WEBVTT - Super Bowl LIII Player/Game Props Preview and Guide

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess it, Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. M Do to to D do Do Do

0:00:53.479 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do don it do yeo, says

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Best Friends Forever. Here the Fantasy Sports were

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Network alongside Frankie Stamfle I Am Greg. What's going on

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>reggae here in a hump day talking player and aime props.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Still some interesting stuff to get into, not just like

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>your average I mean receptions. Is this guy gonna have

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean seeding yards, I'm passing yards like, There's still

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pretty crazy like player and game props involved,

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>like after we didn't even talk about yesterday, so I'm

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:31.839
<v Speaker 1>very excited to do that, Like your cross sport props

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that you were talking about Yeah, there are some interesting

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>things like Russell Westbrook points plus rebounds plus assists or

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Rob Gronkowski's receiving yards. That's something that we could get

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>into later. So you know, throughout the week a lot

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of people have been asking questions in the chat about

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>player props as well. So if you have a question

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>calling A four four, A four, three, six, eight seven nine.

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>But before all that, Greg, how did you sleep last night?

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Buddy's great last night? Actually, yeah, after your great, your

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>failed chicken parmesan. Yeah, we tried to make a healthy

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>version of chicken form and it wasn't as nearly as

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>good as a the unhealthy version. We'll use zootos and whatever.

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's not great, Frank, And I woke up this

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>morning not as great. Why is that? Remember where I

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>came here on Monday and I told you about my

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell Robinson versus Tim Harway's texting you on Sunday night

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>about it? Now? How I won? Yeah, last second, Mitchell

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Robinson put back whatever two rebounds and put back layout.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I woke up this morning I no longer won that

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>correction correction. So when I tell you that, what was

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>your first instinct to be to ask me, what happened?

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>What was this that correction? I don't know because ESPN

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>does not provide you with the stack corrections Basketball stack corrections,

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy football they do, Fantasy Baseball they do. You've got

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to find it somewhere, though, So the

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>n b A, the NBA released that corrections. In Yahoo

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>released that corrections. Now there's a bunch of stack corrections,

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>including some of my players and some of his players. No,

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what was what was put in what

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>was put out? Now? I think my score was the

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>same and it's points right, So I don't exactly remember

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>how many points I had or how many A one

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>buy um my opponent. I was talking to him this

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>morning that he lost my point in a half, so

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>he's gained one point eight, and looking at the Yahoo

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and the NBA stack corrections, I don't know how we

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>get to one point eight. But I don't know. So

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I contacted ESPN this morning and I I said, well,

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>what was that correction? Well we don't. Basically, the NBA

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>releases them and we just adjust them. So I go, well,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>how am I supposed to know what the correction was?

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you can't what do you mean you can't

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you change my score? You change my matchup? That could

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>affect a lot going forward, and I don't even know

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>what you changed. I'm sorry for the inconvenience, Like, oh,

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that's unacceptable. We're sorry for the convenience. How could you

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>not be transparent to your players? Yahoo is? I said

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>this to them, yaho Is, CBS is, how are you not? Well?

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>We will contact our fantasy department and let them know

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that you want this change. They go, let me contact

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy department, I mean the fantasy industry. Who I am?

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Let me contact the fantasy department. You're not allowed to

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of the fantasy department? And what do you mean?

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not allowed to contact the fantasy department. How could

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you make a change of this magnitude and it could

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>have been the playoffs? Right? I mean, how could you

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>make a change of this magnitude which changes my matchup

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and not tell me what you changed? I go, do

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>you know what you change? Because I have no idea

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Because it's automatic, it's automatically done, and maybe makes it

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that correction. We just change in our system. What do

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I understand? Why? They Okay, that's the system that they

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>have set up, but normally for like other sports, even baseball,

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you can go back. Of course, on CBS, you play,

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there's under a list, there's like corrections, so you shay

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>with you. There's a button that correction bad job. It's

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>a show fired up here on a Wednesday over a

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>regular see reason correction fantasy bass. If you lost any

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>matchup in any sport by a stack correction, it's the

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>principle you would be angry and listen, it was a correction, right,

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So I deserve to lose. I'm not saying I didn't,

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>but I want to know why. I want to know

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>what change would happen how I lost. And they can't

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:23.679
<v Speaker 1>tell me that ESPNS Fantasy Basketball, for what it's worth,

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>very lacking. It's awful. I mean, as I've played for

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>years on ESPN for fantasy basketball, you could just tell

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's on the back burner. I know that

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy basketball season long comes up throughout football season, and

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that's why it's lost so much of his

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>luster and not it probably never even had that much

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>luster ever to begin with, but it is just clearly

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>on the back burner. Things that you used to be

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>able to do, like you sort by transaction trends on

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>on ESPN. If you click on most added, they still

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>have like Carmelo Anthony as the most added player. It's

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely not true. It's very weird, like right, senators are

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>all off, like their their plus minus changed and like

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>added players drop players. Ah. I hate to sit up

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>here and bash a fantasy outlet, Greg, but I'm bashing

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is not doing a good job. If you're not doing

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a good job, you deserve to be. Why wouldn't I

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>bash a fantasy outlet that's sucking about it? It's the

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 1>only season long fantasy that's going on right now. Also true,

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, look, if they don't care about basketball,

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>how much how much effort are they putting into hockey? Grag?

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's unacceptable, Like I get TVs. You have to

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>pay for the platform so you can expect more. That's fine.

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>That If ESPN is supposed to be the worldwide leader

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in sports and fantasy and gaming, whatever, how do you

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>not how do you not treat it the same way

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that you treat everything else? Right? If football is your

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>top part, at least once football ends, Like, come on,

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what I was expecting, Like, all right, Christmas New

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Year's like, we'll see it bounce back like ESPN. If

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>football is your top priority, as it should be, I

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>get it. It It makes you the most money, that's fine.

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But to change people's scores and not tell them what

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you chnged, that's a bad look. Man. That's not great.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Might be transitioning into yah Yahoo next year. Maybe even

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>like a fan track. I don't even know if fantrax

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>has I think they have fantasy basketball. Fantasy that sucks too.

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Fan Trax. Fan Trax is very good though, stuff that

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I've looked into there and I've played leagues

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>there before. The great fan I don't prob the fan Trax.

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want you to. Just I just don't

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>want you to. He's my fantasy. I don't even know

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:31.679
<v Speaker 1>if my fantasy league has basketball. It's terrible interface. Also,

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>if you ever need to send an angry email, please

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>contact Greg probably for like a small sum you can

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>send it to his venmo Venmo. He will write out

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>an angry email for you. There's nobody I know, well,

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe my like my mom. She's really she's really good

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>at like conveying her anger, but in like a professional manner.

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like the scariest thing. Reg's really good at sending

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>angry emails. So do you ever need an angry email?

