WEBVTT - How Pope Joan Became the High Priestess

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Noble Blood, a production of iHeartRadio and Grimm

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and Mild from Aaron Mankie listener discretion advised. In twelve

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty five, a pope in northeast France hand wrote a

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>strange tale hoax in Rome, a woman becomes pope. According

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Chronicle, in around eleven hundred, a woman disguised

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>herself as a man in order to rise through the

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>ranks of the Catholic hierarchy, from notary to cardinal and all.

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 2>The way to pope. This woman pulled off her scheme

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 2>for a while, until one day she the pope, was

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>riding on horseback and went into labor, revealing her deception

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>to the Romans. The citizens of Rome dragged her by

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>horseback and stoned her as punishment for breaking the rules.

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:10.199
<v Speaker 2>This short, scandalous story raised a number of questions. Who

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 2>was this woman, where was she from? And how did

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 2>she make it through the gauntlet of Catholic politics without

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 2>getting caught? How did she get pregnant? If this happened

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 2>in eleven hundred, then why is this a female pope?

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 2>Objectively a massive deal only being reported for the first

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 2>time one hundred and fifty years later. Why is the

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 2>one detail we get about her time as pope that

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 2>she gave birth on horseback, which, while impressive and interesting,

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem to be the main headline of the story,

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>which again is that a woman was pope for the

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 2>first and only time in recorded history. This handwritten chronicle

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>from the monastery is even more ambiguous about the pope's

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 2>gender than you might imagine. While the headline explicitly calls

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 2>the pope in the story a woman, the text itself

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 2>never refers to the pope with any female pronouns, instead

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 2>opting for gender neutral pronouns like it and the neuter animated,

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 2>which is a Latin tense that defaults to male. The

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 2>publication notes that the story is quote to be verified,

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 2>seeming to hedge the scandalous nature of the story. In

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>spite of these inconsistencies, the story of the alleged popess

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 2>spread among the medieval Catholic world, with various authors filling

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 2>in their own details about the legend. The popees became

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 2>an english woman from Maines. As a young woman, she

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>fell in love with a scholar and accompanied him to Athens.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 2>While she was intellectually voracious, the Athenian professors wouldn't let

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 2>her into their classrooms, and so she disguised herself as

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 2>a man and moved to Rome. Admired for her vast

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 2>knowledge of scripture, she so successfully embedded herself in the

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Catholic Church that she was unanimously elected Pope. She served

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 2>in the position for two years until she suddenly gave birth,

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 2>traveling from Saint Peter's Basilica to Saint John Lantern, which

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 2>uncovered her deception. Carved busts reveal her name Johannes the Eighth,

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>or Pope Joan, but there is still one massive problem

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 2>with that more detailed history. There is no actual evidence

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>to prove that Pope Joan ever existed. The story I

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>just told about the englishwoman from Maines. It became the

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>most popular version of the legend, but that story was

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 2>cobbled together from hundreds of different accounts with wildly desparate details.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Some versions of the Pope Joan story take place in

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the year nine hundred, others in eight hundred and fifty,

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 2>others in eleven hundred. In some accounts, Joan is named

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 2>agnes Anna or Gilberta, and the length of her papacy

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>varies from two months to two years. One would think

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>that such a scandal would have produced some documentary evidence.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 2>She might have been depicted in paintings or sculptures, or

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 2>mentioned in articles or letters, But there were no references

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 2>to her to be found. So I have to be

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 2>the unfortunate bearer of bad news on this story and

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 2>make it very clear to you, the listener, that it

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 2>is incredibly unlikely that a female pope ever existed. One

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 2>would think that this lack of evidence would deter people

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 2>from spreading the story, but the opposite happened. There wouldn't

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 2>be a single source questioning the validity of the Pope

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Jone story until three hundred years after the initial chronicle

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 2>was published in twelve fifty, and Jon's legend would continue

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 2>to spread for centuries after that, surviving debunking after debunking.

