WEBVTT - Apple Shares Rise to a Record, Fed Meeting

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarplaying and Broud Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>You're live here on a Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio.

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 3>We're streaming live on YouTube as well, so you can

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 3>head over to YouTube dot com and search Bloomberg Podcast.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 3>As Amy was just reporting Apple moving higher, it's now

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 3>intra day all time record. Good for them. It's taken

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the lead over in Nvidia as the second most valuable

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 3>company in the world while also reclaiming the three trillion

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 3>dollar market cap valuation.

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 2>So big day for.

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Apple stocks shareholders. Good news for them. Let's break it

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 3>down a little bit here. Angelo Zeno joins US vice

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 3>president and senior equity analyst at c FR A Research

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 3>journey US from Nueva York via zoom Angel.

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for joining us here.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 3>How did you take How did you interpret yesterday's news

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 3>from Apple? How big of a deal or not was

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 3>their announcements?

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean thanks for having me, guys, So you know,

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 4>as far as you know how a good deal it is,

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 4>we think it's a big deal to us. You know,

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 4>Siri probably just got its biggest upgrade ever since it's

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, original kind of appearance back in twenty eleven.

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 4>And you kind of look at what they've done across

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 4>the ecosystem and the new you know, the new AI

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 4>capabilities and tools that they're going to push out to developers. Now,

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 4>there's going to be a lot that they can do

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 4>with these tools, and you know, in terms of upgrading

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 4>their apps and providing new capabilities out there to the

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 4>consumer may not necessarily be something you see over the

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 4>next kind of three to six months, may take you know,

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 4>may take some time here. That's why we told investors

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 4>out there this is going to be more evolutionary than

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.559
<v Speaker 4>it is some sort of super cycle that you're going

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 4>to see later this year. But that said, I mean,

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 4>I think what's really important here is you kind of

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 4>look at most consumers out there today. Most consumers aren't

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 4>using kind of AI in the sense of chat, GPT

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 4>among other type of you know, large language models out

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 4>there to the extent that they possibly can. And when

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 4>you kind of think about what Apple is doing is

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 4>they're probably they're throwing that kind of you know, ability

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 4>out there for consumers to have it directly in their hands.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 4>So we think that's a big deal, and we think

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 4>that's going to cause consumers out there to ultimately upgrade.

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 4>May not be the sixteen, it might be the seventeen,

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 4>but ultimately it's a very positive thing for the evolution

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 4>of Apple.

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 5>You maintained a by rating on this stock after yesterday's

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 5>news following the conference, but then also if you look

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 5>at the an R function, I know Paul likes to

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 5>look at this. In the terminal, there's forty buys, fifteen holes,

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 5>five cells. And Paul and I were just chatting about

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 5>how this stock when you're looking at Apple up more

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 5>than two twenty percent, is that April nineteenth low. How

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 5>much more room do you think the shares have to

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 5>run now?

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, suggest I think I think that's a great point.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 4>So you kind of look at the move that they

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 4>had going into the announcement here, right, I mean, it's

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 4>a fantastic move though the stock was actually down I

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 4>think about fourteen percent on a year to date basis

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 4>into late April, right, And I think that's kind of

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 4>the story from January to April was, Hey, listen, we've

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 4>got some China issues. Expectations in the second half of

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 4>this year may not be able to be met. Now

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 4>you kind of change the narrative around since kind of

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 4>their earnings were released in early May, as well as

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 4>kind of the developer's conference here to one, whereas, hey,

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 4>those numbers may not be attainable to You know, we've

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 4>gotten now six percent expected growth for the iPhone sixteenth cycle.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 4>There's probably upside to that number instead of downsides. So

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 4>in argue, the narrative has changed. It's all about whether

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 4>or not or how much upside can we see from

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 4>that iPhone sixteenth cycle. At this point in time, we

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 4>think there's upside to the six plus six percent number,

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 4>probably at least eight to ten percent. It'll all be

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 4>sighted also on whether or not Apples can kind of

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 4>or Apple looks to increase prices in the next cycle.

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 4>That remains to be seen. But in our view, there's

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 4>upside potential that still remains despite the move that we've

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 4>seen here over the last five to six weeks.

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 3>So Angel, I'm out there in the marketplace sporting in

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Apple iPhone eleven.