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? It goes back to what I said yesterday.

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>You'd make a great NFL owner as well. Appreciate ruthless

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>ruthless Greg sus No, I just do not care about

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the people I care about winning, which is Greg wants

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to care about winning, making money that Chicken partners, John sleeping,

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Well else you got Greg? Anything else? Fantasy basketball? Or

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is this in the rear view? I'm annoyed, like thankfully

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>this week Like I'm annoyed because personally for me, I'm

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in the race for a bye and now I'm in

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.559
<v Speaker 1>third rather than the second at the most points against

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the league and the second most point scored. Sometimes it

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>bees that way, especially in head to head. That's why

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>very frustrating. Man. To try and mitigate some of that.

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>You play like not just necessarily roteo, but a lot

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of people play dual matchups. They play two matchups and

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at once. That in in head to head formats, whether

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it's baseball or even football, and then you can do

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>in basketball to be it kind of eliminates the unluckiness

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of it, where as what you're saying right now is

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you have the most points against. But you're like, what

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>second or third in point scored and now normally based

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>on how many points scored you have would be towards

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the top. Theoretically yes, but that's why some people in

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>head to head leagues, regardless of fantasy sport, they played

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>two matchups at once. Near Angean tweeted at me on

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter as I basically tell the story on Twitter, and

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>he says the entire ESPN Basketball redesign was poorly conceived

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 1>a message in a roto league. You can't check your

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>progress towards game played limits on their website. You're not

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>able to You can only do it on the app.

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>You also can't set customer limits by position, only can

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>do it overall. I'm just not caring about your customers. Man. Sorry, Greg,

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>sorry that that happens to you. Changing gears a little bit.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that I should slowly work my way

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>back into carbs, because as everyone knows, I've been very

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>open about my diet my habits over the over the

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>past month in January, not eating carbs, not drinking alcohol.

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Now my idea is that come Friday, like I'm diving

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>back in like like Friday, Saturday, Sunday, I'm probably just

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna gain back all the weight that I lost. This one,

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>which is, are you going to check before Friday? I

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>know you don't normally going to your parents as on

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Sunday and check, but you're re instituting carbs on Friday. No,

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>I only do it. I don't have a scale in

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>my house, right, so I have a scale with my

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>parents house. I understand I'm not but I feel bad

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>because you know you're not gonna get the final total

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>before you dive back in the car. I mean whatever, um,

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>people are telling me that if I dive back in

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>too quickly, my stomach is gonna be all messed up

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>because I haven't eaten carbs in a moment. Well, here's

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the thing, true, here's the thing. On Sunday, you're gonna

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>see me here Friday, there's no tweet at a picture

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of it. I'm going to eat a bacon, egg and

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>cheese on and everything Bagel's happened. There's no stopping on Sunday. Yeah,

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>beer and wings and Friday you're already having heart a choke.

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>He's discussed that as well. Dringing beers, Here's and gears

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>No no, no, a buddy of mine's bartender. So I'm

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna go it's cool. So should I not just

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>dive back in? Of course not, but like, yeah, I'm

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. You're gonna anyway whatever you want, And I

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>know I can actually I can tell you, like the

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>health what you should do to be healthy. But you're

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna listen to and eat it. Look, I've been healthy

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>for a month. Enough of that. Hey, I'm very impressed

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>every day, are you. Let's jump in here. Is there

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>anything that jumps off to you right off the top,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>like you want to start with stuff like in the

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>first quarter, first half or player provs game props? I know,

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>like you're into something. Why don't you listen? Why don't

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you? You were on the show? You lead

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it where you want to be? Well, an interesting staff

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen, and I think everyone has seen this

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>at some point throughout the past week or so. Did

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know this, Craig. The Patriots have scored three points

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>total in the first quarter of their previous eight Super

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Bowl games combined three points total. That was last year

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>eight Super bowls. The've scored three points in the first quarter.

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Then New England has also a just nine point three

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>first half points per game this season, third few is

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Basically, what I'm getting at is I

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>love the first half. It's interesting to you that they've

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>scored three points total in the last eight Super Bowls.

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>You said, is it interesting to you than that the

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>person that has the best odds to score the first

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>touchdown is Sonny Michelle. That's a good point. Now, yeah,

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>he does have the best odds to score. Uh, And

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you know they're not so The odds makers right now

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>are looking more so at at what's happened this playoff

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>rather than culminating every clearly that the Patriots have done.

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Clearly what has happened the past two games and the

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Chargers in the Chiefs game is that it's run run

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>first drive it Tony Michelle and me has seven eight

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>minute drive. Why why would they change it? Touchdown once again?

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Why would they change it? Now they're gonna try. The

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>thing is is it gonna work? Well? It didn't work

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys against the Rams, did not because the Rams.

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>What a did that game defensively was We're gonna send

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the house at Ezekiel Elliott. Let's have Dak Prescott try

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>and beat us. Now, it's a little bit different to

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>send the house at Sony Michelle. Tom Brady's gonna pick

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you apart, but it would throw a little bit of

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a wrench in things if that's the plan for Bill Belichick.

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's exactly what we talked about, Greig, because Bill

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Belichick has done something to two games in a row. Now,

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>he started off the first quarter just running the front

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>down the opponent's throat. That's probably not what he's gonna

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>do in this game. Because when you think you know

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna come with Bill Belichick in the Patriots, he

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>does something completely different. And that's what and that's reflected

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in the oddsmakers. The oddsmakers think that they're going to

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to do what they've been doing. How often do

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they do the same thing in a row three games

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in a row, Greg, Not very often. So we're gonna

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>see a long drive on the first drive the game.

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna result and a Sony Michelle touchdown. We're in

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter. Rather, it's scored three points in their

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>past eight Super Bowl first quarters. Come bind. I just

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>thought that was a crazy, crazy stat I saw the

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>first quarter over under for total points where I've seen it,

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it's ten and a half, which doesn't really correlate with

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the first half not which normally would be like maybe

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>like thirteen and a half, right or fourteen I like

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>right around there. That means they know how slow typically

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>both teams get off to the slow starts that they

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>get off to in the Super Bowl. Ten and a

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>half is a little bit too low for me to

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>take the under there because anything could happened there. It's

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>two touchdown, yeah, yeah, it could be like seven six

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're done, Like it could be a touchdown in

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>two fuels. I'd rather I'd rather take the first half

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>under a half. I feel pretty good about I feel

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>good about that too. I feel very good about that,

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>especially when the Patriots defense is played in first half

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this year? Is it is it? Does it make more

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>sense for us to talk about how we think gameflow

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is gonna go in this game and then we could

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like break down the props from that perspective,

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>because then, like you want the props to correlate with

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>how you think the game is gonna go, or should

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we just kind of like talk about the props that

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we like throughout the show, and then at the end

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll kind of like get into well, this is why

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we think the game's gonna go this way, and this

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is why we like these problems the way. Man, I'm

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>following along wherever you wherever you're comfortable with. So I

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's well known that at this point we

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>both think the Patriots are gonna win. Now, I'm not

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna speak for you. You You can talk about how you

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>think the game flow is gonna go. But I do

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>think that we're gonna see a little bit of back

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and forth here. I don't think it's just gonna be

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots dominating all throughout. I think it's we get

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of back and forth throughout this game, which

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't lend itself either way to Okay, the Patriots are

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting on a lead, They're gonna run the ball a lot.

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>The Rams are playing from behind the entire game, They're

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw the ball a lot. I think we see

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of back and forth from both teams throughout.

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the Patriots pull away in the second half.

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really like the fourth quarter where the

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Patriots pull away and ultimately end up winning by like

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>six or seven points. So so I disagree a little bit.

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be one of the games where

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots actually get out to an early lead, as

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we kind of have seen them do before, the Rams

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to storm back and ultimately wind up falling short.

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think there's too much history involved with the

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>slow starts that the Patriots get off too. In the

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, remember three against the Falcons, we all know

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>how that ended over time Falcons didn't even touch the ball.

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And then last year again like they only they only

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>scored three points in the first quarter again against the Eagles.

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Now both teams they ended up clearing actually the first

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>half total, they went over the number because both teams

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>scored a lot in the second quarter as well, both

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles and the Patriots. But the Eagles really had

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots number of the entirety of that game, like

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of seemed like, you know, they were out maneuvering something.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>We don't really see it from Belichick. I just think

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that there's so much history involved and we have so

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>much in the past to go on that they're slow

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>starts that I don't know that the Patriots just get

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>off to this big lead or even like by the

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>end of the first half. I think maybe we're looking

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>at something like a fourteen ten the end of the

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>first half. I think it's seven similar. I just don't

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>think they'd pull away until I think. I disagree personally.

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I think they pull away a little bit earlier than

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you think, and the Ramage gotta come storming back, which

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>they're not built to do with that, We're gonna take

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>our first break when we come back. We die even

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>further into the blayre Props. Fantasy Sports Radio Network. It's

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy best roadscrop. Daily rodo dot Com learned from

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DFS players. We don't just give you advice.

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily roado dot Com Optimizer in minutes

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>build an optimized line up for cash games and tourneys.

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Learned from the game's best DFS players joined Daily roado

0:17:55.119 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The following ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion advised.

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 1>Is someone in your family playing an injurious game of

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand people die a year

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>from drug overdose a hundred and twenty people a day,

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>five people every hour, one person every twelve minutes. Eighty

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand people die every year from alcohol abuse, over

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty people a day, ten an hour,

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>one person every six minutes. Somebody you know. Maybe next

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>learn how to help someone you love get away from

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the drugs, alcohol and bad influences. With the f m

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.959
<v Speaker 1>l A, people can take a leave of absence from

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>their job and still keep it. Call now and learn

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>how we can help you. Eight six six four eight

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>four nine six two one eight six six four eight

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>four nine six two one. That's eight six six four

0:18:53.359 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>eight four ninety six twenty one. It's calling the sixsible winner.

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Who's winning on Sunday? And long ill football every game here.

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I will go with the wild experience, but I love

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the bands on the other don't go the weekdays a

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.959
<v Speaker 1>pm to eleven pm Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on your popular podcast Providers Back with you Fantasy Best

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network. All right, Frankie, you

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>wanna it's very interesting. So I have a list of

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>player props in front of me, and there's some things

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that have been taken off the board highly enough. We'll

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's been taking off the board. This is

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>very popular and it's total rushing attempts for both Todd

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Gurley and C. J. Anderson. They're not on the board

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. Really yeah, I thought the last I saw

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it at was Todd Gurley fourteen and a half on

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>this website. Not on the board? What website are you

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>looking at? Sports Interaction dot com? That's what makes I

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's what makes the player props, especially from the RAMS,

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>so annoying that I can't ever, I han't access odd Shark.

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>He's like the most frustrating thing in the world. You're

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not authorized access the nine. I thought it was like

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>location based. I don't think that happens to me. Really,

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>odds Shark tabs open yesterday. I think what's really interesting

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>about rams props in this game? Do you like more

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>than ever before? Like it's already normally we have an

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>idea when it comes to a certain game, certain team,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 1>like projecting, like okay, it's obvious where now, okay, it's

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>obvious where the match of advantage is with the rams

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>they have, they have so many different players that could

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the production could be spread out between in this game.

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's so like it's impossible to project, Like

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 1>how do you project Todd Durley and C. J. Anderson

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>heading into this game? The year guess is as good

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>as mine. And it's incredibly frustrating because when I talk

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>about the matchups right, like what kind of matchup if

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're the ramp here, what kind of matchup

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>are you trying to exploit? What comes to mind for

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>me is throwing the ball to the running back versus

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots linebackers and safeties. You don't want to throw

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball outside typically against the Patriots because they have

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>great corners like Stefan Gilmore was rated the best cover

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:52.959
<v Speaker 1>according to this year according to Pro Football Focus. They

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>also have Jason mccordy, and then they have his brother

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Devin mccordy, who was a great safety as well, who

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>helps out and coverage. And I think you might want

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to attack is with running backs catching the ball against

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>their linebackers. Gonna say who's gonna catch the ball? It's

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on the field. I'm glad you've asked that.

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>The problem that Gabe was talking about earlier this morning

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>on the morning after was the regards of C. J.

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Anderson cashing a pass. I think they set his reception

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>at zero point five. If you think he's gonna he's

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna be judging by the game flow, we'll probably catch pass.

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>It's trying to figure out how much Todd Girley and c. J.

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Anderson are gonna be used, which look, reports are Todd

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Gurley is going to see the ball a ton in

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>this game right supposedly. Supposedly they've been saving him for

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>now right, which makes absolutely no sense. Even saving Todd

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Gurley for the Super Bowl even I don't even saving him.

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Something's up. As we now, something is up. But meanwhile

0:22:56.320 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they were like there was also a report that there

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>are like scouts or no other front office people around

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. That's ay, c J. Anderson fits what the

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Rams want to do. More if it doesn't make any sense,

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>why would they paid Todd Gurley to be the most expensive, like,

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the highest paid running back in the league to find

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a guy off waivers in c J. Anderson that fits

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>what they want to do. More Like, that is total bullcraft.