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 2>In fact, Pope Joan became a kind of Catholic forest gump,

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>popping up throughout pivotal moments in the history of the

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Catholic Church and playing central roles in religious conflicts. She

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 2>even spread far beyond the church into secular life, popping

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 2>up in plays, novels, and even card games. How did

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 2>the almost certainly false myth of Pope Joan manage to

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 2>survive for almost a millennium in spite of shoddy evidence

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 2>and multiple debunkings. In this episode, we'll try to solve

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the mystery, tracing the story of a woman who, as

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Catholic scholar Tom Noble put it quote, never lived, but

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 2>who nevertheless refuses to die. I'm Danish Schwartz and this

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 2>is noble blood. To solve the mystery of how and

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 2>why the legend of Pope Joan spread, we should look

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 2>more closely at the first mention of her, the Monastery

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Chronicle from twelve fifty five. Unfortunately, we don't know much

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 2>about it. The author of this text was a Dominican

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 2>monk named Jean de Maii, but scholars don't know much

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 2>about him other than that he wrote this article and

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 2>one other book of legends. We don't know where he

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 2>got his information about Pope Joan from, or what his

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 2>intentions were for this story, or if he believed the

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 2>story himself, but Maille's role as a Dominican monk gives

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 2>us a clue. Maye wasn't alone in reproducing sketchy rumors.

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>In fact, it was a matter of principle for friars

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>to document as many stories as possible, no matter how apocryphal.

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 2>It didn't even seem to matter whether or not the

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 2>author believed the story they were reporting. Jean de Meili

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 2>wrote about plenty of legends he didn't personally believe. For example,

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 2>he wrote an account of the Nativity where Salome, one

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 2>of Jesus' disciples, wanted to confirm Mary's virginity before she

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 2>gave birth, so Salome felt her up, which caused her

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 2>arm to wither away. At the end of the piece,

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Meilee concludes that this event probably never happened. This might

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 2>raise the question if Malee didn't believe the story himself,

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 2>then why did he spread it? After all, all, the

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Salome story, like the Pope Joan story, was not widely known.

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Mainly wasn't debunking a popular rumor. He was simply telling

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 2>the story and then mentioning that he didn't find it plausible.

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Pope Joan scholar Elaine Borough argues that Dominican writers of

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 2>that era emphasized quantity over quality. Part of this was

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 2>politically motivated. After the end of the Crusades, the Catholic

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Church had more cultural power than ever, and they flexed

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 2>that power by trying to explain and account for anything

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 2>and everything, even traditions that seemed to challenge the Catholic

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Church's authority. Reproducing rumors, even ones that cast doubt on

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the authority of the Catholic Church or undermined biblical accounts,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 2>made them less threatening. Recording rumors and apocrypha was also

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 2>a matter of religious doctrine. According to the Bible, Jesus

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 2>appeared in the middle of human history rather than in

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the beginning, suggesting that a seismic divine event could occur

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 2>at any time. Therefore, it was crucial that Catholic writers

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 2>document any rumor because it may gain religious significance later.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 2>In the minds of these writers, it would be way

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 2>worse to leave out a potentially significant event than it

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 2>would be to spread a rumor that turned out to

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 2>be irrelevant or untrue. Other Catholic writers would echo this

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 2>logic when reproducing the story of Pope Joan. For centuries

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 2>after that first story was originally published, it became something

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 2>of a self fulfilling prophecy. The story had become so

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>widespread that it would be weirder not to include it.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 2>One Catholic writer, Platina, would say this explicitly when he

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 2>wrote his version of the story of Pope Joan in

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 2>fourteen seventy nine, writing that he wasn't certain that Pope

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Joan actually existed, but he did not want quote to

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 2>omit too obstinately and tenaciously what everyone affirms. Peer pressure

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 2>wasn't the only reason the story gained traction. Another reason

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the story spread was that it was useful in clearing

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>up some inconsistencies around papal infallibility. Around the time that

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Pope Joan appeared in the record in the twelve fifties,

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 2>monks were pretty unhappy with the pope, Pope Innocent the Fourth,

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 2>who limited Franciscan monk's right to preach and hear confession.

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 2>This made the pope hugely unpopular, but he was difficult

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 2>to criticize because, according to Catholic doctrine, he was ordained

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>by God to rule. By suggesting that a woman could

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 2>have ascended to the papacy, the Pope Joan story showed

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 2>that the Church had made mistakes before, so it wouldn't

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 2>be out of the question if it allowed an unworthy

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 2>man like Pope Innocent to rule. In twelve seventy nine,

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>an archbishop Martin of Opava emphasized that reading when he

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 2>published another account of the female pope in his book

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>of Legends. He explained that Pope Joan was intelligent and

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 2>well respected, and that she was unanimously elected to the papacy.

