WEBVTT - What If?! – Bobby Bones Wild Yellowstone Recast

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of the Official Yellowstone Podcast. I'm

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>your host, Bobby Bones, and everything is being remade, rebooted, prequeled, sequeled,

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And so I thought two things. One, if they were

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to reboot Yellowstone as we know it now, they're already

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>prequeling it with some great series mad But if they

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>were to reboot it, or if this weren't alternative timeline

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and we had to recast Yellowstone like the show had

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>never existed and we're back to whatever year it was.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Whenever they're deciding, you know, I think we should go

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>after Kevin Costner. I have recast Yellowstone top ten in

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>some cases top five recasts, depending on the significance of

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the character. And you can let me know or not.

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You can nod to yourself if you'd like. And these

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>are my lists of recast if they were to recast Yellowstone.

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.199
<v Speaker 1>A because hey, let's just launch it again like everything

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>else does. Or two because we're in a different timeline

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is years ago. We'll start with John Dutton obviously,

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Costner, fantastic pick. I remember when I first saw

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that Yellowstone was a show. Now again, I did not

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>get into Yellowstone until season two much like everything else nowadays,

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly word of mouth. It gets you to watch something.

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And I had a friend that I watched all of

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Yellowstone season one, and my wife was like, we should

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>watch Yellowstone and How I grew up. My stepdad watched

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Westerns, and I was like, I'm good,

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm good. I've had enough Westerns in my life. And

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so finally midway through season two, I believe got into it,

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>loved it right. So I've seen every episode, loved that.

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I got to watch season one binge and go right

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to season two binge. Recently, we just did that with

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>The Recruit, which is a show on Netflix where season

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>two was out already, and it's pretty cool because you

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of episodes stored up, and that's it's

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>always a great feeling whenever there's a new show that

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you like and you look and there are a lot

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of episodes stored up because this week to week stuff

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it is not for me anymore. It was how I

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>grew up, but it is not for me anymore. John

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Dutton recasts Here we Go at Number one. Josh Brolin,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Josh Bolin, you would know from No Country for Old

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Men Outer Range, like if I were to guess his age,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>probably mid fifties or early sixties, not sure, but gritty, rugged.

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>He's already proven in the Western settings, and he can

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>do stoic, which is important. But he can also do vulnerable,

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>which is also what made Kevin Costner really strong in

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>his role as John Dutton, because he wasn't always just hard,

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't always just and only. I'm the lead cowboy,

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>so I must keep this cement presence. Number two Jeff Bridges.

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I love Jeff Bridges. First of all, think guy can

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.119
<v Speaker 1>play anything, deep voice, and he's in The Old Man.

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>If you ever seen The Old Man, that is an

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>awesome show. But I go Jeff Bridges, you go through

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>deep boys. He's also very believable as someone who has,

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>how would I describe it, carried a lifetime of burdens.

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he'd be a little less sharp than

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Costner, but I feel like he could also be

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot more philosophical than Kevin Costner. At number three,

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I have Kurt Russell, very much a Western legacy, a

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of charisma at times, can have an energy that

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>seems a bit intimidating. Would probably play John Dutton a

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>little more wild, like gunslinger wild is what I think of,

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but still in control. Those are my top three. If

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm teering these out, those are my top three John

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Dutton recasts. Now the others I have here, I have

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>five others a little more out of the box. Brian Cranston,

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.839
<v Speaker 1>breaking bad, Malcolm in the Middle. I don't know there's

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a role he couldn't play because the guy is complex.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what a good actor is. Sometimes

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I can see somebody go, man, that person's a terrible actor.

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's I don't drink so it's hard for me

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>even to say wine. But I have friends that will go,

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, I can't tell the difference in an expensive

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>wine or a cheap wine. And I have friends that

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>have grown up in settings where they can go, oh,

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I taste all of in this wine. That's a terrible example,

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know what you taste wine. I taste

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>granola in this wine. But with actors, for the most part,

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm the same way. Like, I don't know that Ben

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Affleck's not a great actor. Tell me he's awesome. Never

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>seen Norman Eddin, But Brian Cranston, all that being said,

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is an awesome actor, just because I've seen him be

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>convincible in many different areas, so yeah, he's the master

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of that. He could show John Dutton as a guy

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>doing the wrong things for the right reasons, like a

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>ranching Walter White. I do love Brian Kranston. I almost

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>put him up in the top tier, but I feel

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like he wasn't standard enough to what that character represents.

