WEBVTT - The Mayo Man

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. Now,

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>along with the guys from dante leagues dot com, here's

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Chargian.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to a Thanksgiving weekend edition of Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Paul Jarchi and my co hosts today are Scott

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Fish and Thorneistro.

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, I like a holiday weekend. We I brought

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 3>something for us.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I see that, and you know what, because we are

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 2>not live on the air, Yeah, we can drink all

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 2>we want.

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.279
<v Speaker 3>Oh we can if we were live on the air.

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 2>No FCC, no, dice can't, right right, this is a

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>recorded podcast.

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, whatever we want, right, yeah, baby, Yeah. I brought

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 3>a bottle of two XO bourbon French oak two XOL bourbon.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Now is it bubble oaked?

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 3>It's it's it's one of my new favorites. It's uh yeah,

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 3>two times oaked. Yeah, two double oh.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, we'll give that try. Usually the double oaking

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.559
<v Speaker 2>makes it smoother, but also you do get woodier tapes

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>in there, so that's getting the fine line on that.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 3>I like this. I like this one. So I had

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 3>to bring it in for you. I know you like

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:12.839
<v Speaker 3>your bourbon.

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:13.639
<v Speaker 4>I do like bourbon?

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 2>You bourbon Guy Thorpe, Yeah, love bourbon. I didn't know that.

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sure, time of course.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 2>Oh all right, by the end, by the by the

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>end of the show, by the sixth segment, this show

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be very different.

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 5>Oh boy, I got to talk about bone Eggs in

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 5>an hour or so.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's crack it more.

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 3>And did you know bon Nicks leads the NFL in

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 3>twenty plus yard completions.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 4>Poor pass that over? I who would.

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 3>Have expected that from mister dink and dunk.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>I I'm stunned by this turner out by Bonecks. We'll

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 2>talk about that more in the show later. We'll break

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>down all the games, including that one. We will also

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 2>give the letter grades and all the players take a

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>chance on me the nine players you would not normally start.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Three tough questions, premature speculation, all the stuff you know

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>in love from Fantasy Football Weekly. We begin with the

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Seattle Seahawks traveling to the New York Jets Scotts and

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the more peculiar stats I can remember. Yes,

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, normally when a quarterback goes to the Jets

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>to face Sauce Gardner, DJ Reid and Michael Carter like

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 2>game over. But tell people about the crazy rushing production

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 2>that the Jets are giving up to opposing quarterbacks.

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Just over the last seven weeks they have allowed

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 3>or sorry, just over the last six weeks, they have

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 3>allowed seven rushing touchdowns by quarterbacks.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 2>By most seasons, no team will give up seven quarterback

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 2>rushing touchdowns in a year. The Jets have done in

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 2>six games.

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm guessing most don't even give up four or five.

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is. It puts Gino into a really interesting spot,

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 2>especially for dfs and other places where you're trying to

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe find some unusual angles. Yeah, this might be one.

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 3>It is an interesting angle. And he's also the quarterback

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 3>that leads the NFL in passing yards per game. Obviously

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 3>Lamar is a little ahead of him, but he's on

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 3>one extra game played, right, So I do have a

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 3>B grade on Gino Smith. His main problem has been

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 3>the multi score games. But if if you might be

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 3>able to get a rushing touchdown out of Gino, which

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 3>you got last week, given what this defense is allowed,

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 3>and he's had inside the five run in each of

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 3>the last two weeks, so they're not opposed to giving

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 3>it to him there. I got a B grade here.

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I think his two hundred and fifty to two hundred

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 3>and seventy five yard average throwing a score because he's

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 3>getting one every week, throwing a possible rushing one. I

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 3>think he got a B grade here in this matchup,

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 3>even though it's a very tough Jets secondary over to

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the wide receivers Jackson Smith and Jigba, who has been

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 3>just red hot on fire over the last seven weeks

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 3>or so. We're going to talk about him a little later, yep,

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 3>but I'll get into right now. He's got the best

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 3>matchup of the wide receivers against Michael Carter in the slot,

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 3>but that's still a tough matchups, but it is the

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 3>best of them. His target shares over the last three

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 3>weeks have been averaging in the thirties thirty eight one week,

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 3>thirty six one week, a little under thirty another week.

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 3>But he's scoring tons of Fantasy points. He gets forty

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 3>five percent of the team's wide receiver end zone targets

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 3>in the last month, so he's just getting the ball

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 3>there constantly. Six plus catches in four straight sixty nine

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 3>plus yards in four straight. Yeah, I got him with

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 3>a B grade here. You could talk me into an

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 3>A if it was a better matchup with against an

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 3>easier defense, but don't have it there. I have a

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 3>C grade on DKM Metcalf dominates the team in air

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 3>yards and a dop Jackson Smith and jigb has kind

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>of taken over for him. He lines up on Sausa's

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 3>side a little more, Lockett on red side a little more.

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>But I'm not convinced Lockett's gonna play and when Metcalf

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 3>Mo moves around, he's gonna get one of the two.

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 3>And this is a defense allowing the fewest Fantasy points

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 3>to wide receivers. So I just have a C grade

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 3>on d KY Metcalf, who wasn't even practicing as late

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 3>as Thursday, so it could be a really tough one

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 3>for him there. Tyler Lockett, is that mine?

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 4>It is?

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 6>Wow?

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 4>That's all right.

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what's going on there, Okay, Tyler Lockett

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 3>I have on the bench because he's gonna get that

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 3>same matchup. He's only seen a twelve percent target chair

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 3>since Week seven and just too tough of a spot.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Jackson and metcalf forgetting everything no offense, also on the bench.

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 3>He's futally healthy now, but this is a top defense

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 3>against tight ends. Just forty two yards per game and

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 3>only one score on the year, So he's back on

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 3>the bench. Still back on the bench, still over on

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the Jets side. C grade for Aaron Rodgers as much

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 3>as the Jets lose Rogers yards are low, but he

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 3>gets tons of scores. He's got multiple scores in most games.

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 3>I believe six last eight games the Seattle Seahawks have

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 3>allowed multiple scores, So I think he can get there

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 3>on scores, you know, two hundred yards, but he's going

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 3>to get a couple of scores.

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 2>And I kind of like Garrett Wilson here.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>I do. I do have a beat grade on Garrett

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Wilson and a B grade on Devanta Adams. Wilson is

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 3>third in NFL in red zone attempt so he does

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 3>get a lot of that. But Wilson's catches in yards

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 3>have dropped every week for three weeks. As Davante Adams

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 3>gets more into that system. He gets that matchup against

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Riek Wollan, who has allowed five touchdowns this year. So

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 3>I do like the spot okay there for him. Davante

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Adams also the B grade. He's begun to overtake. As

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 3>I just kind of mentioned. His targets are thirty one

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 3>to twenty four over the last three weeks, compared to

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Garrett Wilson weeks nine through eleven. Adams more targets per

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 3>ut run targets are yards and zone targets, et cetera.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 3>The number one target getter against the Seahawks has topped

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and or scored in six of the last

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 3>seven games, but a bunch of number two's had fifty

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 3>to seventy yards, So I'm fine with both of them. Here.

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 3>In the running game, Breest Hall says he's not sore,

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 3>says he's fine, says he's gonna play, so I'm gonna

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 3>trust him. The Eagles are allowing four point nine plus

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 3>yards per carry, which is fourth worst, allowing the seventh

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>most yards to backs one hundred and forty six combo

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>yards per game. It's just a great spot for a

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 3>guy getting fifteen plus touches that gets also pass game works.

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 3>I have an A grade there. If for some reason

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't go. Braylan Allen's an interesting take a chance

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 3>on me, but I have a bench good on Allen.

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm here, I hear you on that. All right,

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>let's go over to Pittsburgh taking on Cincinnati. You know,

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 2>on the Pittsburgh side. This feels like the Cincinnati defense

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>been very, very leaky. The Steelers offense hasn't been great lately.

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 2>But I feel like you could get the breakout game here.

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:28.239
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, a couple guys that we're going to be targeting

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.559
<v Speaker 5>for that. Not Russell Wilson. No gonna give him a seed.

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 5>The Ravens game was the only one Wilson hasn't thrown

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 5>for a touchdown or scored thirteen point eight plus fantasy points,

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 5>but he only finished quarterback twenty seven and quarterback nineteen

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 5>over the last two weeks. It is a decent matchup

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 5>to your point charge. The Bengals have allowed the sixth

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 5>highest passing yards per game since Week seven. Nase Harrison

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 5>Jalen Warren. I gave them both seas. I was between

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 5>a B and a C on NASE, but I toggled

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 5>it down to a Sea. Nase RB twenty seven and

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 5>fantasy points per game. But he has not finished as

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 5>a top nine running back in any individual week, does

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 5>have the sixteen plus touches in every game, averages close

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.679
<v Speaker 5>to twenty and he has been out playing Jalen Warren

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 5>and getting more red zone work. But I'm gonna give

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 5>him a sea as I'm giving Jalen Warren here. They've

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 5>played six games together since Warren returned from injury. During

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 5>that span, Harris has one hundred and nine carries and

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 5>fourteen targets two hunderd four snaps. Warren sixty one carries,

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 5>twenty targets one hundred and seventy six snaps.

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 6>Half.

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he did score his first touchdown of the season

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 5>last week. Jalen Warren did and had fourteen or more

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 5>touches and scored eleven plus fantasy points in two of

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 5>the past three games. You want to go a little

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 5>bit further. The Bengals, though, have been solid against receiving

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 5>running backs this season. They've allowed the fewest receiving yards

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 5>to opposing running backs. But yeah, I'm gonna give him

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 5>both seas.

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Again.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm back and forth on him, but that's where I settled.

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 5>George Pickins, he's our breakout game guy. We're giving him

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 5>an a here. He comes in thirty wide receiver things

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 5>thirty six fantasy points per game, but I think one

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 5>hundred plus yard game is coming here. He would have

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 5>had a top ten wide receiver finish last week if

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 5>there wasn't that weird miscommunication on a potential touchdown. And

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 5>then Pickens's open score rate is tenth best in the NFL,

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 5>so he's still playing really well.

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 2>What's the sorry, what is the open score rate?

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they mystery the show.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Raiders ever mentioned this before.

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, how often they get open? Okay? We got a

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 4>new one.

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 5>And the Bengals have allowed six double digit wide receiver

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 5>fantasy fantasy scorers in the last three games, so they're

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 5>they're giving up fantasy points to opposing receivers. Pat Fryermuth

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 5>is gonna give him a be tight end twenty in fantasy

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 5>points per game, head and En. He's had fifty plus

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 5>receiving yards only twice in the last seven games, but

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 5>did get three red zone looks in the last three games,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 5>and this is solid matchup for him. Cincinnati has allowed

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 5>the fifth most receiving yards per game and the second

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 5>most fantasy points per game to opposing tight ends.

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Have you noticed speaking of Pittsburgh tight ends Russell Wilson's

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 2>getting Dare Washington involved. Yeah, I like it. It's only like,

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, two or three catches a game, but man,

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 2>I just love to see the ball in his hands.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 5>Huge athlete cuge literally literally a huge.

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's approximate.

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 5>He was growing in the Kirby Smart mutant factory they

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 5>have down there in Athens. Moving over to the Bengals,

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 5>Joe Burrow give him an a quarterback three and fantasy

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 5>points per game. The Steelers do have one of the

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 5>best pass defenses in the league.

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 4>Pittsburgh leads the.

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 5>NFL in opposing QBR in part they run that zone

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 5>coverage defense. I will say the Bengals offense ranks fourth

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 5>in zone QB QBR on offense, so they they have

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 5>done decent against zone defenses so far this year. Gonna

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 5>give Chase Brown and a getting all the work with

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 5>Zach Moss down. He's third in running back fantasy points

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 5>per game first, and target second in receptions.

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 4>Chase Brown has been really good.

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 5>I was wrong about Chase Brown in the draft process.

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 4>He's been good.

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 2>But you know, here's the thing, though, I'll defend you

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 2>this way. He wasn't this good last year, wasn't this

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 2>good at Illinois, and Jason Brown has just gotten better.

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he wasn't a great receiver at Illinois, so that

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 5>part of his game in particular, so credit to him.

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 5>Jamar Chase obvious A and A must start T Higgins.

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 5>I was between an A and B here.

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna give him a B.

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 5>He had almost thirty PPR points in his return from

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 5>a three game quad absence in the week eleven against

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 5>the Chargers, and he scored at least fourteen point seven

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 5>PPR games four games in a row, how to least

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 5>seven targets in each of those games. But Pittsburgh is

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 5>not an easy matchup. The Steelers have allowed the six

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 5>fewest fantasy points to opposing wide receivers. The point about

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Higgins though, in this game that makes him sneaky, which

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 5>why I was considering an A T Higgins is his

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 5>yards per route run against Cover one is three point

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 5>eighty five is sterling number crazy against all other coverages

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 5>one point nine to eight.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 4>Wow, gerarlds per rout run.

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 5>The Steelers used Cover one the second most in the

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 5>entire NFL, so it's like he is good against these

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 5>kind of coverage. His boy, the Steelers have such a

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 5>good pass defense.

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, distill it into a letter.

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 5>I gave him a B, but I was between A

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 5>and B for three aggains and then you keep getting

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 5>Mike Kiseki on the bench.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 4>He's not usable with t Higgins back.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 3>By the way, George pickens with Russell Wilson is wide

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 3>receiver sixteen. Oh, he's thirty six on the season, so

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 3>that's even even better. Before I get yelled at on

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 3>social media, Kenneth Walker, it gets a B grade. I

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 3>completely glossed over Kenneth Walker. Volume backs like James Connor

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Joe Mixon had one hundred plus total yards. It's a

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>tough matchup, but volume backs have done well, So I

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 3>got a B grade on Walker.

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 2>Arizona takes on Minnesota Kyler Murray's average passing game two

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirteen yards in one touchdown. I was looking

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>for who else, what's the quarterback comparison at two hundred

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>and thirteen and one for a passing game. It's Daniel Jones. Boy,

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 2>he's thrown zero or one touchdowns in nine of the

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 2>last eleven games of the eleven this year. For Kyler

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Murray not gad Vikings pass defense better lately, but it's

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 2>also come against inferior passers to Murray. And here's the thing.

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 2>We're here for Murray's rushing mostly, but get this, he's

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 2>in five to the last eight games he's been nineteen

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>rushing yards or less. And what team ranks number one

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 2>against quarterback rushing yards. It'd be the biking it nine yards?

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 2>Nine yeah, nine time, that's it nine yards. So Kyler Murray,

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 2>it's a generous be only because the pass defense has

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>been yielding for the Vikings. Marvin Harrison. I struggled with

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>this one too, massively inconsistent in his six bad games,

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Marvin Harrison averaging one and a half catches twenty four

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 2>scoreless yards. In his five good games, five catches eighty

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 2>one yards and over one touchdown per game. For Marvin Harrison,

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 2>he is the most all or nothing player in the NFL.

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 3>We should talk about him later, we should talk about

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's do it.

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's dive into Marvin Harrison little more later specific to

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.599
<v Speaker 2>this matchup, though more likely to be good in a

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 2>matchup against the bottom rank Vikings pass defense and yards

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 2>allowed to wide receivers, he lines up all over the

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 2>field the X Y Z. That means he's going to

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 2>face all three of the Vikings cornerbacks, honestly, none of

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>which are particularly problematic matches. Marvin Harrison B grade here.

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Trey McBride also B grade. He's caught sixty one passes

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 2>covering almost seven hundred yards and hasn't scored, which is

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 3>He had a rushing tech did a rushing touch you know, I.

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Think you're right about it. You're right, he has a

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>rushing touchdown. But he's top fifty receiving yards in six

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 2>of the past seven games. Last week, McBride twelve catches

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and thirty three yards in Yeah, unreal. Cole

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Kmet randomly hit the Vikings for sixty four yards last week,

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 2>but before that they'd been great against tight ends for

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the previous six games, although none of them is good.

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Never saw a tight end as good as Tray McBride.

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 2>B grade for Trey McBride. Last guy you care about

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>James Connor. Toughest matchup of his year. Okay, no runner

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 2>has top forty eight yards. Again, it's the Vikings in

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a month. Here's their run defense stats rushing yards allowed

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 2>number one yards per carry, number two, defensive EPA number

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>one run defense success rate number one, yards after contact

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 2>number two, and mistackles the Vikings are number one. It

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 2>is a stifling run defense, and James Connor only comes

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 2>in with a C grade. Let's go over to the

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Viking side. Justin Jefferson coming up a dud game and

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 2>he has not scored in five games. But the Vikings

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 2>have won all five games, and they've proven that triple

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 2>covering Jefferson means that Simon Sam Darnold will beat the

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 2>team with other assets. The Cardinals have one very good cornerback,

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Williams, allowing a fifty four percent completion rate and

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 2>just one touchdown all year. He's the fifth He's the

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 2>eighth ranked cornerback by Pro Football Focus. Garrett, and he's

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 2>their slot guy, right, That's exactly right. He's the slot guy. Now,

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Jefferson does run from the slot on about a third

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 2>of his routes, but.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 3>He can avoid them.

