1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:12,600 Speaker 1: Well, coming to y'all city, conscious desire, high, little jail, 2 00:00:14,800 --> 00:00:19,000 Speaker 1: and if you want a little come along. As President 3 00:00:19,079 --> 00:00:24,040 Speaker 1: Biden often says, the United States will support Ukraine for 4 00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:28,320 Speaker 1: as long as it takes. We will not waver. Well, 5 00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:30,480 Speaker 1: I'm gonna try to help me explain to the American 6 00:00:30,560 --> 00:00:35,640 Speaker 1: people that defeating the Russians in Ukraine is the single 7 00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:38,640 Speaker 1: most important event going on in the world right now. Look, 8 00:00:38,720 --> 00:00:40,879 Speaker 1: I was mayor of my hometown for eight years. We 9 00:00:41,240 --> 00:00:45,680 Speaker 1: dealt with a lot of disasters, natural and human freedom 10 00:00:45,840 --> 00:00:51,200 Speaker 1: is back in style. Welcome to the revolution where I'm 11 00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:57,680 Speaker 1: coming to your city? You want to play? Saying you 12 00:00:57,760 --> 00:01:04,400 Speaker 1: a conscious self? The news show more behind the scenes 13 00:01:04,480 --> 00:01:10,520 Speaker 1: information on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America. 14 00:01:11,760 --> 00:01:15,360 Speaker 1: Going up next our final news round up and Information 15 00:01:15,520 --> 00:01:19,000 Speaker 1: Overload hour All right, News rounds Up, Information Overload Hour 16 00:01:19,040 --> 00:01:21,920 Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine four one sewn our number. If 17 00:01:21,959 --> 00:01:24,760 Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program, What 18 00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:28,840 Speaker 1: will the fallout be? What will you know? What? Legal 19 00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:31,679 Speaker 1: I would assume challenges will be headed to court any 20 00:01:31,680 --> 00:01:35,920 Speaker 1: minute now as it relates to quashing uh this this 21 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:40,160 Speaker 1: grand super grand jury report where you have this jury 22 00:01:40,200 --> 00:01:46,240 Speaker 1: four person pretty much all over the place, giddy happy, giggling, um, 23 00:01:46,840 --> 00:01:53,000 Speaker 1: totally unprofessional. But more importantly, it is against what the 24 00:01:53,440 --> 00:01:57,440 Speaker 1: jurors in a grand jury are told if they take 25 00:01:57,480 --> 00:01:59,680 Speaker 1: on that position of in terms of what they are 26 00:01:59,720 --> 00:02:01,800 Speaker 1: allowed to do and what they're not allowed to do. 27 00:02:01,880 --> 00:02:04,960 Speaker 1: When we went through this in great specificity, in great 28 00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:09,119 Speaker 1: detail yesterday, and now the question is what happens here 29 00:02:09,280 --> 00:02:12,680 Speaker 1: legally if you miss some of the comments that she made. 30 00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:16,280 Speaker 1: Her name is Emily Coors. Here's what she's said. Did 31 00:02:16,320 --> 00:02:20,520 Speaker 1: the grand jury recommend an indictment of former President Trump? 32 00:02:21,160 --> 00:02:24,880 Speaker 1: I'm not going to speak on exact indictments, so nothing 33 00:02:24,919 --> 00:02:31,079 Speaker 1: that would surprise people who have been following this. Probably not. 34 00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:35,480 Speaker 1: I wouldn't want to characterize anyone else's reaction, of course, 35 00:02:35,760 --> 00:02:38,040 Speaker 1: but I said that was when we heard a lot 36 00:02:38,040 --> 00:02:42,560 Speaker 1: in testimony, But probably not. Did you personally want to 37 00:02:42,600 --> 00:02:44,360 Speaker 1: hear from the former I wanted to hear from the 38 00:02:44,400 --> 00:02:47,240 Speaker 1: former president, but honestly, I kind of wanted to discippoina 39 00:02:47,280 --> 00:02:49,440 Speaker 1: the former president because I got to swear everybody in 40 00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:51,880 Speaker 1: and so I thought it'd be really cool to get 41 00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:55,160 Speaker 1: sixty seconds with President Trump of me looking at him 42 00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:57,440 Speaker 1: and being like, do you solemnly swear and me getting 43 00:02:57,440 --> 00:02:59,799 Speaker 1: to swear him in. I just kind of thought that 44 00:03:00,160 --> 00:03:03,400 Speaker 1: be an awesome moment. There are indictments recommended, of course, 45 00:03:03,600 --> 00:03:06,960 Speaker 1: is it more than twelve people? Is it more than 46 00:03:07,040 --> 00:03:09,520 Speaker 1: twenty people? I think if you look at the page 47 00:03:09,600 --> 00:03:13,160 Speaker 1: numbers of the report, there's about six pages in the 48 00:03:13,160 --> 00:03:16,840 Speaker 1: middle that got cut out allow for spacing. It's not 49 00:03:16,919 --> 00:03:20,800 Speaker 1: a short list, not a short list after everything that 50 00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:23,080 Speaker 1: you've seen. What would your reaction be if the DA 51 00:03:23,120 --> 00:03:27,120 Speaker 1: decides agnse bringing any charges after what you've seen, I 52 00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:31,400 Speaker 1: will be sad if nothing happens. Like That's that's about 53 00:03:31,400 --> 00:03:37,040 Speaker 1: my only request there is for something to happen, something 54 00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:39,800 Speaker 1: to happen. I mean I was like, it would have 55 00:03:39,840 --> 00:03:42,960 Speaker 1: been so like really cool and like I would have 56 00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:45,400 Speaker 1: I would have been able to swear in President Trump. 