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>There's no ounce of truth to that whatsoever. If Todd

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Gurley does not have some kind of surgery or I mean,

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's just gonna go like hush hush under the

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>radar after the season ends. There's something seriously wrong in

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>l A totally totally trying to project. Like so I

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>was asking, I think it's a pretty good bet though,

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>like taking CJ. Anderson to catch one pass, because I

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>think that that's where you want to attack. To me,

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>where you want to attack the Patriots is with either

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>tight ends or running backs catching passes match up against

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the linebackers, linebackers or safeties of the Patriots, or slot

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>receivers which we know like they can use any Rams

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver more than likely not it will be Robert

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Woods or Josh Reynolds in the slot splitting duty going

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>up against I believe that his name is J. C. Jackson, right,

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of been the guy that's been targeted, like

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>closing teams have been targeting him. He's been getting penalties

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>thrown on him over the past couple of games, definitely

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>more often than guys like mccordy and guys like Stephon Gilmour.

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think the slot receiver and running backs and

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>tight ends throwing passes to those guys makes the most

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>sense for the Rams. But what makes it so hard

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is the Rams have two running backs. Now, the Rams

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>have two tight ends, So do you really want to

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>lean on props there? You know, the most profitable thing

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to do, Greg is to take unders and knows to

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of props because the public, everyone wants to

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>see everyone, everyone wants to see touchdowns. So the profitable

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>thing to do is bet unders and bet knows, which

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I think you can find here with the Rams, because again,

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>like they have two running backs and they have two

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. I think that's the match up to exploit.

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But how can you trust one more than the other.

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's what makes it so difficult when it comes

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to player props or the Rams specifically. And if we're

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.959
<v Speaker 1>just talking about Jared Goff, right, like his completion props

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>at twenty five and a half. I believe his yard

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>his yardage is at like to eighty something like that, Craig,

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I I saw it as passing yards. That's on the

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Fandal Sports book. That's a two eight nine and a half.

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff hasn't gone over twenty five completions games. Is

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that a matter of can that change with a matter

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of game flow? Golf has thrown for more than one

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdown just once in his last seven games. His touchdown

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>prop is that one and a half. So I, you know,

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>gave to talk about a lot of this, like any

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Rams proms. See that's the thing. I don't

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like the Rams props either. Gabe was talking about earlier

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>this morning and yesterday in me that he thinks the

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>best or end on his show on GZ Day, that

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the best props for l A are all around Todd Gurley,

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that's where to make the most sense, around the Rams

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>or Josh Reynolds. Sure you know he loves that too.

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of history in the Super Bowl

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>shows that there's not a lot of long field goals

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>kick in Super Bowl. And now they also don't have kickers.

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, field goals from seventy yards out last week,

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven yard to win would have been good from

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>seventy a lot of times, we don't have kickers of

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that caliber in this spot. But also when it comes

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Super Bowl, it's it's a one and done game, Greg,

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of these guys are playing aggressive, and

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know if they do, if the Rams do fall

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>fall behind, are they gonna sell for field goals? Are

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>they gonna go for on fourth down conversions? Well, I

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>mean they think it depends. Goes back to correlating your

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 1>props where there's props with which Uh do do you

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>think that there will be a fourth down conversion in

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>this game? Yes, I think there'll be a fourth version.

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Definitely it will be a fourth down conversion. I think

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it'll be a two point conversion. Like those are easy

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>bets to make fourth down conversion. I feel much stronger

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>about than two point inversion, especially for two all the time. CJ. Anderson,

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pull up his his game log. I know

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>he had a few catches in one of these game,

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, I want to see what what he's what

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 1>he's done, But that might be the only one. And

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>then I know the long field goal prop in this game,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>what is it like? I think that's a pretty safe

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>bet with both kickers. They're both strong kickers. It's lock

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Doskowski and Greg's urline because you what you all you

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>need at the end of the half of one team

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>going to the field goal, that's what you need, all right, Greg.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>In the four games that C. Anderson has appeared in

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>where he's done stuff with the Rams. Yep, he's had

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>at least one catching three of those. The question one

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>catch last week it's zero catches. He has that at

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>least one target in every game. Zero catches against the Cowboys.

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>He had three against San Francisco. He had one against Arizona. Again,

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Todd Curley wasn't active in either one of those games.

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing. Even last week, where Todd Gurley had

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>five touches the entire game, he was barely on the field.

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Girly had several throws thrown at him, passes known at him.

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I should say, even if Anderson is barely on the field,

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a good opportunity that they dump it

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>off to him at some point and then it's a

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>good bet. Frank at you know, point five, you need

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>one catch? You know, you know, I asked you watch

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>one catch. It's one of the few that I agree

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that we gotta go yes on. Greg. I I advocate

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>for everybody to they're doing this thing like everywhere, UM

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>where they give you like fifty three things you need

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to know about the Super Bowl right right, so at

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Covers dot Com, at the Act, CBS Sports, UM, they

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>all have great ones right, So here's what they have

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>from covers regarding the kickers. Rans kicker Greg's Airline is

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>already a legend for that game winning kick in the

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>NFC Championship game against New Orleans, But he will will

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>he get things started early in Super Bowl. Theirline booted

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty field goals in thirty one opportunities during the regular season,

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>but just three came in the opening quarters. So there's

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a prop. Will Greg's Airline make a first quarter field goal?

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes is plus one seventy, which little enticing, but based

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>on what he's done this season, the odds show that

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>more often than not, that doesn't happen. The very next

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that they tell you is a prop that they like,

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>will Greg Deirline make a first quarter field goal? Yes?

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>At plus one ten? While theirline hasn't been all that busy,

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they definitely mess something up, like what the hell are

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you talking about? Uh, the second quarter? It's in the

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>second quarter. They wrote first quarter, but they mean second

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>quarter because they go on to say, well, theirline hasn't

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>been all that busy in the earth opening fifty, it's

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter. Is a much different story with Cline

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>connecting on ten field goals in thirteen opportunities, is highest

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>make an attempt total in any quarter of this season.

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So what they meant to right here is they had

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a typo. Well, Gregg's rely make a second quarter field goal? Yes?

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that plus one seven? And I think that's pretty

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty safe lot. I'm just talking about Rams

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>player props. I like their line ones. I think TJ.

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Anderson to catch a pass makes a lot of sense

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to like Brandon Cooke's yardage, which you

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>look at the revenge game against the New England Patriots.

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Rams care about that. They're gonna

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.479
<v Speaker 1>try and exploit matchups any way that they can. Brandon

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Cookes on the outside, seeing a guy like Stefan Gilmore,

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>or even if you locked up with Jason mccordy, the

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>two corners that typically play the outside for the New

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>England Patriots, it's just not a favorable matchup. So yeah,

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>he can easily go over his prop number, but to me,

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not very likely. I don't want to mess with

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like the receptions and receiving yards outside

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of TJ. Anderson to catch a pass, and then I'll

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>probably look at Greg's airline for some of these field

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>goal props. I kind of I'm just doing with the

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>rams obviously. I kind of like with the rams. I

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>hate buying a coach to speak, but assuming Tyler Gerally

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>touches the ball more, I don't want to buy into

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>his total rushing yards. I don't want to buy into

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>his total yards over a hundred super high. I kind

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of want hammered that under. It's like ninety nine and

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a half on his total yards, it's higher. It's higher

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on odd shark his total yards. He's a hundred and

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. He had five touches last game.

