn't really been a

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 2>very deep cycle in credit markets, and so you've seen

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 2>very highly correlated performance across the private credit industry. I

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 2>think you're certainly going to see an environment where you

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 2>see dispersion in credit outcomes, and you probably also see

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>dispersion in manager outcomes. And frankly, that's something that an

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 2>institution like Apollo, with the amount of resource that we

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>put into our research and our process, you know, we

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 2>welcome some dispersion in the market. Do I think it's

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>a systemic risk that seems an overstretch to me.

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Where are you seeing stress at the moment within private credits?

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean thinking about you know, software companies coping demands

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of taking on AI or things like that. I mean,

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>what sort of examples can you give us of where

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>there are stresses being seen?

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, software is a really good example. I think it's

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 2>very early days in terms of understanding how AI is

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 2>going to impact the software landscape. But if you think

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 2>about software investing, it was traditionally a very high multiple

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>sector and people lent extremely high leverage levels into that sector.

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 2>We've been cautious on that sector really throughout. I'd say

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 2>if you look at our book across both both Europe

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 2>and the US, we're probably underweight software versus a lot

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 2>of our peers, and a large part of that is

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 2>because of our uncertainty about exactly how AI is going

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 2>to impact the market. So that is certainly an area

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 2>where we've been cautious. We remain cautious. We remain very

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 2>very focused on trying to pass through the risk that

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>our is likely to pose going forward. That's probably more

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 2>a prospective risk than one that we're finding eventuating right now.

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 2>There's not a bunch of software to stress happening immediately

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 2>because of that, but it's certainly something we're focused on.

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 3>How do you think that in the future private credit

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 3>is going to evolve? Do you think we're ever going

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 3>to see true liquidity?

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, I touched earlier on the way

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the public credit markets appear to be getting less liquid

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>and I think in the same way, private credit markets

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 2>are clearly becoming more liquid. So I think we are

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 2>moving to a world where there is greater liquidity in

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 2>private markets. I guess it depends what you mean by

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 2>true liquidity, but you know, my subjective view is that,

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, when we do a large loan private loan,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, the phone tends to run off the hook

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 2>with people trying to buy it from us. So you know,

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 2>in good times you can sell public credit risk and

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 2>you can tell private credit risk, and in bad times,

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, both are relatively tricky to shift. So I'd

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 2>say the liquidity profile of public and private credit is converging.

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of intrigued with the idea of how the

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>European side of this business can develop to you know,

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I suppose perhaps approach what's happening in the US and

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>what you know, are there regulatory steps that you'd like

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to see being taken to try and open up how

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>much European private credit can evolve. Are things like the

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Capital Markets Union helpful?

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Certainly that would be helpful. I mean, just just by

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 2>way of thinking about the scale of our markets. You know,

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the seventy five percent of US corporate financing is non

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 2>bank financing, and that's twelve percent in Europe. So there's

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 2>an enormous amount of growth out there ahead of us. Obviously,

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 2>things that make the somewhat nuanced environment of investing across

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 2>the European Union and Europe as a continent more straightforward

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 2>and capital markets Union will be part of that would

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 2>clearly move things forward at an accelerated pace. But look,

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the growth is there regardless, just because at

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>the moment so little of corporate financing has done from

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 2>private credit and non bank financing.

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 3>I got to ask you about the football We've had

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 3>reporting from Bloomberg this morning suggesting that five billion pounds

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 3>of Europe's football transfer markets ignited this private debt boom.

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Is that a new area of growth for Apollo.

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a big football guy, and I saw the

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 2>headline this morning and I'd get asked about it. It's

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 2>it is an area we're involved in in player financing.

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, five billion is a big number. It's probably

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 2>not gigantic by the scale of you know, the credit

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 2>markets and our activities in Europe, but certainly it's an

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:37.959
<v Speaker 2>area we're involved in, we think is interesting, we think

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 2>represents compelling risk award, and look, it's part of our

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 2>We look at that as part of our setback to business,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 2>where you know, lending against against receivables from high quality

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 2>counterparties is something we're happy to do and we think

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>we can do in a competitive way. And look, the

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>sports world seems to be attracting more and more money

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 2>all the time.

0:09:57.960 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to be prout of a drive up

0:09:59.240 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>driving up player.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure they're going to drive themselves up regardless.

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, christ and great to have you with us. Thank

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you very much for joining us Sin Studio this morning.

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Tristram Leach, their partner and head of investments for Credit

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and Hybrid in Europe at Apollo. Really interesting conversation about

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>this growing area of interest for investors as well. So

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a great time to take the temperature of where things

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>are after what has been a very interesting run for

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the sector