57 00:03:45,640 --> 00:03:47,800 Speaker 1: I was really looking forward to that. I wanted him 58 00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:51,320 Speaker 1: to be subpoened. I mean, it was so cool. And 59 00:03:51,400 --> 00:03:54,000 Speaker 1: it goes on from there and she gives you know, 60 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:59,320 Speaker 1: very specific chapter verse detail about what it is that 61 00:03:59,520 --> 00:04:03,080 Speaker 1: happened inside the grand jury hearings. They are supposed to 62 00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:07,760 Speaker 1: be secretive. The Grand Jury Handbook says, quote, grand jurors 63 00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:11,840 Speaker 1: shall keep the deliberations of the grand jury secret unless 64 00:04:11,880 --> 00:04:15,160 Speaker 1: called upon to give evidence thereof in some court of 65 00:04:15,240 --> 00:04:18,560 Speaker 1: law in the state. And it also goes on to say, 66 00:04:18,640 --> 00:04:22,200 Speaker 1: do not discuss cases with your fellow jurors or anyone 67 00:04:22,240 --> 00:04:25,480 Speaker 1: else outside of the jury room. That seems pretty clear 68 00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:29,440 Speaker 1: to me that all of which has been violated in 69 00:04:29,440 --> 00:04:31,920 Speaker 1: this case. Anyway, Joining us now to way in on it. 70 00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:36,719 Speaker 1: Fox News analyst legal expert Greg Jarrett is with us. 71 00:04:36,720 --> 00:04:40,760 Speaker 1: Brian Claypool is back with US, veteran trial attorney. Welcome 72 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:44,200 Speaker 1: back both of you, Greg Jarrett. Let's get your thoughts 73 00:04:44,440 --> 00:04:48,760 Speaker 1: and more importantly, what is the next move of say 74 00:04:48,839 --> 00:04:53,919 Speaker 1: President Trump and others that may be mentioned in this 75 00:04:54,480 --> 00:04:58,520 Speaker 1: super grand jury report. Well, anybody who cares about our 76 00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:02,400 Speaker 1: system of justice and fidelity to the law should be 77 00:05:02,480 --> 00:05:08,360 Speaker 1: deeply alarmed by what this fourth person was doing. Insane. 78 00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:14,000 Speaker 1: She egregiously violated her oath of office. As a grand jeur, 79 00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:19,040 Speaker 1: she is sworn to maintain the confidentiality of the proceedings, 80 00:05:19,440 --> 00:05:24,760 Speaker 1: either secret grand jury proceedings behind closed doors. She breached 81 00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:28,640 Speaker 1: that duty, and, as I wrote in today's column, she 82 00:05:28,839 --> 00:05:31,599 Speaker 1: to be in legal jeopardy. If I were the judge, 83 00:05:31,600 --> 00:05:36,800 Speaker 1: I'd be I rate, and I would seriously consider holding 84 00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:42,000 Speaker 1: her in criminal contempt of the court. But beyond that, 85 00:05:42,279 --> 00:05:47,400 Speaker 1: insofar as bringing emotion to dismiss the case, it's not 86 00:05:47,680 --> 00:05:52,120 Speaker 1: ripe yet because nobody has been indicted, no charges have 87 00:05:52,279 --> 00:05:55,560 Speaker 1: been filed. But if they are, I mean, the first 88 00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:59,600 Speaker 1: thing that any defense attorney would do is vile emotion 89 00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:04,560 Speaker 1: to dismiss the case based on impropriety within the grand 90 00:06:04,600 --> 00:06:09,040 Speaker 1: jury as well as bias she tainted the potential. Wait. 91 00:06:09,120 --> 00:06:10,840 Speaker 1: Let me ask you, though, why would you have to 92 00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:14,520 Speaker 1: wait to file that knowing that this has already taken place, 93 00:06:14,520 --> 00:06:18,080 Speaker 1: In other words, before this has ever revealed publicly. I mean, 94 00:06:18,160 --> 00:06:21,640 Speaker 1: she is now saying anywhere between twelve and twenty people 95 00:06:22,240 --> 00:06:27,039 Speaker 1: they recommended for indictment here, so at that point are 96 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:31,920 Speaker 1: not following the rules of a grand jury should render 97 00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:36,480 Speaker 1: their findings frankly irrelevant at this point and should be 98 00:06:36,520 --> 00:06:39,200 Speaker 1: squashed by the judge. I don't know why we would 99 00:06:39,200 --> 00:06:42,599 Speaker 1: have to wait. Well, their findings have not been made 100 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:48,640 Speaker 1: public except to the introduction heavily redacted, the conclusion again redacted, 101 00:06:49,720 --> 00:06:54,000 Speaker 1: and again nobody is in legal jeopardy by virtue of 102 00:06:54,040 --> 00:06:57,400 Speaker 1: a charge. So if you tried to bring a motion 103 00:06:57,560 --> 00:07:01,960 Speaker 1: to dismiss. You don't really have ending because you're not 104 00:07:02,160 --> 00:07:06,240 Speaker 1: in legal jeopardy yet. But I can assure you that 105 00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:11,040 Speaker 1: those who might be already have counsel and are, you know, 106 00:07:11,120 --> 00:07:16,000 Speaker 1: drafting the motion to dismiss, they're poised. But wouldn't wouldn't 107 00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:20,280 Speaker 1: this taint the jury pool and prejudice a jury pool? Now? 108 00:07:20,360 --> 00:07:24,480 Speaker 1: Remember this as a special grand jury. They don't have 109 00:07:24,560 --> 00:07:27,600 Speaker 1: the ability to indict. They only have the ability to recommend, 110 00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:30,920 Speaker 1: and the and the district's attorney would have to go 111 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:34,320 Speaker 1: before a regular grand jury. If this information has made public, 112 00:07:34,680 --> 00:07:39,080 Speaker 1: wouldn't it prejudice the potential jury pool. Oh? It absolutely would, 113 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:41,880 Speaker 1: and that would be one of the many basis upon 114 