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Even so, her reign was invalid because a woman could

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>not be pope, suggesting that pope's could be illegitimate even

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 2>if they were elected fairly. It's worth noting that we

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know for sure whether or not Martin of Opava

0:11:54.360 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 2>actually intended to include the Pope Joan story in his work.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't appear in early editions of the book, and the

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 2>story actually first appears in editions of the book around

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 2>thirteen oh four in different handwriting, leading many scholars to

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 2>believe the story was added later by a different writer. Still,

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Martin of Opava's story became the definitive account of Pope Joan.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 2>His book was a best seller, and it spread the

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 2>rumor throughout Europe, getting translated into several languages. It wasn't

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>just popular, it was also the first version of the

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 2>story that actually attempted to give historical evidence for her reign.

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Opava gave the pope a name John, which would later

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 2>be feminized to Joan. He changed the date of her

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 2>reign from eleven hundred to the eight fifties, and suggested

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 2>that she ruled after Pope Leo the fourth. It's unclear

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 2>how he came up with these details. There was a

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Pope John John the eighth in the eight hundreds. Like Joan,

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>his reign was brief. He reconciled a schism between Western

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>and Eastern branches of Catholicism through compromise, which many fellow

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Catholics considered weak and quote womanish Opava may have conflated

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 2>criticisms of his quote effeminate nature into the idea that

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 2>he was actually a woman disguised as a man the

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 2>whole time. It also wasn't totally out of the question

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 2>for a woman to have sought political power through the

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Church at that time. In the tenth century, there was

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 2>what people called a government of harlots, or later a

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 2>pornocracy in Rome, where a few wives and mistresses of

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 2>noblemen attempted to manipulate papal succession from behind the scenes.

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 2>A noble woman in Rome named Theodora advanced several men

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 2>to the papacy, one of whom she allegedly slept with

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and another who had a child with her daughter, Morosia.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Morosia herself would later advance her own son to the papacy.

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 2>People mockingly called these women popouses, since these women seemed

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 2>to be the true source of political power and influence,

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 2>puppeting their popes to advance their own agendas. Many of

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 2>those popes were also named John, connecting those accounts to

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Martin of Opava's story. These hypotheseses aren't perfect. The dates

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 2>don't line up. Opava thought that Joan reigned in eight

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 2>point fifty, while the quote effeminate Pope John the Eighth

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 2>held the throne in eight seventy, and Theodora and Morosia

0:14:56.080 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 2>rose to power in the nine hundreds. Still, they suggest

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 2>that there was a pervasive anxiety in the Catholic Church

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 2>about the influence of women and femininity in religious life,

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 2>which brings us to another reason the story of Pope

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Joan proved useful to the Catholic Church. It discouraged women

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 2>from pursuing political power within the church. Another writer from

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the twelve hundreds, at Tande bourbonc published a fiery polemic

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 2>about Pope Joan, suggesting she was a harlot who had

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 2>what he called quote the audacity or rather insanity to

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 2>become pope. According to him, Joan solicits the help of

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 2>the devil himself, who helps her achieve her political ambitions.

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>This version of the story has a clear moral the

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Church should be wary of wily women with the audacity

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 2>to seek religious power, because it clearly means they are

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 2>in league with the devil. Opava and Bourbon's version of

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 2>the Pope Joan stories couldn't be more different. Opava's account

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 2>is even keeled, based in true or not what purports

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 2>to be historical detail, and it's slightly critical of the

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Catholic Church, while Bourbone's account is salacious, over the top

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 2>and fiercely defensive of the Church, suggesting that the only

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 2>way a woman could have become pope was through black magic.

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 2>But still, the differences in these stories suggest that Pope

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Joan was useful to Catholic writers with a variety of

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 2>styles and agendas. By the fourteen hundreds, the story of

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Pope Joan had become so widespread that Pope jon became

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 2>even more entrenched in the Catholic canon, beyond just compilations

0:16:55.880 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 2>of legends. When the Duomo of Siena commissioned a series

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 2>wories of busts of past popes to display in the

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:09.959
<v Speaker 2>giant ornate Cathedral, they included Pope Joan, proudly displaying her

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 2>alongside seminole figures in Catholic history. The bust of Pope

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Joan wouldn't last forever. Two centuries later, on August seventh,

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 2>sixteen hundred, the Governor of Sienna delivered an edict commanding

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 2>quote remove the pope ess from the cathedral. Just two

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 2>days later, the bust of the pope es was altered

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 2>to depict Pope Zacharias, essentially disguising Joan as a man

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 2>once more. This was the culmination of the work of

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Florimond de Raymond, who had campaigned for months to have

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 2>the bust removed, suggesting that the legend.

