1
00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,720
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

2
00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,520
Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

3
00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,120
Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

4
00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,840
Speaker 1: you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

5
00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:20,720
Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

6
00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:34,040
Speaker 1: Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Tesla.

7
00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:38,640
Speaker 1: Tesla is more than a manufacturer of electric vehicles. It

8
00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:40,920
Speaker 1: is more than a stock which is currently down about

9
00:00:40,920 --> 00:00:43,760
Speaker 1: eight tens of percent, trading at three hundred and seventy

10
00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:46,000
Speaker 1: seven dollars. It is more than a company that was

11
00:00:46,040 --> 00:00:52,120
Speaker 1: founded by Elon Muskoo holds nearly of the shares. Tesla

12
00:00:52,240 --> 00:00:55,000
Speaker 1: is also a company that has eight point six billion

13
00:00:55,080 --> 00:00:58,120
Speaker 1: dollars worth of debt. And here to tell us about

14
00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:01,600
Speaker 1: that debt and the very as bonds that the company

15
00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:05,200
Speaker 1: has issued is Joe Levington, our senior credit analyst for

16
00:01:05,280 --> 00:01:08,839
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Intelligence, and he joins me here in our eleven

17
00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:11,720
Speaker 1: three oh studios. Joel, it is always a pleasure. I

18
00:01:11,760 --> 00:01:13,240
Speaker 1: was gonna say, the best way for me to do

19
00:01:13,280 --> 00:01:15,840
Speaker 1: this is just to say tell us everything we need

20
00:01:15,920 --> 00:01:20,600
Speaker 1: to know about what is going on with Tesla bonds

21
00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:24,000
Speaker 1: because they run the gamut of maturities. There are some

22
00:01:24,080 --> 00:01:26,759
Speaker 1: that are maturing this year, and there are a lot

23
00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:32,480
Speaker 1: of interesting details in the bond covenants which actually were

24
00:01:32,520 --> 00:01:38,640
Speaker 1: affected by yesterday's tweet. Yes um I would say three things. One,

25
00:01:39,160 --> 00:01:43,120
Speaker 1: the immediate effect is that three point three billion dollars

26
00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:47,240
Speaker 1: worth of their convertible debt went into the money yesterday

27
00:01:47,480 --> 00:01:50,160
Speaker 1: off the news, with the stock rose above the three

28
00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:53,800
Speaker 1: D fifty eight dollar threshold where where those bonds trade.

29
00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:58,040
Speaker 1: And that includes nine million dollars that comes due next March.

30
00:01:58,400 --> 00:02:02,840
Speaker 1: So from the liquidity stamp point, the immediate impact is positive.

31
00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:06,800
Speaker 1: Just explain that for people, So this nine hundred and

32
00:02:06,840 --> 00:02:10,880
Speaker 1: twenty million dollars it's no longer debt, doesn't have to

33
00:02:10,880 --> 00:02:13,799
Speaker 1: be right, it can be converted into equity. And that

34
00:02:13,800 --> 00:02:17,840
Speaker 1: that's true for all all of it, mainly in twenty

35
00:02:17,880 --> 00:02:21,600
Speaker 1: two issues as well as the slug next March, and

36
00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:24,480
Speaker 1: so that would be number one. Number two, to your

37
00:02:24,520 --> 00:02:27,600
Speaker 1: point about the covenants in the bonds which are in

38
00:02:27,639 --> 00:02:30,640
Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Barkleys in disease, they have a change of

39
00:02:30,639 --> 00:02:35,600
Speaker 1: control provision and that provision says that a change of

40
00:02:35,639 --> 00:02:42,560
Speaker 1: control must include a controlling investor owning fifty which initially

41
00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:45,360
Speaker 1: I think people thought that that is what was going

42
00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:48,280
Speaker 1: to happen. When Mr must said that I am going

43
00:02:48,320 --> 00:02:51,640
Speaker 1: to take Tesla private or I'm considering taking Tesla private,

44
00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:56,360
Speaker 1: the pronoun I being important there, yes, and then he

45
00:02:56,520 --> 00:02:59,760
Speaker 1: changed he changed his language slightly to there will be

46
00:02:59,800 --> 00:03:03,760
Speaker 1: no controlling investors, so that would keep the unsecured bonds

47
00:03:03,800 --> 00:03:06,960
Speaker 1: that they have outstanding, or theoretically that would keep it

48
00:03:07,639 --> 00:03:11,280
Speaker 1: outstanding and a privatization. And so then it becomes well,

49
00:03:11,280 --> 00:03:14,920
Speaker 1: what does that mean for those bond holders? And for

50
00:03:15,080 --> 00:03:17,800
Speaker 1: that I would go to point three to say, look,

51
00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:21,280
Speaker 1: the issue here would be structural subordination. If they issue

52
00:03:21,720 --> 00:03:26,120
Speaker 1: secured debt that will get the unsecured notes will get primed,

53
00:03:26,240 --> 00:03:28,960
Speaker 1: meaning that the secured debt will be on top on

54
00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:32,440
Speaker 1: the capital structure. Then these blump bonds in the Bloomberg

55
00:03:32,480 --> 00:03:37,360
Speaker 1: Barclays indocy and then the equity owners. And when you

56
00:03:37,400 --> 00:03:40,160
Speaker 1: look at that relative to what rading agencies have done

57
00:03:40,200 --> 00:03:43,800
Speaker 1: in the past with structural subordination, it could mean one

58
00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:47,240
Speaker 1: to notch is worth of downgrade. So that would be

59
00:03:47,280 --> 00:03:50,560
Speaker 1: step one. What does that mean in terms of value

60
00:03:50,720 --> 00:03:53,840
Speaker 1: for the bonds. The value would be if I look

61
00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:56,200
Speaker 1: at triple C bonds, which is where that might head,

62
00:03:57,120 --> 00:04:00,600
Speaker 1: would mean about an eight percent yield for five in

63
00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:03,360
Speaker 1: the triple C zone. That is about a hundred and

64
00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:06,560
Speaker 1: thirty basis points wider than where we are today, which

65
00:04:06,560 --> 00:04:08,960
Speaker 1: is equal to about five or six points. That would

66
00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:11,440
Speaker 1: be a worst case scenario, or how I would frame

67
00:04:11,480 --> 00:04:14,400
Speaker 1: a worst case scenario. Now, it's true that nothing can

68
00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:17,040
Speaker 1: happen because nobody has seen any of the financing or

69
00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:19,960
Speaker 1: if any, if any debt will be issued at all.

70
00:04:19,960 --> 00:04:22,320
Speaker 1: It could be all equity for all I know. UM.

