WEBVTT - Friday Round Table CTJ: The Lighthouse

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Movie Crush, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, Welcome to Movie Crush Special Crush to Judgment Roundtable,

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Friday Edition. I have Casey to my right, Hello, that's sorry. Yeah,

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>miss my cue be God damn professional paulled to my left,

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and at the distant end of this rectangular table, I

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>have Mr Nol trying to reach out and touch each other.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Don't touch me too far, don't do it too far. Um.

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I did a funny thing a minute ago. I was

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in the kitchen to get a refreshing beverage, and our

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>lovely office manager was restocking the fridge to the left

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and the door was open, and the fridge to the

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>right the door was closed. But I was looking at

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the left fridge and reached into the right fridge thinking

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that door was open, and it was closed, and my

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>hand smashed into the glass like a bird hitting a windshield. Yeah,

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that all happened, just now, just now. I'm okay. It

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>was a weedy little grab, wasn't It wasn't that resolution.

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I know you're grab. It's not a firm grab. So

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>before we get going on the lighthouse, I want to

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>chat briefly about your movie. Are you. Okay, no, we

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>weedy little sneeze. I want to talk about Paul's movie.

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Paul made a movie everyone that we believe we mentioned briefly,

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>but it is actually out now on Amazon Prime. It

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is called Annie in the City. That is a N

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>N E Y in the c I T T E Y.

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Just kidding, uh, And let's chat about it because Casey,

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you shot the movie, you were the cinematographer of record,

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's correct, and you wrote and directed it. Yeah.

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I I co wrote it with Annie Reese, who's also

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the star of the movie. Titular Annie. Yeah, who you

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>know from the Slasher round tables. And I'm going to

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>record into the Spider Verse with Annie right after this.

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And a little meta trivia here. The movie contains a

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>movie that I made many years ago. Like within the movie,

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a fact to TV. Yeah, in fact, I don't know.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm always corrected when I used to Yeah, you know

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>what you tell those people go to hell because factoid

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you can certainly use it that way. I think you

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>can do it. I think if it is a fact

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a little nugget, you know, people say technically affect oid. Yeah,

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>just punch them in the base with you next time.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Ben Bolan corrects me. Oh god, so mad at him. So, uh,

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to know how you got the movie on

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Prime. How does that work? How do you get distribution? Uh? So,

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it it technically counts as district ribution, Okay,

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:04.559
<v Speaker 1>but it is. I mean it counts, it counts, it's available. Basically,

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it's quite easy. I just Amazon has a thing called

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Video Direct and you kind of, if you have

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon account already, which I did, you basically sign

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>up for Amazon Video Direct and it allows you to

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>publish videos on their platform. And you just have to

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sign up and give your sort of uh your bank

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>information and if so, I have an LLC that I

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>set up for making the movie that's separate, separate from

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.119
<v Speaker 1>me personally. It's an LLC just made for the movie.

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So I had to give that information. Uh, And you

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>need all that information. So the money that you make,

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the profits you make off of the movie through Amazon,

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>through Amazon, and obviously they take a cut. I actually

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. Amazon takes a cut. Sure. Yeah shocking. I

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>was being facetious. Sorry I missed that. He's always got

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that hands, got to get his a little guy. Yeah.

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So so it's it's it's surprisingly easy. And then um,

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>once you make all that account stuff, you can you know,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>create uh, basically a project for the for the video

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>for the movie. It can be a short film or

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a movie or whatever, and it requires a lot of

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>information that you have to enter, and you have to

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have the movie exported in a certain format file formats,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>not just a bunch of YouTube garbage. They're really weeding

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing out. Yeah, and then once you

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>actually get all your ducks in a row and have

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>everything filled out and all the information, you submit it

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to them and that takes a couple of days and

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>it actually goes through an approval process where it could

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>be rejected if the file format doesn't conform to certain standards,

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>or if the artwork you used for the cover image

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is incorrectly format and stuff like that. All right, so

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>you just gotta have your ducks in a row, follow

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>through on everything, and YouTube can get your movie on

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Prime. Yes, yes, very cool. And as far as

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>like a promotion and stuff that obviously be a separate yes,

0:04:55.040 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>they have like a guidebook where it's basically, uh, here's

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>how to promote your movie, tweet about it with the

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>hashtag prime video or it's you know, it's all you

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>doing it yourself, you know, unless you're a big studio. Uh.

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's on Amazon Prime. It's free to stream, you

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>can prime member, and it's a dollar ninety two rent

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>if you're not all right, So you see it everyone, Yeah,

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really good. I'm just gonna go ahead and put

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that out there, like, it's really fun, it's really heartwarming,

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, it's got it's a cool story and and

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it's beautifully shot and it's just a cool movie. Yeah.

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>I told Paul that I've I'm watching it in pieces,

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>well not in pieces, really two pieces because uh, as

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>soon as he said that email the other day, it's like,

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>oh man, like I can't watch it right now. So

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>if I got I got to see some of it

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>because I gotta get a sense of it. So I'll

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>watch like the first fifteen minutes before I had to

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>get in the shower, and then I'm going to finish

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it up probably tonight. And I liked what I saw,

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.239
<v Speaker 1>and he's great. If she's so endearing as a human

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>being and that comes through on screen. Yeah, uh, and

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>make sure yeah you ask her about it when you record. Uh, nope,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>your Yeah, we'll talk about that for sure. Our buddy

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Chandler Mays too, isn't it And he played he does

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a great dust turn as a kind of a scheezy

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>weed dealer. Um. That was a stretch, but fantastic. If

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you tell anyone listening, if you do watch it, please

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I hate having to ask this, but please rate it

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and review it if you feel so inclined. Even if

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't like the movie, it does mean a lot.

