WEBVTT - Who Wants To Live Forever?

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Technology with text from dot com here and welcome to

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>text to Hi am your host John from Strickland and

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I'm known as strick or Baldy by my guest

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>host Josh Clark of Stuffy Chanel, j stri Jay Stretch.

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>That's true. How are you? Thank you for having me,

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for being on the show. And when I

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>asked Josh what he would like to cover when we

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>started talking about the possibility of doing another tech stuff together,

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you came up with a great suggestion, digital immortality. Digital immortality.

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have a feeling the title of this

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>episode will be who Wants to Live Forever? Right, because

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of Queen. Yeah, who wants to

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Live Forever? That came from the soundtrack to the hit

0:00:55.240 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>film Highlander. Oh cult classic. Did Queen do the whole check?

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>They did Highlander and Flash Gordon? They did. I did

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>not know Highlander and I saw Highlander the other day

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, not, hold up, No, the movie

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>is one of those that I wish we could just

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>wipe from history and redo because the concept is amazing. Yeah,

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but that's not what we're gonna talk about. Although there

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>are immortals in Highlander, yeah, yeah, there are. Yeah, I

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>mean that's the that's the connection, right, I guess so

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>or Queen your love of Queen in Queen doing the

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Highlander sound check. The mortality. Yeah, it's ultimately it all

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>goes back to uh tesla. No, we're gonna be talking

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>about digital immortality, this concept of using technology to extend

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:48.559
<v Speaker 1>our lifespans indefinitely. Yeah, immortality. Yeah, to the point where

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially until the sun burns out right and the great

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>heat death of the universe. Yeah, I mean yeah, because

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you could in theory, if you were had digital immortality,

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing stopping you from hopping on a spaceship and

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>high tailing it somewhere else, or being transmitted it near

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light. Yep. Yeah, you could be beamed

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>from one point to another and sure if you I

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>wonder what that experience would be like. Well, maybe that

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it's that's the future of space travel. Physical space travel

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is as digital beings, rather than maybe that's the while

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>we keep banging up against is the physical limitations, and

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>then that will finally unbridle us and allow us to

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>really do like interstellar travel, intergalactic travel, though presumably you

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>would have to have something you're beaming into well you

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>just purely digital, then you have to have something to

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>house that information. I mean, I guess you could just

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>be literally just information beaming around, but I don't know how.

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what that experience would be, like I wanted

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to be like going to sleep. Think about a laser.

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>The laser doesn't have any sort of infrastructure, and you're

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>trans meeting light information from one place to another at

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light. Right, Well, what if we figured

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>out a way to digitize ourselves, as we'll talk about um,

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and we were able to beat ourselves in much the

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>same way that a laser beams light. Right, But the

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>question is then, because if we are digitizing ourselves, we're

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>usually talking about that with the understanding that that digital

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>information rests on top of some physical architecture. Right, just

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>as software needs hardware to run off of, Right, you

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>need like fiber optics. Now, yeah, I'm saying, what if

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you remove that, you figure out a way to remove it,

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>then there's no leye. If you can get to a

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>point where we become pure information and there is no

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>need for physical infrastructure beneath that, then we're golden. There's

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>no limit. Then I guess we would need some sort

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of receptacle to beam into even on the end, even

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>if we don't have something connecting the two points that

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're just gonna send someone ahead like all right, dull,

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it's your job to set up all these these CPU talents, Bill,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>do not let us down. Make sure they're all plugged in,

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and please use one of those uninterrupted power supplies because

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>if if there's a blackout, we don't want you know,

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we lost Lucy, and then make it over. Please don't

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>smoke while you're setting them up, Bill, because we could

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>smell it last time. It's dunk up the whole place,

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>right right. So to get down to what we're actually

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you probably picked up on this. The idea

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of digital immortality largely revolves around this concept of somehow

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>transferring human consciousness and experience into a digital format. Usually

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the way we describe it as uploading your brain into

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a computer. That's kind of the easiest way to explain it.

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of really smart people who

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>have been talking about this possibility beyond saying it's hypothetical,

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>saying it will be possible or it will happen. A

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people strut around like they're just cock of

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the walks. They and it's gonna happen. And some sometimes

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they even put like dat on things like this, Oh

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>ye know the guy we got to talk about to

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>be at least ray Kurt's watch. Kurtzwile Uh famous for

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>his futurism predictions, including the idea that we will reach

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>what is called the singularity. There's the point at which

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>technology is evolving so quickly that there is no meaningful

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>way to describe the present because it's changing that fast

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and in the way I always think about singularities. Usually

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it's also the moment where UM one of two things

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>has just happened. Either UM in AI has awakened and

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>become conscious right and therefore we it is now the

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>master of the universe as far as we're concerned, or

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>we it's the moment we merge biology merges with technology

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>at a point where we're able to UM remove ourselves

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the limitations of evolution and chart our own courts from

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that point on. Yeah, that's that's pretty accurate. I would

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>argue that there's also there's the possibility of developing UM

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>technology that allows us to genetically alter ourselves without having

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>to directly incorporate like computers or electronics into our systems.

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>That also can be It's transhumanism, is what we're talking

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>about here. We're like right there. Yeah, we're already kind

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>of happening, like very crudely, but it's we're like right there.

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>As far as that last definition, yeah, yeah, we're there. Well,

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 1>even with the incorporation of technology, we're getting there. You

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>look at things like cochlear implants, and while this is

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>this technology is specifically meant to give people who have

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>either lost or never developed a particular uh sense or

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe some other form of neurological process. Uh you know,

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's meant to address that. In the future,

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it could be meant to augment, not just to to

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>repair damage or to address a loss of something. Right, Like,

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the defining characteristic of trans humanism is that, um, you

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want a blade prosthetic leg because the one you

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>were born with was removed. You want to blade prosthetic

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>leg because you want to be able to run faster.

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not to it's not to make up for a loss.

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.679
<v Speaker 1>It's to further, right, it's to go to the next

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>step exactly. So, Uh, this this singularity idea is very

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>closely related to digital immortality, and largely because of Ray Kurtzwild, because,

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, I think it's fair to say

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Ray Kurtzwild has an issue with the concept of mortality. Yeah,

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering, like, I don't know that much about Kurtzwild.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm slightly familiar, but you clearly know a

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>lot more about him than I do. And I was

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>wondering if he is a like a fretful Annie, Like

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>does he constantly worry about misstepping and dying? You know,

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>people dying really weird, random mundane ways every day. And

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if he just lives in literal mortal fear

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:18.679
<v Speaker 1>of that. Well, he he is certainly taking great precautions

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to extend his life because he does believe firmly that

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we will reach this point in which technology will allow

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>us to extend our lifespans indefinitely within his lifetime if

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>he takes care of himself, so he he is determined,

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't. I mean, you would kind of feel like

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a like a dufus if you, you know, if you

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>were capable of feeling if you died the day before

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>they invented digital immortality. Right, it's the like the last

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>guy to die in a war right after like right

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>before there? Right, Yeah, there's a there's a great um.

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen there's a British sketch comedy show

0:08:57.720 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>called that Mitchell and Webb. Look, have you ever seen?

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>You've told me about it though, Yeah, it's it's a

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>two comedians, uh, David Mitchell and Robert Webb who do

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>this series. And one of the ones they they have

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>is it's just supposed to be off the cuff conversation

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>between the two so it's not in the context of

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a sketch, so basically like what we're doing kind of

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing now, except it's obviously scripted and ours

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>is not. But in that case, they have a conversation

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>where David Mitchell is very upset with the thought that

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 1>his generation is going to be the last generation to die,

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and he is spiteful of the of the next generation.

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>He's mad at them for being able to live forever

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>while he has to die. Robert Webb is like, you

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>could just be happy for them, and there's no same

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing I think with Kurt Swile is that

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>he's um taking great pains to take care of himself.

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>He's advocate for a healthy diet and exercise, which is fantastic.

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>He takes something like a hundred and fifty dietary supplements.

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have to correct you, and this is

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>from the article that you two's constantly taking pill you know. Yeah,

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so that's uh. And and there there are plenty of

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>studies that have suggested that unless you are suffering a

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:18.719
<v Speaker 1>deficiency of some sort, these supplements are not actually helpful. Well, um,

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like um, vitamin A. I believe vitamin

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>A H is known to help you see better. Pretty sure,

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's vitamin A UM. And it's been shown that if

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you're especially like night vision is a little deficient, that

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>if you eat some carrots your night vision will improve.

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So carrots do help you, But if it's already up

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.239
<v Speaker 1>to whatever your baseline night vision level is, you can't

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>all the carrots in the world and it's not going

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>to help it. As a matter of fact, you will turn.

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>My wife turned a little orange because she like carrots

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>so much when she was a kid. So, but she

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>couldn't see any better beyond her baseline night vision level.

0:10:58.440 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's the same thing as what you're

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>same thing with vitamin C. Right, once you hit a

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>certain level of vitamin C. Anything beyond that you're such

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is just going to pee away. And in fact, vitamins

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>can become toxic. Much of anything is is toxic to

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the human body because it speaks homeostasis. Right, So I'm

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>wondering if kurts, well, surely he's smart enough to know, like,

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should cut this one out, or maybe I'm

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>taking too much of this. Well, it's also possible that

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the reported number of supplements that he takes has been

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, exaggerated, as it's been reported over and over again.

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>I am personally a little skeptical that he takes that many,

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, the whole point is that he

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>wants to make certain to live long enough to see

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the day when his prediction comes true, that that we

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>will have the technological ability to port a person's mind

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>into some kind of electronic construct. May I point the

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>thing out I have, just while you were speaking, pulled

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 1>out my calculator and Ray Chritswell takes a pill every

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 1>five point seven six minutes a day, assuming he stays

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>up all twenty four hours in a day, assuming again

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that that number is in fact accurate, that the number

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of supplements, not that I completely trust your math. Let's

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about some of the concepts here

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>about how this could in theory happen. Now, obviously, we

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are not at the point where we can create any

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of hardware and or software that would allow us

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to to migrate and intelligence from our meaty brains, right,

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's a huge problem what you've just said, we're

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we are dealing in something called software hardware, when what

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the substrate that our our brains and consciousness exists on

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is what you would term wetware biological material, and where

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily analogous to a computer. Even though people

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and to think of the brain is such, that doesn't

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>mean that it is the same thing. That's absolutely correct.

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's let's take memory for an example. Memory

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is a great way to illustrate the difference between a

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>computer system and the brain. All right, So in a

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>computer system, you end up designating a certain space on

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>some medium, like on magnetic tape or in certain you know,

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it all depends on whatever the form is that you're

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>saving it too, But at any rate, it all ends

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>up being zeros and ones, and it is unaltered. If

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you call up a file and you know you haven't

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>done anything to it since the last time you looked

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>at it's going to be exactly the same there, unless

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>there's some sort of corruption in the file or you

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>have made changes to it and then saved it again.

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>You're not you know, it's gonna be the same experience

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>every time. Human memory totally different a memory is, and

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we only sort of understand memory. Uh, we don't have

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a full grasp on how memory works. But based upon

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>what we do know, when you experience something, your brain

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.359
<v Speaker 1>creates a certain neural pathway in response to the stimuli

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 1>you are experiencing. So, for example, right here in this room,

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>my brain is thin hair. Your hair, the heat in

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>this room, the light in this room, little things, and

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not noticing everything. My hair look pretty good, isn't it.

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You can start contrast with all the rest of the

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>experiences is amazing hair. So the these these pathways are

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>forming in my brain. Later on, assuming that I have

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>converted this particular experience to long term memory, which is

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big assumption. Honestly, I can't remember what a

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>podcasted about two weeks ago. Yeah, I think my hair

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to make it into your long term memory.

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>The more you say it, the more likely it's going

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to happen. When when I think back on it, my

0:14:55.520 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>brain will reconstruct that same pathway. So the memory is

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially representative and the physical relationship between the various synapses

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that light up when I have this experience. Right, So

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>there is a physical pathway that is retraced when you recall. Right,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's not like your memory of how great my

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>hair looks is sitting in one little spot of your

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>brain like it would be on a computer's magnetic tape.

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>It's distributed, and it's faulty because when I remember the

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>process of remembering, sometimes that that pathway doesn't form exactly

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the way it did, and sometimes it adds new stuff

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly I might fill in some gaps. Like imagine if

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you opened a power point presentation that you've made and uh,

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>there are a few slides missing, but then there's some

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>new stuff and maybe it was a little bit better

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>than before. But you haven't done anything. Don't remember this transition,

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>but all right, we'll go with it. Just the very

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>act of retrieving it from your computer's memory and opening

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it again changes it. Right. That doesn't happen computer, but

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't human memories, right, thing, right exactly. That is

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I'm saying. And the reason why I say

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it is that that's a problem because if we are

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>ever to move from wetware in center brains to hardware

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and software in the digital realm, unless we factor that

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>in somehow, like we create an algorithm that mimics the

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>experience of remembering something, the experience is going to be

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally different. The experience of remembering will be totally different.

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one of the reasons why I very much

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>argue against eyewitness testimony for things, especially for crimes that

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>might have happened a long time in the past, is

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that our memories are faulty. Now, if we were in

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>this other experience where we had moved to hardware and

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>software and our memories were more analogous to computer memory,

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that would not be an issue. Perfect. So, but that's

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a that's't just one illustration of how this is a

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>tricky thing. It is tricky. And you say that, you know,

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>comparatively speaking, it sounded like your take on it was

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that human memory is faulty compared to computer memory. I

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I would positive that there's also another way to look

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>at it, that um, human memory is much more robust

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and rich than computer memory because think about it, when

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you say, smell something for the first time, and then

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>you smell it again and again, that that memory of

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>what something smells like is going to become more detailed.

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be more to it, it will become

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>more refined, and it will be totally different from that

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>first sent memory that you created of whatever it was

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you smelled. And so I would pose it again. Sorry

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to use that word twice, but it makes me sound

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty smart when I do um that that additional adding

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.959
<v Speaker 1>new material, adding new stuff to it when you recall

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>things or when you experience something. The ability to make

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>your memory more robust and more rich and and to

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to refine it just through recall, to me,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is superior to just straight here's the information that a

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:12.239
<v Speaker 1>computer will give you, and it should be exactly what

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you have before. And also with memories, we can associate

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff that previously was not connected in our brains, whereas

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>with computers, the way you do that as through meta data.

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>You tag stuff. Right, you're like, Okay, well, let's tag

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this piece of information with all the metadata we can

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>think of that that that describes what this information is

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>really about. And then if I want to associate things,

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I have to look for similar tags like but but

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in my brain, it doesn't automatically, and it does it

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in ways that you cannot necessarily anticipate, which can lead

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to things like innovation, creativity. Yes, precisely, and you also

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of hinted at something that's the big problem facing

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea of uploading ourselves onto the internet strick. It

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:02.959
<v Speaker 1>is that with with men, we can figure out memory.

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Will will eventually figure out how human memory works exactly.

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's what There's a philosopher called David Chalmers. That's

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>what he's pointed out as the easy problem of consciousness.

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>We understand, we're going to understand how the mind functions.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometime down the road. We will figure that out. There's

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a hard problem is what what Chalmers has also pointed

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>out in figuring out how phenomenal experience, our experience of

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 1>reality is produced from those processes. That that is the

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>big issue that is facing us trying to upload ourselves

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>onto the internet. It's like when you talked about meta.

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>The computer is not writing meta itself. It might be

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>able to simulate memory retrieval in its own way, but

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not writing its own tags. It's not making these connections.

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>It takes a human consciousness to do that. And not

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>only do we not know how to make a computer

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>simulate that, we don't even know how we do that, right,

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we may never know. There's a lot of philosophers out

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there there like, we may never figure out the hard

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>problem of consciousness. Uh. Neuroscientists would say that clearly the mind,

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>which is what we could probably you know, use as

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>an umbrella term for things like consciousness and experience and

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and the kind of stuff that that emerges from

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the physical construct of the brain, because you can you

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>can observe changes to the mind when someone suffers an

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>illness or injury that damages the brain. And therefore it

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>stands to reason that the mind in fact is a

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>product of the brain. So if you could figure out

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>how to simulate a brain to a significant level of sophistication,

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>hypothetically you could have intelligence emerge naturally from that simulation, hypothetically,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>hypothe Because we can't do it yet, the best we

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>can do right now is to simulate a few thousand neurons,

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>but there are know, we're talking about billions of neurons

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and synapsis in the human brain. Yeah, from what I saw,

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the low but average estimate is something like EIGHTI six billion,

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and the normal human brain I'm sorry, not synatha's neuron,

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's trillions of synantha. Right, So it's it's incredibly complicated,

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, there's some people who suggest that it

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>may be to truly simulate a human brain, you may

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>have to go down to the molecular level, at which

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>point the computational requirements for simulating that brain are going

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to be so vast as to be impractical or impossible

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to achieve. Well, you mentioned the Blue Brain project in

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>this article that you wrote, um, and I was just

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of skimming their website and they mentioned that in

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>their simulations it requires about a laptops worth of computing power.

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>They didn't say what kind of RAM or hard drive

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>for storage or anything it has. They just used a

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>laptops worths You can kind of let your imagination from

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>on with it, but that that was required just for

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:04.199
<v Speaker 1>one individual neuron to power. Yes, we're talking about billion laptops,

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>which is that's you know, should be great news for

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the exactly any hardware manufacturers out there. Um, there are

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>actually quite a few different uh projects out there that

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>are attempting to simulate brains for one reason or another,

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily so that we can pourt consciousness to them,

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>but also to just study things like, uh, you know,

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>how our brains work, how we might be able to

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>treat brain damage or illnesses that that damage the brain.

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>That how how certain medications might react to our brains.

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Building these very complex simulations, so some of them. M I.

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>T has a course on the emergent science of connect tomics.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that lately too. It sounds so full of bs,

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but apparently it's it's a real deal and and once

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you look into it, that makes total the terrible name.

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Connectomics is all about the connections that happen within the brain.

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And yeah it does. Connectomics sounds like it's some sort

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of weird economics course or like maybe an l. Around

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Hubbard book. Yeah, like Dinetics part two. Connectomics. Yeah, So

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that's an example. There's the US Brain Project, there's an

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>EU Brain project, there's the Google project. Yes, and there's

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the Google Brain project. They hired Ray Kurtzwile. Yeah, he's

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>their chief engineer, director of engineering. Yeah, for for specifically

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Google Brain project. They I mean, clearly Google

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>has just put their cars in the table. They're like,

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>we're putting some serious resources behind figuring out how to

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>get people on to digital consciousness. Right. It's it's one

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>thing to think about this kind of you know, armchair

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>computer scientists neuroscientists sort of approach, but they're really putting

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>actual money towards research and development and on this stuff,

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>including hiring another guy named Jeff Hinton who is a

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>British computer scientist who who specializes in neural networks. So

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at using neural networks for lots of stuff,

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>not just to simulate a human brain. I mean that

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.239
<v Speaker 1>might be part of it too, but neural networks can

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>be really useful for processing different types of information for

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of applications, right true. And also, I mean,

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, just figuring out some of

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the efficiencies that the human brain is evolved to include

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>as far as networking goes, if you could just even

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>get some insider inspiration from that, that could help tremendously. Yeah, absolutely.

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>There's some other great things I can mention. There's um

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Ted Burger, who is a professor at the University of

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Southern California's Center for neuro Engineering, who built a prosthetic

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of the hippocampus. Now, the hippocampus is uh, hippocampuses is large. Yeah,

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is lar argually associated with the formation of memories, also

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>with incorporation of emotion. But memory is a big part

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>of what hippocampus is involved in. So I think it

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>also um takes in century information, determines what region it

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>should be transmitted to, if it should go into long

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>term memory or that kind of stuff. It's kind of

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>like a big deal, big engineer in this case. And

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so in two thousand eleven came up with a proof

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of concept hippocampal prosthesis and tested it in live rats.

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand twelve tested it in non human primates,

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and supposedly sometime this year they're going to test it

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in people. Man, that is amazing. So like, if you

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of damage to your hippocampus and you're

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>no longer able to form memories, then this would be

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing for you. Kind of yeah, I mean, this

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>could end up being depending upon the nature of of

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>the the problem. I mean, it could potentially be a

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>treatment for things like Alzheimer's. Um Whether or not that

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>turns out to be the case, we'll still have to

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>wait and see, but it is very promising. Have you

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>ever heard of Henry Mollison. He is like one of

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the one of the more facing, one of the more

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>famous patients, or to save time, you could just say

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the more faiths um in as far as

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>memory studies go, because he had some he had I

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>believe epilepsy, and some old timey doctor gave him some

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 1>brain surgery and messed up his his hippocampus and the

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>guy was unable to form new memories from that point on.

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>He could remember everything up to that point under the surgery.

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Then after that it was almost like his brain refreshed

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>every I think something like thirty seconds. And he was

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>just lived in an institution and was fortunately taken care

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of by a few doctors that like really studied him

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but also like really kept him from the public limelight.

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>His name wasn't published in the life he died, but

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>he yielded a lot of information about how memories are

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>formed thanks to the hippocampus. But it sounds like he

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>would have been a great candidate for that. Yeah, I'm

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>reminded of and I have to trust other people's uh

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>details of this, because I have no memory of it.

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I had There was a time where I had a

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>kidney stone. It was so bad that I had to

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>go to the hospital and they treat me with a

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>very powerful pain killer that just knocked your hipocampus out

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 1>of a convention, I couldn't remember things. I had no

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>short term memory. Well, it makes sense. Like also, when

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.239
<v Speaker 1>you're drinking, um, your hippocampal function is is messed with

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>your You are not forming new memories, and you require

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.959
<v Speaker 1>the hippocampus do this. So if you're doing something, if

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>you're on drugs, if you have some sort of structural damage,

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>if you have been drinking, like that's why you're you're

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>not forming new memories. That accounts for a blackout, that

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>accounts for amnesia. Your hippocampus is just not functioning properly exactly. Uh.

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>There's another expert I want to mention, Enders Sandberg of

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford Universe. I am

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge fan of that institute. Yeah, yeah, one of

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>my favorite people in the world works. There's names Nis. Yeah,

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I know of Nick Bostrom. So Sandberg had said this

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is a quote. The point of brain emulation is to

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>recreate the function of the original brain. So this is

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about actually creating a copy of a of a

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>person's brain, not just the concept in general, but in

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the specific case of this person's brain. We're going to

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>recreate it digitally. If run, it will be able to

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>think and act as the original brain. We are now

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>able to take small brain tissue samples and map them

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in three D. These are at exquisite resolution, but the

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>blocks are just a few microns across. We can run

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>simulations of the size of a mouse brain on supercomputers,

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but we do not have the total connectivity yet. As

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>methods improve, I expect to see automatic conversion of scanned

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>tissue into models that can be run. The different parts exist,

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>but so far there is no pipeline from brains to emulations.

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Now he thinks that it may be very difficult to

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>ever simulate memory in a computer the way that humans do,

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>for the very reasons we mentioned earlier. Um He also

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>points out that there is a problem with this particular

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>approach as the scanning essentially damages or destroys the brain

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>tissue because there's not a non invasive way. It's like

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Heiberg all over again. Huh. You gotta pretty much crack

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the nogg and open and mush around in the gray

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff to find out, you know, to really scan it

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and get that resolution. This this scanning would either kill

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you or you need a freshly dead person, in which

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.719
<v Speaker 1>case there's no longer consciousness right right, exactly A big

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>so you could make You can make a copy of

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a dead brain, which, as you point out, not really

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that useful. Or you could make a copy of a

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>living brain, but in the process you kill the living brain.

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>You are left with the copy. Now, theoretically, this copy

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>would think and react in a way that would be

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly the way the original person thought and reacted, but

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the original person still dead. So, Josh, if you had

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>this done, there would be a Josh computer Josh Bought

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and Josh Bought would think like you, would

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>have quips like you, better hair, with even better hair

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>than you, and feel somewhat smug about it. Meanwhile, Josh Clark,

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the human being would be no more. And this comes

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to another big problem in the concept of digital immortality,

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>which is continuity. Sure, so continuity being the continuous experience

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of you as Josh Clark, whether you are in your

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>meat body or poured it over to some digital format.

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's that big of a problem. Really,

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>think a man every day there we we have gaps

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>in continuity. We go to sleep and then we wake up.

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>But you're talking about functional continuity. There's also a physical continuity,

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and there's the real problem. So functional continuity is exactly

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about. It's our our experience that we

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>are having, and it does have interruptions, whether it's when

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we go to sleep or we are put under for

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly all of that. It could end up being a

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:39.959
<v Speaker 1>break in our functional continuity. We can recover from that

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>because the physical continuity, the stuff that's in our brains,

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is still there, so that even though we have that reset,

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we can come back and everything will be fine. If

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the physical continuity is destroyed, as in the actual brain dies,

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>then you have a problem. Now. An interesting thing is

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that I've looked at some neuroscientists uh and their work

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and what they have to say about this, and it

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting to me. There's a guy named Stephen Novella.

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a neuroscientist, works at Yale. He has a great

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast called Skeptics Guide to the Universe UM, and he

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is a critical thinker and a skeptic. Uh. He has

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about this as well. He's blogged about

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it and his idea or his perspective. The way he

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>communicates it is that as humans, we have brains that

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are divided into two hemispheres. Now, through drugs or through surgery,

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you can have one of those hemispheres separated from the other.

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>It essentially is rendered inactive. But the two hemispheres are

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>largely copies of each other. So even if this does happen,

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you can have a relatively normal experience. You might have

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>find that some things are now very hard to do,

0:32:55.120 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>like math if your colossum isn't there exactly. Yeah, so

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>he says, but these two halves, which individually can act

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>as a single brain, work together, and we have you know,

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>even if you have the one shut down, the other

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>one can continue to work. You're still you, largely you.

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So he says, what if we then extend this and

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we make the assumption that yes, we have created the

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>hardware and software that will allow for the simulation of

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a brain in in some way we connect that to

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a person's brain so that it becomes an extension. It's

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>another part of the brain, kind of like a third hemisphere.

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess. And and so this one is starting to

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>form pathways that mimic what your brain does naturally, so

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>over time it helps you think the way you think already.

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>It also starts to build in redundant memories, so it's

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially backing up your memories. And gradually it's going to

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>act like it another hemisphere of your brain. And it

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>could even be more powerful. Potentially, you could do things

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>like include algorithms that like make it way easier for

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 1>you to do math. You'd be a math genius. I

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>would hope that if I were uploaded on the internet,

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>my math skills would just automatically improve. I would expect that. Yeah,

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>there's certain little like base assumptions you want to make, right,

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that's one of them. It would be it would be

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>funny to be digitally immortal, but crap at math. So

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess you get made fun of by all the

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>other digital immortals. Very likely, you know, the Kurgan is

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just taunting you before cutting off your digital head. Uh So,

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the his point being that over time you would be

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>relying more heavily on the AI version of your brain,

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that even while your meat brain goes to sleep, your

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 1>AI brain could stay awake so that you know, you

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you as you could remain active all day long because

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's it's your organic brain that's sleeping.

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>But your AI brain takes over, and it could get

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to a point where you don't even really notice that

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>part of you as asleep, and you could theorectly reach

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a point where your AI brain is doing the vast

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>majority of the work, so that the time when your

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>organic brain dies is a non event to you. Okay, so,

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I could see the AI brain becoming

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>very resentful of the organic brain right having to do

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>all the work while it just lays around and sleeps. Right,

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that the left brain gets mad at

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the right brain. Mind us, they're always arguing they're at

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>odds they're doing it right now. Hey, guys, Josh and

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I had so much to say about this topic that

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it turned out it was long enough to be two episodes,

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>not just one episode. So we're going to stop things

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>right here. You can find Josh's work at Stuff you

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Should Know, including the website podcast. They do live events,

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>so check that out. And if you guys have suggestions

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>for me, whether it's a particular type of technology you

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>want me to cover, or to do a profile on

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a person or a company, or even just a suggestion

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>for another guest host or interview, let me know. Send

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>me a message that addresses tech stuff at how stuff

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>works dot com or drop me a line on Twitter,

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Tumbler or Facebook to handle it. All three is tech

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff hs W and I'll talk to you again really

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:41.280
<v Speaker 1>soon for more on this and bathens of other topic,

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:51.840
<v Speaker 1>is it housefs dot com