WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: TechStuff has Klout

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios,

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey there, and welcome to tex Stuff.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works and I Heart Radio and I love

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>all things tech and today we're having another classic episode

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff. This episode originally published on October twenty four,

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and twelve. It's called tech Stuff has Clout

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and spoiler alert, cloud is no longer a thing, but

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>when we recorded this episode, it was a thing. Clout,

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>as you will learn, was all about social media influence

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>and reach, and depending on your point of view, it

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>was either an incredibly useful tool, a tool to turn

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>people into narcissists, or something even more sinister than that.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But spoiler alert again, it's all moot now because it's

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>no longer a thing. Anyway, enjoy this lastic episode as

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Chris and I tout our cloud. So today we wanted

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk about clout and whether whether or not you

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have any uh and maybe you personally. You know that

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>guy over there, he's got no cloud. Apparently I apparently

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I have some. Um the it's a not insignificant amount,

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>though not nearly as much. As you know, like Justin Bieber.

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, what is Cloud? So? Cloud is this company

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>out of San Francisco that was founded by Joe Fernandez

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand and eight. He started to build

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it when he couldn't talk. Did you know about that?

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>There's an article and Wired and I actually revisited it.

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's called what Your Cloud Score Really Means. It's

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>from Seth Stevenson. Actually read it in the print edition,

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>but I went back and revisited it so I could

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>throw in my electronic notes. Yeah. He uh, this is

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>really really funny. He um had had had to have

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>his jaw wired shut. That that's not funny. I don't

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>think that's funny. But because he couldn't talk, he started, Uh,

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he started tweeting and using Facebook to communicate with people

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>because it was driving him nuts that he couldn't talk

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>to people, he said, And in fact he said he

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>couldn't his mom didn't even understand what he was Yeah. Really,

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>uh so, I mean, thankfully he's apparently all better now.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>But I've seen I've seen interviews with him where he

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>was not wired shut and he was talking. Yes, so

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>he actually started uh, he actually started talking about or tweeting,

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>tweeting about this, all sorts of different things about um

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>restaurants that he had been to and making recommendations, and

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, again kind of iron as they point out

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the art kind of ironic. He couldn't open his mouth

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and go eat there, but basically product recommendations. He started thinking,

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>because he had had some experience with with statistics, and

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>started thinking, you know, how many people am I talking to?

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>And and to who are they talking and how much

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>influence do they have over people who buy stuff or

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>go shopping or go out to eat with these different people.

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:14.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's when he started. He started making some rudimentary calculations,

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>rudimentary by the terms of clouds algorithms today, and started

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>putting together this idea of you know, how much influence

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>do people have in the social media? So that's this

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is really an interesting concept to me because some people

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>would have you believe that influence can be measured solely

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>by things like the number of followers you happen to

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>have on social networks. But Fernandez's point is that's not

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the case. You could have lots of people following you,

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>but if no one's really paying attention to what you

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>have to say, and they're following you anyway, then your

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>influence isn't that great. You know, there's a lot of

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>people who could potentially hear you, but no one's really

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>listening to you, and that's a problem problem. So you

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>could you could conversely have relatively few followers compared to

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>someone who has millions, like you know, Justin Bieber's got

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>millions of followers on Twitter. Now he happens to be

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>very influential on Twitter. So that's I've heard that. It's

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a bad example. But let's say let's say

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got someone who's got over example. Let's say the

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>same You've got someone who's got over a million followers,

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>but for some reason, their cloud score is not that high.