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>And also just it does help with like discover ability

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and all those silly things to help the movie get seen.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So I love it. Names with the podcasts, yeah, same thing,

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the podcasts. All right, guys, let's talk about the Lighthouse.

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Casey saw this back in May and France. Correct, correct,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it was. It was not in the official competition,

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.679
<v Speaker 1>but it was in the sidebar the Uncertain My God

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>so um, which is where they put a lot of

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of steing slightly more experimental stuff. And I think

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>it fit right in. I think I thought I was

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>going to play on the ha ha ha day No, no,

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>not surprisingly not interesting. Uh do you feel like you're

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty fresh on it? Still? Well, that's the thing I

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>was going to try to see it again before we

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>did this, and it just didn't come together. So I'm

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>relying on my memory from May and yeah, you'll be

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's I mean, it's I feel like it's a

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>movie that the plot matters, maybe a little less than

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>your average movie. It's it's more about the atmosphere and

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>so on. So sure, you know, what, when did you

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>see it? I saw on Halloween? O? Yeah, all right,

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>yeah on Halloween Halloween day night. Yeah, when't that spooky

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>cold weather came through? It was just when just so

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>got out and tried to have a chat about it

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>with my friends outside and then realized it was far

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>too cold and we weren't going to continue our hangs

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>indoor else indoors elsewhere, so we parted ways. But that

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is pretty funny after a movie about true elemental human

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>suffering and you're outside and you're like, I can't talk

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>about this movie. It's uh And when did you see it, PAULI?

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I just saw it last Today's Wednesday. I saw it

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>last Friday. Okay, yeah, I saw it in New York

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>UM when I was there a couple of weeks ago.

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And boy, let's just get into it. I mean a

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>movie that uh, you know, I was really interested in

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this one a because of Egger's uh Robert Eggers and

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>The Witch was so great and original, I thought, but

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>also because and I've talked about it on the show before,

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>but I wrote a lighthouse movie, a period piece thriller

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>horror not horror, more thriller um a couple of years

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>ago that I tried to get money to make and

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of started and never never did it. But I

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, Man, Eggers is doing a lighthouse movie.

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I'm sure it's way better than what

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna do. And it was, um, but it

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it definitely piqued my interest because I was just like,

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>why has no one written a great movie with the

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>lighthouse is the primary setting, because it forces so many

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>things upon you. Um, probably the most important thing is

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is isolation. Yeah, which is a good foundation for a

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess they're calling this on Wikipedia at least a

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>psychological horror film. It's like a cabin fever movie, sort

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>of in the tradition of like The Shining or something,

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>where your hold up against the elements and you know,

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you kind of lose your mind. Yeah. I didn't feel

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a horror movie, did you guys, No, it's

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe unsettling is the word more than horror. And

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>also it definitely has some comedy in it, Oh, a

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of comedy. It's hilarious. Yeah, yeah, through which were

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>very again, I mean the character of the old grizzled

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>sea captain, you know, I mean, it's like the most

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>stock character you can imagine. Of course, that guy's farting

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Yeah, it's absolutely you know, I mean,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't it is. It does make you giggle a

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but it doesn't come off as like completely

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere, Like it makes absolute sense for his

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>character and it and it makes sense for the Robert

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Pattinson's character to be, like he's dealing with this asshole

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's getting fucking farted in his face on top

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of it all. It's sort of like the the stinky

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>cherry on top. Just for the record, real quick, I

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>just typed in Lighthouse movies and uh, we've got Pete Dragon.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Lighthouse places pretty prominently in that. A movie from nineteen nine,

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a horror thriller called Lighthouse, a movie from five called

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Voice of the Whistler, which looks pretty cool. Um, then

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we've got The Light at the Edge of the World,

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>which very much centers around the lighthouse, and my personal

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:41.599
<v Speaker 1>favorite horror on Snape Island from nineteen seventy two. Um,

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to see all of these. Then you have

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>another movie called The Lighthouse from nineteen it's a foreign film,

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's called faro Um from Argentina. And then to

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the Lighthouse, the Fog, Hysterical and Shutter Island. There was

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a lighthouse. My movie was called The Graves head Light

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.599
<v Speaker 1>because the I should just tell people what it was

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>because I'm never gonna make it, or you know what,

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll make it as a podcast. There you got,

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>there you go. That's cool. And that's the thing I

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to point out too by this movie, like it

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is just as sonically interesting as it is visually interesting,

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.719
<v Speaker 1>like the sound design and the palette and the sparseness

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and the choices they make on point. So it just

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it lulls you into this weird fugue state almost while

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you're watching it, and you start to almost feel that

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>malaise and kind of confusion that the characters are feeling,

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>which is neat because a quick set up two dudes

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>older grizzled sea captain and younger you know, new recruit

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of greenhorn Greenhorn going to this island as Rock

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>as they call it to do some maintenance work for

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a short period of time. I think it's meant to

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>be two weeks or something like that. Yeah, And that's

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just like how they did it. They rotated people in

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and out of stations and lights and this was there

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 1>whatever their next stop. Yeah, because it's literally a functional

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>thing as lighthouses to keep ships from crashing, right, so

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>they have to, you know, make sure everything's functioning, do

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>some maintenance work, some light repairs and roofing and etcetera.

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's what they're there for. Yeah, because the lighthouse

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>gets beat up. You gotta paint those things like once

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a year. The seagulls pecking, all the seagull stuff is phenomenal.

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole credit at the end of the movie

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that's just seagull crew and it's a huge list of people.

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't don't know if it was a joker now,

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think no, No, I think they had

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>like wranglers. Yeah, for sure. You got the scene where

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the beats that seagull to death is fucking brutal. It

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>really made me laugh when it sne came up like

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it's brutal, but it also is very cathartic when you

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>just finally there was a bit I think. I mean,

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>parts of this movie seem like a black comedy. It's weird. Yeah.

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think. The thing that's interesting, though, is there's a

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>line that you don't even you can't hardly tell when

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it gets crossed, Like even in that seagull beating the

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>death scene. Yeah, it's comical and muppety looking at first,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>but then all of a sudden, he's just holding this

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 1>bag of guts and you know, black blood and stuff,

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it becomes kind of disturbing what started off

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>as funny. I think that's a good kind of microcosm

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of the whole movie, you know what I mean, because

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's funny until it's not, and then it

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>gets real unfunny pretty quick, you know. Yeah? Yeah, Um,

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's let's talk a little bit, I guess

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>just about the look, uh, and maybe some more about

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the sound. Does anyone know much about how they shot this?

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So they shot it on actual black and white thirty

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>five millimeter film, uh, double X that a Kodak makes,

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and they use lenses from Pano Vision, but they were

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>lenses that there's one that's like a hundred years old.

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Heard that, and then there's other lenses in the set

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that are like from the nineties. Um. And they had

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to have them kind of modernized and fitted to the

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>cameras that they're using, and um, you know, so that

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>all their accessories and so on would kind of be

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>inner compatible. Um. And they also shot with a blue

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>filter over the camera, which is kind of unusual for

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>black and white because it it tends to darken the

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>image and lower the contrast. Um, but it also brings

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>out like imperfections and skin and it's not a very

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>flattering filter. Yeah. I mean, this movie is not when

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you think black and white. It can there's a range

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about black and white, and uh, what

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I tend to think of is just that gorgeous really

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>black blacks and crisp and this movie is almost just gray, right,

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of like a like the foggy, kind

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of hazy atmosphere and so um yeah, and they they

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>shot in a very kind of unusual aspect ray show

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>one point one nine to one, which is almost square.

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a lot taller than we're used to seeing.

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Did that because of the lighthouse? So yeah, because of

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the lighthouse, and also because a lot of kind of

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>early cinema was shot closer to that aspect ray show.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I really like this aspect ray show. I thought it

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>was cool. It's yeah, I mean, I love I love people.

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I of seeing films that play with, um, you know,

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>aspect ratios that we don't see all the time. I

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>think Wes Anderson for the Hotel movie did that right.

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>It's four by three, but yeah, close enough. I mean

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>he's he's got like two three, five and four by three.

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>There might be one six six in there somewhere. Yeah.

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>A lot of television from the nineties is in a

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>more square aspect ratio. I believe four three, four by three. Yeah,

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's like a TV predescreen. Yes, of course,

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of course exactly. But it's interesting too. There's always a

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>big fuss that gets made when they reissue some of

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that stuff and then they squish it and where they

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>stretch it and so you lose parts of the image

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>when they do that. Right, to accommodate a wider frame,

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>they have to push in it depends on how it

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>was shot. But yeah, basically, yes, like there's certain shows

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>like The Wire for instance, when they when they when

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>they redid that for h D, like there was more

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>information in the negative on the sides that they could

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>open up. But the problem is is that when they

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>were shooting, they only protected for like what was in

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the frame. You know, so there's like stands and you know,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>cables and that they had to paint out and see

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>g I to like interest redo that show basically, and

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of purists myself included, were kind

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of like, I wish you had just done four by

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>three because that is like that's the show I watched,

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, but I mean it looks good in six. Yeah,

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>well this movie looks great. Uh. And it's just so like, um,

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>so realistic and and I know that they I mean,

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>he put these guys through a living hell. And Robert

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Pattinson uh was talking about basically like for all intents

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and purposes, at times, it felt like they were living

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteenth century, you know, on set because they

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>were there, you know, they were in a remote location,

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Scotia. I think, yeah, you can't fake that

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>ship and the weather was really brutal, and you know

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>all those scenes where he's got that rickety wheelbarrow and

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>he's going through the mud and you're just like that

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that had to have been a miserable experience. You can't

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>fake that kind of duress. You know, it's not like

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>they got a stand in to do it. Maybe there's

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of scenes that they did, but in general,

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's because of the aspect racio. A lot

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>of it's super close up and claustrophobics claustrophobics, so he

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, he absolutely was shoveling that ship like you know,

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>painting that house on that like weird uh Pulley system thing.

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>It seemed very dangerous to begin with, and then he

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of course falls and I don't know, like, yes, it's

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a real commitment of acting. That's at the very least

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>you can you have to give it that. Whether you

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>like it or not, you cannot deny that it is

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>some powerhouse acting going on in that film. And it's

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a very physical role, like he has to actually do

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff. And Robert Eggers, in an interview as reading,

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about how you know these older lenses they're not

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>coded as well. They tend to fog up quite easily,

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>especially in like that kind of weather. So there were

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>numerous takes. I think he said one scene they had

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.959
<v Speaker 1>to do like twenty five takes of Robert Pattinson walking

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>into the water and uh, you know with the waves

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and everything, and um, they had to do that like

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty five times just because they kept having problems with

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the lens fogging up all the time, and so a

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>take would be perfectly good except for that, and again

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and didn't Pattinson kind of loses cool with him a

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I saw a thing where he was saying,

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>at least an interview that he wanted to punch him,

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>or that he almost punched him because they were a

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>thin blasting him with a hose at some point to

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>get him wetted down properly. I don't remember exactly. Yeah,

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was a fun shoot. Guys. Well,

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>it's so it's so dirty and grimy and gritty, and

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>just like it feels like for the entire duration of

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that shoot, they probably didn't feel like they ever got clean.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it just kind of wears on you after

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a while. I wonder where they stayed it's a good question. Yeah,

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It couldn't have been too close to

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>any amenity, right right. I wonder if they just rented

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.719
<v Speaker 1>some houses nearby or something. Yeah, yeah, probably. Uh. This

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of movie where, like the acting is

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>so good and it's just two of them. It's almost

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it almost feels like you wish you could give them

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a joint Academy Award or something. It's for like best

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, best duo. Mean there's one is not a

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>supporting actor. I mean, they're both the lead actors. I

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>would like to see them both getting nominated for Lead Actor,

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the Oscars. I think if you had

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>to pick one, though, I would say Defoe, Yeah, just

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>because like he gets all these amazing monologues. He gets

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>more dialogue then. I mean, I think Pattinson's physical performance

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is probably a little more intense, but like as far

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>as acting, you know, like in delivery, just choose it up,

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>he brushes it man. That curse that he does is

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>a scene where he smites Pattinson's character with this insane

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>curse and all these horrible things that are gonna happen

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to him, all because he says he didn't like his cooking. Yeah,

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>that was great because he didn't even like me, lobster.

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>You're fond of me lobster Ange. It was hard not

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to think of the Simpsons Sea Captain. Yeah. Yeah, I

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>mean it's totally that character. Yeah. Um, there's a lot

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of chamber pot stuff. There's a lot of gross human waste. Um,

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of sort of old seafaring and a

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 1>no Egger's and his brother wrote this. They did a

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of really good research John just sort of the

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>superstitions of of the life of a lighthouse keeper. Yeah,

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>and there's there's all these like vintage light keeper diaries

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that that they were reading to to actually pull not

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>so much like entire lines of dialogue from, but certainly

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>like turns of phrase and vocabulary and so on to

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of inhabit that voice, which they did on The

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Witch too. Yes, yeah, even I think even more so

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>on The Witch in terms of like their their lines

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, exchanges in The Witch that kind of

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>comes straight from some some of these primary period sources.

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.239
<v Speaker 1>But this one it was more like they just kind

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of wanted to capture that spirit and style of the

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>matter of speaking. But the dialogue itself is more of

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>like an invention of Eggers and his co screenwriter, his brother. Yea,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is this a movie you like? It's a weird question,

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>but like so, you know, we've we've been talking a

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>lot about the great technical achievements of this movie, acting, cinematography,

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>sound design, which are all stellar, but so far, for

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>me personally, I haven't had much to say on it

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>because I personally did not like the movie that much.

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I was very lukewarm on it. I felt like it

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>was a movie in search of a purpose to exist

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in that all of these technical aspects are great, can't

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>deny it, but I was also kind of like, what's

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the point. And I'm not saying that a movie needs

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to have some great, deep thematic meanings to have any

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>value to me, but it just wasn't enjoyable enough for

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>me to really get much out of it. I don't know, like,

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 1>after the first probably forty minutes, I actually found the

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>movie a bit tedious to watch, and at the end,

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of like, Okay, that's just me personally,

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. Well, here was my take is it's not

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>enjoyable in the sense that you go to a movie

0:21:55.640 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and sort of have that familiar experience of a hero's

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>journey or a the character who's overcome something in the end.

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Like it it is shoes traditional film narrative so much

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's it feels almost borderline and experimental film in

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways, and an exercise and sight and

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>sound and making an audience uncomfortable. Uh, because it's not

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>very plotty. I mean, there's not a lot happens. But

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to what end? To what end of all that stuff?

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>That's my question. I think I think Eggers is playing

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>with a different deck of cards than other filmmakers. I

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's making movies. I mean, The Witch was

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a little more traditional, but this is like he's out

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>there man. The Witch also was in a particularly pleasant film.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>It's more that the Witch the Witch kind of and

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Eggers has talked about this that when you made the Witch,

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 1>he made it in this kind of almost deliberately austere, heavy,

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>like serious art house kind of tell and for this

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to bring in more silliness, more humor, you know,

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to kind of stand alongside the kind of austere look

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and feel of it. And for me, I think I

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>was expecting more of the tone of the Witch or

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>something where it was going to be a little bit

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>more like just straight laced and kind of heavy the

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>whole time like it. Yeah, I was like I was

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>mixed on it, and you know, like Paul said, like

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>everything about it from a technical standpoint, the performances, the

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>way it looks, the way it sounds is all, you know,

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>top notch and clearly the work of like an extremely

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>talented filmmaker who I think is gonna, you know, give

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>us many many great films probably over the course of

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>his career. This one did feel a little bit like

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of at the end left wondering, like

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>what was the point of all that? Sort of It's weird.

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>It's weird because I I like, um, I mean, I

0:23:56.440 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>like certain movies like um, you know, somebody like Nicholas

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Winning Refin when he makes a film like The Neon Demon,

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>which is very much style over substance, which is also maligned. Yeah, yeah,

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people dislike that movie. I tend to

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>like that movie a lot um so, so it's so

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not just that, you know, I think

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>that the film has to have some like greater significance

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>or something for me to like it. But yeah, just

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I I reached that same point, like forty five minutes

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>an hour in where like there was just one too

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>many like long monologues to camera, single take kind of

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like these bravera acting moments where it's like, Okay, they're

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>doing an amazing job of performing right now. I just

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know from a from a kind of larger film

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>ex standpoint, like what it's doing, what it's driving at. Yeah,

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he was almost just trying to do an

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>experimental film where he's like, let me see if I

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>can put an audience through make them feel something like

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>these characters are feeling, because there is a little bit

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of that like oh man, like please let this end.

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, I do think too. I personally, I wish

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you would have embraced the silliness and humor even more.

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's what I'm saying. I wish they had

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>more fart jokes, because those moments of at least levity

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>at least made me enjoy myself while I was watching it,

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise it's so austere and it has this feeling

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>of take this movie seriously, you know that I wish

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>he would have embraced that silliness a little more. Okay, yeah,

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is almost like an over the top,

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>almost cartoon version of what we think of as like

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>an art film in terms of just the black and white,

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the severity of it and everything. You could you could verily,

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>very easily tweak it to be almost like a sketch

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>about you know, what these films are like. Did you

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>like it? No? And that's it is a tricky question because,

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>like you know, like I said, I didn't find it

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a particularly pleasant film, but I left it

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>feeling away and it made me think about what I

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>had seen, and it made me kind of want to

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>see it again, to look a little deeper. But I

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>also think that you're right in that maybe it didn't

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>have as much of a purpose as you know, a

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>film that I might have walked away from feeling a

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit more satisfied by. But I feel like what

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Eggers is really good at doing is giving you, like

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>this lens into a world that you should not be

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a part of, and that in and of itself as

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>an accomplishment. To me, It's like the which again also

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty light on plot. Plot is sort of second secondary.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It's more about the experience of like witnessing this transformation

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and these this family's kind of deterioration, you know, in

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>this isolated state. This movie does very much the same thing.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's about seeing these two men kind of

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>lose their mind in real time. But then you start

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to kind of be a party to that madness because

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you start losing the sense of time and how long

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>have we been here? And you know that disorientation that

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about at the top of the show,

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>which a lot of it has to do with the

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>sound design and the foggy vibes of the whole thing. Um.

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>But to me, this movie is about witnessing like the

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>creation of a myth, Like if you think about all

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>those sea shanties and all of those like tales that

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>they got from the light Keeper's journals and stuff. To me,

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>this film is actually witnessing what that might look like

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>like of a myth or a parable or like some

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of like you know, even like a Bible story

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that then is like regurgitated and turned into all this

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.719
<v Speaker 1>lore or whatever. To that, to me is what it was,

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's fascinating. Well, he definitely likes to

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to do that deep dive into like a period and um,

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean he has like a kind of a set

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>design costume design background. I believe Robert Eggers does. So

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>he's he's extremely hands on with all this stuff. He

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>really likes using you know, the actual materials and everything

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>authentic and um, he's very, very dedicated to small details

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>like that. And for him, I think it's it's sort

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of like the sum of all that research that kind

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>of creates this feeling of just being immersed in a

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>period and authenticity and and all that, which you know, again,

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's great. Um. I just wish that from

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a like a screenplay standpoint, like for instance, you know,

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>The Witch, I thought actually had a lot more going

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.479
<v Speaker 1>on thematically, um that you could kind of sink your

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>teeth into afterwards and would kind of reward multiple viewings.

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>But so more satisfaction out of The Witch, it sounds

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>like for me, yea, even even though it's weird. I

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a big horror guy, So just the experience

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of watching the which I guess isn't wasn't that enjoyable

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>for me. But I think I liked The Witch more.

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>You're saying you were scaredy pants. I'm saying, shut I'm

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>not scared. But to Casey's point, like, I feel like

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I got more out of The Witch, and I feel

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>like it's, in my mind, a better film than The Lighthouse. Yeah,

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>what about you it, man? I thought it was like

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a true masterpiece. Um yeah, I mean again, not like

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a it's not a movie. It's not anything you're really

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>going to quote unquote enjoy. But um, I like that

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this guy is is making these challenging experimental films. Um

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that the ending of this movie is just so bonkers.

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And I loved all the all the you know hallucination

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>uh see creature hallucination stuff and the Mermaids stuff. I

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>just thought it was fucking great. Well spoiler alert now

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that we've we've already kind of done that a little bit.

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>But like this whole thing is I think that, uh,

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that Pattinson's character is in hell and that um deposed

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>character is like some sort of his like keeper that's

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that's putting him through these, uh, these mind games, and

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to start all over again at the

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>end because the last shot where uh Pattinson's characters having

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>his guts eaten by the by the seagulls. Um, that's

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the first shot of the movie from a distance pulls

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>back and you see the foggy shape of the rock,

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's the same exact shot. And I think that

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>was intentional, where it's like, this is a loop and

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>he's going to start back over and have to do

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>this again for all eternity, because Pattinson's character has found

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>out to have been a murderer and you know, a

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>bad man who in person, who murdered somebody and took

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>his identity at some point. Um the foe even says,

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what if, what if I'm in your imagination

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>or this whole places in your imagination, And then that

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like a little bit lazy, but and and it

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be this, But I think that's one

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>interpretation that you could you could you could see. Um Yeah,

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Eggers says that for him, like in terms of the

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>camera and just everything that we're seeing, the whole film

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is from Robert Pattinson's interior perspective as his state of

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>mind deteriorates, and it's only at the very end that

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we get like a handful of shots that are quote

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>unquote objective reality that everything else is kind of his imagination.

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So definitely the wim Defoe character could just be a

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>complete whole cloth like invention of Like would they even

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>need two people to do like you know for two weeks?

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it seems like you could get all this

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff done with just one, but maybe you need someone

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to That's that's true. That's a good point. That's that's raight.

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's historically accurate because I did a lot

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of lighthouse research when I wrote my my garbage thriller, Um,

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you what? What'd your take on the the

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that they had that beautiful for Nell lens, which is

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the hardest parts when when I

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>was kind of doing vague pre pro for for my movie.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Is fine finding a something to use as the lens.

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>They're not cheap to get a real one, and they're

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>hard to fake because it's such a specific thing for

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the lighthouse lamp itself. You mean, yeah, well the lens,

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's called it for Nell lens. It's spelled Fresnel, but

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it's pronounced for Nell. And it's that um, you know

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>coke bottle, you know, ribbed thick glass that it's shaped

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in such a way that it casts light further um,

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of the star of the show. If

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna do a lighthouse movie and you can't can't

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>get around it. And that was sort of the trouble

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>we were having there, like, jeez, what are we gonna

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>do for this lens? But um, they got a real one,

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of course because they had the resources and it looked amazing,

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But what was your take on the lens and the

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>light and you know what he was hiding up there?

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Because it's never really Maybe part of the lack of

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>satisfaction is is you don't really find out anything in

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the end. You kind of catch like little glimpses of

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's no good there's no great payoff. Yeah yeah, yeah,

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Like the Witch had that really great payoff at the end,

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>yeah yeah, and this doesn't really have that. Yeah. Well,

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean yeah, for for me, it's kind of the

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>whole lighthouse thing. It's it's very symbolic that you have

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this thing up at the very top that you're kind

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of asking yourself what is it? You're catching little glimpses

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of it, but you're you're you're only seeing kind of

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the tip of the iceberg. Um, yeah, I don't know.

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's kind of a metaphor for like buried thoughts

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in your mind or you know, just just something that's

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of lurking almost in like the subconscious or something. Yeah,

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that for me, that's maybe why I wasn't

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>as satisfied with the movie, because whatever metaphorical significance, the

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>light has just felt kind of, I don't know, ham

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>fisted a little bit really, yeah, I guess. And I

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>did enjoy at the end where he actually goes up

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>there and he's looking at the light and it's the

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>sound gets all crazy and his eyes kind of burned out,

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's very h takes a cue from David Lynch

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in that sequence, especially almost. Yeah, it's

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>not very much like he's crossed over to the other side,

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>something that he wasn't prepared to actually handle, and it

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of broke him. You know, I don't feel a

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of Lynch DNA and some of his stuff if

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you compare this to like a racer Head or something similarly,

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of like really thick atmosphere and something that was

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:00.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, every frame feels kind of handcrafted very slowly

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and caringly. And the sound too, Lynch sound design his films. Yeah,

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it was one of my favorites, and just all the

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>all the texture and grit and just like nothing feels casually,

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, like put together. Everything feels like it really

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>is aged and weather. Yeah, I mean the set, it's

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>just it feels so authentic. It's ridiculous. Like the you know,

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to drink a beverage in this movie because

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>there basically two forms of liquid that putrid, disgusting. Ah

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>cistern water that you know he pumps out of that thing.

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just you can almost taste it. It's so nasty.

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>And then the firewater alcohol that Willem Dafoe is just consuming,

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know, pounding, and you know it's gonna go bad,

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Like Robert Pattins is not drinking for a reason. And

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 1>when he finally makes him drink out of this, you know,

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you can even hear the rusty tin mugs. You're like,

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 1>oh man, this is not going to end well. Oh

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and then he devolves in they run out of the firewater,

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>he starts drinking straight caressing. Yeah. Well then they find uh,

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they think they find more provisions at one point, because

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you know they're kind of stranded, not kind of stranded,

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they're exactly strange and what they find is just more booze. Yeah,

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they being buried, just like, oh god, this is gonna

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>get really bad. But it gets a little fun for

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a little while when they're drinking and dancing and yeah,

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get their feeling. Yeah. Yeah, there's a

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of that tension going on. Yeah, a lot of

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.959
<v Speaker 1>spooning and just like the sexual tension overall of like

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, being on this island, being isolated. Um, like

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:48.240
<v Speaker 1>what happens on The Mermaid. Yeah. Interesting. My dearly departed

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>old friend Billy used to say life would be a

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 1>whole lot better if you could just suck your buddies

0:35:54.800 --> 0:36:06.240
<v Speaker 1>here here great quotes. Yeah, no, I loved it. Yeah,

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>I want to see it again. I very much want

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to see it again because I saw it. I'm really

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>bad at seeing nighttime movies. I get a little sleepy,

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and this one it's very conducive to that because it

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>does have this drony foghorn. Did you fall asleep? Yeah?

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I might have dozed a couple of times, but then

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I was, you know, jarred awake by some crazy shit happening.

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You know. And Casey, I think you had a sort

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of similar experience. Yes, I had Did you fall asleep?

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:32.879
<v Speaker 1>This is well? This is why I wanted to see

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it again because when I saw it the day I

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>saw it, it was probably my third or fourth movie

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that day, and it was like a ten pm screening,

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.839
<v Speaker 1>so I was also like fading kind of on and off.

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Did you all asleep? I didn't doze, but I did

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the thing where your head kind of falls forward and

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>he realized what you're doing and you're kind of awaking.

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Did you fall asleep? I did not? Good, I was

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>fully conscious the whole movie. I can say that. Well.

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw it as a daytime film because I don't

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>go see night movies. Um. I saw the matinee in

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:02.959
<v Speaker 1>New York, and this is a movie too. New York

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>at least is a little dirty. But it was a

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>nice sunny day and it's a weird matinee. The worst

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.479
<v Speaker 1>was when you lived in l a and you would

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 1>go to like the fucking Grove for a matinee and

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>see a movie like this, and then you walk out

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:19.240
<v Speaker 1>into what feels like Disneyland. It was like palm trees

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and a little like they have a fake little train

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>trolley car that rides by with tourist and it's always

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this weird, shocking adjustment when you walk out outdoor escalators.

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's great. Um, what else we got? I

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>mean or did we cover? It was a thumbtime I had.

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I had a couple of things. All right, let's go.

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.359
<v Speaker 1>So you know, like I said, Robert Egger's he loves

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to do his research for these things. We had already

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 1>mentioned some some like previous Lighthouse movies. But there's two

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>filmmakers in particular that he's referenced in interviews, both kind

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>of working in France and like the nineteen twenties, one

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>named Jean Epstein or Epstein, who was like a film theorist,

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of experimental filmmaker. UM makes these kind of beautiful

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>poetic um films, And he made a series of films

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Brittany region of France and Um which kind

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of has its own separate culture and history and so on.

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And UM he made this film called Finnish Terrey, like

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the End of the Earth, and uh, it's it's about

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>four guys on an island. They're there to gather seaweed

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>just off the coast of the island, and then you

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>burn the seaweed and apparently the ashes are useful for

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>something or other. And um, very quickly, one of the

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>guys cuts his hand on a on a bottle that breaks,

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 1>and uh, the hand gets infected and he can't use

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that arm anymore, and very quickly, like he's in kind

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of a survival situation and he's getting sicker by the day.

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.479
<v Speaker 1>He's having these fever dreams. And there's a whole fever

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>dream sequence where he's dreaming about the lighthouse on this

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 1>island and the lights kind of shining in his eyes

0:38:56.360 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and there's all these kind of cool abstract images happening. Um,

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 1>very clearly I think an inspiration for this movie. Yeah,

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:05.919
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like it. And uh, and eventually there's there's

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>like a whole rescue that happens to kind of get

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>him off the island. And nineteen I think nine when

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you made this. It's an interesting, interesting movie because he

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 1>he does this thing where he cuts away to these

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>close ups, and oftentimes those close ups are in slow motion.

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>It almost feels like Peck and Pop or something, but

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:24.799
<v Speaker 1>it's like forty years before Peck and Pot did it.

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>In the Wild Bunch, so very very innovative. Cool filmmaker

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:30.439
<v Speaker 1>there's also like a lot of handheld in that movie,

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:34.399
<v Speaker 1>which you never saw in nine hardly. Um. And then

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>also it's it's it's almost like half documentary half narrative

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>because um, it's shot all with people that are native

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 1>like that live on those islands, and um, they're they're

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>non actors and they just have these amazing faces. And

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of course it's a silent so they don't have to

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>deliver dialogue or anything, so it works pretty well. That's

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the filmmakers he referenced. Then the other one

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 1>another French filmmaker of that period Johan Galeon who um

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>made a film called The Lighthouse Keepers, which again is

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you can actually find it on YouTube. There's a really

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 1>terrible quality copy on YouTube because it it doesn't really

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 1>have a modern day available version. Yes, yeah, that was

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the only one in the lighthouse most exactly just a

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>father and a son, yeah, in a lighthouse situation. And

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I think it's I I do like

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that he is so dedicated to doing his research, doing

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>his homework, and um, I'm mean I think he's going

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to make a number of great films. You know, this

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>one is next well his so his next one well,

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>he he was trying to keep this under wraps, but

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>some details leaked out. So it's called The Northman. Uh,

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a Viking movie, like the tenth century. I think

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the Foe is going to be in it again. Um,

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know too much else of the plot details.

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you can find kind of like a little

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:55.319
<v Speaker 1>summary online. But Eggers was kind of like peeved that

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the details kind of slipped out. Yeah. Interesting of Viking movie.

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 1>That really does not surprised you know, sounds right, seems perfect. Yeah,

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna hate that one too, Paul, We'll see.

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>We'll see crush to judgment when it comes out. Boy

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Pattinson is just he impresses me more and more. Um,

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, it's a shame that I think there are

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>still people that think of him as the Twilight Guy,

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>because he's just left that in the dust. I don't

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>know those people. Is one of the great actors of

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>his generation. He's incredible, good times, one of my favorite

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>movies of that year. If not, he's got the good

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>few years and he's going to be the next Batman. Yeah, yeah,

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.359
<v Speaker 1>he's got that job. I gotta say, I'm excited for

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>it you and I'm not. I'll go see every Batman ever.

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who am I to say? Yeah, I'm happy

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>for the guy's pay day, but I'm also kind of

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>just over shuffling of the Batman. The Batman. You know. Well,

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited because he'll make a lot of money on

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Batman and hopefully that allows him to do more interesting projects.

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>That's good. He seems to be intent on doing interesting projects.

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Like everything he's been in lately has been Cosmopolis, good time,

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:03.240
<v Speaker 1>high life. Yeah. Like he's he's he worked with choices,

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>City of Ze. I mean, he's he's made like I

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 1>thought it was? Okay, it was. It was probably my

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>least favorite Jane's Gray movie so far. What else did

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>he do? Gosh? Um, Little Odessa, the Yards, Um we

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>on Denight, Two Lovers, the Immigrant and the New One

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>at Astra at Astra. Yeah, I haven't seen that yet either. Yeah.

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I got some work to do, so all right, I

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 1>guess let's rate this puppy. Um, what do we do?

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Nold thumbs thumbs one to five thumbs thumbs, Uh, casey,

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:39.319
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you. Um, I'm gonna say three three

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>out of five thumbs. Three from yeah, okay, No, I'm

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:46.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna do four point five thumbs. Now four thumbs, okay,

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, two point five thumbs, two point five thumbs.

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Just a regular human with the extra little little knob

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>or something. Yeah, um, what do you call it when

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a like a little bit of a tail growing?

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>What's that called? I'm not sure, Chuck, I'm maybe maybe, maybe,

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give it cheese. I mean, I'm gonna give it.

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give it at least. Yeah, I'm gonna give

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it four and a half thumbs. And what and that

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>half thumb is like got a really big thick fingernail,

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>like lighthouse Willem Dafoe fingernail that's got disgusting junk underneath it.

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a masterpiece. It was, you know,

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>when I described it, Emily asked, you know, she didn't

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 1>go to the movie in New York, but yes, what

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:37.919
<v Speaker 1>I thought about it, and so did Paul Schneider and dinner,

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, you know, it's hard to describe.

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's unlike any movie I've seen, um and

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>bold and experimental, and I like that this guy is

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>out there making these kinds of movies. I'm very happy

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>that he's out there doing what he's doing. I think

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really cool that, you know, a black and white

0:43:56.560 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like austere arthouse movie is you know, getting people out

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to see it. Yeah, and I like it. I like

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the idea of testing an audience and what they can take,

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>um because it's not extreme, like you know, some kind

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of horror core thing where like, oh you could just

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>barely sit through it, but it's extreme in in another way.

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah for sure. All right, how many things is that total?

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I can't do math? Let's see I gave four, four,

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>four point five. No, I I didn't see right, four

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half and nine a half, ten and a half, eleven.

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I had three, so fourteen and a half something like that,

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, and went and divide that by four, and

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>what's our average rating? Go see it? Everybody but the

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 1>dumb filmmaker types don't know math. Al right, thanks, dudes,

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>like these round tables. We'll get another one going here,

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of good movies coming down the pike.

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Obviously the Irishman it's got to be on the short list. Yeah,

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 1>let's do that. It's easy for us all to just

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 1>watch at home because it's actually doesn't come out on

0:44:57.000 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Netflix till that's right, that's right here in Atlantic. Okay, yeah, yeah,

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we should make a good point to see that one

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in the theater. I think I'm I'm going to be

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>their day one. Well, I know you are, Casey. You're

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be running the film through the projector that is true,

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:16.359
<v Speaker 1>it's going to actually be film. It'll be a d CP.

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:20.280
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna hit there's like some some prints that might circulate,

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>but now it'll be DCP, DCP all the way. Guys.

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, thanks dudes, Thank you for more podcasts for

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio. Visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.