00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:45,800 Speaker 1: which to file a motion to dismiss. But at this standpoint, 115 00:07:45,840 --> 00:07:48,840 Speaker 1: a judge would say, wait a minute, no charges have 116 00:07:48,920 --> 00:07:52,520 Speaker 1: been filed yet, You've got to convene a regular grand jury. 117 00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:55,080 Speaker 1: That may take weeks or months, and then that grand 118 00:07:55,160 --> 00:07:59,600 Speaker 1: jury will decide whether to bring criminal charges pursue into 119 00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:02,880 Speaker 1: an end. And so the judge would probably say, at 120 00:08:02,880 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 1: this juncture, it's premature, you know, mister, even though we 121 00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:14,400 Speaker 1: know that the entire proceeding has been prejudiced and corrupted. Yeah, 122 00:08:14,440 --> 00:08:18,120 Speaker 1: I mean there might be a motion that can be 123 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:22,680 Speaker 1: made at this juncture by interested parties, including those who 124 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:26,880 Speaker 1: appeared before the grand jury. I knew named some of them, 125 00:08:26,920 --> 00:08:30,720 Speaker 1: you know, Lindsay Graham, Rudy Julietti, who might file a 126 00:08:30,920 --> 00:08:36,400 Speaker 1: motion that any finding of this special purpose grand jury 127 00:08:36,400 --> 00:08:42,679 Speaker 1: should be quashed. And you know, but it's secret unless 128 00:08:42,679 --> 00:08:45,360 Speaker 1: and until the judge reveals the rest of the report, 129 00:08:45,800 --> 00:08:49,840 Speaker 1: which is supposed to be forthcoming and may have already been, 130 00:08:50,160 --> 00:08:54,280 Speaker 1: you know, levied by the district attorney in Atlanta. What 131 00:08:54,360 --> 00:08:57,680 Speaker 1: should say, Brian claypole Y, Shawn great to be back 132 00:08:57,720 --> 00:09:00,360 Speaker 1: with you. I mean, this is a complete sham. This 133 00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:02,960 Speaker 1: was not a grand jury proceeding this. This was another 134 00:09:03,040 --> 00:09:07,720 Speaker 1: example of radical left wing folks that are that are 135 00:09:07,880 --> 00:09:12,640 Speaker 1: they're crafting political witchcraft, and they're using our judicial system 136 00:09:12,679 --> 00:09:15,880 Speaker 1: to do that. I mean, when when I heard her laughing, Sean, 137 00:09:15,920 --> 00:09:18,320 Speaker 1: it almost sounded like they were doing some kind of 138 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:21,120 Speaker 1: interview at a happy hour, you know, at five o'clock 139 00:09:21,160 --> 00:09:24,520 Speaker 1: on Friday in downtown Atlanta. I mean, that's how bad 140 00:09:24,600 --> 00:09:27,360 Speaker 1: this is. And to Greg's point, there's no question about it. 141 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:30,440 Speaker 1: Any indictment that comes out of this if anything does, 142 00:09:30,920 --> 00:09:34,160 Speaker 1: is going to be challenged vigorously, and and and on 143 00:09:34,200 --> 00:09:36,439 Speaker 1: the grounds that Greg's mentioned. But I would go one 144 00:09:36,440 --> 00:09:39,800 Speaker 1: step further. There's got to be some type of investigation 145 00:09:40,360 --> 00:09:45,520 Speaker 1: of this sham grand jury proceeding Sean, seventy five witnesses 146 00:09:45,840 --> 00:09:49,000 Speaker 1: over how many months, over a topic that I think 147 00:09:49,040 --> 00:09:52,640 Speaker 1: both Democrats and Republicans most of us don't even hear about, 148 00:09:52,679 --> 00:09:55,120 Speaker 1: wanting to hear about. We'd rather have our money spent 149 00:09:55,480 --> 00:09:58,640 Speaker 1: on trying to do grand jury proceedings on murderers, on 150 00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:02,920 Speaker 1: child molesters, not to promote a political agenda. So again, 151 00:10:02,920 --> 00:10:06,679 Speaker 1: I would expect a very vigorous attack on any of these. 152 00:10:06,880 --> 00:10:09,480 Speaker 1: One other quick point, Sean, this lady that she comes 153 00:10:09,480 --> 00:10:11,800 Speaker 1: out and says, oh, there might be at least ten 154 00:10:12,200 --> 00:10:15,280 Speaker 1: perjury charges. I think Greg will agree with this. It's 155 00:10:15,320 --> 00:10:19,920 Speaker 1: really hard, Sean. To prove perjury in any state. You've 156 00:10:19,920 --> 00:10:24,240 Speaker 1: got to prove a knowingly false and wilful statement, and 157 00:10:24,280 --> 00:10:27,440 Speaker 1: that you believe that to be untrue. So how is 158 00:10:27,480 --> 00:10:31,079 Speaker 1: this lady proclaiming that all these folks are going to 159 00:10:31,120 --> 00:10:34,160 Speaker 1: be charged with perjury? Well, but but my question is 160 00:10:34,640 --> 00:10:38,720 Speaker 1: to me, it is fundamentally unfair. Knowing that this person 161 00:10:38,960 --> 00:10:43,359 Speaker 1: has tainted the entire process, is giddy about a giggling 162 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:47,760 Speaker 1: about it, revealing things that she is not allowed to reveal, 163 00:10:48,559 --> 00:10:51,880 Speaker 1: that it will now prejudice the entire jury pool in 164 00:10:51,920 --> 00:10:55,440 Speaker 1: the state of Georgia. I don't even know. I don't 165 00:10:55,480 --> 00:10:58,640 Speaker 1: think there's a venue you can change to at this 166 00:10:58,760 --> 00:11:02,280 Speaker 1: point that wouldn't be influenced by some of this. That's 167 00:11:02,280 --> 00:11:04,360 Speaker 1: a great point. You can't get a fair trial. That 168 00:11:04,360 --> 00:11:08,000 Speaker 1: would be your first argument in emotion to throw out 169 00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:11,480 Speaker 1: any indictments. You can't get a fair trial because grand 170 00:11:11,559 --> 00:11:14,640 Speaker 1: jury proceeds are cloaked in secrecy and they shouldn't be 171 00:11:14,679 --> 00:11:17,920 Speaker 1: discussed at all, and there shouldn't be a round table 172 00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:21,800 Speaker 