71
00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:24,360
Speaker 1: And of course there's always a case where he might

72
00:04:24,400 --> 00:04:28,240
Speaker 1: decide to call these bonds back anyway. UM. And the

73
00:04:28,279 --> 00:04:31,359
Speaker 1: way that my math looks at it would indicate that

74
00:04:31,360 --> 00:04:33,600
Speaker 1: there's about a fifteen percent chance that he would call

75
00:04:33,640 --> 00:04:36,240
Speaker 1: the bonds in, about forty five percent that would go

76
00:04:36,279 --> 00:04:39,679
Speaker 1: to triple C, and about forty uh that nothing will happen.

77
00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:42,960
Speaker 1: That seems to be where the bond yields are today.

78
00:04:43,200 --> 00:04:49,680
Speaker 1: Are the covenants that you've just described unusual? They're not unusual,

79
00:04:49,760 --> 00:04:52,640
Speaker 1: but it is very unusual. Uh. You know, as we

80
00:04:52,720 --> 00:04:56,000
Speaker 1: come up on the anniversary of these bonds. Uh. For

81
00:04:56,120 --> 00:05:00,120
Speaker 1: a issuer of such weak credit quality to issue unsecure

82
00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:04,599
Speaker 1: debt and issue with um you know, almost investment grade

83
00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:08,800
Speaker 1: type covenants, very very limited covenance. But is it usual

84
00:05:09,520 --> 00:05:15,320
Speaker 1: to have a actual stock price for the convertible bonds?

85
00:05:15,839 --> 00:05:19,000
Speaker 1: What did you say, three fifty eight dollars a share,

86
00:05:19,960 --> 00:05:24,600
Speaker 1: and have the CEO of the company do something that

87
00:05:24,640 --> 00:05:28,479
Speaker 1: would indicate a price for the stock that is higher

88
00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:34,839
Speaker 1: in order to actually trigger that potential convert and then

89
00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:38,320
Speaker 1: remove that as debt from the balance sheet so that

90
00:05:38,400 --> 00:05:40,400
Speaker 1: you can then go out and issue more bonds. Well,

91
00:05:40,440 --> 00:05:43,680
Speaker 1: Elon Musk is definitely not usual. I have never seen

92
00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:47,960
Speaker 1: that before in my twenty years of of doing credit research.

93
00:05:48,040 --> 00:05:51,400
Speaker 1: But you know, twenty years ago there was no Twitter. No, no,

94
00:05:51,480 --> 00:05:53,560
Speaker 1: clearly I understand that. But I mean, twenty years ago,

95
00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:56,159
Speaker 1: there were bonds, and there were bond covenants. This is true.

96
00:05:56,520 --> 00:06:01,360
Speaker 1: But I've never seen anybody take such a monumental offering

97
00:06:01,480 --> 00:06:04,040
Speaker 1: or potential action and just throw it out there on

98
00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:07,520
Speaker 1: Twitter as if it's you know, like, uh, just a

99
00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:12,520
Speaker 1: general thought in his mind. Based on your experience, what

100
00:06:12,600 --> 00:06:16,600
Speaker 1: would be the normal pattern of trying to take a

101
00:06:16,640 --> 00:06:20,640
Speaker 1: company of this size private? Sure, Well, typically what I

102
00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:23,200
Speaker 1: would expect is that the company would be issuing a

103
00:06:23,240 --> 00:06:27,159
Speaker 1: press release uh and through an eight K filing with

104
00:06:27,279 --> 00:06:31,280
Speaker 1: the SEC, and that would outline you know that they

105
00:06:31,320 --> 00:06:34,839
Speaker 1: are investigating strategic alternatives. I think Mylan said something like

106
00:06:34,880 --> 00:06:38,800
Speaker 1: that today as a very recent example, ticker m y L.

107
00:06:39,440 --> 00:06:41,560
Speaker 1: And you take it from there. You explain here's the

108
00:06:41,560 --> 00:06:44,200
Speaker 1: reasoning or here's the logic, and it will take this

109
00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:47,400
Speaker 1: amount of time. It usually doesn't come out in you know,

110
00:06:47,440 --> 00:06:51,000
Speaker 1: a sixty one character tweet. Thanks very much, Joe Levington.

111
00:06:51,160 --> 00:06:54,240
Speaker 1: We always learned a lot. Senior credit analyst for Bloomberg

112
00:06:54,279 --> 00:07:12,800
Speaker 1: Intelligence talking about Tesla and Tesla bonds. The topic right

113
00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:16,240
Speaker 1: now is Tesla and the shares of Tesla are down

114
00:07:16,280 --> 00:07:19,640
Speaker 1: about three quarters of a per cent is coming after

115
00:07:19,720 --> 00:07:23,200
Speaker 1: Chief executive Elon Musk tweeted yesterday that he was planning

116
00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:27,360
Speaker 1: and looking forward to bringing the company private at a

117
00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:31,320
Speaker 1: price of a share. Here to help us understand this

118
00:07:31,360 --> 00:07:33,560
Speaker 1: more and get his reaction is Gordon Johnson. He is

119
00:07:33,600 --> 00:07:36,880
Speaker 1: managing director Alternative Energy, Metals and Mining as well as

120
00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:42,080
Speaker 1: equipment analysts for Vertical Group and Gordon just to underscore,

121
00:07:42,120 --> 00:07:44,720
Speaker 1: he has already a cell recommendation on Tesla with a

122
00:07:44,760 --> 00:07:48,080
Speaker 1: price target of ninety three dollars. Shares of Tesla currently

123
00:07:48,080 --> 00:07:51,560
Speaker 1: traded three hundred and seventies six dollars. Gordon, always a

124
00:07:51,560 --> 00:07:54,320
Speaker 1: pleasure to hear what you've got to say. What what

125
00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:58,080
Speaker 1: was your reaction when you saw or learned about the

126
00:07:58,200 --> 00:08:02,840
Speaker 1: tweet from elon Us? Well, I gotta tell you, Keim

127
00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:04,480
Speaker 1: and thanks for having me on. I mean, initially it

128
00:08:04,520 --> 00:08:06,640
Speaker 1: was sure excitement because it seemed to me like this

129
00:08:06,720 --> 00:08:09,280
Speaker 1: was Thennell and the coffin. Um. I mean, you gotta

130
00:08:09,320 --> 00:08:11,240
Speaker 1: think about this, right, let's just take a step back

131
00:08:11,520 --> 00:08:14,120
Speaker 1: just a few days ago. Emon must promise that they're

132
00:08:14,120 --> 00:08:18,320
Speaker 1: gonna be profitable forever um starting in three UM. So

133
00:08:18,400 --> 00:08:20,720
Speaker 1: why would he need to go private to end negative

134
00:08:20,760 --> 00:08:23,120
Speaker 1: propaganda from the shorts? I mean, if they're gonna be

135
00:08:23,120 --> 00:08:25,520
Speaker 1: profitable forever and he's saying he's gonna go private at

136
00:08:26,280 --> 00:08:28,920
Speaker 1: I mean the short covering alone, we drive the stock

137
00:08:28,960 --> 00:08:31,600
Speaker 1: to five dollars. I mean, you gotta think about all

138
00:08:31,640 --> 00:08:35,400
Speaker 1: the dynamics regarding an LBL. First and foremost, average biout.