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>The reason for that might be that perhaps a lot

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.679
<v Speaker 1>of those followers aren't real people. They might be boughts,

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So that could be one factor. But what Fernandez wanted

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to do was measure how much impact a person has

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on their various social circles and on the web in general. Uh,

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>not just how many people are following them and those

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>are those are two different things. So he built this,

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>uh this company and this algorithm helped to Yeah, the

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>His side, of course, is called cloud with a k UM,

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and since its inception there have been other imitators. I

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know some of them were actually out beforehand. And

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Twitter itself is working on its own implementation of a

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>similar software that would allow you to see, like when

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you tweet, how how much of your audience are you

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>actually reaching when you send out a Twitter message. And

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this really applies to people who have lots and lots

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of followers. So for example, if you take me, I

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have you know, thousands and thousands of I've got

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>like four thousand followers, which that's that's a that's a

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>lot for me because I'm like, well, I'm just a guy,

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a guy that four thousand people follow

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I hope that I'm interesting enough to justify that. But

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>there are other people out there who have millions of followers,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>but they don't know necessarily how many of those people

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they're reaching when they send out a message. Yeah, just

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>just for independent confirmation, I am sitting here directly across

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>from from Jonathan and he is in fact just a guy. Yes, um,

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a guy with a sixty five cloud score

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>though that's true. And then and part of the reason

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that that Jonathan does have a five Cloud score, and

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that's of the day we're recording this. These things do change.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>It could be, it could be it could be in

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>the low forties. By the fame of this Podcas goes out,

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason that that Jonathan has a cloud

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>score of sixty five is because there are a lot

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of people following him. But he's also well networked with

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>people also in the tech world. So there are people

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>who share his tweets with other people. That's part of

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the score. There there are people who who talk back

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to him who also, boy do they talk back to me?

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Shut up? You? Uh see what I did there? Yes?

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I do. Who There are people who have conversations with

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>him on Twitter, let's go with that, who are also

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>influential in the Twitter sphere and on cloud and therefore, uh,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that boosts his reputation um and his his ability to

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to network with other people, and so therefore he has

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a higher score than than maybe some other people with

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>more followers. This might sound really familiar to you, especially

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>if you are familiar with like Google's page rank algorithms

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 1>what used to be called page rank. Anyway, Uh, the

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>idea that Google would use this complex formula to determine

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>how well various sites would rank and search for any

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>particular term that you're searching for. So when you're searching for,

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, uh, cool tech gifts for the holidays,

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>then Google would look through its use its algorithm and

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>rank all these pages that relate to those search terms

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and give you the highest ranked ones. And that ranking

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is based on lots of different factors, including how many

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>websites link into it, and how old that particular website

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking at is, and and other factors as well.

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of stuff that goes into it. This

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is the same idea except for people instead of pages.

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>It's it's how well a person ranks, partly due to

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>their behavior online, partly due to their network that's around them,

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>partly due to how many people are following them. There

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.559
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of different actors at play. There's actually

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a web page on cloud site that goes into the

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>different factors that that they will admit to. Now, they

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>don't give you the nuts and bolts. It's a secret

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>sauce if you will. Clearly, you wouldn't want to be

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>able to give out all the information, because then people

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>would game the system like crazy just to get their

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>cloud score up, which is not the purpose of the

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of the site at all, or to to start a

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>competitor to another good point. Um, yeah, let's let's talk.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll mention a little bit more about what what they say, Uh,

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>competitors are critics, I should say, actually criticize cloud because

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's usually the comparison I've seen is to a credit score,

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>because the credit reporting agencies don't tell consumers what's actually

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>going into your score. Um. And in the in the

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>case of credit, it has to do with you know

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 1>how much you spend, how quickly you pay it back? Um,

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know how many cards credit cards you have? Are

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it accounts, lines of credit that you have opened, and

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>lots of different little proprietary things, and each of them

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>has a little different mix. Well, the cloud is sort

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of the same way. They tell you roughly what goes

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>into it, but they don't tell you exactly how much

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>weight each one carries. Um. It's based primarily on on

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Facebook. Um, this is not really much of

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a secret. Things like mentions of your name and Facebook posts. Um.