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 2>So I'm guessing I'm right for the upgrade eleven. Yeah,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I guess I have a fourteen.

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 5>I guess mine's a few years old.

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Here's this sex. It's ridiculous.

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 3>So Angelo, do you think there can be people like

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 3>me that are gonna take this AI features that will

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 3>be coming out in the in the iPhone sixteen, I

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 3>guess in mid September. Are there gonna be people like

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 3>me that are going to go out and upgrade? Is

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 3>this gonna be a real driver of unit sales?

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, listen, I think, well, first off, you know,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.679
<v Speaker 4>there's not much of a bar to be here because

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 4>the iPhone's fifteen cycle is a down cycle. If you

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 4>actually look at the four teen cycle, it was relative

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 4>relatively flat cycle as well as well. So we've kind

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 4>of had this kind of pause here over the last

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of two cycles in terms of on a unit basis, right,

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Whereas the twelve and thirteen really took a lot of

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of upside there because of some of the you know,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 4>the China market share gains because of the five G cycle,

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 4>upgrade cycle and what have you. So as we kind

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 4>of now here look here into the sixteen cycle, I

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 4>think a number of things here, as far as kind

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 4>of the fact that the iPhone twelve was that that

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 4>last big upcycle. You're now looking at four years past that.

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 4>So a lot of the twelve consumers out there are

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 4>going to potentially look to upgrade. But for someone like

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 4>you or even someone like myself that haven't upgraded in years,

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 4>this is I mean, forget about the AI capability.

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 6>It's just the camera.

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Capabilities that we've seen since the iPhone eleven. It should

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of you're going to see some notable enhancements, but

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 4>I do think kind of that the new AI capabilities

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 4>out there will drive some of those older consumers to upgrade.

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 4>I think all so listen, this is these AI capabilities

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>don't work on anything kind of outside of the fifteen

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 4>uh pro devices kind of, so so you can even

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.239
<v Speaker 4>potentially see some you know, iPhone thirteen users or fourteen

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 4>users out there look to upgrade as well.

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 5>Talk to us more about when we're saying AI capabilities,

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 5>what exactly are we going to be able to use

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 5>on those devices that's going to be different from before.

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean listen, I think most of it is

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.119
<v Speaker 4>pretty basic in nature versus kind of what we've seen

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 4>thus far, and some of the announcements we've seen right

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 4>in terms of what Samsung has announced at the S

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty four, what we've seen Alphabet with the Google Pixel.

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 5>And what have you.

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 4>But you know, clearly Theories getting its upgrade is the

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 4>big thing out there. You know, embedding chat GP functionality

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 4>in there as well as a big deal. But you know,

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 4>they showcase capabilities, rewrite, summarization, gen Moji might be a

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 4>cool thing with you know, some of the the younger

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 4>users out there. They showed some you know, cool stuff

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 4>on the photo side of things. So they're going to

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 4>be incremental additions in terms of AI across their ecosystem

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 4>that you're going to be able to kind of use

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 4>and just ultimately kind of make yourself just more efficient

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 4>in nature. I mean, if there was something in an

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 4>email that you had forgotten to put in your calendar,

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 4>that's something that kind of theory is going to be

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 4>able to help you with, whereas you do no longer

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 4>have to kind of go back and search that in

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 4>your email box. So a lot of kind of small

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 4>useful information. We'll see how how well this works once

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 4>it actually comes out and it's exactly in the hands

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 4>of consumers out there. But that said, you know, I

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 4>think a lot of it is incremental. But I think

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 4>the way Apple kind of markets their iPhone devices and

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 4>older devices in general, when you kind of throw the

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Aire storyline on top of it, on top of that,

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 4>I think that's really what kind of is going to

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 4>capture the appeal of a lot of those consumers out there.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, Angela, thank you so much for joining us.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Angelo Zeno us a vice president and senior equity annals

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 3>at cfr A Research.

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I actually think I will go and get a new iPhone.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 3>With the new one in September, look at you, and

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm not for Ai'm not for the camera, and I

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 3>just I don't know.

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 5>I kind of need a new care. I don't know

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 5>if my mine's a little too fuzzy and granny. However,

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 5>I have dropped my phone many times, so that's not

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 5>Apple's pot that's actually my own.

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, my thing is it's all about the battery.

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 3>When the battery starts to die, that's my clue upgrade

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 3>and it has been kind of losing its right.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 5>I keep having to charge mine multiple times.