139
00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:38,120
Speaker 1: If you're a leverage biout investors, what you're looking for

140
00:08:38,280 --> 00:08:41,080
Speaker 1: most is keep it or money generation for the cup

141
00:08:41,160 --> 00:08:43,560
Speaker 1: from the company to pay the interest on your debt

142
00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:45,560
Speaker 1: and ultimately the debt. And we know that's not what

143
00:08:45,640 --> 00:08:48,480
Speaker 1: this company does. And we know that these um you know,

144
00:08:48,960 --> 00:08:52,040
Speaker 1: they they rebuffed an investment offer from Saudi Eurabia. So

145
00:08:52,040 --> 00:08:54,840
Speaker 1: if you're passing the hat uh for the largest lb

146
00:08:55,000 --> 00:08:57,640
Speaker 1: OH syndicate in history, why would you say no to

147
00:08:57,720 --> 00:09:00,400
Speaker 1: a big check? I mean, it just doesn't make sense.

148
00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:02,360
Speaker 1: And when you think about the fact this would be

149
00:09:02,400 --> 00:09:06,720
Speaker 1: a seventy or eighty plus billion dollars deal, um uh,

150
00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:09,520
Speaker 1: you know, and and then it's my newly choreograph. I mean,

151
00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:12,840
Speaker 1: the local legal risk for any party involved would be significant.

152
00:09:13,240 --> 00:09:16,920
Speaker 1: So you know you're talking about you know, uh multiple

153
00:09:17,400 --> 00:09:20,400
Speaker 1: and uh lawyers that would need to be involved, multiple

154
00:09:20,640 --> 00:09:23,600
Speaker 1: investments would need to be involved. And we've heard nothing

155
00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:27,920
Speaker 1: from any of these Tesla financiers or lawyers regarding a

156
00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:31,000
Speaker 1: potential LBO. And just today we learned that you know, uh,

157
00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:33,480
Speaker 1: the board members are saying they just started talking about

158
00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:37,000
Speaker 1: this last week. Listen, here's the thing. The question is

159
00:09:37,040 --> 00:09:40,000
Speaker 1: if the STC does their investigation, or if they investigate

160
00:09:40,040 --> 00:09:42,840
Speaker 1: and they decide there's wrong doing here, well, Tesla investors care,

161
00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:45,640
Speaker 1: you know, if Elon must broke offs here, well they care,

162
00:09:45,800 --> 00:09:48,960
Speaker 1: probably not. But I think the bigger problem is if

163
00:09:49,000 --> 00:09:52,320
Speaker 1: there's no real offer out there. If Elon Musk can't

164
00:09:52,320 --> 00:09:54,440
Speaker 1: over the next few weeks show that there's a real

165
00:09:54,520 --> 00:09:57,280
Speaker 1: offer out there, I think he has serious problems with

166
00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:01,360
Speaker 1: respect to his current investors and credibility. I think that's

167
00:10:01,360 --> 00:10:03,920
Speaker 1: the real problem. And when you're thinking about you know,

168
00:10:03,960 --> 00:10:06,160
Speaker 1: even if Elon Musk rolls the shares, and you know

169
00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:08,559
Speaker 1: the share, you know the the employees roll there shares,

170
00:10:08,800 --> 00:10:11,360
Speaker 1: you're still talking about sixty plus billion and capital that

171
00:10:11,400 --> 00:10:14,959
Speaker 1: needs to be raised. You have two current investigations alleging

172
00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:17,559
Speaker 1: frauds with both with Solar City and with the amount

173
00:10:17,559 --> 00:10:19,480
Speaker 1: of Model three is produced. You have a number of

174
00:10:19,520 --> 00:10:23,200
Speaker 1: other potential issues um underpinning this company. With respect to

175
00:10:23,200 --> 00:10:26,640
Speaker 1: a potential sec Wells noticed that maybe out there. I

176
00:10:26,679 --> 00:10:28,280
Speaker 1: know that people have said that's not the case. But

177
00:10:28,320 --> 00:10:30,280
Speaker 1: if you listen to the question on the call, the

178
00:10:30,320 --> 00:10:32,560
Speaker 1: analysts asked the question and not ask Tesla, do they

179
00:10:32,559 --> 00:10:34,240
Speaker 1: have a Wells nonese that do you have something that

180
00:10:34,320 --> 00:10:37,160
Speaker 1: procludes you from raising capital, which is not the definition

181
00:10:37,160 --> 00:10:39,920
Speaker 1: of a Wells. Notice this just seems, I mean, quite

182
00:10:39,920 --> 00:10:44,839
Speaker 1: frankly ludicrous and uh, you know that was our reaction yesterday. Okay,

183
00:10:45,120 --> 00:10:48,360
Speaker 1: is there a way that you can see Elon Musk

184
00:10:48,559 --> 00:10:51,839
Speaker 1: actually completing a deal like this? Would it be? Is there?

185
00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:55,800
Speaker 1: I mean, set aside for just a minute your skepticism

186
00:10:56,200 --> 00:10:59,520
Speaker 1: on a technical basis. Is this a deal that is

187
00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:01,920
Speaker 1: just too big to get done? Or is it possible?

188
00:11:03,880 --> 00:11:05,840
Speaker 1: That's a great question, Pim, But I don't even think

189
00:11:05,840 --> 00:11:08,760
Speaker 1: it's about the size of the deal. Again, think about this.

190
00:11:08,840 --> 00:11:13,559
Speaker 1: A leverage buyout is based on a company generating cash.