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>People who who are engaged with a lot of brands

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>on there, the likes that you have, the TV shows

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you like, UM, the the UH stores that you like

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, UM, the number of comments you have, people

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>who subscribe to you, uh, the number of friends. Obviously

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a metric and obvious metric. You know, how many

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>people follow you on Twitter, how many people follow you

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, people who mention you on on Twitter, or

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>people who um people you reply to and people who

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>reply to you shows your engagement with that network. They've

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>also extended it you to Google Plus, LinkedIn, four Square, Wikipedia, UM,

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>things on on LinkedIn. UM they go by your reported title.

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you say you're CEO of the World then

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and guess that that would probably help your cloud score. Yeah. So,

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>although I think that's probably hard to verify. These are

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>relatively new in the in the cloud world. These these

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>UM these items, because before what it was really looking

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>at was Twitter and Facebook mainly, First it was Twitter,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and then it was there in Facebook then and it

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>also linked You could choose to link stuff to your

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>your cloud. If you create a cloud account, you could

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>choose to link things like Google Plus, Facebook, Twitter and

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>other platforms as well. Now it looks at these other

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>elements like Wikipedia, or if you are mentioned in something

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like the New York Times, so that it can determine

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, um, you know you're getting press, people

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>are writing about you, so then that means you are

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>more in Floyd Childen someone who is not getting pressed,

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>So that would impact your score as well. Yeah, if

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to sign up for Cloud, you would sign

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>up using your Twitter or Facebook information. Basically, once you're

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>logged in, you can you can uh sign up for

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Cloud and it will access your account um and it

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>will say, okay, do you want to add your other accounts?

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to add these other accounts? And they're

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>even more than they're mentioned here, things like Flicker and

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>other accounts and things um and so yeah, what what

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan said is is true. They're also measuring this information

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you sign up for Cloud. Yeah, because

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you're you're if you have a Twitter account and it's

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>public and you are sending out messages, that's public record.

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>That's stuff that anyone can access. So what Cloud does

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is it will automatically start to index you and look

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>at how other people are responding to you. So whether

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you have signed up for Cloud or not, you may

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>have a Cloud score and uh, you know the we

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>have we mentioned what the range of scores is. It's

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>between one and one hundred. So the higher your cloud score,

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the more the more cloud you have, and the more

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>influence you would theoretically have over the web based upon uh,

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the algorithms assessment of you. Most people are

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>not like you would think the average would be fifty,

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but the average is really closer to the twenties range.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's that the people who are fifty or higher

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>are are assumed to be more influential in whatever fields

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>they've been identified as being experts in. Yeah, I mean,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. I was gonna say, if you sign up,

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you'll find out that they ask you, hey, what are

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you influential in? Yeah, And it turns out like if

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I log into my cloud and I'd look to see

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>what I'm influential in. There's some things you would expect,

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, like technology is up there, which that that

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. I do a tech podcast, I write tech

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>articles for a website. Uh, that makes sense. There are

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>other things like Atlanta restaurants. Huh, I didn't know that

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I was that influential with Atlanta restaurants. I should get

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>better tables darn it. Um. But yeah, there there are

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>other things that I look at on that people have

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>identified me as being influential, and some of them maybe jokes,

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but that's that's kind of interesting to me. Yeah, And

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I think here is a good point to

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>point out. And then there are critics and their proponents

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of cloud, just like anything else. But um, I think

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a good point to go right down the middle

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and say, look, this is what one person and his

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>company have done, you know, as as as Joe built

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>this company up, this is how they chose to measure people.

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's not it's it's based on one system, so

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not really I think, Uh, it was a couple

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, or was a couple of years ago

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>last year where they where they rejiggered the algorithm, and

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>was this year? It was this year. It was late

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>some earlier this year when they changed it because my score,

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>my score skyrocketed. I had been around sixty two and uh,

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and then I jumped all the way up to sixty nine.

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>I was almost seventy. It was very close to seventy,

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and I was thinking, whoa, how did that happen? Holy cow?