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 1>But it only represents it because Costner pulled it off

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>so well, right, So it's a bit unfair when I

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>do my casting because I'm casting it partially based on

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>what the current John Dutton already is. I'd put Denzel

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Washington in there. No one has quiet authority like Denzel Washington.

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>No one has intensity and like a wisdom, and I

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 1>do not know how to define that. Someone has wisdom

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in their characters and they are automatically believable. John Q.

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Denzel Washington, where a Son needs a Heart one of

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the most underrated you could go twenty five days. I'll

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>watch the movies Deep. I think could be awesome. Matthew McConaughey.

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Now McConaughey did exist in other layers of this, but

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about casting Ford originally Cowboy credentials check. His

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>version would be a bit more spiritual. I can't do

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>an impression, but he'd give John Dutton a slightly more

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>southern textan vibe. Probably why didn't put him in Tier one?

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Idris Elba. Think about Idris Elba that blows

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>my mind is the fact that he has a British accent.

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Now he wouldn't play the character British, but Eadris Elba

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a plus like Idris Elba is in the top list

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of cool actors. Ever, doesn't matter what he's doing, why

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>he's doing it. That is just cool. But also like strong,

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>like physically strong, like a character like John Dutton's would

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>need to be. And then this was my way way

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>way out of the box one, mostly because I was

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>just on a flight when I did a lot of this.

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I was on a flight and so I'm flipping through

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>movies and I saw the Drummer movie. It'd be nice.

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I can remember the name of the movie too. I

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>remember the name of No Movies and No Songs. JK. Simmons.

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I know him from the insurance commercial. Gritty old dude.

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>He's old dude. He's intense, but that dude's like explosive,

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>he takes no prisoners. It seems so that would be

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>my John Dutton recast. These are my Beth Dutton recasts.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>The wild thing about Beth's kind of the wild thing

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>about Idris Elba, I guess just Idris in the first

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>one is that she's not American, and whenever she talks,

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>she's not talking. It's Beth Dutton. I don't know who

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that is, but my Beth Dutton recasts are number one,

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and I have four tier ones. Charlie'sta on I think

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago she probably would have been too young

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to do it. I'm not even sure how old she

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is now, but she's one elegant like Beth is, and

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>can be at times about ferocious and can go full chaos.

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Margot Robbie a lot of energy. She would definitely be

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a more youth foolish version and I might maybe just

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>be thinking of rolls with her. And I think Margot

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Robbie would be an interesting pick because I think she

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>could play very manipulative as much or more so Beth Dutton.

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Emily Blunt also not American. I think she can be intense.

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I think she can be intimidating. I've seen her in

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>movies where she has to be like a cop. I

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>think Sacario is one of those, or like a border agent,

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>but very emotionally layered. I think that she would play

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Beth as a little less unhinged, so a little less

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of I'm gonna burn every freaking thing down, but a

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>little more of let me strategize this exactly how I

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>would like to strategize it, and then watch it burn

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in the proper way of it, burning layer by layer,

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>just as I had planned for the Box three casts.

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Aubrey Plaza, massive fan, unpredictable. She's extremely deadpan. Obviously, I

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like the dead penness, if that's a word of

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Aubrey Plaza, would make that Beth unhinged nests so uncomfortable

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that that might be really cool. Might be again, this

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is an out of the box casting that might be cool.

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Florence Pugh, a little young, could bring new emotional layers

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to Beth, especially in the family scenes. I like her.

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>She just might be a little young for the role,

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but I thought she could be a cool Beth Dutton.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna hit you with the one that's unconventional and

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>one that I think will be awesome. Raise yourselves, hold

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>your chair, take five seconds, and guess who I'm going

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to say, Because it's going to be so unconventional that

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna go, You're gonna hear to probably go no way.