191
00:11:13,880 --> 00:11:16,640
Speaker 1: So if you're an LBO investors, you effectively take debt

192
00:11:16,640 --> 00:11:19,120
Speaker 1: in a company to take the company over. What the

193
00:11:19,200 --> 00:11:22,760
Speaker 1: prospect being they're going to generate cash to pay you

194
00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:25,040
Speaker 1: back for that debt or pay you back your interests

195
00:11:25,080 --> 00:11:27,320
Speaker 1: and then pay you back for that debt. When has

196
00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:32,120
Speaker 1: Tesla generated never? So why as an LBO investor would

197
00:11:32,160 --> 00:11:34,559
Speaker 1: you be willing to go out on a limb and

198
00:11:34,760 --> 00:11:38,319
Speaker 1: risk potentially uh, you know, a huge default and wasting

199
00:11:38,360 --> 00:11:42,679
Speaker 1: your money. I mean, it just doesn't make any logical sense.

200
00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:46,520
Speaker 1: And I think that investors in the public, and you know,

201
00:11:46,760 --> 00:11:50,640
Speaker 1: quite frankly, sec needs to see this actual money that

202
00:11:50,679 --> 00:11:53,720
Speaker 1: he says he has secured. Those two words money secured

203
00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:56,280
Speaker 1: that he said, I think need to be proven out

204
00:11:56,320 --> 00:11:59,959
Speaker 1: over the next day's, last weeks, and we're highly skeptical

205
00:12:00,120 --> 00:12:02,040
Speaker 1: that's going to be able to be the case. You know.

206
00:12:03,000 --> 00:12:05,240
Speaker 1: It's like a very general question, is there enough money

207
00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:07,360
Speaker 1: out there to do this? Yes? But doesn't make sense

208
00:12:07,400 --> 00:12:12,240
Speaker 1: absolutely not. Well, let's let LBO investors scrutinized bills much

209
00:12:12,280 --> 00:12:14,920
Speaker 1: more than equity short sellers do. And I think that's

210
00:12:14,960 --> 00:12:17,880
Speaker 1: what's gotten lost in a lot of this, you know, uh,

211
00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:20,720
Speaker 1: you know story. I want to thank you very much

212
00:12:20,760 --> 00:12:25,319
Speaker 1: for joining us. Gordon Johnson, Managing director Alternative Energy, Metals

213
00:12:25,400 --> 00:12:29,360
Speaker 1: and Mining and Equipment Analysts for Vertical Group, talking about

214
00:12:29,520 --> 00:12:34,559
Speaker 1: Elon Musk's Twitter proposal to take Tesla private at four

215
00:12:34,679 --> 00:12:55,200
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty dollars a share. Stocks have gained this year.

216
00:12:55,360 --> 00:12:58,840
Speaker 1: The SMP five hundred is currently up nearly seven percent,

217
00:12:59,040 --> 00:13:02,520
Speaker 1: NASDAC stopped SIR stocks are up nearly fourteen percent, and

218
00:13:02,679 --> 00:13:05,480
Speaker 1: the Dow Jones Industrial average up just three and a

219
00:13:05,520 --> 00:13:08,240
Speaker 1: half percent. Here to tell us what to do with

220
00:13:08,400 --> 00:13:11,240
Speaker 1: money is Chuck Lieberman. He is the chief investment officer

221
00:13:11,360 --> 00:13:16,160
Speaker 1: at Adviser's Capital Management. He is also a Bloomberg opinion columnist.

222
00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:19,360
Speaker 1: He helps to manage more than one point three billion

223
00:13:19,440 --> 00:13:23,720
Speaker 1: dollars of customer assets based in Ridgewood, New Jersey. Chuck Lieberman,

224
00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:27,280
Speaker 1: thank you very much for being with me. Maybe, and

225
00:13:27,320 --> 00:13:29,520
Speaker 1: I promise I'm not gonna ask you about Tesla, so

226
00:13:29,600 --> 00:13:31,520
Speaker 1: you can put that one to the side, right. I

227
00:13:31,520 --> 00:13:35,000
Speaker 1: mean that you know there are other things in the world. Uh,

228
00:13:35,280 --> 00:13:37,959
Speaker 1: tell us what you take away from all of the

229
00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:42,439
Speaker 1: information regarding jobs and the health of the US economy

230
00:13:42,679 --> 00:13:48,320
Speaker 1: and how that translates into a strategy for investing money. Sure, well,

231
00:13:48,840 --> 00:13:53,600
Speaker 1: I think everyone agrees that fest labor market is fairly tight. Uh.

232
00:13:53,679 --> 00:13:57,280
Speaker 1: Some people think there's uh there are some people on

233
00:13:57,320 --> 00:14:00,480
Speaker 1: the sidelines who could still be sucked into the job market.

234
00:14:01,320 --> 00:14:03,960
Speaker 1: But the data, no matter how you look at it,

235
00:14:04,000 --> 00:14:07,840
Speaker 1: in the case pretty clearly that labor is scarce. We

236
00:14:07,920 --> 00:14:13,200
Speaker 1: have more job openings than unemployed. The unemployment rate is

237
00:14:13,240 --> 00:14:18,880
Speaker 1: down at very low levels, historically cyclically low levels. Um.

238
00:14:19,240 --> 00:14:24,480
Speaker 1: We're seeing uh, fifty year lows in unemployment claims. So

239
00:14:24,600 --> 00:14:28,360
Speaker 1: by every measure, labor is scarce. That's beginning to drive

240
00:14:28,440 --> 00:14:31,560
Speaker 1: up labor costs. Uh. Some people make the argument that

241
00:14:31,680 --> 00:14:35,080
Speaker 1: labor costs are not rising that quickly. But if you

242
00:14:35,120 --> 00:14:39,280
Speaker 1: look at the last five six years, you can see

243
00:14:39,320 --> 00:14:41,720
Speaker 1: the labor costs started to rise when the unemployment rate

244
00:14:41,760 --> 00:14:45,240
Speaker 1: hit about five So with the unemployment rate now below

245
00:14:45,280 --> 00:14:48,680
Speaker 1: four percent, there's every reason to expect more upward pressure

246
00:14:48,960 --> 00:14:52,360
Speaker 1: on labor costs, and ultimately that will flow into inflation.