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm more and I started comparing myself because it cars.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm a bit of an egomaniac, you know,

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I admit this, and so I was like, let me

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>see what my good friend I as actar of this

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>weekend tech Let me on tech news today. Let me

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>see what how he ranks. Oh, he's he's at sixty five.

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>He's lower than I am. Gosh I as and of

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>course now I think he I think he ranks rightfully

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>so above me, because these things, do you know? It

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>was it was like an initial shock because people's scores

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>changed pretty dramatically. Some went up quite a bit, some

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>went down, and then it's been slowly kind of readjusting

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to where it needs to be based on all this

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>new information. Um, and you know this, this could be

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>really challenging because you're building an algorithm that needs to

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>identify people, and it needs to be able to make

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>sure it links to the right person, because, as it

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>turns out, there's some folks out there who share the

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>same name as other people, and so you have a

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of false positives. For instance, if you were to

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>search Jonathan Strickland in the metro Atlanta area, Uh, some

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>mug shots to be popping up and none of them

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>are me today today. Okay, but let's be fair. Today,

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>here's the recording of this podcast of those mug shots

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>would be me. Who knows what tomorrow may brain. But

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's the thing is that I could end up

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>identifying this stuff like, oh, John, this is being written

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>about in criminal newsletters. That's odd. But I guess that

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>ad just his cloud score, Like, no, that's not me.

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>That's another Jonathan Strickland and the same spelling and everything.

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, so the algorithm has to take that

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff into account. The other thing that's kind of a

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>controversy with clout is how companies are using clout in

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>various ways. Guys, it's Jonathan from two thousand nineteena interrupting

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this classical episode because I don't yet have quite enough

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>clout to get away with this without taking a break

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to thank our sponsor. So what is cloud other than

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>other than influence? A measure of influence in the social

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>media world. An idea of of that, what does cloud

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>get you? Very little or or al or a lot,

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>depending on how high your cloud already is. Um, yeah,

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's cloud is a weird thing. In some cases, all

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it might get you is bragging rights in the sense

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of you know you, you measure your cloud against your buddy,

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like your buddy i azactar of this weekend tech news today,

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and then you say, hey, look at that, or you

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>may say cloud scores going up because you mentioned in

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>very well and deservedly. So the man does good work.

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>As much as I joke. He he is an actual

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine. Uh so, maybe not after this podcast,

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 1>but he. You know, the these these numbers for a

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>large part of the population may not mean much, although

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it can tell you how effective you are online. So

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in a in a sense, it's doing what it's supposed

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to do. It's telling you what your impact is. And

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>if your impact is low, you might say, you know what,

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you might be cool with it. You might be saying, oh,

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just use this for fun, to stay

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>in touch with my friends. That's all I use it

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>for that. I don't care. But if you're trying to

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>get a message out there, then what it's telling you

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is your message is not being heard. It's not it's

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>not punishing you. This number is related back to that algorithm,

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and if you want to make sure your message is

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>heard by more people, you need to look into ways

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of delivering that message in in a in a way

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>that that interests people, that gets other people talking, that

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond just your immediate circle of followers. And if

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you're able to crack that code. And by the way,

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I do not have the secret sauce for that. There

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>are some messages I send out there that go bonkers

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think, Wow, that's amazing, and then I and

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>then I'll sit there and I'll craft what I think

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is the most brilliant, funny, uh timely tweet of all time,

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and I send it out and no one replies, no

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>one favorites, no one retweets. So I mean, I don't

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>have that secret sauce. Definitely you need to ask people

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 1>who have a much higher cloth score than I do.

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But if your score is low, that could be an

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>indicator that, hey, you need to change things so that

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you can make sure that whatever message you're sending out

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>there is being heard by the right people. Yeah, yeah,

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>and so and and for somebody like um, you know,

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.479
<v Speaker 1>for politicians for example, yeah, um, this is incredibly important.

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Or entrepreneurs want who get their name out. And then

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>there's the the other group of people who are are

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>short of in between there there, they're doing this shorter

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>because they want to, and then they might be getting

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>perks are cloud perks. So if you are an influential person,

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>then you are an attractive person for certain brands. If

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you are influential in a particular field. Let's say with me,

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm apparently I'm influential one technology and Atlanta restaurants. Then

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>let's say an Atlanta restaurant opens up and they are

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>cloud savvy, they understand how cloud works. They and they know, Hey,

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.719
<v Speaker 1>if we convinced this guy to come into our restaurant

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and eat our food, and we really pull out all

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the stops, he's gonna go out and he's going to

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about this incredible experience he had. And because his

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>influence is high in this area, that means we could

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>see a return on that investment. We could see people

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>come in because we tapped the right person to talk

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>about this, and that can go across all sorts of industries.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>So that being said, I'll come out and say it

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>right now. I have not received any cloud perks. I

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>am not I don't use cloud to get cloud perks.

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that I would ever use one. If

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>one came along that was just unbelievable, and I'm like, hey,

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly why I need and exactly how I

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>need it. I would probably do it, but I've never

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>had that. I've never had that happen. Yeah. The companies,

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the companies involved in cloud perks are generally people who

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>want to do some promotion. That's it's pretty simple. Um.

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>And so once you get your cloud score up to

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.719
<v Speaker 1>a certain level, and it could it depends on what

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 1>it is. Yeah, it depends on the company. Like some

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>companies will say, Okay, anyone who's below a seventy five,

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not interested in because that's not that's not worth

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the time it would take to do this. Yeah, but

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you might, um, you might pass let's say thirty, and

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they'll say, hey, people with cloud score of thirty, we'll

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>give you a coupon for a free UM six pack

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of our new soda flavor. Go ahead and redeem it

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>at your local store, you know, tell us where to

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>mail the coupon. So they mail the coupon and you

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>get the beverage and you try and you go, hey,

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is pretty good what they're hoping. But there

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is no requirement to do what they're hoping is you're

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>going to share that experience with their friends. Hey, I

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>was Uncloud. They sent me a coupon. I tried this stuff.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>It tastes like a combination of mangoes and feet, But

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I happen to like the taste of mangoes and feet.

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna, you know, tweet this on Facebook and

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and put it on my Google Plus account and

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it on LinkedIn. That you just did exactly what

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the promoters were what apparently my choice of mangoes and

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>feet was not just having I just want to do

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>something so trying not to think about that taste right now.

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to say something silly. I don't like

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>mangoes and I really don't like feet. But yeah, okay,

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>so um so that's essentially what they're hoping that that

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>will say that clout for it for its uh, you know,

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>just to to promote its own credibility here. And I

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's fair to mention this Cloud says there's

0:21:55.720 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no obligation on your part as a cloud participant.

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>If you get a perk to promote it in any

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>way at all, you can take them up on the perk.

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>You can decline the perk. You can tweet about it

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>or not. Um and uh, and you know it's up

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>to you whether you you could say, hey, this stuff

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is nasty. I don't ever want to see it again.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I hope they pull it from the market fast before

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I sue them. UM, you know that that is completely

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>up to you. But it it depends on partially on

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>your cloud score, and it depends partially on generally, and

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it depends partially generally on what areas you are influential.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And I would assume that uh, President Obama and Justin

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Bieber probably you know, get all the cloud perks they want.

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>They probably can't. Don't take anyone up on them. Yeah,

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>there's also we should also point out that, UM, with

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>perks comes the responsibility of revealing the fact that you

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>have received this as a perk, because, uh, there's an

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>ethical problem if you don't do that, and a legal

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>problem too in the United States. Um, you know the

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the quote unquote mommy bloggers, um without cloud this was

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>going on for a while and they were not revealing

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that they had received this as again to its credit cloud.

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>UH encourages you to remember, if you're going to post this,

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>say hey, I got it free because I was here. Yeah.