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna go no way. But I think if you

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>just let your mind accept the fact that I am

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>occasionally sometimes almost some whatever, it's Lady Gaga, regardless of

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>her music, her meat dresses, her stage performance is she

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>can freaking act again, not conventionally. What we know now

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>is Beth Dutton. But we wouldn't know what Beth Dutton

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>was conventionally because it would be in the other timeline. Well,

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess if we were recasting it, it wouldn't be

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the other timeline. Lady Gaga would be awesome because she

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>would be freaking fee Zoe Kravitz, Zoe's cool aloof I

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>think her version of Beth would be a bit more modern.

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>But I like Zoe Kravitz and then Sarah Snook because

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Snook was awesome in succession. I did read an

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>article a couple of days ago where I think Sarah

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Snook is taking on a roll in Broadway and she's

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>doing what Taylor Swift said, she did before she went

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>on towards her training regimen, which is no caffeine, and

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>then do all of her lines on a treadmill because

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the Broadway there's a lot of running around, dancing around,

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>walking around while a sudden you walking next thing, you know,

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>like I'm just singing in I forget what exactly it was.

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think Sarah Snook would have been an awesome Beth.

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm convincing myself to put her in tier one, but

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:56.119
<v Speaker 1>she's already played the manipulave if needed. Also a very likable, twisted,

0:11:56.280 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>super intelligent daughter. I think she could take that and

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>darker with the best. I think I'm putting Sarah snuck

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>In in my top. So there's four and four. Yeah,

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I gotta put Sara Snuck in that one. If they

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>make a graphic for this, I hope they did. They

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>go and they may not make a graphic, I don't.

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope they go conventional recasts in a different timeline,

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>unconventional per Bobby Bones, Rip Wheeler. Everybody loves Rip first

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of all. I'm going with I may say his name wrong,

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>but I just know from the Punisher, the John Burnhal

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I love that dude. Intense muscular, ripped, brooding like tough

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.599
<v Speaker 1>guy but also can do emotions. Might be my favorite.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Scott Eastwood would be good. Has the look, has the legacy,

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>might be a little too clean, but it's really not

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the heart to dirty somebody up. Taylor Kish Friday Night Lights,

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Waco played Branch Davidian. I'm trying to think of Waco

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Wayco was the one where I'm getting all my shows

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>mixed up at this point, but yeah, he was David

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Koresh and Waco and he was really good in it.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I like tail A Kish for it. Jason Momoa, I

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>think would be interesting as Rip Wheeler because and then

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to hide a lot of the tattoos.

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>But there's nobody more physically imposing. And also Jason Momoa

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>can do the love and the violence almost at the

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>same time, like big mountain man with a big heart.

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Like I think Jason Momoa would be a really great

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Rip That is a monster. My out of the box

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>recasts in this one. I probably could have put like

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>ten people in the box for this one, because remember

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Rip was a guy that was a kid that was

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>just found. Where whomever you cast is John, there's gonna

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>have to physically be some semblance with Beth and with

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Casey because those are his biological children. Right now, you

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>can rewrite the storyline for sure, and they could be

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>adopted or half or with ripped. There are no rules

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 1>because Rip just kiddie saved Adam Driver. Adam Driver is

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a little awkward looking that comes from another slightly awkward

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>looking guy. But Scary can play Rip as emotionally repressed

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>but like a volcano, and like that. He was like

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>literally in the military too. Jake Jillen Hall, who could

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>do any role like this, Jillen Hall would be awesome,

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable and soulful. It would just be tough. The reason

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Jake Jillen Hall would be tough in this role is

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>because he is Jake Jillen Hall. And it would be

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to see Jake Jillen Hall in a secondary ish

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>role when he's Jake Jillen Hall. But I think if

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>he said this is his buddy Mike Jillen Hall or

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>his brother Mike Jillen Hall, but it's really Jake, we

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>may accept it a little more because he can do

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it all and he gets extremely ripped up for like

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>his fighting movies. We need a roadhouse because he did

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Roadhouse and then he did that Apple TV series when

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>he was a lawyer and he was so ripped up

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in that Lawyer series because of Roadhouse that he had

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>been training for. There was like, this lawyer is a

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>little too ripped up. But yeah, dude is ripped. How

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>about Shilah buff Okay, I hear you, I hear you.