247
00:14:52,480 --> 00:14:55,440
Speaker 1: So that gets to the things to avoid in the

248
00:14:55,520 --> 00:14:58,520
Speaker 1: things to play for. With a little bit higher inflation

249
00:14:58,600 --> 00:15:01,120
Speaker 1: and solid economic growth, you want to be in the

250
00:15:01,160 --> 00:15:05,160
Speaker 1: cyclicals or companies that will benefit from higher inflation or

251
00:15:05,240 --> 00:15:08,040
Speaker 1: higher interest rates or accommodation, and you want to avoid

252
00:15:08,040 --> 00:15:11,520
Speaker 1: the ones that are susceptible to those factors. So the

253
00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:15,160
Speaker 1: susceptible areas are at the bond market, especially long term bonds,

254
00:15:15,240 --> 00:15:19,200
Speaker 1: and especially high quality long term bonds that include utilities,

255
00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:23,560
Speaker 1: real estate, investment, trust, consumer stables. Those are royal areas

256
00:15:23,560 --> 00:15:26,360
Speaker 1: that we see as relatively vulnerable. And the areas that

257
00:15:26,520 --> 00:15:33,200
Speaker 1: benefit are financials which benefit from rising interest rates. UH,

258
00:15:33,400 --> 00:15:37,920
Speaker 1: energy and pipelines in particular because they'll benefit from rising

259
00:15:38,040 --> 00:15:43,840
Speaker 1: prices for crude oil and more volume passing through pipes um,

260
00:15:44,160 --> 00:15:47,000
Speaker 1: so those are roll attractive areas. Let's talk a little

261
00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:50,440
Speaker 1: bit about energy. What kinds of energy companies if you

262
00:15:50,480 --> 00:15:54,520
Speaker 1: can specifically, we're talking master limited partnerships. Are you talking

263
00:15:54,560 --> 00:15:59,560
Speaker 1: about pure play energy companies, exploration and production, upstream, downstream?

264
00:15:59,560 --> 00:16:02,200
Speaker 1: Where would you like to be, Well, it depends on

265
00:16:02,240 --> 00:16:04,880
Speaker 1: the risk appetite and what the client needs. So if

266
00:16:04,920 --> 00:16:09,120
Speaker 1: they need income, then midstream and downstream are great places

267
00:16:09,160 --> 00:16:11,920
Speaker 1: to be because they generate a lot of income. The

268
00:16:11,960 --> 00:16:18,680
Speaker 1: industry is still transitioned from UH partnerships and incentive distribution

269
00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:23,280
Speaker 1: rights to corporations, and so that's creating a little bit

270
00:16:23,280 --> 00:16:26,880
Speaker 1: of turmoil and uncertainty in the market. Uh, just explain

271
00:16:26,920 --> 00:16:28,760
Speaker 1: if you can. I hate to break in, but just

272
00:16:28,880 --> 00:16:31,760
Speaker 1: explain what is going on, because this is an important point.

273
00:16:31,800 --> 00:16:35,480
Speaker 1: It's it's a way in which master limited partnerships have

274
00:16:35,560 --> 00:16:38,320
Speaker 1: typically operated in the energy sector. And as you say,

275
00:16:38,360 --> 00:16:43,080
Speaker 1: that's changing, yeah, well that's exactly right. So companies used

276
00:16:43,120 --> 00:16:47,440
Speaker 1: to have these UH sort of operations, daughter companies, spinoffs,

277
00:16:47,560 --> 00:16:50,600
Speaker 1: however you want to describe them, and those companies would

278
00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:55,400
Speaker 1: be structured as partnerships with the ownership either in the

279
00:16:55,480 --> 00:16:59,600
Speaker 1: hands of the public or the parent, and the parents

280
00:16:59,640 --> 00:17:04,600
Speaker 1: with quickly UH reap some benefits every time the dividend

281
00:17:04,720 --> 00:17:08,399
Speaker 1: paid to the limited partners increased, so they were motivated

282
00:17:08,440 --> 00:17:13,320
Speaker 1: to increased dividends for UH, for the investors, but it

283
00:17:13,440 --> 00:17:17,119
Speaker 1: also meant that the company had relatively little cash flow

284
00:17:17,440 --> 00:17:21,399
Speaker 1: to finance investments, so the company would be required, really

285
00:17:21,440 --> 00:17:24,639
Speaker 1: forced to use the capital markets to raise capital and

286
00:17:24,720 --> 00:17:29,280
Speaker 1: pay for capital investment. UH. That became untenable when oil

287
00:17:29,280 --> 00:17:32,119
Speaker 1: prices fell and stock prices fell and the cost of

288
00:17:32,160 --> 00:17:36,199
Speaker 1: capital went up very dramatically. And so these companies are

289
00:17:36,240 --> 00:17:42,159
Speaker 1: now being converted into corporations and the entire partnership structures

290
00:17:42,800 --> 00:17:47,400
Speaker 1: is basically being thrown away or gotten rid of. UH.

291
00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:49,640
Speaker 1: Some more of these companies who are going to operate

292
00:17:49,680 --> 00:17:53,160
Speaker 1: like traditional companies, where they're going to retact and retain

293
00:17:53,280 --> 00:17:58,120
Speaker 1: more cash flow, more profits in order to finance their investments. Okay,

294
00:17:58,320 --> 00:18:02,000
Speaker 1: great description. Tell us now about financial stocks. Do you

295
00:18:02,000 --> 00:18:03,919
Speaker 1: want to be in banks? Do you want to be

296
00:18:03,960 --> 00:18:07,280
Speaker 1: in regional banks? What kind of banking stocks are? Financial

297
00:18:07,359 --> 00:18:11,320
Speaker 1: entities are important? Well? I think the regionals and the

298
00:18:11,359 --> 00:18:15,119
Speaker 1: money centers are both attractive. UM. I happen to like

299
00:18:16,080 --> 00:18:18,720
Speaker 1: some of the money centers because they are so cheap.

300
00:18:18,880 --> 00:18:23,000
Speaker 1: We're talking what JP Morgan Chase Bank of America. Well,

301
00:18:23,119 --> 00:18:25,760
Speaker 1: JP Morgan Chase is sort of the criminal a crime

302
00:18:25,840 --> 00:18:28,480
Speaker 1: of the industry, and so it's the most expensive, but

303
00:18:28,520 --> 00:18:32,520
Speaker 1: it's also the safest investment. UH. City is the cheapest

304
00:18:32,680 --> 00:18:36,119
Speaker 1: of the group. Uh, it's the least expensive. It's the

305
00:18:36,160 --> 00:18:39,800
Speaker 1: most international of all the money centers. UH is the

306
00:18:39,880 --> 00:18:43,480
Speaker 1: cheapest for a reason. Well, I think it's cheapest because

307
00:18:43,520 --> 00:18:46,360
Speaker 1: it's not as simple a story. Bank of America has

308
00:18:46,400 --> 00:18:51,639
Speaker 1: a very large retail business. UM, it's very attractive, very cheap.

309
00:18:52,240 --> 00:18:55,600
Speaker 1: City is cheaper still partly because of its international exposure.

310
00:18:56,520 --> 00:18:59,160
Speaker 1: I think there's a very rational case to be made

311
00:18:59,520 --> 00:19:03,080
Speaker 1: for a mix of investing across all of those companies.