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yes, the clouds not condoning unethical behavior, which

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you know that's important to remember because their critics who

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of overlook that, UM, And you know, that's why

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention that what you get for it

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>first before we got to the critics. Yeah, so it's

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>it's gotten. It's become a great tool for UH companies

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>to try and court influencers. Chris and I have a

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit more to say about clout, but before we

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>get to that, let's take another quick break. In some case,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>says it may be that a company says, hey, this

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>person is really influential in the field that we're involved in.

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's not just give him a perk, Let's hire them

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to do something for us. So in that case, you're

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about, like you might have a freelancer out there

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>who is just an incredible influencer in a particular industry,

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and then this company says, this is who we need

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to get to represent our brand or to message out

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>something about our brand, UH, and we're going to actually

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>hire them. Maybe it's a contract for a certain number

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of appearances, or maybe we actually give them a job

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>offer and that's another way that people are using cloud

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Some companies, particularly advertising firms, marketing firms, places where uh

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 1>your ability to get a message out is clearly an

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>important part of your job, they are looking at cloud

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>scores because if you if you're going into an ad

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>agency and you're saying, hey, I know how to message

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>out information. I am. I am the guy that you

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>need or the lady you need to hire for this

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.239
<v Speaker 1>position because I know what I'm doing, And then they

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>look up your cloud score and it's like twenty two.

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>They'll say, hey, um, can you show us a better

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>example than your cloud score, because according to this, you

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 1>are not getting your message heard, and and that's you know,

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that's also drawn some criticism. People have said, well, how

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>is that fair? And the counter argument is to say, well,

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>if the algorithm is measuring how well a message is

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>going out across networks and the and the score is

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>really low, how would it be fair to this company

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to hire someone who is not as good as a

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>different uh potential employee who has a much higher cloud score,

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 1>who has proven that they are able to get a

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>message out across networks? Yeah? Yeah, the the cloud score

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>has come into hiring practices recently, I've seen articles written

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on it. And you know, people who were unaware of

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the cloud score, you know, they hadn't signed up for it,

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't know it existed. Uh, sort of taken aback by

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there is a cloud score. Yes, you

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>are being measured. Um, that's a little uh, that's a

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>little weird, I think for some people, um and people

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.479
<v Speaker 1>without knowing. And it's again the reason they compare the

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>cloud score to the credit credit score is that without

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>knowing exactly what you're being measured on, it's difficult to

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>improve on it, um and be a bit of a

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>treadmill to to constantly try to figure out what to

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 1>say next and how often to say it, exactly what

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>way to fit in, what time to say it, because

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>there are you know those are that That's something I

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>actually take into consideration. You see, I, Chris and I

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't just uh, interface with social networks for ourselves.

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we have to. We do it for our text

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>off brand, right, because because we want we want people

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>to know what we are doing as tech stuff. We

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>want to stay engaged with our audience. We want to

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>know what they're thinking. So uh, but there comes a

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>time where you're like, should I post this now because

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>my audience might be asleep, you know, and then you think, well,

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>considering how many of us are tuned into the social

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>networking crazes out there, a message that was posted four

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>hours ago may never be seen. You know. If I

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>log into Twitter and there's a message that was posted

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>about four hours ago that I think would have been amazing,

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>I might never get to that because too page back

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>through that many tweets, uh, is a daunting task. I'd

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 1>have to clear out a half hour five minutes of

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>my schedule just to do that. So you know, that

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>also comes into place when you should post if you're

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to if you're if you're really trying to use

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>social networking to get a message out. You know, if

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>you're just using social networking to say I watched that

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>episode of Blah Blah blah last night and it was phenomenal,

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>it may not matter that you posted at two in

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the morning or eight am or four pm. It may

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>not have any impact there, and that might be fine

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for you. There's nothing wrong with that. Um. The other

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>element of this is, unlike the credit score, the cloud

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>score is something that I think a lot of people

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>are not aware of and that's the problem, you know,

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>because they could be judged on something that they themselves

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>had no knowledge of going into, you know, a job interview. Yeah.