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's kind of the way that's historically

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 2>been so you know.

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 5>What, maybe you and I both will have new phones

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 5>walk over.

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the good news is we have a huge

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Apple store just you know, right down the block here.

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 2>It's right Fifth Avenue.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Across from the plaza, across from the plaza, and I

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 3>walk past the pen station every day. Sometimes is going

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 3>there with the other throngs of billions tourists go to

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 3>that show.

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 5>Oh it's it's always packed.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 2>It's always packed. Crazy. So maybe I'll go there.

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 3>And that's where Tim Cook comes when he comes into

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the city. Does some of his product launches there?

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 5>That's right, that's stock trading above two hundred and two

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 5>dollars right now, still trading at an intra day wreck,

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 5>so clipsing those December all time highs.

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Paul, good good news for our friends in Cooper Tina.

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business Act. You can also

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Tomorrow Again, all eyes turned to the Federal Reserve as

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 3>it tends to do from time to time. We have

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 3>the statement coming out of two PM press conference at

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 3>two thirty Michael McKee, Bloomberg's own Michael McKee probably hopping

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 3>on the asella later second and hitting down to DC

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 3>so he can badger FED Chairman Jay Palill in our studio.

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 5>Oh so exciting to suspend the soccer.

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 3>He must have found the Jersey transit train station which

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 3>he lost forgot about for a long time. I hered

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Jersey Chief US interest rate strategies for Bloomberg and College

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 3>studio in studio with the soccer carball suspenders, which just loves.

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess tomorrow our expectations should be low for market

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 3>moving news coming from the FED is how we should

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 3>approach it.

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, not necessarily.

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 7>You know that there's the possibility that the FED will

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 7>shift its dots not only for this year, but more importantly,

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 7>at least from my perspective, will be the twenty twenty

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 7>five and twenty twenty six dots. So if the FED

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 7>were to move those up because they think that maybe

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 7>the economy is going to be a little bit more robust,

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 7>they won't have to cut interest rates quite as aggressively

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 7>as the prior top plot from the March meeting, then

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 7>the back end of the yield curve in treasuries could

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 7>potentially move quite a bit.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 2>We don't see.

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 7>Liquidity isn't great right now in the treasury market, so

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 7>you can easily have a ten or fifteenity.

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Great, it's the biggest market of anything.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, but that's the reason, right we've been issuing a

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 7>whole lot of debt and there's only a limited number

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 7>of buyers. So you know, just because you have a

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 7>lot of debt doesn't necessarily mean that there's going to

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 7>be an equal number of buyers out there. So it's

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 7>more it's not that the market's not owned, right that

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 7>So the Treasury Department issues bonds every single almost every

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 7>week now but but basically all the time, and those

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 7>get purchased. Now, the question is in the secondary market,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 7>how easy it is to sell those bonds into the

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 7>into the market and is there a natural buyer on

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 7>the other side, And the answer is sometimes yes, but

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 7>but occasionally in order to find those buyers, the price

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 7>has to move quite significantly to you know, to entice

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 7>people into the market.

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 5>What do you think bond investors want to hear from

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 5>FED chair pal versus what you think we actually will

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 5>hear in his commentary.

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, bond investor, if you're long, you want

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 7>to hear them say that, hey, we're going to cut

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 7>interest rates, you know, starting in July, and and you

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 7>know that that's certainly what what the longs would like

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 7>to see, right, We're not going to hear hear anything

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 7>like that. In fact, we might just hear the opposite.

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's one of the reasons why the

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 7>people in the treasury market have been pretty cautious. There's

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 7>positioning is now much. You had a lot of people

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 7>who were short. They kind of exited those positions when

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 7>we were actually near current levels or even with the

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 7>yields maybe ten or fifteen base points higher.

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 8>But the.

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 7>Sell off that they think is constrained because it does

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 7>seem like the Fed believes and is trying to convince

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 7>everyone that at some point we're going to cut interest rates.

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 7>So it's going to be hard for sell offs to

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 7>be maintained for a very long period of time. Particularly

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 7>now going back to that supply story, the Treasury Department

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 7>is not issuing more debt than it had been before.

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 7>The issuance pace is basically constant, where as you go

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 7>back six nine months ago, they were continuing to increase

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 7>the amount of debt that they were issuing, and that's

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 7>actually slowed down quite a lot.