312
00:19:03,640 --> 00:19:07,000
Speaker 1: Do you believe that higher interest rates will show themselves

313
00:19:07,080 --> 00:19:13,920
Speaker 1: this year? Yes, I like that. That sucks SYNC. You

314
00:19:13,960 --> 00:19:17,200
Speaker 1: don't hear that often. Well, I'm trying to be straightforward

315
00:19:18,160 --> 00:19:21,240
Speaker 1: that Uh yeah, I think we are going to see it.

316
00:19:21,359 --> 00:19:24,760
Speaker 1: I think at the margin, we're already seeing higher inflation.

317
00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:29,919
Speaker 1: The Fed is going to continue to slowly methodically ramp

318
00:19:30,040 --> 00:19:34,800
Speaker 1: up policy rates, meaning another basis points in September and

319
00:19:34,880 --> 00:19:40,400
Speaker 1: another in December. But we're we're running out of room

320
00:19:40,640 --> 00:19:44,320
Speaker 1: for us to be surprised by a shocking inflation number.

321
00:19:44,800 --> 00:19:50,520
Speaker 1: I don't dismiss the possibility. But it's already August, so

322
00:19:51,119 --> 00:19:53,679
Speaker 1: I think we are going to get a number that

323
00:19:53,880 --> 00:19:55,920
Speaker 1: is kind of a shock to the market. I think

324
00:19:55,920 --> 00:19:59,320
Speaker 1: the market is very complacent about inflation pressures, and so

325
00:20:00,280 --> 00:20:03,679
Speaker 1: I think that that's going to be the big mover

326
00:20:04,119 --> 00:20:07,600
Speaker 1: for the bond market. Give you about twenty seconds, Chuck Lieberman.

327
00:20:07,680 --> 00:20:12,439
Speaker 1: You mentioned cychnical stocks. What about consumer discretionary Uh, some

328
00:20:12,560 --> 00:20:16,160
Speaker 1: of those are fairly well placed. Also, with so many

329
00:20:16,200 --> 00:20:21,840
Speaker 1: households now employed, unemployment so far down, consumers do have

330
00:20:22,040 --> 00:20:25,439
Speaker 1: more discretionary income that they can afford to spend, and

331
00:20:25,480 --> 00:20:32,920
Speaker 1: they're doing it. So the discretionary retail space is extremely competitive, however,

332
00:20:33,200 --> 00:20:35,920
Speaker 1: so you really have to look at company by company.

333
00:20:36,680 --> 00:20:40,360
Speaker 1: I think the cruise lines, as an example, are well placed,

334
00:20:40,840 --> 00:20:45,080
Speaker 1: they will do well. The retail space for clothing is

335
00:20:45,720 --> 00:20:49,879
Speaker 1: just an absolute minefield, and so some companies are losing

336
00:20:49,880 --> 00:20:53,240
Speaker 1: out and others like Amazon or picking up share. Thanks

337
00:20:53,359 --> 00:20:56,280
Speaker 1: very much, Chuck Lieberman. He is the chief investment officer

338
00:20:56,400 --> 00:21:00,639
Speaker 1: at Advisers Capital Management, is also a Bloomberg Opinion columnists.

339
00:21:00,680 --> 00:21:03,880
Speaker 1: Helps to manage more than one point three billion dollars

340
00:21:17,440 --> 00:21:21,840
Speaker 1: the world of cryptocurrencies for example, bitcoin Bitcoin now trades

341
00:21:21,880 --> 00:21:23,920
Speaker 1: about five and a half percent lower than it did

342
00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:29,560
Speaker 1: yesterday at eighty dollars for bitcoin, Ripple is down about

343
00:21:29,600 --> 00:21:33,480
Speaker 1: twelve percent, Atherium down four percent, light Coin down seven

344
00:21:33,480 --> 00:21:35,560
Speaker 1: and a quarter percent. Here to help us understand a

345
00:21:35,560 --> 00:21:38,560
Speaker 1: little bit more about the world of cryptocurrencies and their

346
00:21:38,560 --> 00:21:41,320
Speaker 1: exchanges is Joe Marino. He is a partner in the

347
00:21:41,359 --> 00:21:46,800
Speaker 1: White Collar Defense and Investigations Group at Cadwalader in Washington,

348
00:21:46,920 --> 00:21:48,400
Speaker 1: d C. But he joins us here in our eleven

349
00:21:48,440 --> 00:21:50,520
Speaker 1: three oh studios. Joe, it is a pleasure. Thank you

350
00:21:50,560 --> 00:21:52,679
Speaker 1: for coming in. Maybe just give people a little bit

351
00:21:52,720 --> 00:21:55,239
Speaker 1: of your background so they understand where you're coming from

352
00:21:55,280 --> 00:21:57,960
Speaker 1: in your level of expertise. Sure him, and thank you

353
00:21:58,000 --> 00:22:00,679
Speaker 1: so much for having me so. My background is as

354
00:22:00,680 --> 00:22:04,120
Speaker 1: a federal prosecutor and I specialized is specifically in terrorist

355
00:22:04,160 --> 00:22:07,760
Speaker 1: financing at Main Justice down in Washington, d C. And

356
00:22:07,960 --> 00:22:09,880
Speaker 1: just to give a little background as to what we

357
00:22:10,320 --> 00:22:13,120
Speaker 1: used to look at in terms of how individuals would

358
00:22:13,119 --> 00:22:15,720
Speaker 1: funnel money to terrorist groups. In the old days, it

359
00:22:15,800 --> 00:22:18,359
Speaker 1: was cash, right, It was cash carried over the border,

360
00:22:18,440 --> 00:22:21,439
Speaker 1: sometimes mailed in FedEx boxes. Then it was Hawalla's right,

361
00:22:21,440 --> 00:22:25,159
Speaker 1: which are these informal ways with very little documentation of

362
00:22:25,200 --> 00:22:28,600
Speaker 1: moving money between parties as a way to avoid taxes.

363
00:22:28,920 --> 00:22:32,480
Speaker 1: The regulators, the I r S, the Treasury Department and

364
00:22:32,480 --> 00:22:35,680
Speaker 1: so on, and the FBI, and this would be electronic. Well,

365
00:22:35,720 --> 00:22:39,320
Speaker 1: Hawailli's typically we're kind of old school, you know, person

366
00:22:39,359 --> 00:22:42,120
Speaker 1: to person, So maybe two persons in the US would

367
00:22:42,560 --> 00:22:45,960
Speaker 1: exchange money for the purposes of exchanging the same amount overseas,

368
00:22:46,440 --> 00:22:48,879
Speaker 1: mostly off the books. Well, now we're in a digital age.