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I also found an article by a Manachum Wecker about

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a professor at Florida State University who was using cloud

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to grade his students in class. Now it was for

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a marketing class. It was, you know, for an electronic

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>marketing class. So people were upset about it. But it

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes me think, well, if this is specifically

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a metric for measuring your ability to market yourself in

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>electronic media, maybe clouds. I don't know that I would

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>make it the soul thing that you grade someone on,

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but it probably at least belongs in part of it.

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Um or should build an aware that the clash should

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>build an awareness of its prominence in in today's society

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>for that. But I wanted to mention to one thing

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that where it doesn't compare to a credit score, however,

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is there are more than one agency developing credit scores

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Cloud is not alone, but it

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is an unusual prominence and it's a cloud, it turns out,

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you might say that. So, yeah, it's if we If

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we assume that the cloud algorithm is looking at things

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in a very methodical and measured way, and that it is,

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in the end of the day, looking at the how

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>how influential people are based upon how widely their message

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>has heard and how many people are writing about that person,

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>then cloud and of itself is an interesting and I

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>think valuable service for people who are trying to get

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a message out. It's it's not it's not necessarily a

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>good thing or a bad thing. It's a useful tool. Um.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>The way other people are using this tool might be,

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, might make you upset or it might throw

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you depending on your cloud score. Um, but that's you

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>know again, you can't blame the tool for the way

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>people are using it, right. I mean the same thing

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we could say about Twitter. Twitter. When it was launched,

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>people were talking about Twitter being a way that you

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>would send out a message to a group of friends. Right.

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>That was the main use case of Twitter. That is

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>totally changed since Twitter launched. And one of these days

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we are going to do an episode or at least

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>at least one episode about the Twitter will probably a

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>two parter, but the story of Twitter, to really talk

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>about the foundation of it, what it was originally meant for,

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and what it has turned into, especially in light of

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the controversy of how Twitter has handled the whole API

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:55.239
<v Speaker 1>approach and third party developers, because that's definitely caused a

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of frustration in the tech world. Um, and you know,

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got companies like Cloud that are very much leveraging

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Twitter to get, you know, to to become a valuable service. So, um,

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, does cloud really matter?

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends on the industry you're in. And Uh,

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the nice thing about the Cloud score is it's not static.

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>It will change over time, and if you are dedicated

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to increasing that Cloud score, you can do it in

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>legitimate ways. Hopefully, the cloud algorithm will be able to

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:36.719
<v Speaker 1>take into account things like dummy Twitter accounts or dummy

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook accounts, so that if you were to get a

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>huge number of followers immediately, it would not automatically adjust

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>your score because obviously you could gain that system. I mean,

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>there are companies out there already that only exists to

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>provide people fake essentially fake accounts. Uh. There are even

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>other ones that will try and get real accounts to

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>follow you. There's this whole um, I scratch your back,

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you scratch mine approach where you like, if you follow

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>these twenty people, these twenty people will follow you back.

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>You know. That's kind of you know, almost like a

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>pyramid scheme of Twitter followers. I would hope that the

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>cloud algorithm takes that into account and again really concentrates

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>more on the impact and hopefully avoids counting false positives.

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up this classic episode about cloud. The

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>cloud went belly up. Originally it started to kind of

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>get away from the whole scoring system, and then eventually

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it went away entirely. It was an interesting idea, but

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>one that was almost guaranteed to go sour pretty quickly.

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>If we ever assigned scores for anything, people will start

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how to game the system, because

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, getting a high score means winning well. If

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you have any suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>send me an email the addresses tech Stuff at how

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com, or pop on over to tech

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff podcast dot com. You're gonna find archive of all

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of our past shows. There. You will also find links

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to where we are in social media and a link

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to our online store, where every purchase you make goes

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to help the show, and we greatly appreciate it, and

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Y Text Stuff

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is a production of I heart Radio's How Stuff Works.

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.