1: of enviews talking about secret information that was generated in 173 00:11:21,800 --> 00:11:24,439 Speaker 1: the grand jury. So that's what you argue. You can't 174 00:11:24,520 --> 00:11:27,640 Speaker 1: get a fair trial. And I'm pretty confident you know 175 00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:30,160 Speaker 1: that argument is going to win. And Sean real quick, 176 00:11:30,320 --> 00:11:34,679 Speaker 1: I tried. I tried to get grand jury testimony from 177 00:11:34,800 --> 00:11:40,440 Speaker 1: That's how bad and how unethical and potentially criminal that 178 00:11:40,559 --> 00:11:43,800 Speaker 1: this parade is. Click freak more with our lawyers, Greg 179 00:11:43,880 --> 00:11:46,160 Speaker 1: Jarrett and Brian Claypool on the other side than your 180 00:11:46,200 --> 00:11:53,199 Speaker 1: calls eight hundred nine four one, Shawn, as we continue, well, 181 00:11:53,240 --> 00:11:56,920 Speaker 1: continue with our attorneys, Greg Jarrett and Brian Claypool with us. 182 00:11:57,280 --> 00:12:00,480 Speaker 1: This weird posting in the Daily Man and I guess 183 00:12:00,520 --> 00:12:04,120 Speaker 1: it's on her Pinterest page. I don't even that's one 184 00:12:04,120 --> 00:12:06,599 Speaker 1: of the social media pages. I don't even think I 185 00:12:06,640 --> 00:12:08,400 Speaker 1: have an account on. Do you have an account on that? 186 00:12:08,440 --> 00:12:12,760 Speaker 1: You do? Of course you do. But anyway, apparently according 187 00:12:12,800 --> 00:12:17,120 Speaker 1: to the Daily Mail sheet their instructions on how to 188 00:12:17,160 --> 00:12:20,679 Speaker 1: cast magic spells that she put up there. I'm not 189 00:12:20,720 --> 00:12:23,360 Speaker 1: making this up. People are saying, yeah, right, Hannity, Well, 190 00:12:23,400 --> 00:12:28,200 Speaker 1: I'm just reading from the Daily Mail anyway. Quote casting 191 00:12:28,200 --> 00:12:30,880 Speaker 1: a circle, which is a way for witches to protect 192 00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:35,719 Speaker 1: themselves during their magic work. One cleans your space of 193 00:12:35,760 --> 00:12:40,400 Speaker 1: all negative energy. Two visualize pure energy and breath. Three 194 00:12:40,559 --> 00:12:45,160 Speaker 1: recite the following quote. By the earth that is her body, 195 00:12:45,160 --> 00:12:47,480 Speaker 1: by the air that is her breath, by the fire 196 00:12:47,559 --> 00:12:50,439 Speaker 1: that is her spirit, by the living waters of her womb. 197 00:12:50,960 --> 00:12:55,760 Speaker 1: The circle is cast. And so what is the grand jury? 198 00:12:56,080 --> 00:12:58,280 Speaker 1: Is there a magic spell that has now been cast 199 00:12:58,360 --> 00:13:02,120 Speaker 1: on them based on the jury four person? You know, 200 00:13:02,520 --> 00:13:06,200 Speaker 1: I talked to somebody yesterday who had testified before the 201 00:13:06,360 --> 00:13:09,440 Speaker 1: Grand Jury. I'm not going to say who it is. 202 00:13:10,040 --> 00:13:14,520 Speaker 1: This individual said that the four person, Emily Coles, acted 203 00:13:14,679 --> 00:13:22,040 Speaker 1: bizarrely during the questioning period. She acted very strange and 204 00:13:22,520 --> 00:13:26,200 Speaker 1: as I say, this is disturbing an alarming that you know, 205 00:13:26,240 --> 00:13:29,880 Speaker 1: we expect citizens to be reasonably intelligent, those who were 206 00:13:29,920 --> 00:13:34,520 Speaker 1: selected to serve on a special purpose grand jury. It's 207 00:13:34,559 --> 00:13:39,439 Speaker 1: troubling that this woman doesn't think it seriously. But worse 208 00:13:39,520 --> 00:13:42,600 Speaker 1: than that, who's not school than the law. And during 209 00:13:42,640 --> 00:13:46,400 Speaker 1: a grand jury proceeding it's one sided. The defense is 210 00:13:46,400 --> 00:13:49,760 Speaker 1: not there to challenge the testimony of witnesses, not there 211 00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:54,160 Speaker 1: to contest some of the evidence presented. It is, as 212 00:13:54,160 --> 00:13:57,320 Speaker 1: I've always described it, a free for all. There are 213 00:13:57,400 --> 00:14:02,319 Speaker 1: no rules of evidence. Double hears a triple hearsay, quadruple 214 00:14:02,400 --> 00:14:08,600 Speaker 1: hearsay is admissible. The judges usually not. You can't present 215 00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:14,600 Speaker 1: this kind of evidence. Yours are spoon fed prosecutor. Well, 216 00:14:14,640 --> 00:14:17,360 Speaker 1: that's where the phrase you're get indict a ham sandwich 217 00:14:17,400 --> 00:14:21,640 Speaker 1: comes from, because there is no defense at all in 218 00:14:21,680 --> 00:14:25,720 Speaker 1: the proceedings and it's only a one sided presentation about 219 00:14:25,720 --> 00:14:28,920 Speaker 1: whether to indict or not indict, and which I think 220 00:14:28,960 --> 00:14:31,960 Speaker 1: the whole process should be changed anyway. But you know 221 00:14:32,040 --> 00:14:36,360 Speaker 1: I still see you know this press blitz continue, and 222 00:14:36,920 --> 00:14:39,600 Speaker 1: one has to wonder what any judge would be thinking 223 00:14:39,760 --> 00:14:43,000 Speaker 1: if this is now brought before a judge. I would 224 00:14:43,040 --> 00:14:47,320 Speaker 1: think it's not fair, Greg if if those people that 225 00:14:47,440 --> 00:14:53,760 Speaker 1: potentially could be recommended for indictment have their names read 226 00:14:53,880 --> 00:14:56,920 Speaker 1: as a result of all of this, and then only later, 227 00:14:57,000 --> 00:15:00,800 Speaker 1: because then there'll be great suspicion cast over all of them, 228 00:15:00,840 --> 00:15:03,680 Speaker 1: and at that point, you know, they're almost guilty before 229 00:15:03,720 --> 00:15:07,920 Speaker 1: being proven innocent, right, which is why I've long suspected 230 00:15:08,000 --> 00:15:13,080 Speaker 1: that this was attacked by an inexperienced distance attorney in 231 00:15:13,200 --> 00:15:18,800 Speaker 1: Pinton County, pressured by Democrat to smear Donald Trump. You know, 232 00:15:18,880 --> 00:15:22,280 Speaker 1: she's had two years to investigate with the subject matter. 233 00:15:23,320 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 1: Why not convene a regular grand jury? If you have 234 00:15:26,760 --> 00:15:32,920 Speaker 1: confidence in compelling evidence of guilt, convened a special grand jury. 235 00:15:33,120 --> 00:15:36,960 Speaker 1: So the special grand jury information gets out, recommendations of 236 00:15:38,000 --> 00:15:42,960 Speaker 1: indictments come out, and you're assumed guilty because the special 237 00:15:43,000 --> 00:15:47,960 Speaker 1: grand jury, with no indictment powers, says that you're guilty 238 00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:51,160 Speaker 1: of such. Does she then bring it to a regular 239 00:15:51,200 --> 00:15:54,680 Speaker 1: grand jury or does she drop it? Well, if she 240 00:15:54,760 --> 00:15:58,080 Speaker 1: has confidence in her evidence, she has to start from 241 00:15:58,120 --> 00:16:01,760 Speaker 1: square one in panel and regular grand jury present All 242 00:16:01,800 --> 00:16:05,880 Speaker 1: of the evidence in testimony can be expedited somewhat because 243 00:16:05,920 --> 00:16:10,840 Speaker 1: there's a record of that testimony. But still, you know, 244 00:16:10,880 --> 00:16:15,000 Speaker 1: I'm suspicious that this was intended to be a smear 245 00:16:15,480 --> 00:16:18,880 Speaker 1: and that in the end she made real ones. She 246 00:16:19,000 --> 00:16:22,800 Speaker 1: doesn't have a proof beyond a reasonable doubt and can't 247 00:16:22,880 --> 00:16:28,160 Speaker 1: talk case. Greg Jarrett, Brian Claypole, thank you so much 248 00:16:28,200 --> 00:16:30,120 Speaker 1: for being one of us. We appreciate it. We'll follow 249 00:16:30,160 --> 00:16:33,080 Speaker 1: this very closely tonight again on Hannity. All right, let's 250 00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:35,680 Speaker 1: go to our busy phones. Many of you have been 251 00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:39,080 Speaker 1: very very patient. Peter and Georgia. Peter, Hi, how are 252 00:16:39,080 --> 00:16:43,120 Speaker 1: you glad you called what a great grand jury system 253 00:16:43,160 --> 00:16:46,800 Speaker 1: you have down there in George. It's very impressive thinking 254 00:16:46,840 --> 00:16:50,840 Speaker 1: about it. But anyway, what I call about was I 255 00:16:50,880 --> 00:16:54,120 Speaker 1: really don't trust the president of the Ukraine. Well, we 256 00:16:54,200 --> 00:16:58,000 Speaker 1: do know people close to Zelinsky have been taken out 257 00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:00,760 Speaker 1: of his enner circle because they've miss appropriate rated funds. 258 00:17:02,240 --> 00:17:04,639 Speaker 1: I have not. Look, there's a part of me that 259 00:17:04,680 --> 00:17:08,080 Speaker 1: admires the people of Ukraine. They have fault with valor, 260 00:17:08,359 --> 00:17:11,919 Speaker 1: they have fault with courage. They have been underdogs. The 261 00:17:12,080 --> 00:17:16,199 Speaker 1: entire way. There are other things though that I don't like. 262 00:17:16,400 --> 00:17:19,200 Speaker 1: I don't like that Europe is not stepping up. This 263 00:17:19,320 --> 00:17:24,159 Speaker 1: is their backyard. They are far more at risk of, 264 00:17:24,920 --> 00:17:28,200 Speaker 1: you know, territorial ambitions of Vladimir Putin than we are. 265 00:17:28,960 --> 00:17:32,200 Speaker 1: And yet, as usual, the United States has to bear 266 00:17:32,240 --> 00:17:35,720 Speaker 1: the financial burden, or has chosen to bear the financial 267 00:17:35,760 --> 00:17:40,199 Speaker 1: burden of this conflict. But yet at the same time, 268 00:17:40,480 --> 00:17:45,199 Speaker 1: they're not allowing Zelinski to get the fighter jets that 269 00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:48,800 Speaker 1: have been offered by numerous European countries so that they 270 00:17:48,840 --> 00:17:51,960 Speaker 1: can also take their fight to the air and compete 271 00:17:52,000 --> 00:17:55,520 Speaker 1: with Vladimir Putin on an equal playing field. Now, that 272 00:17:55,600 --> 00:17:59,520 Speaker 1: tells me that you know, we're now might we're now 273 00:17:59,560 --> 00:18:05,600 Speaker 1: in trench ourselves in another foreign conflict, likely protracted with 274 00:18:05,880 --> 00:18:09,280 Speaker 1: no end in sight in terms of billions of American 275 00:18:09,320 --> 00:18:12,800 Speaker 1: tax dollars being spent, and Europe gets a free ride 276 00:18:12,800 --> 00:18:17,000 Speaker 1: as per usual. That's unacceptable to me. And if you're gonna, 277 00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:21,120 Speaker 1: if we're gonna get involved in any military conflict, like 278 00:18:21,760 --> 00:18:25,119 Speaker 1: I think the best lesson is Donald Trump. With modern 279 00:18:25,960 --> 00:18:29,520 Speaker 1: warfare technology, we have the ability to fight and win 280 00:18:29,600 --> 00:18:33,800 Speaker 1: wars by pushing buttons and offices in the United States, 281 00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:38,240 Speaker 1: and we can hit any target with pinpoint accuracy pretty 282 00:18:38,320 --> 00:18:41,119 Speaker 1: much any place in the world. We're not fighting the 283 00:18:41,160 --> 00:18:45,320 Speaker 1: war that way now, it's not our war. However, that 284 00:18:45,480 --> 00:18:49,120 Speaker 1: is the type of technology that would help Zolinsky win 285 00:18:49,200 --> 00:18:52,800 Speaker 1: the war and then the conflict in Europe. And I 286 00:18:52,880 --> 00:18:57,639 Speaker 1: am not interested in Americans, you know, getting involved in 287 00:18:57,720 --> 00:19:01,800 Speaker 1: long protracted conflicts with intention of ever winning wars. We've 288 00:19:02,080 --> 00:19:05,800 Speaker 1: been down this road and we saw what happened. It 289 00:19:05,840 --> 00:19:09,480 Speaker 1: took what twenty years? We're in Afghanistan? How long did 290 00:19:09,480 --> 00:19:11,879 Speaker 1: it take to finally get out of Iraq? You know, 291 00:19:11,920 --> 00:19:14,560 Speaker 1: what was the human toll on the United States? What 292 00:19:14,680 --> 00:19:18,560 Speaker 1: was the financial burden on the United States? And I 293 00:19:18,640 --> 00:19:21,480 Speaker 1: just think that you know once again that the United States, 294 00:19:22,160 --> 00:19:25,680 Speaker 1: you know, should not be leading this effort. This should 295 00:19:25,680 --> 00:19:29,840 Speaker 1: be a European effort that we would support, but support 296 00:19:29,920 --> 00:19:34,480 Speaker 1: in a limited way. I agree with you, but let 297 00:19:34,480 --> 00:19:37,480 Speaker 1: me You mentioned his inner circle. There's no doubt in 298 00:19:37,520 --> 00:19:40,840 Speaker 1: my mind he's in control of his inner circle. Okay, 299 00:19:41,520 --> 00:19:44,160 Speaker 1: he's a crook, that's my opinion. We don't know where 300 00:19:44,200 --> 00:19:47,040 Speaker 1: the money went, Sean, and I agree with you. This 301 00:19:47,119 --> 00:19:50,879 Speaker 1: should not be America's war. This should be Europe should 302 00:19:50,880 --> 00:19:54,000 Speaker 1: at least take an equal partner it. Look, I'm just 303 00:19:54,119 --> 00:19:58,200 Speaker 1: telling you, America's got to prioritize. We are thirty trillion 304 00:19:58,200 --> 00:20:00,840 Speaker 1: dollars in debt, thirty two trillion, and we're headed to 305 00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:05,320 Speaker 1: one hundred trillion dollars in debt. We can't afford to 306 00:20:05,359 --> 00:20:09,920 Speaker 1: be the world's policeman. Now. Is putin a thug? Yes? 307 00:20:10,520 --> 00:20:14,240 Speaker 1: Is he targeting innocent men, women and children? Yes? Is 308 00:20:14,240 --> 00:20:17,960 Speaker 1: it a shock to the conscience and soul of humanity? 309 00:20:18,520 --> 00:20:23,880 Speaker 1: Yes it is. Is it the world's responsibility, especially Europe's responsibility, 310 00:20:24,440 --> 00:20:29,600 Speaker 1: to engage him and stop him? Yes, it's their responsibility. First. 311 00:20:30,200 --> 00:20:32,480 Speaker 1: Could we, as the United States do we have a 312 00:20:32,560 --> 00:20:37,280 Speaker 1: moral obligation to help? We do. Unfortunately, they've now put 313 00:20:37,440 --> 00:20:41,119 Speaker 1: most of the burden on us. That is unacceptable to me. 314 00:20:41,840 --> 00:20:44,879 Speaker 1: I don't think the especially with Joe Biden, you know, 315 00:20:44,960 --> 00:20:49,480 Speaker 1: putting handcuffs on not only Zelinsky but all of Europe 316 00:20:49,480 --> 00:20:52,560 Speaker 1: and their ability to fight to win the war. At 317 00:20:52,600 --> 00:20:55,359 Speaker 1: that point, we're throwing good money after bed and you 318 00:20:55,359 --> 00:20:58,840 Speaker 1: would think we would have learned the lesson of Iraq 319 00:20:59,119 --> 00:21:03,160 Speaker 1: and Afghanistan and these other long protracted conflicts. We haven't 320 00:21:03,200 --> 00:21:06,440 Speaker 1: learned them. But we need to anyway appreciate the call. 321 00:21:07,080 --> 00:21:09,440 Speaker 1: Let's say hi to Gary is in New York. Gary, 322 00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:12,679 Speaker 1: how are you glad you called hey Son? Thanks for 323 00:21:12,720 --> 00:21:15,760 Speaker 1: taking my club. Yes, sir, so, I wanted to talk 324 00:21:15,800 --> 00:21:20,199 Speaker 1: to you today about the chillion dollars infrastructure. Bill. I 325 00:21:20,440 --> 00:21:22,399 Speaker 1: live and work in West Sister County, and as you know, 326 00:21:22,440 --> 00:21:25,440 Speaker 1: this is just north of New York City, and my 327 00:21:25,720 --> 00:21:29,240 Speaker 1: job is in sales. My car is my office. I 328 00:21:29,400 --> 00:21:31,920 Speaker 1: drive all day long. I do about one hundred miles 329 00:21:31,920 --> 00:21:36,960 Speaker 1: a day. The roads are a mess up here, pothole city. 330 00:21:37,480 --> 00:21:40,119 Speaker 1: I don't see anybody working on the roads, and I 331 00:21:40,119 --> 00:21:44,040 Speaker 1: don't know where the money's going. Well. Number one, a 332 00:21:44,080 --> 00:21:47,160 Speaker 1: lot of people leaving New York and all those horrible 333 00:21:47,240 --> 00:21:50,800 Speaker 1: rich people that have been demonized for the last two 334 00:21:50,840 --> 00:21:53,960 Speaker 1: decades finally said, Okay, you don't want our money, you 335 00:21:54,040 --> 00:21:57,880 Speaker 1: don't want us here. You demonize us because we have 336 00:21:58,080 --> 00:22:02,520 Speaker 1: conservative values. We're leaving. So we've seen states like New 337 00:22:02,600 --> 00:22:06,960 Speaker 1: York and California, you know, losing and you know, an 338 00:22:06,960 --> 00:22:10,600 Speaker 1: average of close to three hundred thousand people a year. 339 00:22:11,160 --> 00:22:16,080 Speaker 1: And then you see states like Florida, the Carolina's, Texas, Tennessee, 340 00:22:16,119 --> 00:22:20,399 Speaker 1: they're gaining population at a dramatic rate. There's nearly a 341 00:22:20,520 --> 00:22:25,480 Speaker 1: thousand new residents moving into Florida every day, and they're 342 00:22:25,560 --> 00:22:30,520 Speaker 1: leaving states like New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and states 343 00:22:30,520 --> 00:22:35,439 Speaker 1: in the Midwest like Indiana and Michigan and Wisconsin. They're leaving, 344 00:22:36,000 --> 00:22:38,200 Speaker 1: and they're leaving, and they're taking their money with them, 345 00:22:38,280 --> 00:22:42,280 Speaker 1: and they're living in better weather, with lower taxes, less 346 00:22:42,320 --> 00:22:46,040 Speaker 1: burdensome regulation, and a freer lifestyle. And they like what 347 00:22:46,119 --> 00:22:48,080 Speaker 1: they see and they like where they live. So I mean, 348 00:22:48,720 --> 00:22:53,439 Speaker 1: New York is bearing the burden of their horrible governance. 349 00:22:54,440 --> 00:22:57,119 Speaker 1: You know, Gavin Newsom is now in spite of everything 350 00:22:57,160 --> 00:23:01,080 Speaker 1: he's facing, you know what, a thirty thirty five billion 351 00:23:01,119 --> 00:23:04,640 Speaker 1: dollars shortfall out in California. How's he going to make 352 00:23:04,640 --> 00:23:07,320 Speaker 1: that money up? And I'm sure he's gonna go back 353 00:23:07,400 --> 00:23:10,399 Speaker 1: and try and raise more taxes. Meanwhile, they're the highest 354 00:23:10,400 --> 00:23:14,040 Speaker 1: tax state in the country, New York not far behind them. 355 00:23:14,680 --> 00:23:18,160 Speaker 1: So you know, my answer is, you know it, get 356 00:23:18,200 --> 00:23:21,040 Speaker 1: away from the bad infrastructure. I could tell you New 357 00:23:21,160 --> 00:23:24,600 Speaker 1: York versus Florida is a very interesting case study because 358 00:23:24,760 --> 00:23:27,840 Speaker 1: Florida's budget is about half of that in New York 359 00:23:28,480 --> 00:23:31,760 Speaker 1: and their population now is higher than New York. And 360 00:23:32,000 --> 00:23:35,680 Speaker 1: I just spending time down in Florida, which is where 361 00:23:35,720 --> 00:23:39,239 Speaker 1: I eventually planned to be one day. I'm telling you, 362 00:23:39,320 --> 00:23:43,080 Speaker 1: it's it's a much You have much better infrastructure, much 363 00:23:43,119 --> 00:23:47,080 Speaker 1: better government service, you have a better healthier lifestyle. The 364 00:23:47,160 --> 00:23:50,840 Speaker 1: warm weather suits me really well. My days of wanting 365 00:23:50,960 --> 00:23:52,960 Speaker 1: to be on the top of a mountain and freezing 366 00:23:53,000 --> 00:23:56,960 Speaker 1: my ass off are gone. So I don't particularly like 367 00:23:57,040 --> 00:23:59,600 Speaker 1: Winner or the way I used to. Yeah, my daughter 368 00:23:59,640 --> 00:24:02,000 Speaker 1: is a junior in high school and we've actually my 369 00:24:02,040 --> 00:24:04,240 Speaker 1: wife and I have discussed moving out of New York. 370 00:24:04,480 --> 00:24:07,640 Speaker 1: We just want to get her through school the next 371 00:24:07,720 --> 00:24:10,199 Speaker 1: year and a half and then off to college, and 372 00:24:10,240 --> 00:24:13,000 Speaker 1: then we're going to get out of New York. Is 373 00:24:13,040 --> 00:24:16,000 Speaker 1: not a person I speak to now in New York 374 00:24:16,440 --> 00:24:20,359 Speaker 1: that is not thinking about leaving, Not a single person. 375 00:24:20,680 --> 00:24:25,000 Speaker 1: Everybody is thinking about their exit strategy. And so I 376 00:24:25,040 --> 00:24:29,280 Speaker 1: think this is gonna accelerate, It's not gonna decelerate over time. 377 00:24:29,400 --> 00:24:32,399 Speaker 1: That's my guests. Good luck, Gary, Hope you picked the 378 00:24:32,480 --> 00:24:34,879 Speaker 1: right place for you and your family. I'm sure you 379 00:24:34,920 --> 00:24:38,639 Speaker 1: can't do any worse than New York. Jason and Arizona. Jason, 380 00:24:38,680 --> 00:24:42,240 Speaker 1: how are you glad you called Tyler Sen? Thanks for 381 00:24:42,280 --> 00:24:46,520 Speaker 1: getting my towel. I just have a couple of comments 382 00:24:46,560 --> 00:24:50,480 Speaker 1: to make. One of them is about the Grand Jeur 383 00:24:52,080 --> 00:24:56,760 Speaker 1: Foreman in Georgia. And you know, you might be able 384 00:24:56,760 --> 00:25:02,320 Speaker 1: to look at the similarities if you've ever seen the movie, um, Indiocracy, 385 00:25:03,560 --> 00:25:07,440 Speaker 1: there's a lot of things that this uh, this is 386 00:25:07,520 --> 00:25:12,800 Speaker 1: the Democratic Party has been uh been leading leading us 387 00:25:12,960 --> 00:25:16,920 Speaker 1: into that are just like Hollywood movies, and they're all 388 00:25:16,960 --> 00:25:20,399 Speaker 1: the worst of them, uh like you know, the worst 389 00:25:20,440 --> 00:25:24,240 Speaker 1: of the people in the Sopranos. You'll see some similarities there. 390 00:25:24,800 --> 00:25:27,880 Speaker 1: But in the one I'm in the instant time regarding 391 00:25:28,320 --> 00:25:34,840 Speaker 1: referring to is and in the courtroom in Indiocracy, the 392 00:25:34,960 --> 00:25:38,639 Speaker 1: prosecutor just says, looks guilty, just look at them, and 393 00:25:38,720 --> 00:25:41,680 Speaker 1: the judge says, Okay, you're guilty, you know, And this 394 00:25:41,760 --> 00:25:45,720 Speaker 1: is what this is what I'm afraid that the country's 395 00:25:45,760 --> 00:25:49,320 Speaker 1: coming to. So we all need to be looking at 396 00:25:49,400 --> 00:25:51,760 Speaker 1: for that. What do you think, well, I mean, are 397 00:25:51,800 --> 00:25:54,520 Speaker 1: you I'm not I'm not following fully? Will you? Will 398 00:25:54,560 --> 00:25:58,919 Speaker 1: you talking about this story? Four person? Um? No? But 399 00:25:59,000 --> 00:26:05,240 Speaker 1: it's similar in the way of that that people don't 400 00:26:05,240 --> 00:26:08,600 Speaker 1: need evidence anymore to convict. It seems, well, there's a 401 00:26:08,640 --> 00:26:10,880 Speaker 1: reason why they say you can indict a ham Sandwich, 402 00:26:10,920 --> 00:26:14,040 Speaker 1: because when you're in a grand jury, you're only getting 403 00:26:14,600 --> 00:26:17,719 Speaker 1: the grand Jurors are only hearing one side of the story, 404 00:26:17,760 --> 00:26:20,440 Speaker 1: not both sides of the story. There's no defense in there. 405 00:26:21,040 --> 00:26:28,200 Speaker 1: So they are extremely prejudiced. They're overly aggressive prosecutors, especially 406 00:26:28,240 --> 00:26:31,160 Speaker 1: when they're dealing with high profile individuals in this case, 407 00:26:31,600 --> 00:26:37,320 Speaker 1: Donald Trump, Lindzy Graham, Rudy Giuliani. You know, they get 408 00:26:37,359 --> 00:26:41,359 Speaker 1: overly ambitious, they want to overcharge, and they present a 409 00:26:41,440 --> 00:26:43,520 Speaker 1: one sided case and the hopes that they get the 410 00:26:43,520 --> 00:26:47,480 Speaker 1: indictment they want. And now somebody basically still has to 411 00:26:47,520 --> 00:26:51,160 Speaker 1: prove their innocence. Even though we say you're innocent until 412 00:26:51,200 --> 00:26:54,520 Speaker 1: proven guilty. Once you're indicted, the assumption is a people 413 00:26:54,520 --> 00:26:56,439 Speaker 1: that you must be guilty of something. Well, I think 414 00:26:56,480 --> 00:26:58,480 Speaker 1: there's a theory here too. You know, you've got this. 415 00:26:58,560 --> 00:27:03,640 Speaker 1: Emily Cores desperately wants to be a witch. I think 416 00:27:03,680 --> 00:27:05,480 Speaker 1: I may have seen her in a view of the 417 00:27:05,480 --> 00:27:08,439 Speaker 1: Harry Potter films. I'm not sure. I've gone back and 418 00:27:08,480 --> 00:27:10,360 Speaker 1: I've looked, because I don't know a lot about witchcraft, 419 00:27:10,400 --> 