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>His his prop for total yards and a half. You

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>have five touches last hundred and two and a half

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a shark. That's an under. I'm flying with that. I'm

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>flying with that. But the one that I kind of like,

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is just stupid. What do you think without looking,

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>without me telling you what the odds? What the the

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>number is longest rush for both Girly and C. J. Anderson.

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>There are different numbers for Girly and half seventeen laugh

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>under take everything under. I assume you're leaning with the under, right, Greg,

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I am that's a long rush he's not even touching

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball, let alone running for like you long yards place,

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>which again, if you're looking at matchups, what the RAMS

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>should be doing is not only throwing the ball to

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the running backs lot. I think you should be running

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>football like that's the way to attack the guys run

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:36.239
<v Speaker 1>back in the l But that's why, like, even if

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not healthy, and what they're saying is true, that

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>they're just gonna ride him, they're gonna give him the

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>ball a ton even if he's not healthy. I mean,

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>he looked like he was pretty healthy against the Cowboys. Sure,

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what makes it risky. Again, I think I would

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>take the under on all the girls. By the way,

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>his longest run is twelve and a half, which I

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>would also pound the underground rumbling. That's a little bit

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>closer he's had. It's funny that that's his number. He

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>had a long of eight against the Saints, but against

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys it was fifteen against the fort was thirteen

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>against the Cardinals. He's gone over that number and just

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>barely twice. But he's gone over the number three of

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>his last four games. Have you seen this yet? I

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>know there's not the RAMS related, but totally rushing yards

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for Brady. Have you seen this? It's like negative one

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>half point five. Will Tom Brady have one rushing yard

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:33.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Puper Bowl. And I wouldn't touch it because

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>while you know he can go like he might have

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a few of these fourth down things, and if it

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>comes anything like at the end of the half where

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like he doesn't kneel down, or like if you dot

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a hand at the at the at the end of

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the game and he's just kneeling the ball down. Yeah,

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just that's not enough evidence there for me to

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing, right people are not aren't realizing thing.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Brady can rush for a yard, which is true,

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>he definitely can't. But if there, if you believe they're

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna win and he kneels down, that is a loss

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of one yard and that could f you man. Definitely

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>good point, Frankie. Until the rushing a Jared Goffers for

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the record is eight and a half. Uh, yeah, I wouldn't.

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't touch it. I'd probably take the under their um,

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't really touch that either. Let's move into

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots a little bit here, and let's say anything

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>else you want to do with the rams. No, I

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>mean that that you pretty much heard. I think like

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth, Um, give everyone a little sneak

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>peek behind the paywall. Here. The player prop that Daily

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Rodo likes most greg which is their Daily Roydo projection

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>versus the prop right is Brandon Cooks of all the

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 1>props available, because they have them projected for eighty point

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>six five receiving yards. And yeah, so that's the biggest

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>value difference between what their projection is and what the

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>prop line is, is that Daily Rhodo really likes the

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks over and for what it's worth, their biggest

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 1>difference on the under is James James White total rushing yards.

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And I heard a caller call into the Fantasy Football

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Frenzy this week and said that they saw the number

0:34:57.880 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 1>at fifteen and a half and they were freaking out

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.919
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, how could this be possible? James White

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and a half rushing yard? He's definitely gonna have

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>more than that, right, No, Eli Rodo hasn't projected for

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:10.320
<v Speaker 1>ten point eight rushing yards in this game, and his

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>prop is at eighteen and ha gonna rush the ball.

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle looking that he is in rest rex Burg

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>head back in the night. Yeah, of course he's gonna dude.

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:19.760
<v Speaker 1>In the game where he had fifteen receptions against the Chargers,

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>he had zero rushing yards zero of course, So well,

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it's too good to be true. Don't

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>don't fall for it. Don't be a sucker for the

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>James White rushing prop. Greg There's a few numbers that

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I have regarding the Patriots I was gonna jump into

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>before before you do, Yeah, before you do, you mentioned

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks and how high daily Roado is on him.

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I think my favorite proper at least when comes the

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. Inn't so much of the yards, but it's

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the receptions, and I like Robert Woods at five and

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a half receptions. I believe the stat is I have

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it up hand on one second, Um, I think I did.

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Actually just there it is, um, So Robert would five

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half receptions. There were eight out of the

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>eighteen games he played, so one lesson half in of

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen games he's played this year he had more

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>than five receptions. So I know the odds are hanging.

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Take the under on that. But if I believe and

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>alf And already has it at six in the under

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>his minus one sixty, so people are hammering that under.

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>So at five at five and a half, I really

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>like the over because you're talking about gameflow, Frank, if

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe they're gonna have to be in comeback moment

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and this is like, this is from like you correlating

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>your you have to try and like if you're doing

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>player props, you have to figure out, how do you

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>think the game flow is gonna go? Me and Greg

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>different a little bit. We do, and I believe given

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>they'll being comeback a bit in the second half. I

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's lots of Robert Woods, I really do. Maybe

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 1>it's biased and Robert Woods guy, but I like the over.

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I know game Borenci also actually likes the over. Here,

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>do you still take the over at six? You gotta

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>kid seven passes? I mean, I think he could a

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:56.879
<v Speaker 1>much more. I'm much more comfortable at five and a half.

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Oddly because six is like that magic number he's been

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>writing round. He's been right around five six every game

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. Daily Rotor dot Com, by the way, projects

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>him for four point six receptions, so significally under. Yeah,

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks is at five. When we come back, when

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>we go on to the Patriot sides of things, give

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>your favorite props when it comes to the paths and

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 1>let's see some crossover stuff. Also Saya break. We'll be back.

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends forever. Fantasy Sports Radio Fantasy Sports Network

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is hitting you from all angles with the best fantasy

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>sports and betting analysis. You can catch the latest programming

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>on so many platforms. There's no way you'll miss out

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 1>on any of the award winning programming we pump out

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>every single day. You can listen through the f T

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>s Y Rido app, I Heart Radio, tune in Radio, Stitcher,

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 1>download our podcast through iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Audio Boom,

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can watch select programming on the f F F

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and T S Y YouTube channel. The Fantasy Sports Network

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>your only source for fantasy sports and wagering anytime and anywhere.

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Two thousand and fifteen, two thousand and sixteen euro Being

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>long Drive toward Champion two thousand seventeen World number one

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Me personally, I keep my game face on me all

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the time, especially coming out of the bucker, leaving the range,

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>or even leaving the ports. What's your story? Can go

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to game Face Grooming dot com from all your athletic

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>facial wipes and body cleansing needs from the NFL to

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the NBA. Daily Rohodo dot Com is the place to

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:31.839
<v Speaker 1>win millions in daily fantasy. You can get the best

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>DFS NFL coverage all season long for a price of one,

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>or dominate the entire Daily Fantasy Sports realm with the

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Elite package at month. If you use the promo code

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>f n t s Y, you get ten percent off

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>your Daily Rodo package. Go to Daily Rodo dot com,

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>pick your NFL or Elite package, enter promo code f

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>n t s Y, and you'll be on your way

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 1>to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire. Game time decisions,

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>play all your freaking contract and a sign where you

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 1>want to. Sorry to do this a year and a

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>half before you're a free agent leaves a bad dayste

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of my mouth. Yeah, a lot a lot of guys

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>like we you know, we've seen these super teams in

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the past, Like with the money, you know what they

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 1>were able to put together. Good guys pretty much water

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:18.879
<v Speaker 1>dictate where they go, especially where they're free. At least

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>James with your free agent week days four p m.

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Eastern one pm Pacific only on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network.

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Frank and I haven't been in a disagreement during the breaking.

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I love this prop and Ron see in the chat

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 1>break zirl to win the m v P of the

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl at plus ten thousand grade, to which you

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>scoffed at scoffed, and which I throw it back to you.

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>If last week was a Super Bowl, hang on with that, well,

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:57.359
<v Speaker 1>you can, you know, you can talk about it. I'm

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>looking at the NFC. If last week was a Super

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Bowl between the Saints and the Rams, who would have

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>won the MVP. Realistically there was no stand up performer

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 1>for the Rams. Everyone's gonna say all the referees, but realistically,

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the guy who hit the field goal to go into

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 1>overtime like it was nothing and in a fifty seven

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 1>yard and overtime to win the game. You do not

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 1>win the game without that man, is your m v

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.320
<v Speaker 1>P of that game. It's not out of the question.

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Like if the Rams were to win, it's gonna take

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>some herculean effort like that from Zerline. Again, now you know,

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe someone else would get more involved, maybe like Robert

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Woods or or Jared goff or something. If two answers

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to who it could have been, ready, I think one

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>could be John Johnson or the interception in overtime with

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees. Just say the other one be Brandon Cooks

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>who had seven receptions for a hundred and seven yards.

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I get what you're saying, but at plus ten thousand, like,

0:40:58.080 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they are never giving this, who will end pay to

0:40:59.920 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a kicker ever? Ever, ever, ever, ever, if Adam Military.

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I think if last week was a Super Bowl, they

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>would have given if Adam Military kicked a ball to

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>win the Super Bowl multiple times and then get a

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 1>single vote for the Super Bowl MVP. It's never happening, man,

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's why the odds are the way they are.

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Ronty bucks on them, you're throwing you're literally throwing away bucks. Well,

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have put thirty bucks on it, but five

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars at plus ten thousand, I'm just saying I

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>thought that there was a pretty good case to be

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>made last week where but yeah, Brandon Cooks had a

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 1>good statistical game, he was not the reason why they

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 1>won that game. By definition, he was not the most

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>valuable player. The defensive player was probably even more likely

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to get it than Brandon Cooks. Never. In my opinion,

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Greg Derlan was the MVP of that game. That's fine,

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:51.359
<v Speaker 1>but you you don't have a vote. It doesn't really matter.

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>That's absolutely rights, alright, Greg. Some numbers that I have

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:58.399
<v Speaker 1>here from the from the Patriots, per Ian, how would

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you say the same h A R T I t

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>z because it seems like I'm just gonna say heart

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>hits and I don't know if that's right. H A

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>R T I t z. How do you say that

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>last name? Heart? Yea hearts for Ian Heart. It's tom

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Brady lead. Tom Brady led offenses have faced Wade Phillips

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>led defenses nine times in their career. He's average twenty

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>nine point three points per game in those games, with

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the most recent stint tom Brady struggling against the Denver

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Broncos led defensive Wade Phillips. Obviously we all not got

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the defense was a great defense. Now, Tom Brady six

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half completelytions is the number here, Greg. He's

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>had thirty and thirty four completions respectively in his first

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>two playoff games. His artist prop is a point five

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>passing yards. He's gone over that number in eight of

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:57.879
<v Speaker 1>his last ten playoff games, greg the last three Super Bowls. Now,

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 1>this goes back to game flow because trying to figure

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>out how the game flow is gonna go here last

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 1>three Super Bowls. Last year twenty eighteen, we all know

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:06.919
<v Speaker 1>he broke the record five hundred and five yards three

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns against the Falcons. What he needed to do to

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>come back in that game four hundred and sixty six yards,

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:19.240
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns and an interception. In fourteen against the Seahawks

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 1>correct to yards, four touchdowns, two interceptions. But just because

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:29.879
<v Speaker 1>it's happened in history, it goes back to game flow.

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Do he does he need to pass as much? I

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>think the fact that he's gone over two one and

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a half yards and eight of his last ten playoff games,

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>even with him dinking and dunking as much as I

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>expect him to do in this game, because I do

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's how they'll attack the Rams. Once again, they

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of guys on the outside to

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball to, and just from a personnel perspective,

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't make sense, Like you don't want to throw

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the ball to Chris Hogan and Philip door Set because

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that's where keep to leap is gonna be. Maybe you

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 1>want to target target Marcus Peters on some of those

0:43:56.920 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>plays down the field, but maybe we see a little

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of grunk match up against linebackers or safeties. But

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>throwing the ball to running backs and Edelman I think

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 1>makes the most sense with him thinking and dunking. I

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>think Tom Brady goes over the number at one and

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a half. You you gave us what he did the

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 1>past Super bowls. You know how many times he did

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>it this season? I have it? Not many there. He

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>played eighteen games this season, I'll say six over half.

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Now that's not because he didn't throw for a lot

0:44:26.160 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of touchdowns, but that's good to know that the yard

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is still there. There's not one now that this number

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>is lower because is what it was, because earlier in

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the weekend it's jumped a bit. So you have it

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Fanal Sports book at at some point earlier

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>this week it was to seventy eight and a half.

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So my my stat is at two seventy eight and

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a half. Odds Shark has this number even higher, yes,

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and a half, which I still like the over.

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the Tom Brady yards are gonna be

0:44:54.920 --> 0:45:00.360
<v Speaker 1>there to me games this year, very very off for

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots to win. I think even if he's not

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>throwing to like wide receivers James White, it's an eediment

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and throwing it to James White and throwing into Gronk.

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I like the over numbers for for Tom Brady even

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 1>completions at twenty six and a half, a lot of

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:18.880
<v Speaker 1>those Dincon dunts thirty and thirty four of the past

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 1>two games. He didn't need to throw the ball that

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>much against the Chargers, they still did it. What do

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you see for total receiving arnswer Jimmy White, Jim White,

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing the receiving yards on the Fvandal sports book

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:37.320
<v Speaker 1>at fifty one and a half. Okay, yes, that's exactly

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:40.719
<v Speaker 1>what I see. Also fifty one and a half for

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>James White. Everybody who knows what we did the Super well,

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago we had fifteen catches or

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 1>fourteen catches rather the most Super Bowl history. Everyone knows

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we did. Two weeks ago we had fifteen matches. Fifty

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>one didn't come through last week though, no we did not.

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 1>People were just hammering. I think we all we used

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 1>both teams with fandel I to leave used him over

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Sonny Michelle to what do you do? Fifty one a half?

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the over. This is the time when James

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 1>White has used most super Bowl time. Again, I think

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's where do you want to attack the Rams? Most

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 1>is getting James White maxed up in these linebackers and

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>these safeties. You don't want to target a guy like

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a keep to leave and you know, for what it's worth,

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the drama with Nickel, Robie Coleman, He's

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>actually a really, really good slot corner, so maybe he

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:28.319
<v Speaker 1>gives you a little bit of pause when it comes

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to Edelman. I still think that I like the the

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:31.800
<v Speaker 1>over on the Edelman number at eighty and a half,

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but he is a very good corner, Robie Coleman, that is.

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:38.320
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that's the way to target the

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Rams defense is going to be using the James White

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.359
<v Speaker 1>as the extension of the run game, because as we know,

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>defeating a great pass for US is through a lot

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of these dink and dunk passes to specifically running backs

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and James White. I mean, they could use him out

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield. They can line them up as a

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. They could use them in a myriad of ways,

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:02.399
<v Speaker 1>myriad ways, like right, I like him. I like him

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>over fifty one a half. He didn't come through last week,

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 1>but he had the week before with the fifteen receptions

0:47:08.880 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 1>against the chart. So I think about it that and

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 1>again this is just me giving. I don't know my thought, right,

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I have his vision because it was really heavily against

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara last week for my pool, and I had

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 1>this vision, Oh that one drive, would you Breezes dump

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it off to alb Camaro like six times or fifty yards? Right? You?

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And I know we I think we talked about that

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>leg my clear to this problem the first quarter, first half. Correct,

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>knowing that and just having that vision in my mind,

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the overt James White receiving arts at the

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 1>game White of the game, game White game for James

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 1>White's get that game White. Looking at it interesting, the

0:47:55.840 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>fourteen receptions against the History has not been kind to

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:02.839
<v Speaker 1>James White in the in the postseason. Actually because we

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>were we all remember that. We all remember that that

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Falcons game where he caught fourteen for one ten. He

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>also had twenty nine rusty yards in that game. He

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 1>had three total touchdowns. I think that's what we remember most.

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:22.239
<v Speaker 1>He's he's only n He's only cleared fifty one and

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a half receiving yards the over in two out of

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>ten postseason games. James White, how does that number change

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:36.360
<v Speaker 1>your mind? Forty nine against the Chiefs last week, against

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers last year in three games, he didn't have

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty nine games, twenty nine yards. A little

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of a different scenario last year because Deon Lewis

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 1>was kind of doing a little bit of both. I

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know that they trust Birkheads to the same level

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that they did Dean Lewis. Then it was the game

0:48:51.120 --> 0:48:53.640
<v Speaker 1>fourteen for one tan against the Falcons, and he had

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:57.759
<v Speaker 1>three for eight against the Steelers one for nineteen in

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 1>his first two playoff games. Ever, so you gotta remember, though,

0:49:03.560 --> 0:49:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the dynamic in that backfield isn't the same years ago

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that it is right now. Right like Dean Lewis was there,

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:11.919
<v Speaker 1>other guys were there. Um, it was a different team,

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 1>different offenses. We know that this. We know what the

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:17.720
<v Speaker 1>offense is this year, very star to last year, where

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it's James White is you're passing down back, Sony Michelle

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is you're running down back Rex Broke. Kids when they

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 1>want they don't want you to know what they're doing.

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's it, over and over and over again. We

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 1>know this, and I think you're gonna see a lot

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 1>of James White catching the football in this game anything

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 1>else with the Patriots. Frank Edelman's receiving yards is at

0:49:37.800 --> 0:49:42.879
<v Speaker 1>eighty and a half greg and his receptions imagine six

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half or so. I see it at seven

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. Seven. Yeah, the under is minus one two.

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I like the yardage more than I like the receptions.

0:49:55.760 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 1>At eighty and a half, I think ja I think

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Edelman goes over eighty and a half. Shark actually has

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 1>an eighty four and a half A little bit tougher. Huh.

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:07.839
<v Speaker 1>People are probably hammering that over. That's why I don't

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 1>think I want to mess the Juliettelman. Yeah, I mean

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's finally I want to mess with this personally.

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the Gronk stuff is interesting. Receiving yards, I

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>see him at fifty four and a half. I see

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:21.759
<v Speaker 1>receptions at four and a half. You know a lot

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:24.799
<v Speaker 1>of these longest reception and longest I think that's where

0:50:24.840 --> 0:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of money could be me. I agree

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 1>with you with the nose Chris Hogan's longest reception, Again,

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:34.919
<v Speaker 1>it could end on any play you've seen Chris Hogan

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>have nineteen halves that you see? What are you a half? Yeah,

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it's hogan longest reception. I don't get a man, I'm

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:46.359
<v Speaker 1>shocked that I was shocked at Peter's bits on one like, yes,

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:49.919
<v Speaker 1>behind the defense anything with Chris Hogan, right, Chris Hogan

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:54.440
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards from the house twenty and a half, longest reception,

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, But I think a lot of these longest

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 1>receptions right like, But the thing is with those a

0:51:00.760 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit harder because the thing what those are, it's

0:51:03.080 --> 0:51:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it's literally can take one play, literally one play. That's

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:12.399
<v Speaker 1>what makes that one so tough. In my opinion, I'd

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 1>look at a few of those, though. I think the

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Chris Hogan won Chris Hogan and Gronk to stand out

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to me. And then what you mentioned on girly, what

0:51:18.920 --> 0:51:25.440
<v Speaker 1>was it against seventeen a half? Here you're gonna spend

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably gonna take the under is the sports book

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow trying to figure out what to do correct. That's

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 1>why he's been hours on you just be like I want'

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I want this, I want this. I don't know. I

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:40.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta find this as well. The roughing the passer penalties,

0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you gotta find, like I gotta find what the odds

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>are that yes is plus money and the the lead

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>ref in this game, John Perry, what I've read about

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>him is that he had the most roughing the passer

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>penalties called this scene. That's how you said, you said

0:51:55.640 --> 0:52:00.080
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary roughness penalties. That's what I meant. Okay, that what

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 1>he's called the most of those this season. And that

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:06.759
<v Speaker 1>is and that is Dominican sue growing up against Tom Brady.

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And not only do they like to protect Tom Brady

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:12.719
<v Speaker 1>more than any other quarterback. I think the fact that

0:52:12.840 --> 0:52:15.360
<v Speaker 1>there was that miss call happened at the end of

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that Saints Ram's game, that they're going to try and

0:52:17.480 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>overcorrect that this week. Don't forget that they might be

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 1>even quicker to throw. Don't forget though, the call on

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Brady hours later where they didn't touch his face, they

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>called the pastor dude, They slapped like his collar bone right,

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't even touch his his helmet, correct anything, and they

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:35.200
<v Speaker 1>called it. So Parry is the one that makes those calls,

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and that he makes a pass interfers call, he actually

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 1>makes the roughing the pastor calls, so that matters be

0:52:41.520 --> 0:52:44.400
<v Speaker 1>aware of that. I want to sign off a YouTube now.

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for watching the Friends. He's up

0:52:46.560 --> 0:52:49.400
<v Speaker 1>next Corey, Jim day Uh and Chris Adventure will have

0:52:49.520 --> 0:52:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you covered there. Um. Please subscribe like rate us, leave

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>us five stars, and absolutely leave a comment. I also

0:52:57.200 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 1>want to note that before we sign up, I want

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to get into the crosspoort props right because I know

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to talk about that with Russell Westbrook in particular. Yeah,

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Russell Westbrook some some really cool stuff that they have.

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Between Russell Westbrook total points, rebounds assists greater than Rob gronkowskis,

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and I do believe if you add them all up,

0:53:19.560 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the number I saw it was like forty seven point

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:24.240
<v Speaker 1>nine right around, So I was thinking, like fifteen fifteen, fifteen,

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you're getting plus money with Westbrook at plus one. Because

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the receiving yardage prop for Gronk is like fifty five

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:36.560
<v Speaker 1>or fifty three. So if you add up the averages

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of Westbrook, it's a little bit lower than what we're

0:53:40.200 --> 0:53:43.839
<v Speaker 1>seeing is the it's fifty five and a half for gronks. Now,

0:53:45.040 --> 0:53:46.440
<v Speaker 1>let me ask this, you bet on these things? Like

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I know there's another one with the Kyrie Irving total

0:53:48.120 --> 0:53:51.880
<v Speaker 1>points versus Jarry Goff pass completions. We gotta start to

0:53:51.920 --> 0:53:53.560
<v Speaker 1>looking to the NBA schedule on something to see you

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 1>what's my thing? Does this go off the board Kyrie

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:59.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play, or you want Nigly win? Uh of the board?

0:53:59.880 --> 0:54:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Right there? There are a lot of props involving golfers,

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and I saw that the note was if a golfer

0:54:08.120 --> 0:54:11.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make the cut, it's automatically off the board. So

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine the same thing if a player doesn't play,

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 1>If an NBA player doesn't play. The three matchups that

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:18.759
<v Speaker 1>we have on Sunday, the Grizzlies at the Knicks, the

0:54:18.880 --> 0:54:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Thunder at the Celtics, the Clippers at the Raptors, here's

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:23.320
<v Speaker 1>what I love, and I got what I love for

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you what you got? If he plays Kawai Leonard points

0:54:28.280 --> 0:54:33.839
<v Speaker 1>versus James White rushing yards, that's great, Yes, James White

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 1>at minus one in thirties, that what you're seeing as well?

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 1>It seemed at plus one hundred James White plus a

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred Kawai Leonard minus one. Yeah, you like Kawai Leonard, right, yes, yeah, yeah,

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly yeah, yeah, I love mother. Here we go,

0:54:47.200 --> 0:54:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie Irving total points, Jared Goff pass completions. So it's

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie Irving and the Celtic coming up against the Oklahoma

0:54:57.680 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>City thunder right. I think that, Um. But going back

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to your train of thought is if you think that

0:55:05.640 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are playing from behind a little bit in

0:55:07.640 --> 0:55:10.399
<v Speaker 1>this game, and maybe there's more past complete, I don't

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 1>love that. You don't love that one. I don't have

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that one, um, And this is the one because I

0:55:14.880 --> 0:55:16.839
<v Speaker 1>know how you feel about this, Frank, and you get

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:20.720
<v Speaker 1>plus money. James Harden streak of thirty or more games,

0:55:22.040 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we just still go on here at thirty five. I

0:55:23.640 --> 0:55:27.319
<v Speaker 1>think right now one of those two those are very far,

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:32.240
<v Speaker 1>very far. I opened the recap with it this morning. Okay,

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:37.839
<v Speaker 1>keep going. Or longest touchdowns scored in the game, because

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I know you don't think there'll be a long touchdown,

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:42.239
<v Speaker 1>So that number you would love, James Harden, you got

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:50.680
<v Speaker 1>plus money at that. It will be longer. It'll be

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:53.600
<v Speaker 1>longer for fore or something. Yeah, it will be I

0:55:53.640 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 1>think they have like two more games before them, so

0:55:55.600 --> 0:55:57.640
<v Speaker 1>technically it would be at six if you think he's

0:55:57.640 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep the streat going. This is a great bet ready,

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 1>which Georgia Bulldog will have more rushing yards? I've seen that.

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a good one. Yeah, it's I've seen it where um,

0:56:10.000 --> 0:56:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle is actually giving seven a half yards Sony

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Michelle plus one. What's yeah, Girly might Gurlly might not

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:22.440
<v Speaker 1>do anything. I like that. I like Sony Michelle there.

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that's crazy, you're getting plus money on that.

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I've seen bets where Sony Michelle, yeah, getting seven a

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:36.200
<v Speaker 1>half yards. How about this, Greg little college basketball for you?

0:56:37.239 --> 0:56:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Will Zion Williamson, RJ. Barrett and Cam Reddish combined for

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:44.640
<v Speaker 1>more points? Or will the Rams and Patriots combined for

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:48.359
<v Speaker 1>more points? And I looked this up. Duke is facing St.

0:56:48.440 --> 0:56:53.920
<v Speaker 1>John's on Saturday. I think the Rabs of at more

0:56:53.960 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>point a few more, A few more that I do

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 1>like Greg's random ones. Um, you have a fifteen seconds.

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:02.360
<v Speaker 1>There's been defensive or special team touchdown sporting eight of

0:57:02.400 --> 0:57:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the last twelve Super Bowls. You're getting yes at plus

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:07.399
<v Speaker 1>two hundred. Okay that he said you have a few more? Yeah,

0:57:07.440 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, I don't have a time. We'll do

0:57:09.560 --> 0:57:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it all again tomorrow. Corey's up next for Frank. I'm

0:57:12.200 --> 0:57:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Greg see tomorrow. We hope