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Go Lady Gaga and Shila buff Well. I wouldn't cast

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>those two at the same time, to be fair, but

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>like Shila Abuff, great actor, chaotic in real life and

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>on screen, can do both of those. If you want

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to rip that is unhinged at times with moments of

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>real tenderness. I think Shilah buff would be awesome. All Right,

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>so far we've sent John Dutton, Beth Dutton and rip.

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's do Casey. Glenn Powell would be an awesome Casey.

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't lie, don't lie to your elf. Glenn pal will

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>be an awesome Casey. Good looking dude, has the charm.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Put a little gruff on him. He'd be smooth, but

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>not too smooth. Glen Palell can pretty much do anything

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>right now rock and roll. That would be the one.

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>But then I go, what about Austin Butler. Good looking dude,

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>can play intense, can play magnetic like, can be super intense,

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but also it can make you really like him when

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he needs it, has a lot of range. Can I

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>go Liam Hemsworth here? Can I go Liam Himsworth here?

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he lacks the depth, but I say maybe because

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>what do I know? Maybe the roles that he's just

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>taking have it and needed a lot of depth. So

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been But can I say Liam Himsworth? I

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>mean super safe choice if you want to play it straight,

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if he took a shirt off, goes like, oh,

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean even I would I mean JK Simmons and

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>drums with Miles Teller and he's probably like, why are

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you texting me instead of googling it? And that is

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a great point. Whiplash, Thank you very much. Joe Kerey

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>wild Card, a lot of heart, a lot of curiosity.

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>It would skew younger, a bit more introspective. I think

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>if you don't know who Joe Kirey is, he's Stranger Things.

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>He is he played Steve and Stranger Things, so it

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't one of the young kids. You know, Yes, if

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I say that Steven stranger things. You would know who

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that is. I think he'd be a pretty solid Casey

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>at this point, I think he's gotten old enough. I'll

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>give you another one. Lakeith Stanfield. He was in Atlanta.

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he'd be good. I think Jeremy Allen White

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>would be interesting. Jeremy Allen White chef hey chef cooked

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a chef French on the Barbie, Chef French Fry, chef

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Hamburger chef. Saw him at California once. I forget the

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>name of the really expensive place you go to get food.

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.239
<v Speaker 1>It's like a really expensive Whole Foods. But we were

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>there and he was there, and I went up to

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>him and I said, you'd be greatest Casey. Actually I

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't because I was about a year and a half ago.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't even doing this podcast yet. They hadn't even

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>asked me to do this podcast yet. But I think

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>he'd be pretty good. And if I'm going to do

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>one more out of the bot, I think I'm gonna go.

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think his name is Nicholas Holt h o

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>U l T British kid. You've probably seen him in

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>some I'm trying to think what you would know him.

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>He was in about a boy who was in X

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Men first Class mad Max Fury Road. Okay, how about

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Jury number two? Did you watch that? That was awesome,

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere, awesome but awesome. I'm gonna give you

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>one more with Jamie, which, by the way, I think

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Jamie really got a raw deal. Listen. I know Jamie

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>was up to no good. I know Jamie did some

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>bad stuff, but Jamie was placed in a world of bad.

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to put somebody in a world of bad

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and expect him to do good, and he did some good.

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Jamie. I will say no more. You're

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna find me be a Jamie apologist a lot of times.

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Justice for Jamie Dutton's what I say. Okay, James Marsden,

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>who I'm going to tell you right now? No idea

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 1>how this dude's in the fifties, loved James Martin Marsden

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and Jerry Duty. Did you ever watch Do you watch

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the show? I think it's called Jerry Duty all right,

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>where they trick the one person into thinking they're on

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a jury and everybody else is an actor and James

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Marsden plays himself. James Marsden plays quote James Marson, who

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>can't believe he's on Jerry duty because he's famous. And

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>not only that, James Marsden is in the show now

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>called Paradise that's on Hulu that is now. I think

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it's over. It's a four and a half or five

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>out of five show. I think it's over. I'm pretty

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>sure the last one happened, but I've been on a

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>trip overseas for a week. In my brain is mushy mush.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think James Marsden would be an excellent Jamie.