00:27:12,240 Speaker 1: but you know, I'm trying to keep up. I've never 420 00:27:12,280 --> 00:27:14,920 Speaker 1: seen anyone like those women. After everything that you've seen, 421 00:27:15,080 --> 00:27:18,000 Speaker 1: what would your reaction be if the DA decides against 422 00:27:18,040 --> 00:27:21,159 Speaker 1: bringing any charges after what you've seen? I will be 423 00:27:21,200 --> 00:27:25,439 Speaker 1: sad if nothing happens. Like that's about my only request 424 00:27:25,480 --> 00:27:29,679 Speaker 1: there is for something to happen. I don't necessarily know 425 00:27:29,680 --> 00:27:31,600 Speaker 1: what it is. I'm not the legal expert, I'm not 426 00:27:31,640 --> 00:27:34,639 Speaker 1: the judge, I'm not the lawyers, but I will be 427 00:27:34,640 --> 00:27:38,880 Speaker 1: frustrated if nothing happened. Did you personally want to hear 428 00:27:38,960 --> 00:27:41,240 Speaker 1: from the former I wanted to hear from the former president, 429 00:27:41,400 --> 00:27:43,760 Speaker 1: but honestly, I kind of wanted to disappointa the former 430 00:27:43,800 --> 00:27:46,679 Speaker 1: president because I got to swear everybody in, and so 431 00:27:46,720 --> 00:27:48,840 Speaker 1: I thought it'd be really cool to get sixty seconds 432 00:27:48,840 --> 00:27:51,840 Speaker 1: with President Trump of me looking at him and being like, 433 00:27:51,880 --> 00:27:54,399 Speaker 1: do you solemnly swear? I'm me getting to swear him in. 434 00:27:54,480 --> 00:27:56,560 Speaker 1: I I kind of just thought that would be an 435 00:27:56,600 --> 00:28:00,000 Speaker 1: awesome moment. Is it? Would you say? When it comes 436 00:28:00,040 --> 00:28:03,159 Speaker 1: to there are and there are indictments recommended? Of course? 437 00:28:03,359 --> 00:28:06,760 Speaker 1: Is it more than twelve people? Is it more than 438 00:28:06,840 --> 00:28:09,560 Speaker 1: twenty people? I think If you look at the page 439 00:28:09,640 --> 00:28:13,199 Speaker 1: numbers of the report, there's about six pages in the 440 00:28:13,240 --> 00:28:17,439 Speaker 1: middle that got cut out allow for spacing. It's not 441 00:28:17,560 --> 00:28:21,080 Speaker 1: a short list. Not a short list more. I mean, 442 00:28:21,840 --> 00:28:24,800 Speaker 1: when it comes to seventy five witnesses like it, it's not. 443 00:28:25,000 --> 00:28:27,760 Speaker 1: I assume, of course it's not seventy five people. Would 444 00:28:27,800 --> 00:28:31,080 Speaker 1: you characterize it as twenty insh people? I can't say 445 00:28:31,080 --> 00:28:34,440 Speaker 1: I counted, okay, more than a dozen, though I think 446 00:28:34,440 --> 00:28:37,280 Speaker 1: i'd heard you say in another interview. I believe so 447 00:28:38,200 --> 00:28:40,880 Speaker 1: it's probably a good assumption. I really don't want to 448 00:28:40,880 --> 00:28:42,760 Speaker 1: share something that the judge made a conscious decision not 449 00:28:42,800 --> 00:28:46,880 Speaker 1: to share. I will tell you that it was a 450 00:28:46,920 --> 00:28:52,920 Speaker 1: process where we heard his name a lot. We definitely 451 00:28:53,400 --> 00:28:56,040 Speaker 1: heard a lot about former President Trump, and we definitely 452 00:28:57,720 --> 00:29:01,360 Speaker 1: discussed him a lot in the room. And I will 453 00:29:01,400 --> 00:29:05,600 Speaker 1: say that when this list comes out, you wouldn't. They're 454 00:29:05,600 --> 00:29:08,240 Speaker 1: no major plot twists waiting for you. And you know, 455 00:29:08,320 --> 00:29:11,440 Speaker 1: it's interesting. I was thinking about how, when she was 456 00:29:11,480 --> 00:29:13,400 Speaker 1: talking about, you know, how she wanted to do the 457 00:29:13,400 --> 00:29:16,560 Speaker 1: thing with Trump, did you personally want to hear from 458 00:29:16,560 --> 00:29:18,720 Speaker 1: the former I wanted to hear from the former president. 459 00:29:18,880 --> 00:29:21,240 Speaker 1: But honestly, I kind of wanted to subpoena the former 460 00:29:21,280 --> 00:29:24,120 Speaker 1: president because I got to swear everybody in, and so 461 00:29:24,160 --> 00:29:26,280 Speaker 1: I thought it'd be really cool to get sixty seconds 462 00:29:26,280 --> 00:29:29,280 Speaker 1: with President Trump of me looking at him and being like, 463 00:29:29,360 --> 00:29:31,840 Speaker 1: do you solemnly swear I'm me getting to swear him in. 464 00:29:31,920 --> 00:29:34,040 Speaker 1: I just I kind of thought that would be an 465 00:29:34,040 --> 00:29:36,720 Speaker 1: awesome moment. He shouldn't put a spell on him. I 466 00:29:36,760 --> 00:29:39,040 Speaker 1: would actually pay to see that. That That actually be pretty funny. 467 00:29:39,160 --> 00:29:42,480 Speaker 1: Well okay, then, well but she certainly had a very 468 00:29:42,480 --> 00:29:46,520 Speaker 1: strange article written about her in the Daily Mail. All right, 469 00:29:46,560 --> 00:29:48,800 Speaker 1: we are loaded up tonight, I mean loaded up all 470 00:29:48,800 --> 00:29:53,520 Speaker 1: of the latest on this rogue jury. Four person out 471 00:29:53,520 --> 00:29:56,000 Speaker 1: of Georgia will have an update on all of that. 472 00:29:56,040 --> 00:30:00,120 Speaker 1: Will also be updating you on the investigations into the 473 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:04,000 Speaker 1: the FBI and the Department of Justice with Jim Jordan 474 00:30:04,040 --> 00:30:07,840 Speaker 1: and Matt Gates. We have Mike Huckabee. Kurt Schilling is 475 00:30:07,880 --> 00:30:10,880 Speaker 1: on tonight. Jesse Katar Love and Tammy Bruce will be on, 476 00:30:11,400 --> 00:30:15,000 Speaker 1: and then we'll check in with Vivek Ramaswamy, who apparently 477 00:30:15,080 --> 00:30:17,200 Speaker 1: is flirting with a run for the presidency. We'll ask 478 00:30:17,240 --> 00:30:19,760 Speaker 1: him what that's all about. We have a live audience 479 00:30:19,760 --> 00:30:22,520 Speaker 1: show tonight. We'll hope you'll join us. Jimmy Faylis, Sean Duffy, 480 00:30:23,360 --> 00:30:27,440 Speaker 1: David McDowell, Nine Eastern say you, DBR Hannity, Fox News. 481 00:30:27,640 --> 00:30:30,280 Speaker 1: We'll see you tonight at nine. Back here tomorrow. Thank 482 00:30:30,320 --> 00:30:31,760 Speaker 1: you for making this show possible.