WEBVTT - Start All Your J-E-T-S... Really?

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>source for the nation's best fantasy.

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Speculation and advice.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Now along with the guys from Guillotine Leagues dot com.

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's your host. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, Week number five.

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I am Paul Charchi and my costs today are Matt

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Harrison and thor Nystrom. Hey, hey, guys, we've got a

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people already finding themselves in a deep poll.

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>She played against Justin Fields or Sam Howell or DJ Moore.

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>We have to work extra hard on earth in this

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a bye week, the first bye week, some great sleeper hio,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fields. Yeah, it's hard to come together.

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Are you insinuating that we don't work hard on most weeks?

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm insinuating you don't work ok, gotcha most weeks in particular? Yeah,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean yes, over.

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 4>The course, work about the same amount of hard this week. Sorry,

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 4>you didn't warn me up front that I had to

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 4>work harder.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>When Justin Fields throws four touchdowns, you have to work harder.

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 4>Put it in slack next time that, Oh, Matt, gotta

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 4>work harder this week?

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Over the course of the show, we'll break down

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the games and this week's slate, we'll give

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you later grade letter grades on all the players. We'll

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>give you nine players upon whom you can take a chance.

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll answer three tough questions, and we'll give you some

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>players upon whom you can speculate for future weeks, including

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>two dart throw quarterbacks we're gonna come up. Over the

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>course of the show. We begin with Carolina taking on Detroit.

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Matt For Carolina, it was back to Bryce Young and

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the offense took a step backwards last week. What do

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you think of this week? In Detroit?

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Bryce Young is putrid. He's seeing a twenty five point

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 4>eight percent pressure rate, which is extremely high, and he's

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 4>about four foot two and that's contributing to his horrible

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and sixty seven passing yards per game. The

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Lions have the fifth highest pressure rate in the league

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 4>at forty point seven percent, with the third lowest blitz

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 4>rate at fifteen point nine percent. So the Lions can

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 4>rush four yeah and drop everybody back, and Bryce Young's

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 4>not going to be able to get anything done. He's

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 4>on the bench. I will give Adam Thiel in a

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 4>C grade in this one. He has thirty one targets

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 4>in the last three weeks and runs about seventy two

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 4>percent of his routes from the slot. This year, Detroit's

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 4>slot corner Brian Branch has been targeted the fifth most

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 4>among slot corners in the NFL, and he's also allowed

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 4>two touchdowns in his coverage so far. And then Hayden Hurst,

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 4>he gets like a desperation dart throw D I mean

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 4>C grade in the tight end waste land. He did

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 4>see seven targets in Week one and just three per

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 4>week since, but Detroit has allowed the most receptions and

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 4>yards to the tight end position through the first four weeks,

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 4>an average of eight catches in seventy six yards per game.

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 4>That all goes to Hayden Hurst. If we hit that average,

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 4>I like it all the other wide receivers on the bench.

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 4>As for the running backs, my Sanders has been removed

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 4>from the injury report, but there's still a very good

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 4>chance that we see a lot of Chewba Hubbard in

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 4>this game. Hubbard is third in the league in yards

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 4>after contact at two point eight per rushing attempt. He

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 4>actually out snapped Sanders last week thirty nine to thirty one,

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 4>and it's been closer to a timeshare than we imagined.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 4>And it's not a great matchup for a split backfield.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 4>The Lions are only allowing two point eight yards per

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 4>carry and forty five rushing yards per game, so I'm

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 4>leaving both of these guys on the bench since Sanders

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 4>is active. On the other side, though, it's a running

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 4>back bonanza, I'm going to give David Montgomery a fantasy ardvark. Yeah,

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 4>right out of the bat here. He leads the league

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 4>and carries from inside the five. He has seven this

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 4>year and four touchdowns already. He completely took over that

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Jamal Williams role from last year. Also, he leads the

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 4>league in broken tackles with twelve. Wow, he missed the

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 4>whole game. He's really good. He's really really good, and

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 4>he faces a really bad Panthers round defense allowing four

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 4>point nine yards per kerry and have already allowed seven

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 4>touchdowns to the running back position this year. Jamiir Gibbs

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 4>and his thirteen touches per game are also in play

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 4>with a B grade here, So it's fire up those

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Detroit running backs on the passing side. It's so easy

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 4>to run against the Panthers that very few teams even

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 4>try to pass. They're only seeing twenty seven passing attempts

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 4>per game. That's the third lowest in the league.

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Vikings only through nineteen passes last.

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Week nineteen times. Yes, that's why three of the four

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 4>quarterbacks they faced have been held to under two hundred

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight yards, including Kirk Cousins who only had one

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty nine passing yards last week. For that reason,

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 4>Jared Goff just gets a C grade in here. He's

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 4>doing pretty well. He's fourth in the league in on

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 4>target throw percentage at eighty two percent. But how much

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 4>will he have to throw in this one? That's the worry,

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 4>especially if Amon Ross Saint Brown doesn't go in this one.

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 4>He's been downgraded to doubtful. He sat all week with

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 4>an abdominal injury, which I thought was probably just a

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 4>side effect of his six pack expanding to an eight pack.

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Number one wide receivers have had good days against Carolina,

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 4>including Justin Jefferson with eighty five yards and two scores

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 4>last week. DK Metcalf had one hundred and twelve yards

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 4>on six catches the week before. It doesn't look like

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Saint Brown's gonna go. If he doesn't go, Josh Reynolds

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 4>likely flexes into the slot more and probably into a

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 4>wide receiver one role. I'd throw a see his way

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 4>if Saint Brown is inactive. But it's not a Jamison

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Williams or Khalif Raymond or Marvin Jones week.

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>They're all on the bench and we should just spend

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>just one second on Jamal Williams or sorry, Jamis and Williams.

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>People are excited about him coming back a week early, yep.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like, let's see what the snapcount even

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was gonna be.

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's on the field like twelve plays.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, agree, I think maybe won two targets tops. Yeah,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 4>which for him.

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Remember he was active for half of the games last

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>year and he averaged one target per game.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I got one more guy to talk about it,

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 4>Sam Laporta, who gets a B grade. The Panthers are

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>a middle of the pack defense against the tight end.

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Despite not having surrendered a touchdown to the position yet,

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Laporta has had at least five targets and four receptions

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 4>in every game in his young career in a PPR

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 4>league He's a ten pointer just about every week at least,

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 4>so he's a top five tight.

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 5>End at this point.

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 4>You got to keep him in your lineup.

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Stud.

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Houston takes on Atlanta or they just put their

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>eighth offensive linemen on injured reserve. Oh no, Reddy and

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>three different linemen are going to play injured this week.

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Yet here we are, and so to this point, the

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>passing game has been pretty down effective for Houston. Sure

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>has yeah, better news for this rookie quarterback than the

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>last one.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 5>Matt was just talking about CJ. Strout. I'm gonna give

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 5>him a B in this matchup.

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 6>Number four in Fantasy points per dropback, number three in

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 6>yards per attempt.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 5>Decent matchup here.

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 6>The Falcons have allowed the ninth most passing touchdowns so

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 6>far this season. Nico Collins, who was having an amazing

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 6>season so far wide receiver seven in Fantasy about that,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 6>number three in yards per route run. But Atlanta does

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 6>have the solid boundary corners in both aj Terrell, who

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 6>he talked about in the past in particular, and also

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 6>of course Jeffrey Okuda. They temper expectations just a little bit.

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 6>So I'm gonna give Nico a B. Same sort of

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 6>deal with Tank Dell, who I'm gonna give a C.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 6>Tanks number seventeen in yards per route run since week two.

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 6>He leads the Texans in deep targets. That's the good news.

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 6>The bad news is, and everyone out there you know

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 6>that Tank is diminutive. He only has one red zone target.

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 6>So we're gonna give him a C. Robert Woods, We're

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 6>gonna get back to in a bit here because he

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 6>is might take a chance on me wide receiver Dalton Schultz.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 6>Keep him on your bench and also ignore his solid

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 6>three catches for forty three yards and a touchdown receiving

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 6>line last week. He's in a time share with two

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 6>other tight ends. I don't know if he can sustain that,

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 6>so we're gonna keep him on the bench. Damian Pierce,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna give him a C. He played fifty four

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 6>percent or more of snaps in the last two weeks,

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 6>but he only the route participation keeps dropping and dropping

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 6>and dropping.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand that.

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 6>It's only it's down to twenty four point two percent.

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 6>I don't understand it either. The kids a skilled receiver, right,

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 6>you can catch I. I don't understand the Falcons improved

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 6>run defense ranked number twelve and stuff rate. It's stunk

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 6>last year, it's getting solid. So it's not the best

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 6>matchup for Damian Pierce. We're going to give him a

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 6>ce moving to the Falcons. Speaking of stinking the Desmond Ridder.

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 6>Keep him on the bench.

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, well he might be on the Falcons bench

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 5>here was going to do.

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Desmond Ridder finishes this game?

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't.

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, we're getting really close to the hook, right yeah, yeah,

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 6>so do We'll talk more about that later. And for

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 6>a team that's competing for the division title, you just

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 6>can't afford to have him that sort of level of play.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 6>Drake London for that reason that the play at Desmond Radder,

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 6>I think you have to keep him on the bench

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 6>in this game. It is getting ugly London. He had

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 6>seven targets last week, but only three catches for twenty

0:08:59.240 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 6>eight yards.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 5>He did salvage a bit of value with the touchdown.

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 6>The non Drake London Falcons wide receivers last week against

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 6>the Jaguars had two catches for dight tedyard, zero touchdowns

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 6>on five targets. You are, of course keeping them on

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 6>your bench. And in this game, the Falcons game script

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 6>is going to be run, run, run against his Texan defense.

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 6>Of course it's an Arthur Smith team, so we have

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 6>to talk about multiple tight ends. John new Smith, we're

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 6>gonna give him a ce all right, that's my guy. Yeah,

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 6>last week against the Jaguars, cut all six targets for

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 6>ninety five yards.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 5>The last three weeks, John.

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 6>New Smith twenty targets, Kyle Pitts eighteen targets.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I love it. Why isn't Brian Johnson

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>here for this? Killing me right now?

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 6>But Yeah, Smith ran routes on less than sixty percent

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 6>of the dropbacks last week, So I mean he went

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 6>ballistic last week, but I'm not sure how sustainable that

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 6>you know, that production is. We're gonna keep playing that

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 6>kind of snapshare. And the Texans have allowed only one

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 6>touchdown two opposing tight ends this year, So we're giving

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 6>John hu a cee. We're also giving Kyle Pits to see.

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 6>Kyle Pitts lowly sixty three point three PFF receiving grade

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 6>this year ranks three to third among qualified tight ends,

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 6>not the best. Kyle Pitts's yards per route run the

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 6>last three years two point zero two as a rookie

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 6>one point six to nine last year. He is down

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 6>to zero point nine to five so far this year.

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 5>I mean not good.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 6>And the Texans have also allowed the twelfth lowest yards

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 6>per reception too opposing tight ends this year, so we'll

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 6>get both those tight ends to see. The smash matchup

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 6>in this game is Bijon Robinson, of course, obviously a

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 6>Bijon's averaging eighteen point one touches and one hundred and

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 6>thirteen total yards per game. He's also number three amongst

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 6>all running backs in receiving grade and number two in targets.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 6>Bjon Robinson his top ten in running backs and fantasy

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 6>points despite having scored only one touchdown so far. This

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 6>is a bad Texans run defense that has allowed the

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 6>seventh highest explosive run rate in the league so far.

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 6>Bijon obviously hits home runs. I expect him to have

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 6>a couple explosive plays here.

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 5>And Tyler l g is.

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Another guy we're about to get back to because hes

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on me running back, all right,

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City takes on Minnesota Patrick Mahomes, Travis Kelcey obvious,

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>as Vikings gave up two touchdowns to Donald Parham a

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. So these guys are obviously in

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>play every week. I as for the rest of the

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>passing game, I can't put a bit starting great on anybody.

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Some receiver, random receiver insert name here, probably has a

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>good name, a good game, but nobody gets more than

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent of the snaps and the target distribution for

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers for the Chiefs so scattershot that it's

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>just unguessable to wit. In four games this season, four

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>different Chiefs wide receivers have led the team in receiving yards.

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's just, you know, it's not It's not that

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not smart enough. I don't know that the Chiefs

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.719
<v Speaker 1>could even tell you which one receiver'd be the one

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you'd want to start, and many times, many games there's

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>none that you'd want to start. But let's talk about

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Pacheco. Yeah, now we're talking baby. His touches have

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>increased in each game, and deservedly, so this might be

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>though a little bit trickier matchup than it first appears.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people think of the Vikings nationally televised

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>game against the Eagles, in which DeAndre Swift ran up

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and down the field on them. But in the the

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>nine non DeAndre Swift running backs to face, the Vikings

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>have averaged two point six scoreless yards per carry. No

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>other back has top forty one rushing yards against Minnesota.

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Vikings have have a top ten run stuff win rate

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>according to ESPN. This is a decent run defense. So

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the Pacheco goes off here.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>One other exciting development for Pacheco averaging three targets per

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>game after seeing point six targets per game last year.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Love that, so we do love that. Now the counter

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>side of that, the Vikings only allowing fifteen receiving yards

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>per game to opposing running backs, second fewest. Still love

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the way he's playing. Running hard B grade Isaiah Pacheco.

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 5>Let's go to the Vikings.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson TJ. Howkinson obvious as it goes without saying.

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have allowed at least six receptions and fifty five

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>yards of tight ends in three of the four games

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this year. Hackinson likely sitting on a very nice game.

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins also gets an A grade, leads all passers

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in the league in completions and touchdowns, and the Vikings

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>lead the league in passing rate. Game script likely helps

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Cousins here, as the Vikings are presumed to fall behind early,

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>which has happened in losses to the similarly talented Chargers

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and Eagles offense. That will ensure that Cousins Cousins ends

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>up throwing in this game. Unlike last week, Vikings pass

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>blocking has been better than previous years. Still not good,

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>but better. Only seven sacks and four games is a

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>big win for the oft battered Kirk Cousins, who comes

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in with an A for this one. Sticking with the

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>passing game, I really struggle with Jordan Addison. He had

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>one target last week, it was not completed and so

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>he ended up with a zero catch game. Not great.

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>I had given him a I believe a C grade.

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Last week snapcount dropped way off, but as we mentioned

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the show, they only threw nineteen balls. I

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>think you probably throw forty in this game, So I

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think Addison's back on the radar with the C grade here.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>He runs from all over the field, but he most

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>commonly will see Lugerius Snead cornerback for the Chiefs. He

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>hasn't allowed to touchdown, yet only giving up a fifty

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>six percent completion rate, which is good, but weirdly, he

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>ranks his Pro Football Focuses one hundred and thirty first

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>ranked quarterback. So maybe there's an opportunity here for Jordan Addison.

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to move him in with a C grade.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And then lastly, Alexander Madison. Madison is has run better

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks. Chiefs middle linebacker Nick Bolton

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>has been ruled out the replacement, though Drew Trankwell has

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>been PFF's eleventh best run defending linebacker in his absence,

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City has been pushed around at the point of

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>attack this season, earning Kansas City's third has got the

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>third worst run stuff rate, so maybe they get a

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>little something done here for the Vikings, Kansas City sees

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the seventh fewest runs. Cam Akers started eating into the

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>workhorse role that Alexander Madison had previ viously had. That

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>part is not ideal either, so we're just coming in

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>with a C grade on Madison here. There is some opportunity,

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>but gamescript might work against him along with cam Aker's

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>developing role. When we come back, take.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 4>A chance on me.