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Was a hoax.

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 2>This event, the bust removal, marks a massive shift in

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 2>the Pope Joan story. The ledgend had lasted for almost

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>four hundred years without question, but now people were calling

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the story blasphemous. So what happened in fourteen fifteen, more

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 2>than four hundred years after she supposedly lived. Pope Joan

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 2>appeared in an unlikely place, a heresy trial. The defendant,

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Jan Hus, was a czech Man who was once the

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 2>rector for Prague University, but he had turned his back

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 2>on the Church and became its best known critic. He

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>was especially harsh about the sinful behavior of clergy, bishops,

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 2>and even the papacy, arguing that the true authority of

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Catholicism wasn't the Pope but Christ himself. Unlike Jesus, who

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 2>was infallible, popes and other clergy were subject to the

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 2>same sinful urgent as everyone else. This belief was controversial,

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 2>especially for the Catholic higher ups who capitalized off of

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 2>their presumed infallibility. Hughes had been dragged to Constance, a

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 2>small university town in Germany, to defend his beliefs in

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 2>court or be executed. At the trial, he was asked

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 2>to give examples of sinful or illegitimate popes. He listed

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 2>a few, but the clergy struck each of them down

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 2>one by one, with a single exception, Pope Joan. Hughes

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 2>had written earlier in the century that Pope Joan was

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 2>proof that quote, the most unlettered layman or a female

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 2>or a heretic and Antichrist may be Pope end quote.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 2>The clergy, which had been disproving and discrediting us at

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 2>every turn, could not challenge him on this point. This

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 2>event mark's a turning point in the legend of Pope Joan.

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 2>When it initially appeared, the Pope Joan myth was pretty harmless.

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 2>It was a fanciful, salacious rumor that actually proved useful

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 2>as a way for the Church to explore and explain

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 2>doctrinal inconsistencies. But now Pope Joan was being used by

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 2>enemies of the Church as a way to challenge the

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 2>Pope's very existence. It wasn't just use using Joan to

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 2>undermine the authority of the pope. At this time, the

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Catholic Church was in a political crisis. It had managed

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 2>to elect two popes, one based in Rome and another

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 2>in Avignon, who were fighting for legitimacy. A council in

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 2>Pisa tried to resolve this by picking a new pope altogether,

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 2>but this plan backfired. The two deposed popes stood their

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 2>ground and kept control over their territories, so instead of

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 2>one pope, Pisa now meant that there were three. While

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.479
<v Speaker 2>a pseudo pope like Joan may have been a funny

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 2>anomaly in the thirteenth century. By the fifteenth century, with

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 2>illegitimate popes and anti popes cropping up right and left,

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 2>it was less funny. In the bitter debate about what

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 2>to do with all of those popes, both sides used

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Joan to defend their positions. On the one hand, Pope

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Joan proved that there was a precedent for governing bodies

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 2>to depose of an unfit pope. On the other hand,

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Pope Joan was a warning that deposing a pope could

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 2>cause chaos because, according to another legend, after Pope Joan

0:21:55.400 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 2>was executed, Catholic leadership struggled to replace her church was

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 2>left popeless for two years. This reasoning was accidentally kind

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 2>of progressive, because these thinkers are arguing that Pope Joan

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 2>should have stayed in power and that it was better

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 2>to have a female pope than no pope at all.

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 2>And even though hus was successfully convicted of heresy and

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 2>burned at the stake, his threat to the church only

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 2>grew stronger after his death. His execution sparked a new

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 2>religious movement, the Hussites, who rejected core Catholic doctrines like

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Latin masses, the veneration of Saints, and even churches. The

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 2>movement started expanding across Bohemia. They too brought up Pope

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Joan as evidence that Church authorities were not infallible. In

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 2>fourteen fifty one, the Bishop of Siena traveled to a

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Hussate stronghold in Tubor to debate them on that point.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 2>To discredit them, he undermined the veracity of the Pope

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Joan story, albeit in a fairly weak way, saying tentatively

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 2>quote the story is not certain. This moment foreshadows the

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 2>way the Catholic Church would majorly turn on Pope Joan

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 2>in the sixteenth century, as threats to the Church's authority

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 2>continued to spread, while the Holy Roman Empire managed to

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 2>quash the Hussite Revolution by the end of the fifteenth century.

