WEBVTT - Your Quarantine Questions, Answered

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Prognosis. I'm Laura Carlson. It's stay sixty two

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>since coronavirus was declared a global pandemic. Our main story.

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:18.639
<v Speaker 1>As the pandemic rages on, shelter in place orders have

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>stretched from weeks two months for some. It's causing distance

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>fatigue and inspiring people to search for safe ways to

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>bend the rules. An epidemiologist explains how to think about

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the risks of cutting corners while social distancing. But first,

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>here's what happened today. In testimony before it Senate panel today,

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Fauci, the top infectious disease official in the US,

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>strongly warned against reopening the economy too soon. Fauci said

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>he's concerned about cities and states resuming business without reaching

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>checkpoints outlined in the White House guidelines for deciding when

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it's safe. Those checkpoints include things like declining infections. Fauci

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>said a premature reopening would trigger outbreaks that could spiral

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>out of control. Not only would that lead to avoidable

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>suffering and death, he said, but it would set back

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>an economic recovery and quote turn the clock back rather

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>than going forward. Fauci's call for caution puts him in

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>direct conflict with President Donald Trump's race to ease restrictions

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that have crushed the economy. Elsewhere, some governments are exercising

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>extreme caution. Wuhan has ordered officials to test its entire

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>population of eleven million people. That's after a handful of

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>new coronavirus cases were detected in the central Chinese city

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>where the pandemic began. They were the first positive tests

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:10.839
<v Speaker 1>reported since the city's lockdown was lifted in early May.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Six people who were already under quarantine in the same

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>residential compound and who are asymptomatic tested positive. Sweden will

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>adjust a key element of its strategy for dealing with

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen after the death rate at elder care homes

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>shot up. The government will ratchet up staff levels to

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>help protect the country's oldest citizens. Like elsewhere, Sweden's COVID

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen related deaths have disproportionately hit the elderly, but critics

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>argue that many of those fatalities could have been avoided

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>if the authorities had taken more steps to focus attention

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>on the most vulnerable demographic. Finally, back in the US House,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>democrats proposed a three trillion dollar virus relief built today.

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>The bill would offer aid to state in local governments,

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>direct cash payments, expanded unemployment insurance, and food stamp spending.

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It also included a list of progressive priorities, like funds

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for voting by mail and for the troubled US postal service.

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>The bill comes after Congress has already spent three trillion

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>dollars on four bills in response to the economic downturn

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>caused by the coronavirus pandemic. There is a little chance

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of the aid package in its current form getting Senate

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>approval and President Donald Trump's signature, but by passing it

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi will set down a

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>marker as both parties positioned themselves for congressional elections in

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a few months. And now our main story. We're over

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>two months into the global pandemic, and communities everywhere have

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>been facing restrictions like shelter in place for a long time,

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and some have begun looking for ways to get around

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the more onerous social distancing orders. That's especially

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>true is the weather warms up in the US over

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks. Bloomberg reporter Kristen V. Brown has

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>been collecting your questions about social distancing etiquette, and she

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>brought them to an expert to clear up the confusion.

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's Kristen with more. Like a lot of people, I've

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>been spending a fair amount of time each day having

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>conversations with friends and colleagues about risk. I live in Oakland, California,

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>and my county was one of the first in the

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>country to implement shelter in place orders. The rules seemed

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty black and white on the surface. Don't leave home

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>unless it's for something necessary like exercise or going to

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 1>the store. Don't hang out with people you don't live with.

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Just don't put yourself at risk of catching COVID nineteen

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>if you don't need to. But then real life happened.

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>For example, my roommate pointed out that I go to

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store a lot. It's necessary to go get food, sure,

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but probably not actually necessary for me to go to

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Whole Foods every time I think of something new I

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>want to bake every day for the last two months,

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>it seems like we are constantly making these micro risk calculations.

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just not always obvious what the right decision is

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and when we do know what's right. Even though we

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>all want to do our part, sometimes it's hard. A

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of our listeners had questions too, so we turned

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>those questions over to Bill Schaeffer, an epidemiologist at Vanderbilt

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>University in Tennessee. Bill says, handerstands why everything feels so

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>confusing right now. So under the strict lockdown phase shelter

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>at home phase, it was difficult enough with all these questions.

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just gotten even more difficult because many states are

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>now starting to open up in various ways. States are

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>doing it differently, and within my own state, the rural

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>areas are ahead of the cities and we're still unlocked

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>up mode, so there'll be even more opportunities for confusion.

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And as you say, people are trying to take these

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>general guidelines and apply them to their own specific circumstances,

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and we can tie ourselves into nuts doing this. So

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the first listener question we posed a Bill was from Julia,

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>who has two related questions. Julia lives with her friends

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple, but she is single and she had been

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>casually dating a guy for a few months. Once lockdown

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>set in, she wanted to go COVID exclusive with the guy.

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And keep seeing him. But her roommates weren't okay with it.

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, they were okay with her volunteering,

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and she was confused about which activity was actually riskier.

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll let her take it from here. So since then

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I got involved with a project to make face shields

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>for healthcare workers. And each day Monday through Friday, I

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>go to an office with about twenty others, and they're

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>not always the exact same people. We're mindful of keeping

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>our distance and wearing masks, but we are handling the

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>same applies, and we can't wear gloves with this project

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>because we're doing really precise crafting work. So my question

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is which is riskier from an infection standpoint, sleeping and

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with a guy even though he's having other

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>dates over however he does live alone, or doing this

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>much more noble activity of making masks with a team

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of people every day. All right, I'm very curious to

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>hear what you say. I so I thought, actually that

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was among the easier questions. First of all, you can

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>define mask making as an essential activity, and so that

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>gives you the okay to go there. Now, on the

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.679
<v Speaker 1>way there, you want to wear the mask yourself while

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you're in that congregate environment making the masks. You ought

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to be wearing the masks and using good hygiene, and

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>separated by six ft from your other personnel. Wear the

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>mask coming home, and when you come home, wash your

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>hands very, very thoroughly. Now the dating issue is a

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:40.599
<v Speaker 1>completely different one. The A it's not an essential activity.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>B you can't stay six ft away from your date.

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Three you really can't control your dates activity, so you

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know how how compliant your your date has been.

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>This is a period of time when ruled dates are

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the way to go. We're supposed to stay at home

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>except for essential activities. And if you're out dating someone,

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>then you come home and the people with whom you live,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you're putting them at risk. So, uh, staying at home,

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>sheltering in place was a very serious recommendation. It doesn't

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>say if you don't feel like sorry, Julian, I guess

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it's zoom dates for now. Here's the next question. It's

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>also about dating. From Bernie in Toronto. He's divorced with kids,

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and his children split their time between their father and

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>their mother. He also has a longtime girlfriend. She's divorced

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and her kids moved back and forth from one house

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to the other house, and yet since the beginning of

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this I have not seen her. So am I allowed

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to see her? We've been physical distance saying and being

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>very careful about everything we do from the grocery store, etcetera.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And I miss her. Sore to hear your answer, thank you.

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Personal relationships are going to be strained. They're difficult under

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>uh strict sheltering at home time. Because it's really quite

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>clear the answer to that. Under a sheltering at home

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>circumstance is you will have face time with your new girlfriend,

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>but you will not see her in person until the

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>sheltering at home phase ends, and then you can start

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>seeing people again. That's really a pretty straightforward circumstance. Obviously,

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of parents have been having a hard time

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to working from home while also keeping an eye on

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>the kids can be a lot still. Our next listener

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.599
<v Speaker 1>has been playing by the rules and asked their babysitter

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to stop watching the kids, but a friend that they

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>share the baby sit are with recently decided to ask

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the babysitter to come back to work. Our listener didn't

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>know what to do. Did this mean it was safe

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to have the babysitter come back to their house too,

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>or do they need to intervene and ask their friend

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to stop. Are we in the wrong here thinking that

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a little too soon to be trying to get

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>back to normal and bring a babysitter back into the equation?

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Should we be more insistent with our friends that they

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>lay off for a little while longer and trying to

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>make do without a babysitter because it affects us to

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and the people in our apartment building if they bring

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>back our babysitter before thanks sir a little calmer, or

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>do we just need to leave well enough alone, respect

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>their decision and make our own choices based on based

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on what we feel comfortable about. That's it. So, if

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you're in a lockdown mode, then having that person come

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>into your house where they're also been with others clearly

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is not what's being recommended. This is a circumstance where

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you and the family are to shelter at home as

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>as a family unit and not have visitors nor go

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>out except on essential functions. Now, as we open up

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and move into phase one and phase two of opening up, obviously,

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>then people can go out and visit and that may

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>be a time when they can share uh the babysitter.

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they'll want to make sure that the babysitter

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is healthy, doesn't have a fever, and has also been

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>uh sheltering at home and taking care of herself and

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>complying with all the guidelines. So you may be sensing

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a pattern here. Bill says, the rules are there for

0:12:56.280 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>a reason, don't break them. I try to hard to

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>get Bill to acknowledge some sort of gray area in

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>these scenarios. I even asked another epidemiologist for a second opinion.

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>His answers were the same as Bills. I asked Bill,

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>why so many of us are having such a hard

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>time with these rules. We're Americans, were very individual oriented.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>We always look for the exceptions or saying does that

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>really apply to me? It's part of our American very individualistic,

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 1>wonderfully individualistic nature. How can I go out to the

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>edge of this and maybe step a little bit on

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Bill acknowledges that doing the right thing

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't always easy in these times. This virus doesn't care

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>about our social, financial, economic, and cultural needs. It's going

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to affect people, and it will make some people very

0:13:55.640 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>very ill. How we balance that is very very difficult.

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>As I like to say, there are no right answers,

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>they're only very difficult answers. Bill gets it. There are

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>some things he really misses too. I really miss going

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to the library. Oh I'm a withdrawal from that. So

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>there you have it. There really isn't as much gray

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>area as we might like to tell ourselves during these horrible,

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>weird times. But if we follow these rules, at least

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we can know we're doing everything in our power to

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>help get things under control. By the way, if you

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>have any more questions about social distancing, etiquette, or anything

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>else during these confusing times, please give us a call

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and leave a voicemail at six or six four zero.

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>If you leave a voicemail, we might play your message

0:14:49.080 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>on the show. That was Bloomberg's Chris and v Brown

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's our show today. For coverage of the outbreak

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>from one and twenty bureaus around the world, visit bloomberg

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com Flash Coronavirus, and if you like the show,

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>please leave us a review and a rating on Apple

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts or Spotify. It's the best way to help more

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>listeners find our global reporting The Prognosis Daily edition is

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>hosted by me Laura Carlson. The show is produced by

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>me To for Foreheads, Jordan Gospoure and Magnus Hendrickson. Today's

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>main story was reported by Kristen V. Brown. Original music

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>by Leo Sidrin. Our editors are Francesca Levi and Rick Shine.

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Francesco Levy is Bloomberg's head of podcasts. Thanks for listening

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in the l