WEBVTT - Surveillance: Oil Prices Boost Consumer Spending, Swonk Says

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yea. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Why

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>don't you bring in Stephen Whiting, he of the great

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>linkage of economics into the decisions to invest, joining us

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>from City Group, the global chief investment strategist. Good morning

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to stay. Great to have me with what a rapid

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>move we've had, incruded, a huge move from north to

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>seventy five dollars to fifty two in a matter of weeks,

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>not months. Steve, Tom and I was saying that when

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>things move this quick, other things break. What breaks, No,

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you can see that's indeed the fact that

0:00:55.800 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>cross market volatility, there's an impact here asset classes. Correlation

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>between volatile moves, you know, tends to be a bit contagious. UM,

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you can see it with a bit of credit. As

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier, Um, the high yield sector in the

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>United States is fi UM energy related. At this point,

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that's still you know, a much higher share than in

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the equity market. But broadly speaking, when you take a

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>look at um rising credit spreads, it's going to have

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>some impact on how much of a hurdle you think

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>about the great hurdle will need to be in terms

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of equities. UM. So there's just a lot of this

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of rapid movement again by itself creates a bit

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of concern in markets. UM. Ultimately, you know the question,

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>as you just said earlier, is any of its fundamental?

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I think a good deal of it is is politics

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and policy. Uh. But when you move away from all

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of that, you'll settle down eventually. So how do you

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>position for two thousand nineteen? I mean, take a blended

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>city group of proach, you get to bias leftan equities

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>at more on oil, your other great cheen Catherine Man

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and others. I mean, how do you position and set

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>up for two thousand? Well, for US, UM, it'll have

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with I think Barbels uh and

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the sense that for our private bank client portfolios, you know,

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we still have a one percent underweight and global fixed income,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>but we have a very large overweight and US short

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>term fixed income high quality benchmark to essentially the short

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>end that is controlled by the FED, which has moved

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>up a great deal, the flattening of the yield curve.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Higher quality products, some lower quality products, but bear very much.

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The front end of the yield curve is a large overweight.

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Now there's still portfolio room when you have, you know,

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>incredibly low yields across most of the developed world. There

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is some room to take some risk uh in many

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>international equities. But we have moved up in quality. For example,

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we've taken down small cap US to to an underweight

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in this cycle, and we still

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.399
<v Speaker 1>think that we will have before this is all over,

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a recovery on growth expectations. We don't think two thousand

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen marks a down year for the US or the

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world, but it's one where we're going

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to play it a bit more cautious. This laid into

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a fit tightening cycle. Well, let's pick out Germany as

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>one country, one country that's actually posted quarterly contraction for

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Steve, do you see that as temporary, something

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is short term and something we bounced back at off

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>I do very much. And look, I think a particular

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 1>quarterly down move in one ear a zone country does

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>not tell me that we're back into the soup again. Um.

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are other larger issues, uh, the death,

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>sustainability in Italy, how Brexit will work out between the

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>continent and uh the UK, these sorts of issues, you know,

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>But a bit of a production weakness uh in Germany

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>over one quarterly period is not going to sort of

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>revise our our whole view of the region. Steve, the

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>market smelling something in Europe and it doesn't smell good.

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>You're a dollar you're really soft once again today. Buttons

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>receiving a bit through much of this year. I mean

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the gentleman Tenia yeld is going to finish south of

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>where it started the year. That's not a market that

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>smells a rebound, is it. Well, it's one where the

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>ECB again is further along to not helping where it's

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>been a huge assist along the way. We came into

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the year with forecasts for years on growth, talking about boom,

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's been a terrible, terrible adjustment right uh to

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>get us to where we are now, which is growth

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in the region as a whole um is right around

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>trend and that's where I think the exaggerations comm into play.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>That there are particular policy concerns that you have to

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>be worried about with the region, But that's not a

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>reason for us to say we want to take a

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>look at the highest quality European companies and say, well,

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>let's throw them out. Steve, how do you respond to

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>consensus which is a single digit consensus wrapped around some

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>level of gloom, some level of doom? I mean, does

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that set us up once again for double digit returns

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>surpri eyes in November of two thousand nineteen. Well, look,

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I do think that it is very interesting that the

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>possibilities like we have seen right in early two thousand seventeen,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're going to be in deep, deep trouble.

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>The dollar is going to go through the roof, and

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly you find things go the other way. We

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>have been building up a good deal of pessimism. Evaluation

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>across world equity markets is down about fifteen percent this year.

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>That's rising earnings and pessimism. Um. Yet, I don't want

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>to at this point in the cycle when we're talking

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>about you know, rate hike nine coming up, and I

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 1>don't care if you know some news stops the FED

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>from hiking as much as people think, you know, we

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>still have to deal with that news that when we're

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this deep into a tightening cycle, we still want higher

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>quality portfolios. But I think that the performance of markets again,

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>we could be setting up very much for a contrarian rebound. Well,

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Steve Whiting, thank you so much for setting us up,

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and again we'll get a lot more into this with

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a view forward in two thousand nine. Team after what

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>appears to be a single digital for Lucky two thousand eighteen,

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>John Levy with this here very quickly here as we

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>look at Amazon h Q two and he is the

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>one to speak to John Leving out of Richmond and

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>with a real nod of commercial real estate, John, I

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>want to go over tech zone benefits or you know,

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>just a simple taxation of these transaction a grizzled pro

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>like you. Does that pay off for the city, Does

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it pay off for the company, or does it payoff

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for both? Well, it certainly pays off of the company,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>because they're getting huge benefits depending on where they're located. Interestingly,

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Tommy and Long Island City, they're getting paid approximately sixties

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>some thousand dollars per job in the Crystal City or

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the Virginia location, it's a third of that, only twenty

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand. And if you're in Nashville, you're virtually not

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>paying at all. It's less than five thousand. So tremendous

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>number of jobs coming twenty five thousand to Long Island, Virginia,

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in another five thousand to Nashville. Um. So it certainly

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>pays off for for the company. UM and I think,

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, let's it do it a commercial real estate

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>just in the time we have today. I want you

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to speak to commercial real estate developers in Brooklyn or

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Crystal City. Do they win? Yeah, they do, especially in

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Crystal City. Crystal City has been a desert. There's really

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>been nothing going on for ten or fifteen years, and

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>now all of a sudden that just the flurry of activity, apartments,

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>offices people that want to be close to Amazon. Interestingly,

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in Long Island City, Uh, there the facility is located

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in what's called a qualified opportunity zone. So there are

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tax incentives for people that want to

0:07:55.240 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>put money in the area and defer taxes. So so um. Interestingly,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>not in not in Virginia and not in Nashville. But

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of federal tax benefits for people

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that invest in their backyard. John, My kitchen yesterday was

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a qualified opportunity zone. It was silarette. I witnessed that

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>down in flame. I got some stuffing for sale. By

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, time, I too remember Durgin Park and the

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>road beef that came off on both sides of the plate.

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It was so big, that's true, it was Did they

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>swear at your mother too? I don't remember that part,

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.359
<v Speaker 1>but I do remember it being exactly as you described,

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of a scruffy area, to say the least at

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that time. How do I follow this? Do you know what?

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I love blind Bug Radio so much because we never

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>have these moments on Blinmbug TV. Well we should. I

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>think that we should do that, you know what. I

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>remember Duck and Pop too, and I think it was

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>France season. You know, I can't remember what it was,

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we get one more from John, one

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>more from me. John, have seen the store closures, if

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the kitchen things from some of these retailers,

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think we have no. I don't think

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it's over at all yet, John, But but what we're

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>transitioning to, and I think this is pretty clear, We're

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>going from shopping that's a necessity to shopping that's an experience.

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know in the old days, you went out

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>because you wanted, you needed to buy something. Uh. Now

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't do that at least I don't. You know,

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you order on Amazon, you ordered through any number of

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>other channels. And so landlords and and retailers are having

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to come up with more experiences. For example, in your backyard, um,

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>there was the Rose Mansion, which was a pop up

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and it allowed you to drink and talk about rose.

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Now you have something called candy Topia again, an interactive

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>exhibition that talks about a variety of candies. So I

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>think landlords are trying to be more creative. Uh, retailers

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>are trying to be more creative. If and it's not

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>just let's go out, it's let's go out and do

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>something different. Let's go out to an experience. One of

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the big places that we've heard about is a bar

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>where they have a hatchet throwing. I mean, who knew,

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>but this is this is hot. People want to do

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>something different. Are we do that at surveillance every morning,

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what we do with our three men. We have

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>hatchet throwing no better time to speak to Diane Swanky

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>can be on the fed it and be in the

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>American economy, or Diana can be on the gifts that

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>keeps on giving, which I think is lower oil prices.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? It is certainly do in the holiday season.

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the things we think will give an

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>extra boost to consumer spending during this holiday season, and

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it also is giving an extra boots to discussionary spending

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. Consumers are finally going back and buying clothing again.

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>That's really strange. They've been living in gym clothes for

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a long time, but men and women are buying clothing,

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>but also spending at restaurants, although it's weakened on a

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>month a month basis in recent months, it's almost eight

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>percent from a year ago at full service restaurants, double digit.

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>We've never seen these kinds of games. Then, how does

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Grant Thornton process the fact where energy independent were energy dominant?

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It cuts differently than it did in the seventies or eighties. Folks,

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>this with fifty one zero one on oil. I mean,

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a part of America that needs a higher

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>oil price, right absolutely, And one of the things we've

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>seen already is whenever oil prices softened a bit, and

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they softened a lot, as you've already noted, they've plummeted.

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>That really takes away the only investment we've really seen

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in the US economy. We've seen very little investment in

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>US economy except in the oil sector, in the innovations

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in the oil sector. The investment we've seen the oil sector,

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it's been one of the backbones of the U s

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>economy in recent years. It was absent in the third quarter,

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and now you're going to see a lot less of

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it in the fourth quarter as well. And it's one

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the things we saw a reset in oil investment

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in early as well. Twenty years ago, there was only

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>one answer to the following question. Twenty years later, there's

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a much bigger debate. Is lower crude good or bad

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>for the American economy. You're absolutely right, Jonathan, and a

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>net um it still is good. Lower true crisis because

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we employ some few people in the oil industry, but

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it shows up in our GDP numbers and it shows

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>up much more mixed, and the spillover effects of oil

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>production go beyond the people who work directly in the

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>oil industry. So it is a much more difficult thing.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, we're still a

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>consumer driven economy and so it still mets us out

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to the benefit. But boy do they feel it in Dallas.

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And so your point down whether big capex spend has

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 1>been has been in this industry, and this administration wants

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this country, this economy to get a lot more capex,

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot more investment. It's got to be this industry

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that drives it ran exactly, and that's one that we'd

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>like to see it much more broad based. We haven't

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>seen it as broad based. The other big complaint I'm

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>getting from a lot of clients in the oil patch tariffs.

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>The tariffs hit the steel that they import because they

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>only have suppliers they imported mostly from Canada. A tax. Now, Diane,

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>what is your working number for g d P. Let's

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>go twelve months, two thousand nineteen for two thousand nineteen,

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>about two and a quarter percent. Much depends on whether

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>or not we get in a full blown trade war.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I am worried about the next recession. As you know,

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>timing it is really difficult to do of never forecaft

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a recession, and I am Now this came up over

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>cocktails last night because Diane, I failed, it's stuffing. I'm

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's stuffing today. But we we washed it down

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>with some cocktails and the failure of and what you

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>got that right, thank you, Drysack. And what came up

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Diane was you don't see a recession coming. I mean,

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the historical study, right, you don't see it, but

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you can see the ingredients of a recession. And what

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>do I worry about when I look for the ingredients

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of a recession The risk of a policy miss step.

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>That's gone up a lot on a multiple fronts. One,

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>the Fed could raise rates too rapidly or too high

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>at some point in time. By the end of this year,

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll see in one year's time a doubling of short

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>term interest rates by the Federal Reserve. They're still at

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>low levels, but that's a major shift in interest expense

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of short term corporate debt. The debt

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>record highs. That's going to reprice over the next year.

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's one thing we watched. Another thing is trade.

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>You could have a major missed up on trade that

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>not the triffs alone cause a recession, but the collateral

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>damage to the second largest economy in the world, China,

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>not like Japan. It's got tentacles in every other economy

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>out there. So we got to data check. I mean,

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>we're correlated in here. We got oil flat out, plunging

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>ten year yield coming in finally in two solid basis points,

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get a three or three handle in a moment.

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>We're getting a little bit of Friday correlation, aren't we? Yeah,

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we are. And Bright Evans of Rhode ivers wild and

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>does it make sense? And inflation expectations a hit when

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>spot crude rolls over, when crude futures roll out of

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the way they have done. It is really amazing, is

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>how correlated inflation expectations are to oil. It always has been,

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it always will be. What really matters is over the

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>longer haul, what happens to core inflection, because that's what

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we converge to now, Dane, So thank you so much.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>This is great. We've got oil, and we've got a

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>wonderful guest with us right now. Christian Mayleek is out

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of the hugely prestigious Imperial College Chemical engineering program, and

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it knows the visceral nature of the oil market like

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I few do. He joins us now of course with

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan Kazanov in London right now, Christian, I know,

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I know you look at Brent crude as a global

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>oil price. Here in New York, we're focused on the

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>dynamics of West Texas intermediate fifty one fifty handle earlier.

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Is there is there a symbolism to West Texas going

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>through fifty dollars with a forty nine for barrel print?

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Does that matter? Tom? A great question, very kind words.

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I think to sort of to say, to say from

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>from the outstep, you know, as a house Japreen Morgan

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>has been bearish for the best by of the eighteen months.

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>So we've been calling for fifty to sixty barrel for

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>some time now, and we sort of stuck to our guns.

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And the main reasons of answering your question, Tom is

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we've looked at the cost curtain a lot of depths,

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and every time you look at the marginal cost to

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>produce oil is somewhere between forty and sixty dollars about Brent.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, every time you talk to a major or

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at the premium, they're getting more efficient to

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>produce oil and Therefore, when you think about the risk premium,

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the question I think some of us were asking is

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>should have ever been a eighty five? When? When? When?

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>When the cost of the cost to produce oil is

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around fifty, your cost curve shows a Russia challenge.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>We've heard earlier, Penmen. I heard earlier that Mr Putin,

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll meet with the Crown Prince or other worthies

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of G twenty, maybe even before that. How does rush

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to fit into the supplied calculus right now? Well, it's

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a good question, and when we look at what we

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we we did this work called the break Even Championship

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>as a global study looking at break evens not just

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on the costcar but also country break even, open bake

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and fiscal um. And so it was almost like sort of,

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>let's let's think about this massive costcar with everybody on it,

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>not just the projects and Russians. Study were very interesting Russia,

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Russia's break even summer between forty and fifteen. In fact,

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>what was quite controversial when we published this back in

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>March because we said that the Saudi fiscal break even

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.959
<v Speaker 1>and Saudi open fiscal break even is now somewhere between

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen seventy. So when you triangulate the Saudi fiscal break

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>even alongside the Russia break even, what's really interesting is

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know, for Russia, at least their pain thresholds

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>far higher. They can cope with all with with a

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>five handle. I don't think they're loving it, but they

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>can absolutely cope with that, which then sort of puts

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the ball back in Saudi's court and opec as to

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>whether they can actually manage that kind of break even. Yes,

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>And when we think about the epic meeting in June,

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>I think what what we sort of people missed in

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of the production hike was that they were feelings

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>far more comfortable with oil in the sty seventy range

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>or in fifty sixty range because they've managed to fix

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>their economies take those break evens down a lot more

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>than when they cut in twenty six. Did you remember

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>their break evens are north of ninety across the border,

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>our investors prepared for new oil and new energy coming

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>on market, And I'm thinking about the recent find and

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>discovery in the Gulf of Mexico about two hundred miles

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>south of New Orleans by Chevron that is scheduled to

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.360
<v Speaker 1>come online. Plus, you've had recent comments from the head

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of Petro Brass saying that the firm is going to

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>focus on exploration and production. Yeah, it's absolutely right. I

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 1>mean it's interesting that, you know, when when you think

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>about the concerns around a supply crunch, I mean, one

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we kept our doing for why

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>all would be capped around fifty six dollars is that

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, the short term mirage with limited supplies

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>has once again be pushed out the picture. And you

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>mean you make you know, the fact that we have

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>big oil now sort of moving in so to speak,

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>into shale is something which, as you point out, is

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>going to massively accelerate production in the TERMUN the questions

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for how long. I mean, a lot of people are

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>arguing for a rollover in share production at some point

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>in the mid twenties, and I think there is a

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>risk around that. But in the short medium term you

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>have a scaling up of the termun and when you

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>have the big oil or the super majors moving in,

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they've got the infrastructure, the balance sheet, the scale and

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the technology to really scale this. The outlook meaningfully higher. Yeah,

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.239
<v Speaker 1>is there is there sweat at Vienna December six. I mean,

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>is it just another you know, photo opportunity for a

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch of oil ministers or can something actually get down

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>around the tensions of this price. Yeah, no, it's absolutely right.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think what the market is doing

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is putting OPEC feed on the fire. Um. And when

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed OPEC and we we we published a known

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago arguing that OPEC would kick the

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>can down the road. And I think with this moving oil,

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of a bit circular. Right when all moves low,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you start to think OPEC has to act. I think

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that the base cases that OPEC will cut We disagree.

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, our call is that OPEC will um sign

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a deal that's a weak deal. Um. If there is

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort of paper restriction on production for next year,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>it's likely to be with several caveats. So if close

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>expecting OPEC to do a sort of massive you turn

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on the summer where they did a U turn in itself,

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it's unlikely. I think they like the newfound mark is share,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>They've recognized permius here to stay. I don't think we'll

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>quite give up. You know, it's not likely we get

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a sort of November fourteen repeat, but it's going to

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 1>be one of the weakest deal see signed into wonderful briefing.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Christian Mayor. Like with JP Morgan

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Kazanov out of London on E M E. A Oil Now,

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>as we had Joe Felban earlier, his colleague in crime,

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Dana Telsey, joins as Telsey Advisory Group Dana open question.

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>You walk into Macy's on a day like this, what

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>is a grizzled pro like? You look at? What do

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you observe or what do you study when you go

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>into a Macy's on a Black Friday. When I go

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>into Macy's and I was there last night for a

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of hours after they open, I'm looking at what's

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the traffic like, what is the rate of the promotions like?

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And where are the crowds? And I could tell you

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>where the crowds were last night. It's called out in

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>New York. It was all about boots. Those ug boots

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are basically what people were buying. And it was about

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>sweaters and it was about gloves. That's what the key

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with where the traffic was Can they change price on

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>those items? Is there an elasticity where they can adapt

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to the weather too. Of sustained profit, I think there

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is to degree. But keep in mind a lot of

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>these promotions have been planned months in advance for this day,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and you're not just looking at the single retailer, but

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the competitive environment around you. It's how

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you how you coordinated with the brands in order to

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>move product given such a given such an important day. Dana,

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>can you speak to the issue of inventory? Are stores

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>lean with their inventory this season? Stores are in a

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>good inventory position. I would say, don't forget. Some of

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>them brought in goods a little bit early in advance

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>of what could be some expected tariffs coming up. But

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they are definitely in a good position. They're not over inventoried.

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Their priced for goods to move, and if they run out,

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>then they have demand to in other items or other

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>brands that could fill that demand. Doesn't seem like there's

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>any excess inventory in any big ways, and having the

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>cold weather helps the other categories toys given Toys or

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>US is no longer here, and Toys or US sales

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>occurred in the fourth order. Everyone is out there looking

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>to grab market share, and toys who's gonna win and

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna lose. Who's the store or the retailer that

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>has the most at stake this season. I mean, when

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>you think about the retailers overall we have, the discounter

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>should certainly get a good share the private labels that

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Target has invested in, the omni channel initiatives that Walmart has,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, the strength that's been nice to see is

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the momentum that Coles has. Coles is really whether it

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>is any active categories and toys, they really reinvented themselves. Dana,

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>We've had fun today with the geography of Boston. We

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>say good morning one or six ONEFM Boston on the

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>names of another time and place. And as I've said

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>many times before, Miss Telsey lived this at Bergdorf Goodman.

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 1>But Jordan marsh phileens PIM was mentioning a number of

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the investing company, Michael Barr Crowley's of Detroit, and on

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and on, Dana, are we ready for another consolidation in

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>bricks and mortar? You till I think we are. I

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>think overall, it certainly takes time to close stores this year.

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>You obviously have fears and you're gonna have toys r us.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to continue to see companies, whether

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's Gap or whether it's l brands with Victoria's Secret,

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>who basically each articulated that they're relooking at their physical

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>store space, at the Gap brand and at Victoria's Secret,

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>reloking at everything. I think we're gonna see companies reinvent themselves.

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Department stores may have been a little bit ahead of

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the curve in embracing omni channel, and now you're seeing

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>specialty come next. You see tom It's not all bad,

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just transformation. What does omni channel. It means that

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 1>you can have money pulled out of your pocket in

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>any way shape you definitely stopping everywhere any time that

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>there's never the word closed is never an option. Okay,

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll go. It's different than the old Jordan Marsh where

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they actually had, you know, store hours. David Mike Mike

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Allen over the ext Yours has a statistic of the

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>day which is thirty seven percent of shopping is done

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>on smartphones. Really, it's a huge numbers. Smartphones and mobile

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>are definitely growing in the transaction on mobile and frankly,

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>having screens that can have that are bigger with its

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>visibility helps and I think you are seeing definitely more

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>shopping on smart phones done and more conversion being done.

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean for bricks and water? I mean,

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Barney's on Madison and i want something in

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>some other place and I'm on my I'm literally on

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>my smartphone and Barney's buying it, you know, named the store, right.

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I think overall what it means is the fact that

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>now you can even have digital orders fulfilled in stores.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You may buy it online and pick it up in

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the store. And look at some of the retailers out there.

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Coles gave the numbers that they're going to fill fill

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>five million units in November that are picked up in

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>store and five million in December. When companies have when

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>retailers have consumers come in the store to pick something up,

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>guess what they're doing. They're buying something else. Also, that

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>can attach around to the average transaction. Well, when Tom

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>goes shopping in a store right now, is he going

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to be paying full price? Today? You're gonna be paying

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a discount. Today is the day when almost every brand,

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in every company, there's something you can get a deal on.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, You're gonna buy the two words

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of the season to remember the gifts of the season.

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>It's about smart and it's about cozy. It's about smart

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 1>because whether it's smart speakers, smart home devices, wireless earbuds.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's about cozy because pajamas, bluffy, fluffy blankets. So

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>at Burgdorf to Charlotte. Charlotte simone pollypop, two tone, first

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>slip through scarf which looks like something out of the fifties,

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and two dollars. That's cozy. That's what they call cozy.

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>As long as it keeps too warm. It's about being cozy. Okay,

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Dana Telsey, you have a cozy state, stay warm. Dana

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>tells you you go from store to store. Dana Telsey

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>iconic with the tell Us the advisory Crup Holiday you too, Dama,

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much as well. Thanks for listening to

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tom Keene before the podcast. You can

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio