WEBVTT - Monday night recap, Packers running game, NBA optimizer, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy Best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. M Do Do Do Do? Didn do Do

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Do Do? Do? Didn do do do do? Didn't do Yo.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>This is the Fantasy Fast Friends Forever here on the

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network, alongside Frankie Standfell, I am Greg

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Salesman Friday. What's going on Monday, Greggy. After weeks of

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>having some terrible prime time football games, I asked the

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>football gods to not give us anymore. Use some Texans,

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>some more Dallas Cowboys, No more team from Texas. You

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>know we've got two great primetime games in a row.

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>How about that Sunday Monday Night? Man A C. Bethern

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>doing the thing? Is that his name? Yeah? Okay, yeah,

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>he did. It's great. I know her gave talk about

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this earlier. It seemed like he was just slinging the

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>ball the entire first half, like if you had the

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>over for his prop I think it was something like

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>two and fifty five yards something like that. You feel great.

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And then in the second half it's just like he

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't throw the ball at all. Um, but honestly made

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a made mark. He's goodwin fantasy viable again for one

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>game at least. I'm sure we'll be talking about that

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to see whether or not he is a waiver wire

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>target of hours. Um. But yeah, I mean heroics from

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. I don't know that you know, we saw

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>this game being as close as competitive as it was.

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned yesterday that I like the over and the

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>forty niners. I didn't, you know, I thought it was

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be more of like a backdoor cover if anything.

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that it was gonna go down to

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the wire. But it was a great football game overall.

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, for those people who were sweating

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>out their fantasy outcomes on Monday night, I was right

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>there with you man. I ended up winning as of

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>now by one point to two points. I mentioned yesterday,

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I was going up against Aaron Rodgers and Alfred Morris

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and I was up thirty one point Alfred Morris four

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards. As of right now, I have a one

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>point two point lead. Also, that um, that touchdown that

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers through to Time Montgomery like early in the

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>game got reversed to like a rushing touchdown too, So

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just hoping that that call stands um for my

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>sake and everybody else who early one that was facing

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. You know, it was crazy because for me,

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I had I was down ten points on the knee

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>on the night going into Monday Night football, I had

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams. I was facing the Green Bay defense, and

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Adams scores pretty early on in the first quarter, like okay,

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>we have a shot here, and then C J. Bethy

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to Mark he is good and I was like, wait

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a minute, this is getting close. And I was down.

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>At halftime, I was down three points, I think, so

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I was in a pretty good spot. And then interception, um,

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a sack or two, and I'm down I think five points.

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>At one point, Davante Adams gets the job done and

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter when last drive for San Francisco.

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess the second last driver San Francisco before they

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>um pointed it away. You get a sack and we

0:03:54.000 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>are tied at point seven to point seven with more points.

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't see that a lot, not often. So I'm

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.119
<v Speaker 1>just like, listen, let me have just aboute Adams catch

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>one pass on this last on the next drive, just

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>one pass. He caught a thirty eight yard reception and

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>then scure a touchdown and le move on with the victory. Greg,

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>moving on with the victory. You know what's crazy about that?

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>My home league team where I just barely won. I'm

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>three and three, but I'm like a fool's gold three

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and three, Like my it's not good. And I realized that,

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'm you know, I'm just gonna try and write

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it out as long as I could. It's kind of

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>similar to the Jets, right, Like the Jets are three

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and three and like, yeah, you want to be optimistic,

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you feel good about it, but they're facing the Vikings

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Bears the next two weeks. So it's like,

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, you're three and three, but really, how great

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about that? Three and three? You gotta

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>look yourself in the mirror and realize my fantasy tea

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>actually that good. Totally agree, And there's a lot of

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>football to be played there. Sometimes you just get bine

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and you hope to cally you into the playoffs and

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>magic happens, and the other times you're sitting for and

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>too and you're like, which is pretty good? And I

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of feel in the middle of that about my

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>four and two team, and like, I think it's good.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a bad team, but like I

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>was really looking at it this morning, it's not a

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>great team. It's not a great team. Yeah, I was.

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I was one in three with this team, and that

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>was the one that I was freaking out with. A

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. I kept asking you guys, should

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I make trades? Because if I go one in four,

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to climb out of that whole. So

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>now I've climbed back. I've won two in a row,

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>three and three, um, but whatever, So much for that.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Just going back to last night's game, our guy MVS

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty solid, showing m VS third on the team

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and targets six targets, three receptions a hundred and three yards. Man,

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>if he would if he would have like got on

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the end zone. They would have helped team BFF. But

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what, it was a valiant effort regardless, more

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of the same from the Green Baby rush rushing attack right,

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Like Aaron Jones should have had that touchdown. We all

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>saw he crossed the plane, but he had the ball

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>on his on his right right side rather than his left,

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>so it didn't get inside the pylon. He would have

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>had a rushing touchdown. But then gameflow kind of sit

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>set up that he wasn't gonna get a lot of

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts in this game. So you know what, maybe

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should start listening to the fantasy executive more.

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Just don't draft Packers running backs, don't draft Colts running backs,

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure we're going to talk about today, but

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, it's a mess. Aaron Jones, Jamal Williams,

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing? What are you doing here? Greg?

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we're just And I watched a lot of

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the play calling last night, and it was a game

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that I understand Greenbay was down in a bunch and

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they at that time Montgomery out there and they had

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>to have Jamal Williams out there. They don't want her

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on the ball, and let we do this every year

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>because we have these memories of the glory years of

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Eddy Lacy, very few glory years their glory years. It

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>was top five pick at one point, he was a

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>top five pick at some point, like what, no one

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>know he was not. I'm not disputing you. That was

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>part of my rationale for drafting the Packers running backs

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen Packers running backs have fantasy value and

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>just I guess that was fool's gold as well. I

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just don't think that, um Mick McCarthy is an idiot.

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That's it. What else do you need to say. I

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>just don't that they don't care about in the ball

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's not Last Night Action. Yeah, but eventually this

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is gonna catch up to them, like we've almost seen

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it happen a few times now, where like they're just

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to put the ball in the hands Baron Rodgers,

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>like it happened last week or two weeks ago. They

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Detroit Lions and all they did was throw, throw,

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>throw the football because that's all they had to do.

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>That's all they could do with sort of football in

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the game, and they still lost. You can argue they

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>could have they should have won if Mason Crosby did

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>his job in that game. But once you're offense becomes

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to one dimensional, like it's it's easier to defend. I mean,

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>not that easy when you have Aaron Rodgers as your quarterback.

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>But I'm sure eventually the fact that the Packers offense

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is as one dimensional as it is is going to

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>catch up to Mike McCarthy and the Packers. For those

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>who doubted Eddie Lacy as a rookie, rushing yards and

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>eleven touchdowns the next year, eleven and nine touchdowns, so

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>very fantasy viable correct for a for a short period

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of time. Absolutely, Dante Adam was beastly last night. He's

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>just been fantastic all year long. You mentioned MVS of

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>course as well. Jimmy Graham not as involved I thought

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>he would be. I think they'd tried at times. Um,

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a cool misconnects between were disconnects I should say,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>between Aaron Rodgers and Jimmy Graham last night. We had

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a great game, though by for one or four like

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>from a tight end, of course, you thought it could

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>have been even better, is all I was getting to there. Um,

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I expect after the bye for the Packers you'll see

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Geronimo Allison and Randall Cobb return, which probably the end

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>four and v s on the other not necessarily, because

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that's something that I've I've continuously spoke about, like he has.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>He's looked pretty sharp with Aaron Rodgers. So there's definitely

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a chance that he goes away. You might have to

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>drop him because now the team is on a bye.

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But if you play in deeper leagues, I might hold

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>onto him because he developed somewhat of rapport with Rogers.

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Who's to say that they go into the bye and

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, you know, doesn't go up to the coaching

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>staff and talk this kid up and say, look, you know,

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I want him to be playing over Randall Cobb. Like

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the team was about to cut Randall cop before the season,

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to trade him away. Who's to say

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that the three wide receiver set coming out of the

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>bye isn't Davante Adams, Jeronimo Allison and Marquez Valdi scantling.

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a chance. I think it's a chance too.

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I think and Ar Rodgers said in deeper leagues, I

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>would hold him. Aaron Rodgers said it after the game

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>last night the MVS farther along in the other rookie

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, and you could tell nice catch by EQUANIMI

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and st Brown that time by equally, by equal, I'll

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just call him equals b E S B. It was nice,

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>It was nice catch, buts be really really good job

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>by him. But I think he certainly goes to the bench.

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>The other dude goes to the bench vs A long

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>yeah him, um, yeah him, that's true. And he ask

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the only one that has a shot to do anything.

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. But I expect Kavin Elsen to all honestly

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>get their roles back on the other side of things

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.599
<v Speaker 1>where there's a there's a good time I think to

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>start on the waiver wide because he's your bet third

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>for agreement. He looked good, right, he he looked good.

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>He moved the offense so much more than we saw

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>any times last year because he took shots. And while

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we saw a couple of shots that he missed last year,

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he's gotten better with his timing. Uh, and he's certainly

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>understands the speed on Marky's good one. We had said

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>many many weeks on this show, Marky's Goodman is droppable,

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>but last night he finally proved healthy and Kyle Shanahan

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>did with Kyle Shanahan always does the good one. He

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>lets him take shot, He gives him a chance, and

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>on at least two occasions last night, those chances converted

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>into touchdowns. How important is it for if Marky's guban

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>is available to go out and get them. So he's

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>about owning CBS leagues right now. And as usual, we're

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about a lot of wide receivers today. There

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>are more running backs available this week than there have

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.080
<v Speaker 1>been in in the past weeks. But Marky's good and

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd say he he ranks up there probably in like

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the top three, top three wide receivers that you want

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to look at. I think mark He's Goodwin, Chris Godwin,

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and then however you want to look at, you know,

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk, Taylor Gabriel. I think those are all kind

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of like the top three or four wide receiver pickups.

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Mark He's Goodwin. Look, he looked awesome last night. Four

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>receptions twenty six yards, two touchdowns, took the top off

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the defense showed you why you know, you can just

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>throw that ball up and he's gonna go out there

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and get it. We know, you know his history as

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>as an Olympian, how fast he is. But I will

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>still have some trepidation with this Greg because he was

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>third on the team and targets behind Pierre Garson, and

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was George Kittle, Yes it was, Yeah,

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle had six Pearson had six targets, so Goodwin

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>had five targets. Um, So that's something like, okay, the

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>targets share something that there. He's not getting a ton

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of targets. While C. J. Bester looked good in this game,

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't looked great overall on the season. The one

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that I do like is that especially if you

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>meet a wide receiver for next week. This week, upcoming

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Week seven, with four teams on a by, they faced

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the Rams Greg over the past month, the past four

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks without a keep to leave, they're allowing the most

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to opposing wide receivers. I think it's purely

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 1>based for this matchup. If you're desperate, you need a

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. You said it yesterday that this team is

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>very very different without a keep to leave, And as

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned, Kyle Shanahan is gonna allow c J

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>about to take shots. He knows that the offenses it

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>has to be one or the game has to be won.

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 1>When an offense is using their game breakers like digging

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Ducky to Pierre Garson or even George Kittle, it's not

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna work. You need Marky's gooman. And I think against

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rams that we're again, they're going to be playing

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>cash up in. I expect it to be a lot

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>over the top, which is very very good from Mark.

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>He's Goodwin, So I agree with you. I like him

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>for this week and maybe I like him a little

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>bit more um as a season long play, because I

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>think those shots are gonna be there every game. I

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think they'll be consistency, but to get through the

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>by I think there's worst players you can take a

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>shot out a shot on. Ultimately, So without being said, Frank,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>how much you just spend on Mark's Goodwin Marcus Goodwin,

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll go I'll go with high as like ten to

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent. I don't know that there is a wide

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver that I see this week where I'm like okay,

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or even a player for that matter that I'm going

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like over twenty percent of my fab but before I

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>think ten to twelve percent. I would probably live in

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that range. What do you think that makes sense? You

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>might have to go up to fifteen percent, just based

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>on his name value he was drafted. He was when

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it was all said and done in draft season, he

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>was like a fifth or sixth round pick. I was

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>as a vat. If someone dropped him, you might have

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 1>to spend a little bit more, I was gonna says,

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>but is he the top wide receiver? Ad? I don't

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>think so. I I think he's second. I think I

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>had is he said? Or third? At least second? Yeah,

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>so you know I've already mentioned Chris Godwin will get

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>into all these guys, say Chris Godwin, Christian Kirk, Taylor Gabriel,

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>name the guy that I think it's the first all honestly? Oh, well,

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is it a one is it a one week thing? No?

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>All right? Well, I was thinking Josh Reynolds. If you

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>need a one week to seven Cooper help ruled out

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>for week seven. This weeks a week after that. I

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>really like Josh Reynolds, But I think Josh reynoldsill be

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>under the radar. I don't think I'll cost you all

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that much. He's the third wide receiver, but no, so

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>is it. I was gonna get to that after the break,

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, tease um, but yeah, I know, I'm I

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think you named and when he just

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>went through your crew, maybe maybe it did. This is

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be great if we come back into great the

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>break and Greg's like, this is the player I won

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>five times again. Chris Godwin, Zach like Chris Golindzacriscoblin, I

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>haven't mentioned Remaine curse yet, was it? He didn't mention

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't mention him yet. I was like, I

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>really didn't. Christian cur Taylor Gabriel, I think you know, yeah,

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think so was. Taylor Gabriels are really interesting one

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to reel is an interesting one. And you know, I'm

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna paint both sides of the picture here because while

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>he's done a lot of good things, I think the

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that Anthony Miller is back and the fact that

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Tarik Coon is getting as many targets as he is

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of takes away from the luster that is Taylor

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel at this point. But over the last three weeks,

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not including his by Taylor Gabriel has four less catches

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>or gets or whatever it is behind Al Robinson, like

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>he's being targeted everywhere he is. But I just saw,

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I saw those targets go down this week. I agreed

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that while Anthony Miller was out, while Terry Cohen wasn't

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>getting as targeted as much as he is now, Taylor

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel was getting those targets. I think it was a

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>three week span where he saw twenty four targets. But

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>now this week, while he was incredibly efficient, he caught

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>all five of his targets. Again, it was just five targets.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>So we'll talk more about that. I think we should

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>stay in this forty Niners Packers game for a little

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more. I didn't want to. I'm happy you are,

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't want to leave here. I think you

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about Raheem Mostart. Yeah, that's exactly what

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to bring up. Pulling up the snaps from

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Jankie last night, Matt Breeda twenty seven snaps or

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>he most three snaps. I think it's most right, Yeah, Mozart,

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever you wanna snaps. Most someone is twenty three snaps

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and Alfred Morris with them easily won. Yeah, so Moore's

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously got bench, and this team realized that they it

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is a better fit for a faster back, not a

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>scat back, but but a faster guy. And they saw

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it with Brita, and they saw with Mostart as well.

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And Brita was not a last night. He was the

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>number one running back. You right, the snap catch a

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>second ago. He wasn't number one running back. He got

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the goal line carry, but there's a lot of times

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that he had to live off the field that he

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>needed an extra couple of plays off. And they went

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to Mostard, who was most like Brita, and he showed

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>some flashes last night to me. I saw him. I

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>was watching this game, and I'm like, this is interesting

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>if I need a running back, but if Brita is playing,

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>do you ever feel comfortable starting Mosart? Frank, I think

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly what Kyle Sannahan has always done, right.

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>He's always had Davonte Freeman and Tevin Coleman. He's always

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>had like that duo of running backs, and I don't

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>think much of it changes now. It's obviously to a

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>much lesser extent because when Kyle Sannahan was coaching the

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Falcons offense. That's a much more potent offense. Like right

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>now we're talking about the forty Niners with C. J.

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Bethard as the quarterbacks, so they're not going to be

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>nearly as potent. Correct. We look at a lot of

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>these secondary running backs on teams as borderline flex option,

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and most are the way that he played yesterday. I

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>think he's kind of going to climb into that mix,

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>assuming that Alfred Morris is really done now, Like if

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing, I think most are kind of

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>climbs in as a flex option tough run defense. Of

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>course next week with the Rams, but we'll see, we'll

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>take a break come back. Fantasy Best Fence Forever rolls

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on right after this. Daily Rodo dot Com learned from

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DFS players. We don't just give you

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>premier advice. We play every day, all major sports, all

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>year round. We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>custom projections, and now the Daily roado dot Com optimized

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in minutes building, optimize line for cash games and turneys.

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Learned from the game's best DFS players joined Daily Rodo

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Visit to day. I want to get right

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>back in Motzorry, Frank, that's cool, Rahim, wolf Kang'd sorry, yes,

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it look like a second. I remember if Wolfgang came first,

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>or I thought you were thinking whether or not you

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>like this, and now you're like, no, I'm in on it.

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm on it. It's cool. So I want to you

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 1>right back into it because I want to ask Price

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>how much you spend a wolf Gang like this is

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>actually a thing. Obviously he's owning zero percent. He's not there.

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>He's widely available. So especially if you're playing deeper leagues

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and like you need running back help, you gotta take

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the shot forget deep release, Frank. Everybody needs running back help.

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>There's there's nobody that doesn't need running back help, So

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>take that out of it. If you were in a

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 1>your normal twelve team league, not a fourteen team league,

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>not one of them has a thousand bench spots like

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>our GST league. If you were in your normal home league,

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>we both have twelve teams. There's not a lot out here.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we need a running back. What do you do?

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Buys are here? Um me as an example, right, I

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>have take on Barkley, Carlos Hide and Kenyan Drake two

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of those three guys are terrible. I don't have any

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>other running backs. What do I do well? It depends

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 1>who else is available too, because there's a lot of

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a few more running backs on this list that

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we've mentioned. It's what do we like those guys more

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>than most are? That's the question. Because there's Leto Smith,

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>which you know he might be able to help you

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>this week. The Chants have been susceptible to running backs,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but then they have a buy in week eight, and

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Javonte Freeman will be back after that, and then we

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>get back to a three headed monster for the Atlanta

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Falcon so much just a complete mess. Then there's Marlon

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>mack who was sixty two owned and looked like he

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of took a strangle hold back on the Colts

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>running back position. But again, because that defense is as

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>bad as it is and they're throwing the ball as

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>much as they are, do you really want to get

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 1>involved with the Colts running back situation? So you give

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the percentages for Morland Maco Smith Smith. Smith's out there

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>more so than than Mackie's. They'll say this in my league.

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:14.239
<v Speaker 1>In competitive leagues, because running backs are so valuable in

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>both of my home leagues. Both of those guys are gone.

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Just this is again just me, and I understand it

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't affect everybody but her. So he's thirty on CBS's

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>ever really like the guys that highlighted. And I know

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>some people have brought up Barber as well. I owned

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in fifty eight percent of leagues, so he's owned in

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a large majority. And plus I really don't want to

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>fool around with that Tampa Bay Bucks running back either.

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>So if you really need running back help, which a

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people do, I'll go, you know, up to

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent. Again, I don't want to break the bank

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>on Moser, but like, if you need running back help,

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I can understand spending more than that, because this is

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>a good situation for him, you know, he there's obviously

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>something they like about him. That's why Kyle Shanahan used

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>them as much as they did last night. And that

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Brita has been injury prone already this season, and if

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>he gets hurt at some point, then maybe we see

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>an even bigger workload for Mostart. So there is a

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>chance for upside here. And we'll say this about Raheem Mostert,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing the passing game at all last night. Just

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve carries for eighty seven yards, and that's It's incredibly efficient,

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>incredibly efficient. I don't want to break the bank for

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>this dude. So if you if you really want him again,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he's probably in a ten to twelve percent range if

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:30.719
<v Speaker 1>you just want to throw a smaller bit on him,

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight percent. I'm I'm okay with that as well. Like,

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that's probably where I'm going to live if I'm bidding

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on him this week. Yeah, I think, Yeah, you're not

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna spend more than on this guy, are you. I'm

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>not gonna. No, absolutely not. I'm gonna It's probably been

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>like seven dollars on him and just whatever. Yeah, something

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>like that. I think that's fair. I think that. I

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's Sarah. Anything else in this Niners gien be

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>a game before we move on? Uh not George Kittle

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>for for thirty whatever? Um Packers running backs a mess? No,

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we're done with this guy. I

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>think so let me stick with the running backs because

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we we got into it an impassioned discussion in regarding

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>most of it. The other guys you mentioned I think

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>are all the right guys. Frank Peyton Barber, Frank Gore,

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think those two are where I want to start,

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>because they're similar in a way. Frank Gore's old Peyton

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Barber is a retread Barber has kind of been up

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and down this year in fantasy football. You jumped in

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>on him late and draft and you realize he was

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna start. He was terrible, and before the Haven bay

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>By a lot of people have jumped off board went

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>after Ronald Jones. Ronald Jones finished Sunday with how many

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>carries you no one snaps from war than it had

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>been but one carry on the day Peyton Barber was

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>watched much much better. Now we can sit here and

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>hope and pray that Ronald Jones becomes the guy, and

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Chris Venture's doing just that downstairs right now. But Peyton Barber,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and essentially Dick Dirk Cutter has told us this and

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Tom Monic in the same thing. Payton Barbara is my guy.

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And maybe when they continue to lose, they'll turn the

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>range over to the younger player. And I understand that.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But right now, Frankie, if Payton Barbera's out there, he's

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>very very clearly the starting running back in Jampa Bay. Yeah,

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>he is, and he had thirteen carries to Ronald Jones

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>is one. As you mentioned, we saw him use more

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in the past game than ever before. Four receptions, twenty

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>four yards and a touchdown. Here's the thing, I just

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the upside is with him, Like, honestly,

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't you rather take a shot on a guy

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>like Moster right with the San Francisco forty niners, Because

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, and as you reference, like, the further

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks go along and the more they continue to lose,

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>they have to at least see what they have in

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones. They use a second round pick on the guy.

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't know what the upside is for

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Peyton BARBERA. I'm not buying back in the fact that

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>he has scored one touchdown through five games. This was

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the only game this season that he has more than

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>one reception in a game. And that's likely a product

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of playing the Atlanta Falcons because they struggle allowing receptions

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to running backs. So the Tampa Bay knew that and

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that's how that's the fashion that they used Peyton barber

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in this game. They faced the Cleveland Browns this week,

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, surprisingly the Cleveland Browns haven't been as

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>good against running backs as they were last year. We

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>just saw Melvin Gordon uh stomp all over them going

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to Cleveland. They allowed a hundred nineties six total rushing

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>yards between him and Austin Ekeler three rushing touchdowns. So

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a decent matchup. Peyton Barber is likely in the

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>flex discussion. It's just I'm not gonna pay what it's

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna take to get Peyton Barbara. I've had a

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of people asking me about Peyton Barbara ready. It

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like they're trying to buy back in. Everyone has

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>recency bias. They want to go based on what they

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>just saw this past week. And what they just saw

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>was Peyton Barbara running efficiently, being used in the past game,

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>scoring a touchdown. So that's what's fresh in everyone's mind.

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Let you let me remind you what he did the

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>first four games of the season. Seven for twenty four

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Bears, eight for thirty three against the Steelers,

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>six team for twenty two against the Eagles, nineteen for

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine against the Saints. I'm not buying it. I

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>get it, man, I get it. People are if you

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 1>want to put again, if you want to put like

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a ten percent fab bit on them, Okay, I'm not

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna spend the fift what it might take for people

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>who are really really desperate. Without James Conner this week,

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>without um marshaw and Lynch on a bye, with all

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks guys on a bil, someone's gonna spend more

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>than I am on Peyton Barber this week. Fair enough,

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing it. I'll say this though, Peyton Barber,

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in the books or through their by you have them,

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and it works. You have them the rest of the year.

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you playing Devil's advocate right now, but personally,

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing it. Are you doing it? Well? I

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>paid ten percent? Yeah, well, he's probably gonna take fiftcent,

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna he's gonna call ut that much because

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>people see him all starting running back? How many how

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>often do I get a starting running back on the

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire and they're gonna spend more than ten percent?

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay around like ten, but he's gonna go for

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>more than that. I think I might pay up fifteen.

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't go to twenty because he's just starting running back.

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a goal line back. He's out there every day.

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a goal line back. Greg. How how many rushing

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns do you have this year? Donut? The only touchdown

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>he's scored is a receiving touchdowns. When they get in

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the red zone, only do is throw right. The Tampa

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Bay Books defense is terrible. They just fired their defensive coordinator,

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>highest paid defensive quarter in the league. I love that

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it took the game against his former team for them

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to realize, like, it's really sad. You know, he was

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>always the Giants coaches. Yeah, that would have been awesome

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>for them. Really, that's exactly what they need, exactly I'm

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>not doing. Look, the guy has zero rushing touchdowns. Their

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>defense is bad. It's gonna be negative game scripts for him.

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be throwing nothing about Peyton Barber and the

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Bucks running neck situation says pick me up. Okay, at

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>least not to me. Maybe we'll go to the other

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the state in Miami. You feel differently about

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gore. Last week, Frank Gore was picked up in

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>my league for five dollars on the on the Wednesday

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>waiver run. He was then dropped on the Platursday waiver

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>run for name is Winston on the Friday waivery one.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a little weird. Do you have

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>waivers every day? It's fun Instead the first come, first serve,

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>which that waivers every day. Yeah, it should probably just

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>be like two or three times a week. Why I

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Okay, thank you. So it's just like your

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:19.239
<v Speaker 1>money goes every single day, right, like people adding and dropping. Right,

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't that what you try to get away from for

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>first come first seven people just adding and dropping conto? No,

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you know you're getting a waivering first come, first serves

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>me seeing somebody to get her on Twitter and mere

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>going be able to pick him up right now, That's

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 1>why you get away from it, not the added dropping

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so much. I think you guys. In my opinion, what

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>I would do is overnight into Wednesday, overnight into Saturday

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and then Sunday morning. Well, you can't do that has

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to the same time every day. You can't just pick

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>it Saturday night and then Sunday morning. Why why does

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it have to be the same time every day? Because

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>they forces you to do that, you can't. ESPN doesn't

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>allow you to change it. I won't play on ESPN.

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not paying money on CBS. It's stupid and it's

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>a gross interface. Anyway. We ever, so on Friday, I

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>put a zero dollar bid in on Frank Gore and

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I lost someone who was worse than the standings to

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>his zero dollar bid on Francore. I was the Kenyan

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Drake owner. Now that was kind of meaning said by

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the way you were bunning it. You were, you were

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>bunning it. I didn't ask you. You're criticizing my league

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and my settings. I'm offering my opinion and didn't ask

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>for it. That's not fair being honest. Point is I

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>missed out your opinion. Sometimes were best friends. We are

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>best friends. I even tweeted about you today. I did so.

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe you could check my Twitter. So I

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>spent no money on Frank Gore and I went up

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>not getting him. He had the first hundred yard game

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that any player had this year against the Chicago Bears.

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Frankie number one. Can Frank Gore do it again? Number two?

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>It certainly seems that he us the preferred option on

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the ground for Miami UH and for Adam gaze Key

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and Drake is going to be involved. He did play

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>more snaps I believe, and barely outtouched him because of

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the receptions. But when it comes to the groundwork, even

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>on the goal line, the only reason he was out

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the game because he was gassed.

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather own right now Frank Gore can and

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Drake this number two and number three of Gore's out there?

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>How much are you spending? So I would in in

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>half point PPR and full point PPR, I would still

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>rather own Kenyan Drake. And that's just because Frank Gore

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is not being used in the past game whatsoever. But

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>if you play non PPR, if you play in standard ay,

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it's probably you probably still live in the stone Age

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and be um. I'd probably rather have Frank or just

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>because he is dominating carries and it looks like I

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>know that Kenyan Drake was given that opportunity on a

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>goal line carry, but we've seen Frank Gore using the

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>red zone as well. He has double digit carries over

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks. He's out carried Kenyan Drake over

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks as well, and to be honest,

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>over the past two games specifically, he's run very efficiently.

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what has happened with the Miami Dolphins

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>offensive line or the teams that they are facing. But

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Bengals two weeks ago, twelve or sixty three,

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that's five point three yards per carry, and then this

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>past week you've already referenced it, fifteen carries for a

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and one yards six point seven yards per carry

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>against the Chicago Bears. This is like the first thirty

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>five year old running back to rush for a hundred

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>yards in like forever. So in non PPR, I'd rather

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>have him than Kenyan Drake, and half point and full

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>point PPR, I'll still take Kenyan Drake because of his

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>past game usage um, But to be honest, I like

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>both guys this week going up against the Detroit Lions,

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>who have allowed a lot of fantasy points to opposing

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>running backs. This yere spending on Frank. Obviously in non PPR,

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>his values higher. Frank, He's probably he'sn't that range. He's

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in that ten to twelve percent range, like there's nobody.

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of solid options at running back this week,

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>which is more than what we could say for weeks

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>past slids like the right thing. It's solid. It's like fine.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference between solid and fine? Greg, Solid seems

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>like better than fine. No, to me, solid is like average.

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>These are like average, I think find average. But we've

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>had no running backs. We've we've had no running backs

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to be added off the waiver wire. Now it seems

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that we actually have some uh in non PPR. I'll go,

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten to twelve percent in PPR. He catches

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>no passes. There's zero upside in PPR with Frank Gore,

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So I honestly I would just not even look his

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>way when it comes to PPR unless you're really really

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>hurt by the bye weeks, and you know he has

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a good match up against the Lions. They're allowing the

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>fourth most Fantasy points to opposing running back. So I'm

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>telling you right now, Kenyan Drake and Frank Gore will

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>likely both be inside my top twenty four. Yeah, just

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>based on who's on buy and the fact that they're

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>facing the Lions, like it's a really good matchup. I'm

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>really hurting the byes and flex this week. Sorry, Budd,

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you have Frank Frank Gore still do? It's gonna

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>be in your line up because you have Marshall Lynch.

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So for the Marshall Lynch owner, Frank Gore becomes viable

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to agree. So that I so that I agree with.

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>The last running back that I know I had on

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>my list was Edo Smith just this week for Atlanta

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>because as we said, they play on Monday night. DeVante

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Freeman is basically already been ruled out. Then they have

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the buy and then you expect, hopefully for Freeman owners,

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>he'll be ready to rock. Frankie, you know Smith's out there?

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>How much she is? Funny? Quick quick side note before

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you answer that question, Um, Mike Floria one in five

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>reflex one in five with Eric Young one five flex.

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh see what happens you leave the BFFs, you become

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>bad at fantasy football? Greg and Frank too very solid.

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of one of those four and two teams. Though,

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>where I'm looking at it, I'm like, this seemed really

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>foreign to I have a Marie Cooper as like my

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver one. Well, I drafted as my wide receiver one,

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>but now Tyler Boyd has emerged as wide receiver one.

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Edo Smith. Um, if he's a second third least points Smith,

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>he's available he's he's behind an averaging never mind, he's

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>behind all of the running backs that we've mentioned to

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>this point. He's behind most that he's behind Frank Gore,

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>He's behind guess Peyton barber Like, I just I hate

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Painton Barbera, I hate the pucks running back situations. I

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>just don't want anything to do with him. But Edo Smith,

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't deny his usage, especially in the red zone.

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:30.959
<v Speaker 1>In the past couple of weeks they've been using him

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in that part of the field. Again, it's like you

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>don't really know who's going to be used. It's kind

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of just like whoever is on the field at that point.

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>For the Atlanta Falcons, we saw it. Savin Coleman scored

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown this past week, but Edo Smith has scored

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in two straight games. The Giants have allowed

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the tenth most fantasy point to opposing running backs this year.

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>They allowed a touchdown to Corey Clement one week ago.

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So again, if you need a flex running back this

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>week or are really hurting, Edo Smith comes into play,

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>um would depend how much you spend on him, depends

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on how much you meet him. Right Like, if you

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>really really need a running back this week. I could

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>see going as high as like ten to twelve again

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>on Edo Smith. But if you are not going to

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>use him, then you're probably not going to pick him

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>up because once DeVante Freeman is back, I don't know

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>that you're gonna feel great about starting any Falcons running back.

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. I agree that Tevin Coleman was

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>very useless this past weekend. Until that touchdown, he was

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>killing fantasy owners. I had him a DFS, so I

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>felt it with you. Um, but you know Smith this week,

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>with all the buys that we have mentioned, I think

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a start. Would you rather start Edo Smith or

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm a daist? This week forty Niners are facing Rams

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>and the Falcons against the Giants. I'm on the night

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I would play Edio Smith. I think so too. How

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>would you rank the running backs that we've already discussed

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>as ads. We didn't even mention Marlon Mack yet. We

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention Marlin Mack yet? Let me do Let's do

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that before we rank them, and then I guess we'll

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>rank them. Yeah, we'll wake him before the break, hopefully.

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>UM Morlan mac seize this OPPORTU you and as you said,

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>when he came back. Jordan Wilkins did not get off

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Robert Turbin was terrible and I think got

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>reinjured and now he Hines believe had the most snaps

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of anybody, while Marlon Mack looked the best on the ground.

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>It was a tough game against the Jets where the

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>game flow should have dictated a lot more of Nahem Hines,

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:15.879
<v Speaker 1>which is why he was on the floor on the field.

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>But whenever you got the ball, Marlon Mack looked good. Frank,

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he did. And I wasn't a big Marlon Mack

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>guy coming into the season. Uh, And that was because

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was gonna be drafted higher than he was,

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>honestly right. But he looked good in that start um

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets. They said that once he comes back

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 1>like he's going to be the starter. It looks like

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that is the case. The reason I caution you is

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>because the Colts, like the Bucks, are going to be

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of negative game scripts this year. Greg,

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>So I don't I don't think I'm breaking the bank

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>on Marlon Mack either. We'll give you our running back rank.

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>He's getting to the wide receivers cod up next. If

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you're someone that needs fantasy sports advice every day, the

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network has you covered. When you download

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the n T S Y Sports Radio Network GAP, you

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>get the top fantasy advice every single day right through

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. Be sure to listen to our weekend warriors

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>like College Football Today. Welcome to College Football Today Weekend

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Update. They called me the fantasy Jesus in this

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>league is never short of exciting at I T L

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's so much more. Download the Fantasy Sports Radio

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Network GAP in the iTunes and Google play Store now

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and keep the best fantasy experts right in your pocket

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>all day long and all week long with a nice

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to real boats. Sorry now I prefer this much more.

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Have you enjoyed playing dfs but or sick of dealing

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>with the professionals using algorithms like hundreds of lamps, entries,

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>color prosper at the tool over my bookie dot aj

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna having to create multiple line up stitch the

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>hassle do with latup scratches and avoid experts winning ninetives

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>of the money in nesting the players that you want

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>without salary caps. And if you sign up for a

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>new account using the promo code f NC has why

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you can receive a fifty percent to postpone no more

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>do lated line of scratches. New experts compete against just

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you and the props that you choose. My Booky dot

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a G promo codes f n T s Why would

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you sign up? And you can choose the props builder

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>tool that's my Bookie dot a G. The promo code

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is f n T s HY. We also want to

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>tell you about daily Rhodos and the line of optimizer

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>because today is an extremely important day for this Frank.

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Today is opening night in the NBA season. We both

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a drafts last night. We were going back and forth

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>in the text message if feel like my team came

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>out pretty well one one mission because it looks like

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>something I would draft it does? I felt the whole

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 1>way every time because like a lot of players that

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you and I both like, we're like very fairly priced

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>um and I felt it a good deal. Like Paul George,

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I had no interest in getting last night he felt

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in my lap at thirty one dollar, like, how am

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I not doing that? Chris Middleton? Who I wanted? I

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>thought it was? I? I have had twenty one person

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 1>like that, okay, pretty fair price. Um Gary Harris went

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for like twelve. I'm like, what is going on? And

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, the more and more look at this team.

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a fright team. And one thing I told

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Frank going to the draft, and he asked me, is

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>there one player you really want? Was I really want

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Trey Young in this format? And I went overboard with

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 1>trading Young in this format. Um My buddy Danny, who

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>had an auction last week, he told me he also

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I asked him how much trade trade Young went for

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>after I bought him for six bucks and I spent seventeen,

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just like, oh god, this is bad. I

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>was just really that mad at myself. And then I

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>budgeted and I was looking at my my budget wrong

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and well not up okay, because I was really able

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to dominate some of these ten dollar guys that I

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>really wanted Darren Fox and Willie Calli Stein and they

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 1>would to get them all. But I had an extra

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>chunk of money that I could have spent on one

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:43.879
<v Speaker 1>guy rather than spread out spread the wealth, which isn't

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like long a right. So I missed out in DeAndre

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:48.760
<v Speaker 1>eight and Tobias Harris, who both went around twenty dollars.

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I was like, that was the spot where he always

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>regret something, an auction. That was those are the two

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>guys that regret letting go. But the point is, the

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>point is not talking about my fantasy. The point is

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>NBA season starts tonight and there are two games Sixers

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and Celtics, which is awesome, Thunder and Warriors, which is

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>also awesome. Even more awesome over at Fandom of night,

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>four dollars gives you a chance to win two d

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and fifty thousand, four bucks the Costs billion dollar prize pool.

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 1>First place gets fifty. And the first thing I did

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Venture did this morning because we went over

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>daily roado dot com. We used a lot of optimizer

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and then frightened the same thing when he got in

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>an hour later and he optimized and he said, here,

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>what do I deal? And what I was very excited

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 1>about was when they ran the optimizer. The second line

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of it spit out was my lineup and I had

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>used projections with daily Rodo, but I didn't run the

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:45.879
<v Speaker 1>optimizer until I made my initial lineup, just to see

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.439
<v Speaker 1>same lineup. I was like, this is fate I read.

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.439
<v Speaker 1>So I read the article posted on Daily Roado first

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>by Leoni and Drew and Ricky. Then I set my lineup,

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>then I ran the optimizer, and then later today I'll

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 1>be talking to Drew dig Meyer and running my line

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.879
<v Speaker 1>up by him, making sure it makes sense. And I'm ready.

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to rock. I'm ready to win. Two. Really

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:08.839
<v Speaker 1>grant the night and then if that's the case, Frank,

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 1>You've got a text message for me early the morning

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and saying I will not be here tomorrow, and you've

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>also shared on Twitter that I will also, I will.

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I will get some of this absolutely. How much do

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I get if you win? I'll definitely buy you lunch

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>for a week. It's it how you didn't ask for anything. Well,

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not gonna be rude. Let's to give

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>your money. So I just said to buy you lunch

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for a week. Said about this guy's you should be thankful.

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't give you anything. Well, what did you do

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 1>to earn the money? Emotional support? You root for me

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>to lose most things I don't like. I can see

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.919
<v Speaker 1>tonight I have a guy like oh man, I really

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want this guy to goo good because I don't

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>have because I'm playing him in fantasy. I can see

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that happening. I wouldn't do that definitely. What are you

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna give me if you win? Because you participated, you

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>put two line ups? Well, I didn't order revealed that

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to anything, give you anything. You're my best friends.

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to. Yeah, we'll talk about it off the year.

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>You can't do it on the here. No, it's fair

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 1>enough anyway. Use NBA Optimizer is absolutely fantastic. Good daily

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Roada dot com right now it's signed up. It's a

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 1>premium Evan ts wise a promo code. It is well

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>worth it. I promise you we all did it first

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>thing this morning. You gotta do it to before you

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>say you're lae of. It's four bucks on fan would

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 1>win two d fifty grand. You are an idiot if

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't participating in this. Frankie rank the running back

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and we talk about it so far. I would rank

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>them Marlon Mack, Frank Gore, most Dirt and Edo Smith

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and Peyton barber Is. I'm not picking him up, but

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I guess if you want me to rank him, I

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>would put him ahead of you Doo Smith, but behind

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:00.839
<v Speaker 1>the other three. I don't want him. I would do it.

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm very very differently than you of this week. Um,

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I would do it. Peyton Barber number one, Marlon Mack two,

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gore three, Edo Smith four. Uh and we'lf getting

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 1>on days Modesart five Barber one Greig I explained why,

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, you can make that mistake. It's not a mistake.

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>They're all they're all basically cost the same amount. We

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>just talked about this. It's all like the same price,

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that ten to fiftcent range. You're known. You can have

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Payton Barber, thank you. Well, that's give me the story,

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>give me the starting running back man. You can have

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>him when you can take Marlon how long you take

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Morton Mack when he strains his hamstring again, I mean,

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>none of these guys are great by any means exactly.

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm getting a guy that's a lead dollar Marlon

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Mack twelve rushes for eighty nine yards. Great, awesome, Yeah,

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it was awesome for sure. Andrew luck Is his quarterback

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>still got out snap on he mines. That's an issue.

0:42:56.480 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Eating Barber bad an issue. Let's move on to the

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>wider series. We mentioned Marky's good Win, who we both

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>really really like for San Francisco. But as I said

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to you before, he was not my number one guy.

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 1>My number one guy this week is Jermaine Curse. Quincy

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Nuona was out for the next four weeks at least

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>with a high ankle sprain. The Jets clearly believing this

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is a concern. Thou prior also banged up work that

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Richard Matthews today. If wider series is as much of

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a concern as it certainly seems, that means Robbie Anderson

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>steps up and Jermaine Curse steps up. As much as

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the Jets are going to take more shots

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>with Robbie Anderson, the inline guy is still the guy

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to own. That has been Quincy Numa, and

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>once he left this game this past Sunday, it became

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Jermaine Curse. I really like Curse this week and potentially

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>going forward with his anual injury. Definitely with the Annuna injury.

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I just worry about once he returns, how valuable is

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Curse gonna be. Plus he won't be, But but I

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>think I don't think he returns like a month. That

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>might be true. I mean, we don't have any confirmation

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's a high ankle sprain now, don't I know.

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 1>But I mean Sam Donald still spreads the ball around

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like I do like main Curse. Don't get me wrong.

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Since week three we've already kind of seen him take

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the hold of like the top target role on this team.

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 1>He leads the team since week three on with twenty

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>five targets of the target share. And he is the

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who has been playing in the slot most recently

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and is slated to play this lot. And I know

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>they face the Vikings this week, but being the slot

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 1>receiver against the Vikings is probably what you want to

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>target anyway. I imagine Xavier Rhodes will likely be on

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Robby Anderson of the outside. So I'm with you. I

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 1>like Curse. I still just kind of worry because Sam

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald spreads the ball around. He throws to like all

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the tight end. He throws like Chris Herndon. He throws

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a Jordan's leggett, you know, targets running backs a little bit.

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But I do like Jermaine Curse, just not as much

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 1>as Chris Godwin or Mark He's good when I think

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 1>he's just behind those guys by a little bit. How

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>much you're spending on him the main curse, So you're

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm more, I'm more than ten range. I think he's

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:08.919
<v Speaker 1>my favorite guy. I think it depends on what you need.

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I'm looking for I like he needs

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 1>on a PPR like safe floor kind of guy. You

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>need the higher floor guys your main curses. You need

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:22.799
<v Speaker 1>like the one week bangers this week for a good

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely agree with that. I'm looking for er. If you're

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for a guy that's going to give you a

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 1>floor of like eight PPR points a week, I think

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that's your main curse. If you're looking for a guy

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>that has an ability but up twenty points, that's clearly Mark.

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>He's Goodwin. But he also has ability to give you

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a donut. HM. That's how I feel. Now you mentioned

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin here a lot Mark, he's Goodwin, and you

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have Chris Godwin, Javis Winston came back. Chris Godwin very

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 1>much involved this past Sunday. Mike Emmons was not is

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it sustainable here? Um? For Chris Godwin, that's a fair question, um.

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>But he has scored a touchdown in four or five games,

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so he's definitely been without questions in the red zone.

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 1>He leads the Bucks actually in red zone targets this

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>year with eight, which is interesting because he's only played

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps this season, Gregg, which I think is

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 1>why you might have a little bit of hesitancy when

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to adding Chris Godwin. He played only fifty

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>six pent of the snaps this past week in Week six,

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>but he does have nine or more targets and in

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 1>two of the past three games, and we've already referenced

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that game script for the Tampa Bay Bucks says that

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be passing the ball a lot. I

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:28.960
<v Speaker 1>do agree that it is slightly frustrating that he just

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play the second most amount of snaps on this

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 1>team behind Mike Evans, like Adam Humphrey still plays more

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:37.879
<v Speaker 1>than him. Shun Jackson and Chris Godwin are like play

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the same amount there in that fifty five to sixty

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of snaps every single week. So I understand the

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>hesitancy here, but I just think the based on the

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 1>game script, the way he's been using the red zone,

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he has actually scored touchdowns, like he's

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:52.439
<v Speaker 1>not a guy that we're saying, oh, look, he's getting

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the targets. That means production is going to come. Like

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that's something we say every week with Jarvis Slandry, Right,

0:46:57.640 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Slandry is getting double digit targets, fantasy production is

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>bound to come eventually, Chris Godwin. The targets have been

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>there in two of the past three weeks, plus the

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>fantasy production has been there, scoring a touchdown in four

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>out of five games. So it's it actually surprises me

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:14.799
<v Speaker 1>that he's only owned in fifty nine percent of the leagues. Um,

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>he's my top wide receiver, Ed Gregg, I understand that,

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I understand that you know, the snappercentage is annoying, but

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I think even as the season goes on, I think

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that he can be solidified as that number two wide receiver.

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't I mean at all, but more of

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the reason that Dirk Cutter should be fired from this team.

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But he showed that he's talented and the way that

0:47:34.480 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>they're using him, he's my number one wide receiver now.

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 1>He as you mentioned, he scored a four out of

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:41.440
<v Speaker 1>five games. But and this isn't his fault and I'm

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>not like blaming him at all. And anyway, like the

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 1>defensive Tampa Bay has faced New Orleans poor secondary three

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 1>or four one a touchdown. Okay, Philadelphia the week part

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of their team the secondary five s and a touchdown,

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh brutal secondary five seven, ten targets with rabbits Patrick

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:58.800
<v Speaker 1>five or seventy four and a touchdown against the Bears.

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:02.600
<v Speaker 1>In the end, they got she lacked nothing, Atlanta brutal

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 1>secondary sixty and a touchdown. Isn't there a chance it

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>goes the other direction when they face some of these

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 1>better defenses, Frankie, Well, they're slated to face the Browns

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>this week. Touch a better secondary first, I mean ish

0:48:17.840 --> 0:48:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we think that they are, but should we look at it?

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 1>On the season, they've allowed the ninth most fantasy points,

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns to wide receivers and three out of six

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 1>games castle they're vulnerable. They're vulnerable. And then they faced Uh,

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 1>they faced the Bengals, who are right there. They're right

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>behind the Browns. They've allowed to touch on to a

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:37.839
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in every game but one this year. They've

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 1>allowed big games to wide receivers. We just saw that

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>this past week, especially in Week four two and they

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 1>faced the Falcons three d and forty four yards and

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:48.280
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. To wide receivers, and then they face the Panthers,

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>who actually their secondary has played better than you'd imagine,

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 1>But I still don't think they're great either. So I

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just think based on game script, they're gonna be passing

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the ball so much that Chris Godwin is he's gonna

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:01.879
<v Speaker 1>get targets, and especially in the red zone. That's that's

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:04.240
<v Speaker 1>where they like to use him because like other teams

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:07.719
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen now with secondary options, teams want to

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:10.040
<v Speaker 1>try and stop Mike Evans from scoring touchdowns. They want

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to try and stop the tight ends. They forget about

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin. We saw that this past week too when

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you saw Jameis Winston rollout, nobody around Chris Godwin just

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>throws it to him. Chris Godwin just walks in the

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:20.480
<v Speaker 1>end zone. I think we can continue to get a

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of that. My only, my only opinion there to

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:25.280
<v Speaker 1>dispute you is just that there's a lot of options

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:27.640
<v Speaker 1>for those touchdowns to have a bay. You mentioned Mike Evans,

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:29.839
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of volume to there. That's a great point.

0:49:29.880 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 1>And there's Evans, there's great there's Sean Jackson's O. J Howard,

0:49:32.560 --> 0:49:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Do I really like um and there's Godwin, so you

0:49:34.600 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 1>can make a case that he's fourth or fifth on

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:38.960
<v Speaker 1>every play. This works obviously, It's like it's it's two

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 1>fold because I get what you're saying, of course, because

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a much options, but there's so much volume, and

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that volume is going away. We're gonna

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>sign off a YouTube. Remember the Fantasy fotleb All Frenzy

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>comes your way. Next, Corey Parts and Chris Venture and

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Jim Day have your game balls four week six. If

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>you're listening on a podcast, we implore you please subscribe

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:58.799
<v Speaker 1>to the channel. Uh So, subscribe to our show. Make

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:01.480
<v Speaker 1>sure you like a you rate us, and you leave

0:50:01.480 --> 0:50:05.919
<v Speaker 1>a comment. We really really appreciate it. Um she ranked

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that Godwin. Then who is next for you? In PPR?

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:15.839
<v Speaker 1>It would be curse in standard it would be good

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:17.799
<v Speaker 1>when al right, so you're saying cursing, goold win back

0:50:17.840 --> 0:50:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to back here. Other guys that you had mentioned before,

0:50:20.560 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk, who kind of is becoming Josh Rosen's favorite

0:50:24.360 --> 0:50:25.919
<v Speaker 1>por people are sleeping on him a little. We thought

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:28.880
<v Speaker 1>this was possible. Two rookies that have worked together really

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:32.720
<v Speaker 1>since training CAB they've always been connected. Lat show clearly

0:50:32.760 --> 0:50:35.719
<v Speaker 1>banged up at this point, which I don't want to

0:50:35.719 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>say Kirk's lead dog, but there's a connection here. Yeah,

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's only twenty seven percent owned since Week three.

0:50:41.080 --> 0:50:43.480
<v Speaker 1>He leads the team in targets with twenty four that's

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the target share, leads a team with two d twenty

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>eight yards Corey Parson, and then a hundred and five

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 1>yards after the catch. All of those categories lead the Cardinals.

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So well, I know it's not a potent passing game.

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It's on a potent offense by any means. Christian Kirk

0:50:58.640 --> 0:51:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is the guy who's getting theVolume. He seems like he's

0:51:01.200 --> 0:51:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the favorable target. He's also played the snaps this past week,

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 1>which is the first time he's played more snaps than

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Chad Williams. So he has stepped into that number two

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver role. We we've seen him used in multiple

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:17.080
<v Speaker 1>ways as as you know, that possession receiver. We know

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:19.400
<v Speaker 1>he played slot receiver in college. But he also has

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:21.919
<v Speaker 1>some explosiveness. We saw that long touchdown last week too.

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So Christian Kirk is I think Christian Kirk are kind

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of like tied for the next position up there, like third,

0:51:30.520 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>like fourth, fifth. I guess I would take Taylor Gabriel

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>just because that offense. I trust that offense more right

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:39.439
<v Speaker 1>now the Chicago Bearshould Taylor Gabriel be high on this list?

0:51:41.640 --> 0:51:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Should he be higher than Marquis they're similar players? I

0:51:45.680 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 1>think no. I think he's exactly where he should be

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:49.640
<v Speaker 1>on this list. Would be he should be hiring the

0:51:49.719 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk hundred yards receiving two games in a row.

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 1>He should be hired the Christian Kirk, but he should

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:56.560
<v Speaker 1>not be higher. Would you not be hiring anybody else

0:51:56.560 --> 0:51:59.239
<v Speaker 1>on this list? That reasonable? Yeah, I think that's fair.

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:01.239
<v Speaker 1>That the snaps did go down this week to which

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is what I mentioned with his snap his snap percentage

0:52:04.880 --> 0:52:08.400
<v Speaker 1>was below six this week for the first time, you know,

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in over the past like a month or so. So

0:52:11.239 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 1>let me ask two players in particular in regards to drops,

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Royce Freeman and Derrick Henry. And I've got questions about

0:52:19.280 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that on Twitter, I've gotten questions about that on text message,

0:52:22.400 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 1>on g chat and in per person. They're also on

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 1>your list. Can you drop or should you drop Royce

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Freeman and Derrick Henry For some of the players that

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we've mentioned on today's show, I think Look, if you

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:37.080
<v Speaker 1>own these guys, you're likely you likely have a bad record.

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:40.279
<v Speaker 1>You're infuriated, Yes, you're probably. I mean that's not necessarily true.

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:41.920
<v Speaker 1>The guy that owns Royce Freeman in my league's has

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:46.759
<v Speaker 1>best record in the league. This is where where you

0:52:46.800 --> 0:52:49.600
<v Speaker 1>are in the standings determines what you should do with

0:52:49.640 --> 0:52:52.720
<v Speaker 1>these guys. Like if you're three and three or worse,

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 1>and you like need to win this week, I'm taking

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>a shot on you know, some of these other running

0:52:58.280 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 1>backs that we've talked about, some of these other wide

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>receivers if you need the wide receiver help, because you know,

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:04.759
<v Speaker 1>these guys might just be clogging up spots on your bench.

0:53:05.000 --> 0:53:07.399
<v Speaker 1>If you're four and two are better, I think you're

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna afford to have a little bit more patients, especially

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for guys who are drafting the third, fourth round, respectively.

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:16.439
<v Speaker 1>But if you need the help, you just can't hold

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>onto these guys and say, oh, it's gonna happen eventually.

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:20.839
<v Speaker 1>You need to win that. Yeah, I get it. I

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:22.799
<v Speaker 1>think if you're the roy Streeman owner and you're sitting there,

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like my buddy in my league, you're sitting at five

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and one, you hold on, there's there's there's no reason

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:29.719
<v Speaker 1>you're not. You're not paying Eto Smith for him or

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:34.200
<v Speaker 1>or Mozart, right, Like, that's you're not doing that, right,

0:53:34.239 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna hope that. But it's on the playoffs roll around.

0:53:36.560 --> 0:53:38.719
<v Speaker 1>You have something in Royce Freeman. When it comes to

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry, I think it's the same. You kind of

0:53:40.880 --> 0:53:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just hope us gets hurt. Yes, right, like, and that's

0:53:44.000 --> 0:53:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the um. Joey Nelson, I'm holding on him. Amari Cooper

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is traded or just can cuss party? Right, Yeah, but

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Raiders aren't buy you really want to hold

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:01.719
<v Speaker 1>any Raiders beside some totally trained Now, fine cut them,

0:54:01.840 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>see what I can Corey Parson, Jim Day, Chris Venture,

0:54:05.000 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 1>They come your way next for Frank Stample. My name

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is Greg Sausman. Thank you so much for watching listening

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Best Friends Forever. We'll do it all again tomorrow,

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we hope,