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 3>What does a government bond trader do today before a

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 3>FED meeting? Did they make sure they're flat, they're fully hedged?

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Do they know? Did they play their gut and go

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 2>long or short? Here a little bit? What do you

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 2>tip if you do?

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I it's a good question. So I've talked to

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 7>some some folks on the cell side, uh in the

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 7>last couple of days, and and a lot of them

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 7>are are dis confused, so they are relatively short or

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 7>relatively flat, I should say. That being said, if you

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 7>look at the positioning data, so the Federal Reserve every

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 7>single week actually pulls the dealers and gets the primary

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 7>dealer positioning data there.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Are they honest when they're responding to them?

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, well they have to be, because if they're audited

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 7>when they're audited annually by the FED, and if they're

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 7>if they don't do their.

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Job there and okay, get in trouble.

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 7>So the but but but dealers in aggregate or as

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 7>long treasuries as they've ever been, it's almost record longs

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 7>in terms of the notional amount outstanding, So so dealers

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 7>are long. But on the other sides, they're also not

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 7>quite record short, but they are. They're hedged a lot

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 7>with futures, so it's like they're long the cash and

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 7>they're short to future. So they're in what we call

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 7>a basis trade where where they're playing some relative value,

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.839
<v Speaker 7>not taking a ton of risk. But but but they

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 7>still have a lot of cash that that they cash,

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 7>securities that they have on their books.

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 5>I track a lot of the big banks and obviously

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 5>their outlooks for when the potential of the first rate

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 5>could happen. So gold min Sacks, for instance, over the

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 5>weekend they still reiterated that they were thinking it was

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 5>going to happen in September, but then they thought a

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 5>second cut would happen in December rather than November. When

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 5>you're looking at the bond market, what is that really

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 5>telling us as far as what the consensus on the

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 5>potential timing is. But because it is an interesting dynamic

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 5>because you have September and then November, actually that interest

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 5>rate decision is the same week as the election, so

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 5>the meeting starts that Wednesday, not that Tuesday.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 7>They actually moved right to avoid the election. So the

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 7>meeting now the release will be on Thursday, be the

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 7>first time we've had a Thursday US that I can remember, not.

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 5>Quite some time twenty years, so that a lot of

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 5>people have been looking that far ahead to the calendar,

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 5>but I have it circled on my desk, so I

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 5>wanted to ask you your thought process about the timing there.

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 7>So I actually suspect at this point that the Fed,

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, unless the CPI data really comes down massively

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 7>and we start to have job losses in the next

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 7>two months, which doesn't seem likely, I doubt that the

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 7>Fed's going to do anything prior to the election. So

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 7>I think September. While it's not a zero percent probability,

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 7>I'll almost never say that, but although tomorrow's zero, well,

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 7>I think that it's very possible that if the FED

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 7>starts to cut rates, it'll be in November or December.

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 7>And there's a growing possibility of my mind that the

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 7>FED might not start cutting rates at all this year. Right,

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 7>it might not cut rates until twenty twenty five, because

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 7>the economy, even though it's slowing, is still reasonably robust,

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 7>and when you look at a lot of the preponderance

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 7>of the data that we look at, particularly the hard

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 7>data like retail sales and even the job market, although

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, Anamog and our colleagues at Bloomberg Economics certainly

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 7>see some cracks there as well.

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 5>What is it about September in particular, while you're seeing

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 5>kind of more firms expecting it that month in particular

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 5>versus others.

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 7>Because they're just moving it from July, right, you keep

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 7>pushing it out.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, they're just.

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 6>Pushing it out.

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 7>I think that the Fed will still avoid September, even

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 7>though they'll always say that like, we'll do what we

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 7>have to do regardless of the election. This would actually

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 7>be the second closest to an election that they've made

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 7>an initial move. If they were to move in September,

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 7>they basically will say it would say to themselves, you

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 7>know they they'll never say this publicly, but hey, you know,

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 7>why don't we just wait six weeks? You know that realistically,

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 7>we don't have a lot of data, and if the

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 7>data is not absolutely crashing, there's not a there's not

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 7>a fundamental need for us to cut this moment. We

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 7>could just cut a little bit faster later.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Once they do start cutting, what happens then?