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 2>In fifteen seventeen, a new threat to the Catholic Church

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 2>emerged in the form of Martin Luther's ninety five Theses. Luther,

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 2>like jan Hesse and the Hussites, would invoke Pope Joan.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 2>In one of Luther's informal talks, he mentioned seeing a

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 2>statue of Joan during a trip to Rome, but he

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>didn't make much of it. Instead, he wonders why the

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Church would put such an embarrassing object on public display,

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 2>which is actually a pretty effective dis Though Martin Luther

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 2>himself didn't spend much time delving into Pope Joan, he

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 2>would of course spark the Protestant Reformation, which in turn

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 2>caused an avalanche of Pope Joan discourse. From fifteen fifty

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 2>to seventeen hundred, Protestants and Catholics would produce at least

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 2>forty pamphlets devoted exclusively to Pope Joan, which doesn't include reprints,

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 2>new editions, translations, and publications that are lost that are

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 2>cited in surviving texts. Protestants started this century's long debate

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 2>in the fifteen fifties, seizing on Joan as proof that

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the Catholic Church was toast. In fifteen fifty six, Italian

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Protestant Pierre Paolo Bulgario argued in over the top fiery

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 2>prose that Joan seized the papacy by magical arts and

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 2>gave the Catholic Church a whore for a leader and

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 2>a mother for a father. John Calvin, the Protestant who

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 2>would inspire his own namesake Christian sect, Calvinism went even further.

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 2>According to him, not only did Pope jon prove that

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 2>individual popes could sin, she also potentially undermined the whole

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 2>structure of the Catholic Church. He argued that Catholic bishops

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 2>couldn't claim to be directly descendants of Jesus's apostles if

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 2>a fraudulent pope disrupted the chain. Similarly, in the two

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 2>years she allegedly reigned, Pope Joan would have ordained priests

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 2>and bishops, and those priests and bishops would have gone

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 2>on to ordain other priests and bishops, and so on

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 2>and so on, and so. If Pope Joan was illegitimate,

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 2>her bishops and priests would be two, and so would

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 2>all of the bishops and priests in their downlines. By

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 2>that logic, the existence of Pope Joan could potentially render

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the entire structure of the Catholic Church illegitimate. Though Pope

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Joan had originally been a Catholic propaganda tool, after decades

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 2>of watching the Protestants use her to discredit them, the

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Catholic Church had enough. In fifteen sixty two, they finally

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 2>decided to fire back with a book by Anophrio Panvinio,

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 2>which set out to definitively disprove the Pope jon myth

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 2>for the final time. Like the Bishop of Siena who

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 2>had argued about Joan with the Hussites in fourteen fifty,

0:26:55.680 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Anophrio took a reasonable cautious approach to undermine the story,

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 2>focusing on the lack of documentary evidence, the confusing dates,

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 2>and the tentative language in even the earliest retellings of

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the story. In fifteen eighty seven, a French Catholic writer

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 2>named Flora and Raymond made a much bigger splash in

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 2>his book length debunking of the Pope Joan myth. He

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 2>argued that the introduction of Pope Joan in the thirteenth

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 2>century was actually part of a German anti Catholic conspiracy.

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 2>He thought that the Germans, who in his mind, were

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 2>too promiscuous, wanted to undermine the Church's chastity. Those licentious

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Germans created this salacious story to make the Church seem

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 2>hypocritical and giving them more licensed to sleep around. This

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 2>was a bizarre claim, founded more on Raymond's bias against

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 2>Germans than on any historical facts. Pope Jone. Historian Elainborough

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 2>says that Raymond swung for the fences rhetorically speaking because

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 2>of his quote relatively unenlightened mind end quote. Nevertheless, in

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 2>his big mic drop moment, Raymond suggested that it was

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 2>ironic that the Protestants were so fixated on Pope jan

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 2>when they were under the spell of their own female

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 2>usurper of religious authority, namely Queen Elizabeth I, who declared

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>herself the leader of the Anglican Church after becoming Queen

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 2>of England. Raymond's rebuttal pushed the Protestants to get even

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 2>more conspiratorial. In sixteen ten, Alexander Cook wrote an elaborate,

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 2>fervid defense of Pope Jones's existence to match the rays

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:06.479
<v Speaker 2>and takedown. Echoing contemporary clickbait, Cook bragged that Catholics quote

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 2>hate him. Cook claimed that the lack of documentary evidence

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 2>for Joan pointed to a Catholic cover up. According to Cook,

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:21.479
<v Speaker 2>Catholics were intentionally destroying textual evidence of Pope Joan in

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 2>order to suppress her threats to the papal line of succession.