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Nine players not normally in starting lineups. Will tell you

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>who they are what you can do with those guys

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in this the first bye week of the NFL schedule.

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>You need help off the waiver wire. We'll do that

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Take a

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>chance on me nine players you would not normally start.

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you who they are. Many of these are

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be available off of the waiver wire in

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>your league and you might need the help this week.

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin at the quarterback position and Matt Harrison.

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 4>We all need a lot of help for this one.

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Zach Wilson as might take a chance on me quarterback.

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 4>There are some reasons to be optimistic. He's had more

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 4>pass plays and a better completion percentage in three straight weeks,

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 4>while a scramble percentage and snap percentage and pressure percentage

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 4>have dropped in three straight weeks. Wilson's actually tied for

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 4>eighth place and touchdown passes inside the ten yard line

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 4>this year, and he plays Denver this week, who have

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 4>the worst defensive unit in the NFL. Let's even take

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 4>out the seventy point game to Miami. The Broncos have

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 4>allowed an average line of two hundred seventy eight yards

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 4>and two point seven passing scores to non to quarterbacks.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 4>That's a lot. Oh and did we mention that current

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Broncos head coach Sean Payton put former Broncos and current

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 4>Jets offensive co ordinator Nathaniel Hackett on blast for doing

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 4>the worst coaching job ever. You don't think the Jets

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 4>have had this game circled since then? They're going to

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 4>run up the score if they can against Sean Payton.

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, if they can is a big question.

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you kind of can against that DFL as.

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>You're right, you're right about that thor you take a

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>chance on me quarterback.

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 6>I'm going with Brock Purdy against the Cowboys. Brock Perdy

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 6>QB thirteen so far in Fantasy number one in the

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 6>NFL impasser rating, number four in Fantasy points per dropback.

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 6>In this matchup against the Cowboys, Dallas has allowed the

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 6>tenth highest yards per attempt average in the NFL so far.

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 5>I think a big games coming for Brock Perdy.

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill's best matchup of the year is this matchup

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Colts. You remember in the offseason they lost

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>both of their starting cornerbacks steff On Gilmore to free

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>agency and Isaiah Rodgers to gambling, and now their current

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>starting cornerback Dallas Flowers just went on ir so it

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>looks like they're going to have to either reinsert the

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>previous lead benched cornerback Darryl Baker, who allowed touchdowns in

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>both of his starts prior to his benching. Opposite him

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is rookie cornerback Jude Juw Brent, who got his first

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>start last week and promptly allowed all five passes in

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>his coverage to be caught along with a touchdown. It's

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>an elite opportunity for Ryan Fitzpack. Sorry, no Stupiard's back. Yes,

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I would love to have stew Beer back Ryan Tannel

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>he could still play today. Let's go to the running

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>back position.

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna stick with the Jets and go with Dalvin Cook.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Last week, Bryce hallsaw only twenty six snaps and only

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 4>had six rushing attempts. That's a run on only twenty

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 4>three percent of his snaps. Dalvin Cook, meanwhile, had a

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 4>rushing attempt on thirty five percent of his snaps, and

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Cook is the only Jets running back who had to

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 4>carry from inside the five this year. From a target perspective,

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Cook has the exact same amount as Hall. Basically, when

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 4>Cook is on the field, he's getting the ball and

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 4>almost getting the same workload as Haul. Right now, and

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 4>insert the Broncos defense, who I'm gonna pick on all day.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 4>But let's take out that Miami game again where they

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 4>gave up three hundred and fifty one yards, ninety receiving

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 4>yards and eight total touchdowns of the Dolphins backs. Let's

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 4>take that out. Khalil Herbert total one hundred and twenty

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 4>two yards in a score last week. Brian Robinson at

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and twenty nine total yards and two scores

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 4>in Week two. They're a siev.

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Well they are, and you took out there worse, Yeah,

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>which is very very chivalrous. So I didn't even mention it,

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>did I? No, no, no, let's go to Thori. You're

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>take a chance to be running back. I'm going with

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Tyler l Geer against the Texans. I like this one.

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 5>Speaking of terrible run defenses.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 6>Yes, so, Tyler Elgier averaged fifteen point five rushing attempts

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 6>in the first two games, but the last to only

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 6>eight point five touch average per game.

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think we get here's my thinking.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 6>I think we get closer to the usage of the

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 6>first two games with Aljeer in this one as opposed

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 6>to the last two and el Gier. Everybody out there

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 6>knows he's a tackle breaker who's got juice after he

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 6>breaks it. Right now, it ranks fifteenth in the NFL

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 6>in yards after contact per attempt. Mentioned the Texans run

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 6>defense is terrible, and I mentioned before, I think this

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 6>game script flips super duper run heavy for Atlanta.

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 5>I think that's where al Jieer can come in and

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 5>put up some numbers.

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got Gus Edwards. His touches have increased in every game,

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>which is particularly notable since Justice Hill returned last week.

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>He's dinged up. We'll try to play. We don't know

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>for sure how much he can contribute. Didn't take anything

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>away from Gus. Last week, Steelers allowing one hundred and

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven rushing yards per game to opposing running backs

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>on four point nine yards per carry, that is second

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and third worst in the league. Now notable for Gus

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>He's had just one carry from inside the five yard line.

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson had two last week.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 4>That is not cool.

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Jackson wasn't used inside the five at all under previous

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator Greg Roman, but new offensive coordinator Todd Munkin

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>apparently feels a little bit differently about using Jackson near

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the stripe. And I don't like it because we want

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards to have a nice game here. I still

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>think he can even if he doesn't score. The Gus Busson,

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I love the Gus spot. Yeah, guys on, all he's

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>done is average five yards per carry in every one

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>his seasons. Matt, you take a chance with me wide receiver?

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Are you giving us two jets? Who are you going

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 1>with now?

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Haha?

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.239
<v Speaker 4>Broncos, I'm giving you Tyler Conklin as a tight end.

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 4>While they're the worst team in the league against quarterbacks

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 4>and running backs, they're the second worst team in the

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 4>league against tight ends. And oh, by the way, two

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 4>of their opponents decided they didn't even need to throw

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 4>to the tight end to beat them. The Raiders and

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Dolphins combined for two catches against the Broncos. Still, Denver

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 4>has allowed the sixth most yards and the seventh most

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 4>and the second most scores to the position, including seven

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 4>catches eighty five yards and two touchdowns the Cole Comet

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 4>last week. Conklin's getting a target on seventeen percent of

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 4>his routes run. That's the same as Dallas Goddard and

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Darren Waller. He's also flexed out to the slot on

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 4>thirty three percent of his snaps this season and has

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 4>a robust four point nine yards after contact. They like

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Tyler Conklin to get involved today. Tyler Conklin for Sunday.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>You've gone Jets, Jets, Jets, j Ets, Jets, Jets, Jets.

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of lazy. Yeah, yeah, thor you're taking chance

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on me wide receiver. Let's talk about Bobby Trees.

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 6>Texans playing the Falcons this week. Woods leads the Texans

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 6>in target share the last three games the week. Here

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 6>here's the thinking on this one. The week link on

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 6>the Falcons defense is their nickel corner d Alford, who

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 6>is allowing a seventy seven point three percent catch rate

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 6>and get this one hundred and twenty five point eight

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 6>passer rating against on targets.

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 5>I think CJ.

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 6>Stroud, who has already been looking Woods is way quite

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 6>a bit, is additionally incentivized in this game to pick

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 6>on d Alford. I think you might see Woods lead

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 6>the team in targets again. He might take a chance

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 6>on me wide receiver.

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Matt, you went Jets, Jets, Jets, Yeah, and then you

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>made fun of me for it. Yes I did. Yeah,

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going Jets wide receives.

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, that's just cruel. Just you knew you were

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 4>doing that.

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I knew.

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>The Jets offense obviously has looked looked better last week.

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's Lore's the Lazard story. His lowest snappering in any

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>game this year seventy eight percent. He's always on the field.

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>He's getting a reasonably healthy fifteen percent target share. Alan

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Lazard not exactly known as a deep downfield threat, averaging

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>seventeen yards per reception.

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 5>Not bad.

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Broncos give up over thirteen yards per reception, one and

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a half touchdowns per game, twenty eight fantasy points per

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>game to wide receivers, and best of all star cornerback

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Patrick certain is going to spend all of his time

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>on Garrett Wilson. Of course, that means Alan Lazard is

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>going to see the worst starting cornerback in the league,

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Damari Mathis. Mathis has allowed the third most receiving yards

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and the most touchdowns in his coverage four of them.

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Already is giving up an opposer passer rating of one

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty four perfect, or guess worse would be

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty would be the worst possible passerating.

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>He's at one hundred and fifty four. Yeah, Alan Laz close,

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting Alan Lazard a couple of my guillotine leagues,

0:23:57.720 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>putting my neck on the line.

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 4>Wow, now this just in.

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a game being played in ye old London town.

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh should I go get him?

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Colin mccoughney, maybe you're only twenty three debut. Yes, our

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>London correspondent happens to be here in studio making a

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>visit to the Twin Cities due to unspecified medical issues

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>required to go to the Mayo Clinic. Hallo gov'nor Colin mccockney,

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's so good to have you back.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 4>It's me I'm callin. I'm here to get the winner.

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Ain't I gotta bag a few apples and pears with

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 4>them strikers to get y'all sorted for the fantasy footy

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 4>now thor just so.

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, because I never know what he's saying, I

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>need you to be the translator and to help me

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>understand what Colin is saying, because I never have any idea. Yeah,

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I speak the King's English. Colin's speaking some absurd slang

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>version that seems to have come out of a some

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>gutter in London somewhere.

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Kittie Kats and Buffy the Slayer at Rock Solid.

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 4>You looking at CHOCHI didn't you want some Colin? What's

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 4>his name, Thunder mcgovna.

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>That is my name.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 6>I think Colin's saying hello, and I believe he's about

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 6>to do the London match between the Jaguars and Bells.

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh all right, good, let's start on the Jaguars side.

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Colin, Nice try Thundy, clever Mike and a gypsy's kiss,

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 4>Trevy Larry on a sea shanty, smashing chest hair hedges

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 4>and Billy's beans. Blimey, he ain't me captain.

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 6>So he just said that Trevor Lawrence is getting a

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 6>C grade in this matchup. He's only throwing four touchdown

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 6>passes this year and the Bills have only allowed three.

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 6>Then I think he said the Bills are currently top

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 6>five in every category against opposing quarterbacks. Colin also said

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 6>he'd rather have Trevor Lawrence on the bench if he

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 6>had his Drawthers.

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, Noice work, Thundy, Galico, Cat, Ridley Scotton, man

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 4>of God, Kirker, pair of Jimmy Choos in their proper

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Belton Eighth Night Chachie.

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.719
<v Speaker 6>He's saying the matchups for the Jaguars receivers here got

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 6>a little better with Tredevius White going down to an

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 6>achilles injury. It's also saying Kelvin Ridley will draw Dame

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 6>Jackson most often he replaces White and is a.

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 5>League average corner according to PFF.

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 6>He went on to say, from the slot, Christian Kirk

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 6>is gonna see Taron Johnson here, who's been who has

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 6>been the Bill's highest rated corner outside of White. Still,

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 6>this isn't a great matchup for either, and I believe

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 6>Colin gave both of them C grades.

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure he mentioned Ridley Scott at some point

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in here, notable director of films like Blade Runner in Alien.

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how that. I don't know how that

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>worked in there, but I swear I heard Ridley.

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:45.959
<v Speaker 4>Scott Jammy Dodger and we're ready for Tottenham pints. Foggy

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 4>underwearing a base and a gravy for Travy Marvel. He's

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 4>the dog's bollocks, no doubt.

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 6>He's saying the bills weakness is the run, and Travis

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 6>Eten gets an A grade in this one. Then Colin

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 6>went on to say Buffalo has allowed five point nine

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 6>yards per CAKI on the year, which is the worst

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 6>in the entire league. But then he said they're only

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 6>seeing about sixteen rushing attempts per game, which is amongst.

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 5>The lowest in the league.

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 6>Et And has had at least eighteen carries in three

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 6>of four games. So Colin's expecting the Jaguars to try

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 6>to control the pace with et and I believe what

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 6>he was saying. And he also went on to say

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 6>we're not going to get as much of Tank Bigsby though,

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 6>because he's getting all he's getting all of the carries

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 6>inside five yards, but nothing else.

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 5>And the Bills have only allowed to rushing touchdowns so

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 5>far this year.

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure I heard when the phrase botlocks came up.

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure that was Tank Bigsby right there.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 5>That was that part.

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah, tanks one nott in tanks, no two

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 4>ways about it. Can't have any Mickey mouses in your blouses.

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Stephan Al have gone all jam tart on me nobbies

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 4>cause Jimmy the lemon merchant is selling apples. That top

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 4>choice mate.

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 6>Oh, I mean obviously everyone heard it. He's saying, Josh

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 6>Allen and Stefan Diggs are grades in this game.

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, gotta be prop on, no two ways about it.

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 4>Davy Gabe is a submarine captain and Sherfield Wednesday make

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Coppin Oily rag for Austin Martin.

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 6>Yet now what he's saying is Gabe Davis only gets

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 6>a c gray because Davis is lining up on the

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 6>outside most often. We're he'll match up against Jacksonville's Darius Williams.

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 6>Colin also went on to say, there who is the

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 6>top PFF rated cornerback in the league from PFF in

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and sixty two snaps, he's allowed only eleven

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 6>receptions and leads the league and pass it broken up

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 6>with five. And that slot receiver tren Sherfield is going

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 6>to get a seat as well because he's facing Trey Herndon,

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 6>who is Jacksonville's best slot corner. Herndon has allowed a

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 6>one to fifty one passer rating in his slot coverage

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 6>and two touchdowns so far this year. By the numbers,

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 6>he's been the worst slot corner in the league, even

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 6>if he might be Jacksonville's best.

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Even the smolly bums ain't talking about Willis Dalzy and

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 4>Dalty B.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Franks.

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 4>That be salty.

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 6>Now he's talking about Dawson Knox, who has been limited

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 6>in practice all week with a quad injury. Let's fire

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.959
<v Speaker 6>up Dalton Kincaid with a C grade here, Jacksonville has

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 6>allowed the fourth most receptions and third most yards two

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 6>opposing tight ends. And then he went on to say

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 6>the King Kaid split snaps with Knox last last week,

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 6>but the Kinkaid ran routes on seventy nine percent of

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 6>his snaps.

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Wake os, dustbin lids and pull up ye lions, lay on,

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 4>Let oh Collie boy give a Lumpyes, but Colin thinks

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 4>d as a fisherman's data Old Jimmy the chef gets

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 4>helped to scouta.

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 5>So what he's saying here is that he only has

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 5>a C grade on James Cook.

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 6>He's leading a three way time share with Latavius Murray

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 6>and Damian Harris for snaps, but only on the field

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 6>for about forty percent of the snaps right now, and

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 6>outside of Bijon Robinson's good day.

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 5>Last week, the Jaguars have.

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 6>Held opposing backs mostly in check, allowing seventy one rushing

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 6>yards per game only and only one touchdown so far

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 6>total this season. Those numbers don't split three ways. All

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 6>that well, I believe, is how we wrap that up.

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 6>OI got dream team?

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Sort it? Ain't I got you a couple Danny Dyers, Hey, blimey,

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 4>make get your winner?

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 2>There?

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Ain't you top choice?

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Mate?

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Callin Old Bobby's me ship is silent.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Colin an excellent report. Thank you very much bringing all

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the intel from London taking on the Buffalo Bills. That

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>was very, very well done. We're gonna take a break

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>when we come back. And thanks again to Colin. Saints

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>taking on the new England Patriots. Man, this Patriots team

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>nearing rock bottom? Is there anybody to play? This is

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick and to quit in the middle of the game.

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out when we come back. Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Another big block of matchups coming. Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Chargy and Matt Harrison throw Nystrom with you if you

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't tried a guillotine league yet, or maybe if you're

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>only in one, two, or three, you want to add

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>another one. New Guillotine Leagues being formed virtually every day

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine Leagues dot Com. Fourteen weeks left in the season,

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of time to play.

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 5>I can't believe I'm still alive in all four of them.

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Done all right, baby, yeah, I love it. Well done.

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump into the Saints taking on New England. Derek

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Carr looked not right last week, and I feel like

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they brought him back a week too early. They hopefully here,

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the shoulders stronger, you can throw better. Patriots

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>defense had a huge blow at the loss of Christian

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Gonzales and Matthew Judon. I mean, you know, you just

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>took the best guy to the secondary and their best

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>pass rusher off the field. So you know, what had

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>been a stout New England defense, I feel like now

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is a lot more vulnerable. What do you think for

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this game?

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 6>It definitely could be, but I think you have to

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 6>keep Derek Carr on the bench in this game. He's

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 6>officially questionable with that shoulder injury the Charger was referring to.

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:16.719
<v Speaker 5>Does look likely that car will play, but keep him

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 5>on the bench anyway.

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 6>To charge his previous point about the way he looked

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 6>last week, the CARSA dot dropped from ten the first

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 6>three games to seven last week.

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 5>Three yards last Chris.

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 6>O'lave I'm giving him a b Olave ranks number ten

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 6>in the league in receiving grade three point six yards

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 6>per route run against man coverage, which is important in

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 6>this game because the Patriots defense is super man coverage heavy,

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 6>and that secondary also has injuries like Charge was mentioning,

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 6>and they're going to be forced to immediately insert J. C.

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 5>Jackson into this game.

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>With you think he's gonna play already in this game.

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 5>I do, just because all the injuries bad.

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So JAC Jackson's going to go from healthy scratch yes

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>on over to maybe starting or at least getting insignificant reps.

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and Bill Belichick and maybe.

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 6>Across from Chris o'lave on some of those reps. But

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 6>for all Loby, the weak offensive environment of this game

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 6>and the questions I have about Car's ability to get

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 6>it downfield with that shoulder injury, that's what make him

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 6>a Bee for me.

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna give Michael Thomas a volume C grade.

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 6>Thomas only has one point one yards per route run

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 6>against man coverage, but he does have one basically a

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 6>one third first read share versus man, so they are

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 6>throwing him the ball. It's just he's not doing a

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 6>ton with those targets against man. I do expect the

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 6>volume to keep up here for Thomas against that Patriots defense,

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 6>and with the injuries that we've mentioned. I think that's

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 6>what makes Thomas potentially playable. Unfortunately, I do not think

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 6>the same for chargingized boy Rashid Shaki.

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>We love him, but he needs downfield passing.

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 5>He absolutely does.

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 6>And the New England's man cover scheme, to your point,

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 6>they take away the deep ball.

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, that's just what they do.

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 6>In addition to that, Shahit is the Saints' deep ball

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 6>zone killer. That's what the game seat goes often because

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 6>he can get deep beyond there and take the top

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 6>off the defense. But Shahit only has zero point three

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 6>yards per route run against man coverage this year.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 5>That is not good.

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 6>Keep him on your bench. You also have to keep

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 6>all the Saints tight ends on your bench. Juwan Johnson

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 6>has a calf injury. Jimmy Graham may or may not

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 6>start bench Both the Patriots are awesome against opposing tight

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 6>ends and have been for a long time. Alvin Kamara,

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 6>I'm giving him a grade to be in this game.

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 6>Last week, first game back from his suspension, eighty four

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 6>total yards on seventy five percent of the snaps to

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 6>finish his fantasy's RB nine. He had thirteen catches in

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 6>that game, unbelievable as Derek Carr became checked down Charlote

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 6>with the Shelder injury.

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 5>But in this game here for Kamara.

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 6>The Patriots have a strong run defense that ranks number

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 6>three in the league in stuff right. The Patriots also

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 6>suppress receiving running backs. They've allowed the eighth lowest yards

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 6>per reception to opposing running backs this year. Moving on

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 6>to the Patriots of the baw the entire passing game,

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 6>I advise you to keep on the bench Mac Jones,

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 6>DeVante Parker, Juju Smith, Schuster, Hunter, Henry, all of them.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:09.959
<v Speaker 5>Keep them all on the bench.

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 6>The only guy that I think is fantasy playable in

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 6>this game is Ramondre Stevenson, who is not having a

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 6>very good season so far, but just on the volume here.

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm giving him a bee.

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 6>Ramonder's averaging eighteen touches and sixty two point eight total

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 6>yards per game with zero explosive runs.

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 5>Hopefully that changes at some point.

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 4>He's a good back.

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 5>He's a very good back.

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, forty second out of fifty eight qualifying running backs

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 6>in misforce tackles per attempt. For me, that's the bigger

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 6>surprise than the zero explosive runs. I mean that kid's

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 6>a tackle breaker.

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 5>Decent matchup in this game, though, which is why I

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 5>tick him up to the B.

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 6>In addition to the volume, the Patriots are going to

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 6>feed him against what is a middling Saints run defense.

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 6>The Saints pass defense is really good. There's only one

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 6>route for New England here, which is just run the ball.

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 6>That's going to benefit Remondre.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Ramonder's got a thigh injury that we're monitoring. Managed

0:35:58.080 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 1>to practice every day during the week. We think he

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>will be able to go in this game. Baltimore takes

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>on Pittsburgh. The Ravens offensive line dealing with a bunch

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of injuries. You want to double check on Morgan Moses, Tyler, Linderbaum,

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Ronnie Stanley, all guys. You'll want to double check their

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 1>status here. Assuming that this line's been at least some

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>semblance of order. Then there's some playable angles here. Let's

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>start with Mark Andrews. He just rocked a much better

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland defense for a couple of scores. Pittsburgh has only

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed eleven receptions to tight ends, but ten yards per reception,

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so we like that. In Andrews's last four performances against

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, He's top fifty yards three times, which is good.

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>And in two of those games he had really big

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>games eight receptions for eighty yards or better. They faced

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>in Andrews level talent. George Kittle earlier this year held

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 1>him to nineteen yards. So I've only got the B

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>great and Andrews's tight end wasteland. You obviously have to

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 1>start him. It's not a great matchup, it's a good

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.320
<v Speaker 1>decent matchup. B great Mark Andrews. Say Flowers is the

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>other guy that you care about Steelers. In the passing game,

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Steelers are allowing the fourth most yards and second most

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game to wide receivers. Steelers are tied for

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the fourth most Fantasy points per game allowed to wide receivers,

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and despite his small size, Jay Flowers tied for fourth

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in red zone targets I did not expect Zay Flowers

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a red zone guy. That's been a nice development.

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I runs from all parts of the field and that

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>he's really He's got plus individual matchups against all three

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>struggling Steelers cornerbacks. There's Patrick Peterson, Chandon Sullivan, Levi Wallace.

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>They've got pro football focused cornerback rankings of seventy fourth,

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fourth, and one hundred and fifteenth. That's

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>not great. So Jay Flowers be great for him. Rashad

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Bateman appears he's going to be able to go in

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>this game, and I look, and I want to understand

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:45.919
<v Speaker 1>you if you don't even consider Rashod Baman been given

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>his light usage so far and his injuries. But as

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, fantastic matchup against these cornerbacks. So if you're

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for a potential dart throw, Rashad Bateman might be

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>your guy here. OBJ however, still not one hundred percent

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:01.479
<v Speaker 1>off his zank injury and he's done nothing. I gotta

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.760
<v Speaker 1>leave him on the bench. That from a passing game standpoint.

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>The last guy to talk about Lamar Jackson a grade.

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>The last two quarterbacks to face the Steelers have thrown

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for three hundred plus yards and multiple touchdowns, and that

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>was c. J. Stroud and Jimmy Garoppolo, by the way.

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 1>As a result, Pittsburgh's currently bottom eight in passing yards

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and passing touchdowns allowed. Jackson did not face the Steelers

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>last season, but he has rushed for at least fifty

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>five yards in each of his last three games against them.

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 1>If you go back a little bit, and of course

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>had the big rushing game last week. Lamar Jackson getting

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 1>used near the goal line. As we discussed in the

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards take a chance on Me segment earlier in

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this show. He comes in with a C grade for

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>this one. Now we go to Pittsburgh, h Kenny Pickett's

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>going to play. Not that it matters.

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:46.919
<v Speaker 4>That's a shame.

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the entire passing attack is on the bench, regardless

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of quarterback. You're not starting any part of this, this

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>passing attack, and especially not an increasingly healthy and good

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Ravens secondary. Even with healthy Kenny Pickett, the Steelers a

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.320
<v Speaker 1>bottom set even in passing yards, completion rate, and passing

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in the league. The Ravens have hammered similarly woeful opponents,

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 1>allowing averages are just two hundred and three passing yards

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and zero point eight passing touchdowns per game. No Pat

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Fryer mouth in this game, But Darnell Washington's gonna get

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>time or you know. I love the big o Darnell Washington,

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>huge target, gigantic target, normous, So I'm excited to see

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.360
<v Speaker 1>what he does, even though I can't advocate for starting

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Darnell Washington.

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm just disappointed that we didn't get a sad

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 4>trombone ski game so you could really get the sounders going.

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 5>You think I wasn't waiting on that.

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:35.360
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 6>I gotta check on Matt Canada's burner on Twitter to

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 6>see how many targets Washington's gonna get.

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I so much wish he'd go see he

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>would have landed someplace else, ye low, to see what

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>he could do. Let's talk about the only parts of

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh offense you care about, the running back position.

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Najee Harris is the league leader in line of scrimmage

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>stuffs twenty seven percent. That's a great stat that is,

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't it The line of scrimmage stuff? It sounds like

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>an oreo, it does. Yeah, the line of scrimmage double

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff little helmets on the On the cookie, Steelers are

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty ninth and run block win rate, which is not good.

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens have the third best run defense grade according

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to Pro Football fecus. Talking about footballs too much, Yeah, geez,

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 1>only Zach Voss's top fifty nine yards against Baltimore. It

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>took him thirty carries to get past fifty nine yards.

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We got to I think one hundred and ten in

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the game. The passing role is dried up for Najie Harris,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>which is unfortunate, averaging just one catch per game, and

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he has Pro Football focuses seventh worst receiving grade among

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 1>running backs. I can only get him up to a

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:43.799
<v Speaker 1>C grade here. And Jalen Warren is just he's tapped out.

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>It like seven carries a game. I just you know,

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't. You can't do anything from a fantasy standpoint

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of time frame on disappointingly. So yeah, we're.

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 5>Stuck, all right.

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>We've got about I think about four minutes here to

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>get to our next get through our next matchup, which

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is Cincinnati taking on Arizona. Matt I can't tell you

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>how many people have told me they're just they're benching

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Joe Burrow until he proves he can throw down field.

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's fair. He's not on the injury

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 4>report this week. He's going to play, but again, how

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 4>healthy is he? He simply can't get the power on

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 4>his throws with the right calf injury. His average depth

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 4>of target last week against the Titans, who have a

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 4>really bad secondary, was only four point four yards.

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It was just horrible.

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 3>Ye.

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Even in a matchup against the bottom five defense like Arizona,

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 4>it's still tough to trust him. I'll give Burrow a

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 4>c but I'd rather not start him right now. T

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 4>Higgins looks like he's not going to go this week

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:38.279
<v Speaker 4>with a rib injury. Hasn't practiced yet this week. Even

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 4>if he does go, I think i'd leave him on

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:42.760
<v Speaker 4>the bench. But it is a great matchup for Jamar Chase.

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 4>He'll match up most often with Arizona corner Marco Wilson,

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 4>who's allowed the most yards in coverage this season at

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 4>three hundred and forty five already. That's a lot a lot,

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Plus he's now the squeaky Wheel after the comments he

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 4>made last week. This would be an a matchup, but

0:41:58.160 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to give him a B just on the

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 4>bay of Joe Burrow's health and the fact that he's

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 4>probably double covered the entire game. Joe Mixon is leading

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 4>the league in one category. It's not like an oreo category,

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 4>but it's almost as bad. The fewest air yards in

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 4>the league. He's at negative thirty eight air yards, which

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:19.879
<v Speaker 4>translates to an average depth of target of negative four

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 4>point one yards per play. I've never heard of a negative,

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 4>especially the steep into a season. It's horrible.

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:28.320
<v Speaker 4>However, I don't think they need to pass mix in

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 4>the ball much in this game. The Cardinals are one

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 4>of the worst run defenses in the league. They're bottom

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 4>ten and basically every category they're along. One hundred and

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 4>forty six conbo yards and two scores per game to

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 4>the position. A grade for Joe Mixon. On the other side,

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 4>We'll start with James Connor, who I always expect to

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 4>see on the injury report, but he's not there. He

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 4>had sixty three percent of the team's rushing attempts. His

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 4>backup Keanta Ingram looks like he'll miss this week, so

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:55.280
<v Speaker 4>that might go up. Plus, Connor has had one hundred

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 4>percent of his team's rushing attempts from inside the five.

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 4>The Bengals have allowed two one hundred yard rusher through

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:03.240
<v Speaker 4>four games, and the Ravens split backfield of Gus Edwards

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:05.479
<v Speaker 4>and Justice. He'll combine for one zero three in a score.

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Very solid B grade for James Connor. Marquise Brown is startable,

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 4>but it's just a C grade. Getting a great market

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 4>share twenty seven percent of the total targets forty one

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 4>percent of the total air yards. Both are huge shares

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:23.359
<v Speaker 4>top ten in the league. Both both categories that keeps

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 4>him afloat in tough matchups like this one. He'll split

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 4>time with chadobe Awoozia and Cam Taylor Britt on the perimeter.

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Both of them have a three inch and twenty pound

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 4>advantage on Brown. I'm not going as far as to

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 4>go with waiver wire Darling Michael Wilson for this one,

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:43.239
<v Speaker 4>so we'll leave him on the bench. I will throw

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 4>a starting grade on zach Ertz. He gets a B grade.

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 4>He's had target totals of ten, to eight and ten

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 4>in games this season, and he faces a SINCI team

0:43:51.120 --> 0:43:53.720
<v Speaker 4>that's allowed the tenth most receiving yards and is tied

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:56.839
<v Speaker 4>for second most in tight end touchdowns allowed so far.

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.360
<v Speaker 4>And then finally, Josh Dobbs has two top ten weekly

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:01.720
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy finishes this season.

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I can play a little, and he runs a bit.

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 4>He hasn't thrown an interception. He's currently fifth in the

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 4>league and quarterback rushing yards, and he puts up some

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 4>decent numbers in the last two weeks against the Cowboys

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 4>and forty nine Ers. By the way, about that this

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 4>defense isn't as good, I'll give Dobbs a seat, and

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 4>it's closer to a B grade than a bench grade.

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think people saw that coming. No tribute

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:22.879
<v Speaker 1>to him for handling it the way he has. When

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:25.439
<v Speaker 1>we come back three tough questions, you can play along

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>try to go three and zero. Can also join a

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>guillotine league. Guillotine leagues dot Com your opportunity to jump

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:32.880
<v Speaker 1>into a new, fresh guillotine league with a draft with

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>all the things you already know about this season. And

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's nice to know all the stuff that's already happened.

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot Com back in moments. Everybody America's favorite

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 1>game is at wheel four No, No, is it Monopoly?

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:08.280
<v Speaker 1>God know what an awful board game Monopoly is terrible,

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>could never be made today? Do you ever laugh at

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the simplicity and stupidity of that board game?

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 4>We're talking about code names, right, code name is great.

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 4>That's a fun game.

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a good game. Now, that's a good game right there. Instead, No,

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about three tough questions. We're gonna play code

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 1>name weekly.

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Tough question number one.

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Appropriate level of concern for Calvin Ridley? Is it none?

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Is it some?

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Or is it a bowel loosening level of existential dread?

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 4>Matt, I mean it's the Jaguars things. We go get

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:44.760
<v Speaker 4>Collin out of it. I think he's still on the lobby.

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 1>He is in the lobby occasion.

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 4>It's worth noting that the last time I was on

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:51.439
<v Speaker 4>this show, we had the same question, but with Christian Kirk.

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 4>And the last three weeks have been very disappointing for

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 4>for Ridley. But the Jags have been just attacking the

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 4>weaknesses of opposing defense. The Chiefs. Chiefs have two good

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 4>perimeter corners and a bad slot corner, so they targeted

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Kirk Texans. Same thing, same thing with the Falcons last week,

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 4>and actually it's the same thing this week as well.

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:14.720
<v Speaker 4>For the Jaguars going against the Bills. But it's probably

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 4>four disappointing weeks in a row now, so there's got

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 4>to be some concern. But I'm not ready to get

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:22.240
<v Speaker 4>the poop going or anything like that. I think we're

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:23.239
<v Speaker 4>okay here, all right.

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Thor appropriate level of concern for Calvin Ridley, none, some,

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>or about a loosening level of existential dread.

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to give the same answer that I did

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 6>when we talked about Christian Kirk.

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to say some for Calvin Ridley.

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 6>The target here has obviously gone down for him since

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, with Christian Kirk, since Week one.

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 5>After that for Calvin Ridley.

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 6>But I do you know, in agreeing with Matt's point,

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 6>I do think it's situational and circumstantial. You are going

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 6>to have a bunch of games where he's going to

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 6>give you value by yeah, you just have to mix

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 6>some match based on the matchup.

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So some is your answer.

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Yes.

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Ridley has seemed declining targets, declining air yards, and declining

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>target share percentage in every game this year. He's now

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>behind presumed irrelevant teammate Zay Jones in air yards for

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the season. You mentioned the trick in your matchup this week, Matt,

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but also let me mention this Week seven at the Saints,

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 1>that's no kakewalk. Week nine is a bye, I hear

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:26.359
<v Speaker 1>they have a great defense. Week ten San Francisco. Those

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are all games that will cause some hesitation before you

0:47:29.760 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>insert Calvin Ridley into your lineup. By the way, the

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 1>first play schedule's got consequences every year. Sure, no, this

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is it for Jacksonville. Four drops in four games for

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley, no bueno. As a reminder, Calvin Ridley had

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a great twenty twenty. Here's his finish in all the

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>other years of his career. Wide receiver thirty seven, Wide

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 1>receiver eighteen, Wide receiver twenty nine, and right now he's

0:47:56.280 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver thirty one in Fantasy points. Maybe this this's

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 1>just who he is. He is roughly the thirty best

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 1>best wide receiver in the league. He's roughly a flex guy.

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Though maybe the outlier here was his twenty twenty season

0:48:10.840 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>when he finished his wide receiver three. That might not

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be who he is, and maybe our expectations got blown

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>way out of the water in Week one. The appropriate

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 1>level of concern for Calvin Ridley is some.

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Tough question. Number two, is it too.

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Early to sabotage drop Darren Waller? We go to Thorneistrom,

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't drop them. It's the state of the tight

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 1>end position and fantasy right now. It's even worse than

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller has been so far. I would just wonder

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 1>who are you going to drop him for? If you're

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:44.799
<v Speaker 1>going to apples for.

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:51.399
<v Speaker 6>Raffles at that position, John Smith, Mostly they're waiver wire

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 6>for tight ends. It's a wasteland. And you know, even

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 6>the Waller's been bad, and obviously that the Giants have

0:48:56.280 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 6>been a joke. Waller is still te twelve in Ppore,

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:02.800
<v Speaker 6>and I would guess, and I would bet that he

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 6>will be better than that going forward the rest of

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 6>the season.

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:05.839
<v Speaker 5>So I wouldn't cut him.

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt, is it too early to sabotage drop

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller?

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 4>It's worth noting that I was pretty much the only

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 4>one on the show in preseason who is not on

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:16.720
<v Speaker 4>board with Darren Waller.

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Ever, all right, fine, I'll give you the peacock games.

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 1>He said he'd be hurt by now, which he's not.

0:49:20.840 --> 0:49:21.919
<v Speaker 1>He's always hurt.

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:23.560
<v Speaker 4>He's not hurt for three years.

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:24.279
<v Speaker 1>He's not hurt.

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh, by the way, Daniel Jones, he's not good. He's

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 4>never been good as a passer. Everything from a fantasy

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 4>fantasy perspective for Jones that's been good for him has

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 4>been on the ground and never had Waller. So I

0:49:35.239 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 4>can't sabotage drop him. I will just drop him. It's

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 4>not a sabotage drop anymore because nobody's gonna pick him up.

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:46.239
<v Speaker 4>He's bad. It's oh, it's over, Johnny, and they'll start

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:48.359
<v Speaker 4>him too. Yeah. I guess then it is a good

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 4>sabotage drop.

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 5>Let's go.

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:51.760
<v Speaker 1>You know what's gonna happen when you drop Waller?

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 4>Right, he's gonna he's gonna have a game with one

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 4>hundred yards and in the end he's gonna pull a

0:49:58.560 --> 0:49:59.919
<v Speaker 4>hamstring and never play again.

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>The Giants are dumb, but even they can figure out

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that Waller means wins. In their one victory this year,

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Week two against Arizona, Waller totaled seventy six yards on

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>six catches and they won that game. In three losses,

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>he's been held to exactly three receptions in those games

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in each of those and no more than thirty six yards.

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean If you use Waller, you win. If you

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 1>don't use them, you lose. It's so simple, so simple,

0:50:27.239 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't think it would be so hard for them.

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 1>We can't sabotage drop Darren Waller yet there's not enough

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:35.319
<v Speaker 1>good tight ends to go along, and let's just hope

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:36.719
<v Speaker 1>to God that they figure it out.

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 4>So, like the Randy ratio back in the day, they

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 4>need the Waller ratio or something.

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:45.919
<v Speaker 3>Yes, moving on to question number three.

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Should I sell high on Kyron Williams, Matt.

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes, The numbers look good so far, but some of

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:55.720
<v Speaker 4>the advanced stats don't like him very much. His yards

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 4>before contact is on the below average end at two

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:01.880
<v Speaker 4>point four yards per attempt. Yards after contact actually a

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:05.400
<v Speaker 4>bit worse at one point four yards per attempt, but

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 4>the worst number through sixty four rushing attempts. He has

0:51:09.320 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 4>one broken tackle. That's not good. He's pretty small at

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:15.720
<v Speaker 4>five nine one ninety four. I'm not sure this rushing

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 4>style and this amount of a workload is conducive to

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 4>him holding up at this rate for an entire season.

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:22.359
<v Speaker 4>So I would definitely sell high right now?

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Thorpe, are you selling high on Kyron Williams?

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say yes with a couple big caveats.

0:51:29.680 --> 0:51:32.800
<v Speaker 6>It totally depends on what that sell high looks like,

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 6>number one, and also what your team's running back situation is. Like,

0:51:37.040 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 6>if Kyrien's your weekly flex and you're weak at wide

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 6>receiver and someone's going to give you a wide receiver

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 6>one for Kyen, you do that. But if he's your

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:47.880
<v Speaker 6>RB one right now, you're not going to get a

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:50.800
<v Speaker 6>better running back for him one for one in a trade,

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 6>so you would have to hold in that scenario.

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with everything Matt said, and I had

0:51:55.080 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>many of Matt's talking points as well. The answer is

0:51:57.160 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 1>yes on talent. Should Kyron william be the third highest

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>scoring fantasy running back? No, Hello, absolutely not. I shouldn't

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the conversation with Christian McCaffrey. No, of course not.

0:52:08.000 --> 0:52:13.440
<v Speaker 1>He's been aided by massive and likely totally unsustainable usage,

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:16.799
<v Speaker 1>especially near the strike. Eight carries inside the ten yard

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>line already then the league best five touchdowns from inside

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line already for Kyron Williams not sustainable. Meanwhile,

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford playing great, He's got three passing touchdowns on

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the season. Those things are going to equalize out and

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the touchdowns are going to dry up for Kyron Williams.

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy managers desperate at the running back position. I think

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you can find somebody if you shop Kyrienn Williams, you

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:44.879
<v Speaker 1>can find somebody that's gonna trade you a wide receiver, one,

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a top four tight end, a different top ten running

0:52:49.520 --> 0:52:52.480
<v Speaker 1>back that you could go invest in. I think we're

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 1>selling out on Kyrien Williams.

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:55.120
<v Speaker 5>You got him for free.

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna turn him into a much better and more

0:52:57.360 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 1>reliable player. Go back to the matchups the Giants aforementioned

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Giants with Darren Waller. In fact, I wait, start on

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller. Let's get right into Darren Wallert's get right

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:13.839
<v Speaker 1>into it. Darren Waller's solid bench grade. Right it might

0:53:13.880 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be Darren Waller taking on Miami with the for the Giants.

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Do they rebound it for a better game here?

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Well, I'm gonna go a C on Darren Waller.

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:22.719
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry to disappoint.

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:25.880
<v Speaker 6>Matt Waller does have a solid twenty four percent air

0:53:26.040 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 6>yard share, but right now only one point two yards

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 6>per route run amid all the Giants offensive struggles, which

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to talk a little bit think about.

0:53:33.280 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 4>That second one point two yards per route run and

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:39.360
<v Speaker 4>he's got twenty. Daniel Jones is throwing the ball just

0:53:39.520 --> 0:53:42.279
<v Speaker 4>like just over the head of the defensive line right now.

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:45.239
<v Speaker 5>He only has the time to do that for a life.

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:47.839
<v Speaker 6>But you know, like I mentioned before, Waller still does

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 6>sit T twelve in PPR leagues and the Dolphins this

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:54.040
<v Speaker 6>week's opponent. Both they're going to stomp the Giants and

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:56.760
<v Speaker 6>incentivise them to pass more, but they're also average against

0:53:56.960 --> 0:53:59.320
<v Speaker 6>opposing tight ends. They rank middle of the pack in

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:02.960
<v Speaker 6>almost every thing, uh number seventeen for instance, in receiving

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:06.360
<v Speaker 6>yards allowed to the tight end position. You have to

0:54:06.480 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 6>keep all the Giants wide receivers on the bench because,

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:10.759
<v Speaker 6>as always, you don't know where the ball is going

0:54:10.880 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 6>on the few completions that they end up getting. Now, Church,

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:16.319
<v Speaker 6>you know, I'm a I'm a new guy to the show,

0:54:16.680 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 6>do you so?

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:20.239
<v Speaker 5>I don't know? Is there something opposite of a peacock sound?

0:54:20.320 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 5>As I begin to talk about Daniel Dimes.

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 4>There's the mongoose rights.

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Exactly if we have a mongoose is the anti peak?

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 6>I think I need it's time for me to give

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:32.240
<v Speaker 6>me a call PA to the audience. I gave Daniel

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 6>Jones and a last week.

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what I was doing.

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 4>There's also the eye was wrong button that no, not

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:41.400
<v Speaker 4>that one. That one. Wait a minute.

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 5>So the bad news is that exactly is that I

0:54:49.320 --> 0:54:51.200
<v Speaker 5>was dead wrong. But the good news is I think

0:54:51.200 --> 0:54:54.399
<v Speaker 5>I've seen the light last time.

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:58.120
<v Speaker 6>Dimes is obviously badly, badly struggling just in a vacuum,

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:01.960
<v Speaker 6>but even more so behind that injury ravage Giants offensive

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 6>line that at five guys on the injury report, three

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:07.319
<v Speaker 6>of whom have already been ruled out. Andrew Thomas, John

0:55:07.360 --> 0:55:10.719
<v Speaker 6>Michael Schmidz, and Shane Mario Lemieux are all going.

0:55:10.640 --> 0:55:11.480
<v Speaker 5>To be out for this game.

0:55:11.560 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 6>So the offensive line of the blocking is getting no

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:16.640
<v Speaker 6>better for the Giants, which is bad news for Saquon

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:19.279
<v Speaker 6>Barkley if he manages to play. Of course, another guy

0:55:19.360 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 6>on the injury report. Barkley has missed the last two

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:24.920
<v Speaker 6>games with a great two high ankle sprain. Limited in

0:55:25.000 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 6>practice once again this week. Brian Dables said on Friday

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 6>that Sakuon will be a game time decision.

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:34.040
<v Speaker 5>If he plays, you give him a volume C.

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 6>He definitely may not, and if he doesn't, obviously Matt

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:38.680
<v Speaker 6>Brida is gonna play again.

0:55:38.760 --> 0:55:39.200
<v Speaker 5>He wouldn't.

0:55:39.320 --> 0:55:42.000
<v Speaker 6>Brita would only be a desperation play in super deep leagues.

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:44.360
<v Speaker 6>The two games where Seikwon's been out and Brita has

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 6>had to take over seven touch it for eighteen yards

0:55:46.680 --> 0:55:48.440
<v Speaker 6>against the forty nine Ers, he did get a touchdown

0:55:48.480 --> 0:55:50.839
<v Speaker 6>that game for just a little bit of value. Last week,

0:55:50.880 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 6>Brita had fourteen cares for thirty against the Seahawks. Not

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 6>the best, no, but we're gonna move to a team

0:55:56.640 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 6>that has a much funner offense here with the Dolphins.

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 6>To is a must start obviously, an a Fantasy QB eight,

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 6>number one in passing grade in the NFL most throwing

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:11.640
<v Speaker 6>touchdowns versus man coverage this season, and the Giants are

0:56:11.680 --> 0:56:15.239
<v Speaker 6>an extremely man coverage intensive team, so I think this

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:19.280
<v Speaker 6>is a really good matchup for Tua. Tyreek Kill another

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:23.280
<v Speaker 6>weekly must start Tyreek. This is a particularly awesome matchup

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:25.920
<v Speaker 6>for him because he is utterly dominant against man coverage,

0:56:25.920 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 6>always has been.

0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:28.240
<v Speaker 5>He's gonna light up the Giants.

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:31.320
<v Speaker 6>Jalen Wattle, I'm gonna give him a B, but that

0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 6>great would be closer to a sea than an A.

0:56:34.719 --> 0:56:37.160
<v Speaker 6>As I mentioned, the Giants run lots of man coverage.

0:56:37.360 --> 0:56:40.800
<v Speaker 6>The Dolphins go to Tyreek Kill in man coverage. Wattle

0:56:40.880 --> 0:56:44.920
<v Speaker 6>only has a thirteen percent target share against man coverage.

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:47.320
<v Speaker 6>The Dolphins tight ends of corus As always stay on

0:56:47.400 --> 0:56:47.799
<v Speaker 6>your bench.

0:56:48.360 --> 0:56:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Devin A. Chane eight chan as he's not. I'm getting there.

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:56.000
<v Speaker 1>He's the one who changed his name. Yeah, we don't

0:56:56.040 --> 0:56:57.480
<v Speaker 1>have to apologize for not getting it right.

0:56:57.560 --> 0:56:59.600
<v Speaker 6>Two weeks later, I'm still I'm still getting there, but

0:56:59.719 --> 0:57:02.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm giving him an A played sixty percent of the

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:05.439
<v Speaker 6>snaps last week, eleven touches for one hundred and twenty

0:57:05.560 --> 0:57:08.920
<v Speaker 6>total yards. He's taken over this backfield. He's going to

0:57:08.960 --> 0:57:12.640
<v Speaker 6>be the starter going forward. Eight eight Chan is number

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:15.799
<v Speaker 6>one in explode in the NFL, not amongst rookies whatever.

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:20.480
<v Speaker 6>In the NFL, explosive run rate mistackles fourth per attempt

0:57:20.840 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 6>and yards after contact per attempt.

0:57:23.360 --> 0:57:26.200
<v Speaker 5>At folks, we got some good news. The Giants run defense.

0:57:25.880 --> 0:57:28.400
<v Speaker 6>Has allowed the fourth highest explosive run rate in the

0:57:28.600 --> 0:57:33.920
<v Speaker 6>in the NFL. He's going nuts, Rocky Moster, so I

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 6>give him. I forget if I said that. Moster, I'm

0:57:36.160 --> 0:57:39.320
<v Speaker 6>gonna give a bee. He's obviously now going to take

0:57:39.360 --> 0:57:41.600
<v Speaker 6>the back seat. A little bit to the rookie. He

0:57:42.440 --> 0:57:45.200
<v Speaker 6>Moster played forty three percent of the snaps last week,

0:57:45.480 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 6>had ten touches forty five total yards, but he does

0:57:49.160 --> 0:57:52.120
<v Speaker 6>rank number five in the NFL in explosive run rates. Still,

0:57:52.480 --> 0:57:55.560
<v Speaker 6>as I mentioned, the Giants run defense regularly gives up dingers,

0:57:55.720 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 6>so there's always that shot that Moster gets one of those.

0:57:58.320 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 6>But he might need to have one of those explosive

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 6>place to return value in this game.

0:58:01.600 --> 0:58:06.000
<v Speaker 1>See I think you could go a A for both guys,

0:58:06.240 --> 0:58:10.280
<v Speaker 1>but you're totally justifiable given what this matchup is all about.

0:58:10.440 --> 0:58:11.960
<v Speaker 5>This run defense will facilitate it.

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that would make sense. When we come back

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee taking on Indianapolis. On this show last week, we

0:58:17.840 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>basically declared Derek Henry dead and then he probably went out,

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:26.919
<v Speaker 1>had a signature touchdown run and passed. Let's see where

0:58:26.960 --> 0:58:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we land on Derek Henry's he takes on Indianapolis when

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:55.960
<v Speaker 1>we returned to Fantasy Football Weekly, Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:58:56.040 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>We continue to power through all of the matchups. In

0:58:59.080 --> 0:59:03.680
<v Speaker 1>week number five, Tennessee takes on Indianapolis start with Derrick Henry,

0:59:03.800 --> 0:59:06.480
<v Speaker 1>apparently not dead yet, reeled off one of his epic

0:59:06.600 --> 0:59:10.280
<v Speaker 1>signature runs last week. He averaged one hundred and forty

0:59:10.360 --> 0:59:12.880
<v Speaker 1>three total yards against the Colts per game against the

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Colts last year, which are great numbers. Of course, he

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:18.600
<v Speaker 1>faces eight or more defenders in the box on forty

0:59:18.720 --> 0:59:21.520
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of his rush attempts. That's the second highest.

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Colts are middle of the pack in most rushing defensive metrics,

0:59:25.520 --> 0:59:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but are allowing one score per game, and that's where

0:59:28.520 --> 0:59:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Henry's likely to pay dividends here. Colts are much better

0:59:32.120 --> 0:59:34.400
<v Speaker 1>against the run than against the pass. It should be

0:59:34.440 --> 0:59:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the rare Titans game where I think Henry doesn't need

0:59:36.440 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to carry the load. I already told earlier Ryan Tannils

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:40.760
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance at me quarterback. I like the

0:59:40.840 --> 0:59:44.200
<v Speaker 1>passing game here. Derek Henry logs in with a B grade,

0:59:44.680 --> 0:59:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill with a B grade, even though be without

0:59:47.920 --> 0:59:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Traylan Burks in all probability, he'd missed the whole week

0:59:51.720 --> 0:59:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of practice, not expected to play in this one. But

0:59:54.560 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>how about DeAndre Hopkins languishing to this point of the season.

0:59:59.000 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the one where it finally happens. Oh,

1:00:01.520 --> 1:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I told you earlier. Starting cornerback Dallas Flowers is out

1:00:04.280 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for the year. Their cornerback situation is bad. I told

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you earlier Darryl Baker had been benched. He probably gets

1:00:11.200 --> 1:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>back on the field, and if they don't use him,

1:00:13.600 --> 1:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they have to put seventh round rookie Jalen Jones in

1:00:16.520 --> 1:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>his first ever meaningful action onto the field. In either situation,

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a very plus opportunity for DeAndre Hopkins. The Colts

1:00:24.760 --> 1:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have allowed the seventh most receptions and yards per game

1:00:28.400 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers. DeAndre Hopkins logs in with a B

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>grade and I think his first really big box scorer

1:00:33.880 --> 1:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>as a Titan Nick Westbrook a kine showing up into

1:00:38.080 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>this matchup because it's so easy. He scored touchdowns in

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>two of his last three games with Traylon Burks out.

1:00:43.920 --> 1:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Last week, he saw an uptick to six targets, had

1:00:46.600 --> 1:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>five receptions, and Traylon Burk's gonna miss them as well.

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>He also played more outside, where he'll also get that

1:00:52.880 --> 1:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Baker Jalen Jones situation I just described with Hopkins,

1:00:56.120 --> 1:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and he could cash in on that too. Let's throw

1:00:58.920 --> 1:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in chick a konkquo. You gotta be smart about where

1:01:01.120 --> 1:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you start him.

1:01:01.720 --> 1:01:02.840
<v Speaker 4>But this is one of those spots.

1:01:03.160 --> 1:01:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Colts allowing the fifth most tight end receptions, the six

1:01:06.040 --> 1:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>most tight end yards, four different tight ends of top

1:01:09.080 --> 1:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty four yards against the Colts. A Conku was scored

1:01:13.240 --> 1:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in one of the Indie matchups last year. He got

1:01:15.520 --> 1:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a goose egg in the other, So maybe he's a

1:01:18.120 --> 1:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's an all or nothing play here. I like

1:01:20.080 --> 1:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>your opportunities see grade with chig aconk Wu. And it

1:01:23.880 --> 1:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>pains me because I love Tajay Spears, but I think

1:01:28.200 --> 1:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a trickier matchup. Colts are much better against

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the run than the pass. Spears is in an almost

1:01:33.640 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>dead even split in snaps with Derrick Henry, but he

1:01:37.280 --> 1:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't get the ball in his hands enough to

1:01:38.840 --> 1:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>be a reliable starter in trickier matchups. He's getting more

1:01:42.720 --> 1:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>receiving work though, nine targets the past two games. I

1:01:45.440 --> 1:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like that, but still like four catches a game. It's

1:01:47.960 --> 1:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>tough to put it together a meaningful box score that way.

1:01:50.680 --> 1:01:53.360
<v Speaker 4>You're losing your curveball charge. Then you did a nine

1:01:53.440 --> 1:01:55.840
<v Speaker 4>times right there, and it was it was just sitting there.

1:01:55.920 --> 1:01:56.520
<v Speaker 4>It's team.

1:01:56.560 --> 1:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a posthumous nine times right there. I'm really disappointed

1:02:00.560 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in myself. Let's go to the Indianapolis side. Anthony Richardson

1:02:04.920 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>clocking in with an A grade. Yeah, I wish Fish

1:02:08.240 --> 1:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>was here for this. He's been Fantasy Gold and two

1:02:10.680 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half games played so far, he's averaging one

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half rushing touchdowns per game. The Titans have

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>allowed at least two hundred and ninety passing yards and

1:02:18.840 --> 1:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>are multiple passing touchdowns in three or four games, and

1:02:21.480 --> 1:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>they are one of six teams allowing a completion percentage

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>north of seventy percent. I think I think Thoris had

1:02:27.720 --> 1:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>these matchups in both games that you've had against the Titans.

1:02:31.520 --> 1:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>They're great basically, like short of it is, They're a

1:02:33.440 --> 1:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>pass funneling team that's great against the run, and they'll

1:02:36.240 --> 1:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>just they'll get they'll they'll take their chances in the past, correct,

1:02:39.400 --> 1:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and Anthony Richardson should be good enough to run against

1:02:41.920 --> 1:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>them anyway and get a little something done through the air.

1:02:44.600 --> 1:02:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Here. Just think about when Anthony Richardson actually gets good

1:02:47.480 --> 1:02:50.600
<v Speaker 4>too home, then what right he's gonna break the sport he.

1:02:50.680 --> 1:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Might he's breaking Fantasy scoring systems right now. Michael Pittman

1:02:54.040 --> 1:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>locks his logs in with a B grade. He runs

1:02:56.680 --> 1:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>from all over the field and has mostly plus individual

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>matchups wherever he runs from a run against cornerback Sean

1:03:03.560 --> 1:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Murphy bunting often he's just okay, averaging allowing a forty

1:03:07.080 --> 1:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, seventy seven percent completion rate. But he's a

1:03:10.440 --> 1:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>great tackler, and he's also a physical cornerback, so he

1:03:13.360 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>can match Pittman's size and toughness. So I don't say

1:03:16.800 --> 1:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>big plays coming for Pittman, but I see enough receptions

1:03:19.360 --> 1:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to keep him comfortably startable. He's also, by the way, Pittman,

1:03:23.280 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't think the Colts is a high volume offense.

1:03:25.200 --> 1:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>He's the fourth most targeted player in the NFL. Michael

1:03:28.640 --> 1:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Pittman in the red zone. Excuse me, a little asteris

1:03:31.840 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on that? How about this angle? Alec Pierce? What are

1:03:36.640 --> 1:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we talking about? Alec Pierce?

1:03:39.040 --> 1:03:39.520
<v Speaker 3>How about this?

1:03:39.960 --> 1:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>He's on the field for ninety five percent of the

1:03:42.800 --> 1:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>snaps for the Colts, ninety five. He runs the majority

1:03:45.960 --> 1:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of his routes on the side of the field of

1:03:48.040 --> 1:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>struggling cornerback Christian Fulton, who's allowing a seventy eight percent

1:03:51.840 --> 1:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>completion rate and a lot of big plays, including two

1:03:54.680 --> 1:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>forty yard completions in his coverage. Already, Fulton ranks as

1:03:59.040 --> 1:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>cornerback one hundred and fifty one by Pro Football Focus,

1:04:04.480 --> 1:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and Pierce says the fifth longest a dot in the

1:04:07.240 --> 1:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>league at seventeen yards per pass. I think they connect

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>this week. Here's your official dart throw of it. Alec

1:04:14.640 --> 1:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Pierce should have made him might take a chance on

1:04:17.240 --> 1:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>me wide receiver problem.

1:04:18.240 --> 1:04:20.080
<v Speaker 5>He's gonna have at least one long TOUCHDOW in this game.

1:04:20.160 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 5>I feel like I like that angle.

1:04:21.600 --> 1:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're right. How about some underneath stuff for

1:04:24.400 --> 1:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Josh downs while.

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:25.520
<v Speaker 5>We're at it.

1:04:25.600 --> 1:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, see grade on Alick Pierce. See grade

1:04:28.000 --> 1:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>on Josh Downs getting a lot of snaps. He's on

1:04:29.960 --> 1:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the field seventy five percent of the plays. By the way,

1:04:32.760 --> 1:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>it goes to their top three guys on the field

1:04:34.480 --> 1:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Nobody else sees the field as a

1:04:37.480 --> 1:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. On the Colts, he's going to face off

1:04:40.200 --> 1:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>against cornerback Roger McCreary in the slot. McCreary's there's nothing

1:04:43.440 --> 1:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>special giving up seventy two percent completion rate. Slot receivers Keenan, Allen,

1:04:48.200 --> 1:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Rashid Shaheed, Elijah Moore have all posted very good games

1:04:51.280 --> 1:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>against the Titans so far this year. See grade for

1:04:53.920 --> 1:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh downs. And now the tricky part, what do you

1:04:57.360 --> 1:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>do with Jonathan Taylor now? Well, head coach Shane Steiken

1:05:01.840 --> 1:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>would asked if Taylor was going to see the field, said,

1:05:03.840 --> 1:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, but he's a stone cold liar, because well

1:05:07.120 --> 1:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>know they're putting their best player on the field. That's

1:05:09.880 --> 1:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor. He's healthy. That ankle, to me, is not

1:05:13.520 --> 1:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a worry. This is an ankle injury he ran on

1:05:16.360 --> 1:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>last year. I think the ankle is not even an

1:05:19.360 --> 1:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>issue here. I suspect Jonathan Taylor's going to touch the

1:05:22.080 --> 1:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>ball twelve to fifteen times.

1:05:25.560 --> 1:05:26.960
<v Speaker 5>So even against a good.

1:05:26.920 --> 1:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Run defense, which the Titans are they ranked fifth best,

1:05:29.920 --> 1:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and run stuff win rate they ranked sixth, and tackling

1:05:32.560 --> 1:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>by Pro Football Focus, it's still Jonathan Taylor. I believe

1:05:36.320 --> 1:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>he sees the majority of the work here. And I'm

1:05:38.560 --> 1:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>putting a C grade on him in his first game back,

1:05:40.920 --> 1:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm starting him in some of my guillotine leagues.

1:05:42.720 --> 1:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting my neck on the line. Yere Bro lead

1:05:44.840 --> 1:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>backs are averaging a paltry forty two yards per game

1:05:47.280 --> 1:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Titans again, It's a tough spot, but I

1:05:49.720 --> 1:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>believe Jonathan Taylor's back and healthy, and I can't. I'm

1:05:52.800 --> 1:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>not benching him. You can decide if you've got the

1:05:55.440 --> 1:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>stones for that or ovaries for that for that matter,

1:05:59.080 --> 1:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Zach Boss drop him yet, you know, let's just see

1:06:01.840 --> 1:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>how this thing plays out. But I think he moves

1:06:04.160 --> 1:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to a committee Sipe type role as a number two back.

1:06:09.080 --> 1:06:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Now.

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>It feels like an eight touch game coming and we're

1:06:11.080 --> 1:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to start him against a good defense in that.

1:06:13.600 --> 1:06:14.960
<v Speaker 5>Spot, all right.

1:06:15.560 --> 1:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Next up the Jets taking on Denver Man. We have

1:06:19.440 --> 1:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>already accounted for almost every part of the Jets and

1:06:23.160 --> 1:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me.

1:06:24.280 --> 1:06:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:06:25.200 --> 1:06:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Back all the ones that you wouldn't normally start, that's right,

1:06:28.240 --> 1:06:31.040
<v Speaker 4>you're starting them, and all the ones that you normally start,

1:06:31.160 --> 1:06:32.120
<v Speaker 4>you're also starting now.

1:06:32.200 --> 1:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think it just leaves Breece Hall and Garrett Wilson, right.

1:06:35.080 --> 1:06:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Breece Hall gets a B grade for much of

1:06:37.080 --> 1:06:39.560
<v Speaker 4>the same reasons I liked Dalvin Cook. It would be

1:06:39.600 --> 1:06:41.760
<v Speaker 4>an A grade if I could trust the workload actually

1:06:41.840 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 4>increasing for Breese, but still could be a split. Garrett

1:06:45.520 --> 1:06:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Wilson easy a grade in this The Broncos have allowed

1:06:47.960 --> 1:06:50.640
<v Speaker 4>five different wide receivers the top sixty yards of this season.

1:06:51.240 --> 1:06:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Four of those have scored a touchdown, including eight for

1:06:53.680 --> 1:06:56.439
<v Speaker 4>one point thirty one and one to DJ Moore last week.

1:06:56.920 --> 1:06:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Wilson has seen eight, nine and fourteen targets and Zach

1:06:59.760 --> 1:07:03.240
<v Speaker 4>will since three starts and Church mentioned Denver corner Damari

1:07:03.360 --> 1:07:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Mathis who's horrible. Wilson will score this week, so he's

1:07:06.440 --> 1:07:10.480
<v Speaker 4>getting an A grade. On the Denver side. Javonte Williams

1:07:10.600 --> 1:07:12.760
<v Speaker 4>is trending in the right direction, as he went from

1:07:12.800 --> 1:07:15.040
<v Speaker 4>a no show in practice on Wednesday to limit it

1:07:15.080 --> 1:07:18.280
<v Speaker 4>in Thursday. Problem is he's splitting work with samaj p

1:07:18.480 --> 1:07:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Ryan and Waiver Wire Darling Jaliel McLoughlin. McLoughlin has both

1:07:24.240 --> 1:07:27.360
<v Speaker 4>Denver running back touchdowns this year. Even if william goes,

1:07:27.440 --> 1:07:30.000
<v Speaker 4>I think this might be McLoughlin's game here. He was

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Brian's premature speculation in Week two. By the way, that

1:07:33.240 --> 1:07:36.920
<v Speaker 4>was a great call by Brian. Last week, McLoughlin had

1:07:36.960 --> 1:07:38.840
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and four total yards in a score on

1:07:38.920 --> 1:07:42.160
<v Speaker 4>ten touches. The Jets have allowed the fifth most combo

1:07:42.280 --> 1:07:44.720
<v Speaker 4>yards to opposing backs this year at one hundred and

1:07:44.840 --> 1:07:48.320
<v Speaker 4>fifty two per game. So if Williams does go, I

1:07:48.400 --> 1:07:50.640
<v Speaker 4>guess they both get a C grade, But if Javante

1:07:50.800 --> 1:07:53.439
<v Speaker 4>is ruled out, McLoughlin moves up to a B grade.

1:07:53.480 --> 1:07:55.640
<v Speaker 6>In my mind, I look back at my draft rankings.

1:07:55.720 --> 1:07:59.439
<v Speaker 6>I had him compared to Philip Lindsay interestingly.

1:07:58.880 --> 1:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>And interesting I can see that comparison okay.

1:08:02.520 --> 1:08:06.280
<v Speaker 4>From a fantasy perspective, Russell Wilson hasn't been horrible multiple

1:08:06.360 --> 1:08:08.560
<v Speaker 4>touchdowns in three or four games, is thrown for over

1:08:08.640 --> 1:08:11.440
<v Speaker 4>three hundred yards and two of the last three. Problem is,

1:08:11.520 --> 1:08:13.880
<v Speaker 4>the Jets defense has been really good against the pass.

1:08:14.280 --> 1:08:16.599
<v Speaker 4>Dak Prescott's two hundred and fifty five yards and two

1:08:16.680 --> 1:08:19.200
<v Speaker 4>scores is the high water mark against the Jets in

1:08:19.280 --> 1:08:22.559
<v Speaker 4>both categories, and they just held Patrick Mahomes to two

1:08:22.640 --> 1:08:25.920
<v Speaker 4>oh three and one touchdown last week. It's barely a

1:08:26.000 --> 1:08:28.720
<v Speaker 4>C grade for Russell Wilson, and it's only because the

1:08:28.800 --> 1:08:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Broncos have been trailing big in so many games that

1:08:31.320 --> 1:08:33.840
<v Speaker 4>it seems like the game script will dictate that he

1:08:33.960 --> 1:08:38.160
<v Speaker 4>has to throw. As for the receiverers sauce, Gardners stays

1:08:38.240 --> 1:08:40.840
<v Speaker 4>on the left side and that's the no toss sauce zone.

1:08:42.080 --> 1:08:45.439
<v Speaker 4>He'll see Courtland Sutton most often. So Sutton is on

1:08:45.560 --> 1:08:48.840
<v Speaker 4>the bench, Jerry Judy travels from the slot most often.

1:08:49.200 --> 1:08:52.280
<v Speaker 4>That's the best matchup against the other Michael Carter, but

1:08:52.400 --> 1:08:54.360
<v Speaker 4>he's been pretty good this year too. On one hundred

1:08:54.360 --> 1:08:57.240
<v Speaker 4>and twelve slot snaps, Carter has only allowed five receptions

1:08:57.280 --> 1:08:59.679
<v Speaker 4>on the air. So I've got all the Broncos wide

1:08:59.680 --> 1:09:02.479
<v Speaker 4>receiver on the bench, and I don't think that you're

1:09:02.520 --> 1:09:06.080
<v Speaker 4>starting Adam Troutman. But the Jets have allowed the most

1:09:06.200 --> 1:09:08.479
<v Speaker 4>touchdowns to the tight end position this year with four.

1:09:08.640 --> 1:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>What happened to Adam Troutman? You know, it seemed like

1:09:11.960 --> 1:09:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that Week one he was involved in the passing game,

1:09:15.280 --> 1:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and then but Dulsich was healthy. Then then Dulsich gets

1:09:17.920 --> 1:09:20.719
<v Speaker 1>knocked out, and then they like, no passes to Troutman

1:09:20.880 --> 1:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>since then.

1:09:21.520 --> 1:09:23.160
<v Speaker 5>So weird, It's so weird.

1:09:23.960 --> 1:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's been another in a series of tight end

1:09:26.960 --> 1:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>disappointments for this season. Definitely last one for this segment,

1:09:31.320 --> 1:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Dallas taking on San Francisco in a titanic battle of

1:09:34.920 --> 1:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>great defenses. Let's start on the Dallas side, by a

1:09:39.240 --> 1:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>wide margin. This is the best defense they've faced all year.

1:09:42.560 --> 1:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you like on the Dallas side?

1:09:44.520 --> 1:09:45.360
<v Speaker 5>Not Dak Prescott.

1:09:45.800 --> 1:09:49.080
<v Speaker 6>Now you're keeping Dak on the bench only QB twenty

1:09:49.160 --> 1:09:52.280
<v Speaker 6>four in fantasy points per game. How about that second

1:09:52.439 --> 1:09:55.680
<v Speaker 6>worst with a five point nine to a dot. The

1:09:55.760 --> 1:09:58.320
<v Speaker 6>forty nine Ers course have the great pass rush and

1:09:58.360 --> 1:10:00.840
<v Speaker 6>they've been tough on opposing quarterback this season, both in

1:10:00.920 --> 1:10:02.760
<v Speaker 6>fantasy and on the field. So you have to keep

1:10:02.840 --> 1:10:05.720
<v Speaker 6>Dak on your bench. Ceedee Lamb. I'll give him a

1:10:05.840 --> 1:10:10.040
<v Speaker 6>b CD's wide receiver sixteen in fantasy. He's close to

1:10:10.120 --> 1:10:13.280
<v Speaker 6>that number seventeen in yards per rout run this game

1:10:13.320 --> 1:10:16.280
<v Speaker 6>against obviously a good forty nine Ers defense. He's Ceedee

1:10:16.320 --> 1:10:18.679
<v Speaker 6>Lamb's gonna be locking horns with forty nine Ers. Cornerback

1:10:18.760 --> 1:10:22.240
<v Speaker 6>Isjiah Oliver, who's only allowed a sixty two point nine

1:10:22.320 --> 1:10:25.719
<v Speaker 6>passer rating against this year. You have to keep Brandon

1:10:25.760 --> 1:10:29.000
<v Speaker 6>Cooks and Michael Gallup on your bench. Dak isn't throwing

1:10:29.160 --> 1:10:31.920
<v Speaker 6>enough to support a second wide receiver in fantasy.

1:10:32.000 --> 1:10:33.000
<v Speaker 5>It just is what it is.

1:10:33.960 --> 1:10:36.600
<v Speaker 6>Jake ferguson the tight end, We're gonna give him a

1:10:36.720 --> 1:10:40.400
<v Speaker 6>c Okay tight end eight so far in fantasy doing great, Yeah,

1:10:40.640 --> 1:10:44.040
<v Speaker 6>head number one in the league amongst tight ends in

1:10:44.160 --> 1:10:48.799
<v Speaker 6>red zone targets. Oh, Jake Ferguson surprising stat But Jake Ferguson,

1:10:48.880 --> 1:10:51.960
<v Speaker 6>he's sort of like the Cadarius Tony of tight ends.

1:10:52.360 --> 1:10:55.400
<v Speaker 6>The targets wildly vacillate for him. Came in and game

1:10:55.479 --> 1:10:58.360
<v Speaker 6>out because of the playing time, right, I mean, he's

1:10:58.439 --> 1:11:00.160
<v Speaker 6>he's gotten target when he's on the field, But like

1:11:00.439 --> 1:11:04.000
<v Speaker 6>the snapshare is just pretty low. Super volatile fantasy player

1:11:04.040 --> 1:11:06.720
<v Speaker 6>who's dependent on those red zone targets. I'm gonna give

1:11:06.760 --> 1:11:08.760
<v Speaker 6>them a seed just on the upside, but it can

1:11:08.840 --> 1:11:11.320
<v Speaker 6>go either way with Ferguson, that deserves to be said.

1:11:11.560 --> 1:11:14.320
<v Speaker 6>The other thing about this the matchup for Ferguson, forty

1:11:14.400 --> 1:11:16.920
<v Speaker 6>nine Er is very good against opposing tight ends. They

1:11:16.960 --> 1:11:19.680
<v Speaker 6>allow the sixth fewest receiving yards in the NFL to

1:11:19.880 --> 1:11:23.320
<v Speaker 6>that position. Tony Pollard, we're gonna give him a great

1:11:23.520 --> 1:11:27.759
<v Speaker 6>b in this game, running back four in expected fantasy

1:11:27.800 --> 1:11:30.320
<v Speaker 6>points per game, six spots higher than he's running back

1:11:30.320 --> 1:11:33.960
<v Speaker 6>ten right now in the overall scoring. The Cowboys offensive

1:11:34.000 --> 1:11:36.960
<v Speaker 6>line hasn't been fully healthy all season long, but it

1:11:37.160 --> 1:11:40.519
<v Speaker 6>may be this week. But of course, on the other

1:11:40.640 --> 1:11:42.640
<v Speaker 6>side of it, the forty nine Ers run defense is

1:11:42.960 --> 1:11:46.760
<v Speaker 6>super legit. They allow the second lowest explosive run rate,

1:11:47.120 --> 1:11:49.320
<v Speaker 6>So they're gonna bottle up Pollard a little bit. Can

1:11:49.360 --> 1:11:50.800
<v Speaker 6>we get the efficiency, Can we get some of the

1:11:50.880 --> 1:11:51.880
<v Speaker 6>receiving stuff, We'll see if.

1:11:51.920 --> 1:11:53.280
<v Speaker 5>Can we get a touchdown? We'll see about that.

1:11:53.560 --> 1:11:56.080
<v Speaker 6>Given Tony Pollard a be moving on to the forty

1:11:56.160 --> 1:11:59.400
<v Speaker 6>nine Ers side, Christian McCaffrey a RB one and Fantasy

1:11:59.520 --> 1:12:03.000
<v Speaker 6>RB one and our Hearts Weekly must start Brandon Ayuk

1:12:03.240 --> 1:12:06.400
<v Speaker 6>given him a Grade A wide Receiver nine in Fantasy

1:12:06.640 --> 1:12:10.479
<v Speaker 6>so far. This is a smash matchup for Ayuk. We

1:12:10.600 --> 1:12:12.479
<v Speaker 6>talked about this a couple of times already this year.

1:12:12.560 --> 1:12:15.880
<v Speaker 6>Ayuk is the forty nine Ers man coverage beater three

1:12:16.040 --> 1:12:19.200
<v Speaker 6>point eight yards per route run against man. This year,

1:12:19.680 --> 1:12:23.519
<v Speaker 6>the Cowboys are super duper man heavy in their coverage. Yeah,

1:12:23.600 --> 1:12:27.519
<v Speaker 6>Ayuk's gonna smoke them. Deebo, Samuel, he's gonna get a

1:12:27.600 --> 1:12:31.879
<v Speaker 6>CE from me. Zero targets for Deebo last week, despite

1:12:31.960 --> 1:12:34.280
<v Speaker 6>running eighty one percent of the roads.

1:12:34.320 --> 1:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I didn't realize he was that active. It was

1:12:36.120 --> 1:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>all decoy with those Yeah, all.

1:12:39.160 --> 1:12:41.640
<v Speaker 6>A decoy roll banged up a course with he had

1:12:41.680 --> 1:12:44.439
<v Speaker 6>a tweak knee played through. He had the rib injury before.

1:12:45.040 --> 1:12:47.519
<v Speaker 6>We'll see if this is indicative of anything or not.

1:12:47.800 --> 1:12:52.360
<v Speaker 6>But Deebo was taken off the injury report officially on Friday. Yeah,

1:12:52.520 --> 1:12:54.559
<v Speaker 6>So where are we gonna get another decoy week? Does

1:12:54.600 --> 1:12:56.800
<v Speaker 6>you get to play more you know, or get more

1:12:56.880 --> 1:12:59.360
<v Speaker 6>targets that I'm not sure of, But I will say

1:12:59.400 --> 1:13:02.200
<v Speaker 6>in terms of the it's an IU game because of

1:13:02.240 --> 1:13:04.760
<v Speaker 6>the coverage tendencies of the opponent as opposed to Debo.

1:13:04.920 --> 1:13:07.160
<v Speaker 6>Just outside of the stuff that I just said, forty

1:13:07.240 --> 1:13:09.599
<v Speaker 6>nine ers don't throw d ball. The ball nearly as

1:13:09.680 --> 1:13:12.000
<v Speaker 6>much against man coverage. Deebo is the guy who kills

1:13:12.040 --> 1:13:15.120
<v Speaker 6>zone coverage. I'm only giving Deebo a seat in this game.

1:13:15.560 --> 1:13:18.040
<v Speaker 6>Breck Perdy, I love him this week he is might

1:13:18.080 --> 1:13:20.080
<v Speaker 6>take a chance on me quarterback. I think he's gonna

1:13:20.080 --> 1:13:23.280
<v Speaker 6>have a really big game. George Kittle Gonna give him

1:13:23.280 --> 1:13:25.960
<v Speaker 6>a grade of B. Kittle had the seven catches for

1:13:26.080 --> 1:13:29.839
<v Speaker 6>ninety yards in Week three, but thirty or less receiving

1:13:29.960 --> 1:13:32.800
<v Speaker 6>yards in the other games so far, has a twenty

1:13:32.880 --> 1:13:35.960
<v Speaker 6>three percent first re target scheer though versus man like

1:13:36.080 --> 1:13:38.479
<v Speaker 6>the Cowboys are, so I think the targets could tick

1:13:38.560 --> 1:13:41.960
<v Speaker 6>up here for George Kittle. Especially if deebo Is isn't

1:13:41.960 --> 1:13:44.360
<v Speaker 6>one hundred percent despite me taking off the injury or right,

1:13:44.760 --> 1:13:44.920
<v Speaker 6>you know.

1:13:45.000 --> 1:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>We may find out this Dallas defense, which looks dominating,

1:13:49.280 --> 1:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it's got a little bit of fraud to them. Right,

1:13:51.160 --> 1:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>They faced Daniel Jones, Zach Wilson, Josh Dobbs and Mac

1:13:54.960 --> 1:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Jones Bailey's appy combo planner. Yeah, you know, granted they

1:13:58.439 --> 1:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>forced though some of those starters. Know bench some of

1:14:00.840 --> 1:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>those starters in doing it, but you know this is

1:14:03.280 --> 1:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>their first test against a real offense.

1:14:04.960 --> 1:14:06.559
<v Speaker 5>It's a different thing here, for sure.

1:14:06.680 --> 1:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, absolutely, when we come back, premature speculation, guys, you

1:14:11.479 --> 1:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>can pick up now that other people will be trying

1:14:13.640 --> 1:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to pick up after this weekend's games. Find out who

1:14:17.080 --> 1:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they are when.

1:14:18.000 --> 1:14:18.639
<v Speaker 5>We come back.

1:14:18.920 --> 1:14:41.839
<v Speaker 1>It's Fantasy Football Weekly final segment. Fantasy Football Weekly strongly

1:14:42.000 --> 1:14:44.759
<v Speaker 1>encourage you to try a brand new shiny Guillotine league.

1:14:44.760 --> 1:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>You can always draft a new team fourteenth weeks left

1:14:47.760 --> 1:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to play a lot of time left. Of course, you

1:14:49.439 --> 1:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>know the format works. Instead of playing head to head

1:14:52.360 --> 1:14:55.639
<v Speaker 1>every week, the low scoring team gets chopped from the league,

1:14:55.680 --> 1:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>their players go to the waiver wire, and the rest

1:14:57.320 --> 1:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of us build superstar lineups. That just get over the

1:15:00.439 --> 1:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>course of the season. You don't have to be first,

1:15:02.840 --> 1:15:05.479
<v Speaker 1>You just don't be last in any given week. Avoid

1:15:05.520 --> 1:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the chopping block. Last man standing wins the whole thing.

1:15:08.240 --> 1:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot Com, it's time for premature speculation. We

1:15:14.479 --> 1:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>give you three players others will be trying to pick

1:15:17.479 --> 1:15:20.599
<v Speaker 1>up later. You'll be glad you already have. We begin

1:15:20.720 --> 1:15:21.479
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Harrison.

1:15:21.840 --> 1:15:23.839
<v Speaker 4>I think you'll be glad if you pick up Rashie

1:15:23.960 --> 1:15:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Rice before this week's game against the Vikings. Rice. By

1:15:27.080 --> 1:15:31.759
<v Speaker 4>the way, thorneistrom original forty six percent rostered on sleeper

1:15:32.640 --> 1:15:35.360
<v Speaker 4>has seen twelve targets over the last two weeks as

1:15:35.400 --> 1:15:38.200
<v Speaker 4>his role has expanded from week two to week three

1:15:38.280 --> 1:15:40.120
<v Speaker 4>to week four. And there's a lot of guys on

1:15:40.160 --> 1:15:42.920
<v Speaker 4>this roster from a wide receiver perspective, but Rice is

1:15:42.960 --> 1:15:45.760
<v Speaker 4>the only one who's seen some consistent growth over the

1:15:45.800 --> 1:15:47.560
<v Speaker 4>past three weeks. And if you're going to speculate on

1:15:47.600 --> 1:15:50.320
<v Speaker 4>a cheaps wide receiver being viable at all this year,

1:15:50.560 --> 1:15:51.280
<v Speaker 4>he's my choice.

1:15:51.400 --> 1:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, why pick other receivers we know aren't reliable? Yeah,

1:15:55.320 --> 1:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know MVS right, you never you know,

1:15:58.200 --> 1:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>good luck guessing that one. Game a month when you

1:16:00.400 --> 1:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>wish you'd started him.

1:16:01.400 --> 1:16:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Oopsy drops the Kadarius Tony.

1:16:03.320 --> 1:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, yeah, No more like Oopsy there goes my

1:16:06.160 --> 1:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Hammi Kadarius Tony. Yeah all right. Thor your your premature

1:16:10.120 --> 1:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>speculation player.

1:16:11.720 --> 1:16:15.640
<v Speaker 6>This is my for my superflexers out there, and I

1:16:15.800 --> 1:16:18.479
<v Speaker 6>sort of, you know, hinted at this one earlier when

1:16:18.479 --> 1:16:21.000
<v Speaker 6>we were talking about Desmond Ritter and my expectation that

1:16:21.080 --> 1:16:23.920
<v Speaker 6>he's going to get the hook. Taylor Heineke is my

1:16:24.040 --> 1:16:28.120
<v Speaker 6>prespeculation this week. If Desmond Rider plays poorly, I believe

1:16:28.160 --> 1:16:31.240
<v Speaker 6>he is going to get benched. Heinike thirty four hundred

1:16:31.240 --> 1:16:33.679
<v Speaker 6>and nineteen passing yards and twenty one touchdowns of fifteen

1:16:33.760 --> 1:16:36.840
<v Speaker 6>starts back in twenty twenty one for the Commanders. In

1:16:36.960 --> 1:16:40.240
<v Speaker 6>super flex leagues, Heineke could be startable as a quarterback

1:16:40.280 --> 1:16:43.240
<v Speaker 6>two in his good matchups. And here is where I'm

1:16:43.280 --> 1:16:45.200
<v Speaker 6>going with that. The Falcons have a bunch of them

1:16:45.240 --> 1:16:48.479
<v Speaker 6>coming up super favorable schedule over the next five games.

1:16:48.640 --> 1:16:51.599
<v Speaker 6>The Falcons have a plus matchups against the Titans, Vikings,

1:16:51.640 --> 1:16:55.000
<v Speaker 6>and Cardinals in that stretch. Again, if Ritter struggles this week,

1:16:55.080 --> 1:16:56.240
<v Speaker 6>it's Taylor Heineke time.

1:16:56.520 --> 1:16:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna riff off of that and go with another

1:17:00.680 --> 1:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>veteran quarterback that could get moved from his team to

1:17:04.280 --> 1:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback needy team, and that's Andy Dalton. You know,

1:17:08.040 --> 1:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>if something happens, let's look at here. I'll give you

1:17:11.000 --> 1:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>four teams that are possible destinations. Well three and a half.

1:17:13.920 --> 1:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think your I think your Falcons just go

1:17:15.680 --> 1:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to Heineke. I don't think they would actually acquire Andy Dalton.

1:17:18.479 --> 1:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>How about the Patriots in desperate trouble at quarterback. How

1:17:22.400 --> 1:17:25.599
<v Speaker 1>about the Jets trying to keep their seats alive, right yep?

1:17:25.760 --> 1:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>How about the Steelers where they might want to decide

1:17:29.360 --> 1:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to just sit Kenny Pickett for a while.

1:17:30.960 --> 1:17:33.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're getting close to yeah, or just anything.

1:17:33.400 --> 1:17:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Happens to any of the other starting quarterbacks in the league,

1:17:35.640 --> 1:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody gets hurt on a on a contending team, Andy

1:17:39.240 --> 1:17:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Dalton makes the most sense. Carolina is fully invested in

1:17:42.600 --> 1:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>getting Bryce Young all the reps that he can get.

1:17:45.439 --> 1:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Dalton could walk into basically any locker room and be

1:17:49.200 --> 1:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>an effective starter one week later. Effective not great. So again,

1:17:53.360 --> 1:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>two quarterback leagues, super flex leagues. If you're looking for

1:17:56.960 --> 1:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a stash guy, just to see how this thing plays out.

1:17:59.160 --> 1:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton is acquirable for probably like a fourth round pick,

1:18:03.040 --> 1:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so you could afford to get him. He doesn't cost

1:18:05.200 --> 1:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you a lot on the salary cap, and he could

1:18:07.160 --> 1:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>find himself in a landing spot that's better.

1:18:09.160 --> 1:18:11.639
<v Speaker 4>Sory. Are you saying he's a mustache? Oh?

1:18:12.479 --> 1:18:13.760
<v Speaker 3>I like it? I like it?

1:18:13.920 --> 1:18:14.360
<v Speaker 5>Well done?

1:18:15.040 --> 1:18:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Or not?

1:18:15.640 --> 1:18:15.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

1:18:16.000 --> 1:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's start back to the matchups.

1:18:18.720 --> 1:18:20.080
<v Speaker 4>Matt I apologize.

1:18:20.320 --> 1:18:24.479
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. Ram's taking on Philadelphia, and everybody wants to know.

1:18:25.800 --> 1:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Do I start Cooper Cup?

1:18:28.680 --> 1:18:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

1:18:29.040 --> 1:18:29.640
<v Speaker 3>I think you do.

1:18:30.479 --> 1:18:32.519
<v Speaker 4>We can start over on the Rams side. Cooper Cup

1:18:32.640 --> 1:18:34.880
<v Speaker 4>does return this week. How do we feel about this

1:18:35.000 --> 1:18:35.879
<v Speaker 4>for Puka Nakua?

1:18:36.000 --> 1:18:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Though?

1:18:36.720 --> 1:18:38.600
<v Speaker 4>In my mind I think they're both startable with B

1:18:38.760 --> 1:18:41.360
<v Speaker 4>grades here, even Cup right out of the gate. Both

1:18:41.400 --> 1:18:43.759
<v Speaker 4>of them are in the breakfast club with Matthew Stafford,

1:18:43.840 --> 1:18:47.000
<v Speaker 4>so I don't think Nakua and his targets dry up here.

1:18:47.400 --> 1:18:49.760
<v Speaker 4>He's probably not going to get twenty targets like you

1:18:49.840 --> 1:18:53.000
<v Speaker 4>did in week two, but ten targets seems reasonable. That's

1:18:53.000 --> 1:18:55.040
<v Speaker 4>what he had last week when he had nine catches

1:18:55.080 --> 1:18:57.799
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and sixty three yards in a score the Eagles.

1:18:57.840 --> 1:19:01.120
<v Speaker 4>By the way, bottom ten in receptions, yards and touchdowns

1:19:01.120 --> 1:19:03.240
<v Speaker 4>allowed to the wide receiver position, so it's a fine

1:19:03.280 --> 1:19:06.040
<v Speaker 4>start here for Cup as well. I think Atwell's probably

1:19:06.080 --> 1:19:08.519
<v Speaker 4>the guy who loses the target share here. I'd leave

1:19:08.600 --> 1:19:11.760
<v Speaker 4>him on the bench, but fire up Cooper Cup and

1:19:11.960 --> 1:19:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Pooka Nakua with B grades. Tyler Higbee, also getting a

1:19:15.680 --> 1:19:18.240
<v Speaker 4>B grade, averaging six and a half targets per week,

1:19:18.320 --> 1:19:20.360
<v Speaker 4>faces one of the worst tight end defenses in the

1:19:20.439 --> 1:19:23.959
<v Speaker 4>league in Philly. Again, Eagles are bottom ten in receptions,

1:19:24.080 --> 1:19:26.960
<v Speaker 4>yards and touchdowns to the tight end position. Game script

1:19:27.040 --> 1:19:29.360
<v Speaker 4>probably dictates that the Rams are playing from behind in

1:19:29.439 --> 1:19:31.760
<v Speaker 4>this one too, and passing a lot, which is why

1:19:31.760 --> 1:19:35.080
<v Speaker 4>I like Matthew Stafford with a B grade. It's true

1:19:35.680 --> 1:19:38.000
<v Speaker 4>that he only has three passing scores on the season,

1:19:38.120 --> 1:19:40.800
<v Speaker 4>but this is the first time that Stafford and Cooper

1:19:40.840 --> 1:19:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Cup have been healthy and on the field together since

1:19:44.040 --> 1:19:47.439
<v Speaker 4>like the Super Bowl two years ago, so I really

1:19:47.640 --> 1:19:49.559
<v Speaker 4>like this. The Eagles are allowing an average of two

1:19:49.640 --> 1:19:51.800
<v Speaker 4>hundred and seventy nine yards and two and a quarter

1:19:51.880 --> 1:19:54.960
<v Speaker 4>passing scores per game to opposing quarterbacks. It's tough to

1:19:55.040 --> 1:19:57.360
<v Speaker 4>run on them, and the game scripts, like I said,

1:19:57.400 --> 1:20:00.320
<v Speaker 4>have dictated the teams have had to pass. Why I

1:20:00.520 --> 1:20:03.599
<v Speaker 4>don't like Kyron Williams this week? The Eagles are top

1:20:03.720 --> 1:20:06.720
<v Speaker 4>five in yards per carry allowed at two point nine

1:20:07.240 --> 1:20:10.360
<v Speaker 4>combo yards allowed at only eighty four per game, and

1:20:10.400 --> 1:20:13.080
<v Speaker 4>they've only given up one touchdown to the position this season.

1:20:13.120 --> 1:20:15.439
<v Speaker 4>And we mentioned it's probably the cell high moment for Williams.

1:20:15.680 --> 1:20:18.479
<v Speaker 4>I think this is it right here. We saw ninety

1:20:18.560 --> 1:20:21.960
<v Speaker 4>nine percent of the running back snaps go to Williams

1:20:22.000 --> 1:20:24.479
<v Speaker 4>in weeks two and three when they exiled cam Akers.

1:20:24.960 --> 1:20:27.120
<v Speaker 4>But Ronnie Rivers came in last week and picked up

1:20:27.120 --> 1:20:30.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven percent of the snaps. That number might continue

1:20:30.040 --> 1:20:33.080
<v Speaker 4>to grow. I'll give Kyrin the C grade, but I

1:20:33.200 --> 1:20:35.479
<v Speaker 4>don't like it, and it's about the lowest C grade

1:20:35.520 --> 1:20:37.639
<v Speaker 4>there is. Like if there was a lot of guys

1:20:37.640 --> 1:20:40.160
<v Speaker 4>who are C grades, he'd be the lowest one in

1:20:40.240 --> 1:20:41.320
<v Speaker 4>my rankings. Three's there.

1:20:41.439 --> 1:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>He's the most SA of the seas, bottom of the seas.

1:20:44.200 --> 1:20:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Like the most D of the seas. Maybe on the

1:20:46.680 --> 1:20:49.280
<v Speaker 4>other side, Jalen Hurts and AJ Brown, I think they're

1:20:49.320 --> 1:20:52.920
<v Speaker 4>obvious A grades. Even in a somewhat difficult matchup DeVonta Smith.

1:20:53.040 --> 1:20:55.280
<v Speaker 4>He still gets a B grade too. He's been seeing

1:20:55.320 --> 1:20:57.920
<v Speaker 4>about twenty percent of his team's target share, and he's

1:20:57.960 --> 1:21:00.840
<v Speaker 4>got thirty seven percent of the team's air yards. Kobe

1:21:00.960 --> 1:21:03.960
<v Speaker 4>Durant and Akello Witherspoon have been well below average, and

1:21:04.000 --> 1:21:06.559
<v Speaker 4>Smith runs from everywhere on the field, so he gets

1:21:06.600 --> 1:21:09.479
<v Speaker 4>to see both of them. A ton. Dallas Goddard just

1:21:09.560 --> 1:21:12.720
<v Speaker 4>a C grade. He's averaging just four point seventy five

1:21:12.800 --> 1:21:15.559
<v Speaker 4>target per game. Yeah, it's brutal.

1:21:15.720 --> 1:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>These guys are gonna fish with like one hundred catches

1:21:18.720 --> 1:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for one hundred catches for four hundred yards on the season.

1:21:22.160 --> 1:21:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Shane Steichen took all of the plays that were for

1:21:24.920 --> 1:21:26.439
<v Speaker 4>Dallas Goddard, brought him to Indy.

1:21:26.600 --> 1:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>He did and where Jelanie Woods. Some day it's gonna

1:21:30.280 --> 1:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>come off ir and dominate, I swear.

1:21:32.200 --> 1:21:32.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:21:32.640 --> 1:21:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of Indy, the three nondescript Colts tight ends combined

1:21:36.439 --> 1:21:38.400
<v Speaker 4>for six catches, one hundred and seven yards and two

1:21:38.479 --> 1:21:42.920
<v Speaker 4>scores last week against this team. That's what's booing Dallas

1:21:42.960 --> 1:21:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Goddard here. The Rams defense not that great against the

1:21:46.120 --> 1:21:49.640
<v Speaker 4>tight end DeAndre Swift. It's not the easiest matchup, but

1:21:49.680 --> 1:21:51.559
<v Speaker 4>he still gets a be He's seeing about two thirds

1:21:51.600 --> 1:21:54.000
<v Speaker 4>of the snaps over the last three weeks, and that's

1:21:54.120 --> 1:21:56.719
<v Speaker 4>vaulted him into the top ten of fantasy runners because

1:21:56.720 --> 1:21:59.320
<v Speaker 4>of it. However, the Rams aren't giving up a ton

1:21:59.439 --> 1:22:02.280
<v Speaker 4>to opposing They're seventh in the league in total yards

1:22:02.560 --> 1:22:05.160
<v Speaker 4>allowed to opposing backs at about ninety five per game,

1:22:05.920 --> 1:22:09.839
<v Speaker 4>and they've only allowed nine total receptions to back nine times.

1:22:10.439 --> 1:22:12.960
<v Speaker 4>I was on that one. Good. Oh, you were totally

1:22:13.040 --> 1:22:15.519
<v Speaker 4>ready there. That's the best in the league. So DeAndre

1:22:15.640 --> 1:22:19.120
<v Speaker 4>Swift will be you know, it's okay, It's okay, match.

1:22:19.320 --> 1:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I keep forgetting my puka music.

1:22:22.320 --> 1:22:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this is just relaxing. I like this a lot.

1:22:25.439 --> 1:22:26.040
<v Speaker 5>It is nice.

1:22:26.280 --> 1:22:26.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:22:26.640 --> 1:22:29.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, why can't we do Fantasy Football Weekly live

1:22:29.800 --> 1:22:30.599
<v Speaker 1>from Oahu?

1:22:30.880 --> 1:22:32.439
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know, do you think we could get

1:22:32.800 --> 1:22:35.760
<v Speaker 4>the station to get a trip like like they do

1:22:35.960 --> 1:22:37.920
<v Speaker 4>for the Power Trip Morning show out to Vegas. We

1:22:37.960 --> 1:22:41.320
<v Speaker 4>could get a Hawaii Fantasy Football Weekly training camp out there.

1:22:41.439 --> 1:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't see why we can bring the Pro Bowl back? Yeah,

1:22:43.920 --> 1:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to do the Pro Bowl absolutely. The Monday night er

1:22:46.840 --> 1:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is Green Bay at Las Vegas. You want to check

1:22:50.080 --> 1:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the status of the absolutely wrecked Green Bay offensive line.

1:22:54.200 --> 1:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>David Baktiari God bless him. Five knee surgeries he's got

1:22:58.720 --> 1:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>another one coming up. It'll be a fifth knee surgery

1:23:01.439 --> 1:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in three years. Awful situation. He's on ir now. But

1:23:04.960 --> 1:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>also you got a monitor Elton Jenkins and John Runyan

1:23:08.200 --> 1:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>who both may not play in this Monday nighter. If

1:23:11.400 --> 1:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't, and I've dropped all these packers one letter

1:23:15.520 --> 1:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>grade because of these offensive line worries. If between now

1:23:18.960 --> 1:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and Monday, you find out that Jenkins and Runyon are going,

1:23:22.080 --> 1:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>then by all means upgrade these guys. But that's the

1:23:24.400 --> 1:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>presumption I've got going into this one. Let me start

1:23:26.800 --> 1:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>with the wide receivers. Romeo Dobbs, nobody talking about a

1:23:30.960 --> 1:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen receiver in most fantasy formats. He's just a

1:23:34.320 --> 1:23:37.519
<v Speaker 1>weekly starter. You just start him every week. Now then

1:23:37.560 --> 1:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>an obvious one against a bad raider secondary. This week,

1:23:40.640 --> 1:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>he runs predominantly on the left side of the field,

1:23:43.240 --> 1:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>which puts him up against something called Jacoryan Bennett, a

1:23:47.120 --> 1:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>rookie who's learning some tough lessons on the fly. Bennett

1:23:50.280 --> 1:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>giving a big plays with the reception of at least

1:23:52.880 --> 1:23:55.759
<v Speaker 1>thirty two yards in three of four games and allowing

1:23:55.760 --> 1:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>an opposer passer rating of one hundred and thirty eight.

1:23:58.240 --> 1:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Romeo Dobbs b great in the one. Christian Watson on

1:24:02.479 --> 1:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the field for twenty six snaps last week in his

1:24:05.160 --> 1:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>return from the hamstring injury. He's still on the injury list,

1:24:08.320 --> 1:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>so I think I'm gonna show a little more caution

1:24:10.439 --> 1:24:12.599
<v Speaker 1>with him with just the C grade because he's still

1:24:12.680 --> 1:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>not one hundred percent and I don't know that the

1:24:14.400 --> 1:24:16.519
<v Speaker 1>snap crount is going to vault. It'll go up, but

1:24:16.520 --> 1:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it vaults up. Last year, he

1:24:19.400 --> 1:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>was averaging more like fifty snaps a game, so hopefully

1:24:22.240 --> 1:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>he can get closer to that point here. Watson's also

1:24:25.200 --> 1:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>going to see some of the Jacorey and Bennett guy

1:24:27.439 --> 1:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>along with gambling cornerback Marcus Peters in this one. They

1:24:30.240 --> 1:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>both allow a passer ratings so above one hundred and twelve,

1:24:33.120 --> 1:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and both have allowed a touchdown in their coverage already.

1:24:36.840 --> 1:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Last year, four of Watson's six touchdowns came versus man.

1:24:40.640 --> 1:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Last season, Las Vegas cornerbacks play man on about a

1:24:43.760 --> 1:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>third of their plays, So there's going to be some

1:24:45.720 --> 1:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunities here, you know, you know, the dal Christian Watson

1:24:49.080 --> 1:24:51.559
<v Speaker 1>is a boomerbust guy C grade. Hopefully it works out

1:24:52.560 --> 1:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm keeping Jaden Reid in my starting lineup. The rookie

1:24:55.960 --> 1:24:58.519
<v Speaker 1>didn't see any loss of playing time when Christian Watson

1:24:58.600 --> 1:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>came on the field last week because he runs from

1:25:00.800 --> 1:25:03.559
<v Speaker 1>the slot and that puts him up against cornerback Amik Robertson,

1:25:03.760 --> 1:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>who got hurt in Week one, then came back last

1:25:06.240 --> 1:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>week and probably gave up fifty five yards and a

1:25:08.200 --> 1:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in his coverage. Jayden Reid C grade. So if

1:25:12.479 --> 1:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got b's and c's and these receivers, it means

1:25:14.800 --> 1:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Jordan Love at least some. He's NFL's bottom

1:25:19.120 --> 1:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>ranked passer by completion percentage, below guys like Zach Wilson

1:25:23.520 --> 1:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and Kenny Pickett and Desmond Ritter, but Jordan loves a

1:25:27.800 --> 1:25:31.360
<v Speaker 1>highly inconsistent passer being offset a lot by his scrambling,

1:25:31.400 --> 1:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>which is netted him twenty yards and half a rushing

1:25:33.439 --> 1:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game. And the Raiders have allowed multiple touchdowns

1:25:36.360 --> 1:25:39.479
<v Speaker 1>to every opposing quarterback, including two rushing touchdowns last week.

1:25:39.560 --> 1:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So between air and ground, I still like Jordan Love

1:25:41.800 --> 1:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot B grade here and again, if the offensive

1:25:43.720 --> 1:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>line clicks in with some good news on Jenkins and Runyon,

1:25:47.240 --> 1:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we could even see an A grade on Jordan Love

1:25:49.320 --> 1:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>In this game, AJ Dillon's dead to us. AJ Dillon

1:25:53.840 --> 1:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>just isn't good. He's a big guy who does not

1:25:56.479 --> 1:25:59.120
<v Speaker 1>break any tackles and has got no wiggle, no footwork.

1:25:59.560 --> 1:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>He's he's on the bench, and he's a drop candidate

1:26:03.120 --> 1:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for your team. Because even when Jones misses games, you

1:26:06.439 --> 1:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>can't start him. He doesn't do anything in those situations.

1:26:10.439 --> 1:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally out on him. Aaron Jones should if there's

1:26:15.280 --> 1:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>any justice in the world, Aaron Jones should get the

1:26:17.520 --> 1:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of the work in this offense. Now, he

1:26:20.000 --> 1:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>had nowhere to run last week due to the Packers'

1:26:21.960 --> 1:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. That was a wreck, and that worries me

1:26:23.960 --> 1:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>here again to this week. So I've only got the

1:26:26.240 --> 1:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>C grad on Aaron Jones. No Packer running back has

1:26:29.040 --> 1:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>surpassed fifty five rushing yards this season. The Raiders have

1:26:32.800 --> 1:26:35.519
<v Speaker 1>held three or four starting runners to sixty five rushing

1:26:35.600 --> 1:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>yards or less. So hopefully Jones is hamstring adequately healed.

1:26:40.240 --> 1:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>They need to give him a lot of use. I'd

1:26:41.680 --> 1:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like to think it's going to happen here, but there's

1:26:43.280 --> 1:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of variables and I can only go

1:26:45.120 --> 1:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>see grad on Aaron Jones. Josh Jacobs going to the

1:26:48.280 --> 1:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas side has got Pro Football focused. His third

1:26:51.000 --> 1:26:54.479
<v Speaker 1>highest receiving grade among running backs despite posting the tenth

1:26:54.600 --> 1:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>worst yards over expectation by next Gen Stats. He saw

1:26:57.720 --> 1:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a career high eleven targets last week from Aiden O'Connell,

1:27:01.439 --> 1:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>so the shift of the rookie was not a downgrade.

1:27:03.200 --> 1:27:05.439
<v Speaker 1>O'conne will be on the bench here. They have cleared

1:27:05.560 --> 1:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo for this game, which is great news. Garoppolo's

1:27:09.040 --> 1:27:11.360
<v Speaker 1>played pretty well in this offense and thrown way more

1:27:11.439 --> 1:27:17.599
<v Speaker 1>downfield that we thought he was capable of more on Jacobs.

1:27:17.680 --> 1:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Packers allowing the fifth most rushing yards the fifth most

1:27:20.160 --> 1:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards to opposing running backs. That's one hundred and

1:27:23.160 --> 1:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>sixty total yards per game, second worst in the league.

1:27:27.000 --> 1:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So if one hundred and sixty yards are coming to

1:27:29.600 --> 1:27:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders backs, most of that's going to Josh Jacobs

1:27:34.160 --> 1:27:37.479
<v Speaker 1>a grade. You'll need to watch DeVante Adams' status here.

1:27:37.600 --> 1:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>He did not practice Thursday or Friday with his shoulder injury,

1:27:41.600 --> 1:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>so you'll have to give that some consideration here. The

1:27:45.000 --> 1:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>good news is Jimmy Garoppolo's back and he's not dinking

1:27:48.040 --> 1:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and Duncan Adams tied for second interceptions of ten or

1:27:51.320 --> 1:27:53.719
<v Speaker 1>more yards. He's also number one in red zone targets.

1:27:54.000 --> 1:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>If he plays, He's a B grade with the shoulder injury.

1:27:57.479 --> 1:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo B grade. The Packers have gotten a lot

1:28:01.120 --> 1:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of heat on opposing opposing opponents, telling twenty two quarterback

1:28:04.960 --> 1:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>pressures per game. But Garoppolo just survived J.

1:28:08.640 --> 1:28:08.880
<v Speaker 5>TJ.

1:28:09.000 --> 1:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Watt and the Steelers in his last game, and Jay R.

1:28:11.439 --> 1:28:13.479
<v Speaker 1>Alexander may not go in this one. So we'll give

1:28:13.479 --> 1:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a B grade to Jimmy Garoppolo and his C grade

1:28:15.880 --> 1:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>for Jacoby Myers, who's emerged as the clear number two

1:28:19.080 --> 1:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and would get an upgrade if Devanta Adams can't go.

1:28:23.400 --> 1:28:23.519
<v Speaker 3>Who.

1:28:24.040 --> 1:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That's about it, everybody, Wow, lots of stuff to get through.

1:28:27.479 --> 1:28:29.559
<v Speaker 1>Best of luck in the first of the bye weeks.

1:28:29.840 --> 1:28:30.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, go get them.

1:28:30.640 --> 1:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully you weren't playing against Justin Fields DJ Moore and

1:28:35.800 --> 1:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>if you were, good luck, and we hope this show helped.

1:28:38.000 --> 1:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to you a week everybody.

1:28:39.240 --> 1:28:39.639
<v Speaker 5>Bye bye.

1:28:46.400 --> 1:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of iHeartRadio. For more

1:28:50.040 --> 1:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app. Apple podcasts, or

1:28:54.160 --> 1:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.