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Did they cut every month there other than the month

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty five basis points? Fifty basis points? That does the

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 3>five and a half percent discount rate go to where?

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well it would depend in the economic situation. But

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 7>at the end of the day, I think they would

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 7>like to cut in twenty fives. And certainly that's one

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 7>big reason to look at the twenty twenty five and

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty six dots because that'll give you a hint

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 7>test of case. Right, So at this point it looks

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 7>like every other Ish meeting is what they're thinking that

0:16:57.720 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 7>they'll cut.

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 2>What's a big soccer story in the world.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 7>Oh, we real Central New Jersey has a home match tomorrow,

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 7>so we have our beer garden getting ready and where Yeah,

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 7>we play at Ryder University. Yeah, in Marsville, New Jersey,

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 7>which is but you know, right in between Princeton and

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 7>Trent And so we get a pretty we've gotten pretty

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 7>good crowds. We actually have record attendance this year, so.

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>He pretty excited about it.

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 7>And who do you play tomorrow? We played Lehigh Valley United.

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Rush, which is and where do you get players.

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 7>Almost all of our players are Division one collegiate athletes.

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Paul, do you want to join in? Might I

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 2>might join in on the beer bash.

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 7>I've been joked around about that, and I'm like, I

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 7>don't want to pull a hamstring like the first fifteen

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 7>seconds I'm on the pitch.

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Anything on the professional level that reach paint. Well.

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 7>You know, one of our local teams here in New

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 7>York is doing really well in Major League Soccer, Soka

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 7>New York Red Bulls is doing great. They got a

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.239
<v Speaker 7>player named Emil Forstburg from from RBI Leipzig and uh

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 7>and and he's been tearing things up along with some homegrowns.

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.959
<v Speaker 2>And then a great stadium, the Red over there in Jersey.

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, Ira Jersey, thanks so much for joining us,

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 3>Ira Jersey Chief US Interest Rate Strategic Just Bloomberg Intelligence

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 3>joining us here on our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio.

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Playing and

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Surprising News in the financial markets, and I learned something.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 3>You need me to look at the gap between the

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 3>ten year French yields and their German counterparts to see

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of where the relative risk is in the marketplace,

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 3>and the gap between the ten year French yields and

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 3>their German counterparts climb to the highest this year in

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 3>the wake of Macrone's snap election. I'm not really sure why,

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 3>but we have somebody who does.

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 5>Who can talk to us about this.

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 4>Ashworth.

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 3>He covers all that European stuff with an acerbic wit

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 3>and that I mean that the nicest way. But we

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 3>love talking to Marcus because he spares, you know, note

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 3>bones here, Marcus, what was your reaction to what we

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 3>saw out of the European Union and then the subsequent

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 3>decision by mister Macron?

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 8>Hi, guys, I was thinking that, you know, this was

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 8>a long time coming, but it was worse than perhaps

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 8>everyone including Macrol, had expected, and therefore it put him

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 8>in a very difficult situation with I guess his main

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 8>opera opposition holding more than twice which his party got.

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 6>Then he got like fifteen percent or something.

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 8>So though he had another three years as president, if

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 8>he wants to, I don't think he'll resigned, but there

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 8>was some question about that.

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 6>Today he means he won't.

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 8>Have the ability to a quim of Congress to be

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 8>able to do very much.

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 6>He can still do a lot of.

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 8>Presidential decrees, but nonetheless it's boxed him in, and more

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 8>importantly he can he can't run again. His by then,

0:19:58.040 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 8>you know, in by twenty twenty seven is ten year

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 8>leg would be pretty poor. So I think what he's

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 8>decided to now is gamble on a political swing which

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 8>has gone to the right wing that perhaps the French

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 8>people they're challenged again may.

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 6>Push back against that.

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 8>But the consequence of this is that the bomb market

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 8>in particular and the stock market and some degree the

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 8>economy is going to have to take a little bit

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 8>of a how can we say this bit of a shakeup,

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 8>because politically this is a very aggressive move and it

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 8>also puts into very much sharp contrast the financial fiscal

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 8>situation of France, which is rising ever an extorably higher

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 8>in debt and particularly it's budget Deficits annual spend is

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 8>much more than it takes in. It's five and a

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 8>half percent last year, which is pretty shocking and not

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 8>likely dropped much by next year, and I think the

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 8>European Union could put it into the double secret probation.

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 8>They call it an emergency deficit procedure. Really what it

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 8>means is that in the sin bin, and that's hugely

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 8>embarrassing for MAC or any government. But the point is

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 8>the rating agency, the credit rating agencies we saw S

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 8>and P at the end of May knock France down

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:18.959
<v Speaker 8>to double A minus. Fitch are already there, and Moodies

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 8>today came out and basically said they're one notch up

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 8>at double A two, but they may be having a

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 8>look at it. So it's all about a worsting credit

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 8>of France, a worstening political regime, which makes the European

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 8>Union very nervous because you know we've seen with the

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 8>previous situations with Greece and Italy. You know they'll they'll

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 8>turn the blind eye to most things, but they want

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 8>everyone to be very much pro Europe. And Marie la

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 8>Penn's right wing party, which is the National Rally, though

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 8>they no longer argue for Frexit or France exit.

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 6>They once did and then Resa.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 8>Pretty long in Brussels. So the last thing they want

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 8>is a non fully backing Year style prime minister even

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 8>under Mackrell's president, that will be very out and settling.

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 6>For Brussels, that means us very unsettling. For credit rating agencies, panic, panic, panic.

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 8>It means that French debt is perhaps a little bit

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 8>more risky, still pretty safe, but a little bit more

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 8>risk than it.

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 6>Was before weekend.

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 5>You were talking about how France has seen a sustained

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 5>deterioration its fiscal position, particularly when you're looking at its

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 5>debt looad. How did France get into this position.

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 6>They spend more than they had or.

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 8>The reason is I mean, Macrol was elected on reforming

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 8>the fiscal situation, and principally one of his key things

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 8>was raising the retirement age, which he raised from sort

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 8>of really sixty sixty two up to about sixty four.

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 8>He wanted to get it up to about sixty seven,

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 8>which for instance where the UK is, but massive pushback

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 8>and the fact he very basically couldn't get it through

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 8>unless he pushed it through by this as I mentioned before,

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 8>presidential decree worried some of the raising ainsties. Then now

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 8>the fact that he has gotten really nowhere of getting

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 8>stuff through the National Assembly, the Parliament or Congress is

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 8>a really scary situation. So you know, that means there's

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 8>even less chance of any form of fiscal improvement of

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 8>getting that budget deficit down and reducing the overall debtness

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 8>of France. And that's a pretty difficult situation, complete gridlock.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 8>Because if the National Rally were to become the person

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 8>the party to have the Prime.

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 6>Minister and try and form some form of.

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 8>Coappitatial cohabitation, I think it's a in English, is that

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 8>they won't get it. They won't allow any form of

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 8>spending cuts or anything to reduce the benefits that a lot.

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 6>Of French people.

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 8>Fifty eight percent of the French economy is state spending.

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 8>It's a very socialist driven state, and they don't like

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 8>their benefits getting touched, which means nothing will happen at

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 8>least twenty twenty, no improvement on the fiscal outlook. That's

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 8>very bad news for bondholders, for credit radio season, indeed

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 8>probably for European Union cohesion.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 3>So I know in your column, Marcus, perhaps one of

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 3>the rationales for Mark Crohn's boldness here is that will

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.239
<v Speaker 3>actually force Marine la Penn to maybe reveal what her

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 3>plans for the economy are.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 2>What do we know or what don't we know?

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 8>Well, we they deliberately a bit like the Labor Party

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 8>it's about to take power in the UK. They've been

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 8>very should we say, with shurchet In telling us what

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 8>they are actually going to planning to do, and Marilla

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 8>Penn has basically said no to many things but hasn't

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 8>told anyone really what they're they are planning to do,

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 8>how she would sort the pension situation out.

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 6>But the one thing we know for.

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 8>Sure they are pretty anti immigration and they are pretty

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 8>anti the pension changes in any other form of benefit changes.

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 8>So it's gonna be almost impossible for the government to

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 8>stop its welfare spending bill, and that you can only

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 8>mean you know, essentially this would be a deficit and

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 8>debt to GDP ratio negative scenario.

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 6>I would think it'd be very hard for.

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 8>But you know, Mackerel's gamble is precisely as you laid out,

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 8>is that if they put them in power, at least nominally,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 8>the Prime Minister doesn't have anything like as much control

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 8>as you would think, but they have ability to.

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 6>Try and put some things through.

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 8>If they turn out to be incompetent and they turn

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 8>out not to do what they said they would go

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 8>to do or anything like this. It would make the

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 8>presdential elections in twenty twenty seven a bit of a

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 8>little bit more anti the National Rally and approach we say

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 8>Mackerels or more of more.

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 6>Centrists the huge gambles. It could go the other way.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 6>These guys could turn out to be very good in power.

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 8>In fact, the center right are already talking about maybe

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 8>teaming up with the National Rally of the far right

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 8>and creating an anti Macron coalition that can become very popular.

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 8>And we could see it would be a very stupid

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 8>gamble that Macrol's taken. We just don't know the is

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 8>If you're a bondholder, and indeed, as you seem to,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 8>the French banks like sock Gen got hit really hard yesterday.

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 8>You know, why would you want to take the risk

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 8>and perhaps go to somewhere a little bit more safe

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 8>like Germany or I don't know, somewhere.

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 6>Else in Europe.

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 5>So Mark, as you were just bringing up Shausgen, what

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 5>other parts when you're looking at French equities have been

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 5>hit hardest. We're other ones have been maybe more shielded

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 5>right now?

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 8>Well, yeah, but the banks got hit hard as they

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 8>always tend to. Partly that's because you know a lot

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 8>of international investors, particularly American investors, they're invested in Europe,

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 8>they tend to light the banking sector mores more.

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 6>Banks for the butt.

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 8>They understand and can play that game much more cleanly.

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 8>So you know, you should be really worrying if you

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 8>start seeing things like insurance companies going because that's a

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 8>credit issue. But banks are an easy, easy sell, highly liquid.

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 8>I would expect if if things do calm down and

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 8>the by July seventh, you know, the actual results, they

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 8>aren't perhaps as bad as people expected. I wull think

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 8>the banks would probably therefore do the best. But you know,

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 8>industrial sector in all of Europe is in a pretty

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 8>tough time at the moment. France is world leader in

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 8>luxury goods, so LVMH things like that.

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 6>These are companies keep us post is on.

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 8>But they are right perhaps less suspect to these politics,

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 8>but still not great for anyone.

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, very good, Marcus Ashwer, thank you so much.

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate it, folks. Marcus is a calumnist covering European

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 3>markets for Bloomberg Opinion. Check out his column today. Macrome

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 3>plays fast and loose with investor Faith.

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 2>So very interesting. There.

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 2>Just meant sitting in for Alex steel On Paul Sweeney.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 3>We are broadcasting live from the Bloomberg and Actor Brokers

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 3>studio in.

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 2>New York City.

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 3>We're streaming live on YouTube, So hit over YouTube dot

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 3>com search Bloomberg Podcast and that's where will find us. Well,

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 3>despite the US labor market remaining tight, a new survey

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 3>reveals that the recruitment and retainment challenges facing businesses have

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 3>eased a little bit. So let's break that down with

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Robin Ericson, Vice President and Human Capital for the Conference Board,

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 3>joining us.

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Via zoom from Chicago.

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 3>So Robin talked to us about the labor market out

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 3>there from the employer's perspective, how tough is it to

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 3>attract and retain talent these days?

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 9>Thanks so much for having me today. We did find

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 9>that the challenges of recruiting and retaining employees have eased significantly.

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 9>As you can imagine, during the great resignation of twenty

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 9>one and twenty twenty two, it was very difficult to

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 9>recruit and retain workers. But we did find that while

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 9>finding talent is a challenge for more than fifty five

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 9>percent of respondents, this number has decreased from a high

0:28:56.520 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 9>of eighty three percent and twenty twenty two. And then

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 9>retaining workers is less challenging because we found that only

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 9>forty one percent of human capital leaders reported difficulty retaining

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 9>workers compared to a high sixty six percent in twenty

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 9>twenty two. So those are big changes.

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 5>Break down what specific industries and job positions are most

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 5>vulnerable right now when you're trying to find qualified workers,

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 5>but they're not there to match that up.

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 9>Yes, So we did look at the workforce in two categories.

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 9>We looked at the workforce of mostly professional and office workers.

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 9>We had about sixty percent of our respondents from that

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 9>industry or those industries. And we also then looked at

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 9>mostly those organizations that had mostly industry and manual service workers,

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:52.479
<v Speaker 9>and it's definitely more difficult to recruit and retain talent

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 9>in those organizations. With mostly industry and manual service workers.

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 9>If you think about the difficulties that hospitality that the

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 9>hospitality industry is having, especially with you know, hotels and

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:11.719
<v Speaker 9>restaurants do also have issues trying to find the you know,

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 9>truck drivers remains the more difficult job to recruit for.

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 3>So Robin, I guess one of the big issues that

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:23.719
<v Speaker 3>everybody's trying to continue to come to groups with is

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 3>where are people working? Is it back in the office

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 3>five days a week, is it hybrid? Is it work

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 3>from home? How is this kind of shaking out, you know,

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 3>several years past the pandemic.

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 9>So obviously with the spike in remote work, there was sorry,

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 9>obviously there was a big spike in remote work during

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 9>the pandemic, and so we actually started with our Reimagined

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 9>Workplace study looking at how many employees or workers were remote,

0:30:55.000 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 9>how many were hybrid, and how many were fully on site. Interestingly,

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 9>the rate of hybrid workers has remained very similar. And

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 9>so what do I mean by that? It's the in

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 9>our survey, we found that fifty six percent of the

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 9>workers in the organizations that we surveyed are either hybrid

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 9>and remote, so they're either working part time in the

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 9>office and part time at home or they're full time

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 9>at home. That's fifty six percent. That's down from sixty

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 9>one percent, which is a difference of only five percent.

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 9>And the number of workers who are fully on site

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 9>has only risen by five percent since twenty twenty two,

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 9>from thirty nine percent to forty four percent. And we've

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 9>also done some other studies here at the Conference Board

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 9>and have found that flexibility is the number one request

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 9>of employees after a competitive salary.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 5>Do you find that employers are getting more strict to

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 5>try to get employees back into the office. It was

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 5>interesting hearing some of the stats you were just mentioning,

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 5>because some of that seemed to be like potentially, but

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 5>it still seemed like there still was a good amount

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 5>of people working from home for various reasons.

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 9>Obviously, yes, so in the conference So the Conference Board

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 9>has a flagship survey and in twenty twenty four we

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 9>found that only about four percent of CEOs were concerned

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 9>about mandating returned to the office, so they were much

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 9>more concerned about making hybrid work work for their organizations. Obviously,

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 9>there are some well known organizations that have come out

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 9>mandating returning to the office But one of the other

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 9>interesting things that we found in our study was that

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 9>those organizations that allowed their employees to choose where they

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 9>worked had three times less difficulty retaining workers. So those

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 9>organizations that mandated their workers to go into the office,

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 9>forty five percent of our respondents said it was difficult

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 9>to retain workers. Well, only fifteen percent of those organizations

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 9>that had employed choice about whether or not they went

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 9>into the office said it was difficult to retain workers.

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 9>So clearly there is a business case for hybrid and

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 9>more flexibility and more employee choice where it's possible.

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 2>How about AI.

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 3>A lot of folks will talk about AI in so

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 3>many different parts of this economy and what it means

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 3>for not just economy, but for society as well. One

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 3>of the concerns is what will AI do to kind

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 3>of the workforce? Well, we need fewer workers in different jobs.

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 3>I know that was a big issue, for example, for

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 3>the writer's strike in Hollywood. They want a language in

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 3>their contracts that protected them from AI. Writers and actors

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 3>talk to us about how employers think about AI, So

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 3>we know that.

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 9>The majority of organizations are interested in AI in some fashion.

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 9>They've either adopted it already in their organizations or they're

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 9>planning to adopt it. AI is here to stay and

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 9>organizations can actually be more productive and more efficient with AI.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 9>To answer your question Paul around whether or not we

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 9>would need fewer employees, I don't know that we will

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 9>need fewer employees, but I definitely think that employees will

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 9>need to have different skills. So one of the things

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 9>in our survey that we found is that the majority

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 9>of surveyed human capital leaders said that they were experimenting

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 9>with AI pilots at not focusing on long term strategies

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 9>like the job displacement that might come from AI, but

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 9>the reskilling for roles that are different.

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Very good, Robin, thank you so much. Really appreciate getting

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 3>your thoughts at Robin Rickson. She's a vice president for

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Human Capital at the Conference Board, joining us from Chicago here.

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you'll get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal