1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:06,800
Speaker 1: What two three Brits in the middle of the family

2
00:00:07,200 --> 00:00:14,800
Speaker 1: time Hellos football down in the one yard line?

3
00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:17,360
Speaker 2: How about that?

4
00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:20,000
Speaker 1: That is the ultimate kabash.

5
00:00:23,720 --> 00:00:25,640
Speaker 2: And we are underway.

6
00:00:26,160 --> 00:00:29,240
Speaker 3: Hello everyone, Welcome back to another episode of the Action

7
00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:32,360
Speaker 3: Network NFL podcast. I'm Matthew Freeman, the editor in chief

8
00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:35,760
Speaker 3: of Fantasy Labs. We're coming at you with another podcast

9
00:00:35,960 --> 00:00:38,760
Speaker 3: on the Alliance of American Football at the AAF is

10
00:00:38,800 --> 00:00:41,199
Speaker 3: Week four, and as usual with me is our resident

11
00:00:41,280 --> 00:00:44,560
Speaker 3: Alliance expert, Ian Hartez, the director of the Fantasy Labs

12
00:00:44,680 --> 00:00:47,839
Speaker 3: NFL platform and an Action Network analyst. In joining us

13
00:00:48,120 --> 00:00:52,160
Speaker 3: is Scott Barrett, Senior Fantasy Analyst at PFF. He's known

14
00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:56,840
Speaker 3: across the industry for his dude fantasy broness, his statistical

15
00:00:56,960 --> 00:01:00,680
Speaker 3: dankness in his Matt Shoones t shirt fetish news. Scott,

16
00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:01,600
Speaker 3: how's it going.

17
00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:04,200
Speaker 1: Something, man? I'm great. That was an awesome introduction. You

18
00:01:04,280 --> 00:01:07,440
Speaker 1: hit kind of the three key pieces about me that

19
00:01:07,480 --> 00:01:09,920
Speaker 1: I you know, introduced myself as two girls at the.

20
00:01:09,920 --> 00:01:10,960
Speaker 2: Bar, right.

21
00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:15,200
Speaker 3: Yeah, Well that's good because I've been scouting you like

22
00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:17,520
Speaker 3: a girl at a bar for quite a long time.

23
00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:20,319
Speaker 1: All Right, don't knock me too much for my undersized

24
00:01:20,360 --> 00:01:22,040
Speaker 1: hands right exactly?

25
00:01:22,440 --> 00:01:25,880
Speaker 3: Did you see Greg Dorsch's hand discrepancy, Like his left

26
00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:28,720
Speaker 3: hand is like a full inch longer than his right hand.

27
00:01:29,080 --> 00:01:32,080
Speaker 3: It's a George costanz A type of situation. Maybe he

28
00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:35,120
Speaker 3: like broke his wrist or something when he was young,

29
00:01:35,160 --> 00:01:37,560
Speaker 3: and that kind of like slowed the development of like his.

30
00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:39,720
Speaker 2: Hand or something. I don't know, we're gonna need more

31
00:01:39,720 --> 00:01:40,920
Speaker 2: details on that. Ian.

32
00:01:41,120 --> 00:01:42,679
Speaker 3: You're doing all right. It's a busy week with the

33
00:01:42,680 --> 00:01:45,120
Speaker 3: Combine going on. You're sure you're not too distracted to

34
00:01:45,160 --> 00:01:46,200
Speaker 3: talk about the alliance.

35
00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:48,520
Speaker 2: It's a busy week, fun week. I was staying on

36
00:01:48,560 --> 00:01:50,840
Speaker 2: our Combine pod. I was a little more caught off

37
00:01:50,920 --> 00:01:54,040
Speaker 2: guard by the Combine because usually that's our first football

38
00:01:54,720 --> 00:01:56,400
Speaker 2: after the Super Bowl. We gotta go about a month

39
00:01:56,440 --> 00:01:59,080
Speaker 2: without any eleven to eleven action. But you know, we've

40
00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:02,000
Speaker 2: just been with af the whole time, so it's all good.

41
00:02:02,040 --> 00:02:03,600
Speaker 2: I'm ready to get back to I guess the mother

42
00:02:03,640 --> 00:02:04,520
Speaker 2: sport of the off season.

43
00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:07,280
Speaker 3: All right, And right before we jumped on the podcast,

44
00:02:07,360 --> 00:02:11,240
Speaker 3: news broke that Jason Witten has unretired. This dude is amazing.

45
00:02:11,280 --> 00:02:13,360
Speaker 3: First of all, my mom is going to be so happy.

46
00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:16,680
Speaker 3: I'm surprised he hasn't called me yet. But Jason Witten

47
00:02:16,760 --> 00:02:20,760
Speaker 3: retired during the draft. Unretires during the combine. This guy

48
00:02:20,919 --> 00:02:23,680
Speaker 3: just seems like he likes the attention of the offseason.

49
00:02:23,720 --> 00:02:25,760
Speaker 3: I don't know what to say, but yes, Jason Witten

50
00:02:25,800 --> 00:02:27,639
Speaker 3: will be returning for I don't know, this is a

51
00:02:27,720 --> 00:02:29,240
Speaker 3: fifteenth to sixteenth season.

52
00:02:29,400 --> 00:02:32,120
Speaker 2: Ian, what is it? Oh man, he will entered the

53
00:02:32,200 --> 00:02:33,400
Speaker 2: league in OH three, I think.

54
00:02:33,639 --> 00:02:36,720
Speaker 3: Yeah, So anyway, he's he's coming back for more. But

55
00:02:36,960 --> 00:02:39,760
Speaker 3: uh yeah, let's let's get into some af action here.

56
00:02:40,120 --> 00:02:43,080
Speaker 3: The first game for this week is Saturday, four pm

57
00:02:43,080 --> 00:02:46,360
Speaker 3: EASTERNS the San Diego Fleet at the Memphis Express. The

58
00:02:46,360 --> 00:02:48,880
Speaker 3: Fleet are favored by six. There's an over under forty

59
00:02:48,880 --> 00:02:51,560
Speaker 3: one and a half points. Ian, give us any injury

60
00:02:51,600 --> 00:02:52,240
Speaker 3: news and notes.

61
00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:55,120
Speaker 2: Yeah, so both teams are in pretty good spot. But

62
00:02:55,320 --> 00:02:57,440
Speaker 2: big thing for San Diego. I mean, they've had the

63
00:02:57,520 --> 00:03:00,120
Speaker 2: league's best pass us so far, and the big guy

64
00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:02,320
Speaker 2: behind that has been Demontre Moore had a bunch of

65
00:03:02,720 --> 00:03:05,160
Speaker 2: NFL cups of coffee of various teams, but he did

66
00:03:05,160 --> 00:03:07,720
Speaker 2: not practice Wednesday due to a knee injury, and also

67
00:03:07,760 --> 00:03:11,000
Speaker 2: their stud linebacker AJ Tarpley miss practice with a back injury.

68
00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:14,720
Speaker 2: I mean Dimantre is PFF's number one edge defender, Tarpley's

69
00:03:14,760 --> 00:03:17,799
Speaker 2: number six among linebackers. So two real difference makers to

70
00:03:17,880 --> 00:03:20,200
Speaker 2: keep an eye on. And then for Memphis, Zach Stacy

71
00:03:20,200 --> 00:03:22,840
Speaker 2: obviously they're bell Cow. He didn't practice Wednesday with an illness.

72
00:03:22,880 --> 00:03:24,720
Speaker 2: You know, I think we've seen this plenty throughout the

73
00:03:24,840 --> 00:03:27,160
Speaker 2: NFL and just sports in general. You know, early week

74
00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:29,720
Speaker 2: DMP with an illness usually isn't two big of a deals,

75
00:03:29,760 --> 00:03:32,239
Speaker 2: so expecting him to play. But man, big thing about

76
00:03:32,280 --> 00:03:34,560
Speaker 2: this game I'm excited for. I think San Diego has

77
00:03:34,600 --> 00:03:38,000
Speaker 2: pretty much distinguished themselves as the only backfield that only

78
00:03:38,040 --> 00:03:40,280
Speaker 2: consists of two running backs. I mean, Trent Richardson is

79
00:03:40,280 --> 00:03:43,280
Speaker 2: the Bell Cow in Birmingham. But you know San Diego

80
00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:45,560
Speaker 2: we have dakwang Gardner, we have Terrell Watson. I think

81
00:03:45,560 --> 00:03:47,960
Speaker 2: they're pretty much the as version of mark Ingram and

82
00:03:47,960 --> 00:03:50,800
Speaker 2: having Kamara Scott. What do you think it sounds about

83
00:03:50,840 --> 00:03:51,240
Speaker 2: right to me?

84
00:03:51,720 --> 00:03:54,040
Speaker 1: I just want to mention with regards to the matchup,

85
00:03:54,360 --> 00:03:56,520
Speaker 1: definitely looks like the San dieg who gets the better draw.

86
00:03:56,600 --> 00:03:59,440
Speaker 1: So Memphis is giving up the second most Fantasy points

87
00:03:59,480 --> 00:04:02,320
Speaker 1: per game took posing running backs. Zach Stacy. He's my

88
00:04:02,760 --> 00:04:06,160
Speaker 1: number two high priced running back after Trent Richardson. But

89
00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:08,400
Speaker 1: you know, Memphis is also pretty bad through the air.

90
00:04:08,440 --> 00:04:10,760
Speaker 1: They're giving up the third most passing yards per game.

91
00:04:10,920 --> 00:04:13,560
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's been interested in Memphis's defense this year because

92
00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:15,680
Speaker 2: watching them, they have been playing all right in the

93
00:04:15,720 --> 00:04:18,640
Speaker 2: first through the third quarter, and then fourth quarter things

94
00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:20,440
Speaker 2: have kind of fallen apart Wilted a little bit. I

95
00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:22,680
Speaker 2: think they've been on the field a little along with this.

96
00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:25,679
Speaker 2: You know, Hackenberg run the show and not really keeping

97
00:04:25,720 --> 00:04:28,359
Speaker 2: the ball ever doing much of anything. So I'm wondering

98
00:04:28,400 --> 00:04:30,880
Speaker 2: if Zach Mettenberger can not only help this offense but

99
00:04:31,040 --> 00:04:33,440
Speaker 2: really just helped lift his defense in this team. I mean,

100
00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:35,440
Speaker 2: am I putting too much into one half of play?

101
00:04:36,160 --> 00:04:37,800
Speaker 1: I actually just wrote him up as I think the

102
00:04:38,160 --> 00:04:41,440
Speaker 1: chalk quarterback this week. Ooh yeah, I think it's I

103
00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:45,600
Speaker 1: think it's a tough matchup for him overall. Birmingham is

104
00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:48,400
Speaker 1: giving up the fewest fantasy points per game topposing quarterbacks.

105
00:04:48,440 --> 00:04:52,080
Speaker 1: But I mean he's fifty five hundred, you know, Gilbert's

106
00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:54,679
Speaker 1: seventy one hundred, Walford sixty two hundred. I think that's

107
00:04:54,800 --> 00:04:56,719
Speaker 1: the only three quarterbacks you can look at this week,

108
00:04:56,760 --> 00:05:00,960
Speaker 1: and Hackenberger has you know, legitimate NFL experience starts and

109
00:05:01,040 --> 00:05:03,080
Speaker 1: he was like amazing last week. He only played on

110
00:05:03,120 --> 00:05:06,280
Speaker 1: forty six percent of the snaps, but scored twelve point eight

111
00:05:06,320 --> 00:05:10,120
Speaker 1: fantasy points, seventy five percent completion percentage, one hundred and

112
00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:13,599
Speaker 1: twenty yards, two touchdowns, no interceptions, had like had the

113
00:05:13,640 --> 00:05:18,160
Speaker 1: lowest minimum snap threshold. He'd lead all quarterbacks in PFF

114
00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:20,440
Speaker 1: grade right now. You blow everyone out of the water

115
00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:24,160
Speaker 1: and passer rating fantasy points per quarter. So that's where

116
00:05:24,200 --> 00:05:26,200
Speaker 1: that's where I stand. But I am eager to hear

117
00:05:26,240 --> 00:05:28,240
Speaker 1: your thoughts. Are you just trying to pay up for

118
00:05:28,360 --> 00:05:30,200
Speaker 1: Gilbert or maybe even Walford.

119
00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:32,680
Speaker 2: I'm with you, man, I met Burgers to go to

120
00:05:32,760 --> 00:05:35,200
Speaker 2: a cheap quarterback option this week. I mean, we else

121
00:05:35,520 --> 00:05:37,159
Speaker 2: do you need to see the guy do? Last week

122
00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:40,400
Speaker 2: he bought out two touchdown passes and twelve pass attempts.

123
00:05:40,440 --> 00:05:42,560
Speaker 2: I mean, Hackenberg wound up with a wopping zero in

124
00:05:42,600 --> 00:05:45,440
Speaker 2: his sixty three passes this year. So I mean cannot

125
00:05:45,440 --> 00:05:47,520
Speaker 2: overstate like how much of a night and day difference

126
00:05:47,520 --> 00:05:49,960
Speaker 2: as was with the offense. I mean, they outscored the

127
00:05:50,040 --> 00:05:51,599
Speaker 2: best team in the league in the second half of

128
00:05:51,600 --> 00:05:54,840
Speaker 2: Mettenburger under center. So I guess the big question here

129
00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:56,760
Speaker 2: is like, how do we get a good exposure of

130
00:05:56,800 --> 00:05:59,400
Speaker 2: this pass game? Then, because all the guys are cheap

131
00:05:59,520 --> 00:06:02,200
Speaker 2: on family Ball, Reese Horn was the kind of dude

132
00:06:02,200 --> 00:06:04,360
Speaker 2: that was on the field the most. He had five targets,

133
00:06:04,360 --> 00:06:06,479
Speaker 2: didn't really get me in the big plays, but he's

134
00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:08,840
Speaker 2: the highest price guy forty eight hundred. Then we got

135
00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:11,760
Speaker 2: a Gerard Shephard of forty two hundred at Devin Lucien's

136
00:06:11,760 --> 00:06:14,120
Speaker 2: a little bit down there too. I saw an unofficial

137
00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:17,880
Speaker 2: depth chart come out that actually had a Lucian above Shepherd. Now,

138
00:06:17,920 --> 00:06:20,279
Speaker 2: so I'm wondering how much stock to put into that.

139
00:06:20,440 --> 00:06:22,960
Speaker 2: But any thoughts on these pass catchers? Are you kind

140
00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:24,799
Speaker 2: of just thig of metten Berger and Stacey?

141
00:06:25,279 --> 00:06:28,400
Speaker 1: Yeah, I really kind of don't know which of these

142
00:06:28,440 --> 00:06:32,040
Speaker 1: wide receivers to trust or really get excited about it.

143
00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:34,359
Speaker 1: I kind of just want to play Alton Howard just

144
00:06:34,400 --> 00:06:37,080
Speaker 1: because his nickname is Pig. I think that's kind of awesome,

145
00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:40,600
Speaker 1: but but I know that's not hard hitting analysis. Yeah, yeah,

146
00:06:40,640 --> 00:06:42,960
Speaker 1: I don't know. If I play him, I'll probably want

147
00:06:42,960 --> 00:06:48,120
Speaker 1: to stack especially in the larger tournaments. But I don't know.

148
00:06:48,440 --> 00:06:51,000
Speaker 1: I think there's there's some decent receiver value we can

149
00:06:51,040 --> 00:06:53,240
Speaker 1: get to a little later for sure.

150
00:06:53,839 --> 00:06:55,320
Speaker 2: Last time I want to look at with this game,

151
00:06:55,760 --> 00:06:57,960
Speaker 2: are you okay with Trow Watson Jakwan Gardner in the

152
00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:00,040
Speaker 2: same lineup, Because, like I was saying before, I'm and

153
00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:02,960
Speaker 2: this does seem to be the only backfield with two backs.

154
00:07:03,000 --> 00:07:05,960
Speaker 2: So they've been the best rushing offense so far, especially

155
00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:08,279
Speaker 2: these last two weeks once they've kind of realized Philip

156
00:07:08,320 --> 00:07:11,040
Speaker 2: Nelson isn't going to kind of bring back these nineteen

157
00:07:11,080 --> 00:07:13,680
Speaker 2: ninety eight rams for Mike marsh or anything. So I

158
00:07:13,720 --> 00:07:15,120
Speaker 2: don't know, man, I feel like, if you want to

159
00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:16,920
Speaker 2: pay down quarterback, this could be the week to just

160
00:07:16,960 --> 00:07:19,120
Speaker 2: get t rich get Watson and Gardner all in one

161
00:07:19,160 --> 00:07:19,600
Speaker 2: line um.

162
00:07:19,760 --> 00:07:23,080
Speaker 1: So I think here's here's the case. For Watson. It's

163
00:07:23,200 --> 00:07:25,960
Speaker 1: kind of just that he played sixty percent of the

164
00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:30,600
Speaker 1: snaps last week. That was second best behind only Trent Richardson.

165
00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:32,840
Speaker 1: And you know, like running back is a position I

166
00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:37,040
Speaker 1: always prioritize volume over anything else. But this isn't the

167
00:07:37,120 --> 00:07:39,800
Speaker 1: NFL where there's actually a lot of parody. So I'm

168
00:07:39,880 --> 00:07:44,800
Speaker 1: kind of fine chasing someone with hyper efficiency, though I

169
00:07:44,920 --> 00:07:47,320
Speaker 1: don't typically do that in NFL dfs, and I think

170
00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:50,680
Speaker 1: Gardner is just legitimately really good. And he's he's eighty

171
00:07:50,720 --> 00:07:53,400
Speaker 1: eight more rushing yards than the next closest player despite

172
00:07:53,480 --> 00:07:57,680
Speaker 1: ranking eighthan carries, he's averaging eight point zero. I think

173
00:07:57,720 --> 00:08:00,320
Speaker 1: he's earned more work, but of course that's not given

174
00:08:00,400 --> 00:08:01,840
Speaker 1: with San Diego's coaches.

175
00:08:02,240 --> 00:08:04,280
Speaker 3: Here's the question if you had to have only one

176
00:08:04,360 --> 00:08:06,840
Speaker 3: of those guys, Watson or Jaquan Gardner, because I think

177
00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:09,120
Speaker 3: you do want exposure to that running game, but you

178
00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:10,920
Speaker 3: might not be able to have both of them, which

179
00:08:10,960 --> 00:08:14,040
Speaker 3: one would you prefer? Given the discrepancies and price. Jaquan

180
00:08:14,120 --> 00:08:16,160
Speaker 3: Gardner is twenty one hundred more expensive.

181
00:08:16,720 --> 00:08:21,080
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's really expensive, especially based on expected volume. I

182
00:08:21,080 --> 00:08:25,200
Speaker 1: think on a projection per dollar standpoint, he's like one

183
00:08:25,240 --> 00:08:29,160
Speaker 1: of Jeff Radcliffe's who does our rankings and projections, worst

184
00:08:29,680 --> 00:08:32,559
Speaker 1: values by far. But I think I'd still go Gardner,

185
00:08:32,559 --> 00:08:35,280
Speaker 1: even though he's the second highest price running back. Definitely

186
00:08:35,280 --> 00:08:38,520
Speaker 1: not worth it based on that volume. Ian, are you

187
00:08:38,559 --> 00:08:40,600
Speaker 1: grabbing the value at Terrell Wilson, He's just the ninth

188
00:08:40,679 --> 00:08:41,720
Speaker 1: highest price running back.

189
00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:44,160
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm probably taking the value you mentioned it before,

190
00:08:44,360 --> 00:08:47,040
Speaker 2: sixty percent snaps. We've seen both guys get double digit

191
00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:49,040
Speaker 2: carries his last two weeks, so I mean they're definitely

192
00:08:49,080 --> 00:08:51,559
Speaker 2: making an effort to get Gardner involved, even if he's

193
00:08:51,559 --> 00:08:53,920
Speaker 2: not on the field the whole time. But big thing

194
00:08:53,960 --> 00:08:56,680
Speaker 2: for me, I mean, they haven't had these goal to

195
00:08:56,720 --> 00:08:59,880
Speaker 2: go situations really, but we have seen them subman Watson

196
00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:02,040
Speaker 2: for a bunch of these two point conversions is really

197
00:09:02,080 --> 00:09:04,120
Speaker 2: just pound him in, so he does seem to be

198
00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:06,400
Speaker 2: that goal line guy. And when they do eventually get

199
00:09:06,440 --> 00:09:09,240
Speaker 2: to those situations, I think we could see him vulture

200
00:09:09,240 --> 00:09:11,840
Speaker 2: with some of those touchdowns away. So but it is

201
00:09:11,880 --> 00:09:14,360
Speaker 2: hard to fade Gardner. I'm taking Watson. But you know,

202
00:09:14,480 --> 00:09:16,680
Speaker 2: I did say this last week that Gardner wasn't the

203
00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:19,360
Speaker 2: best running back in the AAF, and I'm pretty sure

204
00:09:19,360 --> 00:09:21,920
Speaker 2: I'm wrong on that statement. So I'm definitely interested in

205
00:09:21,920 --> 00:09:24,280
Speaker 2: getting plenty of exposure to both, not.

206
00:09:24,280 --> 00:09:26,160
Speaker 1: To chump around too much. But I did think over

207
00:09:26,200 --> 00:09:29,360
Speaker 1: your question and I think the answer for who to

208
00:09:29,400 --> 00:09:33,840
Speaker 1: stack with Hackenberg at the receiver position, it's definitely Nelson Spruce.

209
00:09:34,320 --> 00:09:36,600
Speaker 1: So I noticed he averaged just twenty two snaps per

210
00:09:36,640 --> 00:09:38,280
Speaker 1: game in the first two weeks this season, but he

211
00:09:38,320 --> 00:09:40,960
Speaker 1: played on forty six in Week three and then you know,

212
00:09:41,000 --> 00:09:44,800
Speaker 1: he was pretty productive on seven targets, caught four passes

213
00:09:44,800 --> 00:09:48,319
Speaker 1: for fifty yards and two touchdowns. So yeah, he's really

214
00:09:48,320 --> 00:09:51,400
Speaker 1: not too expensive. So I do like that.

215
00:09:51,720 --> 00:09:54,280
Speaker 3: Okay, all right, Ian, do you have a way in

216
00:09:54,360 --> 00:09:56,840
Speaker 3: which you are leaning for the game in terms of

217
00:09:56,840 --> 00:09:58,839
Speaker 3: either a side or the over or under?

218
00:09:59,440 --> 00:10:02,000
Speaker 2: Right now? I like Memphis plus six. I thought the

219
00:10:02,040 --> 00:10:03,760
Speaker 2: line was going to open up a little bit closer

220
00:10:03,760 --> 00:10:06,120
Speaker 2: to three three and a half, so I'll be interested

221
00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:08,840
Speaker 2: to see how that moves throughout the week. But yeah,

222
00:10:08,880 --> 00:10:10,480
Speaker 2: I mean, I don't know if Memphis is good enough

223
00:10:10,480 --> 00:10:13,080
Speaker 2: to win this win it yet, but I mean Scott

224
00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:15,080
Speaker 2: was saying, like metten Burger came in. We've only seen

225
00:10:15,160 --> 00:10:17,480
Speaker 2: him for a half, but he was legitimately probably the

226
00:10:17,520 --> 00:10:20,280
Speaker 2: best quarterback. It was the best half any AF quarterback

227
00:10:20,280 --> 00:10:22,439
Speaker 2: has played this year. So I mean, I'm gonna ride

228
00:10:22,480 --> 00:10:24,640
Speaker 2: with that for a little bit. Thinking again, the Memphis

229
00:10:24,640 --> 00:10:26,439
Speaker 2: defense is a little bit better, and the numbers say

230
00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:28,679
Speaker 2: after three weeks, and yeah, I got home, they can

231
00:10:28,720 --> 00:10:29,960
Speaker 2: cover plus six, And.

232
00:10:29,960 --> 00:10:31,840
Speaker 3: I think I'm probably there with you, and I really

233
00:10:31,880 --> 00:10:34,480
Speaker 3: don't have an opinion on the over under right now,

234
00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:38,160
Speaker 3: Let's go to the next game on Saturday, the Orlando

235
00:10:38,200 --> 00:10:42,640
Speaker 3: Apollos the undefeated Orlando Apollos at the Salt Lake Stallions.

236
00:10:42,800 --> 00:10:46,360
Speaker 3: Apaulo is favored by forty three point five over under

237
00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:49,520
Speaker 3: Ian any notes in terms of injuries.

238
00:10:49,679 --> 00:10:52,360
Speaker 2: Yeah, Orlando is super healthy right now. They're only kind

239
00:10:52,360 --> 00:10:55,280
Speaker 2: of questions when they're outside linebacker's nothing to worry about.

240
00:10:55,400 --> 00:10:58,040
Speaker 2: Salt Lake, on the other hand, their right guard and

241
00:10:58,080 --> 00:11:00,840
Speaker 2: they're starting right tackle both miss proud this on Wednesday,

242
00:11:00,880 --> 00:11:03,000
Speaker 2: something to keep an eye on. And also they're starting

243
00:11:03,040 --> 00:11:05,319
Speaker 2: tight end Anthony Denham, who's been one of these few

244
00:11:05,559 --> 00:11:08,160
Speaker 2: tight ends who really pay attention to. He's a DMP

245
00:11:08,280 --> 00:11:09,880
Speaker 2: of the leg injury, so I know he's got that

246
00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:12,880
Speaker 2: shiny three km in price right now, but make sure

247
00:11:12,880 --> 00:11:15,360
Speaker 2: to have monsor him throughout the week. And his use

248
00:11:15,400 --> 00:11:17,199
Speaker 2: has kind of been up and down anyway, so it

249
00:11:17,320 --> 00:11:19,400
Speaker 2: might be a guy stay away from big thing in

250
00:11:19,440 --> 00:11:22,439
Speaker 2: this matchup. And Scott mentioned this before, but Gardner like this,

251
00:11:22,720 --> 00:11:24,880
Speaker 2: I don't know. We assume efficiency is going to kind

252
00:11:24,920 --> 00:11:26,840
Speaker 2: of go back to the mean and football, but this

253
00:11:26,960 --> 00:11:29,120
Speaker 2: isn't the NFL. This is a new league. So I

254
00:11:29,160 --> 00:11:31,200
Speaker 2: see what he's saying, like, maybe a guy can sustain

255
00:11:31,280 --> 00:11:34,920
Speaker 2: efficiency more, and maybe this Orlando offense can sustain being

256
00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:37,080
Speaker 2: by far the best offense in the league. I mean,

257
00:11:37,240 --> 00:11:39,920
Speaker 2: it's ridiculous right now what they're doing, averaging over thirty

258
00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:42,640
Speaker 2: per game. I mean, Gilbert's averaging over ten yards per

259
00:11:42,640 --> 00:11:45,240
Speaker 2: past attempt. No other offense is even over eight. So

260
00:11:45,600 --> 00:11:48,120
Speaker 2: it's truly been amazing what they're doing in the past game.

261
00:11:48,400 --> 00:11:52,040
Speaker 2: And now finally they've selled our running back Deannest Johnson.

262
00:11:52,080 --> 00:11:54,560
Speaker 2: You know, anytime you can slot a two hundred pound

263
00:11:54,640 --> 00:11:56,920
Speaker 2: guy that runs a four to forty as your future back,

264
00:11:56,960 --> 00:11:59,800
Speaker 2: you know you gotta do it. I guess. So it's weird,

265
00:12:00,040 --> 00:12:02,320
Speaker 2: but it's one of these situations where we have now

266
00:12:02,360 --> 00:12:04,880
Speaker 2: a fifty five hundred dollars feature back in the league's

267
00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:07,959
Speaker 2: best offense. Scott, are you fine with riding with Denis

268
00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:10,240
Speaker 2: Johnson even though I mean it's hard for me to

269
00:12:10,240 --> 00:12:11,760
Speaker 2: say a nice thing about him other than he's the

270
00:12:11,840 --> 00:12:12,840
Speaker 2: lead back in this offense.

271
00:12:13,960 --> 00:12:17,240
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean so. So. He averaged sixteen point five

272
00:12:17,280 --> 00:12:19,560
Speaker 1: snaps per game the first two weeks this season, but

273
00:12:19,920 --> 00:12:22,440
Speaker 1: played on thirty three of sixty three last week soft

274
00:12:22,440 --> 00:12:25,880
Speaker 1: thirteen carries three targets. It's pretty good. He also ranks

275
00:12:25,920 --> 00:12:28,959
Speaker 1: second only to Trent Richardson and Fantasy points per touch.

276
00:12:29,280 --> 00:12:31,959
Speaker 1: I don't like him as much as Stacy. I think

277
00:12:31,960 --> 00:12:35,319
Speaker 1: it's close between him and Brandon Oliver for the number

278
00:12:35,360 --> 00:12:38,280
Speaker 1: three overall running back. Just for me, oscided like the

279
00:12:38,280 --> 00:12:41,520
Speaker 1: super cheap guys. Yeah, he's in play. He's not my

280
00:12:41,559 --> 00:12:43,160
Speaker 1: top play, but he's definitely in play.

281
00:12:43,280 --> 00:12:46,240
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's funny you mentioned Brandon Oliver. I just real

282
00:12:46,360 --> 00:12:48,960
Speaker 2: simp simple equation. I took each running backs week three

283
00:12:49,280 --> 00:12:52,319
Speaker 2: carries and targets divided by their salary, you know, see

284
00:12:52,360 --> 00:12:54,880
Speaker 2: who might have the most value there. And the number

285
00:12:54,960 --> 00:12:57,040
Speaker 2: one guy was Brandon Oliver and the number two guy

286
00:12:57,120 --> 00:12:59,560
Speaker 2: was Denis Johnson. So it does seem like those are

287
00:12:59,600 --> 00:13:02,400
Speaker 2: kind of the two cheapest backs where you can safely

288
00:13:02,440 --> 00:13:05,000
Speaker 2: feel good about. Maybe you're on the fifteen touch marks.

289
00:13:05,040 --> 00:13:07,240
Speaker 2: So what do you think about s Orlando passing game?

290
00:13:07,240 --> 00:13:07,400
Speaker 1: Though?

291
00:13:07,400 --> 00:13:09,280
Speaker 2: I mean any interest other than the obvious? You know,

292
00:13:09,360 --> 00:13:10,680
Speaker 2: Charles Johnson, Jail Marshall.

293
00:13:11,120 --> 00:13:15,559
Speaker 1: So yeah, Charles Johnson's always in play. He's also expensive, though,

294
00:13:15,559 --> 00:13:18,719
Speaker 1: so I like him not as much as Ross and

295
00:13:18,880 --> 00:13:24,040
Speaker 1: actually slightly less than McKay and then for salt Lake. Yeah,

296
00:13:24,320 --> 00:13:27,120
Speaker 1: I don't I don't really know. Kenny Bell maybe, but

297
00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:28,760
Speaker 1: that's that's about it for me.

298
00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:31,320
Speaker 2: I don't know what your feelings aren't de mornay Pierce

299
00:13:31,360 --> 00:13:33,080
Speaker 2: and now I just kind of always thought it was

300
00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:35,960
Speaker 2: an Antoine Randuel Dopo ganger for half the year, But

301
00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:39,120
Speaker 2: now he's getting fed targets like no other. But you know,

302
00:13:39,240 --> 00:13:41,000
Speaker 2: I look a little bit closer. The guy's not even

303
00:13:41,040 --> 00:13:43,520
Speaker 2: playing fifty percent of the snaps. I think he's lined

304
00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:46,880
Speaker 2: up outside the slot on only two snaps all season.

305
00:13:47,400 --> 00:13:49,880
Speaker 2: No air yards. I mean. At the same time, though,

306
00:13:49,920 --> 00:13:52,520
Speaker 2: we have Josh Woodrum who has pretty much the quickest

307
00:13:52,520 --> 00:13:55,120
Speaker 2: release time. He's just thinking and Duncan all the time.

308
00:13:55,280 --> 00:13:56,920
Speaker 2: Are you getting behind Pierce and Ow? I mean, I

309
00:13:57,000 --> 00:13:58,760
Speaker 2: know you mentioned Kenny Bell. I agree with you there,

310
00:13:58,800 --> 00:14:01,200
Speaker 2: but anything else Pierson? Now, are you just kind of

311
00:14:01,200 --> 00:14:03,040
Speaker 2: looking Kenny Bell May Brandon Oliver?

312
00:14:03,559 --> 00:14:05,640
Speaker 1: No? I actually like Pierson. I just missed him.

313
00:14:06,080 --> 00:14:06,440
Speaker 2: Okay.

314
00:14:06,559 --> 00:14:08,640
Speaker 1: Yeah, He's had target totals of five, six, and nine

315
00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:11,400
Speaker 1: the last three weeks. He had a twenty four percent

316
00:14:11,440 --> 00:14:14,800
Speaker 1: target market share last week that ranked third best on

317
00:14:14,880 --> 00:14:17,599
Speaker 1: the week. He also caught a passes ninety yards and

318
00:14:17,640 --> 00:14:21,280
Speaker 1: a touchdown. He's honestly right behind Charles Johnson for me,

319
00:14:21,440 --> 00:14:24,280
Speaker 1: just in terms of value among the high priced receivers.

320
00:14:24,280 --> 00:14:26,360
Speaker 3: This week we talk a little bit or can you

321
00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:29,040
Speaker 3: give a little more context on Anthony dNaM, because if

322
00:14:29,040 --> 00:14:30,960
Speaker 3: you look at some of the numbers, he has a

323
00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:34,480
Speaker 3: lot of air yards, so like his usage might be inconsistent,

324
00:14:34,520 --> 00:14:36,480
Speaker 3: but I think he's, you know, like seventh eighth in

325
00:14:36,520 --> 00:14:40,040
Speaker 3: the league in air yards, has fourteen targets for the season,

326
00:14:40,200 --> 00:14:42,840
Speaker 3: which might not seem like a lot, but is more

327
00:14:42,880 --> 00:14:45,720
Speaker 3: than any other tight end, more than a lot of

328
00:14:45,720 --> 00:14:49,120
Speaker 3: the wide receivers. Is it a situation where because of

329
00:14:49,160 --> 00:14:51,640
Speaker 3: the potential injury, we're not sure that we want to

330
00:14:51,680 --> 00:14:54,400
Speaker 3: go with him, or is it more usage concerns?

331
00:14:54,680 --> 00:14:57,400
Speaker 2: What is it with him? It's a little bit of both.

332
00:14:57,880 --> 00:15:00,600
Speaker 2: So I'd like to check in and see he left

333
00:15:00,640 --> 00:15:03,200
Speaker 2: that last week's game because of the injury, because he

334
00:15:03,280 --> 00:15:06,320
Speaker 2: only played forty nine percent of their snaps last week

335
00:15:06,320 --> 00:15:08,280
Speaker 2: and I just found out about the injury yesterday, so

336
00:15:08,640 --> 00:15:10,640
Speaker 2: I'm sorry this morning. So I was kind of writing

337
00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:12,320
Speaker 2: him off as I don't want to tight end that

338
00:15:12,360 --> 00:15:14,920
Speaker 2: plays forty nine percent of his team snaps. But you know,

339
00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:17,240
Speaker 2: if he was seventy five percent the first two weeks

340
00:15:17,240 --> 00:15:19,480
Speaker 2: and just kind of missed an extra quarter because of

341
00:15:19,520 --> 00:15:22,640
Speaker 2: these injuries, maybe we can get back behind that. But yeah,

342
00:15:22,680 --> 00:15:24,480
Speaker 2: I was just cut off them a little bit because

343
00:15:24,680 --> 00:15:26,360
Speaker 2: I was on more last week because it looked like

344
00:15:26,360 --> 00:15:28,720
Speaker 2: he could be the number one guy. Got another week

345
00:15:28,760 --> 00:15:31,040
Speaker 2: of evidence that kind of indicated Pearson l is the

346
00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:34,280
Speaker 2: clear cut target leader in that offense. Could also be

347
00:15:34,320 --> 00:15:37,520
Speaker 2: a thing. I don't think most of Denham's production or

348
00:15:37,560 --> 00:15:39,920
Speaker 2: targets have come with Woodroum under center, and I think

349
00:15:39,920 --> 00:15:42,360
Speaker 2: he was doing a little more at Brandon Silbers. But yeah,

350
00:15:42,400 --> 00:15:44,560
Speaker 2: I think just in this offense a little bit too

351
00:15:44,560 --> 00:15:46,280
Speaker 2: scattered and then throwing the injury and it's just a

352
00:15:46,320 --> 00:15:46,880
Speaker 2: little risky.

353
00:15:47,280 --> 00:15:51,080
Speaker 3: Yeah, Okay, the Apollos are favored by four points. I

354
00:15:51,160 --> 00:15:53,080
Speaker 3: might be the donkey here, but I'm just gonna take

355
00:15:53,120 --> 00:15:55,440
Speaker 3: the team that's undefeated. That's I don't know, that's where

356
00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:57,800
Speaker 3: I am. Do you have any thoughts on on the Apollos.

357
00:15:58,040 --> 00:16:00,080
Speaker 2: It's a tough one. Man. I'm probably gonna stay away.

358
00:16:00,320 --> 00:16:02,760
Speaker 2: I'm inclined to take the points because I think with

359
00:16:03,560 --> 00:16:05,360
Speaker 2: you know, I'd like the Salt Lake team as long

360
00:16:05,400 --> 00:16:08,720
Speaker 2: as Woo Woodrom has been healthy. But yeah, so here's

361
00:16:08,760 --> 00:16:11,160
Speaker 2: the thing. Everyone's been hating on Birmingham this week because

362
00:16:11,200 --> 00:16:13,200
Speaker 2: they are all three and oho, They've played Memphis, they

363
00:16:13,240 --> 00:16:17,240
Speaker 2: played Atlanta, they played pretty easy schedule. Birmingham and Orlando

364
00:16:17,320 --> 00:16:18,800
Speaker 2: are the only teams in the league that have gotten

365
00:16:18,880 --> 00:16:21,480
Speaker 2: the gift of playing Memphis and Atlanta twice already. So

366
00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:24,320
Speaker 2: there's a little bit here also with Orlando, like are

367
00:16:24,360 --> 00:16:26,440
Speaker 2: they for real? So if they can get this good win,

368
00:16:26,480 --> 00:16:28,360
Speaker 2: I'll be a little more inclined to call them Luke's

369
00:16:28,360 --> 00:16:28,760
Speaker 2: best team.

370
00:16:28,920 --> 00:16:32,840
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's that's fair, Scott. Do you have any inclinations

371
00:16:33,040 --> 00:16:35,200
Speaker 3: as to what you might be doing in terms of

372
00:16:35,280 --> 00:16:36,480
Speaker 3: the side or the over under.

373
00:16:36,880 --> 00:16:40,160
Speaker 1: Yeah, I have no real take, but I will say

374
00:16:40,600 --> 00:16:45,000
Speaker 1: Orlando is is pretty easily PFF's top graded team. Though

375
00:16:45,280 --> 00:16:47,640
Speaker 1: you know, Salt Lake is a little bit better than

376
00:16:47,680 --> 00:16:50,920
Speaker 1: their record. The great out fourth overall, so yeah, maybe

377
00:16:50,920 --> 00:16:52,640
Speaker 1: it could be a sneaky close game.

378
00:16:52,920 --> 00:16:57,680
Speaker 3: Okay, Well, on the topic of Apollos and Stallions, let's

379
00:16:57,680 --> 00:17:00,440
Speaker 3: get real for a moment and talk about erectile function.

380
00:17:00,800 --> 00:17:01,080
Speaker 2: Guys.

381
00:17:01,160 --> 00:17:05,720
Speaker 3: Let's be honest, like Apollo. You are a mythical Homeric deity.

382
00:17:06,160 --> 00:17:09,080
Speaker 3: You're the god of music, truth, prophecy, sun and light

383
00:17:09,119 --> 00:17:11,879
Speaker 3: and poetry. And when it comes to your love making,

384
00:17:12,119 --> 00:17:16,399
Speaker 3: you are a stallion, untamed, unbridled, and pumping full of

385
00:17:16,440 --> 00:17:19,879
Speaker 3: the purest, most masculine god given hormones known to beast

386
00:17:20,119 --> 00:17:22,600
Speaker 3: or man. But sometimes you know you're not. And when

387
00:17:22,600 --> 00:17:26,000
Speaker 3: that happens, it's time to pivot from Greek mythology to Roman.

388
00:17:26,160 --> 00:17:29,080
Speaker 3: Metacology is actually I don't even know if metacology is

389
00:17:29,080 --> 00:17:29,320
Speaker 3: the word.

390
00:17:29,359 --> 00:17:29,800
Speaker 1: I think it is.

391
00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:33,000
Speaker 3: Anyway, if you've noticed when you're going about your business

392
00:17:33,080 --> 00:17:35,560
Speaker 3: you're not quite your full self, you might have the

393
00:17:35,640 --> 00:17:40,919
Speaker 3: dreaded ED, so get checked online by the doctors at Roman.

394
00:17:41,240 --> 00:17:44,359
Speaker 3: Roman is a one stop shop where licensed US physicians

395
00:17:44,520 --> 00:17:47,480
Speaker 3: can diagnose ED and ship medication right to your door.

396
00:17:47,680 --> 00:17:50,199
Speaker 3: With Roman, there are no waiting rooms, awkward face to

397
00:17:50,240 --> 00:17:53,040
Speaker 3: face conversations, or uncomfortable trips to the pharmacy.

398
00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:55,439
Speaker 1: You can handle everything discreetly online.

399
00:17:55,560 --> 00:17:57,760
Speaker 3: All you have to do is visit get Roman dot com,

400
00:17:57,800 --> 00:18:01,720
Speaker 3: slash nfl pod, fill out a REEF medical onboarding, chat

401
00:18:01,760 --> 00:18:04,960
Speaker 3: with the doctor, and get FDA approved ED meds delivered

402
00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:08,680
Speaker 3: to your door in unmarked packaging. For a free online visit,

403
00:18:08,880 --> 00:18:11,879
Speaker 3: go to get roman dot com slash NFL pod. That is,

404
00:18:11,920 --> 00:18:14,600
Speaker 3: get roman dot com slash NFL pod for a free

405
00:18:14,600 --> 00:18:18,720
Speaker 3: online visit. Get roman dot com slash NFL pod.

406
00:18:19,440 --> 00:18:19,879
Speaker 2: Nailed it.

407
00:18:20,160 --> 00:18:23,560
Speaker 3: That is the best adread ever until my next ad read.

408
00:18:23,800 --> 00:18:26,640
Speaker 3: You know, always looking to improve my game. Guys, let's

409
00:18:26,640 --> 00:18:29,960
Speaker 3: get back to the Alliance. We have two games on Sunday.

410
00:18:30,320 --> 00:18:34,399
Speaker 3: First one San Antonio Commanders at the Birmingham Iron. The

411
00:18:34,520 --> 00:18:37,280
Speaker 3: Iron favored by seven and over under thirty nine and

412
00:18:37,320 --> 00:18:39,320
Speaker 3: a half. And I think that line has actually even

413
00:18:39,359 --> 00:18:43,320
Speaker 3: moved down while we have been recording. But uh yeah,

414
00:18:43,440 --> 00:18:45,960
Speaker 3: thirty seven and a half is where the line is now.

415
00:18:46,200 --> 00:18:47,720
Speaker 3: Ian any news and notes.

416
00:18:47,840 --> 00:18:50,240
Speaker 2: Thirty seven and a half. That might be a new low.

417
00:18:50,280 --> 00:18:53,600
Speaker 2: That's that's pretty interesting. Yeah, So not too many huge

418
00:18:53,600 --> 00:18:56,159
Speaker 2: injuries for San Antonio, just big thing to monitor at

419
00:18:56,200 --> 00:18:59,080
Speaker 2: them as this qv situation. And their head coach Mike

420
00:18:59,160 --> 00:19:01,760
Speaker 2: Rowley has come out said Logan Woodside, we'll start for

421
00:19:01,800 --> 00:19:05,720
Speaker 2: another week, so Marquise Williams Era has to wait. And hey, guys,

422
00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:09,520
Speaker 2: Johnny Manziel, his team is apparently Santonio if they decided

423
00:19:09,520 --> 00:19:11,560
Speaker 2: to go for it. So we'll see if that works

424
00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:14,480
Speaker 2: out down the road. But for Birmingham, kind of story

425
00:19:14,480 --> 00:19:16,760
Speaker 2: of the season for them is they're healthy everwork except

426
00:19:16,800 --> 00:19:19,800
Speaker 2: wide receiver. They had to put a qualmbray on ir

427
00:19:19,880 --> 00:19:22,840
Speaker 2: with a rib injury. Amba Eta to Wow was the

428
00:19:22,960 --> 00:19:25,440
Speaker 2: number two guy a week one. He's still not practicing

429
00:19:25,440 --> 00:19:28,040
Speaker 2: with the knee injury. And then la Damian Washington, who's

430
00:19:28,080 --> 00:19:30,400
Speaker 2: the only other guy other than Quinton Patton. Last week

431
00:19:30,440 --> 00:19:32,919
Speaker 2: the player over forty percent of snaps he missed practiced

432
00:19:32,960 --> 00:19:35,040
Speaker 2: with a groin injuries. So it's really looking like that

433
00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:37,080
Speaker 2: pass offense is going to continue to be the Quinton

434
00:19:37,119 --> 00:19:40,199
Speaker 2: Patten show. But of course, you know Birmingham is just

435
00:19:40,200 --> 00:19:42,840
Speaker 2: gonna give Trent Richardson the ball twenty times apparently a

436
00:19:42,880 --> 00:19:45,439
Speaker 2: game and see where that goes as well. Sky is

437
00:19:45,440 --> 00:19:48,520
Speaker 2: there anything you like on Birmingham other than Richardson and

438
00:19:48,640 --> 00:19:50,560
Speaker 2: Quinton Patten or do you think it's just kind of

439
00:19:50,600 --> 00:19:53,000
Speaker 2: nice we note how much the production is going to

440
00:19:53,040 --> 00:19:54,080
Speaker 2: flow through those two guys.

441
00:19:54,280 --> 00:19:57,159
Speaker 1: I actually don't like Quinton Patten. He's just kind of

442
00:19:57,240 --> 00:20:00,760
Speaker 1: graded too poorly and it's just not been reductive enough,

443
00:20:00,800 --> 00:20:05,000
Speaker 1: despite like a ridiculous air yardage market share. He's also

444
00:20:05,040 --> 00:20:08,720
Speaker 1: the third highest priced wide receiver on the week, which

445
00:20:08,720 --> 00:20:11,399
Speaker 1: I think is a little too much for him. I mean,

446
00:20:11,440 --> 00:20:15,240
Speaker 1: he's gonna have like a slate busting, huge upside regression

447
00:20:15,280 --> 00:20:18,800
Speaker 1: game coming soon. I'm just gonna hope it's not this

448
00:20:18,840 --> 00:20:21,400
Speaker 1: week because I don't want to pay that salary, which

449
00:20:21,440 --> 00:20:24,120
Speaker 1: I don't think is fair. And then Richardson, Yeah, I'm

450
00:20:24,119 --> 00:20:26,240
Speaker 1: playing him every single week.

451
00:20:26,280 --> 00:20:29,600
Speaker 2: So yeah, yeah, I feel like Richardson's price still just

452
00:20:29,720 --> 00:20:32,359
Speaker 2: isn't high enough. I mean I was talking before I

453
00:20:32,880 --> 00:20:35,960
Speaker 2: was Brandon Oliver and then Deannas Johnson, like Trent, Richardson

454
00:20:36,040 --> 00:20:37,880
Speaker 2: was three or four on that list of just kind

455
00:20:37,880 --> 00:20:40,840
Speaker 2: of value with opportunities in the price tag because it's

456
00:20:40,840 --> 00:20:43,360
Speaker 2: so absurd. I disagree with you with a low bound

457
00:20:43,440 --> 00:20:45,600
Speaker 2: Quinn Patten. He has had some bad drops. You know,

458
00:20:45,680 --> 00:20:48,119
Speaker 2: I'm not out of those big four receivers. I mean,

459
00:20:48,119 --> 00:20:50,359
Speaker 2: I definitely think Rashaan Ross and those guys are better,

460
00:20:50,720 --> 00:20:54,119
Speaker 2: but there's just still little competition elsewhere on this roster

461
00:20:54,240 --> 00:20:57,000
Speaker 2: against what might be the worst secondary in the league.

462
00:20:57,040 --> 00:20:58,720
Speaker 2: I do think he has a chance to get that

463
00:20:58,800 --> 00:21:02,040
Speaker 2: slate busting week potentially this week, but we'll look at

464
00:21:02,040 --> 00:21:04,320
Speaker 2: the other side of the ball too. I can't really

465
00:21:04,400 --> 00:21:07,480
Speaker 2: touch these quarterbacks, it seems like while they're rotating. But

466
00:21:07,960 --> 00:21:09,719
Speaker 2: do you think we got a new backfield leader here

467
00:21:09,760 --> 00:21:12,280
Speaker 2: in Trey Williams because he was able to out touch

468
00:21:12,640 --> 00:21:15,320
Speaker 2: Kenneth Farrow eight to four in the second half. You know,

469
00:21:15,359 --> 00:21:18,199
Speaker 2: I know it's still a fluid situation. No one really played,

470
00:21:18,440 --> 00:21:20,879
Speaker 2: you know, over half the snaps in that backfield, but

471
00:21:21,200 --> 00:21:23,159
Speaker 2: it looks like it's unning towards Trey Williams.

472
00:21:23,640 --> 00:21:25,640
Speaker 1: Yeah, so I wrote him up as my favorite cheap

473
00:21:25,720 --> 00:21:28,600
Speaker 1: running back, though also at it I didn't really like

474
00:21:28,680 --> 00:21:31,800
Speaker 1: him a crazy amount. But yeah, it was his first

475
00:21:31,800 --> 00:21:33,800
Speaker 1: game of the year in Week three. Aaron Green, a

476
00:21:33,800 --> 00:21:36,680
Speaker 1: healthy scratch, expects to be one again. You know, good

477
00:21:36,720 --> 00:21:41,200
Speaker 1: snap share. He was really productive. Seven carries, three targets,

478
00:21:41,280 --> 00:21:44,440
Speaker 1: ninety three yards. It should for sure be in line

479
00:21:44,480 --> 00:21:47,800
Speaker 1: for more work. Definitely a value based on his salary.

480
00:21:47,840 --> 00:21:51,840
Speaker 1: And you know, next week he'll probably be fifty three hundred,

481
00:21:51,880 --> 00:21:53,639
Speaker 1: let's say, rather than the forty one hundred he is

482
00:21:53,720 --> 00:21:54,080
Speaker 1: this week.

483
00:21:54,600 --> 00:21:57,359
Speaker 2: Yeah, good point there, Aaron Green, healthy scratch. Last week,

484
00:21:57,400 --> 00:22:00,920
Speaker 2: I was all over Team three. Aaron Green. I man

485
00:22:01,000 --> 00:22:02,879
Speaker 2: could not stop Yona from the mountains and now the

486
00:22:02,880 --> 00:22:06,240
Speaker 2: guy's a healthy scratch before the end of the first month. Unbelievable.

487
00:22:06,320 --> 00:22:09,800
Speaker 2: But one guy on San Antonio, I'm not backing off yet.

488
00:22:09,840 --> 00:22:12,320
Speaker 2: Greg Ward, I think is still very good. He had

489
00:22:12,320 --> 00:22:15,600
Speaker 2: two touchdowns last week that got called off because one

490
00:22:15,680 --> 00:22:17,720
Speaker 2: was a holding penalty and one they said the ball

491
00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:20,600
Speaker 2: hit the ground. It was debatable. I don't think it

492
00:22:20,720 --> 00:22:23,840
Speaker 2: hit the ground, but the officials said it did. Do

493
00:22:23,920 --> 00:22:27,240
Speaker 2: you see Greg Ward or even DeMarcus Ayers contributing here

494
00:22:27,280 --> 00:22:29,480
Speaker 2: a big game sooner? Is still just kind of mchaal

495
00:22:29,600 --> 00:22:30,800
Speaker 2: McKays show. Yeah.

496
00:22:30,840 --> 00:22:34,480
Speaker 1: I like McKay quite a bit. So he is the

497
00:22:34,480 --> 00:22:37,359
Speaker 1: best matchup of the week. The Commanders are giving up

498
00:22:37,400 --> 00:22:39,920
Speaker 1: forty two point six fantasy points per game to opposing

499
00:22:40,400 --> 00:22:43,320
Speaker 1: wide receivers and the next closest is giving up like

500
00:22:43,400 --> 00:22:46,399
Speaker 1: eight point three fewer than that. He ranks first in

501
00:22:46,480 --> 00:22:49,719
Speaker 1: air yards per game, first in target market share, and

502
00:22:49,800 --> 00:22:52,600
Speaker 1: third in fantasy points per game. And he's the fourth

503
00:22:52,640 --> 00:22:54,800
Speaker 1: highest price wide receiver in the week. So I like

504
00:22:54,840 --> 00:22:57,280
Speaker 1: him quite a bit more so than than Ward.

505
00:22:57,480 --> 00:23:00,920
Speaker 3: All Right, I asked this every week, nice every week

506
00:23:00,960 --> 00:23:04,639
Speaker 3: starting last week, But I mean, Trent Richardson, you basically

507
00:23:04,680 --> 00:23:07,119
Speaker 3: have to lock him in. I'm thinking for cash, but

508
00:23:07,359 --> 00:23:11,439
Speaker 3: for GPPs, what are you thinking you might do with him, Scott?

509
00:23:11,520 --> 00:23:13,240
Speaker 3: Is it a situation where you just kind of bite

510
00:23:13,240 --> 00:23:15,520
Speaker 3: the bullet where you look to fade him and hope

511
00:23:15,520 --> 00:23:17,719
Speaker 3: that he has a bad game and you can leverage that.

512
00:23:18,320 --> 00:23:21,080
Speaker 1: Now, I'm just gonna play him. He's he's still underpriced,

513
00:23:21,560 --> 00:23:25,000
Speaker 1: He's still you know in terms of workload, Like I

514
00:23:25,040 --> 00:23:27,920
Speaker 1: don't think Richardson's good. I think the offense is good,

515
00:23:27,920 --> 00:23:30,600
Speaker 1: and like that's a great offense to be the Balca

516
00:23:30,760 --> 00:23:34,760
Speaker 1: running backun but his volume is just so much greater

517
00:23:34,920 --> 00:23:40,720
Speaker 1: than anyone else in terms of you know, snaps, snapshare, carries, targets,

518
00:23:40,920 --> 00:23:44,920
Speaker 1: goal line usage that you just have to play him.

519
00:23:45,320 --> 00:23:48,120
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean it's sort of like a standard thing

520
00:23:48,119 --> 00:23:51,479
Speaker 3: for tfs that you want those you know, kind of

521
00:23:51,480 --> 00:23:54,320
Speaker 3: like big bodied, three down running backs, and then especially

522
00:23:54,400 --> 00:23:56,560
Speaker 3: when they are favored and then when they're at home,

523
00:23:56,600 --> 00:23:59,280
Speaker 3: it's just sort of like the gold mine of like

524
00:23:59,359 --> 00:24:02,280
Speaker 3: everything can verging on this perfect moment of just starting

525
00:24:02,280 --> 00:24:04,679
Speaker 3: that guy without really even having to think about it.

526
00:24:05,040 --> 00:24:08,320
Speaker 3: But yeah, I mean, I can't believe Trent Richardson is

527
00:24:08,359 --> 00:24:11,919
Speaker 3: you know, the guy, but he is at this point

528
00:24:12,280 --> 00:24:15,320
Speaker 3: probably League MVP. I mean at this point, I mean

529
00:24:15,400 --> 00:24:19,080
Speaker 3: amazingly probably not. But I mean there's an argument to

530
00:24:19,119 --> 00:24:21,200
Speaker 3: be made, which is one of the saddest statements I've

531
00:24:21,200 --> 00:24:21,760
Speaker 3: ever made.

532
00:24:22,440 --> 00:24:23,200
Speaker 1: Fantasy MVP.

533
00:24:23,400 --> 00:24:27,919
Speaker 3: For sure, Yeah, yeah, yeah, Okay, Birmingham favored by seven.

534
00:24:28,440 --> 00:24:30,520
Speaker 3: I'm probably gonna I mean, I don't know. I think

535
00:24:30,520 --> 00:24:33,800
Speaker 3: I'm probably gonna bet on Birmingham. But Ian, do you

536
00:24:33,800 --> 00:24:34,959
Speaker 3: have any way you're leaning on this?

537
00:24:35,400 --> 00:24:38,080
Speaker 2: I got San Antonio plus seven. I'm taking a lot

538
00:24:38,119 --> 00:24:40,520
Speaker 2: of these dollars, I think, except for last game that

539
00:24:40,560 --> 00:24:43,080
Speaker 2: will get to but just one of these things where

540
00:24:43,200 --> 00:24:45,360
Speaker 2: like I would say with Orlando, I'm still not totally

541
00:24:45,400 --> 00:24:48,040
Speaker 2: convinced that Birmingham is one of the top two teams

542
00:24:48,040 --> 00:24:51,399
Speaker 2: in the league despite their record. I like Lewis Perez

543
00:24:51,400 --> 00:24:53,480
Speaker 2: a lot to start the year, but he's that their

544
00:24:53,520 --> 00:24:56,560
Speaker 2: offense is really just not all that great scheme wise.

545
00:24:56,600 --> 00:24:59,639
Speaker 2: He's taken the has the longest average release time in

546
00:24:59,720 --> 00:25:02,000
Speaker 2: the I mean, even the number one receiver at Quinn

547
00:25:02,040 --> 00:25:04,600
Speaker 2: Pad and he's dropping a bunch of balls. Trent Richardson

548
00:25:04,720 --> 00:25:07,280
Speaker 2: averaging two point five yards per carry. It's the least

549
00:25:07,280 --> 00:25:10,120
Speaker 2: efficient rush offense in the league, so I think their

550
00:25:10,160 --> 00:25:12,919
Speaker 2: defense has really benefited from the strength to schedule. I

551
00:25:12,960 --> 00:25:16,199
Speaker 2: love their secondary. Few more questions with the pass us,

552
00:25:16,240 --> 00:25:18,440
Speaker 2: so yeah, I tax San Antonio plus seven just based

553
00:25:18,440 --> 00:25:21,080
Speaker 2: on I don't think Birmingham's as good as their record.

554
00:25:21,440 --> 00:25:24,280
Speaker 3: You know, this is actually, I think a question that

555
00:25:24,320 --> 00:25:26,080
Speaker 3: kind of gets to the core of what you think

556
00:25:26,119 --> 00:25:28,240
Speaker 3: of Birmingham and Scott I'd kind of like your thoughts

557
00:25:28,280 --> 00:25:31,680
Speaker 3: on this. So they've allowed a league low twenty one

558
00:25:31,720 --> 00:25:34,520
Speaker 3: points this year, and you can write a lot of

559
00:25:34,520 --> 00:25:37,160
Speaker 3: that off to schedule, but on the whole, like, even

560
00:25:37,240 --> 00:25:39,960
Speaker 3: if they're playing an easy schedule, that is still pretty impressive.

561
00:25:40,640 --> 00:25:44,600
Speaker 3: How much of their defensive efficiency are you attributing to

562
00:25:44,680 --> 00:25:48,400
Speaker 3: their abilities versus their easy schedule so far?

563
00:25:48,720 --> 00:25:51,080
Speaker 2: I attributed a lot more of their secondary before last

564
00:25:51,080 --> 00:25:53,399
Speaker 2: week and Matt Simmons really went up and down the

565
00:25:53,440 --> 00:25:55,439
Speaker 2: field on them. I know they only wound up with

566
00:25:55,480 --> 00:25:58,399
Speaker 2: twelve points, but I mean dend Robinson had a brutal

567
00:25:58,480 --> 00:26:00,480
Speaker 2: drop in the back of the end zone, another couple

568
00:26:00,640 --> 00:26:03,639
Speaker 2: drives early on that were undone by just some not

569
00:26:03,800 --> 00:26:06,400
Speaker 2: very good drops. And again, this was Atlanta by far

570
00:26:06,520 --> 00:26:08,880
Speaker 2: consensus kind of worst team in the league. And yeah,

571
00:26:08,920 --> 00:26:11,680
Speaker 2: Birmingham won by sixteen. They deserve credit. I pleate They've

572
00:26:11,720 --> 00:26:14,439
Speaker 2: only given up like twenty one points all season, so

573
00:26:14,800 --> 00:26:17,119
Speaker 2: they're killing it. But I do think it is mostly

574
00:26:17,119 --> 00:26:18,840
Speaker 2: scheduled in just at this point, so.

575
00:26:19,040 --> 00:26:21,879
Speaker 1: You know, schedule doesn't really wait as a huge factor

576
00:26:21,920 --> 00:26:24,719
Speaker 1: in PFFS grades, So that definitely could be it. But

577
00:26:25,280 --> 00:26:28,800
Speaker 1: Birmingham is easily our highest graded defense and the ranked

578
00:26:28,840 --> 00:26:32,040
Speaker 1: second best in pass coverage grade, third best in past

579
00:26:32,240 --> 00:26:35,560
Speaker 1: rush grade. And it's really rare in this league to

580
00:26:35,680 --> 00:26:38,680
Speaker 1: find a team that's that's equally good at both. Usually

581
00:26:38,720 --> 00:26:41,840
Speaker 1: it's like Orlando's really good in pass covered San Diego

582
00:26:41,920 --> 00:26:44,520
Speaker 1: San Antonio really good at pass rush. So I do

583
00:26:44,560 --> 00:26:48,080
Speaker 1: think they are one of the more most complete defense

584
00:26:48,160 --> 00:26:49,919
Speaker 1: is the league, at least on paper. But again, you know,

585
00:26:50,160 --> 00:26:52,040
Speaker 1: schedule could be a major factor there.

586
00:26:52,359 --> 00:26:54,879
Speaker 3: Yeah, good stuff there, all right, that feels it. I

587
00:26:54,920 --> 00:26:59,359
Speaker 3: am hammering the iron curtain of the Birmingham iron there. Okay,

588
00:26:59,440 --> 00:27:01,960
Speaker 3: let's get to the last game here on the schedule,

589
00:27:02,320 --> 00:27:06,040
Speaker 3: we have the Atlanta Legends, the oh to three Atlanta

590
00:27:06,119 --> 00:27:09,280
Speaker 3: Legends at the Arizona Hotshots two and oh sorry, two

591
00:27:09,320 --> 00:27:11,960
Speaker 3: to one. Arizona favored by thirteen and a half the

592
00:27:12,040 --> 00:27:15,320
Speaker 3: over under his forty two points. Ian injury news and notes.

593
00:27:15,840 --> 00:27:18,840
Speaker 2: So I haven't seen an official Atlanta practice support yet.

594
00:27:18,880 --> 00:27:22,000
Speaker 2: We'll get one today or tomorrow. But yeah, so we're

595
00:27:22,080 --> 00:27:24,560
Speaker 2: on the street with Atlanta. Is that both Akron Waldley

596
00:27:24,640 --> 00:27:27,040
Speaker 2: and Terry and Fulston are banged up right now. I

597
00:27:27,040 --> 00:27:29,240
Speaker 2: mean we saw Fulston he was a healthy scratch last

598
00:27:29,240 --> 00:27:32,440
Speaker 2: week anyway, and Denard Robinson kind of worked as part

599
00:27:32,480 --> 00:27:35,280
Speaker 2: of a kind of three back committee. But the thing was,

600
00:27:35,440 --> 00:27:37,880
Speaker 2: none of these running backs even had really over six

601
00:27:38,000 --> 00:27:41,000
Speaker 2: or seven total touches because so far Atlanta has been

602
00:27:41,000 --> 00:27:43,639
Speaker 2: by far the most pass heavy offense in the Liga

603
00:27:43,760 --> 00:27:45,800
Speaker 2: to this point. But again, if we can get this

604
00:27:45,840 --> 00:27:48,480
Speaker 2: backfield dwindled down a little bit, could be some opportunity

605
00:27:48,520 --> 00:27:50,879
Speaker 2: there with Shoelace at only thirty two hundred. But the

606
00:27:50,920 --> 00:27:54,800
Speaker 2: big injury to watch here is John Wolford, Arizona starting quarterback.

607
00:27:54,840 --> 00:27:57,560
Speaker 2: He's pretty much been anyone's idea of the kind of

608
00:27:57,560 --> 00:27:59,800
Speaker 2: second best quarterback in the league, and I will see

609
00:27:59,840 --> 00:28:02,080
Speaker 2: if and Berger can say anything about that down the stretch.

610
00:28:02,119 --> 00:28:04,480
Speaker 2: But he strained his back last week, wasn't able to

611
00:28:04,480 --> 00:28:06,960
Speaker 2: play the he got hit first play the second half

612
00:28:07,040 --> 00:28:09,359
Speaker 2: didn't return. He's considered day to day, though he was

613
00:28:09,400 --> 00:28:11,600
Speaker 2: already practicing yesterday. And I mean, I don't want to

614
00:28:11,600 --> 00:28:13,879
Speaker 2: take too much away from a random practice video, but

615
00:28:13,920 --> 00:28:16,080
Speaker 2: the guy was out there like doing drills, letting the

616
00:28:16,080 --> 00:28:18,720
Speaker 2: ball rip. I mean it wasn't like, you know, he's practicing,

617
00:28:18,760 --> 00:28:20,600
Speaker 2: but just standing on the sideline the whole time. So

618
00:28:20,960 --> 00:28:23,000
Speaker 2: if he's trying up towards playing, I mean, we got

619
00:28:23,000 --> 00:28:25,200
Speaker 2: the second best quarterback in the league with the six

620
00:28:25,320 --> 00:28:28,879
Speaker 2: highest price among quarterbacks. Scott, I know you said earlier

621
00:28:28,880 --> 00:28:31,439
Speaker 2: Mettenberger is your a cheap quarterback, but I guess how

622
00:28:31,440 --> 00:28:33,520
Speaker 2: do you compare Himbros Wolford this week?

623
00:28:33,800 --> 00:28:36,600
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean just Wallford's kind of blowing everyone else

624
00:28:36,600 --> 00:28:39,240
Speaker 1: away in terms of Fantasy points for game, PFF grade

625
00:28:39,280 --> 00:28:42,920
Speaker 1: passer rating. And the other only close person you know,

626
00:28:43,080 --> 00:28:48,200
Speaker 1: minimum thirteen attempts Hackenberger had twelve was John Walford, and

627
00:28:48,240 --> 00:28:50,840
Speaker 1: then there's just like a massive gap where nobody comes close.

628
00:28:51,200 --> 00:28:53,240
Speaker 1: I think you're only looking at these three quarterbacks. I

629
00:28:53,640 --> 00:28:57,600
Speaker 1: personally like Mettenberger. I think he's chokworthy just at price.

630
00:28:58,000 --> 00:29:02,600
Speaker 1: But you know, Gilbert has a great matchup. He's he's

631
00:29:02,640 --> 00:29:05,680
Speaker 1: been the best quarterback in the league. He's probably my

632
00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:09,920
Speaker 1: favorite for the af MVP, but he's also nine hundred

633
00:29:09,960 --> 00:29:13,000
Speaker 1: more than Wowford, and like, what's the difference between them.

634
00:29:13,040 --> 00:29:15,560
Speaker 1: I think probably just a little bit more than nine

635
00:29:15,600 --> 00:29:17,760
Speaker 1: hundred dollars worth. So that's where I stand.

636
00:29:18,280 --> 00:29:21,280
Speaker 2: Good stuff. Yeah, and I'm looking at the Arizona running backs.

637
00:29:21,360 --> 00:29:24,480
Speaker 2: I've been a Drell cow truther since Week one, and

638
00:29:24,520 --> 00:29:26,840
Speaker 2: then you know, week two, Tim Cook came out of

639
00:29:26,840 --> 00:29:29,920
Speaker 2: nowhere really stole things. Week three, though Presley was back

640
00:29:29,920 --> 00:29:31,840
Speaker 2: to being the guy, played a little over fifty percent

641
00:29:31,840 --> 00:29:34,800
Speaker 2: of the snaps. Just the production the touchdowns haven't quite

642
00:29:34,880 --> 00:29:37,040
Speaker 2: come there yet. I mean, I figure, just keep kind

643
00:29:37,040 --> 00:29:39,720
Speaker 2: of investing in these running backs and the best offenses,

644
00:29:39,760 --> 00:29:42,800
Speaker 2: you know, hopefully things will kind of change course eventually.

645
00:29:42,840 --> 00:29:45,960
Speaker 2: But we also got Justin Stockton at thirty five hundred.

646
00:29:46,000 --> 00:29:49,640
Speaker 2: Who you know, he's playing mid thirties percent snaps. I

647
00:29:49,640 --> 00:29:52,240
Speaker 2: think Stockton might be the cheapest running back you could

648
00:29:52,440 --> 00:29:54,640
Speaker 2: throw in a GPP line up and feel a little

649
00:29:54,680 --> 00:29:57,240
Speaker 2: bit okay about what are your thoughts? I guess on

650
00:29:57,240 --> 00:30:00,200
Speaker 2: on the run games on both these teams, So I.

651
00:30:00,120 --> 00:30:02,520
Speaker 1: Think you nailed the run game on the other side.

652
00:30:03,200 --> 00:30:05,360
Speaker 1: But I do like Presley. You know, this kind of

653
00:30:05,400 --> 00:30:08,600
Speaker 1: goes back to our prior debate about you know, lack

654
00:30:08,640 --> 00:30:13,080
Speaker 1: of parody in the AAF. How important is talent and

655
00:30:13,480 --> 00:30:17,440
Speaker 1: you know how while you're playing versus raw volume, So

656
00:30:17,440 --> 00:30:20,680
Speaker 1: so Presley ranked second in snaps per game. That's typically

657
00:30:20,720 --> 00:30:23,920
Speaker 1: the best at for predicting running back fantasy production. Like

658
00:30:23,960 --> 00:30:27,600
Speaker 1: in the NFL, just raw total snaps or snaps per

659
00:30:27,640 --> 00:30:31,440
Speaker 1: game correlates better to fantasy points or fantasy points per game.

660
00:30:31,520 --> 00:30:35,920
Speaker 1: Then carries targets touches, which is really absurd because you

661
00:30:35,920 --> 00:30:39,280
Speaker 1: don't get any fantasy points for just a snap. But yeah,

662
00:30:39,280 --> 00:30:42,040
Speaker 1: the problem is he's great, really poorly, he hasn't been

663
00:30:42,160 --> 00:30:45,200
Speaker 1: very productive, but luckily he's not too expensive, So I

664
00:30:45,200 --> 00:30:48,000
Speaker 1: do like him. He's in consideration, He's not my top guy,

665
00:30:48,280 --> 00:30:49,440
Speaker 1: but I do like him.

666
00:30:49,680 --> 00:30:52,120
Speaker 2: Yeah, I hear. I feel like he's the Lamar Miller,

667
00:30:52,240 --> 00:30:54,800
Speaker 2: Are right, I don't want to play him, but you know,

668
00:30:54,840 --> 00:30:56,800
Speaker 2: he's a cheap feature back, so we got at least

669
00:30:56,840 --> 00:30:59,120
Speaker 2: consider it, right, all right? Yeah? And then so last

670
00:30:59,120 --> 00:31:02,840
Speaker 2: thing on these passing games, one other quick injury. Richard Mulaney,

671
00:31:02,880 --> 00:31:06,320
Speaker 2: who is Arizona's pretty much number three receiver, he's men

672
00:31:06,440 --> 00:31:08,440
Speaker 2: priced this week, but it looks like he's going to

673
00:31:08,480 --> 00:31:10,840
Speaker 2: miss another game with his knee injury. I have found

674
00:31:10,880 --> 00:31:12,240
Speaker 2: that these last two weeks we want to keep an

675
00:31:12,240 --> 00:31:13,960
Speaker 2: eye on these injuries because it seems like if a

676
00:31:13,960 --> 00:31:16,320
Speaker 2: wide receiver misses a game or two, they pretty much

677
00:31:16,440 --> 00:31:19,640
Speaker 2: get put back into the lineup or into fanball lineups

678
00:31:19,640 --> 00:31:22,000
Speaker 2: at minimum price. So something to keep an eye on

679
00:31:22,080 --> 00:31:25,160
Speaker 2: for future weeks. But I'm looking at the Atlanta offense.

680
00:31:25,200 --> 00:31:27,080
Speaker 2: You know, Matt Simms. I believe he got over three

681
00:31:27,120 --> 00:31:29,920
Speaker 2: hundred yards last week. Again, he did look good throwing

682
00:31:29,920 --> 00:31:31,280
Speaker 2: the ball. And I have not had a nice thing

683
00:31:31,320 --> 00:31:33,280
Speaker 2: to say about Matt Simms all season, but the guy

684
00:31:33,320 --> 00:31:36,320
Speaker 2: looked good last week. And Uh Centavius Jones, you know,

685
00:31:36,400 --> 00:31:39,600
Speaker 2: had the awesome onside a conversion catch. He's cheaper than

686
00:31:39,640 --> 00:31:43,320
Speaker 2: Malachie Jones somehow. And you know, Centavius definitely has the

687
00:31:43,440 --> 00:31:45,800
Speaker 2: area arts, he has the higher target share. Am I

688
00:31:46,240 --> 00:31:47,800
Speaker 2: you know? Is there a trap here? I don't know.

689
00:31:47,840 --> 00:31:50,400
Speaker 2: I feel like Centavious should definitely be the higher rank guy,

690
00:31:51,160 --> 00:31:51,880
Speaker 2: So I have I have.

691
00:31:51,920 --> 00:31:56,080
Speaker 1: Very little interest in Milwaukee Jones. I considered uh Centavious,

692
00:31:56,160 --> 00:32:00,960
Speaker 1: but he's just graded so terribly that I just can't

693
00:32:00,960 --> 00:32:02,760
Speaker 1: put any faith into him. I mean, if you want

694
00:32:02,760 --> 00:32:05,480
Speaker 1: to stay on the Atlanta side, I like James Quick

695
00:32:05,520 --> 00:32:09,240
Speaker 1: as a value. I like Keith Toebridge as a value.

696
00:32:09,600 --> 00:32:11,400
Speaker 1: We can say on those guys, or we can move

697
00:32:11,440 --> 00:32:13,520
Speaker 1: to what do you want to do if m'lanie's out,

698
00:32:13,560 --> 00:32:15,120
Speaker 1: because I think that's like sneaky big.

699
00:32:15,960 --> 00:32:17,480
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think you're right. I think the answer to

700
00:32:17,520 --> 00:32:20,200
Speaker 2: Atlanta might just be know however we want to what

701
00:32:20,320 --> 00:32:22,520
Speaker 2: lever position we want to look at? But yeah, no,

702
00:32:22,640 --> 00:32:25,080
Speaker 2: I think if Milanie's out. I mean, look, Rashaw Ross

703
00:32:25,160 --> 00:32:28,680
Speaker 2: is completely balling. He's had like five incomplete targets this

704
00:32:28,760 --> 00:32:31,080
Speaker 2: year and he's had four touchdowns. He throw the guy

705
00:32:31,080 --> 00:32:33,400
Speaker 2: at the ball. He's making good things happen. But I

706
00:32:33,440 --> 00:32:36,280
Speaker 2: mean his targets aren't overwhelming. I feel like Josh Huff

707
00:32:36,320 --> 00:32:39,480
Speaker 2: and even Markith Bundy are both confident receivers that could

708
00:32:39,520 --> 00:32:42,360
Speaker 2: maybe go off, you know, in any random week. I'm

709
00:32:42,400 --> 00:32:45,240
Speaker 2: definitely fine investing in these number two number three guys.

710
00:32:45,280 --> 00:32:46,080
Speaker 2: Is that how you're feeling?

711
00:32:46,480 --> 00:32:50,160
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. So Bundy played the third most snaps last week,

712
00:32:50,600 --> 00:32:53,040
Speaker 1: but he drew eight targets. He's the eighteenth highest price

713
00:32:53,080 --> 00:32:56,040
Speaker 1: wide receiver. Huff, he actually let all the three receivers

714
00:32:56,040 --> 00:32:59,040
Speaker 1: and targets with ten. He's the ninth highest price wide receiver.

715
00:32:59,080 --> 00:33:02,200
Speaker 1: But he's also like very productive last week. So you know,

716
00:33:02,680 --> 00:33:04,040
Speaker 1: you can look at either of those guys. I think

717
00:33:04,080 --> 00:33:07,280
Speaker 1: they're both strongly in play bunde to better value. Maybe

718
00:33:07,360 --> 00:33:10,440
Speaker 1: Huff has more upside, but yeah, we're.

719
00:33:10,320 --> 00:33:12,640
Speaker 2: Assuming John Watford is going to play. But let's say

720
00:33:13,000 --> 00:33:15,480
Speaker 2: the back doesn't heal up. What do you think about

721
00:33:15,520 --> 00:33:18,160
Speaker 2: Trevor Knight Scott. I mean, the guy can run, he's

722
00:33:18,160 --> 00:33:20,320
Speaker 2: got a live arm. I know the live arms never

723
00:33:20,400 --> 00:33:23,360
Speaker 2: exactly completed too many of the passes, but I mean

724
00:33:23,400 --> 00:33:25,120
Speaker 2: he's got you know, we like to call a fantasy

725
00:33:25,160 --> 00:33:27,320
Speaker 2: friendly trades at least where he's down the run, he's

726
00:33:27,320 --> 00:33:29,360
Speaker 2: down to throw the ball deep. And in this case,

727
00:33:29,400 --> 00:33:31,120
Speaker 2: his price tag is certainly cheap enough.

728
00:33:31,600 --> 00:33:33,080
Speaker 1: Yeah, I hadn't even thought of that. I think that's

729
00:33:33,120 --> 00:33:36,280
Speaker 1: a really good idea. I don't think i'd go that route,

730
00:33:36,320 --> 00:33:40,200
Speaker 1: just because, like we've seen how bad you know, sixty

731
00:33:40,240 --> 00:33:42,800
Speaker 1: percent of the starting quarterbacks are in the AF so

732
00:33:42,960 --> 00:33:45,080
Speaker 1: like if he's a backup, yeah, I don't know.

733
00:33:45,560 --> 00:33:47,760
Speaker 3: True, that's scary, all right, so I think there are

734
00:33:48,440 --> 00:33:50,400
Speaker 3: a couple of things up for debate with this game.

735
00:33:50,520 --> 00:33:53,040
Speaker 3: One is, how do we even pronounce these guys' names,

736
00:33:53,080 --> 00:33:57,640
Speaker 3: because I think it's Seanta Jones and Malachi Jones. If

737
00:33:57,640 --> 00:34:00,560
Speaker 3: I had to bet, that's how I would bet. But

738
00:34:00,800 --> 00:34:03,920
Speaker 3: more importantly, this is the game on the week with

739
00:34:04,240 --> 00:34:08,279
Speaker 3: the highest over under. We are expecting Arizona to be

740
00:34:08,320 --> 00:34:12,240
Speaker 3: able to score points. Chantavious Jones does have a high

741
00:34:12,440 --> 00:34:16,000
Speaker 3: market share of air yards. He is getting targeted pretty heavily.

742
00:34:16,560 --> 00:34:19,560
Speaker 3: Is this a situation where we would consider game stacking

743
00:34:19,600 --> 00:34:22,360
Speaker 3: here and trying to load up and kind of be

744
00:34:23,000 --> 00:34:26,600
Speaker 3: contrarion in this situation by going with Atlanta but hoping

745
00:34:26,640 --> 00:34:29,040
Speaker 3: that someone on that side of the ball can get

746
00:34:29,040 --> 00:34:31,880
Speaker 3: a decent chunk of yards maybe a touchdown through the

747
00:34:31,920 --> 00:34:33,759
Speaker 3: air because they are going to have to throw.

748
00:34:34,160 --> 00:34:35,840
Speaker 2: I think if you're gonna do and I think you

749
00:34:35,920 --> 00:34:39,640
Speaker 2: got the pronunciation right, I think you're gonna go with Shantavious.

750
00:34:40,560 --> 00:34:42,080
Speaker 2: But other than him, I don't want anything to do

751
00:34:42,120 --> 00:34:44,640
Speaker 2: with this Atlanta offense. And that's just kind of the problem.

752
00:34:44,719 --> 00:34:46,799
Speaker 2: Like if you're doing a game stack and you get

753
00:34:46,800 --> 00:34:49,480
Speaker 2: an exposure to easily the league's worst offense, so I

754
00:34:49,520 --> 00:34:52,200
Speaker 2: just don't know if it's really worth it. I'm more

755
00:34:52,200 --> 00:34:54,719
Speaker 2: inclined just to take my chances with anyone. I count Arizona,

756
00:34:54,800 --> 00:34:58,040
Speaker 2: and I'd rather just piece someone out from like Orlando

757
00:34:58,120 --> 00:34:59,160
Speaker 2: on these better offenses.

758
00:34:59,400 --> 00:35:02,239
Speaker 3: Okay, so, Ian, you already said you are going to

759
00:35:02,280 --> 00:35:03,800
Speaker 3: be back in Arizona.

760
00:35:03,320 --> 00:35:06,080
Speaker 2: Here, that's right, thirteen and a half. But I don't know.

761
00:35:06,160 --> 00:35:08,520
Speaker 2: I feel like the biggest line of the week's usually

762
00:35:08,520 --> 00:35:10,960
Speaker 2: gotten up round fifteen or sixteen. So we're even getting

763
00:35:11,000 --> 00:35:13,560
Speaker 2: a couple extra points in normal But yep, give me

764
00:35:13,560 --> 00:35:15,480
Speaker 2: Wallford or give me a night, they're going to roll.

765
00:35:15,920 --> 00:35:19,360
Speaker 3: Yeah, I would agree. I'd say, if you like Arizona,

766
00:35:19,520 --> 00:35:22,200
Speaker 3: I think wait, I think the line will probably continue

767
00:35:22,200 --> 00:35:27,120
Speaker 3: to move here. Okay, from a fantasy kind of strategy perspective,

768
00:35:27,680 --> 00:35:31,440
Speaker 3: I'm curious, are you guys a little more interested in

769
00:35:31,760 --> 00:35:36,240
Speaker 3: Arizona or in Orlando kind of from a team stacking perspective,

770
00:35:36,239 --> 00:35:38,080
Speaker 3: because I think those are going to be the two

771
00:35:38,120 --> 00:35:41,520
Speaker 3: teams that people gravitate to the most, at least in

772
00:35:41,560 --> 00:35:44,839
Speaker 3: terms of the passing game. Where are you leaning on that?

773
00:35:45,000 --> 00:35:48,279
Speaker 2: Ian? Yeah, it seems like, especially for cash games, you

774
00:35:48,320 --> 00:35:50,040
Speaker 2: got to ask yourself if you want to pay up

775
00:35:50,040 --> 00:35:51,879
Speaker 2: for Garrett Gilbert or if you want to go down

776
00:35:52,000 --> 00:35:55,120
Speaker 2: in the Wallford Mettenburger range. I'm more inclined to pay

777
00:35:55,239 --> 00:35:57,239
Speaker 2: up this week. I think there's plenty of running backs

778
00:35:57,239 --> 00:35:59,480
Speaker 2: to kind of make it possible. So I'm taking now

779
00:35:59,600 --> 00:36:03,160
Speaker 2: Orlando route. If you get Gilbert, y'all get Tea Rich obviously,

780
00:36:03,400 --> 00:36:05,560
Speaker 2: So I think the kind of sacrifice you make if

781
00:36:05,600 --> 00:36:07,200
Speaker 2: you want to pay up there is you're gonna have

782
00:36:07,239 --> 00:36:10,839
Speaker 2: to pivot off your Gardner and your Charles Johnson pick

783
00:36:10,920 --> 00:36:13,919
Speaker 2: up Terrell Watson and Jaln Marshall instead. So I'm fine

784
00:36:13,960 --> 00:36:16,120
Speaker 2: with it. I don't think you're sacrificing many snaps as

785
00:36:16,120 --> 00:36:18,440
Speaker 2: Scott was saying earlier. I mean it's one of the

786
00:36:18,520 --> 00:36:20,920
Speaker 2: highest correlated things we can get. And then with guys

787
00:36:20,960 --> 00:36:24,440
Speaker 2: like Diannes Johnson Darrell Presley, feature backs a little bit cheaper,

788
00:36:25,040 --> 00:36:27,359
Speaker 2: you can just kind of plug in, you know, maybe

789
00:36:27,360 --> 00:36:30,000
Speaker 2: Trey Williams are a cheaper guy after So I think

790
00:36:30,000 --> 00:36:32,840
Speaker 2: there's enough high volume running backs this week that you

791
00:36:32,880 --> 00:36:33,880
Speaker 2: can pay up a quarterback.

792
00:36:34,360 --> 00:36:35,239
Speaker 3: Scott, what do you think?

793
00:36:35,840 --> 00:36:39,680
Speaker 1: Well, you know, I recommended not paying up at quarterback,

794
00:36:39,680 --> 00:36:42,920
Speaker 1: but I do think I like Orlando a little bit

795
00:36:42,960 --> 00:36:44,120
Speaker 1: more than Arizona this week.

796
00:36:44,520 --> 00:36:47,759
Speaker 3: Yeah for cash games, Scott, let's sick with you. Who

797
00:36:47,760 --> 00:36:50,239
Speaker 3: are some of the players that you are looking at?

798
00:36:50,680 --> 00:36:53,680
Speaker 1: So yeah, I said Zach Mettenberger. He said Trent Richardson,

799
00:36:54,520 --> 00:36:58,360
Speaker 1: I'm going to try and pay up for Rashon Ross McKay.

800
00:36:59,120 --> 00:37:02,120
Speaker 1: The problem is it it's really tough. So we didn't

801
00:37:02,160 --> 00:37:04,360
Speaker 1: talk about either of these guys. I really want to

802
00:37:04,400 --> 00:37:06,560
Speaker 1: hear Ian's opinion on this. I think there are two

803
00:37:06,680 --> 00:37:10,480
Speaker 1: tight ends who are very in play as values this

804
00:37:10,520 --> 00:37:15,319
Speaker 1: week and almost for really very low upside, but guaranteed

805
00:37:15,480 --> 00:37:18,840
Speaker 1: you know, snaps and targets. So Keith Tobridge is like

806
00:37:18,840 --> 00:37:21,960
Speaker 1: the fortieth highest price receiver. He played on a team

807
00:37:22,040 --> 00:37:25,200
Speaker 1: high fifty eight of sixty eight possible snaps last week.

808
00:37:25,480 --> 00:37:27,399
Speaker 1: It was almost double his total in the first two

809
00:37:27,400 --> 00:37:30,480
Speaker 1: weeks of the season. He had six targets, just caught

810
00:37:30,520 --> 00:37:34,280
Speaker 1: three for twenty one. And then there's Wes Saxton Junior,

811
00:37:34,600 --> 00:37:37,840
Speaker 1: thirty sixth highest priced receiver. He's another tight end, another

812
00:37:37,920 --> 00:37:41,520
Speaker 1: decent value. He had five targets last week, caught three

813
00:37:41,560 --> 00:37:45,480
Speaker 1: for twenty seven, another team high fifty six snaps of

814
00:37:45,520 --> 00:37:49,000
Speaker 1: sixty six, and that came after sitting out in week one.

815
00:37:49,040 --> 00:37:52,239
Speaker 1: In week two, both these guys should be starting in

816
00:37:52,320 --> 00:37:54,520
Speaker 1: Week four. I kind of don't want to play a

817
00:37:54,600 --> 00:37:56,640
Speaker 1: tight end when I could play a receiver. But these

818
00:37:56,680 --> 00:37:59,800
Speaker 1: guys do look like two of the best receiver values

819
00:37:59,800 --> 00:38:02,560
Speaker 1: this week, and there's a lot of expensive guys I

820
00:38:02,600 --> 00:38:03,319
Speaker 1: want to pay up for.

821
00:38:03,960 --> 00:38:06,520
Speaker 2: Yeah, No, I think I think you're right on there, Scott.

822
00:38:06,560 --> 00:38:09,000
Speaker 2: I'd be more willing to take my chances with West

823
00:38:09,000 --> 00:38:11,560
Speaker 2: Saxon between the two, just because you know, we were

824
00:38:11,560 --> 00:38:13,919
Speaker 2: talking about Birmingham, how it's just kind of a mess

825
00:38:13,920 --> 00:38:16,399
Speaker 2: behind Quentin Patten. We don't really know who the number

826
00:38:16,440 --> 00:38:18,719
Speaker 2: two option is, so it could be Saxon any give

827
00:38:18,760 --> 00:38:21,239
Speaker 2: him week and Towbridge. You know, again, I'm just trying

828
00:38:21,280 --> 00:38:24,399
Speaker 2: to stay away from the Atlanta offensive. Possible one other

829
00:38:24,440 --> 00:38:28,080
Speaker 2: tight end, Gavin Escobar has pretty consistently been a top

830
00:38:28,120 --> 00:38:31,360
Speaker 2: three option with Marts and San Diego. And you know,

831
00:38:31,440 --> 00:38:33,600
Speaker 2: we talked about Anthony Denham a little bit earlier too

832
00:38:33,640 --> 00:38:36,680
Speaker 2: with salt Lake some of the things he's done. But yeah,

833
00:38:36,719 --> 00:38:39,560
Speaker 2: I think in general, I just find myself strained from

834
00:38:39,600 --> 00:38:41,279
Speaker 2: the tight ends. I mean, when you can put a

835
00:38:41,360 --> 00:38:43,640
Speaker 2: running back or wide receiver in there, I think you

836
00:38:43,640 --> 00:38:45,680
Speaker 2: should do it some. You know, obviously some of these

837
00:38:45,719 --> 00:38:47,920
Speaker 2: tight ends are more or less slot receivers, but I

838
00:38:47,920 --> 00:38:50,279
Speaker 2: don't think we've really quite seen one that's more of

839
00:38:50,280 --> 00:38:55,240
Speaker 2: a glorified receiver so far, so I'll be staying away, Scott.

840
00:38:55,239 --> 00:38:58,399
Speaker 3: Are there any players for GPPs who kind of catch

841
00:38:58,440 --> 00:39:00,880
Speaker 3: your eye? Guys you think will be under owned, or

842
00:39:01,239 --> 00:39:04,920
Speaker 3: who offers some sort of like roster construction ability that

843
00:39:05,040 --> 00:39:07,520
Speaker 3: might result in a lineup being low owned.

844
00:39:08,440 --> 00:39:10,680
Speaker 1: You know, I think those hyper efficient running backs, those

845
00:39:10,680 --> 00:39:14,759
Speaker 1: are guys to play in GPPs. Gardner Johnson especially not

846
00:39:15,680 --> 00:39:18,919
Speaker 1: as strong in cash two punt plays. I didn't bring

847
00:39:19,040 --> 00:39:20,920
Speaker 1: up Ian. I needed to tell me if these are

848
00:39:21,000 --> 00:39:25,000
Speaker 1: terrible plays or just you know, thin plays. James Quick

849
00:39:25,040 --> 00:39:27,560
Speaker 1: he played on eight total snaps the first two weeks

850
00:39:27,560 --> 00:39:29,759
Speaker 1: of this season, but he played on thirty in week three.

851
00:39:30,280 --> 00:39:34,240
Speaker 1: He drew a week high twenty nine percent target market

852
00:39:34,239 --> 00:39:39,280
Speaker 1: share eight targets total, thirty sixth highest priced receiver. Still,

853
00:39:39,320 --> 00:39:43,560
Speaker 1: he ranked fourth on the team teams wide receivers and snaps,

854
00:39:44,160 --> 00:39:47,719
Speaker 1: and then Klin Clay. He was technically Salt Lakes wide

855
00:39:47,719 --> 00:39:50,799
Speaker 1: receiver five by snaps after being an active the first

856
00:39:50,840 --> 00:39:53,800
Speaker 1: two weeks, but He saw a team high seven targets

857
00:39:53,840 --> 00:39:56,919
Speaker 1: in Week three, zero air yardage on that, but caught

858
00:39:56,960 --> 00:39:59,759
Speaker 1: five passes for twenty seven yards. Either of those two

859
00:39:59,760 --> 00:40:01,480
Speaker 1: guys decent GPP plays for you.

860
00:40:02,360 --> 00:40:06,319
Speaker 2: The quick ones interesting just again on this Atlanta team.

861
00:40:06,360 --> 00:40:08,920
Speaker 2: A little worried about it. But when he's that cheap,

862
00:40:09,000 --> 00:40:10,680
Speaker 2: I mean, I don't see why not if you want

863
00:40:10,719 --> 00:40:12,840
Speaker 2: to throw him out there. I was looking at Richard

864
00:40:12,880 --> 00:40:15,720
Speaker 2: Mulaney and Amba at the Towe a little bit earlier

865
00:40:15,719 --> 00:40:17,200
Speaker 2: this week, but it looks like both of them are

866
00:40:17,239 --> 00:40:20,200
Speaker 2: going to be out again, So I'm kind of it's

867
00:40:20,200 --> 00:40:22,040
Speaker 2: a little bit dry this week. I feel like these

868
00:40:22,080 --> 00:40:24,000
Speaker 2: last few weeks, you know, we had Brian Brown, like

869
00:40:24,040 --> 00:40:26,319
Speaker 2: Week two or whatever, and someone else there's kind of

870
00:40:26,320 --> 00:40:30,200
Speaker 2: been a glaring starting receiver that's at the men price mark.

871
00:40:30,280 --> 00:40:32,799
Speaker 2: I don't think we really have one really there this week.

872
00:40:32,840 --> 00:40:35,279
Speaker 2: I do agree Kal and Clay looks like, I mean,

873
00:40:35,320 --> 00:40:38,040
Speaker 2: it's him, Kenny Bell and Pearson Ow are pretty much

874
00:40:38,040 --> 00:40:40,680
Speaker 2: their three wide receiver sets. It seems like. So yeah,

875
00:40:40,719 --> 00:40:42,640
Speaker 2: I mean, anytime you can get a guy that does

876
00:40:42,680 --> 00:40:46,120
Speaker 2: at least have some experience in the NFL, ross that

877
00:40:46,320 --> 00:40:48,960
Speaker 2: at least multiple evaluators have said, Okay, this guy's not

878
00:40:49,000 --> 00:40:51,000
Speaker 2: too bad. Fine taking a chance on him if the

879
00:40:51,040 --> 00:40:52,560
Speaker 2: price is right, Scott.

880
00:40:53,000 --> 00:40:55,320
Speaker 3: One more question here, What do you think is the

881
00:40:55,360 --> 00:40:58,200
Speaker 3: core decision that someone needs to make is kind of

882
00:40:58,200 --> 00:41:01,680
Speaker 3: like the first thing that they're siding when building their lineup.

883
00:41:01,719 --> 00:41:04,919
Speaker 1: This week, it's probably a quarterback question. We've been going

884
00:41:04,960 --> 00:41:07,120
Speaker 1: back and forth and it seems like we've narrowed it

885
00:41:07,160 --> 00:41:09,719
Speaker 1: down to Gilbert versus mettenberger Ian.

886
00:41:09,760 --> 00:41:10,440
Speaker 3: What do you think?

887
00:41:10,719 --> 00:41:12,520
Speaker 2: No, yeah, I think I thanks Scotch for right that

888
00:41:12,600 --> 00:41:16,239
Speaker 2: was you know, Fancy Labs breakdown will be out today

889
00:41:16,320 --> 00:41:18,960
Speaker 2: or tomorrow. But went for the cash game construction and

890
00:41:19,000 --> 00:41:20,839
Speaker 2: basically came down to do you want to pay up

891
00:41:20,920 --> 00:41:22,600
Speaker 2: or not? Because you know you're going to get your

892
00:41:22,600 --> 00:41:24,960
Speaker 2: Trent to retris in pretty much no matter what. But

893
00:41:25,440 --> 00:41:27,239
Speaker 2: if you pay down, you got a better chance I

894
00:41:27,360 --> 00:41:30,919
Speaker 2: kind of securing some volume, especially out wide receiver. But again,

895
00:41:30,960 --> 00:41:33,200
Speaker 2: I'm a little more inclined to pay up this week.

896
00:41:33,280 --> 00:41:36,719
Speaker 2: I mean, guys, Garrett Gilbert duel threat. He had a swaggy,

897
00:41:36,719 --> 00:41:40,279
Speaker 2: athletic like fifteen yeard touchdown run last week. I ain't

898
00:41:40,320 --> 00:41:43,920
Speaker 2: the guys easily the number one quarterback, and hey, if

899
00:41:44,000 --> 00:41:45,920
Speaker 2: Orlando is just going to keep running the tray on everyone.

900
00:41:45,920 --> 00:41:47,840
Speaker 2: I'm going to keep keep getting on them.

901
00:41:48,200 --> 00:41:51,279
Speaker 3: All right, Scott, what alliance pieces do you have coming

902
00:41:51,320 --> 00:41:51,920
Speaker 3: out this week?

903
00:41:52,719 --> 00:41:58,200
Speaker 1: My DFS Week for Advice article that dropped this.

904
00:41:58,239 --> 00:42:03,040
Speaker 3: Morning, Okay, and Ian, we published the Offensive Scouting Report

905
00:42:03,080 --> 00:42:06,160
Speaker 3: on Monday or Week four AAF rankings are out on

906
00:42:06,239 --> 00:42:08,920
Speaker 3: the site. You Sean Corner and I put out rankings

907
00:42:08,920 --> 00:42:11,319
Speaker 3: each week. And then what other pieces do you have

908
00:42:11,400 --> 00:42:14,000
Speaker 3: coming out this week at Action Network and Fantasy Labs.

909
00:42:14,280 --> 00:42:18,719
Speaker 2: Yeah, Fanball specific DFS breakdown should be out later this afternoon,

910
00:42:18,800 --> 00:42:21,879
Speaker 2: along with the Action Out of Ultimate Week four guide,

911
00:42:21,880 --> 00:42:23,799
Speaker 2: where I'll have, you know, try to keep track of

912
00:42:23,840 --> 00:42:26,439
Speaker 2: injuries and that kind of stuff along with everything else

913
00:42:26,440 --> 00:42:28,799
Speaker 2: you can imagine. So good stuff, guys. I'm happy we

914
00:42:28,840 --> 00:42:30,680
Speaker 2: made it to a week four. Things weren't looking all

915
00:42:30,680 --> 00:42:32,879
Speaker 2: that hot there for a minute, but we still got

916
00:42:32,880 --> 00:42:35,680
Speaker 2: football in February and March, and I love it all right.

917
00:42:35,719 --> 00:42:38,040
Speaker 3: That is going to do it for this episode of

918
00:42:38,040 --> 00:42:40,680
Speaker 3: the Action Network NFL podcast. Please rate and review the

919
00:42:40,719 --> 00:42:45,080
Speaker 3: show and iTunes, subscribe, unsubscribe, and resubscribe. Thanks to Scott

920
00:42:45,200 --> 00:42:46,960
Speaker 3: for being on the show. You can follow him on Twitter.

921
00:42:47,000 --> 00:42:50,120
Speaker 3: At Scott Barrett DFB. You can follow Ian and the

922
00:42:50,200 --> 00:42:52,560
Speaker 3: Action Network gap at. Iheartitz also used the app to

923
00:42:52,560 --> 00:42:54,920
Speaker 3: get real time odds and track your bets for free

924
00:42:55,040 --> 00:42:58,359
Speaker 3: for Scott and Ian I, Matthew Freeman, Mattethew orcle see

925
00:42:58,360 --> 00:43:10,840
Speaker 3: you again next episode