WEBVTT - Peloton's Rower and Web3 Meets 5G

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm emily check in San Francisco, and this

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg technology coming up in the next hour. Could

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it be the secret to a peloton rebound? The bike

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>maker finally debuts it's long awaited rower. But well, customers

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>spark over more than three thou dollars for it. We'll

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>discuss plus web. Three meets five G in a first

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of its kind. Deal t mobile is teaming up with

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>noble labs to launch the first crypto powered mobile service.

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to the CEO later this hour, and how

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Slana is trying to tackle everyone's energy crypto problems one

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of chain at a time. Co founder at a tole

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:06.919
<v Speaker 1>yaco Venko is with US Peloton launching it's long awaited rower,

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>aiming to expand the fitness company's appeal and help it

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>reverse that sales slide. It'll start taking orders for the

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>PELOTON row and begin initial deliveries to US customers in December.

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Our very own marker and joins us now for more

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>details on this. So, Mark you've been reporting on this

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>rower for a long time now. Our customer is gonna

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>pay for it. I certainly think Peloton has a group

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of consumers that want to build out their own home

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>gym where they own a Peloton road, where they own

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a Peloton bike plus, where they own a tread, where

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>they own the Pelletson Guide and they subscribe to their

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>forty four dollar on the package. Right. But in terms

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of the overall peloton story, I don't think the road

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>device moves the needle right now. This is a US

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>only launch. This is a very premium price product. It

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>comes in between five and more than the main competitors.

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's everything you would want from Peloton in awing machine.

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think rowing has that place in the

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>market that a bike or tread might, or people are

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>going to rush out to buy this thing unless you

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>are one of those fitness enthusiasts. Right. So I think

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>there is limited appeal compared to their other products. So

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this changes the Peloton story very much

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and you see that in the stock today is still

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>down about three and down about one percent for the week.

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.119
<v Speaker 1>But obviously more hardware, more product offerings, is a good thing.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And then one interesting point. I will make about the

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>row is that they're really pushing the content subscription. If

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you buy a bike or bike plus, you do get

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a few basic classes for free and you don't need

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to pay for that dollar a month peloton subscription. Not

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the case with the row. To get any of the

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>tailored content for rowing, you need to pay that fee,

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>which could drive additional revenue over the long term. What

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>does peloton think about how much this is really going

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to change their situation? I mean, do you know how

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>much they're projecting? I mean do they think this is,

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, more of a niche product, or do they

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>have higher hopes? So, when Peloton announced their most recent

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 1>earnings about a month ago, now, tucked in several paragraphs

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>now is a change to the reporting structure. They're no

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>longer guiding full years in advance right and so although

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we have q one earnings coming up later in the year,

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't really have an estimate for their fiscale. This

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>product won't officially start shipping until December, which the company

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>has as their fiscal q two. So we really have

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>no way to know how this is going to benefit

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the company financially at this point. My guest is given

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the launch will be US only. Given the high price point,

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it will be pretty incremental, probably throughout fiscal you know,

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>who can guide, to guide that far ahead though? Anymore?

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean apple did away with guidance long ago. I mean,

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>should that be our expectation anymore, especially in a massive downturn?

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, my personal opinion is that apple has been

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>making the right decision, not guiding right. If I'm running

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a company, you basically only want to do as much

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>as you're legally required to do. Apple went away from

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>iphone unit sales a few years ago. That coincide with

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the greater focus on revenue versus units, as they raised

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a SP S. I think you're seeing a similar thing

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>happened with pellets on here, where the individual units, some

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of the individual numbers, the long out forecasts really aren't

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>not as important as the overall revenue number. The other

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>thing I'll say about Paletson forecasts is that they've been

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>missing right their guidance the last several quarters. At this point,

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>things have been so in flux for the company that

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>it's really impossible for them to really seriously guide. You know,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>more than a quarter out they've made pretty fundamental changes

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to their you know their financial structure and their operational structure.

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Recently they've had many layoffs. I think they've laid off

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>about four thousand people across calendar two with this point.

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So clearly many changes being made to their cost structure there.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>They moved away from in House Logistics and some in

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>house operations. They've saw manufacturing equipment in house and they're

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>relying on outside manufacturers. Interestingly enough, they're relying on some

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of the same manufacturers that apple uses to build some

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>of their latest products. So you're seeing a big cost

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>structure change there and I think you'll hear more about

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>how those cost changes are going to improve their bottom

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>line probably sometime in October and November. Meantime, you've got

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>other companies like soul cycle moving in and trying to

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of of Peloton's struggles. I mean, are they,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, gonna be trying to turn around in a

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>and in a totally different fitness landscape? You know, I

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>think Nordic track is probably, you know, licking their chops

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>right now when they saw that peloton row price point

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.799
<v Speaker 1>check Nordic tracks website earlier this week and they're rowing

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>machines top out at eighteen right. Obviously the products are

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>comparable and some of their functionality. Peloton is really pushing

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>their AI and the machine learning integration. There's actually a

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>few cool, you know, personalization tweaks in the peloton row

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>where they use a and your own personal pace targets

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.559
<v Speaker 1>that you set to interact with the content that plays

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>on the screen. So depending on your paste target or

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>who's using the machine, uh, the instructure will give you, you

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, different goals and such. So it's actually pretty

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>cool from what I've seen and been told by the

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>company of how it all works together, and I think

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>that is one key differentiator. The question for many consumers

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>are those, you know, nice to have that more luxurious element,

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>more personalization. Is that worth the extra thousand dollars? I

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>think for some people who may be already be paying

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>eighteen llars for a rower, maybe another thousand dollars is

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>not too much, especially if you're already in the Peloton

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem where you're paying forty dollars a month and that

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>gets you access to content on all of your peloton machines.

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish I knew how many people own more than

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>one piece of Peloton equipment. I think that would be

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a key metric to know. I my sense is it's

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not a huge number, but you know, maybe times are changing. Bloombergs,

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>part germ, and thank you so much, as always, for

0:06:55.520 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>your reporting. Meantime, the investor known as the SPEC being

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>says he's winding down two of his blank check companies,

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Jamath polly Hapatia, failed to find companies to successfully take public.

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>He's now going to return more than a billion and

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a half dollars to investors. He says valuations and volatility

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the two biggest barriers to closing deals. It's been yet

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>another dry summer here in California, with the state continuing

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to experience longer wildfire seasons as a direct result of

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>climate change. And while it's possible to be on the

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>lookout for fires, it is often already too late by

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.239
<v Speaker 1>the time they're spotted. So a new startup has devised

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a computer vision enabled system to catch the beginnings of

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>wildfires before they become mega fires. It's called Pan o

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Ai just got twenty million dollars in new funding from

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>initialized capital partner, Kim Mike Cutler joins us now to

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about this investment. So Kim

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about how the technology works, given that

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these fires are starting in the middle

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere? Yeah, I mean what they have is a

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>large full stack hardware software platform that enables them to

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>visualize a huge range of territory and that's paired with software,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>computer vision, that and that identifies wildfire fire starts like

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>smoke fluid multiple cameras, you can kind of triangulate where

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>they're starting from, Um and so I think it's I

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's really you know, I I grew up in

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>California and you know, it's important to note that wildfire

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is actually a very natural and normal part of the

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>California ecosystem or environment, and trees and plants and everything

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>are actually evolved to burn. Our most iconic plants, even

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like sequoia trees, require fire to actually reproduce. But over

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the last hunderd years, as United States is engaged in,

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a practice of fire suppression and combined with

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Climate Change, Um, you know, a modest degree, you know,

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a modest change in temperature influences aridity, the lack of

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 1>humidity and Um, you know, creates more, you know, long

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and longer dry seasons, which enables small fires to get

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>wildly out of control, and so being able to have

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a system that enables you to recognize when fires start

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>within fifteen minutes of them starting on one of these

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>very high risk days, Um, you know, can allow us

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to manage our wildfire issue more predictably. That's said, of course.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we are in a system where it is

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>going to happen more often. We're gonna we're going to

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>live in a world where we're gonna have to have

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>more prescribed and manage Birns as well. Kim, you used

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a tech journalist before you became an investor.

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the pivot to climate investing Um.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think if you look at my body

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of work, I've always been really engaged with these kind

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of really tangible problems that affect everyday lives, whether that's

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>housing affordability, job mobility, socio economic mobility. Um and climate

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is obviously, you know, increasingly a piece of that. I

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's important to note that initialized capital, Um actually

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>been investing in companies that have that that addressed climate

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>change and emissions. We've done it for many, many years.

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>There are many companies in the portfolio including run wise,

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>which helps thousands of buildings manage their energy usage and therefore,

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, reduce emissions. We have companies like Albedo, which

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>recently got a huge upground from breakthrough energy ventures, that

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>is doing low flying satellites to look like satellites so

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that we can have really accurate imagery of of you know,

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>our terrain missions and and and heat sources and all

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of stuff like that. And then I I

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>also let a deal in cult sac, which is doing

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>car free neighborhoods and is actually launching its first car

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>free community at the end of this year and in

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>January and Tempe. And you know, transportation is of the

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>US missions. So we've actually been doing it for quite

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a while, hell, um. But of course, you know, climate

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>tech in general is having a second wave. You know,

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>there was an earlier wave, like ten fifteen years ago, Um,

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>when earlier venture capital firms were doing clean tech. And

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously in the last five years, Um, it's becoming undeniable.

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It is here, it is now. You know, we all

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>remember the Orange Day from two years ago when we

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>walked outside and we couldn't see the sun. Um, you

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>can't ignore it anymore. and and therefore we really have

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to come together as a society. You know, whether that's

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>through the incredible three seventy billion dollar inflation reduction act,

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know that the federal government just that Biden just signed,

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and we also have to do it in the private sector,

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with lots of entrepreneurs attacking all kinds, all sides of

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>this problem as well. Right, remember the Orange Day? Well,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I wonder, though, we're, you know, now we're in the

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>midst of this massive downturn. Is that denting the momentum

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>behind climate investing at all? You know, I think it's.

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>It's it's actually kind of interesting. Um. So, you know,

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>climate tyche is actually one of the spots that is

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 1>still very competitive for deals right now. There's a lot

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of capital flowing into it, particularly at the earlier stages. Um.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a number of forces kind of creating

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure for that, which is just obviously the immediacy and

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>scale of the problem, Um, but also, you know, there

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of limited partners um into a lot

0:11:59.920 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of different other you know, funds that like that. What

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>capital deployed quickly, and so we're seeing a lot of

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>at least at the early stage, lots of lots of

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>climate deals are continuing to happen and continue to move

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>forward and then continue to be competitive. Now, you've commented

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and reported on San Francisco Culture for years and I'm

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>so curious what your take is on the recovery, or

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the La or the lack thereof, of San Francisco coming

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>out of the pandemic. What's your sense of how hard

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>tech culture has been hit, if it can recover and

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>if there's really a reason startups need to be in

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco anymore? Sure? Um, so I have. I mean

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I have many thoughts, but I could do I could

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>do a lot longer, Um, you know, more time, but Um,

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, on on. On the you know, startup side.

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've actually shared a lot of data from

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio during and throughout the pandemic showing that we

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>went from, you know, San Francisco obviously being the leading

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>place that companies would have a headquarters to you know

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>distributed Um or remote teams kind surpassing that, but San

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Francisco was still like the number one physical destination that

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that that companies wanted to be located in. Um, I

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>think on the government side, I mean, you know, there

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>was a great ten years that the city had, you know,

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of tax revenues companies being founded there, and

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it kind of overplayed its hand and I think it

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.559
<v Speaker 1>would have been really important for say, you know, you know,

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the Board of supervisors, even the mayor, who has generally

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>been supportive tech, to come out earlier and say that,

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, really wanting to partner with with employers here

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and even now, like two or three years and you

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>don't really get the sense that any of you know,

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>aside from the mayor's office, like any of the leadership

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in the city, really wants companies here. Um, and I

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>know that doesn't make or break a decision, but like

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely like you can compare and contrast the leadership

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of different cities and you know see where where you know,

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>people feel really excited about being and so I do

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think that tone matters a lot. All Right, uh, well,

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you joining US initialized capital partner, Kim My cutlor.

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Good to have you back. Thank you so much for

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>having me. Well, NASTAC is making its first major push

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>into crypto. The second largest stock exchange will start by

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>offering custody services for Bitcoin and either to its institutional clients.

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>This will put NASDAC in competition with Crypto firms like

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>coin base and big go to a certain extent. Coming

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>up a huge day for the car industry, with a

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>big EV order from hearth and a one billion dollar

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>warning from Ford. What's that all about? We'll tell you next.

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg, a suburb of Shanghai is being touted

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>as China's new Silicon Valley. Ling Gong is quickly becoming

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a semiconductor and evy manufacturing hub quick takes. Charlie Jew explains.

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Lin gone, a suburb of China's financial center

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of Shanghai. Over the past few years, tens of billions

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of dollars have poured into this small town. I'm currently

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in Lincoln special area, which is part of the Shanghai

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Free Trade Zone. Three years ago, President Sign Ping identified

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as a frontier hub for future industries. You know, from

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence to electric vehicle and from chip making to

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>bio medicine. Those are the industry that China wants to

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>dominate in the twenty first century. They're also at heart

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of the competition between China and the US. China needs

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to import four thirty billion dollars of semiconductors annually to

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>build iphones, drones, laptops and other electronics, because it has

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>very little high end chip making capabilities of its own. That,

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in turn, is forcing the Chinese government to step up

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>its own indigenous innovation and boost self sufficiency in order

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to rely lessons foreign technology in the future. Critics, Charlie,

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you there. Meantime, rental car giant hurts announced it all

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>by a hundred seventy five thousand evs from GM over

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the next five years. Meantime, GM's crosstown rival Ford Start

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Stock Sync by the most in eleven years. Has schobal

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation and supply chain paint hurts its bottom line. Covering

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it all, who else but are at bloodlow? Can you

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>square the circle for us? Aid? Yeah, I mean it's

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>been a huge day for the industry and neither piece

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of news helped stop market very much at all. For hurts,

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting right because they have been very active

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in trying to electrify their rental fleet. Remember, they've already

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>got deals with others, but they had this objective of

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of their rental fleet being electrified by four and this

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is quite aggressive right at this time where GM's transitioning

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to electric drive train. A hundred seventy five thousand evs

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>over a five year period is a lot of cars.

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just one of their lines. They're talking

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>about Buick, caddy, Chevy and they're going to start shipments

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Bolt E V and EU v as soon

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>as the first quarter of next year. So this seems tangible.

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>But again, look at your screen. It didn't do much

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to support the stock on Tuesday. So talk about for them,

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that's quite a big drop. What's going on here? Yeah,

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's just say it again. For four this

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>was the biggest drop in its stock in eleven years.

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And what they did is revised guidance for the current

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>period because inflation around the world is meaning higher costs

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>for them and supply chain pains continue missing. There are

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>meaning there are apart shortages, real part shorusages. The net

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>result there are forty thousand and forty five thousand Ford

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Suvs and pickup trucks sitting in a parking lot somewhere

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that are not ready to ship to customers. Now the

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>important point. Ford reaffirmed its full year guidance and said

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that they'd be able to get the missing parts back,

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>put them in these vehicles and sell them by the

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>end of this year. But clearly the market didn't believe them.

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the severity of that stock. Is

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>it semi conductors that are causing the real pain here? Yeah,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this is fascinating because in the in the statement, Ford

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't say very much at all. They didn't specify. All

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we have to go on is that semi conductors have

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 1>been an issue throughout this year and even before that.

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>GM earlier in the year, in July, kind of gave

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a similar warning that they had these this inventory of

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>non shippable cars because of missing parts, and semi conductors

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>were a part of that. So we don't have the specifics.

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>We knew that in some sections of the semi conductor market,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>specific types of chips were improving inventories were starting to

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>build up, but we hope to get that granularity when

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Ford actually reports earnings next month because, remember, this was

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>them front running it. This was a prelimb update to

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>their guidance. All right, Lulo, trends. I know you will

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>continue to follow. Thanks much. The SALONA foundation has res

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the third and released the third of its energy impact report.

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>slants overall emissions rose roughly in the past six months,

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>driven by overall growth in its validator network, the number

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of computers running the blockchain and the addition of e

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>waste emissions. In this analysis, here to talk about that

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and more's a lot of laps. Co Founder on a

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>totally Yaco Vengo, as well as our own crypto contributor,

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Shinali Bass and a totally. Thank you so much for

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>joining us. How do these numbers strike you? Um, I

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>think SALONA is doing great. If you look at the

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>overall energy per transaction, it's, uh, you know, for auctions action,

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>as less than a google search and maybe two to three,

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, Google searches for an expensive one. Um, basically

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>is as good as using a web to service, and

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm really proud of that. So at this point, what

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>further steps can be taken to reduce energy use on

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the SALONA blockchain that you're not already doing? Well, as

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the network matures and with every release it gets faster,

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that makes it more energy efficient, as well as every

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 1>hardware release. You know, and Intel or video release their

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>next generation computers. Those are more energy efficient. So this

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>will naturally get cheaper and faster and more energy efficient

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>over time. How big of a deal is this becoming

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to investors? Because you find that people who believe in

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin are still relying on mining and you see ethereum

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>moving over to proof of steak. And so when you're

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>talking to investors and people who are thinking about how

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>these blockchains work moving forward, what's going to be the

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>driving force that pushes people into more environmental concerns? I

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>think this is important for a lot of applications to

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>wanna build web to services and attract new users, because

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the users really care about energy energy efficiency. So we

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>see that a lot of new web three companies really

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Pixelana because of this Um and and really attracted to

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the UM. You know overall roadmap of how we're going

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to make the network even cheaper and faster and more reliable,

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and obviously we're a couple of days away from the

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>great merge from the ethereum network. But what does that

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.719
<v Speaker 1>mean for you since that's happened, do you find that

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the competitive forces have changed by any means? Even Post Merge?

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum is still much less energy efficient than Salona and

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm really excited about the fact that ethereum

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is moving to proof of stake, because this will finally

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>put the debate around whether proof of stake is secure

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to rust. I think ethereum doing this will really make

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>it Um, you know, proof proof to everyone that this,

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>this technology is not mature enough to handle very large,

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, capitalization for for network. How far could you

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>go in terms of potentially rewarding the validators or computers

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that themselves use renewable energy? This is not something that

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we've looked at yet because over all, the SALONA network

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>uses so little energy that it's uh, you know, almost

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in significant amount to uh, to offset Um. SALONA foundation

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>does its own offsets that covers the entire network. So

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>when you look more broadly, Crypto, obviously, you know, it

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.479
<v Speaker 1>obviously gets a bad rap for its energy used. Do

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you think that's deserved? Mining is definitely very energy intensive. Um.

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>What folks need to understand that, you know, bitcoin mining

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>would work in a world without any fossil fuels and

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:12.719
<v Speaker 1>then the end of the day it's the fossil fuels

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>that are the bad part. Um. But it's obvious to

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>me as an engineer that we should build technologies that

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>are more energy efficient, you know, if they serve the

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>same function. So I am definitely, you know, bullish on

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Salana and its energy use when compared to other networks,

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>other networks. If you think about also how N F

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 1>T s have related to the ethereum world versus Salana,

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>there have been days that you're competing hard. In fact,

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>there have been days that you see more n f

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>t s really by dollar volumes, tied to Salana, even

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>more than ethereum. So how do you see that competition

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>playing out? You know, when do you think and do

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you think you can be the more dominant player here? Well,

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to congratulate Magic Eton, the company that's the

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>premier market place on Salona, for its record breaking volumes. Um.

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>So Magic Heaton has show has had volumes bigger than,

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, all of etherums and F T s combined

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>on a couple of days. Um, that's been amazing, I

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>think because salon is so cheap and fast to use

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that when folks experience that they feel like they're using

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a regular web to application and it's really hard for

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>them to go back to using, you know, older technologies. Um,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I hope the strength continues and magic in continues to

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>grow and really accelerate. N F the adoption around the world.

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>N F T adoption, but n F T S and

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>actually staking itself or something that are under the, you know,

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the eye of regulators, particularly the U S Securities and

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Exchange Commission. What type of regulatory risk is there for

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>both of these, you know products, if you will, that

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>are so tied to the ecosystem? Oh, I think folks

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>need to be careful when they look at each n

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>f t project. I think the vast majority of them

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>are community based, you know, uh, things that are fun,

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>uh and build communities and brand around an idea of

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a shared profile, and I think those are pretty far

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>from what most folks would consider our security Um. But

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you still need to be careful. Now, you know, I

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>have to ask you about the ethereum rge. The ethereum

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>blockchain just went through this big, major upgrade and I'm

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>curious what your thoughts are on it and if you

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>think it potentially makes a Salona blockchain less attractive and

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>how you imagine Salona staying competitive and you know, a

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>changed world. Well, the theory emerged doesn't really improve scalability

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>of the ethereum network. When you look at the number

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of transactions that salona handles from applications and from users

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>on a daily basis. That's more than not just ethereum

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but all the E v M ethereum based blockchains combined. Um.

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think ethereum is a long way to go

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>on scalability. Just do does Salona have any plans for

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>an upgrade down the line, or or how? How are

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you thinking about that? Well, Salana is like clinics. It's

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a community driven open source project. There's four teams working

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>on the SALONA core already and every release the network

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>gets a cheaper, faster, more reliable. So you know it's

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it has a roadmap like Linux. Just make the next

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>release better than the than the current one. All Right,

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Anto Yaco Venco, thank you so much for joining us again,

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the CO founder of Salona labs and our own shot.

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate it all right. Coming up, how crypto and web

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>three are colliding with mobile carriers. That is next, Mrs Bloomberg.

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>The world of Web three and five g are colliding

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in a new deal between t mobile and the blockchain

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>firm Nova labs. T mobile has struck a five year

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>exclusive agreement with Nova for a new cellular experience. Noval

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>plans to launch helium mobile, which it calls the world's

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>first crypto powered mobile service, and that means customers earn

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>crypto awards for using the network while saving money. Here

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to explain, a mere Helim's, CEO of noble ABS and

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 1>founder of helium, so a mere how does this work?

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>So helium mobile is the world's first crypto carrier, as

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned. Um, you can think of it from a

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>consumer point of view very similarly to an existing mobile plan.

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>You sign up, we have a nice APP that you

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>will use heavily. Rule like heavily on them. So there

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>should be a very seamless sign up. But the key

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>difference is that users earn cryptocurrency while they're using the

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>network in the form of Mobile Tokens uh, and perhaps

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, they get to actually build and own the

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure that they're using. So can think of this similarly

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to airbnb or or Uber or something like that, where

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not doing a user of the network, but you're

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>also part of the infrastructure and part of building at

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the same time. So if you want to use this,

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 1>how do you sign up? So first of all as

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:57.959
<v Speaker 1>a waitlisted joint so you can go to hello helium

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>DOT COM. That's the first step. Once we're once we launch,

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>which is aimed for q one next year, there'll be

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>a mobile APP that you can use. Ideally if your

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>phone is simcompatible. That's kind of all you have to do.

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You'll just install the APP, you'll get going and the

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>SM will be downloaded straight into your phone. Um, if

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you have an older phone that doesn't support SMS, then

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you will. We will send you a physical Sim and

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll be able to use it that way. Talk to

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 1>us about the challenges of creating a crypto powered mobile network.

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, how is this even possible and what kind

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of trouble shooting are you going to have to do?

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>We proved with the IOT network that we launched in

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen that people powered networks are a real thing.

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think people believed it was doable. At the

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>time we launched in Austin, only fifty hot spots and

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>within three years there are now a million of these

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>hot spots across the globe. Building an IOT network designed

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>for sensors and low powered devices. This next step is

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>moving into the cellular world. So UH, primarily target at

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>cell phones, Um, and we use roughly the same tactics right,

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>which is that people have shown us that they are

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>interested in participating infrastructure and not just being a user

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of a network. They want to own the thing that

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>they use, uh, and so we'll, you know, do roughly

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that we did in the last go around,

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>which is that people are incentivized to build and install

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>what a basically miniature cell towers on any property they

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>have access to and they get rewarded in mobile tokens

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>for doing that when people use their hotspots. And you know,

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously helium is well known for its long, fine network

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>which helps connect low power devices like pet tracking callers.

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, you know, with this deck step, what else

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>could be possible using this technology the next time. I

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>mean the cellular network, is sort of the next logical

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>extension of what we're doing. When we designed helium back

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in two seventeen, cellular networks were on our radar as

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a thing to do. Um, the technology and the regulatory

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>environment has allowed us to now do that with with

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>unlicensed spectrum that we could use. Uh, in the future

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you can expect to see other types of

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>wireless network get built this way. So there will be

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for Wi fi networks and bluetooth networks and vpns.

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, helium is very much a community driven,

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>people powered network and people will propose what they want

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to do next. But we're super excited about what we're

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>doing here with helium mobile. It's really the world's first

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>attempt at trying to do something like this with a

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>hybrid people powered and traditional network combined. You've also considered

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>switching novel ABS to the Salona Network and given that

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking to the CO founder of Salana,

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>where did you end up on that? So the helium

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>network is governed by its users. So there's a community

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>driven process for proposing changes. Um, there's a proposal in

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the community. It's called hip seventy. It proposes to re

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>architect the way helium works, to separate the architecture, to

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit simpler, to be a little bit faster,

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and as part of that we're also proposing moving the

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>block chage function to the Salana network, primarily because of

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly what Anatote was describing. The cost to use the

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>network is extremely low, transactions are extremely fast and there's

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a very diverse and large ecosystem of developers and defy

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>N F T and other applications that we don't currently

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>have access to on the helium network. All right, we'll

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>keep watching how this all unfold. CEO of Novle labs

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and helium founder, a mere Haleem. Thank you for stopping by.

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Youtube is doubling down on the creator economy, announcing new

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>paths to partnership for creators and launching revenue sharing for shorts.

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>This announced during they're made on Youtube event earlier today.

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's break it all down with my next guest, Colin

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Rosen Bloom and Samir Chaudhry, known simply as Colin and

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Samir on Youtube itself. They are the creators helping the

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>next generation of creators learn and understand what works on

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Youtube and how to build successful long term careers there.

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>They were part of this event earlier today and join

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>us now from palm spring. So, Colin and Sameir, thank

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us, Colin. Let's start with you. Um,

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are new benefits to creators here. Creators

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>can start making money earlier. Creators can more easily find

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the music that they want and integrate that into their videos.

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>How did this all land with you? How much of

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>an improvement is this from your perspective? Yeah, I mean

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a huge improvement for us. There's already

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>an incentive for us, as creators that make long form

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>videos to post shorts because we find a lot of distribution,

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we find a lot of audience. You know, we don't

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>necessarily rely on it from monetization, but now that is

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>something we can focus on and I think, you know,

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>when I look at this announcement, it's really just about

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that now there is a light bulb that

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>can go off for a lot of new creators that,

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they can get paid by the platform and

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they can start building a career. That said, Youtube is

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>also upping its commission for shorts, taking fifty five percent.

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's up from forty five percent Sameir. What

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>do you make of that? Yeah, I think. Um, you know,

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the re Qality of it is that on shorts there's

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more nuanced than long form content, especially

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to music. Um, you know, music is

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a big part of short form content and Youtube has

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>decided to take on the cost of music on behalf

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of the creators. So you know, at a glance, when

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, you say okay, wait a second.

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a flipped version of what we're

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>used to youtube typically takes. But you know, what they're

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>doing is actually allowing creators to use music that they

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>couldn't use before and and covering a license fee for that. So,

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, you know, when you look at it,

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the costs they're incurring. I think it it makes sense, Um,

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that in this specific instance, and Swift Colin, there are

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of platforms out there, a lot of platforms

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>vying for your time and the time of other creators.

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>What didn't you hear from Youtube that you would like

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.959
<v Speaker 1>to hear? To be honest, I was really excited about, uh,

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity for revenue sharing on short as I do

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's super important that you know we are going

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses here as creators, uh, and when we do want

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to be partner an on aalistic level with the platforms

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're using. I think what will happen is this

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>rolls out, is more creators. What we're gonna want a

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of transparency about how the payments are doled out,

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>because youtube has always been really transparent, Um, and so

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what we're going to see is like

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a true understanding, broken down from the Creator side, of

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>how we're getting paid. Now you're both on Youtube and

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>TIKTOK as creators Sameir. Why don't you take this one?

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>How do they compare and what do you make of

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the competition between them? So I think there's one fundamental

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>difference between the two platforms that, like you know, we've

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>been on Youtube for ten years and in those ten years,

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've always been in partnership with the platform. Um.

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>The difference is that when we make money, youtube makes

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>money and vice versa, uh, and that that's truly a partnership.

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to Tiktok, you know, and they're fund

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it's never really felt like a partnership. It's it's very

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>unclear how you build a career on Tiktok, specifically when

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it comes to platform payments. Um. Typically we've seen people

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>build audiences on Tiktok and then transition them to youtube

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to to build their careers. So in my opinion, when

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at this and again from our experience building

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a career on Youtube, there's a different depth of the

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>audience and there's also a different depth of platform engagement. Um,

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to how the platform actually pays you.

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And then again, I think, or additionally, I think when

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you look at Tiktok, a lot of people go to

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Tiktok for the for you page. They're not necessarily going

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for specific creators. If you take the top creators off

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of Tiktok it's still enjoyable on the for you page,

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 1>but if you go to youtube and you start taking

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>off the top creators, youtube is a totally different place.

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think youtube is a lot more creator focused

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and that comes across in the way that they pay creators.

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, as you think about where to invest

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>your time and your money, H Collin, how do you

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 1>see the Creator economy evolving? How you know? How are

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you watching me? There seems to be new opportunities, new platforms,

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>m new ways of reaching fans every day. Um, you know.

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>How are you making those calculator sations on a daily

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>basis about where to spend your time? Yeah, I mean

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's no doubt that the majority of creators,

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, their primary business is advertising based, whether that's

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>being paid by a platform like youtube or working with

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>brand sponsors. And I think you know what's already happening,

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to increase. is going to be more

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>direct to consumer, where creators are launching their own brands

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and their audiences have a loyalty to them and not

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily some of the legacy brands that we know. You

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>guys also do a podcast series called Creator support. You

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>answer questions from your audience of creators. What are what

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>are they most concerned about right now? Samir Mad Emily,

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm so happy you brought up creator support. That's so great.

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's really fun because we get to we

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>get like the pulse of what the problems are for

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>aspiring creators, and what's really important to note is that

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the land of creative entrepreneurship and a lot

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>of these, you know, young creators are first time entrepreneurs.

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of the questions we get are around

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>like prising, how do you price yourself? Um, you know, Eagle,

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 1>how do you review contracts? What should I be looking

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>out for? Um Taxes? How do I do my taxes

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 1>as a creator? So a lot of the stuff comes

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>down to just fundamentals of entrepreneurship and I think that's

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>what's really important, is that if you're looking at the

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>creator economy. You know, this is really just a form

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of entrepreneurship. It's it's media first entrepreneurship, and I think

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what's really important to recognize. The problems that we're

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>facing in the creator economy are the same problems that

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 1>that young startups face, that young entrepreneurs face. Um. So

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what we see a lot on creator sport. And then,

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, beyond that, it's a creative business. So you

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>do get a lot of questions around purpose, right what

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 1>like how do I how do I lock into something

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that I can do for the next five, ten years,

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>not just, you know, get myself involved in a viral

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>trend or something that's happening right now. How do I

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>actually turn this into a long term, sustainable career? Um,

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, and some of that is yet to be seen,

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but the creators who have done that for a really

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>long time. What we're seeing is, uh, you know, ability

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to evolve as platforms evolved and as changes, you know,

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.280
<v Speaker 1>are made to the platforms, like what happened today with Youtube,

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>so Gol. And what's one piece of advice for, you know,

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the aspiring content creators out there? A piece of advice

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not obvious, especially after seeing these changes from from

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Youtube today. What would you say? Yeah, I mean obviously

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a question that we get a lot, and

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>what some you're just brought up there. You know about purpose.

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>That is actually like. What the advice is that I

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>always give is that you know, if you're going to

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>be a content creator, make sure that you have a

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>true understanding of why you're doing it. Who's the audience

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to serve? If you were to take social

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>platforms away? You know, what are the communities that you're

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>existing in real life, because you know, it's important that

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you always have that base level understanding that what you're

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 1>doing by making media online is actually just like speaking

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to actual people and providing them some values. So I

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>always encourage new creators start with your I r l life.

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>What are the communities you're a part of? Who are

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the people you want to sir? And then, once you

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>know that, you'll have a much longer trajectory as a creator.

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I like that Hashtag, I R L. That one makes

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. Youtube creators, Colin Rosenblum Samir Chaudhry. Thank

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:14.919
<v Speaker 1>you both so much for joining us. You can catch

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>them on Youtube and Tiktok, and that does it for

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the suggition of Bloomberg Technology. Coming up Wednesday, Larr Hippo,

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>managing partner, Eric Hippo, we'll be joining us, and don't

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>forget to check out our podcast, wherever you get your podcasts.

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm emily chain into Francisco. This is Bloomberg