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 2>They can avoid it, right, I mean the other two

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 2>thirds he won't see that guy, and they could just

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>run him in the slot less if they want to.

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 2>So I've still got an A grade on Justin Jefferson.

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's go over to Jordan Addison, who's been red hot lately,

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 2>primarily running on the outside. He's gonna see cornerbacks Sean Murphy, buntings,

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Starling Thomas. Thomas has been great lately, allowing just two

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 2>catches for twenty three yards in his coverage over the

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 2>last six games, but bunting's a major liability, allowing it

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent can catch rate. Addison's very touchdown dependent because

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't have great volume, and the Cardinals have only

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 2>allowed one touchdown to wide outs in their last five games.

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 2>You want to know why the Cardinals are suddenly sitting

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 2>in first place in their division, and it's this defense

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 2>has come around really nicely. TJ. Hockinson comes in with

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>a B grade. Josh Oliver has been ruled out and

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 2>he was last week too, and Hockinson saw season high

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and snaps and targets. The Cardinals are downright dominant, though

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 2>against tight ends, only two guys all year have top

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 2>thirty six yards.

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 3>That's a low mark.

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 2>That is a low mark, and they've only given up

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 2>one touchdown to tight Endsamer of hope is that the

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 2>only Hockinson level tight end to face the Cardinals was

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 2>George Kittle and he put up eight catches, sixty four

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 2>yards and a touchdown against the Cardinals. B grade for TJ. Hockinson,

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 2>and we'll round out the passing game with Sam Donald

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 2>coming off probably the best two games of his career.

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 2>But the Cardinals are a sneaky good pass defense, as

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I've already alluded to. Over the past four games, they're

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 2>giving up zero point four passing touchdowns, so there is

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 2>some downside with Donald, who usually has a very high floor.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 2>I've given his receivers ABS and C grades, So Sam

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Donald comes in right at the middle with a B grade,

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 2>and that leaves us with Aaron Jones. Arizona was a

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 2>terrible run defense in September, but they've been great since then.

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 2>Over the past seven games, Arizona's only allowed one runner

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 2>to score a rushing touchdown randomly Raheem Moster, other good

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 2>backs like Josh Jacobs, JK. Dobbins, Breese Hall, Kenneth Walker

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 2>really good backs averaging forty seven rushing yards per game

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 2>against Arizona. Cardinals are giving up decent receiving games to runners,

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 2>but Kevin O'Connell just doesn't use Jones that way. So

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he cashes in there. Over the past

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 2>seven games, Aaron Jones is averaging just two catches per game,

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 2>so might be an opportunity missed for him, and he

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 2>comes in with a C grade in this game. When

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 2>we come back take a chance on me nine players

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 2>you would not normally start. Many of these guys in

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the waiver wire. Almost all them tell you who they are.

0:18:30.520 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 2>When we come back on me nine players you would

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 2>not normally start. We begin with Scott Fish. Who is

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 2>your take a chance on me quarterback?

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm going with Drake May in a matchup against

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 3>a Colts that are basically bottom nine in every category,

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 3>but in the past they're just as bad. He's running

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 3>the ball about five times a game. That's gonna give

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 3>you extra work. He has at least one score in

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 3>seven straight games and his yards have been ticking up

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 3>quite a bit lately. So I like Drake May here.

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 2>It's coming around nicely. Drake May, All right, offensive line

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 2>is so bad, so bad?

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's really it's terrible.

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 2>One of the worst I've ever seen. And I know

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a lot of injuries and different things, but can't

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 2>wait to see Drake May next year, find a better line.

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Get him a better line and a wide receiver in

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 3>the draft, and.

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Game on, Game on for Drake may thor you taking

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>chance on me quarterback.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go with CJ. Stroud against the Jaguars.

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Like it.

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 5>Stroud has scored fewer than twenty fantasy points six games

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 5>in a row, five in exceptions in the past three games,

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 5>the same number he had for the entirety of his

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 5>rookie season. He's top two hundred fifty passing yards just

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 5>once over the last four games, but he was close

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 5>to twenty fantasy points last week against Tennessee. And this

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 5>is a great matchup incoming that Jaguars have allowed the

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 5>most fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks this year, and Stroud's

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 5>three career games against the Jaguars nine twenty nine passing yards,

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 5>six touchdowns, zero interceptions.

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 6>C J.

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Stroud love it, bounce back game coming. Will Levis quietly

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 2>playing by far the Mayo man, the Mayo man, play

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 2>the male he delivered. Yeah, I'm playing by far the

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 2>best football of his career and it's not close. Now,

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 2>granted that's not a high bar, but over the past

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 2>three games, Will Levis is sixth in passer rating, eleventh

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 2>in completion percentage, third in depth of target at nine

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 2>point six. I was worried that they had just like

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 2>throttled him down a bunch and he was doing dump

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 2>offs and stuff. No, Will Levis is throwing downfield at

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 2>a high completion percentage in Dynasty.

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 3>Very bons like uh more on that coming in Dynasty.

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Will Levis is an intriguing acquisition target right now because

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 2>it's possible, Like you know, the Will Levis, the Will

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Levis manager is not doesn't realize what he or she

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 2>has got right now. Commander's secondary commanders this week is

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 2>the opponent they're secondary faltering of late. Over the past

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 2>four games, Daniel Jones, Russell Wilson, and Cooper Rush have

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 2>all thrown multiple touchdowns against Washington. They're also giving up

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 2>good rushing games to scrambling quarterbacks like Levitt, who averages

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 2>a respectable twenty two rushing yards per game. All right,

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 2>let's go to the running back.

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask you a question? First? Did you think

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 3>he said mailman or mayo?

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 6>Man?

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 5>Mayo?

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 6>Man? Okay?

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Was playing?

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay? Gotcha got playing?

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Just make it sure, just make it sure.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 2>I was just trying to pivot. I like, I like

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 2>it thing.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I like it.

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Now let's go to the running back position.

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 3>I am going with Antonio Gibson for those same Patriots

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 3>playing those same Colts who are third worst against fantasy

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 3>running backs. Not only are they third worst, they allow

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 3>the most combo yards. They're seventh worst against receptions and

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 3>yards allowed to pass catching backs. That's Gibson's role. He

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 3>got most of the past catching work last week, and

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 3>he out snaps Stevenson after Stevenson got his fifth fumble

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 3>of the year. I wonder if there might be a

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 3>little tie turning bit. It's a good matchup for a

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 3>pass catching back.

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Sounds good. Let's store let's go to your take a

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 2>chance with me running back?

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Is that Kamani Vidal's music? I hear? Is that Kamani

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 4>dal music?

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 2>What would be his music? Can we get something on

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>the button bar?

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't got gotta be something from Alabama because he

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 5>went to Troy.

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 2>That isn't that.

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 5>Leonard Skinner Terry, Yeah, okay, yeah, we'll do that work out.

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 5>I'll do that, okay, But Charger's playing the falcon and JK.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 5>Dobbins with his knee injury is out this week. Gus Edwards,

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 5>he returned from his own injury in November, presumably will

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 5>be the starter here. But it does sound like Vidal

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 5>will be used heavily in this game, especially on passing downs.

0:22:58.000 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 5>I think he'll be in for all the passing downs.

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 5>This was Chargers offensive coordinator Greg Roman speaking this week.

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 5>He said, we fully expect Kamani to step in if

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 5>JK can't go this week. JK is not going might

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 5>get a bigger, a little bit bigger workload.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 4>We'll see.

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 5>We have full confidence in Kamani and where he's at

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 5>end quote. If the Chargers lead throughout the second half

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 5>of this game, Vidal is going to get more work

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 5>there as well. And of course, the Chargers rushing offense

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 5>is averaging one hundred and eighteen plus rushing yards per game.

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 4>So I like Kimani Videll.

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 2>The other part that you didn't mention, Gus Edwards is

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 2>not playing well. You got dead legs, dead legs? Does

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 2>he's got dead legs.

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 4>KIMMANI and Adull does not. No, Yes, that's fresh legs.

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, he's got the Jimmy legs.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly.

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 2>For all the times we've mentioned Kimani in there for

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the last nine months. God, I want to payoff the

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 2>final get here, here comes a break. I'm gonna try

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Jeremy McNichols Washington running back against Tennessee.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 4>Boise State in the House?

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, how about that. It's gonna be some Boise State

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 2>in the House next year?

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, sure will Yeah.

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>There's a chance McNichols is the Commander's lead back because

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Brian Robinson he's got ankle and hamstring injuries, got knocked

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 2>out last week, got knocked out two weeks before that,

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and Austin Eckler is already ruled out of this game.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 2>So worst case, Jeremy McNichols will be running the Austin

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Eckler role. In limited use this year, McNichols has looked

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. He's averaging five yards per carry. He's found

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 2>the end zone three times despite barely getting on the field.

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 2>It's a tough matchup against the Titans, but they've given

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>up touchdowns six rushing touchdowns in the last six games,

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 2>So maybe McNichols converts a goal to go and helps

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 2>you out that way. Let's go to the receivers, Scott,

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 2>you're taking a chance with me guy.

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 3>A couple weeks ago, I gave you mvs. Marquez Valdez

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 3>Scantleon for the Saints.

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's scored when you did that, he scored a big touchdown.

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Ah, there we go. This week he gets a RAMS

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 3>defense allowing the sixth most receptions over twenty yards at

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 3>thirty eight. That's about three and a half twenty plus

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 3>yard receptions per game. If anyone's getting in on that team,

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be mvs. In a game that's slated

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 3>as one of the highest over hunders of the week.

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I think he's going to do it again.

0:24:57.960 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I like it your that's your That's kind of an

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 2>all or nothing darts throw that you could pick up

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 2>off the waiver WI right, Okay, thor you'll take a

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 2>chance on me.

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 5>Receiver Gonna go with Broncos wide receiver Devon hold the

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 5>Veley against the Bronze Yeah. Vley's emerged as Denver's number

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 5>two wide receiver over the past three games. He's a

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 5>top twenty five fantasy receiver in the entire NFL. Has

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 5>posted double digit PPR points in all three of those games.

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 5>The Browns, the opponent this week, have given up the

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 5>tenth most fantasy points to opposing wide receivers, and five

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 5>wide receivers have scored fourteen plus PPR points against Cleveland

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 5>in the past four games.

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 2>I like Vley and Dynasty use. I like picking them

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 2>up here, mostly for next year. But you know, it

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 2>looks like bow Nicks is going to be able to

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 2>support two receivers, and now we're starting to figure out

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 2>who that second one is after they've been rotating guys

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 2>in constantly at that number two spot.

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Vley, he is at an advanced age.

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 5>He's old for a rookie, and in college he was

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 5>always in bad passing environments like with Utah their quarterback

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 5>went down.

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Cam Risen was always getting injured, but an.

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 5>Incredible athlete in a big package sixts four two O

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 5>five two ten and very very fast, so he was

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 5>always like the raw guy to keep an eye on,

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 5>and he is breaking out.

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Adam Feelen returned last week, and I had worried that

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 2>even when thelan was healthy, he might not have a

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 2>major role in the Panthers offense. But as it turns out,

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 2>I think Dave Canalis is looking at all these young

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 2>receivers that are on that Panther's oster, and he's like,

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 2>you know what, let's let Adam Thielen show these kids

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 2>what it's like to be a pro. And he gave

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Flan a major role last week in his first game back,

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 2>a sixty six percent route rate, second only to Xavier Lagette.

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 2>And this is a very favorable matchup against Tampa, and

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 2>especially in the slot. The year they've they've started using

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 2>hybrid safety Christian Izian as their slot guy and he's

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 2>allowing a seventy eight percent completion percentage. And the Tampa

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 2>secondary is going to be missing starting safety Jordan Whitehead

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and the other safety, Tykey Smith is questionable the knee injury.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 2>So the Panthers passing game might get a little something

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 2>going in this one. Adam Thielen as your final take

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 2>a chance on me player, Let's go to our next matchup,

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Indianapolis taking on New England. Scott, you've already told us

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 2>about some of the players you like on the New

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 2>England side. Who do you like on the Indie side?

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll still in the passing game or you know,

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 3>more pseudo rushing game in Anthony Richardson, who I do

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 3>have a C grade on. He's got twenty design character

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 3>carries for ninety three yards and two scores in the

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 3>last two games or three games. Yeah, since returning to

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 3>the spot ten plus carries in three to the last four.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 3>You can expect kind of a base level there that

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna get around ten carries in those two games.

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 3>He got a couple he shared split inside the five

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 3>carries with Jonathan Taylor, which wasn't happening earlier in the season.

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 3>So maybe they're they're using him a little differently, maybe

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 3>to get his confidence up from the benching. I don't know.

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 3>But add to that, his one hundred and seventy five

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 3>yard average on the season has ticked up in the

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 3>last two games, and you know, social media film watchers

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 3>claim he's improved, Okay, so I'll give him that. I'll

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 3>give him the C grade here in his for his

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 3>wide receivers, Michael Pittman, I have a C grade on

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Courd and Mike Clay. In his shadow report, he's gonna

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 3>get shadow treatment from Christian Gonzalez, who saw Jamar Chase,

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 3>DK Metcalf, Garrett Wilson, Brendan Ayuk, Tyreek Hill, you know,

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 3>DeVante Adams, Calvin Ridley, a bunch of those, only DK

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Metcalf was able to top seventy five yards, and just

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 3>Metcalf and Wilson were able to score. Most of them

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 3>were around fifty yards, but Pittman five for forty six

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 3>and six for ninety six in the last two games

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 3>with Richardson, he's getting the volume, so maybe he's one

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 3>of those five or six catches fifty sixty yard guys

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 3>that can get you to a SEA level. I also

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 3>have a SEA on Alec Pierce. New England's just struggling

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 3>on a perimeter receivers tenth most points allowed, fifth most

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 3>to the perimeter, and with Josh Downs out, there's gonna

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 3>be extra targets to go around. Alek Pierce is usually

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 3>a one to three big play shot guy, but with

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Downs out, I'm gonna give him the SE grade. Think

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.719
<v Speaker 3>he gets a little extra one. Jonathan Taylor. I got

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 3>a B grade on Pat's a bottom eight in yards

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 3>and scores allowed to running backs over the last few

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 3>they have been much stingier, allowing about eighty nine total yards.

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 3>But the volume Taylor gets, I expect him to get

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 3>to that eighty nine level. He has been held down

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 3>back to back, but those were both top ten run defenses.

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 3>This is not that big difference here, and he's a

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty plus touchbacks have destroyed the pats so B grade

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 3>here Over on the other side, I mentioned Antonio Gibson,

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 3>he was my take a chance on me player.

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 2>What about Ramondre?

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I have him on the bench because of his two

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 3>point six yards per carry, his constant fumbling, and he's

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 3>just been so dang inefficient and if he splits touches,

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that I can love him.

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Here, and he does because you know how I feel

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 2>about Romond. Yeah, he's my guy. Yeah, nowhere to run ever?

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because of the line.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 2>The line's so bad.

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes, if with six teams on by, he does get

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 3>a matchup. I mentioned in the last segment the third

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 3>most Fantasy points allowed to running back. He's got a

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 3>good matchup if you're really desperate with six teams on buy,

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 3>But so Darthrow at best, Drake may was might take

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 3>a chance on me quarterback. I really only like Damrio

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Douglas and Hunter Henry here, though Tomio Douglas with a

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 3>C grade. He's at nine plus PPR points in four

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 3>straight but he also hasn't top twelve PPR points in those,

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 3>so he's like a nine to twelve point guy. He's

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 3>getting four plus catches fifty plus yards in them, averaging

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 3>seven targets. Colts allowing the seventh most receiving yards wide receiver,

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna give him a C and Hunter Henry

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 3>gets the B five plus catches and forty four plus

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 3>yards in five to last six. He did have a

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 3>dud in at Chicago game where New England got up

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 3>by thirty by a ton and ran the ball thirty

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 3>one times, but otherwise, seven different tight ends have scored

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 3>or hit fifty yards against the Colts, so it's a

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 3>decent spot B grade Henry.

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 2>This is the prototypical rookie quarterback looking for his gigantic

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>tight end middle of the field. Hunter Henry's productivity has

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 2>gone way up. Yeah, may yep, that's you know, he's

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 2>turned into the fantasy player.

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:05.239
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to see it. Give us the tight end

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 3>option out there.

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I know we need more of those. We need more

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 2>of those? Is Will Disley? Won find out as we

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 2>break down the Los Angeles Chargers taking on the Atlanta Falcons.

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Do we like Will Disley in this one Thorn Eistrom

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 2>will break that matchup down for you when we come

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 2>back to Fantasy Football Weekly, another block of matchups for you.

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Chargie and Scott

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Fish and thorn Eystrom with you. We pivot to Thor

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 2>for the Chargers taking on the Falcons. And when we

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 2>went into break Thor, I mentioned Will Disley. It's probably

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>not where you were naturally going to start this matchup,

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 2>but and so you don't have to. But Will Disley

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 2>has turned into a PPR helper at its position where

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 2>you can't always find help. Yeah, So if you want

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 2>to start with Bill Disley weekend, where there's a Will,

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a way, nicely done, nicely done.

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna give Disley a B.

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 5>He sat out practice on Wednesday, but he was off

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 5>the injury report on Friday, so we'll be a full

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 5>goal from that groin injury. Certainly startable. With that being said,

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 5>he's been averaging five catches for forty five yards on

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 5>six targets since taking over. Is the team's primary pass

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 5>catching tight end, and he's number nine and Fantasy points

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 5>among all tight ends over the last month. Justin Herbert

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 5>gonna give him an A scored twenty two plus fantasy

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 5>points four games in a row prior to last week

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 5>seventeen point six against Baltimore. Good matchup to get back

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 5>on track here, the Falcons have given up twenty two

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 5>plus fantasy points to five straight quarterbacks. And this is

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 5>a fun stat at a Tassa sin The Falcons have

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 5>ten sacks this year. That is the fewest by any

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 5>team through eleven games since the twenty eighteen Raiders.

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Holy Cow.

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 5>Might have might have used the edge resher there for

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 5>the defense in the draft may Bee.

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 2>That's probably coming next year.

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well we'll see maybe another quarterback for terrible Terry

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 5>found now. Yeah, Gus Edwards, we're gonna give him a bee.

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 5>I mentioned before Kamani vidal As might take a chance

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 5>on me running back. Gus is gonna get the gust.

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 5>Bus is going to get a be here.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 4>JK.

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Dobbins, of course, with his knee injury, is out for

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 5>this game. After Dobbins left last week, Gus Buss actually

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 5>played eleven snaps twenty two for Hassan Haskins. But yeah,

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm expecting Gus to be the primary guy and Vida

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 5>to be the pass catching guy and maybe get a

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 5>little bit more work than that, especially if they have

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 5>the lead and for Haskins not to be as involved

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 5>here and Gus could be looking at around fifteen carries.

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Like I said, I.

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 2>See you like him for about thirty yards.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 5>He is against right now, he is against the Falcons defense.

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, so we're gonna give him a Bee.

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 5>I also gave Lad McConkie, a bee wide receiver thirty

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 5>one and fantasy points per game. He is the go

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 5>to receiver for Justin Herbert. Over the past two games,

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 5>Lad twelve catches for two hundred and six yards on

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 5>fifteen targets. The Falcons have allowed the fourth most fantasy

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 5>points to opposing receivers, and they've been struggling against slot

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 5>receivers in particular. If I thought this game could be closer,

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 5>I like the Chargers in this one, but maybe I'd

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 5>even tick Ladd up higher. But the second half with

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 5>the lead, I don't know. They put the ball in

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 5>the air as much. Quintin Johnson gave him a seat.

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 5>He had the three drops against the Ravens last week.

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 5>This is a good matchup for him as well, of course,

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 5>versus that bad Falcons pass defense. The Falcons run a

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 5>lot of Cover three. Quinton Johnston has the eleventh best

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 5>yards per route run against Cover three this year.

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Wow, what so he got to give him a seat? Well,

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 2>will he catch whatever throndo him?

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 5>We'll find out. He got the drops, He's out of

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 5>the way. Last week I used him all up. He's

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 5>due to not drop the ball this year. Kirk Cousin's

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:56.439
<v Speaker 5>gonna give him a seat going over to the Falcon side.

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Four games to twenty plus fantasy points this all season.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 5>On two against Tampa Bay. Here's another crazy staff for you.

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 5>For of Cousins's total fantasy points this seasons.

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Tamp came in those two games.

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 5>Incredible zero touchdowns the past two games for Kirk Cousins.

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 5>The Chargers have given up twenty plus fantasy points to

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 5>three straight quarterbacks, but that has in part been because

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 5>of rushing utility, which Cousins does not offer. For that reason,

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 5>I give him a c B. Jon Robinson a must start.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 5>I would advise keeping Tyler l Jeer on the bench.

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't think this is the right matchup for him.

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 5>Like I said, I like the Chargers in the game,

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 5>and the Chargers have also given up the fifth viewes

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 5>PPR points to opposing running backs and the Falcons maybe

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 5>playing from behind the second half, which would cut into

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 5>his usage. Drake London A must start Darnell Mooney b

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 5>for him. He's expected to play after he left the

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 5>last game against Denver with the hamstring injury, but they

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 5>had to buy in between for Darnell Mooney to get healthy.

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Mooney has scored fourteen point six or more PPR points

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 5>in three straight prior to that Broncos game when he

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 5>got hurt. The Chargers have allowed five receivers to score

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 5>at least twelve point three PPR points in the past

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 5>five games. If Mooney were to be ruled out, I

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 5>don't expect him to be, but if he were, then

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 5>Ray Ray mccleody become a deep flex option. But otherwise

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 5>keep Ray Ray on the bench. And then lastly, Kyle Pitts,

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 5>I give him a C. I never I'm always wrong.

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Everyone's always wrong about Kyle. I'll just toss the Sea

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 5>out nine point five PPR points or last three games

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.919
<v Speaker 5>in a row, one game with a touchdown since Week one,

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 5>and this is also a tough matchup. Mark Andrews became

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 5>the first tight end last week to score a touchdown

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 5>against the Chargers all season long, and the Charges have

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 5>allowed the sixth lowest yards per reception and the eighth

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 5>lowest fantasy points per game to opposing tight ends.

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Andrewscott that first touchdown against the Chargers at

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 2>this time last week. I did the Baltimore matchup Mark Andrews.

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 2>He's so touchdown dependent. When he doesn't score, you only

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.720
<v Speaker 2>get like two catches twenty three yards, and the Chargers

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 2>have never given up a touchdown, so you need to

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:00.760
<v Speaker 2>leave him on the bench. It's like saying.

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 4>Candy Man in the mirror three times, that's gonna show up. Yeah, yep.

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay takes on Carolina. I did not expect this

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 2>to be a thorny long matchup, but it kind of is.

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's uh, let's start with Bucky Irving. How good is

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Bucky Irving? Thor among runners with at least one hundred carries,

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Irving ranks number one in yards after contact and nobody

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 2>is close. He's four point two yards after contact. He

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 2>ranks number He's a banana peel that guy. I like this.

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 2>He's number two in avoided tackle rate. He's number five

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 2>in yards per carry, and he's six in yards over expectation.

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 3>You know it is yards after contact were last week,

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 3>just last week seven point three?

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Jeez.

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, just at some point doesn't and I, Scott,

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 2>I think I have already talked about this. I don't

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 2>know if you've chimed in you Thorp, at some point,

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 2>doesn't Bucky Irving just become the starter because he's so much.

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Better than I mean, he out snapped White last week.

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 2>I know, but I want to see more. Okay, I do,

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and I want to believe that sooner or later it's

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:05.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna work out that way. Bucky Irving comes in with

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 2>an A grade here. Carolina is predictably bad against the run,

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 2>allowing the most fantasy points to opposing running backs, and

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 2>even if he only gets his usual like ten twelve

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 2>fifteen touches, that's enough for a big game for Irving.

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 4>I love him.

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm going a grade.

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 3>He won another Bucky Irvings ste please her. He ran

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.399
<v Speaker 3>a route on fifty nine percent of his snaps last week.

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh he again, casts he's digging into that receiving.

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 4>I love it.

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 2>So let's then go to Rashad White, who's got a

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 2>C grade. I think he's fractionally as good a runner Aserving,

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 2>but he continues to get half the snaps. I'll note

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 2>that White snap percentage has decreased in three straight games,

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 2>been Irving snaps have increased in three straight games. White

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 2>does remain startable because of the strong matchup with Carolina,

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 2>though c grade there. It's going to the passing game.

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna start with Baker Mayfield. So with Mike Evans back,

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 2>last week, Mayfield jumped right back to his previous passing

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 2>success with nearly three hundred yards and a eighty percent

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 2>completion rate for Baker Mayfield. The Panther secondary, though sneaky,

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.760
<v Speaker 2>they have improved a lot good quarterbacks, though still finding

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 2>their ways to good games against Carolina, including Patrick Mahomes

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 2>last week, who posted his highest scoring Fantasy day of

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the year. As a bonus, the Panthers have yielded quarterback

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 2>rushing touchdowns or fifty or more rushing yards in every

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 2>game since Week seven. And Baker is really good about

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 2>scrambling out of the pocket and making things happen on

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the fly. So a grade for Baker mayfix this one.

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 2>So then let's go to Mike Evans. He'll mostly see

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 2>cornerback jac Horn, who's one of the few cornerbacks who's

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:39.439
<v Speaker 2>physical enough to battle Mike Evans. Horns a gambler who

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 2>can smother smaller receivers. But obviously that's not Evans, who's gigantic.

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 2>He also gets burned a lot, and he's given up

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 2>four scores this year. Horns and e Lee tackler. He

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.720
<v Speaker 2>shuts down yards after catch, and that's where Mike Evans

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 2>gets a lot of his damages after the catch, and

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 2>jac Horn will not be a part of that. So

0:39:56.840 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I've got to B grade on Mike Evans. Sterling Shepard

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 2>with a sneaky Sea grade, running primarily from the slot.

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 2>That puts him on backup cornerback Dane Jackson a very

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.760
<v Speaker 2>positive matchup seeing the field in only four games, Jackson's

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:12.439
<v Speaker 2>allowed two scores in a seventy one percent completion rate.

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 2>And it's a side note. I like Sterling Shepard in

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the slot his natural position. Mike Evans also runs in

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the slot more than you think, and he could destroy

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the one hundred and eighty pound Dame Jackson. So a

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 2>C grade on Sterling Shepard. All right, where does that

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 2>leave us?

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 2>It leaves us right here, so bold strategy. Cotton is

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 2>off sea. Cotton had a down game last week, as

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 2>predicted on the show, and some people are correlating that

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 2>to the return of Mike Evans. But Evans only lined

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 2>up in the slot three times last week. Aughton lines

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 2>up in line. He lines up in the slot. Point

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 2>being Cotton and Evans path do not cross. Cotton should

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 2>still be safe because he's getting so much extra work

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the field, because Chris Godwin's still gone.

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Carolina getting hammered by tight ends, allowing the most PPR

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy points to tight end. Cotton A grade, A great,

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 2>A grade.

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I knew that was coming.

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's go over to Carolina side. Still plenty to talk about.

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 2>You wouldn't think so. Tuba Hubbard is arguably the league's

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 2>most improved running back. He has scored and or top

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 2>ninety two yards in eight of the last nine games.

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Hubbard is just basically a set it and forget it

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 2>runner on an improving offense. Tampa's gotten a lot better

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 2>against the run. Oh sorry, yeah, they're much better against

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the run than they were previously, and they're better against

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the run than they are against the pass. In the

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 2>past two games. They've held Christian McCaffrey and Tyrone Tracy

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 2>to forty two and thirty nine rushing yards. That's amazing.

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 2>They've given up some big receiving days to runners, but

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 2>Hubbard isn't much of a factor through the air, and

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 2>he's only a B grade. Bryce Young is evolving into

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 2>a plausible starter. We're going to talk more about him

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 2>a little later in the show. Touchdown passes in four

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 2>straight games and clearly obviously improved play. Nobody's going to

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 2>start Young, so I'm not gonna spend a lot of

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 2>time talking about him. But the Bucks are incredibly as

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 2>a matchup, allowing the second most fantasy points of the position.

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Adam thelen Was might take a chance on me wide receiver.

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.399
<v Speaker 2>You can also start Xavier Ligette with Jalen Coker out.

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 2>By the way, theeling's a SEA grade. With Jalen Coker out,

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:14.799
<v Speaker 2>Lagette is on the field nearly every snap now. He's

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 2>not seeing a ton of targets, unfortunately, but big bodied,

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 2>physical receivers have been killing the Bucks. Just in recent games.

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Juwan Jennings put up seven catches ninety three yards. DeAndre

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Hopkins scored twice. The Bucks are likely without starting safety

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Whitehead and their other safety Tykey Smith questioned both

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 2>knee injuries I mentioned earlier in the show. So I

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 2>like Xavier Ligette, who comes in with a se grade.

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 3>That's a take a chance on me player that it

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:41.879
<v Speaker 3>really is a good one.

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I like it. I like it. We've got a couple

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 2>of minutes left in this segment. You two, I don't

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 2>think i've hit with this theory yet. Oh, boy, Thor,

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I think you're especially gonna like this. But Scott you

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 2>might too. Brock Bowers, Oh, I know where you're going on.

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh one year, I knew exactly where you're going. Now

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:04.320
<v Speaker 2>here's the theory.

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 3>No, I get to play this out. So first, it's

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:08.319
<v Speaker 3>the old Kelsey theory. It is.

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 2>It's the old Kelsey theory. Right, So you're gonna have

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 2>black Bowers is going to be the number one ranked

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 2>tight end for most people next year probably, right, So

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:18.280
<v Speaker 2>it'll be number one at his position.

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:20.720
<v Speaker 3>There might be some McBride truthers.

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:23.399
<v Speaker 2>But there might be he's got score more touchdowns. That's

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 2>and Bowers, I think is just a freaky talent. Raiders

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 2>some way, somehow are going to have better quarterbacking next year,

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I have to either through the draft or because they're

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 2>going to land somebody like Sam Darnold, And between that combination,

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I think there's I think blck Bowers is going to

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 2>go on average in the first round.

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, probably at.

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 2>The end, but I think there's a case to be

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 2>made Black Bowers one on one.

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 4>What do you think?

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean?

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 3>You know me, I take tight ends early all the time.

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 3>I'd rather just have that and set it and it's done.

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 5>But they're gonna throw the ball out with Shadir Sanders

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 5>and coach Ryme.

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 3>So they might. I mean, is there something to this

0:43:58.920 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 3>or am I just trying?

0:43:59.760 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 6>No?

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it'd be fun.

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 4>Antonio pier is gonna get fired.

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 5>You got to reach out to coach from Yeah, I

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 5>think that you're gonna have access to his kid.

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 4>Something you want to do to incentivise him to come.

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 4>That would do it.

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 2>That would do it, That would do it. Uh. Three

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 2>tough questions When we come back, you can play a

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 2>lot see if you can go three and oh with

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 2>our panel of experts as we answer some of the

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 2>toughest questions nagging fantasy football players like yourself. When we

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 2>return for our number two A Fantasy Football Weekly, our

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 2>number two Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Charchie and Scott Fish

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 2>throw an eystrom with you, hey this weekend a big

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 2>sale at fantasylife dot com. In shows pass like all

0:44:58.160 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 2>of the show's past, I've mentioned that you can get

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:02.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighty percent off by being a Fantasy Football Weekly listener.

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 2>How about fifty percent of fifty percent off? You get

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:12.320
<v Speaker 2>all the great premium tools at fantasylife dot com, player projections, start,

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 2>sit tools, airyard snapcounts, routes, run p DVP, and the

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:20.280
<v Speaker 2>amazing utilization scores that show you how involved every player

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 2>is in his offense. So much good stuff. Fifty percent

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:26.480
<v Speaker 2>off when you use promo code b F five zero

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:30.240
<v Speaker 2>b like boy F like Frank Black Friday five zero

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent off Fantasy Life plus at fantasylife dot com.

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:36.760
<v Speaker 2>This is a game we call three tough questions.

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.440
<v Speaker 6>Tough question Number one.

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Isaiah Pacheco has been activated from IR rest of season.

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 2>Will Pacheco be a an RB one, an RB two

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 2>flex or bench level player? Scott, let's be with you.

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm gonna go RB two on this week. This

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 3>week they got the Raiders he still split with Hunt Somes,

0:45:58.280 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 3>but did get some pass catch and work, had that

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 3>nice thirty four yard run. But the rest of his schedule,

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 3>and I know this has been talked about out there,

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 3>that they have a one of the tougher run defensive

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 3>schedules going forward. According to my numbers, four of their

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:18.840
<v Speaker 3>next four opponents after the Raiders fifth against fantasy running backs, sixth, seventh,

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:21.879
<v Speaker 3>and eleventh. It's a really tough run for him coming up.

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 3>But he should like he got bell Coow work before

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 3>he got hurt. Kareem Hunt got bellcow work after he

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:30.719
<v Speaker 3>got hurt. I expect him to go right back to that.

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:33.840
<v Speaker 3>He does get a little bit of pass you. I

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 3>think RB two is well within the range even with

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 3>a tough schedule.

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, four, Isaiah Pacheco rest of season? Will he be

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 2>in RB one, RB two flex or bench?

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna say flex. The Chiefs were.

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:50.919
<v Speaker 5>Eight and one without him. Kareem Hunt leads the team

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 5>in rushing. Hunt was asked if he could be entering

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 5>a Platin situation like during his five seasons with the

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 5>Browns with Nick Chobb, and Hunt said quote, it could

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 5>be very similar. I'm excited, I'm used to working with

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 5>other great backs, so I feel like it's gonna be

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:06.280
<v Speaker 5>another great one to two punch end quote.

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna say flex interesting.

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Kareem Hunt was objectively bad with the Chiefs. How bad,

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 2>you might ask? Among the thirty two runners with at

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 2>least one hundred carries, here's where Hunt ranks. Broken tackle

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 2>rate thirtieth out of thirty two, yards per carry thirtieth

0:47:24.480 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 2>out of thirty two, yards after contact thirty one out

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 2>of thirty two, and yards over expectation thirtieth out of

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 2>thirty two for Kareem Hunt, and he still finished his

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 2>RB thirteen. Boy, Despite all that, Pachecko is way better

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:45.480
<v Speaker 2>than Kareem Hunt at this stage of their careers. Last year,

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Pachecko was an RB one roughly running back twelve overall

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 2>and half point PPR. Now, we only saw Pachecko for

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:53.839
<v Speaker 2>less than two full games at the start of the season.

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Was basically two full games Week one versus Baltimore, which

0:47:57.680 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 2>turned out to be an elite run defense. He did

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 2>score in that game, and then Week two against Cincinnati

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:03.359
<v Speaker 2>post one hundred and eleven total yuards. But Checko is good.

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Now the schedule is hard, but there are none of

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the big stoppers on the schedule like Minnesota, Baltimore, Kansas

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 2>City that just locked down opposing running backs. So mostly

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 2>it's neutral ish matchups.

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:17.320
<v Speaker 4>Left.

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 2>If Hunt can be running back thirteen in this offense,

0:48:20.480 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 2>the checko can be an RB one.

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 6>Tough question number two.

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 2>This question inspired by a question from the Fantasy Football

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Weekly Discord channel user epic thank you. What is the

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 2>appropriate level of concern for Marvin Harrison? And I think

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 2>we may have actually had this exact question after like

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 2>week three. We're going back to it none, some or

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 2>a bowl loosening level of existential dread. For this one,

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:45.839
<v Speaker 2>we begin with thorneistrum.

0:48:46.400 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna say some.

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 5>However, I did just pick him up in the Fantasy

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 5>Life Full Timer Guillotine League.

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:55.760
<v Speaker 2>So the fact that he was available in a guillotine

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 2>league right now tells.

0:48:56.880 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 4>You a lot. Yeah, and I didn't have to bet

0:48:58.840 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 4>on him. Was this straight?

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 2>That's because he has assassinate.

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 3>His consistency is exactly what you look for, exactly, ye sarcasm.

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 5>He has been targeted six times or less each of

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 5>the past three games seven points seven PPR points are

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 5>less in two of those outings. Oh boy, not a

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 5>great matchup against the Vikings on deck. But I still

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:21.320
<v Speaker 5>do expect him to make some noise down the Stretchy.

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:23.840
<v Speaker 5>He's been the all or nothing guy. He's gonna have

0:49:23.880 --> 0:49:26.320
<v Speaker 5>a couple of all games. Yeah, down the stretcher.

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:28.360
<v Speaker 4>You just have to pick Ray. You have to choose correctly.

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I like that you went with we're gonna come to

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:32.359
<v Speaker 3>be at a second. But I like that you went

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 3>with targeted seven times or less, and in mind, I

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:37.200
<v Speaker 3>say he's been targeted five times or more, so it's

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:37.920
<v Speaker 3>time to seven.

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, So same question, appropriate level of concern

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:44.719
<v Speaker 2>for Marvin Harrison. None. Some are a bowel loosening level

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:45.799
<v Speaker 2>of existential drive.

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't loosen my bowels for for a guy, for

0:49:49.040 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 3>a guy, you know, But for a guy that's just

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 3>one game removed from a five for fifty four and

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:55.840
<v Speaker 3>one stat line, and just a couple of games removed

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 3>from a six for one eleven and one stat line.

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 3>He's what Amari Cooper was his career. He's what Lee

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 3>Evans was in Buffalo. He's gonna have giant games and

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 3>then he's gonna beat you know. He's gonna have giant

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 3>games and he's gonna have games where he kind of

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:11.080
<v Speaker 3>disappears because he's the third option. It's James Connor and

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 3>it's Trey McBride, and that the offense runs through those

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 3>two avenues. The only reason you're really it blowed is

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:20.839
<v Speaker 3>if you're holding on to that first, second third round

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:23.239
<v Speaker 3>ADP that you drafted him, Matt and he's like, Oh,

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:25.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm freaking out because he's not that guy. But if

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:28.200
<v Speaker 3>you can settle in and accept that he's the third

0:50:28.280 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 3>option on that offense and matchups like this week against

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota is where you play him and other ones are not,

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 3>you're fine.

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 2>So some Harrison has not figured out zone coverage is

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 2>his problem. He doesn't get targeted as often in zone

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 2>and in man coverage. He's targeted on thirty percent of

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Arizona's passes, but in zone only nineteen percent, and on

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:53.440
<v Speaker 2>throws into zone coverage. Get this, Marvin Harrison catching forty

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 2>eight percent of his passes in zone. Yards per route

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 2>run plunges to one point seven for Marvin Harrison in

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:05.360
<v Speaker 2>zone coverage. It makes sense that Harrison, who's a physical

0:51:05.440 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 2>mismatch for most cornerbacks, would be more dominant man coverage,

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:10.560
<v Speaker 2>and he is but defenses won't play him that way.

0:51:11.520 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Even highly drafted wideouts can be excused for not being

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Randy Moss when they start their career. You know, they

0:51:17.600 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 2>don't all come out like you know, Gangbusters in week one.

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 3>We'll give you a pass that ye're not a Hall

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 3>of Famer, but.

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Exactly not yet. There are still some favorable matchups out

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:28.240
<v Speaker 2>there on the schedule for Marvin Harrison. I think Minnesota

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 2>gave him a B grade this week Seattle Rams. He's

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:34.840
<v Speaker 2>got some neutral matchups with the Hopland in Carolina. I overall,

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 2>I think I have concerned. I thought Marvin Harris, we

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:40.480
<v Speaker 2>all did. We all thought Marvin Harrison be way better.

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 2>His one his ADP was the beginning of the second round, YEP,

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 2>which is I don't I think there's this will take

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 2>some of the sheen off of future rookie wide receivers.

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I think from a fantasy stamp fit.

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Neighbors will add it right back on.

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, second year, but future rookies, I think we might

0:51:55.840 --> 0:51:58.239
<v Speaker 2>be like, maybe I need to see it first. Yeah,

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:00.320
<v Speaker 2>we'll see uh. Correct answer.

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:04.360
<v Speaker 6>So tough question number three over the past.

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Five weeks Jackson Smith and Jigba is the sixth highest

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:11.719
<v Speaker 2>scoring wideout for the rest of the year. Will he

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 2>be a wide receiver one, meaning top twelve wide receiver.

0:52:15.280 --> 0:52:17.080
<v Speaker 2>We go back to Scott Fish first for this one.

0:52:17.600 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean he's wide receiver nine on the season

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 3>right now we're talking about going forward. He's got a

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 3>couple of good, if not great matchups and a couple

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:27.480
<v Speaker 3>of rougher ones. The offense is passing at an insane

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:31.040
<v Speaker 3>rate over the last month. It's ticked down a little

0:52:31.080 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 3>bit there the amount of passing, and he's still had

0:52:33.840 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 3>this amount of volume. Both both Lockett and Metcalf have

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:41.320
<v Speaker 3>been dealing with injuries. Four of the final five Fantasy

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:44.359
<v Speaker 3>weeks are against bottom half teams defending the slot, which

0:52:44.440 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 3>is where he plays.

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go with yeah. I think he's going to

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:49.440
<v Speaker 3>keep it up and stay it within that twelve.

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:52.239
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, so you're a yes. That will remain

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Jackson Smith and Jigbo remain a wide receiver one. How

0:52:55.160 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 2>about you thor?

0:52:55.840 --> 0:52:57.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I hope Seattle's trainer is able to get that

0:52:57.920 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 5>FOURK out of Lockets back.

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:04.000
<v Speaker 4>I would say more.

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:06.560
<v Speaker 5>Of a good wide receiver two as opposed to wide

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:09.320
<v Speaker 5>receiver one. I'm very close, but I like top fifteen

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:11.680
<v Speaker 5>guy the rest of the season, not top twelve.

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 4>We're pretty close.

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like charts try to make it hard.

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, yeah, Seattle's throwing even Yeah, they're throwing thirty

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 5>plus times a game. All the usage at this point

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 5>is either going to DK or JSN. Lockett's done. The

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:27.440
<v Speaker 5>volume is propping up JSN. But I expect that to continue.

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:28.360
<v Speaker 5>Why Why wouldn't it?

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Why wouldn't it? Well, let's talk it through for a second.

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 2>JSN runs largely from the slot, is Scott alluded to?

0:53:34.880 --> 0:53:37.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, some defenses are more vulnerable to the slot

0:53:37.600 --> 0:53:39.839
<v Speaker 2>than others, and this, as we know from breaking down

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 2>all these games, this is one of the more predictable

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 2>things that we get because we know who the slot

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 2>cornerbacks are and more often than not, regardless of the

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:50.680
<v Speaker 2>other kinds of coverages and schemes, we know that slot

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:53.600
<v Speaker 2>receiver is going to be on the slot cornerback. Sometimes

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:58.120
<v Speaker 2>those are brutal matchups this week against Michael Carter. Brutal

0:53:58.160 --> 0:54:00.799
<v Speaker 2>matchup Carter Michael Carter. We talk about Sauce Gardner DJ

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 2>read all the time. Michael Carter is giving up per

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:08.400
<v Speaker 2>game averages of one catch for fourteen yards. That's insane,

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:10.880
<v Speaker 2>and he hasn't given up a touchdown all year. This

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:13.400
<v Speaker 2>is a brutal matchup this week, but they're not all

0:54:13.480 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 2>that way last year. The big change for JSN that

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:21.239
<v Speaker 2>I love for this year and especially lately, his a

0:54:21.440 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 2>dot has expanded. Yes, and somebody one of the two

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 2>of you, I think, alluded to this on a previous show.

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 2>It's his last year's eight out with six yards. You

0:54:29.200 --> 0:54:31.839
<v Speaker 2>can't pile up fantasy points on six yards a catch.

0:54:31.960 --> 0:54:34.799
<v Speaker 2>This year it's ten yards, and over the last six

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:38.480
<v Speaker 2>games it's eleven yards for Jackson Smith and Jigbaw. That's

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:42.080
<v Speaker 2>that is the kind of production that will give you

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:47.239
<v Speaker 2>bigger plays on deeper receptions. I was tempted to go

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:49.640
<v Speaker 2>yes on this, but I don't think there's enough goods,

0:54:49.719 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 2>easy slot matchups left on the schedule.

0:54:57.120 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 3>No, Okay, it's close.

0:55:00.680 --> 0:55:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I had yes, originally, I tucked myself out of it.

0:55:03.760 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's move on to our matchups. Next up thor are

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 2>you ready? Houston taking on Jacksonville. Joe Mixon coming off

0:55:10.760 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the rare dud game. Now he gets the Jaguars. Now

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the Jaguars pass defense is horrible. Their run defense is

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:19.200
<v Speaker 2>a little better. What do you see for Joe Mixon

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:20.839
<v Speaker 2>here as in an automatic bounce back.

0:55:20.760 --> 0:55:22.359
<v Speaker 4>Spot automatic bounce back spot.

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:25.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he's an A and a must start and very

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 5>good matchup for mixing here. I think Nico Collins also

0:55:28.920 --> 0:55:30.399
<v Speaker 5>is going to get the A and the muss start.

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:31.319
<v Speaker 4>CJ.

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 5>Sherrows might take a chance on me quarterback Tank Dell

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:36.279
<v Speaker 5>gonna give him a B seven plus targets and ten

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:38.560
<v Speaker 5>plus fantasy points at three of the past four games.

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 5>Dell does better when Nico Collins is on the field,

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:44.359
<v Speaker 5>for sure. He averages more than double the fantasy points

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:46.360
<v Speaker 5>per game win cons is on the field as opposed

0:55:46.360 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 5>to off of it. The Jaguars defense gives up the

0:55:49.200 --> 0:55:52.240
<v Speaker 5>third most fantasy points per game to opposing wide receivers.

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:54.480
<v Speaker 5>So a B on Dell gonna give a seed to

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:57.239
<v Speaker 5>Dalton Schultz tight end twenty five and fantasy points per

0:55:57.320 --> 0:56:00.440
<v Speaker 5>game only one tight end one game this season that

0:56:00.560 --> 0:56:03.279
<v Speaker 5>Jaguars have allowed the eleventh most receiving yards per game

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:06.120
<v Speaker 5>two opposing tight ends and the fifth most fantasy points

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:08.759
<v Speaker 5>per game to tight ends. Going over to the Jaguars side,

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 5>looks like we're going to get Trevor Lawrence back for

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:13.960
<v Speaker 5>this game. Doug Peterson said Lawrence expected to play after

0:56:14.000 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 5>he had missed the two games with the left shoulder injury.

0:56:16.400 --> 0:56:19.000
<v Speaker 5>It's not guaranteed though, as he said here, Lawrence said

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:21.320
<v Speaker 5>surgery is still a possibility. Yeah, for that's brand a

0:56:21.440 --> 0:56:24.600
<v Speaker 5>seed joint. So we'll see if he does start. I'm

0:56:24.640 --> 0:56:27.520
<v Speaker 5>going to give Lawrence a see Lawrence has scored at

0:56:27.640 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 5>least nineteen point six fantasy points in four of the

0:56:30.200 --> 0:56:32.799
<v Speaker 5>five games prior to the injury. Also going to give

0:56:32.800 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 5>a seed to Travis etn Tank Bigsby, with his ankle injury,

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 5>appears on track to play this week.

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I think he's off the injury port altogether. Okay, you

0:56:41.080 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 2>know how you know how I feel about.

0:56:44.640 --> 0:56:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Rolling the tanks.

0:56:45.560 --> 0:56:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh, So, okay, we'll be just pause for a seconds.

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 2>We do have a little extra time. Yeah, it's a

0:56:51.680 --> 0:56:54.120
<v Speaker 2>lost season for the Jaguars. Yeah, you know what Travis

0:56:54.160 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 2>etn Is can give you. I think it's been clearly

0:56:56.760 --> 0:56:59.360
<v Speaker 2>spelled out over the last several years. Can we just

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 2>give Tank Bigsby twenty carries in a few of these games?

0:57:02.160 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 4>We've been begging for it? Yes, Yeah, Doug just won't

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:06.440
<v Speaker 4>do it. But yeah, please dug down.

0:57:06.320 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 2>This track, if only for self preservation, Doug like to

0:57:09.160 --> 0:57:11.880
<v Speaker 2>find some to make it look like you're unearthing, you know,

0:57:12.520 --> 0:57:16.080
<v Speaker 2>new ways to establish this offense and find new ways

0:57:16.120 --> 0:57:19.480
<v Speaker 2>to go win some games. Why not try your clearly better.

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Backs something yeah, something, but yeah.

0:57:22.320 --> 0:57:25.160
<v Speaker 5>The usage being hard to parse is why I give

0:57:25.240 --> 0:57:29.880
<v Speaker 5>ETN the seed despite ETN six point three points PPR

0:57:29.920 --> 0:57:32.400
<v Speaker 5>points or last three games in a row hasn't cleared

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:35.160
<v Speaker 5>either thirteen carries or fourteen point eight fantasy points in

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 5>a game. All season long, the Texans have allowed the

0:57:37.720 --> 0:57:40.440
<v Speaker 5>fifth few as fantasy points to opposing running backs, and

0:57:40.560 --> 0:57:43.120
<v Speaker 5>that's one of the reasons why just this week, I'm

0:57:43.200 --> 0:57:44.600
<v Speaker 5>hoping the same thing as you charge.

0:57:44.920 --> 0:57:47.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm hoping that that Bigsby gets more usage.

0:57:47.360 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm keeping them on the bench in this one though,

0:57:50.040 --> 0:57:52.560
<v Speaker 5>in that first game back ce how the usage shakes out.

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:55.720
<v Speaker 5>Texans are tenth overall in the league in run defense

0:57:55.760 --> 0:57:58.320
<v Speaker 5>as well, and this could be a very bad game

0:57:58.360 --> 0:57:59.040
<v Speaker 5>script as well.

0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:00.560
<v Speaker 4>That is true.

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:04.360
<v Speaker 5>Moving over to the receiving weapons, there Brian Thomas Junior

0:58:04.440 --> 0:58:06.840
<v Speaker 5>going to give him a B wide receiver twenty eight

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:08.640
<v Speaker 5>in fantasy and it would be huge for him if

0:58:08.680 --> 0:58:11.920
<v Speaker 5>Trevor Lawrence comes back. He scored at least fifteen PPR

0:58:12.040 --> 0:58:14.600
<v Speaker 5>points in two of the past three games. Win Lawrence

0:58:14.640 --> 0:58:17.600
<v Speaker 5>started and finished a game gave Davis and Christian Kirk

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 5>both out. Of course, Houston has allowed the eighth most

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:22.520
<v Speaker 5>fantasy points per game to opposing receivers and there should

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:24.880
<v Speaker 5>be plenty of targets there for Brian Thomas and then

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:27.600
<v Speaker 5>lastly Evan Ingram going to give him an a. Ingram

0:58:27.920 --> 0:58:30.000
<v Speaker 5>has at least seven targets three games in a row.

0:58:30.400 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 5>In weeks one to nine with Lawrence under center, Ingram

0:58:33.680 --> 0:58:35.960
<v Speaker 5>was the tight end eight in fantasy points per game.

0:58:36.360 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 5>This could be a sneaky matchup, sneaky good matchup for

0:58:38.840 --> 0:58:43.240
<v Speaker 5>him as well. Texans are the fourth fewest fantasy points

0:58:43.400 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 5>allowed to opposing tight ends. However, Sam Laporta, Luke Schoonmaker,

0:58:47.360 --> 0:58:51.160
<v Speaker 5>and Chickakonquo all scored at least eleven point six PPR

0:58:51.240 --> 0:58:53.160
<v Speaker 5>points the last three games against the Texans.

0:58:53.200 --> 0:58:55.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, well done, my man. When we come back

0:58:56.200 --> 0:58:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Rams taking on the Saints, Scott, it feels like green

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:02.680
<v Speaker 2>light for the past catchers for the Rams. Yeah, it

0:59:02.720 --> 0:59:06.040
<v Speaker 2>really does Marshawn Lattimore less New Orleans Saints and.

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Paulson the Davo less.

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Paul has been out still.

0:59:10.280 --> 0:59:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Both of them have that.

0:59:12.720 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 2>It could be a track meet here for the Rams.

0:59:14.600 --> 0:59:17.240
<v Speaker 2>We'll find out from Scott Fish when we come back

0:59:17.320 --> 0:59:38.960
<v Speaker 2>to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. A

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:43.040
<v Speaker 2>block of matchups for you, beginning with the Los Angeles

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Rams at the New Orleans Saints. Scott, it just feels

0:59:46.880 --> 0:59:49.640
<v Speaker 2>like it's all it's green light all the Rams right here.

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:52.080
<v Speaker 3>I almost just want to say automatic a's for Stafford,

0:59:52.120 --> 0:59:55.479
<v Speaker 3>Cup and Nikoua in this one. Honestly, it's it's so close.

0:59:55.560 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 3>The Saints d has allowed the fourth most passing yards

0:59:57.880 --> 1:00:00.200
<v Speaker 3>and just gave up back to back three hundred plus

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:04.160
<v Speaker 3>yards days James Winston at three ninety five last week.

1:00:04.200 --> 1:00:06.560
<v Speaker 3>It's it's just a really good spot. Since losing a

1:00:06.680 --> 1:00:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Debo and Lattimore, five of the seven qbs they have

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:12.760
<v Speaker 3>faced top three hundred total yards.

1:00:12.920 --> 1:00:13.200
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

1:00:13.400 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Like, yeah, so it's five of the seven since losing

1:00:17.800 --> 1:00:20.240
<v Speaker 3>a day, both three of three of the four since

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Latimore left. Yeah, so just a lot of yards to

1:00:23.160 --> 1:00:23.480
<v Speaker 3>be had.

1:00:24.080 --> 1:00:24.200
<v Speaker 6>Cup.

1:00:24.360 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 3>The Saints allowed the fourth most Fantasy points per game

1:00:26.760 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>to the slot UH for for Nikua, He's had more

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:35.760
<v Speaker 3>catches more yards than than Cup in four last five

1:00:35.800 --> 1:00:38.560
<v Speaker 3>games since returning UH. The only game he did was

1:00:38.600 --> 1:00:40.320
<v Speaker 3>the game that he came out of and only played

1:00:40.360 --> 1:00:43.320
<v Speaker 3>thirty five percent of the snaps. Both both A grades.

1:00:43.360 --> 1:00:46.280
<v Speaker 3>They are just just great spots for them. DeMarcus Robinson

1:00:46.440 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 3>only has five receptions for fifty seven yards of the

1:00:48.760 --> 1:00:51.880
<v Speaker 3>final over the last three games. You're you're caught up.

1:00:51.920 --> 1:00:53.640
<v Speaker 3>You might be caught up on the scores that would

1:00:53.840 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 3>seem much more random, the Puka sitting game and the

1:00:56.720 --> 1:01:00.440
<v Speaker 3>three target game where he scored two against the Vikings.

1:01:00.920 --> 1:01:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Karen Williams A grade leads the NFL in touches and

1:01:04.000 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 3>scores from inside the five. Well, he's tied with Derrick

1:01:07.160 --> 1:01:09.919
<v Speaker 3>Henry on both, but he does lead. He does lead,

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:11.120
<v Speaker 3>died with Derrick Henry.

1:01:11.920 --> 1:01:14.400
<v Speaker 2>It's good to be tied with Derrick Henry in any Yeah.

1:01:15.240 --> 1:01:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, No other back for the Rams, by the way,

1:01:17.080 --> 1:01:19.320
<v Speaker 3>has more than thirteen snaps in any game this season.

1:01:19.360 --> 1:01:22.960
<v Speaker 3>It's all Kyaren Willis. It's all Karen Williams work. Second

1:01:23.040 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 3>most red zone touches. He hasn't seen a target in

1:01:26.360 --> 1:01:28.040
<v Speaker 3>each of the last two games, but prior to that,

1:01:28.160 --> 1:01:30.800
<v Speaker 3>he had eleven catches in three games. That's part of

1:01:30.840 --> 1:01:33.400
<v Speaker 3>his game, and that's where you attack. The Saints their

1:01:33.440 --> 1:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>top twelve in a bunch of category or bottom twelve

1:01:36.120 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 3>in a bunch of categories against pass catching backs. And

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:43.120
<v Speaker 3>they also allowed the ninth most rush yards and fourth

1:01:43.280 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 3>most rushing scores. Like it's just a good spot for

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Karen Williams as well.

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So over on the other side, Derek carm giving

1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 3>a C grade two. He's averaging about two hundred and

1:01:52.280 --> 1:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>fifty yards in the three games since returning. He's got

1:01:54.920 --> 1:01:56.880
<v Speaker 3>five scores in those three games, and the Rams have

1:01:56.960 --> 1:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>allowed multiple scores in about half their games. I think

1:01:59.760 --> 1:02:02.040
<v Speaker 3>this might be like just a shootout, a race to

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:03.840
<v Speaker 3>keep up with the Rams at this point. So I

1:02:03.920 --> 1:02:06.760
<v Speaker 3>got a C grade on Derek Carr. I had to

1:02:06.840 --> 1:02:10.000
<v Speaker 3>take a chance on me with Marcuz, Valkez, feud Az Scandaling,

1:02:10.040 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 3>I think he gets a couple of big plays in

1:02:11.640 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>here and Taysom Hill at this point. You just got

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:17.360
<v Speaker 3>to start him, you do, right, Yeah? In Darren, Yeah,

1:02:17.440 --> 1:02:20.480
<v Speaker 3>in Darren Rizzy's offense, he's his route participation in the

1:02:20.520 --> 1:02:22.840
<v Speaker 3>last two games are sixty percent and sixty three percent.

1:02:23.360 --> 1:02:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Then you tack on a bunch of a bunch of

1:02:25.800 --> 1:02:29.920
<v Speaker 3>rushing and pass. Yeah, he's not a true tight end,

1:02:30.280 --> 1:02:33.320
<v Speaker 3>but he's been the top pass catch, the top pass catcher,

1:02:33.320 --> 1:02:35.440
<v Speaker 3>has scored in four straight against the Rams, and he's

1:02:35.520 --> 1:02:38.640
<v Speaker 3>really their top pass catcher at this point. Yeah, So

1:02:38.920 --> 1:02:41.200
<v Speaker 3>a B grade on Taysom Hill and an A grade

1:02:41.280 --> 1:02:44.720
<v Speaker 3>on Alvin Kamara, who's averaging twenty one touches for plus

1:02:44.800 --> 1:02:47.280
<v Speaker 3>of those being catches, really just puts him in a

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:49.960
<v Speaker 3>category right there. But the Rams are also allowing the

1:02:50.080 --> 1:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>sixth most Comboy yards to backs and sagu and Barkley

1:02:53.040 --> 1:02:55.880
<v Speaker 3>had a kind of good game last week against.

1:02:55.600 --> 1:02:59.720
<v Speaker 2>The Okay he did alright, Yeah, a great opportunity. Yeah,

1:03:00.360 --> 1:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee takes on Washington, and I'm gonna start with Tony Pollard,

1:03:03.640 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 2>who has been much more Fantasy reliable when he doesn't

1:03:09.000 --> 1:03:11.320
<v Speaker 2>split reps with Taj Spears and Spears has missed a

1:03:11.360 --> 1:03:11.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of games.

1:03:11.960 --> 1:03:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but unfortunately Spears.

1:03:14.640 --> 1:03:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, So with Spears, with Spears, he averages just fifty

1:03:19.120 --> 1:03:23.200
<v Speaker 2>seven rushing yards without Spears one hundred and one. It's

1:03:23.240 --> 1:03:27.520
<v Speaker 2>a huge delta. Now, some good news for Pollard and

1:03:27.560 --> 1:03:30.480
<v Speaker 2>why he's still a C grade. Washington is a tepid

1:03:30.560 --> 1:03:34.160
<v Speaker 2>run defense, ranking twenty eighth in run defense success rate,

1:03:34.440 --> 1:03:38.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighth in run defense EPA, and twenty sixth in

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>yards per carry. So Tony Pollard comes into the sea grade.

1:03:42.040 --> 1:03:44.360
<v Speaker 2>We're not starting spears himself because he just never gets

1:03:44.440 --> 1:03:47.320
<v Speaker 2>enough volume. He gets just enough volume to be an

1:03:47.320 --> 1:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>impediment to Pollard, but not enough volume to actually make

1:03:51.240 --> 1:03:56.080
<v Speaker 2>himself fantasy viable. Will Levis was might take a chance

1:03:56.120 --> 1:03:57.919
<v Speaker 2>on me quarterback. You heard that earlier in the show.

1:03:58.120 --> 1:04:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk Calvin Ridley Thorne Eistrom, because five weeks ago

1:04:04.200 --> 1:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>you picked up that Ridley's route assignments had changed for

1:04:08.000 --> 1:04:09.919
<v Speaker 2>the better, and you called it out on this show,

1:04:10.200 --> 1:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>and that his productivity was going way, way up. And

1:04:13.280 --> 1:04:18.440
<v Speaker 2>here's what he's averaged since week eight six catches ninety

1:04:18.600 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 2>yards and half a touchdown per game. Weeks one through seven,

1:04:23.400 --> 1:04:28.040
<v Speaker 2>he was wide receiver sixty four, and now he's since

1:04:28.080 --> 1:04:30.640
<v Speaker 2>week since week eight and forward, he's wide receiver eight.

1:04:30.960 --> 1:04:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Calvin Ridley tip of the hat thorn icetrom. You picked

1:04:33.840 --> 1:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>up on that early, nicely done. Washington has been a

1:04:37.000 --> 1:04:40.240
<v Speaker 2>very good defense against wide outs, thanks in part to

1:04:40.320 --> 1:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>hitting on cornerback Mike Sandrasil in the draft. But Ben

1:04:43.760 --> 1:04:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Saint Juice and Noah ig Binagway that might have got

1:04:48.120 --> 1:04:51.560
<v Speaker 2>that right. Are we liabilities? They rank his Pro Football

1:04:51.600 --> 1:04:54.240
<v Speaker 2>focuses ninety ninth and one hundred and fourth ranked cornerback.

1:04:54.720 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's keep an eye on Marshall Latimer. Remember they made

1:04:57.240 --> 1:04:59.680
<v Speaker 2>that trade at the deadline. Adamore may come back for

1:04:59.760 --> 1:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>this game, and that would change things a little bit.

1:05:02.200 --> 1:05:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I've got to be great on Calvin Ridley and this

1:05:04.440 --> 1:05:06.960
<v Speaker 2>on the new look schemes that they're using him in.

1:05:07.800 --> 1:05:10.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you do with Nick westbrookikine? Guys, have you

1:05:11.000 --> 1:05:11.640
<v Speaker 2>seen anything like?

1:05:11.760 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 3>He's scored five straight, He's scored in six last.

1:05:14.600 --> 1:05:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Seven games, and he came back. He came he missed

1:05:18.000 --> 1:05:20.280
<v Speaker 2>the first five weeks of the season with injury, comes

1:05:20.320 --> 1:05:22.320
<v Speaker 2>back a week six and he's scored in every game.

1:05:22.360 --> 1:05:24.200
<v Speaker 2>But one sense then, and get this, he's doing it

1:05:24.320 --> 1:05:29.160
<v Speaker 2>on two catches per game. That's almost statistically impossible to

1:05:29.240 --> 1:05:31.720
<v Speaker 2>score in six of seven on two catches per game.

1:05:32.480 --> 1:05:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Insane.

1:05:33.720 --> 1:05:36.280
<v Speaker 2>I hate these like all or nothing, low volume players,

1:05:36.760 --> 1:05:39.720
<v Speaker 2>But the commanders have allowed the seventh most air yards

1:05:39.760 --> 1:05:42.760
<v Speaker 2>per completion, So maybe another deep catches in the cards.

1:05:42.800 --> 1:05:44.960
<v Speaker 2>But I'm putting a bench grade on a KNA because

1:05:45.000 --> 1:05:46.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe this is sustainable.

1:05:47.720 --> 1:05:50.200
<v Speaker 3>It is a bye week with six teams.

1:05:49.960 --> 1:05:52.480
<v Speaker 2>On buy not this week, that's next week.

1:05:52.560 --> 1:05:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, that's right, next next week.

1:05:54.280 --> 1:05:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, I saw. I think I'm keeping I'm

1:05:58.360 --> 1:05:59.920
<v Speaker 2>not starting a KNA. But if you like you need

1:06:00.120 --> 1:06:02.680
<v Speaker 2>crazy dart throw, go ahead, let's go to Washington side

1:06:02.680 --> 1:06:06.880
<v Speaker 2>of this matchup. I like Terry McLaurin. As I mentioned

1:06:06.960 --> 1:06:10.120
<v Speaker 2>last week. He's the most lopsided receiver in the league,

1:06:10.320 --> 1:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>meaning he runs seventy eight percent of his routes from

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>one side of the field, the left side of the field,

1:06:16.480 --> 1:06:18.560
<v Speaker 2>So that really tells us who he's going to be

1:06:18.640 --> 1:06:21.480
<v Speaker 2>matched up against. And with Lugarius Sneaed and I Are,

1:06:21.840 --> 1:06:27.360
<v Speaker 2>that puts McLaurin against rookie cornerback Jarvis Brownlee. He's Pro

1:06:27.480 --> 1:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Football focuses eighty first ranked coverage cornerback. Last week, Nico

1:06:32.440 --> 1:06:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Collins hit Brownway Brownlee for seventy two yards, and he

1:06:36.840 --> 1:06:39.240
<v Speaker 2>allowed a touchdown in his coverage to a different player.

1:06:39.760 --> 1:06:41.320
<v Speaker 2>So Terry McLaurin.

1:06:41.320 --> 1:06:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Seventy eight percent from the left.

1:06:44.080 --> 1:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, since seventy eight percent from one side of the field.

1:06:46.600 --> 1:06:49.479
<v Speaker 3>He's like the anti Zoolander who can't go left.

1:06:49.680 --> 1:06:51.760
<v Speaker 2>He can't go left, I like can't go right. The

1:06:51.840 --> 1:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>closest thing to this was aj Green in the final

1:06:54.560 --> 1:06:58.480
<v Speaker 2>couple of his years in Arizona, would run like ninety

1:06:58.640 --> 1:07:01.000
<v Speaker 2>seven percent of his place the right side of the field.

1:07:01.480 --> 1:07:02.520
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's just wild.

1:07:02.800 --> 1:07:03.280
<v Speaker 3>That's crazy.

1:07:03.400 --> 1:07:07.880
<v Speaker 2>It is kind of crazy A grade Terry McLaurin. Zach

1:07:08.000 --> 1:07:10.919
<v Speaker 2>Ertz comes into the C grade now boring consistent option

1:07:11.000 --> 1:07:13.160
<v Speaker 2>who rarely hurts your team and should be reliable. Here,

1:07:13.280 --> 1:07:16.040
<v Speaker 2>the Titans have allowed touchdowns and or sixty receiving yards

1:07:16.080 --> 1:07:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the tight ends in four straight games, and Ertz enters

1:07:19.880 --> 1:07:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the game with touchdowns and back to back games and

1:07:23.480 --> 1:07:25.520
<v Speaker 2>anybody else in the passing game, No, let's go to

1:07:25.600 --> 1:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Jade and Daniels. Daniels struggled in weeks ten and eleven

1:07:28.800 --> 1:07:31.680
<v Speaker 2>against good teams, and then last week it looked dicey

1:07:31.760 --> 1:07:34.200
<v Speaker 2>for a long time against Dallas, but then in the

1:07:34.320 --> 1:07:36.680
<v Speaker 2>final third of the game he scored three touchdowns and

1:07:36.720 --> 1:07:38.959
<v Speaker 2>he turned out that Jade and Daniels had a pretty

1:07:39.000 --> 1:07:42.040
<v Speaker 2>good game. I think he's a pretty safe start here.

1:07:42.480 --> 1:07:45.040
<v Speaker 2>The Titans secondary was very good in the first half

1:07:45.080 --> 1:07:48.080
<v Speaker 2>of the season, but then Sam Darnold c J Stroud

1:07:48.160 --> 1:07:51.320
<v Speaker 2>through multiple touchdowns the past two weeks against Tennessee. But

1:07:51.440 --> 1:07:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm most excited about Jade and Daniels rushing upside. Malik Willis,

1:07:57.440 --> 1:08:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Huntley, Justin Herbert, Rake May and Sam Darnold have

1:08:02.080 --> 1:08:07.320
<v Speaker 2>scored and or rushed for ninety five yards against Tennessee.

1:08:08.000 --> 1:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>B grade for Jaden Daniels Brian Robinson, it looks like

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna play through his ankle injury. But Robinson is battered,

1:08:15.640 --> 1:08:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and this is a brutal matchup. Only one opposing runners

1:08:18.160 --> 1:08:20.639
<v Speaker 2>top sixty two yards, and that was Jamier Gibbs, who

1:08:20.680 --> 1:08:23.439
<v Speaker 2>was just a specimen. Here's the last few runners to

1:08:23.479 --> 1:08:28.360
<v Speaker 2>face Tennessee. Joe Mixon last week twenty two yards, Aaron

1:08:28.479 --> 1:08:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Jones before that thirty nine yards, JK Dobbins before that

1:08:32.520 --> 1:08:36.760
<v Speaker 2>fifty yards, and Ramondre Stevenson before that sixteen yards. That's

1:08:36.880 --> 1:08:40.840
<v Speaker 2>nothing to good runners. I've got Brian Robinson on the

1:08:41.160 --> 1:08:45.479
<v Speaker 2>bench in this game. Austin Ecklin not expected to play

1:08:45.800 --> 1:08:47.559
<v Speaker 2>in this game. We should probably mention that as well.

1:08:47.640 --> 1:08:51.519
<v Speaker 2>Let's try to work on one matchup, Scott. No, wait,

1:08:51.600 --> 1:08:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm on Thorp Cleveland and Denver Thorpe. Let's start in

1:08:56.000 --> 1:08:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the Cleveland side of this. Nick Chubb had two touch

1:08:59.120 --> 1:09:02.840
<v Speaker 2>to rushing touchdown in that bad weather game, but this

1:09:03.080 --> 1:09:05.839
<v Speaker 2>is a tougher matchup where the elements will not necessarily

1:09:05.920 --> 1:09:07.000
<v Speaker 2>work the same way for him.

1:09:07.360 --> 1:09:09.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's right, and the odds are that he won't

1:09:09.760 --> 1:09:12.320
<v Speaker 5>find the end zone again this week. The Broncos have

1:09:12.360 --> 1:09:14.920
<v Speaker 5>a lot only two rushing touchdowns since Week six and

1:09:15.040 --> 1:09:19.240
<v Speaker 5>only five all season, and Chubbi chorus averaging three point

1:09:19.400 --> 1:09:21.920
<v Speaker 5>zero yards per carras and not very good.

1:09:22.120 --> 1:09:24.280
<v Speaker 3>He did not come back returning to form.

1:09:24.479 --> 1:09:27.679
<v Speaker 5>No, I will give him a seed, and I'm gonna

1:09:27.720 --> 1:09:30.840
<v Speaker 5>give Jerome Ford a see as well, because I like

1:09:31.280 --> 1:09:34.519
<v Speaker 5>the opportunity for the pass game work in this matchup. Oh,

1:09:34.680 --> 1:09:37.840
<v Speaker 5>for Ford, the Broncos are terrible at defending running backs.

1:09:37.880 --> 1:09:40.280
<v Speaker 5>In the past game, opposing running backs have scored seven

1:09:40.360 --> 1:09:44.080
<v Speaker 5>PPR points against the Broncos with just their receiving totals.

1:09:45.600 --> 1:09:47.719
<v Speaker 5>And then Ford caught four or four targets for twenty

1:09:47.840 --> 1:09:51.200
<v Speaker 5>nine yards in Week eleven at New Orleans so for

1:09:51.439 --> 1:09:53.960
<v Speaker 5>especially for PPR players, but I'm gonna drop a sea

1:09:54.000 --> 1:09:54.280
<v Speaker 5>on him.

1:09:54.520 --> 1:09:55.840
<v Speaker 4>Jamis Winston bench.

1:09:56.600 --> 1:09:59.000
<v Speaker 5>Winston has scored thirty plus fantasy points in two good

1:09:59.080 --> 1:10:02.679
<v Speaker 5>matchups this season and thirteen point five points or less

1:10:02.840 --> 1:10:05.599
<v Speaker 5>in the two bad matchups. That was against Steelers and Chargers.

1:10:06.240 --> 1:10:08.639
<v Speaker 5>This would account for a bad matchup here. The Broncos

1:10:08.680 --> 1:10:11.680
<v Speaker 5>have allowed the fifth fewest fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks.

1:10:12.439 --> 1:10:14.920
<v Speaker 5>And then on the receiver side, Jerry Judy, I'm gonna

1:10:14.920 --> 1:10:17.280
<v Speaker 5>give him a b. In four games with Winston, Judy

1:10:17.360 --> 1:10:20.080
<v Speaker 5>has scored at least twelve point nine PPR points each game,

1:10:20.439 --> 1:10:22.719
<v Speaker 5>dur at least six targets in each of those games.

1:10:23.080 --> 1:10:25.040
<v Speaker 5>And this, of course is the revenge game for Jerry

1:10:25.080 --> 1:10:28.439
<v Speaker 5>Judy against the Broncos. He could see a decent amount

1:10:28.439 --> 1:10:31.400
<v Speaker 5>of Patrick Sirtan here. And Certan is the guy who

1:10:31.439 --> 1:10:33.679
<v Speaker 5>is allowed one hundred and eighty two yards in coverage,

1:10:33.960 --> 1:10:37.080
<v Speaker 5>the second fewest among cornerbacks with two hundred plus coverage save.

1:10:36.960 --> 1:10:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Again, because that's insane. And we're headingto week thirteen and

1:10:40.280 --> 1:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Sertan is.

1:10:40.840 --> 1:10:45.000
<v Speaker 4>Allowed one hundred and eighty two yards in coverage. Crazy crazy, Yeah,

1:10:45.120 --> 1:10:45.360
<v Speaker 4>he is.

1:10:45.560 --> 1:10:48.680
<v Speaker 5>He is a lockdown but with Cedric Tillman possibly out

1:10:48.720 --> 1:10:51.639
<v Speaker 5>in this game still in concussion protocol, Jerry Judy would

1:10:51.680 --> 1:10:53.320
<v Speaker 5>seem to be getting a lot of targets in this game.

1:10:53.320 --> 1:10:54.439
<v Speaker 5>So that's why I had to give him a bee

1:10:55.280 --> 1:10:58.599
<v Speaker 5>until Tillman is clear from that concussion protocol. Keep him

1:10:58.600 --> 1:11:00.000
<v Speaker 5>on the bench. He can monitor that one if you

1:11:00.080 --> 1:11:02.360
<v Speaker 5>have him on your roster. Elijah Moore, I think is

1:11:02.439 --> 1:11:04.599
<v Speaker 5>kind of I actually considered Elijah Moore for might take

1:11:04.600 --> 1:11:06.320
<v Speaker 5>a chance, let me receiver. I'm gonna give I'm gonna

1:11:06.320 --> 1:11:09.080
<v Speaker 5>give him a c here. More was averaging nine point

1:11:09.160 --> 1:11:12.880
<v Speaker 5>seven targets per contest with Jameis Winston under center prior

1:11:12.920 --> 1:11:15.400
<v Speaker 5>to that bad weather game against the Steelers, and he's

1:11:15.400 --> 1:11:18.920
<v Speaker 5>sneaky startuple here if on the condition that Cedric Tillman

1:11:19.000 --> 1:11:21.680
<v Speaker 5>does not play, because I think Winston may target the

1:11:21.760 --> 1:11:24.960
<v Speaker 5>slot more in this pass heavy game script with certain

1:11:25.280 --> 1:11:26.760
<v Speaker 5>potentially on Judy the whole time.

1:11:26.960 --> 1:11:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Uh, David and Joko are gonna.

1:11:29.000 --> 1:11:30.800
<v Speaker 5>Give him a be tight end eight and fantasy points

1:11:30.800 --> 1:11:33.160
<v Speaker 5>per game with Winston under center, but only two red

1:11:33.200 --> 1:11:36.160
<v Speaker 5>zone targets across the last four games, Broncos have allowed

1:11:36.160 --> 1:11:38.160
<v Speaker 5>the tenth fewest receiving yards per game in the ninth

1:11:38.200 --> 1:11:41.080
<v Speaker 5>fewest fantasy points per game to opposing tight ends and

1:11:41.120 --> 1:11:44.160
<v Speaker 5>then over to the Broncos. Bon Nicks. Got to give him,

1:11:44.200 --> 1:11:45.880
<v Speaker 5>gotta give him his flowers. I'm gonna give him a

1:11:45.920 --> 1:11:47.520
<v Speaker 5>be in this matchup.

1:11:47.160 --> 1:11:47.479
<v Speaker 1>All right?

1:11:48.400 --> 1:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to make any declarative statements right now

1:11:52.800 --> 1:11:53.559
<v Speaker 2>about Bonnicks?

1:11:54.000 --> 1:11:57.840
<v Speaker 5>Bonicks are playing better than I thought he would play. Same, Yeah,

1:11:58.080 --> 1:11:58.320
<v Speaker 5>he is.

1:11:58.479 --> 1:12:01.360
<v Speaker 4>He's toured some bad defense. We'll see here.

1:12:01.600 --> 1:12:04.080
<v Speaker 5>He's scored twenty plus fantasy points in six the last

1:12:04.160 --> 1:12:07.120
<v Speaker 5>eight games, quarterback six in fantasy points per game since

1:12:07.160 --> 1:12:09.920
<v Speaker 5>Week six, and the Broncos have allowed three of four

1:12:10.000 --> 1:12:13.080
<v Speaker 5>quarterbacks to score twenty two point five plus fantasy points

1:12:13.080 --> 1:12:15.879
<v Speaker 5>against him. I wanted to read something that Bill Barnwell

1:12:15.920 --> 1:12:18.800
<v Speaker 5>wrote about Bonix. Though everyone's going nuts about BONECKX. Quote

1:12:18.800 --> 1:12:22.320
<v Speaker 5>this from Bill Barnwell. Bonix has completed the most DePass

1:12:22.400 --> 1:12:24.720
<v Speaker 5>of anyone in the league. Because he's attempted the most

1:12:24.800 --> 1:12:27.000
<v Speaker 5>deep passes of anyone in the league, and because he's

1:12:27.040 --> 1:12:30.320
<v Speaker 5>throwing the third most passes of any type of anyone

1:12:30.360 --> 1:12:30.800
<v Speaker 5>in the league.

1:12:31.040 --> 1:12:32.320
<v Speaker 4>He's twenty eighth in QBR.

1:12:32.479 --> 1:12:35.200
<v Speaker 5>On those throws, he averages ten point five yards every

1:12:35.240 --> 1:12:37.679
<v Speaker 5>time he throws one of them, which is also twenty eighth.

1:12:38.000 --> 1:12:41.400
<v Speaker 5>His CPOE on those throws is thirty third. Nicks has

1:12:41.439 --> 1:12:44.000
<v Speaker 5>taken eight ten plus yard sacks, third most in the league,

1:12:44.200 --> 1:12:46.799
<v Speaker 5>twenty first and QBR twenty first, in yards per dropback

1:12:47.040 --> 1:12:49.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty second and EPA per dropback against the blitz end quote,

1:12:50.520 --> 1:12:53.960
<v Speaker 5>that's Bill Barnwell. That's not you. I wanted to quote.

1:12:54.000 --> 1:12:57.120
<v Speaker 5>I wanted to quote someone that's Bill Barnwell. So send

1:12:57.160 --> 1:12:57.720
<v Speaker 5>your hated him.

1:12:57.720 --> 1:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, don't like that, Okay, all that said, Yeah, you

1:13:01.400 --> 1:13:03.840
<v Speaker 2>and I were very down on Bonnick. We didn't think

1:13:03.880 --> 1:13:06.200
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of his stuff would translate to the NFL. Yeah,

1:13:06.640 --> 1:13:09.080
<v Speaker 2>he's better than we thought. He's running that offense well

1:13:09.160 --> 1:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>for Sean Payton. Yeah, he's They've they've cut down his reason.

1:13:11.920 --> 1:13:12.720
<v Speaker 2>He's doing well with it.

1:13:13.560 --> 1:13:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Javonte Williams's gonna give as far as I'm gonna go,

1:13:16.680 --> 1:13:17.600
<v Speaker 4>as as far as I'm gonna go.

1:13:17.960 --> 1:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Javant simplified the offense enough that bon Nicks can be successful.

1:13:21.400 --> 1:13:24.000
<v Speaker 5>That's exactly what I'm saying, Davonte Williams. He gets to

1:13:24.040 --> 1:13:27.080
<v Speaker 5>see the Broncos running back room. It's just really hard

1:13:27.120 --> 1:13:29.840
<v Speaker 5>to parse with Williams estimate Julia mcgloff, and they've all

1:13:29.880 --> 1:13:33.400
<v Speaker 5>been featured various times. Over the past three games. Williams

1:13:33.439 --> 1:13:35.719
<v Speaker 5>has been the most consistent of the trio. But Williams

1:13:35.760 --> 1:13:37.960
<v Speaker 5>scored two point seven PPR points or less than three

1:13:37.960 --> 1:13:39.479
<v Speaker 5>of the past four games, so I guess maybe he's

1:13:39.479 --> 1:13:41.720
<v Speaker 5>not the most consistent. Browns have given up the seven

1:13:41.760 --> 1:13:44.600
<v Speaker 5>fewest Fantasy points to opposing running backs. Williams needs to

1:13:44.600 --> 1:13:46.880
<v Speaker 5>score a touchdown here, and he has only three this season.

1:13:47.240 --> 1:13:48.520
<v Speaker 4>I'll give him a speculative.

1:13:48.600 --> 1:13:52.040
<v Speaker 5>See though, Cortland Sutton a he's been on fire, scored

1:13:52.040 --> 1:13:54.640
<v Speaker 5>at least fifteen PPR points in five games in a row.

1:13:55.000 --> 1:13:57.559
<v Speaker 5>Three of those times he had nineteen plus PPR points

1:13:57.800 --> 1:13:59.559
<v Speaker 5>at least eight targets in each game.

1:13:59.600 --> 1:13:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Over that.

1:14:00.720 --> 1:14:02.640
<v Speaker 5>Bonick heard me complaining about that one game where he

1:14:02.680 --> 1:14:04.680
<v Speaker 5>didn't even look at Cartland Sutton and ever since then

1:14:04.720 --> 1:14:07.439
<v Speaker 5>he was just poundering with targets. So Cortland gets any

1:14:07.560 --> 1:14:10.760
<v Speaker 5>and then Devon Vley, hold the Vley. He was going

1:14:10.800 --> 1:14:13.639
<v Speaker 5>to take a chance at me receiver, all right, fantastic.

1:14:13.560 --> 1:14:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Would we come back? Premature speculation. We've only got a

1:14:16.280 --> 1:14:18.439
<v Speaker 2>couple of these left. We do it as long as

1:14:18.479 --> 1:14:20.240
<v Speaker 2>there are bye week's left, So next week would be

1:14:20.280 --> 1:14:23.439
<v Speaker 2>our last premature speculation of the year. But we will

1:14:23.680 --> 1:14:26.400
<v Speaker 2>jump back into the Fantasy Football Weekly time machine and

1:14:26.479 --> 1:14:28.040
<v Speaker 2>to give you some guys you want to pick up

1:14:28.120 --> 1:14:30.280
<v Speaker 2>now that Obels is going to try to pick up

1:14:30.320 --> 1:14:32.479
<v Speaker 2>next week, but they're already on your team. And our

1:14:32.560 --> 1:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>final set of matchups including the forty nine ers and

1:14:36.120 --> 1:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the Bills in a possible weather game coming up. We'll

1:14:39.920 --> 1:14:42.599
<v Speaker 2>talk that through when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:14:57.280 --> 1:15:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Sad times the final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:15:01.439 --> 1:15:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh oh man ah my co.

1:15:04.640 --> 1:15:07.599
<v Speaker 2>Host today Scott Fish, Thorn Eistrom. You can follow us

1:15:07.600 --> 1:15:11.280
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter. I'm at Paul Charchian, Scott Fish at Scott

1:15:11.360 --> 1:15:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Fish twenty four, Thornon, i Istrom at thor k You

1:15:15.960 --> 1:15:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Rock Rock Stark, Gotchab.

1:15:17.960 --> 1:15:20.599
<v Speaker 3>There we go every single time without fail.

1:15:20.800 --> 1:15:24.200
<v Speaker 2>You are there. This segment we call premature speculation. We

1:15:24.320 --> 1:15:26.280
<v Speaker 2>try to figure out who you should pick up now

1:15:26.400 --> 1:15:28.680
<v Speaker 2>that other people will trying to pick up later in

1:15:28.800 --> 1:15:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the future.

1:15:29.800 --> 1:15:30.879
<v Speaker 4>We begin with Scott.

1:15:30.840 --> 1:15:33.519
<v Speaker 2>Fish, who is your premature speculation player.

1:15:33.880 --> 1:15:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's not as much this week as you just mentioned.

1:15:38.080 --> 1:15:41.280
<v Speaker 3>With the Tennessee Washington matchup for Taja Spears returning from

1:15:41.320 --> 1:15:43.680
<v Speaker 3>that concussion, but Brian Callahan has said he wants them

1:15:43.680 --> 1:15:46.040
<v Speaker 3>to have a more even split and listen to their

1:15:46.080 --> 1:15:49.040
<v Speaker 3>schedule coming up for the final four or so weeks

1:15:49.080 --> 1:15:52.560
<v Speaker 3>of the fantasy regular season into the playoffs. Yeah, Jaguars

1:15:52.680 --> 1:15:56.519
<v Speaker 3>thirty first against fantasy running backs. Yeah, Colts thirtieth against

1:15:56.560 --> 1:16:00.799
<v Speaker 3>fantasy running backs, so second worst, third worst. Then the Bengals,

1:16:01.160 --> 1:16:03.840
<v Speaker 3>who are you know, top eight against fantasy running backs,

1:16:03.880 --> 1:16:05.479
<v Speaker 3>but have allowed four scores to running backs in the

1:16:05.520 --> 1:16:08.639
<v Speaker 3>last three weeks, and then they get the Jaguars again.

1:16:08.680 --> 1:16:11.360
<v Speaker 3>They have a really good schedule for running backs, especially

1:16:11.400 --> 1:16:13.200
<v Speaker 3>pass catching running backs of the next four weeks.

1:16:13.320 --> 1:16:15.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, Spears, got you?

1:16:15.920 --> 1:16:16.280
<v Speaker 4>All right?

1:16:16.479 --> 1:16:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Thor your premature speculation player.

1:16:19.400 --> 1:16:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Slim pickens this time of the year, but a little

1:16:21.880 --> 1:16:22.679
<v Speaker 4>bit it's gotten harder.

1:16:22.840 --> 1:16:26.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm you know, so I go to speculating non injuries,

1:16:26.200 --> 1:16:28.439
<v Speaker 5>which is why I'm going to do Sean Tucker running

1:16:28.479 --> 1:16:30.679
<v Speaker 5>back for the Buccaneers since weeks.

1:16:30.720 --> 1:16:33.679
<v Speaker 2>So you're not entering into the universe anything bad about

1:16:33.680 --> 1:16:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Bucky Irving right now?

1:16:35.160 --> 1:16:38.840
<v Speaker 4>You no, no, no, maybe maybe I'm Rishard White. Yeah, Okay.

1:16:38.960 --> 1:16:42.320
<v Speaker 5>Since Week seven, Rishad White RB eight and fantasy points

1:16:42.360 --> 1:16:45.200
<v Speaker 5>per game and Bucky Irving is RB twelve Fantasy points

1:16:45.200 --> 1:16:47.600
<v Speaker 5>per game. They'd stay in two running backs. They're one

1:16:47.640 --> 1:16:49.519
<v Speaker 5>of those guys were to get hurt. Tucker is going

1:16:49.560 --> 1:16:51.439
<v Speaker 5>to get twelve to fifteen touches per game in a

1:16:51.520 --> 1:16:56.040
<v Speaker 5>good situation. He had four carries, had a touchdown well,

1:16:56.160 --> 1:16:58.720
<v Speaker 5>catching one target in the win over the Giants last week.

1:16:58.800 --> 1:17:00.960
<v Speaker 4>That was a blowout and in that game script.

1:17:01.160 --> 1:17:03.760
<v Speaker 5>But he's now scored three all purpose touchdowns, only thirty

1:17:03.760 --> 1:17:07.400
<v Speaker 5>eight touches this year, and he's good and limited action

1:17:07.680 --> 1:17:10.479
<v Speaker 5>eighty point seven PFF grade in his seventy three snaps.

1:17:10.680 --> 1:17:12.760
<v Speaker 5>One of those two guys gets injured, Tucker could be

1:17:13.120 --> 1:17:14.920
<v Speaker 5>a starting caliber player down the stretch.

1:17:16.240 --> 1:17:18.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm going now, I'm talking Okay, the player are going

1:17:18.840 --> 1:17:20.559
<v Speaker 2>to talk about it. I'm talking to a very specific

1:17:20.640 --> 1:17:23.760
<v Speaker 2>audience here. Yeah, Dynasty and Empire players is the next

1:17:23.840 --> 1:17:26.160
<v Speaker 2>year think okay, okay, And you need to be in

1:17:26.200 --> 1:17:29.360
<v Speaker 2>super flex or two quarterback league okay before you should

1:17:29.360 --> 1:17:30.679
<v Speaker 2>be interested in Bryce Young.

1:17:31.160 --> 1:17:31.439
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

1:17:31.800 --> 1:17:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm advocating for Young because he is tangibly playing at

1:17:37.800 --> 1:17:40.599
<v Speaker 2>a totally different level than the adeptitude we had seen

1:17:40.640 --> 1:17:44.440
<v Speaker 2>it any other time throughout his career. Dave Canallis, Dave Canalis,

1:17:44.600 --> 1:17:48.639
<v Speaker 2>it's starting to come together, baby steps. Every single week,

1:17:49.040 --> 1:17:53.679
<v Speaker 2>going back three weeks ago, Panthers won actually three games ago,

1:17:53.880 --> 1:17:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Panthers won two in a row. Then they went on

1:17:56.360 --> 1:17:59.439
<v Speaker 2>by and then they took the Chiefs. They were tied

1:17:59.520 --> 1:18:01.680
<v Speaker 2>with the chief So with ninety seconds left, I mean

1:18:01.720 --> 1:18:05.479
<v Speaker 2>the Panthers nearly took down the Chiefs only again only

1:18:05.560 --> 1:18:08.559
<v Speaker 2>one week ago. And some of the improvements we're seeing

1:18:08.640 --> 1:18:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Bryce Young are statistically objective, like zero turnovers in the

1:18:14.240 --> 1:18:16.640
<v Speaker 2>past two games, a deeper a dot than he has

1:18:16.720 --> 1:18:21.240
<v Speaker 2>had on a consistent basis, And some of the intangibles

1:18:21.320 --> 1:18:25.160
<v Speaker 2>are just look at him play, The poise, the confidence,

1:18:25.240 --> 1:18:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and frankly the lack of stupid plays from Bryce Young

1:18:28.160 --> 1:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>are very very encouraging. You know, this is a great time.

1:18:32.640 --> 1:18:35.360
<v Speaker 2>I think in most dynasty and keeper leagues, trade deadline's

1:18:35.400 --> 1:18:38.320
<v Speaker 2>like here, it's it's coming fast. If if you're not

1:18:38.360 --> 1:18:40.840
<v Speaker 2>already there, this is your chance to go get Bryce

1:18:40.960 --> 1:18:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Young at basically bargain basement price. I think Carolina's going

1:18:45.479 --> 1:18:46.800
<v Speaker 2>to go to war with him again next year.

1:18:46.960 --> 1:18:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I can see that.

1:18:48.120 --> 1:18:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you'll have a starting quarterback again. Dynasty Empire

1:18:51.040 --> 1:18:52.160
<v Speaker 2>two quarterback leagues.

1:18:52.080 --> 1:18:54.880
<v Speaker 3>By the way, just in generally, Thorne took a backup

1:18:54.920 --> 1:18:57.759
<v Speaker 3>brainbacks that we mentioned this second half of the season

1:18:57.960 --> 1:19:01.120
<v Speaker 3>entering the playoffs. You want the taj Is, the Benson's,

1:19:01.200 --> 1:19:04.759
<v Speaker 3>the Spears, the Roshan Johnson, the Bigsby's, Singletary, Ray Davis,

1:19:04.800 --> 1:19:08.479
<v Speaker 3>Braylen Allen Jalen Wright. All you want, something's gonna happen.

1:19:09.000 --> 1:19:09.760
<v Speaker 3>You'll want that guy.

1:19:09.920 --> 1:19:12.639
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you should not be You should not be rostering

1:19:12.760 --> 1:19:15.280
<v Speaker 2>third receivers from some team roster cloggers.

1:19:15.320 --> 1:19:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Get rid of them. Look for upside.

1:19:16.880 --> 1:19:19.320
<v Speaker 2>They can help you in the laps, like Tank Bigsby

1:19:19.840 --> 1:19:20.519
<v Speaker 2>as Blake.

1:19:20.360 --> 1:19:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Corn even though he gets nothing, but if Karen goes down, that's.

1:19:24.960 --> 1:19:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, he'd get a lot. And Kiren's been a you know,

1:19:27.120 --> 1:19:29.840
<v Speaker 2>there's somebody who's we don't wish injury on anybody, but

1:19:29.960 --> 1:19:33.120
<v Speaker 2>given his usage right as a candidate. All right, Scott,

1:19:33.240 --> 1:19:35.519
<v Speaker 2>let's go to the Rams taking on the Saints in

1:19:35.640 --> 1:19:37.720
<v Speaker 2>this one. Oh no, sorry, we already did that. San

1:19:37.800 --> 1:19:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Francisco taking on Buffalo, Yeah, could be a weather game.

1:19:41.200 --> 1:19:43.479
<v Speaker 2>The Bills have already asked for volunteers to shovel I

1:19:43.600 --> 1:19:46.559
<v Speaker 2>think the snow is gonna hit before available the game.

1:19:47.680 --> 1:19:50.720
<v Speaker 2>That's right, exactly. Fantasy Football Weekly grew coming down. Oh,

1:19:50.800 --> 1:19:52.479
<v Speaker 2>I like, it wouldn't it be fun to do a

1:19:52.560 --> 1:19:53.599
<v Speaker 2>winter game in Buffalo?

1:19:53.880 --> 1:19:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

1:19:54.200 --> 1:19:54.479
<v Speaker 3>I would.

1:19:54.479 --> 1:19:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I would do that forty nine, taking on Bill Scott. Yeah.

1:19:58.360 --> 1:20:01.720
<v Speaker 3>So, Brock Purty expect to play limited practice this week.

1:20:03.960 --> 1:20:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Your options if he doesn't go. Your pivots on that

1:20:07.720 --> 1:20:11.519
<v Speaker 3>Saturday night game are like Josh Allen Bonix are probably

1:20:11.600 --> 1:20:15.920
<v Speaker 3>both highly rostered, maybe Jameis Winston. So part of the

1:20:16.000 --> 1:20:19.920
<v Speaker 3>C grade is baked in that it's possible he won't play,

1:20:20.200 --> 1:20:21.960
<v Speaker 3>and you should probably go with a different option just

1:20:22.040 --> 1:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>in case that couldn't get knocked out or could get

1:20:24.360 --> 1:20:27.439
<v Speaker 3>knocked out before the injury. I had multiple scores and

1:20:27.520 --> 1:20:29.880
<v Speaker 3>back to back. He also gets a bills d that's

1:20:29.880 --> 1:20:33.120
<v Speaker 3>allowed multiple scores in three straight. Purty's averaging two thirty

1:20:33.160 --> 1:20:35.160
<v Speaker 3>bills are allowing about in the average of two thirty,

1:20:35.200 --> 1:20:37.080
<v Speaker 3>So it feels like two hundred and thirty and one

1:20:37.120 --> 1:20:39.320
<v Speaker 3>to two scores is about where it's gonna go. But again,

1:20:39.479 --> 1:20:42.439
<v Speaker 3>possible weather game paired with we're not even one hundred

1:20:42.439 --> 1:20:44.519
<v Speaker 3>percent sure he's gonna play. There's probably better options, but

1:20:44.560 --> 1:20:47.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll give him a C grade here his receivers. I

1:20:47.280 --> 1:20:50.400
<v Speaker 3>got a B grade on Juwan Jennings. The Bills do

1:20:50.640 --> 1:20:53.200
<v Speaker 3>allow the fifth fewest Fantasy points to the perimeter where

1:20:53.280 --> 1:20:56.679
<v Speaker 3>Juwan Jennings plays, but he's had eleven targets, eleven targets,

1:20:56.720 --> 1:20:59.599
<v Speaker 3>eleven targets and seven plus catches and ninety plus yards

1:20:59.680 --> 1:21:03.400
<v Speaker 3>in each of the last two party starts before before

1:21:03.640 --> 1:21:06.560
<v Speaker 3>you know Party's injury. Even with Allen last week, he

1:21:06.680 --> 1:21:08.000
<v Speaker 3>led the team in targets with seven.

1:21:08.320 --> 1:21:08.800
<v Speaker 4>I love him.

1:21:09.520 --> 1:21:12.719
<v Speaker 3>The problem is the Bills allow the seventh fewest yards

1:21:12.760 --> 1:21:15.559
<v Speaker 3>and or seventh fewest yards and six fewest cards scores

1:21:15.600 --> 1:21:18.439
<v Speaker 3>to wide receivers. The wide receivers who have done well

1:21:18.680 --> 1:21:21.120
<v Speaker 3>get volume, and if he gets that same volume, I'm

1:21:21.160 --> 1:21:23.160
<v Speaker 3>okay with it. I like it, and it's got to

1:21:23.200 --> 1:21:24.960
<v Speaker 3>go somewhere. So I have a B grade on Jennings,

1:21:25.400 --> 1:21:28.120
<v Speaker 3>a C grade on Samuel. They allow the fewest pass

1:21:28.160 --> 1:21:30.240
<v Speaker 3>plays over twenty yards, so you're not going to get

1:21:30.320 --> 1:21:34.400
<v Speaker 3>chunk plays. Deebo hasn't scored since Week six, but he's

1:21:34.439 --> 1:21:38.640
<v Speaker 3>still getting this six to seven targets per game. With

1:21:38.840 --> 1:21:41.680
<v Speaker 3>McCaffrey back, he's shifted almost to the fourth option in

1:21:41.720 --> 1:21:45.040
<v Speaker 3>the pass game, though, so that concerns me too. I know, yeah,

1:21:45.560 --> 1:21:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Ricky Piersall has failed to catch a pass in both

1:21:48.000 --> 1:21:51.599
<v Speaker 3>weeks eleven and twelve. Rout participations have been but we're

1:21:51.640 --> 1:21:54.439
<v Speaker 3>not talking about him. No, George Kittle otto a tight

1:21:54.560 --> 1:21:57.639
<v Speaker 3>end one scored in three straight. Even with Brandon Allen,

1:21:57.720 --> 1:21:59.920
<v Speaker 3>he showed up. It doesn't matter for Kittle at.

1:21:59.800 --> 1:22:02.000
<v Speaker 2>This probably haven't given Kittle enough love this season.

1:22:02.000 --> 1:22:04.360
<v Speaker 3>We really haven't been been. His fantasy points per game

1:22:04.439 --> 1:22:06.960
<v Speaker 3>is like five more than a like even more than Bowers.

1:22:07.000 --> 1:22:10.160
<v Speaker 3>It's crazy where he's sitting at. And then Christian McCaffrey.

1:22:10.160 --> 1:22:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I do have an A grade on nineteen touches and

1:22:12.360 --> 1:22:15.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty one touches over one hundred yards in each of

1:22:15.240 --> 1:22:18.479
<v Speaker 3>his first two games back with party. Last weekend was

1:22:18.479 --> 1:22:21.400
<v Speaker 3>a little different with a tougher defensive draw on Brandon Allen,

1:22:21.479 --> 1:22:25.280
<v Speaker 3>but he's probably getting getting pretty back and the Bills

1:22:25.320 --> 1:22:28.240
<v Speaker 3>allowed the eighth most combo yards have been torched by

1:22:28.360 --> 1:22:31.960
<v Speaker 3>pass catching backs, allowing the most receptions, receiving yards, and

1:22:32.120 --> 1:22:35.880
<v Speaker 3>receiving touchdowns to the position. So seven different backs over

1:22:35.960 --> 1:22:38.840
<v Speaker 3>fifty yards and or a score just through the air.

1:22:39.640 --> 1:22:42.679
<v Speaker 3>So good spot for McCaffrey here over the Buffalo side.

1:22:43.200 --> 1:22:45.960
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, McCaffrey needs it, he does. Yeah,

1:22:46.040 --> 1:22:49.080
<v Speaker 2>last week was not was rough all three weeks? Yeah, well,

1:22:49.240 --> 1:22:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean he had one hundred total yards each of

1:22:52.200 --> 1:22:55.040
<v Speaker 2>those he's helping out. But the past game work is

1:22:55.080 --> 1:22:57.800
<v Speaker 2>what happened. Yes, the groundwork has been bad a grade

1:22:57.840 --> 1:22:59.960
<v Speaker 2>for Josh Allen and the Bills. Six game wins stream

1:23:00.120 --> 1:23:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Allen is averaging two hundred and sixty seven yards and

1:23:02.920 --> 1:23:06.000
<v Speaker 2>two point two scores multiple scores in five of six

1:23:06.600 --> 1:23:08.880
<v Speaker 2>forty nine ers are top ten in yards and scored

1:23:08.920 --> 1:23:09.839
<v Speaker 2>allowed to passers.

1:23:10.200 --> 1:23:11.719
<v Speaker 3>It is a tough tougher spot.

1:23:11.800 --> 1:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>But the four more mobile Russian quarterbacks, the four mobile

1:23:14.880 --> 1:23:17.880
<v Speaker 2>ones they faced, averaged forty four yards and three of

1:23:17.920 --> 1:23:20.680
<v Speaker 2>those four scored. Josh Allen's a mobile quarterback. He might

1:23:20.720 --> 1:23:21.200
<v Speaker 2>get some of that.

1:23:22.520 --> 1:23:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Khalil Shakir double digit PPR games in five straight games,

1:23:26.120 --> 1:23:30.080
<v Speaker 3>super safe, four floor, six plus catches, seven plus targets,

1:23:30.120 --> 1:23:33.120
<v Speaker 3>fifty plus yards in all of those led the team

1:23:33.200 --> 1:23:37.439
<v Speaker 3>and targets in all of those, not to mention two

1:23:37.520 --> 1:23:40.160
<v Speaker 3>slot guys in the last three weeks, JSN and Cede

1:23:40.320 --> 1:23:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Lamb went for one hundred and ten and one hundred

1:23:42.040 --> 1:23:43.840
<v Speaker 3>and forty six against the Niners.

1:23:43.840 --> 1:23:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Against the Niners, Diamadur Leonor is a pretty good slot

1:23:46.800 --> 1:23:48.200
<v Speaker 2>corner Yac. Yeah getting killed.

1:23:48.320 --> 1:23:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, well on those two, like there have been

1:23:50.360 --> 1:23:50.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of games.

1:23:51.080 --> 1:23:52.599
<v Speaker 2>Khalils really good too.

1:23:52.720 --> 1:23:57.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he catches everything. Because Keon Coleman is questionable, he's

1:23:57.520 --> 1:24:00.519
<v Speaker 3>been dealing with that wrist injury. Limited drills on the side,

1:24:00.880 --> 1:24:03.639
<v Speaker 3>and it's a Sunday night game, I said Saturday before

1:24:03.720 --> 1:24:06.439
<v Speaker 3>Sunday night game. I have him on the bench. I

1:24:06.439 --> 1:24:08.920
<v Speaker 3>don't want to risk trying to pivot. You know, maybe

1:24:08.920 --> 1:24:11.599
<v Speaker 3>Elijah Morris a pivot if you really need Keon Coleman,

1:24:11.640 --> 1:24:13.400
<v Speaker 3>but there's no teams on buy. You probably don't need

1:24:13.760 --> 1:24:16.559
<v Speaker 3>the pivot when he's in. If he plays limited even

1:24:16.640 --> 1:24:19.720
<v Speaker 3>he torpedo Samuel who's had fourteen plus targets in the

1:24:19.800 --> 1:24:22.439
<v Speaker 3>last two games. But if he returns, I got both

1:24:22.479 --> 1:24:26.360
<v Speaker 3>of them on the bench. Amari Cooper, dang it, Like

1:24:26.479 --> 1:24:28.320
<v Speaker 3>I want to bench him. I want to bench him,

1:24:28.320 --> 1:24:31.000
<v Speaker 3>but he is He's top fifty five yards in two

1:24:31.080 --> 1:24:35.120
<v Speaker 3>of his three games. He's his top snap percentage is

1:24:35.160 --> 1:24:38.400
<v Speaker 3>fifty one percent. He's a part time limited player, and

1:24:38.479 --> 1:24:40.559
<v Speaker 3>he's top fifty five yards in two of those games

1:24:40.640 --> 1:24:43.000
<v Speaker 3>with limited product. If he gets it this week, if

1:24:43.040 --> 1:24:45.960
<v Speaker 3>he finally gets more snaps, if he's out there running

1:24:45.960 --> 1:24:48.759
<v Speaker 3>more routes, I'm gonna give him c grade on the upside,

1:24:49.439 --> 1:24:52.120
<v Speaker 3>just on the upside. And Dawson Knox is on the bench.

1:24:52.479 --> 1:24:54.479
<v Speaker 3>Unlike last week, this is a forty nine ers d

1:24:54.560 --> 1:24:56.800
<v Speaker 3>allowing the second fewest yards to tight ends and just

1:24:56.880 --> 1:24:58.679
<v Speaker 3>three scores on the year. He was a fine flex

1:24:58.720 --> 1:24:59.479
<v Speaker 3>play last week.

1:25:00.000 --> 1:25:02.639
<v Speaker 2>It turned out okay, well, four for forty he played,

1:25:02.720 --> 1:25:05.200
<v Speaker 2>but he did do play eighty six percent snaps.

1:25:05.240 --> 1:25:08.400
<v Speaker 3>He was out there. The process was correct.

1:25:08.600 --> 1:25:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the process was. Yes, tell me about the

1:25:11.320 --> 1:25:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Cares Advent calendar.

1:25:12.880 --> 1:25:14.840
<v Speaker 3>You know what before I do that? Oh James Cook?

1:25:15.120 --> 1:25:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh sorry, sorry, I thought you were right.

1:25:17.520 --> 1:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I thought I was too. But I forget the

1:25:19.120 --> 1:25:23.200
<v Speaker 3>running back. Sometimes starting running back has scored on the Bills.

1:25:23.320 --> 1:25:25.439
<v Speaker 3>The starting running back has scored against the forty nine

1:25:25.560 --> 1:25:29.439
<v Speaker 3>ers in six straight games, including six scores in just

1:25:29.520 --> 1:25:31.880
<v Speaker 3>the last three weeks. Cook has scored in all but

1:25:31.960 --> 1:25:34.839
<v Speaker 3>three games this year, eleven times in eleven games, averaging

1:25:34.920 --> 1:25:38.240
<v Speaker 3>fifteen plus touches. It's a good spot for him. Despite

1:25:38.320 --> 1:25:40.639
<v Speaker 3>the tenth fewest yards allowed to backs for the forty

1:25:40.720 --> 1:25:42.240
<v Speaker 3>nine ers, they allow a lot of scores, so it'd

1:25:42.240 --> 1:25:42.759
<v Speaker 3>be great.

1:25:42.680 --> 1:25:43.000
<v Speaker 4>All right.

1:25:43.160 --> 1:25:46.280
<v Speaker 2>In twenty seconds, give me the Fantasy Cares Advent calendar.

1:25:46.360 --> 1:25:51.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, Fantasycares dot org slash advent forty dollars donation,

1:25:51.760 --> 1:25:54.720
<v Speaker 3>gets your name in the drawing, a daily drawing for

1:25:54.840 --> 1:25:57.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty five days during the month of December, and we

1:25:57.840 --> 1:25:59.880
<v Speaker 3>give away a sign jersey. It could be like it's

1:26:00.040 --> 1:26:03.200
<v Speaker 3>jerseys like Lamar Jackson, Jamar Chase, Justin Jefferson, those level

1:26:03.280 --> 1:26:07.120
<v Speaker 3>jerseys signed jerseys forty dollars to get two entries per day.

1:26:07.479 --> 1:26:11.559
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy Care fifty fifty entries dot org. Yes, Eagles take

1:26:11.600 --> 1:26:15.000
<v Speaker 3>on the Ravens. Saquon Barkley, Jalen Hurts, AJ Brown, all

1:26:15.080 --> 1:26:18.719
<v Speaker 3>a grades. There is a little bit of trepidation with Barkley,

1:26:18.840 --> 1:26:21.800
<v Speaker 3>just because Baltimore's is such a good run defense. But

1:26:22.240 --> 1:26:25.639
<v Speaker 3>Barkley's insane right now, and you're obviously you're you're total.

1:26:25.680 --> 1:26:27.880
<v Speaker 3>You're going to start all of those guys no matter what.

1:26:28.400 --> 1:26:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Trickier starts include Dallas Goddard, who have got with a

1:26:31.080 --> 1:26:33.559
<v Speaker 2>B grade, good tight ends almost always find their way

1:26:33.560 --> 1:26:37.000
<v Speaker 2>to solid games against the Ravens. Travis Kelce, Brock Bowers,

1:26:37.120 --> 1:26:40.519
<v Speaker 2>Jake Ferguson, Dalton Kon, k zach Ertz, Kate Dotton. That's

1:26:40.600 --> 1:26:44.439
<v Speaker 2>every starting fantasy level tight end Baltimore's face, and they're

1:26:44.439 --> 1:26:48.280
<v Speaker 2>averaging six catches for seventy four yards. So Dallas Goddard

1:26:48.320 --> 1:26:51.280
<v Speaker 2>a safe B grade here. Devata Smith is hoping to

1:26:51.320 --> 1:26:54.639
<v Speaker 2>return from a hamstring injury, but even in a positive matchup,

1:26:54.640 --> 1:26:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd show a little caution since hamstring injuries aggravate easily

1:26:58.320 --> 1:27:01.960
<v Speaker 2>and the Ravens secondary playing way better lately. They've shut

1:27:02.000 --> 1:27:04.600
<v Speaker 2>out receivers in three of the past four games. And

1:27:04.720 --> 1:27:08.120
<v Speaker 2>if Smith clears the injury report completely, then I would say, okay,

1:27:08.200 --> 1:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>let's upgrade him up to a B because then I

1:27:10.040 --> 1:27:12.000
<v Speaker 2>don't have to worry about the reaggravation of the injury.

1:27:12.560 --> 1:27:15.960
<v Speaker 2>But otherwise, ce grade on DeVonta Smith. On the Baltimore side,

1:27:16.479 --> 1:27:19.559
<v Speaker 2>Derrick Henry and Lamar Jackson, I mean, they're always they're

1:27:19.560 --> 1:27:23.040
<v Speaker 2>basically always eight grades, but brutal matchup. The Eagles rank

1:27:23.240 --> 1:27:26.479
<v Speaker 2>number one in fantasy points allowed to quarterbacks number two

1:27:26.680 --> 1:27:29.040
<v Speaker 2>in fantasy points allowed to running backs over the past

1:27:29.120 --> 1:27:32.000
<v Speaker 2>six games, but it's Derek Henry and Lamar Jackson, so

1:27:32.120 --> 1:27:34.240
<v Speaker 2>you're always gonna start him, and I'm gonna keep giving

1:27:34.320 --> 1:27:37.400
<v Speaker 2>him to eight grades anyway, because they're special backs. Zay

1:27:37.520 --> 1:27:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Flowers comes into the Sea grade. He runs from all

1:27:39.760 --> 1:27:42.200
<v Speaker 2>over the field, but there's nowhere to hide from an

1:27:42.280 --> 1:27:46.200
<v Speaker 2>excellent Philly secondary. Flowers has a brutal matchup against Cooper

1:27:46.240 --> 1:27:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Dejen and Quinnon Mitchell and Darius Slay. Slay's the most

1:27:49.960 --> 1:27:52.600
<v Speaker 2>beatable of those three cornerbacks, but even he's got a

1:27:52.640 --> 1:27:55.840
<v Speaker 2>meager fifty nine percent completion rate in his coverage and

1:27:55.920 --> 1:27:57.960
<v Speaker 2>he's given up just two scores all year, and he's

1:27:58.000 --> 1:28:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the easy one. Since weeks when Cooper Dejen became the

1:28:02.040 --> 1:28:05.080
<v Speaker 2>starting slot cornerback, the Eagles have only allowed three wide

1:28:05.120 --> 1:28:09.439
<v Speaker 2>receiver touchdowns and lastly, Mark Andrews tough matchup for a

1:28:09.600 --> 1:28:12.120
<v Speaker 2>mostly touchdown dependent tight end against a team that's only

1:28:12.120 --> 1:28:13.679
<v Speaker 2>allowed one tight end touchdown.

1:28:14.120 --> 1:28:15.799
<v Speaker 3>But like I mentioned earlier show, last.

1:28:15.680 --> 1:28:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Said I said that.

1:28:16.240 --> 1:28:18.160
<v Speaker 2>About the Chargers, who hadn't given up any touchdowns, the

1:28:18.200 --> 1:28:20.559
<v Speaker 2>league gave up one to Mark Andrews, So C grade

1:28:20.560 --> 1:28:22.760
<v Speaker 2>because you never know to him, absolutely, why not?

1:28:22.960 --> 1:28:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Right?

1:28:23.439 --> 1:28:25.560
<v Speaker 2>If you have not tried a guillotine league yet, you

1:28:25.760 --> 1:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>still can. New leagues forming daily at guillotine leagues dot com.

1:28:30.120 --> 1:28:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Six weeks of chopping action left. If you're like I'll

1:28:33.840 --> 1:28:37.639
<v Speaker 2>play next year, try it this year, learn this year,

1:28:37.800 --> 1:28:39.600
<v Speaker 2>and then go be a menace on the rest of

1:28:39.600 --> 1:28:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the league. Filled at Newbies next year at guillotine leagues

1:28:43.200 --> 1:28:46.360
<v Speaker 2>dot com. Thank you for listening, everybody, Best of luck

1:28:46.520 --> 1:28:50.240
<v Speaker 2>in this week the Bipocalypse Part two. Next week, I

1:28:50.320 --> 1:28:52.960
<v Speaker 2>mean next week, we'll give you all the data on

1:28:53.040 --> 1:28:55.320
<v Speaker 2>all the things you want to do in that week

1:28:55.439 --> 1:28:58.240
<v Speaker 2>fourteen coming up next week. We'll talk to you then, everybody.

1:28:58.640 --> 1:28:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Bye bye

1:29:02.080 --> 1:29:03.680
<v Speaker 6>Diary