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 2>The claim was just not true. If anything, Catholics of

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 2>the fourteenth century were the Ones, adding in the story

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 2>of Pope Joan into older texts to make her seem

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 2>more legitimate. But in his enthusiasm to prove the existence

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 2>of Pope Joan, it's pretty apparent that Alexander Cook lost

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the forest for the trees a little bit. One of

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 2>the main tenets of Protestantism is that the Bible was

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 2>the core of religious life, rather than legends of saints

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 2>or elaborate ritual like Latin masses or ornate churches and cathedrals.

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Without documentary evidence of Pope Joan, Cook was turning to

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 2>exactly the random books of legends and paintings that Protestants

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 2>like Martin Luther and Jan Hess built their careers on. Repudiating.

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 2>The massive reversal suggested how far the Pope Jones story

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 2>had come. The story became so symbolically important that it

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 2>had Catholics turning on each other and Protestants lionizing Catholic apocrypha.

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 2>David Blondell, a seventeenth century Calvinist minister and writer, recognized

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 2>the absurdity of the situation. In sixteen forty seven, he

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 2>broke with his fellow Protestants and wrote a debunking of

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 2>the Pope Jones story, which many considered a betrayal of

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the cause. Looking back on the time fifty years later,

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 2>one source says, quote would it not have been better

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 2>to leave the Papists the trouble of wiping their own

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 2>filth away? End? Quote? Some even thought that he must

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 2>have been in league with the Catholics, but it seems

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 2>that Blundell was just motivated by the truth, and many

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Protestants and Catholics were convinced by Blundell's account Because of

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 2>his unbiased approach. One could take issue with the Jones

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 2>story for reasons other than defending Catholicism. After Blundell published

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 2>his book, The Pace of Pope Joan, articles slowed down

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 2>on both sides. Blundell set the stage for the modern

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 2>attitude about Pope Joan that the story was largely a hoax.

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 2>You might think that this was the last we'd hear

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 2>about Pope Joan, But it turns out that the legend

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 2>of the female Pope would take on a life of

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 2>its own in the secular world, a life that would

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 2>keep her legend alive for centuries to come. While the

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Catholics and Protestants were having their own centuries long flame

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 2>war about Pope Jones's clerical legitimacy. Joan was gaining traction

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 2>in the secular world as a folk hero, perhaps to

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the Church's chagrin. The Pope Jones story had broad appeal.

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 2>What's not to love about a wily, plucky woman who

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 2>outsmarted the church and also managed to get laid while

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 2>doing it. In thirteen sixty, long before the Protestant Revolution

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 2>and a century after the first mention of Pope Joan,

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Italian writer Giovanni Boccaccio included a particularly salacious version of

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the story in his book On Faces Women, a compilation

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 2>of stories of notable women from myth and history. Unlike

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 2>his religious contemporaries, Boccaccio didn't care whether or not Joan

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 2>was legitimate or an illegitimate pope. Instead, he focused on

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the more lurid aspects of her story, her alleged lust

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 2>for sex, knowledge, and power. Boccaccio's story begins with Pope

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Joan falling in love with a student and accompanying him

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 2>to Athens, disguising herself as a man to be able

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 2>to pursue her studies as well as to be able

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 2>to pursue her true love. In sort of an Ellwood's

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 2>legally blonde situation. But when her lover dies, she continues

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 2>her pursuit of religious knowledge as a tribute to him,

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 2>and Joan becomes so widely recognized for her intellect that

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 2>she is disguised as a man and unanimously elected Pope.

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 2>The Devil doesn't enter the picture until after she's elected. Pope.

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 2>The Devil encourages her to give in to temptation and

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 2>start sleeping around, which she does. She gets pregnant, and

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the Romans discover her deception and stone her to death.

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 2>In the ending shared by most Pope Joan accounts that said,

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 2>in a stark departure from other Pope Jone stories, Boccaccio

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 2>celebrates Joan for remarkable achievements, whether those achievements are eloping

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 2>with her lover, cross dressing, advancing as a scholar, or

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 2>pursuing clerical power. It's only after she starts seducing other

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 2>men that Boccaccio begins to criticize her. Her tragic downfall

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 2>is that she refused to remain loyal to her dead lover,

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 2>even though she fell prey to lust. Eventually, Boccaccio's Pope

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Joan was a sympathetic portra of a woman as she

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:06.919
<v Speaker 2>amassed power. What gave Boccaccio's Pope Joan's story such remarkable

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 2>staying power wasn't just that it was sympathetic to Joan,

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 2>but that it presented Joan as an archetype rather than

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 2>a historical figure. Women usually got political power in history

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 2>through familial succession or through marriage, and they tended to

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 2>express that power by manipulating men in their lives, at

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:33.919
<v Speaker 2>least according to the stories women like Theodora or Morosia

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the Mother Daughter power duo from the nine hundreds. But

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 2>in Boccaccio's story, Pope Joan gained her power through a meritocracy,

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 2>and she exercised it fairly. She was elected into the

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 2>papacy as a result of her scholarly achievements and her

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 2>ability to deceive the Romans by disguising herself as a man.

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 2>Illustrated editions of Boccaccio's book spread the story of Pope

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 2>Joan throughout Europe, with images of her sitting placidly on

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 2>the throne, wearing her papal robes and an ornate triple tiara.

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 2>These images of Pope Joan found their way into a

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 2>tarot card deck, which was introduced into Europe around fourteen fifty.

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 2>Tarot decks, like decks of playing cards, include various suits

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and numbers that a tarot reader interprets to tell you

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 2>your fortune. But what distinguishes tarot decks from regular old

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 2>playing cards are special symbolic cards like the World and

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the Moon, and these cards form what's called the major arcana.

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 2>One card of the major Arcana is the High Priestess.

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Back in the fourteen hundreds, when the taro was initially

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 2>introduced to Europe, this card was the pope Us. The

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 2>oldest surviving tarot deck, commissioned in fourteen fifty by Filippo

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Maria Visconti, Duke of Milan, and by his successor and

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 2>son in law, includes an image of the popis one

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 2>that resembles the wood cut prints of Joan from the

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Boccaccio illustrations. In this image, hand painted with silver and

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 2>gold leaf, the Popess sits on a throne, holding a

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 2>pontifical staff and wearing the typical papal triple tiara, much

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 2>like the Boccaccio illustrations. It wasn't until the late seventeen

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 2>hundreds that the popess would transform into the high priestess.

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 2>In the midst of the French Revolution, the Catholic Church

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 2>was considered unpopular and corrupt. French tarot decks began to

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 2>decenter images of the clergy, a shift that would eventually

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 2>result in the development of the high priestess card in

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 2>the nineteenth century. But while Pope Joan was being scrubbed

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 2>from the tarot deck, she was about to have a

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 2>major moment of resurgence in revolutionary France. In seventeen ninety

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 2>three alone, three plays about Pope Joan debuted in France,

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 2>all body farces aimed at satirizing the monarchy and the

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Catholic Church. Like Boccaccio's version of the Pope jon myth,

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 2>these plays had almost no interest in confirming or denying

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 2>the veracity of the story. Instead, they held up Joan

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 2>as something of a folk hero, willing to thumb her

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 2>nose at the Church's authority in the pursuit of true love.

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 2>But even as Pope Joan established herself firmly as a

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 2>folklore figure, even today, there are some scholars who stubbornly

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 2>assert that Joan could have been a real historical figure

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 2>in spite of the lack of evidence. After all, even

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 2>from the few primary sources presented in this episode, I

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 2>think it's pretty clear that the textual record is contentious

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 2>and confusing. Some scholars think that the primary sources were

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 2>later altered to provide proof of Pope Jones's existence, but

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 2>others think, like the Protestants in the sixteen hundreds, that

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the lack of documentary evidence is more likely a result

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of Catholics frantically scrubbing the pope ess from the archive.

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 2>There is always the possibility that some historian might stumble

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 2>upon a long buried primary source that proves that Pope

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Joan was a real historical figure. Stranger things have happened,

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 2>But until then, it is Joan's ambiguity that makes her compelling,

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 2>at least in my mind. How she was manipulated and used, reinterpreted,

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 2>and trotted out as evidence on every side of multiple debates. Joan,

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 2>even in legendary form, fueled centuries of resistance to the

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Church's misdeeds from the Protestant Reformation all the way through

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 2>the French Revolution. History is a slippery thing, and it

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work like simple fables with morals. At the end

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 2>of the story. But if the moral of Pope jones

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 2>story is resist the constraints of the institutions you're in

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:27.240
<v Speaker 2>to fight for more equal opportunities, then that's a pretty

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 2>good lesson. That's the story of the myth of Pope Joan.

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Keep listening after a brief sponsor break to hear about

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 2>one of the silliest myths that still persists in Jon's legacy.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 2>A corollary of the Pope Jone myth was that because

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 2>a woman snuck into the papacy, their needs to be

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 2>a final check at the end of the pope election

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that all elected popes were male. According

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 2>to legend, popes had to sit on a special chair

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 2>with a hole in it so that someone could reach

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 2>up through the hole and make sure that the Pope

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 2>to be had testicles. This myth appeared initially in around

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 2>twelve ninety in an account of Pope Joan from a

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Benedictine monk. He wrote, quote it is said that this

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 2>is why Romans established the custom of verifying the sex

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 2>of the elected pope through an opening in a stone

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 2>throne end quote. At around the same time, another Dominican

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 2>monk wrote of a spiritual vision he had where quote

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 2>the Spirit of the Lord took hold of him and

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 2>placed him in Rome, where he saw the chair for himself.

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.720
<v Speaker 2>In the next few hundred years, much like the Pope

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 2>Joan myth, the the Chair ritual myth took on a

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 2>life of its own and became known as the Right

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 2>of Verification. Unlike the Pope Joan myth, the Right of

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Verification had more solid evidence for its existence. There are

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 2>some eyewitness accounts of the ritual, and not just visions

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 2>guided by the Holy Spirit. In fourteen oh four, someone

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that they saw the Pope elect sit on a

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 2>stone throne as part of his inauguration, but it's not

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 2>hard to poke holes in that account because the person

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:38.320
<v Speaker 2>who wrote it wasn't a member of the Roman Curia,

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 2>so he wouldn't have been able to see the ritual

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 2>in the first place. There was another account of the

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Right of Verification from someone who was actually in the Curia,

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 2>a humanist and member of the Roman Academy named Platina

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 2>that you might remember from earlier in this episode, but

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 2>his version only complied Kate's the historical record, since he

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 2>claimed that the stone throne with a hole in the

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 2>seat wasn't used to verify the pope's sex, but rather

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 2>it was used as a toilet. He wrote, quote that

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.439
<v Speaker 2>seat was prepared in such a manner so that one

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 2>who is invested with such great domination will know that

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 2>he is not God but a man, so he must defecate.

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 2>End quote. It turns out, starting in ten ninety nine,

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 2>a pope had to sit on a perforated marble throne

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 2>as part of the papal election ritual, and in keeping

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 2>with the spirit of Platina's explanation, it was meant to

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 2>humble the pope in a moment that he was about

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 2>to gain absolute power. The ritual was relatively uncontroversial it

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 2>was performed up until fifteen thirteen, but the Pope Joan

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Myth added a rectale for the perforated chair and imbued

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 2>the ritual with a scandalous origin story, which allowed it

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 2>to become sensationalized and exaggerated for centuries. In tandem with

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the Pope Joan Myth, the quote right of verification became

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 2>a hot topic during the Protestant Reformation, although it was

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 2>less existentially threatening to the Catholic Church after all, As

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 2>scholar Tom Noble wrote, quote in the early sixteenth century,

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 2>several writers with grim humor said that the right had

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 2>fallen out of use because recent popes had so many

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:44.840
<v Speaker 2>bastard children that their sex was not in doubt. Meanwhile,

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 2>flormand Durraymond, who you might remember as the one who

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 2>thought that the Pope Joan story was a blasphemous, horny

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 2>German conspiracy theory, was relatively chill about the right of verification.

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 2>He wrote, so that the whole thing was quote so

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 2>gross that the only good response for Catholics was to

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 2>laugh at the Protestants who repeated it. Noble Blood is

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:19.959
<v Speaker 2>a production of iHeart Radio and Grim and Mild from

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Manky. Noble Blood is created and hosted by me

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Dana Schwartz, with additional writing and researching by Hannah Johnston,

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Hannah Zuick, Mira Hayward, Courtney Sender, and Lori Goodman. The

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:38.760
<v Speaker 2>show is edited and produced by Noemi Griffin and rima

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 2>Il Kahali, with supervising producer Josh Thain and executive producers

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Manke, Alex Williams, and Matt Frederick. For more podcasts

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:55.280
<v Speaker 2>from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app Apple podcasts, or wherever

0:45:55.320 --> 0:46:30.800
<v Speaker 2>you listen to your favorite shows.