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Jesse Eisenberg would have been a good Jamie.

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Not gonna spend a lot of time with Jamie here.

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>These are just all my straight I don't have any

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>super out of the box ones. I guess I think

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Alexander scars Guard would be good because he would play cold, attached, dangerous.

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>It's funny as I'm going through all my people, a

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of them are European. Do they just win? Now?

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Are they just winning at every thing when it comes

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to create Because even the shows that we've been watching recently,

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them have really wonderful European actors that

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>are playing American roles, or they're just shows like. We

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>watched a couple of shows. One was from like Sweden.

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to watch shows where I have to

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>read what they're saying at the bottom of the screen,

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>but they're so good that I do. But Scars Got

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>would be good. I'm gonna say Army Hammer as well.

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know he will try to eat the cast.

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what happened. Controversial dude, don't think i'd

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be friends with them. I say controversial because I don't

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>know if he really did stuff. I don't know. I'm allegedly, hey,

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>allegedly controversial. I'll do both, possibly allegedly controversial. But before

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he got in trouble, he was like the Golden Boy

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with darkness, and I think you could have nailed that

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>with Jamie Dutton. Matt Boehmer does how you say his name?

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt Boehmer? I wrote it down as I was going

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>through and I like Matt Boehmer. He's really good looking, meaning, oh,

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>here's a soap opera guy. Back in the day. He

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>was in Glee, he was in Magic Mike. It was

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of stuff, white collar, probably no white collar.

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>That show from back in the day, The Sinner. I

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>like Matt Bohmer didn't realize I think that's his name. Okay,

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you one out of the box here

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>on Jamie Rammy Mallet. And the reason that's out of

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the box is because what works for him so well

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is he's always kind of odd. He's an odd look.

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Take it from another odd looking guy. I thought, like,

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>when I said that, I need to say, yeah, I

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>also know I'm no beauty model. It's kind of odd.

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Look was great in the Queen Movie, like Freddie Mercury.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>He crushed that mister Robot. I don't know if you

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>guys watched that back in the day A plus, but

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm worried about saying Matt Bohmer's name, and

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even sure if I'm saying Ramy Mallock's name right. Yeah.

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I think he'd be odd. I think he'd be a

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>really internal character, meaning you're always really wondering what he's thinking.

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>He seems like he's quietly dangerous. I mean it could

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>be an isolated Jamie. I think you'd be an emotionally

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>emotionally fractured Jamie. Whatever those terms are people use for actors.

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's my one out of the box on Jamie

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the rest of those straight out. Yeah, but that's it.

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>You know what. I want to say this as I

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say it as a reboot. I know

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm at the end of this now and ear later

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on I was like a rebooter. I'm just gonna say

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a different timeline or ten years ago. Ten years ago,

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this whole sag is starting, and the people they absolutely

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 1>cannot get are the ones that ended up being in Yellowstone.

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Who would you try to cast? I think that would

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>be the list of who I will be trying to cast.

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>But then ten years ago they wouldn't have this success. Okay, stop,

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Now I weren't a broken time machine and I've confused myself.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys for listening to the podcast. I hope

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>you're enjoying doing it as much as I am. The

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Yellowstone Official Podcast hosted by Me Bobby Bones and brought

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to you by iHeartMedia Podcasts and MTV Entertainment Studios. Big

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>shout out to executive producers Jason Red, Lindsay Hoffman, Karl

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Katl and Kevin O'Connell. Also our senior manager of podcast Marketing,

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Ali Canner Graver for keeping the word out and of

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>course a big thanks to Will Pearson, president of iHeartMedia Podcast,

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>for him supporting this show. We've also got special thanks

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>going out to Whitney Baxter, xavier A Free, Barbara Parida,

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Emily Curry, and Joe Flattery. You guys make this happen.

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>This podcast is produced in association with One on one

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Studios over there executive producer Scott Stone and Director of

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Podcast Development and Production Danielle Waxman. We also got to

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>give a big nod to Michelle Newman, David Glasser and

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>David Hutkin for their support. Thank you guys for tuning in.

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>See you next week.