369
00:22:49,080 --> 00:22:53,040
Speaker 1: So now what we're looking at is largely unregulated, unbanked

370
00:22:53,040 --> 00:22:56,479
Speaker 1: transactions through digital currency, and that is very much on

371
00:22:56,520 --> 00:22:59,920
Speaker 1: the radar of federal prosecutors and regulators because they see

372
00:23:00,040 --> 00:23:02,480
Speaker 1: this as really the wild West, and it's a way

373
00:23:02,520 --> 00:23:05,639
Speaker 1: for people to avoid taxes, to launder money from criminal

374
00:23:05,720 --> 00:23:10,280
Speaker 1: enterprises potentially, and you know, even to violate campaign finance

375
00:23:10,600 --> 00:23:13,239
Speaker 1: and various different things. So it's very much on the

376
00:23:13,359 --> 00:23:17,440
Speaker 1: radar of prosecutors and regulators when it comes to cryptocurrency.

377
00:23:17,520 --> 00:23:20,080
Speaker 1: And again, there's so much promise to this technology, so

378
00:23:20,119 --> 00:23:21,600
Speaker 1: it's a shame that it's gotten a bit of a

379
00:23:21,640 --> 00:23:24,800
Speaker 1: blemish from some bad actors. But when it comes to regulators,

380
00:23:26,000 --> 00:23:29,199
Speaker 1: I would characterize their view of cryptocurrency as ranging from

381
00:23:29,280 --> 00:23:33,120
Speaker 1: highly skeptical to openly hostile because of these reasons. So

382
00:23:33,160 --> 00:23:38,560
Speaker 1: what do you believe the government's process is in determining

383
00:23:39,040 --> 00:23:42,800
Speaker 1: how to regulate or manage this market, Because as you

384
00:23:42,920 --> 00:23:47,840
Speaker 1: just describe, they're not agnostic at all. They're not agnostic.

385
00:23:47,920 --> 00:23:51,520
Speaker 1: So if you are an individual, you can mind cryptocurrency,

386
00:23:51,720 --> 00:23:55,560
Speaker 1: you can invest in cryptocurrency, you can buy and sell cryptocurrency,

387
00:23:55,720 --> 00:23:58,760
Speaker 1: and the government will largely leave you alone except for

388
00:23:58,800 --> 00:24:00,560
Speaker 1: the fact that you have to pay axes on it.

389
00:24:00,680 --> 00:24:03,520
Speaker 1: And the i r S does consider bitcoin and other

390
00:24:03,560 --> 00:24:06,639
Speaker 1: types of cryptocurrency to be property, and they expect you

391
00:24:06,680 --> 00:24:09,840
Speaker 1: to declare and pay capital gains tax on that. And

392
00:24:09,880 --> 00:24:12,600
Speaker 1: a taxable event can come out a number of different ways.

393
00:24:12,800 --> 00:24:15,359
Speaker 1: It's not just when you buy or sell or trade

394
00:24:15,400 --> 00:24:18,199
Speaker 1: the cryptocurrency. It's when you buy something. So if you

395
00:24:18,240 --> 00:24:21,480
Speaker 1: bought bitcoin at one hundred, it's now at two hundred,

396
00:24:21,560 --> 00:24:24,040
Speaker 1: and you buy something at two hundred dollars, the i

397
00:24:24,200 --> 00:24:26,560
Speaker 1: r S sees that as a taxable event and expects

398
00:24:26,560 --> 00:24:29,399
Speaker 1: you to pay short or long term capital gains on

399
00:24:29,600 --> 00:24:33,639
Speaker 1: that differential. So, but in general, if you're not in

400
00:24:33,680 --> 00:24:38,520
Speaker 1: the business of exchanging cryptocurrency, you're largely off the government's radar. Now,

401
00:24:38,640 --> 00:24:42,600
Speaker 1: if you want to get into the business of exchanging cryptocurrency,

402
00:24:42,760 --> 00:24:45,520
Speaker 1: and either you're doing crypto for fiat currency like dollars

403
00:24:45,600 --> 00:24:48,920
Speaker 1: or euro or crypto to crypto like bitcoin and ether,

404
00:24:49,160 --> 00:24:51,399
Speaker 1: and you do this on a regular basis as a

405
00:24:51,440 --> 00:24:54,399
Speaker 1: business to take advantage of the spread. Well, now the

406
00:24:54,440 --> 00:24:57,800
Speaker 1: Treasury Department has made very clear it considers you a

407
00:24:57,880 --> 00:25:00,440
Speaker 1: money services business and what that means means is it's

408
00:25:00,440 --> 00:25:02,560
Speaker 1: a term of art under a statute called the Bank

409
00:25:02,640 --> 00:25:05,280
Speaker 1: Secrecy Act from the nineteen seventies. And what it means

410
00:25:05,400 --> 00:25:08,080
Speaker 1: is you are now subject to registration. So if you

411
00:25:08,119 --> 00:25:11,919
Speaker 1: don't register and you engage as a cryptocurrency exchange, you

412
00:25:11,920 --> 00:25:15,680
Speaker 1: are operating an unlicensed money service business. If you do register,

413
00:25:15,800 --> 00:25:18,600
Speaker 1: which you should if you think you fall into this category.

414
00:25:18,720 --> 00:25:21,840
Speaker 1: Now you have a whole range of record keeping and

415
00:25:21,920 --> 00:25:25,639
Speaker 1: reporting and audit responsibilities to finn SEND, which is the

416
00:25:25,680 --> 00:25:28,119
Speaker 1: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network which is a part of the

417
00:25:28,160 --> 00:25:30,480
Speaker 1: Treasury Department. And this comes to a surprise to a

418
00:25:30,520 --> 00:25:33,560
Speaker 1: lot of companies, whether they be startups or traditional brick

419
00:25:33,600 --> 00:25:35,960
Speaker 1: and mortar banks and broker dealers who want to get

420
00:25:36,000 --> 00:25:38,760
Speaker 1: into the crypto space. Now you said that this is

421
00:25:38,800 --> 00:25:41,159
Speaker 1: something that the companies have to do. What are the

422
00:25:41,480 --> 00:25:45,160
Speaker 1: what are the responsibilities of the people who are actually

423
00:25:45,280 --> 00:25:48,440
Speaker 1: running the companies? Well, so it often these often come

424
00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:51,359
Speaker 1: to a surprise, a surprise to these people because now

425
00:25:51,440 --> 00:25:54,840
Speaker 1: they have not just tax, not just Treasury, but also

426
00:25:54,880 --> 00:25:57,159
Speaker 1: even sanctions obligations. So you have to make sure if

427
00:25:57,160 --> 00:26:00,359
Speaker 1: you're running a business now, you're not running a foul

428
00:26:00,440 --> 00:26:04,439
Speaker 1: of the various laws that apply to traditional financial institutions. Again,

429
00:26:04,800 --> 00:26:08,280
Speaker 1: traditional banks, they're accustomed to being regulated entities. They know

430
00:26:08,440 --> 00:26:11,320
Speaker 1: for for decades how to respond to Treasury, how to

431
00:26:11,359 --> 00:26:16,000
Speaker 1: respond to the compliance divisions. With expertise such as yourself,

432
00:26:16,000 --> 00:26:19,359
Speaker 1: they can call it's an entire industry, right, Not so

433
00:26:19,480 --> 00:26:21,760
Speaker 1: much in the crypto space with these startup companies that

434
00:26:21,800 --> 00:26:23,920
Speaker 1: are you know, they're just they're just figuring out the technology,

435
00:26:23,960 --> 00:26:26,840
Speaker 1: they're getting into it. It's exciting, they're getting investors, they're

436
00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:30,600
Speaker 1: getting customers. They are often shocked at the compliance and

437
00:26:30,640 --> 00:26:33,600
Speaker 1: regulatory burden that's imposed on then. And this is not

438
00:26:33,680 --> 00:26:36,000
Speaker 1: a sleepy industry. Like I started off saying, the government

439
00:26:36,080 --> 00:26:38,119
Speaker 1: is very much attuned to it. So they're looking to

440
00:26:38,160 --> 00:26:41,679
Speaker 1: make examples, they're looking to delve into the books and

441
00:26:41,680 --> 00:26:44,119
Speaker 1: records of these companies and figure out what's going on

442
00:26:44,200 --> 00:26:49,399
Speaker 1: and are they in compliance. What are mixers and tumblers? Okay,

443
00:26:49,440 --> 00:26:53,040
Speaker 1: so those are terms of art in the industry. They

444
00:26:53,080 --> 00:26:58,440
Speaker 1: are specific technologies that provide for further anonymity, and they're

445
00:26:58,880 --> 00:27:01,520
Speaker 1: red flags to be doubt for. Right. So part of

446
00:27:01,560 --> 00:27:05,360
Speaker 1: the appeal of cryptocurrency is that it's largely anonymous. Right.

447
00:27:05,520 --> 00:27:10,480
Speaker 1: The blockchain documents the transaction itself, but tying people's names

448
00:27:10,520 --> 00:27:14,440
Speaker 1: to those transactions can be difficult because there's no universal directory.

449
00:27:14,840 --> 00:27:17,119
Speaker 1: So what mixers and tunnelers do is they make it

450
00:27:17,200 --> 00:27:23,080
Speaker 1: even more anonymous. Possibly that is appealing to bitcoin users

451
00:27:23,240 --> 00:27:25,040
Speaker 1: for whatever reason that they want to stay you know,

452
00:27:25,080 --> 00:27:27,959
Speaker 1: off the radar, but to regulators that's a red flag.

453
00:27:28,200 --> 00:27:30,040
Speaker 1: So if I'm advising a client that's trying to get

454
00:27:30,080 --> 00:27:32,520
Speaker 1: into the crypto space, I say, okay, if we're looking

455
00:27:32,520 --> 00:27:36,359
Speaker 1: for red flags such as transactions to be wary of,

456
00:27:36,520 --> 00:27:40,000
Speaker 1: or customers to avoid any involvement of a mixer or

457
00:27:40,040 --> 00:27:45,000
Speaker 1: a tumbler or any other technology that further anonymizes the transaction.

458
00:27:45,119 --> 00:27:47,320
Speaker 1: Is something from the company perspective you want to be

459
00:27:47,359 --> 00:27:51,840
Speaker 1: wary of. Do you believe that online gaming is an

460
00:27:51,960 --> 00:27:55,960
Speaker 1: area that is specifically targeted by regulators to watch out

461
00:27:56,000 --> 00:27:59,119
Speaker 1: for these kinds of red flags. It's definitely something that

462
00:28:00,280 --> 00:28:02,760
Speaker 1: is going to be on is on their radar. So again,

463
00:28:02,760 --> 00:28:04,800
Speaker 1: if you are triaging, you want to get into the

464
00:28:04,800 --> 00:28:06,720
Speaker 1: crypto business, right you want to think about what kind

465
00:28:06,720 --> 00:28:08,960
Speaker 1: of counterparties, what kind of clients am I taking on?

466
00:28:09,240 --> 00:28:12,239
Speaker 1: And an online gambling company comes to you, it's one

467
00:28:12,280 --> 00:28:15,000
Speaker 1: of those red flags. Doesn't necessarily mean they're doing something wrong.

468
00:28:15,080 --> 00:28:17,320
Speaker 1: They could be in full compliance if they're off shore

469
00:28:17,600 --> 00:28:19,879
Speaker 1: and they're running their business in compliance with the laws

470
00:28:19,880 --> 00:28:22,600
Speaker 1: of whatever jurisdiction they're based in. But do you, as

471
00:28:22,600 --> 00:28:25,600
Speaker 1: a US company, as a bank or money services business,

472
00:28:25,720 --> 00:28:28,680
Speaker 1: want to be doing business with an online gambling company

473
00:28:28,840 --> 00:28:31,240
Speaker 1: knowing that they might be under the radar of US

474
00:28:31,320 --> 00:28:33,679
Speaker 1: regulators who might take a lot of interest in that

475
00:28:33,720 --> 00:28:36,600
Speaker 1: particular client. Thank you very much for being with us.

476
00:28:36,680 --> 00:28:40,680
Speaker 1: Joe Marino, excellent partner White Collar Defense and Investigations Group

477
00:28:40,720 --> 00:28:44,440
Speaker 1: for KED Walader based in Washington, d C. Giving us

478
00:28:44,480 --> 00:28:50,520
Speaker 1: his take on the world of cryptocurrencies. Much appreciated. Thanks

479
00:28:50,560 --> 00:28:53,160
Speaker 1: for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

480
00:28:53,200 --> 00:28:57,000
Speaker 1: can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

481
00:28:57,120 --> 00:29:00,560
Speaker 1: or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Box, I'm

482
00:29:00,600 --> 00:29:04,600
Speaker 1: on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

483
00:29:04,720 --> 00:29:07,320
Speaker 1: It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

484
00:29:07,360 --> 00:29:08,960
Speaker 1: worldwide on Blueberg Radio